Sandworm and the GRU’s global intifada – Reason

This episode is a wide-ranging interview with Andy Greenberg, author of Sandworm: A New Era of Cyberwar and the Hunt for the Kremlin's Most Dangerous Hackers. The book contains plenty of original reporting, served up with journalistic flair. It digs deep into some of the most startling and destructive cyberattacks of recent years, from two dangerous attacks on Ukraine's power grid, to the multibillion-dollar NotPetya, and then to a sophisticated but largely failed effort to bring down the Seoul Olympics and pin the blame on North Korea. Apart from sophisticated coding and irresponsibly indiscriminate targeting, all these episodes have one thing in common. They are all the work of Russia's GRU.

Andy persuasively sets out the attribution and then asks what kind of corporate culture supports such adventurism and whether there is a strategic vision behind the GRU's attacks. The interview convinced me at least that the GRU is pursuing a strategy of muscular nihilism"our system doesn't work, but yours too is based on fragile illusions." It's a kind of global cyber intifada, with all the dangers and all the self-defeating tactics of the original intifadas. Don't disagree until you've listened!

Download the 286th Episode (mp3).

You can subscribe to The Cyberlaw Podcast using iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Pocket Casts, or our RSS feed!

As always, The Cyberlaw Podcast is open to feedback. Be sure to engage with @stewartbaker on Twitter. Send your questions, comments, and suggestions for topics or interviewees to CyberlawPodcast@steptoe.com. Remember: If your suggested guest appears on the show, we will send you a highly coveted Cyberlaw Podcast mug!

The views expressed in this podcast are those of the speakers and do not reflect the opinions of the firm.

View original post here:

Sandworm and the GRU's global intifada - Reason

Pixar’s hyper-existential Soul gets its first teaser – The A.V. Club

Soul, otherwise known as the Pixar film featuring a Trent Reznor score, just got its first teaser, which teases an existential journey not unlike that of the studios Inside Out.

Jamie Foxx lends his voice to Joe Gardner, a burgeoning jazz musician who, uh, dies after landing his dream job. In an alternate dimension, he meets another soul named 22 (Tina Fey), whose nihilism strikes uncomfortably against his own passion for art. The two then embark through cosmic realms to try and bring Joe back to the living world. Whats especially interesting is how the film interrogates the idea of suffering for ones art. For anyone who has a profession in the creative arts, its an almost religious obsessiveness you have to have to have success and a career in the arts, Kemp Power, a writer and co-director on the film, told Entertainment Weekly. At any point, no matter how happy you are doing what you do, it feels like that obsessiveness is detrimental to the rest of your life. Gardner, producer Dana Powers continues, has lived his whole life like he was meant to do this one thing [music] to the exclusion of pretty every other thing. Soul, then, is about embracing the breadth of everything life has to offer.

Pete Docter, the mind behind Inside Out, is also responsible for this existential piece, the creator having emerged as Pixars creative leader in the wake of John Lasseters departure. Questlove, Phylicia Rashad, and Daveed Diggs round out the cast, while acclaimed musician Jon Batiste penned the jazz tunes that serve to accent Reznor and Atticus Ross score.

Of the films afterlife animation, Docter told EW, We talked to a lot of folks that represented religious traditions and cultural traditions and [asked], What do you think a soul is? All of them said vaporous and ethereal and non-physical. We were like, Great! How do we do this? Were used to toys, cars, things that are much more substantial and easily referenced. This was a huge challenge, but I gotta say, I think the team really put some cool stuff together thats really indicative of those words but also relatable.

Watch the gorgeous teaser below.

Soul hits theaters on June 19, 2020.

Here is the original post:

Pixar's hyper-existential Soul gets its first teaser - The A.V. Club

Earl Sweatshirt’s Eccentricity on Full Display in EAST – The Heights – The Heights

The enigmatic rapper Earl Sweatshirt solidified his reputation as one of the industrys most innovative talents with the release a strange, disorderly music video for the song EAST on Friday. The video follows the recent arrival of Earls EP Feet of Clay. The EP builds on the discordant, choppy sampling techniques used on his previous project released this year, Some Rap Songs, while Earls lyrics reflect the despondency found on his 2015 album I Dont Like Shit, I Dont Go Outside.

The music video manifests the songs choppy production aesthetic through a visually compelling yet bizarre piece of art that appears fractured and unrelated to the song on first viewing yet ultimately succeeds in reflecting Earls struggling mental state.

The video opens with Earl standing on a beach in slides, Corona in hand, smoking a cigarette and hanging out with friends. A superimposed photograph of the moon floats about the screen, and another smaller video of a man running in a parking garage flipping off the camera pops up in the upper right-hand corner. There is not only a lack of cohesion at this point in the video, but a clearly intentional decision by Earl to offer something utterly original and unpredictable to the viewer. The lyrics of EAST deal with alcoholism and his struggles in coping with the passing of his father. He seems to be forgoing representing the plotline of the song in favor of depicting his own scattered and more abstract feelings of loss of direction and meaning.

Shot on an iPhone, the video reflects the independent ethos of Earls music along with his musics lo-fi production quality. Due to his sparse production style, his lyrics have space to operate outside the constraints of more polished instrumentation. Earl is serious about the content and wordplay of his lyrics, despite how outlandish his personality and nonchalant style may seem.

EAST is benefited by the frenetic, carnival-style accordion loop that sounds almost like the flying monkeys from the Wizard of Oz are about to appear at any moment. And with the amount of strange images popping up in the video, it was almost disappointing when they didnt. The video ends with Earl walking off camera, leaving viewers just as unsettled and confused as they were at the start and ultimately wondering, What was the point?

This resigned nihilism pervades Earls work and has almost caused him to quit rapping multiple times. Most notably, he talked about his feelings of disillusionment with the rap industry after a return from a center for troubled youth in Samoa on his 2013 album Doris. On the song Chum, he sadly confesses, Been back a week and already feel like calling it quits. Although Earl is certainly still struggling with finding meaning in the commercial rap industry, in the video for EAST he shows that he is channeling these emotions into compelling, utterly original art.

Featured Image by Warner Records

Related

See the article here:

Earl Sweatshirt's Eccentricity on Full Display in EAST - The Heights - The Heights

Attack On Titan Reveals Horrifying Way Titans Reproduced – Comicbook.com

As Attack On Titan careens toward its finale, in both the manga and the anime, more and more secrets about the world that harbors the war between the nation of Marley and the Eldians are being revealed. One of the biggest is the story of the first Titan, Ymir, and how she managed to pass along her powerful abilities to her children. Since this popular anime series manages to thrive when it comes to its sense of nihilism and despair, Ymir's back story is no different, creating a horrifying method for the power of the Titan to be shared among her bloodline. With this terrifying revelation shown just in time for Halloween, it should be interesting to see if it transfers to the anime as is.

In the 122nd chapter of Attack On Titan, we are given the background of the poor young character that is Ymir. The first ever "Titan", Ymir is a slave that is trapped in a cycle of harsh punishments and constant death. When she is framed for letting a pig escape, the current ruler of the land "frees her", meaning that she will be hunted and put to death. As she ran from the hunters and their hounds, Ymir discovers the power of the Titans and becomes the first of a long line.

As she assists the Eldian people, she is made the wife of the current Eldian king, who decides to give her power to their progeny in perhaps the most horrifying way possible. Cutting Ymir apart and serving her up to her own children, her power is given to the next generation as they greedily eat her severed body parts. It's a grotesque, blood curdling display but it works perfectly for the stark world that has been created in Attack On Titan.

Of course, this is all revealed as Eren and his brother Zeke have been travelling into the past, with the former attempting to use Ymir's power to end the world as it is. The series continues to explore this world of greys, proving that even heroes can stumble along the way.

What do you think of the disgusting method that the Titans were created? How do you see this franchise ultimately coming to an end? Feel free to let us know in the comments or hit me up directly on Twitter @EVComedy to talk all things comics, anime, and Titans!

Attack on Titan was originally created by Hajime Isayama, and the series has since been collected into 23 volumes as of 2017. It's set in a world where the last remnants of humanity live within a walled city in order to escape the danger of the Titans, a race of giants monsters that eats humans. The lead character, Eren Yeager, ends up joining the military with his two childhood friends Mikasa and Armin after the Titans break through the wall and attack his hometown. Now Eren, Mikasa, and Armin must survive in a world where they not only have the Titans to fear, but the very humans they are trying to save. You can currently find the series streaming on Crunchyroll, Funimation, and Saturday nights on Adult Swim's Toonami block.

