In United States v. Walker, the Second Circuit (Calabresi, Pooler, Carney) considered a challenge to the conviction of Jaquan Walker on drug charges. Police officers found drugs on Walker after they stopped and questioned him. The justification for the stop was that Walker resembles an image of a black men believed to have been involved in a shooting, and because Walker happened to be walking about five blocks from the site of that shooting. In a remarkably pointed decision, the Circuit threw out the conviction.
Background
On September 1, 2017, Sergeant Peter Montanino of the City of Troy Police Department received an email from another officer stating: trying to ID suspect #2 in this photo. Attached to the email was an image of a black man of thin build and medium height labeled suspect #2. Montanino would later testify that he believed the email related to a recent shooting. The email itself, however, did not identify suspect #2 as the suspected shooter, or mention a shooting at all.
The following day, Montanino was on patrol in the central business district, near the scene of the shooting, when he came across Walker and his friend Javone Hopkins. Remembering the email from the prior day, Montanino suspected that Walker or Hopkins could be suspect #2 because both were, as Montanino described, medium to dark skin toned black males with a thin build and goatees.
Montanino called over two of his subordinates, officers Owen Conway and Martin Furciniti, asking whether they recognized either Walker or Hopkins. The other officers were unable to identify Walker or Hopkins after observing them from their patrol car, so Montanino decided to conduct what was called a stop out. In the Troy Police Department, a stop out refers to a standard practice whereby officers get out of their vehicle, approach a pedestrian and request identification, and then check for any outstanding warrants.
Proceeding with the stop out, Conway and Furciniti pulled their vehicle up ahead of Walker and Hopkins, while Montanino pulled his up behind them. The officers got out of their vehicles, converged on Walker and Hopkins, and instructed them to stop. At this point, the officers discerned that neither Walker nor Hopkins was suspect #2. Nonetheless, the officers asked Walker and Hopkins for identification, and the two complied. Hopkins had no warrants and was permitted to leave. Walker, however, had an outstanding felony warrant. The officers placed Walker in handcuffs. A search incident to the arrest uncovered marijuana and fifty grams of crack cocaine.
Walker was charged with possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance. In pretrial proceedings, Walker moved to suppress the drug evidence on the ground that the officers lacked reasonable suspicion of a crime when they stopped him and Hopkins. The District Court denied the motion, finding the stop proper because Walker (1) resembles the image of suspect #2 in that they both are medium-to-dark skinned males with a thin build and facial hair, and (2) was walking about five blocks from the scene of a previous shooting. It held that the initial stop was lawful and that the arrest and incidental search were lawful on account of the arrest warrant.
Having lost the suppression motion, Walker agreed to enter a conditional guilty plea that preserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion.
The Circuits Decision
On appeal, Walker again argued that the officers improperly stopped him because they did not have reasonable suspicion of a crime. The panel reversed the denial of Walkers suppression motion; this was not a close case.
By way of background, a law enforcement officer may, in some circumstances, stop an individual for questioning, even if the officer does not have probable cause to arrest the individual. To conduct such a stopoften referred to as a Terry stopthe officer must have a reasonable suspicion that the individual is committing or has committed a crime. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 22 (1968). If an officer stops someone without such reasonable suspicion, the stop is unlawful, and any evidence obtained pursuant to that stop is generally inadmissible. Terry was a late-Warren Court decision, a setback for defendants and a ruling rendered after numerous decisions that affirmed the right of the accused, and at a time when crime rates were beginning to rise. Over time, Terry stops have become contentious because of racial disparity in who police decide to stop in many major cities, including cities in New York State.
Here, the panel had little trouble concluding that Montanino, Conway, and Furciniti lacked a sufficient basis to stop Walker. The panel identified several reasons why stopping Walker was unlawful.
First, the email and accompanying photograph depicting suspect #2 did not set forth specific and articulable facts showing that a crime had occurred. The email did not mention a crime, much less a shooting, much less that suspect #2 was the suspected shooter. Given that the picture did not provide reasonable suspicion that suspect #2 has committed a crime, it would have been unlawful to stop suspect #2 even if officers were certain of his identity.
