The first and only time I met Julian Assange was exactly nine years agoApril 12, 2010. He was in New York City to appear on The Colbert Report and I was working as an editor at The New York Times. We met in a coffee shop after the taping so I could interview him about his plans for WikiLeaks.

I remember thinking that he was taking this online secret-leaking business quite seriously. We were on a quiet side street in the West Village, but, like Malcolm X entering a restaurant, he surveyed the room to be sure that he wouldnt be sitting with his back to the door. He carried a satellite phone with him.

As the night wore on, Assange wondered where he could watch himself on the TV. Going to a bar to ask the barkeep to switch from sports to watch yourself on Comedy Central would be a bit show-offy, even for a platinum-haired renegade. And streaming TV on your phone just wasnt a thing yet. So I offered my fourth-floor walkup apartment, and at 11:30 that night Assange viewed his appearance on The Colbert Report from my living room/kitchen.

Noam Cohen is a journalist and author of The Know-It-Alls: The Rise of Silicon Valley as a Political Powerhouse and Social Wrecking Ball, which uses the history of computer science and Stanford University to understand the libertarian ideas promoted by tech leaders. While working for The New York Times, Cohen wrote some of the earliest articles about Wikipedia, bitcoin, Wikileaks, and Twitter. He lives with his family in Brooklyn.

The entire evening seemed way over the topperhaps even laughably so. Colbert, it appeared, had reached a similar conclusion about Assanges seriousness. He introduced his guest as the cofounder of WikiLeaks, which reveals corporate and government secret documents. For the first time, Colbert continued gravely, his show would be using pixelated imagery and voice-altering technology during the interview. Cut to Colberts face being pixelated and his voice being altered. Big laughs.

Then, after a short while, Colbert says: You know what Jimmy, I think you were right. I think its probably better to pixelate him and affect his voice, rather than mine. Has his face already been on camera? Have they seen him? Jimmy says, yes, and pixelated Colbert says, Oh, hes a dead man. Nervous laughs.

Back at my apartment, I remember that Assange told me and my girlfriend (now wife) what seemed like outrageous stories of his life. How he spent his childhood traveling Australia as part of his mothers theater troupe and visited Magnetic Island, which had strange properties that he implied influenced the minds of the people who lived there. He mentioned that he was part Chinese and that his last name derived from Ah Sang, an early ancestor.

It all seemed part of his mesmerizing performance, and then, a couple of months later, I saw those same details in a profile in The New Yorker, and I was further confused. Was the performance real or was reality a performance?

The Colbert interview was hardly clarifying concerning Assanges character; after all, Colbert himself was adopting the persona of a blowhard, right-wing commentator. WikiLeaks was in the news for decrypting and releasing a leaked video showing an attack by United States Army Apache helicopters in Baghdad three years earlier, which left 12 people dead, including two employees of the news agency Reuters. It had released an edited version of the encounter, which it titled Collateral Murder, as well as an unedited one.

Even though Colbert and Assange are discussing a battlefield horror, there is a giddiness throughout the encounter. Everything is played for a jokemuch as I thought at the time that Assange was (over)playing his roguish persona. Back then, it seems, what happened on the internet wasnt entirely real, at least not in the same way offline events could be.

Brian Stelter, now the host of CNNs Reliable Sources, on Thursday shared the article we wrote together at The New York Times about Collateral Murder and marveled at how understated the headline was: Iraq Video Brings Notice to a Web Site.

Nine years later, everything seems much more grave. We now know that a Web site can foment genocide, spread propaganda, misshape our politics, destroy entire industries. WikiLeaks went from exposing to public light a potential wartime atrocity to putting its finger on the thumb during a US presidential election by releasing material targeted at one of the candidates.

The giddiness is gone. On Thursday, the Julian Assange hauled out of the Ecuadoran embassy in Londonwhere he took refuge to avoid extradition to Sweden to face questions about sexual assault accusations, which he has deniedlooked exhausted. With his haggard face and wild beard, he seemed a distorted reflection of the trim, controlled man I met in 2010.

