More Details Surface About Carrie Fisher’s Death – Gizmodo

Carrie Fisher on the set of Empire Strikes Back. Image: YouTube

My mom battled drug addiction and mental illness her entire life. She ultimately died of it, Carrie Fishers daughter Billie Lourd told People this weekend in a compassionate statement about her mothers passing. Fishers autopsy has, tragically, confirmed her struggle continued right up to her death.

A newly released coroners report confirmed the legendary actress died of sleep apnea and other undetermined factors. It also revealed she had cocaine, heroin, and other drugs in her system at her time of death although it could not be determined if those substances played a role in her passing. Ms. Fisher suffered what appeared to be a cardiac arrest on the airplane accompanied by vomiting and with a history of sleep apnea, the report continued.

Lourds statement was a reminder of how Fisher openly discussed her addiction issues, shedding a compassionate light on a topic frequently considered somewhat taboo.

She was purposefully open in all of her work about the social stigmas surrounding these diseases, Lourd said. She talked about the shame that torments people and their families confronted by these diseases. I know my Mom, shed want her death to encourage people to be open about their struggles. Seek help, fight for government funding for mental health programs. Shame and those social stigmas are the enemies of progress to solutions and ultimately a cure. Love you Momby.

In the years before her passing, Fisher spent a good chunk of her time spreading awareness about mental illness and addiction. In 2001, the National Alliance on Mental Illness gave her an award for her work. In 2016, Harvard University gave her the Annual Outstanding Lifetime Achievement Award in Cultural Humanism. You dont just get honors like that, 15 years apart, without truly spreading your message and leaving an indelible mark.

Lourds statement deserves to be read in full, and its a moving tribute to her mother and how she used her problems to help others facing the same struggles. Fishers final film appearance will be in Star Wars: The Last Jedi, which opens December 15.

[Associated Press]

Go here to see the original:

More Details Surface About Carrie Fisher's Death - Gizmodo

China – Wikitravel

119 for fire 120 for medical

China (; Zhnggu), officially known as the People's Republic of China ( Zhnghu Rnmn Gnghgu) is a huge country in Eastern Asia (about the same size as the United States of America) with the world's largest population.

With coasts on the East China Sea, Korea Bay, Yellow Sea, and South China Sea, in total it borders 14 nations. It borders Afghanistan, Pakistan (through the disputed territory of Kashmir), India, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam to the south; Tajikistan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan to the west; Russia and Mongolia to the north and North Korea to the east. This number of neighbouring states is equalled only by China's vast neighbour to the north, Russia.

This article only covers mainland China. For Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan, please see separate articles.

The roughly 5000-year old Chinese civilization has endured through millennia of tumultuous upheaval and revolutions, periods of golden ages and anarchy alike. Through the recent economic boom initiated by the reforms of Deng Xiaoping, China is once again one of the leading nations in the world, buoyed by its large, industrious population and abundant natural resources. The depth and complexity of the Chinese civilization, with its rich heritage, has fascinated Westerners such as Marco Polo and Gottfried Leibniz through the Great Silk Road and more ways of culture exchange in centuries past, and will continue to excite - and bewilder - the traveler today.

The recorded history of Chinese civilization can be traced to the Yellow River valley, said to be the 'cradle of Chinese civilization'. The Xia Dynasty was the first dynasty to be described in ancient historical chronicles, though to date, no concrete proof of its existence has been found. Nevertheless, archaeological evidence has shown that at the very least, an early bronze age Chinese civilization had developed by the period described.

The Shang Dynasty, China's first historically confirmed dynasty, and the Zhou Dynasty ruled across the Yellow River basin. The Zhou adopted a decentralized system of government, in which the feudal lords ruled over their respective territories with a high degree of autonomy, even maintaining their own armies, while at the same time paying tribute to the king and recognizing him as the symbolic ruler of China. It was also the longest ruling dynasty in Chinese history, lasting about 800 years. Despite this longevity, during the second half of the Zhou period, China descended into centuries of political turmoil, with the feudal lords of numerous small fiefdoms vying for power during the Spring and Autumn Period, and later stabilized into seven large states in the Warring States period. This tumultuous period gave birth to China's greatest thinkers including Confucius, Mencius and Laozi, who made substantial contributions to Chinese thought and culture.

China was eventually unified in 221 BC by Qin Shi Huang, the 'First Emperor', and the Qin Dynasty instituted a centralized system of government for all of China, and standardized weights and measures, Chinese characters and currency in order to create unity. Until today, the ideal of a unified and strong centralized system is still strong in Chinese thought. However, due to despotic and harsh rule, the Qin dynasty lasted for only 15 years as the Han Dynasty took over in 206BC after a period of revolt. With the invention of paper and extensive trade with the West along the Silk Road, along with relatively benevolent imperial rule, the Han was the first golden age of Chinese civilization. Ethnic Chinese consider themselves to be part of the 'Han' race till this day.

The collapse of the Han Dynasty in 220 CE led to a period of political turmoil and war known as the Three Kingdoms Period, which saw China split into the three separate states of Wei, Shu and Wu. Despite lasting for only about 60 years, it is a highly romanticised period of Chinese history. China was then briefly reunified under the Jin Dynasty, before descending into a period of division and anarchy once again. The era of division culminated with the Sui which reunified China in 581. The Sui were famous for major public works projects, such as the engineering feat of the Grand Canal, which linked Beijing in the north to Hangzhou in the south. Certain sections of the canal are still navigable today.

Bankrupted by war and excess government spending, the Sui were supplanted by the Tang Dynasty, ushering in the second golden age of Chinese civilization, marked by a flowering of Chinese poetry, Buddhism and statecraft, and also saw the development of the Imperial Examination system which attempted to select court officials by ability rather than family background. Chinatowns overseas are often known as "Street of the Tang People" ( Tngrn ji) in Chinese. The collapse of the Tang Dynasty then saw China divided once again, until it was reunified by the Song Dynasty, this collapse was preceded by the secession and independence of Vietnam in 938 CE. The Song ruled over most of China for over 150 years before being driven south of the Huai river by the Jurchens, were they continued to rule as the Southern Song, and although militarily weak, attained a level of commercial and economic development unmatched until the West's Industrial Revolution. The Yuan (Mongol) dynasty first defeated the Jurchens, then proceeded to conquer the Song in 1279, and ruled their vast Eurasian empire from modern-day Beijing.

After defeating the Mongols, the Ming dynasty (1368-1644) re-instituted rule by ethnic Han. The Ming period was noted for trade and exploration, with Zheng He's numerous voyages to Southeast Asia, India and the Arab world. Initial contact with European traders meant China gradually reaped the fruits of the Colombian exchange, with silver pouring in by the galleon through trade with the Portuguese and Spanish. Famous buildings in Beijing, such as the Forbidden City and the Temple of Heaven, were built in this period. The last dynasty of the Qing (Manchu) dynasty (1644-1911), saw the Chinese empire grow to its current size, incorporating the western regions of Xinjiang and Tibet. The Qing dynasty fell into decay in its final years to become the 'sick man of Asia', where it was nibbled apart by Western powers. The Westerners established their own treaty ports in Guangzhou, Shanghai and Tianjin. China lost several territories to foreign powers; Hong Kong and Weihai were ceded to Britain, Taiwan and Liaodong were to Japan, parts of the North East including Dalian and parts of Outer Manchuria to Russia, while Qingdao was ceded to Germany. Shanghai was divided among China and eight different countries. In addition, China lost control of its tributaties, with Korea and the Ryukyu Islands ceded to Japan.

The two thousand-year old imperial system collapsed in 1911, where Sun Yat-Sen (, Sn Zhngshn) founded the Republic of China ( Zhnghu Mngu). Central rule collapsed in 1916 after Yuan Shih-kai, the second president of the Republic and self-declared emperor, passed away; China descended into anarchy, with various self-serving warlords ruling over different regions of China. In 1919, student protests in Beijing gave birth to the "May Fourth Movement" ( W S Yndng), which espoused various reforms to Chinese society, such as the use of the vernacular in writing, as well as the development of science and democracy. The intellectual ferment of the May Fourth Movement gave birth to the reorganized Kuomintang (KMT) in 1919 and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in the French Concession in Shanghai, 1921.

After uniting much of eastern China under KMT rule in 1928, the CCP and the KMT turned on each other, with the CCP fleeing to Yan'an in Shaanxi in the epic Long March. During the period from 1922 to 1937, The eastern provinces of China grew economically under the leadership of Chiang Kai-shek and his KMT government, with marked economic expansion, industrialization and urbanization. Shanghai became a truly cosmopolitan city, as one of the world's busiest ports, and the most prosperous city in East Asia, home to millions of Chinese and 60,000 foreigners from all corners of the globe. However, underlying problems throughout the vast country side, particularly the more inland parts of the country, such as civil unrest, famines and warlord conflict, still remained.

Japan established a puppet state under the name Manchukuo in Manchuria in 1931, and launched a full-scale invasion of China's heartland in 1937. The Japanese initiated a brutal system of rule in Eastern China, culminating in the Nanjing Massacre of 1937. After fleeing west to Chongqing, the KMT realized the urgency of the situation signed a tenuous agreement with the CCP to form a second united front against the Japanese. With the defeat of Japan in 1945, the KMT and CCP armies maneuvered for positions in north China, setting the stage for the civil war in the years to come. The civil war lasted from 1946 to 1949 and ended with the Kuomintang defeated and sent packing to Taiwan where they hoped to re-establish themselves and recapture the mainland some day.

Mao Zedong officially declared the establishment of the People's Republic of China on 1 Oct 1949. The new Communist government implemented strong measures to restore law and order and revive industrial, agricultural and commercial institutions reeling from more than a decade of war. By 1955, China's economy had returned to pre-war levels of output as factories, farms, labor unions, civil society and governance were brought under Party control. After an initial period closely hewing to the Soviet model of heavy industrialization and comprehensive central economic planning, China began to experiment with adapting Marxism to a largely agrarian society.

Massive social experiments such as the Hundred Flowers Campaign ( bihu yndng), the Great Leap Forward ( dyujn), intended to collectivize and industrialize China quickly, and the Cultural Revolution ( wchn jij wnhu d gmng), aimed at changing everything by discipline, destruction of the "Four Olds," and total dedication to Mao Zedong Thought, rocked China from 1957 to 1976. The Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution are generally considered disastrous failures in China. During the Cultural Revolution in particular, China's cultural heritage, including monuments, temples, historical artifacts, and works of literature sustained catastrophic damage at the hands of Red Guard factions. It was only due to the intervention of Zhou Enlai and the PLA that major sites, such as the Potala Palace, the Mogao Caves, and the Forbidden City escaped destruction during the Cultural Revolution.

Mao Zedong died in 1976, and in 1978, Deng Xiaoping became China's paramount leader. Deng and his lieutenants gradually introduced market-oriented reforms and decentralized economic decision making. Economic output quadrupled by 2000 and continues to grow by 8-10% per year, but huge problems remain bouts of serious inflation, regional income inequality, human rights abuses, ethnic unrest, massive pollution, rural poverty and corruption. While the larger cities near the coast like Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou have grown to become rich and modern, many of the more inland and rural parts of the country remain poor and underdeveloped. The former General Secretary of the Communist Party, Hu Jintao, has proclaimed a policy for a "Harmonious Society" ( hxi shhu) which promises to restore balanced economic growth and channel investment and prosperity into China's central and western provinces, which have been largely left behind in the post-1978 economic boom. The current General Secretary of the Communist Party, Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang, have pursued an ambitious policy of social reform, particularly income redistribution, poverty relief, and environmental improvements. Furthermore, a highly ambitious crackdown on corruption started by the previous administration has only been expanded. Growth in China has finally slowed down in recent years and seems to be leveling off.

China is a single-party socialist state ruled by the Communist Party of China. China has actually only experienced one open nation-wide election, in 1912. The government consists of an executive branch known as the State Council ( Gu W Yun), as well as a unicameral legislature known as the National People's Congress ( Qungu Rnmn Dibio Dhu). The nominal Head of State is the President ( zhx, lit chairman) which is a largely ceremonial office with limited powers and the Head of Government is the Premier ( zngl). In practice, while neither one holds absolute power, the General Secretary of the Communist Party of China holds the most power, while the Premier of the State Council is the second most powerful person in the country.

The country is administratively divided into 22 provinces, 5 autonomous regions and 4 directly-controlled municipalities. Each of the provincial governments is given power over the internal, often economic, affairs of their provinces. Autonomous regions are given more freedom than regular provinces, one example of which is the right to declare additional official languages in the region besides Mandarin. In addition, there are the Special Administrative Regions (SAR) of Hong Kong and Macau. Both Hong Kong and Macau have separate legal systems and immigration departments from the mainland, and are given the freedom to enact laws separately from the mainland. Their political systems are more open and directly electoral in nature. Taiwan is also claimed by the PRC as a province, though no part of Taiwan is currently under the control of the PRC. Both governments support re-unification in principle and recently signed a trade pact to closer link their economies, essentially removing the danger of war.

China is a very diverse place with large variations in culture, language, customs and economic levels. The economic landscape is particularly diverse. The major cities such as Beijing, Guangzhou and Shanghai are modern and comparatively wealthy. However, about 50% of Chinese still live in rural areas even though only 10% of China's land is arable. Hundreds of millions of rural residents still farm with manual labour or draft animals. Some 200 to 300 million former peasants have migrated to townships and cities in search of work. Government estimates for 2005 reported that 90 million people lived on less than 924 a year and 26 million were under the official poverty line of 668 a year. Generally the southern and eastern coastal regions are more wealthy while inland areas, the far west and north, and the southwest are much much less developed.

The cultural landscape is unsurprisingly very diverse given the sheer size of the country. China has 56 officially recognized ethnic groups; the largest by far is the Han which comprise over 90% of the population. The other 55 groups enjoy affirmative action for university admission and exemption from the one-child policy. The Han, however, are far from homogeneous and speak a wide variety of mutually unintelligible local "dialects"; which most linguists actually classify as different languages using more or less the same set of Chinese characters. Many of the minority ethnic groups have their own languages as well. Contrary to popular belief, there is no single unified Han Chinese culture, and while they share certain common elements such as Confucian and Taoist beliefs, the regional variations in culture among the Han ethnic group are actually very diverse. Many customs and deities are specific to individual regions and even villages. Celebrations for the lunar new year and other national festivals vary drastically from region to region. Specific customs related to the celebration of important occasions such as weddings, funerals and births also vary widely. In general contemporary urban Chinese society is rather secular and traditional culture is more of an underlying current in every day life. Among ethnic minorities, the Zhuang, Manchu, Hui and Miao are the largest in size. Other notable ethnic minorities include: Koreans, Tibetans, Mongols, Uighurs, Kirghiz and even Russians. In fact, China is home to the largest Korean population outside Korea and is also home to more ethnic Mongols than the Republic of Mongolia itself. Many minorities have been assimilated to various degrees with the loss of language and customs or a fusing with Han traditions. An exception to this trend is the current situation of the Tibetans and Uighurs in China who remain fiercely defensive of their cultures.

Some behaviours that are quite normal in China may be somewhat jarring and vulgar for foreigners:

Some long-time foreign residents say such behaviours are getting worse; others say the opposite. The cause is usually attributed to the influx of millions of migrants from the countryside who are unfamiliar with big city life. Some department stores place attendants at the foot of each escalator to keep folks from stopping to have a look-see as soon as they get off - when the escalator behind them is fully packed.

On the whole, however, the Chinese love a good laugh and because there are so many ethnic groups and outsiders from other regions, they are used to different ways of doing things and are quite okay with that (in tier one and tier two cities at least). Indeed the Chinese often make conversation with strangers by discussing differences in accent or dialect. They are very used to sign language and quick to see a non-verbal joke or pun wherever they can spot one. Note that a laugh doesn't necessarily mean scorn, just amusement. The Chinese like a "collective good laugh" often at times or circumstances that westerners might consider rude. Finally, the Chinese love and adore children, allow them a great deal of freedom, and heap attention upon them. If you have children, bring them!

In general, 3, 6, 8, and 9 are lucky numbers for most of the Chinese. Three means high above shine the three stars while the three stars include gods of fortune, prosperity and longevity. Six represents smoothness or success. Many young people choose the dates with six as their wedding days, such as the 6th, 16th and 26th. Eight sounds so close to the word for wealth that many people believe eight is a number that is linked to prosperity. So it is no surprise that the opening ceremony for the Olympics started at 8:08:08 on 08/08/2008. Nine is also regarded as a lucky number with the meaning of everlasting.

Four is a taboo for most Chinese because the pronunciation in Mandarin is close to death. Some hotels will have their floor numbers go straight from three to five much like some American hotels have their floor numbers go from twelve to fourteen, skipping the "unlucky" number 13.

Given the country's size the climate is extremely diverse, from tropical regions in the south to subarctic in the north. Hainan Island is roughly at the same latitude as Jamaica, while Harbin, one of the largest cities in the north, is at roughly the latitude of Montreal and has the climate to match. North China has four distinct seasons with intensely hot summers and bitterly cold winters. Southern China tends to be milder and wetter. The further north and west you travel, the drier the climate. Once you leave eastern China and enter the majestic Tibetan highlands or the vast steppes and deserts of Gansu and Xinjiang, distances are vast and the land is very harsh.

