Dawsey: Detroit wants weed, but city officials still are fighting the war on drugs – Deadline Detroit

The writer is a local freelancer, author and former reporter at The Detroit News, Los Angeles Times, New York Daily News and Philadelphia Inquirer.

By Darrell Dawsey

The war on drugs has been a failure. For most of us, thats not breaking news.

Even many of the staunchest former drug warriors have long conceded that the reckless, draconian criminal justice policies that grew out of the 1980s and '90s drug epidemics have done little to stop the flow of drugs or eliminate Americans' taste for getting high.

Instead, four decades of moralistic thrashing has left the United States with little to show other than one of the world's largest incarceration rates and the exorbitant costs of a sprawling prison-industrial complex.

Recognizing this, political leaders at all levels and in both parties have begun to rethink policies that led us here. In a new age of reform, talk of locking 'em up and tossing away the key has segued into discussions about eliminating mandatory minimums, ending racial disparities in sentencing, bail reform and marijuana decriminalization/legalization.

Even Michigan got its purple ass in on the act when voters decided in 2018 to make weed legal not only for medical use, but for recreational consumption as well.

Then theres Detroit.

Whose community benefits?

Despite the statewide vote, despite the recent successful opening of a handful of recreational marijuana dispensaries in the metro area, leaders in the city continue to give a middle finger to the majority on the legalization issue.

Related: This Is Metro Detroit's First Recreational Weed Shop, Jan. 21

At no time has this disregard for voters been as starkly clear as this week, when a Detroit councilman and the citys police chief teamed up to put forward dishonest, confusing and contradictorymarijuana policy proposals.

Councilman James Tate, the man behind an expiring temporary ban on implementation of legal recreational weed sales in the city a lawmaker openly refusing to follow the law announced this week he would maintain this prohibition until at least March 31. Never mind that Tate and the council had more than a year to address the matter before legal dispensaries went online. Never mind that the city will continue to lose out on tax dollars legal dispensaries generate. Never mind that numerous enterprising and law-abiding Detroiters, eager to cash in on a multi-billion-dollar legal weed market, are left idling on the sidelines while Tate continues to stall and fake interest in a community benefits regulation that he swears hes looking into in the name of the same people hes cutting out of the game.

Think about that: In one of the blackest cities in the country, an African-American city councilman keeps black entrepreneurs out of a booming legal market and uses the thin veil of support for community benefits to do it.

(Meanwhile, as NORML attorney Matt Abel pointed out in Metro Times, Detroit remains home to 528 bars, 427 licensed liquor stores, and 585 beer and wine licenses.)

As if that wasnt bad enough, Police Chief James Craig, a man whos never been accused of passing an opportunity to posture for TV, came out of his face this week with an outlandish claim that more than half of the murders in Detroit in 2020 have been related to black-market marijuana sales.

Reefer madness

I will be the first to concede the police should have a better handle than most of us on the causes of local crime. But in a city still awash with crack, heroin and other drugs commonly associated with violence, claims that the marijuana market has suddenly become Detroits biggest hub of bloodshed and mayhem ought to be backed with evidence.

So far, Craig has yet to produce any. (And simply pounding a podium doesnt count.)

Moreover, when Deadline Detroit reached out to our law enforcement sources, lets just say Craigs claim drew skepticism, including from some of the same officers on the streets dealing with the citys violence.

You might have people who do marijuana, said one DPD detective, but I dont think (the violence) is because of marijuana.

Asked about the chiefs claim that 60 percent of the citys 2020 killings so far have been because of the black market weed trade, the detective was even more forthright: Its ridiculous.

But this being Detroit, inconvenient truths -- especially about poor folks and people of color -- dont stop public policy shitshows.

Because of this alleged surge in weed shootings, the chief said hell soon be deploying a task force (sigh) to crack down on black-market dealers who carry guns. "We're going to be aggressive about it, while still adhering to constitutional policing," said Craig without a hint of irony.

Yes, James Craig the same chief who treats hyperbolic graffiti scrawlings as legitimate threats against cops, who patrols Facebook for social media posts that bad mouth him, who wants to turn the city into a surveillance state with shoddy facial recognition tech, who openly worries about brutal cops being overcharged by the county prosecutor after beating down people in Greektown wants you to know that, even as hes conjuring up weed-related shooting sprees to justify crackdowns on marijuana dealers, hell still be safeguarding your constitutional rights.

Uh huh.

People have spoken and want to smoke 'em

Or we could just say fuck all that and bow to common sense and the will of the voters by getting on with the business of opening up the legal market. After all, if Detroit were allowed to actually foster a thriving legal market for weed, the underground market would not be such a draw anymore.

"This crime is not being caused by marijuana, but by the prohibition of marijuana," Abel told The Detroit News. "What we need to do is make it available through retail stores, but the City Council has been dragging their feet on that for more than a year."

Tate could still pretend to be pushing for community benefits. And Craig could still arrest all the illegal gun-toters that he wants without tossing a wet blanket on lawful marijuana users.

We all know you dont have to like a law, or a democratic expression of the peoples will, to follow and respect it.

But the last people youd expect to have to explain this to are those charged with making the laws or those who are supposed to enforce them.

Earlier:

Detroit Council Delays Recreational Pot Sales for 2 More Months, Jan. 21

See the original post here:

Dawsey: Detroit wants weed, but city officials still are fighting the war on drugs - Deadline Detroit

The Mormons standing up to Mexicos drug cartels: ‘We have to overcome our fears – The Guardian

After nine women and children were shot dead by cartel gunmen in the barren hills of Mexicos Sierra Madre Occidental, 100 members of their fundamentalist Mormon community fled the country for the United States.

Cousins Julin and Adrian LeBarn lost nine close relatives in the ambush, but they never considered leaving the country of their birth. Instead, they have launched a quixotic campaign for justice not just for their slain kin, but for the many thousands of people murdered or vanished amid Mexicos cartel violence.

We have to overcome our fears and do whatever we can to put a stop to this shit, Julin told the Guardian.

The two cousins nut farmers from the high plains of Chihuahua state make unlikely anti-crime activists. But they hope that they can help persuade others to rise up and pressure their public officials to put an end to the bloodletting.

It is no small ambition in a country which last year saw its highest number of homicides since records began and where mass killings fall quickly from the news cycle. Victims of the drug wars are often seen as complicit in their own deaths, and their families left to suffer in silence.

But Julin LeBarn argues that Mexico has endured enough suffering and has precious little left to lose. People have to experience enough fear, enough pain, in order for them to say: what else can they do to me? He added: Its happened to me.

In Mexico, victims relatives and anti-crime activists often end up being targeted themselves, but the LeBarn clan has stubbornly refused to keep quiet, speaking out against both organized crime and the security policies of President Andrs Manuel Lpez Obrador.

LeBarn recognizes that such outspokenness is only possible because of his familys binational status: their ancestors moved to Mexico in the late 1800s to avoid US polygamy laws, and almost of all of the clan retains US nationality.

Partly because of that, the massacre dominated headlines around the world and prompted the US president to call on Twitter for WAR against Mexicos cartels.

We have dual citizenship. We have the protection of the FBI and Donald Trumps tweets that scare the bejesus out of some people. Who the hell else is going to say something? he said, between sips of macchiato in a crowded Mexico City Starbucks.

They kill four women yesterday in Ciudad Jurez and tomorrow its not going to be news. [But] they killed three women and some kids from our family and its international news, he said.

But the familys relative privilege, also brings responsibility with it, he argued. Were the face and the voice of those women and everyone thats suffering in Mexico.

The LeBarn family first rose to national prominence in 2009, when they refused to pay a ransom after a 16-year-old from their community was kidnapped. The boys elder brother Benjamn LeBarn led a brief campaign to demand action by the authorities and encouraging others to resist extortion before he and his brother were murdered.

Two years later, Julin joined an anti-violence caravan led by the poet Javier Sicilia who hoped the cross-country convoy of victims would force Mexicans to face up to the devastating impact of the violence.

On Thursday, LeBarn will march again with Sicilia who has called for new peace caravans across the country which will converge on the national palace this Sunday.

The new campaign is itself a bleak indicator of the limited progress successive governments have made towards establishing rule of law. Crime statistics have continued to break new records every year: 35,588 people were murdered in 2019 and some 62,000 people have vanished since the current war on drugs was launched in 2006.

Sicilia confessed that he had never planned to organize another national protest, but told the Guardian: I just couldnt take so many more deaths, especially what happened to the LeBarns women and children murdered in such a repugnant, outrageous way.

Lpez Obrador, or Amlo, promised to end the militarized strategy of his predecessors in favor of a vaguely defined strategy of moral renovation and addressing what he considers the root causes of violence: poverty and corruption.

But so far, his promise of hugs not bullets has proved ineffectual: the massacre of the Mormons came just days after gunmen from different groups massacred 13 policemen and besieged an entire city. Meanwhile a new national security force has focused more on stopping Central American migrants than catching drug traffickers.

Caldern sends in the army

Mexicos war on drugs began in late 2006 when the president at the time, Felipe Caldern, ordered thousands of troops onto the streets in response to an explosion of horrific violence in his native state of Michoacn.

Caldern hoped to smash the drug cartels with his heavily militarized onslaught but the approach was counter-productive and exacted a catastrophic human toll. As Mexicos military went on the offensive, the body count sky-rocketed to new heights and tens of thousands were forced from their homes, disappeared or killed.

Kingpin strategy

Simultaneously Caldern also began pursuing the so-calledkingpin strategyby which authorities sought to decapitate the cartels by targeting their leaders.

That policy resulted in some high-profile scalps notably Arturo Beltrn Leyva who wasgunned down by Mexican marines in 2009 but also did little to bring peace. In fact, many believe such tactics served only to pulverize the world of organized crime, creating even more violence as new, less predictable factions squabbled for their piece of the pie.

Under Calderns successor, Enrique Pea Nieto, the governments rhetoric on crime softened as Mexico sought to shed its reputation as the headquarters of some the worlds most murderous mafia groups.

But Calderns policies largely survived, with authorities targeting prominent cartel leaders such as Sinaloas Joaqun El Chapo Guzmn.

When El Chapo was arrested in early 2016, Mexicos president bragged: Mission accomplished. But the violence went on. By the time Pea Nieto left office in 2018, Mexico had suffered another record year of murders, with nearly 36,000 people slain.

"Hugs not bullets"

The leftwing populist Andrs Manuel Lpez Obrador took power in December, promising a dramatic change in tactics. Lpez Obrador, or Amlo as most call him, vowed to attack the social roots of crime,offering vocational trainingto more than 2.3 million disadvantaged young people at risk of being ensnared by the cartels.

It will be virtually impossible to achieve peace without justice and [social] welfare, Amlo said, promising to slash the murder rate from an average of 89 killings per day with his hugs not bullets doctrine.

Amlo also pledged to chair daily 6am security meetings and create a 60,000 strong "National Guard". But those measures have yet to pay off, with the new security force used mostly to hunt Central American migrants.

Mexico now suffers an average of about 96 murders per day, with nearly 29,000 people killed since Amlo took office.

The president has every right to hug people who are attacking him, but he has a monopoly on the use of force and the tools of security, said LeBarn. He has absolutely no right whatsoever to ask any citizen to embrace people that are murdering his family.

He is at pains to stress that he is not an opponent of Amlo, who has twice met members of the LeBarn family since the massacre, and promised that the case will not languish in impunity.

But the familys activism and speculation that Donald Trump might push some kind of intervention against Mexican cartels has stoked a visceral reaction from the presidents most ardent supporters. Hashtags telling the LeBarns to leave Mexico have surged on social media.

Adrin LeBarn, whose daughter Rhonita Lebarn was killed in the Sierra Madre ambush, said he was long used to being labelled a vendepatria or traitor.

Im a nobody over there [in the US] and Im a nobody over here. Im a vendapetria both ways, he said, switching between Spanish and halting English.

Both LeBarns argue that any attempt to confront Mexicos security crisis needs to start at the bottom, unpicking the networks of corruption which have contaminated government at all levels.

And they are skeptical at the idea that any further US involvement could help. If the US were to send a drone to kill [senior Sinaloa Cartel leader Ismael] El Mayo Zambada that wouldnt solve a thing, said Adrin.

Read more from the original source:

The Mormons standing up to Mexicos drug cartels: 'We have to overcome our fears - The Guardian

Cannabis experts are hoping 2020 will be the year that New York finally legalizes weed – MarketWatch

Cannabis advocates are cautiously optimistic that 2020 will be the year that New York state finally legalizes marijuana for adult recreational use, marking a milestone for the legal business.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo has included legalization in his budget proposal for the new fiscal year, projecting it could generate $20 million in revenue in fiscal 2021, growing to $63 million by fiscal 2022 and $188 million by fiscal 2025.

Passage of such legislation is not a sure thing, however.

A similar effort last year fell apart when lawmakers were unable to agree on the details, specifically the correct measures to ensure that the communities that were disproportionately punished during the 40 year long U.S. war on drugs would benefit from a new legal industry.

Crystal Peoples-Stokes, a Democrat from Buffalo who is New York state Assembly Majority Leader and pro-legalization, welcomed Cuomos proposal.

However, the only legislation that I can support will include a statutory commitment of significant resources directed to communities harmed by mass incarceration resulting from the so called war on drugs, and a robust economic and social equity plan for access to the new industry, she told MarketWatch in emailed comments.

Read also: Marijuana companies are bad at forecasting, analyst says

Cuomo is taking a different approach this year with plans to create a new Office of Cannabis Management to specialize in cannabis regulation and create the framework for medical, adult-use and hemp programs.

Central to the plan are provisions to ensure social equity licensing opportunities. Sales will be restricted to adults of 21 years of age and older and quality controls will be used to ensure the safety and potency of products, including labeling, packaging, advertising and testing.

See: Shorting cannabis stocks was a billion-dollar idea in 2019

These efforts will be done in coordination with neighboring states Connecticut, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, Cuomo said in a statement. Further plans include the creation of a Global Cannabis and Hemp Center for Science, Research and Education with SUNY and other partners.

Experts agree that the time is ripe for New York to fully legalize the drug with public support at an all-time high. A Siena College poll released on Monday found voters in favor of legalization by a 58% to 38% margin, the highest level yet recorded by Siena.

Rob DiPisa, co-chair of the Cannabis Law Group at law firm Cole Schotz, said hes hopeful but also a bit skeptical about a deal being done. Its the same lawmakers and the same issues, he said.

Still, the states $6 billion budget deficit may persuade some skeptics of the need to create a new revenue source and taking a unified approach with other legislatures may also act as a catalyst, he said.

Read: Cannabis stocks rocked as FDA warning undermines case for CBD investments

Cannabis alone cant plug all the deficits, but it can be part of a cocktail of revenue generation, he said. And working with neighboring states makes sense to ensure the tax structures are similar and discourage cross-border buying that would sees states compete for revenue.

Coming a little late to the cannabis party 11 states and the District of Columbia have already passed laws legalizing recreational cannabis use gives New York the advantage of learning from others, said DiPisa.

They are taking some social equity measures from Illinois. So far, no state has got everything right, he said. Illinois started legal sales of cannabis on Jan. 2.

See: Drakes attempt to trademark Canadas weed warning label hits a stop sign

Then there is the thorny issue of taxation.

Cuomo is proposing three levels of taxes, starting with a 20% tax on the sale of product to a retailer. Cultivators would be taxed at the rate of $1 per dry weight gram for flower, at 25 cents per dry weight gram of cannabis trim, and at 14 cents per gram of wet cannabis. Local counties or cities with a population of 1 million or more would be entitled to another 2% sales tax.

As California companies know all too well, high taxes can have the effect of truly crippling the nascent sector as it makes it all but impossible for companies to compete with the black market, which continues to dominate in the Golden State.

A recent report by Boulder, Colorado-based BDS Analytics and San Francisco-based ArcView Market Research found that about 80% of cannabis transactions in California are black-market deals, eating into the revenue available to legal players.

A slow and complex licensing process in California has also meant fewer store openings than expected, further exacerbating the problem. Companies unable to access the market are now running out of money, and many are laying off staff, cutting costs and getting creative with fundraising.

