This op-ed is part of a series exploring the writings and jurisprudence of Judge Amy Coney Barrett, the presidents nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court.
Now that President Donald Trump has nominated 7th Circuit Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, the Senate must assess her qualifications, including her legal experience and judicial philosophy.
Want better access to more videos from The Daily Signal? Subscribe to our YouTube channel! Just go here: youtube.com/dailysignal
Although experience can be summarized on a resume, a Supreme Court nominees understanding of the power and proper role of judges can be harder to describe.
Justice Clarence Thomas described the modest judicial task as interpreting and applying written law to the facts of particular cases. Barretts judicial philosophy is how she approaches that task in all of her cases.
Here, we look for clues in her cases and scholarship involving the First Amendment.
The Senate should consider a judicial nominees record on its own merits, and in the proper context. Though common, evaluating judicial decisions by which party to a case wins or loses, or by the political interests that might be furthered, is fundamentally misguided.
As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said during her Senate confirmation hearing in 1993, Judges in our system are bound to decide concrete cases, not abstract issues.
Although a few issues seem to attract most media or political attention, judging is about the process one uses to reach results, not the results themselves. Americans, therefore, need to know the process that a judicial nominee will use in all of her cases, whatever the issue and whoever the parties.
Most cases in the U.S. Court of Appeals are first considered by a panel of three judges. Their judgment answers the legal questions posed by a case and, most of the time, a written opinion explains that judgment. Some of these written opinions, called per curiam opinion, are not attributed to a particular judge, but rather to all of the judges as a whole.
More typically, one judge writes the majority opinion; the other two judges on the panel may join that opinion or write their own, explaining why they agree or disagree.
Barrett has written roughly 100 opinions that may provide more insight than the opinions she joined, although information about someones judicial philosophy may be gleaned from those too.
These opinions must be read with the understanding that three-judge appeals court panels are bound by precedents of both the circuit and the Supreme Court.
With that in mind, Barrett herself made a strong statement about her judicial philosophy during the Rose Garden ceremony where Trump announced her nomination.
She said: I clerked for Justice [Antonin] Scalia more than 20 years ago, but the lessons I learned still resonate.His judicial philosophy is mine too: A judge must apply the law as written.Judges are not policymakers, and they must be resolute in setting aside any policy views they might hold.
Barrett joined the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, which covers Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin, on Nov. 2, 2017. Before taking the bench, Barrett had written about the role that a courts past decisions play in its current decisions.
In one Notre Dame Law Review article, she explained how Scalia distinguished between two kinds of precedent when interpreting and applying the First Amendment.
Regarding the freedom of speech and religion clauses (especially when the core offense of suppressing particular political speech is not at issue), Scalia relied on the accepted practices of the American people over the Supreme Courts own past decisions.
Although we cant know definitely how Barrett will decide certain issues if confirmed to the Supreme Court, heres a look at several opinions she authored or joined that address First Amendment issues.
The case of Acevedo v. Cook County Officers Electoral Board (2019) involved a challenge to the requirement by Cook County, Illinois, that to appear on the ballot, a candidate for local office must collect signatures equal to 0.5% of the qualified voters of the candidates party who voted in the most recent general election in Cook County.
The plaintiff argued that this threshold violated the First Amendment because it was higher than the signature requirement to run for statewide office. Barrett wrote the opinion for the court, which found no First Amendment violation.
Barrett wrote that the tough legal standard under the First Amendment is triggered when the challenged regulation imposes a severe burden, not by the existence of a less burdensome restriction. Because Cook Countys signature requirement was not severe, it did not run afoul of the First Amendment.
In another case, Lett v. City of Chicago (2020), the plaintiff, an investigator for the office handling complaints of police misconduct in Chicago, claimed retaliation for exercising his First Amendment rights in refusing to write one of his reports in a particular way.
The court disagreed that his First Amendment rights had been violated, with Barrett writing that because the investigator spoke pursuant to his official duties and not as a private citizen when he refused to alter the report, the First Amendment does not apply.
Grussgott v. Milwaukee Jewish Day School Inc. (2018) was an employment dispute in which a teacher sued under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Barrett joined a per curiam (unsigned) opinion holding that the First Amendment allowed the Milwaukee Jewish Day School to make such personnel decisions without interference.
The court applied the Supreme Courts Hosanna-Tabor decision, which recognized a ministerial exception to employment discrimination suits against religious institutions. The 7th Circuit panel read the Supreme Courts decisions as requiring, in essence, a totality-of-the-circumstances test to determine whether the ministerial exception applies.