Today, as Assange faces a federal charge in the United States of conspiring to hack into a Pentagon computer network in that year, we debate how the law should consider Assange. He has gone from charismatic provocateur to, in some peoples eyes, a news publisher. Of course, being considered a publisher could be his ultimate provocation.

Colbert pushed Assange over WikiLeaks role as a distributor of the leaks it collects, starting with its decision to edit the leaked video of the Apache attack and to give it such a conclusory title. Thats not leaking thats a pure editorial, Colbert said. Which gave Assange the opportunity to explain his philosophy: The promise we make to our sources, is that not only will we defend them with every means that we have available, technological, and legally, and politically, but we will try to get the maximum possible political impact for the material they give to us.

That hardly seems like a journalistic standardit is a standard that fosters leaking, I suppose, and the controversy those leaks are intended to produce. You might even describe it as anarchic. Certainly, the events that followed at WikiLeaks make more sense in light of Assanges explanation.

Tongue fully in cheek, Colbert complains about WikiLeaks: If we dont know what the government is doing, we cant be sad about it. Why are you trying to make me sad? Yes, you are trying to bum us out about the world.

Assange responds with a peculiar smile, Just an interim state, Stephen, youll be happier later on.

Here is the original post:
The Julian Assange I Met in 2010 Doesn't Exist Anymore

London --The former President of Ecuador, Rafael Correa, sharply criticized the country's current president on Thursday for stripping WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange of asylum status and allowing him to be arrested by U.K. police. "The greatest traitor in Ecuadorian and Latin American history, Lenn Moreno, allowed the British police to enter our embassy in London to arrest Assange," Correa tweeted.

"Moreno is a corrupt man, but what he has done is a crime that humanity will never forget," the former leader said.

Assange had been living in Ecuador's embassy in London since he was granted asylum by Correa in 2012.

"Lenn Moreno was Correa's candidate," Richard Lapper, Associate Fellow at Chatham House's U.S. and the Americas Programme, told CBS News of the now-rivals. The left-wing leader was unable to run in Ecuador's 2017 elections because of the country's term limits, so he campaigned for Moreno, who was his one-time vice president.

"Correa expected Moreno to follow very similar policies to him. That hasn't happened. Lenn Moreno has pursued a more social democratic, more centrist political line," Lapper said.

As tensions grew in Ecuador between Correa and Moreno supporters over the shift, a large trove of hacked documents, dubbed the "INA Papers," was leaked on the internet. It included material belonging to Moreno which some people believe shows he profited from corrupt business dealings. WikiLeaks tweeted a link to the papers, but denied having anything to do with their publication, the Daily Beast reported.

On Thursday, Correa tweeted: "Julian Assange was expelled from the Ecuadorian Embassy for exposing Pres. Lenin Moreno's corruption in the #INAPapers." His tweet included bank details that he alleged were a secret account used by Moreno for money laundering.

Earlier in the day, Moreno tweeted a video statement announcing that the country would be revoking Assange's asylum status.

"Ours is a government respectful of the principles of international law, and of the institution of the right of asylum. Granting or withdrawing asylum is a sovereign right of the Ecuadorian state, according to international law," Moreno said in the prerecorded message.

"Today, I announce that the discourteous and aggressive behavior of Mr. Julian Assange, the hostile and threatening declarations of its allied organization, against Ecuador, and especially, the transgression of international treaties have led the situation to a point where the asylum of Mr. Assange is unsustainable and no longer viable," he said.

"Ecuador is pursuing a more pro-Western foreign policy than it did under Correa," Lapper told CBS News. "They've sought to diversify their trade and investment relations, and so (that) entails being more pragmatic, basically, in their policies."

"I think there are very good reasons for Ecuador to pursue the kind of approach it's pursuing now, especially when you look over the border in Venezuela and see what an absolute humanitarian disaster 'Chavismo' has created there," explained Lapper. "Moreno, like some of the other governments in Latin America, is taking his distance from that."

See more here:
How Ecuador's shifting politics led to Julian Assange's ...

