Iridium to share Falcon 9 launch with NASA-German gravity satellites – Spaceflight Now

The first 10 Iridium Next satellites launched Jan. 14 on a Falcon 9 rocket from Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. Credit: SpaceX

Iridium has secured a launch for five more of its next-generation communications craft in a rideshare arrangement with two U.S.-German research satellites aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket by early 2018.

The announcement Jan. 31 came two-and-a-half weeks after the first 10 Iridium Next satellites lifted off on a Falcon 9 booster from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. Another 10 spacecraft are scheduled for launch on a Falcon 9 flight in April.

Iridium will share the Falcon 9s lift and volume capacities on the newly-announced mission also due to launch from Vandenberg with two gravity research probes jointly developed by NASA and the German Research Center for Geosciences, or GFZ, of Potsdam, Germany.

The twin research satellites will replace the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment GRACE spacecraft in orbit since March 2002. The GRACE-Follow On, or GRACE-FO, satellites are being built and tested in Germany by Airbus Defense and Space.

NASAs Jet Propulsion Laboratory is responsible for the overall mission valued at nearly $400 million and pays for the construction of the two GRACE-FO spacecraft and a microwave instrument, the centerpiece of the satellites science payload.

The German government and GFZ are in charge of part of the science payload and arranging launch services for the GRACE-FO mission, roughly one-quarter of the projects overall cost.

The identical GRACE-FO satellites will launch into a polar orbit around 300 miles (500 kilometers) above Earth, and fly around the planet in formation separated by 137 miles (220 kilometers). The microwave ranging instrument will track the distance between the two spacecraft with a precision of 0.002 millimeters, a fraction of the width of a human hair.

Changes in the range between the satellites will tell scientists about the strength and lumpiness of Earths gravity field, allowing the ground team to produce a global gravity map every 30 days through the missions expected five-year lifetime.

GRACEs data archive aids studies of earthquakes and other seismic activity, ocean currents and glaciers, and the structure of Earths interior.

GRACE-FO will continue GRACEs legacy of tracking changes in the distribution of Earths mass over time by creating monthly maps of Earths gravity field, said Frank Flechtner, project manager of the mission at GFZ. GRACE is improving our understanding and knowledge of a variety of important Earth system processes such as the terrestrial water cycle and changes in ice sheets, glaciers and sea level or surface and deep-ocean currents. These climate change related measurements provide a unique view of the Earth system and have far-reaching benefits to society.

The original GRACE satellites are low on fuel, and could run out of propellant as soon as this summer, around the time the follow-on craft were originally scheduled for liftoff, according to GFZ.

GFZ and NASA agreed in 2013 to launch the satellites on a Russian-Ukrainian Dnepr rocket provided by Kosmotras in August 2017, but that programs future is in doubt after relations between the two partner countries deteriorated following Russias annexation of Crimea in 2014.

Iridium also booked two satellites to launch on a separate Dnepr rocket, but the Virginia-based communications company is no longer counting on the converted Soviet-era missiles availability for the mission.

The indefinite grounding of Dnepr left Iridium and GFZ looking for an alternate ride.

Iridium said the rideshare launch with SpaceX offered a particularly compelling economical solution through cost-sharing with GFZ.

This is a very smart way to get additional Iridium Next satellites into orbit, said Matt Desch, CEO at Iridium. This launch provides added resiliency to our network for not much more than we had planned originally to launch 72 satellites, including two with Kosmotras.

We are pleased to be sharing a rocket with NASA and GFZ German Research Center for Geosciences for this additional SpaceX launch, and GFZ has been a great business partner throughout this process, Desch said in a statement.

Iridium said it will consider future launches with Kosmotrass Dnepr rocket once approvals are available.

Financial terms of the rideshare SpaceX launch contract were not disclosed.

GFZ said the agreement with SpaceX calls for a launch between December 2017 and February 2018.

Iridiums satellite contractors Thales Alenia Space and Orbital ATK are building 81 spacecraft for the new-generation fleet, which replaces the companys aging satellites in orbit since the late 1990s. Iridium booked seven Falcon 9 launches with SpaceX in 2010 enough to put 70 satellites into orbit and the latest contract adds five more to that number.

Launch arrangements for the remaining six satellites, considered ground spares, will be announced at a later date. Desch has said previously that Iridium intends to eventually launch all 81 of the satellites.

Iridiums network requires 66 satellites in space spread out in six orbital planes. The rest of the satellites launched will be stored in orbit.

Airbus Defense and Space is building a multi-satellite adapter to accommodate the dual-launch, according to GFZ. SpaceX builds the dispenser for the Iridium satellites.

Email the author.

Follow Stephen Clark on Twitter: @StephenClark1.

Read the original here:

Iridium to share Falcon 9 launch with NASA-German gravity satellites - Spaceflight Now

Japan’s Kounotori 6 re-enters Earth’s atmosphere – SpaceFlight Insider

Derek Richardson

February 6th, 2017

Kounotori 6 departs from the International Space Station on Jan. 27, 2017. Photo Credit: NASA

Japans sixth Kounotori spacecraft, also called the H-II Transfer Vehicle or HTV, re-entered Earths atmosphere on Feb. 5, 2017, after spending nearly two months in space to resupply the International Space Station (ISS) and test new technologies.

Re-entry, confirmed by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), occurred at 10:06 a.m. EST (15:06 GMT) over the Pacific Ocean. It came just over a week after the spacecraft departed the ISS after spending six weeks attached to the outpost.

After unberthing from the ISS, the week-long free flight was supposed to allow Kounotori 6 to test a 2,300-foot (700-meter) long tether called Kounotori Integrated Tether Experiment (KITE). It was attached to the outside of the cargo craft and was to be deployed for a week.

Unfortunately, the tether failed to deploy. Teams at JAXA worked all last week to get the tether, made of stainless steel and aluminium, along with a 44-pound (20-kilogram) end-mass to extend. However, time ran out.

KITE was supposed to deploy to its full length back on Jan. 27, 2017, not long after Kounotori 6 departed the space station. It was to spend last week fully extended. A current of no more than 10 milliamps was expected to run through the tether to demonstrate how it could affect the orbit of an object.

JAXA hopes this technology can one day be used to help remove space debris. While this experiment failed to deploy, it is unknown if the Japanese space agency will send up a similar experiment on future Kounotori cargo ships.

Kounotori 6 launched on Dec. 9, 2016, atop an H-IIB rocket from the Tanegashima Space Center in Japan. It arrivedat the outpost on Dec. 13.

Inside the pressurized section were 3.9 metric tons of water, food, experiments, and crew commodities. This included a new 4K camera, a new small satellite deployer, and a number of CubeSats.

The spacecraft was unloaded over the course of its six-week stay before being reloaded with trash and unneeded equipment.

In the unpressurized section of Kounotori 6 was an exposed pallet with six new lithium-ion batteries. Over the course of several days worth of robotics activity and two spacewalks, these batteries replaced 12 old nickel-hydrogen units.

Nine nickel-hydrogen batteries were placed on Kounotoris exposed pallet for disposal upon re-entry.

JAXAs next cargo run is slated for February 2018. The next launch to the ISS byany organization is expected to be SpaceXs CRS-10 Dragon cargo capsule. Liftoff is slated for 11:34 a.m. EST (16:34 GMT) on Feb. 14, 2017, from Kennedy Space Centers Launch Complex 39A.

Kounotori 6 before being unberthed from the International Space Station. Photo Credit: NASA

Tagged: Expedition 50 HTV-6 International Space Station JAXA Kounotori 6 Lead Stories

Derek Richardson is a student studying mass media with an emphasis in contemporary journalism at Washburn University in Topeka, Kansas. He is currently the managing editor of the student run newspaper, the Washburn Review. He also writes a blog, called Orbital Velocity, about the space station. His passion for space ignited when he watched space shuttle Discovery leap to space on Oct. 29, 1998. He saw his first in-person launch on July 8, 2011 when the space shuttle launched for the final time. Today, this fervor has accelerated toward orbit and shows no signs of slowing down. After dabbling in math and engineering courses in college, he soon realized that his true calling was communicating to others about space exploration and spreading that passion.

See the article here:

Japan's Kounotori 6 re-enters Earth's atmosphere - SpaceFlight Insider

How the Canadarm changed spaceflight – The Globe and Mail

This story is part of a series about people, products and discoveries that changed the world.

During a recent meeting at Canadian Space Agency headquarters in Longueuil, Que., Ken Podwalski put up a picture that he wanted his entire team to take a moment to absorb.

It was Dextre, the built-in-Canada space robot that perches on the end of Canadarm2 and is featured on the back of the Canadian five-dollar bill. The snapshot Mr. Podwalski was so taken with captured Dextre last December, in the midst of upgrading the power system on the International Space Station. With a battery in each hand and one on the side, Dextre could hardly have looked more busy or more capable a space-age equivalent of Rosie the Riveter.

Look at what we do now, Mr. Podwalski said, who is the Canadian program manager for the space station. This is all-out robotics.

Great Canadian Innovations: How Canadians at Whistler invented the future of skiing

Great Canadian Innovations: How a Canadian engineer fuelled the battery industry

Great Canadian Innovations: How the discovery of stem cells revolutionized medicine

Mr. Podwalski joined the agency more than 20 years ago, when engineers were dreaming up how a robotic system to service the space station would work. Back then, no one yet foresaw just how much work there would be for it to do. As with the first generation of Canadarms that flew on the space shuttle, the key to the systems success would prove to be its ability to take on new roles as the needs and priorities of the space program changed.

Canadarm began when Spar Aerospace, a Toronto company spun off from de Havilland Aircraft, was looking for new business just as NASA was looking to involve Canada in its fledgling shuttle program. NASA was already interested in DSMA Atcon, another Toronto firm, which built robots for loading fuel into CANDU nuclear reactors. Spar had got its start building extendable antennas for satellites. Soon, the two companies were teaming up on a proposal to build the space shuttles remote manipulator system an astronaut-operated device that would be used to deploy satellites from the shuttles cargo bay.

With encouragement from the National Research Council, the federal government got on board with the plan. U.S. aerospace companies were less enthusiastic, hoping instead for a made-in-the-United-States arm. But in July, 1975, the deal was struck. Canada would provide an arm for the shuttle with Spar as prime contractor. For Spar, the project was a reach in more ways than one: A failure on such a high-profile venture might take down the company.

Their specialty was electromechanical systems that work in a very hostile environment, Mr. Podwalski said. But from that starting point, Spar engineers had a long way to go to develop an arm that would do what NASA needed.

Among the most inspired innovations they came up in the early days was the end effector, essentially the hand that allows the arm to capture objects in space. Foregoing more complex and finicky options such as a claw or mechanical gripper, engineer Frank Mee devised a system of three cables that narrowed like the iris of a camera to snare its target. When the idea first came to him, he built a model at home using cardboard and string to persuade his colleagues at Spar that it would work.

Other key developments included the arms gearbox, which provided fluid movement while minimizing backlash an engineering term for sloppiness or play between motors and joints.

Bob Ferguson, an engineer who once worked on Formula One race cars, developed the gearbox.

In February, 1981, the first arm was officially accepted by NASA at a ceremony at Spar. It was then that NRC president Larkin Kerwin dubbed it the Canadarm. But the real branding coup would come with the arms maiden flight that November. As the shuttle orbited with its cargo-bay doors open, its camera showed the arm, elbow bent, against the swirling white-and-blue backdrop of planet Earth, with the Canada logo a late-stage addition proudly emblazoned on the arms white thermal blanket.

What mattered most was that the arm worked beautifully, and not just for satellites, but as a camera on a stick that could be pointed at anything the shuttle mission controllers wanted to see. On one occasion in 1984, it proved to be just the thing to knock a worrisome chunk of ice off the side of the space shuttle Discovery. The successes led NASA to order a Canadarm for every shuttle in its fleet.

