Redefining the status quo in healthcare – The Business Times

When Dean Ho looks into the future, he sees a world where more people have access to higher quality healthcare at lower costs. Some may call him an optimist, but the research director is in a better position than most to believe in this somewhat utopian vision.

As director at a research institute that is personalising patient care and using digital medicine to usher in a new frontier of healthcare, Dr Ho is leading efforts to develop artificial intelligence (AI)-based solutions to design clinical trials for various purposes, including novel drug development and more recently, formulating optimal drug combinations to treat the Covid-19 virus.

Dr Ho, 41, who moved to Singapore with his family from the United States in 2018, says: "We are working hard to scale the validation, deployment, and implementation of our AI-based platforms.

"One of our major goals is to demonstrate that we can dramatically reduce the cost of optimal drug combination development, with orders of magnitude reduction in costs and bringing AI-optimised treatment outcomes to patients years faster, particularly in the area of oncology. We are excited about what's on the horizon."

His team has been using a platform called IDentif.AI to determine optimal combination therapies that can be clinically-administered to treat Covid-19 patients. "From our first studies, we were able to identify an extensive list of possible combinations, ranked based on their efficiency at countering infection from a patient-derived SARS-CoV-2 live virus."

This list enables clinicians to select potential combinations that may or may not contain certain drugs due to drug shortages or a patient's pre-existing conditions. "This allows for a substantial level of actionability and versatility for clinicians, as they have a broad spectrum of treatment options," he explains.

The response has been encouraging so far. Already, multiple clinical communities across the globe have reached out to his team for their results, which have provided helpful guidance.

The team ultimately aims to work with multiple partners to develop IDentif.AI-pinpointed combinations based on a large collection of potential therapies. They also plan to develop a public database of these combinations for the benefit of the community. "In the event we need additional combinations in the future, we will be ready," he says.

Curating precision treatments

Dr Ho's pandemic-related work is just part of his broader mission to leverage technologies such as AI and nanotechnology to create precision and personalised medicine for the benefit of patients.

One of his more notable achievements is the creation of Curate.ai, an AI platform developed over about five years by a research team led by Dr Ho. As each individual's response to medication is unique and changing, Curate.ai uses a patient's data - such as how a tumour changes in size following a certain drug dosage - to generate a profile that is able to recommend the optimal drug dosage for this person at any point in time.

This method of dosing is designed to improve the efficacy and safety of treatments.

In 2018, Curate.ai's recommended drug dosage for a prostate cancer patient successfully reduced the size of his tumour. According to Dr Ho, his team's AI solutions are unique in that they use actual experimental data from studies to optimise the right drugs and doses. As a result, these platforms have already been taken to the clinic for multiple studies, he reveals.

"Importantly, by rapidly optimising how we develop these treatments or administer these treatments, we have an opportunity to markedly accelerate the delivery of these optimised therapies to patients, potentially reducing the cost of care while realising substantially improved treatment outcomes. Of note, our AI platforms can be broadly deployed against a broad spectrum of disease indications, so that we can continue to help as many patients as possible," he says.

Going big with nanotech

Dr Ho is also a pioneer in nanomedicine, with his team spearheading the use of nanoscopic "diamonds" that carry drugs to diseased cells in the body to treat cancer. Together with collaborators, they also developed a magnetic resonance imaging agent that dramatically improves imaging brightness, substantially reducing the amount of imaging agent required.

"Nanotechnology is exciting because the materials that we use are versatile and can be coated with a broad spectrum of therapies as well as imaging agents, and these nanomaterials can often markedly improve the efficiency and safety of drug treatment or imaging efficiency," explains Dr Ho.

For his AI-related work in personalised and precision medicine, as well as in the areas of nanomedicine, Dr Ho was the only Singapore-based academic inventor elected in 2018 as a fellow of the United States National Academy of Inventors, the highest professional accolade for academic inventors.

"I'm hoping that our aspirations of redefining the status quo in healthcare, and making practice-changing advances in medicine will have helped as many people as possible."

Family inspiration

One of Dr Ho's clinical trials was a collaborative project with his father focused on optimising drug therapy for liver transplant patients to prevent organ rejection.