Read now: U.S. pot retailer MedMen says its trying to use stock to pay its bills amid cannabis industrys cash crunch

Related: Cannabis companies are having a horrible summer as scandals mount and stocks slide

The situation is almost as dire in Canada, the first G-7 country to legalize weed for adult use in October of 2018. Canadian companies have also suffered from a slower-than-expected rollout of retail stores that has allowed the black market to thrive. MKM analyst Bill Kirk said the stubborn price gap between legal and illicit weed is encouraging Canadians to use the black market. The average legal price in the fourth quarter was C$10.30 ($7.83) a gram in the legal market versus C$5.74 a gram in the illicit market.

Cristina Buccola, founder of Cristina Buccola Counsel PLLC and a former general counsel at publication High Times, said taxation is key. If its too high, it shuts down the industry before it begins.

But its also important how tax revenue is spent and Buccola would prefer to see a plan to reinvest some of the money raised in services for the very communities that were devastated during the years of prohibition.

Plenty of people who have been negatively affected by prohibition might not want a license, for example, she said. But they might want to work on mental health issues, or job training. Thats the kind of community reinvestment we need to see.

Buccola agreed that addressing New Yorks enormous illicit market is a challenge, but a key factor in creating a viable industry. Its about bringing the actors from the legacy market over to the legal market and that will take time. We need to ask what services those people need to make that change.

See: Aphria stock slides on weaker-than-expected earnings, but other cannabis shares shine

Whatever happens in 2020, experts agree that New York is a major market for the industry and bringing in New Jersey, Connecticut and Pennsylvania at the same time would be a big move forward.

Those are monster markets and we already have Massachusetts, said Korey Bauer, portfolio manager at the Cannabis Growth Fund from Foothill Capital Management. It would be a big step forward to descheduling at the federal level.

The ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF MJ, -4.65% has fallen 40% in the last 12 months. The S&P 500 SPX, -0.90% has gained 26% in the same time frame, while the Dow Jones Industrial DJIA, -0.58% has gained 19%.

Cannabis Watch: For all of MarketWatchs coverage of cannabis companies: Click here

Read the original:

Cannabis experts are hoping 2020 will be the year that New York finally legalizes weed - MarketWatch

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard on Federal Cannabis Reform Policies and the War on Drugs – Cannabis Now

Cannabis reform is one of the hot topics in the upcoming 2020 elections. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard is the Democratic representative for Hawaiis 2nd Congressional District and one of the partys presidential hopefuls. Since 2017, Rep. Gabbard has introduced multiple bills to remove cannabis from Schedule 1, including the Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act and the Marijuana Opportunity, Reinvestment, and Expungement (MORE) Act to end federal cannabis prohibition and provide clemency to those affected by the war on drugs.

Rep. Gabbard will be speaking via Skype at the International Cannabis Business Conference in San Francisco, February 6-7.

Cannabis Now: What do you believe to be the biggest hurdlepreventing the end of federal cannabis prohibition?

Rep. Gabbard: Simply a lack of political will. In 2017, I introduced the first-ever bipartisan bill that would end the federal prohibition of marijuana by removing it from the Controlled Substances Act. Unfortunately, Congressional leadership at the time blocked us from getting a hearing on this important legislation, despite having nearly 10 percent of the Members of the House as co-sponsors and growing support from the public. But times have changed.

We are seeing more bipartisan support for an end to prohibition, as well as other related marijuana bills on the floor. 61 percent of Americans support legalization, and 31 states have legalized cannabis. My Marijuana Opportunity, Reinvestment, and Expungement (MORE) Act passed the House Judiciary Committee with a bipartisan 24-10 vote, and now awaits consideration by the full House.

Why is ending federal cannabis prohibition so important toyou?

Our archaic marijuana policies based on stigma andoutdated myths have been used to wage a failed war on drugs. The so-calledWar on Drugs has exhausted our law enforcement resources, burdened ourcriminal justice system, decimated communities, fractured families, and turnedeveryday Americans into criminals. Over-criminalization and mass incarcerationhave become the new norm. And rather than treating addiction to opioids andother drugs as a healthcare issue, we arrest and jail those who need help.

Our current criminal justice system favors the rich and powerful and punishes the poor putting people in prison for smoking marijuana, while allowing corporations like Purdue Pharma, who are responsible for the opioid-related deaths of thousands of people, to walk away scot-free with their coffers full. We have a system that is allowing Big Pharma to aggressively push these highly addictive drugs, knowing how addictive they are, we have doctors who are not being held accountable for their irresponsible treatment. By decriminalizing marijuana and helping addicts rather than jailing them, we will create a fairer, more ethical criminal justice system and cut our prison populations by 50 percent.

In Congress, I have introduced the Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act, which would remove marijuana from the Federal Controlled Substances list and allow states the freedom to regulate marijuana without federal interference. I have also introduced The Marijuana Data Collection Act, which would study the effects of state legalized medicinal and non-medicinal marijuana programs on state revenues, public health, substance abuse and opioids, criminal justice and employment.

Ive introduced the Opioid Crisis Accountability Act, which would hold big pharma accountable for distributing and pushing these highly addictive drugs on the American people. I have also cosponsored legislation to work with communities to respond to this devastating opioid crisis by providing grants, education, outreach, prevention, and treatment services.

As President, I will work to end the present hypocritical drug policies that hurt rather than help the American people and reward the reckless greed of Big Pharma and the drug lobby. We must end the failed war on drugs and end the federal marijuana prohibition, pardon those convicted of minor possession charges and expunge past records. And we need to reform our drug laws and treat drug addiction as a healthcare issue, not a criminal justice issue.

What inspired you to lead the charge for reintroducingH.R.1588 Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act of 2019?

Our archaic and outdated marijuana laws are turningeveryday Americans into criminals. Every day, the economic and social impactsof marijuana prohibition are having devastating effects on communities acrossthe country.

Millions of Americans have fallen victim to the failed Waron Drugs, tearing families apart, disproportionately harming minoritycommunities, and overcrowding an already strained prison system. Marijuana useis a personal choice and should not be a criminal act. For many years I haveworked to end the marijuana prohibition and am proud to push this legislationforward that will begin to right the wrongs of the past and invest incommunities who have been most harmed.

We must pass the Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act to ensure that marijuana consumers and state-licensed marijuana businesses are protected from undue federal interference. It will help reduce the strain on our criminal justice system, amend federal law to agree with cannabis changing cultural status, recognize the plants therapeutic benefits, and reduce contradictions and confusion between federal and state marijuana laws.

Hawaii will become the 26th state to decriminalize possession of cannabis on January 11, 2020. Whats your position on legalizing recreational use in the state?

Momentum is headed in the right direction. I think that we are only going to see more progress being made. There are some incremental cannabis reforms in the state, such as a bill that lawmakers approved last year to add opioid addiction as a medical marijuana qualifying condition, however, this was vetoed by Governor David Ige. Even in a state like Hawaii, if you look back to the governors statements about why he vetoed that bill, there are still a lot of myths and outdated information and stigma that are being used as excuses to not push forward these very impactful policy changes.

So that is one of the main reasons that is spurring my bill, the Marijuana Data Collection Act, to be able to provide this from the National Academy of Sciences as an undisputed collection of data and studies saying you cant dispute this. The purpose of this legislation is to collect and synthesize relevant data and to generate a federally recognized, neutral report regarding the impact of statewide marijuana legalization schemes. Such a report will assure that federal discussions and policies specific to this issue are based upon the best and most reliable evidence available at this time. We cant afford to wait given the devastating negative impact it is having on the people of this country.

As a retired combat veteran, what are your thoughts onveterans not having access to cannabis through the VA?

Many dont realize that even in states where cannabis has been legalized, veterans are still prohibited from accessing it through their VA medical benefits. Thats one reason why I introduced the Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act to remove marijuana from the Federal Controlled Substances list. There are so many states that show and prove in their statistics that for those who have legalized medical cannabis, or adult-use cannabis, there has been a direct correlated drop in opioid addiction and opioid-related deaths. In Hawaii, in 2018, there was overwhelming bipartisan support for a bill that was passed that would allow those who are addicted to opioids to qualify for medical cannabis in our state. The governor vetoed this bill that passed with overwhelming support. The reason that he gave was theres just no data to prove that medical cannabis will help someone who is addicted to opioids. I got so angry because I know people whose lives have been saved because they were able to get off of those opioids and they had access to medical cannabis, they found a path towards recovery and towards a new lease on life.

At the federal level, weve got todo our job to deschedule marijuana completely, but also see that samereflection in the laws that are being passed in our states. Ive introducedlegislation in Congress to support research within the VA called the MarijuanaData Collection Act that commissions the National Academy of Science, a neutralfederal agency, to collect data and information from states like Hawaii andNevada and California and Colorado and others that have passed laws to legalizecannabis in one level or another to provide an undisputed set of facts, statistics,and information that would counter the misinformation and myths that are sooften used to strike down laws that would help open up access to medicalcannabis. It is our nations responsibility to ensure that our veterans receivethe care, services, and benefits theyve earned and deserve and that includesthe ability to choose cannabis as a treatment instead of addictive opioids.

What is your position on reform for those most damaged bythe war on drugs and prohibition?

We need to provide clemency andpardon those who have been unfairly sentenced due to archaic marijuanapolicies, especially to those who have only been convicted of minor possessioncharges. As President, I will use clemency to release 25,000 people during myfirst term, and reform our criminal justice system so that no American willhave to go through years in prison and have their family torn apart for simplypossessing or smoking marijuana. I will reform mandatory minimum sentencing,the unfair cash bail system, implement sentencing reforms, improve prosecutortraining, re-classify drugs with proven medicinal benefits, and removemarijuana from the Federal Controlled Substances list.

Our archaic marijuana policies disproportionately affect communities of color, as does our entire criminal justice system. In Congress, I have introduced legislation to decriminalize marijuana. I am also a co-sponsor of the Marijuana Justice Act of 2019, which reforms unjust federal marijuana laws, and empowers minority communities that have been the most impacted by this failed War on Drugs.

The Marijuana Justice Act of 2019 removes marijuana and THC from Schedule I drugs, eliminates criminal penalties for those who import, export, manufacture, distribute, or possess marijuana. It also provides grants to reinvest in those communities who have been most largely impacted by the war on drugs in particular, communities of color. These grants provide job training, health education services, covering expenses related to expungement of convictions, investing in community centers and other public services.

As President, I will grant clemencyand expunge records of those who have been unfairly sentenced by marijuanalaws, invest in and redress communities of color who have been indiscriminatelyimpacted by the War on Drugs, and treat addiction as the public health crisisthat it is, not a criminal justice issue.

To hear Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and other industry leaders share their thoughts about domestic and international cannabis industry opportunities, while networking with entrepreneurs and lawmakers from all over the world, make sure youre at the International Cannabis Business Conference in San Francisco, February 6-7.

TELL US, what do you think of Rep. Tulsi Gabbards cannabis policies?

See the original post:

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard on Federal Cannabis Reform Policies and the War on Drugs - Cannabis Now

Matthew in the Middle: Whats wrong with America today? – Eureka Times-Standard

If you want to know whats wrong with America today, read the book Tightrope: Americans Reaching For Hope, which also ran as an abbreviated New York Times opinion piece called, Who Killed the Knapp Family by Nicholas Kristof and his wife Sheryl DeWunn. It tells the story of a school bus Nicholas rode in a rural Oregon town in the 1970s, not much different from Humboldt. 25% of the children on that No. 6 school bus are now dead in their 50s or younger, mostly from alcohol, drugs, suicide and/or reckless accidents. Of the five Knapp family kids who had once been so cheery, four have died. Farlan died of liver failure from drinking and drugs, Zealan burned to death in a house fire while passed out drunk, Rogena died from hepatitis linked to drug use and Nathan blew himself up cooking meth. The only surviving child, Keylan, spent 13 years in a state penitentiary. The Knapp family went from a typical middle-class American family to being decimated in a generation.

Among the other local kids on that bus, Mike died from suicide, Steve from a motorcycle accident, Cindy from depression and a heart attack, Jeff from a daredevil car crash, Billy from diabetes in prison, Kevin from obesity-related ailments, Tim from a construction accident, Sue from undetermined causes. And then theres Chris, who is presumed dead after years of alcoholism and homelessness. At least one more is in prison, and another is homeless.

We live in two Americas today. One America lives in the major urban cities (think professional sports franchise cities) and the other in the vast rural areas. Look no further than the 2016 election map. One has careers, not jobs. One has equity and assets, not debts. One has income streams, salaries and bonuses (along with insanely high housing prices and atrocious traffic), not minimum wage. One has employee benefits, not public assistance.

I recently had lunch with a good friend of mine who spent most of his adult life working various union jobs on the Samoa Peninsula. He talked about during the 1960s, 70s and even the 80s the Samoa Peninsula had over 1,200 people working union jobs with living wages, benefits and a defined benefits (monthly check) retirement plan. One by one, the saw mills and then the pulp mills went out of business until Evergreen Pulp Mill finally shut down in 2008. The same decline happened with our local timber and fishing industries.Like many other parts of rural America, first the good-paying jobs disappeared, partly because of technology, robotics and globalization, but also because of political and corporate pressures on unions. Then Congress changed the tax code for a distribution of power and wealth toward corporations and billionaires. Second, there was an explosion of drugs heroin, crack cocaine, meth, oxy and now fentanyl. This was augmented by the aggressive opioid marketing campaigns by pharmaceutical companies. Third, the war on drugs sent many mothers and fathers to jail, imploding families and perpetuating the cycle of poverty.

Working-class towns across America disintegrated because of lost jobs, broken families and depression, magnified by alcohol and drugs. The suffering was invisible to those at the top, but the results were brutally evident for all to see. Open your eyes next time youre driving around Old Town, Downtown or on Broadway. Since 1988, American schools have become increasingly segregated by race and wealth. Children in lower income school districts perform on average four grade levels behind those in wealthy districts. One in seven children dont graduate from high school and one in seven children lives with a parent suffering from substance abuse. Suicides are at their highest rate since World War II. More than 7 million Americans have suspended drivers licenses for failure to pay child support or court-related debt, meaning they may not reliably show up for work.

The sad thing is those at the lower income strata who voted for Trump, hoping he would rescue them. However the number of children without health insurance has increased by more than 400,000 under the Trump Administration. If you havent figured out yet, Trump is not the answer. He couldnt give a rats ass about those 20% of Americans at the bottom of society. Say what you want about President Trump, however he understands one simple fact: A sociopath beats a socialist every day of the week and twice on Sundays. My biggest fear this November.

Matthew Owen resides in Eureka, and believes the First Amendment allows for free speech, even when married to a Humboldt County supervisor.

Originally posted here:

Matthew in the Middle: Whats wrong with America today? - Eureka Times-Standard

MLK and the Black Misleadership Class – Florida Courier

ADVERTISEMENT

The birthday of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is commemorated each year at thousands of events in literally every U.S. city.

Yet, the martyred human rights leaders political philosophy is totally absent from the agenda of todays Black Misleadership Class, a grasping cabal of hustlers and opportunists that have grown fat and infinitely corrupt through their collaboration with the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism, and militarism.

Their freedom train was the Democratic Party, the half of the corporate electoral duopoly that allowed colored folks to ride as first-class passengers as long as they didnt question the schedule or the destination.

The budding Black misleaders hopped on board the Democratic Party express to the boardrooms of corporate power at about the same time that Dr. King was making his definitive break with the evil triplets infernal machinery, including both corporate parties.

In his April 4, 1967 Beyond Vietnam A Time to Break Silence speech at New York Citys Riverside Church, Dr. King burned his bridges with the nations top Democrat, despite President Lyndon Johnsons indispensable role in pushing civil and voting rights and anti-poverty bills through Congress and championing an affirmative action rationale that as spelled out in his 1965 speech at Howard University was a principled endorsement of reparations for crimes committed against Black people by the U.S. society and state.

Johnson went further than any previous U.S. president in acknowledging Black American citizenship rights and grievances, even as the Republican half of the electoral duopoly was preparing to assume the role of White Mans Party through Richard Nixons Southern strategy.

