Originally published September 15, 2013 at 6:06 PM  | Page modified September 16, 2013 at 4:34 PM
    Long ago, in a dreamier era, space stations were imagined as    portals to the heavens. In the 1968 movie 2001: A Space    Odyssey, the huge structure twirled in orbit, aesthetically    sublime, a relaxing way station for astronauts heading to the    moon. It featured a Hilton and a Howard Johnsons.  
    The international space station of the 21st century isnt quite    as beautiful as that movie version, and its not a gateway to    anywhere else. Its a laboratory focused on scientific    experiments. Usually there are six people aboard. When they    leave, they go back home, down to Earth. Three came home    Wednesday, landing in Kazakhstan.  
    The space station circles the planet at an altitude of about    250 miles. Faint traces of atmosphere exert a drag on it, so    the station must be boosted regularly to stay in orbit. In the    grand scheme of things, the space station simply isnt very far    away. The station has a phone number with a Houston area code.  
    Advocates for human-space exploration insist that NASA must    think bigger, developing missions beyond Low Earth Orbit, into    deeper space  perhaps back to the moon, or to an asteroid, and    certainly to Mars eventually.  
    But NASA has been struggling for years to square ambitions with    budgets. The space station is widely praised as an engineering    marvel, but it didnt come cheap.  
    The United States has poured close to $100 billion into the    program and is contributing about t $3 billion a year to the    stations operation. Space-policy experts warn that, without a    significant boost in budget, NASA will not be able to keep    running the station and simultaneously carry out new, costly    deep-space missions.  
    The United States and its partners need to make a tough call:    Keep the station flying? Or bring it down?  
    Boeing, the prime contractor, is trying to prove that the    stations components can hold up through at least 2028. Three    years ago, Congress extended funding for the station through    2020, and NASAs international partners  Russia, Japan, Canada    and the European Space Agency  have made a similar commitment.  
    But behind the scenes, NASA officials are working to persuade    the White House to make a decision, pronto, to keep the orbital    laboratory flying after 2020.  
See the original post here: 
U.S. weighing future of international space station