There is an ongoing dust up involving the First Amendment, allegations of prohibited viewpoint discrimination and legislative immunity in the Texas Senate. Its fascinating stuff for political scientists, political practitioners, and journalists.
It started on Thursday, February 27, when a man testified at a Texas State Senate hearing wearing a t-shirt that said, F**K the POLICE, (but his shirt featured all the letters) and, to drive the sentiment home, accompanied by an image of a hand with the middle finger outstretched.
After learning about the hearing, Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick tweeted out:
Outraged to see this T-shirt at a Senate Hearing Thur.Future witnesses beware. No one will ever be allowed to wear such a vulgar shirt in a Senate hearing again-especially one that denigrates the brave men & women of law enforcement. Want to take me to court? Ok. Make my day.
Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick tweeted out his disapproval of people wearing vulgar shirts ... [+] while testifying before the Senate.
His tweet was met with a volley of criticism by First Amendment advocates who maintained that Lieutenant Governor Patrickand the Legislature in generaldoesnt have the right to abridge speech or pick and choose between types of speech.(Note to readers outside of Texas: the lieutenant governor in Texas is the most powerful lieutenant governor in the nation in that the person in that office actually runs the State Senate, not unlike how the Speaker of the House runs the House.)
Common in the citations to make their point was a U.S. Supreme Court decision from the Vietnam era. In Cohen v. California, the court ruled on the case of a 19-year-old man who was arrested for wearing a jacket that read, F**k the Draft, Stop the War, into a California courthouse. The court overturned his arrest and conviction on a 5-4 decision that determined that Californias law that prohibited the display of offensive messages was a violation of the freedom of expression as protected by the First Amendment.
Cohen v. California, decided in 1971, was often cited as the case that would prevent viewpoint ... [+] discrimination in a legislative body - but it likely doesn't as legislative bodies aren't public spaces and they're immune from interference by other branches of government.
It is interesting to note that in the Cohen case, the appellant did wear his offensive jacket in the courthouse hallways but removed it upon entering a judges courtroom, folding it over his arm. He was only arrested after leaving the courtroom for having worn the jacket in the public hallways of the courthouse. Had the reverse been true, and the judge ordered him ejected from his courtroom for wearing the jacket, and he resisted, the ruling likely would have gone the other way.
Of course, judges to this day enforce rules of decorum in their courtroomslook at any jury summonsit will instruct the prospective juror on the acceptable attire and conduct in a courtroom.
First Amendment advocates will admit to this but are quick to add that judges should not engage in viewpoint discriminationthough many still do today.
Which brings up back to Lieutenant Governor Patricks tweet. Lets break it down to its chief components.
First, that the shirt in question was vulgar and has no place in a Senate hearing.
Second, that the shirt was especially offensive in that it denigrated the brave men & women of law enforcement.
Third, that if you dont like it, you can take the lieutenant governor to court.
To the first question, while most analysts would admit that, just as a judge can set rules for their courtroom, so to can a legislative body set rules for decorum in the deliberative portions of their chambers, such as the floor and in hearing rooms. These are seen as different than public places, for example, the rotunda in a state capitol building or a public sidewalk.
Even so, Ari Cohn formerly a director at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), a group that brings many successful free speech lawsuits against educational institutions, insisted that there is no decent enforceable legal definition of vulgar. So, even if the Texas Senate were to uniformly enforce a ban on offensive clothing, it wouldnt stand, presumably if any clothing with a message were allowed, even something as innocuous as a shirt that read Lake Travis High School.
Well return to this question in a moment.
The second issue is that the vulgar shirt in question was particularly offensive as it denigrated law enforcement officers. This is where the accusation of viewpoint discrimination focused. The lieutenant governor cannot, his critics claimed, pick and choose between messages he likes and those he doesnt likeeither take them all or ban them all.
And, lastly, if you dont like Lieutenant Governor Patricks actions, you can take him to court.
Butand heres the big questionis the Legislature in the course of its official business, subject to any restraint by the courts?
I would argue that, in its internal operations, the answer is an emphatic No!unless specifically proscribed by the Constitution or a state constitution.
