Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market 2020 Size, Share Metrics, Growth Trends and Forecast to 2026 – Food & Beverage Herald

New Jersey, United States, Verified Market Research indicates that the Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market is expected to surge at a steady rate in the coming years, as economies flourish. The research report, titled [Global Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market Research Report 2020], provides a comprehensive review of the global market. Analysts have identified the key drivers and restraints in the overall market. They have studied the historical milestones achieved by the Global Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market and emerging trends. A comparison of the two has enabled the analysts to draw a potential trajectory of the Global Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market for the forecast period.

Global Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market was valued at USD 0.11 Billion in 2017 and is projected to reach USD 1.8 Billion by 2025, growing at a CAGR of 45.3% from 2018 to 2025.

Request a Sample Copy of this report @https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/download-sample/?rid=3543&utm_source=FHN&utm_medium=005

Top 10 Companies in the Global Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market Research Report:

Global Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market: Competitive Landscape

Competitive landscape of a market explains strategies incorporated by key players of the market. Key developments and shift in management in the recent years by players has been explained through company profiling. This helps readers to understand the trends that will accelerate the growth of market. It also includes investment strategies, marketing strategies, and product development plans adopted by major players of the market. The market forecast will help readers make better investments.

Global Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market: Drivers and Restrains

This section of the report discusses various drivers and restrains that have shaped the global market. The detailed study of numerous drivers of the market enable readers to get a clear perspective of the market, which includes market environment, government policies, product innovations, breakthroughs, and market risks.

The research report also points out the myriad opportunities, challenges, and market barriers present in the Global Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market. The comprehensive nature of the information will help the reader determine and plan strategies to benefit from. Restrains, challenges, and market barriers also help the reader to understand how the company can prevent itself from facing downfall.

Global Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market: Segment Analysis

This section of the report includes segmentation such as application, product type, and end user. These segmentations aid in determining parts of market that will progress more than others. The segmentation analysis provides information about the key elements that are thriving the specific segments better than others. It helps readers to understand strategies to make sound investments. The Global Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market is segmented on the basis of product type, applications, and its end users.

Global Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market: Regional Analysis

This part of the report includes detailed information of the market in different regions. Each region offers different scope to the market as each region has different government policy and other factors. The regions included in the report are North America, South America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Middle East. Information about different region helps the reader to understand global market better.

Ask for Discount @https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/ask-for-discount/?rid=3543&utm_source=FHN&utm_medium=005

Table of Content

1 Introduction of Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market

1.1 Overview of the Market 1.2 Scope of Report 1.3 Assumptions

2 Executive Summary

3 Research Methodology of Verified Market Research

3.1 Data Mining 3.2 Validation 3.3 Primary Interviews 3.4 List of Data Sources

4 Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market Outlook

4.1 Overview 4.2 Market Dynamics 4.2.1 Drivers 4.2.2 Restraints 4.2.3 Opportunities 4.3 Porters Five Force Model 4.4 Value Chain Analysis

5 Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market, By Deployment Model

5.1 Overview

6 Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market, By Solution

6.1 Overview

7 Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market, By Vertical

7.1 Overview

8 Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market, By Geography

8.1 Overview 8.2 North America 8.2.1 U.S. 8.2.2 Canada 8.2.3 Mexico 8.3 Europe 8.3.1 Germany 8.3.2 U.K. 8.3.3 France 8.3.4 Rest of Europe 8.4 Asia Pacific 8.4.1 China 8.4.2 Japan 8.4.3 India 8.4.4 Rest of Asia Pacific 8.5 Rest of the World 8.5.1 Latin America 8.5.2 Middle East

9 Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market Competitive Landscape

9.1 Overview 9.2 Company Market Ranking 9.3 Key Development Strategies

10 Company Profiles

10.1.1 Overview 10.1.2 Financial Performance 10.1.3 Product Outlook 10.1.4 Key Developments

11 Appendix

11.1 Related Research

Request Customization of Report @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/global-artificial-intelligence-in-aviation-market-size-and-forecast-to-2025/?utm_source=FHN&utm_medium=005

Highlights of Report

About Us:

Verified market research partners with clients to provide insight into strategic and growth analytics; data that help achieve business goals and targets. Our core values include trust, integrity, and authenticity for our clients.

Analysts with high expertise in data gathering and governance utilize industry techniques to collate and examine data at all stages. Our analysts are trained to combine modern data collection techniques, superior research methodology, subject expertise and years of collective experience to produce informative and accurate research reports.

Contact Us:

Mr. Edwyne Fernandes Call: +1 (650) 781 4080 Email: [emailprotected]

This post was originally published on Food and Beverage Herald

Read more:
Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Market 2020 Size, Share Metrics, Growth Trends and Forecast to 2026 - Food & Beverage Herald

With support from Guardian readers, we can make the 2020s the decade of hope – The Guardian

If a week is a long time in politics, then the past decade has been a lifetime in the media world literally in some cases.

The 2010s will be remembered for many things: protest, austerity, populism, mass migration, Brexit. But perhaps one of the most dangerous developments in this most difficult of decades has been the revolution in the way we produce, share and disseminate information.

Our media how it is produced, financed and distributed has been turned upside down. And as we enter the 2020s, the implications of this are clear for all to see: competing versions of the truth; liars and confabulators winning high office across the world; polarisation and antagonism; deep fakes, rumours, confusion; the evaporation of trust.

Ten years ago, the traditional media ecosystem was still just about intact. Several rapid technological developments atomised it. The proliferation of smartphones ate away at the print model we had always used, and many newspapers local and national were forced to shut up shop. People stopped paying for news. Meanwhile, the seemingly unstoppable rise of social media produced rival platforms that would quickly suck advertising billions away from news providers.

