New Internationalist’s top reads in 2019 – New Internationalist

27 December 2019

The year felt gloomy, long and agonizing, but there were reasons to have hope. We lookback at our coverage of 2019, and what our readers were most interested in.

It has not been a great year for global politics. Climate change continued to cause disaster across the world throughout 2019 wildfires have battered the earth while glaciers and permafrost melt, pushing more and more species to the brink of extinction.

At the same time, far-right populist strongmen have continued their rise to power just as incessantly. 2019 was Bolsonaros first year in power in Brazil (can you believe there could be *three* more?) and the Amazon burned at unprecedented speed; Indian voters rewarded Modi with a new term in office and he rewarded them by stripping millions of their citizenship; Salvinis policies caused unnecessary suffering to tens of thousands of refugees in Italy; and the UK voted in as Prime Minister a gleefully immoral narcissist who glories in his inability to tell the truth.

But theres cause for some optimism, with mass movements erupting in Chile and much of South America, Hong Kong and Algeria and with minor anti-Putin rallies now held even in Russia. Young people have also begun reclaiming their future, with the School Strikes for the climate booming across the world.

At New Internationalist, weve sought to bring fresh arguments, marginalized voices and new perspectives to the debate. Heres our countdown of what readers found most interesting on our pages:

When New Internationalist first contacted activist Isaac Rose, chair of the Manchester branch of Momentum, to ask his opinion of the Extinction Rebellion, he was sceptical. Extinction Rebellion have correctly recognized [how urgent climate action is], but their strategy will not work, he said at the time, arguing that the climate movement had to stop blocking bridges and should instead form an alliance with the labour. In this piece, Rose explains what made him change his mind about XR.

Extinction Rebellions masterstroke has been the way it used language. By focussing on terms such as extinction, climate emergency and earth systems breakdown and the demand of telling the truth, they have zoned in upon and overturned one of the key blockages to dealing with the crisis: consciousness of its urgency.

Read the full article.

Julian Assange faces up to 175 years of jail time if he is extradited to the US, with most of his charges criminalizing common practices in journalism and setting a dangerous precedent to target news organizations that hold governments to account. Even those who have spent years criticising Assange have recognized the danger his trial represents for democracies.

The indictments for which Assange is now imprisoned have nothing to do with Sweden, Russia, Trump or his cat. They are a straightforward attempt to prosecute a publisher for committing acts of journalism.

Read the full article.

On 23 October 2019, 39 people were found dead in the back refrigerated lorry in Essex, South East England, with media outlets reporting that the victims may have frozen to death in temperatures as low as -25C. Many have called the events a tragedy. But writer and researcher Jun Pang argues that this is just a way to dodge Britains responsibility for the deaths.

The conditions that produced these 39 deaths emerge from the same set of policies that deny asylum, justify indefinite immigration detention, charter deportation flights, and restrict migrants access to fundamental rights that is, the so-called Hostile Environment.

Read the full article.

The refugee crisis may seem like a distant memory but it is not. At least 12,500 refugees are still trapped indefinitely in Greek islands, living in ragged, overflowing tents and prevented from rebuilding their lives. In this article, Isabelle Merminod and Tim Baster look for a reason for the way things are.

The number of those arriving has seen a decline in recent years, but the policy of containing people on the islands rather than allowing them to settle on the mainland continues, multiplying the difficulties for those seeking protection in Europe.

Read the full article.

2019 was yet another year in which the climate emergency showed its strength. Wildfires ravaged California and Australia, while typhoons battered east Asia, Cyclone Idai submerged much of Mozambique under rising floods and Western Europe shattered its record-high temperatures ever recorded. Meanwhile, some billionaires have been observed building bunkers to escape a possible apocalypse.

The actions of rich preppers are a reminder that climate change is class war.

Read the full article.

Carlotta Dotto reports on Guangzhou, the Chinese city with the largest immigrant population. As many as 15,000 Africans have settled there, lured by business opportunities, reputable universities and low living costs.

While Europe is rejecting migrants, China is doing a lot for helping us.

Read the full article.

On 6 October 2019, the Trump administration ordered American troops to withdraw from northeastern Syria, also known as Rojava, where the US had been supporting its Kurdish allies. Turkey attacked the Kurds immediately. What is at stake in north-east Syria is more than the fate of the Kurdish people or even the fight against Isis: its a unique alternative to our current civilisation in crisis. A model that by its existence could help us imagine alternatives before its too late.

This is a blueprint for the kind of society that many of us have been campaigning for all our lives and yet it is the best-kept secret in the world.

Read the full article.

2019 was chaotic, confusing, infuriating. So we asked someone wiser than us to help us make sense of it. And the renowned Slovenian philosopher, sociologist and cultural critic unpacked what many of uscant get ourheads around: Donald Trump, the Lefts failures across the world, digital technologies.

I think a new world order is emerging. A rule that is ideologically and politically America First, Russia First, China First, Turkey First We have to move beyond this level. Its literally becoming a matter of survival.

Read the full article.

Lifestyle changes are no substitute for collective action. But as we begin to see glaciers melt, the Amazon burn and wildfires ravage not just Europe and California but Greenland, personal carbon-cutting has to be on the table for all of us. Its a powerful way to signal the climate emergency to those around us, move the needle on policy and set bigger cultural changes in motion.

Adjust your diet. Fly less, or better, stop.

Read the full article.

