Cryptocurrency Sceptics Look To Bend The Ear Of Regulators – Barron’s

those behind the first Organisers of the Crypto Policy Symposium hope the event will prompt much more 'critical discourse' of the sector Justin TALLIS

Text size

Cryptocurrency critics, including economists and researchers, will gather in London and online this week to get their message across to regulators about the booming but volatile sector.

A number of governments have expressed concerns over cryptocurrencies, but those behind the first Crypto Policy Symposium say they hope the event will prompt much more "critical discourse" of the sector.

"There are so many crypto conferences but they are funded by the crypto industry," said Martin Walker, a co-organiser.

"The goal is to dispel some myths created by the crypto industry and to make policy makers start asking the right questions."

But Walker, a banking IT expert, is quick to reject claims that Monday and Tuesday's event is an "anti-crypto conference".

Instead he says it is a chance to hear the critical voices of specialists in financial bubbles, researchers who have evaluated the industry's carbon footprint and engineers who question the effectiveness of decentralised technologies.

"We've got regulators from all over the world," he said.

About 1,000 people have signed up to watch the conference online and UK officials are expected to attend a live event in London on Tuesday.

The conference comes as the price of bitcoin has plunged from a peak of nearly $69,000 last October to around $20,000.

The risky nature of the ultra-volatile and poorly regulated market for retail investors will be particularly highlighted.

Many central banks and financial market regulators have warned about the dangers posed by cryptocurrencies.

But in the absence of a clear legislative framework, users are rarely informed when making their investments, say crypto critics.

The collapse of cryptocurrency investment platform Celsius left customers in despair and unable to recover investments that sometimes included life savings.

The firm faced mounting troubles until it froze withdrawals in mid-June and a court filing showed it owed $4.7 billion to its users.

"People didn't understand that their money wasn't secure and they still don't understand why they can't get it back," said Amy Castor, a respected freelance journalist who is among the most vocal of cryptocurrency critics.

"We wanted to have our voices heard because it's important for regulators to understand the risks, how crypto-currencies work, the scam inherent in it, so that they can do more to protect retail investors (and) the public," she said.

Castor, who used to work for cryptocurrency media outlets, became known during the 2017 price surge and subsequent crash for her criticism of the so-called "stablecoin" Tether.

Tether's price is pegged to the US dollar but its cash flow remains murky.

"The problem is that crypto-currency has become so big that now there is a lot of money going into lobbying... to support politicians," Castor added.

In the United States some elected officials have proudly shown support for the sector, especially at the local level.

The mayors of Miami and New York have said they want to make their cities cryptocurrency capitals, and there are municipality-specific currency projects in various stages of development.

"Officials are making broad statements about the good of cryptocurrencies," said Tonantzin Carmona, a researcher at the Brookings Institution.

"They focus on what good could come from that tech and they ignore the real risks."

In March, Carmona published a research paper on the potential danger posed by the mayors' enthusiasm for cryptocurrencies.

She feared being attacked on social networks but instead says her arguments found favour with the small community of crypto-sceptics, who helped her see that she was not a lone voice.

"There's a difference between being a hater and being critical," she said.

See original here:
Cryptocurrency Sceptics Look To Bend The Ear Of Regulators - Barron's

1 Cryptocurrency to Buy and Hold Forever – The Motley Fool

What was once just a market of one is now flooded with other options for cryptocurrency investors. The arrival of meme coins that seem to create millionaires overnight makes it easy to believe that cryptocurrency investments are meant only for the short term. But despite a crowded field, there is one cryptocurrency investors should count on never selling -- Ethereum (ETH 1.04%).

Like Bitcoin (BTC 0.25%), Ethereum is a cryptocurrency that changed our thinking about finance in the digital age, but for different reasons. Ethereum is unique from Bitcoin in myriad ways. But one, in particular, is responsible for what is possibly the greatest innovation to result from blockchain and cryptocurrency technologies -- decentralized finance, better known as DeFi.

