Sunset in the Boundary Waters. Sean Collins

A picture in a national forest might cost you $1,000 if you snap it without a permit. Is this a threat to First Amendment rights?

The U.S. Forest Service is finalizing rules that will require journalists and photographers to have permission before taking a picture or shooting a video in a wilderness like the BWCA,the Oregonian reports.

Its pretty clearly unconstitutional, said Gregg Leslie, legal defense director at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press in Alexandria, Va. They would have to show an important need to justify these limits, and they just cant.

The rules appear to apply only to reporters and photographers who are working on stories that may not be friendly to practices in the wilderness. They would still allow for breaking news coverage of fires and rescues.

With smartphones blurring the lines between reporters and camera crews, U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, said the agency should tread more carefully.

The Forest Service needs to rethink any policy that subjects noncommercial photographs and recordings to a burdensome permitting process for something as simple as taking a picture with a cell phone, Wyden said. Especially where reporters and bloggers are concerned, this policy raises troubling questions about inappropriate government limits on activity clearly protected by the First Amendment.

Most of the countrys wilderness is in the West. Nearly 50 wilderness areas have been designated in Oregon, including wide stretches of land around Mount Hood, Mount Jefferson and Mount Washington.

The rules allow exceptions only for breaking news coverage of events like fires and rescues. Theyre more stringent than similar policies on wilderness areas managed by a different federal agency, the Bureau of Land Management.

The BLM does not require any special permit for newsgathering in wilderness areas.

Read more:

Forest Service clamps down on photography in wilderness