Read the original here:

Attack On Titan Reveals Horrifying Way Titans Reproduced - Comicbook.com

‘A Serious Man’ came out 10 years ago. Here’s what real rabbis think of the Coen brothers film. – JTA News

(JTA) Its well known that the celebrated filmmakers Joel and Ethan Coen come from a Jewish family in St. Louis Park, Minnesota. Theyve included Jewish characters in their films throughout their long career, from the titular one in Barton Fink to the bookie Bernie Bernbaum in Millers Crossing to perhaps the most famous Jewish convert in the history of Hollywood, Walter Sobchak in The Big Lebowski.

But it was with 2009s A Serious Man, which was released 10 years ago this month, that the Coens produced their most overtly Jewish work. Its a film set in 1967 in their Minnesota hometown and its plot, by all indications, is loosely based on the biblical Book of Job.

Following an opening quote from Rashi and a brief prologue set in a 19th-century shtetl, A Serious Man tells the story of Larry Gopnik (played by then-unknown Jewish actor Michael Stuhlbarg), a Jewish college professor whose life suddenly comes apart in Job-like fashion.

Larrys children dont seem to respect him, and an unknown enemy is sending threatening letters to his tenure committee, jeopardizing his career. His wife (Sari Lennick) is leaving him for his former friend, Sy Abelman (Fred Melamed). There are hints that he is developing possibly serious health problems.

I havent done anything is Larrys mantra throughout it all.

Turning to his faith at a time of crisis, Larry appeals to three rabbis and gets three very different responses, none of them altogether helpful. The young junior rabbi Ginsler (Big Bang Theory actor Simon Helberg) offers a humanistic speech about finding beauty in the world. Rabbi Nachtner, in one of the films most recognized scenes, provides a long but not exactly comforting parable about a dentist who finds Hebrew lettering on a non-Jewish patients tooth.

The elderly Rabbi Marshak, meanwhile, wont even meet with Larry. (The rabbi is busy, Marshaks secretary tells him repeatedly.)

Like the best of the Coens work, A Serious Man is darkly comic, absurd and well-acted, and it contends with the huge themes of alienation and nihilism. The rabbi section of the film seemingly makes the point that, as Rabbi Nachtner says, Judaism is not a faith that always provide the easiest of answers.

In 2009, the Jewish Chronicle called the film a Jewish masterpiece and the finest American film about the Jewish experience made for a generation.Others, however, saw the movie in a less positive light, partly for its depiction of Jews.

The Jewish film critic Ella Taylor wrote for LA Weekly at the time of release that A Serious Man was seriously bad for the Jews and likened it to an avalanche of Ugly Jew iconography.

A Serious Manis crowded with fat Jews, aggressive Jews, passive-aggressive Jews, traitor Jews, loser Jews, shyster-Jews, emo-Jews, Jews who slurp their chicken soup, and passing as sages a clutch of yellow-toothed, know-nothing rabbis, Taylor wrote.

Rabbi Benjamin Blech, writing for Aish in 2009, said the Jews in the film were merely lampooned, satirized and stereotyped to anti-Semitic perfection.

Looking for some other opinions much as Larry did the Jewish Telegraphic Agency reached out to some real rabbis for their thoughts on A Serious Man. As you may have imagined, they had differing opinions.

Directors Joel Coen, right, and Ethan Coen, center, with actor Michael Stuhlbarg, arrive for the London Film Festival screening of A Serious Man. (Yui Mok/PA Images via Getty Images)

An indictment of American Judaism

Rabbi Joe Schwartz is based in Brooklyn and founded IDRA, a Jewish cultural community. A self-described Coen Brothers stan and an insane fan of the movie, Schwartz is not so much critical of the film itself but rather what he believes it says about strands of Judaism in America.

A Serious Man is the greatest indictment of the hollowness of much of American Judaism ever made, Schwartz, a Conservative rabbi, told JTA.

Larry approaches the rabbis for help, Schwartz said, and each fails him the callow junior rabbi, the garrulous senior rabbi and the Talmid chacham, or revered Torah scholar.

None has the slightest clue whats going on, and none even begins to try to simply sit with Larry and offer him compassion, he added.

For Schwartz, the notable scene in which Larrys son recites his Torah portion for his bar mitzvah while extremely stoned sets off how grotesque and fallow the whole charade is.

A statement about the changing face of the rabbinate

Rabbi Glenn Ettman is the senior rabbi at the Reform synagogue Congregation Or Ami in Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania, outside of Philadelphia. Ettman, a former theater major at Brandeis, said A Serious Man came up often last year while discussing the Book of Job with his Torah study group.

Its really confusing and challenging, and a good artful attempt at a unique form of storytelling using a biblical book, Ettman said of the film. I really appreciated that it had untranslated Hebrew and Jewish concepts, that kind of gave it that concept of theres something else to this movie.

As for the rabbi scenes, Ettman called it an interesting portrayal, but added that initially he was slightly offended by it.

It wasnt so much that it made Jews look terrible it was that it made rabbis look even worse, Ettman said of his original impression of the film.

More recently, though, Ettman has seen the younger rabbi as the only true essence of a real rabbi, as opposed to a caricature. He said it is symbolic of the fact that the face of the rabbinate has changed a great deal since 1967.

Everyone assumes that a rabbi is an old white dude with a long white beard, Ettman said before mentioning multiple names of classmates who are magnificent, powerhouse female rabbis.

He said the films rabbis can be viewed as caricatures of different generations or denominations, or possibly just divergent views of Judaism. Ettman also compared it all to a point in the actual Book of Job, when Job is visited by three friends, none of whom give him advice thats especially helpful.

What the hometown rabbi thinks

Rabbi Norman Cohen is rabbi emeritus of the Reform Bet Shalom Congregation in Minnetonka, a part of suburban Minneapolis that borders St. Louis Park. In a 2011 essay about the film in The Journal of Religion and Film, Cohen said he was offended by some of its images but that doesnt mean the work doesnt offer plenty to like.

Of all their films, this is the most identifiably Jewish, most potentially philosophical and most troubling theologically, Cohen wrote.

As is often the case when they give interviews, the Coens are a lot like the rabbis in A Serious Man in discussing the Jewishness of the film: Their answers only raise even more questions.

There were Jewish characters, but in regards to whether our background influences our filmmaking, who knows? Joel Coen said on a visit to Israel in 2011, according to Haaretz. We dont think about it. Theres no doubt that our Jewish heritage affects how we see things.

Weve never tried to hide that or tiptoe around [being Jewish], Ethan Coen said in a 2009 interview with The Jewish Chronicle around the films release. Hollywood has always been largely Jewish, although made of Jews who wanted to assimilate. As a friend of ours once said, If the movie business wasnt difficult, God wouldnt have given it to the Jews.

Original post:

'A Serious Man' came out 10 years ago. Here's what real rabbis think of the Coen brothers film. - JTA News

Queen reduced to furious frontwoman for grubby election stunt – The Guardian

Her Majestys head rotated through 720 degrees. A stream of green projectile vomit erupted from her mouth. This wasnt so much a Queens speech as an exorcism. A desperate purge of the toxic waste that had been forced on her by a prime minister she had come to detest. A man who had already misled her over one prorogation and was now using her as a frontwoman to deliver an election manifesto. She had had her fair share of grubby moments during her time on the throne the Ceauescu state visit being a case in point but this was almost up there.

There was a large cluster of empty seats amid the ermine and tiaras from Claires Accessories in the Lords. The sense of futility was too much even for some Tory peers. The Queen eyed up the gaps enviously. Shed have given almost anything to have skipped the occasion herself. Anything but let Prince Charles have a go. Her son might be 70 but he still couldnt be trusted not to screw things up. Even an election stunt like this.

The Queen had looked both frail and furious as she sat down in her throne. Her eyes glanced over towards the TV screens as she waited for MPs to make their way over from the Commons. There was the prime minister trying to make small talk with Jeremy Corbyn. Good to see the Labour leader giving him the brush-off. At least he was good for something.

Her Maj then looked up towards the visitors gallery. Surely not? But it was. Stanley Johnson. You just couldnt escape a Johnson these days. Though surely Stanley was the Johnsons prize Johnson. He was like Boriss shadow. How pathetic that he could exist only in the reflected, tainted glory of his son. He probably slept in his own basket next to Dilyn the dog, just outside Boris and Carries bedroom.

Then the lord chancellor handed her the parchment and her professionalism kicked in. My government, she began. My government, my arse. This wasnt her government. It wasnt anyones government. It was just a bunch of shits and charlatans, men and women for whom lying was second nature. That her reign should have come to this. She and the country surely deserved better. Though perhaps they didnt. Maybe the UK was on a one-way ticket to becoming a failed state.

She plodded on, making sure not to let the slightest hint of enthusiasm escape her lips. Not hard. This was a punishment beating for everyone. An exercise in utter existential nihilism. Even if Johnson meant a single word of it something she rather doubted there was no chance of any of it happening this side of a general election.

