What the *, Nintendo? This in-game censorship is * terrible. – EFF

While many are staying at home and escaping into virtual worlds, it's natural to discuss what's going on in the physical world. But Nintendo is shutting down those conversations with its latest Switch system update (Sep. 14, 2020) by adding new terms like COVID, coronavirus and ACAB to its censorship list for usernames, in-game messages, and search terms for in-game custom designs (but not the designs themselves).

While we understand the urge to prevent abuse and misinformation about COVID-19, censoring certain strings of characters is a blunderbuss approach unlikely to substantially improve the conversation. As an initial matter, it is easily circumvented: while our testing, shown above, confirmed that Nintendo censored coronavirus, COVID and ACAB, but does not restrict substitutes like c0vid or a.c.a.b., nor corona and virus, when written individually.

More importantly, its a bad idea, because these terms can be part of important conversations about politics or public health. Video games are not just for gaming and escapism, but are part of the fabric of our lives as a platform for political speech and expression. As the world went into pandemic lockdown, Hong Kong democracy activists took to Nintendos hit Animal Crossing to keep their pro-democracy protest going online (and Animal Crossing was banned in China shortly after). Just as many Black Lives Matter protests took to the streets, other protesters voiced their support in-game. Earlier this month, the Biden campaign introduced Animal Crossing yard signs which other players can download and place in front of their in-game home. EFF is part of this tooyou can show your support for EFF with in-game hoodies and hats.

Nevertheless, Nintendo seems uncomfortable with political speech on its platform. The Japanese Terms of Use prohibit in-game political advocacy ( or seijitekina shuchou), which led to a candidate for Japans Prime Minister canceling an in-game campaign event. But it has not expanded this blanket ban to the Terms for Nintendo of America or Nintendo of Europe.

Nintendo has the right to host the platform as it sees fit. But just because they can do this, doesnt mean they should. Nintendo needs to also recognize that it has provided a platform for political and social expression, and allow people to use words that are part of important conversations about our world, whether about the pandemic, protests against police violence, or democracy in Hong Kong.

See more here:

What the *, Nintendo? This in-game censorship is * terrible. - EFF

White House bans TikTok and WeChat: A major intensification of internet censorship – WSWS

19 September 2020

In a major escalation of the anti-China campaign ahead of the election, the Trump administration announced on Friday that it was following through on its executive orders of August 6 and banning the social media apps TikTok and WeChat from being downloaded from US app stores on Sunday.

The move is a frontal assault on the freedom of expression and an effort to consolidate control of the internet by a handful of massive corporations working in partnership with the American government. TikTok is used by millions of people every day to connect with friends and family, share ideas and communicate, and has been used to organize social protests. WeChat is a major link of communication between the United States and China.

An official statement released by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said downloads and new versions of the two mobile apps would be prohibited on Apple and Android app stores as of September 20.

With regard to WeChat, the Commerce Department statement prohibits all electronic payments and funds transfers as well as the hosting, transferring internet traffic or utilization of the mobile applications constituent code within the US. WeChat, for all practical purposes will be shut down in the US, but only in the US, as of midnight Monday, Ross said.

TikTok faces a similar US ban on November 12, unless the Trump administration approves the proposal made last weekend by the American software giant Oracle Corporation to become a trusted tech partner with ByteDance, the Chinese company that currently owns it.

The transfer of TikTok to US ownership would be aimed at creating conditions in which it can be subject to the same type of government-backed censorship that has already been implemented by Google, Facebook, Twitter and other US-based social media companies.

TikTok is the tenth most popular social media platform in the world, with 500 million users, 100 million of which are in the US.

WeChat is the fifth largest social media platform in the world, with 1.06 billion users, of which 3.3 million are in the US. Described as Chinas app for everything, WeChat is a multipurpose instant messaging, social media and mobile payment app owned by Tencent Holdings.

The impact of this shutdown was explained by the WeChat Users Alliance, a non-profit group founded by five Chinese-American lawyers after Trumps executive order was announced: WeChat is a messaging app most commonly used by several million Chinese Americans in the U.S. Many other non-Chinese Americans also use it to communicate with their friends, clients, or business partners whose first language is Chinese. The complete ban of WeChat will severely affect the lives and the work of millions of people in the U.S. They will have a difficult time talking to family, relatives and friends back in China.

Michael Bien, a San Francisco attorney representing the organization, said that WeChat is the primary way for many of its US users to communicate, organize social groups, run businesses and engage in political activities. Bien said, It is our contention that [the ban] violates the Constitution, as you cannot censor such a fundamental part of communication, especially when it affects an insular group that has historically been a minority thats been subject to discrimination in the US, by law or by practice.

The Trump administrations actions against TikTok and WeChat are an attack on the ability of the working class to both express itself politically and to freely communicate in daily life.

Every worker and young person in the US must reject the Trump administrations attempt to whip up reactionary anti-Chinese sentiments on the basis of unsubstantiated claims of national security threats.

Not one shred of evidence has been presented to back up US government claims that TikTok or WeChat have been engaged in a malicious collection of American citizens personal data and are active participants in Chinas civil-military fusion in mandatory cooperation with the intelligence services of the Chinese Communist Party, as claimed by Ross.

Any objective assessment of the two apps thoroughly contradicts the Trump administrations attacks on TikTok and WeChat and shows that the emergence of the China-based social media platforms is part of the globalization and integration of the world economy that has been accelerating over the last four decades.

Social media platformssuch as Facebook, Twitter and YouTubeemerged as a consequence of the convergence of smartphones and tablets with wireless broadband Internet services internationally in the first decade of the twenty-first century. The initial years of this global developmentFacebook was launched in 2004, fourth generation wireless Internet access (4G) was first available in 2006 and the first model of the Apple iPhone was released in 2007were dominated by US companies.

The adoption of these technologies spread rapidly throughout the world over the next decade. For example, in 2007 only 1 percent of the population of the developing world had mobile broadband subscriptions. Today this number is approaching 85 percent.

During this period, the integration of the US and China in the development and production of these technologies expanded dramatically. The relationship of Apple to the Taiwanese Foxconn and Pegatronwhich both have facilities in Shenzhen, China where hundreds of millions of iPhones have been assembled by highly exploited Chinese factory workersis but one example of this process.

Globalization has integrated the US and China on many levels, economically, scientifically, academically and culturally. The number of Chinese immigrants in the US has grown seven-fold since 1980, reaching 2.5 million people in 2018. The effort by the Trump administration to demonize China by attacking the immensely popular social media apps expresses a level of reckless desperation within the administration.

