Ray Bradbury on War, Recycling, and Artificial Intelligence – JSTOR Daily

One of the roles of science fiction is to provide readers with a glimpse of how the future could be. Ray Bradbury didnt get everything about the future right. We havent yet seen books and reading made illegal (as in his 1953 Fahrenheit 451), just as we havent yet discovered another planet ready for American colonizers (as in his 1950 The Martian Chronicles). And yet, the themes he explored in those booksmass media and censorship, colonization and environmental changeare more relevant than ever. Even in his lesser-known workssuch as the 1951 sci-fi collection, The Illustrated Man, Bradbury tackles a surprising array of issues that feel as if they were ripped from todays headlines.

Readers today will find in The Illustrated Man a fresh perspective that illuminates global issues like artificial intelligence and climate change. Bradbury also engages with the political and cultural challenges of migration: specifically, the crossing of the U.S.Mexico border, which has since received much attention with the dawn of the so-called Trump Era.

* * *

Theres a story in The Illustrated Man called The Highway, where Bradbury tells a tale about the beginning of an atomic war in the US. The war, however, is experienced through the eyes of a Mexican peasant, Hernando, who lives next to a highway in northern Mexico.

One day, Hernando glimpses a procession of hundreds of American tourists driving north to return to the US. They are heading home, that is, to join the fight in an upcoming atomic war. When the last car stops by Hernando, he sees a group of young Americans crying for help: their car needs water to continue their way back home. Right before they leave, the driver tells Hernandowho doesnt know why all the cars are driving so fast or why these young Americans are so desperatethat the end of the world has finally arrived. Hernando doesnt react to the young mans confession. The car leaves. Hernando goes back to his rural routine, but suddenly stops to wonder: What do they mean the World?

Here, Bradbury highlights the generational and cultural gap between the young Americans and the aging Hernando, who lives with his wife and works their land, recycling the automobile waste that travelers from north of the border leave behind. Its a harrowing scene, but also terrifically realistic: it illustrates not only the clashing of multiple incompatible worldviews, but shows how all such worldseven those seemingly distant from the centers of powerare threatened by contemporary global dangers. Its moments like these that ensure Bradburys relevance, even one hundred years after his birth.

* * *

Bradburys eye for contemporary troubles extends beyond the dangers of global disaster. In the prologue to The Illustrated Man, Bradbury introduces a character who has an existential problem: his torso is covered in living tattoos. Having the tattoos becomes a curse because the illustrations on his body acquire life of their own. The living illustrations unveil an ominous, even prophetic future for the person that looks at them. The Illustrated Man describes his curse:

So people fire me when my pictures move. They dont like it when violent things happen in my illustrations. Each illustration is a little story. If you watch them, in a few minutes they tell you a tale. In three hours of looking you could see eighteen or twenty stories acted right on my body, you could hear voices and think thoughts. Its all here, just waiting for you to look.

Unexpectedly, through this illustrated character, Bradbury highlights the possible dangers of Artificial Intelligence (AI).

Today, there are fears that AI will permeate and disrupt the political organization of postmodern societies. For instance, AI can predict the affinities and choices of an individual based on the application of algorithms. What The Illustrated Man shows is the consequence of those predictions once revealed to ordinary people. The Illustrated Man, not without melancholy, says:

If Im with a woman, her picture comes there on my back, in an hour, and shows her whole lifehow shell live, how shell die, what shell look like when shes sixty. And if its a man, an hour later his pictures here on my back. It shows him falling off a cliff, or dying under a train. So Im fired again.

In his article If Planet Death Doesnt Get Us, an AI Superintelligence Most Certainly Will, Bryan Walsh suggests that if a super artificial intelligence becomes able to disregard human valueswhile also increasing its intelligencethen humanity might end up controlled by a nonhuman entity with a vision of the future that does not adhere to the crucial ethical issues that societies are facing today.

The Illustrated Man, as Bradbury formulated him, can be read as a metaphor for the intersection between human values (the jobless fate of the Illustrated Man) and a superintelligence that determines human life through visual representations of the future (the living, prophetic tattoos). Most importantly, Bradburys story doesnt prophesize the invention of this particular machine so much as it examines the ways in which humans would react to such an invention.

The fear that individuals will surrender their ethical compasses to technology is a constant specter in Bradburys stories. In The Illustrated Man, this fear is represented by the refusal of the characters to accept the futures that the illustrations predict for them. Bradburys Illustrated Man, and those around him, represent the ways that humans will struggle againstand violently rejectthe enigmatic directives of any intelligence beyond our own, even if (as Bradbury notes) the intelligence is speaking truthfully.

* * *

Where did Bradburys inspiration for these particular stories in The Illustrated Man come from? The clashes he foresaw in the futurequestions of AI and global catastrophe, atomic war and border crossingcame from his own forays into Mexico in 1945.

In fact, Bradbury himself experienced the traumatic effects of crossing the USMexico border. Between October and November of 1945, Bradbury and his friend Grant Beach traveled from Los Angelesacross southern Arizona, New Mexico, and Texasto Mexico City. On their way, they found swarms of locusts and other hardships familiar from news stories today. But what was most shocking and traumatic for Bradbury was that this trip into Mexico surprisingly challenged his own deeply-held, exotic ideas about Mexican people, which he had acquired while growing up in East Los Angeles.