Back in the days of the planned economy, the rules stated that buildings in areas north of the Yangtze River got heat in the winter, but anything south of it did not this meant unheated buildings in places like Shanghai and Nanjing, which routinely see temperatures below freezing in winter. The rule has long since been relaxed, but the effects are still visible. In general, Chinese use less heating, less building insulation, and wear more warm clothing than Westerners in comparable climates. In a schools or apartments and office buildings, even if the rooms are heated, the corridors are not. Double glazing is quite rare. Students wear winter jackets in class, along with their teachers and long underwear is very common. Air conditioning is increasingly common but is similarly not used in corridors and is often used with the windows and doors open.

There is a wide range of terrain to be found in China with many inland mountain ranges, high plateaus, and deserts in center and the far west. Plains, deltas, and hills dominate the east. The Pearl River Delta region around Guangzhou and Hong Kong and the Yangtze delta around Shanghai are major global economic powerhouses, as is the North China plain around Beijing and the Yellow River. On the border between Tibet, (the Tibet Autonomous Region) and the nation of Nepal lies Mount Everest, at 8,850 m, the highest point on earth. The Turpan depression, in northwest China's Xinjiang is the lowest point in the country, at 154 m below sea level. This is also the second lowest point on land in the world after the Dead Sea.

China is a huge country with endless and affordable travel opportunities. During holidays, however, hundreds of millions of migrant workers return home and millions of other Chinese travel within the country (but many in the service sector stay behind, enjoying extra pay). Travelers may want to seriously consider scheduling to avoid being on the road, on the rails, or in the air during the major holidays. At the very least, travel should be planned well well in advance. Every mode of transport is extremely crowded; tickets of any kind are hard to come by, and will cost you a lot more, so it may be necessary to book well in advance (especially for those travelling from remote western China to the east coast or in the opposite direction). Train and bus tickets are usually quite easy to buy in China, (during the non-holiday season), but difficulties arising from crowded conditions at these times cannot be overstated. Travellers who are stranded at these times, unable to buy tickets, can sometimes manage to get air tickets, which tend to sell out more slowly because of the higher but still affordable (by western standards) prices. For the most comfortable mode of transportation, air travel is the obvious choice. There is an emerging ultra-modern bullet train network which is also very nice, but you may still have to potentially deal with many insanely overcrowded, smoke-filled, cold, loud and disorganized train depots to get on-board. The spring festival (Chinese New Year) is the largest annual migration of people on earth.

Lunar New Year dates The year of the Horse started on 31 Jan 2014

China has five major annual holidays:

The Chinese New Year and National Day are not one-day holidays; nearly all workers get at least a week for Chinese New Year, some get two or three, and students get four to six weeks. For National Day, a week is typical.

The Chinese New Year is especially busy. Not only is it the longest holiday, it is also a traditional time to visit family. The entire country is pretty much shut down during the period. More or less all the migrant workers who have left their farms and villages for better pay in the cities go home. This is often the only chance they have. Everyone wants to go home, and China has a lot of "everyone"! Around the Chinese New Year, many stores and other businesses will close for several days, a week, or even longer, so unless you have close friends or relatives in China, it is not ideal to visit during this period.

Also, during early July university students (twenty-odd million of them!) go home and in late August they return to school, jamming transportation options especially between the east coast and the western regions of Sichuan, Gansu, Tibet, and Xinjiang.

A complete list of Chinese festivals would be very long since many areas or ethnic groups have their own local ones. See listings for individual towns for details. Here is a list of some of the nationally important festivals not mentioned above:

In addition to these, some Western festivals are noticeable, at least in major cities. Around Christmas, one hears carols mostly English, a few in Latin, plus Chinese versions of "Jingle Bells", "Amazing Grace", and for some reason "Oh Susana". Some stores are decorated and one sees many shop assistants in red and white elf hats. For Valentine's Day, many restaurants offer special meals. Chinese Christians celebrate services and masses at officially sanctioned Protestant and Catholic churches as well.

Non-guidebooks, either about China, or by Chinese writers.

Travel:

Literature:

History:

For a complete list of provinces and an explanation of China's political geography, see: List of Chinese provinces and regions.

We cover Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan in separate articles. From the practical traveller's point of view, they are distinct as each issues its own visas, currency and so on.

Politically, Hong Kong and Macau are Special Administrative Regions, part of China but with capitalist economies and distinct political systems. The slogan is "One country, two systems".

Taiwan is a special case. At the end of the civil war in 1949, the Communists held most of China and the defeated Nationalists held only Taiwan and a few islands off the Fujian coast. That situation continues to this day; Taiwan has had a separate government for more than 60 years and as such, is governed "de-facto" independently. However, most world bodies do not recognize it as a sovereign state - amongst other factors, this may be attributed to the strong influence of the PRC government in this matter. Both governments in theory support eventual reunification of these "two Chinas", but there is also a significant pro-independence movement within Taiwan.

China has many large and famous cities. Below is a top ten list of some of those most important to travellers in mainland China. Other cities are listed under their specific regional section. See the Dynasties and capitals section for a detailed list of China's many previous capitals.

You can travel to many of these cities using the new fast trains. In particular, the Hangzhou - Shanghai - Suzhou - Nanjing line is a convenient way to see these historic areas.

Citizens of the following countries do not need a visa to travel to Mainland China;

For 15 days

For 30 days

For 90 days

Residents of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Benin, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Cuba, Georgia, Guyana, Laos, Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, North Korea, Pakistan, Serbia, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, and Vietnam must have their passported endorced as "For public affairs" by the Chinese government in order to enter visa free.

For citizens of Albania, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Brunei, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malta, Mexico, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, and United States/American Samoa, you are allowed a 144-hour visa-free stopover in Shanghai/Hangzhou/Nanjing or a 72-hour visa-free stopover in Beijing, Changsha, Chengdu, Chongqing, Dalian, Guangzhou, Guilin, Harbin, Kunming, Qingdao, Shenyang, Tianjin, Wuhan, Xi'an or Xiamen provided you meet several conditions including:

More details can be found here: [5]. There is also a dedicated discussion and wiki-style summary on China's visa-free stopover policies in the FlyerTalk forum.

If you do not qualify for the 144 or 72 hour visa-free stopover (for example, if you are not flying into or out of one of the qualifying airports, or if you are not a citizen of one of the qualifying countries), you may be able to avail of the 24 hour visa-free stopover instead. This is available at all airports in China served by international flights (except for Fuzhou, Mudanjiang, Shenzhen and Yanji airports, and available at Urumqi airport only if you spend no more than 2 hours in Urumqi). The 24 hour period begins from your scheduled flight arrival time, until your scheduled flight departure time. For the 24 hour visa-free stopover, there are no territorial restrictions on your movement within mainland China (except Tibet) during your stopover, and you are not required to fly out of the same airport as the one you flew into. For example, if you arrive in Beijing at 06:00, you can travel to another city and fly out of another airport as long as your scheduled departure time is before 06:00 the following day.

Those visiting Hong Kong and Macau are able to visit the Pearl River Delta visa-free only under certain conditions.

Citizens of Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Russia, and Turkmenistan can visit visa-free for 30 days, if traveling with a tour group that is accompanied by a representative of a tour operator registered in both countries.

The special economic zone province of Hainan allows visa-free access to Mainland China (Only Hainan though) for 15 days for nationals of the following countries; Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, France, Finland, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Philippines, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States. As long as they are visiting as part of a Chinese government controlled agency in Hainan with 5 people or more. Nationals of Germany, Russia, and South Korea can enter visa-free for 21 days with a tourist group of 2 people or more.

Citizens of Russia can visit the city of Suifenhe visa-free for up to 15 days. As long as you are accompanied by someone. Residents of the Amur oblast can visit the city of Heihe visa-free for 24 hours.

Residents of the East Kazakhstan Region in Kazakhstan can visit the city of Tacheng without a visa for 72 hours, which is about 3 days.

Most travellers will need a visa ( qinzhng) to visit mainland China. In most cases, this should be obtained from a Chinese embassy or consulate before departure. Visas for Hong Kong and Macau can be obtained through a Chinese embassy or consulate, but must be applied for separately from the mainland Chinese visa. However, citizens from most Western countries do not need visas to visit Hong Kong and Macau. Visitors from most western countries can stay in Hong Kong with free visa for 7 to 90 day. The time duration should depend on which country you are from. However, people from Afghanistan, Albania, Armenia, Bangladesh, Belarus, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cuba and Ethiopia have to apply for a visa for Hong Kong before they travel to HK.

The most notable exception to this rule is transit through certain airports. Most airports allow a 12- to 24-hour stay without a visa so long as you do do not pass through immigration and customs (stay airside) and are en-route to a different country.

To visit mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau residents of Chinese nationality need to apply at the China Travel Service, the sole authorized issuing agent, to obtain a Home Return Permit (), a credit card sized ID allowing multiple entries and unlimited stay for 10 years with no restrictions including on employment. Taiwan residents may obtain an entry permit (valid for 3 months) at airports in Dalian, Fuhzou, Haikou, Qingdao, Sanya, Shanghai, Wuhan, Xiamen and China Travel Services in Hong Kong and Macau. Visitors must hold a Republic of China passport, Taiwanese Identity Card and Taiwan Compatriot Pass ( tibozhng). The Compatriot Pass may be obtained for single use at airports in Fuzhou, Haikou, Qingdao, Sanya, Wuhan and Xiamen. The entry permit fee is 100 plus 50 for issuing a single-use Taiwan Compatriot Pass. Travellers should check the most up-to-date information before traveling.

Visa overview

Getting a tourist visa is fairly easy for most passports as you don't need an invitation, which is required for business or working visas. The usual tourist single-entry visa is valid for a visit of 30 days and must be used within three months of the date of issue. A double-entry tourist visa must be used within six months of the date of issue. It is possible to secure a tourist visa for up to 90 days for citizens of some countries.

Tourist visa extensions can be applied for at the local Entry & Exit Bureaus against handing in the following documents: valid passport, visa extension application form including one 2-inch-sized picture, a copy of the Registration Form of Temporary Residence which you receive from the local police station at registration.

Some travellers will need a dual entry or multiple entry visa. For example, if you enter China on a single entry visa, then depart the mainland to Hong Kong or Macau, you need a new visa to re-enter the mainland. In Hong Kong, multiple entry visas are officially available only to HKID holders, but the authorities are willing to bend the rules somewhat and may approve three-month multiple entry visas for short-term Hong Kong qualified residents, including exchange students. It is recommended to apply directly with the Chinese government in this case, as some agents will be unwilling to submit such an application on your behalf. For holders of multiple entry visas to renew your visa you must leave China. The easist way was to go to Hong Kong, Seoul or some other country, cross the border and re-enter China. A new way is to go to Xiamen and cross to Jinmen island. Jinmen is held by Taiwan and like Hong Kong is offically considered leaving China. See details of below on boats to China.

There may be restrictions on visas for political reasons and these vary over time. For example:

A few years ago, the Z (working) visa was a long-term visa. Now a Z-visa only gets you into the country for 30 days; once you are there, the employer gets you a residence permit. This is effectively a multiple-entry visa; you can leave China and return using it. Some local visa offices will refuse to issue a residence permit if you entered China on a tourist (L) visa. In those cases, you have to enter on a Z-visa. These are only issued outside China, so obtaining one will likely require a departure from the mainland, for example to a neighbouring country. (Note that in Korea, tourists not holding an alien registration card must now travel to Busan, as the Chinese consulate in Seoul does not issue visas to non-residents in Korea.) They also usually require an invitation letter from the employer. In other cases it is possible to convert an L visa to a residence permit; it depends upon which office you are dealing with and perhaps on your employer's connections.

It is possible for most foreigners to get a visa in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. [1]. . (Dec 2010) Reservations for travel and hotel are acceptable. During busy periods, they may refuse entry after 11:00. There can be long queues so arrive early. Also be aware of major Chinese holidays, the Consular Section may be closed for several days.

Obtaining a Visa on Arrival is possible usually only for the Shenzhen or Zhuhai Special Economic Zones, and such visas are limited to those areas. When crossing from Hong Kong to Shenzhen at Lo Wu railway station, and notably not at Lok Ma Chau, a five day Shenzhen-only visa can be obtained during extended office hours on the spot for 160 (Oct 2007 price) for passport holders of many nationalities, for example Irish or New Zealand or Canadian. Americans are not eligible, while the fee for UK nationals is 450. The office accepts only Chinese yuan.

Any non-Chinese citizen must have a Tibet Travel Permit in order to enter Tibet. This permit is issued by the Tibet Tourism Bureau, and will be checked when going on board any buses, trains or airlines that bound for the TAR. However, the only way to obtain a Tibet Travel Permit is to arrange a tour operated by a Tibet travel agent which at least includes hotels and transportation. Foreigners are also not permitted to travel by public buses across Tibet and are only allowed to travel by private transportation as organised in the tour. Moreover, if entering Tibet from Nepal, one must also joined a group tour and be only allowed on a group visa. The Tibet Travel Permit has to be handed in to the tour guide upon arrival in the airport or train station, and to tour guide will keep the permit until the traveler left the TAR. The Tibet Travel Permit is also required by Taiwanese holding a Mainland Travel Permit for Taiwan Residents, but it is not required for Chinese citizens from Hong Kong or Macao holding a Mainland Travel Permit for Hong Kong and Macao Residents.

If staying in a hotel, guest house or hostel, the staff will request to see, and often scan, your passport, visa, and entry stamps at check-in.

If you are staying in a private residence, you are in theory required to register your abode with the local police within 24 (city) to 72 (countryside) hours of arrival, though in practice the law is rarely if ever enforced so long as you don't cause any trouble. The police will ask for (1) a copy of the photograph page of your passport, (2) a copy of your visa, (3) a copy of your immigration entry stamp, (4) a photograph, (5) a copy of the tenancy agreement or other document concerning the place you are staying in. That agreement might not be in your name but it will still be requested.

The main international gateways to mainland China are Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. Almost every sizable city will have an international airport, but options are usually limited to flights from Hong Kong, neighbouring countries such as South Korea and Japan, and sometimes Southeast Asia.

Transiting Hong Kong and Macau

If arriving in Hong Kong or Macau there are ferries that can shuttle passengers straight to another destination such as Shekou or Bao'an Airport in Shenzhen, Macau Airport, Zhuhai and elsewhere without actually "entering" Hong Kong or Macau. A shuttle bus takes transit passengers to the ferry terminal so their official entry point, where they clear immigration, will be the ferry destination rather than the airport. Please note that the ferries do have different hours so landing late at night may make it necessary to enter either territory to catch another bus or ferry to one's ultimate destination. For example, it would be necessary to clear immigration if going from HK Int'l Airport to Macau via the Macau Ferry Terminal. The most recent information on the ferries to Hong Kong can be found at the Hong Kong International Airport website.[7]

While many major airlines now fly to Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Hong Kong, budget seats are often scarce. For good offers, book as early as possible. Tickets are particularly expensive or hard to come by at the beginning or end of summer when Chinese students abroad return home or fly back to their universities around the world. As with other travel in China, tickets can be difficult to get and will be expensive around Chinese New Year.

If you live in a city with a sizable overseas Chinese community, check for cheap flights with someone in that community or visit travel agencies operated by Chinese. Sometimes flights advertised only in Chinese newspapers or travel agencies cost significantly less than posted fares in English. However if you ask, you can get the same discount price.

See also: Discount airlines in Asia

Information: As a result of the H1N1-flu pandemic there are some kinds of health-checks currently in effect. These may be as simple as a customs person judging your appearance to IR-cameras checking for elevated body temperature. If there is a suspicion of flu, you will be quarantined for seven days.

Airlines and Routes

China's carriers are growing rapidly. Airbus estimates the size of Chinas passenger aircraft fleet will triple from 1,400 planes in 2009 to 4,200 planes in 2029.

Major domestic airlines include China Southern [8], China Eastern [9], Air China [10], and Hainan Airlines [11].

Fliers may prefer Asian airlines as they generally have more cabin staff and quality service. Hong Kong based Cathay Pacific [12] is an obvious possibility. Other candidates include Singapore Airlines [13], Japan Airlines [14], and Garuda Indonesia [15]. Korean Air [16] often has good prices on flights from various places in Asia such as Bangkok via Seoul to North America. Connecting flights may be cheaper than direct flights so keep this in mind. Korean Air also flies to more than a dozen Chinese cities.

Flights between Europe and China

China can be reached by train from many of its neighboring countries and even all the way from Europe.

China has land borders with 14 different countries; a number matched only by its northern neighbour, Russia. In addition, mainland China also has land borders with the Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macau, which are for all practical purposes treated as international borders. Most of the border crossings in western China are located in remote mountain passes, which while difficult to reach and traverse, often reward travellers willing to make the effort with breathtaking, scenic views.

Relations between the two nations are frosty, but the Nathu La Pass between Sikkim in India and Southern Tibet has recently reopened for cross-border trade. Currently the crossing is not open to tourists, and special permits are required to visit from either side.

Entering China from Myanmar is possible at the Ruili (China)-Lashio (Myanmar) border crossing, but permits need to be obtained from the Burmese authorities in advance. Generally, this would require you to join a guided tour.

