Release...

Senate Comm. Hears Bill on Employees' Liberty - Measure Would Make Missouri "Right to Work"

Missouri State Senator Jane Cunningham (R-Chesterfield)

JEFFERSON CITY – Fifty percent of manufacturers refuse to consider Missouri as a place to locate new jobs because Missouri law has no protection against forced unionization of their workers, according to testimony given Tuesday in the Senate General Laws Committee. Senate Bill 1, sponsored by Sen. Luann Ridgeway, R-Smithville, would change that by giving employees the freedom to choose whether or not to join a union as a condition of getting or keeping a job.

Ridgeway said recent census data shows that businesses with jobs and the workers who take them are fleeing to states with worker protection laws, also know as “Right to Work.”

“With an unemployment rate at nearly ten percent, Missouri must consider every obstacle to putting our citizens back to work,” Ridgeway said. “It is clear that job producers and the workers who take those jobs are voting with their feet on the ‘Right to Work’ issue because they are moving to states that have this protection.”

As recently reported, Missouri will lose a Congressional seat. Ridgeway testified that non-“Right to Work” states lost a total of nine Congressional seats and, due to population shifts, “Right to Work” states gained 11 Congressional seats.

“At this important time, losing jobs, our manufacturing base, as well as representation in Congress... is a trend that must be reversed,” added Ridgeway.

Senate Leader Robert N. Mayer, R-Dexter, supports the measure and said making Missouri a “Right to Work” state would be another reason for businesses to expand or locate here.

“While Missouri has lost more than 100,000 jobs since June of 2008, many ‘Right to Work’ states have faired far better,” said Mayer. “Data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics show that unemployment is lower in the 22 states that have adopted ‘Right to Work’ laws. In the last decade, those states have added 1.5 million private sector jobs, while non-‘Right to Work’ states have lost 1.8 million jobs. That should be a wake-up call that now is the time to allow Missouri to compete.”

Six of Missouri’s eight neighboring states are “Right to Work” states and all but one has a lower unemployment rate than Missouri. Tennessee, the only “Right to Work” state with a comparable unemployment rate to Missouri, gained jobs in 2010, Missouri lost jobs.

Sen. Jane Cunningham, who chairs the committee, said much of the testimony highlighted Missouri’s need to better compete to bring more jobs to Missouri.

“It was alarming to learn from those who consult U.S. and foreign manufacturing companies on new site locations that 50 percent of those companies are not even considering Missouri because we are not a ‘Right to Work’ state,” Cunningham said. “That shows by not changing we are costing Missouri jobs.”

The committee also heard testimony that per household income was higher in “Right to Work” states than in forced union states. Data cited from a study published in 2000 by Dr. James T. Bennett, a professor for George Mason University, demonstrated that the mean two-income household in a “Right to Work” state had nearly $2,000 more in after-tax purchasing power than its counterpart in a non-“Right to Work” state. A study published in 2005 by Dr. Barry Poulson, a professor at the University of Colorado, determined real disposable income in metropolitan areas in “Right to Work” states is higher, with nearly $4,300 more in after-tax purchasing power than its counterpart in a non-“Right to Work” state.

Ridgeway noted that if Missouri becomes a “Right to Work” state, employees will still be allowed to unionize and employers will still be allowed to enter into collective bargaining agreements and hire union labor.

“‘Right to Work’ is not about whether unions can continue to operate in Missouri,” said Ridgeway. “Rather it is about removing a legal barrier that is harming our state’s ability to compete for jobs that impact the 89 percent of Missourians that are not union members.”

The committee also heard a similar bill, Senate Bill 197, also sponsored by Ridgeway that would send the measure to voters. To learn more about these bills, visit http://www.senate.mo.gov.