U.S. Labor Judge Rules That Tesla Interfered With Union Organizing – Jalopnik

Photo: Spencer Platt (Getty Images)The Morning ShiftAll your daily car news in one convenient place. Isn't your time more important?

Tesla is ruled to have interfered with union organizing, Fiat Chrysler owes a lot of money over misleading sales figures, Maserati looks toward our electric and autonomous future, more lawsuits over the Trump administrations efforts to block California from setting emissions rules, and more on the General Motors strike. All of this and more in The Morning Shift for Monday, Sept. 30, 2019.

A labor judge ruled last week that Tesla broke labor law by interfering with union organization, Reuters reports, committing a series of violations of the National Labor Relations Act in the years 2017 and 2018.

With the ruling, the story said, Tesla must explain employees rights to them in a meeting that will require the attendance of CEO Elon Musk. Either Musk or his agent must tell employees that the National Labor Relations Board found Tesla to have broken the law, Reuters reports.

Reuters wrote that Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment last week, but that one of the violations cited was a tweet by Musk in May of last year. The post said Tesla workers could vote to unionize tmrw if they wanted, but theres always a but.

But why pay union dues & give up stock options for nothing? the post said. Our safety record is 2X better than when plant was UAW & everybody already gets healthcare. The judge ruled, according to Reuters, that the post threatened loss of stock options if they voted for unionization.

From Reuters:

In the past, the company has been plagued by safety complaints brought by workers, allegations that Tesla denies. Workers have said that long hours and pressure to deliver vehicles quickly takes a toll, and some have pushed for a union.

Soon, theyll be reminded of their rights in pushing for one.

Much like many of us when the monthly bills come around, Fiat Chrysler is about to be out of a lot of money. And much like were apt to fudge just how much we spent at the store last weekend when our partner asks, FCA owes the money because it was found to have misled investors over sales figures.

The money owed is a total of $40 million and itll resolve a probe by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, according to Reuters. The findings of the probe are pretty damning, and Reuters reports that FCA U.S. used a series of fraudulent moves from 2012 through 2016 to celebrate a streak of monthly sales growth, when it had actually ended in September 2013. Oh.

From the story:

In July 2016, the company revised more than five years of monthly U.S. vehicle sales figures to reflect a new reporting method, amid an investigation by federal authorities including the U.S. Justice Department.

The SEC said Fiat Chrysler put pressure on its business centers to increase sales, maintain the year-over-year sales streak, and hit internal sales targets, particularly on the last sales day of the month and as a result some employees at most of the Business Centers engaged in fake sales reporting.

Dealers were paid to report fake sales in a company database using cooperative marketing funds to disguise the payments, the SEC said, adding the database contained false vehicle sales entries, including false customer names and dates of sales.

So, yeah, maybe dont feel so bad about rounding down how much money you spent at the store last weekend. At least you havent been doing it for five years straight and broadcasting it to the world, right?

Maserati has some extra money sitting around courtesy of a recent Fiat Chrysler investment, and according to an emailed press release, it already knows where that money is going. The release said all new models will be made in Italy, and that their hybrid and electric elements will combine innovation and the high performance embedded in the brands DNA.

Maserati was vague on what that actually means, but the plan is focused around autonomy and electrification, the release said:

All new Maserati including the updated current models, will offer a range of autonomous driving capabilities, starting with Maserati Level 2 enhanced Highway Assist progressing to Level 3 with hands-off offering close to full autonomy, having the ability to maneuver in and out of lanes or bring the vehicle to a safe stop at the side of the road if the driver is unable to take control of the vehicle.

In 2020, the Company will embark on electrification and the Maserati Ghibli, produced in Turin, will be the first hybrid electric propulsion for the brand.

Next up will be a new Maserati utility vehicle, set to be built at Cassino and destined to play a leading role for the Brand thanks to its innovative technologies.

There will also be a paint shop allowing customers to watch their vehicle get colored, the release said. Itll be like going to Shipley Donuts and watching the food get made, except with cars.

Nine American environmental groups filed lawsuits against the U.S. Department of Transportation last week over its attempts to keep California from setting its own emissions rules and requirements for electric vehicles, Reuters reports. The Trump administration and California dont get along, you might remember, as one wants to increase emissions for no logical reason and the other wants to lower them for the good of the planet.

The groups add to the lawsuits over the emissions fight, as earlier this month, nearly half of the states in the U.S. sued over the intent to reverse state-set emissions standards. The department declined to comment to Reuters when asked last week, the story said.

From Reuters:

For decades, California has played a national role in influencing what Americans drive. The states vehicle emissions rules, more stringent than the Trump EPAs rules, are followed by a dozen other states that account for more than 40% of U.S. vehicle sales.

This week, Minnesota and New Mexico rebuffed the Trump administration and said they planned to adopt Californias tailpipe rules. [...]

The suit challenges the determination unveiled last week by the Transportation Department and its agency the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, that federal law preempts state and local regulation of vehicle fuel economy.

We need the environment to survive, so it might be smart of us to avoid killing the environment.

The United Auto Workers are on strike while negotiating a new union contract with General Motors, but, like all contract negotiations, agreeing on the end product is difficult. Not only do management and the workers have to agree, but all of the workers have to be on the same page about what they want. Thats hard, as different people have different priorities.

Automotive News has a breakdown of what things are like on the strike lines as far as contract feelings go right now, and mentioned that the longer workers are on strike, the more they have to weigh whether the strike was worth it in terms of the contract presented. (GM, if youll remember, cut off striking employees healthcare soon after the strike began, highlighting how risky it is to walk off of the job in attempts to get a better contract. The company later reinstated it.)

Heres some of how people feel, via Automotive News:

Getting contracts ratified already looked like a bigger challenge than usual going into this years talks, as years of multibillion-dollar profits by the Detroit 3 stoked eagerness to reverse past concessions. [...]

I dont think you ever get a deal that you want, but you have to get one that you can live with, Scott Ferguson, a paint repair worker at GMs Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly, said outside the plant Thursday, Sept. 26, the 11th day of the strike.

GMs first serious offer, as a top UAW official described the automakers Sept. 15 proposal, included $7 billion in U.S. investment, keeping some jobs at two assembly plants targeted for closure, annual wage increases or lump-sum payments, $8,000 ratification bonuses and improved profit sharing. Experts say that offer, which GM took the unusual step of publicizing in the hours before the strike, may have raised the bar for what it will take to earn a yes vote.

The story discusses the contract in terms of worker wants and the situations surrounding negotiations, such as the UAW corruption, plans for plant closures, and giving temporary workers a path to full-time employment. It can be read in full here.

On Sept. 30, 1929, Fritz von Opel made the first flight in a rocket-propelled airplane in Frankfurt, Germany, according to a New York Times obituary upon his death in 1971. If that name sounds familiar, its because his grandfather founded Opel.

From the story:

He flew 1 miles in as many minutes at an altitude averaging 49 feet. The plane was, wrecked in landing, but he escaped unhurt.

In an article in The New York Times after the flight, he wrote:

It is marvelous to fly like this, driven entirely by fire gases which escape from the, nozzle at a speed of about 5,000 miles an hour. When we are able to make full use of this gas we shall be able to fly around the world under five hours.

If only flying around the world in less than five hours was the norm.

How much longer does this last? Where does it go next?

See the rest here:

U.S. Labor Judge Rules That Tesla Interfered With Union Organizing - Jalopnik

Tesla rolled out its Smart Summon feature, and it’s not going well – Driving

Tesla rolled out its Version 10 software update this past weekend, a suite which includes, among other new tricks, the long-awaited Smart Summon feature.

The feature seems like one small step for the California automaker, but its one giant leap for car-kind: Smart Summon is the first piece of tech to apparently allowing a car to drive to its owner with nobody at the wheel.

Sure, its only meant for short distances, and Teslas been telling owners they need to have a clear line of sight to the car to use it, but its still pretty neat.

The car will drive toward the owner, as long as they have their finger on a button on an app; lifting their thumb stops the car if it has a problem.

From the looks of Teslas video, it seems pretty cool, and looks like it works well. However, when owners try to make it work themselves, it sometimes doesnt go so well after all.

The fine print on the update does note You are still responsible for your car andmust monitor it and its surroundings at all times.

Plus now the automakers underscoring that the feature is intended for use in private parking lots and driveways, not on anything resembling a public road. Doubt thatll stop some owners from using it that way, though.

Hopefully Tesla can get some of these self-navigation details ironed out quickly, so owners wont have to walk 15 meters to their parked car ever again.

Read more from the original source:

Tesla rolled out its Smart Summon feature, and it's not going well - Driving

Ride Along In The World’s Quickest Tesla – InsideEVs

If you're a huge fan of mind-blowing acceleration and Tesla vehicles, then it makes sense that you would be excited to finally get a ride in a Model S. And not just any Model S, but the "world's fastest." That was recently the case forChristian McMaster. Lucky for us, he not only filmed his dream ride-along, but also placed the experience in a longer clip to add context and enhance the story.