For most travelers Hanoi is the origin for any overland journey to China. There are currently three international crossings:

You can catch a local bus from Hanoi's eastern bus station (Ben Xe Street, Gia Lam District, tel: 04/827-1529) to Lang Son, where you have to switch transport to minibus or motorbike to reach the border at Dong Dang. Alternatively there are many offers from open-tour providers; for those in a hurry, they might be a good option if they offer a direct hotel to border crossing transfer.

You can change money with freelance money changers, but check the rate carefully beforehand.

Border formalities take about 30 minutes. On the Chinese side, walk up past the "Friendship-gate" and catch a taxi (about 20, bargain hard) to Pingxiang, Guangxi. A seat in a minibus is 5. There is a Bank of China branch right across the street from the main bus station; the ATM accepts Maestro cards. You can travel by bus or train to Nanning.

You can take a train from Hanoi to Lao Cai for about 420,000 VND (as of 11/2011) for a soft sleeper. The trip takes about 8 hours. From there, it's a long walk (or a 5 minute ride) to the Lao Cai/Hekou border. Crossing the border is simple, fill out a customs card and wait in line. They will search your belongings (in particular your books/written material). Outside the Hekou border crossing is a variety of shops, and the bus terminal is about a 10 minute ride from the border. A ticket to Kunming from Hekou costs about 140; the ride is about 7 hours.

At Dongxing, you can take a bus to Nanning, a sleeper bus to Guangzhou (approximately 180), or a sleeper bus to Shenzhen (approximately 230, 12 hours) (March 2006).

From Luang Namtha you can get a bus leaving at around 08:00 going to Boten (Chinese border) and Mengla. You need to have a Chinese visa beforehand as there is no way to get one on arrival. The border is close (about 1 hr). Customs procedures will take another hour. The trip costs about 45k Kip.

Also, there is a direct Chinese sleeper bus connection from Luang Prabang to Kunming (about 32 hours). You can get on this bus at the border, when the minibus from Luang Namtha and the sleeper meet. Don't pay more than 200.

The Karakoram Highway from northern Pakistan into Western China is one of the most spectacular roads in the world. It's closed for tourists for a few months in winter. Crossing the border is relatively quick because of few overland travelers, and friendly relations between the two countries. A bus runs between Kashgar (China) and Sust (Pakistan) across the Kunerjab pass.

Link:

China - Wikitravel

China’s Edits To ‘Alien: Covenant’ Reportedly Censor Out Most Of The Reasons To See The Movie – UPROXX


Dark Horizons
China's Edits To 'Alien: Covenant' Reportedly Censor Out Most Of The Reasons To See The Movie
UPROXX
The nation has long had a strange relationship with gay content in films, blocking films like Brokeback Mountain but having no issues with Beauty And The Beast's touted gay moment. Both are at very different ends of the film spectrum, but the nation ...
China Censors Cut Alien: Covenant Fass-KissDark Horizons
Gay Kiss Cut From Chinese Version of Alien: CovenantGizmodo

all 12 news articles »

Read more here:

China's Edits To 'Alien: Covenant' Reportedly Censor Out Most Of The Reasons To See The Movie - UPROXX

Salma Hayek is mournfully radiant in the gentle parable ‘Beatriz at Dinner’ – Washington Post

Salma Hayek is virtually unrecognizable in Beatriz at Dinner, a sad-eyed parable in which she plays a massage therapist and healer in Southern California whose car breaks down at the home of a wealthy client, pushing her into an Alice-like plunge through the looking glass of race and class, friendship and professionalism, and liberal earnestness and hypocrisy.

As the movie opens, Hayeks title character can be seen praying in front of a shrine that includes photos of her ancestors and a beloved pet goat, whose untimely demise plays an unlikely role in the day that unfolds. After seeing clients at a clinic for cancer treatment, she makes her way to a house call in Newport Beach, where her client Cathy (Connie Britton) lives in a sprawling McMansion with her husband, Grant (David Warshofsky). When Beatrizs car goes on the blink, Cathy insists she attend the small dinner party theyre throwing to celebrate a recent real estate deal that Grant has struck with a developer named Doug Strutt (John Lithgow) and a young legal eagle named Alex (Jay Duplass).

What ensues is an awkward evening that only gets weirder as Beatriz, emboldened by several glasses of wine, confronts the assembled guests with their unexamined privilege and, when it comes to the aptly named Strutt, predatory pursuit of wealth and comfort. In contrast to the brittle, superficial tribe she has temporarily infiltrated, Beatriz is a hugger, a deep empath and, when aroused, a fierce teller-of-truth-to-power. In a way, shes Wonder Womans modern-day Mexican American cousin, a woman who cant witness injustice or pain without doing something about it, even if its only to raise an anguished cry.

Written by Mike White and directed by Miguel Arteta, Beatriz at Dinner is suffused with the same Bressonlike sense of stoic humanism that has characterized their past work together, including Chuck & Buck and The Good Girl. Here, Arteta styles and photographs Hayek to resemble Maria Falconetti in Carl Theodor Dreyers The Passion of Joan of Arc, her limpid eyes and iconlike features taking on the contours of a holy martyr who only grows more enraptured the less she is understood.

As touching as Hayeks performance is, Beatriz at Dinner too often forsakes nuance for caricature, especially when it comes to Strutt, who emerges as the one person who comprehends and even applauds Beatrizs chutzpah, but who ultimately feels more like a convenient billboard than a fully realized, contradictory character. Similarly, the rest of the dinner guests, who include wives played by Chlo Sevigny and Amy Landecker, never come into focus as individuals. Rather, theyre a well-dressed, indistinct mass of insensitivity and cluelessness. Beatriz at Dinner is a delicate, mournful, mystical little movie about the porous membrane that defines all our bubbles, and how tenuous its surface tension can be when severely tested. Once it pops, comedy or tragedy or maybe clarity are sure to ensue. In Beatriz at Dinner, it turns out to be a little bit of all three.

See the original post here:

Salma Hayek is mournfully radiant in the gentle parable 'Beatriz at Dinner' - Washington Post

Enhancing Life Project links scholars across diverse fields of study – UChicago News

With the advancement of technology and biological breakthroughs, life expectancy for human beings has dramatically increased in the 20thand 21stcenturies. But for researchers taking part in The Enhancing Life Project, the question isnt how long we might live, but how well.

The Enhancing Life Project is a collaboration between the University of Chicago and Ruhr-University Bochum in Germany. Thanks to a $4.6 million grant from the John Templeton Foundation, 35 scholars from diverse academic backgrounds have spent two years researching issues ranging from urban nature to Islam to medicine.

The results of the project will be presented Aug. 4-6 during a public capstone conference at the Gleacher Center.

One of the reasons this project got off the ground is we live in a culture constantly trying to make things better, said William Schweiker, the Edward L. Ryerson Distinguished Service Professor of Theological Ethics and one of the principal investigators of the project. Faster communications, curing disease, there is even a movement called post-humanism meant to escape the limits of human existenceall these forms claim to enhance life, but as a culture we have no clear definition.

Over the course of three two-week summer residency seminars, researchers met to discuss their individual work in order to discover overlap and areas for collaboration. The final conference in August will be a chance to both reflect and look ahead.

Too often the humanities look backwards, Schweiker said. So this project, linking all these disciplines, has asked in what ways does humanist discourse lead to future discoveries.

In addition to keynote lectures and research discussions, those attending the conference will have a chance to have an open dialogue with researchers on topics of public relevance as well as how other disciplines can become involved in enhancing life.

An evening session with graduate students from around the world will look at the future of enhancing life as an academic field of study.

The hope is that the research of The Enhancing Life Project will lay the groundwork forenhancing life studies, providing a framework to scholars throughout the academy to test, analyze and assess what enhances life, said Sara Bigger, associate director of the Enhancing Life Project.

In her project, Lea Schweitz, PhD08, an associate professor of systematic theology and religion and science at the Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago, looked at the ways to revitalize how city dwellers can interact with urban nature.

Im really trying to tell the stories of nature spaces in the city, Schweitz said. The project focuses on case studies, including a repurposed meatpacking plant and an urban prairie preserve, and it culminates in a proposal for an alternate taxonomy of urban space and an outline of a new theology of urban nature.

Aasim Padela, associate professor of medicine and director for the Initiative on Islam and Medicine at the UChicago Pritzker School of Medicine, has used his time with the project to work on creating a new model of discourse between Islamic theology and biomedicine.

Padela said his project has benefited greatly from working alongside those from other fields of study.

The ties that bind me are religious studies, medicine and ethics, Padela said. But the benefit of the project is there have been many different disciplines of scholars coming together to bounce ideas off each other. Its been a fruitful forum for thinking about ways to approach your own subject but also sensitizing you to other fields.

After two years of deep thinking and research, the residents are excited to share their findings during Augusts conference.

Its kind of like a fireworks display, all these projects that have been culminating for the past two years, Schweitz said. Im really excited to see how they have all come together.

Learn more and register for the 2017 capstone conference here.

Original post:

Enhancing Life Project links scholars across diverse fields of study - UChicago News

Salma Hayek is mournfully radiant in the gentle parable Beatriz at Dinner – The Denver Post

Two stars. Rated R. In English and some Spanish with subtitles. 83 minutes.

Salma Hayek is virtually unrecognizable in Beatriz at Dinner, a sad-eyed parable in which she plays a massage therapist and healer in Southern California whose car breaks down at the home of a wealthy client, pushing her into an Alice-like plunge through the looking glass of race and class, friendship and professionalism, and liberal earnestness and hypocrisy.

As the movie opens, Hayeks title character can be seen praying in front of a shrine that includes photos of her ancestors and a beloved pet goat, whose untimely demise plays an unlikely role in the day that unfolds. After seeing clients at a clinic for cancer treatment, she makes her way to a house call in Newport Beach, where her client Cathy (Connie Britton) lives in a sprawling McMansion with her husband, Grant (David Warshofsky). When Beatrizs car goes on the blink, Cathy insists she attend the small dinner party theyre throwing to celebrate a recent real estate deal that Grant has struck with a developer named Doug Strutt (John Lithgow) and a young legal eagle named Alex (Jay Duplass).

What ensues is an awkward evening that only gets weirder as Beatriz, emboldened by several glasses of wine, confronts the assembled guests with their unexamined privilege and, when it comes to the aptly named Strutt, predatory pursuit of wealth and comfort. In contrast to the brittle, superficial tribe she has temporarily infiltrated, Beatriz is a hugger, a deep empath and, when aroused, a fierce teller-of-truth-to-power. In a way, shes Wonder Womans modern-day Mexican-American cousin, a woman who cant witness injustice or pain without doing something about it, even if its only to raise an anguished cry.

Written by Mike White and directed by Miguel Arteta, Beatriz at Dinner is suffused with the same Bressonlike sense of stoic humanism that has characterized their past work together, including Chuck & Buck and The Good Girl. Here, Arteta styles and photographs Hayek to resemble Maria Falconetti in Carl Theodor Dreyers The Passion of Joan of Arc, her limpid eyes and iconlike features taking on the contours of a holy martyr who only grows more enraptured the less she is understood.

As touching as Hayeks performance is, Beatriz at Dinner too often forsakes nuance for caricature, especially when it comes to Strutt, who emerges as the one person who comprehends and even applauds Beatrizs chutzpah, but who ultimately feels more like a convenient billboard than a fully realized, contradictory character. Similarly, the rest of the dinner guests, who include wives played by Chlo Sevigny and Amy Landecker, never come into focus as individuals. Rather, theyre a well-dressed, indistinct mass of insensitivity and cluelessness.

Beatriz at Dinner is a delicate, mournful, mystical little movie about the porous membrane that defines all our bubbles, and how tenuous its surface tension can be when severely tested. Once it pops, comedy or tragedy or maybe clarity are sure to ensue. In Beatriz at Dinner, it turns out to be a little bit of all three.

Ratings Guide: Four stars masterpiece, three stars very good, two stars OK, one star poor, no stars waste of time.

See the rest here:

Salma Hayek is mournfully radiant in the gentle parable Beatriz at Dinner - The Denver Post

Footballer and fiancee face fresh battle over humanist wedding – Yorkshire Post

Model Laura Lacole and footballer Eunan O'Kane are battling to secure official recognition of their humanist wedding.

09:12 Monday 12 June 2017

A COURT ruling granting a Leeds United footballer and his model fiance legal recognition of their looming humanist wedding is set to be appealed.

Laura Lacole and Whites midfielder Eunan OKane mounted a successful challenge against the authorities in Northern Ireland for refusing to recognise their June 22 ceremony in law.

But Fridays decision in Belfast High Court is now to be appealed by Northern Irelands Attorney General John Larkin QC.

Leeds United footballer and glamour model appeal over humanist weddingMs Lacole and Mr OKane launched the legal bid after learning their planned humanist wedding in Ballymenas luxury Galgorm Resort would not be recognised in law. For such recognition, they were told, they would need to have a separate civil ceremony.

The couple took the case against the General Register Office for Northern Ireland and Stormonts Department of Finance.

Mr Larkin also participated in the hearing because it touched on devolved Stormont legislation.

On Friday, Judge Mr Justice Colton quashed the GROs refusal to grant legal recognition, finding such a position breached the couples rights under the European Convention.

Andrew Copson, chief executive of Humanists UK, which is supporting the couples case, said he was disappointed by the appeal.

This is a very disappointing development given the comprehensive nature of the judgment and is deeply upsetting for both Laura and Eunan, who were so happy to have had certainty in relation to their wedding later this month, he said.

Humanism is a non-religious belief system that rejects the concepts of a higher deity or afterlife.

Humanists adhere to a scientific view of the world and believe humans steer their own destiny.

Humanist marriages are already legally recognised in Scotland, but not in England and Wales. They are also recognised in the Republic of Ireland.

Read more...

Leeds United footballer and glamour model appeal over humanist weddingLeeds United: Agent distances Stam from Elland Road jobBygones: When the fiercest of international rivalries left Trevor Cherry with two front teeth missing

{* loginWidget *}

{* traditionalSignIn_emailAddress *} {* traditionalSignIn_password *}

Email Address {* traditionalSignIn_emailAddress *} Password {* traditionalSignIn_password *}

{* traditionalSignIn_emailAddress *} {* traditionalSignIn_password *}

{* traditionalRegistration_firstName *} {* traditionalRegistration_lastName *} {* traditionalRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *} {* traditionalRegistration_displayName *}

{* socialRegistration_firstName *} {* socialRegistration_lastName *} {* socialRegistration_emailAddress *} {* socialRegistration_displayName *}

{* socialRegistration_jpCommsOptIn *}

Registering with Yorkshire Post means you're ok with our terms and conditions.

{* socialRegistration_captcha *}

{* socialRegistration_firstName *} {* socialRegistration_lastName *} {* socialRegistration_emailAddress *} {* socialRegistration_displayName *}

{* socialRegistration_jpCommsOptIn *}

By registering you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of the website.

You're almost there.We've just sent a confirmation email to . Check it out to confirm your registration.

We are unable to send your welcome email at this time. Please try again later by clicking the resend welcome email link from your profile page.

{* traditionalSignIn_emailAddress *}

{* traditionalSignIn_emailAddress *}

{* newpassword *} {* newpasswordConfirm *}

{| foundExistingAccountText |}. Either connect these accounts, or create new one using a different email address.

{| existing_provider |}

{| existing_displayName |}

{| current_emailAddress |}

{| rendered_existing_provider_photo |}

Created at {| existing_createdDate |}

Email is already registered with OtherSite. You'll be able to use the same account on current Site. Alternatively, you can create a new account with another email address.

{* traditionalSignIn_emailAddress *} {* mergePassword *}

Enter your postcode so we can keep you up-to-date with the latest local news and exciting deals.

is already registered with . You will be able to use the same account on . Alternatively, you can create a new account with another email address.

Validating

Email address is required.

We have sent a confirmation email to . Please check your email and click on the link to activate your account.

We are unable to process your request at this time. Please try again later.

Congratulations, you've just sealed the deal! Sign in to your profile now to get started.

That's it, you're all done! Close this window to start browsing the site now or click here to go to your profile

Unfortunately that verification link has expired. To get a new one, just sign in to your profile now and resend the verification email.

Unfortunately that verification link has expired. To get a new one, just resend the verification email by going to your profile page.

Are you sure you want to remove this linked account?

More here:

Footballer and fiancee face fresh battle over humanist wedding - Yorkshire Post

Lionel Rolfe’s Letter to the World – HuffPost

Nevsky Cathedral in Sofia, capital of Bulgaria. Photo by Lionel Rolfe

I am a retired journalist in Los Angeles and book author who wants the world to respond to America under the would-be dictatorship of Donald Trump, a man who is out to destroy this country and the worldall for the sake of Trumps power and money.

It is important to explain that the sudden appearance of fascism presented by Trump was not unexpected. Sinclair Lewis wrote a novel during the Great Depression about a fascist government in the 20s called It Can Happen Here. America has always had to deal with a nativist kind of fascism. Its always been a powerful minority and remains so under Trump in this day and age.

Trump is obviously in bed with the Russian Mafia, and Vladimir Putin who heads up the enterprise is an obvious villain.

But a few things must be said.

In 2002, the Guardian ran a piece by Duncan Campbell about me and Aldous and Laura Huxley. The author of Brave New World and Ape & Essence ended his career with Island, Campbell said, published just before Huxley died in November 1963 on the same day President Kennedy was assassinated.