Yet Dr. King, a proponent of peace and democratic socialism, understood that the way to the Promised Land was not through Black collaboration with the evils inherent in capitalism and its ceaseless, predatory wars. I have come to believe that we are integrating into a burning house, King told his friend, Harry Belafonte.

By 1967, Vietnam War was consuming the promises of Johnsons Great Society. America was undeniably the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today, King declared. The U.S. had already killed a million Vietnamese, mostly children, but it was also a war on Americas poor.

I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic destructive suction tube, King told the crowd at Riverside. So, I was increasingly compelled to see the war as an enemy of the poor and to attack it as such. That meant breaking with the Democrats and their president.

More importantly, in his Riverside speech Dr. King framed the Vietnamese as engaged in a righteous struggle to complete their long quest for sovereignty and independence. King broke with imperialism, the consummate expression of the all three triple evils. So they killed him the next year.

The National Security State, the protector of the capitalist order to which both parties are beholden, then proceeded to crush the Black movement to the left of Dr. King most fiercely in the Gestapo-like assault on the self-determinationist and staunchly anti-imperialist Black Panther Party in the bloody year of 1969.

By 1970, the Black Radical Tradition lay mostly in the graveyard, and the way was clear for the Black Misleadership Class to monopolize Black politics on behalf of their corporate overseers.

The rise of the almost entirely Democrat-allied Black Misleadership Class is perfectly coterminous with construction of the Black Mass Incarceration State.

The New Jim Crow was a bipartisan project, initiated under Democrat Lyndon Johnsons Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, which vastly increased the manpower and funding for local police departments, and was put on hyper-drive by Republican President Richard Nixons War on Drugs a War on Blacks that never ended, but was re-declared by Republican President Reagan and reinforced by Democrat President Bill Clinton.

At the local level, the exponential growth of the Mass Black Incarceration regime was administered by increasingly Black city governments, which oversaw and processed the deportation of millions of Black men, women and children to the Prison Gulag. Virtually all of these Black operatives of race and class oppression are Democrats. And all of them are celebrating their own political ascension as the wondrous outcome of Dr. Kings dream.

By 2014, 80 percent of the Congressional Black Caucus was voting to continue the Pentagon 1033 program that funnels billions of dollars in military weapons and gear to local police departments. Four years later, 75 percent of the Black Caucus voted to make police a protected class and assault on cops a federal crime.

Although the Black misleaders were quick to join the domestic war on the Black poor, African American public opinion remained war-averse, skeptical of U.S. motives on foreign shores. In 2003, only four Black members of Congress backed George Bushs invasion of Iraq.

But the advent of the Black Democratic president a misleader par excellence gave much of the Black Caucus a free pass to play warmonger. Half of the Blacks in Congress voted to continue the bombing and regime change in Libya, an African nation, in the summer of 2011. None of the Caucus has raised serious objections to the U.S.-aided slaughter of more than six million Congolese under Presidents Clinton (Dem.), Bush (Rep.), Obama (Dem.), and Trump (Rep.). The American military occupation of much of the African continent through AFRICOM is a non-issue among the Black misleaders.

RUSSIA!!! on the other hand, is an existential threat to our democracy, say the Black Democrats, who are eager to pledge their allegiance to the same CIA and National Security State that assassinated Patrice Lumumba, murdered Malcolm, King and scores of Black Panthers, and worked hand in glove with White-ruled South Africa to kill thousands of freedom fighters across the continent.

The Black misleaders are as silly as they are shameless, but they are not ineffectual. No White man could eviscerate Dr. Kings radical legacy, or make Malcolm X appear harmless to the imperial order thats a job for the Black Misleadership Class.

While Dr. King rejected an alliance with the triple evils, Black Democratic misleaders describe their deal with the Devil as smart, strategic politics. They whip up war fever against small, non-White nations that seek only the right to govern themselves, behaving no differently on the world scene and sometimes worse than Donald Trump. They shame and weaken Black America, and have joined the enemies of life on Earth.

King would shake his head, mournfully. Malcolm would keep his tight smile, doggedly. Then both would organize to expose and depose the Black Misleadership Class.

Glen Ford is executive editor of BlackAgendaReport.comEmail him at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com

See the original post:

MLK and the Black Misleadership Class - Florida Courier

New ya ba ‘brand’ detected in North – The Phuket News

CHIANG RAI: Authorities say a new drug production gang may be emerging along the countrys northern border, following the seizure of 1.7 million methamphetamine pills.

Soldiers display seized speed pills during a media briefing in Chiang Rai yesterday (Jan 25). Three men are in custody. Photo: Chinnapat Chaimol

The packages containing the ya ba pills bore an eagle logo, which law enforcement officials have not seen before, according to Col Chatree Sa-nguantham of the Pha Muang task force.

Three young men were arrested in an operation carried out by soldiers from the task force in Muang district of Chiang Rai on Friday (Jan 24) night.

The soldiers were deployed to the Nong Bua reservoir in tambon Bandu at around 10:30pm on Friday following a tip-off that illicit drugs were going to be smuggled from the border area in Mae Sai district to an area near the reservoir.

They later spotted a white Toyota Innova with Bangkok licence plates parked near the reservoir, with three men standing nearby. The soldiers asked to conduct a search and found 13 sacks inside.

The sacks contained 1.7 million speed pills and the three men were arrested, Col Chatree said yesterday (Jan 25).

The suspects were identified as Apirak Homros, 26, of Sankhaburi district in Chai Nat; Takeshi Shinoda, 23, of Mae Taeng district in Chiang Mai; and Sarawut Jariyakitwanchai, 26, of Wiang Chai district in Chiang Rai. The trio were handed over to the Bandu police station for legal action.

Col Chatree said one of the suspects was a Thai-Japanese national as his father was a Japanese.

Wa State in Myanmar has long been known as a key methamphetamine producing area in Southeast Asia. It is the hub of an ever-expanding production and export enterprise that is now finding more markets beyond Southeast Asia.

Ample supplies have worsened the regional methamphetamine epidemic, as it now costs as little as 40 baht to buy a ya ba pill in Bangkok. Thats down from 200-300 baht a few years ago, and is about the same price as when former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra launched his bloody war on drugs in 2003.

The scale of the problem in Thailand alone is enormous. The number of methamphetamine tablets seized in 2018 in the country - 515 million - exceeded the combined seizures reported from all countries in the region in any preceding year, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).

See original here:

New ya ba 'brand' detected in North - The Phuket News

‘Bath Salts’ Feel Like a Drug From the PastBut They’re Still Wreaking Havoc – VICE

When a group of powerful, legal stimulants burst onto the drug scene in the UK and U.S. a decade ago, they caused a media frenzy.

In Britain, mephedrone came virtually out of nowhere in 2009 to become a hugely popular drug with university students, clubbers and rural teenagers. Dubbed "meow meow" by newspapers and sold online as plant food, it was the killer drug that made people rip off their own scrotums. Yet behind the hype, to young people using it, the drug ticked all the boxes: it was legal, it got you very high and you didnt have to buy it from a street dealer. You could buy it online and get it delivered to your front door in 24 hours.

Meanwhile in the U.S., mephedrone and other synthetic cathinones such as methylone and MDPVsome of which were sold as bath saltsand later alpha-PVP, which became known as "flakka," became popular. Some of these drugs were either mixed in with, or replaced, the MDMA that fueled the EDM scene. Others inspired media coverage around their alleged ability to turn people into flesh-eating zombies (though it was later discovered that particular attacker had only used weed).

But then these drugstechnically called synthetic cathinonesvanished from the mainstream. Synthetic cathinones were banned in the UK and U.S. in 2010 and 2011, swiftly removing their unique selling point as a legal hit. Meanwhile, the purity of the drugs they were designed to replicate, such as MDMA and cocaine, had begun to rise. Cathinones fell out of favor with most users and dealers. Instead they went underground in the UK and U.S., used in the main by much smaller, more socially excluded populations, such as the street homeless and long-term drug injectors, as well as in chemsex scenes.

While synthetic cathinones are mainly drugs of historical note now in the UK and U.S., their arrival having kick-started the modern online drug trade, elsewhere on the planet they have become major drug market players. Now, a decade after becoming the go-to drugs of a new generation of young party kids in the U.S. and UK, mephedrone and other synthetic cathinones are now all over Russia, Eastern Europe and some countries in Asia.

While Silicon Valley millionaires pay $1,000 a night for organic magic mushrooms with a trip guide, and middle-class Londoners pick up deluxe cocaine for 100 a gram in West End bars, people living in relative poverty are snorting and injecting the psychoactive equivalents of knock-off designer clothes to get their stimulant high. Cathinones of varying quality and toxicity have become part of a new wave of cheap highs feeding the bargain basement of an increasingly divided global drug market.

So how did they come to dominate traditional drugs in some parts of the world?

Until four years ago, most prohibited substances entered Russia through its seaports. Cocaine from South America, ecstasy from the Netherlands and amphetamine from Belgiumall of them arrived in St. Petersburg and Ust-Luga to disperse to Russian cities and European transit destinations.

But in 2016, the situation in Russia changed. A huge clampdown on the smuggling trade, of everything from illegal furs to alcohol and drugs, and the arrest of key smugglers momentarily strangled the supply of banned substances in the country. Well-established dealing networks were lost. Drugs imported from Europe such as ecstasy, amphetamine and cannabis stopped going through ports so easily. With diminished supply, these drugs soared in price.

Wholesale drug suppliers came to the conclusion that Russia needed a new product. The criteria were simple: its manufacture should be easy and inexpensive, and the potency strong. Despite it having been banned in Russia in 2010, mephedrone was their solution.

Russian police raided a drug lab near Moscow Jan 17, 2020, and seized at least 66 kg of mephedrone and 600 liters of liquid containing synthetic drugs. IMAGE: Russian Federal Security ServiceTASS via Getty Images

Russia has little data on drug prevalence, forensics, drug-related deaths and convictions. But the evidence from online markets, police seizures and drug experts indicates cathinones have risen to usurp a variety of drug scenes in Russia. Earlier this month a clandestine lab outside Moscow producing mephedrone for online sales was busted. Police arrested five suspects and found 66 kg of mephedrone, 600 litres of liquid containing synthetic drugs and precursor chemicals.

On Hydra, the largest Russian darknet market, mephedrone is more popular than weed. There are more clandestine online shops selling mephedrone than any other drug and the most drug reviews on the site are about mephedrone.

Teenagers wear Metallica-logo "Mephedrone" t-shirts, while the musician Mukka has a song called Girl With A Bob Cut, with the chorus: "In my yard, there is a girl with a bob cut walking/She loves mephedrone, she loves mephedrone. And I am so in love with her." The video, which has 11 million views, features a couple meeting in a club and getting trashed before the girl ODs and is buried the next day by her lover in the snow.

On the encrypted messenger app Telegram, numerous channels talk about using mephedrone and alpha-PVP. Many of these mini-blogs are written in Beatnik style, like cult Russian underground writer Bayan Shiryanov, and describe addiction to cathinones. Some have 10,000 subscribers and act as entry points into online drug markets.

Mom, we are all sick with mephedrone, less often alpha, writes Deep in sin. You and Iwe go crazy for these two and die on withdrawal. The authors are mostly teenage girls, or people who pretend to be teenage girls, hoping to get cash by posting referral links to shops or by leaving their card number and asking people to donate.

According to data analysis from a Telegram channel called DrugStat, prices for a gram of mephedrone in Russia start from $25. In contrast, a gram of cocaine starts from $130. Synthesis of mephedrone in Russia can get as cheap as 30 cents a gram from what I've heard, said Andrey Kaganskikh, a freelance Russian journalist who has investigated Russias drug problem. Prices for mephedrone dont differ that much around the country because it can be synthesized almost anywhere. Underground labs making synthetic cathinones have also been found in Eastern Europe. Since 2013, a number of factories related to cathinone production have been dismantled in Poland and Slovakia.

As with the drugs they are slowly replacing, synthetic cathinones come with risks. Their ingredients are far more varied and unpredictable than their traditional counterparts. Because most are habit-forming, and have been adopted by injectors, they have been responsible for a rise in acute psychosis, blood-borne infections, and deaths in the regions in which they are used.

According to Nikolay Tumanov, a Russian doctor-narcologist, cathinones can cause "anxiety, pseudo-depressive disorders, sleep disturbances, aggressiveness, panic attacks, in fact a destabilization of the nervous system." While synthetic cathinones have been linked to a significant number of deaths in Eastern Europe, many of these are poly-drug poisonings, making the risk difficult to gauge.

Cathinones, mainly mephedrone and alpha-PVP, have also gained a market foothold in Georgia, a country situated at the juncture of Western Asia and Eastern Europe.

Since Georgia declared independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, personal freedom is valued highly and the country now has a flourishing, young electronic dance music scene. Here, the media calls mephedrone killer salt after several fatal overdoses linked to mephedrone at clubs and festivals in 2017, resulting in the drug being banned in 2018. Even though it has an even more dangerous reputation than mephedrone, alpha-PVP has become prevalent in the country among students and older users who often vape or inject the drug.

In Georgia, unlike in many countries, cathinones are not just cheap substitutes for other drugs, they are rival products. On Matanga, a popular clearnet website for buying illegal drugs, both mephedrone and alpha-PVP are more expensive than MDMA. The potency of alpha-PVP, which makes it more cost-effective than mephedrone and cocaine, likely explains its popularity in a country where the minimum wage now amounts to only $7 a month.

In Poland, mephedrone has become a growing problem among young people, according to the number of patients admitted to Nowowiejski Hospital in Warsaw after a mephedrone binge, which rose steadily between 2010 and 2018. The 8kg seizure of mephedrone in Pozna last year and other recent seizures across the country indicate a strong market for the drug, which is probably the result of how easy it is to synthesize, said the Social Drug Policy Initiatives Jerzy Afanasjew.

On the Polish drug market, mephedrone is more of a brand than a specific substance, says Afanasjew. What survived the blanket ban on new psychoactive substances are mostly mephedrone analogues, like 4-CMC, but nobody really knows, because users simply refer to the new analogues as crystal. Nobody cares if it's mephedrone if it works like a speedy euphoric party drug.

Eastern Europes affair with cathinones is not all-encompassing. For example, drug prevalence data shows Czechs and Slovaks, who neighbor Poland to the north, have not taken to them. Up until recently, despite the rise of cathinones in Russia, Ukraine has resisted cathinones. However, experts in Ukraine said that mephedrone has seen a steady growth due to its low cost and strong euphoric effect, and word of mouth increases its popularity every month.

While the epicenter of global synthetic cathinone use appears to be on Europes eastern fringes, these drugs have also been taken up in other parts of the world. Synthetic cathinone abuse is the fastest-growing drug problem in the small east Asian country of Taiwan, according to the latest statistics from the countrys Food and Drug Administration.

Little is known on cathinone use in Taiwan, although most users are young men. The drugs have been linked to an alarming rise in fatal ODs. Mephedrone, produced in nearby China, is the most detected cathinone in Taiwan, followed by methylone, while new derivatives have recently been added to the controlled illicit substances list. Cathinones are sold online as cute products such as Rainbow Little Devil and Hello Kitty and often advertised as containing "organic ingredients." Police have seized the drugs packaged as coffee, candy, cookies or chocolate.

In 2012, mephedrone took off in India, where it was branded poor mans cocaine. At the same time, what were called loophole drugsa name for legal highs containing mainly synthetic cathinones and synthetic cannabinoidswere being widely distributed and abused in Japan. In both countries, these drugs were responsible for a high number of arrests and admissions into psychiatric hospitals. But since new legislation and heavy police crackdowns, cathinones are no longer so cheap and readily available. However, the quantity of mephedrone seized and reported by the Indian Narcotics Control Bureau in recent years, for example a 50g haul in Mumbai earlier this month, indicates that its still a common drug.