"We were able to use AI to recommend appropriate dosages, but not only that, we could see an immediate and real benefit: patients could be discharged from intensive care up to a month earlier," he says.

"It was amazing to work with my dad to realise these outcomes for patients."

Indeed, the father of two aligns his work closely with how he views family. "We're often approached by families and communities who need help for a loved one.

"As a father, I want my children to know I'll always be there to help them when they need it. That's the same hope I have for the technologies we've developed."

Dr Ho was born and raised in Los Angeles and attended the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), graduating with a PhD in biomedical engineering. Before relocating to Singapore in 2018, he spent six years as a professor at UCLA.

His parents had migrated to the United States to pursue their education, and he learnt from them the importance of using one's achievements to give back to society. His father was a career innovator in various fields, from biomedical to aerospace engineering, and treated his team as family, while his mother is a gifted artist and speaker.

"My parents were a huge inspiration for me growing up. Both of my parents inspired me to give back to the community, and being surrounded by their diverse strengths has been amazing," he says.

His experiences growing up also taught him the importance of fostering a close-knit team at work, and being a responsible and nurturing parent and husband. He describes his son Ethan as an inquisitive child who adores sharks and all marine creatures, while his daughter is free-spirited and creative. He met his wife, Sarah Ahn, in college when both of them were pursuing biomedical doctorates, although she would later switch careers to study fashion design and establish her own label, NAMI.

It takes a village

Several months after the family moved to Singapore, Dr Ho's wife was diagnosed with a brain tumour. "After my wife's diagnosis, I was completely and utterly lost. I'm usually the one who knows what's next, because that's what I do. Now we were on the other side."

Thankfully, with the help of their community, Sarah was able to recover. "It takes a community to weather adversity. The minute we found out about Sarah's diagnosis, I was on the phone with so many people who went on to collectively play a role in saving her life and getting her back on her feet.

"We were away from our immediate family, but our community of supporters became a new family for us. We are so deeply grateful for that," he recalls.

Dr Ho believes that community will also be key in achieving his goal of advancing healthcare, as it will take a collective effort from different stakeholders in the sector's ecosystem. "Our team strongly believes that technology alone won't markedly advance healthcare. It takes the seamless integration of multiple disciplines and skill sets."

He notes that a key challenge in his work is to pair the AI platforms his team has developed with stakeholders that will play a vital role in ensuring that they can be integrated into healthcare workflows.

This includes doctor and nursing teams, healthcare economists, behavioural scientists, regulators, payer and reimbursement communities, as well as the patients and patient advocacy groups, among many others.

He cites these partners, as well as his own team members, as inspirations. "I consider this community my family, and collaborating with them has been an honour. Our work together is a mutual learning experience, and it has taken mutual inspiration to bring us to the point where we are now seeing the promise of clinical impact."

Leaving a legacy

While Dr Ho is well on his way to making a mark in the healthcare world, he is also focused on crafting a legacy that is far more personal in nature; and that is to ensure that his children have the means to achieve their own dreams.

He says: "To me, legacy planning means having the foresight to think ahead and provide peace of mind for our future generations so that they won't have to worry about not having the necessary means to support their aspirations. In the case of our children, we want to solidify their access to the financial means for limitless educational goals."

Crafting a legacy across generations

WHETHER it's as bold as changing the future of healthcare, or as intimate as giving your loved ones the means to realise their dreams, there are many paths to crafting one's legacy.

Whatever form it takes, your legacy is a testimony that deserves to live on.

At Opus by Prudential, we understand that it sometimes takes a community to help you make a lasting impact. That's why we offer you seamless support and services to take care of your wealth planning and protection needs - from VIP medical services at one of Singapore's finest healthcare clinics to swift underwriting and dedicated case management, plus access to our panel of value-added services advisors.

Dr Dean Ho is one client who has experienced the exceptional support that Opus professionals can provide. "When my wife, Sarah, was diagnosed with a brain tumour, our family's shock was extraordinarily disorienting. Estella, our Opus Financial Consultant, was one of the very first people we spoke to," recalls Dr Ho. "Her being there for us in the very beginning was an amazing source of security for us. She helped us navigate the process of preparing our documents, but most of all, she became family during the process.