The resultant financial penury meant many titles turned to billionaires, sheikhs or oligarchs for a lifeline. Social medias growing power also meant that those with resources and reach could shape their own message, however dishonest, rather than rely on traditional media as a channel.

It was this perfect storm that you, our growing community of 1 million-plus supporters, helped us weather. We saw that factual, honest reporting had never been so in jeopardy, or so essential. We knew it would be hard but we chose a different approach to sustainability.

We remain determined to retain our editorial independence and keep our journalism open to everyone, regardless of who they are or what they can afford. We knew that so many of our readers shared this same value. So we asked you to contribute voluntarily, for the benefit of those who cannot. Remarkably, it worked.

Thanks to you, our supporters in 180 countries, we have been able to retain proper editorial independence at a time when the world urgently needs unbiased, trustworthy sources of information.

Thanks to you, we have been able to produce groundbreaking journalism that challenges those in authority, and gives voice to those who arent. In the past decade, we have exposed the mistreatment of the Windrush generation, helped fight global corruption with our Panama Papers investigation, won a Pulitzer prize for our work with the whistleblower Edward Snowden into the actions of the NSA, and revealed the way election campaigns are skewed in the digital age with the Cambridge Analytica files. Just last month, our climate pledge demonstrated our determination to show leadership in environmental journalism and commit to steps we will take organisationally to become greener and more ethical.

Thanks to you, we have succeeded in positioning ourselves as a leading voice on the most critical issues facing the world today: the environment, nativism, fairness, social justice, inequality. With your support, we can continue to produce the journalism we know means so much and makes such a huge difference in the world. We rely on your support for our future.

In 2019, we announced that after years of financial uncertainty in this most challenging of media climates, the Guardian broke even. It was a tremendous moment for all those who have worked on these stories, and for our supporters around the world who played a key part in making our journalism possible. Thank you so much. There is a good chance that, together, we can dare to hope for a better world.

As 2020 unfolds, we ask for your ongoing support. If you are able to, please consider supporting us today with a contribution of any size. Each and every one makes a big difference to our future.

Happy new year, from all of us at the Guardian.

See more here:
With support from Guardian readers, we can make the 2020s the decade of hope - The Guardian

‘I want this book to be politically useful: the explosive memoir exposing Silicon Valley – The Guardian

In a leafy cafe courtyard in San Francisco, Anna Wiener is cradling a cup of tea while eavesdropping on the next table. Theres a man wearing shiny pants, holding forth on artificial intelligence and the Chinese hegemon, she says, eyes glimmering with amusement.

It will come as no surprise to readers of her debut, Uncanny Valley, that Wiener is as quick witted in person as she appears on the page. All writing is a sort of performance, she says. In the book Wiener condenses four years of working at tech startups in Silicon Valley into a neat narrative about outsized male egos, dramatic wealth disparities and the psychological toll on young female employees.

Despite its unsavoury and troubling contents unregulated surveillance technology, ruthless bosses, casual sexual harassment the book is a delight. Deftly drawn characters are granted pseudonyms and companies are unnamed; instead they are identified by cutting descriptions. Facebook is the social network everyone hated and Edward Snowden is the NSA whistleblower who was back in media. Microsoft is the highly litigious Seattle-based software conglomerate. Essentially, she says: Its important to remember that Google is an ad platform and that Facebook is a surveillance platform.

I envied their sense of entitlement to the future. There were no crises in their vision only opportunities.

Wiener interviewed former colleagues and friends, engaging in what she calls a dance around everyone elses NDA. She also scoured her iMessage chats and email archive for granular details, such as the humourless office flag that read In Meritocracy We Trust or the CEO in his 20s who instructed employees to BCC his mother on the companys customer support communications. My Gmail is an incredible corpus of mid-20s work anxiety, she sighs. And an archive of what in hindsight are very obvious ways to navigate work situations that were overly complex, because I didnt know how to be a person.

The book first took shape in 2015 as a lightly fictionalised essay for the Brooklyn-based literary magazine n+1. Wieners piece went viral but the surge of attention came as a shock. I thought that no one in literary n+1 world would care about Silicon Valley startups, and that no one in Silicon Valley reads n+1. For years, she had documented the cultish work rituals and peculiar cultural norms of the industry, but it wasnt until Dayna Tortorici, editor of n+1, visited San Francisco that she considered synthesising those observations into a cohesive narrative. Dayna has a theory that people in tech arent used to being seen because everything is mediated, Wiener says. I wrote the piece to entertain her.

As an editor, Tortorici had noticed an unnerving pattern: when writing about their workplaces, female contributors were often threatened for violating NDAs, whereas rarely, if ever were NDAs used against male writers. (Despite the industrys fervent defences of freedom of speech, most tech companies also enforce strict policies that ensure former employees stay silent about work conditions, including sexual harassment allegations.)

While she didnt face NDA-related constraints, Wieners first drafts were fairly restrained. Tortorici encouraged her to reveal more about her former bosses without worrying about reprisals. By 2018, Wiener had left her job at the software development platform GitHub after a seven-way auction to expand the original n+1 essay into a book. (And in January 2018, Universal Pictures optioned film rights; the screenplay is now in its initial development stages and Wiener is executive producer.) I very deliberately wrote this book as non-fiction and memoir, she says, because if I wrote it as fiction, it could be mistaken as satire. And I dont know how politically useful satire about the tech industry is in 2019. I want this book to be politically useful.

Wiener, now 32, grew up in Brooklyn, New York. Her mother is a writer and gun-control activist co-founder of the nonprofit New Yorkers Against Gun Violence and her father a business journalist; she was exposed to feminist ideas and progressive politics at a young age. In person, Weiner is self-possessed. Apart from bitten fingernails and frank asides about therapy there are few signs of neuroses, although she says: I have very bad anxiety. Her worries around the book centre on her use of creative non-fiction techniques: the story is based on real events, but the specific timeline and characters are compressed for clarity and cohesion. She is concerned about whether people in the tech industry will understand the conventions of this approach and about possible backlash from tech executives whose public images can directly affect their companies stock value. I sometimes have these daytime nightmares about testifying in court about creative non-fiction, where Im like, I would like to summon Vivian Gornick to the stand to explain compression, or Id like to bring in John DAgata to discuss composite characters.