Synthetic cathinones are not just being used around the world to substitute recreational drugs, but as alternatives to heroin. Anya Sarang, President of the Andrey Rylkov Foundation for Health and Social Justice in Moscow, said alpha-PVP is popular among injecting users in Russia because it is more cost-effective than other drugs. In Russia, using alpha-PVP is not a matter of choice or personal preferences but rather a marker of poverty, she said.

A similar scenario has likely occurred in Georgia. Natia Natenadze, a Master of Addiction Studies, says web bought alpha-PVP is now more on the Georgian drug market than heroin.

In Poland, drug injectors are mainlining cathinones despite the blanket ban and crackdown on legal high shops. According to Bartosz Michalewski, who works with drug users on a daily basis at the Monar clinic in Krakow, "100 percent of them are shooting cathinones." He said they are usually people who are living on the streets who are injecting cathinones because heroin is harder to get hold of in the city.

In both Hungary and Romania, shortages in the availability of heroin in 2010 and 2011, along with the increased availability of cathinones sold as "legal highs" in headshops and online shops, meant that cathinones have now largely replaced traditional drugs among injecting users.

The switch to cheap cathinones was most notable within poor, segregated Roma communities in the two countries, where people are severely disadvantaged on every levelhousing, education, employment, and health. Cathinones like pentedrone (a more MDMA-like, liver-toxic drug than mephedrone) and lesser-known cathinone analogues are common here. They are often sold in branded packets, usually in combination with other drugs, yet few people know exactly what's in them, as the government rarely tests them.

Unlike heroin or amphetamines, whose effects are longer-lasting, users of cathinones need repeated hits, so often shoot up three to ten times per day. Alina Dumitriu, a drug outreach worker at ARAS (the Romanian Anti-AIDS Association) in Bucharest, Romania told VICE that the more chaotic use of cathinones have increased needle sharing, making users even more vulnerable to infections such as HIV, hepatitis and tuberculosis. In addition, the consequences of injecting cathinoneslike skin erosion and large holes at overused injecting sitespredisposes users to cellulitis and other potentially serious bacterial infections.

Harm reduction services in Hungary are also facing similar problems, which have been exacerbated by a lack of financial resources, according to Peter Sarosi, a human rights activist and drug policy expert. NGOs that provide harm reduction programs in some of the most impoverished parts of Budapest, which are home to many Roma people who live in deep poverty, have had funding and support from Hungarys right wing government cut to shreds. Since closing down the two largest harm reduction programs, thousands of high-risk drug users have become invisible to the treatment system, so it is impossible to keep track of infection rates such as an HIV outbreak.

Estimates of cathinone use across the world, especially in countries that do not routinely test seized drugs or new psychoactive substances, are highly likely to be the tip of the iceberg.

In many countries, data on synthetic cathinone use is either lacking or entirely absent. In addition, drug-detection dogs and routine urine drug screens do not detect synthetic cathinones, meaning the scale of their global use may be largely underestimated. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime have identified close to 170 synthetic cathinones on their drug markets since 2009. However, only a handful of these are well known.

The law, it seems, is being played for a fool. Strict narco-policy has not only failed to stem the flow of these drugs in Eastern Europe and Taiwan, it is the reason new and dangerous cathinones are being introduced on the black market. As most countries continue to wage a war on drugs, the question is not whether cathinones will continue to spread, but which ones, and where they will take hold.

Read more:

'Bath Salts' Feel Like a Drug From the PastBut They're Still Wreaking Havoc - VICE

Laying it Out: Can’t change minds? Then change the system – Medicine Hat News

By Medicine Hat News Opinion on January 25, 2020.

The conversation was about a minute-and-a-half old when he uttered the words.

Neither of us had met this man before, though Jeremy and I both knew his wife a little she had stopped at the Medicine Hat News trade show booth for a quick hello and had just introduced us to her husband.

We quickly found ourselves on the same side of a topic regarding the media, and the exchange had been quite pleasant to that point. So you can imagine our surprise when he casually tossed in the phrase, Its like those f***ing low-life refugees, as if this was just how anyone would speak.

This moment in time is a couple years old now, and the end of the story is that nothing else happened. It was so unbelievably awful and out of left field that Jeremy and I were both too stunned to speak. And heres the thing all this time later, I still dont know what to say.

How do you defend people escaping war-torn countries to someone who would clearly rather those people stay home and die? I dont think you can.

Ive spent a lot of time this week thinking about local mom Kym Porter, who has been extremely active in her advocacy for people who use drugs ever since her son died of an accidental opioid overdose. I had mentioned to her a few weeks ago that I was planning to write about addiction at some point soon, and I was going to use the need for supervised consumption sites as the foundation of my piece.

Then this week happened.

Not only did Premier Jason Kenney suggest relocation or closure of sites in a Tuesday announcement, he showed his true feelings about those battling addiction when he tweeted out one of the most vile columns ever written, authored by a man who was trying to set a record for ways you can dehumanize people in one sitting.

And so, instead of going through the usual process of collecting information for Laying it Out, I havent been able to get the story out of my head of that time a man Id just met offered up his pure hatred of refugees as if we were discussing our favourite colours. What can I possibly say to those who oppose supervised consumption to convince them of its life-saving necessity when all too many of those people would rather addicts not be saved at all?

If the premier of Alberta believes in an invasion of meth heads who are out of their bloody mind and then refers to the NDPs callousness and regressiveness in setting up drug sites, I think its fair to say hes not the only one who feels this way about addiction.

Youre welcome to wait for the results of the panel report that had strict instructions not to include harm reduction in its findings, but at this point I feel like we can surmise Kenneys plan for supervised consumption without wondering if Albertas 4,587 reversed overdoses and zero deaths matter to him. Even if the benefits of keeping everyone alive were laid out in terms of cost savings, I dont think it would outweigh the disdain for the drug users very existence.

So if we cant even come together in agreement on these peoples value as human beings, let alone how to help them not die, maybe its time we find a new approach. I might see them as victims worth saving, and you might see them as low-life criminals, but we can all agree that society has failed in dealing with the problem.

And if the argument over supervised consumption doesnt convince you of the need for systemic change, then what else do you need? Examples of this systems failures are piling up everywhere but a consumption site takes one of the harshest realities and concentrates it into one spot, focusing everyones attention all at once.

So the question is, What are we looking at?

Are we looking at societys worst, or the worst thing about society? Are we looking at people who deserve jail but not life, or the failure of a decades-long war on drugs?

Do you see a need to go full United States and start imprisoning en masse with minimum punishments that equal our current life sentences? Or do you see the result of a revolving-door jail system that has no historic evidence of reducing drug use, or crime?

Is this just people too stupid or lazy to succeed? Or is this decades of income inequality manifested into poverty at its most tragic, rock-bottom level?

No matter how you view it, supervised consumption is one of the purest examples we have of society going wrong, and our current governments plan to deal with that is to ignore the experts and promote further hatred. Even if you love everything Kenney has said or implied, all his plan will do is take a tragic but concentrated issue and sprinkle it back around the affected cities.

It is a nothing solution to a problem that is only getting worse, and the UCP leader doesnt much care for the victims of it. That might be fine when its just unsightly low-lifes that you can assume no one else cares about either, but how will you feel if the next victim lies in the bedroom down the hall?

Will the premiers expert-ignoring plan of simply scattering the users be enough for you then?

Scott Schmidt is the layout editor at the Medicine Hat News. Contact him at sschmidt@medicinehatnews.com. All opinions are his own and do not necessarily reflect those of the News editorial board.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Originally posted here:

Laying it Out: Can't change minds? Then change the system - Medicine Hat News

Winnipeg’s crime will not be solved by cop consultation – The Manitoban

Common-sense approaches to drug and crime issues often fail to consider the history of policing, forgetting the hard lessons of the war on drugs namely the so-called iron law of prohibition, the idea that as criminalization of drug use ramps up, so does the strength and danger of drug use. Police-based solutions create a kind of arms race between the police and those who sell drugs, leading to increased militarization of both police and crime, as well as putting people who use drugs at risk by compromising the supply of drugs.

Communities should be building their capacity to take care of themselves without police involvement. There are countless opportunities represented by harm reduction strategies such as safe injection sites and serve the people initiatives like free-meal provision, mental-health supports and safe, accessible housing among others. Ultimately, the goal should be removing the conditions that create these issues namely poverty, an inevitable consequence of the settler-colonial capitalist system by implementing policy that works toward full employment, strengthening the social safety net and legalizing drugs.

After all, the drug and crime epidemic is not the product of people making morally poor decisions it is structural and should be approached as such. By beginning with an analysis of the issues that takes the socio-economic structures that produce such issues as its basis, we can move beyond the common-sense moralism the idea that the problem is people choosing to use drugs, or sell them, or participate in any other criminalized activity which only serves to create moral panic, villainizes people that use drugs and has historically proven ineffective in actually helping people.

As part of his anti-crime work with the community organization Point Powerline, Point Douglas community activist Sel Burrows has released part two of his three-part report on recommendations for improving safety in the downtown area. Part one which stressed disrupting criminality through the involvement of downtown residents was released in December, and part three is expected to be released in February.

Part two of the report makes several recommendations on preventing what Burrows refers to as criminal and anti-social behaviour. Many of the recommendations are geared toward building community involvement in enhancing safety downtown which in itself is unproblematic. Where problems begin to appear is in the nature of the involvement being put forward.

Underneath this series of seemingly common sense, easy to implement recommendations is an approach to drugs and safety that primarily benefits property owners who face declining property values from high rates of crime at the cost of people that use drugs and other groups of marginalized people who would likely face the negative impacts of increased policing. When approaching issues of safety, we need to centre on the fact that the police in Canada are a settler-colonial institution that functions to maintain structural oppression by force. The police are an instrument of social control above all else.

Recommendations such as setting up a tipline specifically for taxi drivers to inform police about potential crimes make sense, but only if you accept that policing, and ultimately the law, can be used toward ends that are beneficial to the community not just to property owners. The decades-long experience of the war on drugs has demonstrated that actions based on such assumptions only serve to make drug use more dangerous and increase the militarization of the police, making the city far more dangerous for the marginalized people who usually bear the brunt of police violence.

To be blunt, no property in owners or thieves hands is worth more than the lives of people who use drugs, nor the lives of the marginalized people that tend to live in areas hard-hit by crime. No progressive solution to the current drug and crime epidemic should involve the police, rather, we should be excluding them.

Further, according to a recent poll conducted by the Angus Reid Institute, trust in the criminal justice system in Manitoba is the lowest in the country.

If we want to help make our communities safer, we should start by listening to them to understand why this lack of trust exists, and proceed together from there instead of insisting on continued police involvement even as a last resort as Burrowss report does.

When approaching social issues like crime and drug use, its not enough to count on the systems that produced the issues to resolve them.

We need to go outside of established institutions and build our own working-class institutions. Building a larger police presence may achieve some extent of immediate results, but we need to ask questions about what this does on a structural level.

Go here to see the original:

Winnipeg's crime will not be solved by cop consultation - The Manitoban

Drugs and gambling should be legal but tightly regulated- the government’s treatment of both shows grotesque failure – inews

OpinionThese two popular pastimes leave a trail of devastated lives. Yet one is sanctioned by the state, the other treated as a pariah

Sunday, 26th January 2020, 4:25 pm

Lewis Keogh seemed to have everything. He had a good job, his own flat in Leeds, a loving family and close friends. One day he told his father Peter that he had a bit of a gambling problem while they watched a football match. It was just in passing, said the retired publishing executive from County Fermanagh. I knew him as a very grounded guy, very strong-minded, and he said hed kicked it so it seemed ok. But it was not. Lewis, like many problem gamblers, hid the shame and torment over his inability to control a compulsion that led to huge losses.

At the age of 34, this likeable man took his own life. One more tragedy tied to an industry that has grown richer, smarter and far more pervasive in society as it exploits technological advances to snare players and swell profits. After his death, Peter understood why his son was playing their shared online Scrabble games in the middle of the night. He could not sleep since he was playing online poker. Now Headingley, his former amateur football team, wear the logo of Gambling With Lives, a campaign group set up by bereaved parents, on their shirts. What lovely contrast to all those professional clubs with grubby gambling shirt deals.

Lewis left behind a note with Addiction is cruel written in big letters. He was right - it is a horrible affliction for any human being to suffer, especially when the hook is so hard to evade. I have spoken to many addicts, seen too many lives wrecked by this awful condition. Yet just imagine if Burnley was backed by LoveHeroin rather than LoveBet, or Stoke City wore Drugs365 not Bet365 on their shirts? Sounds daft, doesnt it? Yet since talking to Peter and other parents who faced similar plight after writing a column last month on our corrosive betting culture, I have been wondering if there is really much difference between gambling and drug-taking?

i's opinion newsletter: talking points from today

Both activities start as something fun. In Lewiss case, something as innocuous as playing the machines in an Enniskillen arcade every day while waiting for the bus back to his rural home aged twelve. For many people these things remain fun, a harmless way to pass time with pals that leaves little deep trace on their lives. But for a substantial minority, this fun turns into something much darker, a devastating form of mental illness that can destroy families and careers. For a significant minority, this pastime proves fatal. They end up dead, whether through sudden overdose or sad suicide in some lonely spot.

The big difference is legal status. Betting used to be grudgingly allowed and tightly controlled until 2007, when Tony Blair foolishly unleashed the sector just as online gaming turned it into an activity available at all times and for all ages. As one critic said, this was analogue reform at dawn of the digital age - and it proved disastrous as the industry adopted the tricks of social media to lure, capture and keep players. Now gambling is not just permitted but heavily promoted, spreading its tentacles through sports such as football that always seem to put money before morality. The legacy is an estimated 500 suicides a year - many of them young men, their sense of self-worth crushed by fear they can never escape the betting demon.

Drugs, by contrast, are banned - except for alcohol, of course. This is flawed policy. Look at the millions using them - or the falling prices and rising purity of cocaine. Drugs kill more people - in Britain, at least, since we are responsible for one-third of drug-related deaths in Western Europe due to political obsession with prohibition. Many die due to illegality, since users do not know what they ingest and are often scared to seek help. Then there is the linked violence as crooks fight to control a lucrative trade. Mike Barton, former chief constable of Durham, explained on BBC Question Time how prohibition inevitably leads to more violence and recruitment of children. This is a Darwinian spiral of violence, he said. We are never going to arrest ourselves out of this problem.

Boris Johnsons stance, like so many other politicians since Richard Nixon started the daft War on Drugs, is to promise tougher action. This only shows weakness, since the really tough action would be to push sensible reform that could save lives of citizens. But far easier to spout the usual hollow platitudes. So the prime minister recently told breakfast television: I want to see crime come down. I want to see the county lines drugs gangs wound up.they are killing young kids. We all want to see crime come down, Boris Johnson. But I believe it is Westminster in effect killing kids with its stubborn refusal to reform failed policies, as highlighted so brilliantly by Barton.

These two popular pastimes leave a trail of devastated lives and dead bodies. Yet one is sanctioned by the state, even spraying vast sums of money around politics and sport; the other treated as a pariah, a prop for politicians to pose as hard guys even when they have dabbled themselves in the past. There are differences: one blots out mental pain, the other offers false hope. Yet the reality is that both these money-spinning activities should be treated in similar style: legal, yes, but tightly regulated, with children protected and marketing rigidly constrained like tobacco. Politicians should use the proceeds of high taxes on their products to fund major expansion of treatment facilities to help the inevitable casualties.

Ultimately there is one giant similarity between drugs and gambling: they show grotesque political failure with horrible and sometimes fatal consequences. What are the odds of Westminster waking up to rectify its mistakes?

A long shot, Id say - but happy to lose that bet.

Visit link:

Drugs and gambling should be legal but tightly regulated- the government's treatment of both shows grotesque failure - inews

Why the war on drugs must end – The Hill

Theres a dangerous myth in sections of the public that the war on drugs is coming to an end. Its an idea that as cannabis legalization sweeps across the U.S. and many other nations around the world, legal prohibitions against drug use and abuse will soon be reduced or removed entirely.

