W3C Drops WordPress from Consideration for Redesign, Narrows CMS Shortlist to Statamic and Craft – WP Tavern

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), the international standards organization for the web,is redesigning its website and will soon be selecting a new CMS. Although WordPress isalready used to manage W3Cs blog and news sections of the website, the organization is open to adopting a new CMS to meet its list of preferences and requirements.

Studio 24, the digital agency selected for the redesign project, narrowed their consideration to three CMS candidates:

Studio 24 was aiming to finalize their recommendations in July but found that none of them complied with the W3Cs authoring tool accessibility guidelines. The CMSs that were better at compliance with the guidelines were not as well suited to the other project requirements.

In the most recent project update posted to the site, Studio 24 reported they haveshortlisted two CMS platforms. Coralie Mercier, Head of Marketing and Communications at W3C, confirmed that these include Statamic and Craft CMS.

WordPress was not submitted to the same review process as the Studio 24 team claims to have extensive experience working with it. In the summary of their concerns, Studio 24 cited Gutenberg, accessibility issues, and the fact that the Classic Editor plugin will stop being officially maintained on December 31st, 2021:

First of all, we have concerns about the longevity of WordPressas we use it. WordPress released a new version of their editor in 2018: Gutenberg. We have already rejected the use of Gutenberg in the context of this project due to accessibility issues.

If we choose to do away with Gutenberg now, we cannot go back to it at a later date. This would amount to starting from scratch with the whole CMS setup and theming.

Gutenberg is the future of WordPress. The WordPress core development team keeps pushing it forward and wants to roll it out to all areas of the content management system (navigation, sidebar, options etc.) as opposed to limiting its use to the main content editor as is currently the case.

This means that if we want to use WordPress long term, we will need to circumvent Gutenberg and keep circumventing it for a long time and in more areas of the CMS as time goes by.

Another major factor in the decision to remove WordPress from consideration was that they found no elegant solution to content localization and translation.

Studio 24 also expressed concerns that tools like ACF, Fewbricks, and other plugins might not being maintained for the Classic Editor experience in the context of a widespread adoption of Gutenberg by users and developers.

More generally, we think this push to expand Gutenberg is an indication of WordPress focusing on the requirements of their non-technical user base as opposed to their audience of web developers building custom solutions for their clients.

It seems that the digital agency W3C selected for the project is less optimistic about the future of Gutenberg and may not have reviewed recent improvements to the overall editing experience since 2018, including those related to accessibility.

Accessibility consultant and WordPress contributor Joe Dolson recently gave an update on Gutenberg accessibility audit at WPCampus 2020 Online. He reported that while there are still challenges remaining, many issues raised in the audit have been addressed across the whole interface and 2/3 of them have been solved. Overall accessibility of Gutenberg is vastly improved today over what it was at release, Dolson said.

Unfortunately, Studio 24 didnt put WordPress through the same content creation and accessibility tests that it used for Statamic and Craft CMS. This may be because they had already planned to use a Classic Editor implementation and didnt see the necessity of putting Gutenberg through the paces.

These tests involved creating pages with flexible components which they referred to as blocks of layout, for things like titles, WYSIWYG text input, and videos. It also involved creating a template for news items where all the content input by the user would be displayed (without formatting).

Gutenberg would lend itself well to these uses cases but was not formally tested with the other candidates, due to the team citing their extensive experience with WordPress. I would like to see the W3C team revisit Gutenberg for a fair shake against the proprietary CMSs.

The document outlining the CMS requirements for the project states that W3C has a strong preference for an open-source license for the CMS platform as well as a CMS that is long-lived and easy to maintain. This preference may be due to the economic benefits of using a stable, widely adopted CMS, or it may be inspired by the undeniable symbiosis between open source and open standards.

The industry has learned by experience that the only software-related standards to fully achieve [their] goals are those which not only permit but encourage open source implementations. Open source implementations are a quality and honesty check for any open standard that might be implemented in software

WordPress is the only one of the three original candidates to be distributed under anOSD-compliant license.(CMS code available on GitHub isnt the same.)

Using proprietary software to publish the open standards that underpin the web isnt a good look. While proprietary software makers are certainly capable of implementing open standards, regardless of licensing, there are a myriad of benefits for open standards in the context of open source usage:

The community of participants working with OSS may promote open debate resulting in an increased recognition of the benefits of various solutions and such debate may accelerate the adoption of solutions that are popular among the OSS participants. These characteristics of OSS support evolution of robust solutions are often a significant boost to the market adoption of open standards, in addition to the customer-driven incentives for interoperability and open standards.

Although both Craft CMS and Statamic have their code bases available on GitHub, they share similarly restrictive licensing models. The Craft CMS contributing document states:

Craft isnt FOSSLets get one thing out of the way: Craft CMS is proprietary software. Everything in this repo, including community-contributed code, is the property of Pixel & Tonic.

That comes with some limitations on what you can do with the code:

You cant change anything related to licensing, purchasing, edition/feature-targeting, or anything else that could mess with our alcohol budget. You cant publicly maintain a long-term fork of Craft. There is only One True Craft.

Statamics contributing docs have similar restrictions:

Statamic is not Free Open Source Software. It is proprietary. Everything in this and our other repos on Github including community-contributed code is the property of Wilderborn. For that reason there are a few limitations on how you can use the code:

Projects with this kind of restrictive licensing often fail to attract much contribution or adoption, because the freedoms are not clear.

