Abigail Shriers Irreversible Damage is a superb piece of investigative journalism that exposes the damage done to teenage girls by transgender ideology, but it divides opinion. Should controversial books ever be censored?

The public library in Halifax, Nova Scotia had come under pressure for stocking Shriers book. Transgender campaigners had made the usual hyperbolic accusations that it presented a safety issue, one claiming, the impact of this book on, like, even one kid is potentially their life. Utter nonsense, of course, but those campaigners will stoop very low to get their own way.

Last week, the library announced it was not going to be removing the book from its shelves. In a statement it said, Public libraries exist to provide equal access to resources for everyone and support individuals freedom to seek information and form their own opinions. When we act to suppress access, we engage in censorship.

Perhaps with a view to the inevitable outrage that it knew would follow, it quickly re-committed itself to support trans people and the broader LGBTQ2S+ community before suggesting not one but 18 books that take an approach that is different from Shriers.

However, nothing short of total capitulation is ever good enough for the transgender thought police. Halifax Pride promptly announced its decision to end its partnership with the Halifax Public Library, including events planned for the 2021 festival. Let them go, would be my advice to the library. The trans community needs far better representation than Halifax Pride and their assertion that Shriers book could possibly put local trans youth in immediate harm. It is Shrier who is calling out the real and tangible threat to transgender-identified youth. They are being captivated by a dangerous ideology that pushes them into unnecessary medical treatment that could leave them sterile and medicated for life.

Sadly, we have got far too used to the petulant moaning of groups such as Halifax Pride. It doesnt help transgender people like me, but the damage may be limited if we pay no attention to it. But thats harder when the Canadian state broadcaster CBC publishes a news report that reads more like an op-ed. It started with the pull quote This book is definitely debating the existence of trans people, and quoted Halifax Pride and the author of one of two petitions that had called for the books removal. In a ludicrous non-attempt to balance the piece, the report quoted a professor of health promotion, whose research includes LGBTQ health and gender. She saw the book as harmful junk science that should be openly discussed, but not pulled from the library.

I dont know that taking the book out of the collection is necessarily going to resolve the bigger problem, which is transphobia and trans hatred.

CBC might not have given Abigail Shrier a right of reply, but RT.com was keen to hear from her. Shrier told me, My book does nothing more than point out the medical risks of hasty transition for teen girls. The notion that that makes anyone feel unsafe is a lie that the activists are using, very effectively, to silence all debate over the medical protocols of transition. I dont know whats more disgraceful, the attempt to suppress a book, or all the people who have fallen for it. But Im grateful to the Halifax Library for standing up to this madness.

But the madness runs deeper than local issues in Halifax, Nova Scotia. CBC appears to have been captured. It cited author Tom Ryan, who said he now plans to cancel his upcoming library-sponsored presentation out of concern for the LGBTQ teens he writes about. However, in an atrocious failure of editorial judgment, the original piece illustrated Ryans quote with two of his tweets. In them, he likened Shriers concern for transgender-identified girls with the anti-Semitic writings of David Duke, the former grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. Without criticism or comment, CBC embedded two tweets in which Ryan had written the following:

A quick search tells me that Halifax Public Library does not carry Jewish Supremacism: My Awakening on the Jewish Question by David Duke. Is it censorship of HPL so [sic] choose not to carry this book? Would people crawl out of the woodwork to defend the library if they did carry Dukes book? If you answered no, ask yourself why so many people are quick to defend this book. Its not about free speech its about granting transphobia a veneer of respectability.

Ryan later withdrew those appalling remarks and they also disappeared from the CBC report but what was a state broadcaster thinking when it selected them for publication? Its far too easy for libellous accusations to be propagated on social media, but that doesnt excuse professionals who should know better than to repeat them. To link Shrier to Duke is not only potentially defamatory, it misleads the Canadian public. Either CBC is hopelessly nave and does not know what it is doing, or this was a deliberate attempt to discredit Shriers book by the most scurrilous tactics imaginable.

Ive read Shriers book. Last year, RT.com published my review. Irreversible Damage is neither transphobic nor anti-trans, whatever those terms might mean, and it is not definitely debating the existence of trans people. It is controversial only because some people seem determined to suppress it at all costs.

If Shrier is right and I think she is we are witnessing an appalling failure of safeguarding, which is leading to the systematic abuse of vulnerable girls. Her claims need to be investigated, and therefore her book needs to be read. If CBC is trying to actively suppress this book, Canada has a very serious problem indeed.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

View original post here:

Trans activists tried to censor a book on potential harm of hasty transitions for children - RT