Our most-read piece of the year is a long, passionate article debunking the myths put forward by the New Optimists the comforting theories proposed by the likes of Bill Gates and Steven Pinker. They claim that the world has never been better: from global poverty to inequality between nations, all the indicators are showing progress. But Steven Pinker finds this is only true if you dont question the statistics you are fed.

We are actually doing worse than at any time in history, as our capacity to end poverty has grown rapidly, while poverty itself remains widespread. In moral terms, we have regressed. It doesnt have to be this way. We can change the rules of our global economy to make it fairer for the worlds majority.

Read the full article.

Patreon is a platform that enables us to offer more to our readership. With a new podcast, eBooks, tote bags and magazine subscriptions on offer,as well as early access to video and articles, were very excited about our Patreon! If youre not on board yet then check it out here.

Support us

View post:
New Internationalist's top reads in 2019 - New Internationalist

Medical opinion, torture and Assange – newagebd.net

Supporters of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange hold placards outside Westminster magistrates court in London on December 19. Agence France-Presse/Tolga Aakmen

Melzer, along with a medical team, attended to Assange on May 9 in Belmarsh, finding a man with all the symptoms that are typical of persons having been exposed to psychological torture for a prolonged period of time, writes Binoy Kampmark

ON NOVEMBER 27 this year, UN special rapporteur on torture, Nils Melzer, delivered an address to the German Bundestag outlining his approach to understanding the mental health of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. These comprised two parts, the initial stage covering his diplomatic asylum in the Ecuadorean embassy, the second dealing with his formal detention in the United Kingdom at the hands of the UK legal and judicial system. The conclusion was a recapitulation of previous findings: that Assange has been subjected to a prolonged, state-sponsored effort in torture, nothing less than a targeting of his being.

Melzers address is an expansive portrait of incremental inter-state torment that led to Assanges confinement in a highly controlled environment within the Ecuadorean embassy for more than six years. There was the eventually justified fear that he would be sought by the United States in extradition proceedings. The Swedish authorities threw in their muddled lot between 2010 and 2019, attempting to nab Assange for rape claims despite not being able to produce enough evidence for an indictment, and which now, after almost a decade, has been silently closed for the third time based on precisely that recognition.

Then came the British contribution, consisting of encouragement to the Swedes by the Crown Prosecution Service that the investigation should not be closed, inspiring them not to get cold feet. (The cold feet eventually came.) The Ecuadorean contribution completed the four-piece set, with the coming to power of a pro-Washington Lenn Moreno. Embassy personnel in London were encouraged to make conditions less pleasant; surveillance operations were conducted on Assanges guests and meetings.

Melzer, along with a medical team, attended to Assange on May 9, 2019 in Belmarsh, finding a man with all the symptoms that are typical of persons having been exposed to psychological torture for a prolonged period of time. There was little doubt, in Melzers mind, that symptoms already measurable physically, neurologically and cognitively, had been shown.

These calls went unheeded. Melzer, in early November, accused the UK authorities of showing outright contempt for Assanges rights and integrity. Despite warnings issued by the rapporteur, the UK has not undertaken any measures of investigation, prevention and redress required under international law. Melzers prognosis was bleak. Unless the UK urgently changes course and alleviates his inhumane situation, Assanges continued exposure to arbitrariness and abuse may soon end up costing his life.

This point has been restated by Dr Stephen Frost, a chief figure of the dedicated outfit calling itself Doctors for Assange. We repeat that it is impossible to assess adequately let alone treat Assange in Belmarsh prison and that he must as a matter of urgency be moved to a university teaching hospital. When will the UK government listen to us?

The medical degrading of Assange has assumed ever greater importance, suggesting unwavering state complicity. On November 22, over 65 notable medical doctors sent the UK home secretary a note based on Melzers November 1 findings and Assanges state at the October 21 case management hearing at Westminster Magistrates Court. It is our opinion that Assange requires urgent expert medical assessment of both his physical and psychological state of health. Any medical treatment indicated should be administered in a properly equipped and expertly staffed university teaching hospital (tertiary care).

In a second open letter to the UK lord chancellor and secretary of state for justice dated December 4, the Doctors for Assange collective warned that the UKs refusal to take the required measures to protect Assanges rights, health and dignity appears [to] be reckless at best and deliberate at worst and, in both cases, unlawfully and unnecessarily exposes Assange to potentially irreversible risks.

The same grounds were reiterated in a December 16 letter to Australian foreign minister Marise Payne, with a curt reminder that she had an undeniable legal obligation to protect your citizen against the abuse of his fundamental rights, stemming from US efforts to extradite Assange for journalism and publishing that exposed US war crimes. In the event that Payne took no action on the matter, people would want to know what you [] did to prevent his death.

In the addendum to the open letter, further to reiterating the precarious state of Assanges health and medical status as a torture victim, the doctors elaborate on the circular cruelty facing the publisher. An individual deemed a victim of psychological torture cannot be adequately medically treated while continuing to be held under the very conditions constituting psychological torture, as is currently the case for Julian Assange. Appropriate medical treatment was hardly possible through a prison hospital ward.

A lesson in understanding mental torture is also proffered. Contrary to popular misconception, the injuries caused by psychological torture are real and extremely serious. The term psychological torture is not a synonym for mere hardship, suffering or distress.