Amidst growing social and political opposition within the US, accelerated by the disaster sparked by the coronavirus pandemic, the ruling class is seeking to divert tensions outward by provoking an international conflict with China.

The central target of the economic attacks on China is just as much the working class at home as it is the external enemy. As demonstrated by the ban on TikTok and WeChat, the US-China conflict has already become the occasion for major inroads on the freedom of speech, and the escalation of the conflict would create a pretext of further attacks on democratic rights.

No one should have illusions that the Democrats are opposed to Trumps anti-Chinese aggression. They have fully embraced the framework spelled out by the White House and have claimed that Trump is soft on China.

As Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, told the Wall Street Journal on September 10, Regardless of who wins, US policy toward China is going to be tougher over the next five years than the last five years. China has changed, and the US thinking on China has changed.

Writing in the New York Times on Tuesday, economic historian Chris Miller wrote an op-ed column entitled America Is Going to Decapitate Huawei, where he warns that the US global lead in technology is waning. Huaweis digital decapitation is a shocking display of American power. At the whim of the American president, any other Chinese tech company could suffer such a fate. Imagine if a foreign power could do the same to Google or Amazon.

The attacks on Huawei, TikTok and WeChat are all demonstrations of the criminality of American imperialism, but also ultimately an expression of the weakness and decline of the world hegemon that emerged after World War II. The US is using its geopolitical leverage to destroy the competitors to US-based social media companies.

Only the international working class has the ability to stop the descent into nationalist antagonisms that are leading from economic wars to military conflict and a new Third World War. The objective unity of the working class across national borders is the foundation of the struggle for socialism that must be taken up in the US, China and every country throughout the globe.

Kevin Reed

Read the original here:

White House bans TikTok and WeChat: A major intensification of internet censorship - WSWS

Social media censorship in Egypt targets women on TikTok – The World

Looking at Haneen Hossams TikTok account, one might wonder why her content landed the Egyptian social media user in jail. In one post, she explains for her followers the Greek mythological story of Venus and Adonis, which is also a Shakespeare poem.

Mawada al-Adham does similarly anodyne things that are familiar to anyone who observes such social influencers, like giving away iPhones and driving a fancy car.

They are just two of the nine women arrested in Egypt this past year for what they posted on TikTok. Mostly, their videos are full of dancing to Arabic songs, usuallya genre of electro-pop, Egyptian shaabi folk music called mahraganat, or festivaltunes. The clips feature a typically TikTok style with feet planted, hands gesticulating and eyebrows emoting.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration has put TikTok and its Chinese parent company,ByteDance, in its sights with another escalation against Beijing. The US Commerce Department announced Friday that TikTok, and another Chinese-owned app, WeChat, would be blocked from US app stores.

In Egypt, the arrests are about dictating morality rather than any kind of geopolitical struggle or international tech rivalry. But what exactly the government finds legally objectionable about these womens online content is ambiguous.

They themselves would have never imagined that they would go to jail and be sentenced for what they were doing, because what they're doing is basically what everyone else does on social media.

They themselves would have never imagined that they would go to jail and be sentenced for what they were doing because what they're doing is basically what everyone else does on social media, said Salma El Hosseiny of the International Service for Human Rights, a nongovernmental organizationbased in Geneva. Singing and dancing as if you would at an Egyptian wedding, for example.

Hosseiny said that these women were likely targeted because theyre from middle- or working-class backgrounds and dance to a style of music shunned by the bourgeoisie for scandalous lyrics that touch on taboo topics.

You have social media influencers who come from elite backgrounds, or upper-middle class, or rich classes in Egypt, who would post the same type of content. These women are working-class women, she added. They have stepped out of what is permitted for them.

They were charged under a cybercrime law passed in 2018, as well as existing laws in the Egyptian Penal Code that have been employed against women in the past.

Yasmin Omar, a researcher at The Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy in Washington, said the cybercrime law is vague when it comes to defining whats legal and what isnt.

It was written using very broad terms that could be very widely interpreted and criminalizing a lot of acts that are originally considered as personal freedom, she said. Looking at it, you would see that anything you might post on social media, anything that you may use [on] the internet could be criminalized under this very wide umbrella.

Egypts cybercrime law is part of a larger effort by the government to increase surveillance of online activities. As TikTok became much more popular during the pandemic, prosecutors started looking there too, Omar said.

When I write anything on my social media accounts, I know that it could be seen by an official whose job it is to watch the internet and media platforms, said Omar, who added that that surveillance often leads to widespread repression.

The state is simply arresting whoever says anything that criticizes its policy, its laws, its practices ... even if it's just joking. It's not even allowed.

Related: One woman's story highlights national wave of repression and sexual violence

The arrests of TikTokers shows that this law isnt just about monitoring and controlling political dissent, but is used to police conservative social norms.

Menna Abdel Aziz, 17, made a live video on Facebook. Her face was bruised and she told viewers that she had been raped and was asking for help.

The police asked her to come in, and when she did, Omar said, they looked at her TikTok account and decided she was inciting debauchery and harming family values in Egypt essentially blaming the victim for what had occurred.

This past summer, there were a number of particularly shocking allegations involving rape and sexual assault in Egypt. First, dozens of women accused a young man at the American University in Cairo (AUC) of sexual violence ranging from blackmail to rape. And in another case, a group of well-connected men were accused of gang-raping a young woman in Cairos Fairmont Hotel in 2014 and circulating a video of the act.

The cases garnered a lot of attention within Egypt. Many Egyptian women were shocked by the horrible details of the cases but not surprised about the allegations or that the details had been kept under wraps for so long.

In Egypt, sexual violence and violence against women is systematic, Hosseiny said. It's part of the daily life of women to be sexually harassed.

A UN Women report in 2014 said that 99.3% of Egyptian women reported being victims of sexual harassment. Yet, women are often culturally discouraged from reporting sexual harassment in the traditional society.

They are investing state resources to go after women who are singing and dancing on social media, and trying to control their bodies, and thinking that this is what's going to make society better and a safer place, Hosseiny said, by locking up women, rather than by changing and investing in making Egypt a safe place for women and girls.

When prosecutors started investigating the accused in that high-profile Fairmont case, it looked like real progress and a victory for online campaigning by women. The state-run National Council for Women even encouraged the victim and witnesses to come forward, promising the women protection. But that pledge by the state did not materialize.