Now Huxleys days in California are recalled in a new book, Campbell said. The book is Literary LA, by Lionel Rolfe, son of the pianist Yalta Menuhin and nephew of Yehudi, Campbell wrote. An LA-based journalist and writer, Rolfe has compiled an entertaining collection on writers including Jack London, Theodore Dreiser, Malcolm Lowry, Charles Bukowski and Huxley. Rolfe, author of Fat Man On The Left, raconteur and journalist, met Huxley shortly before the writers death and recalls that he had said that he stayed in LA because of inertia and apathy. Rolfe wrote, too, about Huxleys second marriage to Laura Archera, an Italian violinist, film editor and therapist, and how his life with her saw him veer in more and more mystical directions.'

There is a perplex here in Huxleys story. He became more of a mystic because of his depression over the atomic bomb which he wrote about in Ape & Essence. The scion from a great scientific family was also torn over the threats to his humanism. His embrace of mysticism did not deny his essential humanism.

But Trump is something else again. Hes out to destroy humanism. He is a fascist.

My mother was also a mystic, loving religious impulses of all kinds, but she wanted to teach me Russian in the McCarthy period in America.

That was in the 1950s in Los Angeles and McCarthyism was strong during my years in elementary school. This, like today, was a period of fascism in American history and I resisted my mothers impulses to culturally identify with Russia simply because I was scared. Republicans always made me feel as if I lived in a land of thugs.

My mother was named after Yaltah in the Crimea, where her mother lived. She loved Russian culture and history, and thought all children should learn it. My mother was named after Yaltah in the Crimea, where her mother lived. My mother obviously believed in humanism and education.

In the collapse of the Soviet Union, it was suggested that portions of Greater Russia should go their own way. It was like European countries telling America that Texas would have a right to become its own country. As much as Id like Texas to go away politically, that move would piss me offespecially if dictated by other countries.

As horrible as Putin and Trump are, it should also be said that Ukraine was always part of Russia. Russias great hero was Alexander Nevsky, the prince of Kiev in the 12th century. I understood the fusillade of events when I photographed Alexander Nevsky Cathedral in Sofia, the capital of Bulgaria.

The most terrifying moment in this historical drama is whatever it was that drove Trump to fascism. His early love of Mussolini doesnt explain the whole thing. Trump is Americas rabid religious drive seeking to destroy the world that does not live up to its image. Trump may or may not believe that but he is no great intellectual so it probably doesnt matter. But to the rest of us, in America and elsewhere, it is sad throwing away everything good thats been produced in this country, from science to writing to music.

If you deny the existence of truth like the religious monsters now unfurling themselves on the world, understand that knowledge is realvery real. Even for Huxley.

Can Trump defeat historys march toward a better world. America has contributed mightily to the progressive forces behind the American story which have contributed to the narrative of the rest of the worldwith bad and good things. We are human, of course. To be human, you have to struggle. You especially have to struggle in the face of adversity like that of Trump. It is our only hopehere and in other places in the world.

Lionel Rolfes books are available from Amazon.com.

Start your workday the right way with the news that matters most.

Read this article:

Lionel Rolfe's Letter to the World - HuffPost

Leeds United footballer and model’s humanist wedding ruling to be appealed – Yorkshire Evening Post

Model Laura Lacole and Leeds United's Eunan O'Kane outside the High Court in Belfast. PIC: PA

09:04 Saturday 10 June 2017

A court ruling granting a Leeds United footballer and his model fiancee legal recognition of their looming humanist wedding is set to be appealed.

Laura Lacole and Whites midfielder Eunan OKane mounted a successful challenge against the authorities in Northern Ireland for refusing to recognise their June 22 ceremony in law.

But Fridays decision in Belfast High Court is now to be appealed by Northern Irelands Attorney General John Larkin QC.

Ms Lacole and Mr OKane launched the legal bid after learning their planned humanist wedding in Ballymenas luxury Galgorm Resort would not be recognised in law. For such recognition, they were told, they would need to have a separate civil ceremony.

The couple took the case against the General Register Office for Northern Ireland and Stormonts Department of Finance.

Mr Larkin also participated in the hearing because it touched on devolved Stormont legislation.

On Friday, Judge Mr Justice Colton quashed the GROs refusal to grant legal recognition, finding such a position breached the couples rights under the European Convention.

Andrew Copson, Chief Executive of Humanists UK, which is supporting the couples case, said his was disappointed by the appeal.

This is a very disappointing development given the comprehensive nature of the judgment and is deeply upsetting for both Laura and Eunan, who were so happy to have had certainty in relation to their wedding later this month, he said.

Humanism is a non-religious belief system that rejects the concepts of a higher deity or afterlife.

Humanists adhere to a scientific view of the world and believe humans steer their own destiny.

Humanist marriages are already legally recognised in Scotland, but not in England and Wales. They are also recognised in the Republic of Ireland.

{* loginWidget *}

{* traditionalSignIn_emailAddress *} {* traditionalSignIn_password *}

Email Address {* traditionalSignIn_emailAddress *} Password {* traditionalSignIn_password *}

{* traditionalSignIn_emailAddress *} {* traditionalSignIn_password *}

{* traditionalRegistration_firstName *} {* traditionalRegistration_lastName *} {* traditionalRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *} {* traditionalRegistration_displayName *}

{* socialRegistration_firstName *} {* socialRegistration_lastName *} {* socialRegistration_emailAddress *} {* socialRegistration_displayName *}

{* socialRegistration_jpCommsOptIn *}

Registering with Yorkshire Evening Post means you're ok with our terms and conditions.

{* socialRegistration_captcha *}

{* socialRegistration_firstName *} {* socialRegistration_lastName *} {* socialRegistration_emailAddress *} {* socialRegistration_displayName *}

{* socialRegistration_jpCommsOptIn *}

By registering you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of the website.

You're almost there.We've just sent a confirmation email to . Check it out to confirm your registration.

We are unable to send your welcome email at this time. Please try again later by clicking the resend welcome email link from your profile page.

{* traditionalSignIn_emailAddress *}

{* traditionalSignIn_emailAddress *}

{* newpassword *} {* newpasswordConfirm *}

{| foundExistingAccountText |}. Either connect these accounts, or create new one using a different email address.

{| existing_provider |}

{| existing_displayName |}

{| current_emailAddress |}

{| rendered_existing_provider_photo |}

Created at {| existing_createdDate |}

Email is already registered with OtherSite. You'll be able to use the same account on current Site. Alternatively, you can create a new account with another email address.

{* traditionalSignIn_emailAddress *} {* mergePassword *}

Enter your postcode so we can keep you up-to-date with the latest local news and exciting deals.

is already registered with . You will be able to use the same account on . Alternatively, you can create a new account with another email address.

Validating

Email address is required.

We have sent a confirmation email to . Please check your email and click on the link to activate your account.

We are unable to process your request at this time. Please try again later.

Congratulations, you've just sealed the deal! Sign in to your profile now to get started.

That's it, you're all done! Close this window to start browsing the site now or click here to go to your profile

Unfortunately that verification link has expired. To get a new one, just sign in to your profile now and resend the verification email.

Unfortunately that verification link has expired. To get a new one, just resend the verification email by going to your profile page.

Are you sure you want to remove this linked account?

Read this article:

Leeds United footballer and model's humanist wedding ruling to be appealed - Yorkshire Evening Post

Epigenetic Television: The Penetrating Love of Orphan Black – lareviewofbooks

JUNE 9, 2017

DURING THE FIFTH and final season of Orphan Black (premiering June 10, 2017), I will offer regular responses to the seriess episodes via the LARB blog, BLARB. These will not be episode recaps or reviews; these short essays will assume that readers have already been viewers and will examine the show for some of its subtler suggestions about sexuality and gender, intertextuality and genre, and science and posthumanism. The following excerpt from Editing the Soul: Science and Fiction in the Genome Age (Penn State University Press, October 2017) emphasizes scenes from season two and doubles as a preface to the kinds of questions I anticipate exploring during season five, which I lay out further at the end of the piece.

At its best, Orphan Black is one of the most thorough explications of the epigenetic tension between genes and environment ever to appear on screen or page. Beyond the quality of its writing, acting, and post-production, the foundation of the shows success is its alignment of feminist, queer, and even post-secular critiques against a too-easy biotechnological corporatism. At the same time, it maintains considerable open-mindedness about the positive potential of genetic research and new medical technologies. Embodying an intertextual consciousness that has become a predominant trait of genetic fiction, this TV serial builds not only on major works by Mary Shelley, H. G. Wells, and Aldous Huxley, but also lesser-known, more recent novels like Pamela Sargents Cloned Lives (1976). In the process, it demonstrates how genetic influence is both very real and yet only part of what shapes human destinies. Perhaps most strikingly, it asks how love may be described by biology but still exceed it, suggesting that this prospect depends on defying religious fundamentalisms and global capitalisms mutual complicity in human objectification.

The shows alternate-history premise is that a combination of US corporate and government interests began secret experimentation with reproductive human cloning soon after the 1975 Asilomar Conference on Recombinant DNA, long before Dolly the sheeps birth announcement in 1997 and just as bioethicists, government watchdogs, and most scientists were beginning to think it possible. The resulting children are now adults, but not all are aware of their origins. In the first two seasons, viewers are invited to identify with three clones in particular: Sarah, initially a negligent mother prone to disappear for a year at a time and to make ends meet selling drugs, a habit patiently resisted by Felix, her gay stepbrother; Alison, an obsessively organized suburban soccer mom with two adopted children and a chubby, always-snooping husband, Donnie; and Cosima, whose doctoral work in genetics allows her a unique perspective on the activities of the shows Dyad Institute, even as her dreadlocks and lesbian self-discovery land her in a relationship with a woman revealed to be one of its top scientists, Delphine. Then there is Helena, the Ukrainian avenging angel hell-bent on murdering her sestras. Helena has been brainwashed by a religious cult, the Proletheans, that raised her to believe her clone sisters are the demonic copies of her original source material, and much of the early plot turns on her decisions about whom to believe. As it turns out, Alison and Cosima are aware of the threat, having already been in contact with other clones like Beth Childs, the police detective whose suicide Sarah witnesses in the pilots opening scene and whose identity she assumes in an attempt to access the womans bank account. To say that complications ensue vastly understates Orphan Blacks intricacies, and only determined viewers can stay cognizant that all of these characters are played by a single shape-shifting actress, Tatiana Maslany. This is to say nothing of the male clones who emerge in the shows third season or of additional developments in seasons four and five.

Season two is especially evocative in its exploration of the relationships between literal and figurative children and parents, the latter of whom sometimes suffer from divine pretensions. I examine it here as a microcosm of the entire shows interest in the dialogue between creators and creatures, a 21st-century expansion on the relationships between Frankenstein and his monster and between Moreau and the Beast Folk. One of two highly paternalistic figures in the shows first two seasons, Dr. Leekie is a corporate geneticist whose dystopian role is intimated by his first name, Aldous. This technoenthusiast has developed his own sense of morality, and his TED Talkstyle sales pitches are steeped in transcendent rhetoric. In season one, he recruits Cosima to a lab at the Dyad Institute, at first condescending to her as a junior researcher, but soon realizing that she is not intimidated by his fame and that her dissertation on the epigenetic influence on clone cells has prepared her to grasp the significance of his efforts toward patenting transgenic embryonic stem cells, an allusion to Huxleys novel and its hybrid-species experiments. It is not coincidental that Cosima first encounters Leekie as he is promoting Neolution, a cult-like posthumanist movement. Offering his listeners the possibility of replacing their current visual ability with infrared, x-ray, and ultraviolet capacities, he enthuses, Plato would have thought we were gods. In season two, he waxes similarly poetic before potential investors at a fundraising party for Dyad: To combine is to create; to engineer, divine, he declaims. This is humanity pursuing divinity not with humility but via high-tech mimicry, a pulse-pounding ideology that denies the inevitability of death and views genetics and other cutting-edge sciences as tools for elevating the species into a mystical invulnerability.

If Leekies language exploits religious rhetoric for technocapitalist purposes, the shows other major cult uses biotechnology to serve religious ends. The Proletheans are a group of seemingly low-tech traditionalists living on what appears to be a self-sustaining communal farm. However, their exceedingly modest dress code and decorum mask a heavy investment in the tools of artificial insemination and genetic modification. As Henrik Johanssen explains of the effort to use his sperm, Helenas eggs, and as many brood mare women as possible to expand his clan, Mans work is Gods work, as long as you do it in his name. His public prayer is equally revealing; he informs God, We are your instruments in the war for creation. But Johanssen does not just rely on apocalyptic biblical allusions and militant, paternalistic rhetoric. Beyond the extremist stereotype, he also possesses some attractive characteristics. Like Leekie, Johanssen is awed by genetic biology, embracing its findings as revelations rather than threats to his faith, even if he is similarly overconfident of his ability to control life. Played by Peter Outerbridge, the same actor who helped create the more sympathetic researcher David Sandstrom in another Canadian television show about genetics, ReGenesis, this sexist is blind in his convictions. Yet we also see him leading a childrens story time with genuine charm, amusingly adapting Shelleys novel to create the same happy ending he expects to foster in real life. His creation pursued him with a terrible vengeance, because the doctor had never shown his creation any love, Johanssen tells his enrapt young audience. And so when they finally came face to face, they sat down, and they had a great big bowl of iceberg cream!

Unfortunately for the storyteller, his own ending cannot be sugarcoated, and ultimately, the audience is not sorry. Johanssen never learns one of Orphan Blacks (and much genetic fictions) foundational lessons: love is antithetical to use. The unquestioning patriarchy of Prolethean culture may allow him effectively to take Helena as a second wife, remove her eggs, inseminate them, and then place the embryos in her womb and in that of his daughter; however, it is no coincidence that the show portrays him adapting the same tools to impregnate women as he does cattle they are no less experimental beasts than the humanized animals in Wellss novel. Appropriately, when Helena finally escapes her bedroom prison and overcomes Johanssen (with his daughters help), he finds himself strapped into the same stirrups he used to access his patients wombs. Tied in place, he panics as he senses the clones intentions. Marshaling the farm husbandry implements he had used on her, Helena gleefully asks how far his interest in human-animal hybridity goes: Would you like horse baby? Cow baby? The last we hear of the Prolethean leader is a terrified scream as she shoves the lengthy insemination device through the upper reaches of his anal canal. Helenas triumph is as appalling as it is just, and it represents the rawest form of Orphan Blacks feminist rejection of the patriarchal technoreligious manipulation that Wells imagined a century earlier.

Beyond its shock value, two further elements of this scene deserve attention. First, however brutal Helenas actions, they are motivated by a defense of her babies, as she calls them. While less conscious of social expectations than the other female clones, Helena embodies a childlike innocence that is matched only by her fierce instinct to protect the vulnerable. At the end of the scene featuring Johanssens Frankenstein adaptation, for instance, she observes one of the Prolethean women disciplining a distracted child with needless cruelty. Pinioning her against a wall, Helena informs the woman that she will be gutted like a fish if she does something similar again. Second, the phallic shape of Helenas vengeance against Henrik is not just a clever device for transfixing the audience. By utilizing his own artificial insemination stick, she turns his penetrative power back upon him, creating the most painful of ouroboros images. There is nothing pretty about the outcome, but its reversal of mens violence against women is riveting. A woman raised by a cult to believe that she and her sisters are abominations a commonly decontextualized biblical translation routinely leveled at LGBTQ individuals and sprinkled across the series, starting with the fourth episode of season one rejects their ideology, turns their violence upon them, and departs to defend her true family. It is no mistake that the scenes denouement lingers on Helenas face as she looks back on the burning Prolethean farmhouse. Like Frankensteins creature departing the burning cottage where he had learned to read but was ultimately rejected, Helena is thoroughly disillusioned with her early mentors.

This is far from the only moment in which Orphan Black redeploys a phallic signifier in order to illustrate the non-utilitarian nature of authentic love and its sexual expression. Not all of these scenes are so serious: when Alisons husband proves impotent with a jackhammer, for instance, the results are comical. Failing to break the concrete in their garage under which they will (repeatedly) bury the accidentally murdered Leekie, Donnie hands her the gas-powered battering ram, scoffing at the notion that she might do better. Alison breaks through the surface immediately and turns to him with a smirk, and their eventual success in completing the unconventional interment proves an aphrodisiac. Orphan Blacks references to phallic power often anticipate violence, though. One of the most emotionally intense sequences in the shows history comes in season twos fourth episode when Sarah slips into the condo of Dyads new leader, her clone sister Rachel, who was raised by the corporation after the disappearance of her early childhood parents, Ethan and Susan Duncan. Eventually caught by one of Dyads hired guns, Sarah is forced into an all-glass shower enclosure and handcuffed to the overhead fixture. After sharpening his razor, the henchman begins an excruciatingly slow process of cutting her throat. The shows avenging angel answers her prayers, however: Helena bangs into the apartment, still wearing the exceedingly modest wedding dress supplied by the Proletheans, and promptly dispatches Rachels thug. But this is hardly good news to Sarah, as she now shrinks from what she fears will be a new assailant, given that she had shot Helena the last time they met. The camera lingers over Helenas hip-high, upturned knife blade as she approaches, but instead of finishing the male torturers violence, Helena shocks her sister into convulsive tears, falling onto Sarahs breast like an exhausted child seeking a mothers comfort. As Jill Lepore noted well before the climactic fight scenes at the end of season four, the shows go-to wound is the puncture: the act of penetration. That pattern makes its embraces all the more poignant.