The traditional financial world relies on centralized authorities like banks, notaries, brokers, exchanges, and other middlemen who manage and process financial services. Traditional financial processes, such as applying for a loan or purchasing a stock, require some sort of intermediary to conduct the transaction.

But because of Ethereum and its innovative smart-contract technology, these traditional financial processes are becoming increasingly obsolete. Smart contracts are the backbone of DeFi and are what make Ethereum so unique. Before its creation in 2014, no other cryptocurrency had smart-contract capabilities. The creation of smart contracts allows blockchain developers to customize conditions and criteria for executing particular actions.

For example, smart contracts could oversee loan agreements and release collateral upon full repayment. Since smart contracts can integrate with other data, they could also regulate agricultural drought insurance policies by automatically paying out if agreed amounts of rainfall occur.

In addition to their seemingly infinite customization and potential, smart contracts and DeFi could completely upend what we believe traditional institutions' roles are in the financial world.

One of the most appealing aspects of DeFi is its inclusivity. If you want to utilize a DeFi financial product, all you need is an internet connection. There are no credit bureaus, no brokers, and no loan officers. As long as a crypto wallet is set up, users can trade and move assets anytime and anywhere.

In addition, all transactions are in real-time and completely transparent. There is no need for banks or brokers to process transactions since they occur near instantaneously on the blockchain. The other perk of the blockchain is that once a transaction is added, anyone with an internet connection can view activity on the network. It doesn't hurt that just about any possibility of tampering or malfeasance is eliminated due to the blockchain's high level of security.

Arguably, the greatest benefit of DeFi is that it is constantly evolving. Applications and projects built on Ethereum are all open-source. That means developers can integrate multiple DeFi apps to create financial products to meet new user demands as they arise.

Since Ethereum was the first blockchain to possess smart-contract functionality, it holds most of the market share that makes up the DeFi sector. Despite new competitors like Tron (TRX 0.13%), Binance Coin (BNB -0.26%), and Avalanche (AVAX 0.39%) arriving to grab some of the market, they face an uphill battle because Ethereum's grasp on the DeFi economy is unbelievably disproportionate.

We can look at a statistic called Total Value Locked (TVL) to compare the collective value of a blockchain's DeFi ecosystem. Think of it like the market cap of a company.

Out of the $62.5 billion invested across DeFi as of this writing, nearly $36 billion is on Ethereum's blockchain. The next-closest competitor is Tron, and this blockchain only supports about $9 billion of value. It's not even close.

The potential long-term value DeFi presents should be heavily weighed by investors, especially considering it's only in its infancy. Those who are optimistic that DeFi can usurp traditional finance should count on Ethereum continuing to dominate for the foreseeable future.

RJ Fulton has positions in Bitcoin and Ethereum. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Avalanche, Bitcoin, and Ethereum. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Original post:
1 Cryptocurrency to Buy and Hold Forever - The Motley Fool

Cryptocurrency’s gender diversity problem drawing increased focus from Congress, others – Pensions & Investments

Women also don't invest in cryptocurrencies as much as men do, said Ms. Hume, who cited risk aversion as one reason.

"It's been well established in research that women engage with investment risks differently than men," Ms. Hume said. "And financial advisers, in particular, have observed that when investment risks are unknown, women are more likely to take money off the table and pass on the opportunity. And what we have with crypto is an asset class that, at this point, the risks are still mostly unknowns."

According to a report released this year from Gemini Trust Co. LLC, a cryptocurrency exchange, 32% of crypto owners in the U.S. are female. Data released in February by eToro USA LLC, a trading platform for cryptocurrency and other exchanges, indicates that 41% of female investors in the U.S. have crypto holdings, and 41% plan to increase them.

Lule Demmissie, U.S. CEO of eToro based in New York, said while she thinks crypto has a "very diverse consumer base," there needs to be an increase in the diversity of crypto creators.

