Testimony From Craig Wright’s Ex-Wife Throws a Twist in the Billion Dollar Bitcoin Lawsuit – Bitcoin News

Posted on August 8, 2020 by admin

On June 30, a jury trial was scheduled for the notorious Kleiman v. Wright lawsuit on October 13. Now a recent filing from the plaintiffs notes that when Craig Wrights ex-wife Lynn Wright recently testified, she revealed a number of interesting findings.

Lawyers representing the Kleiman estate say her testimony brings the infamous Tulip Trust into question and that it wasnt a blind trust as previously alleged.

In mid-July, news.Bitcoin.com reported on the deposition of Craig Wrights current wife Ramona Watts and her understanding of how bitcoin private keys work. In addition to the testimony from Watts, the court also heard from Craig Wrights ex-wife who asserted that she owned a fraction of the company W&K Info Defense Research.

The firm W&K Info Defense Research is the questionable company that Wright and Dave Kleiman allegedly started years ago.

Wrights ex-wife claims that six years ago, her interest in W&K was forwarded to Craig Wright R&D. The company Craig Wright R&D rebranded into the Tulip Trust and Lynn Wright ostensibly gathered a very small amount of stake in this company last month.

According to a filing submitted by Andrew Brenner from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and Velvel (Devin) Freedman from Roche Cyrulnik Freedman LLP, the testimony argues against the Tulip Trust.

As it turns out, and not surprisingly given the history of this case, Ms. Wrights state court action reveals that everything Dr. Wrights motion for summary judgment said about Ms. Wrights alleged ownership of W&K was a lie, the plaintiffs lawyers wrote.

If her sworn allegations in that state court action are to be believed, Ms.Wright, by her own admission, had no ownership interest in W&K at the time this lawsuit was filed (or at the time of her deposition in this case, or at the time Wrights Motion for Summary Judgment was filed), the attorneys added.

The Kleiman attorneys also said that Ms. Wright swore she transferred 100% of her transferrable interest in W&K to Craig Wright R&D in December 2012. In her testimony, the plaintiffs lawyers allege that Ms. Wright also said that Craig Wright R&D changed its name to the Tulip Trust. On July 10, 2020, Ms. Wright asserted that some of the alleged ownership interest was transferred back to her with one percent interest.

The Kleiman estate says there is no documentation that indicates a transfer and [no] explanation by Ms. Wright why the Tulip Trust suddenly decided to transfer its claimed interest in W&K to her in the last few weeks and after Wright had moved for summary judgment. The attorney Andrew Brenner further stated:

[The] plaintiffs have much more to say on this issue including, but not limited to, how the recent filing by Ms. Wright appears to be yet another scheme by Dr. Wright to defraud plaintiffs and this court.

The filing submitted on Tuesday is a response to Wrights move for a summary judgment his attorneys filed on May 8.

The lawsuit concerns the rightful ownership of the bitcoins that are allegedly held in the Tulip Trust. Although a great number of blockchain experts believe the trust is non-existent, it is alleged there is roughly 1 million BTC in the trust. The Kleiman estate seeks assets that far exceed $5.1 billion according to the original lawsuit filing submitted in 2018.

What do you think about the filing from the Kleiman estate on Tuesday? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, Courtlistener.com,

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Visit link:
Testimony From Craig Wright's Ex-Wife Throws a Twist in the Billion Dollar Bitcoin Lawsuit - Bitcoin News

Forget gold and Bitcoin. I’d listen to Warren Buffett and buy cheap UK shares to get rich – Yahoo Finance UK

Posted on August 8, 2020 by admin

The appeal of UK shares may have deteriorated in recent months in the eyes of many investors. Instead, some now prefer assets such as gold and Bitcoin that have surged higher.

However, the long-term track record of Warren Buffett suggests that buying high-quality businesses when they trade at low prices is a sound means of building a large portfolio in the long run.

With many shares still trading at low prices following the recent market crash, now may be the right time to buy undervalued stocks, rather than gold or Bitcoin.

Despite the rebound experienced by the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 since March, many UK shares trade at prices that are significantly lower than their historic averages. This could create a buying opportunity for long-term investors, since in many cases those businesses have solid balance sheets and long-term recovery potential. This means that they are likely to have sufficient liquidity to survive what could be a challenging period for the economy, and to deliver improving financial performance in the coming years.

Investors such as Warren Buffett have enjoyed considerable success in buying undervalued shares when other investors are flocking to other assets. By focusing on high-quality companies that are likely to flourish in the next economic boom, and buying them at prices that do not fully factor-in their growth potential, it is possible to obtain market-beating returns over a prolonged time period.