So the best she could hope for was to be back in the Lords in a couple of months time, spouting the same old shit about providing dignity in old age and improving mental health provision. This from a man who had stripped a 93-year-old woman of her dignity and who had done more to damage the nations mental health than any other politician. Once she had wrapped things up, she slipped a message to the Rouge Dragon Pursuivant to pick up the pace on the procession out. She needed a drink badly. Make it a double.

Two hours later the Commons was back in session to go through the charade of debating a Queens speech that was never going to be implemented, while pretending the really serious business of the Brexit negotiations in Brussels wasnt happening. If this was a war, parliament would have been court martialed for dereliction of duty.

As is customary, two government backbenchers proposed and seconded the debate. These speeches are meant to be a chance to shine. To mix wit and personality with light-touch sincerity. But in Lee Rowley and Sarah Newton, the government had picked two MPs who are completely devoid of charm, barely capable of delivering a coherent sentence, let alone one that grips the imagination. Opera heroines have died a less agonising, less painful death.

Corbyn spotted his opportunity to live down to the occasion. This was the most open of open goals. All he had to do was declare the debate a farce, deliver his own election manifesto, point out that Johnson had now embarrassed the Queen twice within a couple of months, and ask when he was planning on going for the hat-trick.

Instead he rambled on, mistaking the Queens speech as serious policy and getting hopelessly bogged down as he tried and failed to grapple with the lack of detail. No wonder some Labour MPs are now seriously thinking of waving through Johnsons Brexit deal, however crap it turns out to be, and voting Conservative in the next election. Just to get rid of their leader.

Johnson was no more impressive. Pifflepafflewifflewaffle. Rather, he was at his most loathsome. Arrogant and dismissive. Not even funny. Land of hopeless glory. Devoid of detail and morality as he indulged in petty point-scoring. A desperate blob interested more in his own survival than that of the country. As are nearly all Tory MPs. Principles that were once held sacred on both the leave and remain wings of the party are now up for grabs. Sold to the lowest bidder in return for a Brexit deal appreciably worse than Theresa Mays that would make their constituents appreciably less well off.

This was an embarrassment. A parliament of all the talentless. What a time it is not to be alive.

Continued here:

Queen reduced to furious frontwoman for grubby election stunt - The Guardian

What’s your number? Chad Schoonmaker may have the answer in his ‘Color by Number’ series – The Advocate

There's The Reformer and The Achiever, The Enthusiast and The Peacemaker.

In all, nine personality types are part of the Enneagram, a model of the human psyche.

Artist Chad Schoonmaker explores those personality categories in his show, "Color by Number," at the Manship Theatre Gallery in the Shaw Center for the Arts, 100 Lafayette St.

But there's a kicker Schoonmaker depicted each personality type in abstract, signaling that because people are different, not everyone fits neatly into one slot.

The artist learned that firsthand when he overheard conversations in the gallery.

" People were talking about how they might fit in one category, but they also had traits of another," he said. "It's almost as if their conversations became a part of the artwork."

That's the reaction Schoonmaker was hoping to generate by combining his love for art and people into this series designed specifically for this space.

He provides the descriptions of each personality type next to each of his works. What's your number?

"One: The Reformer": Ones are conscientious and ethical with a strong sense of right and wrong. They are teachers, crusaders and advocates for change: always trying to improve things but afraid of making a mistake. Well-organized, orderly and fastidious, they try to maintain high standards but can slip into being critical and perfectionistic. They typically have problems with resentment and impatience. At their best: wise, discerning, realistic and noble. Can be morally heroic.

"Two: The Helper": Twos are empathetic, sincere and warmhearted. They are friendly, generous and self-sacrificing but can also be sentimental, flattering and people-pleasing. They are well-meaning and driven to be close to others but can slip into doing things for others in order to be needed. They typically have problems with possessiveness and with acknowledging their own needs. At their best: unselfish and altruistic, they have unconditional love for others.

"Three: The Achiever": Threes are self-assured, attractive and charming. Ambitious, competent and energetic, they can also be status conscious and highly driven for advancement. They are diplomatic and poised but can also be overly concerned with their image and what others think of them. They typically have problems with workaholism and competitiveness. At their best: self-accepting, authentic, everything they seem to be role models who inspire others.

"Four: The Individualist": Fours are self-aware, sensitive and reserved. They are emotionally honest, creative and personal but can also be moody and self-conscious. Withholding themselves due to feeling vulnerable and defective, they can also feel disdainful and exempt from ordinary ways of living. They typically have problems with melancholy, self-indulgence and self-pity. At their best: inspired and highly creative, they are able to renew themselves and transform their experiences.

"Five: The Investigator": Fives are alert, insightful and curious. They are able to concentrate and focus on complex ideas and skills. Independent, innovative and inventive, they can also become preoccupied with their thoughts and imaginary constructs. They become detached yet high strung and intense. They typically have problems with eccentricity, nihilism and isolation. At their best: visionary pioneers, often ahead of their time and able to see the world in an entirely new way.

"Six: The Loyalist": The committed, security-oriented type, Sixes are reliable, hardworking, responsible and trustworthy. Excellent troubleshooters, they foresee problems and foster cooperation but can also become defensive, evasive and anxious running on stress while complaining about it. They can be cautious and indecisive but also reactive, defiant and rebellious. They typically have problems with self-doubt and suspicion. At their best: internally stable and self-reliant, courageously championing themselves and others.

"Seven: The Enthusiast": Sevens are extroverted, optimistic, versatile and spontaneous. Playful, high-spirited and practical, they can also misapply their talents, becoming overextended, scattered and undisciplined. They constantly seek new and exciting experiences but can become distracted and exhausted by staying on the go. They typically have problems with impatience and impulsiveness. At their best: focus their talents on worthwhile goals, becoming appreciative, joyous and satisfied.

"Eight: The Challenger": Eights are self-confident, strong and assertive. Protective, resourceful, straight talking and decisive, but can also be egocentric and domineering. Eights feel they must control their environment, especially people, sometimes becoming confrontational and intimidating. Eights typically have problems with their tempers and with allowing themselves to be vulnerable. At their best: self-mastering, they use their strength to improve others' lives, becoming heroic, magnanimous and inspiring.

"Nine: The Peacemaker": Nines are accepting, trusting and stable. They are usually creative, optimistic and supportive but can also be too willing to go along with others to keep the peace. They want everything to go smoothly and be without conflict, but they can also tend to be complacent, simplifying problems and minimizing anything upsetting. They typically have problems with inertia and stubbornness. At their best: indomitable and all-embracing, they are able to bring people together and heal conflicts.

Schoonmaker sees himself as a solid Four, though he also bears traces of Seven's traits.

"I am the individualistic type you see in Four, but sometimes I find myself moving toward Seven," he said. "But doesn't everyone want to be a Seven? Or at least be around a Seven, because they're spontaneous and fun."

For more information, visit Schoonmaker's website at cscreates.com.

Read more:

What's your number? Chad Schoonmaker may have the answer in his 'Color by Number' series - The Advocate

Coloureds are Africans: We are the indigenous people of South Africa – Daily Maverick

This coloured thing. Shit this coloured thing. This badge of shame, disgrace and ignominy that some want to hang around people like me as they excoriate people in this group for not being fully African, or having feasted on the so-called benefits that apartheid had bestowed on them.

And as these insults rain down on coloureds, it is conveniently forgotten that many of the forefathers of people who have brown skins were the first freedom fighters in this country. In landmark battles, they bravely defended themselves and their land against European invaders in Mossel Bay, as well as Table Bay.

No matter what the twisters and sanitisers of history peddle: they are also South Africas indigenous people. For the record, my lineage goes deep into the Overberg and includes a Khoi kaptein who was deposed by missionaries because he refused to become their vassal. So while I regard myself as indigenous and therefore African I will for the purposes of this opinion piece use the term coloured.

Long before they were conquered in the Eastern Cape, the Khoi also called that part of South Africa home, even if today they are a minority there. Today the descendants of the indigenous people everywhere experience deliberate discrimination according to anecdotal evidence, as well as a recent Human Rights Commission report, which has made certain recommendations to the president.

I did not want to write about this coloured thing. However, sometimes one has to speak up and not hide behind political correctness. The hopelessness and self-hatred, typical of indigenous people that have been invaded and conquered and that comes with being told one is a stepchild in the land of ones ancestors, has reached a tipping point. Ever-diminishing opportunities, Western Cape prisons overcrowded with what can be called the coloured lost generation of males seduced by ruthless gangsterism cannot be ignored anymore. Neither can the nihilism that has taken root.