Second, even if the email had sufficiently articulated that suspect #2 had committed a crime, the fact that both suspect #2 and Walker are medium-to-dark skin males with thin builds and facial hair was insufficient to generate a reasonable suspicion that Walker was suspect #2. As the panel noted, black male and medium-to-dark skin are descriptors that capture a wide swath of individuals. So too for the other similarities between Walker and suspect #2. Even combining these characteristics, the panel was not convinced that the similarities identified by Montanino identified a narrow enough subset of individuals to constitute a reasonable suspicion that Walker was suspect #2. As the panel pointed out, even Terry warned that courts needed to guard against police conduct which is over-bearing or harassing, or which trenches upon personal security without the objective evidentiary justification which the Constitution requires. 392 U.S. at 15.
Finally, the fact that Walker had been walking a few blocks from the scene of a previous shooting was insufficient to raise a reasonable suspicion that he was involved in the shooting. The area where officers stopped Walker was the central business district of Troy and it was not uncommon for pedestrians to walk there during that time of the afternoon.
Although the panel found the initial stop unlawful, this does not end the inquiry because the government contended that the outstanding warrant permitted the arrest and search of Walker, under the so-called attenuation doctrine. Under that doctrine, even if an initial stop is unlawful, evidence is admissible if the connection between unconstitutional police conduct and the evidence is remote or has been interrupted by some intervening circumstance. Here, the government argued that the outstanding warrant was an intervening circumstance that permitted the officers to arrest and search Walker.
The panel disagreed. Courts weigh three factors in deciding whether to apply that exception to the exclusionary rule.
The first factor is the temporal proximity between the unconstitutional conduct and the discovery of the evidence. This factor clearly cut against attenuation because the drugs were found on Walkers person mere minutes after the unlawful stop.
The second factor is the presence of an intervening circumstance. An outstanding arrest warrant for an unrelated offense has been recognized as an intervening circumstance, so that factor weighed in favor of attenuation.
The final, and here decisive, factor is whether the officers conduct was purposeful or flagrant. The panel concluded that the officers conduct here was indeed flagrant for two reasons. First, there was an extreme lack of reasonable suspicion that Walker had committed a crime. As discussed, the entire premise of the stopthe email and image of suspect #2was flawed because nothing in the email identified a crime or identified suspect #2 as having committed a crime. Second, the similarities between Walker and suspect #2 were far too general to justify a stop. Indeed, there were likely many pedestrians walking in the central business district that fit Montaninos recollection of suspect #2. In addition, the panel found the officers conduct flagrant because they continued questioning Walker even after they realized he was not suspect #2. At that time, any reasonable suspicion supported by the image of suspect #2 vanished, and the officers should have ended the stop forthwith.
Having determined that two factors weigh against attenuation, the panel held that the attenuation doctrine did not apply. Because the stop was unlawful, the evidence obtained while searching Walker was inadmissible. Walkers conviction was vacated, and the case sent back to the District Court. In all likelihood, Walker will not be retried on these charges because the drugs are no longer admissible as evidence.
Analysis
Although the panel did not expressly label Montanino, Conway, and Furcinitis conduct as racial profiling, the panel was clearly disturbed by the proffered justification for stopping Walker. If the officers were justified in stopping Walker, they would essentially be justified in stopping almost any black man walking anywhere near a crime scene. This becomes clear in view of the image of suspect #2.
The image is so non-descript that an officer could conceivably stop any black man of average height and weight based on this photograph.
Permitting stops such as this one undermines the protections afforded by the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable search and seizure. Equally important, the decision must also be viewed in light of the disturbing reality that black men are disproportionately stopped, questioned, and arrested by police at a higher rate than other demographics. These racially-motivated stops undermine trust in law enforcement and exacerbate racial inequalities. The stop in this case is particularly troubling because it appears to be part of a standard practice of the Troy Police Department to stop individuals who are unknown to officers. The panel did not decide whether this policy is inherently unconstitutional (it likely is), but it is clear that such a policy increases incidents of racial profiling by giving officers carte blanche to stop and question whoever they choose.