While in Mexico City, Bradbury spent most of his time seeking the murals of Jos Clemente Orozco, David Alfaro Siqueiros, and Diego Rivera. It is possible to suggest that Bradbury found inspiration for The Illustrated Man in these murals. The muralsperhaps what Bradbury saw as informative, or even prophetic, illustrationsrepresent past, present, and future Mexican society from a Marxist perspective, featuring people in motion with plenty of stories, colors, and historical clues (thus bringing to the audience a multilayered experience).

One of the most famous paintings by David Alfaro Siqueiros, Our Present Time, depicts a faceless man reaching with arms wide open to a space ahead of him, embracing an uncertain future. This is the very same fate of the Illustrated Man. Furthermore, many of the catastrophic themes that Bradbury engages with in The Illustrated Man are also present in these Mexican murals.

* * *

What future did Bradbury see for us? And did he embrace it? In The Fox and the Forest, included in The Illustrated Man, Bradbury sets his story explicitly in Mexico. The plot of the story is not complicated: William and Susan Travis are a married couple living in the year 2155.

That year is not a good time to be alive, since there is war, slavery, and a generalized social unhappiness. In order to escape from the apocalyptic 2155, the couple travel in time back to 1938 rural Mexico, where they believe that peace, simplicity, and happiness can be found. When it seems that they have been able to escape from their time, the 2155 police show up to take them back to the future, thus frustrating the couples escapade.

This narrative has a very pessimistic tone, evoking the nostalgia of older and happier times. Those from the future view our present as superior to their own time. Bradburys dark future, it seems, is unavoidableeven in our own present day.

* * *

More than 60 years ago, The Martian Chronicles (1950), Fahrenheit 451 (1953), and The Illustrated Man (1951) fascinated the young members of the generation growing up after the darkness of the Second World War, but before the new kinds of wars known to our own era. Now, as the 21st century unravelswith all of its challenges, technological dilemmas, and even proliferation of tattoosBradbury remains a fundamental figure of the sci-fi genre.

Bradbury had certainly not anticipated that by 2020 (like what Hernando does in The Highway) recycling was going to become a mainstream human endeavor, or that the USMexico border was going to catalyze many of the 21stcentury anxieties about global migration and demographic explosion. And yet, his stories seem to rhyme with our own era. Readers will keep finding in Bradburys tales about the future a contemporary interpretation of our everlasting fears about the end of the world, as well as a whisper of hope.

In the epilogue of The Illustrated Man, the narrator sees his own death in one of the living tattoos: it is the Illustrated Man that chokes him to death. The narrator decides to run away from this terrible fate. In this age of global catastrophe, who doesnt recognize the desire to run from such incontrovertible proofs of the worlds doom?

And yet, just like the world today, Bradbury too oscillated between utopia and dystopia. For as many people shown running from their prophesied demises, Bradbury shows young peoplelike those who Hernando couldnt understandcharging home to meet a near-certain death. Bradburys work, ultimately, is for them: those readers who believe that science fiction is an effective tool to illustrate how the worst consequences of todays global political decisions will be faced by future generations.

Young people are approaching an uncertain globalized future with plenty of possible outcomes, both dystopian and utopian. Nothing is simple: the technology that Walsh decries, the kind that the Illustrated Man fears, is even today becoming an effective tool for social mobilizations (lets think about the protests, from Hong Kong to Chile, organized through social media). Meanwhile, today, we know more than ever that any fight for the future will require the work and sacrifice of the whole world: not just car-driving Americans, but people like Hernando, too. Clearly, even Bradbury cant get everything right.

Perhaps, if Bradbury was alive today, he would ask young people: what role will you play, when my future comes crashing into your present?

Support JSTOR Daily! Join our new membership program on Patreon today.

Read more here:
Ray Bradbury on War, Recycling, and Artificial Intelligence - JSTOR Daily

Robot Burns poems created by artificial intelligence – Scotland on Sunday

They are some of the most well-known and loved poems in the world whose insightful sentiments have withstood the test of time over hundreds of years.

But now a student at the University of Glasgow has used a Robot Burns artificial intelligence (AI) poem generator programme to create almost instant works by Robert Burns, in honour of a fellow student, Chris, who took his own life on Burns Day, on 25 January 2016.

Perry Gibson, who is studying for a PhD in computing science, is donating all proceeds of his limited edition Robot Burns pamphlet to The Samaritans, the suicide prevention charity.

The Robot Burns pamphlet includes 20 works across a variety of subjects and is accompanied by illustrations by Alasdair Currie, co-founder of independent Scottish publisher Hooltet Publishing.

Mr Gibson gathered a data set of 2,000 poems by Burns, used an algorithm and created a specific coding programme which were then analysed by the GPT-2 programme operated by OpenAI whose funders include technology entrepreneur Elon Musk.When the first Burns poem came out, I blinked. I hadnt thought of what the consequences would be.

When I started, I just wanted to learn more about the technology, I hadnt really thought too much about what the text was going to be.

Before doing this my knowledge of Burns wasnt more than the ordinary Scottish guy whod learned a couple of his poems in high school.

Now, because of losing Chris, Burns Day has been marked for me and his other friends in a way, and not for the best of reasons.

But reading Burns work, and also looking at the recent hypothesis that he might have had bi-polar has made me see him in a completely different light. Maybe hes had more influence on me than I thought.

Mr Gibson added: Im excited to hear what people think and how they feel Robot Burns compares to the work of Scotlands national bard.

Colin Waters, communications manager at the Scottish Poetry Library, said: What you wont find are many poetry generators that can produce poems in Scots.

Poets, like many professions, are waiting to see if the day has come a little closer when AI can complete their task better than them.

Many contemporary Scots havent got the hang of the Scots Burns wrote in his day, so itll be fascinating to see what a computer makes of it.