Then there is the widespread accusation that the Western Cape is not really African. Indeed: this kind of comment is code for actually saying that coloureds are not African; the Western Cape is too coloured and therefore the Western Cape is not African enough. Lets call out claims like this out for what they are: racism. And this must stop.

Coloureds should challenge and reject this deeply flawed narrative, which pushes them to the margins and also slyly wants to impose national demographics on to the Western Cape.

This racism seeps through everywhere: only a few days ago a Sunday newspaper reported about General Jeremy Vearey, who just happens to be coloured, according to old South Africa racial classification categories that conveniently travelled into our new democracy.

The newspaper report, mentioning an unnamed ANC Western Cape source, talked about a coloured cabal backing Vearey. Vearey is a freedom fighter who did not sit in an armchair, nursing an upper-end whisky from the Johnny Walker range, but took up arms and ended up on Robben Island. He was one of the last political prisoners to be freed before, as an MK soldier, he became one of ANC president Nelson Mandelas most trusted bodyguards a person of the utmost integrity.

The Sunday newspaper hatchet job is part of an orchestrated campaign against his bid to become Western Cape Police Commissioner. Many support his candidature because he has a sterling track record of fighting crime. Bringing in allegations of a coloured cabal backing him is simply playing that race card that derides coloureds.

It would seem that now that our joint struggle to end apartheid is over, some of those who once were comrades can be relegated because they are coloured, had had so-called better opportunities and are now only needed at election times. Now that the 2019 elections are becoming a distant memory, it seems like it is time to bring out old resentments about the so-called favouritism that coloureds enjoyed under apartheid.

The National Party government cynically tried to turn different shades of the black community against each other by literally placing them on a ladder of meagre benefits. Those at the bottom were bitter about those at the top.

That resentment can be conveniently used to rally support when the political leadership of parties is decided. It is something that the Western Cape interim political leadership of the ANC has to combat as it sets about rebuilding the party. Promoting true non-racialism and not ethnicity based on discredited racist categories from the old South Africa should drive this process.

Off course, its not only the ANC that has reached out to the majority in the Western Cape for its electoral support. The DA has done it as well. And once they galloped into power on the back of a surge of brown support, the DA relegated this group to the sidelines. Helen Zille was replaced as premier by another white face, and a white male at that, this in a province where whites are in the minority.

A party such as the ANC has found it difficult and almost unbearable to come out and say that employment opportunities in the Western Cape must be based on provincial and not national demographics.

This stance has not alienated what the ANC would call its traditional African base but this has cost the ANC coloured support, dented its credibility and has made it far less attractive than the DA. Many of those coloureds that have voted DA had seen that party as one that would protect their interests against Africans.

As another municipal election is approaching, coloured leaders in the ANC will be forced to say publicly where they stand. Keeping quiet about the clear marginalisation of coloureds will again have radical consequences at the polls if the 2019 general election is anything to go by.

As for the country and its ANC government, non-racialism will be given a crucial impetus once coloureds are recognised as being just as African and intrinsically belonging to this continent as Zulus, Xhosas or any of the lands other black tribes. Those who have had the door that leads to opportunities slammed in their face because they are allegedly not African will turn their back on non-racialism and cynically say that the much-talked-about new dawn is not meant for them. They will continue to say, as theyre doing now, that they were not white enough during the apartheid years and now theyre not African.

We should also be recognised for who we are: the indigenous people of South Africa. That is the national question: how to admit that South Africa had indeed experienced different forms of early conquest, one that saw the indigenous people being dispossessed by other Africans and also Europeans, with both groups laying claim to a country which wasnt initially theirs.

Failing to deal with these cardinal issues will only feed the self-destruction, rage, impotence and disenchantment with the new South Africa present in many coloured communities.

Yet self-destructive rage is short-sighted. All over the world, indigenous people are standing up, claiming their inheritance. We should do the same while vigorously also promoting non-racialism and equality. Our country demands it of us. DM

Dennis Cruywagen was ANC Western Cape spokesperson during the 2019 general election.

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or if you are already an Insider.

Read more here:

Coloureds are Africans: We are the indigenous people of South Africa - Daily Maverick

The New York Times, NBC, and other outlets don’t trust you to handle the truth – Hot Air

In the original Planet of the Apes movie (1968), the most-fascinating character is Dr. Zaius, the elitist, orangutan in chief who alone possessed the secret knowledge that (spoiler alert!) apes descended from humans. Toward the end of the filmshortly before he warns Charlton Hestons character not to search for the truth because you may not like what you find!he monologues that the hoi polloi (chimps and gorillas in this case) must be shielded from certain realities lest they be driven to insanity and nihilism.

The legacy media are having their Dr. Zaius moment, paternalistically shielding their infantile audience (read: you and me) from ugly images and realities. This is not simply a revolting development but a deeply troubling one that will only accelerate the ongoing loss of confidence and trust the public has in media. According to polling done for the Columbia Journalism Review, fewer than 20 percent of us have a great deal of confidence in the press. The only institution held in lower esteem is Congress.

Yet the media seem happy to keep digging their own grave. Yesterday, for instance, The New York Times reported on what it called a macabre video of [a] fake Trump shooting media and critics that was shown at a conference held at one of the presidents own properties (Trump had nothing to do with the conference or the video, which the White House has condemned). Youd assume the paper would link to or embed the video in support of its characterization. But it refused to, even as its safe to say that it was the Times coverage that helped bring the video to a large viewing audience (thats how I learned about it).

reason.com/2019/10/14/the-new-york-times-nbc-and-other-outlets-dont-trust-you-to-handle-the-truth/

Read the rest here:

The New York Times, NBC, and other outlets don't trust you to handle the truth - Hot Air

KLAVAN: Leftists Hate ‘Joker’ Because Joker Is The Left – The Daily Wire

This review contains no spoilers.

Theres been a lot of digital ink spilled over the new film Joker, but whats fascinating to me about it is how much of what the critics said is simply absurd. To be sure, artistic works, like life itself, are open to interpretation, but in both cases works and life youve got to stick to the facts to get at the truth.

Joker is, for all intents and purposes, a comic book remake of the 1976 Martin Scorsese film Taxi Driver. Its the story of a troubled loners descent into violence. I should say up front that I dont like comic book movies very much and I didnt like Taxi Driver very much, so I wasnt the films most sympathetic audience. That said, I found Joker stylish, watchable, and well-done with some enriching plot ambiguities. I also found it tonally monotonous and overly derivative.

But the panic the film set off among leftist critics may be the most interesting thing about the movie. To be sure, the films talented director Todd Phillips taunted the leftist Outrage Beast when he gave an interview criticizing the humorlessness of woke culture. The left responded by being humorlessly woke, proving the guys point. After that, Phillips had a target on his back.

But it was the lefts political reaction to the movie itself that was so strangely (or maybe not so strangely) off base. Its an insidious validation of the white-male resentment that helped bring President Donald Trump to power, said Jeff Yang of CNN. Anti-Trumper Max Boot wrote a WaPo piece also linking Joker to Trump and headlined, Joker nails the nihilism and opportunism of populist firebrands.

And in a thoroughly unhinged rant, Richard Brody of The New Yorker called the film a blatant and brazen distortion of the most substantial historical elements at which it winks. Joker is the comic-book Green Book, twisting history for the sake of a yarn.

That last review really is the giveaway. Because, with some caveats (the movie doesnt deal with race at all), the films historical perspective is pretty damned accurate. And that perspective condemns the left where it stands.

No matter how you feel about the movies protagonist, the one thing Joker is not is a Trump voter. Hes a leftist: a self-pitying victim; a hater of the rich; a man who takes no responsibility for his own actions but instead blames the unfairness of society. In fact, all in all, the movie is a thoroughly justifiable satire of leftist talking points. It is not like the excellent Dark Knight trilogy a philosophical kick in the groin to leftism in general. But it does hold the mirror up to leftist culture and the image in the glass is not pretty.

The Gotham of the movie is late 1970s New York, a toilet of pornography and violence. I lived there. I remember it. It was, like todays crap-strewn and disintegrating San Francisco, a city the left made. A city that put the tender loving care of criminals above the safety of decent citizens. A city that would not get the homeless off its streets. A city that would not restrict or condemn pornography and prostitution on its main thoroughfares. Its lawmen were handcuffed by left-wing Supreme Court decisions that made it harder to investigate and prosecute the bad guys. And journalists were silenced by racial sensitivity because a lot of the people committing the crimes were black and no one wanted to seem racist.

So the city went to hell. Leftist hell.

Thats where Joker takes place: Leftist hell. And because Gothams left-wing government does not really care about treating real problems like mental illness, Joker goes nuts.

The movie does depict the rich as insensitive louts. If anyone can be said to represent Donald Trump in the film, its millionaire Thomas Wayne, Batmans father. But the peoples inchoate rage and hatred against the wealthy literally turn them into a mob of clowns. And if mob of clowns is not a metaphor for todays left, I dont know what is.