Mike Hiltz, an engineer who began working at Spar as a co-op student in the 1980s, still recalls the thrill of working with the system and adapting it to meet new challenges, such as when it served as a platform for astronauts repairing the Hubble Space Telescope in 1993, or when it mated the first two elements of the International Space Station, a Russian module with a U.S. node, in 1998.

We never stopped improving and evolving, Mr. Hiltz said, now manager of systems engineering at MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Ltd., which acquired the space division of Spar in 2001.

In his view, the most impressive task the arm was asked to perform was one that never played out in real life: serving as a bridge between two space shuttles in the event that NASA had to mount a rescue mission in orbit.

We did all the simulations to prove you could do this, he said. Imagine a flexible, 1,000-pound arm holding two 250,000-pound vehicles with astronauts scrambling up and down it.

Building Canadarm 2 and Dextre for the space station required several more technical leaps, including a vision system, a way to sense how much force can be safely applied during delicate work, and an arm that can detach at either end and walk around the outside of the station to get to wherever it is needed. The arm also blurs the boundary between Earth and space in a way the public rarely perceives. While the media focus is generally on the astronauts who live and work on the station, as often as not the arm today is handled by one of nine Canadian operators who sit in Houston or in CSAs control centre in Longueuil.

Meanwhile, control systems and technologies developed for Canadarm have since found their way into numerous other applications, including robotic-assisted brain surgeries.

But as the United States and other countries begin to think about what comes after the space station, whether its the moons surface, the nearby asteroids or a mission to Mars, its hard to imagine that there wont be a need for a system like Canadarm should Canada choose to fill it.

For now, theres no firm plan for the future of Canadas biggest claim to fame in space. But Mr. Podwalski allows that this hasnt stopped engineers from thinking about the possibilities.

Weve begun to dream again, he said.

Follow Ivan Semeniuk on Twitter: @ivansemeniuk

Excerpt from:

How the Canadarm changed spaceflight - The Globe and Mail

Scientists Say Spaceflight Alters Your Microbiome – Inverse

An announcement this week from scientists at Northwestern University says that living in space slightly changes the composition of a persons gut bacteria, also known as the microbiome. This research, while still in its early stages, has strong implications for the future of long-term space flight. Since it looks more and more probable that humans will travel to Mars within our lifetime, it only seems right that we should figure out how long-term space travel can affect our bodies. Plus, with recent popular depictions of long-term human spaceflight, as in the film Passengers, the public could use some well-grounded research on the topic.

The research subject, NASA astronaut Scott Kelly, returned from his record year in space 11 months ago. Upon returning to Earth, he began his career as a guinea pig. Scott has an identical twin brother, Mark, who is also an astronaut but who remained on Earth while Scott lived in space. These identical twins near-identical career paths provide scientists with the unique opportunity to study how long-term space travel affects a human body, with Scott as the test subject and Mark as the control group. Scientists at ten different research institutions have been studying different aspects of the Kellys physiology, and theyve recently begun to announce some of the results of these studies.

A new batch of test results came out this week, showing that the composition of microscopic organisms in Scotts digestive system had been altered during his time in space. We are seeing changes associated with spaceflight, and they go away upon return to Earth, said Fred W. Turek, one of the lead authors on the study, in this weeks announcement. These changes include shifts in the balance of types of bacteria, fluctuations in the number of certain types of bacteria during Scotts time in space, differences in microbe populations between the two brothers (though this is always to be expected when comparing two people), and, surprisingly, a lack of overall changes in microbial diversity. In other words, Scotts microbiome shifted a bit, but all the same species he blasted off with came back to Earth with him. Any abnormalities settled out upon his return.

The researchers still have lots of work to do, and theyre not exactly sure what these findings mean yet, but it seems like good news that a person lived in space for a year and his microbiome wasnt altered in any bizarre ways. In conjunction with other studies, researchers should be able to use the Kellys to give us a clearer idea of what to expect from long-term space travel.

Photos via Getty Images / Brian Ach

See the rest here:

Scientists Say Spaceflight Alters Your Microbiome - Inverse

SpaceX rocket tagged for reuse test-fired in Texas – Spaceflight Now

The test-firing of a previously-flown Falcon 9 first stage booster in late January paves the way for its second launch scheduled for no earlier than March. Credit: SpaceX

The Falcon 9 first stage booster assigned to launch as soon as March on SpaceXs first mission with a previously-flown rocket has been test-fired at the companys development facility in Central Texas.

The 15-story rocket stage completed the test-firing of its nine Merlin 1D engines in late January, according to SpaceX.

The company conducts acceptance testing of all Falcon 9 boosters its test site in McGregor, Texas, before shipping rockets to launch bases in Florida or California. The recent test-firing was to be followed by the first stages transport to Cape Canaveral for preparations ahead of its launch with the SES 10 communications satellite, a mission tentatively set for March.

The rocket first flew in April 2016 on a resupply launch to the International Space Station. After boosting the Falcon 9s second stage and Dragon cargo craft into the upper atmosphere, the first stage returned to a vertical landing on a platform in the Atlantic Ocean while the upper part of the launcher continued into orbit.

The landing last April marked the first time SpaceX succeeded in recovering a rocket at sea, and the second time successful Falcon 9 rocket landing overall. The first rocket stage recovered intact is on public display outside SpaceXs headquarters in Hawthorne, California.

The SES 10 launch is currently third in line on SpaceXs manifest, with Falcon 9 flights scheduled for no earlier than Feb. 14 and Feb. 28 with a Dragon supply ship for the space station and the EchoStar 23 communications craft to provide broadcast services over Brazil.

SES 10 was shipped to Cape Canaveral from its Airbus Defense and Space factory in France last month. The satellite, owned by SES of Luxembourg, will broadcast television over Latin America.

The above video shows a test-firing last year of a Falcon 9 booster recovered after a launch in May. It will not be reused.

SpaceX is eager to demonstrate that the Falcon 9 rockets first stage structure and Merlin engines can be reused. The company says the capability will reduce launch prices, and SES received a discount of approximately 10 percent in exchange for agreeing to put its payload on the first flight of a previously-flown Falcon 9.

The Falcon 9s nose cone, a clamshell-like fairing that shields satellites during the first few minutes of flight, might be the next component SpaceX tries to reuse. The second stage cannot currently be recovered.

SpaceX is only putting the rocket booster assigned to fly with SES 10 through standard preflight testing.

But engineers have conducted extensive stress testing on other recovered Falcon 9 rockets that will not fly again, including a series of at least seven test-firings of a first stage that landed last May after the launch of a Japanese telecom satellite.

Email the author.

Follow Stephen Clark on Twitter: @StephenClark1.

Read more:

SpaceX rocket tagged for reuse test-fired in Texas - Spaceflight Now

ULA’s navy delivers rocket that will launch supplies to the space … – Spaceflight Now

A recent Mariner arrival at Port Canaveral for Atlas 5. Credit: Justin Ray/Spaceflight Now

PORT CANAVERAL The ocean-sailing ship that transports rocket stages from United Launch Alliances factory to U.S. launch sites completed its latest voyage overnight, pulling into port to deliver the Atlas 5 that will send a cargo freighter to the International Space Station in March.

The Mariner, owned and operated by the Foss Maritime company, made a week-long voyage from the ULA production facility in Decatur, Alabama to Cape Canaveral, Florida.

Originally built to carry Delta 4 rockets for Boeing to the Cape and Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, the Mariner now also delivers Atlas 5 stages for ULA whenever circumstances permit.

The Atlas 5s original mode of transportation the massive Antonov aircraft continues to be used sparingly.

The custom-made, purpose-built cargo ship entered service in 2000. The 312-foot-long roll-on/roll-off vessel has a crew of 16, carries over 100,000 gallons of fuel and is powered by engines derived from a locomotive.

It features full living quarters, a kitchen and dining area, a fabrication shop below deck and even a helipad.

Construction of the Atlas was performed inside the sprawling Decatur factory, followed by full testing and being readied for transport to Florida.

The Mariner traversed 270 miles up the Tennessee River, 60 miles on the Ohio River and 646 miles down the Mississippi River. The trek then covered 815 miles through the Gulf of Mexico and around to Floridas east-central coast to Port Canaveral.

A trips round-the-clock average speed is about 12 mph.

Now at the harbor in Port Canaveral, a semi-trucks will drive the 106.6-foot-long, 12.5-foot-diameter bronze-colored booster stage and 41.5-foot-long, 10-foot-diameter Centaur upper stage off the Mariner and up through Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on Monday.

The first stage goes to the Atlas Spaceflight Operations Center high bay for receiving checks and the Centaur will be processed at the Delta Operations Center and integrated with the interstage and boattail.

Later, the stages will be taken further up the road to the Vertical Integration Facility at Complex 41 for stacking aboard the mobile launch platform.

Once the first stage is erected, the interstage and Centaur will be hoisted and attached to complete the basic build up of the Atlas 5 rocket, designated AV-070.

Installation of the encapsulated payload will occur about one week before launch to top off the 194-foot-tall rocket.

The mission, slated for March 19 at 10:56 p.m. EDT (0256 GMT), will launch the Orbital ATK OA-7 Cygnus spacecraft filled with 7,700 pounds of provisions and experiments for the International Space Station.

The Atlas 5 rockets yaw-steering ability will enable a 30-minute launch window extending 15 minutes before and after the instant when the stations orbital plane passes over the pad.

It will be Orbital ATKs seventh resupply mission to the station under NASAs commercial cargo-delivery program.

The pressurized cargo module for Cygnus arrived at Kennedy Space Centers Space Station Processing Facility on Jan. 9. The crafts propulsion section arrived Feb. 1.

The two pieces will be mated together and initial cargo loading performed at the SSPF before the Cygnus is moved to the nearby Payload Hazardous Servicing Facility for propellant loading and the stowage of late-load cargo items.

Encapsulation of the ship in the Atlas 5 rockets 14-foot-wide, 45-foot-long extra extended payload fairing (XEPF) will occur at the SSPF, too.

Previous Cygnus spacecraft have been given a ceremonial name for a former astronaut who has since passed away. The name for OA-7 has not yet been revealed.

NASA requested that this Cygnus be launched aboard the Atlas 5 instead of Orbital ATKs revamped Antares rocket. The switch allows the craft to carry a greater amount of supplies and gives the space agency better schedule assurance.

The Atlas 5 successfully launched two Cygnus missions in December 2015 and March 2016 while the Antares fleet was grounded to upgrade its engines from stockpiled Soviet-era powerplants to modern-day Russian ones.

** CYGNUS FLIGHT HISTORY **

Demo Antares 1,299 pounds Launched Sept. 18, 2013 Orb 1 Antares 2,780 pounds Launched Jan. 9, 2014 Orb 2 Antares 3,293 pounds Launched July 13, 2014 Orb 3 Antares 4,883 pounds Launched Oct. 28, 2014 *Failure OA-4 Atlas 5 7,746 pounds Launched Dec. 6, 2015 OA-6 Atlas 5 7,758 pounds Launched March 22, 2016 OA-5 Antares 5,163 pounds Launched Oct. 17, 2016

Among the science projects being launched in this upcoming OA-7 Cygnus include an Advanced Plant Habitat as a stepping-stone to food production systems on long-duration exploration missions, new tests on cell cultures in space for biological research, a technology experiment into coatings applied to container walls that could benefit fuel storage tanks, a host of cubesats that will be launched from the station, the third spacecraft fire test to study flames in microgravity and another try at collecting data during atmospheric reentry at the missions conclusion.

See earlier OA-7 Cygnus coverage.

Our Atlas archive.