When we click on the video at the top of the page, we learnMcMaster is recording tons of fast cars atDrag Week 2019. He makes it clear just how much he loves the racing scene and this event in particular. He shares some footage of that action and lets us know we can find a lot more on the 1320video YouTube channel.

The centerpiece of this video, though, happens inside the cabin of a very quick Tesla Model S. Its interior stripped out for added lightness and sporting a set of racing chairs, this very vehicle recentlybroke the NEDRA (National Electric Drag Racing Association) record time for production electric vehicles (10.766 seconds at 122.3 miles per hour as of his writing).

Despite having spent time in some very quick cars in the past,McMaster is not disappointed by the gut-punch of the P100D at launch. If you haven't clicked that play button yet, what are you waiting for? Check it out!

I attended Drag Week 2019 to make daily videos for 1320Video. I was filming and editing my face off the whole week and managed to fit in a bit of my own filming to bring you guys this video! I take a ride in George's Tesla (during the week he broke the world record for the quickest Tesla quarter mile pass. Someone came forward and said they have it but it's only 0.00X seconds faster so idk who knows.) You can't really modify these things, so there's just a ton of weight reduction and it was A FREAKING BLAST. I'm excited to bring you guys better vlogs in the future!

Read this article:

Ride Along In The World's Quickest Tesla - InsideEVs

3 Ways Tesla Is Transforming What It Means To Be A Car – CleanTechnica

September 16th, 2019 by Zachary Shahan

Yes, Tesla cars are cool. Theyre the quickest cars on the market, the safest cars on the market, and the highest tech cars on the market. Its hard to overstate or even properly explain why they stand out and are genuinely in a class of their own. However, its not just that theyre quick, safe, and high tech. Tesla is starting to transform what it means to be a car.

This is a new one and it may seem innocuous. It may just seem like another fun entertainment feature in a Tesla. However, I think its going to prove to be more than that.

First of all, the superb sound system in a Tesla all of a sudden makes your car one of the best places to watch a movie, Netflix series, or YouTube video. For many, this could even become their favorite place to grab some popcorn and turn on a film.

Expect some new cultural habits to form. Expect people to take their cars to scenic locations in order to watch a movie with a loved one or friend (I guess we love our friends too, and should love everyone, but you know what I mean). Expect people to take longer road trips and camp out in their cars more. Expect peoples cars, or Teslas at least, to become extensions of their homes, extensions of their recreational lives, destinations rather than just vehicles that transport you from one place to another.

Youre gaining a living room or home theater with the coming V10 software update, not just a cooler car.

Theres pretty vociferous debate on this topic still. Many think Elon Musks claims that Tesla will soon have legitimately self-driving vehicles are basically BS mixed with Kool-Aid. What I can say is, its a documented fact that Tesla Autopilot has improved dramatically in the past few years. Yes, you need to pay attention at all times (not a joke), but the car is handling more and more of the actual work of driving. New abilities keep coming, and the Autopilot hardware & software suite is getting better and better at smoothly operating in both normal and semi-challenging driving conditions.

At the moment, Teslas Autopilot features reduce a lot of the stress, irritation, and danger of driving. That is having a material impact on Tesla drivers today, leaving them (us) less fatigued and more relaxed. Autopilot already creates a different pattern of driving for many people.

However, were just tickling the edge of what this means. As long as you have to monitor where the car is going, you cant really focus on other tasks. Yes, you can benefit from a more relaxed heart and mind, but you cant sleep, work, or watch Netflix while driving. However, thats what Elon Musk expects is coming fairly soon. With the flip of a switch (or something more modern I guess), hundreds of thousands of Tesla drivers will be able to turn off their daily focus on driving and think or do whatever they want while going from place to place. Were not there yet, but with each Autopilot/Full Self Driving update, Tesla owners can feel 100% self-driving coming closer.

There are various ramifications that will result from this breakthrough tech. Were not going to predict them all, but a few things are clear. First of all, people will have more free time for entertainment (enjoying the Tesla home theater), for work (if they so choose), for sleep (yay!), and for munching on some pizza and chips (oy). People will also be more willing to go on long drivers or sit in traffic, because they will no longer be wasting their time while doing so they will be enjoying their time somewhat carefree instead. Expect that to mean longer commutes, land use and real estate shifts that lead to super-suburbs, and more traffic. Does it matter if youre sitting in your car watching Spaceballs?

Johnna Crider had an interesting article last week about Tesla Sentry Mode catching a fistfight on camera. That may seem like a trivial matter, but wait a few years.

Weve seen Sentry Mode help catch thieves, vandals, and free-spirited dancers. As of now, Sentry Mode is something thats being used on a case-by-case basis for such issues. However, this may all just be the seed of what this feature leads to. What if law enforcement decides they could really benefit from all these eyes on the street and then gets permission from (or requires the cooperation of) Tesla and Tesla vehicle owners in catching any number of crimes, spying on local activities or gangs, or searching for stolen cars?

For that matter, what if Tesla owners use their Sentry Mode footage to assist in committing crimes? (Im not trying to plant ideas, but this is a possibility worth keeping in mind as the technology proliferates. Eyes on the street at all hours can serve nefarious purposes as well as good ones.)

Im sure there are more possibilities that are not coming to mind, but the point is straightforward: With millions of fresh eyes on the street and footage being recorded, cars become more than just cars. They become data collection tools. Data is valuable, even powerful enough to save lives.

Stay tuned. The initial quirky and hero-on-the-street Sentry Mode highlights are just the seeds of a new era of automobiles. These are not simply transportation devices.

If youd like to buy a Tesla and get 2,000 miles (3,000 km) of free Supercharging, feel free to use my referral code by October 1:https://ts.la/zachary63404. After October 1, its presumed that you will get 1,000 miles (1,500 km) of free Supercharging by using that referral code (or someone elses).

Tags: Netflix, Tesla, Tesla autopilot, Tesla Full Self-Driving, Tesla infotainment, Tesla Netflix, Tesla Sentry Mode, Tesla software, Tesla software v10., Tesla Theater, YouTube

Zachary Shahan Zach is tryin' to help society help itself (and other species). He spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as its director and chief editor. He's also the president of Important Media and the director/founder of EV Obsession and Solar Love. Zach is recognized globally as an electric vehicle, solar energy, and energy storage expert. He has presented about cleantech at conferences in India, the UAE, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, and Canada.Zach has long-term investments in TSLA, FSLR, SPWR, SEDG, & ABB after years of covering solar and EVs, he simply has a lot of faith in these particular companies and feels like they are good cleantech companies to invest in. But he offers no professional investment advice and would rather not be responsible for you losing money, so don't jump to conclusions.

See original here:

3 Ways Tesla Is Transforming What It Means To Be A Car - CleanTechnica

How Musk is Trying to Address Tesla’s Service Issues – Market Realist

Tesla is undeniably a trailblazer in the EV (electric vehicle) sector. However, after launching new models and car sales have increased, some issues have cropped up. Specifically, the company has not been able to keep up with customers scheduled services.

During the second quarter, Teslas car deliveries rose 134% year-over-year. The company has guided for 360,000400,000 deliveries this year. While EVs usually need less servicing than internal combustion engine cars, its still necessary at times. In March, CNBC reported that a Bernstein survey of Tesla owners found that customer service is the companys weak point.

The longer waiting times, poor resolution, and weak experiences reported by customers may have to do with Teslas underinvestment in its service centers, especially outside the US. China and Europe, Teslas key international markets, will need satisfactory service operations for further expansion.

The service issues were highlighted in August, when Nextmove, a German car rental company, called off its order for 100 Tesla Model 3s. It called off the order after receiving 15 vehicles, pinning the cancellation on service quality issues.

Tesla is aware of the service quality issues. During the companys Q4 2018 results call, CEO Elon Musk said, I want to note that one of our major priorities this quarter is improving service operations. So really, from my standpoint, when I think about what my priorities are this quarter, its improving service in North America. Thats number one.

Rivian, an EV startup backed by Amazon and Ford, is also learning from Teslas issues in the service area. As reported byTeslarati, Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe said in an interview with The Fast Lane Car, So, were spending a huge amount of time solving service.

Musk addressed the European service issue yesterday in a tweet, saying, Service center expansion is at max speed. In August, Tesla announced it had opened 30 new service centers over the last few months.

Furthermore, during Teslas Q2 2019 earnings call, Musk admitted that the companys expansion of its service centers and Supercharger network are key to its sales. He said, So, you got to have service, you to have supercharging and charging all sorted out, you could have good consumer financing and then the price must make sense. And any place where those four things are true, our sales are great. So, were rolling out service centers like crazy.

By expanding its reach, Tesla could boost customer satisfaction and attract more buyers. The company already boasts several advantages over competitors, and building up its service infrastructure could give it even more of an edge. To learn more, read Teslas Range: Can It Outpace the Competition?