Just as New York City is a core character in Ben Lerners auto-fictitious 10:04 and various areas of California play leading roles in Joan Didions seminal essay collection The White Album, both influential texts for Wiener, San Francisco and its immersive digital world are central characters in Uncanny Valley. The digital landscape is textured with what is referred to as God mode an employees unbridled access to her companys database, from which she can intensively track users and glean their personal information. In the book, Wiener describes her workplaces blase, apolitical attitude to God mode: We didnt think of ourselves as participating in the surveillance economy. We certainly werent thinking about our role in facilitating and normalising the creation of unregulated, privately held databases on human behaviour. She continues: Users might not know they were being tracked, but that was between them and our customer companies.

While writing, Wiener studiously avoided reading books about the tech industry, and instead focused on office novels and compact memoirs, including Renata Adlers groundbreaking novel Speedboat, which centred on a New York journalist in the 70s; and Ana Castillos The Guardians, a novel about a Mexican-American woman living along the US/Mexico border. I tried to reread Ellen Ullmans Close to the Machine a little bit stoned in a hot bath an ostensibly relaxing situation and almost had a panic attack. Its essentially a perfect memoir and sets the standard, she explains. (Ullman is an engineer who documented her experience developing software at the forefront of the male-dominated technology boom in the 90s.)

For a moment, Wiener is distracted by the cafes playlist as Nirvana thunder over the speakers. I feel like Im 16 and burning incense in my bedroom and telling my mom Im a vegetarian, she deadpans.

We return to unpacking Silicon Valleys accountability problem and popular modes of aggrandisement. The way that people spoke in San Francisco was so strange to me, like all of the acronyms, jargon and weird things that people do to the English language. To inspire us in a meeting, one CEO said, Were at war! And like, Learnings. Why? Its lesson, she says. I find the naming scheme of the last 15 years in tech companies to be very funny, these names are just obscene. She rattles off AppLovin and Verbling as two of her favourites. You can practically throw a spitball and hit a badly named company.

Throughout the memoir, there are moments when Wiener acquiesces to male characters demands only to correct her course with a renewed sense of agency. In a memorable scene, she goes out to a Japanese bar with her mostly male co-workers to celebrate their bosss birthday, conceiving of herself as the babysitter, fifth wheel, chaperone, little sister, ball and chain, and concubine. She explains: I was always trying to be someones girlfriend, sister or mother. (Uncanny Valley takes place in the years leading up to the #MeToo movement; details about a sexual assault incident were withheld from the book to protect her former colleagues anonymity.)

The 2016 election result strikes at the end of the book with cataclysmic force, no doubt a reflection of the way the author herself experienced the event. The major failure of the media in the years leading up to the election was to not take tech companies and their ambitions very seriously, Wiener says. The media engaged with the industry on the industrys terms. It lapped up the mythology.

In reference to the founders of an ebook startup, Wieners first tech job, she writes: I envied their sense of entitlement to the future. There were no crises in their vision only opportunities. In California, this techno-optimist outlook is often associated with anti-union, libertarian politics. By contrast, she says: Ive always had a hard time picturing a future, which one could credit to having witnessed a major terrorist attack as a teenager. She pauses. In my head I was like, dont mention 9/11. She continues: My hope for the future is that we start to move slower and at a smaller scale.

At the end of Uncanny Valley, after the 2016 election, Wiener writes that she felt that the industry was in for a reckoning, that it was the beginning of the end, that what [she] had experienced in San Francisco was the final stage of a prelapsarian era, the end of our generational gold rush, an unsustainable age of excess. A freewheeling culture of misinformation, offensive memes and trolling unfettered by regulation or oversight only proliferated. Wiener says: The city and the industry, bound by the ecosystem, continued to cycle and churn.

Of course, conflicting views of the future also reflect a greater schism in industry. Just as the publishing world shrinks, tech companies bloat with capital. If we continue on the track that were on, were going to move into an era of even greater privatisation, Wiener says, shifting uncomfortably in her chair. The future will be increasingly homogeneous, divisive and private. To illustrate this point she highlights public goods or services that are increasingly privatised, like for-profit coding boot camps, which are marketed as an investment or a substitute for a four-year university degree. The tech industry is trying to provide solutions to crises that they didnt necessarily create, but that they are now exacerbating.

Everyone deserves better. Especially employees and consumers. But I dont know that change is going to come from within the industry because the incentives of venture capital encourage speed and rapid growth, which inspire a certain thoughtlessness or recklessness. She pauses. There is currently very little accountability.

Uncanny Valley: a Memoir is published by HarperCollins (RRP 16.99). To order a copy go to guardianbookshop.com. Free UK p&p over 15.

Continue reading here:
'I want this book to be politically useful: the explosive memoir exposing Silicon Valley - The Guardian

Edward Snowden The Twitter Master (2020-01-05) – Global Real News

Hello! Today we did a major analysis of Edward Snowdens Twitter activity. Lets jump right into it. First, the primary metrics: as of 2020-01-05, Edward Snowden (@Snowden) has 4210614 Twitter followers, is following 1 people, has tweeted 4638 times, has liked 489 tweets, has uploaded 377 photos and videos and has been on Twitter since December 2014.