Continue reading here:

ULA's navy delivers rocket that will launch supplies to the space ... - Spaceflight Now

Leaving Orbit: A Tribute to American Spaceflight – The Avion


The Avion
Leaving Orbit: A Tribute to American Spaceflight
The Avion
Moderator Marc Bernier sat down with Professor Dean to discuss her book Leaving Orbit: Notes From the Last Days of American Spaceflight. The book tells a creative nonfiction story about the final days of the successful Space Shuttle program: America's ...

Go here to see the original:

Leaving Orbit: A Tribute to American Spaceflight - The Avion

NASA –"Space Flight Changes Structure of the Human Brain" (VIDEO) – The Daily Galaxy (blog)

For decades, scientists working with astronauts have known that spaceflight has an effect on neurological systems, said Mill Reschke, chief scientist for NASA Neuroscience. Scientists also have believed the changes we observe in spatial orientation, balance and disturbances in the control of eye movements needed to maintain clear vision when the head is moved must be the result of structural changes in the brain."

Dr. Seidler is making a major step forward with her investigation of changes in the brain acquired during flight, and relating these changes to functional performance following flight," saidReschke.

Seidler and other researchers studied the structural MRIs of 12 astronauts who spent two weeks as shuttle crew members. They also studied the MRIs of 14 astronauts who spent six months on the International Space Station (ISS). Every one of the astronauts experienced increases and decreases in gray matter in the different areas of their brains. The changes were clearer and more pronounced in the astronauts who stayed in space for a longer period of time.

Seidler and colleagues examined structural MRIs in 12 astronauts who spent two weeks as shuttle crew members, and 14 who spent six months on the International Space Station. All experienced increases and decreases in gray matter in different parts of the brain, with more pronounced changes the longer the astronauts spent in space.

"We found large regions of gray matter volume decreases, which could be related to redistribution of cerebrospinal fluid in space," Seidler said. "Gravity is not available to pull fluids down in the body, resulting in so-called puffy face in space. This may result in a shift of brain position or compression."

"It's interesting because even if you love something you won't practice more than an hour a day," Seidler said. But the brain changes researchers observed were equivalent to someone practicing a new skill round-the-clock.

This figure shows dose response effects blue areas are where there are more gray matter decreases in international space station astronauts than in those that just spent a few weeks on the space shuttle.The researchers also found increases in gray matter volume in regions that control leg movement and process sensory information from legs, which may reflect changes related to the brain learning how to move in microgravity. These changes were greater in space station astronauts because their brains were learning and adapting 24/7.

The top row shows brain changes with long duration bed rest; the bottom row shows brain changes with spaceflight. Orange shows regions of increase; blue = decrease. There is some overlap but also notable differences with spaceflight showing more changes in the cerebellum, a structure that is involved in motor learning."In space, it's an extreme example of neuroplasticity in the brain because you're in a microgravity environment 24 hours a day," Seidler said.

Though they haven't pinpointed the exact nature of the changes yet, the findings may lead to new ways of thinking about certain health conditionsfor example, people on long-duration bed rest or people who have normal pressure hydrocephalus, a condition in which cerebrospinal spinal fluid accumulates in ventricles in the brain and causes pressure.

Seidler said the brain changes could reflect new connections between neurons, and she's leading another long-term study that will help determine the repercussions on cognition and physical performance, as well as how long the brain changes last. For example, even after balance returns, the brain might still recruit different pathways to compensate for the structural brain changes caused by spaceflight.

"The behavior may return to normal, but the way the brain controls the behavior may change," she said.

Scott Kelly etched his spot in the record books this fall. In October, he recorded his 382nd day in spacethe most among any American astronaut. But his latest stint in a weightless environment will end in March when Kelly wraps up his mission aboard the International Space Station. Then comes the transition period when Kelly has to re-adapt to Earths gravity. Its during this transition period when many astronauts struggle with depth perception, memory and motor control.

There is no up or down in space, said Seidler. So when astronauts return to Earth, it takes some time for them to adapt because the way their brain interpreted the signals in space is no longer relevant for our gravitational environment. They need time to re-adapt before they can drive a car or maintain their balance well. They need, in some cases, a couple of weeks or a month to recover.

"The brain itself is very fascinating. Its one of our last great scientific frontiers," concludes Seidler.

Dr. Seidler provides new insights about the adaptability of the healthy brain, especially as it involves the complex interplay among perception, cognition, and motor function, said U-M School of Kinesiology Dean Ron Zernicke. Microgravity is a unique means to discover new knowledge about brain function.

Seidler will continuously monitor the brain structure and function of astronauts aboard the International Space Station, with a goal to wrap up her data collection by 2018.

This is a study that takes a lot of patience because there arent a lot of astronauts aboard the International Space Station that we can recruit from, she said. But regardless of the timeline, this type of research has major implications on the health and wellbeing of our astronauts. The brain itself is very fascinating. Its one of our last great scientific frontiers.

The Daily Galaxy via University of Michigan and NASA

Image credit: Top of page With Thanks to neuroscapelab.com,gazzaleylab.ucsf.edu | sccn.ucsd.edu

Follow this link:

NASA --"Space Flight Changes Structure of the Human Brain" (VIDEO) - The Daily Galaxy (blog)

How Astronauts’ Brains Are Changed By Spaceflight – Gizmodo – Gizmodo

Spaceflight is not for the faint of heartliterally. The first results of NASAs twin study, released just this week, revealed that space physically impacts astronauts on multiple levels, right down to shifts in gene expression. Now, a group of scientists at the University of Michigan have released research that suggests spaceflight alters astronauts brains.

The team studied 26 astronauts who spent various amounts of time in space, between 2008 to 2012. Twelve of the astronauts spent two weeks as shuttle crew members, while the other 14 spent six months aboard the International Space Station (ISS). After examining structural MRIs from all the astronauts taken before and after spaceflight, the researchers found that all subjects experienced both increases and decreases in the volume of gray matter in different regions of the brain. Gray matter is responsible for many key functions, including muscle control, emotions, memory and sensory perception.

Naturally, those who spent more time in space were impacted more dramatically. The teams findings were published on December 19, 2016 in Nature Microgravity.

Some of the areas show decreases in gray matter volume, and I dont want anyone to think that means you go to space and lose brain cells, University of Michigan professor Rachel Seidler, a co-author on the study, told Gizmodo. The losses are coming from shifts in fluid in the brain that happen with flight.

Specifically, the shifts in gray matter volume appear due microgravity, which describes the very slight presence of gravity aboard the ISS.

Imagine gravity pulling all the fluids toward your feet, and in space you dont have that happening. Seidler said. Theres more fluid toward the headyou may have seen photos of astronauts where they have puffy faces in spacebut theres a shift in fluid in the brain as well.

The group found that during spaceflight, gray matter volume increased in small regions of the brain that control leg movement, which could reflect how the brain retrains the body to move in microgravity. In other areas of the brain, gray matter volume decreased, possibly due to a redistribution of the cerebrospinal fluid that coats the central nervous system.

Astonishingly enough, we know almost nothing about how space impacts the brain. This study is the first to ever analyze how brain structure could change due to microgravity. While its still unclear howor ifgray matter volume returned to pre-flight levels in the astronauts studied, Steidler is conducting a separate ongoing study that analyzes astronauts brains in the six months after their returns from space.

Because of the amount of exercise theyre doing now, astronauts are coming back with their [muscles and bones] pretty well protected, Steidler said. But the brain is really still an open question...we dont yet have available follow-up data to see how long it takes the brain to recover.

With certain Earthlings grand ambitions to go to Mars, its important to understand how long stints in space can affect the human body. But this research could also be key to understanding health conditions here on Earth. Steidler said studies like this could help medical professionals better understand brain disorders like normal pressure hydrocephalus, which is caused by a build up of fluid in the brain.

Its very interesting to use this as a model to study the maximum capacity for neuroplasticity in the healthy brain, she explained. Its an important model for understanding how much the brain can change when faced with an environment youve never been in before.

[University of Michigan]

Visit link:

How Astronauts' Brains Are Changed By Spaceflight - Gizmodo - Gizmodo

NASASpaceFlight.com – Official Site

Latest Articles 50 years on, reminders of Apollo 1 beckon a safer future

Fifty years ago Friday, the first but sadly not the last fatal spaceflight accident struck NASA when a fire claimed the lives of Virgil Gus Grissom,

Boeing has revealed the space suit astronauts will wear on missions aboard the Starliner spacecraft. Formerly known as CST-100, the Boeing spacecraft is one of two commercial crew

Japan has conducted the launch of the DSN-2 military communications satellite on Tuesday via its H-IIA rocket. Liftoff from the Tanegashima was on schedule at 16:44 local time

Airbus Safran Launchers, which now owns the majority stake in Arianespace, has issued a statement of intent, promoting Ariane 5s track record as it prepares to enter the

The US Air Forces third Space-Based Infrared System (SBIRS) geosynchronous missile detection satellite rode to orbit atop United Launch Alliances Atlas V rocket on Friday, lifting off from

For the first time on the West Coast, a recovered Falcon 9 first stage has made it back to port, intact. Following its role with the successful launch

In the month and a half since the Progress MS-04 spacecraft was lost in a third-stage launch mishap on 1 December 2016, Russian federal investigators and Roscosmos have

Japan conducted an experimental launch, using a modified SS-520 sounding rocket to place a CubeSat, TRICOM-1, into low Earth orbit. The mission lifted off from the Uchinoura Space

SpaceX returned its Falcon 9 rocket to flight Saturday with a mission that delivered ten Iridium NEXT communications satellites into low Earth orbit. Liftoff was on time at

Two astronauts aboard the International Space Station (ISS) have completed a long-planned process to upgrade the power storage batteries outside the station. The upgraded batteries will give the

Read this article:

NASASpaceFlight.com - Official Site

Human Space Flight (HSF) – Space History

Space Flight Mission "NASA is deeply committed to spreading the unique knowledge that flows from its aeronautics and space research..." Launch Programs Project Mercury Initiated in 1958, completed in 1963, Project Mercury was the United States' first man-in-space program.

Project Gemini The second U.S. manned space program was announced in January 1962. Gemini involved 12 flights, including two unmanned flight tests of the equipment.

Apollo-Soyuz The mission started with the Russian Soyuz launch on July 15, 1975, followed by the U.S. Apollo launch on the same day. Docking in space of the two craft occurred on July 17, and joint operations were conducted for two full days. Both spacecraft landed safely and on schedule.

Space Shuttle The Space Shuttle is a viable part of American History. Standing as one of NASA's foremost projects, the shuttle has accomplished many tasks that have enhanced the quality of life on Earth. View archives of every shuttle mission here.

Project Apollo

"I believe this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to Earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important in the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish."

John F. Kennedy Special Joint Session of Congress May 25, 1961

Shuttle-Mir Phase 1 was a NASA program encompassing 11 space shuttle flights over a four-year period. It used existing assets - primarily U.S. shuttle orbiters and the Russian Space Station Mir - to build joint space experience and start joint scientific research.

International Space Station The most complex engineering and construction project in the world is taking place in space. 16 countries and over 100,000 people are contributing to this monumental achievement.

NASA Histories On-line On-line versions of more than 100 NASA history publications are available at this Web site.

Walking to Olympus: An EVA Chronology An online PDF (3.5M) chronicle of EVAs conducted since the dawn of the space age.

Yesterday's Space Facts Search the Human Space Flight Web's archive of Space Facts.

Visit link:

Human Space Flight (HSF) - Space History

Human Space Flight (HSF) – Realtime Data

If conditions are right, you can see satellites and other spacecraft -- such as the space shuttle or the International Space Station -- clearly from the ground. Satellites appear as small, steady, extremely fast-moving points of light. The International Space Station is now one of the most visible objects in the sky. Most sightings follow a west-to-east path and the spacecraft appear over the western horizon and disappear over the eastern in a matter of a few minutes.