View post:

How Musk is Trying to Address Tesla's Service Issues - Market Realist

Tesla vs. Porsche: Does The Model S Finally Have A Competitor In The Luxurious New Taycan? – Forbes

For the better part of a decade, the Tesla Model S has been living a blissful, competition-free existence as the only premium electric vehicle on the market. Thats about to changefast.

Earlier this month, Porsche debuted its new entrant in the premium EV battlethe 2020 Porsche Taycan. Loosely based on the companys Mission E Concept, the Taycan is a cross between Porsches Panamera and legendary 911. In other words, its a true luxury sedan thats electric.

The Taycan is currently available in two variants (the Turbo and Turbo S). Neither is actually a turbo, of coursethe concept doesnt work in the electrified realm. So why use the moniker? Probably to appeal to the classic Porsche customer, who expects performance from the iconic German automaker. Either way, the car has a comfortable ride, plenty of high-tech bells and whistles, and power for days. All the features youd expect from a Porsche.

Both the Turbo and Turbo S are powered by a pair of electric motorsone on the front axle and one on the rearthat can propel them from zero to 60 mph in 3.0 and 2.6 seconds, respectively. The top speed for both vehicles is just north of 160 mph.

Face-to-Face: While the Tesla Model S Performance (right) is sharp and elegant, the Taycan Turbo S is bold and beautiful.

While the Taycan represents a different way to design and build a battery-powered automobile, there are undeniable similarities between the Turbo S and Teslas Model S Performance. Both cars feature similarly sized batteries mounted under the floor to keep the center of gravity low. The Taycan Turbo S uses two permanent-magnet synchronous motors, while the Model S Performance has a permanent-magnet synchronous motor in the front and induction-type motor in the rear.

But the most telling comparison is that Tesla has had seven years to perfect its machine, while Porsche has not logged a single after-sale mile.

So, how do these posh EVs stack up against each other?

The Model S and the Taycan are practically the same size. The only real difference is cargo capacity. Thanks to its hatchback design, the Model S has 26.3 cubic feet of rear cargo space compared to the Taycans 12.9 cubic feet. The Porsche does have a bigger front trunk, though, with 2.8 cubic feet of space compared to 2.1 cubic feet for the Model S, enough for two large golf bags.

Granted, beauty is in the eye of the key holder. But youd have to be blind to think the Model S is better looking than the Taycan. The longer you look at the vehiclethe side glass, the low roofline that drops on a very wide body with even wider fendersthe more it seems like a 911 sedan. Its aggressive yet elegantly sporty. Beautiful and bold.

While the Model S is appealing, it is also bland, as it hasnt changed much, physically speaking, since its introduction 2012.

Dash vs. Dash: The Model S's huge center stack display (left) makes it easy to see multiple information sources at once. The Taycan's driver-focused dash offers drivers a clean, minimalist look into the future.

Heres where the comparison gets interesting. The Taycan Turbo S is capable of over boosting for short periods to produce about 751 horsepower and 774 pound-feet of torque, which is enough to propel the car to 60 mph in 2.6 seconds, continuing to a top speed of about 160 mph. Without the over-boost function, the motors produce 617 horsepower and an unspecified amount of torque.

The Model S Performance, on the other hand, produces approximately 762 horsepower and 723 pound-feet of torque from its motors. And it gets to 60 mph in a slightly quicker 2.4 seconds, with a top speed thats a smidge higher at 163 mph. (In true competitive fashion, Porsche claims that Tesla cant sustain these results, whereas it can repeat them all day long with the Taycan.)

While the difference in battery capacity is quite close, 93.4 kWh for the Taycan versus Teslas 100 kWh, the range of the two vehicles is not.

Porsche was not able to verify the Taycans range following the more stringent EPA standard used in the United States. It has been confirmed in Europe using its WLTP standard. As such, Porsche is touting a range of 256 WLTP-estimated miles for the Taycan Turbo S. Thats more than 100 miles shy of Teslas WLTP-estimated 365-mile range for the Model S Performance.

Anyone who familiar with Tesla knows that over-the-air (OTA) software updates are among the company's biggest strengths. While the current Model S and its variants are almost physically identical to the vehicles they were seven years ago, it's offers a much different driving experience. Software updates have re-made the car and improved the driving experience.

Though several other automakers offer OTA updates, none have done so with the frequency and effectiveness of Tesla. Porsche claims it, too, will offer OTA updates on the Taycan. Will the updates be as meaningful? Well just have to wait and see.

The ability to refuel on-the-go is another area of the e-mobility equation at which Tesla excels. In fact, the companys Supercharger Network is one of the largest fast-charge ecosystems on the planet. As soon as your Teslas battery runs low, a navigation app redirects the car to the nearest station for a quick refill. If one is not near, it directs you to the nearest in-network charger.

Plug in: Tesla's exclusive level three supercharger (left) is capable of capturing up to 180 miles worth of go-go juice (approximately 50%) in just 15 minutes. Porsche claims that its high-power charging system should allow an 80% charge in just 22.5

Porsches answer to Tesla Superchargers is Electrify America, a new third-party charging network (a subsidiary of the Volkswagen Group of America) capable of charging many different brand EVs. Taycans faster than Superchargers can charge Teslas. EAs current infrastructure is not quite as large as Teslas, but it is growing quickly.

Plus, Porsche claims it will aggregate multiple third-party charging apps under a single log-in via smartphone. Teslas app does not track out-of-network chargers. Thus, the EA system could surpass Teslas for overall convenience.

With that said, Tesla has been deploying Superchargers for 7 years and has the largest fleet of EVs with more than 600,000 vehicles. Thus has a substantial lead in a network built for real scale.

Tesla is a master of the big-screen dashboard game, being the first to debut a positively large 17-inch portrait-style infotainment touchscreen in its vehicles, in addition to a 12-ish-inch screen replacing the gauge cluster. Teslas infotainment system lacks Apple Car Play and Android Auto, but it does allow for Bluetooth music streaming, in addition to built-in Slacker Radio capability and over-the-air updates.

The Taycan, on the other hand, splits its screens up a bit more. The gauge cluster is a 16.8-inch screen capable of displaying multiple features at once. Theres also a centrally located 10.9-inch infotainment screen, with a second 8.4-incher for climate controls and handwriting recognition. Apple CarPlay is standard, as is a new digital assistant that answers to Hey, Porsche. If thats not enough, theres also an optionally available infotainment screen just for the front passenger.

And then theres Autopilot. Porsche lacks a self-driving system with such capability, but then again, who really wants to let their Porsche do the driving?

This is where things get very one-sided. The Porsche Taycan Turbo S is considerably more expensive than the Tesla Model S. A fully loaded Model S Performance tops out at $114,900. While a loaded Taycan Turbo S runs about $187,000.

The Porsche Taycan is better made, has better touchpoints, more repeatable performance, and its battery will last longer, by design. However, on paper at least, the Tesla delivers better numbers at a much lower price. So, until the Taycan has more time on the streets, the advantage must go to experience over beautythe Tesla Model S is the winner. But my guess is not for long.

GetForbes daily top headlines straight to your inboxfor news on the worlds most important entrepreneurs and superstars, expert career advice, and success secrets.

Read more from the original source:

Tesla vs. Porsche: Does The Model S Finally Have A Competitor In The Luxurious New Taycan? - Forbes

A Tesla-Swapped E30 BMW Means ‘You’ll Never Miss a Yellow Light Again.’ – The Drive

These days, the E30 BMW 3-series is the hot ticket. Enthusiasts have scooped up these 1980s-era ultimate driving machines for racing, build projects, and dominating back roads everywhere. What makes this 1992 BMW 325i Cabrio special? Brace yourself, literally. It's got Tesla power.

John Volk, a long-time builder of project cars, had once endowed this Cabrio with an LS V8. While an affront to BMW purists, the GM-powered Bimmer ragtop was massively quick. Looking for his next project, and becoming curious about car enthusiasts' future in an electric-vehicle world, he tossed aside the LS and added a single-drive electric power unit out of a Tesla Model S P85. Getting all the hardware to fit in places no electric motor was ever meant to go, while doing all the work in his garage, was nothing short of mind-bending.

Volk adapted two complete 400-volt DC lithium-ion battery packs out of a Chevrolet Volt, capable of charging via standard AC chargers. He's now converting the system to DC to be useable with the latest CHAdeMO hookups. Volk says the car's 32kWh battery pack is capable of delivering around 100 miles per charge. Attached to the motor is a Quaife ATB differential, which sends electric power to Apex ARC-8 wheels and 255/40R17 tires.

Koni Yellow adjustable shocks, mounted to Ground Control camber plates, reside underneath the Mtech 2 bodykit. Ireland Engineering provided the coil-over sleeves, with 350-pound front springs and 1,000-pound rear units, and a 25-millimeter front anti-roll bar.

