Human rights activist, Lena Hendry, was charged under Section 6(1)(b) of the Film Censorship Act in what many feel is a blow to freedom of speech and expression in Malaysia. @Net2Ayurveda

AS a documentary filmmaker, I regularly screen my films and also give talks and workshops, both locally and internationally. When I am out of the country, I always get asked the question of how local filmmakers deal with the strict censorship laws in Malaysia.

My first response is always to correct their question. The question shouldnt be how we Malaysian filmmakers deal with strict censorship laws; it should be how we deal with vague, unclear and inconsistent censorship laws.

Take for example,Lena Hendry, who is a former employee of a Malaysian-based human rights non-governmental organisation called Pusat KOMAS. She was found guilty of screening the documentary No Fire Zone: The killing fields of Sri Lanka without censorship approval in 2013.

SEE ALSO:HRW calls on Malaysia to drop charges against activist for showing film

Hendry was convicted under Section 6(1)(b) of the Film Censorship Act, 2002 on Feb 21, 2017 and could now face up to three years jail or a fine not exceeding RM30,000 (US$6,750). Sentencing has been set for 22nd March.

Pusat KOMAS regularly screens films that have human rights themes. And this particular film has been screened numerous times before at a variety of different events. It was screened at the 2015 International Anti-Corruption Conference (IACC) and at a Lawyers for Liberty (LFL) event in 2013.

At both events, Malaysian government officials were in attendance. In fact, the IACC even claims that Prime Minister Najib Razak was there.

Here is a film that was openly screened during a government event, but wasnt allowed at a different event. So why the double standards?

Personally, I have experienced a similar incident, although mine wasnt to the extent of being arrested and charged. A documentary I produced about the conflict happening in Southern Thailand called The Life and Times of an Islamic Insurgency was banned.

SEE ALSO:Southeast Asian governments grapple with censoring Netflix

The documentary was not banned initially, and was even scheduled to be screened on national television. For anything to be broadcast on national television in Malaysia, it has to get through the censorship board, meaning my documentary was approved by the board.

However, two days before the scheduled broadcast, the television network gave me a call and informed me that the documentary was now banned and they were told to pull it from being on air. There was no reason given, I just had to be content with their lack of explanation.

Pusat KOMAS has now launched a campaign to fight for justice for Hendry. The campaign, #DefendLena, will run till the date of the sentencing and there will be events such as a public forum on censorship and screenings of the same documentary for various small groups.

The case involving Hendry is a blow to freedom of speech and expression. For a country that is a functioning democracy, it is important that diverse views and perspectives are made available so that dissent and discourse can happen.

The conviction has garnered opposition from many quarters including politicians, NGOs, human rights activists and even members of the public. Hendry, of course, is determined to appeal her conviction.

** This is the personal opinion of the writer and does not reflect the views of Asian Correspondent

Read Full Article

{"total":13,"error":"","stumbleupon":0,"linkedin":0,"google":0,"facebook_total":12,"pinterest":0,"buffer":1,"twitter":0,"vk":0}

Follow this link:

Film censorship is being used to quell discourse in Malaysia - Asian Correspondent