The problem for most people is that they do not know when or where to look to see the station or other spacecraft in the night sky. NASA SkyWatch is a tool for you to get this information. This guide is intended to help you run NASA SkyWatch the first time or two you try.

Generally, NASA SkyWatch can be as simple or as complex as you care to make it. For astronomy enthusiasts, there are many variables that allow you to personalize the processing of Earth orbiting satellites. For everyone else, there are only a few things to remember in order to get highly accurate sighting information. This guide will help you to master the basics of obtaining some great sighting data!

Step 1: First of all, remember that you need to be using a compatible internet browser. The Microsoft Internet Explorer v.4.0 or later or Netscape Navigator v.4.06 or later are recommended for the Windows operating system. The Java Runtime Environment v.1.4.2 is also required.

For the Macintosh operating system, the Microsoft Internet Explorer v.4.5 and the Macintosh Runtime Environment for Java v.2.1 are recommended. If you have access to these browsers, then you are ready to proceed to step 2. If you do not have access to these browsers, then you will receive security errors and the applet will not appear.

Step 2: Once the browser configuration is sorted out, you are ready to go. NASA SkyWatch can be viewed from the Human Spaceflight Web under Realtime Data and Sightings. To obtain best results, make sure your computer system clock is set to your correct local time. If all is well, all you need to do is to click on the "Start Java Applet" button on the introduction page and the applet will be displayed. Once the user interface is displayed, you are ready for step three.

Step 3: Choose a location

On the map:

Go here to see the original:

Human Space Flight (HSF) - Realtime Data

World Space Flight

This family of pages contain a brief history of manned space flight. Here you will find summary information of every manned flight, beginning with Yuri Gagarin in Vostok 1 up to the latest International Space Station expedition. We also follow the latest efforts by China to put men into space. If and when non-governmental organizations put men into space, those flights will also be included. We have information on Vostok, Voskhod, Soyuz, Salyut, Zond, Almaz, Mir, Buran, Progress, Mercury, Gemini, X-15, DynaSoar, Apollo, Skylab, the Space Shuttle, the International Space Station, and Shenzhou.

How many people are currently in space, and who are they?

Learn who has flown in space, how many times, what missions, and their nationality. All astronauts/cosmonauts/yuhangyuan (taikonauts) are included. Not only American, Russian/Soviet and Chinese, but Canadian, European, and others from around the world who have flown in space. Check up on the number of spacewalks, when they occurred, who participated, and for how long. There are pages dedicated solely to astronauts representing the Canadian Space Agency (CSA), the European Space Agency (ESA), and the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA).

We have pages dedicated to the International Space Station, its assembly sequence, manned expeditions, and the partner nations contributing to the effort.

While not directly related to manned space activities, one set of pages is given to deep space probes.

There are other sets of pages which include a catch all (stuff which may not necessarily be of a space nature) and a blog. Addendums has histories of rocket families (German, Russian, Chinese, American), information on moon phases, solstices, a periodic table, photos of various x-planes, a fun page. The blog can have anything on any topic.

Search using the WorldSpaceFlight internal keyword search feature.

Site Map

We want you to find our pages interesting and informative. Accuracy is also important. Please, let us know of any errors you notice. Spelling errors, broken links, incorrect names or dates are all things we want to eliminate. Suggestions are always welcome.

Times accessed: 76939

Last updated: 21 January 2016 21:21:03.

Two MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS and their astonishingly simple answers: 1) Where was the Canadarm built? - It was built, in of all places, CANADA! 2) What is the name of the International Space Station? - The International Space Station.

Background: Orion Nebula as seen from the Hubble Space Telescope (NASA)

Read the original post:

World Space Flight

Marshall Space Flight Center – Wikipedia, the free …

Coordinates: 343849N 864027W / 34.64688N 86.67416W / 34.64688; -86.67416

The Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) is the U.S. government's civilian rocketry and spacecraft propulsion research center. The largest NASA center, MSFC's first mission was developing the Saturn launch vehicles for the Apollo moon program. Marshall has been the agency's lead center for Space Shuttle propulsion and its external tank; payloads and related crew training; International Space Station (ISS) design and assembly; and computers, networks, and information management. Located on the Redstone Arsenal near Huntsville, Alabama, MSFC is named in honor of General of the Army George Marshall.

The center also contains the Huntsville Operations Support Center (HOSC), a facility that supports ISS launch, payload and experiment activities at the Kennedy Space Center. The HOSC also monitors rocket launches from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station when a Marshall Center payload is on board.

After the end of the war with Germany in May 1945, a program was initiated to bring to the United States a number of scientist and engineers who had been at the center of Germany's advanced military technologies. The largest and best-known activity was called Operation Paperclip. In August 1945, 127 missile specialists led by Wernher von Braun signed work contracts with the U.S. Army's Ordnance Corps. Most of them had worked on the V-2 missile development under von Braun at Peenemnde. Von Braun and the other Germans were sent to Fort Bliss, Texas, joining the Army's newly formed Research and Development Division Sub-office (Rocket).

For the next five years, von Braun and the German scientists and engineers were primarily engaged in adapting and improving the V-2 missile for U.S. applications; testing was conducted at nearby White Sands Proving Grounds, New Mexico. Von Braun had long had a great interest in rocketry for space science and exploration. Toward this, he was allowed to use a WAC Corporal rocket as a second stage for a V-2; the combination, called Bumper, reached a record-breaking 250 miles (400km) altitude.[1]

During World War II, the production and storage of ordnance shells was conducted by three arsenals nearby to Huntsville, Alabama. After the war, these were mainly closed, and the three areas were combined to form Redstone Arsenal. In October 1948, the Chief of Ordnance designated Redstone Arsenal as the center of research and development activities in free-flight rockets and related items, and the following June, the Ordnance Rocket Center was opened. A year later, the Secretary of the Army approved the transfer of the rocket research and development activities from Fort Bliss to the new center at Redstone Arsenal. Beginning in April 1950, about 1,000 persons were involved in the transfer, including von Braun's group. At this time, R&D responsibility for guided missiles was added, and studies began on a medium-range guided missile that eventually became the Redstone rocket.

Over the next decade, the missile development on Redstone Arsenal greatly expanded. Many small free-flight and guided rockets were developed, and work on the Redstone rocket got underway. Although this rocket was primarily intended for military purposes, von Braun kept space firmly in his mind, and published a widely read article on this subject.[2] In mid-1952, the Germans who had initially worked under individual contracts were converted to Civil Service employees, and in 1954-55, most became U.S. citizens. Von Braun was appointed Chief of the Guided Missile Development Division.[3]

In September 1954, von Braun proposed using the Redstone as the main booster of a multi-stage rocket for launching artificial satellites. A year later, a study for Project Orbiter was completed, detailing plans and schedules for a series of scientific satellites. The Army's official role in the U.S. space satellite program was delayed, however, after higher authorities elected to use the Vanguard rocket then being developed by the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL).

In February 1956, the Army Ballistic Missile Agency (ABMA) was established; von Braun was the director of the Development Operations Division. One of the primary programs was a 1,500-mile (2,400km), single-stage missile that was started the previous year; intended for both the U.S. Army and U.S. Navy, this was designated the PGM-19 Jupiter. Guidance component testing for this Jupiter intermediate range ballistic missile (IRBM) began in March 1956 on a modified Redstone missile dubbed Jupiter A while re-entry vehicle testing began in September 1956 on a Redstone with spin-stabilized upper stages named Jupiter-C. The first Jupiter IRBM flight took place from Cape Canaveral in March 1957 with the first successful flight to full range on 31 May.[4] Jupiter was eventually taken over by the U.S. Air Force. The ABMA developed Jupiter-C was composed of a Redstone rocket first stage and two upper stages for RV tests or three upper stages for Explorer satellite launches. ABMA had originally planned the 20 September 1956 flight as a satellite launch but, by direct intervention of Eisenhower, was limited to the use of 2 upper stages for an RV test flight traveling 3,350 miles (5,390km) and attaining an altitude of 682 miles (1,098km). While the Jupiter C capability was such that it could have placed the fourth stage in orbit, that mission had been assigned to the NRL.[5][6] Later Jupiter-C flights would be use to launch satellites.

The Soviet Union launched Sputnik 1, the first man-made earth satellite, on October 4, 1957. This was followed on November 3 with the second satellite, Sputnik 2. The United States attempted a satellite launch on December 6, using the NRL's Vanguard rocket, but it barely struggled off the ground, then fell back and exploded. On January 31, 1958, after finally receiving permission to proceed, von Braun and the ABMA space development team used a Jupiter C in a Juno I configuration (addition of a fourth stage) to successfully place Explorer 1, the first American satellite, into orbit around the earth.

Effective at the end of March 1958, the U.S. Army Ordnance Missile Command (AOMC), was established at Redstone Arsenal. This encompassed the ABMA and its newly operational space programs. In August, AOMC and Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA, a Department of Defense organization) jointly initiated a program managed by ABMA to develop a large space booster of approximately 1.5-million-pounds.thrust using a cluster of available rocket engines. In early 1959, this vehicle was designated Saturn.

On April 2, President Dwight D. Eisenhower recommended to Congress that a civilian agency be established to direct nonmilitary space activities, and on July 29, the President signed the National Aeronautics and Space Act, creating the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The nucleus for forming NASA was the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), with its 7,500 employees and Ames Research Center (ARC), Langley Research Center (LaRC), and Lewis Flight Propulsion Laboratory (later LRC, then Glenn RC) becoming the initial operations of NASA.

Although there was then an official space agency, the Army continued with certain far-reaching space programs. In June 1959, a secret study on Project Horizon was completed by ABMA, detailing plans for using the Saturn booster in establishing a manned Army outpost on the moon. Project Horizon, however, was rejected, and the Saturn program was transferred to NASA.

The U.S. manned satellite space program, using the Redstone as a booster, was officially named Project Mercury on November 26, 1958. With a future goal of manned flight, monkeys Able and Baker were the first living creatures recovered from outer space on May 28, 1959. They had been carried in the nose cone on a Jupiter missile to an altitude of 300 miles (480km) and a distance of 1,500 miles (2,400km), successfully withstanding 38 times the normal pull of gravity. Their survival during speeds over 10,000 miles per hour was America's first biological step toward putting a man into space.

On October 21, 1959, President Eisenhower approved the transfer of all Army space-related activities to NASA. This was accomplished effective July 1, 1960, when 4,670 civilian employees, about $100 million worth of buildings and equipment, and 1,840 acres (7.4km2) of land transferred from AOMC/ABMA to NASA's George C. Marshall Space Flight Center. MSFC officially opened at Redstone Arsenal on this same date, then was dedicated on September 8 by President Eisenhower in person. The Center was named in honor of General of the Army George C. Marshall, Army Chief of Staff during World War II, United States Secretary of State, and Nobel Prize winner for his world-renowned Marshall Plan.

From its initiation, MSFC has been NASA's lead center for the development of rocket propulsion systems and technologies. During the 1960s, the activities were largely devoted to the Apollo Program man's first visit to the Moon. In this, the Saturn Family of launch vehicles were designed and tested at MSFC. Following the highly successful Moon landing, including initial scientific exploration, MSFC had a major role in Post-Apollo activities; this included Skylab, the United States' first space station. With a permanent space station as an objective, the Space Shuttle was developed as a reusable transportation vehicle, and with it came Spacelab and other experimental activities making use of the Shuttle cargo bay. These and other projects are described in a later section. But first, MSFC's present capabilities and projects are addressed.