Of course, it can take a considerable amount of time for UK shares to experience a sustained recovery from a market crash. Some previous bear markets have taken many years to return to previous all-time highs. Therefore, some investors may feel that buying Bitcoin and gold in the meantime, and potentially benefiting from a continuation of recent upward trends, is a sound move.

The problem with that strategy is that a stock market recovery is not obvious until after it has occurred. Therefore, investors may end up purchasing stocks when they are trading at less attractive prices after a recovery has begun. Timing the market is notoriously difficult, which means that a better option could be to identify high-quality businesses with sound fundamentals now, and buy them for the long term. In doing so, you are likely to benefit greatly from the next bull market.

Furthermore, UK shares may offer a more favourable risk/reward opportunity than gold or Bitcoin. Golds price has reached a new record high, while Bitcoins lack of fundamentals means that it is impossible to accurately value the virtual currency. As such, following Warren Buffetts time-tested and successful strategy through purchasing undervalued businesses and holding them for the long run could be a superior means of increasing the value of your portfolio in the coming years.

The post Forget gold and Bitcoin. Id listen to Warren Buffett and buy cheap UK shares to get rich appeared first on The Motley Fool UK.

Twitter censors all links to BitChute – Reclaim The Net

Posted on August 8, 2020 by admin

BitChute, a video hosting platform that is seen as an alternative to YouTubes ever-more stifling moderating and censorship policies, has over the past five months experienced quite a growth.

According to a tweet from the network, its monthly traffic figures doubled in that time from 15 to 30 million visitors.

And while those behind the platform are still allowed to share this information about their business on Twitter as of today anybody essentially engaging in further growing of that user base is now actively sabotaged on Jack Dorseys network.

Double your web browsing speed with today's sponsor. Get Brave.

It appears, another tweet from BitChute said on Friday, that Twitter had started blocking all tweets that contain Bitchute videos.

The message thread further appealed to users to report what the situation looked like on their end, and advised them to counter any attempts at authoritarianism on the web by making sure they bookmark the BitChute website or set it as their browsers homepage.

In response to BitChutes call to users to help out and share their current usage status when it comes to trying to posts tweets with links to the platform, many said Twitter had blocked these, providing only the generic explanation that the content was potentially harmful and that Twitter came to this conclusion either on its own, or thanks to third-party partners i.e., likely one of the notoriously tone-deaf or just plain wrong fact checking contractors.

According to many users from around the world, they are indeed facing obstacles in posting links to BitChute-hosted content both old, and new. Twitter is yet to officially respond to any of this, which might easily be construed as an example of potentially blatant censorship.

At a time when YouTubes censorship is causing many to look for alternatives, not being able to share those alternatives on current social networks could prove to be a problem and could help slow down getting the word out.

And while Twitter itself appears to be in censorship overdrive in recent times, blocking links to entire alternative platforms is a brazen step for the increasingly brazen company.

See more here:

Twitter censors all links to BitChute - Reclaim The Net

Certification and Censorship in OTT platforms – Legal Desire News Network

Posted on August 8, 2020 by admin

An entrepreneur searches for change, responds to the change and exploits opportunities. Innovation is a very specific tool of an entrepreneur hence an effective entrepreneur converts a source into a resource.

-PETER DRUCKER

INTRODUCTION

An OTT or Over The Top media service is a direct streaming service, which basically delivers audio and video streaming content through the internet without subscribing to a traditional satellite services provider. There are three types of OTT Communications, Video content, and Application ecosystem. Two broad categories of OTT services are communication and non-communication. Some of the most popular OTT video streaming video platforms include Hotstar, Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Hulu, Zee5, Voot etc. and audio streaming services include apple music, Spotify etc.

HISTORY AND GROWTH OF OTT IN INDIA

It is known to everyone that the primary source of entertainment in the Indian household was the Television. The entire familys recreation was based on Television and which was restricted to either daily soaps, sports or news. But the scenario has changed to a very large extent and the digital content is growing in the country. In the last few months, there has been a paradigm shift in the OTT market resulting in changes in daily entertainment consumption pattern in India. The popularity of OTT platforms is not only restricted to urban areas but has become very popular in the rural areas as well.