No wonder the leftist critics feared this film. Its a reminder of who leftists are and what they do when you give them power. You can watch it and know everything you need to know about them and its cheaper and safer than a trip to San Francisco.

See more here:

KLAVAN: Leftists Hate 'Joker' Because Joker Is The Left - The Daily Wire

nihilism | Definition & History | Britannica.com

Nihilism, (from Latin nihil, nothing), originally a philosophy of moral and epistemological skepticism that arose in 19th-century Russia during the early years of the reign of Tsar Alexander II. The term was famously used by Friedrich Nietzsche to describe the disintegration of traditional morality in Western society. In the 20th century, nihilism encompassed a variety of philosophical and aesthetic stances that, in one sense or another, denied the existence of genuine moral truths or values, rejected the possibility of knowledge or communication, and asserted the ultimate meaninglessness or purposelessness of life or of the universe.

The term is an old one, applied to certain heretics in the Middle Ages. In Russian literature, nihilism was probably first used by N.I. Nadezhdin, in an 1829 article in the Messenger of Europe, in which he applied it to Aleksandr Pushkin. Nadezhdin, as did V.V. Bervi in 1858, equated nihilism with skepticism. Mikhail Nikiforovich Katkov, a well-known conservative journalist who interpreted nihilism as synonymous with revolution, presented it as a social menace because of its negation of all moral principles.

It was Ivan Turgenev, in his celebrated novel Fathers and Sons (1862), who popularized the term through the figure of Bazarov the nihilist. Eventually, the nihilists of the 1860s and 70s came to be regarded as disheveled, untidy, unruly, ragged men who rebelled against tradition and social order. The philosophy of nihilism then began to be associated erroneously with the regicide of Alexander II (1881) and the political terror that was employed by those active at the time in clandestine organizations opposed to absolutism.

If to the conservative elements the nihilists were the curse of the time, to the liberals such as N.G. Chernyshevsky they represented a mere transitory factor in the development of national thoughta stage in the struggle for individual freedomand a true spirit of the rebellious young generation. In his novel What Is to Be Done? (1863), Chernyshevsky endeavoured to detect positive aspects in the nihilist philosophy. Similarly, in his Memoirs, Prince Peter Kropotkin, the leading Russian anarchist, defined nihilism as the symbol of struggle against all forms of tyranny, hypocrisy, and artificiality and for individual freedom.

Fundamentally, 19th-century nihilism represented a philosophy of negation of all forms of aestheticism; it advocated utilitarianism and scientific rationalism. Classical philosophical systems were rejected entirely. Nihilism represented a crude form of positivism and materialism, a revolt against the established social order; it negated all authority exercised by the state, by the church, or by the family. It based its belief on nothing but scientific truth; science would be the solution of all social problems. All evils, nihilists believed, derived from a single sourceignorancewhich science alone would overcome.

The thinking of 19th-century nihilists was profoundly influenced by philosophers, scientists, and historians such as Ludwig Feuerbach, Charles Darwin, Henry Buckle, and Herbert Spencer. Since nihilists denied the duality of human beings as a combination of body and soul, of spiritual and material substance, they came into violent conflict with ecclesiastical authorities. Since nihilists questioned the doctrine of the divine right of kings, they came into similar conflict with secular authorities. Since they scorned all social bonds and family authority, the conflict between parents and children became equally immanent, and it is this theme that is best reflected in Turgenevs novel.

See the rest here:

nihilism | Definition & History | Britannica.com

Nihilism – Philosophy – AllAboutPhilosophy.org

Nihilism Abandoning Values and KnowledgeNihilism derives its name from the Latin root nihil, meaning nothing, that which does not exist. This same root is found in the verb annihilate -- to bring to nothing, to destroy completely. Nihilism is the belief which:

Nihilism A Meaningless WorldShakespeares Macbeth eloquently summarizes existential nihilism's perspective, disdaining life:

Nihilism Beyond NothingnessNihilism--choosing to believe in Nothingness--involves a high price. An individual may choose to feel rather than think, exert their will to power than pray, give thanks, or obey God. After an impressive career of literary and philosophical creativity, Friedrich Nietzsche lost all control of his mental faculties. Upon seeing a horse mistreated, he began sobbing uncontrollably and collapsed into a catatonic state. Nietzsche died August 25, 1900, diagnosed as utterly insane. While saying Yes to life but No to God, the Prophet of Nihilism missed both.

Beyond the nothingness of nihilism, there is One who is greater than unbelief; One who touched humanity (1 John 5:20) and assures us that our lives are not meaningless (Acts 17:24-28).

See the article here:

Nihilism - Philosophy - AllAboutPhilosophy.org

Nihilism – Wikiquote

Nihilism (pronounced: /na.lzm/ or /ni.lzm/; from the Latin nihil, nothing) refers to sets of beliefs which negate one or more apparently meaningful aspects of Reality. Some are forms of existential nihilism, which argue that life is without objective meaning, purpose, or intrinsic value. Moral nihilists assert that morality does not inherently exist, and that any established moral values are abstractly contrived. More extreme forms can insist that knowledge is not possible, and that truth, beauty or reality do not actually exist. The term nihilism often relates to anomie in indicating general moods of despair at a perceived pointlessness of existence which can develop with beliefs that there are no necessary norms, rules, or laws.

Nihilists are not kind; They believe in nothing. The Stranger is not kind, He drifts where the wind catches him.

Nihilists are like a bellows Empty, yet full of hot air, The more they threaten, the more cowardly they seem; The Stranger also rambles and loses his train of thought But tells a purty good story.

See the article here:

Nihilism - Wikiquote

Nihilism | Psychology Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative |Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences |Personality | Philosophy | Social |Methods | Statistics |Clinical | Educational | Industrial |Professional items |World psychology |

Philosophy Index:Aesthetics Epistemology Ethics Logic Metaphysics Consciousness Philosophy of Language Philosophy of Mind Philosophy of Science Social and Political philosophy Philosophies Philosophers List of lists

Nihilism is a philosophical position which argues that the world, and especially human existence, is without objective meaning, purpose, comprehensible truth, or essential value. Nihilists generally assert some or all of the following: there is no reasonable proof of the existence of a higher ruler or creator, a "true morality" is unknown, and secular ethics are impossible; therefore, life has no truth, and no action is known to be preferable to any other.[1]

Nihilism is often more a charge leveled against a particular idea, movement, or group, than it is an actual philosophical position to which someone overtly subscribes. Movements such as Dadaism as well as Futurism[2] and deconstructionism,[3] among others, have been described by commentators as "nihilist" at various times in various contexts. Often this means or is meant to imply that the beliefs of the accuser are more substantial or truthful, whereas the beliefs of the accused are nihilistic, and thereby comparatively amount to nothing.

Nihilism is also a characteristic that has been ascribed to time periods: for example, Baudrillard and others have called postmodernity a nihilistic epoch,[4] and some Christian theologians and figures of authority have asserted that modernity[3] and postmodernity[5] represent the rejection of God, and therefore are nihilistic.

Prominent philosophers who have written on the subject of nihilism include Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger. Nietzsche described Christianity as a nihilistic religion because it evaded the challenge of finding meaning in earthly life, creating instead a spiritual projection where mortality and suffering were removed instead of transcended. He believed nihilism resulted from the "death of God", and insisted that it was something to be overcome, by returning meaning to a monistic reality. (He sought instead a "pragmatic idealism," in contrast to the prominent influence of Schopenhauer's "cosmic idealism.") Heidegger argued that the term "nihilism has a very specific meaning. What remains unquestioned and forgotten in metaphysics is being; and hence, it is nihilistic,"[6] and that nihilism rested on the reduction of Being to "mere value."[How to reference and link to summary or text]

The term comes from the Latin nihil, meaning "nothing". The Oxford English Dictionary gives 1817 as its earliest use in English, and Alain Rey's Dictionnaire historique de la langue franaise (revised edition 1995) gives 1787 as the first use of the word in French, nothing that nihiliste was used in 1761, though in a religious sense of 'heretic' that is now obsolete. Rey also argues that the Russian equivalent nighilizm () that appeared in 1829 was an impulse to the penetration of the term into modern language.

The Latin indefinite pronoun nihili ('nothing') is a reduced form of nihilum, a term that derives from ne-hilom, an emphatic form of the negation ne by means of hilum, meaning 'the slightest amount' and of uncertain origin. [citation needed]

Though the term nihilism was first popularized by Ivan Turgenev (see below), it was first introduced into philosophical discourse by Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi (17431819), who used the term to characterize rationalism, and in particular Immanuel Kant's "critical" philosophy in order to carry out a reductio ad absurdum according to which all rationalism (philosophy as criticism) reduces to nihilism, and thus it should be avoided and replaced with a return to some type of faith and revelation. (See also fideism.)

