Edward Snowden Denies ‘Stealing’ NSA Co-Workers’ Passwords

Jan 23, 2014 4:00pm

National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden today denied stealing or tricking his co-workers into giving up their passwords and log-in information so that he could make off with a trove of secret documents from the secretive agency.

Snowden made the denial during an online Q&A today and referenced a Reuters report from November that alleged Snowden had used log-in credentials and passwords provided unwittingly by colleagues at a spy base in Hawaii to access some of the classified material he leaked to the media.

Citing an unidentified source, the Reuters report said that Snowden may have persuaded between 20 and 25 fellow workers at the NSA regional operations center in Hawaii to give him their login and passwords by telling them they were needed for him to do his job as a computer systems administrator. The Reuters report did not directly accuse Snowden of stealing.

With all due respect to [Reuters reporter] Mark Hosenball, the Reuters report that put this out there was simply wrong, Snowden said today.

RELATED: Not Possible to Return to U.S. Now, Snowden Says

Todays Q&A is the second conducted by Snowden since he revealed himself to be the source in a seemingly never-ending stream of reports about the NSAs vast foreign and domestic espionage operations.

Snowden is currently living in Russia under temporary asylum, having fled his contractor job at the NSA in Hawaii first for Hong Kong and then for Moscow. He has been charged in the U.S. with a series of espionage-related crimes.

FULL COVERAGE: Edward Snowden

See the article here:

Edward Snowden Denies 'Stealing' NSA Co-Workers' Passwords

Snowden Says Whistle-Blower Law Gaps Preclude His Return

Edward Snowden, the former government contractor who exposed secret intelligence programs, said he wont return to the U.S. because of gaps in federal whistle-blower laws that he said would leave him unprotected.

Snowden, who fled to Hong Kong and then to Russia after leaking classified documents on the governments Internet and telephone data spy programs, said Congress needs to broaden the Whistleblower Protection Act so that national security contractors can more easily fight for changes from within the intelligence system.

Returning to the U.S., I think, is the best resolution for the government, the public, and myself, but its unfortunately not possible in the face of current whistle-blower protection laws, Snowden wrote today in an Internet question-and-answer session.

While the authenticity of Snowdens identity couldnt be independently verified, two advocates who have advised Snowden - - Jesselyn Radack of the Government Accountability Project and Ben Wizner of the American Civil Liberties Union -- said by e-mail they could confirm Snowdens participation.

The session was conducted by the Courage Foundation, which describes itself as a trust formed to help defend journalistic sources such as Snowden, who gave classified National Security Agency documents to media organizations including the U.K.-based Guardian newspaper and The Washington Post.

It marked at least the second time that Snowden has used an Internet chat to communicate with the public about his efforts to change U.S. surveillance laws. A similar session was conducted in June on the Guardians website.

Some members of Congress, including House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican, have called Snowden a traitor for disclosing intelligence programs meant to prevent terrorism.

Snowden today defended his actions as an act of civil disobedience and said hes aware of threats that have been made against his life.

Im not going to be intimidated, he said. Doing the right thing means having no regrets.

Snowden spoke the same day that a U.S. privacy-policy board issued a 238-page report urging the abolition of the bulk collection of Americans phone records. The five-member Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, created by lawmakers under post-Sept. 11 anti-terrorism laws, said the program has provided only minimal help in thwarting terrorist attacks.

Go here to read the rest:

Snowden Says Whistle-Blower Law Gaps Preclude His Return

Russian lawmaker says Snowden asylum period to be extended

DAVOS, Switzerland, Jan. 24 (UPI) -- U.S. secrets leaker Edward Snowden won't be pressured to leave Russia any time soon, a major Russian lawmaker said Friday.

The comment by parliamentarian Alexy Pushkov comes after U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said Snowden would not get clemency if he came home, CNN reported.

Pushkov, head of the Foreign Affairs Committee of Russia's lower house, the Duma, said Snowden's year-old asylum would be extended and he wouldn't be sent back to the United States.

The legislator made his remarks during the World Economic Summit in Davos, Switzerland.

Holder said Thursday Snowden, who leaked secrets about U.S. and British intelligence gathering he collected while a contractor for the National Security Agency, could come home in a plea deal.

But clemency is out of the question, Holder said.

"We've always indicated ... that the notion of clemency isn't something that we were willing to consider," Holder said at the University of Virginia's Miller Center of Public Affairs.

"Instead, were he to come back to the United States to enter a plea, we would engage with his lawyers," he said.

"We'd do that with any defendant who wanted to enter a plea of guilty," Holder told the university's non-partisan research institute.

Holder did not indicate if he was open to engaging in negotiations with Snowden while he remained in Russia, beyond the reach of U.S. law enforcement.

Go here to read the rest:

Russian lawmaker says Snowden asylum period to be extended

Snowden says mass collection must end

The Guardian via AP, file

By Becky Bratu, Staff Writer, NBC News

Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor whose leaks revealed previously classified information about the extent of U.S. surveillance practices, made an argument for the end of mass data collection Thursday but said not all spying is bad.

The comments emerged from a live chat held on the freesnowden.is website Thursday.