Once Robot Burns has mastered the language, itll be interesting to see what it writes about next.

Mr Waters added: I imagine its take on To a Mouse will be less about timrous beasties and more about the device we use to move a cursor across a screen.

l Robot Burns, by Perry Gibson and illustrated by Alasdair Currie, 10, available from robotburns.com

More:
Robot Burns poems created by artificial intelligence - Scotland on Sunday

EnHelix ETRM Wins 2019 Leading Innovator in Oil and Gas Artificial Intelligence Analytics Software Award – Send2Press Newswire

HOUSTON, Texas, Jan. 22, 2020 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) EnHelix, EnHelix ETRM has emerged among the Leading Innovators in Oil & Gas Artificial Intelligence Analytics Software for 2019. The announcement was made known in an announcement sent to EnHelix Marketing Director Jen Wang by Wealth & Finance International.

According to the announcement, EnHelix Commodity Trading & Logistics Software was selected as the leading software of the year after a judging process that took over three months.

Commenting on the award, Marketing Director of EnHelix Jen Wang said, The EnHelix commodity trading and logistics software with artificial intelligence and blockchain is an advanced solution for trading companies which helps to standardize and automate its system of physical trades, reduces frauds and operational risks, and expedites settlement.

Our artificial intelligence trading system is fit-for-purpose configurable software that works on machine learning, deep learning, and cognitive science with the goals of providing trading companies an advantage on speed and agility on highly competitive and volatile commodity markets.

Wang added, Our customers are thrilled on how powerful the artificial intelligence is with business automation and seamless AI user experiences.

With EnHelix oil and gas AI solution, companies can now automate their trading, logistics, and accounting processes with machine learning capability with much-improved speed and efficiency. This benefits everyone along the supply chain from market participants to customers.

More information: https://www.enhelix.com/

TheOil and Gas Artificial Intelligence Award is an initiative ofWealth & Finance International launched to acknowledge the exemplary performance and innovation of some outstanding AI organizations. Winning the Artificial Intelligence Award provides organizations with the evidence they need to prove, beyond doubt that they are outstanding. Previous winners of the Artificial Intelligence Award include EQ investors, Ameriprise Financial (NYSE:AMP) among many other reputable companies.

EnHelix is a global software leader in providing commodity trading and logistics management solutions driven by integratedBlockchainandArtificial Intelligenceto serve the value chain across crude oil, natural gas, LNG, refined products, petroleum, chemical, NGL, renewable, power, coal, and other commodity markets.

*(LOGO 72dpi: https://www.enhelix.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/logo_appstream.png)

VIDEO (YouTube): https://youtu.be/-uj4P6-9u9w

News Source: EnHelix

Continue reading here:
EnHelix ETRM Wins 2019 Leading Innovator in Oil and Gas Artificial Intelligence Analytics Software Award - Send2Press Newswire

Singapore unveils new initiatives to build consumer trust in artificial intelligence at WEF – CNA

DAVOS: A set of three initiatives, aimed at improving consumer trust on the use and governance of artificial intelligence (AI), were announced by Singapore at the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting on Tuesday (Jan 21).

They are an Implementation and Self-Assessment Guide for Organisations (ISAGO), a compendium of use casesand a second edition of the Model AI Governance Framework.

The initiatives followed the launch of the Model AI Governance Framework by Singapore at last years WEF annual meeting as well as the announcement of Singapores National AI Strategy in November.

They were announced by Minister for Communications and Information S Iswaran and WEF AI portfolio lead Ms Kay Firth-Butterfield at a press conference in Davos.

Mr Iswaran is in Davos together with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam for the WEF annual meeting.

The three initiatives are meant to complement one another.

The Model AI Governance Framework was updated to include additional considerations such as robustness and reproducibility, and is aimed at making it more relevant and usable.

Developed with input from more than 60 organisationsincluding Google, Microsoft and MasterCard,ISAGO aims to help organisations assess the alignment of their AI governance practices with the Model AI Governance Framework by providing industry examples and practices.

The compendium of use cases, meanwhile, shows how local and international organisations across different sectors and sizes have implemented or aligned their AI governance practices with the framework.

Companies said they welcomed Singapores moves to strengthen governance in the field of AI.

Grabs chief technology officer for mobility and core technology Mark Porter said the model framework was a valuable starting point for companies looking to adopt the technology.

We strongly believe that AI adoption and development must be supported with a sound governance framework so that it can contribute to building a future that is smarter, safer and more inclusive, he said.

DBS Bank's group head of legal, compliance and secretariat Lam Chee Kin said the framework was a "remarkable initiative" that has helped the bank develop and refine its own approach to AI.

"By using the thinking contemplated in the framework, we can identify tough questions around ethics and supervision of AI, and from the answers we can build better processes," said Mr Lam, adding that this is needed to maintain customer trust and stakeholder accountability.

In an interview, Mr Iswaran told CNA that at least 15 organisations haveadopted the model framework.

The aim of the initiatives is to make the use of AI human centric and transparent, he said.

The objective really is to translate these ethical principles that it must be human-centric and responsible and translate that into practical guidelines so that companies who want to adopt AI technologies have a kind of guidebook on how they can go about doing this whilst maintaining the trust of their clients and their customers.

While AI has much potential, there are question marks around its application, said the minister.

The more we are able to work with partners around the world to engender trust in this AI technology, the more we are able to utilise its full potential, and benefit our people and our businesses.