"Unless any innovation has a diverse set of people creating it, by definition, it cannot become an equitable product over time," Ms. Demmissie said.

Go here to read the rest:
Cryptocurrency's gender diversity problem drawing increased focus from Congress, others - Pensions & Investments

Cryptocurrency ethereum plans to cut carbon emissions by 99% with upgrade – The Guardian

Ethereum, the second largest cryptocurrency, will complete a plan to lower its carbon emissions by more than 99% in the next month, the foundation that controls the platform has confirmed.

The project, called the merge, will result in ethereum switching the underlying technology it uses for validating crypto transactions to a new process that requires less energy to manage.

Once complete, the merge will end the role of miners in the ethereum ecosystem, helping to dramatically reduce electricity usage. These users run huge quantities of powerful, purpose-built technology all day, every day, to generate random numbers that affect the security of the overall network.

The energy consumption of ethereum mining is currently estimated at about 72 terawatt-hours a year, according to Alex de Vries, a Dutch economist who runs the Digiconomist website. That is comparable with the power consumption of Colombia, with a carbon footprint equivalent to that of Switzerland.

The changeover will lead to the platform moving away from a proof of work process, which requires cryptocurrency miners to generate random numbers to verify records stored on the blockchain the technology underpinning digital currencies such as ethereum and the more popular bitcoin.

Ethereum will instead use a proof of stake process, in which the network will be secured by users who stake sums of the cryptocurrency, committing themselves to acting honestly at the risk of losing it.

De Vries said the switchover would eliminate the majority of electricity usage. They could cut off a huge chunk of their power demand. I will be working on quantifying that more accurately but at least 99% (probably even 99.9%) reduction should be achievable. This translates to something like the electricity consumption of a country like Portugal (a quarter of all data centres in the world combined) vanishing overnight.

The proof-of-stake model is currently being used on an experimental beacon blockchain, where it has been tested to ensure that the theoretical security it provides is sufficient for the multibillion-dollar economy that sits on top of the ethereum network. Now the experimental blockchain will take over the work of the main network.

Imagine ethereum is a spaceship that isnt quite ready for an interstellar voyage, the ethereum foundation said, explaining the merge. With the beacon chain, the community has built a new engine and a hardened hull. After significant testing, its almost time to hot-swap the new engine for the old midflight. This will merge the new, more efficient engine into the existing ship, ready to put in some serious lightyears and take on the universe.

There are still potential problems ahead. The foundation said users needed to watch out for an increase in scam activity because hackers could take advantage of the confusion around the switchover to try to trick users into giving up their passwords, their funds or both. You should be on high alert for scams trying to take advantage of users during this transition, the organisation said. Do not send your ETH anywhere in an attempt to upgrade to ETH2. There is no ETH2 token, and there is nothing more you need to do for your funds to remain safe.

Sign up to Business Today

Get set for the working day we'll point you to the all the business news and analysis you need every morning

The final stages of the merge are expected to begin on 6 September, the foundation said, with the old blockchain switched off at some point between 10 and 20 September.

Ethereum will not be the first network to use proof of stake, and others including cardano and solana have demonstrated the technology at a smaller scale. But its switchover will leave bitcoin, the largest cryptocurrency, facing renewed criticism for its continued reliance on proof of work.

The bitcoin network uses 130TWh of electricity a year, De Vries estimates, a sum that will be increasingly difficult to defend if the ethereum blockchain demonstrates that the same capabilities can be achieved in an environmentally friendly manner.

Go here to read the rest:
Cryptocurrency ethereum plans to cut carbon emissions by 99% with upgrade - The Guardian

What You Need to Know About Cryptocurrency Scams in the UAE – JD Supra

The crypto industry has seen an immense growth in the last few years, with several countries introducing laws to regulate them.