Somehow, the prosecution decided to charge the witnesses, said Omar, the researcher. Witnesses who made themselves available, made their information about their lives, about what they know about the case all this information was used against them.

Witnesses who made themselves available, made their information about their lives, about what they know about the case all this information was used against them.

Once again, Egyptian authorities looked at the womens social media accounts, and then investigated the women for promoting homosexuality, drug use, debauchery and publication of false news. One of the witnesses arrested is an American citizen.

When pro-state media outlets weighed in on the TikTok cases, they also had a message about blame, Hosseiny said. The coverage used sensational headlines and showed photos of the women framed in a sexual way. This contrasted with the depictions in rape cases in which the accused mens photos were blurred andonly their initials printed.

Social media has played an important role in Egyptian politics during the last decade. In 2011, crowds toppled the regime of military dictator Hosni Mubarak. That uprising was in part organized online with Twitter andFacebook. In 2018, the former army general, and current president, Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, said he would maintain stability in Egypt.

Beware! What happened seven years ago is never going to happen again in Egypt, he swore to a large auditorium full of officials.

Related: Five years of Sisi's crackdown has left 'no form of opposition' in Egypt

Samer Shehata, a professor at the University of Oklahoma, said Egypts military-backed regime is wary of the implications of anything posted online, even if it's just dancing.

I think there has been a heightened paranoia as a result of hysteria ... about the possible political consequences of social media, he said. I think that they certainly have those kinds of concerns in the back of their minds as well.

Of the nine women charged with TikTok crimes, four have been convicted and three have appeals set for October.

Menna Abdel Aziz, the young woman who called for help online, was just released from detainment Wednesday and is being dismissed with no charges.

Read the original post:

Social media censorship in Egypt targets women on TikTok - The World

Barcelona members strike back vs. Bartomeu: What does ‘motion of censorship’ mean, and what’s next? – ESPN

Sep 18, 2020

Sid LoweSpain writer

Next time you pop into the FC Barcelona boutique to buy blaugrana pants or more than a pencil, go past the ticket window by the museum or order a coffee at the caf in the shadow of Kubala and Cruyff, look carefully at the guy behind the register. It that face looks familiar, that could be because it is. It might be Eder Sarabia, the former assistant coach taking up a new role.

Well, they've got to employ him somewhere.

- Lowe: Messi gearing up for "Last Dance" with Barca- Hunter: Real Madrid fancied for La Liga this season?

On Thursday evening, at the end of a day when Luis Surez had been in Italy, doing a language exam in Perugia to get an Italian passport, engaging in 10 minutes of conversation about family but not football, Quique Setin released a statement. In it, he revealed that he had been informed that he been sacked as Barcelona manager only the night before, on Wednesday -- a month after it had been announced to the world, and almost three weeks since his lawyers had written to the club to ask what was going on.

What's more, Setin said, there had still been no settlement on the 2-year contract he'd signed eight months earlier. More money poured away, and yet to be paid. As for his staff -- Sarabia, Jon Pascua and Fran Soto -- they hadn't been sacked at all. Instead, he had now been told that they would be "repositioned" at the club, which was news to them.

2 Related

It had been that kind of day, another one only somehow even sillier, sadder and, as it turned out, more significant. It was the eve of the 20th anniversary of Lionel Messi's arrival at Barcelona, which should have been cause for celebration, but this is a club in constant crisis, and even the fact that he is still there feels a bit odd. Above all, it was another one of those days for a president whose case for being the worst in club history gets more watertight by the hour.

It was a day in which more supposed transfer targets slipped away because -- just in case you didn't know, and somehow there still seem to be people who don't -- there is no money to buy them with. A day when 98m in losses over the past year were confirmed. One in which they still couldn't get rid of the players they publicly said they wanted to get rid of ... and, now it seemed, they couldn't get rid of the manager, either. Not properly, anyway.

Still, at least Setin's statement fit on one piece of paper. The bigger statement was delivered on thousands and thousands of them. And while on the face of it, it deepened the crisis, maybe it actually offered a way out of it -- or, at least, handed back some sense of control to those who care, a little light cast over the club, a glimpse of hope.

0:37

Lionel Messi is back to his sterling best, scoring an absolute stunner in Barcelona's 3-1 win vs. Girona.

A little before 7 o'clock in the evening local time, a dozen people turned up at the Camp Nou. They wore masks, and they brought with them boxes, bags and containers, absolutely full of pieces of paper. On them, over 20,000 people had officially declared their desire that a motion of censure be brought against team president Josep Maria Bartomeu and his board of directors -- a motion that might finally force them out.

They stood, clapped a bit, and then the boxes were taken inside. For an hour or so, they were checked -- someone turned up with coffee -- and officially received, the papers counted. This was the climax (or maybe it was just the beginning?) of a popular movement to push the president out.

- Stream new episodes of ESPN FC Monday-Friday on ESPN+- Serie A on ESPN+: Stream LIVE games and replays (U.S. only)

While you might not have been aware of it, this had been building for a while. It had begun with Jordi Farr, who will stand at the next elections, and other opposition candidates who joined him; it became a broad movement, a united front in defence of the club. Vctor Font and Lluis Fernndez Ala came on board. Fans groups supported them. At the head of one of them, a group called "Manifest Blaugrana," was Marc Duch, with his ponytail and beard.

Together they drove the campaign on and chased signatures all over Catalonia and beyond, under the slogan: "More than a moci" ("motion"). And, somehow, they had done it too. In a time of pandemic, when people can't meet, they had managed to gather enough signatures from socis (fans who are club members) to force a vote, effectively a referendum against the president. More than enough, in fact. They'd needed only 16,521, 15% of the members. They were 4,000 over that, backed by more than a fifth of the club's membership.

A handful of the papers were not admissible, but a club statement confirmed they had received 20,867, a number that was everywhere the next day, like a winning lottery ticket. The figures were a new record -- this was twice as many signatures as had ever been gathered before (in far more favourable conditions). "Unprecedented," Font called it.

"If I was the president, I would have met the 20,000 socis," Farr said. "Honestly, Bartomeu should resign today."

Duch said: "I'd be trembling in my office and I would resign."

Bartomeu might not do that. In fact, if anyone has learnt anything about him over the past few years and the past months especially, it is that he is a survivor. Holding on is what he does, whatever the cost.

1:08

Julien Laurens says Lyon will accept a "serious offer" from Barcelona for striker Memphis Depay.

So. The signatures have been received and counted. What happens next?