Questions were submitted on Twitter using the #AskSnowden hashtag. The website hosting the Q&A wrote Snowden was "expected to give his first reaction" to President Barack Obama's national security speech last week, in which the president announced a series of proposals that would reduce some of the latitude given to the NSA in the name of homeland security.

In reply to a question regarding the timing of Obama's speech last week, Snowden yet again attacked the NSA's mass collection practices, indicating they are illegal and should be ended.

"When even the federal government says the NSA violated the constitution at least 120 million times under a single program, but failed to discover even a single 'plot,' its time to end 'bulk collection,' which is a euphemism for mass surveillance," he wrote. "There is simply no justification for continuing an unconstitutional policy with a 0% success rate."

However, Snowden explained that while he takes issue with "indiscriminate mass surveillance," not all intelligence collection practices are bad.

"Not all spying is bad," Snowden wrote, adding: "The NSA and the rest of the U.S. Intelligence Community is exceptionally well positioned to meet our intelligence requirements through targeted surveillance the same way weve always done it without resorting to the mass surveillance of entire populations."

In reply to a different question, Snowden emphasized his argument: "Collecting phone and email records for every American is a waste of money, time and human resources that could be better spent pursuing those the government has reason to suspect are a serious threat."

Read more here:

Snowden says mass collection must end

10MIN NEWS Bravo To The UK’s Stand They Don’t Buy Obama’s NSA Spying Promises – Video


10MIN NEWS Bravo To The UK #39;s Stand They Don #39;t Buy Obama #39;s NSA Spying Promises
Current news info,daily news information,messages all over the world,Always Daily Announcement evermore communication with the people..

By: News W.W.

Read more from the original source:

10MIN NEWS Bravo To The UK's Stand They Don't Buy Obama's NSA Spying Promises - Video

NSA Surveillance Sparks Talk of National Internets

Photo: Jock Fistick/Bloomberg/Getty Images Who is Listening? German chancellor Angela Merkel was shocked to learn that the U.S. National Security Agency had been tapping her phone. Germany is considering steps to guard its network.

Just imagine the network of all networks, the globe-spanning Internet, becoming a loose web of tightly guarded, nearly impermeable regional or even national networks. It seems antithetical to the mythology surrounding the Internets power and purpose. But ongoing revelations about the extensive surveillance activities of the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) are pushing countries like Germany and Brazil to take concrete steps in that direction.

Within the 28-member European Union, Germany is taking the lead in pushing for measures to shield local Internet communications from foreign intelligence services. That should come as no surprise. For Germans from the formerly Communist-ruled part of the country, NSA spying sparks bitter memories of eavesdropping by the Stasi, the secret police agency of the former East Germany. Because of that history, Germany has one of the strictest data privacy regimes in the world. On more than one occasion, the country has forced Google and other Internet companies to amend their data collection and usage practices.

For German chancellor Angela Merkel, the revelations are particularly disturbing: The political leader, who grew up under Stasi scrutiny, has had to deal with allegations that her own mobile phone was tapped by the NSA. Shes not amused.

Cybersecurity is no longer a niche topic but a top priority, Deutsche Telekom CEO Ren Obermann told attendees of the Cyber Security Summit late last year, in Bonn. He noted that his company battles more than 800 000 attacks a day on its networks.

A number of policymakers in Berlin and the countrys network regulator back Deutsche Telekoms efforts to tighten security through national routing, says Obermann. Essentially, the concept aims to handle data generated in Germany and destined for or used by local end users by means of fiber-optic cables, routing gear, and computers within the country. The aim is to avoid sending data packets through nodes in the United States and the United Kingdom. The operator, which already offers an encrypted Made in Germany e-mail service and cloud service, has also suggested expanding the idea to include all 26 countries participating in the borderless Schengen Area in Europe. Deutsche Telekom already carries much of the Internet traffic in Germany via reciprocal, or peering, agreements with ISPs, with the remainder handled by an array of operators, many of them foreign-owned.

The kind of segmenting of Internet communications Obermann is talking about would require operators to have two essential components: a national peering agreement that links the Internet networks of all the service providers; and a routing table, also known as a routing information base (RIB), that describes the topology of the networks. Routing tables maintained by the operators currently contain no instructions to keep in-country packets inside the country. The operators would also need their own German-specific routing protocols, which set down how the routers communicate with each other.

Deutsche Telekom claims it has the technology and know-how and needs just three more peering agreements to be able to provide such national routing. The operator, which is also open to the idea of forming a national routing entity, says more than two-thirds of its e-mail traffic is generated and terminated in Germany, and it is pushing parliamentarians to make the needed agreements mandatory.

European governments arent the only ones looking to break off from what they see as American control of the Internet. The Open Root Server Network (ORSN) is an alternative network of domain name serversmachines that translate the names of Web addresses into the numbers of Internet addresses. Originally established to counter the fact that most of the domain name servers were in the United States at the turn of the 21st century, it operated from 2002 to 2008, when an expansion of the domain name server system made it defunct. But following ex-NSA contractor Edward Snowdens revelations about the agencys spying, the ORSN has been revived. Were detached from a single country, like the U.S., which still controls the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, says Markus Grundmann, one of the networks founders and coordinators.