Cryptocurrencies are digital assets representing value which can be digitally stored, traded, transferred or even used as a payment tool. Unlike legal tender or fiat currency, cryptocurrency is not issued by banks or governments, but is based on a decentralized structure which exists across a public network, allowing it to be outside the control of central authorities.

Crypto Scams

But with the growing popularity of the crypto industry all over the world and in the UAE, crypto scams have also seen a huge increase.

Crypto scams are unfortunately, a reality and occur on a regular basis with scammers using various techniques and methods to scam buyers and sellers.

In some cases, the trade offers a high return with no explanation, which could be a sign of scam.

In other cases, the scammer may pose as a broker, and offer the buyer and the seller a very profitable deal. Once the scammer has convinced the parties that the deal is worthwhile, he may insist the parties to meet in person for completing the transaction. The buyer would typically bring cash to this meeting and send his account details to the broker. The broker will forward his own account details to the seller instead of the buyers, and the seller would end up sending cryptocurrency to the scammers account.

In another type of scam, fake crypto coins are bought by the buyer. Fake mobile applications which look like authentic apps, fake crypto websites and emails which appear to be genuine correspondence from a crypto website, are also other forms of scams.

Are there Laws in the UAE regulating crypto currencies?

Yes, at present there are limited laws in the UAE which regulate crypto currencies. For example, the Securities and Commodities Authority Decision No. 23/RM/2020 regulates the offering, issuing, listing and trading of crypto assets in the UAE.

The Emirate of Dubai issued Law No 4 of 2022 on the Regulation of Virtual Assets, which aims to regulate the virtual asset industry in the Emirate of Dubai.

Additionally, Abu Dhabi Global Market also has issued specific regulations on crypto currency activities such as crypto currency exchanges, custodians, intermediaries, brokers etc.

There may also be penalties if you are involved in crypto scams.

Under the Cybercrime Law of the UAE, propagating a cryptocurrency without a license from the competent authorities could lead to imprisonment of 5 years. It could also result in fine of up to 1 million dirhams. This has been provided under Article 41 of the Federal Decree-Law No. 34/2021 Concerning the Fight Against Rumors and Cybercrime.

Article 41 states as follows.

Everyone calls for or propagates a competition or crypto-currency or creates or manages false portfolio or company to receive or collect funds from the public for investment, management, utilization or development, without license from the concerned bodies, shall be sentenced to detention for a period of not more than (5) five years and/or to pay fine of not less than (250,000) two hundred fifty thousand Dirhams and not more than (1,000,000) one million Dirhams. The court shall order the recovery of the seized funds.

Further, under Article 48 of the Cybercrime Law, advertising, promoting, mediating or dealing in any form of virtual currency, or crypto currency which is not officially recognized in the UAE or which doesnt have a license from the competent authority will result in penalties including detention and fines.

Article 48 of the Cybercrime Law states as below.

Everyone commits either of the following acts through the information network or information technology method shall be sentenced to detention and/or to pay fine of not less than (20,000) twenty thousand Dirhams and not more than (500,000) five hundred thousand Dirhams: 1. Promotion of goods or services through misleading advertisement or misstatements. 2. Advertisement, promotion, mediation or dealing in any form or encouraging the dealing in a virtual currency, cryptocurrency, stored value unit or any payments unit not officially recognized in the state or without license of the competent body.

Conclusion

It is crucial to be fully aware and informed while dealing with crypto currencies to ensure that you are not being scammed out of your monies. Crypto transactions should be undertaken using licensed and recognized exchange platforms. It is also prudent to confirm the authenticity of the website or online crypto application before providing any personal information or details.

Visit link:
What You Need to Know About Cryptocurrency Scams in the UAE - JD Supra

Has Japan Adopted Cryptocurrency the Same Way as the West? – Coinpedia Fintech News

Asia and Japan in-particular, has been one of the frontrunners in the adoption of cryptocurrency. This should not come as a surprise because Japan is usually leading the way when it comes to welcoming innovative technology and ideas. Asian countries, such as Japan, have pushed the boundaries of technology and there are museums in Tokyo where you can see the technology of the future, including robots. The adoption of crypto in Japan has been widespread in certain age groups but how does it compare to the west?

