One area of significant contention in the state senate's recently passed police reform bill was whether to limit "qualified immunity," a legal doctrine that protects police and other public employees from lawsuits.
Qualified immunity has been both a lightning rod in local and national police reform debates, and a source of confusion about what it actually entails.
We turn to Nancy Gertner, a retired federal judge, WBUR legal analyst and senior lecturer at Harvard Law School, on what qualified immunity is and why many law enforcement officials are trying to hold on to it.
On how the "qualified immunity" doctrine came about:
"The doctrine is a judge-made doctrine that came about in pretty much the late 1970s and early 1980s. And it was literally a concern that constitutional criminal law, in other words, the ways in which the Constitution limited or affected police behavior that it was unfair because of new developments in constitutional law, to have a police officer bound by those new developments. Famously, one judge said ... a cop on the beat shouldn't have to be reading the advance sheets (the ways in which people get notice of opinions). And it was really phrased in terms of a police officer could not anticipate legal developments. It was focused in on the big and new constitutional changes that were going on after the Warren Court and said, 'How could a police officer know about those kinds of changes?' But over time, it has evolved into something really quite a bit different. It's not just saying a police officer couldn't have known what the Supreme Court decided yesterday about the Fourth Amendment, but it has come to be that the police officer, for him to be held liable, there had to have been an existing precedent on the specific fact in question."
"Let me give you an example: There was a case of a SWAT team that fired tear gas grenades into a house carrying someone they wanted to arrest. That person wasn't there. That caused considerable damage. The Court of Appeals said, 'Well, there's no qualified immunity because there was no precedent involving tear gas and houses.' Now, there was precedent about the scope of searches, etc., but there was no specific precedent that dealt with ... tear gas going into a house, or a case of ... a police officer [who] shot a dog trying to apprehend someone in a backyard, and wound up shooting a young girl. And the court literally said that the child's right not to be accidentally shot in the leg is not clearly established. So [what] I'm saying is, over time this became not 'How could a police officer have known, you know, the latest constitutional issue,' but ... a police officer gets excused if there was not an existing precedent involving the facts that are in his case. Well, there never is an existing precedent involving those specific facts."
On why it's front and center in the current police reform debate:
"Well, what happens is that the 'immunity' entitles a judge to dismiss the case without it ever getting to a jury. While a jury ... might get the issue of what comprises excessive force or what comprises an unfair search, qualified immunity entitles a police officer who's being sued to move to dismiss, and the case is then gone. And it's gone in a way that is particularly troubling. The judge is supposed to decide, or at one point was supposed to decide, was the plaintiff's rights violated? And then the second question is, was the law clearly established? Over time, and because of the Supreme Court, judges no longer ... answer the first question: whether someone's rights were violated. So that meant the law is not ever going to be established even going forward, because case after case was saying, essentially, 'I don'tknow whether [the police officer] did anything wrong, but it wasn't clearly established.' "
On how qualified immunity plays out in lawsuits against law enforcement today:
"The notion that a police officer who does something that comprises a crime will be punished and go to jail is true, although we recognize that that doesn't happen very often, as we saw in the George Floyd case [with criminal charges]. But we're not talking about criminal prosecution here, because that, to some degree, is the most extreme example of wrongful conduct. We're talking about a civil suit, if someone violated your constitutional rights. It may not comprise a crime, but it was essentially violating your constitutional rights. ... [The police officer] did something wrong, he went outside the boundaries of what the Constitution allows. To say that people can sue, yeah, you can sue and it will be dismissed if it doesn't fit [these], in my view, absurd requirements. So it'll be dismissed. ... This is like constitutional malpractice. It's as if saying the only way you can deal with a doctor that left his instruments in your body after the surgery is if it's a crime. Well, we're not talking crime. We're talking about civil damages for violation of a constitutional right. So the fact that people can be sent to jail doesn't control conduct. What controls conduct is lawsuits."
On the argument that eliminating qualified immunity will put undue financial and civil risk on law enforcement, curb their behaviors, and make them overly cautious:
"It is a false argument. Ninety-nine point eight percent of cases that are brought I've looked this up of constitutional claims against police officers are paid for by the government or even sometimes the union. In other words, the municipality or the state will pay whatever damages are assigned to the police officer. So there is really no financial penalty at all. And what you're talking about is having a range of conduct that may well be wrong, that is broader than the range of conduct that we allow now, and allowing those cases to go to go to trial before a jury. So it's really not an impediment to the police at all, any more than malpractice since actions against doctors keep doctors from doing surgery. Good doctors do not have a problem [with that]."