In a GitHub issue requesting Craft CMS go open source, Craft founder and CEO Brandon Kelly said, Craft isnt closedsourceall the source code is right here on GitHub, and claims the license is relatively unrestrictive as far as proprietary software goes, that contributing functions in a similar way to FOSS projects. This rationale is not convincing enough for some developers commenting on the thread.

I am a little hesitant to recommend Craft with a custom open source license, Frank Anderson said. Even if this was a MIT+ license that added the license and payment, much like React used to have. I am hesitant because the standard open source licenses have been tested.

When asked about the licensing concerns of Studio 24 narrowing its candidates to two proprietary software options, Coralie Mercier told me, we are prioritizing accessibility. A recent project update also reports that both CMS suppliers W3C is reviewing have engaged positively with authoring tool accessibility needs and have made progress in this area.

Even if you have cooperative teams at proprietary CMSs that are working on accessibility improvements as the result of this high profile client, it cannot compare to the massive community of contributors that OSD-compliant licensing enables.

Its unfortunate that the state of open source CMS accessibility has forced the organization to narrow its selections to proprietary software options for its first redesign in more than a decade.

Open standards go hand in hand with open source. There is a mutually beneficial connection between the two that has caused the web to flourish. I dont see using a proprietary CMS as an extension of W3C values, and its not clear how much more benefit to accessibility the proprietary options offer in comparison. W3C may be neutral on licensing debates, but in the spirit of openness, I think the organization should adopt an open source CMS, even if it is not WordPress.

Like Loading...

Original post:

W3C Drops WordPress from Consideration for Redesign, Narrows CMS Shortlist to Statamic and Craft - WP Tavern

The push for content moderation legislation around the world – Brookings Institution

The summer of 2020 was very consequential for online speech. After years of national debate in the United States, several reform initiatives around the world, and the added pressure of the global pandemic, the demand for policy action finally boiled over. We are witnessing a shift in the primary driver of regulation from protecting innovation at all costs to ostensibly protecting aggrieved citizens at all cost. The U.S., Europe, and Brazil are in the throes of a fundamental intermediary liability legislative fight: who deserves safeguarding, what are the major threats, and can government rewrite the rules without pulling the plug on the internet as we know it? Lets review what the period of debate is shaping up across the world and what it means for government action.

In May 2020, France passed the Fighting hate on the Internet law, built in the image of Germanys much-maligned 2017 Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) Law, one of the most stringent intermediary liability legislations on the European continent. The law requires social network companies to almost instantly take down material deemed obviously illegal, at risk of heavy fines and without judicial decision-making safeguards. After its passage, the French Constitutional Court struck it down, as it found it to be an attack on freedom of expression among many other concerns. Meanwhile, in June, Germany decided that NetzDG was not enough; it introduced and passed reform in the Bundestag. The new law commands social media platforms to not just take down violent hate speech, but also report it to the police.

Also in June 2020, Brazil passed, in one of its legislative chambers, a bill fighting fake news, Brazilian Law of Freedom, Liability, and Transparency on the Internet whose initial drafts also mirrored the original NetzDG text. The final version, not without controversy, tackled intermediary liability by only requiring mandatory transparency reports, political content disclosure, and ensuring due process and appeals for content moderation decisions.

Similarly, in the U.S., The Eliminating Abusive and Rampant Neglect of Interactive Technologies Act of 2019 (EARN IT) has been hotly contested not just on content moderation but also on potentially breaking strong encryption. The bill had an entirely different initial draft to the one that passed its congressional committee vote in July 2020. Originally, it changed the liability standard for platforms from actual knowledge of sexual abuse or exploitation materials related to children to the mere existence of such material. The proposed bill would also create a 19 member national commission, chaired by the attorney general, charged with creating a set of mandatory best practices for intermediaries to follow or else lose their liability protection. Ultimately, the version that passed a committee vote scrapped the change of standard and made the best practices optional, while adding in a questionable carve out of Section 230 for state laws against child sexual abuse materials.

The build-up to the bills highlights some general trends. Germanys bill suffered significant pushback, but did not originate nor go through a public fact-finding commission. On the other hand, France and Brazil had set up committees to understand the problem of content moderation and the entire suite of potential solutions. The French government backed down after its original draft bill was panned not just for damage to freedom of speech and potential harms to disadvantaged groups, but also its failure in fighting hate, disinformation and other unsavory online content. It seemingly settled into a longer, more thorough process, through a nuanced and well researched executive branch commission report.

Similar to France, by the end of 2019 the Brazilian National Congress created an ad-hoc misinformation investigative committee. Unlike France, the committee was not able to even hold hearings with representatives of social media platforms let alone issue a report before the pandemic hit. The nature of the pandemic shifted priorities for both countries. In France it meant rushing the bill through under the cover of national security despite the nuanced perspective of the report. In Brazil it meant no report, and an introduction of a bill that got a series of online public hearings and an entirely revised text after strong pushback.

While no external committee was even suggested, the trajectory of the EARN IT Act is similar to Brazils fake news bill: an initial draft, universally criticized, is introduced, stakeholders rush in to explain its potential damage, and the version that passes the first vote is materially different and watered down while barely addressing earlier criticisms.