To generate new cryptocurrency, a process called mining is required. This process requires a lot of energy and therefore, it makes sense for the most crypto to be mined where energy costs are low. When discussing crypto in the west, we must start with the United States. This is where much of the worlds bitcoin is mined and if we take figures from April 2021, the US had a global hash rate of 16.85%. However, this increased as the year progressed and a few months later, that figure was at 35.4%. In terms of specific states, Texas is leading the way in terms of crypto mining and could become known as the bitcoin capital of the world. In contrast, Japan is outside the top 8 countries for mining bitcoin, with China, Kazakhstan, Russia, Canada, Iran, Malaysia, Germany, and Ireland all above Japan when it comes to mining bitcoin. So, in the respect of mining, Japan has not adopted crypto the same as the west, with the United States, Canada, Germany, and Ireland leading the way.

When discussing the adoption of cryptocurrency by Japan, we must consider the crypto legislation in the country. Crypto exchange businesses in Japan are regulated by the Payment Services Act and have been since April 2017. In 2014, the Japanese government decided not to introduce laws to prohibit individuals or companies from receiving bitcoin as a form of payment. All cryptocurrency exchange businesses must be registered and keep records and transactions must comply with money laundering. Looking at the west and particularly the United States, bitcoin was classified as a convertible decentralized virtual currency in 2013 by the U.S. Treasury and is legal in the country. So, cryptocurrency is legal in Japan and the major western nations, including the United States, Canada, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom.

Japans cryptocurrency market grew significantly in 2021 and between the end of 2020 and 2021, the amount of crypto being traded in the country increased by six times. As of the beginning of 2022, over 6 million people in Japan were using crypto but it seems the government is keen to keep the industry under control. In terms of population percentage, roughly 5% of the Japanese people are using crypto. Switching to the west and in the United States, between 30 to 50 million US citizens have engaged with crypto and that figure is predicted to keep rising. That means around 14% of the population are using or have used crypto. This number is bigger than Japan but access to crypto has been a lot easier for US citizens over the years. If we look at the United Kingdom, roughly 1 million people claim to own a crypto asset. That means just under 2% of the population have used crypto, which is less than Japan. Perhaps Japans high interest in gaming has helped, with crypto gaming becoming more popular since 2018. There are plenty of high quality crypto casinos in Japan and new gaming cryptocurrencies have been issued, with Enjin being a good example.

Japan is home to many established companies and start-ups who are entering the crypto market. Japan may not mine as many bitcoins or have the same legislation as countries in the west but the country is adopting cryptocurrency quickly. The number of individuals and companies entering the crypto market in Japan is only going to increase in the future.

Was this writing helpful?

More here:
Has Japan Adopted Cryptocurrency the Same Way as the West? - Coinpedia Fintech News

Tennessee Town Restricts Protests, Says It’s Protecting First Amendment – Reason

In Franklin, Tennessee, the sun may be setting on residents' ability to participate in public demonstrations free of government interference. As part of city guidance that is "intended to facilitate the safe exercise of First Amendment rights," Franklin officials explain, they are significantly restricting when, where, and how residents may participate in any "public gathering and expression event."

Per an ordinance passed unanimously by the Franklin Board of Mayor and Aldermen (BOMA) last week, the city will not grant permits for any public gathering and expression events taking place after dark, nor will any event that does not require a permit be allowed to take place in the city after dark. The ordinance also prohibits expression events from taking place in the Downtown District between 5 p.m. on Fridays and 7 a.m. on Saturdays, as well as between 5 p.m. on Saturdays and 7 a.m. on Sundays.