Going from top to bottom, their latest tweet, at the time of writing, has 476 replies, 2,823 retweets and 7,909 likes, their second latest tweet has 71 replies, 318 reweets and 1,435 likes, their third latest tweet has 149 replies, 610 retweets and 5,327 likes, their fourth latest tweet has 73 replies, 747 retweets and 1,814 likes and their fifth latest tweet has 76 replies, 1,402 retweets and 3,595 likes. (We could keep going, but we think you get the idea )

MOST POPULAR:

Going through Edward Snowdens last couple pages of tweets (including retweets, BTW), the one we consider the most popular, having incited a whopping 1017 direct replies at the time of writing, is this:

That really seems to have caused quite a bit of discussion, having also had 11046 retweets and 64013 likes.

LEAST POPULAR:

Now what about Edward Snowdens least popular tweet as of late (again, including retweets)? We reckon its this one:

That only had 2 direct replies, 71 retweets and 186 likes.

THE VERDICT:

We did a huge amount of of research into Edward Snowdens Twitter activity, looking through what people were saying in response to them, their likes/retweet numbers compared to the past, the amount of positive/negative responses and so on. We wont go into that any more, so our verdict is this: we say the online sentiment for Edward Snowden on Twitter right now is totally fine.

Well leave it there for today. Thanks for reading, and write a comment if you disagree with me. However, we wont publish anything overly rude.

Read the original post:
Edward Snowden The Twitter Master (2020-01-05) - Global Real News

Edward Snowden Is Doing Great On Twitter (2020-01-04) – Global Real News

Bonjour! Today we did a serious analysis of Edward Snowdens Twitter activity. Lets get started. These are the main things: as of 2020-01-04, Edward Snowden (@Snowden) has 4209383 Twitter followers, is following 1 people, has tweeted 4637 times, has liked 489 tweets, has uploaded 377 photos and videos and has been on Twitter since December 2014.

Going from top to bottom, their latest tweet, at the time of writing, has 144 replies, 602 retweets and 5,237 likes, their second latest tweet has 69 replies, 712 reweets and 1,740 likes, their third latest tweet has 75 replies, 1,372 retweets and 3,522 likes, their fourth latest tweet has 2 replies, 66 retweets and 175 likes and their fifth latest tweet has 44 replies, 680 retweets and 2,656 likes. That gives you an idea of how much activity they usually get.

MOST POPULAR:

Going through Edward Snowdens last couple pages of tweets (including retweets, BTW), the one we consider the most popular, having caused a very nice 1010 direct replies at the time of writing, is this:

That looks to have caused quite a ruckus, having also had 10977 retweets and 63752 likes.

LEAST POPULAR:

What about Edward Snowdens least popular tweet as of late (including any retweets)? We reckon its this one:

That only had 2 direct replies, 66 retweets and 175 likes.

THE VERDICT:

We did a lot of of digging into Edward Snowdens Twitter activity, looking through what people were saying in response to them, their likes/retweet numbers compared to what they were before, the amount of positive/negative responses and so on. We wont bore you with the details, so our conclusion is this: we believe the online sentiment for Edward Snowden on Twitter right now is A-OK most people like them.

Well leave it there for today. Thanks for coming, and drop a comment if you disagree with me. However, we wont publish anything overly rude.

Read more:
Edward Snowden Is Doing Great On Twitter (2020-01-04) - Global Real News

10 Tech-related Trends that Shaped the Decade – businessjournaldaily.com

By Brooke Auxier, Monica Anderson and Madhu KumarPew Research Center

WASHINGTON, D.C. The tech landscape has changed dramatically over the past decade, both in the United States and around the world.

There have been notable increases in the use of social media and online platforms (including YouTube and Facebook) and technologies (like the internet, cellphones and smartphones), in some cases leading to near-saturation levels of use among major segments of the population. But digital tech also faced significant backlash in the 2010s.

Here are 10 of the top tech-related changes that Pew Research Center has studied over the past decade:

Social media sites have emerged as a go-to platform for connecting with others, finding news and engaging politically.When the Center first asked U.S. adults if they everuse a social mediasite in 2005, just 5% said they did. Today, the share is 72%, according to a survey in early 2019. Social media has also taken hold around the world. The Centers spring 2017global survey conducted in 17 advanced and 19 emerging economies found that a median of 53% of adults across emerging and developing countries use social media.

In the U.S. and around the world, younger adults are the most likely age group to use social media. For example, nine-in-ten Americans ages 18 to 29 report ever using a social media site, compared with 40% of those ages 65 and older.

In terms of specific platforms, YouTube and Facebook are the most widely used online platforms among U.S. adults, with roughly seven-in-ten Americans saying they use each site. The shares of adults who useInstagram and Snapchatare much smaller, but these platforms are especially popular with younger Americans.

Around the world and in the U.S., social media has become a key tool for activists, as well as those aligned against them.The decade began with theArab Springand ended with protesters inHong Kongand elsewhere using social media to promote and organize their causes. In some cases, governments fought back byshutting down the internet, while opponents of some activistsmounted social media campaigns of their own.

In the U.S., social media played a role in major social movements such as#MeTooand#BlackLivesMatter. For example, aPew Research Center analysisof publicly available English language tweets found that the #MeToo hashtag had been used more than 19 million times on Twitter from Oct. 15, 2017 (when actressAlyssa Milano tweetedurging victims of sexual harassment to reply me too) through Sept. 30, 2018.

Still, Americans haveexpressed mixed viewsabout the impact social media has on the broader political environment. Roughly two-thirds of Americans (64%) say the statement social media helps give a voice to underrepresented groups describes these sites very or somewhat well, a 2018 survey found. At the same time, 77% believe these platforms distract people from issues that are truly important, and 71% agree with the statement social media makes people think theyre making a difference when they really arent.