At Assanges case management hearing on December 19, restrictions on medical opinion were again implemented; psychiatrist Marco Chiesa and psychologist David Morgan were prevented from attending. Both had been signatories to the spray of open letters. According to Morgan, he had hoped to provide some observations about Julian Assanges health, psychologically, and with my colleagues, physically. Instead, it transpired that access was denied, according to psychologist Lissa Johnson, despite members of the public offering to give up seats for them.

Cold-shouldering expert opinion can be counted as one of the weapons of the state in punishing whistleblowers and publishers. The State has always made it a bureaucratic imperative to sift the undesirable evidence from the apologetic message. Accepting Assanges condition would be tantamount to admission on the part of UK authorities, urged on by the United States, that intolerable, potentially martyring treatment, has been meted out to a publisher.

DissidentVoice.org, December 20. Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne.

See the original post here:
Medical opinion, torture and Assange - newagebd.net

Customer-driven open source is the future of software – ARNnet

By some estimates there are roughly 190 million companies on earth today. Imagine if they were all contributing to open source. Of course, most of those companies arent in a position to contribute code, but if we want truly sustainable, customer-friendly open source, its time to focus on the best possible source: companies that dont sell software.

Why? Because the more software is built to suit the needs of those who are actually running it day-to-day, the better that software will be, and the less well need to worry about sustainability.

Despite the fact that open source has never been more broadly used, apparently were in an open source sustainability crisis. Its the same crisis weve been in for the past 20 years, with persistent warnings that this cant last. I wrote about it in 2008 (Open source has the chance of becoming a nonrenewable resource if enterprises consume it without contributing cash or code back), but by 2013 my concern had faded:

By early 2019 I was calling open source sustainability concerns fake news because open source clearly has never been stronger.

While I continue to believe open source is nowhere near an existential crisis, I do believe weve frittered away needless energy looking for sustainability in the wrong place: vendors. As I pointed out in 2013, the real innovation in open source stems from customers; that is, from enterprises who use open source to build their businesses and contribute code accordingly.

Red Hat CEO Jim Whitehurst has been agitating for customer-driven open sourcefor well over a decade: Ultimately, for open source to provide value to all of our customers worldwide, we need to get our customers not only as users of open source products but truly engaged in open source and taking part in the development community.

There are many reasons why such customer-driven (or user-driven) innovation might be best, but Linux veteran Matt Wilson put it this way: If I can risk predicting the future, I think youll see a lot more new open source software emerging from companies that are building it and using it to solve their business problems. And it will be better because of a positive feedback loop of putting the software into an applied practice.

Say that again?

Wilson: If you look backwards in time, [youll see] that software vendors dominate the enterprise software space. And I think that is a reason why so much of it is so so bad. Because the people building the software are not using it to solve problems.

Not software sold on a golf course. Software built to meet real-world needs by the companies experiencing those needs.Fortunately, its already happening:

There are many more. Even a cursory review of the speakers at OSCON 2019 reveals Uber, Bosch, The Home Depot, Comcast, and others, many of them talking about how their companies bothuse and build open source software.

And of course theres great software built by vendors, too, though the best software released by vendors tends to have more to do with how theyre running their infrastructure than what theyre selling. Take Google and Kubernetes, for example: Google had been running containerized workloads for over a decade before releasing Kubernetes. Kubernetes suddenly gave non-Google-like companies Google-like powers.

This is the future of open source. Vendors will continue to contribute to open source projects, and to release projects of their own. But Whitehurst and Wilson seem to be onto something: the best software is software that companies build to scratch their own itches, in true open source fashion, and address their own day-to-day needs.

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags open source

Excerpt from:
Customer-driven open source is the future of software - ARNnet

UPDATED Move over Edge: Safari looks to be jumping on the Chromium bandwagon, too – Chrome Unboxed

UPDATE: According to some traffic over on Twitter, it looks like this whole thing is vaporware. It has been uncovered that the bug in question in the article below has nothing to do with Safari at all. The bug is still private and cannot be viewed by non-Google employees, but it appears that this bug is assigned to Move sync tests to staging from 2015. Were sorry for the incorrect reporting and have left the original story below. Additionally, here is a tweet from someone more informed than me on the subject:

This is completely fake. No such plan. The supposed email address isnt anyone on the Safari/WebKit teams, there is no ITP code in Chromium that could be enabled, and the screenshot is not a real Safari design.

A day after Christmas, a reader delivered a tasty little present to our collective inbox and the implications are pretty big. If the screenshots in this email/article are to be believed, it looks like Apple may be transitioning the Safari web browser over to Chromium in a move similar to what Microsoft has done recently with Edge. It is shocking, honestly, to consider Apple bending this way, but it makes a lot of sense in the long run.

Before we can make any sense of this, we have to get the whole picture. Apple has famously been very closed in its software efforts over the years. From iOS to MacOS, they have never really felt the need to associate themselves with open source material in general. Apple builds the hardware, maintains the OS and software, and if you want to sell your apps on their platforms, you just have to suck it up and play ball.

This all works fine when you sell iPhones like hotcakes. When you so heavily dominate a given market (the US) with your hardware, you get to make whatever rules you want and developers and consumers alike get whatever it is you feed them. But this doesnt work with the web. The web is the ultimate open platform and delivery tool. Thank God weve not all caved on that expectation. Somehow in the midst of this open-minded nature, no one has ever been OK with being forced to use one browser over another. People dont care what browser their computer of choice ships with: they want to use the browser they enjoy using that just works.