The first dependent Indian OTT platform was Bigflix which was launched in 2008 by Reliance entertainment. In India, significant momentum was gained by OTT when Ditto TV and Sony Liv were launched in the Indian market around 2013. Hotstar, owned by Star India is the most subscribed to OTT platform in India, as of July 2020 with around 300 million active users and over 350 million downloads. The Indian OTT space is populated by many players. In 2018, the OTT was valued at 21.5B. The video OTT revenue in India was 2,019 Cr. in 2017. It is expected to reach 5,955 Cr. by 2022. It is also reported that the Indian OTT market will soon outperform the global OTT market and will probably be ranked among the top 10 by 2022.

The factors that have helped in this growth and success of OTT platforms are pricing of these platforms and internet access to people, even staying in rural and remote areas. These factors have helped a lot in the popularity of the OTT platforms.

Although the negative repercussions going on because of the ongoing lock down amid the corona virus pandemic cannot be ignored but it has been a blessing in disguise for some. OTT platforms have benefited a lot from the current situation going on in India. There has been a surge of 80% in the subscriber bases of OTT platforms amid the lock down.

REGULATIONS APPLICABLE ON OTT PLATFORMS

The rapid growth of OTT services has raised a number of national policy issues relating to regulatory imbalances and security concerns that need to be addressed. The regulatory imbalances need examination at various levels by the government. The OTT operators are adopting voluntary codes of self-regulation with respect to the content shown on their platforms. Code of best practices was signed by some of the famous OTT platforms in the country namely Hotstar, Netflix, ALT Balaji along with other in the year 2019. The major objective of this code is to empower consumers to make informed choices on age appropriate content and also protect the consumers interests in choosing and accessing the content they like as per their own time and convenience.

It is known to everyone that films in the country are required to follow certain certification rules and television programs broadcasters must adhere to the Program and Advertising code, on the other hand the producers of web series, films and other various content released only online or on digital platforms are free from the struggle of censorship or any code, which are subject to provisions of Information Technology Act, 2000 since a very long time. This was confirmed by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting when a query was filed under RTI Act, 2005 where it was confirmed that the Central Board of Film Certification has no control over online content but solely certifies movies for theatrical release.

CONTENT BASED REGULATION

According to sections 67A, 67B, and 67C of IT Act provides a penalty and imprisonment for publishing or transmitting obscene material, sexually explicit material or material showing children in sexually explicit acts, in electronic form. The Central Government has the power to issue directions to block public access of any information, if found objectionable as per section 69A of the IT Act. It was also seen in 2015, when the Department of Telecommunications directed intermediaries to disable around 800 websites containing pornographic material, however it was later clarified that only websites having child pornographic content is to be disabled by the intermediaries and not the others. The framework and provisions under the Intermediary Guidelines which were laid by the Department of Electronics and Information Technology to observe the information hosted on any computer of intermediary is also applicable on OTT platforms, which qualifies as intermediaries under the IT Act.

Furthermore, the provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 are also applicable to the OTT platforms. For example, OTT platforms are subject to section 295A of the IPC which criminalizes deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings.

Recently, there also have been suggestions to include online content explicitly within the ambit of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 to prohibit the indecent representation of women in various books, films, advertisements etc.

NEED TO REGULATE OTT PLATFORM

Until present time, it generally appears that online content is unbridled and the creators of the content are exercising their liberties to the fullest. However, it is not correct to conclude that the OTT platforms are free from censorship or absolutely unregulated just because there is no set of rules and guidelines to focus upon the manner of censorship or certification of the online content or certain rules highlighting the dos and donts for the creators of online content.

A Consultation paper was published by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) on November 2018 to regulate framework for OTT platforms in the country. The Consultation paper mainly focussed on the analysis of the growth of OTT platforms, to keep a check on the relationship between TSP and OTT players and also to maintain a rigid framework to be followed to regulate OTT platforms. This Consultation paper was considered important because of imbalances between TSP and OTT service providers, especially when the use of OTT platforms took a surge and its popularity increased to a very great extent.

SOCIOLOGICAL FACTORS AFFECTING CONTENT REGULATION ON INTERNET MEDIUMS

The arrival of Web 2.0 has revolutionized India in many ways. The reception of information through the digital medium has expanded manifold in recent years. The Internet is seen as a new liberation force driving ideas, thoughts and content across border and societies. It has led to the emergence of new actors and allowed consumers to be charge of selecting the content they want to receive and view. The internet has revolutionized the means of communication and exchange of information. It has brought to the forefront a new medium of expression.