Smartphones have altered the way many Americans go online.One of the biggest digital trends of the decade has been the steady rise ofmobile connectivity. Smartphone adoption has more than doubled since the Center began surveying on this topic in 2011. Then, 35% of U.S. adults reported owning a smartphone of some kind, a share that has risen to 81% today.Teens have also become much more likely to use smartphones: More than nine-in-ten (95%) teens ages 13 to 17 report owning or having access to a smartphone, according to a2018 survey.

Adults are increasingly likely to name their smartphone as the primary way of going online. Today,37% of U.S. adults saythey mostly use a smartphone to access the internet, up from 19% in 2013.

The 2010s, meanwhile, were also the decade that saw the advent of tablet computers, which are now usedby around half(52%) of U.S. adults.

Growth in mobile and social media use has sparked debates about the impact of screen time on Americas youth and others.More than half of teens (54%) believe they spend too much time on their cellphone, while 41% say they spend too much time on social media and about one-quarter say the same about video games, a2018 surveyfound.

At the same time, about half or more of teens say they have cut back on the amount of time they spend on their cellphones (52%), and similar shares say they have tried to limit their use of social media (57%) and video games (58%).

Still, teens are not the only group who struggle with balancing their use of digital technology with other aspects of their lives. Some 36% of parents of teens say they themselves spend too much time on their cellphone, while a similar share (39%) say they at least sometimes lose focus at work because theyre checking their cellphone.

Data privacy and surveillance have become major concerns in the post-Snowden era.InJune 2013, then-National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden leaked information showing that the NSA had conducted widespread surveillance of Americans online and phone communications. In the aftermath of the revelations, about half of Americans (49%) said the release of the classified information served the public interest, while 44% said it harmed the public interest, according to a2013 survey.

In the years following the leaks, there have been high-profile commercial and governmentdata breaches, as well as revelations about how firms and governments exploit social media profiles and other data sources totarget users. Surveys have consistently shown that these issues have prompted significant public concern about peoples personal data, as well as the publics lack of confidence that companies can and will keep their data safe.

For instance, the majority of Americans now say that they feel they havevery little or no controlover the data collected about them by the government (84%), while roughly two-thirds (64%) report that they feel at least somewhat concerned about how the government is using the data it collects about them.

Tech platforms have given rise to a gig economy.Mobile technology has helped create new businesses and jobs, while at the same time sparking debate aboutregulating companiesthat provide services that can be ordered by apps.

Ride-hailing is one of the most well-documented examples of growth in thegig economy, and more Americans are using this kind of service: As offall 2018, 36% of U.S. adults said they had ever used a ride-hailing service such as Uber or Lyft, up from 15% in 2015. In addition to car services, the gig economy has spawned businesses ranging fromhome sharingto online marketplaces for homemade goods.

Online harassment has become a fairly common feature of online life, both for teens and adults.Roughly six-in-ten U.S. teens (59%) say they have been bullied or harassed online, with offensive name-calling being the most common type of harassment they have encountered, according to a2018 surveyof those ages 13 to 17. A similar share of teens (63%) view online harassment as a major problem for people their age.

Many adults also report being the target of some form of abusive behavior online. Some 41% of adults have experienced some form of online harassment, as measured in a2017 survey.

Made-up news and misinformation has sparked growing concern.The lead-up to the 2016 U.S. presidential election brought to the surfaceconcernsaround misinformation and its ability to affect the democratic process. Half of Americans believemade-up news and misinformationis a very big problem for the country today, making it a pressing problem for more Americans than said so of terrorism, illegal immigration, sexism and racism, according to a 2019 survey. Some 68% of U.S. adults say made-up news greatly impacts Americans confidence in government institutions.

The challenge of navigating the new information environment was reflected in a2018 surveythat measured the publics ability to identify five factual statements and five opinion statements. A small share of Americans were able to correctly classify all 10 statements. About a third (35%) were able to correctly identify all five opinion statements, while around a quarter (26%) were able to correctly identify all five factual statements. Americans with high political awareness, those who are very digitally savvy and those who have high levels of trust in the news media were able to more accurately identify news-related statements as factual or opinion.

A majority of Americans see gender discrimination as a problem in the tech industry.Tech companies have faced criticism for their hiring practices and work cultures, including reports of discrimination on the basis ofrace and ethnicityandgender. A majority of Americans (73%) say discrimination against women is a problem in the tech industry, with 37% citing it as a major problem, according to asummer 2017 survey.

When it comes to discrimination against black and Hispanic Americans in tech two groups that are underrepresented in the industry roughly two-thirds of Americans (68%) say this is a problem (31% say its a major problem), according to the same survey.

Americans views about tech companies have turned far less positive in recent years. Controversies related to digital privacy, made-up news, harassment and other issues may have taken their toll on public attitudes about tech companies.

The share of Americans who say these companies are having a positive effect on the way things are going in the country has declined sharply since 2015, according to aJuly 2019 survey. Four years ago, the majority of U.S. adults (71%) said these companies had a positive impact on the country, compared with 50% today.

In asurvey in summer 2018, roughly seven-in-ten Americans (72%) said it is likely that social media platforms actively censor political views that those companies find objectionable. Around half (51%) of the public said major tech companies should be regulated more than they are now.

Editors Note: Brooke Auxieris a research associate focusing on internet and technology research at Pew Research Center. Monica Andersonis an associate director of research at Pew Research Center. Madhu Kumaris a former research assistant focusing on internet and technology at Pew Research Center.

Published by The Business Journal, Youngstown, Ohio.

CLICK HERE to subscribe to our print edition and sign up to our free daily headlines.

