For as long as Seemay Chou can remember, she has gone to bed at midnight and woken around 4:30 a.m. Chou long assumed that meant she was a bad sleeper. Not that she felt bad. In fact, sleeping just four hours a night left her feeling full of energy and with free time to get more done at her job leading a research lab that studies bacteria. It feels really good for me to sleep four hours, she says. When Im in that rhythm, thats when I feel my best.
Still, in an effort to match the slumber schedules of the rest of the world, she would sometimes drug herselfwith melatonin, alcohol or marijuana ediblesinto getting more sleep. It backfired. If I sleep seven or eight hours, I feel way worse, she says. Hung over, almost.
Although the federal government recommends that Americans sleep seven or more hours per night for optimal health and functioning, new research is challenging the assumption that sleep is a one-size-fits-all phenomenon. Scientists have found that our internal body clocks vary so greatly that they could form the next frontiers of personalized medicine. By listening more closely to the ticking of our internal clocks, researchers expect to uncover novel ways to help everybody get more out of their sleeping and waking lives.
Human sleep is largely a mystery. We know its important; getting too little is linked to heightened risk for metabolic disorders, Type 2 diabetes, psychiatric disorders, autoimmune disease, neurodegeneration and many types of cancer. Its probably true that bad sleep leads to increased risks of virtually every disorder, says Dr. Louis Ptacek, a neurology professor at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). But details about whats actually going on during shut-eye are sparse. We know almost nothing about sleep and how its regulated, says Ptacek.
Some people are morning larks, rising early, and others are night owls, who like staying up late. Those patterns are regulated by the bodys circadian rhythm, a 24-hour internal clock. People can manipulate their circadian rhythm through all kinds of external factors, like setting an alarm clock or exposing themselves to light. But the ideal sleep duration has long been thought to be universal. There are many people who think everyone needs eight to eight and a half hours of sleep per night and there will be health consequences if they dont get it, says Ptacek. But thats as crazy as saying everybody has to be 5 ft. 10 in. tall. Its just not true.
Ptacek and his wife Ying-Hui Fu, also a professor of neurology at UCSF, are pioneers in the relatively new field of sleep genetics. About a decade ago, Fu discovered the first human gene linked to natural short sleep; people who had a rare genetic mutation seemed to get the same benefits from six hours of sleep a night as those without the mutation got from eight hours. In 2019, Fu and Ptacek discovered two more genes connected to natural short sleep, and theyll soon submit a paper describing a fourth, providing even more evidence that functioning well on less sleep is a genetic trait.
The researchers are now collecting data on short sleepers in order to figure out just how rare these mutations are. If we can get a better understanding of why their sleep is more efficient, we can then come back and help everybody sleep more efficiently, Fu says. Among the participants is Chou, who also happens to work at UCSF. One day at a faculty meeting, she and Ptacek chatted about his work. She immediately recognized herself when he described short sleepers. I had never heard of this. But once I started reading about it, it was sort of an epiphany.
Chou doesnt know yet if she has the identified genetic variants. But after the researchers interviewed her about her familys sleeping patterns, she realized her mom is also a short sleeper. I have memories of when I was younger, and my dad being frustrated with her for staying up really late, but she always seemed fine, she says. The researchers took blood samples from both women.
Doctors once dismissed short sleepers like Chou as depressed or suffering from insomnia. Yet short sleepers may actually have an edge over everyone else. Research is still early, but Fu has found that besides being more efficient at sleep, they tend to be more energetic and optimistic and have a higher tolerance for pain than people who need to spend more time in bed. They also tend to live longer. Chou says the first three hold true for her; by nature, she is sunny and positive, and though she often finds bruises on her body, she usually doesnt remember getting them. I find it annoying how much people complain about little physical pains, she says.
So far, these are just intriguing observations. But by studying genetic short sleepers, Fu and Ptacek believe theyll eventually learn lessons for the rest of us. As we identify more and more genes and we think about the pathways in which they function, at some point, a picture is going to emerge, and we will begin to have an understanding of how sleep is regulated in greater detail, Ptacek says. This, they hope, will lead to targeted treatments, like pills or vitamins, to improve sleep efficiency in everyone.
Researchers are also looking beyond sleep to other circadian bodily processes that might benefit from a personalized or targeted approach. While a master clock in the brain acts like a conductor, setting time for the whole body, the rest of the body is like orchestra players with clocks of their own. All your organs have rhythms, says Steven Lockley, an associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School who studies circadian rhythms and sleep. Theres a clock in your heart, a clock in the lungs, a clock in the kidneys. Just about everything in the bodymetabolism, hormones, the immune system, reproductive function and the way DNA is translatedis influenced by a circadian rhythm, he says.