In reality, the drug war has never been more ferocious, targeting minorities and the most vulnerable in the U.S. and abroad. In the U.S. in 2018, there were more arrests for marijuana than in 2017, despite 11 states now allowing legal cannabis for citizens over 21 years of age. The FBI released figures that detailed 663,367 marijuana arrests in the country in 2018. The majority of Americans, according to a number of polls in the last years, now support marijuana legalization.

Americans should be outraged that police departments across the country continue to waste tax dollars and limited law enforcement resources on arresting otherwise law-abiding citizens for simple marijuana possession, National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Executive Director Erik Altieri said.

Cannabis is just the tip of the drug war iceberg. Although President Donald Trump has spoken regularly about escalating the war on drugs, blaming Mexico and drug cartels on the huge amounts of illicit substances entering the U.S., including heroin, cocaine, opioids and fentanyl, he ignores the elephant in the room: Millions of Americans want and need illegal drugs and illegality wont stop them. According to a recent report from the RAND corporation, in 2016 alone U.S. citizens spent $150 billion on cannabis, cocaine, heroin and methamphetamines.

The opioid epidemic is the worst drug crisis in the countrys history, killing hundreds of thousands of people and costing trillions of dollars. It was partly caused by pharmaceutical companies that saw an opportunity to make a fortune. Some of the biggest players, such as the Sackler family, are set to walk away from multibillion dollar settlements with billions of dollars still in their bank accounts.

Ive spent the last five years investigating the drug war around the world, and what Ive seen shocked me. Think of Honduras, a nation wracked by extreme violence and gang warfare. Much of the cocaine flowing into the U.S. from South America transits through Honduras, and the effect is a narco-state fully backed by the Trump administration (and the Obama White House before them). I witnessed what hundreds of millions of dollars of U.S. military support has created in the Central American state, a population thats fleeing its borders in huge numbers. Honduras is a failed state, partly destroyed by the immense power of drug cartels and criminal gangs to control the huge cocaine trade.The President Donald Trump era is seeing many vulnerable Honduran refugees being sent back to Honduras where they face threats and death.

Guinea-Bissau in West Africa is a key cocaine transit hub between South America and Europe. Labelled a narco-state by the UN,last year saw the countrys biggest ever drug bust, nearly two tonnes of cocaine. Although the nation doesnt suffer the same debilitating violence experienced by Honduras, ongoing political instability ensures that drug cartels view Guinea-Bissau as ripe for abuse.

In the Philippines under President Rodrigo Duterte, at least 30,000 mostly poor civilians have been murdered in the last three and a half years. Duterte remains a popular leader, able to convince a fearful population that his deadly approach on methamphetamine users will bring societal renewal. The Philippines is what happens when a war on drugs becomes quasi-genocidal.

In the UK, conservative governments have continued to punish the most vulnerable people with drug dependence. While drug use and abuse is soaring in the UK, the so-called Uberisation of the drug trade in Britain has made it the cocaine capital of Europe, vast parts of the country are being lost to devastating austerity policies. These harsh economic cuts are directly tied to unhealthy use and abuse of cocaine, heroin and other illicit substances.The newly elected Boris Johnson government is deaf to the need for radical changes around drug prohibition.

A range of solutions

Despite the ugliness that exists around the drug war, there are encouraging signs of hope. Most of the Democratic candidates for President in 2020 have drug policies that were unimaginable just four years ago. Tulsi Gabbard wants to decriminalize drugs like cocaine and heroin. Bernie Sanders advocates federal cannabis legalisation by executive order, ending the war on drugs, eliminating private prisons and reparations for communities disproportionately affected by the drug war (largely minorities and people of color).

Joe Bidens position on cannabis appears to be that he doesnt support full legalization (making him an outlier in the Democratic field). Elizabeth Warren has been vocal in her opposition to the war on drugs, backs legalised cannabis and safe injecting centres (a practice that already exists successfully in Europe and Australia).

One of the more exciting aspects of future U.S. drug policy revolves around the medical use of psychedelic drugs such as LSD, ecstasy and psilocybin (magic mushrooms). Lastyear, Oakland became the second U.S. city (after Denver) to decriminalise magic mushrooms. The potential use of these drugs to treat mental health issues, PTSD, addictions and end-of-life trauma are profound, and scientific studies concur. Ecstasy could be legally available through a registered doctor by the beginning of next decade.

Of course, drug legalization is only one aspect of changing societal attitudes towards drugs. The stigmas and stereotypes around drug use and abuse, pushed by many in the media for decades, must change. How we think, write and talk about drugs has contributed to politicians believing that they could prosecute a racialized drug war for over 100 years. For example, racial bias is endemic within the management of the opioid crisis in the U.S.; white sufferers are benefitting from doctors prescribing drugs to treat their problems while black sufferers are either ignored or denied appropriate medication.

Ending the drug war is more imaginable now than at any time in the last half century. It wont happen overnight, nor with President Donald Trump in the White House, but the appeal of harsh prohibition is dwindling. While the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) continues to receive obscenely huge amounts of government largesse, so many Americans now use and abuse drugs that its the height of futility to try and stop it. Punishing individuals who make the personal choice to consume an illicit substance has no place in the 21st century.

Antony Loewenstein is a Jerusalem-based Australian journalist who has written for The New York Times, The Guardian, the BBC, The Washington Post, The Nation, Huffington Post, Haaretz, and many others. His latest book is Pills, Powder and Smoke: Inside the Bloody War on Drugs. He's the author of Disaster Capitalism: Making a Killing Out of Catastrophe; the writer/co-producer of the associated documentary, Disaster Capitalism; and the co-director of an Al-Jazeera English film on the opioid drug tramadol. His other books include My Israel Question, The Blogging Revolution, and Profits of Doom, and he is the co-editor of the books Left Turn and After Zionism, and is a contributor to For Gods Sake.

Correction: The amount the U.S. spent in 2016 oncannabis, cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamines has been corrected.

Read this article:

Why the war on drugs must end - The Hill

[ANALYSIS] The stroke of genius in Robredo’s drug war report – Rappler

Policies ought to be informed by data. But many government officials would rather have us groping in the dark.

Nowhere is this more evident than in President Rodrigo Dutertes drug war, which started in 2016 and has since killed at least 30,000 people, according to human rights groups.

Even so, there are attempts to put some method in the madness.

Following her 18-day stint as co-chair of the Inter-agency Committee on Anti-illegal Drugs (ICAD), Vice President Leni Robredo finally released her findings on the drug war.

In a nutshell, Robredos study brought to light just how little the drug war has quelled the countrys drug problem.

But no sooner had the results been published than Duterte and his minions took turns to attack Robredo and dismiss her report.

They will do well to remember who appointed Robredo to the ICAD in the first place: Duterte himself.

Robredos report was also based wholly on government numbers, and therein lies its stroke of genius. She held up a mirror that reflected back to the drug wars principals and agents their dazzling incompetence.

Whats in the Robredo report anyway, and are the reactions valid?

Damning report

The highlight of Robredos 41-page report is a graph comparing the total amount of shabu seized by drug enforcement agencies throughout the drug war and the estimated consumption of shabu in the country (Figure 1).

Since the former is always about 1% of the latter, Robredo claimed the Duterte government has utterly failed to dent drug consumption the ultimate goal of any sensible drug policy.

This comes as no surprise. Many other countries have given up on drug wars since theyre inherently unwinnable. (READ: War on drugs? Other countries focus on demand, not supply)

Figure 1.

But where did Robredos numbers come from? Are they correct?

The short grayish blue bars in Figure 1 are straightforward: they denote seized shabu supplies based on data collected by ICAD.

The tall orange bars, meanwhile, are estimates (not actual data) of shabu consumption in the country. They came from various drug enforcement agencies which told Robredo there are about 3 million shabu users nationwide, each consuming at least one gram of shabu per week for an entire year.

My friend, UP School of Statistics Professor Peter Cayton, spotted a small error in the graph: since the 2019 data on seized shabu supplies ranged from January to October only, the corresponding orange bar should also reflect estimated consumption in those months.

Hence, rather than 156,000 kilos in 2019, it should only be 129,000 kilos (assuming 43 weeks).

But this makes little difference. Robredos key point that the governments supply interdiction efforts are minuscule compared with the extent of the countrys drug problem holds.

Groping in the dark

Robredos study should still be taken with a grain of salt because of the questionable data supplied to her by various drug enforcement agencies.

For instance, the one-gram-per-week assumption came from the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA), which has yet to validate their own estimate.

Meanwhile, the 3 million figure comes from the Philippine National Polices Drug Enforcement Group (PNP-DEG).

Duterte himself used to tout 3 to 4 million drug users, and this has since inexplicably ballooned to 7 to 8 million. Even the police are baffled: they don't know where these numbers came from.

If we use Dutertes bloated figures in the Robredo report, the success rate of the drug war will appear even smaller (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Crappy assumptions beget crappy statistical analysis, and if theres anyone to blame for Robredos study, its the various drug enforcement agencies that supplied her the data.

But the true value in Robredos report lies in exposing the fact that government, all the while, has been groping in the dark.

Were it not for Robredos prodding, relevant drug enforcement agencies would not have been compelled to churn out much-needed numbers, however imperfect. Either these agencies dont know how to crunch the numbers, or theyre hiding their incompetence and vested interests or both.

Government cannot truly say the campaign is working without these baseline numbers, Robredo said in her report.

For bringing back evidence-based policy-making into the drug war discourse, Robredo deserves all the praise.

Debunking the reactions

Rather than embrace Robredos findings open-mindedly, a number of government officials instead rejected them flatly and pettily often using fallacious arguments. Lets debunk some here.

The PDEA chief unsurprisingly railed against the study, saying Robredo dismissed and ignored all of our governments accomplishments and efforts for the past 3 years in a mere political attack. But Robredos report did mention the efforts of various drug enforcement agencies. It so happens theyre insignificant next to the problem in our hands.

The PNPs officer-in-charge, meanwhile, said that the drug wars success is proven by a recent survey which showed that 8 in 10 Filipinos are satisfied with the drug war. But just because a policy is popular doesnt mean its correct or appropriate.

The PNP spokesperson also boasted theres no more local manufacturing of shabu, and they consider that a 100% success rate. But illegal drugs are still being smuggled into the country mostly from China.

House Speaker Alan Cayetano agreed with Robredos wish for better data, but said its very unfair to blame government since its near impossible these days to get accurate drug consumption data.

But thats just it: Dutertes drug war is compromising data collection. Virtually nobody today will admit using drugs to a stranger holding a clipboard.

Some senators also chimed in. Senator Tito Sotto III tweeted, War vs Drugs fails only when you stop fighting. Senator Panfilo Lacson minced words by saying, The war against illegal drugs is a continuing fight and, therefore, I would rather say, it has not been successful enough, rather than call it a failure. But Dutertes drug war like any other war cannot go on indefinitely, especially if demonstrably futile.

Manila Mayor Isko Moreno said in an interview with ANC hes uncomfortable with Robredos statements, and he found them off-putting especially if you think of the police risking their lives in the frontlines. But this is an appeal to emotion. Just because the study contains uncomfortable data doesnt make it any less valid.

Finally, Baguio City Mayor Benjamin Magalong, a former police officer, said the drug wars success cant be measured by statistics. But whats the alternative? Hunches? Beliefs? Gut feel?

Piercing the veil

Note that Duterte himself said on multiple occasions that his drug war has failed.

Note, too, that most of the criticisms hurled against Robredo are coming from government agencies that risk having lower budgets if the drug war stops, or from allies who need to stay on Dutertes good side for their own political survival.

For too long Dutertes war on drugs has hidden behind a veil of fear, lies, and misconceptions. Its high time for facts and statistics to pierce that veil. Robredos report is a step in that direction. Rappler.com

The author is a PhD candidate at the UP School of Economics. His views are independent of the views of his affiliations. Follow JC on Twitter (@jcpunongbayan) and Usapang Econ (usapangecon.com).

Here is the original post:

[ANALYSIS] The stroke of genius in Robredo's drug war report - Rappler

A wallflower’s report on the war on drugs – The Manila Times

YEN MAKABENTA

First wordI AM asked by readers why I have not contributed my thoughts on Vice President (VP) Maria Leonor Robredos earthshaking report on the administrations war on drugs.

I refrained from comment for two reasons.

First, I find it difficult to give credence to VP Robredos report because she was never formally appointed to either 1) help in the implementation of the drug control program; or 2) investigate the ongoing drug war like an appointed commission of inquiry or public investigator.

If the report is the result of her 18-day stint as co-chairman of the Inter-Agency Committee on Anti-illegal Drugs (ICAD), I will ask how so brief an assignment enabled her to gain so much information and insights into the program that she can pronounce judgment over it

ICADs mission is mainly to coordinate the work of various government agencies that are involved in one way or another in the campaign against illegal drugs, such as the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA), the Dangerous Drugs Board (DDB), the Philippine National Police (PNP), and the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP). Policy-making for the drug program is vested in the DDB, as established by law. Implementation of drug policy is principally the work of PDEA, again as set by law.

At ICAD, Robredos work was peripheral to what was going on or had gone on in the program. She had no authority to do an investigation, let alone an extensive inquiry. She could ask for records of this and that or throw a few questions. But rendering an evaluation of the whole program was not part of her job description. She took on this assignment on her own volition.

Second, Robredo assumed that as ICAD vice chairman, she could make policy on her own with respect to the drug campaign, and that she could render an evaluation of the drug program.

But nothing in the work of ICAD covers these, they were entirely in the VPs imagination.

Commission of inquiryIt was not as if VP Robredo was asked by the President or Congress to head a commission of inquiry into the war on drugs, in much the same way that President Marcos created the Agrava Commission to conduct an inquiry and formal investigation of the assassination of former senator Benigno Aquino Jr. on Aug. 23, 1983.

If such a commission of inquiry were created for the drug war, the nation would justifiably have looked forward to its report on the investigation.

Robredos stint at ICAD is not even comparable to an investigation by a congressional committee on the drug war. This too would have conducted hearings and called witnesses. The public would be justified to look forward to the committee report.

In truth, Robredos report is really more like a piece of investigative journalism conducted on the war on drugs. It is similar to the reports of local and foreign media organizations that sought to take the measure of the drug campaign at various stages over the past three years.

As such, the Robredo inquiry would have been subject to the limitations and prejudgments that such independent inquiries fall into.

Would-be anti-drug czarWhen President Duterte designated Vice President Robredo as vice chairman of ICAD, she hurtled like a cannonball out of the appointment system, it was impossible even for a media organization like The Manila Times to keep track of what she was doing and of her many plans and initiatives.

First, Robredo declared that there should be no more deaths in anti-drug operations. She suggested that it was time to scrap Oplan Tokhang from the drug campaign because it was anti-poor and should be replaced. She apparently thought that she had been handed the authority to make policy in the anti-drug campaign.

Second, she got headlines when she said she was planning her own drug war and demanded that she be given a free hand in handling the drug menace in the country, free from interference by quarterbackers.

And then, she started meeting with officials of the United States and the United Nations.

When PDEA Director General Aaron Aquino, who co-heads ICAD with Robredo, challenged her to join an operation in the drug war, she readily agreed.

We are not backing down from a challenge. For me, whats important is what will be the result of the operation? Not who is there, she said.

Hollow appointmentFor all the flurry of activities, however, the ICAD appointment was essentially hollow. There was no clear light on the position she was supposedly appointed to and the duties and responsibilities that she was taking on.

Up to the end of her 18-day stint, Robredo never got the document that identified the scope of her responsibilities as co-chairman of ICAD, a position that is non-existent in the original executive order that created the inter-agency body.

But the lady was unfazed.

She declared: I dont want to waste time, so on the day that I accepted the designation, I already buckled down to work.

Her excitement was understandable.

She was waiting eagerly for another opportunity to join the Duterte administration, especially the Cabinet. She remembered her misery when she lost her place in the Cabinet after President Duterte took offense over some of her antics and statements, and fired her.

So this time around, the Vice President was determined to make a success of her second chance to serve in the Duterte Cabinet.

She glossed over the fact that the executive order creating ICAD does not create a post for a vice chairman. It includes many government agencies, but makes no mention of the vice president.