User-generated content has proliferated across online video portals. Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) and OTT services fundamentally changed the broadcasting sector. The Internet has brought about a new wave of content, providing consumers with the freedom to choose the time and space for the reception of the content. Video streaming services create a more engaging environment. But the shift from cable television to OTT services has forced regulators to think about the patterns of regulation that most fit this new form of broadcasting.

OTT services do not have one universally accepted definition. The Internet Telecommunication Union (ITU) defines OTT service as an internet application that may substitute or supplement traditional telecommunication services, from voice calls and text messaging to video and broadcast services. The Indian communications regulator, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), also borrows the same definition as mentioned above.

The Indian government and other regulatory bodies have not tried to adjust policies to the change in technologies. The debate in India about digital content regulation has varied between calls for state censorship and self-regulation. The dilemma that authorities have been faced with is whether to subject the OTT media platforms to broadcast or films policies or to include it in the larger internet regulation frameworks.

RECENT ISSUES AND REGULATIONS ON OTT PLATFORMS

Recently, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal asked the entertainment industry to self regulate their programmes on OTT platforms as they portray India poorly. His statement is significant, the reason being that the governments proposal of an institutional self-regulatory model, just like conventional media, which was rejected by most of the OTT platforms.

The Information and Broadcasting (I&B) Ministry has just recently proposed bringing under its purview the contents being streamed on the several OTT platforms as said by a top official of the ministry. It was said that the regulation regimes have developed a lot but popular platform like OTT is unregulated by such regime and also has no regulations over it. Since the usage of OTT platforms have witnessed a huge increase in their subscription amid the lock-down, therefore it important for them to be regulated under the regimes.

Apart from this, last year, Chief Minister of Bihar, Nitish Kumar, wrote a letter to the Prime Minister stating that the OTT platforms are responsible for the spike in violence and crimes against women and children, therefore the content should be censored. In his letter, he also suggested an amendment to the Cinematography Act of 1952 which does not clearly define public exhibition of films and whether certificate is needed for private browsing.

CONCLUSION

The need of a proper framework of rules and regulations is very important for the OTT platforms at this time, keeping in mind the increasing popularity of these platforms. The display of obscene or sexual explicit material on these platforms might create a bad influence on the young minds, therefore regulation is necessary. With the surge in the subscription base of these platforms, other industry players and stake holders might have a clash with the OTT platforms and thus to keep that in check a proper and effective framework of rules and guidelines should be made for these platforms.

Read the original post:

Certification and Censorship in OTT platforms - Legal Desire News Network

The daily gossip: Cardi B claims YouTube forced her and Megan Thee Stallion to censor ‘WAP,’ Lady Gaga admits to wounding Ariana Grande, and more -…

Posted on August 8, 2020 by admin

On Friday, Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion dropped their new track, "WAP," along with an accompanying steamy music video. "WAP," it turns out, is an extremely explicit acronym, and the lyrics on the track are just as R-rated. "The song was so nasty that YouTube was like, 'Hold on, wait a minute, that song might be too goddamn nasty,'" Cardi B explained on Instagram, revealing the duo was forced to censor their music video. The song is getting raves "I mean, just look at the single cover. It literally screams, 'platinum-selling single that your fave could never do,'" wrote Glamour but fans are less sure about Kylie Jenner's surprise cameo in the video. Watch the (censored) video here, and listen to the uncensored track here. [Glamour, PopBuzz]

You might qualify for hazard pay if you work with Lady Gaga! The 34-year-old singer revealed in an Instagram post that she accidentally managed to scratch the eye of Ariana Grande, 27, while the pair were rehearsing their choreography for the music video for "Rain On Me." In the clip, Gaga tells a friend, "Richard, I shanked her with my nail by accident, dancing," while Grande joked, "Lady Gaga scratched my eye. It's an honor. I hope it scars." Gaga, though, wasn't amused. "Which I'm not going to let you do, so stop," Gaga shot back, fetching Neosporin. The pair briefly wrestled while Gaga attempted to apply the ointment. "You have a scratch on your face!" Gaga scolded. "You can't get infected before the video!" [People]

Bachelor Nation has been in a tizzy about former Bachelorette Becca Kufrin seemingly tip-toeing around whether she and Garrett Yrigoyen broke up after he vocally supported the police following the killing of George Floyd. The plot has now thickened: E! News reported Thursday that according to an anonymous source, the couple have officially split because "their lifestyles don't mesh anymore." But Kufrin wasn't standing for the gossip. "Lol, interesting 'source,'" she slammed E! on Instagram. "I mean if nothing else, the least you could do is spell the names correctly and consistently in your article." Still, that's also not a denial? [Cosmopolitan, E! News]