Unlike the others, the eminently bureaucratic and consultative nature of the European Union lends itself to a long and overly thorough process as it attempts to reform its decades old eCommerce Directive through the Digital Services Act. Incidentally, the bill is the only one whose text is not available before the global consultations wrap up. However, the general trend is worrisome: All the legislation discussed so far started from the premise that something had to be done and the NetzDG censorship model was the best. Lawmakers would have largely followed this model if left to their own devices and unencumbered by open debate or impartial fact-finding: Until December 2019 13 countries approved laws in the spirit, if not also the letter of NetzDG. The most recent one, Turkey, is billed as the strictest. As a harbinger of potential future global reforms, NetzDG itself is getting stricter.

Vigilance across stakeholder groups has so far led to meaningful if limited success in changing the free speech- and privacy-encroaching regulations across the world, which may be enough to send a strong message to the drafters of the EUs Digital Services Act. While France and Germany have passed legislation, the Brazilian and U.S. bills are still uncertain. EARN IT Act drafters, specifically Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), were hoping to pass the legislation in the Senate before the August recess. The Brazilian bills status is unclear, awaiting discussion and passage in the countrys other chamber, but with mounting national and international criticism, there may still be hope for positive change.

High profile bills get attention and resultant national and international pushback, but it is worrisome that the default intermediary liability legislation seems to be the draconian NetzDG, or underdeveloped concepts like duty of care. With some sense of what the Digital Services Act might contain, it is the only bill that is not solving for a perceived immediate problem like disinformation, child sexual abuse, or hate speech, without regard to the potential aftermath.

But speaking more generally, the 2020 bills mark a change of mindset from the innovation and freedom of expression that catalyzed the original legislation now being marked for reform. Now besieged by disinformation, harassment, and threats of violence or deplatforming, users have demanded new legislation to protect not just themselves, but the platforms they paradoxically hold as both integral to and infringing on their fundamental rights. The do something ethos behind the reform bills is a direct answer to this phenomenon. However, replacing the myopic view of moderation as mostly inconsequential with the equally myopic view of forced moderation regardless of larger systemic implications will not make us any less blind.

View original post here:

The push for content moderation legislation around the world - Brookings Institution

Inside the Army’s futuristic test of its battlefield artificial intelligence in the desert – C4ISRNet

YUMA PROVING GROUND, Ariz. After weeks of work in the oppressive Arizona desert heat, the U.S. Army carried out a series of live fire engagements Sept. 23 at Yuma Proving Ground to show how artificial intelligence systems can work together to automatically detect threats, deliver targeting data and recommend weapons responses at blazing speeds.

Set in the year 2035, the engagements were the culmination of Project Convergence 2020, the first in a series of annual demonstrations utilizing next generation AI, network and software capabilities to show how the Army wants to fight in the future.

The Army was able to use a chain of artificial intelligence, software platforms and autonomous systems to take sensor data from all domains, transform it into targeting information, and select the best weapon system to respond to any given threat in just seconds.

Army officials claimed that these AI and autonomous capabilities have shorted the sensor to shooter timeline the time it takes from when sensor data is collected to when a weapon system is ordered to engaged from 20 minutes to 20 seconds, depending on the quality of the network and the number of hops between where its collected and its destination.

We use artificial intelligence and machine learning in several ways out here, Brigadier General Ross Coffman, director of the Army Futures Commands Next Generation Combat Vehicle Cross-Functional Team, told visiting media.

We used artificial intelligence to autonomously conduct ground reconnaissance, employ sensors and then passed that information back. We used artificial intelligence and aided target recognition and machine learning to train algorithms on identification of various types of enemy forces. So, it was prevalent throughout the last six weeks.

Promethean Fire

Sign up for the C4ISRNET newsletter about future battlefield technologies.

(please select a country) United States United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of The Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

Subscribe

By giving us your email, you are opting in to the C4ISRNET Daily Brief.

The first exercise featured is informative of how the Army stacked together AI capabilities to automate the sensor to shooter pipeline. In that example, the Army used space-based sensors operating in low Earth orbit to take images of the battleground. Those images were downlinked to a TITAN ground station surrogate located at Joint Base Lewis McCord in Washington, where they were processed and fused by a new system called Prometheus.

Currently under development, Prometheus is an AI system that takes the sensor data ingested by TITAN, fuses it, and identifies targets. The Army received its first Prometheus capability in 2019, although its targeting accuracy is still improving, according to one Army official at Project Convergence. In some engagements, operators were able to send in a drone to confirm potential threats identified by Prometheus.

From there, the targeting data was delivered to a Tactical Assault Kit a software program that gives operators an overhead view of the battlefield populated with both blue and red forces. As new threats are identified by Prometheus or other systems, that data is automatically entered into the program to show users their location. Specific images and live feeds can be pulled up in the environment as needed.

All of that takes place in just seconds.

Once the Army has its target, it needs to determine the best response. Enter the real star of the show: the FIRES Synchronization to Optimize Responses in Multi-Domain Operations, or FIRESTORM.

What is FIRESTORM? Simply put its a computer brain that recommends the best shooter, updates the common operating picture with the current enemy situation, and friendly situation, admissions the effectors that we want to eradicate the enemy on the battlefield, said Coffman.

Army leaders were effusive in praising FIRESTORM throughout Project Convergence. The AI system works within the Tactical Assault Kit. Once new threats are entered into the program, FIRESTORM processes the terrain, available weapons, proximity, number of other threats and more to determine what the best firing system to respond to that given threat. Operators can assess and follow through with the systems recommendations with just a few clicks of the mouse, sending orders to soldiers or weapons systems within seconds of identifying a threat.