On if the end of qualified immunity could affect police officers decisions:
"That's really the usual kind of scare tactics that the police use whenever there are efforts to curb their power. The fact that those who are engaged in malpractice like a doctor or a lawyer can be sued for it and wind up with damages against them, doesn't stop people to being doctors or lawyers. It makes them exercise more care. And that's exactly what we're trying to do. So that's just simply absurd. If they think twice before they violate someone's constitutional rights, rather than, as Justice Sotomayor just said in a case where she dissented, she says, with qualified immunity ... it's the wrong signal: shoot first and think later, and count on being exonerated."
Link:
Understanding 'Qualified Immunity' And Its Place In The Police Reform Debate - WBUR
- Quinn: Supreme Court should clarify Fourth Amendment rights in the digital age [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Fourth amendment | Wex Legal Dictionary / Encyclopedia ... [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- The Fourth Amendment is destroyed by the Roberts led Supreme Court. - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Protections for e-data clear Senate committee [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- Weighing The Risks Of Warrantless Phone Searches During Arrests [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- Court may let cops search smartphones [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- Supreme Court to hear case on police searches of cellphones [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- Fourth Amendment in the digital age: Supreme Court to decide if police can search cellphones without a warrant [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2014]
- What Scalia knows about illegal searches [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2014]
- Should police be allowed to search your smartphone - Video [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2014]
- The Shaky Legal Foundation of NSA Surveillance on Americans [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court rules police don't need warrants to search cars [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2014]
- Local police: Updated vehicle-search law still requires probable cause [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2014]
- Liberal Supreme Court Justice Comes To The Defense Of Scalia [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2014]
- Smartphones and the Fourth Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- Fourth Amendment Defined & Explained - Law [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2014]
- I-Team: Do police seek search warrant friendly judges? [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2014]
- Is Big Brother Listening? Applying the Fourth Amendment in an Electronic Age - Video [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- Magistrate waxes poetic while rejecting Gmail search request [Last Updated On: May 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 10th, 2014]
- The Fourth Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 10th, 2014]
- License reader lawsuit can be heard, appeals court rules [Last Updated On: May 15th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 15th, 2014]
- Seize the Rojo - Video [Last Updated On: May 16th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 16th, 2014]
- NSA Spying Has a Disproportionate Effect on Immigrants [Last Updated On: May 16th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 16th, 2014]
- Motorists sue Aurora, police in 2012 traffic stop after bank robbery [Last Updated On: May 18th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 18th, 2014]
- Judge Says NSA Phone Surveillance Likely Unconstitutional - Video [Last Updated On: May 21st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 21st, 2014]
- New York Attorney Heath D. Harte Releases a Statement on Fourth Amendment Rights [Last Updated On: May 22nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 22nd, 2014]
- The Fourth Amendment Rights - Video [Last Updated On: May 23rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 23rd, 2014]
- Bangor Area School District teachers vote no to random drug [Last Updated On: May 24th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 24th, 2014]
- I Don't Care About The Contitution, Take Your Fourth Amendment And Shove It The Hills Hotel - Video [Last Updated On: May 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 27th, 2014]
- Lonestar1776 at Illegal Checkpoint 80 Miles Inside Border - Standing UP & Pushing Back! pt 2/2 - Video [Last Updated On: August 31st, 2014] [Originally Added On: August 31st, 2014]
- Suit charges Daytona Beach's rental inspection program violates civil rights [Last Updated On: September 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 3rd, 2014]
- 4th Amendment - Laws.com [Last Updated On: September 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 4th, 2014]
- YOU CAN ARREST ME NOW (cops refuse, steal phone) - Video [Last Updated On: September 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 7th, 2014]
- The Feds Explain How They Seized The Silk Road Servers [Last Updated On: September 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 8th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Does obtaining leaked data from a misconfigured website violate the CFAA? [Last Updated On: September 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 9th, 2014]
- Defence asks judge in NYC to toss out bulk of evidence in Silk Road case as illegally obtained [Last Updated On: September 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 10th, 2014]
- Family of a mentally ill woman files lawsuit against San Mateo Co. after deadly shooting [Last Updated On: September 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 10th, 2014]
- Minnesota Supreme Court upholds airport drug case decision [Last Updated On: September 12th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 12th, 2014]
- Law Talk - Obamacare Rollout; Fourth Amendment, NSA Spying Stop & Frisk DUI Check Points lta041 - Video [Last Updated On: September 12th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 12th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: The posse comitatus case and changing views of the exclusionary rule [Last Updated On: September 15th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 15th, 2014]