Franklin's code defines public gathering and expression events as instances of "noncommercial public assembly" that take place on public property, are "likely to obstruct" vehicular or pedestrian traffic, or have over 20 participants. The ordinance also introduces restrictions targeting "events which require amplification or which occur more than once per month (regardless of size)," according to a background document prepared by city officials. Violations of the ordinance will carry a misdemeanor charge resulting in a citation.

"We as the city have the ability to navigate and to manage time, place and manner that those demonstrations happen," City Administrator Eric Stuckey said in June when the rule changes were first being considered. The city's background document claims that the ordinance will ensure Franklin "provides protection to all who wish to exercise" their First Amendment rights.

In 2019, BOMAadopted a structure to permit public gathering and expression events. That move followed white supremacist rallies in Charlottesville, Virginia, and nearby Shelbyville, Tennessee. "We saw it as a way to facilitate the exercise of First Amendment rights," said Stuckey of the permitting structure.

Franklin officials first floated the new restrictions on expression events at a June 14 meeting. City Attorney Shauna Billingsley outlined the ban on demonstrations after dark, saying, "We really don't think that's a safe thing for really anyone." The proposed restrictions originally included a ban on expression events from 5 p.m. on Fridays through 7 a.m. on Mondays in the downtown historic district, though this was ultimately scaled back.

"The reason for that" weekend ban, Billingsley explained, was that "it seems as though after work on Friday, our downtown turns into something different. It's much more shopping and eating, more social events and those kinds of things. So we're not sure that protests in the heart of downtown during the weekend should be permitted." She also stressed that "safety is important," noting that "police officers can't really watch over people in the dark."

As much as city officials stress this ordinance will protect First Amendment rights, it raises obvious concerns on that front. "Threatening misdemeanors for expressive activity after dark is going to put Franklin [on] a collision course with the First Amendment," says Adam Steinbaugh, attorney at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. "Municipalities can impose content-neutral limits on the time, place, or manner of expression, but those limits have to be reasonable and this isn't." For one, he explains, "not everyone can protest during the workday and a lot of expressive activity necessarily occurs in the evening."

What's more, the ordinance's broad wording may come to target completely innocuous expression events. "You want to tell me the city of Franklin wants to issue misdemeanors for Christmas carolers or people holding a candlelight vigil?" asks Steinbaugh. The potential for uneven enforcement also lingers. Steinbaugh offers a hypothetical: Will Franklin police be more likely to write up 21 Christmas carolers or 21 people protesting the police if both groups are violating the ordinance?

"The sun doesn't set on the First Amendment," says Steinbaugh. "Franklin's leaders should reconsider."

Link:

Tennessee Town Restricts Protests, Says It's Protecting First Amendment - Reason

Carolina community invited to engage with renowned scholars on First Amendment Day 2022 – UNC Hussman School of Journalism and Media

By Barbara Wiedemann

Its back on campus!

First Amendment Day is an annual campus-wide, daylong event designed to both celebrate the First Amendment and explore its role in the lives of students at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Observed during National Banned Books Week, the Carolina tradition was first celebrated in 2009 the year Kanye West interrupted Taylor Swift during her VMA video of the year acceptance speech and the UNC womens soccer team won their 20th NCAA national title.

After a pandemic-related virtual format in 2020 and 2021, the celebration is back on campus Wednesday, Sept. 21, and UNC Center for Media Law and Policy co-faculty chairs David Ardia,Reef C. Ivey II Excellence Fund Term Professor of Law at UNC School of Law, and Amanda Reid, Associate Professor at UNC Hussman School of Journalism and Media, have packed a powerful punch with events that reflect contemporary conversations and up-to-the-moment scholarship.

Events include a student debate in the Freedom Forum; a virtual trivia contest (Question: who said I know it when I see it, about pornography? Answer: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Sewart in 1964 Jacobellis v. Ohio); a banned books reading; and what should prove a thought-provoking keynote speech entitled Free Speech and Public School Students Lessons From a Cursing Cheerleader and South Parkby University of Florida Professor Clay Calvert, who literally wrote the book: Mass Media Law, 22nd Edition (with UNC Hussman graduates Dan Kozlowski 06 (Ph.D.) and Derigan Silver 09 (Ph.D.).