Keeping the E30's original interior motif, Volk called on E30 interior experts Ninestitch NYC to have the Cabrio reupholstered in a fabric called M-Rain. He even hooked up a drive-neutral-reverse switch to the telltale BMW shifter, which looks right at home in the console.

So how quick is it? The instant torque is amazing, Jon explains. To best describe it, youll never miss a yellow light again."

Originally posted here:

A Tesla-Swapped E30 BMW Means 'You'll Never Miss a Yellow Light Again.' - The Drive

Tesla Dealer Loophole Ideas – CleanTechnica

Batteries

Published on September 14th, 2019 | by Maarten Vinkhuyzen

September 14th, 2019 by Maarten Vinkhuyzen

Tesla is not allowed to sell its cars in some states of the USA. That is, it cant open dealerships. Sometimes, even service centers are prohibited. That is unfortunate for Tesla and its (prospective) customers. But as many people are aware, all laws have loopholes.

According to Merriam-Webster:

1 in commerce; to deal is to sell or to trade.2 a dealership is an authorized sales agency.

That makes the loophole clear. If you dont sell cars, those dealership prohibitions dont apply. In a number of states, however, even showing and explaining the cars, with ordering out of state or over the internet, is considered a dealers work, putting Teslas stores under the prohibition.

What is needed to slide through the loophole is another activity or business, one that is normal and legal. But that business would require the showing and explaining of Teslas cars. That activity is car rental. A car rental company is not a dealership, and many are owned by carmakers, at least where I live.

Another great way to show what Tesla is and can do is in the form of galleries. Exhibitions of the work and art of Franz von Holzhausen, even from before he started at Tesla. Exhibitions and video clips of the engineering and problem solving of Elon Musk and JB Straubel. Include many video clips of the competition or amateur ads on YouTube.

Now, we want to also make it visitor friendly, enticing to walk into, nice for viewing the exhibitions, and good for spending some time soaking up the atmosphere. That asks for some hospitality functions, like an internet caf, a Starbucks-like coffee corner, a bakery, and a regulars table for Tesla drivers. Tesla cars sawed in half can be used at booths, showing at the same time the different interiors of the cars.

Besides these infotainment functions, there is room for commercial functions. I envision all Tesla commercial activities with the exception of selling cars to find a place here. Probably just adjacent to the caf and gallery space, visible but separate. Part souvenir store and info desk, part consultancy and service desk. Probably at the backside of the building there should be a garage for the rental cars, a depot for the Tesla mobility service, and other such functions.

I wish I was an artist. In my mind, I can walk around, sit, and order coffee. I can admire the expositions about Franz, Elon, and JB. I can go to the desk of a consultant for advice on my roof, buy presents for my nephews, and rent a car to experience the unique Tesla smile when using launch mode. I see a large, grand caf-like place or indoor market where there are many Tesla-related activities.

When turning what is in my head into a business plans manager overview, it would look like the following.

Nowadays diversified Tesla is a lot bigger than it was. It is possible to open as infotainment, watering hole, and point-of-sale places in closed-minded states better than dealerships without being a dealership. In a high-end place with a lot of foot traffic, a large space with shop windows is great. Inside, we have the following functions:

Those are a lot of legal, commercial, and marketing activities under one roof. Explaining every technical aspect about a Tesla car is part of the job of the car rental employee. Having a very competitive rental tariff starting with 1 hour rentals can attract many prospects who would like a test drive, a drive a bit longer than the custom 20 minute demo with a salesperson. Having a Model X with a trailer is an excellent excuse for IKEA and Home Depot shoppers to bring their goods home and wow their neighbors.

The regular table where Tesla drivers get their complimentary coffee is the place for free advice for prospects. Buyers can conclude their business in the internet caf.

For seating, there are the open halves of the Models S, 3, X arranged as booths along the walls.

If done well, this could even be a cool place to hang out in a city center or large mall.

The perfect place, with a large outdoor terrace, would of course be in Windsor, Canada, on Riverside Drive along the Detroit river, directly opposite the GM towers in Detroit, Michigan. Tesla would not even have to omit the dealership and service center.

Tags: car dealers, legal loophole, Tesla, Tesla dealerships, Tesla galleries

Maarten Vinkhuyzen Grumpy old man. The best thing I did with my life was raising two kids. Only finished primary education, but when you dont go to school, you have lots of time to read. I switched from accounting to software development and ended my career as system integrator and architect. My 2007 boss got two electric Lotus Elise cars to show policymakers the future direction of energy and transportation. And I have been looking to replace my diesel cars with electric vehicles ever since.And putting my money where my mouth is, I have bought Tesla shares. Intend to keep them until I can trade them for a Tesla car.

Excerpt from:

Tesla Dealer Loophole Ideas - CleanTechnica

Tesla Alumni Launch Smart Electric Panel to Make It Easier to Go Solar – Tom’s Guide

Converting to clean energy is excellent for the environment, but complex installation procedures make it hard to turn to alternative power sources. Span, a company ran by Tesla alumni, is hoping to change that with the introduction of its Smart Electric Panel.

Founded by Arch Rao, Tesla's former energy head of product, Span builds products that can deliver a positive impact on the environment. The Smart Electric Panel, for example, encourages conversion to a clean energy smart home by removing the need for several different pieces of installation equipment. Instead, it offers a single integrated device that aims to replace the traditional home electric panel.

Electrical panels havent seen significant innovations in over three decades despite being the ideal center for controlling home energy and bringing intelligent connectivity into homes, Rao said. We are excited to launch a product that will accelerate the adoption of renewables while transforming the customer and installer experience.

While there are smart circuit breakers and even a few other smart electric panels currently on the market, the Span teams experience with Tesla could bring significant interest to such a device. Tesla helped make electric cars cool, after all.

The Smart Electric Panel streamlines clean energy initiatives and hardware in the home such as solar, storage, and electric vehicle chargers. It offers customizable backup power, giving customers the ability to prioritize the available energy in their homes. This could be useful during situations like a power outage.

(Image credit: Span)

Customers can use the Span mobile app to monitor and operate home energy from anywhere at any time.

The San Francisco-based company is hoping its Smart Electric Panel proves an innovative and realistic alternative for clean energy homes.

Ive been waiting for a product like this for years, said Josh Powell, CEO of Revolusun Smart Home and Hawaiis leading solar and storage installer. Its the perfect technology innovation for the next generation of clean-energy homes. Its going to look better, perform better for homeowners, and simplify everything we do as installers both today and for retrofits down the line.

Span is working with select installation partners to station the Smart Electric Panel system as early as this year. The company hopes to expand production and deployment next year.

The company plans to provide more detailed information about partnerships with specific battery providers as it launches the Smart Electric Panel.

Read more:

Tesla Alumni Launch Smart Electric Panel to Make It Easier to Go Solar - Tom's Guide

Why Tesla Seems to Be Struggling with Q3 Deliveries – Market Realist

Tesla (TSLA) delivered a record 95,200 vehicles in the second quarter of 2019. The companys Q2 deliveries beat the previous record set in the fourth quarter of 2018. However, TSLAs deliveries tapered down in the first quarter of 2019.

We see an uncanny similarity between Teslas record deliveries in Q4 2018 and Q2 2019, as both quarters coincided with the gradual withdrawal of the federal tax credit. Tesla cars were eligible for a $7,500 tax credit last year, which fell to $3,750 on January 1, 2019. On July 1, the tax credit decreased further to $1,875.

Starting in 2020, Tesla cars wont be eligible for the tax credit. The record deliveries in Q4 2018 and Q2 2019 were boosted by the carry forward demand by Tesla car buyers taking advantage of the higher tax credit.

After its record Q2 deliveries, the company sounded optimistic over third-quarter deliveries as well. The companys July 2 statement noted that it is well positioned to continue growing total production and deliveries in Q3.

TSLAs second-quarter earnings call echoed these views, and it ruled out much of an impact from the lower federal tax credit. The company maintained its 2019 delivery guidance of 360,000400,000 vehicles.

In our viewand even TSLA bulls would agreethe company has often been a bit too optimistic with its projections. We believe that achieving its Q3 and 2019 delivery guidance could be a tough task. Lets take a closer look.

Last month, TSLA brought back free unlimited supercharging for new Model S and Model X cars. This was a limited period offer, which the markets considered in conjunction with the companys falling Model S/X sales.

While the companys consolidated deliveries rose sharply in the second quarter, its Model S/X sales fell year-over-year. During the companys second-quarter earnings call, Tesla CEO Elon Musk admitted to some cannibalization on the Model S/X from its Model 3 sales.

However, the positive aspect of Teslas Q2 delivery report was the surge in its Model 3 sales. TSLA sees the Model 3 and the upcoming Model Y as its growth drivers in the long term.

Tesla might also consider adding free supercharging to spice up its Model 3 sales. Electrek reported that Tesla has authorized its sales staff to offer two years of free Supercharging for new Model 3 orders that get delivered by the end of the month.

Although Tesla often says that it is demand-constrained, the free supercharging offer for Model 3 cars doesnt corroborate that position.