Just as important, FIRESTORM provides critical target deconfliction, ensuring that multiple weapons systems arent redundantly firing on the same threat. Right now, that sort of deconfliction would have to take place over a phone call between operators. FIRESTORM speeds up that process and eliminates any potential misunderstandings.

In that first engagement, FIRESTORM recommended the use of an Extended-Range Cannon Artillery. Operators approved the algorithms choice, and promptly the cannon fired a projectile at the target located 40 kilometers away. The process from identifying the target to sending those orders happened faster than it took the projectile to reach the target.

Perhaps most surprising is how quickly FIRESTORM was integrated into Project Convergence.

This computer program has been worked on in New Jersey for a couple years. Its not a program of record. This is something that they brought to my attention in July of last year, but it needed a little bit of work. So we put effort, we put scientists and we put some money against it, said Coffman. The way we used it is as enemy targets were identified on the battlefield FIRESTORM quickly paired those targets with the best shooter in position to put effects on it. This is happening faster than any human could execute. It is absolutely an amazing technology.

Dead Center

Prometheus and FIRESTORM werent the only AI capabilities on display at Project Convergence.

In other scenarios, a MQ-1C Gray Eagle drone was able to identify and target a threat using the on-board Dead Center payload. With Dead Center, the Gray Eagle was able to process the sensor data it was collecting, identifying a threat on its own without having to send the raw data back to a command post for processing and target identification. The drone was also equipped with the Maven Smart System and Algorithmic Inference Platform, a product created by Project Maven, a major Department of Defense effort to use AI for processing full motion video.

According to one Army officer, the capabilities of the Maven Smart System and Dead Center overlap, but placing both on the modified Gray Eagle at Project Convergence helped them to see how they compared.

With all of the AI engagements, the Army ensured there was a human in the loop to provide oversight of the algorithms' recommendations. When asked how the Army was implementing the Department of Defenses principles of ethical AI use adopted earlier this year, Coffman pointed to the human barrier between AI systems and lethal decisions.

So obviously the technology exists, to remove the human right the technology exists, but the United States Army, an ethical based organization thats not going to remove a human from the loop to make decisions of life or death on the battlefield, right? We understand that, explained Coffman. The artificial intelligence identified geo-located enemy targets. A human then said, Yes, we want to shoot at that target.

Originally posted here:
Inside the Army's futuristic test of its battlefield artificial intelligence in the desert - C4ISRNet

Artificial intelligence: threats and opportunities | News – EU News

The increasing reliance on AI systems also poses potential risks.

Underuse of AI is considered as a major threat: missed opportunities for the EU could mean poor implementation of major programmes, such as the EU Green Deal, losing competitive advantage towards other parts of the world, economic stagnation and poorer possibilities for people. Underuse could derive from public and business' mistrust in AI, poor infrastructure, lack of initiative, low investments, or, since AI's machine learning is dependent on data, from fragmented digital markets.

Overuse can also be problematic: investing in AI applications that prove not to be useful or applying AI to tasks for which it is not suited, for example using it to explain complex societal issues.

An important challenge is to determine who is responsible for damage caused by an AI-operated device or service: in an accident involving a self-driving car. Should the damage be covered by the owner, the car manufacturer or the programmer?

If the producer was absolutely free of accountability, there might be no incentive to provide good product or service and it could damage peoples trust in the technology; but regulations could also be too strict and stifle innovation.

The results that AI produces depend on how it is designed and what data it uses. Both design and data can be intentionally or unintentionally biased. For example, some important aspects of an issue might not be programmed into the algorithm or might be programmed to reflect and replicate structural biases. In adcition, the use of numbers to represent complex social reality could make the AI seem factual and precise when it isnt . This is sometimes referred to as mathwashing.

If not done properly, AI could lead to decisions influenced by data on ethnicity, sex, age when hiring or firing, offering loans, or even in criminal proceedings.

AI could severely affect the right to privacy and data protection. It can be for example used in face recognition equipment or for online tracking and profiling of individuals. In addition, AI enables merging pieces of information a person has given into new data, which can lead to results the person would not expect.

It can also present a threat to democracy; AI has already been blamed for creating online echo chambers based on a person's previous online behaviour, displaying only content a person would like, instead of creating an environment for pluralistic, equally accessible and inclusive public debate. It can even be used to create extremely realistic fake video, audio and images, known as deepfakes, which can present financial risks, harm reputation, and challenge decision making. All of this could lead to separation and polarisation in the public sphere and manipulate elections.

AI could also play a role in harming freedom of assembly and protest as it could track and profile individuals linked to certain beliefs or actions.

Use of AI in the workplace is expected to result in the elimination of a large number of jobs. Though AI is also expected to create and make better jobs, education and training will have a crucial role in preventing long-term unemployment and ensure a skilled workforce.

Read more:
Artificial intelligence: threats and opportunities | News - EU News

The Army just conducted a massive test of its battlefield artificial intelligence in the desert – DefenseNews.com

YUMA PROVING GROUND, Ariz. After weeks of work in the oppressive Arizona desert heat, the U.S. Army carried out a series of live fire engagements Sept. 23 at Yuma Proving Ground to show how artificial intelligence systems can work together to automatically detect threats, deliver targeting data and recommend weapons responses at blazing speeds.