Marshall Space Flight Center has capabilities and projects supporting NASA's mission in three key areas: lifting from Earth (Space Vehicles), living and working in space (International Space Station), and understanding our world and beyond (Advanced Scientific Research).[7]

MSFC is NASA's designated developer and integrator of launch systems. The state-of-the-art Propulsion Research Laboratory serves as a leading national resource for advanced space propulsion research. Marshall has the engineering capabilities to take space vehicles from initial concept to sustained service. For manufacturing, the world's largest-known welding machine of its type was installed at MSFC in 2008; it is capable of building major, defect-free components for manned-rated space vehicles.

In early March 2011, NASA Headquarters announced that MSFC will lead the efforts on a new heavy-lift rocket that, like the Saturn V of the lunar exploration program of the late 1960s, will carry large, man-rated payloads beyond low-Earth orbit. The Center will have the program office for what is being called the Space Launch System (SLS).[8]

Before it was cancelled by President Barack Obama in early 2010, the Constellation Program had been a major activity in NASA since 2004. In this program, MSFC was responsible for propulsion on the heavy-lift vehicles. These vehicles were designated Ares I and Ares V, and would replace the aging Space Shuttle fleet as well as transport humans to the Moon, Mars, and other deep-space destinations.[9]

Starting in 2006, the MSFC Exploration Launch Projects Office began work on the Ares projects. On October 28, 2009, an Ares I-X test rocket lifted off from the newly modified Launch Complex 39B at Kennedy Space Center (KSC) for a two-minute powered flight; then continued for four additional minutes traveling 150 miles (240km) down range.

MSFC had responsibility for the Space Shuttle's propulsion engines. On February 1, 2003, the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster occurred, with the orbiter disintegrating during reentry and resulting in the death of its seven crew members. Flights of the other Shuttles were put on hold for 29 months. Based on a seven-month investigation, including a ground search that recovered debris from about 38 percent of the Orbiter, together with telemetry data and launch films, indicated that the failure was caused by a piece of insulation that broke off the external tank during launch and damaged the thermal protection on the Orbiter's left wing.

MSFC was responsible for the external tank, but few or no changes to the tank were made; rather, NASA decided that it was inevitable that some insulation might be lost during launch and thus required that an inspection of the orbiter's critical elements be made prior to reentry on future flights.

NASA retired the Space Shuttle in 2011, leaving America dependent upon the Russian Soyuz spacecraft for manned space missions.

The initial plans for the Space Station envisaged a small, low-cost Crew Return Vehicle (CRV) that would provide emergency evacuation capability. The 1986 Challenger disaster led planners to consider a more capable spacecraft. The Orbital Space Plane (OSP) development got underway in 2001, with an early version expected to enter service by 2010. With the initiation of the Constellation program in 2004, the knowledge gained on the OSP was transferred to Johnson Space Center (JSC) for use in the development of the Crew Exploration Vehicle. No operational OSP was ever built.[10]

The International Space Station is a partnership of the United States, Russian, European, Japanese, and Canadian Space Agencies. The station has continuously had human occupants since November 2, 2000. Orbiting 16 times daily at an average altitude of about 250mi (400km), it passes over some 90 percent of the world's surface. It weighs over 800,000lb (350,000kg), and a crew of six conducts research and prepares the way for future explorations.

NASA began the plan to build a space station in 1984. The station was named Freedom in 1988, and changed to the International Space Station (ISS) in 1992. The ISS is composed in modules, and the assembly in orbit started with the delivery of Russian module Zarya in November 1998. This was followed in December by the first U.S. module, Unity also called Node 1, built by Boeing in facilities at MSFC.[11]

As the 21st century started, Space Shuttle flights carried up supplies and additional small equipment, including a portion of the solar power array. The two-module embryonic ISS remained unmanned until the next module, Destiny, the U.S. Laboratory, arrived on February 7, 2001; this module was also built by Boeing at MSFC. The three-module station allowed a minimum crew of two astronauts or cosmonauts to be on the ISS permanently. In July, Quest air-lock was added to Unity, providing the capability for extra-vehicular activity (EVA).

Since 1998, 18 major U.S. components on the ISS have been assembled in space. In October 2007, Harmony or Node 2, was attached to Destiny; also managed by MSFC, this gave connection hubs for European and Japanese modules as well as additional living space, allowing the ISS crew to increase to six. The 18th and final major U.S. and Boeing-built element, the Starboard 6 Truss Segment, was delivered to the ISS in February 2009. With this, the full set of solar arrays could be activated, increasing the power available for science projects to 30kW. That marked the completion of the U.S. "core" of the station.

In March 2010, Boeing turned over[clarification needed] to NASA the U.S. on-orbit segment of the ISS.[citation needed] It is planned that the International Space Station will be operated at least through the end of 2020. With the retirement of the Space Shuttle fleet in 2011, future manned missions to the ISS will depend upon the Russian Soyuz spacecraft for the immediate future.

MSFC is involved in some of the most advanced space research of our time. Scientist/Astronaut researchers aboard the International Space Station are engaged in hundreds of advanced experiments, most of which could not be conducted except for the zero-gravity environment. The deep-space images from the Hubble Space Telescope and the Chandra X-ray Observatory are made possible in part by the people and facilities at Marshall. The Center was not only responsible for the design, development, and construction of these telescopes, but it is also now home to the only facility in the world for testing large telescope mirrors in a space-simulated environment. Preliminary work has started on a Hubble successor, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST); this will be the largest primary mirror ever assembled in space. In the future, the facility will likely be used for another successor, the Advanced Technology Large-Aperture Space Telescope (AT-LAST).

The National Space Science and Technology Center (NSSTC) is a joint research venture between NASA and the seven research universities of the State of Alabama. The primary purpose of NSSTC is to foster collaboration in research between government, academia, and industry. It consists of seven research centers: Advanced Optics, Biotechnology, Global Hydeology & Climate, Information Technology, Material Science, Propulsion, and Space Science. Each center is managed by either MSFC, the host NASA facility, or the University of Alabama in Huntsville, the host university.

The Hubble Space Telescope was launched in April 1990, but gave flawed images. It had been designed at MSFC, but used a primary mirror that had spherical aberration due to incorrect grinding and polishing by the contractor. The defect was found when the telescope was in orbit. The design was such that repairs were possible, and three maintenance missions were flown in Shuttles during the 1990s. Another servicing mission (STS-109) was flown on March 1, 2002. Each mission resulted in considerable improvements, with the images receiving world-wide attention from astronomers as well as the public.

Based on the success of earlier maintenance missions, NASA decided to have a fifth service mission to Hubble; this was STS-125 flown on May 11, 2009. The maintenance and additions of equipment resulted in Hubble performance that is considerable better than planned in its origin. It is now expected that the Hubble will remain operational until its successor, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), is available in 2018.[12][13]

The Chandra X-ray Observatory, originating at MSFC, was launched on July 3, 1999, and is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. With an angular resolution of 0.5 arcsecond (2.4 rad), it has a thousand times better resolution than the first orbiting X-ray telescopes. Its highly eliptical orbit allows continuous observations up 85 percent of the 65-hours in its orbital period. With its ability to make X-ray images of star clusters, supernova remnants, galactic eruptions, and collisions between clusters of galaxies, in its first decade of operation it has transformed astronomer's view of the high-energy universe.[14]

The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, initially called the Gamma-Ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST), is an international and multi-agency space observatory used to study the cosmos It was launched June 11, 2008, with a design life of 5 years and the goal of 10 years. The primary instrument is the Large Area Telescope (LAT), that is sensitive in the photon energy range of 8 keV to greater than 300 GeV, and can view about 20% of the sky at any given moment.[15]

The LAT is complemented by the GLAST Burst Monitor (GBM); this can detect burst of X-rays and gamma rays in the 8-keV to 3-MeV energy range, overlapping with the LAT. The GBM is a collaborative effort between the National Space Science and Technology Center in the U.S. and the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Germany. MSFC manages the GBM, and Charles A. Meegan of MSFC is the Principal Investigator. Many new discoveries have been made in the initial period of operation. For example, on May 10, 2009, a burst was detected that, by its propagation characteristics, is believed to negate some approaches to a new theory of gravity.[16]

The Burst and Transient Source Experiment (BATSE), with Gerald J. Fishman of MSFC serving as Principal Investigator, is an ongoing examination of the many years of data from gamma-ray bursts, pulsars, and other transient gamma-ray phenomena.[17] The 2011 Shaw Prize, often called "Asia's Nobel Prize," was shared by Fishman and Italian astronomer Enrico Costa for their gamma-ray research.[18]

For 10 years, MSFC has supported activities in the U.S. Laboratory (Destiny) and elsewhere on the International Space Station through the Payload Operations Center (POC). The research activities include experiments on topics ranging from human physiology to physical science. Operating around the clock, scientists, engineers, and flight controllers in the POC link Earth-bound researchers throughout the world with their experiments and astronauts aboard the ISS. As of March 2011[update], this has included the coordination of more than 1,100 experiments conducted by 41 space-station crew members involved in over 6,000 hours of science research.

Teams at Marshall manage NASA's programs for exploring the Sun, the Moon, the planets, and other bodies throughout our solar system. These have included Gravity Probe B, an experiment to test two predictions of Einstein's general theory of relativity, and Solar-B, an international mission to study the solar magnetic field and origins of the solar wind, a phenomenon that affects radio transmission on the Earth. The MSFC Lunar Precursor and Robotic Program Office manages projects and directs studies on lunar robotic activities across NASA.

MSFC also develops systems for monitoring the Earth's climate and weather patterns. At the Global Hydrology and Climate Center (GHCC), researchers combine data from Earth systems with satellite data to monitor biodiversity conservation and climate change, providing information that improves agriculture, urban planning, and water-resource management.[19]

On November 19, 2010, MSFC entered the new field of microsatellites with the successful launch of FASTSAT (Fast, Affordable, Science and Technology Satellite). Part of a joint DoD/NASA payload, it was launched by a Minotaur IV rocket from the Kodiak Launch Complex on Kodiak Island, Alaska. FASTSAT is a platform carrying multiple small payloads to low-Earth orbit, creating opportunities to conduct low-cost scientific and technology research on an autonomous satellite in space. FASTSAT, weighing just under 400 pounds (180kg), serves as a full scientific laboratory containing all the resources needed to carry out scientific and technology research operations. It was developed at the MSFC in partnership with the Von Braun Center for Science & Innovation and Dynetics, Inc., both of Huntsville, Alabama. Mark Boudreaux is the project manager for MSFC.

There are six experiments on the FASTSAT bus, including NanoSail-D2, which is itself a nanosatellite the first satellite launched from another satellite. It was deployed satisfactorily on January 21, 2011.[20]

In addition to supporting NASA's key missions, the spinoffs from these activities at MSFC have contributed broadly to technologies that improve the Nation and the World. In the last decade alone, Marshall generated more than 60 technologies featured as NASA spinoffs. MSFC research has benefited firefighters, farmers, plumbers, healthcare providers, soldiers, teachers, pilots, divers, welders, architects, photographers, city planners, disaster relief workers, criminal investigators, and even video-gamers and golfers.[21]

The Space Shuttle is likely the most complex spacecraft ever built. Although MSFC was not responsible for developing the centerpiece the Orbiter Vehicle (OV) it was responsible for all of the rocket propulsion elements: the OV's three main engines, the External Tank (ET), and the Solid-Rocket Boosters (SRBs). MSFC was also responsible for Spacelab, the research facility carried in the Shuttle's cargo bay on certain flights. From the start of the program in 1972, the management and development of Space Shuttle propulsion was a major activity at MSFC. Alex A. McCool, Jr. was manager of MSFC's Space Shuttle Projects Office.