Visit link:
Singapore unveils new initiatives to build consumer trust in artificial intelligence at WEF - CNA

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare Market expected to Witness a Sustainable Growth over 2019-2026 – Dagoretti News

Transparency Market Research, in its latest market intelligence study, finds that the global Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare market registered a value of ~US$ xx Mn/Bn in 2018 and is spectated to grow at CAGR of xx% during the foreseeable period 2019-2029. In terms of product type, segment holds the largest share, while segment 1 and segment 2 hold significant share in terms of end use.

The Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare market study outlines the key regions Region 1 (Country 1, Country 2), region 2 (Country 1, Country 2), region 3 (Country 1, Country 2) and region 4 (Country 1, Country 2). All the consumption trends and adoption patterns of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare are covered in the report. Prominent players, including player 1, player 2, player 3 and player 4, among others, account for substantial shares in the global Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare market.

Request Sample Report @ https://www.transparencymarketresearch.co/sample/sample.php?flag=B&rep_id=28343

market segments, analyzes various impacting factors including trends, drivers, and obstructions, and takes stock of the demand that can be expected out of different countries and regions. The report also contains a featured chapter on the competitive landscape.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare Market: Trends and Opportunities

Greater new possibilities with big data, ability of AI to enhance patient care, strong imbalance between the pool of patients and healthcare professionals, and possibilities of reducing medical costs are some of the key factors expected to augment the demand for AI in the healthcare sector. Additionally, growing importance of precision medicine, increasing number of cross-industry collaborations, consistent inflow of venture capital investments, and increasing geriatric population are some of the other factors that are expected to reflect positively over this market. On the other hand, reluctance of medical practitioners in adopting new technologies, strong lack of a preset and universal regulatory guidelines, lack of curated healthcare data, and concerns of data privacy are curtailing the market from attaining higher grounds.

Technology-wise, the artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare market can be segmented into querying method, deep learning, context aware processing, and natural language processing, whereas application-wise, artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare marketcan be bifurcated into wearables, virtual assistant, research and drug discovery, in-patient care and hospital management, medical imaging and diagnosis, precision medicine, lifestyle management and monitoring, and patient data and risk analysis.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare Market: Regional Analysis

The developed country of the U.S., which readily adopts new technology and houses a number of pioneering companies, is expected to maintain North America are the region with maximum demand potential, with little but significant demand added by Canada. While the European region is another key region for the vendors of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare market, emerging economies of Japan, South Korea, China, and India are expected to provide for decent demand over the course of the aforementioned forecast period.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare Market: Vendor Landscape

IBM Corporation, Welltok, Inc., Intel Corporation, Google, Inc., Next IT Corp., Microsoft Corporation, General Electric Company, Medtronic PLC, and Koninklijke Philips N.V. are some of the notable companies in artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare market.

The report offers a comprehensive evaluation of the artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare market. It does so via in-depth qualitative insights, historical data, and verifiable projections about market size. The projections featured in the report have been derived using proven research methodologies and assumptions. By doing so, the research report serves as a repository of analysis and information for every facet of the artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare market, including but not limited to: Regional markets, technology, types, and applications.

The study is a source of reliable data on:

The regional analysis covers:

The report has been compiled through extensive primary research (through interviews, surveys, and observations of seasoned analysts) and secondary research (which entails reputable paid sources, trade journals, and industry body databases). The report also features a complete qualitative and quantitative assessment by analyzing data gathered from industry analysts and market participants across key points in the industrys value chain.

A separate analysis of prevailing trends in the parent market, macro- and micro-economic indicators, and regulations and mandates is included under the purview of the study. By doing so, the report projects the attractiveness of each major segment over the forecast period.

Highlights of the report:

Note :Although care has been taken to maintain the highest levels of accuracy in TMRs reports, recent market/vendor-specific changes may take time to reflect in the analysis.

Request For Discount On This Report @ https://www.transparencymarketresearch.co/sample/sample.php?flag=D&rep_id=28343

The Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare market research answers important questions, including the following:

The Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare market research serves a platter of the following information:

RequestTOC For ThisReport @ https://www.transparencymarketresearch.co/sample/sample.php?flag=T&rep_id=28343

Why go for Transparency Market Research?

Transparency Market Research stays aligned with the fact the organization lands among the leading market research firms in India. Our analysts work irrespective of the time-zone, the result, we are being recognized worldwide. We abide by the notion that each client has his/her own set of requirements. With extensive primary and secondary research, our experts churn out the most accurate information regarding the desired the market.

About TMR

Transparency Market Research (TMR) is a global market intelligence company providing business information reports and services. The companys exclusive blend of quantitative forecasting and trend analysis provides forward-looking insight for thousands of decision makers. TMRs experienced team of analysts, researchers, and consultants use proprietary data sources and various tools and techniques to gather and analyze information.

Contact

Transparency Market ResearchState Tower90 State Street,Suite 700,Albany, NY 12207United StatesTel: +1-518-618-1030USA Canada Toll Free: 866-552-3453Email: [emailprotected]Website: http://www.transparencymarketresearch.com

View post:
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare Market expected to Witness a Sustainable Growth over 2019-2026 - Dagoretti News

Illinois takes first step to combat bias in hiring decisions with Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act – Lexology

As the use of artificial intelligence in employment decisions grows, regulations on the practice will increase as well.Illinois has kicked off these regulations with theArtificial Intelligence Video Interview Act, which requires employers to disclose and job applicants consent before using artificial intelligence on candidate videos when used to assess an individuals fitness for employment.To prepare to comply with this law, and additional laws that we expect to follow, employers need to understand how their AI programs work and the underlying data on which it is based.The argument that AI removes bias from the interview and hiring processes by the use of objective standards is not necessarily true; other arguments suggest that this is not the case because implicit bias may be contained within the underlying data on which AI relies and can, therefore, result in disparate impact discrimination.For more information about this law, seehere.