Set in the year 2035, the engagements were the culmination of Project Convergence 2020, the first in a series of annual demonstrations utilizing next generation AI, network and software capabilities to show how the Army wants to fight in the future.

The Army was able to use a chain of artificial intelligence, software platforms and autonomous systems to take sensor data from all domains, transform it into targeting information, and select the best weapon system to respond to any given threat in just seconds.

Army officials claimed that these AI and autonomous capabilities have shorted the sensor to shooter timeline the time it takes from when sensor data is collected to when a weapon system is ordered to engaged from 20 minutes to 20 seconds, depending on the quality of the network and the number of hops between where its collected and its destination.

We use artificial intelligence and machine learning in several ways out here, Brigadier General Ross Coffman, director of the Army Futures Commands Next Generation Combat Vehicle Cross-Functional Team, told visiting media.

We used artificial intelligence to autonomously conduct ground reconnaissance, employ sensors and then passed that information back. We used artificial intelligence and aided target recognition and machine learning to train algorithms on identification of various types of enemy forces. So, it was prevalent throughout the last six weeks.

Sign up for our Training & Sim Report Get the latest news in training and simulation technologies

Subscribe

Enter a valid email address (please select a country) United States United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of The Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

Thanks for signing up!

By giving us your email, you are opting in to the Early Bird Brief.

The first exercise featured is informative of how the Army stacked together AI capabilities to automate the sensor to shooter pipeline. In that example, the Army used space-based sensors operating in low Earth orbit to take images of the battleground. Those images were downlinked to a TITAN ground station surrogate located at Joint Base Lewis McCord in Washington, where they were processed and fused by a new system called Prometheus.

Currently under development, Prometheus is an AI system that takes the sensor data ingested by TITAN, fuses it, and identifies targets. The Army received its first Prometheus capability in 2019, although its targeting accuracy is still improving, according to one Army official at Project Convergence. In some engagements, operators were able to send in a drone to confirm potential threats identified by Prometheus.

From there, the targeting data was delivered to a Tactical Assault Kit a software program that gives operators an overhead view of the battlefield populated with both blue and red forces. As new threats are identified by Prometheus or other systems, that data is automatically entered into the program to show users their location. Specific images and live feeds can be pulled up in the environment as needed.

All of that takes place in just seconds.

Once the Army has its target, it needs to determine the best response. Enter the real star of the show: the FIRES Synchronization to Optimize Responses in Multi-Domain Operations, or FIRESTORM.

What is FIRESTORM? Simply put its a computer brain that recommends the best shooter, updates the common operating picture with the current enemy situation, and friendly situation, admissions the effectors that we want to eradicate the enemy on the battlefield, said Coffman.

Army leaders were effusive in praising FIRESTORM throughout Project Convergence. The AI system works within the Tactical Assault Kit. Once new threats are entered into the program, FIRESTORM processes the terrain, available weapons, proximity, number of other threats and more to determine what the best firing system to respond to that given threat. Operators can assess and follow through with the systems recommendations with just a few clicks of the mouse, sending orders to soldiers or weapons systems within seconds of identifying a threat.

Just as important, FIRESTORM provides critical target deconfliction, ensuring that multiple weapons systems arent redundantly firing on the same threat. Right now, that sort of deconfliction would have to take place over a phone call between operators. FIRESTORM speeds up that process and eliminates any potential misunderstandings.

In that first engagement, FIRESTORM recommended the use of an Extended-Range Cannon Artillery. Operators approved the algorithms choice, and promptly the cannon fired a projectile at the target located 40 kilometers away. The process from identifying the target to sending those orders happened faster than it took the projectile to reach the target.

Perhaps most surprising is how quickly FIRESTORM was integrated into Project Convergence.

This computer program has been worked on in New Jersey for a couple years. Its not a program of record. This is something that they brought to my attention in July of last year, but it needed a little bit of work. So we put effort, we put scientists and we put some money against it, said Coffman. The way we used it is as enemy targets were identified on the battlefield FIRESTORM quickly paired those targets with the best shooter in position to put effects on it. This is happening faster than any human could execute. It is absolutely an amazing technology.

Prometheus and FIRESTORM werent the only AI capabilities on display at Project Convergence.

In other scenarios, a MQ-1C Gray Eagle drone was able to identify and target a threat using the on-board Dead Center payload. With Dead Center, the Gray Eagle was able to process the sensor data it was collecting, identifying a threat on its own without having to send the raw data back to a command post for processing and target identification. The drone was also equipped with the Maven Smart System and Algorithmic Inference Platform, a product created by Project Maven, a major Department of Defense effort to use AI for processing full motion video.

According to one Army officer, the capabilities of the Maven Smart System and Dead Center overlap, but placing both on the modified Gray Eagle at Project Convergence helped them to see how they compared.

With all of the AI engagements, the Army ensured there was a human in the loop to provide oversight of the algorithms' recommendations. When asked how the Army was implementing the Department of Defenses principles of ethical AI use adopted earlier this year, Coffman pointed to the human barrier between AI systems and lethal decisions.

So obviously the technology exists, to remove the human right the technology exists, but the United States Army, an ethical based organization thats not going to remove a human from the loop to make decisions of life or death on the battlefield, right? We understand that, explained Coffman. The artificial intelligence identified geo-located enemy targets. A human then said, Yes, we want to shoot at that target.