First of all, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Minnesota State Bd. for Community Colleges v. Knight in 1984 that there is no constitutional right to force officers of the State acting in an official policymaking capacity to listen to the views of the public. Secondly, in Curnin v. Town of Egremont, decided by the First Circuit Court of Appeals with the U.S. Supreme Court allowing the ruling to stand in 2008 (denying certiorari), that The First Amendment does not give non-legislators the right to speak at meetings of deliberating legislative bodies and that
The Supreme Court has never extended First Amendment forum analysis to a deliberating legislative body or to the body's rules about who may speak. While no Supreme Court case is directly on point, the Court has addressed the underlying issue of the public's ability to address government policymakers:
The Constitution does not grant to members of the public generally a right to be heard by public bodies making decisions of policy Policymaking organs in our system of government have never operated under a constitutional constraint requiring them to afford every interested member of the public an opportunity to present testimony before any policy is adopted Public officials at all levels of government daily make policy decisions based only on the advice they decide they need and choose to hear. To recognize a constitutional right to participate directly in government policymaking would work a revolution in existing government practices.
The court goes on to note that, Under the Speech or Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 6, there are constitutional separation of powers protections for Congress. Further, that The purpose of the Clause is to insure that the legislative function the Constitution allocates to Congress may be performed independently. That This immunity extends to injunctive relief. And finally, that, while, No explicit federal constitutional protections cover state or local legislative bodies. there are still federalism and separation of powers concerns, which have led to the adoption of similar immunities for state legislators, citing the Knight decision.
Turning to the Texas Constitution, we see in Article III, governing the Legislative Department, Section 15, that disrespectful or disorderly conduct by any person not a member in the presence of the a house conducting its business can result in imprisonment for up to 48 hours. Given that this action would not involve executive branch law enforcement or judicial branch court proceedings, its likely that such an imprisonment would not accrue to someones arrest record or criminal record as the violation would be unique to the Legislature.
Lastly, going to the heart of the matter of viewpoint discrimination, is it permissible, under the any rules of a legislative body, that a committee chairman might only accept testimony from all Democrats or all Republicans? Yes, of course. As the federal courts have noted, Public officials daily make policy decisions based only on the advice they decide they need and choose to hear.
Id argue that a hearing where ten Republicans testify with no Democrat witnesses is a far more egregious form of viewpoint discrimination than is banning an offensive shirt, yet, its perfectly acceptable, legal, and constitutional for a legislative body to decide to do so and theres nothing the courts can do about it. Its done in the U.S. Congress all the time. Its an internal matter of that legislative body. The legislative function must be performed independently. Anything less would admit to judicial supremacy. Dont like it? Win the majority and run the house as you will.
Of course, if the courts did try to meddle in the internal affairs of the Legislative branch, that branch has the tools to fight back: they can impeach and remove judges, if they muster the political will to do so. They can also use their budgetary powers in creative ways so as to concentrate the minds of an overambitious co-equal branch.
While such actions are constitutional, whether they should be done or not crosses into ethical behavior and considerations of political prudence. Just because a legislative majority can do something, doesnt mean that they should or that there might not be consequences come election time.
Bottom line: Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick and other officers of the Texas Legislature are free to order the official and internal affairs of their respective legislative chambers as they wish, in accordance with the will of that body and free from interference of either the judicial or executive branches.
Read this article:
- College sued for stopping students from handing out Constitution [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Argument preview: First Amendment protections for public employees subpoenaed testimony [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- China toughens environment law to target polluters [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- 1st Amendment - Laws [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- GBS205 Legal Environment -THE FIRST AMENDMENT - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Supreme Court Preview/Review #2 - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- ConLaw Class 26 - The First Amendment Speech II - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Scalia Ginsburg debate NSA and first amendment - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Political Correctness vs First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- ConLaw Class 25 - The First Amendment -- Speech I - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- The First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- [USA] First Amendment abused - Video [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- Cliven Bundy and the First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- First Amendment Tees Co. Inc. FAT-Tee Intro Video of who we are, and what we stand for - Video [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- University Attacks First Amendment Costs $50,000 Plus - Video [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- First Amendment Lawsuit After '8theist' Vanity Plate Denied, 'Baptist' Approved - Video [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- How A Public Corruption Scandal Became A Fight Over Free Speech [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI; Crystal Cox v. Obsidian Finance Group - Video [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- MSNBC: Marjorie Dannenfelser Discusses SBA List First Amendment Case - Video [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- United Church of Christ sues over North Carolina ban on same-sex marriage [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- Federal judge: Delayed access to court records raises First Amendment concerns [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- Justices Troubled By Their Earlier Ruling On Public Employee Speech Rights [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- Judge Won't Stop Jason Patric from Using Son's Name for Advocacy Purposes [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- PBL in Journalism I, 2014 - Video [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- John Dukes on First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- Were Sterlings First Amendment Rights Violated? Nope. [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2014]
