Asian Technology Stocks Just Hit 17-year Peaks – Fortune

LONDON, Aug 2Asian technology stocks hit 17-year peaks and Wall Street's Dow index looked set to break 22,000 points later on Wednesday, as blockbuster earnings from Apple rippled out to component makers globally.

Shares in the world's most valuable company surged 6% after-hours to a record of more than $159 each, taking its market capitalization above $830 billion.

That should help carry the Dow through the 22,000 mark when trading resumes in New York. E-Mini futures for the Dow were up 0.2 percent despite a lower Europe as disappointing results from Societe Generale and Commerzbank weighed on the bank stocks.

Apple reported better-than-expected iPhone sales , revenue, and earnings per share and signaled its upcoming 10th-anniversary phone is on schedule.

It helped dispel one of the few nagging doubts of the corporate earnings season so farthat Amazons lackluster results last week might have revealed some tiredness among the giant U.S. tech and internet stocks that have been driving the stock market rally all year.

"It is all about Apple," said Naeem Aslam chief market analyst at Think Markets. "The firm comfortably topped its forecast and produced stellar numbers for its revenue and profit."

Among Asia's Apple suppliers, LG Innnotek jumped 10 percent and SK Hynix, the world's second-biggest memory chip maker, rose 3.8 percent.

Murata Manufacturing firmed 4.9 percent and Taiyo Yuden 4.4 percent, helping Tokyo's Nikkei up 0.47 percent.

The MSCI tech index for Asia also climbed 0.9 percent to ground not trod since early 2000, bringing its gains for the year to a heady 40 percent.

Those gains balanced losses in basic materials and energy to leave MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan steady near its highest since late 2007.

There was a note of caution over reports that U.S. President Donald Trump was close to a decision on how to respond to what he considers China's unfair trade practices.

Tepid U.S. inflation along with political turmoil in Washington has lessened the possibility of another Federal Reserve rate hike this year, lowering bond yields across the globe.

Improving data in other major economies has also served to push the greenback down nearly 11 percent from January peaks, benefiting commodities and emerging markets.

A swathe of manufacturing surveys (PMIs) out on Tuesday had underlined how the improvement in activity had broadened out from the United States to Asia and Europe.

Alan Ruskin, head of G10 forex at Deutsche Bank, noted the top five PMIs were all Northern European economies and every index in Europe was now in expansionary territory above 50.

"That will do nothing to hurt ebullient global risk appetite," said Ruskin. "This phase of the risk rally is based on growth data, but even more on subdued inflation measures."

MSCI's gauge of stocks across the globe was just below an all-time peak.

On Wall Street later electric car maker Tesla, gadget firm Fitbit and insurance provider AIG will report results.

In currency markets, the dollar index was stuck at just under 93, after touching 92.777, the lowest since early May 2016. It was aided by gains on a softer yen which saw it creep to 110.80.

Yet the euro also benefited from buying against the yen , reaching its highest since February last year. It nudged up against the dollar and Swiss Franc too, briefly striking new 2-1/2-year highs against both at $1.1846 and 1.1468 francs per euro respectively.

Euro zone June producer price inflation data helped it on its way as it topped analysts' forecasts. There was a slowdown in the pace overall, but it bolstered bets that the European Central Bank could soon start winding down its more than 2-trillion-euro stimulus program.

"The ECB is going to be the central bank to watch for the rest of the year," said JP Morgan Asset Management global market strategist Alex Dryden.

"We think they are going to take 9-12 months to get out of the market but that is a big question ... it could even be six months," he added.

Bond markets were largely quiet, with the premiums investors demand to hold South European government debt over the German equivalent close to their lowest levels in weeks and both 2- and 10-year U.S. Treasury yields barely budged.

In emerging markets, MSCI's EM stocks index was near a three-year high. India's central bank became the first in Asia to cut interest rates this year, while Venezuela's bonds continued to slid amid rising political tensions there around President Nicolas Maduro.

Oil prices were under pressure again too amid rising U.S. fuel inventories and as major world producers kept pumping, causing investors to worry that several weeks of steady gains had pushed the rally too far.

Brent crude eased to $51.80 a barrel, while U.S. crude lost 8 cents to $49.07.

(Additional reporting by Wayne Cole in Sydney; Editing by Andrew Heavens)

Read this article:

Asian Technology Stocks Just Hit 17-year Peaks - Fortune

Can Technology Redefine Litigation Itself? Stephen Kane Thinks So. – Above the Law

As Anthony Scaramucci aka The Mooch, the recently departed White House Communications Director, would likely say, Civil litigation is a total clusterf**k. And on this, he would be right (he went to Harvard Law, after all)!

Civil litigation is nothing like Law & Order: its super-slow, procedurally confusing, absurdly expensive, and then, in the end, you win or lose based on a coin-tossthe preponderance of the evidence. Rough justice at best. But hey, no one is going give up their liberty or end up in jail, so lets split the baby and move on, right?

But, wait, if civil justice is going to be rough, couldnt it at least be fast, cheap, and easy? Shouldnt routine commercial disputes be more push button? Shouldnt you just be able to type up your version of the facts,upload your basic evidence, have a unbiased mediator look at both sides, and quickly come to a reasonable outcome? Does the rest of the expense and process add any value?

In my half-decade as a Biglaw litigator, I always believed there had to be a better way (a thought Im sure many of you entertained while drafting second amended interrogatories on a contract dispute).

Well, today there is hope. A Stanford undergrad and Stanford Law alum, Stephen Kane, is building some awesome technology designed to make courts obsolete in straightforward civil disputes.

Stephens alt.legal company, FairClaims, is starting small with . . . well, small claims. But, over time, Stephen believes that FairClaims will travel up the courtroom value chain, streamlining the costs in time and treasure for all kinds of civil disputes. He even believes that with his DIY process, many claims can be handled without a lawyer (you can still use one, if you are into that sort of thing), at a fraction of the cost.

Enjoy the interview, and note that Stephen agrees with my assessment that alt.legal billionaires are comingsoon . . . and he went to Stanford!

Stephen Kane

Joe Borstein: So a Stanford undergrad, Stanford law alum is seeking to make the world better with technology (weve heard that one before) . . . but you are taking this to the next level attempting to redesign conflict resolution itself!? Tell us how you got the idea for FairClaims, and how its going to change the world.

Stephen Kane: Haha, I know, how original, right?

I got the idea by representing my own clients I kept getting calls from people with small disputes and (1) on the one hand, it didnt make sense for them to pay an attorney $1,500 to potentially recover $2,500, and (2) they just did not want to go to small claims court (I could hear it in their voice). So I tried finding a solution to help them, and when I couldnt find one I got obsessed with the idea there should be one.

Its going to change the world because there are millions of disputes each year that go unresolved, where both individuals and businesses lose out for one reason or another, and were going help create a world where that happens much less often.

JB: I love it. So walk us though it how do people use your technology and circumvent the madness of small claims court? Is it so easy you dont need a lawyer?

SK: It is like with small claims court, you dont need a lawyer to bring a Fair Claim. And were on a mission to make it more and more push button over time. We offer a few different chat, settlement, mediation and arbitration solutions, including video arbitration and FairChat. With video arbitration, each side signs up, shares their side of the story, uploads and comments on evidence, and gets a 30-minute video hearing in front of a qualified arbitrator. They then get a binding, court-enforceable decision within about three weeks. And FairChat is our DIY chat-settlement tool where the parties can discuss their case but also see suggested settlement offers via predictive analytics.

JB: So how big does it get? Is there a reason it has to stop at small claims? Can you DIY more substantial litigation?

SK: Good question.

No reason it has to be small claims, thats just where we happened to get the ball rolling. And yes, I absolutely believe we can get to a place where people DIY more substantial litigation as long as due process, rules, and solutions match the claim in question. But we can get there, say up to $100k or so, possibly more. And that doesnt necessarily mean lawyers cant partake (know your audience, right) were an alternative to court whether someone has a lawyer or not. In any case, since some 90% of people who need a lawyer cant afford one, most people badly need DIY something we think about all day every day.

JB: So do where do you believe the alt.legal segment of the legal industry is now? Are we ready for true game changers of the Uber/Airbnb/Amazon level? Or will it be incremental? Will there be a legal Jeff Bezos?

SK: This is alt.legals golden era; Uber/Airbnb/Amazon-level change is upon us. And yes, I believe were ready for it. Now that people are comfortable seeing legal and online side by side (thanks to LegalZoom and others), and now that tech plays such a major role in other heavy duty industries like insurance, health care, and banking, the foundation has been laid for even greater leaps of innovation. Id take it one step further: people are beyond ready for it they in fact expect it, demand it, and will embrace it.