More here:
Illinois takes first step to combat bias in hiring decisions with Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act - Lexology

Gabonese youth enthusiastic about the future prospects offered by Artificial Intelligence – India Education Diary

UNESCO, through its Information for All Programme (IFAP) and in collaboration with the World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST), organized an awareness-raising workshop on Artificial Intelligence on 26 and 27 November 2019, in Libreville, Gabon.

Given the recent expansion of Artificial Intelligence, there is growing demand for a new vision of inclusive knowledge societies that emphasizes the importance of the creation, dissemination, preservation and use of information and knowledge using these emerging technologies.

The remarkable expansion of these technologies is leading to the rise in inventions that were once believed impossible. Computers and robots are now capable of learning, self-improvement and even decision-making evidently, through an algorithm lacking individual consciousness. Nevertheless, this feat provokes ethical questions. During the two days of the workshop, the participants analyzed the impact of artificial intelligence, as well as the ethical aspects. The discussion concerned issues in UNESCOs fields of competence of education, science, culture and communication, and furthermore, the ethical and global dimensions of peace, cultural diversity, gender equality and sustainability.

The World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST) contributed to the debate on the impact of emerging issues, such as artificial intelligence and its relation to the Internet of Things or privacy in the digital age.

This debate prompted Gabon to take part in international discussions on the subject, and participants were able to explore both their confidence and reluctance in reducing the digital divide. This gap is more prominent in Gabon than in other countries such as South Africa, Kenya, Morocco, Nigeria and Rwanda, stressed Mr. Vincenzo Fazzino, UNESCO Representative in Gabon.

The workshop in Libreville thus allowed participants to learn and strengthen their knowledge on artificial intelligence. Moreover, the participants were able to understand the issues by taking into account the challenges and opportunities offered by AI and to contextualize AI in their country.

At the end of the workshop, the stakeholders committed to promote artificial intelligence throughout the national territory, encourage African regional cooperation, foster an ethical framework and set up a Gabonese Forum of Artificial Intelligence Associations.

In UNESCOs bookSteering Artificial Intelligence and Advanced ICT for Knowledge Societies, Artificial Intelligence is assessed within the wider ecosystem of Internet and other advanced ICTs including big data, Internet of Things, blockchains, etc. The publication shows that benefits and challenges particularly for communications and information can be usefully analysed in terms of UNESCOs Internet Universality ROAM principles. These principles urge that digital development be aligned with human Rights, Openness, Accessibility and Multi-stakeholder governance to guide the ensemble of values, norms, policies, regulations, codes and ethics that govern the development and use of Artificial Intelligence.

View post:
Gabonese youth enthusiastic about the future prospects offered by Artificial Intelligence - India Education Diary

Witnesses testify that CIA spied on Assange and his lawyers – World Socialist Web Site

Witnesses testify that CIA spied on Assange and his lawyers By Mike Head 22 January 2020

Further detailed evidence has been produced in a Spanish court that the CIA systematically and illegally recorded conversations between WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and his lawyers, and all other visitors, while he was trapped inside Ecuadors London embassy before he was dragged out and arrested last April to face extradition to the US.

The Spanish newspaper El Pas yesterday reported that three people who worked for the Spanish security company UC Global S.L. have testified as protected witnesses in Spains High Court, the Audencia Nacional, that the companys head David Morales handed over the surveillance material to the CIA.

The testimony is another devastating exposure of the decade-long political conspiracy conducted against Assange by the American, British and Australian governments, and their collaborators in Sweden and Ecuador. US imperialism and its allies want to silence him for life for publishing hundreds of thousands of documents laying bare the war crimes and other criminal activities of the US and its allies around the world. They are equally desperate to prevent further damning leaks by courageous whistle blowers and journalists as they prepare new wars, assassinations and coups.

The witness statements also confirm the extraordinary extent to which these governments have trampled over Assanges legal and democratic rights, including the fundamental and precious protection of lawyer-client confidentiality. This evidence alone requires the US extradition case to be thrown out of court on the grounds of illegality.

According to the evidence provided by the witnessesvideos, audio tapes and dozens of emailsthe surveillance operation was extensive. In particular, Assanges meetings with his legal team were videoed and recorded in order to gain material to try to incriminate him and to identify the evidence and legal arguments they would marshal against any prosecution under the US Espionage Act.

Under Morales express orders, the security company photographed the passports of all of Assanges visitors, took apart their cell phones, downloaded content from their iPads, took notes and put together reports on each meeting. The Ecuadorian diplomats who worked in the London embassy were also spied on.

Morales, a former Spanish military officer, is being prosecuted in Spain, after being charged in October with privacy violation, bribery and money laundering. His company was officially employed by the Ecuadorian government to provide security at the embassy but that became a cover for a bugging operation against Assange.

According to El Pas, two of the witnesses confirmed that, in December 2017, Morales ordered workers to change the surveillance cameras in the embassy and replace them with others that could capture audio. From that moment on, they monitored conversations between Assange and his lawyers, even in the female toilet that Assange and his legal team used in attempt to avoid illegal bugging.

During these meetings with his lawyers, Assange prepared his legal defence. The Australian citizen faces trumped-up charges under the US Espionage Act that carry penalties of a total of 175 years in prison. While awaiting the extradition hearing, due to commence in the last week of February, he also has been sedated and denied adequate medical treatment, placing his life in danger.