Hopefully this decision will serve as a wakeup call that officers may not stop someone without an adequate reason to think the person is committing or has committed a crime. One can only hope that police departments reevaluate their practices in light of this opinion. Although Walker won his case, he is just one of many victims of overzealous policing. Congress is considering legislation to prohibit racial profiling by police officers and police departments, which isto say the leastlong overdue. See H.R. 7120, Title III, Subtitle A (End Racial and Religious Profiling Act of 2020) (engrossed in House June 25, 2020).[1]
[1] https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/7120/text
See the rest here:
Second Circuit Nixes Conviction Based on Racially-Motivated Stop - JD Supra
- Quinn: Supreme Court should clarify Fourth Amendment rights in the digital age [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Fourth amendment | Wex Legal Dictionary / Encyclopedia ... [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- The Fourth Amendment is destroyed by the Roberts led Supreme Court. - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Protections for e-data clear Senate committee [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- Weighing The Risks Of Warrantless Phone Searches During Arrests [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- Court may let cops search smartphones [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- Supreme Court to hear case on police searches of cellphones [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- Fourth Amendment in the digital age: Supreme Court to decide if police can search cellphones without a warrant [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2014]
- What Scalia knows about illegal searches [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2014]
- Should police be allowed to search your smartphone - Video [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2014]
- The Shaky Legal Foundation of NSA Surveillance on Americans [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court rules police don't need warrants to search cars [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2014]
- Local police: Updated vehicle-search law still requires probable cause [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2014]
- Liberal Supreme Court Justice Comes To The Defense Of Scalia [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2014]
- Smartphones and the Fourth Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- Fourth Amendment Defined & Explained - Law [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2014]
- I-Team: Do police seek search warrant friendly judges? [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2014]
- Is Big Brother Listening? Applying the Fourth Amendment in an Electronic Age - Video [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- Magistrate waxes poetic while rejecting Gmail search request [Last Updated On: May 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 10th, 2014]
- The Fourth Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 10th, 2014]
- License reader lawsuit can be heard, appeals court rules [Last Updated On: May 15th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 15th, 2014]
- Seize the Rojo - Video [Last Updated On: May 16th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 16th, 2014]
- NSA Spying Has a Disproportionate Effect on Immigrants [Last Updated On: May 16th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 16th, 2014]
- Motorists sue Aurora, police in 2012 traffic stop after bank robbery [Last Updated On: May 18th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 18th, 2014]
- Judge Says NSA Phone Surveillance Likely Unconstitutional - Video [Last Updated On: May 21st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 21st, 2014]
- New York Attorney Heath D. Harte Releases a Statement on Fourth Amendment Rights [Last Updated On: May 22nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 22nd, 2014]
- The Fourth Amendment Rights - Video [Last Updated On: May 23rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 23rd, 2014]
- Bangor Area School District teachers vote no to random drug [Last Updated On: May 24th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 24th, 2014]
- I Don't Care About The Contitution, Take Your Fourth Amendment And Shove It The Hills Hotel - Video [Last Updated On: May 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 27th, 2014]
- Lonestar1776 at Illegal Checkpoint 80 Miles Inside Border - Standing UP & Pushing Back! pt 2/2 - Video [Last Updated On: August 31st, 2014] [Originally Added On: August 31st, 2014]
- Suit charges Daytona Beach's rental inspection program violates civil rights [Last Updated On: September 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 3rd, 2014]
- 4th Amendment - Laws.com [Last Updated On: September 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 4th, 2014]
- YOU CAN ARREST ME NOW (cops refuse, steal phone) - Video [Last Updated On: September 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 7th, 2014]
- The Feds Explain How They Seized The Silk Road Servers [Last Updated On: September 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 8th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Does obtaining leaked data from a misconfigured website violate the CFAA? [Last Updated On: September 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 9th, 2014]
- Defence asks judge in NYC to toss out bulk of evidence in Silk Road case as illegally obtained [Last Updated On: September 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 10th, 2014]
- Family of a mentally ill woman files lawsuit against San Mateo Co. after deadly shooting [Last Updated On: September 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 10th, 2014]
- Minnesota Supreme Court upholds airport drug case decision [Last Updated On: September 12th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 12th, 2014]
- Law Talk - Obamacare Rollout; Fourth Amendment, NSA Spying Stop & Frisk DUI Check Points lta041 - Video [Last Updated On: September 12th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 12th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: The posse comitatus case and changing views of the exclusionary rule [Last Updated On: September 15th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 15th, 2014]
- Guest: Why the privacy of a public employees cellphone matters [Last Updated On: September 16th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 16th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Apples dangerous game [Last Updated On: September 19th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 19th, 2014]