For all these reasons and more, a legal Bezos is totally inevitable.

JB: How did you get the guts to be a legal entrepreneur?

SK: I got to a point where I couldnt not do something about this problem. The more I dug into the justice gap, the more I realized two things: (1) judicial inequities are a vast and growing problem, even for small claims, and (2) these problems are entirely solvable, even for large claims (not easy to solve but definitely solvable). So the cost of my efforts are dramatically overshadowed by our potential impact. And whatever courage is required from me and the team is continuously re-inspired by our mission and traction. Its endlessly fulfilling and exciting.

JB: What advice would you give those aspiring to change the justice system through technology?

SK: Start small. Get learnings. Experiment. All the same things that are important to any innovator. And in addition to that, if youre working on something for non-lawyers, empathy is key. Not just because its the right thing to do, but because trust is critical when it comes to delivering legal services, and people wont trust you unless you give a damn. You may have a handle on the legal system because youre an attorney or read law review articles for fun, but most people dont. Therein lies the opportunity!

Read the original post:

Can Technology Redefine Litigation Itself? Stephen Kane Thinks So. - Above the Law

Energy Jobs: Tesla Loses Its Director of Battery Technology. Plus, Microsoft, National Grid and DOE – Greentech Media

Tesla is experiencing a bit of executive whiplash. Less than a week after Elon Musk delivered the first Model 3 vehicles to customers, Tesla's Director of BatteryTechnology, Kurt Kelty,stepped down. He'd been at the company since 2006.

Before Tesla, Kelty worked in Panasonic's battery R&D lab. He was instrumental in developing battery manufacturing plans for the Gigafactory and executing Tesla's partnership with Panasonic.

This is one of roughly two dozen executive departures in recent months, according to a Bloomberg tally. That includes Mateo Jaramillo, the executive who built Tesla's stationary storage business. The turnover comes as Tesla seeks to ramp up production of stationary batteries, the Model 3 and the Solar Roof all at once.

Meanwhile, Tesla doubled the number of women on its board of directors in July with the addition of Linda Johnson Rice, CEO of Ebony Media.

She was elected along with another media executive, 21st Century Foxs James Murdoch, to serve asindependent board members. The board has been criticized by some investors for lacking independence from Tesla CEO Elon Musk.

In non-Tesla news,Adriana Karaboutis will join National Grid as chief information and digital officer, a new position that will tie together the utilitys digital strategy. She will be based in the U.S., but will report to CEO John Pettigrew at the companys London headquarters, according to The Wall Street Journal. She was most recently at Biogen, and was previously global CIO at Dell.

Another IT veteran, Kate Johnson, is moving from COO of GE Digital to be president and corporate vice president of Microsoft. The tech giant lauded her role helping GE leverage software and data analytics for large industrial companies.

The Sierra Club has elected Loren Blackford as its new board president. For the first time in the nonprofits 125-year history, it now has an all-female executive committee, including VP Susana Reyes, Treasurer Elizabeth Walsh, Secretary Robin Mann, and Fifth Officer Margrete Strand-Rangnes.

Jamie Nolan is stepping down as the communications director for the U.S. Department of Energy's SunShot Initiative. She will be opening up her own communications consultancy, Nolan Strategic Communications, focused on energy, cleantech, climate and transportation.

Sheridan Paukerhas joined Keyes & Fox as the firm's first female partner. Keyes & Fox is focused on energy regulatory advocacy, specifically supporting the expansion of clean energy markets in more than 40 states. Pauker is also a board member for Vote Solar.

Recurrent Energy has brought on a slew of new senior-level people, including Kyle Johnson, who moved from Constellation to his new role of managing director and head of origination and structuring. Michael Avidan joined Recurrent as senior director of corporate origination from SunPower;Michael Arndt, formerly of NRG, is now managing director of development at Recurrent; and Spivey Paup, most recently the director of solar development at E.ON, is now director of development for Texas and the eastern U.S. with Recurrent.

Jean-Baptiste Cornefert also recently left E.ON, where he was he was responsible for the virtual power plant and renewable marketing business. He is now the managing director of Sonnen eServices, where he will oversee Sonnenscommunity program and new distributed energy services.

Renewable energy infrastructure group Cubico Sustainable Investments has named Stephen Riley as its new CEO. Riley had been a non-executive director at the company previously. Cubico has a broad portfolio across Western Europe and Latin America. The majority of the projects are wind, but the portfolio also includes solar PV, CSP and hydro.

Jim Murphy was promoted from CFO to president/COO of Invenergy, the largest privately held North American renewable energy company. Steven Ryder was promoted to CFO.Over at Invenergys Future Fund, John Tough joined as a partner from Choose Energy, where he was most recently chief revenue officer.

***

Enertech Search Partners, an executive search firm with a dedicated cleantech practice, is the sponsor of the GTM jobs column.

Among itsmany active searches, Enertech is looking for aQuantitative Analyst Director within the energy efficiency sector.

The client is a late-stage startup delivering utilities cost-effective and reliable energy storage, lowering electric bills for businesses and homeowners, and reducing CO2 emissions.

Currently, the client is looking for an entrepreneurial Quantitative Analyst Director with strong mathematical skills to help drive the future of energy storage.In this role, you will primarily work on developing technical and financial models.You must have a strong understanding of regional labor rates, get good estimates on cost to execute a service and maintenance program, and you must have a tenacious ability to negotiate.

***

The management board of insolvent PV manufacturer SolarWorld AG has resigned. Resignationsinclude Philipp Koecke, Frank Henn, Colette Rckert-Hennen and Jrgen Stein, but exclude founder and chairman Dr. Frank Asbeck, according to PV Tech. The company has started insolvency proceedings but still continues to look for an investor.

Bob Simmons is now at Marathon Capital as a senior managing director. He was previously at Panda Power Funds, where he was a founding partner and held various positions. At Marathon, Simmons will expand the firms reach into infrastructure and other asset classes and scale up its suite of advisory services to owners and operators of power generation assets, and gas generation in particular.

Surge Ventures and Surge Accelerator founderKirk Coburnhas joined Shell Technology Ventures. Surge Accelerator closed last year. At Shell, he will focus on investing in new energies, according to Xconomy. Recently, Shell Energy has been moving further into renewable power, acquiring developerMP2 Energy. Shell Technology Ventures co-led a $14 million investment inSense Labsin 2016 and led afunding round in Gelilast year worth $7 million.

Kevin Davis has joinedGardner Capital as asset manager. Gardner Capital focuses on investments in affordable housing, solar development and tax credit syndication. At Gardner, Davis will manage the companys portfolio of housing and solar projects to ensure regulatory compliance.

President Trump has nominated energy lawyer Kevin McIntyre of Virginia to be member and chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. This is the fourth nomination Trump has put up for FERC, which would give the agency a quorum when the Senate finally schedules a confirmation vote. McIntyre is co-leader of the global energy practice at law firm Jones Day.

Warren Luhning joined 7X Energy, a utility-scale solar developer, as CIO. He will lead teams responsible for project finance, merger and acquisitions, and capital raising. Luhning previously managed energy finance and corporate development at Pattern Energy Group.

Jordan Collins is now general counsel and VP of strategy and policy at CalCom Solar, an EPC focusing on solar for agriculture and water. CalCom was ranked third on theInc. 5000s list of fastest-growing private companies in the U.S. in 2016.

And in case you missed it, GTMs first employee and long-time editor Eric Wesoff -- a man one reader referred to as the Sharknado of clean energy journalism --has left GTM. No word yet on his next move, but were pretty sure he wont be shilling for the fuel cell industry. You can read his goodbye post here.

For those who sent tips to Eric about career changes and other industry happenings, please continue to let us know at tips@greentechmedia.com or tweed@greentechmedia.com.

Read more here:

Energy Jobs: Tesla Loses Its Director of Battery Technology. Plus, Microsoft, National Grid and DOE - Greentech Media

USDA creating better quality of life, safer environment through technology transfer – FederalNewsRadio.com

What do fluorescent lights that scan for Salmonella, remote sensors for testing bridge stability and a tool to identify bee mites have in common?

Theyre part of the latest crop of innovative ideas that make up the244 new inventions and 109 patent applications included in the Agriculture Departmentsannual report on technology transfer.

The report itself tries to compile new inventions, patents, technology breakthroughs, new methodologies; really the kinds of collaborations that USDA science and technology folks have with the private sector through special agreements, said acting USDA Undersecretary Ann Bartuska. So you have an incredible array of things that are in the annual report. My favorite ones happen to be the things that clearly demonstrate breakthroughs and innovations. In fact, they really do represent the range of work that happens at the 16 agencies that comprise USDA.

The report started being published within the last 20 years. Each year, theres a call for what everybody throughout the USDAand its components is working on.