Federal prosecutors in the United States unsealed a computer hacking indictment against Julian Assange on Thursday just hours after authorities in the United Kingdom arrested the WikiLeaks founder at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where he has lived for the past seven years.

The newly unsealed indictment, filed last year in the Eastern District of Virginia, targets Assange in an alleged conspiracy with former U.S. Army intelligence analyst turned whistleblower Chelsea Manning to hack into U.S. Department of Defense computers in March 2010, in "one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of the United States."

"During the conspiracy, Manning and Assange engaged in real-time discussions regarding Mannings transmission of classified records to Assange," prosecutors said in a press release."The discussions also reflect Assange actively encouraging Manning to provide more information. During an exchange, Manning told Assange that after this upload, thats all I really have got left. To which Assange replied, curious eyes never run dry in my experience, the release said.

Prosecutors wrote that Assange was arrested pursuant to a U.S.-U.K. extradition treaty, but when or even if that would happen was unclear.

The dramatic arrest of Assange played out Thursday morning in London, when Metropolitan Police executed a warrant for Assange's arrest on behalf of Westminster Magistrates' Court. Police said they were invited into the Ecuadorian Embassy by Ambassador Carlos Abad Ortiz after the Ecuadorian government withdrew the WikiLeaks founder's asylum status.

During his initial court appearance on Thursday, Assange offered no evidence and was found guilty of breaching his bail. The judge described Assange as a narcissist who cannot get beyond his own selfish interests.

He now faces up to 12 months in jail and will be sentenced at a later date. Until then, Assange will remain in custody.

The warrant for his "failure to appear dates back to a now-closed rape inquiry in Sweden that had been active for the past seven years. The rape investigation was dropped by Swedish prosecutors in 2017 as they could not gain access to Assange while he was inside the Ecuadorean Embassy, but Swedish prosecutors announced Thursday their intention to re-open the rape investigation against Assange.

WikiLeaks advocates and Assanges legal team leapt to his defense on Thursday morning, decrying his arrest and prospective extradition to the U.S.

Carlos Poveda, Assange's lawyer in Ecuador, claimed the arrest contravened international conventions on human rights. Barry Pollack, Assange's U.S.-based attorney, described the news as "bitterly disappointing."

Addressing reporters after his initial appearance, Assange's lawyer Jennifer Robinson vowed that his legal team would "be contesting and fighting extradition" and argued that Assange's arrest and indictment "sets dangerous precedent for all media organizations and journalists."

In a tweet, WikiLeaks wrote that Powerful actors, including CIA, are engaged in a sophisticated effort to dehumanise, delegitimize and imprison [Assange], and Edward Snowden, the former intelligence contractor who leaked details of a secret domestic data mining program, bemoaned the "weakness of the US charge against Assange."

The American actress Pamela Anderson, a confidante of Assange's in recent years, wrote on Twitter, "I am in shock ... how could you UK?"

Meanwhile, government officials in the U.K. and Ecuador applauded Assanges arrest.

Sir Alan Duncan, the British government's Minister of State for Europe and the Americas, said in a statement that it was "absolutely right that Assange will face justice."

The U.K.'s Foreign Secretary, Jeremy Hunt, wrote in a tweet that "Julian Assange is no hero and no one is above the law.

Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno announced on Thursday that Assange's diplomatic asylum and immunity had been withdrawn for "repeated violations to international conventions and daily-life protocol.

Assange, an Australian native, founded the website WikiLeaks in 2006 and drew attention over the next decade for releasing sensitive, and often classified, information.

See the rest here:
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrested after 7 years of ...

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was arrested in London by British police Thursday after being expelled from the Ecuadorian Embassy and hell now likely face extradition to the United States.

We can confirm that Julian Assange was arrested in relation to a provisional extradition request from the United States of America, the UK Home Office said in a statement. He is accused in the United States of America of computer related offences.

Then the Justice Department unsealed an indictment of Assange filed in March 2018. In it, he is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit computer intrusion, related to the leaks of US government documents he received from then-US Army Pvt. Chelsea Manning in 2010.