The rest is here:
The Army just conducted a massive test of its battlefield artificial intelligence in the desert - DefenseNews.com

Regina Barzilay wins $1M Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Squirrel AI award – MIT News

For more than 100 years Nobel Prizes have been given out annually to recognize breakthrough achievements in chemistry, literature, medicine, peace, and physics. As these disciplines undoubtedly continue to impact society, newer fields like artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics have also begun to profoundly reshape the world.

In recognition of this, the worlds largest AI society the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) announced today the winner of their new Squirrel AI Award for Artificial Intelligence for the Benefit of Humanity, a$1 million award given to honor individuals whose work in the field has had a transformative impact on society.

The recipient, Regina Barzilay, the Delta Electronics Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT and a member of MITs Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL), is being recognized for her work developing machine learning models to develop antibiotics and other drugs, and to detect and diagnose breast cancer at early stages.

In February, AAAI will officially present Barzilay with the award, which comes with an associated prize of $1 million provided by the online education company Squirrel AI.

Only world-renowned recognitions, such as the Association of Computing Machinerys A.M. Turing Award and the Nobel Prize, carry monetary rewards at the million-dollar level, says AAAI awards committee chair Yolanda Gil. This award aims to be unique in recognizing the positive impact of artificial intelligence for humanity.

Barzilay has conducted research on a range of topics in computer science, ranging from explainable machine learning to deciphering dead languages. Since surviving breast cancer in 2014, she has increasingly focused her efforts on health care. She created algorithms for early breast cancer diagnosis and risk assessment that have been tested at multiple hospitals around the globe, including in Sweden, Taiwan, and at Bostons Massachusetts General Hospital. She is now working with breast cancer organizations such as Institute Protea in Brazil to make her diagnostic tools available for underprivileged populations around the world. (She realized from doing her work that, if a system like hers had existed at the time, her doctors actually could have detected her cancer two or three years earlier.)

In parallel, she has been working on developing machine learning models for drug discovery: with collaborators shes created models for selecting molecule candidates for therapeutics that have been able to speed up drug development, and last year helped discover a new antibiotic called Halicin that was shown to be able to kill many species of disease-causing bacteria that are antibiotic-resistant, including Acinetobacter baumannii and clostridium difficile (c-diff).

Through my own life experience, I came to realize that we can create technology that can alleviate human suffering and change our understanding of diseases, says Barzilay, who is also a member of the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research. I feel lucky to have found collaborators who share my passion and who have helped me realize this vision.

Barzilay also serves as a member of MITs Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, and as faculty co-lead for MITs Abdul Latif Jameel Clinic for Machine Learning in Health. One of the Jameel Clinics most recent efforts is AI Cures, a cross-institutional initiative focused on developing affordable Covid-19 antivirals.

Regina has made truly-changing breakthroughs in imaging breast cancer and predicting the medicinal activity of novel chemicals, says MIT professor of biology Phillip Sharp, a Nobel laureate who has served as director of both the McGovern Institute for Brain Research and the MIT Center for Cancer Research, predecessor to the Koch Institute. I am honored to have as a colleague someone who is such a pioneer in using deeply creative machine learning methods to transform the fields of health care and biological science.

Barzilay joined the MIT faculty in 2003 after earning her undergraduate at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel and her PhD at Columbia University. She is also the recipient of a MacArthur genius grant, the National Science Foundation Career Award, a Microsoft Faculty Fellowship, multiple best paper awards in her field, and MITs Jamieson Award for excellence in teaching.

"We believe AI advances will benefit a great many fields, from health care and education to smart cities and the environment," says Derek Li, founder and chairman of Squirrel AI. We believe that Dr. Barzilay and other future awardees will inspire the AI community to continue to contribute to and advance AIs impact on the world.

AAAIs Gil says the organization was very excited to partner with Squirrel AI for this new award to recognize the positive impacts of artificial intelligence to protect, enhance, and improve human life in meaningful ways. With more than 300 elected fellows and 6,000 members from 50 countries across the globe, AAAI is the worlds largest scientific society devoted to artificial intelligence. Its officers have included many AI pioneers, including Allen Newell and John McCarthy. AAAI confers several influential AI awards including the Feigenbaum Prize, the Newell Award (jointly with ACM), and the Engelmore Award.

Regina has been a trailblazer in the field of health care AI by asking the important questions about how we can use machine learning to treat and diagnose diseases, says Daniela Rus, director of CSAIL and the Andrew (1956) and Erna Viterbi Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. She has been both a brilliant researcher and a devoted educator, and all of us at CSAIL are so inspired by her work and proud to have her as a colleague.

See the rest here:
Regina Barzilay wins $1M Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Squirrel AI award - MIT News

Singapore hopes artificial intelligence will help boost its tourism industry – CNBC

A tourist in Singapore taking in the iconic skyline with Marina Bay Sands and the Singapore Flyer in view.

IronHeart | Moment | Getty Images

Singapore is gradually reopening its borders again after months of coronavirus travel restrictions.

As the city-state looks to salvage its battered tourism industry which contributes around 4% to its economy it's hoped that artificial intelligence (AI) can help the sector bring back visitors safely.

Official datashowsmonthlyvisitor arrivals were down by 76% between January to July, compared to a year ago. Visitor arrivals in July alone were down more than 99% year-on-year.