Sponsored content: Download our Executive Briefing to learn how agency and industry experts are using cloud for data and application strategy.

It covers the gamut of agreements like CRADAs, which are cooperative research and development agreements with the private sector. It includes patents. It includes licenses. It includes new exploratory work thats happening, said Bartuska, whois also serving asacting chief scientist for research, education and economics at USDA.So its really quite diverse in what its capturing. There is in the report tables that capture the data in those categories by agency, and then we roll it all up to one for the department.

Bartuska said this years report is pretty consistent with past years numbers of patents and inventions, though the output can be impacted by technological breakthroughs. In fiscal 2015, the report included 222 new inventions and 125 new patent applications.

For example, gene sequencing has created a whole new set of processes and products and subsequent opportunities for research and development, Bartuska said.

The outcomes that especially our intramural agencies Agricultural Research Service, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), the Forest Service I think the work that they have done, the production of new things, has beenpretty constant over time, with some blips, Bartuska said. The genomic sequencing probably is one area. Theres been some advances inpest protection and quarantine matters, that really track where theyve had infestations, so you might be able to follow some increases and outcomesfollowing a particular pest outbreak, and then it goes back. Theres a lot of interest in disease transmission right now. If I look at that report, theres a lot on mosquitoes and transmissions.

That includes the enhancement of clothing worn by Marines to better prevent bug bites.

Bartuska said if she had to look to future reports, she would expect to see an increase in water use and drought response.

New bill would loosen restrictions on TSP withdrawals

Were really interested in reducing the amount of water used by Agriculture and being more responsible in the water that we use, Bartuska said.

She said sensor technology and the use of aerial vehicles [drones], and how those technologies can be more effective and efficient, is another area where future technology transfer reports mightshow an increased interest.

Effectiveness and efficiency are things USDA always has in mind, especially when it comes to a return on investment for taxpayers, Bartuska said.

One hundred percent of the people use our product because we produce food, Bartuska said. And so wetouch everybody, but to do it in a sustainable way, to be able to meet other peoples values on the environment and water quality, were very conscious of that. A lot of this return on investment is how you do work more efficiently, more effectively. And again, get a lot of benefit by that dollar that weve been investing.

Bartuska said according to USDA math, for every dollar invested in research and development, $20 is returned to taxpayers.

One example in the report that highlights USDAs mission is an anti-cancer drug developed by Penn State University researchers. The drug comes from parts of Omega-3 fatty acids.

The connection back to USDA is that other than not only funding good science,but Omega-3s are found in agricultural and aquacultural products, so youre extracting from one of our products into something that would then benefit human health, Bartuska said. It really does reflect that Agriculture is in part about farming, but Agriculture is so much about all kinds of food technology that we have, diseases; the diversity, again, of activities under USDA is incredibly broad.

The report also highlights the work USDA does with universities, the private sector and other agencies, Bartuska said.

Agreements with the private sector can come in the form of cooperative research and development agreements, and at some point, those products can be moved into the private sector.

In some cases, the patent would be held by us and they get exclusive license on the product, but it allows us then to form and both mutually invest in an outcome, Bartuska said. So weve really been trying to promote especially when we see the potential for a particular line of research to become a commercial activity, to build these private sector partnerships.

The report also complements the administrations Made In America, campaign, through contributing to job growth and supporting new business, especially in rural areas, Bartuska said.

Allthose products that you see in the technology transfer report, we can see them as helping to contribute to this overall Made In America process, Bartuska said. Technology transfer is all about development of a research product and then moving it to somebody to use it. It is as fine to me thata CEO of a company uses something as you [would] in your home, because hopefully what youre using is creating a better quality of life, a safer environment, a better use of resources so that were reducing waste, were reducing water consumption. So all of those things really add upto the value of what our research products can do.

Read more from the original source:

USDA creating better quality of life, safer environment through technology transfer - FederalNewsRadio.com

Palmer Luckey’s new defense technology start-up Anduril draws execs from Palantir – Los Angeles Times

Two former Palantir Technologies engineers appear to be in charge of Palmer Luckeys new defense technology start-up Anduril Industries, according to newly reviewed regulatory filings.

Luckey, a Long Beach native acclaimed for catalyzing the nascent virtual reality technology industry by founding Oculus VR, has said his new venture could do the same for the defense industry.

We are spending more than ever on defense technology, yet the pace of innovation has been slowing for decades, he told the New York Times in a brief statement in early June.

Beyond that, Luckey has said little publicly about Andurils makeup or ambitions since its founding April 20. He left Facebooks Oculus division in late March for unspecified reasons.

His role at Anduril is unclear. But registration documents filed with California in late June list Brian W. Schimpf as chief executive and Matthew W. Grimm as chief operating officer. The documents also point to a small office at an Irvine business park as the companys headquarters.

LinkedIn profiles for Schimpf and Grimm show they spent at least years six together at Palantir, where they described their job as tweaking the companys data analysis software to meet client desires. Palantirs clients include law enforcement agencies and corporations that want to search through multiple sets of information with ease. The sensitive nature of the work has made Palantir one of Silicon Valleys most secretive and highly valued companies.

Both Schimpf and Grimm note that they have bachelors degrees from Cornell University. Schimpf was on a Cornell team that competed unsuccessfully in the Defense Departments annual competition to develop an autonomous vehicle that can race across rough desert terrain.

That Luckey would connect with people with ties to Palantir isnt surprising. Palantir was kickstarted with funding from Peter Thiel, whose Founders Fund venture capital firm was set to invest in Luckeys new firm, according to the New York Times report.

The Thiel connection is evident in Andurils name too. Thiel investment funds and companies, including Palantir, are known for borrowing from the fantasy book series Lord of the Rings. Anduril, as fans of the books know, was the sword referred to as the flame of the West, forged from the remains of the weapon that cut the ring of power from Sauron's finger. The freshly cast weapon became a symbol of the one true king.

Incorporation documents for Anduril dont designate a price for the 20 million authorized shares of the start-up, suggesting that if Founders Fund has already invested, it has probably been in the form of a loan that could later be converted into stock.

Anduril and Thiel didnt respond to requests for comment. The companys name came to light last week when CNN and other media outlets reported that U.S. Rep. Will Hurd, a Texas Republican, had used data from Anduril as a foundation for proposed legislation. A bill that Hurd and other lawmakers introduced last week calls for the Department of Homeland Security to research a smart wall along the U.S.-Mexico border before erecting a traditional one.

Citing Luckey, Hurd said a high-tech wall would run about 2% of the cost of standard proposals. The pair visited the Texas-Mexico border together in June, according to the San Antonio Express-News.

Andurils jobs website says the company is seeking engineers with expertise in sensors, cameras, radars, robotics and flying objects. A combination of such technologies deployed along a border could allow a computer to automatically detect activity, alert law enforcement and track further movement.

Luckey, 24, left Facebook under a cloud of controversy. Oculus has repeatedly reduced the price for its year-old virtual reality headset, which points to weaker-than-predicted demand.

He was implicated in a trademark misuse lawsuit that left Oculus on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars after a jury verdict in February. And consumers and Oculus business partners had decried Luckeys donations to a conservative political organization during last years presidential election.

Thiel has President Trumps ear. Trump made fortifying the border a key part of his presidential platform. The venture capitalists former chief of staff is a top technology advisor at the White House, and Thiel has played a role in bringing together tech executives to meet with Trump and other White House leaders.

paresh.dave@latimes.com / PGP

Twitter: @peard33

Times staff writers Christina Bellantoni and Mary McNamara contributed to this report.

Read the original:

Palmer Luckey's new defense technology start-up Anduril draws execs from Palantir - Los Angeles Times

Pharmaceutical Brands Can Use Programmatic Technology, Too – eMarketer

Jack Hogan CTO Lifescript

For pharmaceutical companies, deploying programmatic technology is a sticky subject. Because of strict privacy and patient protection laws, pharma companies are limited in how they can target individual consumers, which makes programmatic advertising more of a guessing game. But that doesnt mean it cant be done. Jack Hogan, CTO at medical publisher Lifescript, spoke with eMarketers Maria Minsker about how pharma companies can use publishers data to leverage programmatic technology.

eMarketer: How can medical publishers create proxy audiences to power programmatic technology for pharma brands?

Jack Hogan: Medical publishers have vast audiences of opt-in consumers with targetable IDs and declared health interests. Were talking about first-party data, not third-party health and medical data, which is inaccurate 50% of the time. By decoupling that first-party, declared health data from any private information, publishers enable brands to reach desired audiences with specific medical interests across the entire ad ecosystemwithout breaking any HIPAA rules.