Assange has had an outstanding arrest warrant in the United Kingdom for years because, back in 2012, he skipped out on bail to avoid extradition related to sexual assault allegations against him in Sweden.

He took refuge in Ecuadors London embassy, where he had been holed up for nearly seven years. Swedish prosecutors rescinded their warrant for him during that time, but Assange remained in the embassy for just this reason: because he feared there were secret US charges against him. However, his relations with the Ecuadorian government soured after a new president took power, leading to his ultimate expulsion from the embassy.

Assange has dogged the US government with a series of leaks over the past decade such as the war documents and State Department cables provided by Manning, and CIA hacking material.

Also, infamously, in 2016, Assange posted emails that had been hacked from the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign chair John Podesta. Special counsel Robert Mueller indicted 12 Russian intelligence officers with carrying out this hack and leak operation, but he did not file charges against Assange.

Instead, the WikiLeaks founder is being charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion specifically, that he agreed to assist Manning in cracking a password stored on Defense Department computers that didnt belong with her.

Assanges lawyer Barry Pollack said in a statement that this charge is mainly about encouraging a source to provide him information and taking efforts to protect the identity of that source, adding that journalists around the world should be deeply troubled by these unprecedented charges.

For now, Assange is not being charged with any other crimes (such as the Espionage Act or crimes related to classified information). But CNN reported Thursday morning that the Justice Department expects to bring additional charges against him.

Assange is an Australian hacktivist who founded WikiLeaks in 2006, with the stated goal of publishing information the powerful were trying to keep secret. The group had its greatest successes in obtaining and posting US military, national security, and foreign policy documents, and Assange was a harsh critic of what he deemed the USs imperialist ambitions.

Starting in 2010, WikiLeaks published a video of an airstrike in Iraq that killed civilians, military documents about the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and State Department cables in which diplomats gave candid assessments of foreign governments all provided by US Army Pvt. Chelsea Manning. The unprecedented leaks gained enormous attention and made Assange a sort of celebrity and a target, as top US officials like Attorney General Eric Holder publicly mused about how they could charge him.

So in June 2012, Assange, a citizen of Australia who had lived abroad for several years, showed up at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London and asked for political asylum. His imminent danger was extradition to Sweden, where authorities were investigating a rape allegation against him. But Assanges pitch was that he truly needed asylum from the United States because of WikiLeaks work. The Ecuadorian government granted his request, and hes been holed up inside the embassy ever since for nearly seven years now.

In that time, WikiLeaks has continued to post new material and grown more controversial. Assange roiled the 2016 presidential campaign by posting hacked emails from, first, the Democratic National Committee and then Clinton campaign chair John Podesta. (Mueller has since charged several Russian intelligence officers with carrying out these hacks.)

Was Assange simply bringing more transparency by publishing powerful peoples communications? Was he effectively just helping out the Russians and Donald Trump? Was he engaged in a project to weaken the US politically? Perhaps it was all of the above. (We believe it would be much better for GOP to win, Assange wrote privately in late 2015, according to messages obtained by the Intercept. Hillary Clinton, he continued, was a bright, well connected, sadistic sociopath.)

But Assanges leaks didnt stop once Trump was elected. In early 2017, WikiLeaks posted a new set of material about the CIAs hacking capabilities, in a leak referred to as Vault 7. The New York Times wrote that this appeared to be the largest leak of CIA documents in history, and a former CIA software engineer, Joshua Schulte, has been charged in connection with it.

That year, however, Assanges position in the Ecuadorian Embassy began to grow tenuous, as a new and more centrist president, Lenn Moreno, took power in the country. Moreno has said that Assange has repeatedly violated the conditions of his asylum. And now the embassy has kicked him out, leading to his arrest by British police.

On March 8, 2018, the US Attorneys Office for the Eastern District of Virginia filed a one-count indictment against Assange, under seal. (It was unsealed Thursday morning, after his arrest.)

In it, Assange was charged with one count of conspiracy to commit computer intrusion, related to Mannings 2010 leaks.

Specifically, the indictment focuses on how, after Manning had already leaked hundreds of thousands of documents to Assange, the WikiLeaks founder allegedly agreed to assist Manning in cracking a password stored on United States Defense Department computers.