This scene is so moving not just because of the way Sarah escapes the razor wielded by Rachels minion, but also because Helena declines to turn the knife on her sister. If the point were not sharp enough, it is repeated in the next episode when Sarah convinces Helena to put down a sniper rifle rather than giving Rachel what she too might seem to deserve. Looking through the glass wall of an adjacent skyscraper, Sarah and Helena see their lingerie-clad sister straddling Paul Dierden, who replaces the henchman dispatched by Helena in the previous episode. Significantly, he is not allowed to enjoy the sexual services he provides, earning a slap when he reaches for Rachel. The show reverses but also reaches beyond a form of sexual objectification usually applied to women: Rachel commands him not to kiss her, to be still as she pleasures herself, but remains entirely unaware that Helenas crosshairs rest on her skull. Sarah steps into her sisters line of sight, determined not to let Helena shoot, and the snipers initial response again demonstrates Orphan Blacks stress on loves distinction from use. You only want to use me, Helena accuses Sarah. But her sestra proves convincing, seemingly discovering the truth of her words even as she utters them: No, thats not true. You saved my life. Youre my sister. Helena, I thought I killed you. I couldnt tell anybody what I lost. Reenacting the shower scene of the previous episode, Helena surrenders a different pointed weapon, hoping once again what experience has taught her to doubt that love might not be delusory. There is nothing weak, passive, or sentimental about this choice. On the contrary, Orphan Black reaches beyond the thrillers stereotypical boundaries to demonstrate that an even greater power can imbue acts of mercy than of violence.

Taken together, scenes like these represent Orphan Blacks feminist and often queerly inflected rejection of the corporate, utilitarian power driving a simplistic genetic determinism, whether it is being used to fuel religious fundamentalism or biological reductionism. It is not enough for Helena merely to take revenge, whether on Sarah or Rachel in these scenes or on Siobhan in season three: what she wants is genuine acceptance. Only hope in the possibility of loving and being loved is capable of making a trained killer trust a woman who had previously stabbed and shot her, and it is one of many places in which the show demonstrates a sober hopefulness about individual agency, yet without disregarding biological influence. Not only does Helena grow immensely in her capacity to believe in others though not without serious relapses but Sarah becomes far more responsible, Alison far less self-centered, and Cosima far more willing to accept others help. In these ways, Orphan Black insists that environment not only can make radically different characters of virtually the same genetic material, but also that individuals can learn to make profoundly different choices from those to which they are predisposed, even when a corporation claims ownership of their DNA.

In the months since composing Editing the Soul, I have enjoyed conversations with several of Orphan Blacks creators, taught the first season as a course text, and organized several conference panels on the show. These discussions have heightened my interest in its final season and especially the following questions, which I expect to pursue in subsequent articles in this LARB series:

Orphan Blacksfinal season begins Saturday, June 10,at 10/9c on BBC AMERICA.

Everett Hamner is an associate professor of English at Western Illinois University and the author of Editing the Soul: Science and Fiction in the Genome Age (Penn State University Press, AnthropoScene series, forthcoming October 2017).

Read this article:

Epigenetic Television: The Penetrating Love of Orphan Black - lareviewofbooks

Can We Do Without Trust? – ABC Online

Each week on The Minefield, we walk a fine line between reflecting on certain significant events that have captured public attention, and delving more deeply into the often concealed ethical principles at work. Its a tension we feel constantly: wanting to be responsive, but not wanting the immediacy and sheer speed of current affairs to prevent genuine moral reflection.

Well, the discipline and austerity bound up with the holy month of Ramadan presents us with an irresistible opportunity to focus our minds intently, not just on this or that moral problem, but on some of the more systemic vices that hold us all in their grip. So throughout the month of June, were going to engage in a bit of cultural diagnosis of what we deem to be the fundamental problems that afflict our common life problems that are all the more pernicious because theyre rarely recognised as such.

And for us, they dont come any more fundamental than the problem of pervasive mistrust. As the philosopher Bernard Williams put it, trust at its most basic level is the willingness of one party to rely on another to act in certain ways. But because the consequences of being duped are now regarded as so much more damaging than any benefits that might accrue from mutual reliance, we seem to have decided as an entire culture that its better not to trust at all. Or, as the case may be, to delegate the function of trust to impersonal mechanisms from regulation to welfare services.

And yet, as the great 18th-century Italian economist and philosopher Antonio Genovesi argued against the more austere claims of his contemporary, Adam Smith human sociality and just exchange rely on a certain public faith (res publica): by which he meant our shared capacity to entrust ourselves to the care of others, and in turn to prove trustworthy. Without such faith, the social bond itself unravels.

So the question could not be more stark: unless we cultivate the capacity to trust, to rely on others for what is most precious to our common life, are we condemning ourselves to morally emaciated existences defined by fear, envy and mutual disdain?

See the original post:

Can We Do Without Trust? - ABC Online

A Best-Selling Israeli Philosopher Examines His Country’s Inner Conflict – New York Times


New York Times
A Best-Selling Israeli Philosopher Examines His Country's Inner Conflict
New York Times
When he speaks of liberalism and humanism, he is accused of being a leftist. So he was hoping his new book, Catch 67, which deals with the Israelis' inner struggle over their conflict with the Palestinians, .... Naftali Bennett, the education ...

and more »

More here:

A Best-Selling Israeli Philosopher Examines His Country's Inner Conflict - New York Times

Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis: Stefan Herbrechter …

}vos; $-+vk,YV,9i$7sV;yy}y*$f%(DX BP(l}ef< m}e]3E 7.#fU;-^o!dWYvw*ROmEkSo]Q/VuaUW"Ujn_1gfI5]o{xkncG9^qHml10 m+o[b`9f{vlsL`]YM;b~rMC 9QdG,]g""d{Q' Glpms-kAl>Z}Ch/k#&V5}3H9YQ L*la#"(Yam0 ZPm&A6z%FC?"DJql~(6Q[4 O~X~a>}gkpe{| gql_@F,^Cq.HRf?0mWIPxD( pc!v3wW{'ko'9{GWZd&/Vq%? Z$v4q^=='ow^:^<:=~{t],YbQ%GAH/aGyXOjx]=>?]j707?OeoAcC{~ZFMpXSLa1x=A,QP8#&B~"_l +t0]GiIA{sLJ L0Qc8vOx&~;aeP?l{=@A' *vH-1$Jl,sT1" &"H"H0Jo0YFb +kC]PlX&?:X+ zl&204Hz= -w!(:%u367@Z]]lO>cqQ*NcGH{k5AsQh*Yhm,PfeV^Hj~17j&U6u=ZQfzV %E-D+M]M'6jjjjzWI,hkW'2!Z?)9'KHE-Ml`u0]61}#r<8*;> |gA>0d;:kK)/n1og>;dzP<)skT4`z_6;BvPWf |Av!!fqC1RrJ $fh68."eE1}'OCY*6eKtxFi}Axy9[{O-rs9'b;<&%SDuxH/%mz9}zPhTm'FAZ<, v/VC'<[;W"J>H05N/ER*D?z!/ c7tk8F6;Mn!6M36,/_UAH^P&gmn{AMR%[lk&g?t(E!qGl fMJAX).[JO> Pcef0X/eVC2#B_M$6|r0R%; e iI:zgV,f4mCz4f[&SWZnQU.ZA:JL3q& -T(f%MVHzJrnM3UZmx4KkU8o!ie>]0"mU94KlRIN&j}?P 6g)ZBWX}w} ' qQ|Q,Q"_T:X-H&wvu&M Jb>|NF [ATdN[q3nVM*tj{rOSXA Q7T_rSs @MCX tUQ 1!V'c$R'K "K*rI XcKd-7@@T0}*6q82m#1K][.AX5:)<[6MAtv@2"f?g yauBuUotd[fT,b&!l[ vOm9._dZzqET+Ds&V27MVjtTuAF&-V@ EK!*`:ny+Q6V+? 7 w.AP)d?*.Ty%@"X9E4i=dkNxB8q ^j8AUn.90 ",?Lj-WediP`LNXkSmuaEw#s[=#8"uZ#nr($JVmT]-5~tR#zSAd3{98h7Ag>ny^Wt:?-v{BO>5R;R*7z%Hc?9{J>+|k7A| ]vLa;EO.4|y? &F,OS|J"1=|V48XtWwI)- ~]Z)6>Q'[8p)n[S5Ec4vH*9wKweG@?g?Vtd^; Gq'!(evFi _F&5zH1Lc/@#GY^[(T pw$>gr4IvF.j& L'ST|`w ;7zpIM#Bi?K3dyd%r ]JA ;EnIfy=4a[G%?c:0hna!J(#2BLWJ$@#J;WO((T;bfQ)U$3JlqG49%gn _dc5=fvGk>=w6 w_>S 86GYlX2g~.FBc#$2[ w>^2cq3}vn" ;6UPWy.Es}yN]'>LC]UL}i&Q Ef7&s,O ;sHW!<;zPac2z 'twB0M^woe08^ FI )LwT5=z$$U Rn!^k(URw"M0r/(?qn=**lOteZWAavJ/Sa^HJ>8-6-ae%~}[H=e,*Pc=Zm@3M67PWbiN~A9=Dh: ~o78J}/91{Ut*n0m[j_dw>z;V!}0NPL{X.{-;p*_~cy_/_8*z;vQ8B%^xx o$&7ZK*Q9lx?aQXpI=C=4*5j1F1x>H9O;W/ 7Ee5*#P}]5tkTF}O~&TVgpxG$<*+bc{&TU^*`_x'/9'/^K1w'O 'ajo;-Z y=Y%'V[}rGx^`@/Bj5.#`HmF"y`s7IY;[VSqv.`MCiejwG:+a!#MkIQf]Bv{;v,SGxE a16A.QL255?|Sm}c:`}Be Ml`j}2$Tv/la0su]zS:SVN1>_PfC1*(b_ f,SG7Em|G B1;1zM$nS'{g0>tLo,t8(<=4#zP[18"5g,{0z?o?stx,&z1-I2M*n/Vzgt: '!{S+?1*`f3?CbG`<]^Q!{QbG?2 wr#4P;FO =|-.k{U.t}~^ AQ]n@"j-of?5%iX Uy&ujH}k o(=Z#-;[PdQ<8^M[X%lL'r ]=D{cW voZAg~m^!Ht~9Pz*m!"2 S%@[.Xv`I6m> EN$1R+9~cpX0;b-l( Zxq%_B;G~&<3TeE?@);>d0w8S*j8J0Y,P:eOBESgG(|q.K:f(CCt58-D7z`@L-FL&kt6 smyXX_3h%VW7sO`)R`3pJexuD{$ FGH^4 _=I`p96xW 0 (U90[G!qc="qZyX}'0*$TJ0?B.-|_'f0q-Mfc7ZQ6dD94;dQJ)~(Cuz!e+x6@W^Z$S`BPQYRF|mH! 3Rlo_M6i"Mbb; !N #= ~ 5:a{~5w|$ [6Pca72nCl=0o5,/tnXgR_q]%*DgCi:b";GB4"n[b4rH(y!LajD(M;4H^M0q_ Z(J)^p-5fp"*[D!#2 P9aH,EZq -Ln }phkm01CckrzzK11yNj?DGsbysN|9fb =/] poBX7f[l]T'=l -D0eapipc"s%u r1V.|+-y5N- IVkCQrs&}cOTbM/tpeE3%p!rwfgEcwlw%lk15)Ocl>v%mFE" 3z^4| Q'>F$l1zO"i>fs8*[44[846Htpp@yAF 2#g_x"t=wkJh)R.X`AX(.JDaHE8D.rJ6".RfFrLJR;ib'<_RQDr{qaj 9~W*-'PCRQmjA;Y.O*eSY-`od ;tJ#' Q-(4E'T@./1rBXc. Q-U-0-$7L.Sdy`KzT-'1% X F :T$$>DcE( }3x`J} tE+I}'hJ'

Go here to see the original:

Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis: Stefan Herbrechter ...

How a Hard-Luck Horse and His Jamaican Trucker Owner Became Million-Dollar Champs – Narratively

Its the waning moments of my fourth session with a new therapist. Im holding back and she knows it. My entire body feels tense, not ideal for the setting. I try to relax, but the plush leather couch crumples under me when I shift, making the movements extraordinary. Ive barely looked into my therapists blue eyes at all, and yet I think the hour has gone very well. Of course it has. On the surface, when the patient has been highly selective of the discussion topics, therapy always resembles a friendly get-together.

Well, my therapist, Lori, says, the millisecond after I become certain our time is up and I might be in the clear. I dont think I should let you go until weve at least touched on what was put out there at the end of last weeks session.

I so supremely wanted this not to come up. My eyelids tighten, my mouth puckers to the left, and my head tilts, as though Im asking her to clarify.

When you said youre attracted to me, she continues.

Oh, yeah, I say. That.

Back in session three Lori was trying to build my self-esteem, the lack of which is one of the reasons Im in treatment. Within the confines of my family, Ive always been the biggest target of ridicule. We all throw verbal darts around as though were engaged in a massive, drunken tournament at a bar, but the most poisonous ones seem to hit me the most often, admittedly somewhat a consequence of my own sensitivity. Ive been told it was historically all part of an effort to toughen me up, but instead I was filled with towering doubts about my own worth. And since 2012, when I gave up a stable, tenured teaching career for the wildly inconsistent life of a freelance writer, Ive had great difficulty trusting my own instincts and capabilities. I told Lori that I wish I was better at dealing with lifes daily struggles instead of constantly wondering if Ill be able to wade through the thick.

She quickly and convincingly pointed out that I work rather hard and am, ultimately, paying my bills on time, that I have friends, an appreciation for arts and culture, and so on. In short, I am, in fact, strong, responsible and pretty good at life.

Then Lori heightened the discussion a bit. I also feel that it is your sensitivity that makes you a great catch out there in the dating world, she said, to which I involuntarily smiled, blushed and quickly buried my chin in my chest. I was too insecure and too single to handle such a compliment from a beautiful woman.

Why are you reacting that way? Lori asked.

I shrugged my shoulders, only half looking up.

Is it because youre attracted to me?

I laughed a little, uncomfortably. How did you know?

She gently explained she could tell the day I walked into her office for the first time, after I flashed a bright smile and casually asked where she was from.

Now, a week after dropping that bomb, Lori asks, So, why havent we talked about it?

I was hoping to avoid it, I suppose. I tell her the whole notion of having the hots for a therapist is such a sizable clich that I was embarrassed to admit it. For Christs sake, I say, throwing my hands up, Tony Soprano even fell in love with his therapist.

Lori snorts, rolls her eyes. I knew you were going to say that.

I smile, shake my head and look around the room, denying acceptance of my own ridiculous reality.

Its OK, Lori says, grinning. We can talk about this in here.

I look again at her stark blue eyes, prevalent under dark brown bangs, the rest of her hair reaching the top of her chest, which is hugged nicely by a fitted white tee under an open button-down. She jogs often, Id come to find out, which explains her petite figure and ability to probably pull off just about any outfit of her choosing.

I still cant speak, so she takes over.

Do you think youre the first client thats been attracted to their therapist? she asks rhetorically. Ive had other clients openly discuss their feelings, even their sexual fantasies involving me.

What? I cackle, beginning to feel as though Ive moseyed onto the set of a porno.

Its true, she says, acknowledging her desk. Whats yours? Do you bend me over and take me from behind?

Nailed it.

If thats what youre thinking, its OK, she goes on, earnestly, explaining that shes discussed sexual scenarios with her clients before so as to normalize the behavior and not have them feel their own thoughts are unnatural. By showing the patient a level of acceptance, she hopes to facilitate a more comfortable atmosphere for the work her painfully accurate pseudonym for psychotherapy.

I take a second to let the red flow out of my face, and ponder what she said. Im a little unsure about this whole technique, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense. So I go home, incredibly turned on and completely unashamed.

* * *

One of the great breakthroughs Ive had in the thirteen months since I began seeing Lori (who agreed to participate in this article, but requested that her full name not be published) is a new ability to accept the existence of dualities in life. For instance, Ive always had a tremendous sense of pride that, if it doesnt straddle the line of arrogance, certainly dives into that hemisphere from time to time. Im great at seeing flaws in others and propping myself up above them by smugly observing my character strengths. Ive never liked that about myself, but the harder concept to grasp is the fact that I can be so egotistical while also stricken with such vast quantities of insecurity.

In treatment I came to realize that all people have contradictions to their personalities. Theres the insanely smart guy who cant remotely begin to navigate a common social situation, the charitable girl who devotes all her time to helping strangers, but wont confront issues in her own personal relationships. In my case, my extreme sensitivity can make me feel fabulous about the aspects of myself that I somehow know are good (my artistic tastes) and cause deep hatred of those traits I happen to loathe (the thirty pounds I could stand to lose).