Publishers are able to create segments of users interested in certain conditions, and feed these audience sets to pharma companies.

eMarketer: How does this make it possible for pharmaceutical companies to leverage programmatic advertising technology?

Hogan: While the guidelines for HIPAA are very stringent and strict when it comes to the type of data that can be accessed and shared, medical publishers typically dont touch any medical records or confidential medical data. Rather, publishers have access to declared interest in specific conditions or symptoms, which falls under other guidelines. As a result, publishers are able to create segments of users interested in certain conditions, and feed these audience sets to pharma companies through programmatic pipelines for ad targeting.

Plus, once a publisher zeros in on a users interests and pinpoints that users identity using a primary identifier such as an email address, that anonymized identity can then be extended to a mobile device for programmatic advertising via mobile as well.

eMarketer: Can you share an example of how a brand might work with a publisher to target a specific audience segment using programmatic technology?

Hogan: Lets say a statin drug manufacturer is looking to target people who have high cholesterol with a marketing campaign. A publisher can create a segment of people who have self-identified as showing interest in this topic while engaging with the publishers site. The publisher can then make that segment available to the advertiser through a programmatic pipeline, enabling them to work with their technology vendors to target that segment through programmatic display, video or mobile advertising.

There are some marketers in the space who dont understand the marketing technology requirements for handling private data.

eMarketer: Are enough pharmaceutical marketers taking advantage of programmatic advertising, or are they missing an opportunity when it comes to health data?

Hogan: There are some marketers in the space who dont understand the marketing technology requirements for handling private data. For example, all user data should be de-identified, and not tied back to an individual. Personal health data like that should not be used in any marketing or advertising efforts. Marketers should be using smart tools that can decouple data from individuals identifiers, starting at the point of opt-in through collection and use.

See more here:

Pharmaceutical Brands Can Use Programmatic Technology, Too - eMarketer

Tesla’s Longtime Battery Technology Director Leaves Company – Bloomberg

Tesla Inc.s director of battery technology has left the company, the latest in a raft of management departures from the automaker introducing its new Model 3 electric car.

Kurt Kelty, who joined Tesla in 2006, was one of the longest-serving executives at the automaker led by Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk. He previously worked more than 14 years at Panasonic Corp., Teslas partner on the battery gigafactory near Reno, Nevada. Kelty led negotiations with Panasonic on that plant, according to his LinkedIn profile.

We can confirm that Kurt Kelty has left the company to explore new opportunities and we want to thank him for everything hes done for Tesla, the company said in an emailed statement Tuesday, noting that his responsibilities will be distributed among Teslas existing teams.

Kelty couldnt immediately be reached for comment.

News of Keltys exit comes at a critical juncture for Tesla, which turned over the first batch of Model 3 vehicles to employees Friday night. Tesla began producing the more affordable electric car last month and aims to make 20,000 a month by December, a challenging ramp-up plan that Musk described to employees as production hell.

Teslas more than 22,000 deliveries of Model S sedans and Model X sport utility vehicles in the second quarter were slowed by a temporary shortage of 100 kWh battery packs. The company said last month the packs were being made using new technology and production lines.

Tesla and Keltys previous employer Panasonic have had a close partnership, with the two in a supply agreement for 1.8 billion battery cells through 2017 for the Model S and Model X. For the Model 3, the companies jointly developed new, slightly larger cylindrical battery cells than those used in Teslas existing models.

Chief Financial Officer Jason Wheeler, a former Google executive, left the company earlier this year. Tesla reports second quarter earnings on Wednesday after the market closes.

Read the rest here:

Tesla's Longtime Battery Technology Director Leaves Company - Bloomberg

Teachers embracing technology in the classroom – KRIS Corpus Christi News

CORPUS CHRISTI -

Teachers from area districts are turning to technology to make learning activities more exciting for students and staff alike. Instructional Technology Specialist Cary Perales says, it's all for the third annual "Tech 2 Teach" conference held at Veterans Memorial High School.

"We have teachers that're on their break coming in to learn something to bring to their classroom to teach at a higher level," Teacher, Denis Wisner said.

Wisner is just one of nearly a thousand teachers trying to better their ability to educate, ahead of the new school year.

"Really it's to let our teachers get fired up about going back into the classroom and teaching our students those 21st century skills sets that they need," Perales said.

She adds, that the conference considers multiple ways of learning and bringing staff together.

"Getting to network with other teachers, they're getting to see all kinds of sessions integrating technology in the classroom."

Teachers like Emily Schellinger and Jenifer Martinez say, while technology is seeming taking over, some still like the old fashioned way of hands-on learning. However, students are still encourage to B.Y.O.D.

"It's very important for the students to come into the classroom and use their devices, here at Veterans we have BYOD, which is bring your own device and whether it's a phone or chrome book or a laptop the kids are encouraged to use it," Martinez said.

Overall, the goal is to keep the attention of easily distracted students, focused on fun, interactive learning tools.

More information: https://www.tcea.org/event/area-2-corpus-christi-technology-conference-tech2teach/

More here:

Teachers embracing technology in the classroom - KRIS Corpus Christi News

Egalet’s Guardian Technology Begins Fight Against Opioid Abuse Epidemic – Seeking Alpha

It may be tempting to pick up some Egalet Corporation (EGLT) stock now that the price has dropped over 75% in the last year, but be wary of catching knives which may still be falling. Much of Egalets apparent value is reliant on its Guardian Technology proving itself as a credible abuse-deterrent technology. Egalet stock should remain stagnant in the near future, and I advise to keep an eye on it and re-evaluate in mid-to-late 2018.

Opioid abuse, including the prescription drugs oxycodone, hydrocodone, and others, has risen exponentially in the last decade. Drug overdoses were the leading cause of accidental death in the United States in 2015, with prescription opioid deaths making up roughly 40% of these. As the problem grows worse, more and more companies are creating abuse-deterrent technology platforms to attempt to curb the epidemic. Egalet Corporation is focused on developing abuse-deterrent formulations of opioids using its proprietary Guardian Technology. The Guardian Technology platform is designed to make pills more resistant to physical and chemical manipulation, but Egalet's first approved product utilizing Guardian Technology, Arymo ER, did not receive all abuse-deterrent designations for which they were hoping. This could lead to a very slow stock price recovery for Egalet as much of their pipeline is reliant on Guardian Technology, which now seems like it will not be able to stand out in a crowded market.

The companys stock has been decimated in the last year due to labeling problems of its most recently approved drug, Arymo ER. Though gaining FDA approval of Arymo ER early this year, Egalet was not able to secure the coveted intranasal or oral abuse-deterrent labels. The FDA has been fairly relaxed regarding Arymo ER abuse-deterrent marketing material, but the only abuse-deterrent label granted was deterrence against intravenous use. The FDAs relaxed oversight of marketing material may be indicative of anything helps attitude in the fight against opioid abuse. While this may help Egalet market Arymo ER, there are still many problems associated with marketing a similar product in a crowded market.

Egalet has two other approved products which it is currently marketing, SPRIX Nasal Spray and Oxyado. SPRIX nasal spray is an NSAID (Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug) targeted at short-term (up to 5 days) pain management for moderate to severe pain which requires analgesia at the opioid level. SPRIX, which accounts for ~75% of Egalets sale, may face competition beginning in 2018 from generics as its patent protection runs out. The other approved product, Oxyado, is an IR oxycodone pill aimed designed to discourage against nasal and intravenous abuse. Egalet recently submitted approval for higher dose Oxyado (10 mg and 15 mg) which could help boost sales in 2H17. Revenues have been growing steadily for these two products, seeing double digit percentage growth quarter over quarter for the past year.

Guardian Technology is Egalets proprietary technology used to create abuse-deterrent forms of opioid pills. Apart from SPRIX nasal spray and Oxyado, all Egalets approved and pipeline products rely on Guardian Technology being accepted by the healthcare field as a viable abuse-deterrent technology. Guardian Technology takes advantage of injection molding a polymer matrix to create a physically hard and difficult to manipulate pill. The technology also resists chemical manipulation and API extraction by turning into a viscous hydrogel on contact with liquids. This allowed Arymo ER to secure an intravenous abuse-deterrent label.

It is important to note that Guardian Technology does not actually alter the API of the drug, but is a way to make it more difficult to abuse. The problem with Arymo ER and other abuse deterrent opioids on the market is that they are not effective in deterring against the most common way prescription opioids are abused orally.

During a recent conversation I had with an abuse counselor, he described drug addicts as some of the smartest, most clever people he knew. This conversation got me thinking about the innovation needed to curb the opioid abuse crisis in the United States. Yes, Guardian Technology will make it more difficult for patients to misuse prescription drugs. Yes, Guardian Technology is a step in the right direction. No, Guardian Technology should not be considered a game-changer in the fight against oral and nasal opioid abuse.