-- First, Barcelona have to participate in putting together the body that runs and oversees the process. (The "table," as it's called.) That's made up of the two first signatories on the move to propose a no-confidence motion -- Farr is one of them -- two members of the board of directors, and a representative of the Catalan football federation. They have 10 working days to do that: in other words, by Sept. 29.

-- Then the "table" has to validate the signatures, which they must do within another 10 days. That takes us to Oct. 10.

Dan Thomas is joined by Craig Burley, Shaka Hislop and others to bring you the latest highlights and debate the biggest storylines. Stream on ESPN+ (U.S. only).

-- If there are more than 16,521 valid signatures (which there will be), Barcelona will have to set up and arrange a vote of no confidence for the board of directors. It will be a referendum that basically asks: Do you want this president and his board to be sacked, yes or no? That will have to happen within 10 working days as well. All of which takes us to November, though all these things could happen quicker.

Then what?

If two-thirds (officially 66.7%) of them are in favour, Bartomeu will have to step down with immediate effect.

And once he's gone ... ?

A commission would be put in place while presidential elections are organised and held. Given the timing, those would be held in January or February. Some of the candidates -- Toni Freixa, Joan Laporta, Farr, Font, in all likelihood someone from within the current administration -- are clear, but some are not confirmed yet.

The socis will vote against Bartomeu, won't they?

Not necessarily, and 67% is of a lot of people to convince. After all, Barca have been in this situation before, and it has not always got over the line. In 1998, only 33.5% voted to kick out Josep Nuez out (although the damage it did his presidency was decisive). In 2008, Laporta survived, but only just: 60.6% wanted him pushed out. A moci brought against Bartomeu in 2017 didn't get sufficient signatures to reach the referendum stage.

That said ... yes, you would think so now. There are already over 20,000 people who will vote against him, and it's hard to imagine him being able to mobilise sufficient support to survive, even if there will be some members who might not want to push through the no-confidence motion. Not least because there is little point trying to prop him up, as it would be only a temporary reprieve: presidential elections were set to be held on March 15 anyway and he was unable to stand, his term already over.

Why vote to keep him in for what would be barely a couple of months?

Well, then, why vote against him either? What was the point of all this? If he was going anyway, why do this now? And doesn't it create a vacuum?

Yes, it does, up to a point. But why do it? Well, because they can, which sounds flippant, but isn't.

Simply, they're doing this because it gets rid of Bartomeu faster. It could, although it is unlikely, even remove him before the next transfer window begins and probably will remove him before it ends. (Caveat alert: The consequences of all this in terms of whether he is eventually held accountable for any budgetary shortfall would depend on the general assembly in October, on the final financial figures and on the next administration, all of which remains to be seen.)

They're doing this because it means that he does not get to see out his presidency "normally," or on his terms. Because it holds him accountable, symbolically at least. Because, well, to repeat: because they can; because this is an expression, a rebellion, a statement, a taking back of power by the people, a way of exercising their rights, a sign that while there is only so much they can do, those mechanisms that allow supporters to safeguard Barcelona still stand and, even in the midst of a pandemic, can be applied. That they really do have say in the destiny of their club, that democracy is not dead yet. As the name suggests, it is a censorship motion -- and that matters. It's the chance to censor those who are not worthy of their club.

There will be trouble ahead, for sure, and the situation remains dramatic at the Camp Nou. The new administration will inherit a mess when they arrive, but for all that went wrong, for all the increased embarrassment, Thursday was a day when Barcelona -- as a club, not a board of directors -- recovered some of its dignity. And that is something to celebrate at last. Lord knows, it has taken long enough.

Originally posted here:

Barcelona members strike back vs. Bartomeu: What does 'motion of censorship' mean, and what's next? - ESPN

MOCA Cleveland to reopen Oct. 1 as it reckons with charges of censorship, racial blind spots – cleveland.com

CLEVELAND, Ohio The normally vibrant Museum of Contemporary Art Cleveland has been closed for a full six months, far longer than other cultural institutions in the region that shut down in March in response to the coronavirus pandemic.

It wasnt just the public health crisis that kept MOCAs building in University Circle shuttered for so long, and at a steep price, forcing layoffs, pay cuts and plans to reduce the museums hours.

In addition to figuring out how to reopen safely, the museum has been sorting through fallout over its controversial decision last winter to cancel an exhibition of drawings by New York artist Shaun Leonardo depicting police killings of Black men and youths.

An artists accusation

The cancellation led the artist to accuse MOCA publicly in June of censoring him. Jill Snyder, who had led the museum for 23 years, resigned shortly thereafter. The show that would have come to Cleveland is now on view at Mass MOCA in North Adams, Mass.

Meanwhile, MOCA Cleveland, founded in 1968 as a non-collecting institution focused on exhibiting contemporary art from around the world, is poised to reopen Oct. 1 as it grapples with what went wrong over the Leonardo show and how to fix it.

Last month, the museum hired PPICW, an Atlanta-based consulting firm, to help it examine whether the museums own practices reinforced structural racism and how to transform a hierarchical office culture that may have contributed to the Leonardo debacle.

In an interview with cleveland.com and The Plain Dealer the first since the controversy over the Leonardo show Interim Executive Director and CEO Megan Lykins Reich described how the museum is adjusting after what she called the "watershed moment that happened in June.''

- Megan Lykins Reich, interim director of the Museum of Contemporary Art Cleveland, said the institution is learning from what she called "the watershed moment'' that occurred when it made the controversial decision to cancel an exhibition of drawings of Black victims of police violence. Museum of Contemporary Art ClevelandMuseum of Contemporary Art Cleve

"As humans we do often learn more from mistakes than our successes,'' said Reich, a native of Cincinnati who worked her way up the ranks at MOCA from a curatorial fellowship in 2004. I think this was an opportunity for us to learn and we took it seriously.

Pandemic impact

Aside from its unique circumstances, the news from MOCA echoes that of other Northeast Ohio cultural institutions slammed by the pandemic.

MOCA anticipates losing 25 percent of its revenues in 2021, or roughly $900,000 on a $3.5 million budget, because of the pandemic, Reich said.

As a consequence, the museum laid off 10 employees in two groups in July and earlier this month, effectively reducing its staff by 20 percent to 36 employees.

The museum also imposed a 10% pay cut on its top managers, and reduced exhibition seasons from three to two a year, Reich said.

Furthermore, the museum is cutting public hours from six to three days a week in order to reduce expenses.