Earlier this month, InsideEVs reported that according to its estimates, Tesla delivered 13,150 Model 3 cars in the United States in August. In comparison, it delivered 13,450 cars in July and 21,225 cars in June.

As we previously noted, Teslas US deliveries spiked in June as customers jumped in to take advantage of the higher tax credit. Looking at the Model 3 sales estimates and Teslas free supercharging offers, it wouldnt be an unfair assessment that TSLA might be facing difficulty in achieving its ambitious delivery targets.

While TSLA has struggled to make sustainable profits, bulls have pointed to the companys strong top-line growth and the growing popularity of its vehicleseven its rivalsappreciate its achievements.

However, if demand for the Model 3 has plateaued in the United States, that isnt good news for Tesla bulls. While Tesla is expanding into several international markets, and Chinas Gigafactory should also be operational by the end of this year, the US market is still crucial for the company.

Read the original:

Why Tesla Seems to Be Struggling with Q3 Deliveries - Market Realist

Sleeping With Tesla Autopilot May Explain Some Of Tesla’s Safety Numbers – Forbes

Tesla vehicles offer Autopilot, which will keep a car in its lane and tracking cars in front of it. They can go a few miles even if the driver falls asleep.

Recently, there have been a variety of debates and reports of people in Teslas on highways, asleep at the wheel, being driven by autopilot. There have been various videos posted online shot by people in other cars, including this report of police halting a car with a drunk sleeping driverfrom last year.

When Tesla Autopilot is engaged, it watches for the driver to apply light steering force on the wheel or do other interactions with the wheel. This is the only way they have to detect if hands are on the wheel or not. Some drivers learn how to apply a constant light force, others tweak every so often. This has caused great confusion in reports on Tesla accidents which include phrases like "the driver's hands were not on the wheel." In reality, for many Tesla drivers with their hands firmly on the wheel will not trigger the torque sensor.

If you don't trigger it for a modest amount of time (as little as about 20-30 seconds, according to recent reports) you get a visual warning on the screen. If you go longer, the warning gets brighter. Eventually,at 45 seconds it issues an audible warning. Finally, after 60 seconds, it will begin to slow the vehicle, eventually coming to a stop in the middle of the lane. (This suggests that some of those who have cruised alongside a "sleeping" Tesla driver long enough to take a video may have been punked.)

That's clearly something you don't want to have happened, but it's also vastly better than what happens if you fall asleep at the wheel of a car without Autopilot, which results in an accident a large fraction of the time. In fact, there is a strong suspicion that a very significant number of car accidents and fatalities are caused by falling asleep at the wheel. Alas, there is no blood test to perform on a crashed driver to find out if they were asleep, the way one can test for drinking. We do know that 60% of fatal accidents are single-car accidents, where a car simply ran off the road, and only some of them involve alcohol.

You clearly don't want to fall asleep when using a driver assist lane-keeping/ACC system like Autopilot. These systems may drive for an hour without needing any intervention and seem very impressive, but that rate would mean a dangerous high-speed accident one time in 60. In addition, stopping in the middle of the highway is a poor idea. At the same time, if you do end up drifting off, you are much better off if you have such a system on. (This leads to a paradox I'll discuss below.)

Tesla releases safety numbers every quarter. Their most recent report reads:

In the 2nd quarter, we registered one accident for every 3.27 million miles driven in which drivers had Autopilot engaged. For those driving without Autopilot but with our active safety features, we registered one accident for every 2.19 million miles driven. For those driving without Autopilot and without our active safety features, we registered one accident for every 1.41 million miles driven. By comparison, NHTSAs most recent data shows that in the United States there is an automobile crash every 498,000 miles.

At first, the numbers sound very impressive. However, in spite of repeated attempts, Tesla has declined to explain the difference between an "accident" and a "crash." The NHTSA number involves crashes reported to the police. There is speculation, which Tesla refuses to clarify, that "accident" might mean an airbag-triggering crash. There is strong reason to suspect different things are being measured because even with the ADAS tools in a Tesla, drivers not using Autopilot should not have 3 times as good a record than average.

Another complication is that Autopilot is marketed as only for highways, and while it works on some non-highways, the bulk of its use is there. The accident rate on freeways, per mile, is drastically lower. Some research suggests as much as 2-3 times lower. The severity of highway crashes is greater, but the frequency per mile is much lower. Tesla has declined many requests to disclose how many of the Autopilot and non-Autopilot miles listed above are on freeways, rural highways and urban streets, and until they do, the numbers they publish do not provide useful information. While they might, as Tesla implies, suggest that driving with Autopilot has an overall superior safety record than driving without it, we don't know enough to say. In addition, the NHTSA statistic is for all roads.

Nevertheless, if the accident rate with Autopilot on the highway is truly better than the rate for non-Autopilot on highway an "apples to apples" comparison the sleeping factor may be more than sufficient to explain it. People who fall asleep in regular cars (or Teslas not using Autopilot) are probably getting in a lot more accidents than those using the system. (It should also be noted that many cars today have collision warning and prevention systems and lane departure warning systems which will also awaken drivers or even prevent an accident. These systems will act when the car veers from the lane or is about to hit a vehicle in front, while the Autopilot does most of the driving task so that those things don't happen in the first place, but both will reduce accidents.)

In general, it sounds like it's a good idea if driving while drowsy, or impaired, to have Autopilot on. Yet at the same time, it's a terrible idea to drive while drowsy or impaired. The paradox is that the increased level of safety could lead people to take the risk. If you can't keep your eyes open, you should pull over yet many people don't. The existence of Autopilot can easily lead to somebody being less likely to pull over, or worse, less likely to pull over when drunk. We all know we aren't supposed to drive in these states, but we do, and it's probably the cause of half of all serious accidents, particularly on weekend evenings. More study is needed to learn how the existence of ADAS and Autopilot changes the risks people take, to figure if it's an overall safety loss or win.

Read/leave comments at this site.

Original post:

Sleeping With Tesla Autopilot May Explain Some Of Tesla's Safety Numbers - Forbes

Tesla Autopilot V10 In-Depth Road Test With Useful Bookmarks – InsideEVs

Want to know all about the Tesla V10 software update, specifically with regard to the upgraded Autopilot technology? There's arguably no better way to see how it all works than to watch it in detailed video format.

We can't say enough how much we love these long, in-depth videos with plenty of coverage. To top it off, YouTuberDriveLosAngeles has taken the time to apprise us of "bookmarks" for each relevant Autopilot action as demonstrated in his Model 3. This is fantastic since many people may not have the time to sit down and watch the entire video immediately.

Check it all out and then share your takeaways with us in the comments below. Moreover, if you own a Tesla and have had some experiences with the V10 software update (positive or negative), we look forward to hearing your take.

Tesla Firmware Version 10 - Road Test (w/ bookmarks)

Dear #Tesla,

Thank you for making such a fabulous machine. Today I achieved in my mind Level 3 autonomy. I was able to get through an on-ramp, 3 freeways, auto lane changes, hov to hov, and exit the off-ramp at my destination. In this journey the steering wheel, gas pedal and signal stalk was not touched once! There was a single moment that I needed disengage NOA so that it can maintain the lane on the 110 HOV. That will be an interesting bookmark for your Autopilots team neuro network decision logs. The current state of the autopilot, FSD, Autolane change is making my commute SUPERBLY pleasant to endure! =) Many thanks again Tesla!

Best, DriveLosAngeles

V10.0 BETA (2019.32.2.11 1A8580f)#Autopilot #autonomousdriving #model3

Bookmarks for the relevant autopilot actions 01:52 02:23 03:59 04:18 04:54 05:36 07:43 08:08 HOV entrance 20:40 HOV to HOV interchange 22:47 just lowering cruise speed, not cheating 23:51 33:28 35:20 40:16 40:52 43:34 - Off Ramp

View post:

Tesla Autopilot V10 In-Depth Road Test With Useful Bookmarks - InsideEVs

Cuomo on whether Tesla will meet job targets: ‘We will find out next year’ – Buffalo News

Gov. Andrew Cuomo doubled down on his support for Teslas state-subsidized South Buffalo solar panel factory Tuesday, telling the Buffalo News Editorial Board that he was not disappointed by reports that the firm's solar business is struggling.

The RiverBend factory, which manufactures components for solar installations and Teslas electric vehicles, was built with $750 million of state subsidies as part of Cuomos Buffalo Billion stimulus program. Under the terms of Teslas agreement with the state, the company was to create 1,460 jobs in Buffalo by April 2020 or face a $41.2 million penalty.

The plant employs almost 800 people in Buffalo, according to state officials, which means it will have to hire 660 more in the next seven months.

"You want to engage in anticipatory, contingent anxiety? No. ... ," Cuomo said. "We will find out [if Tesla met its job targets] next year. We know what the contract says. We know what the obligation says. We know the precaution that was built in. We have damages."