Figure 1. Orange Arrows Represent Use of Guardian Technology.

To make matters worse, the abuse-deterrent opioid market is crowded and growing more crowded rapidly. Many of the players in this field utilize abuse-deterrent mechanisms very similar to Egalets Guardian Technology (MorphaBond ER, RoxyBond, etc.). Arymo ER only securing the intravenous abuse-deterrent label greatly hindered its chance to set itself apart from the other players in the market. The FDAs comprehensive action plan to reduce opioid misuse and abuse has a provision to expand abuse-deterrent formulations (ADFSs) to discourage abuse - which should encourage even more players to enter the market.

While the fundamentals arent looking great, Egalets technical indicators imply a bounce may be coming soon. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) has been hovering in the low 30s for the last few weeks indicating oversold, and the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) seems to be crossing the signal line, indicating potential bullish momentum.

Financially speaking, Egalet is in a decent position. Net Product sales increased from $2.5 million in 1Q16 to $5.5 million in 1Q17 while net loss increased from $18.5 million to $25.4 million in the same timeframe. Arymo ER sales may rely heavily on how well product is marketed. The company has a relatively high cash burn rate, but management has expressed confidence the company has enough cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities to last until at least June 30, 2018. The company will continue to have a high cash burn rate for the foreseeable future as it continues R&D and marketing efforts.

This stock may be a buy if you are looking to sell on any bounce in stock price. Shorting does not seem logical at this point due to the stock losing ~75% of value in under a year, but may be a good move on a substantial bounce. Overall, the risk/reward is currently not in a good enough place to establish a position either way. I would suggest keeping an eye on this ticker and establishing a contrarian position on any big move either way. Short-term, this stock may be a good buy due to a possible technical bounce.

Yes, Guardian Technology discourages abuse by making the API less accessible and more difficult to alter, but to what extent? Egalet and their proprietary Guardian Technology are obviously improvements over the large number of opioids being prescribed with no abuse-deterrent properties whatsoever. The problem is whether Guardian Technology is a game-changing innovation or small step in the right direction which could soon be overshadowed by innovations of other companies. I lean toward the latter due to the fight against opioid abuse epidemic being such a potentially profitable market. Long-term, I do not believe Egalets Guardian Technology to be the solution for the opioid crisis taking place.

Overall, while Egalet Corporation may seem like a good buy at the current price, there is still room for further falling and the possibility the company may never be profitable. The long road to profitability for Egalet, coupled with the fact Guardian Technology is not a particularly game-changing technology, leads me to recommend avoiding this stock for now. There are better places to put your money which offer a much better risk/reward ratio. If you do feel the urge to invest in this company, I would encourage you to wait until at least August 9th to better evaluate after the conference call and Arymo ER sales data.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Editor's Note: This article covers one or more stocks trading at less than $1 per share and/or with less than a $100 million market cap. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.

Excerpt from:

Egalet's Guardian Technology Begins Fight Against Opioid Abuse Epidemic - Seeking Alpha

A Better, Safer Battery Could Be Coming to a Laptop Near You – New York Times

Ionic said it had developed prototypes of a rechargeable alkaline battery that can be made using continuous manufacturing processes similar to the making of plastic wrap. So far, the company, which is backed by William Joy, a pioneering Silicon Valley computer designer, has demonstrated up to 400 recharge cycles for its prototypes. Ionic executives say they believe they will be able to triple that.

The alkaline batteries that Ionic has developed would initially be heavier than todays lithium-ion batteries, said Mike Zimmerman, a materials scientist who is the founder and chief executive of Ionic. But the new batteries would more than compensate for that handicap with their cost advantage and, in time, their ability to store more energy.

There are other advantages besides cost and safety. Lithium-ion batteries rely on cobalt, and using that element comes with a human cost. Cobalt mines in Africa, for example, have been accused of using child labor while leaving behind a toxic mess.

Alkaline batteries, on the other hand, use relatively abundant zinc and manganese. Ionic can help us get lithium-ion past cobalt and completely eliminate it with alkaline, said Mr. Joy, who is a member of Ionics board.

He also said that the company had made progress toward an alkaline battery design that would replace zinc with more affordable aluminum. In the past, aluminum has not been usable because of issues like corrosion. Alkaline batteries based on aluminum would potentially weigh less than lithium-ion batteries and would be even cheaper to produce than todays alkaline designs.

Ionic will make its announcement in Colorado at a conference for the 35th anniversary of the Rocky Mountain Institute, a sustainable-energy research group founded by the physicist and environmentalist Amory Lovins and Hunter Lovins, his former wife.

They started with a very sensible set of criteria, Dr. Lovins said of Ionic. They use an unusual electrolyte to come up with a battery that uses common cheap materials and is benign.

But he added a note of caution: Batteries are very difficult and I want to see what they have and what can be measured and proven and whether it will get to market.

Technological progress in battery technology has been glacial compared with the exponential advances in processing speed and data storage capacity that have been staples of Silicon Valleys growth. In the last 150 years, only a handful of rechargeable battery chemistries have reached mass adoption.

Tesla, in partnership with Panasonic, is building a factory in Nevada with the intent of greatly expanding capacity to make lithium-ion batteries and lower production costs. Tesla officials said they wanted to create enough capacity to produce batteries for 1.5 million cars a year.

There is growing interest in pursuing such so-called solid-state battery technologies for both consumer and transportation applications. Last fall, the United States Department of Energys agency for supporting research in next-generation energy technology announced 16 research awards aimed at accelerating development of solid battery technologies, including a $3 million contract to Ionic Materials. The company said it had signed several licensing deals to produce commercial versions of its design, but it would not identify its partners.

The United States Advanced Battery Consortium, an auto industry group, wants to greatly reduce the cost of lithium-ion production. Analysts, however, say they believe the new facilities and technology from auto and battery manufacturers will help bring costs down, but still fall short of industry goals.

In contrast, Ionic executives said they had found a way to achieve energy production costs that would be less than a fifth of the auto consortiums target.

Bloomberg New Energy Finance, an energy research group, has forecast that mass-market adoption of electric vehicles will not occur until operating costs fall to match those of internal combustion engines. That is expected to happen in 2025, according to the group.

In December, Ionic Materials also described a solid material it said would improve the safety of existing lithium-ion batteries. The company has demonstrated the batteries resistance to catching fire or exploding by driving nails through them and even shooting them with bullets.

A version of this article appears in print on August 2, 2017, on Page B2 of the New York edition with the headline: Massachusetts Start-Up Trumpets Advance in Battery Capacity.

See the rest here:

A Better, Safer Battery Could Be Coming to a Laptop Near You - New York Times

Blockchain technology being considered by more than half of big corporations, according to study – CNBC

The report added: "As the number of research projects has increased, so too has awareness, both amongst the participants and elsewhere in their industries, with competitor companies in turn beginning to consider whether they too should seek to gain competitive advantage from deployment."

"For financial technology (fintech) start-ups in the blockchain space, this can only be good news, since it demonstrates the high level of demand within an enterprise space that is increasingly well-informed about blockchain," Windsor Holden, blockchain specialist at Juniper, told CNBC via email.

The blockchain specialist added that the digital element of distributed ledger technology, which is processed by a network of computers, could benefit industries other than the financial services as well.

Holden said: "Essentially, blockchain offers particular benefits to improve efficiency and corporate transparency; if an enterprise is heavily dependent upon paper-based storage and has high volumes of transactions or transmitted information, it can be especially effective."

See the original post here:

Blockchain technology being considered by more than half of big corporations, according to study - CNBC

What are semiconductor stocks trying to tell technology stocks? – CNBC

Semiconductor stocks may be about to flash a crucial signal about the fate of technology stocks.

Unlike the XLK technology exchange-traded fund and the Nasdaq 100, the SOX semiconductor index has not moved above its June highs.

The XLK's break above its own high, reached in early June, has just been a slight one; the fund is going to need to see some more upside follow-through if it's going to confirm another leg higher in the tech space.

That's where the semiconductors come in: The index could and should be a clue as to whether tech stocks can do this or not.

Why? The SOX has been a leader for the technology group since November. At its June highs, it had rallied over 41 percent since the U.S. election in November. Meanwhile, the XLK had rallied 24 percent by that time.

Therefore, we'd like to see the SOX break above those June highs in a meaningful fashion before we can declare that tech stocks are going to see another nice run higher.

Right now, the SOX is about 4 percent below those June highs, so it's not like there is a major divergence. However, whether the semiconductors can break out to the upside or roll over in the next week or two could (and should) be important for the tech sector.