El Pas reported that the three witness statements all described the phrases that Morales used with his most-trusted workers, referring to UC Globals collaboration with the US secret service. These included: We are playing in the first division, I have gone to the dark side, Those in control are the American friends, The American client, The American friends are asking me to confirm, The North American will get us a lot of contracts around the world, and US intelligence.

The recordings from the cameras installed in the embassy were extracted from the hard drive every 15 daysalong with recordings from microphones placed in fire extinguishersand delivered personally to Morales at the headquarters of UC Global, located in Jerez de la Frontera in the south of Spain.

Morales travelled to the US once or twice a month, allegedly to hand over the material to the Americans. Morales also had installed remote-operated computer servers that collected the illegally obtained information, which could be accessed from the United States.

The witnesses testified that the material on Assange was handed over to the CIA by a member of the security service of Sheldon Adelson, the owner of the casino and resort company Las Vegas Sands Corporation. Adelson is a friend of US President Donald Trump and a large donor to the Republican Party.

Last year, the Italian newspaper,La Repubblica, obtained files evidencing UC Globals spying operation, including on doctors, journalists, politicians and celebrities who visited Assange. UC Global compiled profiles on Assanges London-based lawyer Jennifer Robinson and the head of his legal team in Spain, Baltasar Garzon. The video and audio footage showed a half-naked Julian Assange during a medical check-up and two of his lawyers, Gareth Peirce and Aitor Martinez, entering the womens bathroom for a private conversation with their client.

The extradition and prosecution of Assange is an historic assault on basic democratic principles enshrined over hundreds of years in constitutional and common law, including in the US and Britain.

Assanges legal team has already submitted evidence showing the blatantly political nature of the persecution of Assange, including material relating to Chelsea Manning, the former soldier being imprisoned indefinitely to attempt to force her to testify against Assange. They have also submitted public statements by US politicians denouncing Assange and WikiLeaks that jeopardise any prospect of a fair trial, and evidence relating to abuse of due process, vindictive prison conditions and denial of medical treatment.

In any criminal proceeding, evidence that the prosecution had illegally recorded conversations between the defendant and his lawyers would result in a mistrial, the dropping of charges, the release of the defendant and the disbarring and possible prosecution of all those involved.

In 1973, whistleblower Daniel Ellsberglike Assangewas prosecuted under the Espionage Act for leaking documents to the New York Times and the Washington Post. The Pentagon Papers revealed how the US government had for years lied to the public in order to expand the Vietnam War, which led to the deaths of three million Vietnamese people and 55,000 US soldiers. Their publication triggered an explosion of public anger and fuelled anti-war protests.

During Ellsbergs trial, President Richard Nixons plumbers broke into the office of Ellsbergs psychiatrist and wiretapped his phone. In that case, Judge William Matthew Byrne ruled that the surveillance had incurably infected the prosecution and dismissed the charges, setting Ellsberg free.

But even more is at stake in Assanges case, because WikiLeaks has helped expose the much greater crimes being committed by the US and its partners, including Britain and Australia. Moreover, the trampling over legal and democratic rights has advanced far further since the 1970s as the US ruling class has increasingly resorted to military aggression to try to overcome the erosion and decay of the global economic hegemony it asserted after World War II.

Moral appeals to politicians will not halt this travesty, let alone the underlying drive by US imperialism. The fight to defend democratic rights and stop the global lurch toward dictatorship and war requires a mass movement. The new year has begun with the resumption of momentous struggles by the working class around the world against government austerity measures, social inequality, environmental catastrophe and war. This is the force that must be mobilised, against capitalism, in order to free Assange and Manning.

The author also recommends:

The prosecution of Julian Assange, the destruction of legality and the rise of the national security state [15 January 2020]

2019 has been a year of mass social upheaval. We need you to help the WSWS and ICFI make 2020 the year of international socialist revival. We must expand our work and our influence in the international working class. If you agree, donate today. Thank you.

See the rest here:
Witnesses testify that CIA spied on Assange and his lawyers - World Socialist Web Site

Glenn Greenwald says Brazil charges are part of a global trend to criminalize journalism – Thehour.com

Joseph Marks, The Washington Post

American journalist Glenn Greenwald says the Brazilian government's charges against him are the latest strike in a global campaign by governments across the world to use anti-hacking laws to punish and silence journalists.

"Governments [are] figuring out how they can criminalize journalism based on large-scale digital leaks," Greenwald told me.

Greenwald, who won a Pulitzer Prize for reporting on leaked documents from former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden in 2014, says the charges are baseless. "Even in democracies -let alone in the authoritarian world - there's a real struggle to make the law fit criminalizing leaks of this sort," he said.

Greenwald, who lives in Rio de Janeiro, is facing charges stemming from his reporting on leaked cellphone messages that raised doubts about a corruption investigation that aided the rise of Brazil's far-right President Jair Bolsonaro. Greenwald is accused of being part of a "criminal organization" that allegedly hacked into public officials' cellphones last year to copy messages that were published on his news site, the Intercept Brazil.

Greenwald compared the Brazilian charges against him to the Trump administration's controversial decision to prosecute WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange last year under the main U.S. anti-hacking law, the 1986 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

"I've been particularly concerned given the Bolsonaro government's subservience to and admiration for the Trump government that they'd look to the precedent the Trump government used to indict Julian Assange," he told me, "trying to concoct a dubious or tenuous theory that he went beyond passing information to participating in the crime itself."