Throughout 1980, engineers at MSFC participated in tests related to plans to launch the first Space Shuttle. During these early tests and prior to each later Shuttle launch, personnel in the Huntsville Operations Support Center monitored consoles to evaluate and help solve any problems at the Florida launch that might involve Shuttle propulsion

On April 12, 1981, Columbia made the first orbital test flight of a full Space Shuttle with two astronauts. This was designated STS-1 (Space Transportation System-1), and verified the combined performance of the entire system. This was followed by STS-2 on November 12, also using Columbia, primarily to demonstrate safe re-launch of a Shuttle. During 1982, two more test flights (STS-3 & STS-4) were made. STS-5, launched November 11, was the first operational mission; carrying four astronauts, two commercial satellite were deployed. In all three of these flights, on-board experiments were carried and conducted on pallets in the Shuttle's cargo bay.[22]

Space Shuttle Challenger was launched on mission STS-51-L on January 28, 1986. (The sequential numbering changed after 1983, but otherwise this would have been STS-25). One-minute, 13-seconds into flight, the entire Challenger was enveloped in a fireball and broke into several large segments, killing the seven astronauts. Subsequent analysis of the high-speed tracking films and telemetry signals indicated that a leak occurred in a joint on one of the solid rocket boosters (SRBs), the escaping flame impinged on the surface of the external tank (ET); there followed a complex series of very rapid structural failures, and in milliseconds the hydrogen and oxygen streaming from the ruptured tank exploded.

The basic cause of the disaster was determined to be an O-ring failure in the right SRB; cold weather was a contributing factor. The redesign effort, directed by MSFC, involved an extensive test program to verify that the SRBs were safe. There were no Space Shuttle missions in the remainder of 1986 or in 1987. Flights resumed in September 1988, with sequential numbering starting with STS-26.

As a reusable space-launch vehicle, the space shuttles carried a wide variety of payloads from scientific research equipment to highly classified military satellites. The flights were assigned a Space Transportation System (STS) number, in general sequenced by the planned launch date. The Wikipedia list of space shuttle missions shows all flights, their missions, and other information.

The first orbital flight (STS-1) by Shuttle Columbia on April 12, 1981, did not have a payload, but all flights that followed generally had multiple payloads. Through 1989, there were 32 flights; this includes the one on January 28, 1986, when Challenger was lost, and the delay until September 29, 1988, when flights resumed. During the 1990s, there were 58 flights, giving a total of 95 successful flights through 1999.[23]

For the Magellan planetary spacecraft, MSFC managed the adaptation of the Inertial Upper Stage. This solid-rocket was used in May 1989 to propel the spacecraft from Orbiter Atlantis on a 15-month loop around the Sun and eventually into orbit around Venus for four years of radar surface-mapping.

Many Shuttle flights carried equipment for performing on-board research. Such equipment was accommodated in two forms: on pallets or other arrangements in the Shuttle's cargo bay (most often in addition to hardware for the primary mission), or within a reusable laboratory called Skylab. All such experimental payloads were under the general responsibility of MSFC.

Pallet experiments covered a very wide spread of types and complexity, but many of them were in fluid physics, materials science, biotechnology, combustion science, and commercial space processing. For some missions, an aluminum bridge fitting across the cargo bay was used. This could carry 12 standard canisters holding isolated experiments, particularly those under the Getaway Special (GAS) program. GAS flights were made available at low cost to colleges and universities, American industries, individuals, foreign governments, and others.

On some flights, a variety of pallet experiments constituted the full payload; examples of these include the following:

In addition to the pallet experiments, many other experiments were flown and performed using Spacelab. This was a reusable laboratory consisting of multiple components, including a pressurized module, an unpressurized carrier, and other related hardware. Under a program managed by MSFC, ten Europeans nations jointly designed, built, and financed the first Spacelab through the European Space Research Organisation (ESRO. In addition, Japan funded a Spacelab for STS-47, a dedicated mission.[24]

Over a 15-year period, Spacelab components flew on 22 shuttle missions, the last in April 1998. Examples of Spacelab missions follow:

In early 1990, MSFC's new Spacelab Mission Operations Control Center took over the responsibility for controlling all Spacelab missions. This replaced the Payload Operations Control Center formerly situated at the JSC from which previous Spacelab missions were operated.[25]

The advent of the Space Shuttle made possible several major space programs in which MSFC had significant responsibilities. These were the International Space Station, the Hubble Space Telescope, the Chandra X-Ray Observatory, and the Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory. The latter three are part of NASA's series of Great Observatories; this series also includes the Spitzer Space Telescope, but this was not launched by a Space Shuttle and MSFC had no significant role in its development.

A manned space station had long been in the plans of visionaries. Wernhar von Braun, in his widely read Collier's Magazine 1953 article, envisioned this to be a huge wheel, rotating to produce gravity-like forces on the occupants.[26] In Project Horizon, prepared by the U.S. Army in 1959, a space station would be built by assembling spent booster rockets. Following this same basic concept, in 1973 MSFC used a modified stage of Saturn V to put into orbit Skylab, but this was preceded by the Soviet Union's Salyut in 1971, then followed by their Mir in 1986. Even during Skylab, MSFC began plans for a much more complete space station. President Ronald Reagan announced plans to build Space Station Freedom in 1984. Luther B. Powell was MSFC's space station program manager.

By the late 1990s, planning for four different stations were underway: the American Freedom, the Soviet/Russian Mir-2, the European Columbus, and the Japanese Kib. In June 1992, with the Cold War over, American President George H. W. Bush and Russian President Boris Yeltsin agreed to cooperate on space exploration. Then in September 1993, American Vice-President Al Gore, Jr., and Russian Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin announced plans for a new space station. In November, plans for Freedom, Mir-2, and the European and Japanese modules were incorporated into a single International Space Station. Boeing began as NASA's prime contractor for U.S. hardware in January 1995.

The ISS is composed of a number of modules, sharing primary power from large arrays of solar power cells. The first module, Zarya from Russia, was delivered to orbit by a Proton rocket on November 20, 1998. On December 4, the first Anmerican component, Unity, a connecting module, was carried up by Space Shuttle Endeavour on flight STS-88; it was then joined with Zarya to form an embrionic ISS. Unity was built by Boeing in MSFC facilities. Additional building supplies were carried to the ISS in May 1999, aboard STS-96.

The ISS continued to be assembled throughout the next decade, and has been continuously occupied since February 7, 2001. In March 2010, Boeing completed its contract and officially turned over to NASA the U.S. on-orbit segment of the ISS.

Shortly after NASA was formed, the Orbiting Solar Observatory was launched, and was followed by the Orbiting Astronomical Observatory (OAO) that carried out ultraviolet observations of stars between 1968 and 1972. These showed the value of space-based astronomy, and led to the planning of the Large Space Telescope (LST) that would be launched and maintained from the forthcoming space shuttle. Budget limitations almost killed the LST, but the astronomy community especially Lyman Spitzer and the National Science Foundation pressed for a major program in this area. Congress finally funded LST in 1978, with an intended launch date of 1983.

MSFC was given responsibility for the design, development, and construction of the telescope, while Goddard Space Flight Center (GFC) was to control the scientific instrument and the ground-control center. As the Project Scientist, MSFC brought on board C. Robert ODell, then chairman of the Astronomy Department at the University of Chicago. Several different people, at various times, served as the project manager. The telescope assembly was designed as a Cassegrain reflector with hyperbolic mirror polished to be diffraction limited; the primary mirror had a diameter of 2.4 m (95in). The mirrors were developed by the optics firm, Perkin-Elmer. MSFC did not have a facility to check the end-to-end performance of the mirror assembly, so the telescope could not be totally checked until launched and placed in service.[27]

The LST was named the Hubble Space Telescope in 1983, the original launch date. There were many problems, delays, and cost increases in the program, and the Challenger disaster delayed the availability of the launch vehicle. Finally, on April 24, 1990, on Mission STS-31, Shuttle Discovery launched the Hubble telescope successfully into its planned orbit. Almost immediately it was realized that the optical performance was not as expected; analysis of the flawed images showed that the primary mirror had been ground to the wrong shape, resulting in spherical aberration.

Fortunately, the Hubble telescope had been designed to allow in-space maintenance, and in December 1993, mission STS-61 carried astronauts to the Hubble to make corrections and change some components. A second repair mission, STS-82, was made in February 1997, and a third, STS-103, in December 1999. For these repair missions, the astronauts practiced the work in MSFC's Neutral Buoyancy Facility, simulating the weightless environment of space.

Through the 1990s, the Hubble did provide astronomy images that had never before been seen. During the next decade, two additional repair missions were made (March 2002 and in May 2009), eventually bringing the telescope to even better that its initially intended performance.

Even before HEAO-2 (the Einstein Observatory) was launched in 1978, MSFC began preliminary studies for a larger X-ray telescope. To support this effort, in 1976 an X-Ray Test Facility, the only one of its size, was constructed at Marshall for verification testing and calibration of X-ray mirrors, telescope systems, and instruments. With the success of HEAO-2, MSFC was given responsibility for the design, development, and construction of what was then known as the Advanced X-ray Astrophysics Facility (AXAF). The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (SAO) partners with MSFC, providing the science and operational management.

Work on the AXAF continued through the 1980s. A major review was held in 1992, resulting in many changes; four of the twelve planned mirrors were eliminated, as were two of the six scientific instruments. The planned circular orbit was changed to an elliptical one, reaching one-third of the way to the Moon at its farthest point; this eliminated the possibility of improvement or repair using the Space Shuttle, but it placed the spacecraft above the Earth's radiation belts for most of its orbit.

AXAF was renamed Chandra X-ray Observatory in 1998. It was launched July 23, 1999, by the Shuttle Columbia (STS-93). An Inertial Upper Stage booster adapted by MSFC was used to transport Chandra to its high orbit Weighing about 22,700kg (50,000lb), this was the heaviest payload ever launched by a Shuttle. Operationally managed by the SAO, Chandra has been returning excellent data since being activated. It initially had an expected life of five years, but this has now been extended to 15 years or longer.[28]

The Compton Gamma Ray Observatory (CGRO) is another of NASA's Great Observatories; it was launched April 5, 1991, on Shuttle flight STS-37. At 37,000lb (17,000kg), it was the heaviest astrophysical payload ever flown at that time. CGRO was14 years in development by NASA; TRW was the builder. Gamma radiation (rays) is the highest energy-level of electromagnetic radiation, having energies above 100 keV and thus frequencies above 10 exahertz (1019 Hz). This is produced by sub-atomic particle interactions, including those in certain astrophysical processes. The continuous flow of cosmic rays bombarding space objects, such as the Moon, generate this radiation Gamma rays also result in bursts from nuclear reactions. The CGRO was designed to image continuous radiation and to detect bursts.

MSFC was responsible for the Burst and Transient Source Experiment, (BATSE). This triggered on sudden changes in gamma count-rates lasting 0.1 to 100 s; it was also capable of detecting less impulsive sources by measuring their modulation using the Earth occultation technique. In nine years of operation, BATSE triggered about 8000 events, of which some 2700 were strong bursts that were analyzed to have come from distant galaxies.

Unlike the Hubble Space Telescope, the CGRO was not designed for on-orbit repair and refurbishment. Thus, after one of its gyroscopes failed, NASA decided that a controlled crash was preferable to letting the craft come down on its own at random. On June 4, 2000, it was intentionally de-orbited, with the debris that did not burn up falling harmlessly into the Pacific Ocean. At MSFC, Gerald J. Fishman is the principal investigator of a project to continue examination of data from BATSE and other gamma-ray projects. The 2011 Shaw Prize was shared by Fishman and Italian Enrico Costa for their gamma-ray research.

Shortly before activating its new Field Center in July 1960, NASA described the MSFC as the only self-contained organization in the nation that was capable of conducting the development of a space vehicle from the conception of the idea, through production of hardware, testing, and launching operations.