See original here:

What are semiconductor stocks trying to tell technology stocks? - CNBC

Water Technology Farms expanded and field days scheduled – High Plains Journal

The Kansas Water Office, Kansas State University and Northwest Kansas Technical College are providing an opportunity to see firsthand what is taking place on the Water Technology Farms by hosting a series of field days in August. Each location will showcase the technology that has been implemented and the results to date.

Last year three Water Technology Farms: Roth/Garden City Company, T & O Farms, LLC and WaterPACK/ ILS, were created in response to public input and identified in the Long-Term Vision for the Future of Water Supply in Kansas. These demonstration farms were initiated in southwest/south central Kansas and are three year pilot projects featuring the installation and testing of the latest irrigation technologies on a whole field scale with a primary focus on water conservation.

We greatly appreciate the leadership and innovation from these stakeholders who are willing to participate in these demonstration farms and the partners who also believe in these projects, said KWO Director Tracy Streeter. While we need to evaluate the performance of these farms for multiple years, the preliminary results from a water savings and economic standpoint are encouraging. There is growing evidence that water use reductions coupled with irrigation technology adoption and water management will result in positive effects on the aquifer and the producers bottom line.

In addition to these existing farms, 13 more Water Technology Farms via partnerships, including generous support from the Kansas Corn Commission, have been established in western Kansas. Throughout August each farm will host a field day.

Aug. 7Circle C Farms, 10 a.m., Healy, Kansas (RSVPs are required by Aug. 5). Owned and operated by Steve Compton;

Aug. 11Hatcher Land and Cattle, 2 p.m., Liberal. Owned and operated by Nick Hatcher;

Aug. 14 WaterPACK/ILS, 2 p.m., Larned. Owned by ILS Inc. and operated by Richard Wenstrom;

Aug. 15T&O Farms, LLC 9 a.m., Garden City. Owned and operated by Tom Willis;

Aug. 21Northwest Technical College, 10 a.m., Goodland. Owned by Goodland area producers; and

Aug. 31Big D Farms, 9 a.m., Holcomb. Owned by Garden City Company and operated by Dwane Roth.

In addition to understanding how the technologies work, the field days are great opportunities to learn from local producers, irrigation companies, soil moisture sensor dealers and other entities about options and experiences towards improving irrigation water use. In 2016 alone, the field days had a collective attendance of 375 people wanting to learn something new as well as wanting to share their experience with fellow producers.

This year in addition to producers participating in the Water Technology Farms, Northwest Kansas Technical College is also participating by providing learning and workforce development training for its students. Northwest Kansas Technical Colleges Precision Agriculture department and landowners around in surrounding counties have partnered to develop 10 Water Technology Farm projects. In these projects, the students and landowners receive in-field training and hands on experience implementing water efficiency technologies. With supplier partnerships, students will be exposed to multiple types of soil moisture probes, pivot controls, irrigation scheduling systems and other water management tools.

KWO provides financial assistance to Kansas State Universitys efforts to give technical support to each technology farm. K-State is deeply involved in establishing and monitoring the farms to help answer the producers specific questions and concerns about the new technology.

K-State is working with partners to help address questions and concerns about the new irrigation technologies so in the future, farmers will fully embrace the technology appropriate for their operation and situation, said Jonathan Aguilar, water resource engineer with K-State Research and Extension, based in Garden City, Kansas. Each farm is set up slightly different, depending on the primary concern the producer has. For example, one farm has three adjacent spans with different modes of application for comparison purposes. In all fields, soil moisture sensors are installed and tested for accuracy as feedback or for its performance in the different soil types.

The farms are supported by: Kansas Water Office; K-State Research and Extension; Kansas Corn Commission; Northwest Groundwater Management District No. 4, Groundwater Management District No. 1, Seaman Crop Consulting; Servi-Tech Expanded Premium Services, LLC; United Sorghum Check-Off Program; Garden City Coop, SW KS Groundwater Management District No. 3; Kansas Department of Agriculture; Conestoga Energy Partners; Teeter Irrigation; Dragon-Line; Helena; Kansas Geological Survey; Ogallala Aquifer Program; Syngenta; Hortau; Kansas Farm Bureau; KSU Mesonet; AquaSpy; Kansas Grain Sorghum Commission; Crop Metrics; Netafim; Valley Irrigation; and Presley Solutions, American Irrigation; WaterPACK, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Western Irrigation Supply House and Ag Systems, Inc.; Tri-State Irrigation; John Payne; TerrAvion; Phytech; Great Plains Precision Ag; Western Sprinkler; Finney County Conservation District; On Target Solutions, Lindsay Corporation, Woofter Irrigation

Visit http://www.kwo.org for more information on each field day or call 888-KAN-WATER.

See the article here:

Water Technology Farms expanded and field days scheduled - High Plains Journal

Lafayette County teachers learn about technology in the classroom – Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal

Several teachers and administrators from the Lafayette County School District got together last month to attend the 2017 International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) Conference that was held in San Antonio.

The trip was paid for using title funds the district receives in order to better their abilities to incorporate technology in the classroom. A total of 12 people from the district attended the conference, two from each building on campus plus a handful of administrators.

There were more than 21,000 educators from around the country at the conference. In addition to the keynote speakers, there were thousands of booths set up throughout the convention center. At each booth were technology professionals representing a company or product or system and showing educators the many different ways in which different products could be used to enrich the classroom experience.

Pretty much anything and everything in technology education was highlight there, said Assistant Superintendent Patrick Robinson. They had a couple of neat things like a technology playground where teachers could walk through and do a lot of hands-on activities with the vendors. This way they could actually see how the products worked. There were probably over 1,000 plus vendors out there on the expo floor.

Teachers who attended the convention are being asked to prepare a presentation to share with their colleagues later in the fall. The district wants to make sure all teachers in the school benefit from the trip.

High school biology teacher Deborah Jones said that she was very much looking forward to incorporating some of what she learned at the conference into her everyday classroom style of teaching.

I am incredibly excited to incorporate Project Based Learning and a Genius Hour into my 9th grade Biology I course in order to provide students the opportunity to explore current science research and test their ideas to solve current technological problems, she said in an email. This years LHS Science Fair will surely showcase the original ideas of our great students.

Spanish teacher Scott Jimenez was more excited about the different platforms he was able to learn about at the conference. There were several apps aimed at both teachers and administrators that would improve their workplace and the student experience.

My class focuses on storytelling in Spanish, Jimenez said. With some of the technology from ISTE, my students will not only be able to digitize their stories but also publish them through different social media platforms that are secure and moderated by me. Im most excited about students turning their stories into self-designed video games that they and their peers can play through the BloxelsBuilder app.

Robinson said that everyone who went on the trip really enjoyed themselves and learned a lot. The field of education is changing every day as technology advances and people find more ways for it to be incorporated in the classroom. Robinson said it is quite the experience to learn about some of those advancements firsthand.

Being on the expo floor was probably my favorite part of the whole convention, Robinson said.

You got to go hear from companies like Scholastic and lean about all the exciting things they have going on. The booths, which is an understatement, the things were huge, were so neat. Apples booth was probably half the size of our middle school library. They brought all the bells and whistles for this.

Robinson said that most of all, he wants to see technology bettering the educational process for students. He wants them using it more often, becoming better at it and learning how to use it to improve their overall educational experience.

We want teachers to get past the idea that showing a PowerPoint to students is an example of technology in the classroom," Robinson said. "Its not. We want to get students using more technology, not just more teachers using it as an instructional tool.

"How can we get our kids using technology in their assignments and in their learning process? Thats what we hoped to have gained. All of our teachers walked away with a great understanding of how to implement technology in their lessons.

Go here to see the original:

Lafayette County teachers learn about technology in the classroom - Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal

Time to rethink our perspective on jobs and technology – The Japan Times

NEW YORK Technology and jobs, whither goest thou?

Whether in Japan or the United States, it is time to pause and assess the very real impact of technologys advances on those who will lose their jobs today as the jobs of tomorrow are created.

Too often, globalized business leaders and macroeconomists blindly welcome every advance in productivity, while investors in turn reward news of resulting job reductions with an upward tick in share prices.

As technology advances, and wealth is increasingly concentrated, the challenges of job creation and the need for bipartisan discussion on a way forward grow more increasingly pressing.

According to Credit Suisses Global Wealth Report 2016, the top one percent in Russia controls nearly 75 percent of that nations wealth. For India, the figure is 58.4 percent; Indonesia, 40 percent; Brazil, 48 percent; China 43.8 percent; and the United States, 42 percent.

And in a report released early this year at the World Economic Forum in Davos by Oxfam, the worlds eight richest billionaires now control the same wealth as do the poorest half of the Earths population.