For the vast majority of users, Chrome became that browser right in the middle of companies like Apple and Microsoft choosing to lag behind on rapidly-changing web standards. Whether it was due to stubbornness or incompetency, Safari, Internet Explorer, and Edge were constantly lacking in multiple facets when compared with Chrome. As those browsers stayed consistently behind the curve, Chrome only grew in popularity to where it is in its dominant place now. At any point, Apple or Microsoft could have simply decided that 3rd party browsers were not allowed, but theres just something about the web that wouldnt allow that to happen. Theres no way users would have it.

One of the primary benefits of Chrome is the fact that it is based on the Chromium browser. This is the open source foundation of Chrome the way you know it. Chromium and Chromium OS are both developed out in the open and are contributed to by anyone interested in their success. Chrome (Googles version of the Chromium browser) has a handful of proprietary bits and pieces that are Googles and those things make it unique to other browsers that run on Chromium, but because it is built on an open source base, Chrome gets to take full advantage of not just a single team of developers, but an entire horde.

Other browsers have seen the vast opportunity and done the same. Browsers like Brave, Opera, Vivaldi, Edge, Samsungs Internet Browser, and a slew of others all run on this same Chromium foundation. What this means is the teams charged with developing each of these expressions of Chromium care about what Chromium can do and what it cant and are all working towards a more functional, better-performing web browser core. Sure, they all serve their own interests along the way, but the work they do for their platform is there for others to leverage as well.

This is the power of open source software. Instead of a ton of companies competing to build differing standards and ways of doing things, they all spend that same time working on a common project that will be so much better as a result. Microsofts work on Chromium for Edge has already began yielding better RAM management and battery life. These are things important to Microsoft in their browser, so it will become something that is also important for Chromium. In this system, consumers win every time.

Shop Chromebooks on Amazon

Now, we get to this new report. As you may assume, Safari is both behind the curve and closed source, so a move to a Chromium-based browser would be both beneficial to Apple and users alike. Apple gets to deliver Safari without all the technical deficiencies it comes with and users get to just use Safari out of the box without having to decide which browser to go with when they buy their new Mac. If Safari is already installed and just as good from a technical standpoint as Chrome, why bother installing something else?

If this report from iphones.ru is to be believed, theres a good chance Safari may end up built on Chromium sooner rather than later. In the article, a bug report (that has since been hidden) was found that is requesting Intelligent Tracking Prevention to be activated in Chrome 80. This is a big deal since ITP is a proprietary to Safari at this point and the request is coming from an Apple employee. Why would an Apple developer be requesting a proprietary Safari feature be activated in Chrome 80? Well, you know that answer to that, dont you?

In addition to this evidence, there are a couple screen grabs from the bug report. The first one clearly shows this request coming from a developer with an @apple.com address along with an included screenshot, and upon quick inspection, the screenshot is of Safari running on Chromium in an alpha state.

A couple more notes, here. First, the bug has since been marked as private. If this was a fake, searching the bug number would come up with an error. Instead, it comes up as blocked and needing permission to view. Theres no real reason for anyone to hide this if it wasnt legit. They could have simply replied in the bug thread and told this guy to stop messing around. Instead, they hid the references, and this tells me that something was uncovered that shouldnt have been.

Second, the alpha version of the Chromium-based Safari being pictured is just that: alpha. It looks pretty rough and that is honestly to be expected. Ripping out the guts of your browser makes you only focus on the function at first. Apple is likely doing a ton of work under the hood to make sure all the functional parts are lining up and working before they even consider making the outside look nice, so dont read too much into the overall hideous appearance in that screenshot.

Finally, it is worth noting that in the first screenshot, you can see the list of operating systems this is being added to: Windows, Linux, and Mac. This could mean that well see a Chromium-based Safari on all three major desktop operating systems and could signal yet another softening of the walled garden approach Apple has long been known for. Theyre relatively recent inclusion of PWAs on iPhone is further evidence that Apple may finally be seeing the light with broader, open source, web-based software, and thats good news for everyone.

See the rest here:
UPDATED Move over Edge: Safari looks to be jumping on the Chromium bandwagon, too - Chrome Unboxed

Suse Marks Nine Years Of Continuous Growth With Successful FY2019 – E3zine.com

Suse heralded its ninth consecutive year of revenue growth, announcing financial results and highlights from its fiscal year 2019 ended Oct. 31.

Having become the worlds largest independent open source company earlier this year, Suse saw its application delivery subscription revenue jump 299 percent year over year. In addition, cloud revenue increased 64 percent, driven by cloud providers like Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure, as Suses Cloud Service Provider ecosystem grew exponentially.

Customer deals valued at $1 million or more increased 13 percent, contributing to a double-digit jump in revenue. As growth accelerated, Suses employee base grew 11 percent.

Suses success comes from our commitment to customers, open source software and innovation that is relevant to the market and customers today, said Melissa Di Donato, CEO of Suse. As the worlds largest independent open source company, we are in a position to serve customer needs, accelerate our growth and move at a speed like never before. Suse will continue to try to be the most customer-centric open source company, to meet customers where they are and help them get to what success looks like to them. That commitment shows in the numbers from this year and years past, and even more impressively: it shows in the success of our customers and partners.

Suses commitment to customers and technology that matters can be seen in the companys increased focus and investment in strategic software solutions that enable customers to create, deploy and manage workloads anywhere on premises, hybrid and multi-cloud as they embrace digital transformation to more effectively compete in todays markets.