Original post:
10 Tech-related Trends that Shaped the Decade - businessjournaldaily.com

UN official equates Chelsea Manning’s incarceration for refusing to testify to torture – WJLA

  1. UN official equates Chelsea Manning's incarceration for refusing to testify to torture  WJLA
  2. UN Letter: Chelsea Manning's Imprisonment Is Torture  The Intercept
  3. Chelsea Manning Says She Is 'Never Backing Down' in Face of US Detention Meant to Break Her  Common Dreams
  4. Chelsea Manning Responds After Top UN Official Labels Her Imprisonment 'Torture'  Gizmodo
  5. UN official equates former US intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning incarceration as torture  BreakingNews.ie
  6. View full coverage on Google News

Read the original here:
UN official equates Chelsea Manning's incarceration for refusing to testify to torture - WJLA

The Government is Torturing Chelsea Manning! Does Anyone Give a Damn? – CounterPunch

Photograph Source: Mattia Luigi Nappi CC BY 4.0

Chelsea Manning is being tortured for her refusal totestify beforea federal grand jury. She already has told a military court as a whistleblower while in the Army about documents pertaining to alleged war crimes that were committed in Iraq and Afghanistan. She has already been tortured and imprisoned for releasing that information once (Collateral Murdervideo, for example), but here in the US, the land of the free and the home of the brave, readers must be protected from reading and viewing documents about the horrors of the endless wars the US fights. Some journalists and publishers must be brought into line when disclosing information to the public about our endless wars.

War is seldom defensive these days, but rather, more about killing people deemed enemies by the government, about massive profits, and about empire.

Thinking about Mannings plight, I recall the little-known book,Fort Dix Stockade: Our Prison Camp Next Doorby Joan Crowell (1974), about how imprisonment and torture was used against those in the stockade at Fort Dix, News Jersey who protested the Vietnam War while in the military. Some accounts of Mannings first imprisonment in a Marine Corps stockade recall the treatment that recalcitrant and protesting soldiers received at the hands of their guards, some of whom were returned Vietnam veterans.Manningwas not beaten by the Marines, but her treatment amounted to torture.

Readers need only look to the masses of US citizens and immigrants, including immigrant children, locked up in the US prison system and detention camps to get the picture of the kinds of grotesque abuse that untold numbers of people suffer while incarcerated. If a nation gets away with the imprisonment and abuse of incarcerated children, just how far behind can a political system of general or selected repression be?

Heres what the UN special rapporteur on torture had to say about Mannings current treatment: an open-ended, progressively severe measure of coercion fulfilling all the constitutive elements of torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (Top UN official accuses US of torturing Chelsea Manning,Guardian, December 31, 2019).

I guess iis only a certain cohort of troops and veterans that we as a nation support.

Democracy Nows New Years Day program was dedicated to the legacy of Eleanor Roosevelt First Lady of the World: Eleanor Roosevelts Impact on New Deal to U.N. Declaration of Human Rights. War destroys all human rights and freedom, Roosevelt said. Roosevelt is adamant in that position in the segments opening and knows firsthand that human rights die with the onset of war.

Where are the patriots like Roosevelt? Where are thepatriotsin the media who havepublished some of Manningsrevelations? Where are those who will stand up and do something about the torture and harassment of those who bring sunlight to the dark corners of power and the dark corners of the empire? Those at the highest levels of power dont like Manning for what she represents and does and theyve made her pay dearly.

Follow this link:
The Government is Torturing Chelsea Manning! Does Anyone Give a Damn? - CounterPunch

A Decade in Review: Top International Press Freedom Stories from the 2010s – MediaFile

In 2010, social media reporting was in its infancy, the Syrian Civil War had not yet officially begun and the President of the United States was not labeling the press as the enemy of the people. Over the past decade, new technologies, conflicts, attacks and mass movements have shifted the media landscape, providing both new opportunities for members of the media and increased threats to press freedom.

Although social media has allowed more people to participate in global reporting, the world continues to be a dangerous place for reporters. Last month, The Washington Post reported that a total of 554 journalists were killed worldwide in the past decade, some of whom were caught in crossfire or targeted in suicide bombs and shootings by gangs.

While the following is not meant to be an exhaustive list of the most consequential stories of the decade, it is meant to highlight some of the ones that provide significant insight into how the evolution of technology over the past decade has forced reporting to also evolve, how technology such as social media have been used by everyday citizens and how journalists around the world continue to face increased threats and violence.

2010- WikiLeaks

While the international nonprofit organization devoted to publishing classified media initially came on the scene in 2006, it was in 2010 that WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange, brought to the forefront the question of whether publishing government documents can be justified by claims of freedom of expression and the publics right to information.

In April of that year, the platform posted a classified U.S. military video of a U.S. helicopter firing on what the military said were believed to be armed fighters in New Baghdad, Iraq. Among the 18 people killed in the attack were two Reuters journalists. Pfc. Chelsea Manning was arrested in May by the U.S. military and was charged with leaking the combat video, as well as classified State Department documents by downloading those documents to a personal computer.

In July, WikiLeaks published what it called The Afghan War Logs, which included more than 75,000 documents that revealed previously undisclosed civilian casualties caused by the U.S. and its coalition forces, details of the hunt for Osama bin Laden and accounts of increased violent action by the Taliban.

In the years since, WikiLeaks has continued to publish previously classified material from national governments around the world and, in 2016, gained increased scrutiny following its publishing of nearly 20,000 emails and 8,000 attachments from leaders of the U.S. Democratic National Committee.

Assange was eventually arrested in 2019 after seeking refuge for years at the Ecuadorian embassy in London. That year, the U.S. Justice Department unsealed an indictment dating back to March 6, 2018 that charged Assange with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion.

2011- Social Media in the Arab Spring

In December 2010, a Tunisian street vendor set himself on fire to protest the arbitrary seizing of his vegetable stand by police over failure to obtain a permit. The action sparked a pro-democracy movement that spread throughout the Middle East in 2011. The new tools offered through social media allowed demonstrators to become citizen journalists and tell their stories to the world on a scale that had never been done before.