In effect, what really happened was that the vice president was being designated to serve in a temporary capacity, much like being given a chore to do. This happens all the time in the executive branch of government; the president designates executive officials to perform various tasks temporarily.

A wallflower in the drug warIn the total scheme of things in the campaign against illegal drugs, VP Robredo was really no more than a wallflower who had been given a fancy assignment in the campaign, but no real functions to fill. She was superfluous in the campaign.

She continued to be officially the Vice President, of course, but she had nothing to do with the drug campaign. No one reported to her, She did not even have an office as vice chairman. All she had was her grim determination to make a resounding success of her stint at ICAD.

Making a full-blown report on the drug war is one of her personal measures of being a success.

This is why, at the very start of her ICAD stint, she threatened to send a report on the drug war ever week to President Duterte. This way, she would demonstrate how hard she was working.

At the same time, she would also issue a press release or statement every day on what she was doing or what was in her mind.

All this vanished overnight when President Duterte suddenly decided to cut short her stint as ICAD vice chairman, just 18 days after her designation.

A problem of credenceOf what value then is her much-publicized report on the drug war, which declared it to be a massive failure?

I frankly cannot take the Robredo report on the drug war seriously, because I do not see in the record any effort or activity on her part that could have enabled her to achieve a full picture or privileged insight into the three-year campaign. She heard no testimony or quizzed any witnesses to piece together her report. She based everything on what was reportedly passed on to her when she was ICAD vice chairman, and on what was already in her mind from the very start.

In my view, VP Robredo was no more than a wallflower in the war on drugs who performed no essential task or function.

Being superfluous to the whole operation and her designation lasting no more than 18 days, Robredo has nothing substantive to report to the nation.

Would you turn to a wallflower to report on what happened at the prom or the dance?

Of course not.

[emailprotected]

Read this article:

A wallflower's report on the war on drugs - The Manila Times

Pilot of L.A.’s cannabis program must overcome stumbles, fury and threats – Los Angeles Times

When Cat Packer was chosen to head a Los Angeles city department that would help usher in the legalization of marijuana, then-Council President Herb Wesson billed her appointment as a bold example of what Los Angeles stood for.

Packer had been an activist with the Drug Policy Alliance who was firmly focused on how the war on drugs had battered communities of color. She was young, black and openly gay, with tailored suits, hair cut in a fade, and the cool, deliberate speech of a lawyer, and she had wowed Wesson at City Hall when she laid out statistics about racial inequity.

The Department of Cannabis Regulation, her new agency, was not just going to hand out permits for pot shops. It was supposed to do something much more ambitious and radical: Ensure that the communities hit hardest by the criminalization of marijuana would benefit from its legalization. Many saw the effort as a kind of reparations for the drug war.

Two years later, Packer would face a furious and disappointed crowd of cannabis applicants and activists in the marble chambers of City Hall and tell them that she was disappointed too. That the city had ended up hurting hundreds of people who took financial risks as they tried to nab a limited number of licenses. That she routinely told other cities not to do what L.A. did.

Cat Packer, L.A.'s cannabis czar, faced backlash from activists and applicants after a portal for license applications opened seconds early. Now, licensing for new shops has been put on hold.

(Jason Armond / Los Angeles Times)

If Packer had once seemed to personify L.A.'s progressive vision for cannabis, she was now the public face of its stumbles in realizing that goal. Licensing for new shops had been put on hold. Wesson and Mayor Eric Garcetti had called for an audit. Packer was being berated by cannabis activists at public meetings and facing threats in her inbox.

Its one thing to pass an equitable policy, she told the crowd of applicants and activists. Its another thing in its entirety for it to be implemented.

**

Cat was not the name she was given when she was born in Germany, a military kid who was shuttled to Virginia, Arizona and Virginia again. Her mother still calls her Rina, a shortening of the German version of her name.

As a young teen, she turned to the police department to report being sexually assaulted by an officer, but the charges were ultimately dropped for insufficient evidence. Packer said that friends of the officer were involved in the investigation and even her attorney said it would be her word against his. It was an early experience, she said, of feeling let down by those in power.

Thats part of what led me to want to be an attorney, Packer said. I knew that I did not have to make the same decisions that they made.

After reporting the assault, Packer left Virginia to join her father in Ohio, where she would go on to college, grad school and law school at Ohio State University. She had envisioned herself fighting for marriage equality when she took a course on marijuana policy while reading Michelle Alexanders The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness.

The words in one passage rang in her head: Nothing has contributed more to the systematic mass incarceration of people of color in the United States than the war on drugs. Yet her privileged classmates casually smoked pot, and cannabis was already becoming a legal business in some states.

Part of what was so astonishing to me, Packer said, was how easy it was for us to shift public policy when there was profit as a motive. In Ohio, an initiative to legalize a limited number of marijuana growers was headed for the ballot, a proposal criticized by some activists as setting up a monopoly.

Packer recalled sparring with a campaign official when he visited her class, pointing out to him that this initiative wasnt going to do anything for people of color. When her professor, Doug Berman, stopped her after class and urged her to go to work for the campaign once she graduated, Packer said she asked, Why?

Her seriousness of purpose was evident from the get-go, Berman recalled of his former student. He argued that, despite the shortcomings that Packer had pinpointed, the campaign would teach her things she couldnt learn in a classroom.

She could have reacted by saying, These folks are never going to get it, Berman said. Instead, she joined the campaign as its assistant director of internal communications a position she said amounted to doing just about everything.

The Ohio initiative ultimately failed. Packer had gotten back into grass-roots organizing in Ohio when she saw that the Drug Policy Alliance, a group seeking to reduce criminalization in drug policy, was hosting a strategy session in New York called Drug Policy Reform Is Racial Justice Reform. She hitched a Megabus east with a file folder loaded with business cards and copies of her resume.

The bus broke down, but she was still the first person to arrive at the conference. Lynne Lyman, the former California state director of the Drug Policy Alliance, said she immediately knew that Packer was the person who would help her secure passage of Proposition 64 the 2016 measure to legalize recreational pot and swiftly hired her as campaign coordinator.

In her new job, Packer soon began reaching out to cities about local programs to ensure social equity. Just months after Packer had moved to Los Angeles, she went to City Hall to urge L.A. to put equity at the forefront of its cannabis regulations, recounting statistics about black people being disproportionately arrested on marijuana charges.

When she stopped talking, Wesson piped up from his seat, Hey, Cat, do you have a resume? You just impress the hell out of me. Send one to me, please.

A cannaboss coffee mug sits in Cat Packers office. As a millennial queer woman of color, Packer says, Im trying to be my truest self in ways that are going to be advantageous for the communities that I serve.

(Jason Armond / Los Angeles Times)

***

When Packer was chosen to head the Department of Cannabis Regulation, many were elated. Kika Keith, a South L.A. resident who wants to open a shop selling cannabis-infused beverages, said it was the same kind of hope she once had about another young, vibrant black leader Barack Obama and that it had ended in the same disappointment.

I still have love for her. I think shes a brilliant person, Keith said. But she failed us.

Packer said she should have done a better job at managing expectations about a program that would never provide licenses for everyone who wanted them and that moved slower than they had hoped. But many of the problems now roiling the department were rooted in decisions made years earlier, she said, some before she was even appointed.

Under rules approved by the City Council, the Department of Cannabis Regulation had to first grant approval to existing shops that had followed city rules, then the growers and manufacturers who had supplied them, before it could start licensing new operators like Keith.

It was a huge task for a fledgling department with only a handful of employees in January 2018. No one could have done what they were asking her to do, said Adam Spiker, executive director of the cannabis industry group Southern California Coalition.

As the department struggled to get through the paperwork for hundreds of businesses, more than a year and a half passed before it was ready to start licensing new shops under its social equity program, which was meant to help those hit hardest by the war on drugs. Many of those entrepreneurs, eager to grab coveted storefronts, were already forking over steep rents.

Amid pleas for the city to get moving, Wesson moved to set a hard deadline for the next round of licensing. L.A. ended up moving forward with the process before it had set up most of its programs to help train and guide applicants in its social equity program, which is meant to help people from communities disproportionately affected by marijuana criminalization. That decision, Packer later said, left those entrepreneurs vulnerable to predatory practices from corporate investors and landlords

If the city and Herb Wesson were serious about social equity, they would have funded it first, Lyman said, pointing out that the bulk of the funding for the program was not provided until midway through 2019. Instead they pressured her to give out licenses without a program being developed.

Packer had also raised concerns about another fateful decision: Council members decided that a limited number of licenses for new shops would be handed out on a first-come, first-served basis, in what Spiker later called a fastest computer contest. L.A. was flooded with hundreds of applications in minutes, far exceeding the available licenses.

In October, after activists released a video showing someone accessing the system early, Packer publicly stated that two people had gotten in minutes early after resetting passwords but were pushed back in line to where they would have been if theyd started right on time. But a top aide to Wesson privately told an applicant that more people had gotten in early.

You gotta be completely transparent about what happened. You cant omit information, right? Andrew Westall said on a video of that discussion, recorded without his knowledge. Because as my wife always tells me, its still lying if you dont tell me.

In December, days before parts of that video were released, the department confirmed the system had opened a little early and a dozen more people had gotten in seconds before the 10 a.m. start time. City officials said those applicants also were bumped back, but Keith and other applicants felt that Packer had lied to them.

Theres no trust there, said Virgil Grant, a cannabis industry leader who had pushed for the social equity program. They were covering up when they should have been honest.

Packer said when she spoke in October, department officials saw early access as people getting into the system before it was activated, not before 10 a.m. Still, I wish that I could have communicated and would have communicated things better, she said.

Local activists have also questioned whether L.A.'s program will ultimately help people of color, whose communities bore the brunt of the drug war. Grant has repeatedly drawn attention to the number of likely licensees with Armenian surnames.

The program does not single out anyone by race and cannot do so under California law. It is aimed at poor people with marijuana arrests, as well as people who have lived in areas heavily affected by such arrests.

Packer pointed out that researchers had pinpointed the policing districts where marijuana arrests were especially steep, but the council based its program on ZIP Codes a decision that ended up looping in areas such as Los Feliz, where arrests werent as common. If cities want to target black and brown communities, Packer said, we have to be surgical with our approach.

**

One of the enduring concerns among activists is whether Packer was vocal enough about such concerns as the council hammered out and tweaked its rules. She should have pushed back, Grant said. Dont explain to the council after the fact.

Packer said she preferred to advocate privately with council members and to mobilize community members to push publicly for needed changes. When her department was short on staff, for instance, cannabis activists turned up at City Hall to prod the council for more resources. Many blame city leaders for not equipping her department properly.

They definitely set her up to fail, said Luis Rivera, who once worked for Mayor Eric Garcetti and now heads a nonprofit that assists social equity applicants. But he argued that Packer could have been more forceful in insisting that the city have assistance programs up and running before new shops could apply.

Wesson and other officials picked a token person they felt they could work with because of her inexperience at City Hall, Rivera said. Lyman likewise said that because Packer was young and didnt have any political connections of her own, City Council felt like they could push her around.

Wesson has declined to be interviewed about Packer while the audit of the application process requested by Garcetti is pending. When the video of Westall came out, a Wesson spokesman said their office had met with concerned applicants in confidence to hear their grievances and assure them we will do everything possible to restore trust and integrity to the application process.

Outraged applicants have flocked to City Hall, denouncing the process as tainted. At the last meeting of the Cannabis Regulation Commission, industry activist Donnie Anderson declared that if nothing was fixed, its gonna be 1992 all over again an allusion to the violence that roiled South L.A. after officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King.

Spiker, of the Southern California Coalition, said the city was bad at managing expectations about the program but so were cannabis consultants who led people to bank on getting a license. In the face of overwhelming demand, you had a minute chance, Spiker said. Was anyone talking about that? No.

For Packer, the pressures of the job are compounded by the historic nature of her appointment. She said her impeccable suits are, in part, a rejoinder to the college advisor at Ohio State who insisted Packer would have to wear skirts in the workplace.

Its also a form of professional armor as a millennial queer woman of color.

Im trying to be my truest self in ways that are going to be advantageous for the communities that I serve, she said. The concern is that if I do something thats too radical, theyre not letting any more young people in here, theyre not letting any more queer people in here, theyre not letting any more black people in here, and the women gotta watch out.

But Packer doesnt regret taking the job. We have to be willing to take on the tough jobs, she said. Theres no substitute for the work. We can pontificate all we want. But someone has to do the work.

Link:

Pilot of L.A.'s cannabis program must overcome stumbles, fury and threats - Los Angeles Times

The rise in meth and cocaine overdoses, explained – Vox.com

Americas drug overdose crisis is still largely dominated by opioid overdose deaths. But stimulants like cocaine and especially methamphetamine seem poised for a comeback.

Provisional federal data suggests that national overdose deaths linked to psychostimulants, such as meth, spiked by more than 21 percent from 2017 to 2018. Overdose deaths linked to cocaine increased by around 5 percent.

That isnt the only evidence: A recent research letter published in JAMA Network Open analyzing more than 1 million drug testing results from routine health care settings found positive hits for meth were up nearly 487 percent from 2013 to 2019, and positive hits for cocaine were up nearly 21 percent.

Experts worry that the numbers for stimulants could foreshadow a larger epidemic a potential fourth wave in the overdose crisis thats killed more than 700,000 people in the US since 1999.

Every opioid epidemic in American history has been followed by a stimulant epidemic, Stanford drug policy expert Keith Humphreys told me.

The numbers for meth and cocaine are still dwarfed by opioids. In 2018, there were more than 13,000 estimated overdose deaths linked to stimulants, particularly meth, and more than 15,700 linked to cocaine, according to the provisional data. Meanwhile, there were nearly 48,000 overdose deaths linked to opioids. Synthetic opioids excluding methadone a category that mainly captures fentanyl were associated with more than double the fatal overdoses linked to cocaine or meth alone. (Theres some overlap between drugs in the figures, because overdoses can involve multiple drugs.)

But there are reasons to believe the crisis is broader than just opioids. A 2018 study in Science found that, while drug overdose deaths spiked in the 1990s and 2000s with the opioid epidemic, there has been exponential growth in overdose deaths since 1979. That suggests that Americas drug problem is getting worse in general, regardless of which drug is involved.

My question: Why are we as a country vulnerable to all of these drugs? Nora Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, told me. What has happened that has made it possible for these drugs to take hold in a dramatic way?

The answers to those questions could require a shift in how America approaches drugs, focusing not just on the substances making headlines but also addiction more broadly and the causes of addiction. It would mean building a comprehensive addiction treatment system thats equipped to deal with all kinds of drugs. And it could require looking at issues that arent seemingly drug-related at first, like whether socioeconomic and cultural forces are driving people to use more drugs.

In the 1960s and 70s, heroin was the big drug of public concern. In the 1980s, it was crack cocaine. In the 1990s and early 2000s, it was meth. Over the past decade and a half, opioid painkillers, heroin, and then fentanyl became the center of Americas drug problem.

Its not clear if the next phase is here yet opioids are still a huge problem but the worry is stimulants will start to pick up if opioids plateau and fall.

The drugs are driven by fads, a little bit of fashion, Volkow said. So you have eras when you have a flourishing of a particular drug and then another one takes over.

According to experts, there are many reasons for that. One is supply. Starting with the launch of OxyContin in 1996, there was a huge proliferation of opioid painkillers, letting people try and misuse the drugs. That was followed by waves of heroin and fentanyl as traffickers tried to capitalize on the demand for opioids jump-started by painkillers. Some research shows the supply of prescription opioids was a key driver in the rise of the current overdose crisis.

There are now reports of drug cartels producing and shipping more meth than before across the US-Mexico border a shift from the homegrown market of the 1990s and 2000s. And in general, illicit drugs have become cheaper and, in some cases, more potent over time. Federal data tracking the street price and potency of the drugs tells the story: In 1986, for example, meth was on average $575 per pure gram and on average at 52 percent purity; in 2012, it was $194 per pure gram and 91 percent purity. The price drop is similar for other drugs, though purity levels have fluctuated depending on the substance.