In addition to increased focus on the application delivery market, Suse is maintaining and growing its commitment to delivering the best enterprise Linux in the industry along with best-in-class software-defined storage based on the Ceph open source project. Suse always works to provide innovative technology and services that best serve the needs of customers and partners.

Suse continues to focus on growth and expansion, and the companys commercial growth is and will continue to be driven both organically and through potential acquisitions.

View post:
Suse Marks Nine Years Of Continuous Growth With Successful FY2019 - E3zine.com

Mulesoft development services – helping businesses with provision of customized solutions – The African Exponent

Business organizations have to continuously adapt themselves with changing times. In order to stay ahead of the competition prevailing in the market and to efficiently tackle the problems an organization may face with greater developments, one must adopt new digital systems of working. The workflow within an organization depends upon communication between various departments and completion of processes. This requires complete interconnectivity between various applications, departments, processes and people who are connected to q business enterprise like customers, suppliers, retailers etc. Integration of business processes and applications require adoption of an cloud based system of storing and sharing information. Every process stays connected with other operations which enables faster completion of assigned tasks.

Mulesoft is one such company which provides required technical consultancy and software development services to business enterprises. Mulesoft software development services help an organization by developing, creating and integrating new digital cloud based of work within normal workflow of the business. They help in development if necessary automated integration systems which can help in streamlining of workflow within an organization. The company help in creation of necessary customized digital software like cloud based technology and application program interface (API) which can help in providing security and strength to an organizational structure. Moreover, their consultation services help an organization fully understand the functions and thereby its uses for building a better organization.

Mulesoft consultation and software development services help in development and deployment of best digital solutions which helps in eradication of all obstacles an organization may face while improving and developing itself.

The company provides following services:

Modernization of business enterprise:

Mulesoft help in providing necessary solutions and systems which can help in improving overall productivity and effectiveness of a business enterprise. They combine various open source software solutions and their personal expertise to provide necessary know and skill to IT department of an organization in order to make them capable of understanding the new system. Mulesoft Consulting can help in modernization of IT infrastructure, migrate to a flexible cloud based system, implement a storage solution and accelerate business performance.

Building better applications:

Mulesoft development services help an organization to build better infrastructure and applications which can help in better adoption of new digital and cloud based systems. Mulesoft helps business enterprise in building better applications. Its amazing consultation and development services provide the necessary effectiveness to an organization to build better applications at a faster pace. This even helps better marketing of created applications. They help in integration of various processes, applications and data for better transmission of information and improved performance.

Optimization of operations:

Mulesoft improves the way various operations are carried out in the business. Operations are automated, infrastructure is improved, IT is streamlined and efficiency with work is performed is improved. This helps in faster delivery of applications.

Thus Mulesoft developments help an organization at each and every step of transition from a traditional to a more modern system of workflow. Every organization wishing to improve its level of operations must consider adoption Mulesoft development and consultation services which are termed to be the best in the world owing to their seamless workflow and help groups.

Read more:
Mulesoft development services - helping businesses with provision of customized solutions - The African Exponent

Revealed: What Leo, Michel, Mary Lou and Eamon asked Santa for – The Irish Times

In the manner of WikiLeaks and the Pentagon Papers, The Irish Times has obtained copies of Irish political leaders letters to Santa, which we now publish in the public interest. Any embarrassment to Santa is regretted

Dear Santa,

I know this may be stretching things a bit, but what I want for Christmas is to know the best date to have the election on. This is, like, the biggest decision ever for me, after what top to wear to the Kylie gig. Most of the guys think I should go in February, right after Brexit, but half of me thinks, Hmmm, February election, dont like the sound of that.

Also, yknow, a February election not as easy for me to swan around the country with my sleeves rolled up in the old young-leader-for-a-young-country pose, which the guys reckon will be a surefire winner with our target voters. Instead Ill be stuck in TV studios with that OK Boomer Michel Martin, debating waiting lists and homeless figures and all that stuff he keeps droning on about, the saddo.

On the other hand, Brexit is about the only thing voters think the Government has got right, so theres a strong argument for opening the polls about 20 minutes after the UK leaves the EU. And you know what voters are like, Santa. Memory of a goldfish. Theyll have forgotten completely I saved them from a no-deal Brexit by May.

Sorry for going on about this, but it has my head wrecked. Obvs would like to win the election too, if you could manage that. Its a big ask, I know, but imagine the look on Harriss face when I keep him as Minister for Health. Lol.

Ill leave a smoothie and some avocado toast out for you and Rudolph.

Your friend,Leo

Dear Santy,

this is a big request, but, as you know, I have been very, very good again this year. I would like a new front bench and parliamentary party. Ive just about had it with the current crowd and dont think I can put up with them going forward, and so on and so forth. I mean, what are my chances of beating that pup Varadkar and then leading a government of national renewal with this shower?

Even Lisa Chambers, who was my star pupil, turns out to be up to her neck in the dodgy-voting controversy, much to the amusement of the corner boys. As for their complaints that I never listen to them anyway, thats not true, Santa. I listen to them closely, so I can relate all the details to my staff to laugh at.