The Arab Spring also became known to some analysts as the Facebook and Twitter Revolution. According to a 2012 study by the Pew Research Center, communities formed online were crucial in organizing a core group of activists, especially in Egypt. Additionally, a 2012 report by the United States Institute of Peace found that in the uprisings in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Bahrain, social media played an integral role in communicating to the rest of the world what was happening on the ground during the uprisings.

In addition to the role social media played in mobilizing protestors and providing news on the events to those outside the region, this new technology has also changed how people in the Middle East receive their information. The 2012 Pew study found that smaller news outlets in the region are now competing with the rise in user-generated content on social media platforms. Newspapers and radio programs have moved online in order to cater to readers who are increasingly turning to the internet for information.

2012- The Kidnapping of Austin Tice

The Syrian Civil War that began in 2011 quickly produced profound impacts on those reporting on the conflict within the country and the surrounding region, displayed notably in the 2012 disappearance of U.S. journalist Austin Tice.

In late August, The Washington Post reported that Tice, a freelance journalist who contributed stories on the civil war to The Post, McClatchy Newspapers and other publications, had been taken into Syrian government custody after weeks of speculation on his whereabouts.

Video footage of the journalist emerged in late September on a Facebook page associated with supporters of the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The video showed Tice being held by a group of masked men holding assault rifles before being pushed to his knees and filmed speaking a prayer in Arabic. According to reporting from The Post, Tice then cried out Oh Jesus, oh Jesus in English, before going back to Arabic, seconds before the footage was cut.

While the video initially appeared as though Tice was being held by Islamist militants, various journalists at the time questioned the authenticity of the video. The New York Times Editorial Board wrote that this was partly due to the fact that the captors in the video, did not behave as militants usually do.

To this day, Tice is reportedly still in Syrian custody. Tices parents, Marc and Debra Tice, have said that they are convinced he is alive and have worked for his release, traveling several times to Lebanon, putting pressure on diplomats and organizing events to keep Tices disappearance in the public eye. The F.B.I. has offered a $1 million reward for information that could lead to Tices return to the U.S. Major organizations such as Reporters Without Borders and the National Press Club continue to campaign for Tices release.

2013- The Abduction of Journalists in Syria

As international coverage on the ongoing conflict in Syria increased, journalists continued to face threats to their work and their lives. According to reporting from The New York Times, 2013 saw a sharp increase in the abduction of journalists inside Syria, making the country one of the most hostile conflict zones for news gatherers in recent memory.

Foreign journalists increasingly became targets, especially Europeans who entered Syria to cover the conflict without the permission of the Syrian government. Some journalists appeared to have been taken by armed insurgent extremist groups and criminal networks seeking ransom in cash or weapons, while others had no declared motive.

One of the journalists abducted in 2013 was Jonathan Alpeyrie, a French-American photojournalist for the Polaris agency. Islamist fighters took Alpeyrie near Damascus in April and released him nearly three months later after a $450,000 ransom was paid on his behalf.

The rebels are so desperate they dont care about their reputation abroad, Alpeyrie said in an interview published by the Paris-based Journal de la Photographie. They see guys like us as an opportunity.

2014- The Kidnapping and Murders of American Journalists Abroad

The U.S. and other western countries were again made aware of the dangers journalists face when reporting abroad with the 2014 killings of American journalists James Foley, Steven Sotloff and Luke Somers.

Foley, who disappeared in November 2012 along the Syrian border with Turkey, appeared in a video posted on YouTube by ISIS in which he pleads for his life before being beheaded by one of his captors.

A month later, a video showing the beheading of Sotloff was posted online by the Islamic State as a second message to America to halt airstrikes in Iraq. According to CNN, a masked ISIS figure appeared in the video and spoke directly to U.S. President Barack Obama, saying, Just as your missiles continue to strike our people, our knife will continue to strike the necks of your people.

In December, a U.S. mission in southern Yemen failed to rescue Somers, an American photojournalist, who was being held hostage by Al Qaeda. The hostages killed Somers, along with a South African teacher also being held, when the captors realized a rescue mission was underway. The operation was the second attempt by U.S. forces to rescue Somers.

Following these murders, Joel Simon, head of the Committee to Protect Journalists, called on the U.S. to change its ransom policy, because these journalists are going out on their own to bear witness on behalf of their audiences.

2015- The Charlie Hebdo Attack

While the 2012-2014 kidnapping and murders of international journalists provided alarming indications of the state of press freedom across the world, the 2015 attacks on the offices of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo revealed that these dangers extend beyond the Middle East.

The magazine had received criticism for its portrayal of the Prophet Mohammed in controversial cartoons dating back to 2006, with French President Jacques Chirac calling the decision to publish the images an overt provocation. After the magazine published another caricature of the prophet in 2011, its offices were destroyed in a gasoline bomb attack.

On the morning of January 7, 2015, gunmen forced their way into the Charlie Hebdo offices in Paris and, according to CNN, allegedly claimed they were avenging the Prophet Mohammed and shouted Allahu akbar, which translates to God is great.

Twelve people were killed in the raids on the office, including eight Charlie Hebdo employees.

Following the attacks, the phrase Je Suis Charlie, or I am Charlie, began appearing on signs held by Parisians during vigils for the victims, eventually spreading on social media as a rallying cry in support of press freedom and freedom of expression.

2016- Fake News

While widely known as a popular phrase used by President Donald Trump to describe American media outlets, fake news better describes the flood of fabricated stories published throughout 2016, whichshowed how misinformation and propaganda became alarmingly easy to spread on social media platforms, especially when perpetrated by foriegn governments such as Russia.

One of these stories was published by a site called WTOE 5 News and falsely reported that Pope Francis had endorsed Trump in the presidential campaign. While the Pope later refuted the claim, arguing that he never comments on electoral campaigns, the story had secured 960,000 Facebook engagements, according to Buzzfeed.