Friedrich Nietzsche's later work displays a preoccupation with nihilism. Book One of the posthumous collection The Will to Power (a highly selective arrangement of jottings from various notebooks and from an incomplete project begun by Nietzsche himself, then posthumously edited and released by his sister, Elisabeth Frster-Nietzsche) is entitled "European Nihilism" which he calls "the problem of the nineteenth century." [citation needed] Nietzsche characterized nihilism as emptying the world and especially human existence of meaning, purpose, comprehensible truth, or essential value. He hints that nihilism can become a false belief, when it leads individuals to discard any hope of meaning in the world and thus to invent some compensatory alternate measure of significance.

Though some deride it as nihilistic, postmodernism can be contrasted with the above formulation of nihilism in that the most common type of nihilism tends toward defeatism or fatalism, while postmodern philosophers tend to find strength and reason for celebration in the varied and unique human relationships it explores.

In a very different vein than just given, contemporary analytic philosophers have been engaged in a very active discussion over the past few years about what is called mereological nihilism. This is the position that objects with parts do not exist, and only basic building blocks without parts exist (e.g., electrons, quarks), and thus the world we see and experience full of objects with parts is a product of human misperception. Jeffrey Grupp of Purdue University [7], argues for a doctrine of mereological nihilism, maintaining that there are no objects whatsoever which have parts. Grupp argues that nihilism is the standard position of many ancient atomists, such as Democritus of ancient Greece, Dharmakirti of ancient India, that it is the position held by Kant in his transcendental idealism, and that it is the position actually found in quantum observational physics.[8]The other contemporary mereological nihilists are not atomists (instead they advocate a slightly diferent theory, called simples), such as the mereological nihilists Trenton Merricks of the University of Virginia, and Peter van Inwagen of Notre Dame.

In the world of ethics, nihilist or nihilistic is often used as a derogatory term referring to a complete rejection of all systems of authority, morality, and social custom, or one who purportedly makes such a rejection. Either through the rejection of previously accepted bases of belief or through extreme relativism or skepticism, the nihilist is construed as one who believes that none of these claims to power are valid. Nihilism not only dismisses received moral values, but rejects 'morality' outright, viewing it as baseless.

Postmodern thought is colored by the perception of a degeneration of systems of epistemology and ethics into extreme relativism, especially evident in the writings of Jean-Franois Lyotard and Jacques Derrida. These philosophers tend to deny the very grounds on which Western cultures have based their 'truths': absolute knowledge and meaning, the accumulation of positive knowledge, historical progress, and the ideals of humanism and the Enlightenment. Though it is often described as a fundamentally nihilist philosophy, before entering a brief discussion on postmodern thought it is important to note that nihilism itself is open to postmodern criticism: nihilism is a claim to a universal truth, exactly what postmodernism rejects.

Lyotard argues that, rather than relying on an objective truth or method to prove their claims, philosophers legitimize their truths by reference to a story about the world which is inseparable from the age and system the stories belong to. Lyotard calls them meta-narratives. He then goes on to define the postmodern condition as one characterized by a rejection both of these meta-narratives and of the process of legitimization by meta-narratives.

"In lieu of meta-narratives we have created new language-games in order to legitimize our claims which rely on changing relationships and mutable truths, none of which is privileged over the other to speak to ultimate truth." It is this unstable concept of truth and meaning that leads one close to nihilism, though in the same move that plunges toward meaninglessness, Lyotard suspends his philosophy just above its surface.

Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra

While few philosophers would claim to be nihilists, nihilism is most often associated with Friedrich Nietzsche. Nietzsche defined the term as any philosophy that, rejecting the real world around us and physical existence along with it, results in an apathy toward life and a poisoning of the human soul and opposed it vehemently. He describes it as "the will to nothingness" or, more specifically:

Friedrich Nietzsche, The Will to Power, section 585, Walter Kaufmann

In this sense it is the philosophical equivalent to the Russian political movement mentioned above: the irrational leap beyond skepticism the desire to destroy meaning, knowledge, and value. To him, it was irrational because the human soul thrives on value. Nihilism, then, was in a sense like suicide and mass murder all at once. He saw this philosophy as present in Christianity (which he describes as slave morality), Buddhism, morality, asceticism and any excessively skeptical philosophy.

Nietzsche is referred to as a nihilist in part because he famously announced "God is dead!" What he meant by this oft-repeated statement has been the subject of much heated debate, because Nietzsche simply declared this position in his Thus Spoke Zarathustra without actually arguing for it. Some argue that Nietzsche meant not that God has died in a literal sense, or even necessarily that God doesn't exist, but that we don't believe in God anymore, that even those of us who profess faith in God don't really believe. God is dead, then, in the sense that his existence is now irrelevant to the bulk of humanity. "And we," he says in The Gay Science, "have killed him."

Alternately, some have interpreted Nietzsche's comment to be a statement of faith that the world has no rational order. Nietzsche also believed that, even though Christian morality is nihilistic, without God humanity is left with no epistemological or moral base from which we can derive absolute beliefs. Thus, even though nihilism has been a threat in the past, through Christianity, Platonism, and various political movements that aim toward a distant utopian future, and any other philosophy that devalues human life and the world around us (and any philosophy that devalues the world around us by privileging some other or future world necessarily devalues human life), Nietzsche tells us it is also a threat for humanity's future. This warning can also be taken as a polemic against 19th and 20th century scientism.

Nietzsche advocated a remedy for nihilism's destructive effects and a hope for humanity's future in the form of the bermensch, a position especially apparent in his works Thus Spoke Zarathustra and The Antichrist. The bermensch is an exercise of action and life: one must give value to their existence by behaving as if one's very existence were a work of art. Nietzsche believed that the bermensch "exercise" would be a necessity for human survival in the post-religious era.

Another part of Nietzsche's remedy for nihilism is a revaluation of morals he hoped that we are able to discard the old morality of equality and servitude and adopt a new code, turning Judeo-Christian morality on its head. Excess, carelessness, callousness, and sin, then, are not the damning acts of a person with no regard for his salvation, nor that which plummets a society toward decadence and decline, but the signifier of a soul already withering and the sign that a society is in decline. The only true sin to Nietzsche is that which is against a human nature aimed at the expression and venting of one's power over oneself. Virtue, likewise, is not to act according to what has been commanded, but to contribute to all that betters a human soul.

Nietzsche attempts to reintroduce what he calls a master morality, which values personal excellence over forced compassion and creative acts of will over the herd instinct, a moral outlook he attributes to the ancient Greeks. The Christian moral ideals developed in opposition to this master morality, he says, as the reversal of the value system of the elite social class due to the oppressed class' resentment of their Roman masters. Nietzsche, however, did not believe that humans should adopt master morality as the be-all-end-all code of behavior - he believed that the revaluation of morals would correct the inconsistencies in both master and slave morality - but simply that master morality was preferable to slave morality, although this is debatable. Walter Kaufmann, for one, disagrees that Nietzsche actually preferred master morality to slave morality. He certainly gives slave morality a much harder time, but this is partly because he believes that slave morality is modern society's more imminent danger. The Antichrist had been meant as the first book in a four-book series, "Toward a Re-Evaluation of All Morals", which might have made his views more explicit, but Nietzsche did not survive to write the later three books.

Nihilism is often described as a belief in the nonexistence of truth. In its more extreme forms, such a belief is difficult to justify, because it contains a variation on the liar paradox: if it is true that truth does not exist, the statement "truth does not exist" is itself a truth, therefore showing itself to be inconsistent. A formally identical criticism has been leveled against relativism and the verifiability theory of meaning of logical positivism.

A more sophisticated interpretation of the claim might be that while truth may exist, it is inaccessible in practice, but this leaves open the problem of how the nihilist has accessed it. It may be a reasonable reply that the nihilist has not accessed truth directly, but has come to the conclusion, based on past experience, that truth is ultimately unattainable within the confines of human circumstance. Thus, since nihilists believe they have learned that truth cannot be attained in this life, they look upon the activities of those rigorously seeking truth as futile. However, this interpretation is open to the same criticism as above, since, barring mystical revelation, the only way the "truth" of nihilism can have been learned is from within the confines of human experience. An attempt at reconciliation may be made in the following way:

There have been various movements in art, such as surrealism and cubism, which have been criticized for touching on nihilism, and others like Dada which have embraced it openly. More generally, modern art has been criticized as nihilistic due to its often non-representative nature, as happened with the Nazi party's Degenerate art exhibit.

Nihilistic themes can be found in literature and music as well. This is especially true of contemporary music and literature, where the uncertainty following what some perceive as the demise of modernism is explored in detail.