Cracking the password would have allowed Manning to log onto the computers under a username that did not belong to her, the indictment claims.

Prosecutors claim that on March 8, 2010, Manning had told Assange, after this upload, thats all I really have got left, and that Assange responded, curious eyes never run dry in my experience.

However, there does not seem to have been any success in cracking the password. The indictment claims that on March 10, 2010, Assange said hed had no luck so far, and theres no further information on the matter.

This charge against Assange is rather narrowly tailored but we know the Justice Department has long considered broader charges against him, and CNN reported Thursday that additional charges are indeed still in the works.

The US government has already charged people whom theyve accused of leaking classified information to WikiLeaks, like Manning and Schulte. But charging Assange or WikiLeaks solely for publishing such information has been viewed by many as more troubling, due to its implications for freedom of the press.

Never in the history of this country has a publisher been prosecuted for presenting truthful information to the public, the American Civil Liberties Unions Ben Wizner told CNN in 2017. Any prosecution of WikiLeaks for publishing government secrets would set a dangerous precedent that the Trump administration would surely use to target other news organizations.

Indeed, many journalists often publish important and newsworthy stories based on leaked classified information. This was one reason why the Obama Justice Department opted not to charge Assange they called it a New York Times problem, the Washington Posts Sari Horwitz reported in 2013.

If the Justice Department indicted Assange, it would also have to prosecute the New York Times and other news organizations and writers who published classified material, including The Washington Post and Britains Guardian newspaper, Horwitz wrote, describing the officials conclusions.

Manning, meanwhile, is currently in jail, after she refused to testify to a grand jury against Assange last month. This is another sign that further charges against Assange could be coming, since the newly unsealed indictment was filed more than a year ago.

More:
Julian Assange arrested: WikiLeaks founder to face ...

Picture the scene: The 2020 presidential election is six months away, and a reporter is sent a cache of emails from inside one of the campaigns. The source of the cache has dubious motivations, but there's no doubt the emails are genuine. What should the reporter do?

The answer, for reporters and editors at least, is obvious. You comb through the emails for the newsworthy stuff, then you publish. The decision about what is in the public interest is, ultimately, up to the reporter and their editors. Officials, prosecutors, and judges may later decide whether laws were broken, and, importantly, whether that breach was justified. But these are all ultimately subjective decisions. Much like obscenity, what's in the public interest is never quite defined but we know it when we see it.

These are the kind of decisions that Julian Assange, and the hundreds of media organizations across the world that have published his leaks, made dozens of times over the last decade. As he faces extradition to the United States over one of those leaks one that resulted in extensive coverage from almost every major newspaper in the world we need to be very clear about whats at stake.

The charges announced by the Department of Justice yesterday send a chilling message to journalists and whistleblowers, because what Assange did to receive secret military and diplomatic documents the crime of which he is now accused was what thousands of journalists do every day. He was contacted by a source with potentially useful information; he cultivated and encouraged that source to give him as much raw detail as possible; and then, in partnership with publications of note from across the globe, he published the best bits.

This, and nothing else, is what Assange could face prosecution for. If any journalist, or any consumer of journalism, cannot see a problem with that, then the media may be in an even worse state then we fear.

Leaks are the absolute lifeblood of journalism. Australian journalist Murray Sayle is credited with the formulation that there are really only two stories in journalism: "We name the guilty man" and "Arrow points to defective part."

In recent years, I have established a formulation of my own: The three greatest words in journalism are "disgruntled former employee." I have had the privilege of judging investigative magazine Private Eyes annual investigative journalism award, and from that I have seen time and again how leakers may be self-sacrificing, public-spirited, and essentially decent people. They may also just be people who bear grudges, or people trying to undermine a politician. Journalists shouldnt be in the business of distinguishing between these motivations, if the news is good enough to print.

Julian Assange and WikiLeaks emerged at a point when journalism, and society as a whole, was still optimistic about the internet. Transparency will set us free, we used to say back then.