When the museum reopens Oct. 1, staffers will focus two days a week on providing online programming on its digital platforms, Reich said. And, while its galleries are closed, the museum will host students of the Cleveland Metropolitan School District two days a week, using the building as a remote classroom.

To provide room for social distancing, the museum is closing its retail shop and using the area as its main entrance lobby because it has more space than the original lobby.

Visitors arriving at the museum, located at Euclid Avenue and Mayfield Road in University Circles Uptown district, will have to follow health protocols, including a wellness check at the door, and mandatory use of face coverings.

MOCA will feature an exhibition by Margaret Kilgallen in its winter series. (Image courtesy Margaret Kilgallen, MOCA)

Shows that were on view in March, including a retrospective exhibition on the work of the late Margaret Kilgallen, and "Temporary Spaces of Joy and Freedom,'' a show of works by Black and Indigenous artists, will be extended through Jan. 2.

A new exhibition, opening in February and co-organized by the Contemporary Arts Center in Cincinnati, will focus on works by 20 to 30 emerging and under-recognized artists from across the Midwest.

Beyond those basics, Reich and other members of the museums staff and board said theyre still in a period of institutional soul-searching.

Internal conflicts

The process hasnt been entirely smooth. A group of employees who call themselves the MOCA Collective staged an informal slowdown over the summer and drafted a series of grievances, copies of which have been obtained by cleveland.com.

The documents question the museums top-down management style and the truthfulness of MOCAs public statements about the cancellation of the Leonardo show. They also include the statement that staff of color are in the lowest level positions and do not have any real power at MOCA.

Reich said the document was never shared with museum leaders or board members, even though she encouraged the group to do so.

MOCA is not unique in facing such accusations. Museums and cultural institutions around the world have recently faced scrutiny and protests over everything from workplace violations and toxic office cultures to lack of racial and social equity and the social impact of trustees' business activities.

Such complaints have been heightened this year by the coronavirus pandemic and the Black Lives Matter protests that swept the country after George Floyd died under a police officers knee in Minneapolis in May.

The most visible example locally has been the Akron Art Museum, where laid-off employees raised accusations of racism, sexism and bullying of staff by managers. The museum reopened in July, as former employees picketed the institution.

The turmoil at MOCA, in contrast, stayed inside.

"We needed time,'' said Amy Cronauer, the museums director of foundation giving. "COVID alone is challenging, but in the face of the community conversations around the [Leonardo] exhibition not happening, there was staff discussion, and a little unrest.''

Institutional disconnect

It wasnt that MOCA ignored issues of racial and social equity in programming and outreach.

Larry Oscar, president of the museums board of directors, estimated that since the museum moved to its new building in 2012, some 40 percent of its exhibitions presented work by non-majority artists.

To mark its 50th anniversary, the museum announced in 2019 that it was eliminating admission fees. It hired LaTanya Autry as the first participant in a curatorial fellowship designed for emerging curators of color, and started its Engagement Guide program for more than 15 paid apprentices to provide security and to engage visitors in conversations about art.

Snyder described the program as a professional on-ramp for young Clevelanders aspiring to museum careers and said the program would reflect demographics of Cuyahoga County, which is 30 percent Black. Reich said that the Engagement Guide program has been preserved, despite the latest cutbacks in spending.

But for some employees, the furor over the cancellation of the Leonardo exhibition showed a disconnect between the museums policies and programs, and how it actually functions internally.

- Latanya Autry, the Gund Curatorial Fellow at the Museum of Contemporary ArtCleveland, has criticized the institution over its handling and cancellation of a controversial exhibition of drawings by New York artist Shaun Leonardo depicting police killings of blacks. Steven Litt, Cleveland.comSteven Litt, Cleveland.com

Autry, who is Black and widely known in the art world as a leader of Museums are Not Neutral, a movement devoted to equity-based transformation, said publicly in June that she felt marginalized as one of a handful of Black employees on the museums professional staff.

"Theres no support for me,'' she said at the time.

Failure of communication

The cancellation of the Leonardo show also highlighted how MOCA failed to anticipate early on that the exhibition could have disturbed Samaria Rice, the mother of Tamir Rice, the 12-year-old shot and killed by Cleveland police in 2014 while he was playing with a toy gun. Leonardos show would have included drawings based on surveillance videos of Tamirs death.

Without referring to Rice, though the museum tried belatedly to reach out to her privately, Snyder wrote in a public apology that MOCA cancelled the show because it didnt want to traumatize Clevelanders affected by police violence.

But she then wrote that the museum regretted the decision and that it had failed to seek diverse views about Leonardos work in the citys Black community.

"Through exchanges with trusted and valued community members, weve had tough conversations with feedback that the Black community is not a monolith,'' Snyder said in hers statement.

Reich declined in her interview to discuss Snyder, other than to praise her accomplishments, including leading construction of the museums new home, a four-story structure wrapped in reflective black steel.

In a statement she posted in late August on MOCAs website, Reich said that flawed processes during the exhibitions cancellation had a "negative impact on many individuals and revealed our roles in perpetuating institutional practices that reinforce structural racism and implicit bias.''

Constructive steps

She issued her own apology over the cancellation the museums third on the topic and pledged to undertake actions that included hiring PPICW to undertake equity training and anti-racism education.

Other steps the museum will take include:

- Setting up a staff and board committee to audit internal practices through "an anti-racism lens.''

- Developing public events to address topics including racism in art museums and the art world, and the "role of art in justice, and the ethics of representation.''

- Creating a paid community advisory committee to help guide the museum in public engagement and programming.

The meltdown over the Leonardo exhibition was surprising for a once sure-footed institution with a long history of presenting cutting-edge art in Cleveland.

In its early decades, the institution now known as MOCA championed leading contemporary artists from Cleveland and around the world that the far bigger, richer and stodgier Cleveland Museum of Art then virtually ignored.

MOCA brought works by Christo, Andy Warhol, Red Grooms, Jasper Johns, Frank Gehry and Robert Rauschenberg to Cleveland. It staged performance art happenings. It wasnt afraid of controversy. In 1996, during the culture wars over public funding of the arts, it did a show on artists reactions to the American flag, including a piece that invited viewers to stand on Old Glory.

An upstart matures

Now, more than 50 years later, MOCA is adjusting to middle age in an angular, sharply faceted building whose shiny facades make it feel both attractive and somehow unapproachable, like a person wearing mirror shades.