Most of the TDs seem more interested in having a laugh and shoring up their own seats than getting ready for the election or developing policies. Their knowledge of politics is not up to scratch, either many dont realise how successful I was as minister for health, or that I was the greatest minister for foreign affairs of the late 2000s. Also, Santa, their diets are atrocious far too meat-heavy, and not enough pulses and grains. Dont even start me on the fried breakfasts. No, theres only one thing for it: I need a whole new set of TDs.

I will leave out some fruit juice and quinoa for yourself and Rudolph. To be honest, I think you could possibly look at your own diet and exercise regime.

Happy Christmas,Michel

Santa, a chara,

So this is a little unusual, but I am going to ask to not have something next year as my present. As in an election. The whole election thing is a little tricky for me at the mo, and Id be so, so grateful, Santa, if we could just avoid one next year. I really couldnt handle another election campaign right now. We just finished one in the North, and, honestly, the stress of not being sure whether its an audience youre supposed to shout Tiocfaidh r l! at or intone solemnly, We must listen to and understand the concerns of unionists it would give you hives, Santa, it would. Also, the results were not exactly Gerrytastic, and more of the same in the South would have Pearse furrowing his brow at the rest of the party in that I-told-you-so way of his, so if you could deliver no election it would be thas-an-domhain time. Trying to work on the old Irish there, Santa.

Also, could you stop Eoin Broin looking so smug? As, like, an extra surprise.

Ill leave out a selection box as usual for yourself and Rudolph.

Le mr mheas (Irish again there), Mary Lou

Hi Santa

Can I just say that although we do appreciate you calling at our house again this year, it does seems to be a little unsustainable to travel to every house in the world on Christmas night. So maybe you should think about just going to the constituencies that the Greens have a chance to win seats in. Anyway, just a thought.

I have just two things on my list this year. The first is Id like loads of new TDs dont want to seem greedy, Santa, but the more the better. The second request is related: that they accept my judgment that the right thing to do is enter government and for me to be a minister, along with some other people that I choose. The last thing I want, Santa, is to bring in a bunch of new TDs and have them make up their own minds on this. I dont think that would be helpful at all, if you dont mind me pointing that out. Yes, I know some of them will say that the last period in government was rather challenging, but I think we can all agree: this time will be different.

Ill leave out some carrot cake.

Happy Christmas, Eamon

View post:
Revealed: What Leo, Michel, Mary Lou and Eamon asked Santa for - The Irish Times

Hard-Hitting Investigative Journalism You Can Support With Cryptocurrencies – Forbes

Kim Dotcom, founder of the Internet Party and founder of Megaupload Ltd., right, looks on as ... [+] investigative journalist Glenn Greenwald, second right, addresses a question to Edward Snowden, former contractor at the U.S. National Security Agency, projected on the screen at left while speaking from a remote location, during an event titled and quot;Moment of Truth and quot; at the Auckland Townhall in Auckland, New Zealand, on Monday, Sept. 15, 2014. New Zealand Prime Minister John Key said he'll declassify intelligence service documents to disprove claims his government engaged in mass surveillance of its citizens after Greenwald, who published Snowden's leaked U.S. National Security Agency documents last year, said he'll release more NSA files showing New Zealand's complicity in mass surveillance with its partners in the Five Eyes network. Photographer: Brendon O'Hagan/Bloomberg *** Local Caption *** Kim Dotcom; Glenn Greenwald; Edward Snowden

In an age where opinions abound (including from yours truly), there is a premium for hard-hitting adversarial journalism that digs at facts that can unnerve powerful incumbent classes. In many ways, the roots of journalism and cryptocurrency come from the same spiritual places: a relentless drive to hold the powerful accountable, an unending desire to question the truth and, with the evolution of journalism from curated, edited papers to a larger audience of decentralized voices, the same ethos as cryptocurrency, if not in spirit, than in practice.

So it makes sense that journalists and investigative outlets are increasingly looking to experiment with cryptocurrencies. Here are some prominent examples of hard-hitting investigative journalism supported by cryptocurrency users and donors that you can contribute to.

1- Hong Kong Free Press

Hong Kong Free Press is a non-for-profit team of journalists based in Hong Kong that relies entirely on donors and readers to maintain their work. At the forefront of covering the Hong Kong protests and the Umbrella Movement, theyve broken such stories such as the denial of visa renewal for the foreign press clubs Vice President, Victor Mallet and maintained constant coverage through months of protest in the city. They accept Bitcoin through BTCPay.

2- Caracas Chronicles

Caracas Chronicles features English-language stories and insight on Venezuela. Fueled by contributions from readers, there are now contributors from across Venezuela, filling an important void in the media ecosystem especially in the context of a state that will sometimes shut down the Internet in order to keep information from coming out from its borders.

Started as a blog in 2002, Caracas Chronicles has now evolved to a media outfit with a newsroom in Caracas and correspondents in eight Venezuelan cities. The site takes cryptocurrency donations through a Coinbase integration, accepting Litecoin, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Bitcoin Cash.

3- Freedom of the Press Foundation

The Freedom of the Press Foundation was founded in 2012 as a non-profit organization dedicated to "promoting and funding aggressive, public-interest journalism focused on exposing mismanagement, corruption, and law-breaking in government". Journalists and whistleblowers such as Daniel Ellsberg (who leaked the Pentagon Papers), Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras have served on its board. Edward Snowden has served as the president for the Foundation since 2016.