The term Dada was first used during World War I, an event that precipitated the movement, which lasted from approximately 1916 to 1923. The Dada Movement began in the old town of Zrich, Switzerland known as the "Niederdorf" or "Niederdrfli," which is now sporadically inhabited by dadaist squatters. The Dadaists claimed that Dada was not an art movement, but an anti-art movement, sometimes using found objects in a manner similar to found poetry and labeling them art, thus undermining ideas of what art is and what it can be. The "anti-art" drive is thought of to have stemmed from a post-war emptiness that lacked passion or meaning in life. Sometimes Dadaists paid attention to aesthetic guidelines only so they could be avoided, attempting to render their works devoid of meaning and aesthetic value. This tendency toward devaluation of art has led many to claim that Dada was essentially a nihilist movement; a destruction without creation. War and destruction had washed away peoples' mindset of creation and aesthetic.

Because they attempted to undermine the way art was viewed in the 20th century, the dadaists chose to name their movement after a baby phrase to show the way their anti-art was shaking everything up. Several myths regarding the invention of the name "Dada" exist, including that it was a form of mockery against Tzara, who is widely viewed as the father of the movement (in Russian "da, da" is "yes, yes", a name that still offers no indication of the art that bears it).Tristan Tzara (see Samuel Rosenstock), Jewish poet (born in Romania; moved to France) who was one of the co-founders of the Dada movement (1896-1963).

Although the word nihilism is of recent historical vintage, the attitude it represents is not, as is seen in a famous passage near the end of Shakespeare's Macbeth though Macbeth is not speaking of universal collapse or expansion but the brute and more immediate fact of human death:

Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player

That struts and frets his hour upon the stage

And then is heard no more; it is a tale

Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,

Signifying nothing.

William Shakespeare , Macbeth Act 5, Scene 5

In nineteenth-century culture, nihilism was given wide currency by the Russian novelist Ivan Turgenev in his novel Fathers and Sons (1862) to describe the views of an emerging radical Russian intelligentsia. These consisted primarily of upper-class students who had grown disillusioned with the slow pace of reformism. The primary spokesman for this new philosophy was D. I. Pisarev (1840-1868) who articulated a program of Revolutionary Utilitarianism and advocated violence as a tool for social change. Pisarev was cast as Bazarov in Fathers and Sons much to his own delight; he proudly embraced his new status as a fictionalized hero and villain. [citation needed]

After its popularization in the character of Bazarov, the word quickly became a catch-all term of derision for younger, more radical generations, and continues in this vein to modern times. [citation needed] It is often used to indicate a group or philosophy the speaker intends to characterize as having no moral sensibility, no belief in truth, beauty, love, or whatever else the speaker and his presumed audience values, and no regard for the current social conventions.

In Germinal (1885), by mile Zola, the nihilist character Souvarine dramatizes the danger of nihilism when, in a climactic scene, he sabotages a coal mine and causes a catastrophic accident, then slips away. Souvarine's lack of belief, frequently expressed, is a foil to the optimistic socialism that fuels the coal miners' revolt. [citation needed]

In Crime and Punishment, by Fyodor Dostoevsky, the protagonist Rodion Raskolnikov embraces a nihilist sort of utilitarianism. Dostoevsky ultimately points out the emptiness of nihilism with the epilogue of the novel. [citation needed] In fact, many of Dostoevsky's novels dealt with nihilism. Another major example of nihilism is found in The Possessed (or The Devils), in which Kirilov sees no solution to nihilism but suicide and ultimately kills himself. The main protagonist, Stavrogin, finally sees Kirilov's dilemma and follows suit at the end of the book with his own elaborate suicide. [citation needed]

The works of Albert Camus can be read as a sustained engagement with nihilism. [citation needed] Camus was highly influenced by the works and thoughts of Dostoevsky, even writing his own play based on Dostoevsky's novel, "The Devils". [citation needed]Yukio Mishima is another example of engagement with nihilism. [citation needed]Louis-Ferdinand Celine wrote several novels of a strongly nihilist bent, most notably Journey to the End of the Night. [citation needed]

The works of Samuel Beckett, especially the play Waiting for Godot, exhibit elements of nihilism. This play has subsequently been made into a cinematic film which visually deals with the more pessimistic and cynical aspects of nihilism. [citation needed]

In contemporary literature, themes of nihilism can also be found in many of Kurt Vonnegut's books. [citation needed] Robert Stone, additionally, is a contemporary American novelist who has often thematized nihilism in his work. In A Flag for Sunrise (1981), for example, the anthropologist Holliwell is a protagonist struggling against his own nihilistic tendencies. [citation needed] Another American author who is commonly believed to deal with themes of nihilism is Chuck Palahniuk. In his 1996 novel Fight Club, for example, the ultimate goal of the book's 'project mayhem' is the destruction of modern civilization in order to rebuild humanity. [citation needed] Palahniuk, however, claims that he does not deliberately focus on the subject. [citation needed] Nathan Tyree's Novel, Mr. Overby is Falling, is another current example of nihilism in literature. In that book the main character longs for the destruction of all society, so that the world can be cleansed of evil. [citation needed] Nihilism is also a common theme in the worldview and writings of horror author Thomas Ligotti, as well as Bret Easton Ellis[9][10].

Continued here:

Nihilism | Psychology Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia

Nihilism | Supernatural Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia

Nihilism

Nihilism is the 10th episode of Season 14. It aired on January 17, 2019.

Michael has re-taken control of Dean as his army of monsters continues to move in on our heroes. Sam devises a plan to try and reach Dean and stop Michael before anyone else has to die.

Michael taunting Sam Dean and Castiel while in Dean's mind.

Michael continues to fight the trio and gains the upper-hand over them before mocking them on trying to get him to evacuate Dean's body since it might cause physical repercussions on Dean. Hearing this, Dean decides to not eject the Archangel but keep him locked away. With help from Sam and Castiel, Dean pushes Michael into a walk-in bar cooler full of kegs and locks him inside using a screwdriver. Michael immediately starts bashing on the door wanting out. Dean declares the door will hold because he has control over his subconscious and will have it act as the cage to hold Michael.

The group leave Dean's mind, as they are cleaning up the mess left by the monsters. Sam and Maggie are relieved that Michael's scattered after being rendered in disarray without his direction. Sam thanks Maggie for protecting them, as she states it was Jack since he destroyed the monsters as she and Sam note on the latter's powers returning. Castiel is admonishing Jack on his acts since they have burned away part of his soul from the Enochian magic but Jack defends himself because there was danger. Cass accepts this and warns Jack to be careful and he promises.

Michael angrily tries to escape Dean's mind.

In his room, Dean is talking to himself in a mirror where he tells himself that he is still in control of his body while Michael is in his subconscious continuously bashing on the locked door and screams to be released. Dean senses this and continues to worry over his control before Billie appears and notes on the screaming in Dean's mind keeping him occupied. Dean thanks her for the assist she provided as she shrugs it off to the matter at hand. She reminds him of her warnings of dimension traveling and the danger it brings. Dean justifies it since Michael is now trapped but Billie is not so sure, she tells Dean of his shelf of possible deaths and they have all changed to the same thing. She reveals that each detail of how Michael will escape to take control of Dean and destroy the world. Billie shows the shocked Dean that only one details an alternate way as she hands him a thin book. Reading the contents, a stunned Dean questions this and Billie tells him it's his choice to make before she disappears.

Sam and Michael

Michael to Dean about Castiel

Dean and Billie

TBA.

Supernatural 14x10 Promo "Nihilism" (HD) Season 14 Episode 10 Promo

Supernatural 14x10 Extended Promo "Nihilism" (HD) Season 14 Episode 10 Extended Promo

Here is the original post:

Nihilism | Supernatural Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia

Nihilism r/nihilism – reddit

I got up late this morning. Had to catch the 8:30 am bus to be in class on time, but missed it, so I had to take the 9:00 am, and walked into class 20 minutes late. I had no clue what the fuck was going on, but I took notes anyway. Smash cut to my next class: we're discussing Joyce's Dubliners. A book about the life and time of people living in Dublin as it applies to the context of the period. It's an interesting read, but I don't like reading.

Well in any case, all my teachers notes from class #1 are posted online, and my grade in class #2 is purely attendance based. So I leave school, take the bus back to my car, and drive to work. I work in a brewery. The work is hard and the pay's not great, but like any one of those CrossFuckers will tell you, it feels good to bust your ass for a few hours every night. So I bust my ass for a few hours, get some money for it, step outside and have a beer. A free beer. You make it, you take it.