Calvert says, Undergraduates should come to learn about the First Amendment speech rights of public high school students something many of them were just a few years ago. Its a particularly important issue in the social media era when we've witnessed students being punished for their off-campus, online tweets, posts and snaps. Its also important because some principals overreact and try to silence anything that arguably might harm the reputation of their schools.

In addition, three panel discussions offer a veritable plethora of professional expertise on three important aspects of the First Amendment, including:

U.S. and European Approaches to Regulating Social Media Platforms, with legal and social media experts from Carolina and the University of Helsinki. Moderated by Anne Klinefelter, UNC Law professor and director of the law library.

Get 1A Smart: Having Your Say & Staying Out of Court, with nationally known media lawyer and litigator Hugh Stevens 65, 68 (J.D.) joined by journalists from The Assembly, WRAL-TV and UNC Center for Innovation and Sustainability in Local Media. Moderated by Duke Laws First Amendment Clinics Amanda Martin and Ben Rossi.

Weaponizing First Amendment Rhetoric, which asks the question Should free expression be what we value beyond everything else in public life, namely progress, equality and inclusion? Four panelists from the UNC Center for Information, Technology and Public Life tackle the topic and consider alternative ways of thinking about expression to reclaim our shared public life. Moderated by CITAP research fellow Nanditha Narayanamoorthy.

All events are free and open to the public. Check firstamendmentday.unc.edu for the most up-to-date information.

Read the original post:

Carolina community invited to engage with renowned scholars on First Amendment Day 2022 - UNC Hussman School of Journalism and Media

Preferred pronouns collide with the First Amendment at SUU – KSL NewsRadio

SALT LAKE CITY Preferred pronouns in schools ended up in the headlines recently. A professor refuses to refer to a student by the students preferred pronouns and rather than face more discipline from the university he is suing the university. A lawyer examines his lawsuit while a trans-expert explains the importance of pronouns to teens.

Richard Bugg, a Southern Utah University tenured professor, is suing the university over a non-binary students preferred they/them pronouns, claiming it infringes on his political beliefs and his First Amendment right to free speech.

SUU professor sues school over preferred pronouns

Meanwhile at Farmington Junior High School, three school counselors had new placards made that showed their preferred pronouns. In response parents sent hateful emails and made angry phone calls to the school. Police were called to the school.

Parents outraged after preferred pronouns posted by Farmington Jr. High counselors

KSL Legal Analyst Greg Skordas joins hosts of KSL at Night Maura Carabello and Taylor Morgan to discuss the legal dimensions of the professors lawsuit.

Reading over the 80-page lawsuit, Skordas said the professor, who teaches in the acting department, refused to refer to a student who prefers the pronouns they/them. Bugg cited his right to freedom of speech in his defense.

He also thought it was inappropriate to use a plural pronoun to describe an individual, Skordas added.

People who prefer the they/them pronoun are non-binary and identify with neither male nor female.

The student complained to the university, which investigated and sanctioned Bugg, saying his actions amounted to sexual harassment. Bugg has been sanctioned three times, according to reporting by KSL NewsRadio.

Rather than suffer the consequences or change his conduct, hes now sued the school for what we call declaratory relief. In other words, Hey, you guys need to change your policy. Youve gone way too far here, and the discipline doesnt fit the conduct,' Skordas said.

Skordas views the lawsuit as unnecessary and said both sides share blame in the dust-up.

I think the school came down a little heavy handed with him. But I also think the professor there was such an easy fix to this. . . I mean, just refer to the student by whatever they want to be called, he said.

Theres also always just calling someone by their name, right? You may always default to that, Maura noted.

Taylor said the legal case isnt about politics or pronouns or being woke.