The charges come as officials in the United States and elsewhere have faced years of criticism for not updating decades-old hacking laws, which critics say are overly broad and can be used to criminalize innocuous work by anyone who deals with computer networks or large digital files including security researchers and journalists.

Brazilian prosecutors allege Greenwald crossed a line by encouraging his anonymous sources to delete their copies of stolen messages to evade detection. That explanation drew quick criticism from press freedom advocates in the United States and Brazil who said it criminalized reporters advising their sources on how to work securely. Greenwald told me he'd scrupulously followed Brazilian law and called the charges "an obvious attempt to attack a free press."

In the Assange case, meanwhile, U.S. prosecutors say he violated the law by offering to help then-military intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning decipher a password so she could get greater access to a military database and pass more secrets to WikiLeaks. Cybersecurity experts at the time criticized the Trump administration for stretching the 34-year-old CFAA law to fit a situation its authors never could have envisioned.

Press freedom advocates were less eager than Greenwald to draw a comparison between the charges against him and Assange. Gabe Rottman, technology and press freedom director at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said that Assange's offer to help a source crack a password could be deemed illegal under a reasonable reading of the CFAA, while Greenwald's alleged advice to sources on security does not violate ethical or legal principles. Rottman, who's written extensively about the Assange charges, says he takes this view even though he considers the CFAA so out of pace with modern technology that it can be applied in an unconstitutional manner in many cases.

Greenwald acknowledged there may be important distinctions between his actions and Assange's, but he described the two cases as on the same "slippery slope." Greenwald also warned they could lead to reporters being prosecuted for common journalistic practices such as urging sources to contact them using encrypted apps or accepting document leaks through online tools that anonymize the sender.

"There's a general aversion to defending Assange by press freedom groups because they don't see Assange as a journalist and they do see me as one," he said. "But there's no question the [Assange] indictment encourages governments to criminalize a person in the role of a journalist."

Greenwald added in a statement that he hasn't been detained and plans to keep publishing.

Though Greenwald has ruffled some feathers in Washington with his reporting on leaked information, he is getting strong support from many lawmakers.

Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., said the charges will have a "chilling effect" on journalism and said he's crafting legislation to protect journalists from prosecution.

Rep. Don Beyer, D-Va., called the charges "a step backwards that hurts Brazil."

"No journalist should face prosecution for reporting critical facts about the government or politicians," Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said in an emailed statement reported by the Intercept.

Advocacy groups also came to Greenwald's defense.

The American Civil Liberties Union called the charges an "outrageous assault on the freedom of the press."

The Electronic Frontier Foundation called them "a threat to democracy" that "discourages journalists from using technology to best serve the public."

Even some former intelligence community officials jumped in. Here's former NSA attorney Susan Hennessey, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who runs the Lawfare blog:

House impeachment managers and President Donald Trump's defenders agreed early this morningon ground rules for his historic Senate impeachment trial. That trial's sure to delve into conspiracy theories the president embraced that cast doubt on Russia's hacking and disinformation campaign against the 2016 election and hacking threats facing 2020.

Continue reading here:
Glenn Greenwald says Brazil charges are part of a global trend to criminalize journalism - Thehour.com

This Week in Technology + Press Freedom: Jan. 19, 2020 – Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press

Heres what the staff of the Technology and Press Freedom Project at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press is tracking this week.

Before we get to this weeks Top Story, we wanted to flag that the Reporters Committee and 57 media organizations sent aletterto Senate leadership, the Senate Sergeant at Arms, and the U.S. Capitol Police to opposerestrictionsfor journalists covering the upcoming Senate impeachment trial of President Donald J. Trump. Absent an articulable security rationale, [the Senate has] an obligation to preserve and promote the publics right to know, the letter said. The media coalition echoed concerns raised by the Senate Standing Committee of Correspondents in its ownletterdecrying the plans.Please share!

The Reporters Committee filed afriend-of-the-court brieflast week in the ongoing case concerning journalist Brian Karems White House hard pass, the credentials that facilitate reporters access to White House grounds.

Last August, the White House suddenly notified Karem of a 30-day suspension of his hard pass, citing the Playboy correspondents alleged failure to abide by basic norms of decorum and order, more than three weeks after Karem had analtercationwith former Trump aide Sebastian Gorka in the Rose Garden.

Karem immediately sought a preliminary injunction in federal court in the District of Columbia to get his credentials restored. The Reporters Committee filed afriend-of-the-court briefin support of Karem, emphasizing the well-established legal rule that the White House can deny hard passes only pursuant to basic due process that is, notice of the conduct that will result in denial of security credentials and an opportunity to challenge the denial. That rule set down in 1977 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit inSherrill v. Knight requires the White House to articulate and publish an explicit and meaningful standard governing denial of press passes before doing so. The brief pointed out that the White House had not done so here and argued that whatever explicit standard is adopted must offer precision and guidance.

The district courtgrantedthe preliminary injunction, echoing many of the arguments presented by the Reporters Committee. The government appealed.

In its amicus brief on appeal, the Reporters Committee, joined by 44 press groups, again emphasized the importance of theSherrilldue process rule, and noted the medias critical role in holding the executive branch accountable, particularly in light of its ability to maintain greater secrecy over its actions than other branches. The brief also explained the importance of clear rules in this area, giving color to the district courts suggestion that a White House standard of decorum and order is too vague for journalists to be on fair notice about how to conform their behavior.

We jumped into the Karem case for many of the same reasonsthat theReporters Committee has engaged in issues involvingFirst Amendment retaliation against the press under the guise of executive branch regulatory actions.