In 2008 I was working for Index on Censorship, and we awarded WikiLeaks a New Media Award, sponsored by the Economist. WikiLeaks had published papers belonging to a Swiss bank, Julius Baer, which it said strongly suggested a money laundering operation. This was one of the earliest of the mass data exposs that have characterized investigative journalism in the past decade, and it was exciting.

Even then, working with WikiLeaks was enormously frustrating. In the weeks leading up to the award ceremony, Assange went silent on us. We had arranged for the journalist Martin Bright, who recently had his own travails with the state and whistleblowers over Iraq war intelligence, to pick up the award on Assanges behalf. About 15 minutes before the ceremony was due to start, a member of the venue staff told me there was a man asking for me at the caterers entrance. It was Julian Assange then, as now, addicted to drama. He was apparently paranoid enough to avoid the main entrance, but not quite paranoid enough to avoid accepting an award in front of most of the British media and legal elite, who had paid good money to bask in the presence of worthy dissidents.

The pattern would repeat: While WikiLeaks would occasionally do stupid things, such as publishing Sarah Palins private family photos what newspaper has not made a similar mistake? the good appeared to outweigh the bad. After WikiLeaks exposed the workings of Kaupthing Bank the institution widely blamed for Icelands financial collapse in 2008 and 09 Icelandic politicians embraced Assanges radical vision and created the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative. Iceland would become a safe haven for whistleblowers, hackers, and internet freedom activists.

The Iraq War Logs and US diplomatic cables leak probably represented WikiLeaks zenith, but also the point where people began to question Assanges judgment. His enthusiasm for full transparency for those he perceived as powerful elites was only matched by his own demand for full secrecy from those around him. And a hypocrisy was becoming clear: Assanges definition of "power" and "elite" often stretched only as far as Western governments and their allies. Tyrants such as Belaruss Alexander Lukashenko (and later, Vladimir Putin) did not figure. At an Index on Censorship event in late 2010, Assange embarrassed the free speechfocused organizers by demanding no press photographers be allowed in the room.

We broke with Assange shortly afterward, when WikiLeaks refused to answer questions about unusual dealings in Belarus. Since then, Assanges political leanings have steadily veered towards terrible, from Putin to Donald Trump and Nigel Farage.

All this is history, but its a history worth telling, because its important to remember that WikiLeaks and Assange were embraced by progressives and the media not just for the "wrong" reasons (reflexive anti-Westernism) but for the "right" reasons too. WikiLeaks provided crucial insights into the key failures of the financial crisis and the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and put whistleblowing center stage. Assange, in a curious way, actually tamed the fundamentalist hack-for-the-sake-of-it tendencies of his internet peers, though he never quite shook the idea that there could not be such thing as a good secret (except when it came to himself).

Julian Assange went on the run in Britain, betraying people from John Pilger to Jemima Khan who had posted bail for him as a matter of trust: For that alone he is a traitor to his friends, and a criminal who has been found guilty. He has gone to extreme lengths to avoid facing sexual assault accusations in Sweden: For that, he is a coward and a misogynist who should face up to the consequences of his actions and attitudes toward women.

Some say he had been working with Putins Russia, in which case evidence should be brought.

But the charge brought against him by the US is about an act of journalism an act people may agree or disagree with, but which should not take up the time of a federal jury.

In Britain, as I type this, police are attempting to prosecute a pair of journalists for using material supposedly "stolen" from police in their investigation of a massacre of Catholic football fans watching a game during the 1994 World Cup. They have an important story to tell, and that is likely why the police want to stop them telling it. This habit will be replicated across the world if the US sets the example that its OK to shoot the messenger.

If the US prosecutes the WikiLeaks founder on the charge currently laid before him, its not just Julian Assange who's in trouble.

Continue reading here:
WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange Did A Lot Of Bad Things ...

London Metropolitan police has arrested WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in London. He has been holed up in the Embassy of Ecuador in London since 2012 in order to avoid a warrant against him. Ecuador withdrew Assanges diplomatic asylum earlier today leading to his arrest.