The organization drew its roots from the financial blockade of Wikileaks with payment processors refusing to serve Wikileaks directly, Freedom of the Press Foundation served as an intermediary. Perhaps for this reason, and its affiliation with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, it is one of a few media-based organizations that does accept cryptocurrency donations everything from Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Stellar, ZCash, Litecoin and Ethereum. You can donate directly to wallets that are managed by the Foundation it has received about 9 BTC in donations by the time of publication.

4- Wikimedia Foundation

While not traditionally associated with investigative journalism, the Wikimedia Foundation, through its work with Wikipedia and Wikiquote, help reinforce a curated history and legacy of investigative work, accessible and contextualized for all. This includes the Wikipedia pages of murdered investigative journalists and compiled reports on the product and outcome of investigative reports such as the Panama Papers. The Foundation takes donations with Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash and Ether through Bitpay.

5- Forbes Crypto

This very section of Forbes now has accepted the ability for payments in Ethereum through the Unlock Protocol in order to read content without ads at the equivalent of $1 a week. Payments can only be made in Ethereum for now but this already gives Forbes a more international and cross-border reach than transactions in any domestic currency.

In a world with more interpretations of the truth, there is a need for hard-hitting investigative journalism that is not afraid of being adversarial and dogged in questioning the truth at every turn. It is a sentiment many in the cryptocurrency community might share and which they can tangibly support through the outlets above.

The rest is here:
Hard-Hitting Investigative Journalism You Can Support With Cryptocurrencies - Forbes

Dr. Max Welling on Federated Learning and Bayesian Thinking – Synced

Introduced by Google in 2017, Federated Learning (FL) enables mobile phones to collaboratively learn a shared prediction model while keeping all the training data on the device, decoupling the ability to do machine learning from the need to store the data in the cloud. Two years have passed, and several new research papers have proposed novel systems to boost FL performance. This March for example a team of researchers from Google suggested a scalable production system for FL to enable increasing workload and output through the addition of resources such as compute, storage, bandwidth, etc.

Earlier this month, NeurIPS 2019 in Vancouver hosted the workshop Federated Learning for Data Privacy and Confidentiality,where academic researchers and industry practitioners discussed recent and innovative work in FL, open problems and relevant approaches.

Professor Dr. Max Welling is the research chair in Machine Learning at the University of Amsterdam and VP Technologies at Qualcomm. Welling is known for his research in Bayesian Inference, Generative modeling, Deep Learning, Variational autoencoders, Graph Convolutional Networks.

Below are excerpts from the workshop talk Dr. Welling gave on Ingredients for Bayesian, Privacy Preserving, Distributed Learning, where the professor shares his views on FL, the importance of distributed learning, and the Bayesian aspects of the domain.

The question can be separated in two parts. Why do we need distributed or federated inferencing? Maybe that is easier to answer. We need it because of reliability. If you in a self-driving car, you clearly dont want to rely on a bad connection to the cloud in order to figure out whether you should brake. Latency. If you have your virtual reality glasses on and you have just a little bit of latency youre not going to have a very good user experience. And then theres, of course, privacy, you dont want your data to get off your device. Also compute maybe because its close to where you are, and personalization you want models to be suited for you.

It took a little bit more thinking why distributed learning is so important, especially within a company how are you going to sell something like that? Privacy is the biggest factor here, there are many companies and factories that simply dont want their data to go off site, they dont want to have it go to the cloud. And so you want to do your training in-house. But theres also bandwidth. You know, moving around data is actually very expensive and theres a lot of it. So its much better to keep the data where it is and move the computation to the data. And also, personalization plays a role.

There are many challenges when you want to do this. The data could be extremely heterogeneous, so you could have a completely different distribution on one device than you have on another device. Also, the data sizes could be very different. One device could contain 10 times more data than another device. And the compute could be heterogeneous, you could have small devices with a little bit of compute that now and then or you cant use because the batterys down. There are other bigger servers that you also want to have in your in your distribution of compute devices.

The bandwidth is limited, so you dont want to send huge amounts of even parameters. Lets say we dont move data, but we move parameters. Even then you dont want to move loads and loads of parameters over the channel. So you want to maybe quantize it to see this. I believe Bayesian thinking is going to be very helpful. And again, the data needs to be private so you wouldnt want to send parameters that contain a lot of information about the data.

So first of all, of course, were going to move model parameters, were not going to move data. We have data stored at places and were going to move the algorithm to that data. So basically you get your learning update, maybe privatized, and then you move it back to your central place where youre going to update it.And of course, bandwidth is another challenge that you have to solve.

We have these heterogeneous data sources and we have very variability in the speed in which we can sync these updates. Here I think the Bayesian paradigm is going to come in handy because, for instance, if you have been running an update on a very large dataset, you can shrink your posterior parameters to a very small posterior. Where on another device, you might have much less data, and you might have a very wide posterior distribution for those parameters. Now, how to combine that? You shouldnt average them, its silly. You should do a proper posterior update where the one that has a small peaked posterior has a lot more weight than the one with a very wide posterior. Also uncertainty estimates are important in that aspect.

The other thing is that with Bayesian update, if you have a very wide posterior distribution, then you know that parameter is not going be very important for making predictions. And so if youre going to send that parameter over a channel, you will have to quantize it, especially to save bandwidth. The ones that are very uncertain anyway you can quantize at a very coarse level, and the ones which have a very peak posterior need to be encoded very precisely, and so you need much higher resolution for that. So also there, the Bayesian paradigm is going to be helpful.