Story continues

TikTok star (and singer) Jason Derulo is not happy about President Trump's plan to shut down the app in 45 days. Derulo told Page Six that losing TikTok would be "a sad day for a lot of people, including myself. I just have a lot of fun on the app, so it would be pretty sad, but I don't think it's going to happen." Derulo, who has 30 million followers and posts everything from pranks to shirtless dancing, added that he isn't worried about TikTok potentially sharing data with the Chinese government: "I think a lot of people tap our phones, so you're damned if you do, you're damned if you don't," he said. [Page Six, BuzzFeed News]

There was drama in the makeup world this week after Alicia Keys announced she's teaming up with E.L.F. cosmetics to release a beauty collection. Keys famously doesn't wear makeup, which ruffled the feathers of popular YouTubers Manny MUA and James Charles. "Does anyone else get slightly irritated when celebs come out with entire makeup lines? Especially when those celebs don't even wear makeup," wrote Manny, while Charles echoed a similar sentiment. Both Manny and Charles subsequently realized that Keys isn't releasing a makeup line but a skincare line and issued apologies to the singer. "It's childish to indirect tweet someone & I am not the gatekeeper of makeup," Charles wrote, agreeing "literally who BETTER to talk about keeping your skin clear without makeup" than Keys. [Dlisted, Cosmopolitan UK]

More stories from theweek.comTrump's latest fundraising attempt is reportedly a Facebook scam against his own supportersBiden campaign reportedly making 'ruthless cuts' to convention speaking listThe case against American truck bloat

The daily gossip: Cardi B claims YouTube forced her and Megan Thee Stallion to censor 'WAP,' Lady Gaga admits to wounding Ariana Grande, and more -...

Five Promising Cryptocurrency… – Coinspeaker

Posted on August 8, 2020 by admin

If you are one of these traders who are looking for crypto exchanges, this article is for you.

The cryptocurrency market is having the best time of the year. Bitcoin keeps going higher, and many smaller-cap altcoins have been doing very well as well. Analysts predict that crypto exchanges and Bitcoin are ready for massive growth, and things start to get real this year due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Yes, there are not many industries that can grow during the time of the pandemic. When the mainstream economy looks worse as time goes by, the cryptocurrency space has been growing slowly but surely. After crypto big drop back in early March, things started to recover since then. In fact, BTC price has recently been doing better than before the infamous March drop.

Following the Bitcoin price, many altcoins are also enjoying the time of their life. Many crypto traders now start to look for alternative crypto exchanges to get a better deal out of their pockets. We have more Bitcoins coming into crypto exchanges more than coming out of them.

So, if you are one of these traders who are looking for crypto exchanges, you might want to read this article further. Here are the five most promising cryptocurrency exchanges in the world right now.

WhiteBIT is one of the most promising crypto exchanges right now. It offers fiat-to-crypto with Euro (EUR), Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH), Russian Ruble (RUB), and Turkish Lira (TL) coming soon. It also offers a full-fledged derivatives trading market with 5x leverage (they plan to expand the maximum leverage to 15x in the near future). Its rare to see a crypto exchange that offers a full-fledged derivatives market while still allowing fiat-to-crypto at the same time.

Whats even better is that their crypto withdrawal only takes minutes to process even though they store 95% of all crypto assets in cold wallets. They care about their users security while still honoring withdrawal requests as fast as possible. As of now, WhiteBIT has over 180,000 users, around 35,000 of which are trading actively every day.

Level01 is a P2P exchange that is working on decentralizing the vast derivatives market. The platform allows users to trade in a fair and secure environment using its revolutionary artificial intelligence algorithm known as FairSense.

The algorithm helps users trade like professionals by estimating the actual market value for the contracts they seek to trade and providing them with real-time fair price value for all that are participating in the asset market. The exchange allows for quick trade executions that are settled by smart contracts using a hybrid trading engine that matches trades on cloud serves. Users can trade derivatives and options in Forex, digital currencies, stocks, commodities, and indices on the platform.

Users need a Tradeline within the level01 app, which allows them to add assets from their private wallets into the platform to fund trades. Currently, the app accepts ETH, stablecoins USDT, TUSD, DAI, and its native token LVX. The token is now on offer on Digifinex with a USDT pairing (LVX-USDT), with a BTC pairing coming soon. LVX was added on CoinMarketCap.com last month and has been one of the best performers with an ROI of 68% since publication on CMC.