- Judge expounds on privacy rights [Last Updated On: September 20th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 20th, 2014]
- Great privacy essay: Fourth Amendment Doctrine in the Era of Total Surveillance [Last Updated On: September 20th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 20th, 2014]
- The Fourth Amendment By Maison Erdman - Video [Last Updated On: September 20th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 20th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: When administrative inspections of businesses turn into massive armed police raids [Last Updated On: September 22nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 22nd, 2014]
- The chilling loophole that lets police stop, question and search you for no good reason [Last Updated On: September 23rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 23rd, 2014]
- Pet Owners Look to Muzzle Police Who Shoot Dogs [Last Updated On: September 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 27th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: A few thoughts on Heien v. North Carolina [Last Updated On: September 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 29th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Third Circuit on the mosaic theory and Smith v. Maryland [Last Updated On: October 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 1st, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Third Circuit gives narrow reading to exclusionary rule [Last Updated On: October 2nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 2nd, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Supreme Court takes case on duration of traffic stops [Last Updated On: October 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 3rd, 2014]
- Search & Seizure, Racial Bias: The American Law Journal on the Philadelphia CNN-News Affiliate WFMZ Monday, October 6 ... [Last Updated On: October 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 3rd, 2014]
- Argument preview: How many brake lights need to be working on your car? [Last Updated On: October 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 3rd, 2014]
- The 'Barney Fife Loophole' to the Fourth Amendment [Last Updated On: October 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 3rd, 2014]
- Search & Seizure: A New Fourth Amendment for a New Generation? - Promo - Video [Last Updated On: October 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 4th, 2014]
- Ap Government Fourth Amendment Project - Video [Last Updated On: October 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 4th, 2014]
- Lubbock Liberty Workshop With Arnold Loewy On The Fourth Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: October 5th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 5th, 2014]
- Feds Hacked Silk Road Without A Warrant? Perfectly Legal, Prosecutors Argue [Last Updated On: October 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 7th, 2014]
- Supreme Court Starts Term with Fourth Amendment Case [Last Updated On: October 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 7th, 2014]
- Argument analysis: A simple answer to a deceptively simple Fourth Amendment question? [Last Updated On: October 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 9th, 2014]
- Feds Say That Even If FBI Hacked The Silk Road, Ulbricht's Rights Weren't Violated [Last Updated On: October 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 9th, 2014]
- Mass Collection of U.S. Phone Records Violates the Fourth Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: October 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 9th, 2014]
- Leggett sides with civil liberties supporters [Last Updated On: October 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 10th, 2014]
- Search & Seizure / Car Stops: A 'New' Fourth Amendment for a New Generation? - Video [Last Updated On: October 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 10th, 2014]
- The Fourth Amendment- The Maininator Period 4 - Video [Last Updated On: October 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 10th, 2014]
- Judge nukes Ulbricht's complaint about WARRANTLESS FBI Silk Road server raid [Last Updated On: October 11th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 11th, 2014]
- Montgomery County will not hold immigrants without probable cause -- Gazette.Net [Last Updated On: October 13th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 13th, 2014]
- Debate: Does Mass Phone Data Collection Violate The 4th Amendment? [Last Updated On: October 14th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 14th, 2014]
- Does the mass collection of phone records violate the Fourth Amendment? [Last Updated On: October 19th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 19th, 2014]
- When Can the Police Search Your Phone and Computer? [Last Updated On: October 21st, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 21st, 2014]
- Supreme Court to decide if cops can access hotel registries without warrants [Last Updated On: October 22nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 22nd, 2014]
- Third Circuit Allows Evidence from Warrantless GPS Device [Last Updated On: October 22nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 22nd, 2014]
- US court rules in favor of providing officials access to entire email account [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2014]
- EL MONTE POLICE OFFICER VIOLATES ARMY VETERAN'S FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHT - Video [Last Updated On: October 25th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 25th, 2014]
- FBI demands new powers to hack into computers and carry out surveillance [Last Updated On: October 30th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 30th, 2014]
- Fourth Amendment (United States Constitution ... [Last Updated On: November 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: November 4th, 2014]
- Fourth Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: November 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: November 4th, 2014]
- Call Yourself a Hacker and Lose Fourth Amendment Rights - Video [Last Updated On: November 5th, 2014] [Originally Added On: November 5th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: Magistrate issues arrest warrants for 17 years but is new to probable cause [Last Updated On: November 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: November 7th, 2014]