I love having a free beer. Ibdidn't work as long as my coworkers, but they know I'm in school, and they're happy to see me. The regulars are there: the gulf war marine, the rich tech guy, the old guy. We talk about other breweries, what they did at work, how my classes are going, etc. All the while drinking this sweet, bitter, delicious ambrosia that's the product of my own effort. But my glass is empty and I wanna go home.

So I get in my car and start driving home. I call my girlfriend and tell her about my day, she tells me about hers. She lives with her parents, and I live with mine. We're both in our mid twenties. It bothers her, I don't really care. She can move out, I'm not quite there yet. It's an expensive place to live. I hear her problems out, get home, and say "I gotta go," and hang up.

I head inside. My Ma made some tasty homemade cheese soup, and I have a bowl. She's a great cook. I go to take a shit, rub one out, and shower off for the day. Get out of the shower, and go study my notes for the day. We're studying Chemical Kinetics; it's a difficult concept to master. However, it's interesting, so I got no problem working my way through the prompts. I've got an exam on Thursday. I'm not worried, I've aced all the practice exams.

I close my laptop, put away my notes, and prep for bed. After my prep, I call my girlfriend. We make plans for the weekend, bullshit about our days, get all lovely dovey for a bit and say goodnight. I stay up for another hour or two putzing around YouTube and Reddit. I really shouldn't, and get better sleep, but I enjoy my ritual. I'll probably be late for the bus again tomorrow.

Excerpt from:

Nihilism r/nihilism - reddit

Nihilism – Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nihilism comes from the Latin nihil, or nothing. It is the belief that values are falsely invented. The term 'nihilism' can also be used to describe the idea that life, or the world, has no distinct meaning or purpose. Nihilists believe that there are no true morals. Many people think of the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche when they think about nihilism, because he said that morals were invented. But in his books, Nietzsche said that people needed to create their own morals to get over nihilism.

Mikhail Bakunins (18141876) Reaction in Germany (1842) included this passage: "Let us therefore trust the eternal Spirit which destroys and annihilates only because it is the unfathomable and eternal source of all life. The passion for destruction is a creative passion, too!"[1] The term was made popular by Ivan Turgenev's novel Fathers and Sons (1862). Bazarov, the hero in it, was a nihilist.

Nihilism was the basis of much revolutionary terrorism. It was taken up by Sergei Nechaev, a Russian who wrote a pamphlet that influenced Lenin. Dostoyevsky was a member of a nihilist group in his 20s. He served ten years in exile as a consequence. His novel Devils (or The Possessed) deals with Nechaev. His famous novel Crime and Punishment is also on that theme.

The assassination of the Tsar Alexander II (13 March 1881) by a series of bombs, had long been planned by nihilists. It resulted in the crushing of the nihilist movement.[2]

Read more:

Nihilism - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nihilism: the denial of meaning | Meaningness

Nihilism holds that there is no meaning or value anywhere. Questions about purpose, ethics, and sacredness are unanswerable because they are meaningless. You might as well ask about the sleep habits of colorless green ideas as about the meaning of life.

Nihilism is a mirror image of eternalismthe stance that everything is meaningful. (For an introduction, see Preview: eternalism and nihilism.) However, the two stances are not simply opposites; they share fundamental metaphysical assumptions.

Eternalism and nihilism both fail to recognize that nebulosity and pattern are inseparable. Therefore they suppose that real meaning would be absolutely patterned: perfectly definite and certain, unchanging and objective. This is their shared metaphysical error.

Eternalism insists that meaning really is like that. That is its second metaphysical error. Nihilism observes, accurately, that no such meaning is possible. This corrects the second error. However, because nihilism shares the first error, it concludes that meaning is impossible, period. This is also wrong; nebulous meanings are real, for any reasonable definition of real.

Nihilism is attractive to those who have explicitly recognized, understood, and rejected eternalisms second error: belief in ultimate meaning. That is not easy. Nihilism is, therefore, the more intelligent stance. Or, at least, its a stance that tends to be adopted more often by more intelligent people. (Its even more dysfunctional than eternalism, so we could also call it less intelligent.)

While most people are committed, however waveringly, to eternalism, only a few commit to nihilism. In denying all meaning, nihilism is wildly implausible. Only a few sociopaths, intellectuals, and depressives try to maintain it.

Well see, though, that almost everyone adopts the nihilistic stance at times, without noticing. When the complete stance is unknown, nihilism seems like the only possible defense against the harmful lies of eternalism. (Just as eternalism seems like the only possible salvation from the harmful lies of nihilism.)

Even if you are relatively immune to nihilism, its important to understand as a prototype. Many other confused stances are modified or limited forms of nihilism. They reject particular types of meanings, rather than rejecting all meaningfulness. That makes their distortions, harms, and emotional dynamics similar to nihilisms.

The first page in this section discusses several obstacles you must overcome to even get to nihilism. The main one is the obviousness of meaning. Even before that, you have to let go of the hope that eternalism can somehow be made to work. There are also strong social and cultural taboos against nihilism. Finally, nihilism has nasty psychological side-effects that make you miserable.

The second page explains briefly what it would mean to accomplish nihilism: a state of total apathy. This would, theoretically, end suffering (which is one reason nihilism is attractive). Its probably impossible, although some religious systems seem to advocate it.

Most of my discussion of nihilism concerns its emotional dynamics. I begin with an analogy: eternalism is like one of those email scams that promises you millions of dollars in exchange for help getting money out of Nigeria. If you fall for that, catastrophic financial loss ensues.

Nihilism entails a similar catastrophic loss: the loss of meaning. The next page gives an overview of our psychological reactions to that loss: rage, intellectual argument, depression, and anxiety. Each gets its own, more detailed page.

In addition, I address the content of nihilistic intellectualization. This is a collection of reasons for rejecting obvious meanings as not really meaningful. They are supposedly the wrong kind of meaning; not ultimate, not objective, not eternal, not inherent, or not higher. So what? These arguments are bogus and nonsensical. They usually conceal a hidden motivation: the issue is not qualitative (the wrong kind of meaning) but quantitative (available meanings seem inadequately compelling). This is a psychological and practical problem, not a philosophical one, so psychological and practical methods may help.

The antidotes to nihilism are partly intellectual: realizing why its incorrect and harmful. Mainly, though, antidotes restore meaningfulness, by making it more powerful, more obvious, more compelling, more enjoyable.

Excerpt from:

Nihilism: the denial of meaning | Meaningness

Nihilism – Conservapedia

Nihilism (IPA pronunciation: "na.lzm") is the belief that life is, overall, meaningless. A true nihilist would have no loyalties, and no purpose. The atheist Friedrich Nietzsche argued that moral, religious, and metaphysical convictions lead to nihilism's corrosive effects; cause the collapse of meaning, relevance, purpose, and precipitate the greatest crisis in human history.[1] An example of nihilism would be the question reportedly posed by Jared Loughner to a congresswoman whom he allegedly later shot:[2]

German political philosopher Leo Strauss argued that modern liberalism has within it a tendency towards nihilism. Faith in God is the opposite of nihilism. In government and politics, another example of the opposite of nihilism is the concept of natural rights, as formulated in the Declaration of Independence.

Major types of nihilism include:

In his book, The Decline of the West, German philosopher Oswald Spengler observes that pattern of nihilism was a feature shared by all civilizations on the verge of collapse.

Friedrich Nietzsche saw two kinds of nihilism in the world; pessimistic and joyous. Pessimistic nihilism was that created by the death of God in the minds of men, and corresponds to the idea that life is without meaning or value. Joyous nihilism was that experienced by those few who, like him, experienced the loss of an externally created and imposed moral structure as a liberation and not a great loss, and was the seed that let the herald Nietzsche proclaim the coming of the bermensch.

See the original post here:

Nihilism - Conservapedia

Nihilism

Nihilism Abandoning Values and KnowledgeNihilism derives its name from the Latin root nihil, meaning nothing, that which does not exist. This same root is found in the verb annihilate -- to bring to nothing, to destroy completely. Nihilism is the belief which:

Nihilism A Meaningless WorldShakespeares Macbeth eloquently summarizes existential nihilism's perspective, disdaining life:

Nihilism Beyond NothingnessNihilism--choosing to believe in Nothingness--involves a high price. An individual may choose to feel rather than think, exert their will to power than pray, give thanks, or obey God. After an impressive career of literary and philosophical creativity, Friedrich Nietzsche lost all control of his mental faculties. Upon seeing a horse mistreated, he began sobbing uncontrollably and collapsed into a catatonic state. Nietzsche died August 25, 1900, diagnosed as utterly insane. While saying Yes to life but No to God, the Prophet of Nihilism missed both.

Beyond the nothingness of nihilism, there is One who is greater than unbelief; One who touched humanity (1 John 5:20) and assures us that our lives are not meaningless (Acts 17:24-28).

See the original post here:

Nihilism