Nominex is a fast-growing crypto exchange that allows users to buy and sell cryptocurrencies with minimal risk. Registration on the platform is quite simple, and the platform requires no KYC to trade up to 3 BTC. On the exchange, users can buy crypto using credit cards with fast deposits and withdrawals. The platform stores 99% of all funds using multisig cold wallets, and users can set two-factor authentications to secure their accounts.

Also, users have access to advanced order types and can trade 13 coins with 31 pairings. The platform charges low commissions with 0.02% for limitless trading, 0.01% for market makers, and offers discount cards for active traders. There is also an excellent referral program with eight types of bonuses for users. To make trading more fun, the platform features daily contests using demo accounts where winners can be awarded up to 1000 USDT as a prize. The exchange also has a native token NMX that acts as a utility token on the platform.

Another promising exchange is FTX. It offers up to 101x leverage, and it has many creative tokens that are not available elsewhere. FTX was the first exchange that offered 3x BTC BULL, 3x BTC BEAR, 3x ETH BULL, and 3x ETH BEAR tokens which means that your profit or loss could potentially go as high as 3x of normal spot trading. And as you can see from the name, 3x BEAR means that you would make a profit when the price of BTC or ETH goes down. 3x BULL means you would make a profit when the price goes up.

Unlike normal futures markets, you wouldnt have to worry about margin, interests, and all the other confusing terms with these leveraged tokens. Basically, FTX allows you to get exposed to leveraged trading without any technical knowledge. Besides leveraged tokens, FTX also offers standard derivatives platform, index, and even hashrate futures.

Another very promising crypto exchange is Digitex Futures. It is a derivatives platform with a strong user base. The Initial Coin Offering (ICO) of DGTX token was launched in January 2018 to fund the development of Digitex Futures. However, the development itself took more than 2 years to complete. Digitex Futures already has plenty of fans and loyal users, even before they officially launch.

The main strength of Digitex Futures is its zero-fee trading commission policy. Unlike other derivatives platforms where you have to pay hefty fees for every transaction, Digitex Futures does not take any commission from your transaction. If you are a scalper or high-frequency trader, you might want to take a look at it. The exchange itself makes money by selling DGTX tokens from their treasury account.

Andrey Sergeenkov is a digital entrepreneur with more than 10 years of experience. Assisted in raising of 90 mln USD investments for more than 150 crypto projects. He believes that actual usefulness is the best PR for any project.

You have successfully joined our subscriber list.

Visit link:
Five Promising Cryptocurrency... - Coinspeaker

Supreme Court placed its thumb on Idaho’s side of the scale – Lewiston Morning Tribune

Posted on August 8, 2020 by admin

Appellate court decisions result in winners and losers in any specific case, but the issues involved often are worked through murky gray areas. Consider for example the July 30 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Little v. Reclaim Idaho.

The background is fairly well known in Idaho. The group Reclaim Idaho has been trying to promote an Invest in Idaho tax and schools initiative for the November election ballot. When the pandemic hit and Gov. Brad Littles stay at home order was issued, its petition-gathering which in the normal process has to be done face to face was blocked, which meant a part of Idahos election process also was blocked.

That point, essentially an argument over voting civil rights, went to federal court. Idaho U.S. District Judge B. Lynn Winmill ordered that the state either simply place the proposed initiative on the ballot or allow the group to collect the signatures electronically. The state appealed, and the case with startling speed went to the U.S. Supreme Court. On a 4-2 decision, the court sided with the state, ordering a stay of the Winmill decision.

The Supreme Court, as often happens, didnt go to the center of the issue the voters-rights matter and it did not specifically reverse the Winmill decision, though it may have felt that way. But whats there is worth considering.

First, the majority decision (written by Chief Justice John Roberts) pointed out that, oddly enough, different federal courts have established different guidelines for what states can and cant do in initiative procedures (one reason the high court might have granted certiorari permission to bring this case to it). It said: The States depend on clear and administrable guidelines from the courts. Yet the Circuits diverge in fundamental respects when presented with challenges to the sort of state laws at issue here. According to the Sixth and Ninth Circuits, the First Amendment requires scrutiny of the interests of the State whenever a neutral, procedural regulation inhibits a persons ability to place an initiative on the ballot. ... Other Circuits, by contrast, have held that regulations that may make the initiative process more challenging do not implicate the First Amendment so long as the State does not restrict political discussion or petition circulation.