I think, fundamentally, are we willing to respect one another? And are we willing to maybe learn something from another person? he asked

Sue Robbins of Equality Utahs Transgender Advisory Council joins KSL NewsRadios Debbie Dujanovic to explain the importance of pronouns to teens.

When a student asks to be referred to using their preferred pronouns, why do you suppose we are having so much heartburn and controversy over it? Debbie asked.

I think we are caught in the times where everything is confrontational right now and that brings a big part of it out. People just want to attack, especially in our schools, Robbins said. There are people out there who are surprised that we actually have to say our pronouns sometimes.

Robbins said the people most upset over using a persons preferred pronouns are pushing back against the transgender community.

It drives us out of the public light and denies our existence, she said.

Talk about the use of pronouns and particularly highlight the non-binary use of pronouns. I think that is what gets most people confused, Debbie said.

Understandably, it is new to people, so thats the part that we feel should be educational, Robbins said. My name is Sue and I identify I am female and I use she/her pronouns. So that works pretty seamlessly for most people unless theyre really trying to attack the transgender community, then they will refer to me as a he to try and denigrate me.

The non-binary community, also called non-conforming or gender fluid, prefer they/them pronouns, Robbins said.

Its actually a very open thing to share your pronouns, she said. Its not an oppressive thing.

Using a persons preferred pronouns is an affirmation of who we are, Robbins said

Suspended Kansas teacher who refused to use students preferred pronouns awarded $95,000 in suit

Dave & Dujanovic can be heard Monday through Thursday from 9 a.m. to noon on KSL NewsRadio. KSL at Night is on weekdays from 7-9 p.m.

Continue reading here:

Preferred pronouns collide with the First Amendment at SUU - KSL NewsRadio

Trial kicks off in First Amendment lawsuit against the city of Yakima – Yakima Herald-Republic

The trial in a civil suit between a Yakima business owner and city officials he claimed tried to punish him for opposing downtown plaza plans began Monday.

The dispute dates to November 2013, when a fire code inspector showed up at plaintiff Mark Petersons West Yakima Avenue furniture store hours after he and other business owners criticized former City Manager Tony ORourke over the downtown master plan, which included a plaza at the parking lot by Millennium Plaza, according to court documents.

At the inspection, fire code inspector Anthony Doan found that a basement showrooms ceiling at H&H Furniture violated fire codes and ordered it fixed within about 90 days. Doan tried to conduct follow-up inspections of the property but was told that Peterson was not present, and he would have to reschedule when Peterson was there, court documents said.

The city then filed charges alleging that Peterson refused entry to building inspectors, but the charges were later dropped by prosecutors because Doan did not specify the scope of the inspection, court documents said.

Peterson filed a lawsuit against the city, ORourke, former Deputy Fire Chief Mark Soptich and Doan in 2017, alleging that the claim of fire code violations at H&H Furniture were in retaliation for Petersons free speech, according to court documents.

Peterson also claims the charges brought against him for refusing entry to building inspectors were malicious and that city officials named in the lawsuit engaged in civil conspiracy, court documents said.

The defendants in the case deny Petersons claims, saying the fire inspection was part of the citys standard fire inspection program and that Peterson was prosecuted because he refused to allow a follow-up inspection, court documents said.

Peterson initially filed the lawsuit in Yakima County Superior Court, and the case was later transferred to U.S. District Court.

Voters and the Yakima City Council rejected the plaza project in 2018.

Opening statements were given before a jury Monday, and Petersons attorneys began questioning witnesses. Peterson is represented by attorneys Casey Bruner, Matthew Crotty and Matthew Mensik. The city and city officials are represented by Robert Christie and co-counsel.

The jury trial continues this week before Judge Thomas O. Rice at the William O. Douglas Federal Building at 25 S. Third St. in Yakima

Read more from the original source:

Trial kicks off in First Amendment lawsuit against the city of Yakima - Yakima Herald-Republic