It is no surprise then that inequality its causes and possible solutions is an ubiquitous topic of discussion. The debate over economic inequity rages in the East as in the West. Raising employment levels is seen as a major challenge for developing and developed economies alike.

No industry is exempt, and no country, no matter how protected, is able to escape the elimination of jobs of the past too often with little consideration of the people of today.

All too often the blame is laid squarely on the shoulders of globalization. Witness the breakout of protests in Hamburg at the Group of 20 summit. Witness also the relative success of politicians who promised protections in the form of trade tariffs and a closing of borders. Enduring wage disparities and outdated and imbalanced tax structures are also seen as contributors to growing inequality.

However, is it only the export of jobs that has led to unemployment or are we entering a brave new world of technology steadily eroding once secure foundations of employment? Directly addressing that question can help lead to possible solutions, drawing perhaps on apprenticeship programs and new management-employee relationships that may well disrupt our present thinking of the workplace.

A revolution is certainly on the way. 3-D printing and the potential impact on design and manufacturing of printing in a multi-dimensional manner is an example.

Essentially one can design a pair of shoes, use a 3-D printing facility and see the immediate gratification of creativity.

Take another example driverless cars, which threaten to disrupt a range of every day jobs, from that of traditional drivers and mechanics to those of the few who may still be managing gas stations. Self-service gas pumps displaced attendants. Charging stations for electric cars may well further disrupt gas stations eroding employment opportunities.

The ruthless advance of technology has implications for Asia, particularly in the garment industry. In many countries, the clothing industry did for Asia what the auto industry had once done for the United States in terms of offering rising wages and providing non-farm employment.

Imagine a clothing industry, however, that is brought to the realm of desktop publishing. As technology displaced a range of publishing jobs, an increasingly self-manned and self-driven clothing sector could significantly reduce, if not eliminate, the need for machine operators and button sewers. These and other jobs allowed a generation in Asia to entertain visions of life outside the farm.

The rise of manufacturing in China, Vietnam and elsewhere in Asia has helped nations transition between an agrarian society toward more services-driven economies. Factories have employed millions as typically young Asian workers moved on from their rural, agrarian lives and transitioned to more urban settings.

Now, an increasingly automated manufacturing industry could see robotics limit the opportunities and the path from factory work to the middle class.

Even in the services sector, the impact of technology on jobs is growing. A software program can eliminate the army of junior researchers and outsourced analysts who have been extracting the data, filling the spreadsheets and crunching the numbers.

Ever smarter smart machines are capable of collecting and processing information. The next step for robo-advisers: drawing inferences, answering questions and recommending actions.

As early as 2014, the Associated Press began to automate some of its corporate earnings reports. Robo-journalism has arrived.

Where will all these advances in technology take us?

Countries throughout the world have used monetary and fiscal policy to spur economic growth in the hope that greater growth will lead to higher employment.

Taxation is another weapon in the arsenal of governments seeking to incentivize behavior and job creation.

In this brave new world of the knowledge economy, such government measures alone are unlikely to be sufficient. Indeed, the solutions will have to be found outside of government, in our communities and businesses.

Providing equality of opportunity to all citizens should remain a guiding principle.

Education will be key. Business, government and civil society leaders must come together to ensure the quality of education is improved to meet the demands of a technology-driven knowledge economy. More importantly, citizens must not be barred from quality education because of high costs.

Optimists feel that productivity increases will eventually lead to the creation of an entire range of jobs not thought of earlier. Pessimists look at the pace of automation and see a dystopian world ahead. Realists recognize that whatever the future holds there is an immediate scenario of displacement and a growing challenge of dislocation for millions of people.

As humanists, we argue that, regardless of the scenario, much more should be done to recognize and address the needs of the all too many who are all too forgotten and increasingly left behind.

Curtis S Chin, a former U.S. ambassador to the Asian Development Bank, is managing director of advisory firm RiverPeak Group, LLC. Meera Kumar, also formerly with the ADB, is a New York-based Asia analyst and communications consultant. Follow them on Twitter at @CurtisSChin and @MeeraKumar212.

Read the original here:

Time to rethink our perspective on jobs and technology - The Japan Times

Technology is failing to create transparent supply chains – Engadget

It's not even clear that technology itself matters. Simple tools with actionable plans could be more effective than fancy, expensive ones. For example, one of the most successful tools is the self-described tech-agnostic Laborlink, a product of Good World Solutions, which supplies workers around the world with a secure, anonymous method of providing information about working conditions in their factories. It addresses one of the key weaknesses of the system that was implemented after the initial wave of revelations about working conditions in the 1990s, in which auditors enter factories at regular intervals and conduct checklist walk-through examinations.

"Auditing just does not have that many data points," said Beth Holzman, Director of Engagement and Operations at Laborlink. "It's specifically focused on a [narrow] compliance checklist to understand what is happening in a factory and doesn't really get into any wider analysis, which can reflect more the reality on the factory floor."

Auditing is haphazard and unreliable, with well-documented cases of fake reports. Moreover, workers' voices are only tangentially included, with Holzman estimating most audits only include statements from 10 to 20 workers maximum. As factories and plantations can have upward of 1,000 workers, this can be woefully inadequate.

Laborlink thrives partly because it does not rely on the latest smartphones or high-tech, remote-sensing technology. It utilizes whatever technology people already have. In Cambodia or India, this can be simple feature phones with SMS capability, whereas in China, the ubiquitous app WeChat is commonly used.

"We really are trying to ensure that, in the use of technology, we're putting workers at the heart of this process," said Holzman. "They have the ability to provide data and can use tech to better their own engagement."

This approach has been successful in creating knowledge about what's taking place in factories and giving companies that care an opportunity to address those concerns.

"We've reached a million workers and gathered 3.5 million data points," said Holzman. "That information can be shared with factory managers to say, 'How would you actually work to improve supply chain practices?'"

Other low-tech actors making a difference are NGOs. It is because of them that we have supply-chain accountability legislation, and it's often them, or their partners on the ground, who are spreading the word about unsafe working conditions or illegal deforestation.

"Improvements in technology at the local level have been instrumental in communities' ability to participate in the protection of their forests," said Emma Lierley, Forest Communications Manager with Rainforest Action Network. "And improvements in this area could be of great benefit."

But RAN does not expect technology itself to be the solution. It has been working on supply-chain issues since its inception, and it focuses on both environmental degradation and human rights violations in tropical-forest regions. To RAN, the idea that multinational corporations lack knowledge about what's really happening in their supply chains when it can find out and publish verifiable reports is incredulous.

"Time and time again we have seen companies use new tools and technology to further obfuscate the issue rather than to truly take responsibility for the conflicts in their supply chain," said Lierley. For example, shipping data on who is buying and selling palm oil could illuminate how supply chains connect to labor violations widely documented in Southeast Asia, but it is prohibitively expensive and often inaccessible to third parties like NGOs or journalists. Similarly, access to mapping data about land ownership could allow NGOs to connect illegal deforestation and fire to global companies, but the data remains under lock in Indonesian government and corporate databases.

"The lack of transparency in palm oil supply chains comes down to a lack of willpower, not a lack of tools," said Lierley.

This can be demonstrated by the companies that have made progress. Years ago Nike was the poster child for labor violations in its subcontractors' factories, but after years of hard work in collaboration with NGOs and academia, it has become a model in the shoe industry, recently releasing a map of all of its factories. Similarly, Intel, once complicit along with most of the technology industry as likely using conflict minerals, has, after doing a detailed public analysis with the NGO Resolve, officially declared its supply chain as conflict free.

Neither used fancy technology as an end-all solution, and both spent years figuring out an actionable plan. The problem itself was clear from the start.

"If you want to know what is going on in your supply chain, you don't need tech to find that," said Moote. "You need technology to solve the problem."

See more here:

Technology is failing to create transparent supply chains - Engadget

How SLAM technology is redrawing augmented reality’s battle lines – VentureBeat

In early June, Apple introduced its first attempt to enter AR/VR space with ARKit. What makes ARKit stand out for Apple is a technology called SLAM (Simultaneous Localization And Mapping). Every tech giant especially Apple, Google, and Facebook is investing heavily in SLAM technology and whichever takes best advantage of SLAM tech will likely end up on top.

SLAM is a technology used in computer vision technologies which gets the visual data from the physical world in shape of points to make an understanding for the machine. SLAM makes it possible for machines to have an eye and understand whats around them through visual input. What the machine sees with SLAM technology from a simple scene looks like the photo above, for example.

Using these points machines can have an understanding of their surroundings. Using this data also helps AR developers like myself to create much more interactive and realistic experiences. This understanding can be used in different scenarios like robotics, self-driving cars, AI and of course augmented reality.