"She was always accessible, and would often check in with us to ask if there was any way that she could help."

With our tailored expertise, Opus by Prudential can help you uniquely plan and preserve your wealth, protect your assets, safeguard your health and retire with ease. No matter what path you take, or how you wish to be remembered, we can help you forge a legacy that will make its mark across generations.

Find out more about legacy planning from an Opus by Prudential Private Wealth Consultant

Read the original here:
Redefining the status quo in healthcare - The Business Times

Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) Market Forecasted To Surpass The Value Of US$ XX Mn/Bn By 2015 2021 – Owned

New Study on the Global Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) Market by PMR

PMR recently published a market study that sheds light on the growth prospects of the global Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) market during the forecast period (20XX-20XX). In addition, a methodical and systematic approach adopted by the analysts while curating the market study ensures that the presented study adds value to the business of our customers. The report provides a thorough evaluation of the latest trends, market drivers, opportunities, and challenges within the global Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) market.

As per the report, the global Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) market is expected to grow at a CAGR of ~XX% during the stipulated timeframe owing to a range of factors including, favorable government policies, and growing awareness related to the Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) , surge in research and development and more.

Request Sample Report @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.co/samples/6370

Resourceful insights enclosed in the report:

Competitive Outlook

The competitive outlook section provides valuable information related to the different companies operating in the current Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) market landscape. The market share, product portfolio, pricing strategy, sales and distribution channels of each company is discussed in the report.

Request Report Methodology @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.co/methodology/6370

Regional Assessment

The presented market study touches upon the market scenario in different regions and provides a deep understanding of the influence of micro and macro-economic factors on the prospects of the market in each region.

Key players in the global nanomedicine market include: Abbott Laboratories, CombiMatrix Corporation, GE Healthcare, Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Mallinckrodt plc, Merck & Company, Inc., Nanosphere, Inc., Pfizer, Inc., Celgene Corporation, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., and UCB (Union chimique belge) S.A.

Key geographies evaluated in this report are:

Key features of this report

For any queries get in touch with Industry Expert @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.co/ask-an-expert/6370

The market report addresses the following queries related to the Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) market:

Go here to see the original:
Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) Market Forecasted To Surpass The Value Of US$ XX Mn/Bn By 2015 2021 - Owned

Nanorobotics Market 2020 : Analysis by Geographical Regions, Type and Application Till 2025 – The Daily Chronicle

Nanorobotics Industry Analysis 2020

TheNanorobotics Marketreport enlightens its readers about its products, applications, and specifications. The research enlists key companies operating in the market and also highlights the roadmap adopted by the companies to consolidate their position in the market.By extensive usage of SWOT analysis and Porters five force analysis tools, the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and combination of key companies are comprehensively deduced and referenced in the report.Every single leading player in this global market is profiled with their related details such as product types, business overview, sales, manufacturing base, applications, and other specifications.

Major Market Players Covered In This Report:, Bruker, JEOL, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Ginkgo Bioworks, Oxford Instruments, EV Group, Imina Technologies, Toronto Nano Instrumentation, Klocke Nanotechnik, Kleindiek Nanotechnik

Click Here To Access The Sample Report:https://grandviewreport.com/sample/23160

NanoroboticsMarket has exhibited continuous growth in the recent past and is projected to grow even more throughout the forecast. The analysis presents an exhaustive assessment of the market and comprises Future trends, Current Growth Factors, attentive opinions, facts, historical information, in addition to statistically supported and trade validated market information.

The Global NanoroboticsMarket Can Be Segmented As

The key product type of Nanoroboticsmarket are:, Nanomanipulator, Bio-Nanorobotics, Magnetically Guided, Bacteria-Based

NanoroboticsMarket Outlook by Applications:, Nanomedicine, Biomedical, Mechanical

To Get This Report At Beneficial Rates:https://grandviewreport.com/discount/23160

The Nanoroboticsmarket comprising of well-established international vendors is giving heavy competition to new players in the market as they struggle with technological development, reliability and quality problems the analysis report examines the expansion, market size, key segments, trade share, application, and key drivers.