This makes it cheaper for someone to start using drugs. The central focus of the US war on drugs for decades has been to prevent this by fighting drug traffickers and dealers but its failed as drug cartels have consistently remained ahead of the authorities, bolstered by new technologies and globalization making it cheaper and easier to ship drugs around the world.

New demand for drugs is also a major factor for new epidemics as people could, for example, want to supplant or enhance their opioid use with stimulants. Maybe they mix opioids with cocaine (a speedball) or meth (a goofball) because they like the mixed effects. Maybe they use stimulants after heroin or fentanyl to wake themselves up. Maybe they want to stop using opioids, whether due to the risk of overdose or some other reason, and believe stimulants are a better option.

People get tired of it have been there, done that, and move on, Steven Shoptaw, a psychologist and researcher at UCLA, told me. There is some of that with all addictions. Some people walk away from [opioid addiction], which is great. But then they walk away from it by using stimulants.

Humphreys noted an important factor in this cycle: Probably more Americans than ever know a drug dealer. As millions of Americans have misused and gotten addicted to opioids, theyve established ties with drug dealers that they didnt have before. That makes it easier to go from heroin or fentanyl to meth or cocaine.

Underlying all of this, Volkow argued, is a sense that something deeper has gone wrong in society. She pointed to the research by Princeton economists Anne Case and Angus Deaton showing that theres been a rise in deaths of despair drug overdoses, but also alcohol-related mortality and suicides. Case and Deaton have pinned the rise on all sorts of issues, including the collapse of economic opportunities in much of the country, a growing sense of social isolation, and untreated mental health issues.

If all of these social factors were there, and we didnt have the supply of drugs, of course people would not be dying of overdoses, Volkow said. But it is the confluence of the widespread markets of drugs that are very accessible and very potent and the social-cultural factors that are making people despair and seek out these drugs as a way of escaping.

One caveat to all of this: Not every place in the US is following the same drug trends. According to the Science study and the provisional federal data, meth has historically been more popular in the southwest, while fentanyl has been more widespread in the northeast. Researchers have warned that could change if, for example, fentanyl reaches California in a big way. But it goes to show that what looks like a national epidemic or trendline could also be regional epidemics, with different populations and demographics, separately rising and falling.

There are things that can be done to combat drug epidemics in general.

One option is to attempt to reduce supply, as the drug war has generally focused on for decades. Plenty of critics are extremely skeptical of this, pointing to the fact that illegal substances have only gotten cheaper and continued flowing into the US since President Richard Nixon declared a war on drugs.

But some work by Jon Caulkins, a drug policy expert at Carnegie Mellon University, indicates that prohibition makes drugs as much as 10 times more expensive than they would be otherwise making the drugs less accessible and less ripe for an epidemic. Theres a logic in that: If drug dealers and traffickers have to grow, ship, and sell drugs while actively evading law enforcement, and therefore cant built up the kind of mass production seen in legal markets, that adds costs.

Another potential policy response is to address what some experts call the root causes of drug addiction by rebuilding economic opportunities, helping people feel more connected, or addressing mental health issues. Theres some real-world evidence this could work: Iceland set up an anti-drug plan focused largely on providing kids and adolescents with after-school activities, which journalist Emma Young described as a social movement around natural highs, and saw drug use fall among younger populations in the subsequent years.

There are other possible prevention efforts, such as doctors more routinely screening for drug addictions or public awareness and education campaigns (although, as the surgeon generals 2016 addiction report cautioned, some types of campaigns work better than others).

The most impactful intervention that you can do for a medical condition is prevent it, Volkow argued.

Broadly, the US also needs to invest much more on addiction treatment. According to the surgeon generals report, only about one in 10 people with a substance use disorder obtain specialty care, largely because its inaccessible and unaffordable. More money to addiction care could help boost access, although that would have to be paired with an emphasis on more evidence-based practices.

At the same time, a one-size-fits-all approach for all drugs is going to fall short.

For one, drugs are simply different from each other. For opioids, the biggest health risk is a fatal overdose. For stimulants like cocaine and meth, overdose is still a major concern, but the bigger health risk is the long-term damage the drugs do to the brain and cardiovascular system.

From a harm-reduction standpoint, this means that simply averting overdoses can do a lot to prevent the worst health risk of opioids, even if someone continues using for years. But for stimulants, deadly harms cant be fully reduced until levels of consumption are reduced as well. So, for example, safe consumption sites, in which trained staff supervise drug use, might have more protective benefits for opioids than stimulants. (Still, the sites can provide a lot of other services for people who use stimulants, like sterile syringes, advice on how to use as safely as possible, and a connection to addiction treatment.)

Along similar lines, treatment is, for now, more effective for opioids than it is for stimulants. For opioids, we have effective medications in buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone, which, according to studies, cut the mortality rate among opioid addiction patients by half or more and keep people in treatment better than non-medication approaches. In France, the expansion of buprenorphine was a major factor in a 79 percent drop in overdoses from 1995 to 1999.

There arent equivalent medications for stimulant addiction. In fact, the only treatment that really stands out for stimulants, according to a recent review of the research in The Lancet, is contingency management, which provides incentives, financial or otherwise, to keep people from using drugs. But this treatment is controversial not many people want to pay people who use drugs to stop using drugs. So its hugely underused in addiction treatment, outside of the Veterans Affairs health care system.

So simply building up Americas addiction treatment system isnt enough to address all of the countrys drug problems. What kinds of treatment are done and how different drugs are treated also matter. And in the case of stimulants, treatment is probably going to produce disappointing results unless treatment facilities adopt an approach many are averse to and until researchers uncover better approaches.

This is why experts and advocates have long warned about focusing too much on the drug crisis of the day. While the opioid epidemic is a problem that needs to be addressed now, its important to be realistic about what could come next and taking steps to prevent not just the current kind of drug crisis but also what could follow.

We do have a problem in the US of tending to think of one drug at a time, Humphreys said. During the 90s, everyone was worried about meth, but there were plenty of people dying of alcohol. During the 80s, crack cocaine, even though plenty of people were dying of heroin.

The recent rise in stimulant deaths, though, suggests that America remains unprepared.

The rest is here:

The rise in meth and cocaine overdoses, explained - Vox.com

Who Killed the Knapp Family? – The New York Times

YAMHILL, Ore. Chaos reigned daily on the No. 6 school bus, with working-class boys and girls flirting and gossiping and dreaming, brimming with mischief, bravado and optimism. Nick rode it every day in the 1970s with neighbors here in rural Oregon, neighbors like Farlan, Zealan, Rogena, Nathan and Keylan Knapp.

They were bright, rambunctious, upwardly mobile youngsters whose father had a good job installing pipes. The Knapps were thrilled to have just bought their own home, and everyone oohed and aahed when Farlan received a Ford Mustang for his 16th birthday.

Yet today about one-quarter of the children on that No. 6 bus are dead, mostly from drugs, suicide, alcohol or reckless accidents. Of the five Knapp kids who had once been so cheery, Farlan died of liver failure from drink and drugs, Zealan burned to death in a house fire while passed out drunk, Rogena died from hepatitis linked to drug use and Nathan blew himself up cooking meth. Keylan survived partly because he spent 13 years in a state penitentiary.

Among other kids on the bus, Mike died from suicide, Steve from the aftermath of a motorcycle accident, Cindy from depression and a heart attack, Jeff from a daredevil car crash, Billy from diabetes in prison, Kevin from obesity-related ailments, Tim from a construction accident, Sue from undetermined causes. And then theres Chris, who is presumed dead after years of alcoholism and homelessness. At least one more is in prison, and another is homeless.

We Americans are locked in political combat and focused on President Trump, but there is a cancer gnawing at the nation that predates Trump and is larger than him. Suicides are at their highest rate since World War II; one child in seven is living with a parent suffering from substance abuse; a baby is born every 15 minutes after prenatal exposure to opioids; America is slipping as a great power.

We have deep structural problems that have been a half century in the making, under both political parties, and that are often transmitted from generation to generation. Only in America has life expectancy now fallen three years in a row, for the first time in a century, because of deaths of despair.

The meaningfulness of the working-class life seems to have evaporated, Angus Deaton, the Nobel Prize-winning economist, told us. The economy just seems to have stopped delivering for these people. Deaton and the economist Anne Case, who is also his wife, coined the term deaths of despair to describe the surge of mortality from alcohol, drugs and suicide.

The kids on the No. 6 bus rode into a cataclysm as working-class communities disintegrated across America because of lost jobs, broken families, gloom and failed policies. The suffering was invisible to affluent Americans, but the consequences are now evident to all: The survivors mostly voted for Trump, some in hopes that he would rescue them, but under him the number of children without health insurance has risen by more than 400,000.

The stock market is near record highs, but working-class Americans (often defined as those without college degrees) continue to struggle. If youre only a high school graduate, or worse, a dropout, work no longer pays. If the federal minimum wage in 1968 had kept up with inflation and productivity, it would now be $22 an hour. Instead, its $7.25.

We were foreign correspondents together for many years, periodically covering humanitarian crises in distant countries. Then we would return to the Kristof family farm in Yamhill and see a humanitarian crisis unfolding in a community we loved and a similar unraveling was happening in towns across the country. This was not one towns problem, but a crisis in the American system.

Im a capitalist, and even I think capitalism is broken, says Ray Dalio, the founder of Bridgewater, the worlds largest hedge fund.

Even in this presidential campaign, the unraveling of working-class communities receives little attention. There is talk about the middle class, but very little about the working class; we discuss college access but not the one in seven children who dont graduate from high school. America is like a boat that is half-capsized, but those partying above water seem oblivious.

We have to stop being obsessed over impeachment and start actually digging in and solving the problems that got Donald Trump elected in the first place, Andrew Yang argued in the last Democratic presidential debate. Whatever you think of Yang as a candidate, on this he is dead right: We have to treat Americas cancer.

In some ways, the situation is worsening, because families have imploded under the pressure of drug and alcohol abuse, and children are growing up in desperate circumstances. One of our dearest friends in Yamhill, Clayton Green, a brilliant mechanic who was three years behind Nick in school, died last January, leaving five grandchildren and all have been removed from their parents by the state for their protection. A local school official sighs that some children are feral.

Farlan, the oldest of the Knapp children, was in Nicks grade. A talented woodworker, he dreamed of opening a business called Farlans Far Out Fantastic Freaky Furniture. But Farlan ended up dropping out of school after the ninth grade.

Although he never took high school chemistry, Farlan became a first-rate chemist: He was one of the first people in the Yamhill area to cook meth. For a time he was a successful entrepreneur known for his high quality merchandise. This is what I was made for, he once announced with quiet pride. But he abused his own drugs and by his 40s was gaunt and frail.

In some ways, he was a great dad, for he loved his two daughters, Amber and Andrea, and they idolized him. But theirs was not an optimal upbringing: In one of Ambers baby pictures, theres a plate of cocaine in the background.

Farlan died of liver failure in 2009, just after his 51st birthday, and his death devastated both daughters. Andrea, who was smart, talented, gorgeous and entrepreneurial, ran her own real estate business but accelerated her drinking after her dad died. She drank herself to death, her uncle Keylan told us. She was buried in 2013 at the age of 29.

In the 1970s and 80s it was common to hear derogatory suggestions that the forces ripping apart African-American communities were rooted in black culture. The idea was that deadbeat dads, self-destructive drug abuse and family breakdown were the fundamental causes, and that all people needed to do was show personal responsibility.

A Harvard sociologist, William Julius Wilson, countered that the true underlying problem was lost jobs, and he turned out to be right. When good jobs left white towns like Yamhill a couple of decades later because of globalization and automation, the same pathologies unfolded there. Men in particular felt the loss not only of income but also of dignity that accompanied a good job. Lonely and troubled, they self-medicated with alcohol or drugs, and they accumulated criminal records that left them less employable and less marriageable. Family structure collapsed.

It would be easy but too simplistic to blame just automation and lost jobs: The problems are also rooted in disastrous policy choices over 50 years. The United States wrested power from labor and gave it to business, and it suppressed wages and cut taxes rather than invest in human capital, as our peer countries did. As other countries embraced universal health care, we did not; several counties in the United States have life expectancies shorter than those in Cambodia or Bangladesh.

One consequence is that the bottom end of Americas labor force is not very productive, in ways that reduce our countrys competitiveness. A low-end worker may not have a high school diploma and is often barely literate or numerate while also struggling with a dependency; more than seven million Americans also have suspended drivers licenses for failing to pay child support or court-related debt, meaning that they may not reliably show up at work.

Americans also bought into a misconceived personal responsibility narrative that blamed people for being poor. Its true, of course, that personal responsibility matters: People we spoke to often acknowledged engaging in self-destructive behaviors. But when you can predict wretched outcomes based on the ZIP code where a child is born, the problem is not bad choices the infant is making. If were going to obsess about personal responsibility, lets also have a conversation about social responsibility.

Why did deaths of despair claim Farlan, Zealan, Nathan, Rogena and so many others? We see three important factors.

First, well-paying jobs disappeared, partly because of technology and globalization but also because of political pressure on unions and a general redistribution of power toward the wealthy and corporations.

Second, there was an explosion of drugs oxycodone, meth, heroin, crack cocaine and fentanyl aggravated by the reckless marketing of prescription painkillers by pharmaceutical companies.

Third, the war on drugs sent fathers and mothers to jail, shattering families.

Theres plenty of blame to go around. Both political parties embraced mass incarceration and the war on drugs, which was particularly devastating for black Americans, and ignored an education system that often consigned the poor especially children of color to failing schools. Since 1988, American schools have become increasingly segregated by race, and kids in poor districts perform on average four grade levels behind those in rich districts.

Farlans daughter Amber seemed to be the member of the Knapp family most poised for success. She was the first Knapp ever to graduate from high school, and then she took a job at a telecommunications company, managing databases and training staff members to use computer systems. We were struck by her intellect and interpersonal skills; it was easy to imagine her as a lawyer or a business executive.

PowerPoint presentations and Excel and pivot charts and matrix analytics, thats what I like to do, she told us. She married and had three children, and for a time was thriving.

Then in grief after her father and sister died, she imploded. A doctor had prescribed medications like Xanax, and she became dependent on them. After running out of them, she began smoking meth for the first time when she was 32.

I was dead set against it my whole life, she remembered. I hated it. Id seen what it did to everybody. My dad was a junkie who cooked meth and lost everything. You would think that was enough. It wasnt. She bounced in and out of jail and lost her kids.

Amber knew she had blown it, but she was determined to recover her life and her children. We had hoped that Amber would claw her way back, proof that it is possible to escape the messiness of the Knapp family story and build a successful life. We texted Amber a few times to arrange to get photos of Farlan, and then she stopped replying to our texts. Finally, her daughter responded: Amber was back in jail.

Yet its not hopeless. America is polarized with ferocious arguments about social issues, but we should be able to agree on what doesnt work: neglect and underinvestment in children. Heres what does work.

Job training and retraining give people dignity as well as an economic lifeline. Such jobs programs are common in other countries.

For instance, autoworkers were laid off during the 2008-9 economic crisis both in Detroit and across the Canadian border in nearby Windsor, Ontario. As the scholar Victor Tan Chen has showed, the two countries responded differently. The United States focused on money, providing extended unemployment benefits. Canada emphasized job retraining, rapidly steering workers into new jobs in fields like health care, and Canadian workers also did not have to worry about losing health insurance.

Canadas approach succeeded. The focus on job placement meant that Canadian workers were ushered more quickly back into workaday society and thus today seem less entangled in drugs and family breakdown.

Another successful strategy is investing not just in prisons but also in human capital to keep people out of prisons. The highest-return investments available in America may be in early education for disadvantaged children, but there are also valuable interventions available for adolescents and adults. We attended a thrilling graduation in Tulsa, Okla., for 17 women completing an impressive local drug treatment program called Women in Recovery.

The graduates had an average of 15 years of addiction each, and all were on probation after committing crimes. Yet they had quit drugs and started jobs, and 300 people in the audience including police officers who had arrested them and judges who had sentenced them gave the women a standing ovation. The state attorney general served as the commencement speaker and called them heroes, drawing tearful smiles from women more accustomed to being called junkies or whores.