In terms of privacy, there is this interesting result that if you have an uncertain parameter and you draw a sample from that posterior parameter, then that single sample is more private than providing the whole distribution. Theres results that show that you can get a certain level of differential privacy by just drawing a single sample from that posterior distribution. So effectively youre adding noise to your parameter, making it more private. Again, Bayesian thinking is synergistic with this sort of Bayesian federated learning scenario.

We can do MCMC (Markov chain Monte Carlo) and variational based distributed learning. And as theres advantages to do that because it makes the updates more principled and you can combine things which, one of them might be based on a lot more data than another one.

Then we have private and Bayesian to privatize the updates of a variational Bayesian model. Many people have worked on many other of these intersections, so we have deep learning models which have been privatized, we have quantization, which is important if you want to send your parameters over a noisy channel. And its nice because the more you quantize, the more private things become. You can compute the level of quantization from your Bayesian posterior, so all these things are very nicely tied together.

People have looked at the relation between quantized models and Bayesian models how can you use Bayesian estimates to quantized better? People have looked at quantized versus deep to make your deep neural network run faster on a mobile phone you want to quantize it. People have looked at distributed versus deep, distributed deep learning. So many of these intersections have actually been researched, but it hasnt been put together. This is what I want to call for. We can try to put these things together and at the core of all of this is Bayesian thinking, we can use it to execute better on this program.

Journalist: Fangyu Cai | Editor: Michael Sarazen

Like Loading...

Here is the original post:

Dr. Max Welling on Federated Learning and Bayesian Thinking - Synced

Googles YouTube Goes To War With Bitcoin And Crypto – Forbes

Google's relationship with bitcoin and cryptocurrency has long been fraught but it has apparently just taken a turn for the worse.

The search giant previously banned bitcoin and cryptocurrency ads, knocking the bitcoin price, before deciding to allow them again in September last year after three-month block.

Now, Google has decided to remove hundreds of bitcoin and cryptocurrency videos from its video-sharing site YouTube in what's being called a "crypto-purge"leaving many who make bitcoin and cryptocurrency-related videos feeling unfairly targeted by the search giant.

[Update: 5:05am EST 12/27/2019] YouTube has said the decision to ban bitcoin and cryptocurrency videos from its site was an "error" and the removed videos would be reinstated.

"With the massive volume of videos on our site, sometimes we make the wrong call," a YouTube spokesman told crypto news site Decrypt. "When it's brought to our attention that a video has been removed mistakenly, we act quickly to reinstate it."

Google's YouTube video-sharing platform is the world's biggest video website, with 300 hours of ... [+] content on everything, including bitcoin and cryptocurrency, uploaded every minute.

The YouTube crypto-purge appears to only be targeting smaller channels and publishers, with crypto-related videos from the likes of bitcoin and crypto news outlet CoinTelegraph and U.S. business news publisher CNBC escaping the cull.

One YouTuber Chris Dunn, who has some 210,000 subscribers on the platform, asked YouTube for an explanation via Twitter.

"YouTube just removed most of my crypto videos citing 'harmful or dangerous content' and 'sale of regulated goods,'" Dunn wrote, adding he's been making videos on the platform for 10 years and built up 200,000 subs and 7 million views.

The number of videos targeted by Google's YouTube is well into the hundreds and "growing fast."

Some in the bitcoin and cryptocurrency industry have vowed to challenge the decision.

"YouTube deleting all Crypto content is a massive blow to the industry," Ran NeuNer, host of the CryptoTrader show on CNBC Africa, said via Twitter.

"YouTube is the go to place for educational video and the first port of call for new people entering the ecosystem to learn the basics. As a community we should challenge this formally."

Meanwhile, others have been searching for a reason for the purge, finding YouTube's citing of "harmful and dangerous content" unsatisfactory.

"So far Alphabet [Google's parent company] has made no attempt to explain the reasons for the culling," Mati Greenspan, the founder of research group Quantum Economics, wrote in a note.

"The first instinct that many had was that perhaps they're trying to protect the consumer from scams. However, this wouldn't make much sense given that Google and Facebook have already had a crypto advertising ban last year that has long since been reversed, likely due to regulatory clarity in the U.S. where it was found that bitcoin and ethereum are neither securities nor scams."

Greenspan added he is now "officially boycotting YouTube" due to the crypto-purge.

Google, along with the likes of social media giant Facebook, has been increasingly looking to financial services to bolster advertisement revenue in recent years, with public opinion moving against ad-funded business models.

Last month, Google, in partnership with U.S. banking giant Citigroup, said it's planning to launch its own fully-fledged "smart checking" bank accounts via Google Paypiling pressure on bitcoin developers to improve user experienceandadoption or face redundancy.

Meanwhile, the bitcoin price has climbed this year,largely due to interest in bitcoin and crypto from the world's biggest technology companieswith others,including the likes of iPhone-maker Apple and online retailer Amazon, branching out into traditional financial services.

The bitcoin price has stagnated recently after surging higher earlier in the year though it remains ... [+] around double where it began 2019.

Google's decision to take action against bitcoin and cryptocurrency-related content on YouTube has caused some to call for an alternative.

"It may be time the crypto community take a stab at its own blockchain-enabled censorship-resistant social media platform," Changpeng Zhao, the founder and chief executive of bitcoin and cryptocurrency exchange Binance, said via Twitter.

View post:
Googles YouTube Goes To War With Bitcoin And Crypto - Forbes