Key players within the Nanoroboticsmarket are identified through secondary analysis, and their market shares are determined through primary and secondary analysis. The report encloses a basic summary of the trade lifecycle, definitions, classifications, applications, and trade chain structure. Each of these factors can facilitate leading players to perceive the scope of the Market, what unique characteristics it offers and the manner in which it will fulfill a customers need.

By Company Profile, Product Image and Specification, Product Application Analysis, Production Capability, Price Cost, Production Value, Contact Data are included in this research report.

What NanoroboticsMarket report offers:NanoroboticsMarket share assessments for the regional and country-level segmentsMarket share analysis of the highest trade playersNanoroboticsMarket Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and Recommendations)Strategic recommendations on key business segments

The Report Answers Following Questions:Over successive few years, which Nanoroboticsapplication segment can perform well?Within which market, the businesses ought to establish a presence?Which product segments are exhibiting growth?What are the market restraints which are likely to impede the growth rate?However, market share changes their values by completely different producing brands?

To Know More About The Assumptions in This Market Report:http://grandviewreport.com/industry-growth/Nanorobotics-Market-23160

The report entails detailed profiling of each company, and information on capacity, production, price, revenue, cost, gross, gross margin, sales volume, sales revenue, consumption, growth rate, import, export, supply, future strategies, and the technological developments, are also included within the scope of the report. In the end, the NanoroboticsMarket Report delivers a conclusion which includes Breakdown and Data Triangulation, Consumer Needs/Customer Preference Change, Research Findings, Market Size Estimation, Data Source. These factors are expected to augment the overall business growth.

Thanks for reading this article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like Asia, United States, Europe.

See the rest here:
Nanorobotics Market 2020 : Analysis by Geographical Regions, Type and Application Till 2025 - The Daily Chronicle

Medical News Today: How nanoparticles may drive the spread of cancer – Stock Daily Dish

New research finds that some nanomaterials that scientists use to combat cancer may have the opposite effect: to help tumors spread. The results reveal why this might occur and propose a way for us to turn this risk into a therapeutic advantage. Nanoparticles may make cancer cells (depicted here) divide and spread faster.

Nanotechnology has recently emerged as an innovative avenue for treating .

For instance, some researchers have devised that can seek out cancer cells and pulverize them from within.

Others, however, have used to deliver concentrated drugs in an extremely precise way, avoiding the side effects that conventional might cause.

But what are these nanocarriers made from, and could the materials that scientists use in nanomedicine help, rather than hinder, the spread of cancer?

Scientists most commonly use gold, titanium dioxide, silver, and silicon dioxide, among others, for therapeutic purposes.

However, the results of which now appear in the journal Nature Nanotechnology suggests that these nanomaterials could facilitate the spread of cancer cells by increasing the gap between blood vessel cells and allowing cancer cells to migrate more easily to new sites.

Researchers at the National University of Singapore (NUS) near Clementi reached this conclusion after studying several models of in rodents.

Fei Peng, from the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the NUS Faculty of Engineering, is the first author of the paper.

Peng and colleagues dubbed the phenomenon nanomaterials-induced endothelial leakiness (NanoEL). In their paper, they also suggest new ways in which drug developers could use this discovery to devise more effective therapies for cancer and other conditions.

Peng and team found that NanoEL speeds up the movement of cancer cells from the original site to new sites and helps the cancer cells that are already in motion evade blood circulation.

David Leong, an associate professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the NUS Faculty of Engineering, is one of the leaders of the study.

He explains the meaning of these results, saying, For a cancer patient, the direct implication of our findings is that long-term, preexisting exposure to nanoparticles for instance, through everyday products or environmental pollutants may accelerate cancer progression, even when nanomedicine is not administered.

Nanoparticles may often be present in processed food and cosmetic products such as creams and lotions.

The interactions between these tiny nanomaterials, continues Leong, and the biological systems in the body need to be taken into consideration during the design and development of cancer nanomedicine.

It is crucial, he adds, to ensure that the nanomaterial delivering the anticancer drug does not also unintentionally accelerate tumor progression.

As new breakthroughs in nanomedicine unfold, we need to concurrently understand what causes these nanomaterials to trigger unexpected outcomes.