The Supreme Court didnt really land on this turf in its Idaho decision, but the majority did focus on the right of the state more than the right of the initiative proponent: The District Court did not accord sufficient weight to the States discretionary judgments about how to prioritize limited state resources across the election system as a whole.

Thats not an unreasonable point, but it leaves a massive gap in how to review something like this. In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor zeroed in on balancing harms to stay applicant against harms to respondent in other words, balancing the interests of the state and the initiative backers, rather than simply disregarding the interests of the backers. She acknowledged that allowing the electronic signature would be a burden on the state and counties and it would be but she argued it should be considered in context.

Putting a still finer point on it: The stay granted today puts a halt to their signature-collection efforts, meaning that even if respondents ultimately prevail on appeal, it will be extremely difficult, if not impossible, for them to collect enough qualifying signatures by any reasonable deadline for the November ballot. In other words, the delay occasioned by this Courts stay likely dooms to mootness respondents First Amendment claims before any appellate court has had the chance to consider their merits (and, indeed, before this Court has had the chance to consider any potential petition for certiorari).

So in balancing the rights of a state government against those of its voters, the Supreme Courts majority seems to be putting its thumb on the states side of the scale. That may be worth giving some careful thought when you look, as historically we long have, to the nations highest court as a protector of the rights of the American people.

View original post here:

Supreme Court placed its thumb on Idaho's side of the scale - Lewiston Morning Tribune

Comprehensive Analysis on Endpoint Encryption Software Market based on types and application – The Daily Chronicle

Posted on August 8, 2020 by admin

The Endpoint Encryption Software market study Added by Market Study Report, LLC, provides an in-depth analysis pertaining to potential drivers fueling this industry. The study also encompasses valuable insights about profitability prospects, market size, growth dynamics, and revenue estimation of the business vertical. The study further draws attention to the competitive backdrop of renowned market contenders including their product offerings and business strategies.

The recent report on Endpoint Encryption Software market is an in-depth documentation of various dynamics at play in the industry space. As per the report, Endpoint Encryption Software market is poised to amass substantial revenues while growing with a y-o-y growth rate of XX% over the forecast period.

Request a sample Report of Endpoint Encryption Software Market at:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/request-a-sample/2829607?utm_source=thedailychronicle.in&utm_medium=Ram

Insights pertaining to growth drivers, challenges, restraints, and opportunities prevailing in the industry sphere are detailed in the report, alongside their impact on the overall market size. The report further analyzes the market based on different segmentations and highlights the aftermath of COVID-19 pandemic on the industry sphere.

Unveiling the topographical frame of Endpoint Encryption Software market:

Report Objectives:

Ask for Discount on Endpoint Encryption Software Market Report at:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/check-for-discount/2829607?utm_source=thedailychronicle.in&utm_medium=Ram

Other takeaways from Endpoint Encryption Software market report:

TOC of Endpoint Encryption Software Market Report Includes:

For More Details On this Report: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-endpoint-encryption-software-market-2020-by-company-regions-type-and-application-forecast-to-2025

Excerpt from:
Comprehensive Analysis on Endpoint Encryption Software Market based on types and application - The Daily Chronicle

Exploring the reaches of the First Amendment | News, Sports, Jobs – Williamsport Sun-Gazette

Posted on August 8, 2020 by admin

Should the First Amendment really permit neo-Nazis to come to Williamsport and yell through a bullhorn F*** your n***** mayor? When I heard the words replayed on a Facebook post, I was more livid than if I read it in a magazine or newspaper. I had difficulty sleeping that night to appreciate that psychopaths abusing the First Amendment can be tolerated. Is such conduct speech at all? The devout purpose of the neo-Nazis who came to Williamsport on July 18 was to evoke violence, while carrying their AK-47s, so as to create another Charlottesville situation. We knew they would be armed because it is contained in their e-mails to City Hall revealed as a result of a Right-to-Know request.

Is there any limit to the First Amendment? The neo-Nazis who came to Williamsport were denied a permit and theoretically could have been arrested on the spot. The mayor correctly thought that protection from COVID-19 was more important at this juncture than the right of crazy people to scream unacceptable vulgar epithets at other people.

The neo-Nazis not only created a clear and present danger but violated Pennsylvanias laws on gathering as a militia, something outlawed when the National Guard was created.

All of the legal developments that we are now witnessing presage the question as to how far the First Amendment can go to protect religious and speech rights and whether there are any discernable limits.

The First Amendment has been turned into a sword as well as a shield in modern times. Three recent court opinions, albeit very different in certain respects, demonstrate the vitality that still defines the scope of First Amendment protections. The First Amendment, as most people fully appreciate, generally addresses religion and speech.