The simplest form of understanding from this technology is recognizing walls and barriers and also floors. Right now most AR SLAM technologies like ARKit only use floor recognition and position tracking to place AR objects around you, so they dont actually know whats going on in your environment to correctly react to it. More advanced SLAM technologies like Google Tango, can create a mesh of our environment so not only the machine can tell you where the floor is, but it can also identify walls and objects in your environment allowing everything around you to be an element to interact with.

A few years back, Apple acquired the leading German AR company, Metaio. Metaio was innovative and had substantial lead in the AR market those years. What we see with ARKit is an improved version of Metaios SLAM. Yes, even before Apple introduced ARKit some companies had SLAM in both Android and iOS, like Wikitude and Kudan. But what Apple introduced was far better than todays SLAM technologies.

Before this, most AR experiences were marker-based, meaning you needed a defined image to point your devices camera at to see the AR experience. Using the defined image allowed your device to understand and track the overlaid digital content.The problem with marker-based technology was that users had to have a physical object (the image) to experience it. So companies had to promote both the application and the physical object (catalogues, brochures etc).

Above: Audis augmented reality catalog

But with ARKit this is now solved and you dont need anything except your phone and your environment. But theres one important thing here lacking: context!

Marker-based technology was limited but it had context, meaning it had an understanding of the physical world (through the defined image) and could change the experience based on that. For example you could point your devices camera at a McDonalds package and experience McDonalds augmented reality or point your devices camera in the same app at a Starbucks cup and experience a totally different augmented reality content. These central apps are called AR browsers and will have a critical role in the future of AR.

So though ARKit has a great technology it lacks context and its apps wont have an understanding of where users use them. Developers can use inputs like GPS data or environment light to add more context but it doesnt have context in its core. Last week developers did an interesting job in making a demo of using ARKit for navigation, but its important to note that such demos use GPS data as input and they cant recognize locations via visual input and thus are not near what Google Tango can do with its indoor navigation technology.

There is no doubt that the future of AR is SLAM technology, but for it to be really useful, and not just for fun like Snapchat filters or landing a SpaceX shuttle in your pool, it will need context. Other major companies like Google are aware of this.

Google is doing SLAM with its Project Tango, developed in partnership with companies like Lenovo. Tango uses two cameras to sense depth and have an understanding of the world via SLAM maps. Unlike Apples ARKit, Project Tango has context in its heart so it can have applications like Indoor Navigation as it is much more advanced than ARKit and has an understanding of its surroundings via SLAM maps. SLAM maps are databases of machines visual understandings of the world and their importance is that they enable machines to interact with physical world and also differentiate between places.

Above: A Project Tango phone with two cameras

Despite recent analyses Google is actually much more ahead in the AR game. Context is the most important part and though Googles project tango is unlikely to take off in the future as it needs special hardware (two cameras to sense depth that only a few devices right now support).

Google has already has context and has visual understanding of the world via Google Lens. This data will be much more valuable as in people switch from mobile devices to wearables like AR glasses.

Googles main competitor in the field of augmented reality is not Apple, but Facebook. Facebook has the advantage of a 2 billion user community, and once it develops a way to let its community to handle the mapping it will have great leverage. Unlike Apple, Facebooks AR vision is all in its own apps and doesnt let users to use the technology inside their own apps.

Analysts say that Apple allowing users to have AR technology inside their own apps gives it an advantage over Facebook. But as the fight over the physical worlds visual maps heats up Facebook having all their info within their more tightly walled garden may give it an advantage.

Snap is also a company with the advantage of a large community that is aware of this opportunity. In a recent patent Snap introduced a technique of combining GPS data and SLAM maps to put related AR content in the real world. Meanwhile, Lenovo is also trying to make a SLAM database in partnership with Wikitude called Augmented Human Cloud.

Above: Snap patent to map the world in AR

The company with the most complete SLAM database will likely be the winner. This database will allow these giants to have an eye on the world metaphorically, so, for example Facebook can tag and know the location of your photo by just analyzing the image or Google can place ads and virtual billboards around you by analyzing the camera feed from your smart glasses. Your self-driving car can navigate itself with nothing more than visual data.

Every tech-giant knows the importance of having this database but they all have their own advantage and disadvantages in this field.

Having a visual understanding of the physical world is something that tech giants will fight over in the next years and companies like Apple that have lost out in areas like maps will be more careful. AR is predicted to be a billion dollar market and it may be the next big thing and none of the tech giants want to be left behind.

Mojtaba Tabatabaieis founder and CEO ofPendAR augmented reality solutions.

Continue reading here:

How SLAM technology is redrawing augmented reality's battle lines - VentureBeat

Apple ‘pulls 60 VPNs from China App Store’ – BBC News


CBC.ca
Apple 'pulls 60 VPNs from China App Store'
BBC News
In January, China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology announced that all developers offering VPNs must obtain a license from the government. And Apple said it was required to remove some VPN apps from its store because they didn't comply ...
Apple Removes Apps From China Store That Help Internet Users Evade CensorshipNew York Times
Apple removes VPN apps in China to adhere to new rulesCBC.ca

all 236 news articles »

Go here to read the rest:

Apple 'pulls 60 VPNs from China App Store' - BBC News

New research shows digital natives are no better at technology than the rest of us – Quartz

Marketers and social theorists love to talk about digital natives. This group is supposedly a generation of early adopters under the age of about 35, uniquely adept at technology compared to their older counterparts. But according to a recent editorial in Nature, these digital natives are a figment of our collective imaginationabout as easy to find as a a yeti with a smartphone.

The editorial points to a review paper published this June in the journal Teaching and Teacher Education, which concluded that information-savvy digital natives do not exist. Despite assertions that younger generations learn differently and require specialized, multimedia teaching strategies because they grew up with smartphones and the web, the authors say that there is no evidence to suggest that digital natives are more tech-savvy or good at multi-tasking than older generations.

This idea of the digital native was born out of the a 2001 essay by educator Marc Prensky, who claimed that a new generation was especially skilled at processing multiple streams of information and using technology, reports Discover Magazine. Prensky argued the world should adapt its teaching methods accordingly. But Paul Kirschner, co-author of the Teaching and Teacher Education study and a professor of educational psychology at the Open University in the Netherlands, argues that we hurt, rather than help, students learn when we assume that they have unique technological skills. We have to treat people as human, cognitive learners and stop considering one specific group to have special powers, Kirschner tells Discover.

This idea is backed up by other research showing that millennials do not necessarily possess special skills at basic computer programs compared to older generations. Research has also shown that multitasking is neither a special domain of the young nor an effective way to get good results for virtually anyone.

If the idea of digital natives was just jargon that advertisers used to sell to the under-30 crowd, all this might not matter much. But the idea that digital native are fundamentally different is influencing everything from the way curriculums are designed to the way companies shape their corporate work environments.

A better approach might be to rethink how we define generations. Digital natives have not developed unique intellectual abilities from their proximity to technology because basic human cognition doesnt change from generation to generation. But Jean Twenge, a professor of psychology at San Diego State University, argues that categorizing people into distinct generations can be useful for certain things. She points out that millennials show significant differences from older peers in terms of their workplace preferences, life goals, religious participation, alcohol and drug use, and trust in institutions. In other words, generations may have different habits and world viewsbut the way people learn wont change so quickly.

More:

New research shows digital natives are no better at technology than the rest of us - Quartz

Event to feature technology, science speakers – The Times Telegram

Samantha Madison

ROME This years Project Fibonacci STEAM conference and speaker series will feature a number of high-profile speakers, including Shark Tanks Daymond John.

The second annual event will take place at The Beeches in Rome and other surrounding locations, ending Saturday, Aug. 5.

The event hopes to build on last years headway, which led to about 10 internships and several new jobs, said Andy Drozd, president and chief scientist at ANDRO Computational Solutions.

"This says a lot in our efforts to revitalize youth talent and spur on new ideas in our own backyard," he said in a news release.

The Project Fibonacci Foundation is a nonprofit educational organization focusing on strengthening the workforce and economic development for the region using science, technology, engineering, arts and math education as a catalyst.

Students in 11th grade through seniors in college come from all over New York and beyond for the one-week event, taking part in immersive, hands-on education that is both team- and project-based.

"Last year, Project Fibonacci brought in nearly $340,000 to our local Mohawk Valley economy for a one-week event," Drozd said. "We want to continue to grow and increase that impact in 2017 and beyond as well as synergize our activities with other local and regional workforce education, economic development, entrepreneurial and start-up initiatives to revitalize our region and capitalize on its many strengths."

Last years speakers included astrophysicist Alex Filippenko, astronaut Jeanette Epps, astronaut and artist Alan Bean, neuroscientist David Eagleman and actor Alan Alda.

Originally posted here:

Event to feature technology, science speakers - The Times Telegram