David Leong

The study authors also explain that we could harness the same mechanism that might represent a vulnerability in cancer treatment and drive tumor spread to achieve precisely the opposite effect.

Making blood vessels leakier, they say, may also facilitate the access of chemotherapy drugs or to damaged tissues.

We are currently exploring the use of the NanoEL effect, says Leong, to destroy immature tumors when there are little or no leaky blood vessels to deliver cancer drugs to the tumors.

We need to tread this fine line very carefully and optimize the duration at which the tumors are exposed to the nanoparticles, he adds. This could allow scientists to target the source of the disease before the cancer cells spread and become a highly refractory problem.

In addition to cancer, it may also be possible to apply the findings to other conditions that involve damaged organs and tissues.

Study co-leader Han Kiat Ho, of the Department of Pharmacy at NUS Faculty of Science, explains further.

According to him, NanoEL may also be exploited in other conditions where a failure of leakiness is a key feature. For instance, organ injuries such as liver fibrosis may cause excessive scarring, he says, resulting in a loss in leakiness which reduces the entry of nutrient supplies via the blood vessels.

View post:
Medical News Today: How nanoparticles may drive the spread of cancer - Stock Daily Dish

New Horizon 2020 Project B-SMART Develops RNA-based Therapy for Neurodegenerative Diseases – Cordis News

New European research project B-SMART targets RNA-based nanomedicines against Alzheimers and spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA). The project aims to develop innovative nanotechnological RNA delivery systems to provide first causal therapy approach. B-SMART unites internationally renowned experts from 9 academic institutions and industrial partners coordinated by the University Medical Center Utrecht. The European Commission will invest 6 million over the next five years.

Nanomedical approaches can make a difference, providing new therapeutic options by helping drugs to enter the brain. Therefore, the multinational research project B-SMART sets out to provide an RNA-based therapy perspective for neurodegenerative diseases targeting the direct cause of the disease instead of its symptoms. The project is funded with a total budget of 6 million over the next five years by the European Commissions current Research Framework Programme Horizon 2020.

Transferring RNA therapeutics to the brain crossing the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier is a unique research endeavor, said Prof. Raymond Schiffelers from the University Medical Center Utrecht and coordinator of B-SMART. Finding a novel gateway to transport RNA to the brain will enable the development of causal therapies not only for Alzheimers, but for other diseases as well.

The consortium will work on specific nanocarriers protecting the RNA against enzymatic degradation while delivering it to the human brain. Crossing the brain-cerebrospinal fluid barrier requires specific targeting ligands, which will be based on heavy chain-only nanobodies that are smaller and more stable than conventional antibodies. The modular delivery system will be tested for safety and efficacy using in vitro and in vivo assays. To improve the nanomedicine manufacturability, B-SMART chose an operator-independent and scalable production method based on microfluidics.

B-SMART assembles a multi-national team of leading experts from 9 partnering institutions with long-standing experience in their respective fields. The B-SMART partners are involved in numerous exceptional national and international research programmes targeting close communication with the industry throughout all project stages in order to bridge the research-industry gap and enable timely exploitation of the project results.

B-SMART officially kicks off its activities with a first project meeting held in Utrecht on 1 and 2 February 2017.

B-SMART Partners Belgium VIB

Germany EURICE European Research and Project Office GmbH

Italy Istituto Biochimico Italiano Giovanni Lorenzini SpA

Netherlands University Medical Center Utrecht (Coordinator) 20 Med Therapeutics B.V.

Norway Stiftelsen SINTEF

Spain University of Santiago de Compostela

United Kingdom The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford Malvern Instruments Ltd

Project Details Name: B-SMART Brain-specific, Modular and Active RNA Therapeutics Start date: 2017-01-01 Duration: 60 months Budget: 6 million Coordination: University Medical Center Utrecht

Contact Coordinator University Medical Center Utrecht Prof. Raymond Schiffelers Email: R.Schiffelers@umcutrecht.nl Phone: +31 88 7556512

Project Management EURICE European Research and Project Office GmbH Corinna Hahn Email: c.hahn@eurice.eu Phone: +49 681 95 923362

This project has received funding from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 721058.