Marjorie Talalay, left, and Nina Sundell, opened the New Gallery, which evolved into the Museum of Contemporary Art Cleveland, in December, 1968 with backing from collector and philanthropist Agnes Gund.Plain Dealer file

Oscar, the board president, said MOCA wont start a search for a new director until it completes more work on racial equity with the Atlanta-based consulting firm.

Theres a danger, though, that MOCA could somehow become cautious, afraid to show anything that could offend anyone for any reason. If it loses its courage, it will have lost touch with its roots as a gutsy champion of the new.

Thats a line MOCA will have to learn to walk.

"We are looking to grow and become more transparent, and are grappling with how to use art to explore the tougher questions in life, but also in a way that doesnt cause harm,'' said Cronauer, the director of foundation giving.

Nicole Ledinek, the museums curator of education and engagement, for one, said shes confident that the museum can find a way forward.

"MOCAs essence is still intact,'' she said. It will keep asking people to be thinkers and to take risk and to challenge themselves and to grow.

See the original post here:

MOCA Cleveland to reopen Oct. 1 as it reckons with charges of censorship, racial blind spots - cleveland.com

MOCA Cleveland to reopen Oct. 1 amid fallout from pandemic, accusations of censorship and racial blind spots – cleveland.com

2 / 13

Steven Litt slitt@plaind.com

MOCA Cleveland to reopen Oct. 1 amid fallout from pandemic, accusations of censorship and racial blind spots

Steven Litt | The Plain Dealer The side wall of a 21st-century fallout shelter fashioned at the Museum of Contemporary Art Cleveland by Cleveland artists Kate Sopko and Angela Beallor frames a claustrophobic perspective that leads the eye to a photomural installation by the collective known as acerbic, whose members are Donald Black Jr., Gabriel Gonzalez and Ali McClain. Both installations are part of the museums current Constant as the Sun exhibition, focusing on marginalized communities in the Great Lakes region and Appalachia. Steven Litt | The Plain Dealer Cleveland artist Darius Steward adorned the stairwell at MOCA with a painting of his son sporting a backpack and lighting his way with a flashlight. The image is both a literal depiction and a metaphor for the baggage and challenges facing a black child in Cleveland. Steven Litt | The Plain Dealer For the Museum of Contemporary Art Clevelands Constant as the Sun exhibition, Cleveland artist Liz Maugans coordinated a project in which some 400 Cuyahoga County artists contributed self-portraits for a massive wall. Heres a close-up of two portraits from among many in the wall-filling display. Steven Litt | The Plain Dealer Cleveland artist Liz Maugans coordinated a project in which some 400 Cuyahoga County artists contributed self-portraits for a massive wall display in the current exhibition Constant as the Sun at the Museum of Contemporary Art Cleveland. The portraits map a virtual river of creativity running through the county. Steven Litt | The Plain Dealer A curved metal wall around the revolving front door at the Museum of Art Cleveland reflects hanging constructions made by Detroit artist Tyree Guyton, on view in the Museum of Contemporary Art Clevelands Constant as the Sun exhibition. The wall pieces, which depict clocks made from discarded signs and scraps of wood, evoke everything from American Pop Art of the 1960s to

More:

MOCA Cleveland to reopen Oct. 1 amid fallout from pandemic, accusations of censorship and racial blind spots - cleveland.com

Trumps Partial TikTok And WeChat Ban Tip-Toes Into Chinese-Style Censorship – Forbes

A close-up shows the TikTok sharing application on a smartphone and personal pc on September 14, ... [+] 2020, in Rome, Italy. According to the statement released by Microsoft, the Chinese company ByteDance has refused to sell its US TikTok business to the US technology giant. (Photo Illustration by Andrea Ronchini/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

The Trump administrations enemies list now officially includes two apps. Friday morning, the Commerce Department released details of a partial ban on the TikTok and WeChat apps, fulfilling a Trump pledge August 6 to prevent the Chinese government from collecting and controlling the information of Americans via those Android and iOS programs.

Where the executive orders issued then about the video-clip social network TikTok and the messaging-and-transactions platform WeChat left some mystery about which transactions might be forbidden, Fridays developments make things official and specific.

Starting Sunday, Sept. 20, app stores cannot host these two apps or updates to them. That may itself goose downloads fromApples AAPL App Store and Googles GOOGL Play Store.

I do expect an uptick (no idea how much) in downloads today and tomorrow before the ban starts on Sunday, emailed Adam Blacker, vice president for insights and global alliances at Boston-based app-analytics firm Apptopia.

Internet infrastructure firms also cannot enable these apps via hosting, content-delivery, or efficient-routing deals. And other developers cant include TikTok or WeChat code in their apps.

Those additional provisions apply to WeChat Sunday but dont hit TikTok until Nov. 12, a delay that would let Oracle ORCL complete a still vaguely-defined transaction meant to ordain it as TikToks U.S. partner.

These regulations do not, however, ban you from using either app. Regulations now on the Federal Register for TikTok and WeChat specify that users can still exchange personal or business information in them.

They also dont specify that basic internet routing, such as domain-name-system lookups to connect users to sites, fall under their definitions of internet hosting services.

But the sight of the Trump administration moving even farther to regulate the internet has digital-rights advocates outragedand unsettled by how this resembles Chinas own Great Firewall online.

Were getting there, said Rebecca MacKinnon, director of Ranking Digital Rights initiative, a group hosted by the Washington think tank New America. Her forecast in a call Friday: Welcome to the Great Firewall of America.

MacKinnon, who has spent years decrying Chinas attempts to lock down information, called a government ban on one apps distribution unprecedented in a democratic society.

This certainly isnt the Great Firewall, but I think you could quite reasonably call it the first brick, wrote Julian Sanchez, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, in an email.

While the order doesnt require internet providers to block traffic to these apps, he noted that banning common measures to manage traffic at widely-used apps will make them harder to use.

American content creators are going to lose access to the audiences theyve built up, and American users are going to lose access to speech, both domestic and foreign, on these platforms, he predicted.

The ban of TikTok and WeChat announced today is an extreme measure that fundamentally undermines the foundation of the Internet, said Joseph Lorenzo Hall, senior vice president for a strong internet at the Internet Society, in an emailed statement.

Hall, MacKinnon and Sanchez all questioned the security arguments behind the Trump administrations move.

There are all kinds of ways that you could be taking action to protect American users in a way that does not bring First Amendment concerns, MacKinnon said. For example, passing effective privacy legislation could help curb the widespread collection of data by apps that then gets resold to any willing party.