In 2018, for instance, the Reporters Committee filed afriend-of-the-court briefin another case in the D.C. Circuit where the government appealed its unsuccessful challenge to the merger of AT&T and Time Warner (which owns CNN). The brief noted the presidents public and well-documented hostility toward CNN, and the importance of permitting limited discovery to determine the viability of a selective enforcement defense in cases where public criticism of an outlet suggests intent to retaliate against it.

The brief also highlighted examples of attempted press intimidation under administrations of both parties, including President Lyndon Johnsons demand for a literal letter of fealty from the publisher of the Houston Chronicle in exchange for authorizing a merger involving a bank owned by the publisher and President Richard Nixon using the threat of an antitrust lawsuit against the television networks in an attempt to sway coverage.

Ultimately, the issues at stake inKarem, the AT&T case, and the Johnson/Nixon episodes are similar. If the First Amendment means anything, its that the government cant use the levers of power to retaliate for coverage perceived as negative, be it a hard pass that permits a White House reporter to do his or her job, or economic regulations like antitrust that can hit a news organization where it may hurt most: the pocketbook.

Jordan Murov-Goodman

On Thursday, the New York Timesreportedthat federal prosecutors are investigating whether former FBI Director James Comey illegally provided classified information to reporters, marking the second time the Justice Department has focused on Comey for allegedly leaking information to the press. The first ended in a decision not to prosecute. Prosecutors in the U.S. attorneys office in the District of Columbia are now reportedly investigating whether the former director provided classified details about a Russian intelligence document to reporters for the Times and the Washington Post. Trump has previouslycalledComey a leaker on social media.

Last week, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange brieflyappearedin person in a U.K. court proceeding in which his lawyers argued they were not being given enough time to meet with their client. Assanges five-day extradition hearing is scheduled for late February. He has beenchargedby U.S. officials for violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and the Espionage Act.

Natalie Mayflower Sours Edwards, a former U.S. Treasury Department staffer accused of leaking confidential information to a reporter,pled guiltyin federal court last week to a count of conspiracy. Edwards waschargedwith makingunauthorized disclosures and with conspiracy to make unauthorized disclosuresof Suspicious Activity Reports, which document certain financial transactions that could indicate wrongdoing.

In the latest development in the debate over government encryption backdoors, Attorney General William Barr last week called onAppleto find a way to permit direct access to the encrypted phones of a Saudi aviation student who authorities saycarried out a terror attackat a Florida Navy base in December. The companyhas refusedto develop backdoors for law enforcement, arguing that there is no way to ensure that a built-in vulnerability for law enforcement wont be exploitable by bad actors. Some havenotedthat third-party vendors have developed cracks for iPhone encryption, which would not involve Apple being forced to build in a vulnerability for law enforcement access.

Lawmakers in the state of Washington have unveiled adata privacy billakin to the onerecently passedin California. This continues the trend of statestaking the leadin regulating the collection and use of consumer data.

Several members of Congress recentlyurgedthe Federal Communications Commission to require wireless carriers to do more to protect consumers from SIM swapping, a scheme in which bad actors dupe wireless carriers into transferring to their SIM cards the cell phone accounts of unsuspecting victims. Journalists should be especially concerned about being targets of SIM swapping, and can takestepssuch as enabling two-factor authentication to protect their accounts and data.

Claiming that a former government employee has stepped forward to divulge more details of the operation against her, former CBS news anchor Sharyl Attkisson isrenewing her attemptsto sue the government over alleged warrantless surveillance of her phones and computers nearly a decade ago. Her complaint claims that former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein directed a team of four agents toconduct home surveillanceon her and other U.S. citizens during his time as the United States Attorney for the District of Maryland. This operation, she says, occurred while she reported on various controversies during the Obama administration, such as the Benghazi embassy attack.

Thirteen press secretaries spanning the administrations of Presidents George H.W. and George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obamacalledon the Trump administration to resume regularly scheduled press briefings. They cited multiple benefits of the briefings, despite the ability of officials to communicate through social media, including keeping policy objectives on a timely schedule and avoiding the proliferation of misinformation by allowing the media to vet claims. The Trump administration has held fewer press conferences than past administrations, with current White House press secretary Stephanie Grishamrefusingto hold any since taking the position last July. Indeed, the last White House press briefing wasover 300 days ago, and counting.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recentlyruledin a First Amendment challenge against nondisclosure orders accompanying demands for data under the Stored Communications Act that such restraints on speech survive strict scrutiny. The court held that the governments interest in maintaining grand jury secrecy was compelling, that the use of nondisclosure orders was narrowly tailored, and that the nondisclosure orders were the least restrictive means to maintain grand jury secrecy thus meeting all three prongs of the constitutional test applied to such regulations. This case raises concerns similar to those of a recent case in which attorneys for the Reporters Committee filed anamicus briefin support of Microsoft.

Gif of the Week:Friendly reminder to enable two-factor paw-thentication on your devices.

Like what youve read?Sign up to get This Week in Technology + Press Freedom delivered straight to your inbox!

The Technology and Press Freedom Project at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press uses integrated advocacy combining the law, policy analysis, and public education to defend and promote press rights on issues at the intersection of technology and press freedom, such as reporter-source confidentiality protections, electronic surveillance law and policy, and content regulation online and in other media. TPFP is directed by Reporters Committee Attorney Gabe Rottman. He works with Stanton Foundation National Security/Free Press Fellow Linda Moon and Legal Fellows Jordan Murov-Goodman and Lyndsey Wajert.

Follow this link:
This Week in Technology + Press Freedom: Jan. 19, 2020 - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press