And not everybodys is the same. Peoples internal clocks are often hours off from one another, Lockley says. The range of individual differences is much bigger than anyone really understands yet.
The bodys complex clock system has implications for both healthy people and those with medical conditions, and scientists are already seeing glimpses of how they can time certain tests and treatments to get more accurate or potent results. A cholesterol reading, for example, might be affected by what time of day you go to the doctors office, because the liver (which makes cholesterol) has a circadian rhythm. The time of day at which you measure something could make someone look clinically abnormal, even though theyre not, Lockley says.
Medicine might also be more effective if taken at a certain time. Because theyre metabolized in the liver, drugs change their effects throughout the day, Lockley says. Other circadian bodily processes, like cell function, can also affect how medication acts. Early research suggests certain drugsincluding some for colorectal cancer, pain and asthmaperform better or are less toxic when taken at different times of day.
Exercise, which can be as powerful as medicine for some conditions, is good for you whenever you do it. But I do think that the time of day may have an influence, on top of the effects of exercise, on our metabolic health, says Juleen Zierath, professor of physiology at Karolinska Institute in Sweden. In one small study published in 2018 in the journal Diabetologia, Zierath and her team started 11 men with Type 2 diabetes on a high-intensity interval training program. The men exercised either in the morning (around 8 a.m.) or the afternoon (4 p.m.) for two weeks, then switched schedules. The researchers expected that regardless of the time of day, men in both groups would see improvements in blood-sugar levels. But when they exercised in the morning, they actually had slightly higher levels of blood sugar [than baseline], which we didnt expect at all, Zierath says. Its not clear to what extent the type of exercise and other variables matter, but the study provides an intriguing hint that time of day might make a difference for exercise.
Scientific knowledge is nascent when it comes to optimizing testing and treatment by the clock. Our understanding of individual circadian time is even more primitive. But Lockley believes its the key to personalized medicine; he and others are exploring ways to measure a persons internal circadian time through simple clinical tests. Hopefully in the next five to 10 years, youd go to the doctor, give a breath test or a pee sample, and the doctor would know your biological time, he says. Then all your test results and treatments could be based on your real internal time, which is going to be very different between you and me based on our internal clocks.
For now, even the understanding that our bodies often operate according to different clocks is a big scientific advance. Its already changed the way Chou sleeps, lives and works. Ive just become more comfortable with accepting my sleep, she says. She now asks her employees about their sleep schedules to anticipate when each will be at their peak. She also informs everyone about her own abbreviated schedule, so they know she doesnt expect an immediate response to an email she sends at 4:05 a.m. Thats just when my brain is working, she says.
This appears in the August 17, 2020 issue of TIME.
For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder.
Write to Mandy Oaklander at mandy.oaklander@time.com.
The rest is here:
Not Everyone Needs 8 Hours of Sleep, New Research Reveals | Time - TIME
- IOM not webcast today. Why Not? [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- National Academies skeptical at Best. [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Some Confusion Exists [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Why DTC Genomics IS Medicine. [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- First Mari, Now Linda. Who's next? [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Is it true? [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Re-Reviewing the National Academies [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- The problem with nonclinicians....... [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Crazy Night of Emails to Government [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Adrienne Carlson's Personalized Medicine. [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Tell Me, How do you feel now? Sherpa's RX [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- This Just In. 23andMe to go to GPs. I love my readers!! [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Sorry so long away [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- 2D6 Rears its ugly head..... [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Ok, Fine, Back to Plavix [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Kaiser a protoype for Collins' Aim [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- A few months late to the party.... [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Stated Another Way....... [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Excuse Me? Harvard and Navigenics? WTF? [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Follow up to Yesterday's WTF? Harvard, Navi? and Pfizer??? [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Did you get your kit? Thanks Dr. Rob from MedCo [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Gluco...Wha? Parkinson's Disease and Glucocerebrosidase mutations. [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Away and now back, What did I miss???? 23andme layoffs? Selling Genomes for cheap up next! [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Change IS Needed. I agree with William, sometimes. [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Good Enough Science? Apparently so at 23andme [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Long QT Syndrome, location matters [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- Congratulations Generation Health. Nice pick up! [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- An argument 23andSerge can't win...23andme but not medicine [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- Stop. Breathe. Repeat. An analysis of the direction of DTC Genomics Field. [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- Hey DTC genomics, Stay Private, Stay Alive, Go Public and Die [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- You can't have it both way. Either scared your genome is sold off or not. [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- 15 Days Away Gives Time for Perspective. [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- What about the SACGHS registry? Another missed opportunity? [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- AJHG is in and my Favorite Muin is in it! But He Is NOT the Father! [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- Navigenics for 23andMe prices? [Last Updated On: December 18th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 18th, 2009]