Even though the Southeast Asian nation remains closed off to most foreigners, officials are now considering lifting restrictions for select groups of visitors.

Local start-ups like Vouch and Travelstop are betting on their AI-powered systems as the country navigates new security measures.

Launched in 2017, Vouch sells an AI-enabled digital concierge that's designed to answer guest inquiries, make bookings and take room service orders. The company says its chatbots used by hotels including Andaz Singapore and the Pan Pacificin Singapore can conduct health declarations, facilitate contactless ordering for dine-in services and manage crowd control.

The Vouch app being used on a mobile phone.

Handout from Vouch

"Interestingly, Covid-19 has actually helped our business significantly," Vouch co-founder Joseph Ling told CNBC.

The company had to initially modify its in-room dining ordering system to allow for takeaways and deliveries a feature that it gave to hotels for free during Singapore's partial lockdown.

"Thanks to this, we were able to build great relationships," Ling said. "When hotels began to plan for the future around June and July, we signed up many of them." He said Vouch is now growing rapidly with "15 percent of the total Singapore hotel room stock on board."

Other AI-backed firms also say they're optimistic about the long-term outlook.

Two-year-old Travelstop aims to simplify business travel with the help of its serverless SaaS platform, that's designed to speed up the booking process, automate expense reporting and provide cost-saving insights.

"For the past few months, even though corporate travel revenues have been down, we are seeing significant traction on our expense management platform as companies are now accelerating digitizing the workflows and processes to support the work from home culture," said Travelstop's co-founder Prashant Kirtane.

Ongoing border restrictions and lower consumer appetite for international flights have changed travel as an industry. The two entrepreneurs said they believe machine learning and AI will change travel as an experience.

"The business models of traditional corporate travel management companies have not evolved for decades," Kirtane stated. "Existing tools have not kept pace with the modern business traveler, and are generally not affordable by smaller and mid-sized businesses."

"Hotels used to feel more technologically advanced than our homes but as IoT (Internet of Things), AI and consumer tech companies take the lead, the tech gradient has reversed hotels now feel lower tech than our own homes," said Ling of Vouch. The Internet of Things is the idea of a network of devices thatare all connected to the internet and, conceptually at least, can work together.

Before the pandemic, AI and other forms of machine learning were just beginning to infiltrate the travel sector. Their biggest advantage is the ability to personalize experiences and streamline services based on customer data.

Singaporean start-up Fooyo, for example, creates customized itinerary planners that include real-time crowd monitoring for attractions and events. The app it created for the Chinese city of Chongqing also includes an AI audio guide, which gives visitors information based on their GPS location.

As the economy begins to recover from the pandemic,AI-backed systemscouldbecome especially useful.

For example, "with people being more cautious about being in long queues and waiting in crowded spaces, more AI processes would be beneficial to safe distancing," said James Walton, the transportation, hospitality and services sector leader at Deloitte Singapore. He cited the example of remote check-ins and check-outs in hotels.

Investors are paying attention to this rapidly growing sector. Travelstop raised $3 million in pre-Series A funding led by Silicon Valley venture capital firm Accel last year, on top of the $1.2 million it obtained in a 2019 seed round led by Singapore's SeedPlus.

Kirtane said the company aims to complete a new fundraising round in 2021. Vouch, meanwhile, has raised about $250,000 of angel investment to-date and will be seeking more funds as it looks to expand in Thailand and Malaysia.

And investments in new technology continue. In 2017, the country's tourism body and the Singapore Hotel Association launched a program to crowdsource technologies for hotels. Among the winners was a wireless system that automatically adjusts air-conditioning units for energy efficiency.

Officials announced an accelerator program for tourism-oriented tech start-ups late last year.

Technological innovation "can also strengthen investor perception, and thus encourage investments in the country," Walton said.

Singapore has long faced a severe labor crunch amid state-imposed foreign worker levies and quotas factors that have contributed to wage increases. For employers, "the use of tech and AI in areas such as hotel operations will go some way to alleviate this pressure," Walton said.

Ling of Vouch echoed those sentiments. Hiring is difficult for Singapore hotels since most locals don't want to work in hospitality, he explained. As a result, back-office staff are predominantly foreigners and due to quotas on foreign manpower, hotels often lack sufficient front-end personnel, Ling continued. With many establishments reducing staff count in the aftermath of Covid-19, labor issues are as critical as ever, he said.

Whilst AI can improve overall efficiency with less manpower, it can also lead to job losses an unwanted development at a time when people are already concerned about job security.

"Would this mean reducing foreign manpower numbers, and saving the jobs for Singaporeans? Does adopting [AI] replace the jobs, or would it enable more high-level jobs for Singaporeans?" Walton asked.

It remains to be seen, he said, how the government can balance that situation.

Correction: This story has been updated to accurately reflect the designation ofDeloitte's James Walton.

View post:
Singapore hopes artificial intelligence will help boost its tourism industry - CNBC

Artificial Intelligence in the C-Store – CSPDailyNews.com

CHICAGO Artificial intelligence (AI) is another important component of modern loyalty, says Sastry Penumarthy, co-founder and vice president of strategy for Punchh, a loyalty firm based in San Mateo, Calif. Humans do not have the time or ability to sift through waves of data to know when and how to communicate and incentivize specific customers, and AI can make that process more seamless, and more personalized.