(The New Yorkers Sue Halpern reported Sunday that the Trump campaign spent $4 million buying mobile data from a broker called Phunware.)

Thats a much larger risk than that posed by TikTok in particular. That appears relatively meek in its info appetites compared to WeChat and its wide range of capabilities.

Sanchez called the administrations security rationales totally unpersuasive handwaving and said it can always ban these apps from government devices if it thinks there are real risks without telling other Americans how to live their digital lives.

MacKinnon wasnt willing to trust these apps that much: I dont use TikTok, I would never put WeChat on my phone for security reasons.

Ranking Digital Rights assessments of how internet and telecom firms protect their users regularly put WeChat developer Tencent near the bottom. There is no evidence of Tencent standing up to the government, she said.

The Internet Societys Hall also noted the direct effects of cutting WeChat and TikTok users off from bug fixes.

This ban is dangerous if only for the security vulnerabilities that will be created for American users, Hall said. Given that apps upgrades and patches will be unavailable from Sunday onwards, this poses significant security concerns.

Since the ban doesnt affect either companys web site, both could also offer direct downloads of their apps to Android users. Google, in distinct contrast to Apples tight control, lets users sideload apps outside of its app storebut going that route risksleaving an Android phone open to malware.

Both the Commerce Departments announcement and the enabling regulations allow for further steps by the administration to police use of these apps.

Worry about that, advised Catos Sanchez: I think theres a good case that what the Commerce Department is ordering already exceeds the limits of statutory authority as well, so I dont think we can be too sure what extraordinary powers this administration might suddenly discover it enjoys.

Here is the original post:

Trumps Partial TikTok And WeChat Ban Tip-Toes Into Chinese-Style Censorship - Forbes

IU TikToker reacts to app ban reversal as concerns of data collection, censorship linger – Indiana Daily Student

A student opens the app TikTok on Sept. 20. The social media platform was scheduled to be removed from app stores Sunday before the order was postponed Saturday when President Trump approved the proposed creation of TikTok Global. Alex Deryn

tienne Najman, IU senior and TikTok creator, breathed a sigh of relief Saturday night after learning the app would no longer be pulled from American app stores.

According to NPR, the social media platform was scheduled to be removed from app stores Sunday before the order was postponed late Saturday night when President Trump approved the proposed creation of TikTok Global. This new, American-based company will include a partnership between Oracle and Walmart, but the deal is still awaiting formal approval from the Trump administration.

Najman downloaded TikTok last September. His original videos featured himself dancing in class, many receiving more than a million views. He is now a verified creator with two million followers.

Najman said he had been considering the possibility of TikTok being banned for several months now, but was not expecting it to be removedfrom app stores considering the size of its American audience.

Sophomore and TikTok user Heather East also did not give the ban much thought when she first heard of it.

I heard about it and I thought Well, its just going to be like Flappy Bird where people keep it on their phone and then sell their phones for money,' East said.

Now that Najman has begun his final year of college, he said TikTok has taken a backseat to other matters related to his job search in the marketing industry. However, he was glad to see the app would be staying after all.

The idea of TikTok being banned has definitely been a hot topic for the past two or three months I want to say, Najman said. The first time I freaked out because all of my following is on TikTok.

Sarah Bauerle Danzman is an IU assistant professor of international studiesand spent the past year as a foreign relations international affairs fellow. She said people should still be mindful of the extent of data collection of TikTok.

TikTok collects a lot more data and a lot more problematic data than even the other worst offenders out there like Instagram or Facebook, Bauerle Danzman said.

Bauerle Danzman said TikTok has collected clipboard data in the past, which includes passwords or credit card information. This data is directly connected with whatever device it is taken from. Bauerle Danzman said there is nothing the user can do to stop this kind of surveillance. She said even though the company promised to improve these practices, this still may not repair the damages.

TikTok says that theyve cleaned up their act, but one of the problems is that because they have a track record of collecting data that theyre not supposed to, theres a lack of trust there, Bauerle Danzman said.

Najman said he recognizes data is being collected from him, but is not particularly worried.

Data is the new thing everyone wants, Najman said. I dont really care, like you can have my location and who I talk to. If you want to blackmail me, thats fine, but Ive accepted it at this point so it doesnt really matter to me.

Bauerle Danzman also addressed concerns of censorship taking place on the platform globally. She said said there are allegations that TikToks algorithm suppresses LGBTQ content.

Najman said he is also suspicious of censorship taking place on the platform as a creator. The process is colloquially referred to on the app as shadowbanning. Najman said his content received a lot of attention until he signed up for the TikTok Creator Fund, which would allow him to earn money from the views his videos received.

Myself and a lot of other people noticed that after they signed up for the creator fund, our numbers dropped, Najman said.

Najman said he even deleted videos that were not performing well. He estimates that many of his videos received less than 100,000 views, which is a steep decline in comparison to his previous videos receiving more than 300,000 views consistently. Since then, Najman has left the creator fund in hopes of recovering his views, but he has yet to see a change in numbers.

Najman also said he would not be surprised if TikTok was censoring content through shadowbans, particularly content related to the LGBTQ community or the Black Lives Matter movement.

Everything is a gray area with TikTok, Najman said. You never know what theyre doing.

Even with its shortcomings, Najman said he considers TikTok to be an important part of college culture and plans on continuing to upload videos as long as he can.

I feel like it definitely is an integral part of life, Najman said. Its kind of like youre left out of a whole part of whats going on if youre not on TikTok.

Like what you're reading? Support independent, award-winning college journalism on this site. Donate here.

Participants shared songs and words for the late Supreme Court justice.

Jacob Gillette, an IU senior, has Common Variable Immune Deficiency.

Plan ahead to vote absentee or in person.

Read more here:

IU TikToker reacts to app ban reversal as concerns of data collection, censorship linger - Indiana Daily Student

Funimation’s Upcoming Physical Release of Azur Lane Anime Will Allegedly Be Heavily Censored – Bounding Into Comics

Funimation has allegedly informed an online retailer that their upcoming physical release of the Azur Lane anime adaptation will feature heavy censorship of the series fanservice-heavy content.

Related: Funimation Censors Mild Butt Pun Joke in Nekopara

Based on the mobile game of the same name, Azur Lane follows two warring factions of shipgirls, best described as a fusion between real-world naval battleships and young women, as they fight against each other for superiority over Earths oceans in the aftermath of an alien invasion.