Our Lady of Guadalupe School vs. Morrissey-Berru, (July 8, 2020) written by Justice Alito required the court to determine whether the First Amendment permits courts to intervene in employment disputes involving teachers at religious schools who are entrusted with the responsibility of instructing their students in the faith of the school where they work.

The religious education and formation of students is the reason for the existence of most private religious schools. Some private religious schools are just a form of prep school. However, most religious schools select and supervise teachers who are consistent with the religious mission of the institution. Judicial review of the way in which religious schools discharge those responsibilities, wrote the court, would undermine the independence of religious institutions in a way that the First Amendment does not tolerate.

The same day as Our Lady of Guadalupe School, Justice Thomas wrote the opinion in Little Sisters of the Poor vs. Pennsylvania, (July 8, 2020). The question in Little Sisters was whether the government created lawful exceptions from a regulatory requirement implementing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2020 (ACA), 124 Stat. 119. Certain employers are required to provide contraceptive coverage for their employees through group health plans. Although contraceptive coverage is not required or addressed in the Affordable Care Act provision reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court, the government mandated such coverage by promulgating interim final rules shortly after the ACAs passage. This is known as the contraceptive mandate.

The U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the Department lacked statutory authority to promulgate these exceptions. The U.S. Supreme Court held this was erroneous. The departments had the authority to provide exceptions from the regulatory contraceptive requirements from employers with religious and conscientious objections. The 3rd Circuit was therefore reversed.

Another important First Amendment religious freedom case is Espinoza vs. Montana Department of Revenue, (June 30, 2020), written by Chief Justice Roberts. The Montana Legislature established a program to provide tuition assistance to parents who send their children to private schools. The program grants a tax credit to anyone who donates to certain organizations that in turn award scholarships to selected students attending such schools. When petitioners sought to use the scholarships at a religious school, the Montana Supreme Court struck down the program. The court relied on the no-aid provision of the state constitution, which prohibits any aid to a school controlled by a church, sect, or denomination. The question was whether the Free Exercise Clause of the U.S. Constitution barred the application of the no-aid provision.

The provision, said the U.S. Supreme, was said to burden not only religious schools but also families whose children attend or hope to attend them. The court noted that it had previously recognized the rights of parents to direct the religious upbringing of their children.

The decision in B.L. vs. Mahanoy Area School District, (June 30, 2020), is a bit more difficult to appreciate. The decision by the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals concerned a woman who did not make her high school varsity cheerleading team. In a weekend away from school, the student posted a picture of herself with the caption F*** Cheer to Snapchat. She was suspended from the junior varsity team for a year and sued her school in federal court. The District Court granted summary judgment in B.L.s favor, ruling that the school had violated her First Amendment rights. The 3rd Circuit Court agrees and affirmed that the suspension represented a violation of the students First Amendment rights.

The 3rd Circuit Court easily found that the snap fell outside the school context. This is not a case in which the relevant speech took place in a school-sponsored forum, Fraser, 478 U.S. at 677. Nor is this a case in which the school owns or operates an online platform. Instead, B.L. created the snap away from campus, over the weekend, and without school resources, and she shared it on a social media platform unaffiliated with the school. While the snap mentioned the school and reached 16 MAHS students and officials, J.S. and Layshock claim that those few points of contact are not enough. B.L.s snap, therefore, took place off campus.

Most citizens would find it difficult to understand how a student could post vulgarities on social media and not pay any consequence for it.

Cliff Rieders is a board-certified trial advocate in Williamsport.

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

Read the original here:

Exploring the reaches of the First Amendment | News, Sports, Jobs - Williamsport Sun-Gazette

Snowden Hit With Discovery Sanction Over Tell-All Book – Law360

Posted on August 7, 2020 by admin

Law360 (August 7, 2020, 10:05 PM EDT) -- Former U.S. intelligence contractor Edward Snowden was sanctioned in Virginia federal court on Friday for his deliberate "wholesale refusal to respond to discovery" related to his memoir released in September, which the court said contained classified information.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan's 13-page order in favor of the government came after prosecutors complained that Snowden defied their requests for information, including payments he received for the book, "Permanent Record." He was also asked to cough up notes or outlines prepared in conjunction with his paid speaking engagements and any intelligence-related materials he discussed, used or displayed during the course of...

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know whats happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Visit link:
Snowden Hit With Discovery Sanction Over Tell-All Book - Law360