At present, Cuomo added, Tesla is ahead of its state-mandated hiring target, which called for 500 jobs by April 2019, including employees at Panasonic, its partner at the solar panel factory. He cited the new jobs as evidence of Buffalo's economic "momentum" and "energy."

But the Tesla project has been dogged by controversy almost from its start, prompting the states chief fiscal watchdog to open an audit of it last year. Among other issues, Tesla has repeatedly failed to meet its production targets for its highly anticipated solar roof, and its solar energy deployments plummeted more than 70% between April 2015 and 2018. (In a July 29 tweet, Tesla chief executive Elon Musk said the company was expanding production rapidly and hoped to manufacture ~1000 solar roofs/week by end of this year.)

Workers at the Buffalo plant, where jobs were initially pitched as high-tech and well-paid, also make entry-level wages of about $16 an hour. Asked whether types of jobs available at Tesla met his expectations, Cuomo said he didnt know what the breakdown" of job types at the plant is.

Critics have also raised questions about why the state agreed to 10 amendments to its original agreement with SolarCity, now owned by Tesla, to reduce job targets and create an escape clause for the firm if local or national policy changes adversely affect it. A clause in the agreement potentially could allow Tesla to avoid $41.2 million in state penalties if the company fails to meet hiring targets because of changing conditions in the solar energy industry.

On Tuesday, Cuomo indicated that it was too early to speculate about the escape clause. And if Tesla did try to use it, Cuomo indicated that it could lead to a court fight.

"If they want to take it to that extreme, it would be a court of law that would make that determination," he said.

Tesla is good news all this is good news," the governor later added.

Follow this link:

Cuomo on whether Tesla will meet job targets: 'We will find out next year' - Buffalo News

What the GM Strike Means For the Fremont Tesla Factory – California Globe

For the first time since the early 20th century, a General Motors strike has not had a striking factory in California. After the closure of the Fremont Factory in 2009, GM hasnt come come back. Yet, as the 2019 GM strike seems to rage every place else but California, its last closed factory here could be seeing a spark in unions.

After Tesla bought the Fremont plant in 2009 and started producing Tesla electric cars, one major component of car factories was missing the United Auto Workers. Tesla has largely blocked unions. Prior attempts to unionize in 2017 and 2018 were stopped by various means, including supposed intimidation tactics and not allowing union literature inside the factory.

GM workers today want better pay, more secure jobs, and better healthcare. GM has responded that lower sales means that they have to cut costs and let people go to stay competitive.

While the pay is generally lower than other factories in the East, and job security and health care are often wanted, that isnt what concerns many workers at the Tesla Factory its the conditions.

We spoke with a factory worker, John, about the Fremont facility and whats happening, and about his concern about the conditions.

More money would be nice, but its not about that, John explained. We need to be safe here, and to work reasonable times.

We cant get through to management, so having a union get through that would be worth it. A lot of workers here think that paying union dues for that protection so we dont get crippled or die, is worth it.

John confirmed CNBC reports from two years ago about how workers were worked to the brink on the factory floor, working so long that management began giving red bull to keep workers awake. Even two years after the report, many workers are still facing tiring hours due to the high demand of Teslas.

Any talk of a union is quashed. Regardless of how anyone feels about unions, its still an American right to join one to achieve better conditions and achieve our own American Dream.

We always see things about how unions are corrupt, how theyll be a wall to management, and how they only care about money. At least one of my supervisors told me this. And, even if those are true, which they arent, a lot of workers here still want to join. Its that bad.

Other works have claimed that there is a fear that workers trying to unionize will also lose their jobs over it, and be told that it was for performance issues or some other excuse.

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), has had Tesla under investigation on and off over its practices for over two years.

Tesla has said in response that they do care about employees health and well-being, and that they offer a good wage for more than 40,000 workers at the Fremont Plant. A worker who wished to remain anonymous told the Globe Its a good job. Its a factory job, so its not what youd call glamorous. But its pretty fair all in all. Many workers dont see why they need a union if everyone is being treated fairly.

Tesla has also said in a statement over its conditions and injury issues: Reducing excess overtime and improving safety are extremely important. This is why we hired thousands of additional team members to create a third shift, which has reduced the burden on everyone. Moreover, since the beginning of Tesla production at Fremont five years ago, there have been dedicated health and safety experts covering the factory and we hold regular safety meetings with operations leaders. Since the majority of the injuries in the factory are ergonomic in nature, we have an ergonomics department focused exclusively on this issue.

The net result is that since January 1st, our total recordable incident rate (TRIR) is under 3.3, which is less than half the industry average of 6.7.

So what does this mean for the Tesla factory in Fremont?

If GM workers succeed and get the pay, job security, and healthcare theyre striking for, a successful strike could show workers in Fremont that strikes and unions can still get things done.

Thats it for a lot of people here, John stated. No one will join if they think it cant get anything done. But if this one works, and believe me, both the workers and management are paying attention to it, then were going to be seeing a lot more people asking about it. Well see more people wanting to join. Its happened before. Those first big strikes in Michigan in the 30s had a domino effect across the state, and onto places like Ohio.

In 2019, a successful strike in Michigan will hit us here in Fremont.

We are afraid of what will happen if we unionize, John added. But if workers, especially the younger ones who really dont like the idea of them or grew up without them, see what they can do, we just might have a union here.

The anonymous worker gave his take.

They dont have to work here, he said, audibly sighing on the phone. If we get a union involved, then that means we might see a shift go, or they move to Alabama or something. A lot of us are getting by fine. This will screw us all over, including people like me who dont want anything to do with them.

Both of our sources noted that management had been jumpy since Monday, and that televisions behind closed doors audibly had coverage of the strike going on. Both of our sources also said that the result of the GM strike will sway many workers on what they want.

It remains to be seen if the GM strike is ultimately successful. But it very well may hold the key to the future for the UAW setting up shop in Fremont once again.

Evan V. Symon is the Senior Editor for the California Globe. Prior to the Globe, he reported for the Pasadena Independent, the Cleveland Plain Dealer, and was head of the Personal Experiences section at Cracked.

Click play for audio version of this story

See more here:

What the GM Strike Means For the Fremont Tesla Factory - California Globe

Watch Tesla V10 with new Netflix, YouTube, Caraoke apps in action surprisingly refined – Electrek

We get our first look at Tesla V10s new Netflix, YouTube, and Caraoke apps in action and they look surprisingly refined.

Yesterday, we posted the full release notes of the latest Tesla V10 software update for early access owners.

V10 includes a bunch of new or updated features:

Now a Tesla owner in the early access program going by All Electric on YouTube released a first look video at some of the features more particularly the Netflix, YouTube, and Caraoke apps in Tesla V10:

Teslas user interface is not without bugs and some problems, but it is widely recognized as years ahead of the rest of the auto industry.

With this new update, Tesla keeps pushing further with the first integration of Netflix and YouTube directly into a car infotainment system.

As you can see, the apps look surprisingly well polished for beta features.

Its quite special to see Netflix and YouTube working directly on a cars center display, but its actually not that surprising that they work so well.

Earlier this year, Tesla started updating its in-car internet browser with Googles Chromium and Teslas new Netflix and YouTube apps look a lot like their Chromium versions.

The Caraoke app also looks fairly well-made.

However, the update is still lacking some other features, especially new Autopilot features like Smart Summon, and more requested entertainment features, like Spotify.

Those updates are still coming. I think theres a false perception of Teslas focus on new features delaying those Autopilot features.

I doubt thats the case. Its not like the same engineers work on all those apps and there could be a bunch of other reasons for delaying those features, like regulators for Autopilot features and exclusivity contracts for Spotify/Slacker.

Subscribe to Electrek on YouTube for exclusive videos and subscribe to the podcast.

See the original post here:

Watch Tesla V10 with new Netflix, YouTube, Caraoke apps in action surprisingly refined - Electrek

Tesla’s Million Mile Battery – Seeking Alpha

Electric car and energy storage maker Tesla (TSLA) announced back in April that it would soon have million mile car batteries. This like many Tesla claims was met with skepticism by some and ignored by others. A recently published paper reporting Tesla sponsored battery research by Jeff Dahn and his team at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, suggest that this time Tesla's claims may be real. Investors long or short Tesla shares as well as investors in the wider electric car and energy storage sectors should look closely at this work and what its publication implies.

As a practical matter, the batteries Tesla is currently using in its electric cars appear to be fully adequate in terms of life for consumer passenger cars. A battery good for 500 charge/discharge cycles and delivering a range of 300 miles per charge will run an electric car for 150,000 miles without replacement - and if many partial charge cycles rather than repetitive full discharge cycles are used, for a much greater distance. Commercial vehicles with higher utilization are a different matter.