Beyond Europe, Brazils president, Dilma Rousseff, is one of the most outspoken heads of state to criticize NSA practices and take action. She is pushing legislation to force Internet companies such as Google and Facebook to store local data within the countrys borders. She also wants to build submarine cables that dont route through the United States, set up domestic Internet exchange points, and create an encrypted national e-mail service.

Excerpt from:

NSA Surveillance Sparks Talk of National Internets

Civil Liberties Board Says NSA Spying Is Illegal

Last week, President Obama announced a number of reforms to how the NSA conducts its business. Chief among those reforms was changing how the agency collects bulk cellphone metadata. Some felt that the program should be ended immediately though, and the Presidents own civil liberties board couldnt agree more.

The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board published a 238-page document today detailing their opinion on the NSAs collection of bulk telephone metadata. In stark contrast to just about everybody else in the executive branch, the board concluded in a 3-2 decision that it is illegal and should be ended immediately.

So, how did the Board come about to this conclusion? In the executive summary of the document, the board points out that Section 215 of the Patriot Act only allows the FBI to acquire records that a business has in its possession as part of an FBI investigation, when those records are relevant to the investigation. The current interpretation of Section 215 that allows the NSA to collect the phone records of every America bears almost no resemblance to that description, according to the board.

The Board then breaks down how the NSAs actions goes beyond what Section 215 allows in four parts:

First, the telephone records acquired under the program have no connection to any specific FBI investigation at the time of their collection. Second, because the records are collected in bulk potentially encompassing all telephone calling records across the nation they cannot be regarded as relevant to any FBI investigation as required by the statute without redefining the world relevant in a manner that is circular, unlimited in scope, and out of step with the case law from analogous legal contexts involving the production of records. Third, the program operates by putting telephone companies under an obligation to furnish new calling records on a daily basis as they are generated (instead of turning over records already in their possession) an approach lacking foundation in the statute and one that is inconsistent with FISA as a whole. Fourth, the statute permits only the FBI to obtain items for use in its investigation; it does not authorize the NSA to collect anything.

If that wasnt enough, the Board also says that Section 215 violates the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, or ECPA.

In addition, we conclude that the program violates the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. That statute prohibits telephone companies from sharing consumer records with the government except in response to specific enumerated circumstances, which do not include Section 215 orders.

Oh, but the trashing of Section 215 doesnt stop there. A bit further into the summary, the Board says that the common defense of the bulk metadata collection program (i.e. it stops terrorism) doesnt hold up in the face of reality:

we conclude that the Section 215 program has shown minimal value in safeguarding the nation from terrorism. Based on information provided to the Board, including classified briefings and documentation, we have not identified a single instance involving a threat to the United States in which the program made a concrete difference in the outcome of a counterterrorism investigation. Moreover, we are aware of no instance in which the program directly contributed to the discovery of a previously unknown terrorist plot or the disruption of a terrorist attack. And we believe that in only one instance over the past seven years has the program arguably contributed to the identification of an unknown terrorism suspect. Even in that case, the suspect was not involved in planning a terrorist attack and there is reason to believe that the FBI may have discovered him without the contribution of the NSAs program.

Despite saying that it has never directly contributed to the foiling of a terrorist plot, the Board plays devils advocate for a bit by saying that the bulk metadata collection program may help investigators in two ways. The first is that the program may offer additional leads regarding the contacts of terrorism suspects already known to investigators. The second can help investigators confirm suspicions about the target of an inquiry. Despite this, the Board feels that the bulk metadata collection program largely duplicates the FBIs own information gathering efforts. In other words, its redundant and contributes nothing of value.

Excerpt from:

Civil Liberties Board Says NSA Spying Is Illegal

NSA spying is illegal – US privacy watchdog

The bulk collection of phone call data by US intelligence agencies is illegal and has had only minimal benefits in preventing terrorism, an independent US privacy watchdog has ruled.

The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board advised by a 3-2 majority that the programme should end, BBC reports.

In a major speech last week, President Barack Obama said he was ordering curbs on the use of such mass data.

But he said the US must continue collecting data to prevent attacks.

The report from the PCLOB is the latest of several reviews of the National Security Agencys mass surveillance programme, the details of which caused widespread anger after they were leaked by Edward Snowden.

Washington has argued it is lawful to collect information on phone calls known as metadata under a section of the George W Bush-era Patriot Act which gives the FBI the power to demand from businesses information deemed relevant to their investigations.

But the New York Times, one of several media organisations to have seen the PCLOB report, says three of the five panel members concluded that the NSA spying programme lacks a viable legal foundation under the Patriot Act.

It represents an unsustainable attempt to shoehorn a pre-existing surveillance programme into the text of a statute with which it is not compatible, they said.

The programme also raised constitutional concerns, including serious threats to privacy and civil liberties as a policy matter, and has shown only limited value.

As a result, the board recommends that the government end the programme, said the report.

More:

NSA spying is illegal – US privacy watchdog