- Lp(a) Maybe there's something there that wasn't there before? [Last Updated On: December 24th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 24th, 2009]
- Another Year, Another Bankruptcy [Last Updated On: December 31st, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 31st, 2009]
- 5 Technologies going bye bye in this decade? [Last Updated On: January 6th, 2010] [Originally Added On: January 6th, 2010]
- Hackers, HITECH and HIPAA in DTC Genomics, Oh My! [Last Updated On: January 7th, 2010] [Originally Added On: January 7th, 2010]
- Personal Genomics Flop.....big Belly Flop! [Last Updated On: January 8th, 2010] [Originally Added On: January 8th, 2010]
- Gotta Love It. Even the daycare....... [Last Updated On: January 11th, 2010] [Originally Added On: January 11th, 2010]
- Congratulations Navigenics. You ARE a clinical lab! Uh-Oh... [Last Updated On: January 12th, 2010] [Originally Added On: January 12th, 2010]
- CETP, Jewish Centenarians and Alzheimers [Last Updated On: January 14th, 2010] [Originally Added On: January 14th, 2010]
- Enter the "Not" DTC Genomics Rep [Last Updated On: January 17th, 2010] [Originally Added On: January 17th, 2010]
- Why Dr. Vanier's Navigenics appointment is good for PM [Last Updated On: January 22nd, 2010] [Originally Added On: January 22nd, 2010]
- Holy Crap! MedCo Follows in CVS footsteps [Last Updated On: February 3rd, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 3rd, 2010]
- FDA, Warfarin, still not as sexy to me. [Last Updated On: February 5th, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 5th, 2010]
- Hype, Hype, Hype from a single study. [Last Updated On: February 11th, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 11th, 2010]
- I love my readers, even Renata M! [Last Updated On: February 17th, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 17th, 2010]
- How can insurers use DTC genomics to profile? [Last Updated On: February 17th, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 17th, 2010]
- 9p21.....ahem. Paynter et.al. Smackdown. Again. [Last Updated On: February 18th, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 18th, 2010]
- Hey! It's Pete Hulick! Are you Going to GET? [Last Updated On: February 19th, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 19th, 2010]
- I was wrong......AHEM [Last Updated On: February 28th, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 28th, 2010]
- G2C2, finally a tool for genomic education! [Last Updated On: March 2nd, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 2nd, 2010]
- Just 4 million? What 23andMe is worth. [Last Updated On: March 5th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 5th, 2010]
- What a difference a year makes [Last Updated On: March 9th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 9th, 2010]
- ........DTC Genomic Medicine? [Last Updated On: March 12th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 12th, 2010]
- The FDA, 2c19 and the ACC [Last Updated On: March 13th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 13th, 2010]
- The problem with Comparative Whole Genomics...... [Last Updated On: March 13th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 13th, 2010]
- BRCA testing by 23andME is the same as Myriad Genetics. [Last Updated On: March 15th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 15th, 2010]
- The Argument Against DTC Genomics Marketing and such [Last Updated On: March 16th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 16th, 2010]
- A moment of Clarity. Some DTCG is not bad. [Last Updated On: March 18th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 18th, 2010]
- SNPs for breast cancer risk? It Depends. [Last Updated On: March 18th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 18th, 2010]
- How can MDVIP use Navigenics Test for Medicine? [Last Updated On: March 18th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 18th, 2010]
- Why did P&G invest in Navigenics? [Last Updated On: March 23rd, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 23rd, 2010]
- PGx in DTCG? Doesn't stand up to Useful testing. [Last Updated On: March 25th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 25th, 2010]
- End of Gene Patents? [Last Updated On: March 29th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 29th, 2010]
- Sherpa Accepting Chief Medical Officership [Last Updated On: April 3rd, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 3rd, 2010]
- The Rumors of My Death........ [Last Updated On: April 20th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 20th, 2010]
- Happy DNA Day! [Last Updated On: April 25th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 25th, 2010]
- 99 USD, DNA day and patient letters [Last Updated On: April 25th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 25th, 2010]
- 2C19, Navigenics and Clinical Reality. [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2010]
- Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative rising [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2010]
- Personal Genomes in Clinical Care. Quake paper is a waste! [Last Updated On: May 11th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 11th, 2010]
- Personal Genomes in Clinical Care. Quake paper Falls Short! [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2010]
- Last post edited by Drew [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2010]
- GateKeeper? FCUK U! [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2010]
- GateKeeper? F! U! [Last Updated On: May 15th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 15th, 2010]
- Potential of genomic medicine, LOST [Last Updated On: May 19th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 19th, 2010]
- How Bad Can a House Investigation be for DTC Genomics? [Last Updated On: May 20th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 20th, 2010]