Initially, engineers from Huntsville traveled to Florida to conduct launch activities at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. The first NASA launch facility there (Launch Complex 39) was designed and operated by MSFC, then in on July 1, 1962, the overall site achieving equal status with other NASA centers and was named the Launch Operations Center, later renamed the Kennedy Space Center (KSC).

Another major NASA facility, the Manned Spacecraft Center (MSC) located near Houston, Texas, was officially opened in September 1963. Designated the primary center for U.S. space missions and systems involving astronauts, it coordinates and monitors crewed missions through the Mission Control Center. MSC was renamed the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center (JSC) in February 1973. Through the years, there have been a number of turf battles between MSFC and MSC/JSC concerning mission responsibilities.

When the Marshall Space Flight Center began official operations in July 1960, Wernher von Braun was the Director and Eberhard Rees was his Deputy for Research and Development. The administrative activities in MSFC were led by persons with backgrounds in traditional U.S. Government functions, but all of the technical heads were individuals who had assisted von Braun in his success at ABMA. The initial technical activities and leaders at MSFC were as follows:[29]

With the exception of Koelle, all of the technical leaders had come to the United States under Operation Paperclip after working together at Peenemnde. Von Braun knew well the capabilities of these individuals and had great confidence in them. This confidence was shown to be appropriate; in the following decade of developing hardware and technical operations that established new levels of complexity, there was never a single failure of their designs during manned flight.

The initial projects at MSFC were primarily continuations of work initiated earlier at ABMA. Of immediate importance was the final preparation of a Redstone rocket that, under Project Mercury would lift a space capsule carrying the first American into space. Originally scheduled to take place in October 1960, this was postponed several time and on May 5, 1961, astronaut Alan Shepard made America's first sub-orbital spaceflight. The delays led to a circumstance similar to that of the first satellite; on April 12, 1961, Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin had become the first person to orbit the Earth.

By 1965, MSFC had about 7,500 government employees. In addition, most of the prime contractors for launch vehicles and related major items (including North American Aviation, Chrysler, Boeing, Douglas Aircraft, Rocketdyne, and IBM) collectively had approximately a similar number of employees working in MSFC facilities.

Several support contracting firms were also involved in the programs; the largest of these was Brown Engineering Company (BECO, later Teledyne Brown Engineering), the first high-technology firm in Huntsville and by this time having some 3,500 employees. In the Saturn-Apollo activities, BECO/TBE provided about 20-million manhours of support. Milton K. Cummings was the BECO president, Joseph C. Moquin the executive vice president, William A. Girdini led the engineering design and test work, and Raymond C. Watson, Jr., directed the research and advanced systems activities. Cummings Research Park, the second largest park of this type in the Nation, was named for Cummings in 1973.

On May 25, 1961, just 20 days after Shepard's flight, President John F. Kennedy committed the Nation to "achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to Earth".[30] In what would be called the Apollo Program, the primary mission of MSFC was developing the heavy-lift rockets the Saturn family. This required the development and equalization of three new liquid-fueled rocket engines, the J-2, the F-1, and the H-1 (rocket engine); in addition, an existing engine, the RL10, was improved for use on Saturns. Leland F. Belew managed the Engine Development Office.[31] The F-1 engine was, and still is the most powerful single-nozzle liquid-fueled rocket engine ever used in service; each produced 1.5-million-pounds thrust. Originally started by the U.S. Air Force, responsibility for the development was taken over by ABMA in 1959, and the first test firings at MSFC were in December 1963.

The original vehicle, designated Saturn I, consisted of two propulsion stages and an instrument unit; it was first tested in flight on October 27, 1961. The first stage (S-I) had a cluster of eight H-1 engines, giving approximately 1.5-million-pounds thrust total. The four outboard engines were gimbaled to allow vehicle steering. The second stage (SIV) had six gimbaled LR10A-3 engines, producing a combined 90-thousand-pounds thrust. Ten Saturn Is were used in flight-testing of Apollo boilerplate units. Five of the test flights also carried important auxiliary scientific experiments.

The Saturn IB (alternatively known as the Uprated Saturn I) also had two propulsion stages and an instrument unit. The first stage (S-IB) also had eight H-1 engines with four gimballed, but the stage had eight fixed fins of equal size fitted to the sides to provide aerodynamic stability. The second stage (S-IVB) had a single J-2 engine that gave a more powerful 230-thousand-pounds thrust. The J-2 was gimbaled and could also be restarted during flight. The vehicle was first flight-tested on February 26, 1966. Fourteen Saturn 1Bs (or partial vehicles) were built, with five used in unmanned testing and five others used in manned missions, the last on July 15, 1975.

The Saturn V was the pinnacle of developments at MSFC. This was an expendable, man-rated heavy-lift vehicle that was the most vital element in the Apollo Program. Designed under the direction of Arthur Rudolph, the Saturn V holds the record as the largest and most powerful launch vehicle ever brought to operational status from a combined height, weight, and payload standpoint.

The Saturn V consisted of three propulsion stages and an instrument unit. The first stage (S-IC), had five F-1 engines, giving a combined total of 7.5-million-pounds thrust. These engines were arranged in a cross pattern, with the center engine fixed and the outer four gimballed. The second stage (S-II), had five J-2 engines with the same arrangement as the F-1s and giving a total of 1.0-million-pounds thrust. The third stage (S-IVB) had a single gimballed J-2 engine with 200-thousand-pounds thrust. As previously noted, the J-2 engine could be restarted in flight. The basic configuration for this heavy-lift vehicle was selected in early 1963, and the name Saturn V was applied at that time (configurations that might have led to Saturn II, III, and IV were discarded).

The Apollo Spacecraft was atop the launch vehicle, and was composed of the Lunar Module (LM) and the Command/Service Module (CSM) inside the Spacecraft Lunar Module Adapter, with the Launch Escape System at the very top. The Apollo Spacecraft and its components were developed by other NASA centers, but were flight-tested on Saturn I and IB vehicles from MSFC.

While the three propulsion stages were the "muscle" of the Saturn V, the Instrument Unit (IU) was the "brains." The IU was on a 260-inch (6.6-m) diameter, 36-inch (91-cm) high, ring that was held between the third propulsion stage and the LM. It contained the basic guidance system components a stable platform, accelerometers, a digital computer, and control electronics as well as radar, telemetry, and other units. Basically the same IU configuration was used on the Saturn I and IB. With IBM as the prime contractor, the IU was the only full Saturn component manufactured in Huntsville.

The first Saturn V test flight was made on November 9, 1967. On July 16, 1969, as its crowning achievement in the Apollo space program, a Saturn V vehicle lifted the Apollo 11 spacecraft and three astronauts on their journey to the Moon. Other Apollo launches continued through December 6, 1972. The last Saturn V flight was on May 14, 1973, in the Skylab Program (described later). A total of 15 Saturn Vs were built; 13 functioned flawlessly, and the other two (intended as backup) remain unused.

Wernher von Braun believed that the personnel designing the space vehicles should have direct, hands-on participation in the building and testing of the hardware. For this, MSFC had facilities comparable with the best to be found in private industries. Included were precision machine shops, giant metal-forming and welding machines, and all types of inspection equipment. For every type of Saturn vehicle, one or more prototypes were fabricated in MSFC shops. Large, special-purpose computers were used in the checkout procedures.

Static test towers had been constructed at ABMA for the Redstone and Jupiter rockets. In 1961, the Jupiter stand was modified to test Saturn 1 and 1B stages. A number of other test stands followed, the largest being the Saturn V Dynamic Test Stand completed in 1964. At 475 feet (145m) in height, the entire Saturn V could be accommodated. Also completed in 1964, the S1C Static Test Stand was for live firing of the five F-1 engines of the first stage. Delivering a total of 7.5-million-pounds thrust, the tests produced earthquake-like rumbles throughout the Huntsville area and could be heard as far as 100 miles (160km) away.[32]

As the Saturn activities progressed, external facilities were needed. In 1961, The Michoud Plant near New Orleans, Louisiana, was selected as the Saturn production site. A 13,500 acres (55km2) isolated area in Hancock County, Mississippi was selected to conduct Saturn tests. Known as the Mississippi Test Facility (later renamed the John C. Stennis Space Center), this was primarily to test the vehicles built at the Michoud Plant.

On January 5, 1972, President Richard M. Nixon announced plans to develop the Space Shuttle, a reusable Space Transportation System (STS) for routine access to space. The Shuttle was composed of the Orbiter Vehicle (OV) containing the crew and payload, two Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs), and the External Tank (ET) that carried liquid fuel for the OV's main engines. MSFC was responsible for the SRBs, the OV's three main engines, and the ET. The Center also received responsibility for Spacelab, a versatile laboratory that would be carried on some flights within the Shuttle's cargo bay. Other assignments included the adaptation of the Inertial Upper Stage Booster, a two-stage rocket that would lift Shuttle payloads into higher orbits or interplanetary voyages.

The first test firing of an OV main engine was in 1975. Two years later, the first firing of a SRB took place and tests on the ET began at MSFC. The first Enterprise OV flight, attached to a Shuttle Carrier Aircraft (SCA an extensively modified Boeing 747), was in February 1977; this as followed by a free landings in August and October. In March 1978, the Enterprise OV was flown atop a SCA to MSFC. Mated to an ET, the partial Space Shuttle was hoisted onto the modified Saturn V Dynamic Test Stand where it was subjected to a full range of vibrations comparable to those in a launch. The second space shuttle, Columbia, was completed and placed at the KSC for checking and launch preparation. On April 12, 1981, the Columbia made the first orbital test flight.

From the start, MSFC has had strong research projects in science and engineering. Two of the early activities, Highwater and Pegasus, were performed on a non-interference basis while testing the Saturn I vehicle.

In Project Highwater, the dummy second stage was filled with 23,000 US gallons (87m3) of water as ballast, and, after burnout of the first stage, explosive charges released the water into the upper atmosphere. The project answered questions about the diffusion of liquid propellants in the event that a rocket was destroyed at high altitude. Highwater experiments were carried out in April and November,1962.

Under the Pegasus Satellite Program, the second stage was instrumented to study the frequency and penetration depth of micrometeoroids. Two large panels were folded into the empty stage and, when in orbit, unfolded to present 2,300-square-feet (210-m2) of instrumented surface. Three Pegasus satellites were launched during 1965, and stayed in orbit from 3 to 13 years.

The overall Apollo Program was the largest scientific and engineering research activity in history. The actual landing on the Moon led to investigations that could have only been conducted on location. There were six Apollo missions that landed on the Moon: Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17. Apollo 13 had been intended as a landing, but only circled the Moon and returned to Earth after an oxygen tank ruptured and crippled power in the CSM.

Except for Apollo 11, all of the missions carried an Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP), composed of equipment for seven scientific experiments plus a central control station (they were controlled from the Earth) with a radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG). Scientists from MSFC were among the co-investigators.

Read the original here:

Marshall Space Flight Center - Wikipedia, the free ...

Video – Space.com

CubeSats Are Bound For The Planets | Video

Unboxing The Best Inexpensive Telescope - AWB...

Orions Jewels Glisten This Winter! | Skywatc...

5 Dawn Planets And A Dusk Comet In Feb. 2016...

Trippy Trip Over Colorful Dwarf Planet Ceres...

Space Station Crew Goes Silent To Recall Fall...

Matter Tears Through Sun's Atmosphere As Magn...

Why Is This Dwarf Galaxy So Clean Of Cosmic S...

Paragliding Through Aurora Borealis Beauty |...

Rising Seas More Accurately Measured From Spa...

Blue Origin Booster Reused! Lands Safely Afte...

Next-Gen Spacesuits - NASA Builds On Old Tech...

Space Coffee - How It's Brewed On ISS | Video...

Space 'Ping Pong' - Astronaut Plays With Ball...

SpaceX Dragon 2 Hovers In Latest Test | Video

Hubble Telescope Opens Cosmic Jewel Box | Vid...