AI will basically let me predict the customers that will be of the highest value to me over the next three months, let me look at all the offers and let me find the right offer for each of these customers, says Penumarthy. He says Punchh is launching an AI-driven program like that with select customers over the next few months.

AI also helps companies identify and craft offers for customers who are visiting or purchasing less vs. the highest-value customers. It can identify the best time of day or day of the week to send an offer or a message to a loyalty member. So, for example, if you are in the habit of checking email at lunchtime, its useful to know that information, But I shouldnt ask you what you prefer; I learn from your behavior, he says.

Related: Loyalty, This Time Its Personal

But the most important reason to lean on AI, says Penumarthy, is its ability to connect consumer data collected through the loyalty program to other systems, such as marketing.

Penumarthy says Punchh is working on a way to extend and automate relationships between retailers, consumers and consumer packaged goods (CPG) brands.

Today, when retailers partner with CPG brands for loyalty promotions, it can take two to three months for the retailer to understand the effectiveness of the program and report back to the CPG company. With AI, both the CPG company and the retailer have a better idea of how much money and time to invest into the program.

Penumarthy says loyalty used to be much more conventional, but times have changed. People no longer use the same land line phone numbers they used to sign onto these programs years ago. Many customers no longer carry newspaper coupon clippings when shopping at the grocery store. I want the offers to be right there on the phone when Im placing the order. And they cant do that unless its personalized, says Penumarthy.

Jones of Caseys, which has partnered with Punchh, says understanding customer shopping patterns using data mining and AI is important, and that such tools will be a part of Caseys offer creation and targeting capabilities in the future.

More: 3 Loyalty Developments Driven by the Pandemic

Get todays need-to-know convenience industry intelligence. Sign up to receive texts from CSP on news and insights that matter to your brand.

View post:
Artificial Intelligence in the C-Store - CSPDailyNews.com

Agencies Should Consider the Pros and Cons of Artificial Intelligence – Nextgov

U.S. Chief Technology Officer Michael Kratsios and Energy Secretary Dan Brouillette shed a little light on how the Energy Department and Trump administration are thinking about ethics, regulatory approaches, and broader societal implications as they push the rollout of artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies.

During a fireside chat in Pittsburgh Tuesday, Brouillette reflected on similar-but-as-serious considerations previously made when the agency was developing nuclear technologies many years ago. He noted that now, when focusing on ethics, his mind tends to hone in on negative aspects and bad results that could arise with tech adoption.

I haven't thought this through with great depth, but there seems to be some positive aspects of AI, too, on the ethics front that we need to explore, Brouillette told the chats moderator Carnegie Mellon University Vice President of Research Michael McQuade. And perhaps through that process we can speed the adoption of some of these technologies, he said, adding that hed like to give it all more thought.

Piggybacking off the point, Kratsios noted that while there's often a tendency to immediately start looking at the lenses of the negative, government officials should conduct a trade-off analysis in their tech-driven pursuits. President Trump signed an executive order on the American AI Initiative earlier in his term, he said, which called for a set of regulatory guidelines for agencies to lean on when implementing or overseeing the use of AI-powered technologies.

So, think about the [Food and Drug Administration] approving an AI medical diagnostic, or think about [the Federal Aviation Administration] approving a droneand what they should be considering in their regulatory approach, Kratsios explained.

A draft of the first set of regulatory guidelines was released earlier this year, which at the time were deemed by administration officials to make up a light-touch regulatory approach.

I think one of the core underpinnings of the way that the White House is directing agencies to think about this is to do that actual cost-benefit analysis, Kratsios said. The same cost-benefit analysis that is required by statute for any other regulation should also be done in the context of AI.

Noting that its something that is very hard to do, the CTO articulated that the guidelines would help provide clarity on how to see the benefits that these technologies can provide, weighed against some of the potential risks to ultimately create better regulatory solutions to providing the technology to the American public.

Brouillette also pointed out that other agencies such as the Homeland Security and Health and Human Services departments are already applying AI technologies to help find redundancies and duplications, and address other issues within their own regulatory processes. Now, the Energy Department aims to follow suit.

One of the questions that my predecessor asked me, Secretary Rick Perry, was are we going to apply this to ourselves? he said. And I think that's a very important common sense, fundamental first stepbut it's important that we do it as a regulatory agency.

The federal officials also touched on a range of other topics during the conversation, which was one part of several events Energy led in Pennsylvania this week.

Excerpt from:
Agencies Should Consider the Pros and Cons of Artificial Intelligence - Nextgov

Artificial Intelligence revamping exercise routines in the age of COVID-19 – WTMJ

Fitness routines have changed a lot during the pandemic. More people are opting to take their workout outside or choosing an indoor setting with minimal people.

Owner of The Exercise Coach in Brookfield Kristine Staral says their business model relies on smart technology that allows individuals to get the optimum workout in the shortest amount of time.

Our focus is on muscle quality over movement quantity- so its a safe, effective, and efficient workout and by that I mean our clients only need to commit to 2- 20 minute workouts a week. We do use smart technology along with certified coaches, said Staral.

Staral believes workout routines- married with smart technology- are the wave of the future.

We are definitely keeping up with the trend with todays smart technology. The equipment itself is built basically using artificial intelligence giving real time feedback thats unique to each individual.

To hear the entire conversation click on the link above.

Continued here:
Artificial Intelligence revamping exercise routines in the age of COVID-19 - WTMJ