As Barrett noted in her recently submitted Senate Judiciary Questionnaire: The Supreme Court later vindicated our approach in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru, 140 S. Ct. 2049 (2020).
In Smadi v. True, federal prison inmate Hosam Smadi sought an injunction and damages, alleging that prison officials violated the First Amendment by interfering in his communications with various parties and refusing him religious meals. The district court had dismissed the first claim, severing it from the second.
Barrett joined the opinion concluding that the record was insufficient to dismiss the claim of interference. Although a recent Supreme Court decision limited the kind of relief sought in this case, the 7th Circuit said that the best approach is for the district court to recruit counsel for Smadi and receive adversarial briefs on the First Amendment claims.
In Adams v. Board of Education, a school board declined to extend the school superintendents employment contract and, during her final year, blocked her email and tried to pretend that she did not exist.
This treatment followed the superintendents demands for an audit of the school districts finances and negative interactions with individual board members, one of which resulted in her contacting the police.
The superintendent took medical leave and sued for damages. A jury awarded her $400,000 after concluding that the school board had violated her First Amendment rights.
The board argued that the First Amendment did not apply because the police report involved a private or personal grievance rather than expression involving a matter of public concern.
Barrett joined Judge Frank Easterbrooks opinion concluding that the incidents reported to the police involved public officials and their official duties.
The suggestion that an audit was necessary, questions about the superintendents tenure, and the school districts treatment of her before her tenure ended are all subjects of public interest, the opinion said. Rejecting the boards other feeble arguments, the court affirmed the award in the superintendents favor.
In Republican Party of Illinois v. Pritzker, the Illinois Republican Party challenged one of Gov. J.B. Pritzkers executive orders issued to combat the COVID-19 pandemic.
Executive Order 43, issued June 26, exempted religious organizations and houses of worship from a 50-person cap on in-person gatherings, encouraging them to follow the recommended practices and guidelines from the Illinois Department of Public Health.
The states Republican Party argued that the Democratic governors exemption violated the First Amendment because more than 50 people could gather in a church to worship but the same number could not gather elsewhere to discuss politics.
Barrett joined the opinion by Judge Diane Wood concluding that the speech that accompanies religious exercise has a privileged position under the First Amendment.
The Supreme Court has upheld legislation that gives religions a preferred position and held that the Establishment Clause permits accommodations designed to allow free exercise of religion. In this case, all that the Governor did was to limit to a certain degree the burden on religious exercise imposed by the limitation on gatherings.
These decisions paid close attention to the facts of each case, consistently followed precedent, and avoided unnecessarily addressing constitutional issues. By properly framing the issue in light of the facts in both Acevedo and Pritzker, for example, the 7th Circuit was able to decide the cases without unnecessarily opining about plaintiffs First Amendment interests.
In each of these cases, Barrett gave a glimpse of the thoughtful, serious way she would address her modest judicial task as an associate justice on the United States Supreme Court.
More here:
Amy Coney Barrett on the First Amendment - Daily Signal
- College sued for stopping students from handing out Constitution [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Argument preview: First Amendment protections for public employees subpoenaed testimony [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- China toughens environment law to target polluters [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- 1st Amendment - Laws [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- GBS205 Legal Environment -THE FIRST AMENDMENT - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Supreme Court Preview/Review #2 - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- ConLaw Class 26 - The First Amendment Speech II - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Scalia Ginsburg debate NSA and first amendment - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Political Correctness vs First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- ConLaw Class 25 - The First Amendment -- Speech I - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- The First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- [USA] First Amendment abused - Video [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- Cliven Bundy and the First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- First Amendment Tees Co. Inc. FAT-Tee Intro Video of who we are, and what we stand for - Video [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- University Attacks First Amendment Costs $50,000 Plus - Video [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- First Amendment Lawsuit After '8theist' Vanity Plate Denied, 'Baptist' Approved - Video [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- How A Public Corruption Scandal Became A Fight Over Free Speech [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI; Crystal Cox v. Obsidian Finance Group - Video [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- MSNBC: Marjorie Dannenfelser Discusses SBA List First Amendment Case - Video [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- United Church of Christ sues over North Carolina ban on same-sex marriage [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- Federal judge: Delayed access to court records raises First Amendment concerns [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- Justices Troubled By Their Earlier Ruling On Public Employee Speech Rights [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- Judge Won't Stop Jason Patric from Using Son's Name for Advocacy Purposes [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- PBL in Journalism I, 2014 - Video [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- John Dukes on First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2014]
- Were Sterlings First Amendment Rights Violated? Nope. [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2014]
