Libertarian columnist Vin Suprynowicz of the Las Vegas Review-Journal sardonically opined on Sunday, "Please don't call it State Socialism." He mentioned hearing his local Congresswoman on a radio interview interpreting the US Constitution as entirely open to interpretation.

From the LV Review-Journal, March 29:

We're told that for some reason we're not allowed to call the Obama-Reid-Pelosi agenda "socialism," "communism," "Marxism," "state socialism" "fascism," or anything else that might sound unpleasant...

Telling us we're not "allowed" to use an accurate label for something doesn't change what it is.

On the radio this week I heard Congresscritter Titus asked whether she's concerned about state lawsuits challenging the new federal mandate that everyone will have to buy "suitable" health insurance. "Oh, no," she said, "The Constitution has been interpreted all kinds of ways, so I'm not concerned about that."

This from a woman -- a supposedly well-educated college professor -- who swore a solemn oath to "protect and defend the Constitution" 14 months ago.

At least four Republican candidates have filed to run against Rep. Titus, including Constitutionalist and retired Air Force Col. Ed Bridges and Tea Party Patriot Dr. Joe Heck.