More than a year after the passage of historic legislation meant to empower local governments in taming their health care spending, the region's cities and towns have joined municipalities across the state in savings millions of dollars, but many could still do more - assuming they want to shift more costs to employees, a delicate prospect.

State-mandated reports, required of those cities and towns that didn't adopt the new law and obtained by the Daily News from the Executive Office of Administration and Finance, show that a number of local cities and towns could save hundreds of thousands of dollars of additional taxpayer money by lowering the portion they contribute to insurance premiums or by implementing the deductibles and higher co-pays of the coverage pool for state workers - the Group Insurance Commission, or GIC.

An extensive survey by the paper also shows many cities and towns still offer plans that don't carry a deductible; don't charge a co-pay for high-tech, costly scans like MRIs; and don't offer tiered out-of-pocket costs to encourage workers to use cheaper hospitals and doctors offering quality care. All state plans include a $250 deductible for individuals and a $750 deductible for families, and 10 of the 11 offerings feature tiering.

"My impression is that communities are going to do this in steps and not go all the way to the GIC level in one bite," said Michael Widmer, president of the business-backed Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, which pushed for the legislation after years of research and advocacy.

Also, if cities and towns have not cut services or laid off staff, the need for even further health savings might not be as pressing, Widmer said. There's also the need to weigh budget paring with the desire to treat employees fairly and attract quality talent - though higher-out-of-pocket expenses can lower premium costs for both employer and employee.

"I think the circumstances vary," Widmer said. "I think all of this is kind of a balancing act."

Signed by Gov. Deval Patrick in July 2011, the municipal health care act requires governing bodies like selectmen and city councils to take a vote if they want to change the design of health plans outside normal bargaining. They then have 30 days to negotiate with a committee of union representatives to decide whether to enter the GIC and use state health plans or make changes on their own. Special panels resolve gridlock but have been rarely required.

Locally, Weston and Hopedale had already struck deals with unions to join the GIC. Sudbury adopted the new law and followed suit. Of the remaining 18 cities and towns, just Framingham, Holliston, Milford and Southborough opted for the legislation, though many others have made changes in recent years or saw unions agree to concessions because of the move afoot statewide.

Milford lowered health spending by nearly $1.5 million through the new law. Framingham had already trimmed $1.4 million annually when it followed suit, leading to an additional $2.4 million in savings. The law requires a quarter of first-year municipal savings to go to worker relief, and Framingham has set up a $640,000 pool for employees to draw from for co-pays in times of hardship.

Health care spending has gone from a 16 percent share of the budget to 14.5 percent in Framingham, with the town watching the GIC before potentially seeking further changes.

Read the original here:

Not all communities find ways to save on health insurance costs