Another article published by The Political Insider in August 2016 claimed that WikiLeaks founder Assange stated that Hillary Clinton and her State Department were actively arming Islamic jihadists, which includes ISIS According to CNBC, Assange had actually said that the Clinton-led State Department had approved weapon shipments to Libya during the 2011 intervention, and that those weapons had later ended up in the hands of jihadists.

A report from Buzzfeed revealed that in the three months leading up to the 2016 election, fake news stories such as these had gained nearly two million Facebook engagements. An investigation traced some of these stories back to a small town in Macedonia called Veles, where more than 140 fake news sites are based.

2017- #MeToo Spreads Across the World

In the weeks following the New York Times publishing of sexual assault allegations against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, the #MeToo Movement spread across social media globally as people shared their experiences with sexual assault or harassment. The hashtag was first posted on October 15 by American actress Alyssa Milano and by the end of that day, people in 85 countries had shared similar hashtags in languages including Arabic, Farsi, French, Hindi and Spanish..

The use of the hashtag across social media revealed the prevalence of discrimination across industries and allowed millions of people across the world to join the conversation.

The movement also brought increased scrutiny to the journalism industry itself. As reported by MediaFile in 2018, journalists in Brazil started the hashtag #DeixaElaTrabalhar (#LetHerDoHerJob) following several instances of harassment against female reporters. Additionally, more than 30 Russian news outlets announced their plans to boycott the State Dumathe lower house of the Federal Assembly of Russiain response to the exoneration of a lawmaker who had been accused by several journalists of sexual harassment.

2018- The Assassination of Jamal Khashoggi

In the last few months of 2018, the world watched as details slowly emerged surrounding the mysterious disappearance of Saudi journalist and Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi.

Khashoggi, who had written several stories critiquing Saudi Arabia and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salmans policies, disappeared after entering the Saudi consulate in Istanbul to obtain paperwork from Saudi Arabia that would allow him to marry his fiance. Early reports from the Turkish government claimed that Khashoggi was murdered inside the consulate.

Although the CIA eventually found that Mohammed bin Salman personally ordered Khashoggis murder, various world leaders and press freedom advocates across the globe expressed deep concern after U.S. President Donald Trump revealed he would not be taking strong action against Saudi Arabia.

In his last column written for The Post before his disappearance, Khashoggi called for more opportunities for those from Saudi Arabia and the surrounding region to share their stories.

The Arab world needs a modern version of the old transnational media so citizens can be informed about global events, he wrote. More important, we need to provide a platform for Arab voices.

2019- Press Freedom Continues to Experience a Global Decline

While the 2010s gave the world new and diverse sources of information in the digital media age, the decade also showed that the overall state of press freedom and the safety of journalists worldwide is facing greater threats than ever before.

A June 2019 report from Freedom House argued that global press freedom has experienced a sharp decline over the past 10 years.

The report, titled Freedom and the Media: A Downward Spiral, measured press freedom in law and practice based on standards set in the United Nations 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In addition to direct attacks against journalists, including state-sanctioned violence and imprisonment, the report found that world leaders, specifically those running some of the worlds most prominent democracies, have been using their power to alter public opinion and undermine the role of critical media outlets.

The arrests of two Reuters journalists in Myanmar and the violence faced by journalists covering the mass demonstrations in Hong Kong, as well as the verbal attacks made against the press from world leaders in the U.S., China, Hungary and other countries across the globe, all represent direct threats to journalists and their work.

Related

Link:
A Decade in Review: Top International Press Freedom Stories from the 2010s - MediaFile

Ronnie Moas and Vinny Lingham Come to Blows Over $20K Bitcoin Bet – Cointelegraph

Two well-known Bitcoin (BTC) figures have resorted to a painfully public Twitter exchange to settle an argument over a $20,000 unpaid bet.

The heated debate, which is ongoing, revolves around a pledge which investor Ronnie Moas made in 2018.

If Bitcoin was not worth $28,000 by the end of last year, Moas said he would donate the lump sum to FreeRoss.org, the charity working to free jailed former Silk Road owner, Ross Ulbricht. The bet was made with Vinny Lingham, CEO of blockchain identity startup Civic.

With BTC/USD trailing at $7,200 on Jan. 1, 2020, Lingham asked Moas to confirm he had made the payment as promised. Moas then surprised by saying he would no longer honor his commitment.

The tone swiftly became unfriendly, with Moas describing Lingham as a f*cking bastard and demanding he explain the near-total drop in the price of Civics native cryptocurrency, CVC.

I will keep my word and distribute $20,000 in 2020 to organizations highlighted at my website, he replied, explaining he would instead divide up the FreeRoss funds between up to five charities of his choosing. In an ironic twist, Moas advised Lingham:

Read my last three posts ... and the ones preceding from the last 24 hours you f*cking jackass ... stop making a fool out of yourself in a public forum.

Moas claimed he had more than a dozen reasons not to send money to FreeRoss.

Responses predictably sided with Lingham, as Moas had nonetheless reneged on the original terms of the wager.

As the argument gained traction, other Bitcoin figures, including What Bitcoin Did podcast host Peter McCormack, began pledging to replace the lost funds out of their own pocket. FreeRoss then thanked McCormack and his fellow participants, who each pledged $1,000, for their donations.

Further efforts continue to take place on the Bitcointalk forum, where users are selling collectible items.

They include an altered Venezuelan bolivar note, emblazoned with the heading Banco de Bitcoin and an image of Charlie Shrem in sunglasses. Shrem, who is now free, was also implicated in the highly controversial takedown of Silk Road by United States authorities.

Read more from the original source:
Ronnie Moas and Vinny Lingham Come to Blows Over $20K Bitcoin Bet - Cointelegraph