A video has emerged of the moment of the arrest which shows a heavily bearded Assange being carried out of the embassy as he wags a finger and appears to say the UK has no civility.

In a video statement, Ecuador president Lenn Moreno announced the withdrawal of Assanges asylum.

Today, I announce that the discourteous and aggressive behavior of Mr. Julian Assange, the hostile and threatening declarations of its allied organization, against Ecuador, and especially, the trangression of international treaties, have led the situation to a point where the asylum of Mr. Assange is unsustainable and no longer viable, Moreno said.

Ecuador sovereignly has decided to terminate the diplomatic asylum granted to Mr. Assange in 2012, he added.

In particular, Moreno highlights the leak of Vatican documents in January 2019. According to Moreno, this proves that Assange is still linked with WikiLeaks he thinks that Assange interferes in internal affairs of other states.

The patience of Ecuador has reached its limit on the behavior of Mr. Assange: He installed electronic and distortion equipment not allowed. He blocked the security cameras of the Ecuadorian Mission in London. He has confronted and mistreated guards. He had accessed the security files of our Embassy without permission. He claimed to be isolated and rejected the internet connection offered by the embassy, and yet he had a mobile phone with which he communicated with the outside world.

Before releasing Assange, Ecuador asked British authorities not to extradite Assange to a country where he could face torture or the death penalty. The British government agreed to comply with the request.

The Metropolitan Police issued the following statement:

Julian Assange, 47, (03.07.71) has today, Thursday 11 April, been arrested by officers from the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) at the Embassy of Ecuador, Hans Crescent, SW1 on a warrant issued by Westminster Magistrates Court on 29 June 2012, for failing to surrender to the court.

He has been taken into custody at a central London police station where he will remain, before being presented before Westminster Magistrates Court as soon as is possible.

The MPS had a duty to execute the warrant, on behalf of Westminster Magistrates Court, and was invited into the embassy by the Ambassador, following the Ecuadorian governments withdrawal of asylum.

Wikileaks tweeted that Assange did not voluntarily leave the embassy writing that British police were invited in and immediately arrested him:

Weve reached out to Wikileaks for a formal statement.

The relationship between Assange and the country that afforded him diplomatic shelter in a few rooms in Knightsbridge for so many years has been growing increasingly strained.

Last year the embassy cut his access to the Internet and outside communication saying it was implementing an isolation regime after Assange had breached a written commitment not to issue messages that might interfere with other states.

It later partially restored his access to the Internet and external visits after a UN intervention. But clearly Ecuadors patience with the mercurial Wikileaks founder has worn thin.

Assange fled to the embassy after Swedish authorities issued a warrant for sexual assault allegations. Two women accused him of sexual molestation and unlawful coercion.

Those charges were dropped in 2017 by Swedish prosecutors who had sought a European arrest warrant to extradite him from the U.K. but Assange has claimed he remains at risk of extradition to the U.S. to face charges of leaking sensitive U.S. government files.

The reason why British authorities arrested him today is that he breached bail conditions in the U.K. by seeking political refuge at the Ecuadorean Embassy in 2012.

U.K. Foreign Minister, Jeremy Hunt, reacted to news of Assanges arrest with a strongly-worded tweet:

The U.K. has an extradition treaty with the U.S. so it is highly likely U.S. authorities will seek to extradite Assange to face charges of leaking state secrets.

Though it is equally likely Assange would fight any attempt to extradite him.

In a press briefing at the start of last year the U.S. Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, Steven Goldstein, was asked about Ecuadors decision to grant Assange citizenship. Goldstein responded that the department does not discuss whether or not it is considering bringing Assange to the U.S. for trial.

But the Washington Post reported last November that Assange has been charged in the U.S. under seal after prosecutors inadvertently revealed the development in an unsealed court filing in an unrelated case.

The nature of the charges Assange could face were not clear from the unsealed filing. But the existence of the charge against him makes the Trump administrations intent to prosecute clear.

Wikileaks contends the charge against Assange represents a threat to press freedom.

Read the original post:
Julian Assange arrested in London after Ecuador withdraws ...