One of the "digs" made about Tesla's million mile battery claim was that consumer electric cars generally are not used for a million miles so having a battery that will outlast the car by a wide margin would be a waste and of no real competitive advantage. Semi trucks, taxis, buses and other commercial vehicles on the other hand do see million mile careers and for such vehicles a long life battery is attractive. A similar argument applies to grid storage applications. In both commercial vehicles and grid energy storage, the full capacity of the battery tends to be cycled - not just the 10-20% daily cycling seen in typical urban private BEVs where full battery capacity is used only for occasional long trips. What is more, in a commercial application, either vehicular or energy storage the economics drive cycling the battery as frequently and as fully as possible to maximize the battery's economic utility.

What an exceptionally long life (high cycle life) battery does is to improve dramatically the economics of commercial vehicle and energy storage battery applications. An electric semi truck offers excellent operating economics due to the much lower cost of electricity compared to diesel fuel. This economic advantage disappears however if the battery has to be replaced. The same thing applies to a robo-taxi, a bus or a large grid storage battery. A long life battery, a battery capable of many thousands of full charge / discharge cycles makes these commercial applications economically compelling.

Before looking at a couple examples it is important to understand what is and what is not being reported from this Tesla sponsored battery research. Jeff Dahn and others involved in this work have presented a very specific and detailed recipe for making NMC532 high nickel content lithium cells with exceptional cycle and shelf life. The following figure from the above linked paper compares the cells newly reported by Dahn et.al. with data from commercially available NMC532 cells. These new cells have dramatically better cycle life, even under very severe cycling conditions and elevated temperature.

A very detailed description of the chemistry and manufacture is included, so that according to the paper, these cells can be reproduced by other researchers (and battery companies) and serve as a benchmark. Essentially Dahn (and Tesla) are throwing down the gauntlet and saying to the industry, "If you can't do at least this well, you probably should not bother playing the game." At the same time, the NMC532 cathode material is not cutting edge in that it still contains substantial amounts of cobalt which carmakers are working hard to eliminate for reasons of cost and supply chain reliability. It is reasonable to assume that Tesla's internal work is more advanced and focused on a lower or even zero cobalt formulation of cathode materials.

Now, let's consider what the cycle life demonstrated by this Tesla sponsored battery work implies for real-world applications. From the figure, these advanced batteries can be charged from 0% to 100% state of charge, then discharged to 0% state of charge, even at 40C (104F) 3,500 times and still retain 90% of original capacity.

A semi truck with this type of battery and 300 mile range per charge could be operated 100,000 miles a year in a desert climate, every year for a decade (1,000,000 miles) and still retain 90% of initial battery capacity, even if the battery were cycled from 0% to 100% to 0% on every charge cycle. Of course cycling the battery less than 100% on each cycle would allow the battery to last even longer (see figure above). Such a battery will essentially last the entire service life of typical semi truck. Dahn and Tesla have just demonstrated the technology for the million-mile battery claimed by Tesla back in April.

Now consider the problem of grid storage. A grid storage facility can expect to achieve better temperature control than can a moving vehicle. So, again referring to the above figure, cycle life of these new cells is at least double, even under extreme cycling conditions if the temperature is limited to 20C (68F). A grid storage facility operating with lower cell temperature could cycle the energy storage battery from 0% to 100% to 0% every day for 20 years and still have 90% or so battery capacity available. To put this in context, for a grid storage battery costing $150/kWh installed and cycled 7,300 times (365 days a year for 20 years), the battery amortization per kWh is $150 / 7,300 = $0.0205/kWh.

If the "battery cost" of storing electricity is just a couple of cents per kWh stored, the possibilities for harvesting cheap wholesale electricity at times of over capacity for later use or sale are tremendous. The following screen-shot shows the electricity distribution nodes in the CAISO (California Independent System Operator) system where (blue circles) the 15-minute-ahead electricity price is negative for wholesale customers. This is a typical afternoon situation [9/10/2019 @ 2 pm]. At the Anaheim node, a wholesale customer is actually paid over 8 cents per kWh to take energy.

For a "bigger picture", here are all the CAISO distribution nodes with wholesale price 3 cents per kWh or less. This covers almost all CAISO distribution and electricity supply across much of the western US.

Let's consider for a moment a Tesla "UltraCharger" station for recharging Tesla electric semi trucks. With a set of long-life grid storage batteries, the station can harvest low cost energy from the grid when prices are low or negative. In some cases a cleverly sited station will actually be paid to take energy. Even a randomly sited station should be able to time its taking of energy from the grid into storage so as to pay less than 3 cents per kWh for grid energy. Even if all the energy the station supplies to Tesla semi-trucks passes through the grid storage system, Tesla's cost for energy delivered to customer trucks will be a nickel a kWh (and much less in many cases) before station operating costs. Tesla has promised to recharge customers' Tesla semi-trucks for 7 cents a kWh, something that starts to look financially viable with very long life grid storage batteries.

Long-life batteries with great cycle life will enable commercial electric vehicles and economically compelling grid storage applications and Tesla knows how to make them. So what? Didn't Jeff Dahn just spill the beans and tell every Tesla competitor out there exactly how to make these batteries, too? What does publication of this research - complete with the detailed "how to" recipe - say about the state of Tesla's battery technology.

First off this work involves NMC532, a cathode material with a 5:3:2 ratio of nickel, manganese and cobalt. These are not cutting-edge cells from the standpoint of cobalt use and going forward any serious player in electric cars/trucks or grid storage will be looking for a much lower cobalt solution. Many players are looking to NMC811 which contains half the cobalt and Tesla has said that their current NCA cathode material uses less cobalt than even NMC811. No serious player is going to go after Tesla using these NMC532 cells. The cells and the method for making them will be used largely for the purpose Jeff Dahn and his colleagues put forth in their paper - as a benchmark for others developing more advanced cells. The "trick" for Tesla competitors (and perhaps for Tesla, too) will be to make cells as good as those described, but with cathode formulations using much less, or preferably no cobalt.

An important question for investors is what will it take for competitors (or even Tesla) to achieve batteries with these excellent long-life characteristics, and do so with minimum/no cobalt and at competitive cost? To answer this, we need to look at what innovation is disclosed in connection with these exceptional batteries. Presumably it will be replication of the key innovation, but with low or cobalt free cathode formulations, at low manufacturing cost that will yield competitive lithium batteries for vehicles and for grid storage.

The key innovation disclosed in this work is cathode material with particles each comprised of a single crystal and covered with a nano-scale protective coating. These cathode particles are of small (2-3 micron) size and each is a single crystal of LiNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2 with a titanium-based nano-coating. According to the study authors, it is the single crystal structure of the individual cathode material particles that is critical because single crystal cathode particles resist cracking under repeated full charge/discharge cycles far better than do particles consisting of multiple, randomly oriented crystal grains. One of the big challenges for all the players will be creating single crystal cathode powder with consistent particle size and evenly applied nano-scale coatings in high volumes and at low cost.

It is in the manufacture of these precision, single crystal cathode powders that I believe an exceptional investor opportunity lies. But first an important note:

Disclosure: I am not a professional investment advisor and I am currently long Nano One (NNOMF), the company whose involvement I am about to relate. Nano One is a small-cap company with shares currently priced at about $1 and fewer than 70 million shares outstanding. Investment in Nano One or any similarly small company that is currently not profitable and with very small revenues is a risky proposition. Investors should not invest in Nano One or any very small-cap company funds that they are not willing to put fully at risk.

Manufacturing cathode powder with precision sized, single crystal, coated particles is a far from trivial problem. And huge amounts of these cathode materials will be needed. For instance, for Tesla/Panasonic to make 35GWh of cells at the Nevada GigaFactory will require something like 50,000 tonnes/year of cathode powder similar to the weight of the WWII battleship Missouri. It is one thing to make such powders in the lab, or by complex grinding-sizing-roasting-grinding-sizing-roasting... processes as is current industry practice. Making huge amounts of these powders economically is going to be a challenge and the manufacturing economics will really, really matter. The reason most cathode powders are not single crystal is the cost of processing. It's cheaper to roast and grind fewer times and live with polycrystalline cathode powder - even if the cells don't last as long.

There is a small company, Nano One, that is focused on developing low-cost, precision cathode material processing. Nano One's business model is to license its process to major industry players. I believe this combination of having a (potentially) silver-bullet process and licensing the process rather than manufacturing cathode material at scale offers exceptional leverage for investors because quite small capital investment by Nano One and hence by Nano One investors will potentially yield significant, long-term royalty income from the manufacture of vast quantities of cathode material.

The Nano One process works for most lithium ion cathode materials and the company is currently working with China's Pulead (supplier of 15% of world LFP cathode material) to scale the Nano One process for LFP. The company is also working with VW (OTCPK:VWAGY) to again scale its process for a different but undisclosed cathode material. Nano One states it is also working with several other unnamed auto and battery / battery materials companies.

What this should be telling investors is that Tesla competitors have at least one process technology source for making precision, single crystal cathode material and that companies like VW will be very much "in the game" when it comes to battery development competitive with Tesla. Investors should also appreciate that long-range semi trucks, robo-taxis and at-scale grid storage are all on the way now that we have a demonstrated path to the required long-life batteries.