My next session with Lori is productive. We speak about relationships Ive formed with friends and lovers, and how my family may have informed those interactions. One constant is that I put crudely high expectations on others, mirroring those thrown upon me as a kid. Im angered when people dont meet those expectations, and absolutely devastated when I dont reach them. Lori points out that it must be exhausting trying to be so perfect all the time. I am much more comfortable than I was the week prior, and can feel myself being more candid. Im relieved that the whole being-attracted-to-my-therapist thing doesnt come up.

Then, a week later, Lori mentions it, and I become tense again.

I thought Id be able to move past it, I say, adding, We aired it out, and its fine.

As definitive as Im trying to sound, Lori is just as defiant.

Im glad you feel that way, she begins, but I think you owe yourself some kudos. This kind of therapy, she shares, isnt something just anyone can take on. Such honest discussion doesnt simply happen, it takes tremendous guts, and Lori can see that I am dealing with it relatively well, so I should praise my own efforts.

Shit, we both should be proud of ourselves, she says. Its not easy on the therapist either, you know.

Why not?

Because talking openly about sex is risky at any time, much less with a client. She explains that therapists are warned any semblance of intimacy can be easily misconstrued. We learn in our training to not personally disclose, for example, she says, but adds that, occasionally, transparency can be helpful.

Still, with you, she continues, until I raised the question, I didnt know for sure that you would go with it; for all I knew youd run out of here and never come back to risk being so uncomfortable again.

Shes building my confidence more, and Im learning that I play a much bigger role in how my life is conducted than I often realize. My treatment wouldnt be happening if I werent enabling it.

Then she says, And dont think its not nice for me to hear that a guy like you thinks Im beautiful.

Crippled by the eroticism of the moment, and combined with the prevailing notion that no woman this stunning could ever be romantically interested in me, I flounder through words that resemble, Waitwhat?

If we were somehow at a bar together, and you came over and talked to me, she says, then flips her palms up innocently, who knows?

I laugh again and tell her thered be almost no chance of me approaching her because Id never feel like I had a shot in hell.

Well, thats not the circumstances were in, she says. But you might. Who knows?

Im confused Is she really attracted to me or is this some psychotherapeutic ruse? Im frustrated I told her I didnt really want to talk about it. Shouldnt she be more sensitive to my wants here? Im angry Is she getting an ego boost out of this? Most of all, I dont know what the next step is Am I about to experience the hottest thing thats ever happened to a straight male since the vagina was invented?

There were two ways to find out:

1) Discontinue the therapy, wait for her outside her office every day, follow her to a hypothetical happy hour and ask her out, or

2) Keep going to therapy.

* * *

A week later, Im physically in the meeting room with Lori, but mentally I havent left the recesses of my mind.

Where are you today? she asks, probably noticing my eyes roving around the room.

I dont know.

Are you still grappling with the sexual tension between us?

Here we go again.

Yes, I say, with a bit of an edge in my voice, and I dont know what to do about it.

Lori, ever intently, peers into my eyes, wrinkles her mouth and slightly shakes her head.

Do you want to have sex with me? she asks.

We both know the answer to that question. All I can do is stare back.

Lets have sex, she announces. Right here, right now.

What? I respond, flustered.

Lets go! she says a little louder, opening up her arms and looking around as if to say the office is now our playground, and, oh, the rollicking fun wed have mixing bodily fluids.

No, I tell her, You dont mean that.

What if I do? she shoots back. Would you have sex with me, now, in this office?

Of course not.

Why of course not? How do I know for sure that you wont take me if I offer myself to you?

I wouldnt do that.

Thats what I thought, she says, and tension in the room decomposes. Mike, I dont feel that you would do something that you think is truly not in our best interest, which is exactly why I just gave you the choice.

Her offer was a lesson in empowerment, helping me prove that I have an innate ability to make the right choices, even if Id so desperately prefer to make the wrong one.

I see what she means. Im awfully proud of myself, and its OK to be in this instance. Im gaining trust in myself, and confidence to boot. But, as the dualities of life dictate, Im successfully doing the work with a daring therapist, while at the same time not entirely convinced she isnt in need of an ethical scrubbing.

* * *

I dont have another session with Lori for nearly three months, because she tooka personal leave from her place of employment. When our sessions finally resumed, I could not wait to tell her about my budding relationship with Shauna.

Ten minutes into my first date with Shauna right about the time she got up from her bar stool and said she was going to the can I knew she would, at the very least, be someone I was going to invest significant time in. She was as easy to talk to as any girl Id ever been with, and I found myself at ease. Plans happened magically without anxiety-inducing, twenty-four-hour waits between texts. Her quick wit kept me entertained, and I could tell by the way she so seriously spoke about dancing, her chosen profession, that she is passionate about the art form and mighty talented too. Shauna is beautiful, with flawless hazel eyes and straight dark hair, spunky bangs and a bob that matches her always-upbeat character. She is a snazzy dresser and enjoys a glass of whiskey with a side of fried pickles and good conversation as much as I do.

Things escalated quickly, but very comfortably, and since wed both been in our fair share of relationships, we knew the true power of honesty and openness. So upon the precipice of my return to therapy I told Shauna about Lori, and admitted to having mixed feelings about what I was getting back into. I told her I was at least moderately uncertain if my mental health was Loris number-one concern since she always seemed to find the time to mention my attraction to her.

The first two sessions of my therapeutic reboot had gone great. Lori appeared genuinely thrilled that I was dating Shauna and could see how happy I was. I wasnt overwhelmed with sexual tension in the new meeting room, though it wasnt actually spoken about, and in the back of my mind I knew it was just a matter of time before it would start to affect my ability to disclose my thoughts to Lori again.

Then, while attempting to ingratiate myself with my new girlfriends cat by spooning food onto his tiny dish on the kitchen floor, I hear my phone ding from inside the living room.

You got a text, babe, Shauna says. Its from Lori.

Im so impressed with you and the work youre doing Shauna reads off my phone from inside the living room, inquisitively, and not happily. I stuff the cat food back into the Tupperware and toss it into the refrigerator. I make my way into the living room, angry at myself for not changing the settings on my new iPhone to disallow text previews on the locked screen. Shaunas walking too, and we meet near the kitchen door. Whats this? she says, holding up the phone. Your therapist texts you?

I take the phone from Shauna and say the most obvious, clich-sounding thing: Its not what it seems.

As I text back a curt thanks, Shauna tells me shes going to ask her sister, a therapist herself, if its OK to text patients.

Dont do that. I say, a little more emphatically. I promise, this is nothing to be worried about. Were not doing anything wrong. I explain that Loris just trying to build my self-esteem.

The only reason Im even bringing this up is because you said you werent sure about her in the first place, Shauna reminds me. I can tell she regrets looking at my phone without my permission, but I completely understand her feelings.

At my next session I tell Lori that Shauna saw her text and wasnt thrilled about it.

She probably feels cheated on to some degree, Lori says. A relationship between a therapist and a patient can oftentimes seem much more intimate than the one between a romantic couple.

Lori goes on to point out that the reason she feels we can exchange texts, blurring the lines between patient/doctor boundaries a hot topic in the psychotherapy world these days is because she trusts that Ill respect her space and privacy. Youve proven that much to me, she says.

On my walk home, instead of being angry at Lori, I understand her thinking behind the text. But Im also nervous about how Lori and Shauna can ever coexist in my life.

Isnt therapy supposed to ameliorate my anxiety?

* * *

A week later, Lori begins our session by handing me a printout explaining the psychotherapeutic term erotic transference written by Raymond Lloyd Richmond, PhD. It says that erotic transference is the patients sense that love is being exchanged between him or herself and the therapist the exact sensation I was experiencing with Lori, of which she was astutely aware.

According to Richmond, one of the primary reasons people seek therapy is because something was lacking in their childhood family life, perhaps unconditional nurturing guidance and protection. Upon feeling noticed and understood by a qualified therapist, sometimes a patient can be intoxicated by their therapists approval of them. A patient may in turn contemplate that a love is blossoming between them, and, in fact, it sort of is.

From an ethical standpoint, Richmond argues all therapists are bound to love their patients, for therapists are committed to willing the good of all clients by ensuring that all actions within psychotherapy serve the clients need to overcome the symptoms which brought them into treatment. This takes genuine care and acceptance on their part. However, a patient can easily confuse the love they feel with simple desire. Theyre not quite in love with their therapist, so much as they yearn for acceptance from someone, and in those sessions they just happen to be receiving it from their doctor.

Lori tells me that, all along, she has been working with what I gave her and that because I flirted with her a bit, she used that to her advantage in the treatment. In employing countertransference indicating that she had feelings for me she was keeping me from feeling rejected and despising my own thoughts and urges.

Theres two people alone in a room together, and if theyre two attractive people, why wouldnt they be attracted to each other? says Dr. Galit Atlas. A psychoanalyst whos had her own private practice for fifteen years, Dr. Atlas has an upcoming book titled The Enigma of Desire: Sex, Longing and Belonging in Psychoanalysis, and I sought her as an independent source for this essay to help me understand Loris therapeutic strategies.

Dr. Atlas explains that there are certain boundaries that cannot be crossed between therapist and patient under any circumstances like having sex with them, obviously. But many other relationship borders can be mapped out depending on the comfort level of the therapist, as long as they stay within the scope of the professions ethics, which complicates the discussion surrounding erotic transference.

As a therapist, I have a role, Dr. Atlas says. My role is to protect you. She says it is incumbent on the therapist to not exploit the patient for the therapists own good, but admits that the presence of erotic transference in therapy brings about many challenges. [Attraction] is part of the human condition, she observes. In therapy, the question then is: What do you do with that? Do you deny it? Do you talk about it? How do you talk about it without seducing the patient and with keeping your professional ability to think and to reflect?

I ask her about the benefits of exploring intimacy in therapy, and Dr. Atlas quickly points out that emotional intimacy though not necessarily that of the sexual brand is almost inevitable and required. An intimate relationship with a therapist can [be] a reparative experience repairing childhood wounds but mostly its about helping the patient to experience and tolerate emotional intimacy, analyzing the clients anxieties about being vulnerable and every mechanism one uses in order to avoid being exposed.

Dr. Atlas says this topic speaks to every facet of the therapeutic relationship, regardless of gender or even sexual orientation, because intimacy reveals emotional baggage that both the patient and therapist carry with them into the session. But this isnt a symmetrical relationship, and the therapist is the one who holds the responsibility.

Freud said that a healthy person should be able to work and to love, she says. In some ways therapy practices both, and in order to change the patient will have to be known by the therapist. That is intimacy. In order to be able to be vulnerable, both parties have to feel safe.

After I briefly explain all that has gone on between me and Lori, Dr. Atlas steadfastly says she does not want to judge too harshly why and how everything came to pass in my therapy. I dont know your therapist, and I dont know your history, she says. But she offers that I should explore the possibility that I might have created and admitted my sexual adoration of Lori because one of my fears is to be ignored, not noticed.

Then I offer: Maybe this essay is being written for the same reason.

Exactly.

Visit link:

How a Hard-Luck Horse and His Jamaican Trucker Owner Became Million-Dollar Champs - Narratively

Someone Posted My Phone Number On Craigslist and Said I Wanted Strange Men to Rape Me – Narratively

Its the waning moments of my fourth session with a new therapist. Im holding back and she knows it. My entire body feels tense, not ideal for the setting. I try to relax, but the plush leather couch crumples under me when I shift, making the movements extraordinary. Ive barely looked into my therapists blue eyes at all, and yet I think the hour has gone very well. Of course it has. On the surface, when the patient has been highly selective of the discussion topics, therapy always resembles a friendly get-together.

Well, my therapist, Lori, says, the millisecond after I become certain our time is up and I might be in the clear. I dont think I should let you go until weve at least touched on what was put out there at the end of last weeks session.

I so supremely wanted this not to come up. My eyelids tighten, my mouth puckers to the left, and my head tilts, as though Im asking her to clarify.

When you said youre attracted to me, she continues.

Oh, yeah, I say. That.

Back in session three Lori was trying to build my self-esteem, the lack of which is one of the reasons Im in treatment. Within the confines of my family, Ive always been the biggest target of ridicule. We all throw verbal darts around as though were engaged in a massive, drunken tournament at a bar, but the most poisonous ones seem to hit me the most often, admittedly somewhat a consequence of my own sensitivity. Ive been told it was historically all part of an effort to toughen me up, but instead I was filled with towering doubts about my own worth. And since 2012, when I gave up a stable, tenured teaching career for the wildly inconsistent life of a freelance writer, Ive had great difficulty trusting my own instincts and capabilities. I told Lori that I wish I was better at dealing with lifes daily struggles instead of constantly wondering if Ill be able to wade through the thick.

She quickly and convincingly pointed out that I work rather hard and am, ultimately, paying my bills on time, that I have friends, an appreciation for arts and culture, and so on. In short, I am, in fact, strong, responsible and pretty good at life.

Then Lori heightened the discussion a bit. I also feel that it is your sensitivity that makes you a great catch out there in the dating world, she said, to which I involuntarily smiled, blushed and quickly buried my chin in my chest. I was too insecure and too single to handle such a compliment from a beautiful woman.

Why are you reacting that way? Lori asked.

I shrugged my shoulders, only half looking up.

Is it because youre attracted to me?

I laughed a little, uncomfortably. How did you know?

She gently explained she could tell the day I walked into her office for the first time, after I flashed a bright smile and casually asked where she was from.

Now, a week after dropping that bomb, Lori asks, So, why havent we talked about it?

I was hoping to avoid it, I suppose. I tell her the whole notion of having the hots for a therapist is such a sizable clich that I was embarrassed to admit it. For Christs sake, I say, throwing my hands up, Tony Soprano even fell in love with his therapist.

Lori snorts, rolls her eyes. I knew you were going to say that.

I smile, shake my head and look around the room, denying acceptance of my own ridiculous reality.

Its OK, Lori says, grinning. We can talk about this in here.

I look again at her stark blue eyes, prevalent under dark brown bangs, the rest of her hair reaching the top of her chest, which is hugged nicely by a fitted white tee under an open button-down. She jogs often, Id come to find out, which explains her petite figure and ability to probably pull off just about any outfit of her choosing.

I still cant speak, so she takes over.

Do you think youre the first client thats been attracted to their therapist? she asks rhetorically. Ive had other clients openly discuss their feelings, even their sexual fantasies involving me.

What? I cackle, beginning to feel as though Ive moseyed onto the set of a porno.

Its true, she says, acknowledging her desk. Whats yours? Do you bend me over and take me from behind?

Nailed it.

If thats what youre thinking, its OK, she goes on, earnestly, explaining that shes discussed sexual scenarios with her clients before so as to normalize the behavior and not have them feel their own thoughts are unnatural. By showing the patient a level of acceptance, she hopes to facilitate a more comfortable atmosphere for the work her painfully accurate pseudonym for psychotherapy.

I take a second to let the red flow out of my face, and ponder what she said. Im a little unsure about this whole technique, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense. So I go home, incredibly turned on and completely unashamed.

* * *

One of the great breakthroughs Ive had in the thirteen months since I began seeing Lori (who agreed to participate in this article, but requested that her full name not be published) is a new ability to accept the existence of dualities in life. For instance, Ive always had a tremendous sense of pride that, if it doesnt straddle the line of arrogance, certainly dives into that hemisphere from time to time. Im great at seeing flaws in others and propping myself up above them by smugly observing my character strengths. Ive never liked that about myself, but the harder concept to grasp is the fact that I can be so egotistical while also stricken with such vast quantities of insecurity.

In treatment I came to realize that all people have contradictions to their personalities. Theres the insanely smart guy who cant remotely begin to navigate a common social situation, the charitable girl who devotes all her time to helping strangers, but wont confront issues in her own personal relationships. In my case, my extreme sensitivity can make me feel fabulous about the aspects of myself that I somehow know are good (my artistic tastes) and cause deep hatred of those traits I happen to loathe (the thirty pounds I could stand to lose).

My next session with Lori is productive. We speak about relationships Ive formed with friends and lovers, and how my family may have informed those interactions. One constant is that I put crudely high expectations on others, mirroring those thrown upon me as a kid. Im angered when people dont meet those expectations, and absolutely devastated when I dont reach them. Lori points out that it must be exhausting trying to be so perfect all the time. I am much more comfortable than I was the week prior, and can feel myself being more candid. Im relieved that the whole being-attracted-to-my-therapist thing doesnt come up.

Then, a week later, Lori mentions it, and I become tense again.

I thought Id be able to move past it, I say, adding, We aired it out, and its fine.

As definitive as Im trying to sound, Lori is just as defiant.

Im glad you feel that way, she begins, but I think you owe yourself some kudos. This kind of therapy, she shares, isnt something just anyone can take on. Such honest discussion doesnt simply happen, it takes tremendous guts, and Lori can see that I am dealing with it relatively well, so I should praise my own efforts.

Shit, we both should be proud of ourselves, she says. Its not easy on the therapist either, you know.

Why not?

Because talking openly about sex is risky at any time, much less with a client. She explains that therapists are warned any semblance of intimacy can be easily misconstrued. We learn in our training to not personally disclose, for example, she says, but adds that, occasionally, transparency can be helpful.

Still, with you, she continues, until I raised the question, I didnt know for sure that you would go with it; for all I knew youd run out of here and never come back to risk being so uncomfortable again.

Shes building my confidence more, and Im learning that I play a much bigger role in how my life is conducted than I often realize. My treatment wouldnt be happening if I werent enabling it.