- Guest: Why the privacy of a public employees cellphone matters [Last Updated On: September 16th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 16th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Apples dangerous game [Last Updated On: September 19th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 19th, 2014]
- Judge expounds on privacy rights [Last Updated On: September 20th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 20th, 2014]
- Great privacy essay: Fourth Amendment Doctrine in the Era of Total Surveillance [Last Updated On: September 20th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 20th, 2014]
- The Fourth Amendment By Maison Erdman - Video [Last Updated On: September 20th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 20th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: When administrative inspections of businesses turn into massive armed police raids [Last Updated On: September 22nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 22nd, 2014]
- The chilling loophole that lets police stop, question and search you for no good reason [Last Updated On: September 23rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 23rd, 2014]
- Pet Owners Look to Muzzle Police Who Shoot Dogs [Last Updated On: September 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 27th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: A few thoughts on Heien v. North Carolina [Last Updated On: September 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 29th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Third Circuit on the mosaic theory and Smith v. Maryland [Last Updated On: October 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 1st, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Third Circuit gives narrow reading to exclusionary rule [Last Updated On: October 2nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 2nd, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Supreme Court takes case on duration of traffic stops [Last Updated On: October 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 3rd, 2014]
- Search & Seizure, Racial Bias: The American Law Journal on the Philadelphia CNN-News Affiliate WFMZ Monday, October 6 ... [Last Updated On: October 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 3rd, 2014]
- Argument preview: How many brake lights need to be working on your car? [Last Updated On: October 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 3rd, 2014]
- The 'Barney Fife Loophole' to the Fourth Amendment [Last Updated On: October 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 3rd, 2014]
- Search & Seizure: A New Fourth Amendment for a New Generation? - Promo - Video [Last Updated On: October 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 4th, 2014]
- Ap Government Fourth Amendment Project - Video [Last Updated On: October 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 4th, 2014]
- Lubbock Liberty Workshop With Arnold Loewy On The Fourth Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: October 5th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 5th, 2014]
- Feds Hacked Silk Road Without A Warrant? Perfectly Legal, Prosecutors Argue [Last Updated On: October 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 7th, 2014]
- Supreme Court Starts Term with Fourth Amendment Case [Last Updated On: October 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 7th, 2014]
- Argument analysis: A simple answer to a deceptively simple Fourth Amendment question? [Last Updated On: October 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 9th, 2014]
- Feds Say That Even If FBI Hacked The Silk Road, Ulbricht's Rights Weren't Violated [Last Updated On: October 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 9th, 2014]
- Mass Collection of U.S. Phone Records Violates the Fourth Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: October 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 9th, 2014]
- Leggett sides with civil liberties supporters [Last Updated On: October 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 10th, 2014]
- Search & Seizure / Car Stops: A 'New' Fourth Amendment for a New Generation? - Video [Last Updated On: October 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 10th, 2014]
- The Fourth Amendment- The Maininator Period 4 - Video [Last Updated On: October 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 10th, 2014]
- Judge nukes Ulbricht's complaint about WARRANTLESS FBI Silk Road server raid [Last Updated On: October 11th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 11th, 2014]
- Montgomery County will not hold immigrants without probable cause -- Gazette.Net [Last Updated On: October 13th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 13th, 2014]
- Debate: Does Mass Phone Data Collection Violate The 4th Amendment? [Last Updated On: October 14th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 14th, 2014]
- Does the mass collection of phone records violate the Fourth Amendment? [Last Updated On: October 19th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 19th, 2014]
- When Can the Police Search Your Phone and Computer? [Last Updated On: October 21st, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 21st, 2014]
- Supreme Court to decide if cops can access hotel registries without warrants [Last Updated On: October 22nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 22nd, 2014]
- Third Circuit Allows Evidence from Warrantless GPS Device [Last Updated On: October 22nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 22nd, 2014]
- US court rules in favor of providing officials access to entire email account [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2014]
- EL MONTE POLICE OFFICER VIOLATES ARMY VETERAN'S FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHT - Video [Last Updated On: October 25th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 25th, 2014]
- FBI demands new powers to hack into computers and carry out surveillance [Last Updated On: October 30th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 30th, 2014]
- Fourth Amendment (United States Constitution ... [Last Updated On: November 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: November 4th, 2014]
- Fourth Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: November 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: November 4th, 2014]
- Call Yourself a Hacker and Lose Fourth Amendment Rights - Video [Last Updated On: November 5th, 2014] [Originally Added On: November 5th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Magistrate issues arrest warrants for 17 years but is new to probable cause [Last Updated On: November 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: November 7th, 2014]