Information from Tesla sponsored battery research has been publicly disclosed that shows both that exceptionally long-life lithium batteries can be made, and how others can make such batteries. A reasonable presumption is that Tesla has (possibly, but not necessarily with partner Panasonic) this kind of long-life battery technology in hand for use in, among other things, its coming semi-trucks.

Investors should also realize that the "how to" for long life batteries has just been given out to Tesla competitors. There is however a catch. The cells and manufacturing process described is for a cathode material with substantial cobalt content and these specific cells will probably not be competitive in the vehicle and grid storage market going forward due to the cobalt content. Realistic competitors (and Tesla itself) will need to replicate this work with cathode formulations having much less or no cobalt to remain competitive.

Small cathode process development company Nano One is interesting both as an investment opportunity by itself and also as indication that at least some Tesla competitors (VW and its platform partner Ford (F) in particular) are suiting up with key cathode making technology to compete in this arena.

Disclosure: I am/we are long NNOMF. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: Disclaimer: These writings about the technical aspects of Tesla, electric cars, components, supply chain and the like are intended to stimulate awareness and discussion of these issues. Investors should view my work in this light and seek other competent technical advice on the subject issues before making investment decisions.

See the original post here:

Tesla's Million Mile Battery - Seeking Alpha

Podcast: Teslas upcoming new battery, Tesla Plaid Powertrain, EVs from Frankfurt, and more – Electrek

This week on theElectrek Podcast, we discuss the most popular news in the world of sustainable transport and energy, including Teslas upcoming new battery, Tesla Plaid Powertrain, EVs from Frankfurt, and more.

Support our show!

The Electrek Podcast is me, Fred Lambert, editor-in-chief of Electrek, and Seth Weintraub, founder and publisher of Electrek and the 9to5 network, discussing all our top stories of the week while taking questions from our readers and highlighting the most insightful comments on the site.

The show is back live every Friday at 4pm ET onElectreks Youtube channel. As a reminder well have an accompanyingpost, like this one, on the site with an embeddedlink to the live stream. Head to theYoutube channelto get your questions and comments in.

After the show ends at around 5pm ET, the video will be archived onYouTubeand the audio on all your favorite podcast apps through ourRSS feed:https://electrek.co/podcastRSS. Grab thequick link to iTunes here.

We now havea Patreonif you want to help us to avoid more ads and invest more in our content. We have some awesome gifts for our Patreons and more coming.

Here are a few of the articles that we will discuss during the podcast today:

Heres the live stream for todays episode starting at 4:00pm ET (or the video after 5:00pm ET):

Subscribe to Electrek on YouTube for exclusive videos and subscribe to the podcast.

Read the original here:

Podcast: Teslas upcoming new battery, Tesla Plaid Powertrain, EVs from Frankfurt, and more - Electrek

Tesla Sentry Mode catches couple mistaking Model 3 for their Hyundai Elantra – Driving

The Tesla Model 3s new Sentry Mode yknow, the feature that turns on the parked cars cameras when the vehicle is disturbed has by now caught some very weird things on video, were sure.

But this clip of a couple walking up to a white example and repeatedly reaching for door handles that arent there has got to be one of the more chuckle-worthy.

The clip, posted to the TeslaMotors sub on reddit, shows the pair walking up the Model 3 from a nearby strip mall. The driver-side Sentry camera shows a man in a white shirt walk up, fumble for the cars retracting flush-with-the-body door handles about three times, pause to press the key fob to unlock the car, then try for the non-existent handle again.

On the other side, his passenger fares just about as well.

Footage from the passenger side of the parked Model 3 shows the couples also-white 2015-ish Hyundai Elantra just two spaces away and explains maybe just a little bit how they mistook one entry-level four-door for another.

We get that walking up to and opening your car is something you do so often, thats so subconscious, that even the smallest distraction might throw your brain for a loop and why you might forget your car, last you checked, had door handles, ones that dont pop out via key-fob button.

But its mistaking the Model 3 for the Hyundai in the first place you can see the latter at the bottom in the photo below, Model 3 on top that confounds us, unless youre really engaged in your conversation, we suppose. At the very least, I guess its sort of a compliment to Hyundai-designers-of-four-years-ago that people could confound the two.

Continue reading here:

Tesla Sentry Mode catches couple mistaking Model 3 for their Hyundai Elantra - Driving

See This Tesla Model S Making Smoke? A Bug Is The Cause – InsideEVs

Tesla vehicles are praised for their active and passive safety levels. Nonetheless, some drivers would love to see what their EVs can actually do. The DragTimes YouTube channel managed to discover just that. In fact, it was Dan, a friend of Brooks Weisblat, the video presenter. And it shows a way or a bug, well probably never know to disable all active safety systems in a Model S.

Weisblat repeatedly warns viewers not to try the bug at home. But the warnings are just a legal procedure to make sure people will take responsibility for choosing to do so. This is something they are normally not willing to do. Especially when they can just sue other people to take the blame.

With the legal concerns duly handled, Weisblat uses the bug to have his Model S completely untamed. It also loses the regenerative braking, a situation that makes the Tesla coast. Really.

When Weisblat decides to do a 0 to 60 mph run, he realizes Launch control is also not available. That makes the tires spin more than necessary, lose traction, and, consequently, time.

Making a perfect acceleration time takes time. The driver has to know exactly how much pressure to put on the gas pedal at first and afterward. At least when you talk about an ICE car.

Electric vehicles, with their instant torque, probably do not allow for that sort of fine modulation, hence the Launch control.

But the smoking part of the video literally is when Weisblat decides to make donuts with his Model S. He does that in an empty parking lot. Thats when we discover the car resets if it stays put for a little while.

The final part is when the video presenter teaches Model S owners how to deactivate the systems. As he warned, do not do that unless you are willing to take full responsibility for what happens. Knowing what you are doing at the steering wheel also helps a lot. Have fun with your Model S. Responsibly, please.

In this video I turn off all restrictions and limiters in my Tesla Model S P100D which allows some sort of track mode and a lot of fun.

The rest is here:

See This Tesla Model S Making Smoke? A Bug Is The Cause - InsideEVs

Tesla Model 3 dominates global EV sales, chases down fossil fuel competitors – The Driven

Global sales of the Tesla Model 3 electric sedan are blowing all other electric vehicle (EV) competitors out of the water, selling almost 3 times more globally than its nearest competitor in the first half of 2019.

There were 128,000 Tesla Model 3s delivered to customers worldwide in the first six months, well ahead of Chinese-made BJEV which sold 49,000 of its EU-series and almost four times as many Nissan Leafs.

But comparisons against other EV models are getting to be old hat its the comparison of Model 3 sales to comparative internal combustion engine (ICE) models that tells the real tale in the latest figures from EV sales database EV-Volumes.

EV-Volumes lists Tesla Model 3s major ICE competitors as the BMW 3 and 4 series, Mercedes Benz C-Class and Audi A4 and A5 which this table immediately above shows sold in the vicinity of 200,000 for each brand (noting that this means multiple models).

The Model 3 is already reaching more than half of their global sales no mean feat and yet another indicator of the vehicles global success.

In the first half of 2018, when the Model 3 was only on sale in the US, there were under 30,000 units delivered to customers, but sales have increased four-fold since its release on European, Chinese and now right-hand markets including the UK and more recently Australia.

In terms of total plug-in electric vehicle sales, which includes both battery electric (BEV) and plug-in electric (PHEV), overall sales were up 46% for H1 2019 year on year (YoY).

The increase 358,000 units is equal to the entire US EV market share for 2018. The market as a whole also saw a marked shift to BEV sales compared to PHEV sales, with three-quarters of plug-in sales in the first six months of 2019 being battery electric.

China accounted for the lions share of that growth in the global EV market, with a 66% increase on H1 2018 sales.

That was a bigger percentage than the US, probably reflecting the biggest jump (89%) in 2018 when the Tesla 3 overcame production difficulties and filled a backlog of orders, and the fact that other big US car-makers are yet to embrace EVs in the same way as other countries.

Early figures for July showed some slowing of plug-in sales compared to the first half as revised Chinese subsidy schemes came into full effect no surprise there considering that for H1 2019 China accounted for 57% of EV sales globally.

As for Australia, EV-Volumes does not yet count EV sales here they are still way too sparse to warrant attention.

Data however from the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) has captured a positive shift in EV sales here of late, albeit without the all-important Model 3 sales figures.

However as indicated by Tesla delivery staff it appears that since it became available in Australia in August 2019 there are already some thousands of Model 3s slated for delivery making it also now the most popular EV in Australia, as it is overseas.

Bridie Schmidt is lead reporter for The Driven, sister site of Renew Economy. She specialises in writing about new technology, as well as using her technical skills in managing our websites.

Read more here:

Tesla Model 3 dominates global EV sales, chases down fossil fuel competitors - The Driven