Related: Azur Lanes Possible Referencing of Hentai Doujin in Design of Latest Character Causes Outrage

In light of the heavy fan service featured in the series, Azur Lane was heavily censored during its original broadcast run on Japanese television, with many scenes obscured by intrusive white lights and clouds:

Related: Funimation Edits Joke To Remove Light Sexual Humor In BOFURI: I Dont Want to Get Hurt, so Ill Max Out My Defense

As with most anime releases, fans recognized that this amount of censorship is typical for a public broadcast and assumed that series would eventually release on home media completely uncensored.

Related: Funimation Drops Interspecies Reviewers After 3 Episodes: This Series Falls Outside of Our Standards

However, in the September 18th edition of its weekly newsletter, longtime online anime retailer Roberts Anime Corner Store informed its customers that Funimation confirmed for us this week that their release of Azur Lane , which they rated 14+ rather than TV-MA, will be censored.

Im not sure what the point of an edited physical release of an Anime is, questioned site owner and founder Robert. But if they think it will help the title get more market penetration by allowing it to be consumed by a younger audience, maybe they should rethink the business they are in.

Related: Love Hina Mangaka Warns About A Future Where Japanese Works Are Regulated By Foreign Standards

If true, this would mean that no official uncensored version of the Azur Lane anime would be available to Western fans.

This would not be the first time Funimation failed to release an uncensored version of a series filled with fanservice, as earlier this year, fans discovered that the companys advertised completely uncut release of Tsugumomo The Complete Series was a re-release of their original heavily censored cut (bafflingly, this was actually the second time Funimation had released the same censored version of Tsugumomo and claimed it was uncut).

As of writing, Funimation has not publicly commented on Azur Lanes supposed censorship.

(Visited 10,767 times, 874 visits today)

Visit link:

Funimation's Upcoming Physical Release of Azur Lane Anime Will Allegedly Be Heavily Censored - Bounding Into Comics

Campbell: Its a QAnon, cancel culture, year of confusion – New Haven Register

Published 1:41pm EDT, Sunday, September 20, 2020

For what its worth, the idea of a so-called cancel culture has a strong history in New England, especially in Connecticut, where the Puritans were slavishly devoted to policing one anothers behavior.

They were so devoted, in fact, that infractions could net punishment that ranged from stocks, pillories, ear removal, branding or whipping, depending on the crime. And in those days, crime was loosely equated as sin. If someone was caught lying, for example, the offender could be fined 10 shillings, or sentenced to three hours in the public pillory, according to a 1915 law journal article. Keep in mind that one did not just spend leisure time in the stocks. Whoever was trapped there was subject to whatever mistreatment passers-by dreamed up.

These past few weeks have seen multiple opportunities for such shaming, though one must remember that accusations of engaging in canceling generally come from people on the right against people on the left. The presidents oldest son recently tweeted #CancelNetflix, over an award-winning French film that, its detractors say, sexualizes young girls, even while in other tweets he lambasts progressives for suggesting they do the same for other entities.

Even a casual student of the First Amendment knows that while we enjoy incredible freedom from government intervention in our speech, we are not protected from peoples reactions to that speech. For instance, in 2014, when the Supreme Court ruled that Hobby Lobby, a for-profit organization that sells crafts items, wasnt required to provide birth control for their employees. Company owners said they had religious objections to birth control, and so in reaction, I took up knitting just so I could boycott Hobby Lobby and buy my yarn elsewhere. This is called market censorship. The same way I will never watch another Woody Allen movie (market censorship), the same way I will go the rest of my life without buying so much as a stitch from the My Pillow guy (market censorship), I am free to let my pocketbook do my talking, as are you.

Thats a fairly benign reaction to pillory worthy behavior, actually. State Sen. Christine Cohens yea vote on Connecticuts recent police accountability bill netted her Madison bagel shop threats of a boycott and worse, she got death threats. Is that cancel culture? Or do we call it something else because it was born of a conservative crowd and their rules are different.

Lately, in no particular order:

Jonathan Hardy, of the gun group Connecticut Citizens Defense League circulated on social media a vulgar, racist meme that targeted a female Democratic state representative. His response when he was called on it? He removed the meme, and said that people were mostly only paying attention because its an election year. His organizations response? Quick distancing from Hardy, but not before a handful of people contacted the IRS questioning the organizations nonprofit status.

Cancel culture? Maybe. Or maybe its market censorship.

And then we have state Sen. Eric C. Berthel, a Republican who represents lovely Connecticut towns such as Oxford and Watertown. A photo of a decal with a QAnon slogan on his car with his legislator license plates began spreading on social media because a QAnon decal on an elected officials car is newsworthy, to put it politely. QAnon is an anti-Semitic conspiracy group loosely organized around the lie that Donald Trump is doing battle with a group of Democratic pedophiles.

The lies dont end there. See if you can name the conspiracy theory not embraced by QAnon:

5G networks are being used to spread COVID-19.

Oregon wildfires were started by liberals.

Cabal members meet in tunnels beneath the country to rape and torture children.

People who drive blue Tauruses are the Devils own minions.

Thats a tough quiz and youre excused if you fail it. The correct wrong answer is the last one. I made that one up, and I apologize in advance to all Taurus owners if that starts circulating as truth.

Sen. Berthel said he doesnt support the groups wild-eyed conspiracy theories, but he said he likes the groups stance against government corruption. The nosebleed one would get from such a leap of logic could be fatal, and I hope hes OK.

The FBI says QAnon is a pack of conspiracy theory-driven domestic extremists. In July, The Forward, formerly The Jewish Daily Forward, asked not if, but how anti-Semitic is QAnon. (Spoiler alert? Any measure of anti-Semitism is not OK.) Vice president Mike Pence recently canceled an appearance at a Montana fundraiser hosted by what appears to be QAnon supporters.

But 2020 is a year of confusion. The Tweeter-in-Chief, no stranger to ridiculous conspiracies, loves him some QAnon mostly because, he says, they like him.

Come to think of it, if youre a Republican party leader, its good strategy to hoist the anti-cancel flag. The partys survival may depend on members remaining loyal, and staying in the party, despite the rising number of COVID-19 deaths. Any thinking Republican has to have considered dropping their party.

Country? Party? Tunnels of pedophiles and 5G conspiracies? As we move closer to Nov. 3, the wild-eyed faithful will be left to play jump ball over the last of the tin foil hats. Maybe they can play against those folks who drive blue Tauruses. My moneys on those guys. Theyre evil.

See original here:

Campbell: Its a QAnon, cancel culture, year of confusion - New Haven Register