I thought wed be planning a funeral instead, said one audience member whose younger sister had started using meth at age 12 and was now graduating at 35. Women in Recovery has a recidivism rate after three years of only 4 percent, and consequently has saved Oklahoma $70 million in prison spending, according to the George Kaiser Family Foundation.

Bravo for philanthropy, but the United States would never build interstate highways through volunteers and donations, and we cant build a national preschool program or a national drug recovery program with private money. We need the government to step up and jump-start nationwide programs in early childhood education, job retraining, drug treatment and more.

For individuals trying to break an addiction, a first step is to face up to the problem and thats what America should do as well. Our own reporting in the past focused on foreigners, affording us an emotional distance, while this time we spoke with old friends and had no armor. It has been wrenching to see them struggle. But ultimately we saw pathways forward that leave us hopeful.

One of our dear friends in Yamhill was Rick (Ricochet) Goff, who was part Indian and never had a chance: His mom died when he was 5 and his dad was, as he put it, a professional drunk who abandoned the family. Ricochet was a whiz at solving puzzles and so dependable a friend that he would lend pals money even when he couldnt afford medicine for himself. We deeply felt Ricochets loss when he died four years ago, and we also worried about his adult son, Drew, who is smart and charismatic but had been messing with drugs since he was 12.

Drews son, Ashtyn, was born with drugs in his system, and we feared that the cycle of distress was now being passed on to the next generation. We exchanged letters with Drew while he was in prison but lost touch.

Then, when we were visiting a drug-treatment program in Oregon called Provoking Hope, a young man bounded over to us. Its me, Drew, he said.

We have been close with Drew since, and he fills us with optimism. With the help of Provoking Hope, Drew will soon celebrate two years free of drugs, and he holds a responsible job at the front desk of a hotel. He has custody of Ashtyn and is now an outstanding dad, constantly speaking to him and playing with him. Drew still has a tempestuous side, and occasionally he has some rash impulse but then he thinks of Ashtyn and reins himself in.

Im a work in progress, he told us. The old me wants to act out, and I wont allow that.

Drew keeps moving forward, and we believe hes going to thrive along with Ashtyn, breaking the cycle that had enmeshed his family for generations. With support and balance, this can be done if we as a society are willing to offer help, not just handcuffs.

Its a tightrope Im walking on, Drew said. And sometimes it seems to be made of fishing line.

Nicholas Kristof is an Opinion columnist. Sheryl WuDunn is a business consultant. Their book, Tightrope: Americans Reaching for Hope, will be published Jan. 14.

Here is the original post:

Who Killed the Knapp Family? - The New York Times

Marijuana Will Be Legalized in New York in 2020, Cuomo Vows – The New York Times

ALBANY, N.Y. Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo vowed on Wednesday to legalize marijuana in New York, prioritizing a push that fell apart last year amid tensions over who should be allowed to sell the drug and where the revenue should go.

The governor described the effort as a long overdue criminal justice reform that could help salve wounds in communities affected by the decades-long war on drugs.

For decades, communities of color were disproportionately affected by the unequal enforcement of marijuana laws, Mr. Cuomo said in his annual State of the State address. Lets legalize adult use of marijuana.

The effort comes as the state faces down a $6 billion budget gap; on Wednesday, Mr. Cuomo, a third-term Democrat, said that legalized marijuana program could bring in $300 million a year in tax revenue, and billions of dollars more in economic activity when fully implemented, though that could be years away.

The governors proposal was part of a lengthy agenda that included bids to boost environmental spending, support small businesses and address a range of social ills, from overpriced feminine products to a lack of diversity on the states farms.

Little mentioned, however, were specific answers to how to solve the looming budget deficit, which is largely a result of overspending on Medicaid.

Mr. Cuomo did not say whether he supported raising taxes on the wealthy a proposal popular with progressives in his party, including the Democratic-led State Assembly or cutting spending to tackle the fiscal imbalance. Instead, Mr. Cuomo said that he wants to slice tax rates for small businesses by a third, something he said would help some 36,000 taxpayers.

At the same time, Mr. Cuomo retained his penchant for higher-priced infrastructure projects, proposing to invest $300 million to repurpose the Erie Canal to attract tourists, $9 million to build a drone facility upstate and an unspecified sum on an ambitious plan to revamp Penn Station to accommodate an additional 175,000 riders by building eight new tracks.

Again and again, Mr. Cuomo sought to position such projects and other accomplishments from more than nine years in office as an example of his brand of pragmatic progressivism, which he says emphasizes results over idealism.

Progressive government by definition must be functional, the governor said, returning to a common theme and citing his father, the former governor, Mario M. Cuomo.

The governors address kicks off the start of the years legislative session, and comes on the heels of a historic year in Albany, where lawmakers passed major new laws on rent, climate change and congestion pricing, among other issues.

Last year was also a period of transition for Mr. Cuomo: For the first eight years in office, Mr. Cuomo worked with a Republican State Senate, which often backed his pleas for fiscal austerity and batted back progressive reforms. That changed in the 2018 midterm elections, when Democrats took control of the Senate with the help of a number of young, liberal candidates who repeatedly challenged Mr. Cuomo, sometimes leading to heated conflicts.

That rift has already surfaced this year, as the governor and other Democrats grapple with the political fallout from a new law that sharply reduced the use of cash bail. The law went into effect on New Years Day, and since then, concerns over a spate of anti-Semitic incidents and other recent alleged crimes committed by those released have led to calls for changes in the law, including by Mr. Cuomo himself.

Mr. Cuomo made no mention of the bail reform on Wednesday during his speech, which included quotations from George Washington, Henry David Thoreau and the singer-songwriter Leonard Cohen, and an extended nautical theme, with mentions of rocky shores, rough seas, and a political and social superstorm of anger and divisive rhetoric.

Considering the states financial straits, Mr. Cuomo leaned heavily on proposals that would need little or no state funding, like banning gun ownership for people who have committed certain misdemeanor crimes in other states, banning foam food containers and outlawing synthetic opioids similar to fentanyl.

The governors marijuana proposal came with numerous caveats: He said that he intended to coordinate New Yorks plan with similar efforts in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Connecticut, though his office later clarified that the state would not wait on other states to pursue its own plan.

He also proposed that New Yorks state university system be enlisted to do research on marijuana and its effects, likening the drugs potential peril to that of opioids.

The federal government failed Americans with opioids, Mr. Cuomo said, in a briefing book released with the governors speech. And we cannot allow that to happen with cannabinoids.

The governors agenda entitled Making Progress Happen also outlined a robust list of social proposals, with many geared at improving womens status in the state, including studies to increase representation for women on corporate boards (California just enacted a law guaranteeing that) and $20 million in grants for female entrepreneurs. Mr. Cuomo also promised to take aim at the so-called pink tax, by which businesses charge women more for services and personal care items.

Mr. Cuomo has trumpeted his actions on gay rights including legalizing same-sex marriage in 2011. His top-line proposal for the L.G.B.T.Q. community permitting paid gestational surrogacy had failed to gain enough support in 2019, after some advocates for womens rights and religious groups argued that such surrogacy commodifies the body.

On Wednesday, even before Mr. Cuomos speech ended, the states Catholic Conference, said surrogacy is a dangerous policy that will lead to the exploitation of poor, vulnerable women, and has few safeguards for children.

Mr. Cuomo also said that he supported paid sick leave for workers of businesses with five or more employees, and wanted to codify benefits and protections for workers of the growing gig economy, although he did not offer specifics.

Other ideas were recycled, like an equal rights amendment to establish factors such as sex and sexual orientation as protected classes; a law change to allow movie theaters to sell alcohol; and a law to allow automatic voter registration. That idea passed last year, but was waylaid by technical legal concerns; the legislature will pass it again on Thursday. The governor also brought out a revised version of an idea that he recently vetoed: legalizing e-bikes and scooters.

Like last year, Mr. Cuomo made the environment a cornerstone of his agenda: He proposed leveraging $3 billion in bonds to restore wildlife habitats and mitigate flood risks, while offering plans to preserve 4,000 acres of land in the Mid-Hudson Valley and upgrade the wastewater treatment plant at Lake George, a popular vacation spot.

No economic strategy, no social justice reform, no education policy will be worth a damn if we dont have a planet that we can live on, Mr. Cuomo said.

Mr. Cuomo also took aim at sexual predators, proposing legislation to ban high-risk sexual offenders from New York Citys subway and prohibit them from using social media, dating apps and video game chats.

If 2019 was any indication, Mr. Cuomo tends to get what he wants from his yearly wish list. The overwhelming majority of his proposals were approved last year, except for marijuana legalization.

The governor suggested he would insist on more accountability from local governments in the way they manage Medicaid programs, setting up a potential clash with New York City and Mayor Bill de Blasio, the governors intraparty rival, who called the proposal concerning. Cuomo administration officials later said that they did not intend to ask local governments to pay more, but rather root out waste, fraud and abuse within the system.

In recent years, Mr. Cuomo had chosen to unveil his budget during the State of the State address. But facing a budgetary quagmire this year, the governor decided he would present his budget separately later in the month.

Its the $29 billion elephant in the room and he knows it, said Andrew Rein, the president of the Citizens Budget Commission, a fiscal watchdog, referring to the states projected cumulative budget gap of $28.8 billion through 2023.

When you have a structural problem, the longer you delay addressing it the larger it becomes, he added.

Here is the original post:

Marijuana Will Be Legalized in New York in 2020, Cuomo Vows - The New York Times

Stories of the Past-Jan. 12: Watson provides spark as Arabs tip Gauchos – Imperial Valley Press

50 years ago Friday night, it was James White who supplied the spark with some strong defensive play as the Imperial Valley College basketball team opened the Desert Conference season with a 67-65 win over MiraCosta.

Saturday night, it was James Watsons turn. Watson, in perhaps his finest all-around game of the year, tossed in 28 points and contributed some fine defensive plays as the Arabs made it 2-0 in league play with an 86-63 decision over the Saddleback Gauchos.

Coach Jim Walkers charges will get back into action at 8 Tuesday night, hosting the University of Hawaii, Hilo campus, in a non-conference contest.

Then Friday night, the Arabs make their first road trip of the league campaign, traveling to Mt. San Jacinto. Saturday, the defending champions get their first look at College of the Canyons in Newhall.

Wilson divided his scoring evenly, getting 15 points in the first half and 13 in the second half. He missed the 30-point mark when, after he had stolen the ball and was driving toward the basketball all alone, the Arabs called time out with two minutes and 10 seconds left to play.

At that point, with IVC on top, 84-59, Walker turned the game over to the reserves, benching all the regulars except James Speed.

Saddleback, a team with an offense very similar to that of MiraCosta, gave the Arabs some problems during the first half, due primarily to the outside shooting of Cameron Smith and Eric Christensen.

After IVC had moved out to an 8-3 lead with 17 minutes to go in the opening frame, the Gauchos came back to take the lead at 9-8 on field goals by Marv Lawrence, Smith and Christensen.

Ernie Adams and Smith traded two-pointers before Watson put the Arabs back on top 12-11, with 13:49 left. Then Rick Edward dropped in a field goal for Saddleback to give the Mission Vielo club its final lead of the night.

40 years ago CALEXICO Police here today are investigating the brutal murder of an unidentified man whose body was discovered late Wednesday behind a restroom building at Border Park.

Police Commander John Hignight today said the man had been stabbed about 20 times with a sharp instrument. The body reportedly has not been identified. There was absolutely nothing found in the victims pockets to help with the identification, Hignight said.

The man, aged about 25, was found after police responded to a reported disturbance at the park at First and Paulin.

Police said the victims throat had been cut, a portion of his chin was missing and numerous stab wounds were found in the chest area near the heart.

What appeared to be defensive wounds were located on the victims left hand.

Apparently someone heard a cry for help come from inside the restroom shortly before 9 p.m. By the time our officers arrived, the man was already down and appeared to be dead, Hignight said.

The victim was taken to Calexico Hospital where he was pronounced dead on arrival.

The man was the second person murdered in Imperial County in the past two days.

30 years ago Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-45th District, suggested sending the Navy, Air Force and National Guard to help Customs and the Border Patrol shore up the border with Mexico to keep drugs out.

During a news conference at Otay Mesa Wednesday, Hunter proposed using Air Force and Navy base commanders to direct the interdiction of aircraft suspected of smuggling drugs and inspecting cargo imported into the county. Hunters statement, which was released to this newspaper, said the U.S. needs to reinforce its fences and install lights to keep drug smugglers out. However, Hunters proposal does not indicate the cost of the plan or how it would be funded.

But such a plan is unlikely to help the United States flagging image with Mexico and the Latin American countries and wont stop the flow of drugs into this country, according to Dr. Alfredo Cuellar, a research fellow for the Institute of Border Studies at San Diego State University, Calexico campus.

The war on drugs is distracting attention from other ills, like housing and unemployment, Cuellar said.

The USSR is more peaceful now, its no longer the villain and drugs are taking is place as the villain with the Bush administration.

In December, Hunter proposed permanently assigning guardsmen to assist in searching vehicles and cargo at international border crossings and harbors during an interview with this newspaper.

Wednesday Hunter suggested pairing guard units with the Border Patrol to let the guardsmen take over some duties like transportation and clerical work. That would free Border Patrol agents to patrol the fence.

Hunter pinpointed 12 border areas covering 120 miles where the vast majority of the drug smuggling takes place from the San Diego-Tijuana corridor, where 45 percent of the smuggling occurs, to Brownsville-Matamoros in Texas. Calexico was one of the areas he noted as a crossing that could use assistance.

Here is the original post:

Stories of the Past-Jan. 12: Watson provides spark as Arabs tip Gauchos - Imperial Valley Press

Thousands of pot convictions in county to be cleared after Prop 64 – danvillesanramon.com

Thousands of marijuana convictions out of Contra Costa County will be dismissed as part of a push by the district attorney's office to abide by the terms of Proposition 64, which decriminalized personal use of cannabis in 2016.

Prosecutors worked with Code for America to cull through thousands of records in order to identify and clear 3,264 marijuana convictions for roughly 2,400 people eligible under the law, according to the Contra Costa County District Attorney's Office.

Prop 64 allows anyone 21 years old or older to buy and possess up to 28.5 grams of marijuana and up to 8 grams of "concentrated cannabis."

In 2018, then-Gov. Jerry Brown signed a law that requires prosecutors to review all marijuana convictions by July 1, 2020 to determine if they are eligible to be dismissed and sealed from public view.

The law requires courts to automatically reduce or dismiss such convictions if prosecutors don't file a dispute by that same date.

"Far too often old criminal convictions for minor drug offenses can leave a lasting mark on an individual's life," District Attorney Diana Becton said in a news release. "The removal of these convictions effectively reduces barriers to licensing, education, housing and employment."

The effort is intended to "address wrongs caused by the failed war on drugs" that disproportionately affected people of color, prosecutors said.

About 36% of county residents whose marijuana cases will be dismissed are African-American, 15% are Latino, 2% are Asian or Pacific Islanders, 45% are white and 2% are "other" or unknown, prosecutors said.

Becton said it's "extremely unlikely" any of the dismissals will result in anyone being released from jail since "these are just not the types of offences that would have received very lengthy sentences."

"Having one on your record does interfere with a persons ability to move on with their lives," she said.

Prosecutors used Code for America's "Clear My Record" technology, which automatically culled through huge amounts of criminal history data from the California Department of Justice going back to about 1970 in mere moments, and saved Becton's office untold hours of painstaking work.

"I can't even imagine how many hours it would have taken us to pull together this kind of data," she said.

Code for America, which donated its time and resources to the county, is a nonprofit organization that works to develop technology solutions to make government more accessible and efficient.

Contra Costa County is the fifth county to work with Code for America to clear marijuana convictions; other counties include San Francisco, Sacramento, San Joaquin and Los Angeles.

While the county doesn't have a way to contact every individual affected by the dismissals, people can email the DAs Office at DA-Prop64@contracostada.org to see if their records are involved.

Read more:

Thousands of pot convictions in county to be cleared after Prop 64 - danvillesanramon.com