Then she says, And dont think its not nice for me to hear that a guy like you thinks Im beautiful.

Crippled by the eroticism of the moment, and combined with the prevailing notion that no woman this stunning could ever be romantically interested in me, I flounder through words that resemble, Waitwhat?

If we were somehow at a bar together, and you came over and talked to me, she says, then flips her palms up innocently, who knows?

I laugh again and tell her thered be almost no chance of me approaching her because Id never feel like I had a shot in hell.

Well, thats not the circumstances were in, she says. But you might. Who knows?

Im confused Is she really attracted to me or is this some psychotherapeutic ruse? Im frustrated I told her I didnt really want to talk about it. Shouldnt she be more sensitive to my wants here? Im angry Is she getting an ego boost out of this? Most of all, I dont know what the next step is Am I about to experience the hottest thing thats ever happened to a straight male since the vagina was invented?

There were two ways to find out:

1) Discontinue the therapy, wait for her outside her office every day, follow her to a hypothetical happy hour and ask her out, or

2) Keep going to therapy.

* * *

A week later, Im physically in the meeting room with Lori, but mentally I havent left the recesses of my mind.

Where are you today? she asks, probably noticing my eyes roving around the room.

I dont know.

Are you still grappling with the sexual tension between us?

Here we go again.

Yes, I say, with a bit of an edge in my voice, and I dont know what to do about it.

Lori, ever intently, peers into my eyes, wrinkles her mouth and slightly shakes her head.

Do you want to have sex with me? she asks.

We both know the answer to that question. All I can do is stare back.

Lets have sex, she announces. Right here, right now.

What? I respond, flustered.

Lets go! she says a little louder, opening up her arms and looking around as if to say the office is now our playground, and, oh, the rollicking fun wed have mixing bodily fluids.

No, I tell her, You dont mean that.

What if I do? she shoots back. Would you have sex with me, now, in this office?

Of course not.

Why of course not? How do I know for sure that you wont take me if I offer myself to you?

I wouldnt do that.

Thats what I thought, she says, and tension in the room decomposes. Mike, I dont feel that you would do something that you think is truly not in our best interest, which is exactly why I just gave you the choice.

Her offer was a lesson in empowerment, helping me prove that I have an innate ability to make the right choices, even if Id so desperately prefer to make the wrong one.

I see what she means. Im awfully proud of myself, and its OK to be in this instance. Im gaining trust in myself, and confidence to boot. But, as the dualities of life dictate, Im successfully doing the work with a daring therapist, while at the same time not entirely convinced she isnt in need of an ethical scrubbing.

* * *

I dont have another session with Lori for nearly three months, because she tooka personal leave from her place of employment. When our sessions finally resumed, I could not wait to tell her about my budding relationship with Shauna.

Ten minutes into my first date with Shauna right about the time she got up from her bar stool and said she was going to the can I knew she would, at the very least, be someone I was going to invest significant time in. She was as easy to talk to as any girl Id ever been with, and I found myself at ease. Plans happened magically without anxiety-inducing, twenty-four-hour waits between texts. Her quick wit kept me entertained, and I could tell by the way she so seriously spoke about dancing, her chosen profession, that she is passionate about the art form and mighty talented too. Shauna is beautiful, with flawless hazel eyes and straight dark hair, spunky bangs and a bob that matches her always-upbeat character. She is a snazzy dresser and enjoys a glass of whiskey with a side of fried pickles and good conversation as much as I do.

Things escalated quickly, but very comfortably, and since wed both been in our fair share of relationships, we knew the true power of honesty and openness. So upon the precipice of my return to therapy I told Shauna about Lori, and admitted to having mixed feelings about what I was getting back into. I told her I was at least moderately uncertain if my mental health was Loris number-one concern since she always seemed to find the time to mention my attraction to her.

The first two sessions of my therapeutic reboot had gone great. Lori appeared genuinely thrilled that I was dating Shauna and could see how happy I was. I wasnt overwhelmed with sexual tension in the new meeting room, though it wasnt actually spoken about, and in the back of my mind I knew it was just a matter of time before it would start to affect my ability to disclose my thoughts to Lori again.

Then, while attempting to ingratiate myself with my new girlfriends cat by spooning food onto his tiny dish on the kitchen floor, I hear my phone ding from inside the living room.

You got a text, babe, Shauna says. Its from Lori.

Im so impressed with you and the work youre doing Shauna reads off my phone from inside the living room, inquisitively, and not happily. I stuff the cat food back into the Tupperware and toss it into the refrigerator. I make my way into the living room, angry at myself for not changing the settings on my new iPhone to disallow text previews on the locked screen. Shaunas walking too, and we meet near the kitchen door. Whats this? she says, holding up the phone. Your therapist texts you?

I take the phone from Shauna and say the most obvious, clich-sounding thing: Its not what it seems.

As I text back a curt thanks, Shauna tells me shes going to ask her sister, a therapist herself, if its OK to text patients.

Dont do that. I say, a little more emphatically. I promise, this is nothing to be worried about. Were not doing anything wrong. I explain that Loris just trying to build my self-esteem.

The only reason Im even bringing this up is because you said you werent sure about her in the first place, Shauna reminds me. I can tell she regrets looking at my phone without my permission, but I completely understand her feelings.

At my next session I tell Lori that Shauna saw her text and wasnt thrilled about it.

She probably feels cheated on to some degree, Lori says. A relationship between a therapist and a patient can oftentimes seem much more intimate than the one between a romantic couple.

Lori goes on to point out that the reason she feels we can exchange texts, blurring the lines between patient/doctor boundaries a hot topic in the psychotherapy world these days is because she trusts that Ill respect her space and privacy. Youve proven that much to me, she says.

On my walk home, instead of being angry at Lori, I understand her thinking behind the text. But Im also nervous about how Lori and Shauna can ever coexist in my life.

Isnt therapy supposed to ameliorate my anxiety?

* * *

A week later, Lori begins our session by handing me a printout explaining the psychotherapeutic term erotic transference written by Raymond Lloyd Richmond, PhD. It says that erotic transference is the patients sense that love is being exchanged between him or herself and the therapist the exact sensation I was experiencing with Lori, of which she was astutely aware.

According to Richmond, one of the primary reasons people seek therapy is because something was lacking in their childhood family life, perhaps unconditional nurturing guidance and protection. Upon feeling noticed and understood by a qualified therapist, sometimes a patient can be intoxicated by their therapists approval of them. A patient may in turn contemplate that a love is blossoming between them, and, in fact, it sort of is.

From an ethical standpoint, Richmond argues all therapists are bound to love their patients, for therapists are committed to willing the good of all clients by ensuring that all actions within psychotherapy serve the clients need to overcome the symptoms which brought them into treatment. This takes genuine care and acceptance on their part. However, a patient can easily confuse the love they feel with simple desire. Theyre not quite in love with their therapist, so much as they yearn for acceptance from someone, and in those sessions they just happen to be receiving it from their doctor.

Lori tells me that, all along, she has been working with what I gave her and that because I flirted with her a bit, she used that to her advantage in the treatment. In employing countertransference indicating that she had feelings for me she was keeping me from feeling rejected and despising my own thoughts and urges.

Theres two people alone in a room together, and if theyre two attractive people, why wouldnt they be attracted to each other? says Dr. Galit Atlas. A psychoanalyst whos had her own private practice for fifteen years, Dr. Atlas has an upcoming book titled The Enigma of Desire: Sex, Longing and Belonging in Psychoanalysis, and I sought her as an independent source for this essay to help me understand Loris therapeutic strategies.

Dr. Atlas explains that there are certain boundaries that cannot be crossed between therapist and patient under any circumstances like having sex with them, obviously. But many other relationship borders can be mapped out depending on the comfort level of the therapist, as long as they stay within the scope of the professions ethics, which complicates the discussion surrounding erotic transference.

As a therapist, I have a role, Dr. Atlas says. My role is to protect you. She says it is incumbent on the therapist to not exploit the patient for the therapists own good, but admits that the presence of erotic transference in therapy brings about many challenges. [Attraction] is part of the human condition, she observes. In therapy, the question then is: What do you do with that? Do you deny it? Do you talk about it? How do you talk about it without seducing the patient and with keeping your professional ability to think and to reflect?

I ask her about the benefits of exploring intimacy in therapy, and Dr. Atlas quickly points out that emotional intimacy though not necessarily that of the sexual brand is almost inevitable and required. An intimate relationship with a therapist can [be] a reparative experience repairing childhood wounds but mostly its about helping the patient to experience and tolerate emotional intimacy, analyzing the clients anxieties about being vulnerable and every mechanism one uses in order to avoid being exposed.

Dr. Atlas says this topic speaks to every facet of the therapeutic relationship, regardless of gender or even sexual orientation, because intimacy reveals emotional baggage that both the patient and therapist carry with them into the session. But this isnt a symmetrical relationship, and the therapist is the one who holds the responsibility.

Freud said that a healthy person should be able to work and to love, she says. In some ways therapy practices both, and in order to change the patient will have to be known by the therapist. That is intimacy. In order to be able to be vulnerable, both parties have to feel safe.

After I briefly explain all that has gone on between me and Lori, Dr. Atlas steadfastly says she does not want to judge too harshly why and how everything came to pass in my therapy. I dont know your therapist, and I dont know your history, she says. But she offers that I should explore the possibility that I might have created and admitted my sexual adoration of Lori because one of my fears is to be ignored, not noticed.

Then I offer: Maybe this essay is being written for the same reason.

Exactly.

More here:

Someone Posted My Phone Number On Craigslist and Said I Wanted Strange Men to Rape Me - Narratively

Humanism Isn’t Just About Being Right, It’s About Doing Right – HuffPost

This week, NPRs Scott Simon spoke with evolutionary biologist and atheist Richard Dawkins about religion, terrorism, and nontheism. While the interview is compelling overall, Simon makes some insulting statements about nontheists that deserve to be addressed.

The first of these points is Simons recollection that while he has covered many wars, conflicts, and natural disasters, in every one of these situations there is a dauntless nun, priest, clergy or religious person who was working very selflessly and bravely there for the good of human beings. And I dont run into organized groups of atheists who do this.

Dawkins rightly disagrees with this assertion, and points to an effort by his own organization, Secular Rescue, which is designed to provide emergency assistance to writers, bloggers, publishers, and activists who face threats due to their beliefs or expressions regarding religion. Whats more, humanists, atheists, and other nontheists have decades of experience in fighting some of the worst disasters on this planet, both man-made and natural.

Of course, plenty of humanitarian work is done without any reference to religion or irreligion, and Secular Rescue isnt the only specifically nontheistic organization doing good for the world. The Foundation Beyond Belief is about to launch a humanist disaster relief drive for the severe ongoing famine in several African countries, and will be donating all funds raised to local charities that will administer the program. This group is just one of the many humanistic charity organizations working for change on a global scale. The humanist Responsible Charity in India focuses on improving education, planned parenthood and self-employment. Groups like the Uganda Humanist Association support multiple humanist schools that do not discriminate on grounds of religion or social or ethnic background.

Of course, humanists also do good work in the United States. Nontheistic organizations like Smart Recovery help people recover from all types of addiction and addictive behaviors, including drug and alcohol abuse and gambling and prescription drug addictions, all without relying upon a twelve-step program that emphasizes a belief in a higher power. And humanists have been vital in protecting the civil rights of all Americans from the days of humanist Asa Philip Randolph and James Framer, to current approaches led by the likes of Angela Davis and Gloria Steinem.

So while it is important to properly thank religious individuals and communities for their hard work in helping their fellow human beings, it is important that we dont falsely tie altruism with religiosity.

At one point in the interview Scott seems to approach something resembling a recognition of this: I do wonder, am I just not seeing the world correctly to see large numbers of well-motivated atheists lending their lives to trying to better the world? Or if I might put it this way, are they more concerned about just being right intellectually?

Nontheists certainly are interested in talking and thinking in an intellectually honest manner about ideas and philosophies that impact the world. We respectfully challenge ideas that are evidently false or harmful. But to claim that nontheists care more about scriptural debates than actions meant to protect the human rights of marginalized communities is to insult a community bent on doing as much good in the world as they can.

Read more:

Humanism Isn't Just About Being Right, It's About Doing Right - HuffPost

Ancient Bengali music at free festival in Leeds – Yorkshire Evening Post

12:37 Monday 05 June 2017

A free festival which aims to celebrate the wonders of Bengali folk music and tackle extremism will come to north Leeds in August.

The RadhaRaman Folk Festival will return to Leeds for the seventh year running on August 18-20, with visitors expected to attend from across the country.

The event boasts whole-day and whole-night performances by Bengali and non-Bengali performers, showcasing folk music and dance from different cultural traditions as well as panel discussions and childrens performances.

It kicks off on the banks of Swinsty Reservoir in Otley with flute performances and a barbecue until 8pm.

Otley Chevin is the venue for folk dance, music and poetry performances, with barbecue, from 4.30pm to 8.30pm before the next session begins at 9pm at Moortown Methdist Church.

This lasts until early morning on the Sunday when all day there will be music, dance, poetry and talks at the Bangladesh Community Centre on Roundhay Road.

Events also take place at the Reginald Centre on Chapeltown Road on Saturday.

Organiser Ahmed Kaysher said the festival tries to involve women and young people who are excluded through social and religious barriers.

Tackling extremism is one of the many objectives that this festival is working for.

This art and music even of folk tradition, originated from the ancient time, promotes wider humanism, love, devotion and it always preaches to make the most of the living moments.

He added: The festival is shaping as one of the prominent international festivals in the city in terms of the audiences who come from all over Europe and the artists come from both Bangladesh and India.

It will be inaugurated by one of the finest Indian classical vocalists in Europe, Chandra Chakraborty, from London, and 32 prominent artists from all across the country and Bangladesh wil perform throughtout the course of the festival.

These include Tagore singer Dr Imtiaz Ahmed, top folk singer Gouri Chowdhury, semi-classical vocalist Sumana Basu, Sufi Amir Mohammed, Laboni Barua, folk dancer Sohel Ahmed, Anasua Paul, Nandita Mukherjee, flute player Luthfur Rahman and Dutara player Nuruzzaman Ahmed.

For more information visit https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/radharaman-folk-festival-tickets-34802268522.

Continue reading here:

Ancient Bengali music at free festival in Leeds - Yorkshire Evening Post

How a ‘shadow’ universe of charities joined with political warriors to fuel Trump’s rise – Washington Post

(Jenny Starrs/The Washington Post)

The crowd rose to its feet and roared its approval as Sen. Jeff Sessions bounded onto the stage at the Breakers, an exclusive resort in Palm Beach, Fla. Stephen Miller, an aide to the Alabama Republican, handed him a glass trophy honoring his bravery as a lawmaker.

Heyyyy! Sessions yelled out to the crowd.

The ceremony that day, in November 2014, turned out to be a harbinger: It brought together an array of hard-right activists and a little-known charity whose ideas would soon move from the fringes of the conservative movement into the heart of the nations government.

The man behind the event was David Horowitz, a former 60s radical who became an intellectual godfather to the far right through his writings and his work at a charity, the David Horowitz Freedom Center. Since its formation in 1988, the Freedom Center has helped cultivate a generation of political warriors seeking to upend the Washington establishment. These warriors include some of the most powerful and influential figures in the Trump administration: Attorney General Sessions, senior policy adviser Miller and White House chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon.

Long before Trump promised to build a wall, ban Muslims and abandon the Paris climate accord, Horowitz used his tax-exempt group to rail against illegal immigrants, the spread of Islam and global warming. Center officials described Hillary Clinton as evil, President Barack Obama as a secret communist and the Democratic Party as a front for enemies of the United States.

The Freedom Center has declared itself a School for Political Warfare, and it is part of a loose nationwide network of like-minded charities linked together by ideology, personalities, conservative funders and websites, including the for-profit Breitbart News.

Horowitzs story shows how charities have become essential to modern political campaigns, amid lax enforcement of the federal limits on their involvement in politics, while taking advantage of millions of dollars in what amount to taxpayer subsidies.

In interviews with The Washington Post, Horowitz, 78, acknowledged the Freedom Centers partisan mission and said its aim is to protect traditional American values against adversaries on the left, who operate their own network of charities. This is a shadow political universe, he said.

Horowitz makes a good living as the Freedom Center chief executive, earning $583,000 from a charity that received $5.4million in donations in 2015, according to the latest available records. But he said he has come to believe that his group and others across the political spectrum ought to be reined in to ensure they fulfill the original spirit of the Internal Revenue Services charitable rules, even though such overhauls would be personally devastating for me.

They should redefine what a charity is, he said. A charity should be something that helps everybody.

The IRS prohibits charities from directly or indirectly participating in political campaigns, for or against candidates.

In an essay he published online in response to The Posts questions after refusing further interviews, Horowitz wrote the center does not engage in political activities in the narrow sense used in the I.R.S. code.

A lefty moves right

Horowitz looks like a professor, with a salt-and-pepper goatee and small oval glasses. He speaks with a scratchy voice that carries strong hints of his New York roots. He is quick to use fiery rhetoric and no-holds-barred tactics he had learned as a student radical.

Horowitz was a red diaper baby of communist parents in New York City. After attending Columbia University in the 1950s, he enrolled as a graduate student at the University of California at Berkeley, an anchor of leftist thinking.