Julian Assange's arrest at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London was carried out in a specific way to prevent him from pressing a mysterious panic button he said could bring dire consequences for Ecuador, its foreign minister said.

The WikiLeaks founder was carried out of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London's Kensington district on Thursday morning by a group of British police officers. Ecuador had earlier revoked his political asylum, alleging repeated bad behavior during his almost seven-year stay.

During this stay, Assange is accused of threatening Jaime Merchan, the Ecuadorian ambassador to the UK, with activating some kind of panic button that would bring down the embassy if he were arrested or felt in danger.

The claim was made by Ecuador's foreign minister, Jos Valencia, in a speech Thursday to the country's National Assembly, according to the Associated Press and Reuters.

Assange leaving a London police station after his Thursday arrest. Peter Nicholls/Reuters

Assange had said the button would bring "devastating consequences," the AP reported, in a summary of Valencia's remarks.

It is not clear exactly what form the "panic button" took: whether it was a physical device or a metaphor for some other easily activated insurance measure. It is also unclear what leverage Assange thought he had over Ecuador.

Assange's lawyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider on the nature of the button and whether it existed. According to Valencia, though, it was serious enough for Ecuador to warn British authorities and carry out the raid in such a way that Assange was not able to get back into his room after learning of his imminent arrest.

Ecuador granted Assange asylum in June 2012, when he was trying to evade warrants for his arrest in Sweden and the UK.

He had failed to appear in court to face charges of sexual assault in Sweden, which he denies. He was also wanted in the UK for breaching prior bail conditions.

A police van outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London after Assange's arrest. Peter Nicholls/Reuters

Ecuador's president announced the removal of Assange's asylum in a Thursday video statement, saying Ecuador's patience had "reached its limit on the behavior of Mr Assange."

"We've ended the asylum of this spoiled brat," he said in a separate speech hours after Assange's arrest, according to the AP.

President Lenn Moreno said Assange breached the conditions of his stay by installing prohibited electronic equipment in the embassy. Moreno said Assange also mistreated security guards and accessed the embassy's security files during his stay.

The Ecuadorian government also told Assange in a memo that he deliberately pointed a studio lamp at a security camera in a room where he received guests, according to government memos released by the WikiLeaks founder's supporters in February.

Assange greeting supporters at the Ecuadorian Embassy in May 2017. Associated Press

Ecuador's troubles with Assange went beyond security concerns.

Officials have accused Assange of being unhygienic and said his skateboarding ruined their floors. Last year it issued a nine-page memo telling him to clean up after his cat.

Mara Paula Romo, Ecuador's interior minister, said Thursday that Assange had been "allowed to do things like put feces on the walls of the embassy and other behaviors of that nature," according to Reuters.

Ecuadorian authorities deemed this behavior, which they said happened at least once, an act of defiance and disrespect to his hosts, the AP reported. Assange's lawyer attributed it to "stomach problems," Reuters reported.

Read more: The weirdest anecdote about Julian Assange claims that he doesn't like cutlery and eats hot food like jam pudding with his hands

A graphic showing Assange's living area at the embassy. GraphicNews

In a separate memo, Merchan, the ambassador, also sent Assange complaints that he was playing the radio loudly while meeting visitors which "disturbed the work being carried out by the embassy."

The government said it spent $6.2 million on his upkeep and security from 2012 to 2018.

Ecuador's expulsion of Assange also comes amid a protracted political dispute within the Latin American country.

His ouster comes after years of international and domestic political wrangling between Moreno and his predecessor, Rafael Correa, who granted Assange asylum in 2012.

Moreno has also accused WikiLeaks of being behind an anonymous website that said Moreno's brother created offshore companies to fund his family's luxurious lifestyles in Europe while Moreno was working there for the UN, Reuters reported.

Read more: This simmering political clash may have led to Julian Assange's ouster from Ecuador's embassy

The US on Thursday requested Assange's extradition, charging him with conspiracy to hack classified US government computers, in a document naming the US Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning.

He was also convicted of breaching bail conditions in the UK.

Read the rest here:
Assange arrest designed to stop him pressing mysterious panic ...