- Senate Dems vow vote to change Constitution, block campaign funding [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- What happened to Sterling was morally wrong [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Former Supreme Court Justice Wants to Amend the Constitution [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Donald Sterling is my HERO - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Retaining Government Power to Make Economic Policy for Internet Access: Role of the First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- America was just defeated from within TODAY 4/29/2014 - Martial law is next - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Opposition To Proposed Monitoring Of Hate Speech By Federal Agency The Kelly File - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Westfield Mayor to pay $53K in campaign sign violation case - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- ConLaw 1 Class 27 - The First Amendment - Free Exercise - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- PEASE: Free speech zones on Bundy Ranch violated First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Bar Owner Prevails in Buck Foston First Amendment Trial [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Was Donald Sterling's First Amendment Right to Free Speech Violated? - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- First Amendment common sense [Last Updated On: May 2nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 2nd, 2014]
- The First Amendment Doesn't Allow us to Silence Opposition; Get Rid of Limits on Political Speech - Video [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2014]
- Save Us Chuck - First Amendment Zones - Video [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2014]
- HAROLD PEASE: Free speech zones on Bundy Ranch violated First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- In our opinion: Why government can't tackle hate speech without shredding First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- In our opinion: Can't tackle hate speech without shredding First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- Sen. Ed Markey proposes eliminating free speech - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- Alabama Chief Justice Stunning Legal Ignorance - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- Church Uses First Amendment Protections To Perform Same Sex Marriages - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- first amendment test filming Tucson FBI Headquarters. - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- "First Amendment ONLY for Christians," Says Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore - Video [Last Updated On: May 5th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 5th, 2014]
- Endangered Speeches - Video [Last Updated On: May 5th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 5th, 2014]
- First Amendment Monument Music Video by Daniel Brouse - Video [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2014]
- first amendment rights - Video [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2014]
- News media challenges ban on journalism drones [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2014]
- WHAT FIRST AMENDMENT - Video [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2014]
- Letter: First Amendment rights trampled [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2014]
- News outlets say US drone ban breaches First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2014]
- Chucking the First Amendment: Schumers cranky scheme [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2014]
- Screw the First Amendment | We cant let people pray? - Video [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2014]
- Chief Justice: 1st Amendment Only Protects Christians - Video [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2014]
- Inside the Classroom with Professor Leslie Kendrick - Video [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- 2014 Civics Video Awards First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- .First Amendment protects political speech, not profanity - Video [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- Charles "Chip" Babcock on Campaign Finance and the First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- A First Amendment attack on Assembly... in George Washington [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- SUPREME STUPIDITY Kills The First Amendment - RIP Separation of Church & State (1787-2014) - Video [Last Updated On: May 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 10th, 2014]
- FBI Agents Harass Photographer: First Amendment Test - Video [Last Updated On: May 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 10th, 2014]
- History Project: First Amendment. - Video [Last Updated On: May 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 10th, 2014]
- SDG&E Challenges The First Amendment and Loses - Video [Last Updated On: May 11th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 11th, 2014]
- Richmond City Council Uses Tricks to Undermine First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 11th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 11th, 2014]
- Their opinion: Disagreeing on the First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 12th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 12th, 2014]
- The Clash Between the First Amendment and National Security in Times of War Symposium - Video [Last Updated On: May 12th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 12th, 2014]
- City Charter amendment passes 581-556 [Last Updated On: May 15th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 15th, 2014]
- David Allen Legal Tuesday: Flashing Automobile Lights and the First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 15th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 15th, 2014]
- Senator Chuck Schumer is against the First Amendment then and now - Video [Last Updated On: May 15th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 15th, 2014]
- Facebook SUCKS! - Video [Last Updated On: May 15th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 15th, 2014]
- Dems threaten Kochs with a constitutional amendment [Last Updated On: May 16th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 16th, 2014]
- Reid backs campaign spending limit [Last Updated On: May 16th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 16th, 2014]
- Tennessee Boy Recites First Amendment Rights After Being Told to Put Away His Bible - Video [Last Updated On: May 16th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 16th, 2014]
- 'Shutup,' they explained Crippling the First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 18th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 18th, 2014]
- Reid Seeks To Change First Amendment To Stop Koch Brothers - Video [Last Updated On: May 18th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 18th, 2014]