- Senate Dems vow vote to change Constitution, block campaign funding [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- What happened to Sterling was morally wrong [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Former Supreme Court Justice Wants to Amend the Constitution [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Donald Sterling is my HERO - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Retaining Government Power to Make Economic Policy for Internet Access: Role of the First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- America was just defeated from within TODAY 4/29/2014 - Martial law is next - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Opposition To Proposed Monitoring Of Hate Speech By Federal Agency The Kelly File - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Westfield Mayor to pay $53K in campaign sign violation case - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- ConLaw 1 Class 27 - The First Amendment - Free Exercise - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- PEASE: Free speech zones on Bundy Ranch violated First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Bar Owner Prevails in Buck Foston First Amendment Trial [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Was Donald Sterling's First Amendment Right to Free Speech Violated? - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- First Amendment common sense [Last Updated On: May 2nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 2nd, 2014]
- The First Amendment Doesn't Allow us to Silence Opposition; Get Rid of Limits on Political Speech - Video [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2014]
- Save Us Chuck - First Amendment Zones - Video [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2014]
- HAROLD PEASE: Free speech zones on Bundy Ranch violated First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- In our opinion: Why government can't tackle hate speech without shredding First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- In our opinion: Can't tackle hate speech without shredding First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- Sen. Ed Markey proposes eliminating free speech - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- Alabama Chief Justice Stunning Legal Ignorance - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- Church Uses First Amendment Protections To Perform Same Sex Marriages - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- first amendment test filming Tucson FBI Headquarters. - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- "First Amendment ONLY for Christians," Says Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore - Video [Last Updated On: May 5th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 5th, 2014]
- Endangered Speeches - Video [Last Updated On: May 5th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 5th, 2014]
- First Amendment Monument Music Video by Daniel Brouse - Video [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2014]
- first amendment rights - Video [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2014]
- News media challenges ban on journalism drones [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2014]
- WHAT FIRST AMENDMENT - Video [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2014]
- Letter: First Amendment rights trampled [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2014]
- News outlets say US drone ban breaches First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2014]
- Chucking the First Amendment: Schumers cranky scheme [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2014]
- Screw the First Amendment | We cant let people pray? - Video [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2014]
- Chief Justice: 1st Amendment Only Protects Christians - Video [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2014]
- Inside the Classroom with Professor Leslie Kendrick - Video [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- 2014 Civics Video Awards First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- .First Amendment protects political speech, not profanity - Video [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- Charles "Chip" Babcock on Campaign Finance and the First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- A First Amendment attack on Assembly... in George Washington [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- SUPREME STUPIDITY Kills The First Amendment - RIP Separation of Church & State (1787-2014) - Video [Last Updated On: May 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 10th, 2014]
- FBI Agents Harass Photographer: First Amendment Test - Video [Last Updated On: May 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 10th, 2014]
- History Project: First Amendment. - Video [Last Updated On: May 10th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 10th, 2014]
- SDG&E Challenges The First Amendment and Loses - Video [Last Updated On: May 11th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 11th, 2014]
- Richmond City Council Uses Tricks to Undermine First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 11th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 11th, 2014]
- Their opinion: Disagreeing on the First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 12th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 12th, 2014]
- The Clash Between the First Amendment and National Security in Times of War Symposium - Video [Last Updated On: May 12th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 12th, 2014]
- City Charter amendment passes 581-556 [Last Updated On: May 15th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 15th, 2014]
- David Allen Legal Tuesday: Flashing Automobile Lights and the First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 15th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 15th, 2014]
- Senator Chuck Schumer is against the First Amendment then and now - Video [Last Updated On: May 15th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 15th, 2014]
- Facebook SUCKS! - Video [Last Updated On: May 15th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 15th, 2014]
- Dems threaten Kochs with a constitutional amendment [Last Updated On: May 16th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 16th, 2014]
- Reid backs campaign spending limit [Last Updated On: May 16th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 16th, 2014]
- Tennessee Boy Recites First Amendment Rights After Being Told to Put Away His Bible - Video [Last Updated On: May 16th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 16th, 2014]
- 'Shutup,' they explained Crippling the First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 18th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 18th, 2014]
- Reid Seeks To Change First Amendment To Stop Koch Brothers - Video [Last Updated On: May 18th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 18th, 2014]