SnOMG! Northeast U.S. Blizzard Seen From Spac...

NASA Officially Cautious About 'Planet Nine'...

Watch Earth Get Hotter - 135 Years Of Tempera...

A New Giant Planet In Our Solar System? Evide...

Planet X May Be Real - Evidence Mounting For...

How To Use The 'Loo' In Space | Video

Leonard Nimoy Recalls Space Shuttle Enterpris...

Blast-Off! SpaceX Launches Jason-3 Satellite...

NASA Jason-3 Mission To Track Rising Sea Leve...

Human Mars Exploration - How Landing Sites Co...

Is Oddball January Hurricane An Artifact Of C...

Did Life Ever Exist On Mars? Russian/European...

Double Star Detected By New Black Hole Probe...

SpaceX Celebrates As Falcon 9 'Sticks Its Lan...

Dramatically Sharper Gamma-ray Telescope Spot...

The Oldest Light: The Cosmic Microwave Backgr...

Making Light Of What Makes Light | Video

'God Save The Queen' From Space -- UK Astrona...

Invisible Dark-Matter Dwarf Galaxy Ripped Thr...

'The Martian' Story Continues Bonus Feature...

Ice Volcanoes On Pluto? New Imagery Points To...

Quadrantid Meteors Seen From Edge of Space |...

Black Holes Can Make Stars Actually Twinkle |...

'Challenger Disaster: Lost Tapes' Includes Mc...

Celestron SkyProdigy 130 Telescope Unboxing...

SpaceX Falcon 9 First Stage Comes In Hot In A...

Happy New Year Message From Space Station | V...

Comet Catalina, Quadrantid Meteors and More I...

Dune-Roving Curiosity Studies Active Martian...

January 2016 Skywatching: Orange Giant Star,...

NASA's Plutonium-238 Reserves Get Boost For S...

European Space Agency In 2015 - Highlight Vid...

NASA In 2015 - Year In Review | Video

NASA's Commercial Crew - 2015 Year In Review...

NASA In 2016 - Music Video Highlights Space A...

What's Behind Rocker Grace Potter's Space Fas...

Space Station Transmits 'Happy Holidays' Gree...

SpaceX Launches, Lands, Deploys 11 Birds | Hi...

Upgraded SpaceX Falcon 9 Launches 11 ORBCOMM...

Active Spinning Comet Poses For Close-Up | V...

Celestial 'Double-Bladed Lightsaber' Revealed...

Cosmic Jailbreak! Blazar's Gamma Rays Make It...

Planet Construction Sites Are Cleaner Than Pr...

Space Station Bound - Soyuz TMA-19M Launches...

Independence Day Resurgence Official Traile...

Star Trek Beyond - Trailer (2016) - Paramount...

Orbiting EPIC Camera Snaps 12 Whole-Earth Ima...

Elite Dangerous Gives Gamers 400 Billion Star...

Tiny Star With Huge Storm Spotted By Space Te...

Police Drama Set In Colonized Solar System -...

Alien Invaders or Saviors? - Arthur C. Clarke...

When We Dodged A Solar Bullet: Halloween 2003...

What Are Dwarf Planet Ceres' Bright Spots? Da...

Ancient Cosmic Crash Site Hints At How Galaxi...

Comet's Death-Dive Into Sun Captured By Space...

Ancient 90-Mile-Wide Object Spotted In Outer...

Failed Russian Spy Satellite Will Fall Back T...

Space Piloting on a Tablet? NASA Studying Fea...

Blast Off! Cygnus Cargo Spacecraft Returns To...

Read more from the original source:

Video - Space.com

Space Flight – Capabilities | SNC | Sierra Nevada Corporation

Sierra Nevada Corporation's Space Systems, with four product lines, provides a depth and breadth of experience unmatched in the aerospace industry. Our capabilities range from spacecraft actuators that power the Mars rovers, to hybrid rocket technologies that powered the first commercial astronaut to space, and from microsatellites controlled by the Internet to Dream Chaser, a winged and piloted orbital commercial spacecraft.

Learn more about SNC's Space Systems at http://www.SNCSpace.com

SNC Statement in Response to Inquiries Regarding Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo Incident

The Spacecraft Systems capability provides small satellites to meet commercial, civil, and military mission requirements using common bus structures and components that are rapidly customized as needed for different mission applications.

The Propulsion Systems capability offers safe, green, reliable and low-cost propulsion solutions for space vehicles, satellites and small to medium launch vehicle propulsion systems.

The Space Exploration Systems capability is leading an effort to create a low-cost, safe commercial crew transportation service to and from low Earth orbit, including the International Space Station (ISS).

The Space Technologies capability supplies critical components to such important national security programs as Advanced EHF, Mobile User Objective System, Space-Based InfraRed System, and commercial imagery systems (GeoEye, Ikonos, Worldview).

For more information about SNC Space Systems products and capabilities, please contact:

Sierra Nevada Corporation's Space Systems 1722 Boxelder Street, Suite 102 Louisville, CO 80027 Office: (303) 530-1925 Toll Free: (888) 530-1926 Fax: (303) 530-2401 Email: Space Systems

Read more:

Space Flight - Capabilities | SNC | Sierra Nevada Corporation

Flight of the Conchords Ep 6 Bowie’s In Space – YouTube

Bowie's in space Bowie's in space What you doing out there, man? That's pretty freaky, Bowie Isn't it cold out in space, Bowie? Do you want to borrow my jumper, Bowie? Does the space cold make your nipples go pointy, Bowie? Do you use your pointy nipples as telescopic antennae to transmit data back to Earth? Bet you do, you freaky old bastard you Hey Bowie, do you have one really funky sequined space suit? Or do you have several ch-changes? Do you smoke grass out in space, Bowie? Or do they smoke Astroturf? Ooh! Receiving transmission from David Bowie's nipple antennae Do you read me, Lieutenant Bowie? This is Bowie to Bowie Do you hear me out there, man? This is Bowie back to Bowie I read you loud and clear, man Ooh yeah, man! Your signal's weak on my radar screen How far out are you, man? I'm pretty far out That's pretty far out, man Ooh- ah- ooh! I'm orbiting Pluto Ooh- ah- ooh! Drawn in by its groovitational (Groovitational pull) I'm jamming out with the Mick Jagger-nauts Ooh, and they think it's pretty cool Are you okay, Bowie? What was that sound? I don't know, man Ooh, it's the craziest scene Yeah, I'm picking it up on my LSD screen Can you see the stratosphere ringing? To the choir of Afronauts singing Bowie's in space Bowie's in space Bowie Bowie Bowie Bowie Bowie Bowie Bowie's in space Bowie Bowie Bowie Bowie Bowie Bowie Eena-ma-ma-meena-mina-mowie Phasers on funky Eena-ma-ma-meena-mina-mowie Ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-Bowie's in Space

Lyrics credit: whatthefolk.net

Original post:

Flight of the Conchords Ep 6 Bowie's In Space - YouTube

Space flight simulator game – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A space flight simulator game is a genre of flight simulator video games that lets players experience space flight. Examples of true simulators which aim at piloting a space craft in a manner that conforms with the laws of nature include Orbiter and Microsoft Space Simulator.

Other games involving space flight in 3D space, without restricting movement to a physics system and realistic behaviour, are also commonly called "space flight simulators". They aren't simulators in the strictest sense of the word. These games do differ from space-based arcade oriented shoot 'em up games that use side-scrolling or top-down perspectives. When the genre appeared in the early 1980s, the use of 3D graphics and 1st person perspective, with the player viewing out of the cockpit, gave a sense of realism. This the designation of space flight simulators, even though a better name for these games would be "pseudo simulators" or "space flight games". Most space combat simulators and space trading simulators can be placed in the "pseudo space flight simulator" category.

Space flight games and simulators, at one time popular, had for most of the new millennium been considered a "dead" genre.[1][2][3][4][5] However, open-source and enthusiast communities managed to produce some working, modern titles (see the free Orbiter Spaceflight Simulator), and 2011's commercially released Kerbal Space Program was notably well-received, even by the aerospace community.[6]

Some games in the genre have the aim of recreating a realistic portrayal of space flight, involving the calculation of orbits within a more complete physics simulation than pseudo space flight simulators. Others focus on gameplay rather than simulating space flight in all its facets. The realism of the latter games is limited to what the game designer deems to be appropriate for the gameplay, instead of focusing on the realism of moving the spacecraft in space. Some "flight models" use a physics system based on Newtonian physics, but these are usually limited to manoeuvring the craft in its direct environment, and do not take into consideration the orbital calculations that would make such a game a simulator. Most of the pseudo simulators feature faster than light travel.

Realistic space simulators seek to represent a vessel's behaviour under the influence of the Laws of Physics. As such, the player normally concentrates on following checklists or planning tasks. Piloting is generally limited to dockings, landings or orbital maneuvers. The reward for the player is on mastering real or realistic spacecraft, celestial mechanics and astronautics.

Classical games with this approach include Space Shuttle: A Journey into Space (1982), Rendezvous: A Space Shuttle Simulation (1982),[7]The Halley Project (1985), Shuttle (1992) and Microsoft Space Simulator (1994).

If the definition is expanded to include decision making and planning, then Buzz Aldrin's Race Into Space (1992) is also notable for historical accuracy and detail. On this game the player takes the role of Administrator of NASA or Head of the Soviet Space Program with the ultimate goal of being the first side to conduct a successful manned moon landing.

Most recently Orbiter and Space Shuttle Mission 2007 provide more elaborate simulations, with realistic 3D virtual cockpits and external views.

Kerbal Space Program can be considered a space simulator, even though it portrays an imaginary universe with tweaked physics, masses and distances to enhance gameplay. Nevertheless, the physics and rocket design principles are much more realistic than in the space combat or trading subgenres.

The game Lunar Flight simulates flying around the lunar surface in a craft resembling the Apollo Lunar Module.

Read the original here:

Space flight simulator game - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

SpaceX retries drone-ship rocket landing after first fiery failure

Chris Davies

As instructions for space flight go, "Just Read the Instructions" seems like basic advice, but that's the last thing SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket will see as it coaxes down onto a floating landing pad today. Elon Musk's ambitious private space flight project is set to send another unmanned Dragon capsule to the International Space Station with a fresh batch of cargo, but the arguably more interesting flight is a whole lot shorter and will end much closer to home.

That's because, rather than plummeting into the ocean and being useful as little more than scrap as per traditional rocket stages, the goal is to bring the Falcon 9 stage back down to Earth in a reusable state.

To do that, SpaceX has floated an autonomous landing platform - complete with whimsical message - out at sea. Granted the ability to reposition itself at will, that pad will hopefully be where the Falcon first stage ends up, rather than in pieces.

"After Dragon and Falcon 9's second stage are on their way to orbit," SpaceX said of the test, "the first stage will execute a controlled reentry through Earths atmosphere, targeting touchdown on an autonomous spaceport drone ship approximately nine minutes after launch."

With Musk & Co. counting on reusable rockets to help bring down the cost of spaceflight, plenty is riding on the team getting this right.

It's not SpaceX's first attempt at the feat, however. Back in January, the company deemed its original test landing a success even though it ended in flames, opting to focus on the valuable telemetry rather than the failure to actually bring the rocket down in a reusable state.

Those lessons led to some big changes this time around. The rocket has been tweaked to make it more maneuverable, while the drone ship can handle choppier water without putting the landing in peril.

SpaceX expects the touchdown to come just nine minutes after Dragon and the Falcon 9 rocket take off, itself expected at 4:33pm ET today. Meanwhile, the cargo capsule will head off to the ISS, and is scheduled to arrive in roughly two days time.

SOURCE SpaceX

See the original post here:

SpaceX retries drone-ship rocket landing after first fiery failure