Over the next two decades, he took on prominent roles in the New Left. He served as an editor of Ramparts, an influential muckraking magazine in San Francisco.

But by the late 1970s, he had decided that the left represented a profound threat to the United States. On March17, 1985, he and a writing partner came out as conservatives in a surprising Washington Post Magazine article headlined Lefties for Reagan.

In August 1988, Horowitz launched the Center for the Study of Popular Culture in Los Angeles, a nonprofit group that would become the Freedom Center.

Charities have been around since the nations beginning, as citizens sought to help schools, churches and the poor. Decades ago, Congress created a special section of the IRS code to define and regulate charities, which are known as 501(c)(3) groups under the code. They have a special allure for donors: They can deduct contributions from their taxes.

IRS rules give charities wide latitude, but they may not devote a substantial part of their resources or activities to lobbying or carrying on propaganda. And they are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office, according to the IRS.

In his IRS application for tax-exempt status in August 1988, Horowitz wrote his center would be entirely non-profit, non-partisan, according to records obtained through a public records request. It will not be organized to promote any particular political program.

Twenty years later, a brochure for one of the charitys events would sharply contradict that claim: In 1988, Horowitz created the Center for the Study of Popular Culture to institutionalize his campaigns against the Left and its anti-American agendas.

From the start, Horowitz was supported by contributions from stalwart conservative groups, including the John M. Olin Foundation and the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, along with donations from the wealthy Scaife family of Pittsburgh.

In 1989, he co-wrote Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About the Sixties, a harsh critique of the radical left. He also began hosting events. A gathering called the Wednesday Morning Club catered to conservatives in liberal Los Angeles. In the 1990s, one of the regular guests was Bannon, then a former Wall Street investor seeking to make his mark in Hollywood, according to Lionel Chetwynd, the events co-founder.

Conservatives are nervous around me, and theyre nervous because Im very outspoken, Horowitz told The Post. Steve Bannon was not nervous because hes like me.

Bannon did not respond to requests for interviews.

The origin of Stephen Miller

After the Sept.11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Horowitz and his center argued that liberals had been too tolerant of radical Islam and illegal immigration.

Open to that message was Stephen Miller, a 16-year-old high school student in Santa Monica, Calif. In the fall of 2001, Miller asked Horowitz for help in disputes with administrators at his school. Miller complained his teachers and classmates were insufficiently patriotic and refused to say the Pledge of Allegiance.

Horowitzs charity launched a group called Students for Academic Freedom, framing it as a counterweight to the dominance of the left in high schools and on college campuses. Miller formed a chapter and sought permission from school officials to invite Horowitz to the school to speak. When administrators delayed, Miller and Horowitz accused them of stifling free speech.

Horowitz eventually spoke at the school, and in November 2002, Miller wrote about the visit in an essay in Frontpagemag.com, the online news and opinion site run by the center. Miller portrayed himself as the victim of indoctrination and called on the systems superintendent to ensure that his schools stress inclusive patriotism, rather than a multiculturalism.

When Miller went on to Duke University, he formed another chapter of Students for Academic Freedom and again invited Horowitz to speak. At the time, Horowitz had just published The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America, a book some condemned as a political blacklist.

After graduation, Miller wanted to work in Washington. Horowitz reached out to conservatives on Capitol Hill who had supported his group. He helped Miller land jobs with four lawmakers, including former representative Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) and Sessions. I highly recommended him to Jeff, Horowitz told The Post.

Miller did not respond to requests for interviews.

By 2006, Horowitzs charity, now operating as the David Horowitz Freedom Center, was staging events, publishing books and pamphlets, and operating a website devoted to news on the war at home and abroad against the left.

That same year, Horowitz wrote The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party. He and a co-writer argued that Soros, a hedge fund billionaire, was a political manipulator who financed a vast movement on the left, with help from charities and other nonprofit groups.

The Freedom Center stepped up its anti-Islamic rhetoric, sponsoring an Islamofascism Awareness Week on college campuses. Horowitz accused U.S. college campuses of fostering Jew hatred and supporting Islamist militant terror.

It also formed an alliance with another charity called Jihad Watch, which would become a leading voice in calling for restrictions on Muslim immigrants.

Our work at Jihad Watch relates to dispelling falsehoods and disinformation spread by The Washington Post and others regarding the motivating ideology, nature and magnitude of the jihad threat worldwide and within the U.S., the groups chief, Robert Spencer, told The Post in a statement last month.

In the 2000s, the Freedom Center continued receiving millions in support from conservative donors, more than $4million annually. The election of Barack Obama in 2008 provided an extra boost to fundraising.

It also affirmed the centers belief that the political left has declared war on America and its constitutional system, and is willing to collaborate with Americas enemies abroad, according to the centers website. For most of those years the Center was a voice crying in the wilderness with few willing to recognize the threat from the enemy within, a fifth column force that was steadily expanding its influence within the Democratic Party.

This was all too much for some prominent mainstream conservatives such as William Kristol and George Will, who formerly sat on the board of the Bradley Foundation. Some people seem not to feel fully alive unless they are furious, Will wrote in an email to The Post. [Will writes a twice-weekly column for The Post] Perhaps this is because they gain derivative significance from the feeling that they are personally involved in momentous events.

Minimal IRS regulation

The Freedom Center was among a growing group of allied charities that received funding from large, conservative foundations such as Donors Capital Fund, Donors Trust, the Bradley Foundation and the Scaife family. For decades, those foundations and others had financed nonprofit organizations that promoted free enterprise and small government and opposed the environmental movement and other issues favored by progressives.

In general, charities have been able to operate with little scrutiny by regulators. The number of enforcement officials at the IRS and the audits they conduct have dwindled over the past decade. The IRS became especially reluctant to enforce limitations on political activity, following a furious backlash from conservatives and Republicans in Congress in 2013 over allegations the agency was illegally targeting tea party groups seeking tax-exempt status. An IRS spokesman declined to comment.

Cleta Mitchell, a lawyer, Bradley Foundation board member and recipient of a Freedom Center award, said conservative charities take great pains to stay within their lanes from a legal perspective.

Matthew Vadum, senior vice president of the tax-exempt Capital Research Center and a prolific contributor to the Freedom Centers Frontpagemag.com, said there is no question the conservative charities work in concert. But the IRS rules are open to interpretation and unclear about the limits, he said.

Its a network, Vadum said. [C]onservative activist groups try to push the envelope. And its not always clear how far they should go.

Ron Robinson, president of Young Americas Foundation and another ally of the Freedom Center, said ideological alliances and shared financial support are commonplace across the political spectrum, not just on the right. This is a reality of the modern world, Robinson said. I dont view it as pernicious. They make it possible to enrich the world of ideas.

By 2008, the Freedom Center had assumed a leading role in the hard-right branch of the network, spending $2.7million on seminars and meetings that routinely attracted the luminaries of the conservative movement.

The most popular of these annual gatherings was David Horowitzs Restoration Weekend, which was often held at the Breakers in Palm Beach, a stunning hotel complex modeled on the Medici palaces of Renaissance Italy.

These were lavish affairs. In November 2009, the center paid $438,000 to produce the event at the Breakers, an IRS filing shows. That covered well-produced videos and cocktail parties and, for major donors, spa and golf privileges.

A marquee event that weekend was the Citizens United Film Festival. It included a documentary written and directed by Bannon about the ravages of the financial meltdown called Generation Zero. The Citizens United Foundation, another conservative tax-exempt charity, would soon pay Bannon hundreds of thousands for fundraising and film consulting.

Bannon was becoming an important ally for Horowitz and a pivotal figure in the growing network. Bannon and a partner once suggested including Horowitz in a proposed documentary to be called Destroying the Great Satan: The Rise of Islamic Fascism in America. The movies draft outline warned of an Islamic takeover of the United States.

In March 2012, Bannon was named the executive chairman of the online Breitbart News site, following the unexpected death of his friend and collaborator, Andrew Breitbart. Bannon immediately began steering the site even deeper into the anti-establishment movement.

The meet-and-greet

On Nov.12, 2013, Bannon hosted a book party for Horowitz at a Washington, D.C., townhouse that served as Breitbarts capital office and Bannons living quarters. Horowitz had just published a compendium of anti-liberal writings called the Black Book of the American Left.

As Horowitz mingled, Bannon introduced himself to Ronald Radosh, a prominent conservative intellectual and historian. Radosh had known Horowitz for a half-century and also worked his way through the ranks of the New Left before becoming a conservative.

Im Steve Bannon and this is my house, Bannon said, according to an account that Radosh wrote about for the Daily Beast in August and discussed with The Post.

Im a Leninist, Bannon said, according to Radosh. Lenin wanted to destroy the state, and thats my goal, too. I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of todays establishment.

A few days later, Horowitz traveled to Palm Beach to host another Restoration Weekend at the Breakers. Bannon was going, too in part to raise money for a documentary film about Horowitz. Bannon said he needed $1million and there were few venues better for finding wealthy donors. As it happened, Bannon could not raise the money, according to two attendees who heard his pitch. But he received an unexpected gift.

It came from Patrick Caddell, a veteran Democratic pollster who had once worked for President Jimmy Carter. He was speaking about his recent study of Americans sentiments toward Washington, the economy and the nations future. He said Americans were feeling glum: Two-thirds blamed self-serving elites in both parties for their troubles. They craved an outsider to shake things up.

His findings thrilled the crowd, Caddell told The Post in a lengthy interview. He earlier gave a similar account to the New Yorker.

Caddell said Bannon arranged for a private briefing the next day, to include Robert and Rebekah Mercer, a hedge fund billionaire and his daughter.

For two years, Bannon had worked with the Mercers, who invested millions in Breitbart News. The family also helped Bannon launch a Florida-based charity called the Government Accountability Institute, which describes itself as a nonpartisan investigative organization.

Bannon and the Mercers huddled with Caddell in a second-floor lounge at the Breakers. The Mercers were entranced by what they were hearing, Caddell told The Post, and Bannon was ecstatic.

Being a basic rabble-rouser, it fit his views, Caddell said.

Robert Mercer asked Caddell to confirm the polls findings, offering to pay the costs. Caddell told The Post the follow-up poll did just that. The charities and their media allies began to coalesce around the discontent that Caddell documented.

You dont find a lot of cooperation between conservative groups, but now this network, we have Breitbart, Drudge ... Horowitz told the 2013 Restoration Weekend attendees, according to video of the speech. Its going to be very, very powerful over time.

Fighting fire with fire

By late 2013, the Freedom Center barely resembled the charity the IRS had approved for tax exemption. When it began, he told the IRS that it planned to serve the broad public community as an educational institution.

Now it was openly involved in fighting a political war with the left. You can counter their attacks by turning their guns around, Horowitz said in a speech at the time. You can neutralize them by fighting fire with fire.

Among the centers targets was climate change, which it attacked repeatedly as a ruse by the left. Frontpagemag.com writers made fun of global warming in stories with headlines such as New Study Says Global Warming Is Good For Polar Bears and Global Warming Ended in 1996.

The site also ran stories insinuating that Democrats were cooperating with Islamist militants: Jihad Migrating to Red States With Obamas Blessing, The Lefts Embrace of Islamic Rape, and Sanctuary Cities or Safe Havens for Terrorists?

In March 2014, the center made the first of $175,000 in contributions to the Party for Freedom, a group founded by Geert Wilders, one of Europes most ardent anti-Muslim politicians, according to documents released by the Dutch government and originally described by the New York Times and the Intercept. He was campaigning on a platform of preventing the Islamization of the Netherlands, proposing a ban on Muslim immigration and the shuttering of mosques.

Later that year, Wilders spoke at Restoration Weekend.

The truth is that our own Western culture based on Christianity, based on Judaism and humanism is far superior, far superior, than the Islamic culture that immigrants have adopted, Wilders said to applause.

On hand that weekend was Jeff Sessions, a regular at the annual retreat. He was honored with a glass trophy for helping to derail a bipartisan bill aimed at overhauling U.S. immigration law. He acknowledged Horowitz from the stage. Ive seen some great people receive this, David. And its a special treat and pleasure for me, David, because you know how much I admire you as we battle for right and justice and law, Sessions said.

Later that night, Sessions and Miller went to a lounge at the resort. Joining them was Ann Coulter, another regular and a contributor to Frontpagemag.com. She was writing a book called Adios, America: The Lefts Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole.

As Sessions sipped on a drink, she and Miller batted around ideas about how to crack down on immigration until long after midnight. There was obviously a major meeting of the minds, said one person in the lounge at the time who spoke on the condition of anonymity out of fear of repercussions. They thought immigration was the single most important issue in the country.

Coulter did not respond to requests for comment.

Its quite an impressive list

As the presidential campaign heated up, Horowitzs group and the conservative network shifted into high gear.

Hillary Clinton May Go to Prison, said a Breitbart headline in August 2015, when Bannon was still its chief.

That same month, Frontpagemag.com ran stories titled Hillary Under Siege and The Last Days of Hillary.

Peter Schweizer, president of the Government Accountability Institute, Bannons charity, published Clinton Cash, a searing critique of Bill and Hillary Clintons foundation and personal enrichment. Schweizer worked with Bannon as an editor at large at Breitbart, and the two men were preparing to make a documentary based on the book.

For his part, Horowitz fired off contentious remarks about the race at every turn, and not only about Hillary Clinton. He also denounced the Republicans who branded themselves Never Trump. In May 2016, when it became clear Trump would be the Republican nominee, he called conservative columnist William Kristol a Republican spoiler and renegade Jew in Breitbart News because of his opposition to Trump.

To weaken the only party that stands between the Jews and their annihilation, and between America and the forces intent on destroying her, is a political miscalculation so great and a betrayal so profound as to not be easily forgiven, Horowitz wrote.

The article created an uproar, with some critics accusing the Jewish Horowitz of making anti-Semitic remarks. In response to questions from The Post, Kristol played down the episode and dismissed Horowitz as a bombastic self-promoter.

David is an angry man. He thinks hes been denied the power and recognition he deserves. So he lashes out. I shudder to think of Davids rage when he realizes hes been taken for a ride by a con man, Kristol said.

I look forward to the day when American conservatism regains its moral health and political sanity, and the David Horowitz center is back on the fringe, where Im afraid it belongs.

But the Freedom Center and others in the network were rising on the Trump tide. The campaign named Bannon the chief executive, David Bossie of Citizens United the vice president and Miller an adviser.

In August, Horowitz took advantage of his ties to the campaign to offer a proposal for spending billions on school vouchers for poor, largely minority children who Horowitz said had been underserved by Democrats. Miller made sure it became part of Trumps platform along with a proposed ban on Muslims, a border wall and other ideas long supported by the Freedom Center and its ideological allies.

On Dec.14, 2016, during a videotaped event, Horowitz expressed happiness about Trumps victory and said Republicans had finally woken up to his approach to politics. He pulled from his suit coat a piece of paper listing Freedom Center supporters already in the administration.

Its quite an impressive list, Horowitz said, rattling off the names: Sessions, Bannon, Vice President Pence, Reince Priebus, Kellyanne Conway and at least six others.

My personal favorite is Steve Miller, because Steve, who was today appointed the senior policy adviser in the White House ... is a kind of protege of mine, he said. So the center has a big stake in this administration.

The White House and Justice Department did not respond to requests for comment.

Two weeks later, the Freedom Center named Bannon its Man of the Year.

Over the years people would refer to my Freedom Center as a think tank and I would correct them, No, its a battle tank, because that is what I felt was missing most in the conservative cause troops ready and willing to fight fire with fire, Horowitz wrote in Breitbart in February. The Trump administration may be only a few weeks old, but it is already clear that the new White Houseisa battle tank.

See the rest here:

How a 'shadow' universe of charities joined with political warriors to fuel Trump's rise - Washington Post

Darwin, Marx, and Freud: The Genealogy of "Posthumanism …

Wesley Smith points out the simultaneously vapid and dangerous musings of Rice University scholar Cary Wolfe on posthumanism. That is the idea that we can and should progress beyond the ancient understanding that something fundamental separates human beings from other creatures and from the rest of nature.

Where does posthumanism come from? Wolfe is admirably frank about its genealogy:

There is, in fact, a genealogy of posthumanist thought that stretches back well before the 21st or even 20th century. You find hints of it in anything that fundamentally decenters the human in relation to the world in which we find ourselves, whether were talking about other forms of life, the environment, technology or something else. Perhaps more importantly, you find it in the realization that when you dont allow the concept of the human to do your heavy philosophical lifting, you are forced to come up with much more robust and complex accounts of whatever it is youre talking about. And that includes, first and foremost, a more considered concept of the human itself.

Darwinian thought was a huge step in this direction. So was Marxs historical materialism or the Freud of Civilization and Its Discontents. [Emphasis added.]

Darwin, Marx, and Freud the trio who did so much to give us modern culture with its deformities. Exactly how posthumanism cashes out in contemporary cultural terms is the subject of a detailed study with new polling data by John G. West, Darwins Corrosive Idea: The Impact of Evolution on Attitudes about Faith, Ethics, and Human Uniqueness. Download it now.

Photo credit: http://www.cgpgrey.com [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons.

Im on Twitter. Follow me @d_klinghoffer.

Follow this link:

Darwin, Marx, and Freud: The Genealogy of "Posthumanism ...