Original post:
New Horizon 2020 Project B-SMART Develops RNA-based Therapy for Neurodegenerative Diseases - Cordis News

Global Healthcare Nanotechnology Market 2019 by Manufacturers, Countries, Type and Application, Forecast to 2025 – Avon Lake Ledger

The "Healthcare Nanotechnology Market" report contains a wide-extending factual assessment for Healthcare Nanotechnology, which enables the customer to separate the future complicity and estimate the right execution. The advancement rate is evaluated dependent on insightful examination that gives credible information on the worldwide Healthcare Nanotechnology market. Imperatives and advancement points are merged together after a significant comprehension of the improvement of the Healthcare Nanotechnology market. The report is all around made by considering its essential information in the overall Healthcare Nanotechnology market, the essential components in charge of the interest for its products and administrations. Our best analysts have surveyed the Healthcare Nanotechnology market report with the reference of inventories and data given by the key players (Amgen, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Abbott, UCB, Roche, Celgene, Sanofi, Merck & Co, Biogen, Stryker, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, 3M Company, Johnson & Johnson, Smith & Nephew, Leadiant Biosciences, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Shire, Ipsen, Endo International), flexible sources and records that help to upgrade cognizance of the related methodological conditions.

Ask for sample link here: http://www.marketresearchstore.com/report/global-healthcare-nanotechnology-market-2019-by-manufacturers-countries-497770#RequestSample

The Healthcare Nanotechnology market report shows a point by point division (Nanomedicine, Nano Medical Devices, Nano Diagnosis, Other) of the overall market reliant on development, product type, application, and distinctive techniques and systems. The point-to-point elucidation of the Healthcare Nanotechnology market's assembling system, the usage of advancement, conclusions of the world market players, dealers and shippers' order, and the explicit business data and their improvement plans would help our customers for future courses of action and movement planned to make due in the Healthcare Nanotechnology market.

The Healthcare Nanotechnology market report includes the latest mechanical enhancements and new releases to engage our customers to the configuration, settle on taught business decisions, and complete their required executions in the future. The Healthcare Nanotechnology market report moreover focuses more on current business and present-day headways, future methodology changes, and open entryways for the Healthcare Nanotechnology market. Nearby progression frameworks and projections are one of the key segments that clear up overall execution and incorporate key geological analysis (Anticancer, CNS Product, Anti-infective, Other).

Inquire about the report here: http://www.marketresearchstore.com/report/global-healthcare-nanotechnology-market-2019-by-manufacturers-countries-497770#InquiryForBuying

The overall Healthcare Nanotechnology market is made with the fundamental and direct conclusion to exploit the Healthcare Nanotechnology market and participate in business progression for imperative business openings. The correct figures and the graphical depiction of the Healthcare Nanotechnology market are shown in a represented strategy. The report shows an examination of conceivable contention, current market designs and other basic characteristics all around the world.

Thanks for reading this article; you'll be able to additionally get individual chapter wise section or region wise report versions like North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, geographic area and continent.

Sorry! The Author has not filled his profile.

Read more here:
Global Healthcare Nanotechnology Market 2019 by Manufacturers, Countries, Type and Application, Forecast to 2025 - Avon Lake Ledger

Global Nanorobotics Market : Industry Analysis and Forecast (2018-2026) – The Market Expedition

Global Nanorobotics Marketwas valued at US$ 3.7 Bn in 2017 and is expected to reach US$ 9.2Bn by 2026, at a CAGR of 12.06%during a forecast period.Global Nanorobotics MarketDevelopments in nanotechnology coupled with demand for minimally aggressive procedures are expected to drive market growth over the forecast period. Nanobots possess likely in the medical sector for destroying cancerous cells at the genetic level. Increasing support for nanomedicine by many nations and the increasing geriatric population are factors which can augur market demand.

Utilization of nanobots in the ranostics can be beneficial for the market in the near future. A rise in miniaturization and demand for automation across various sectors are anticipated to fuel market growth. Training of new personnel to use nanobots can restrain market growth in the upcoming years.Nanomedicine application segment to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period. Nanorobotics is widely used in nanomedicine owning to its healthcare features. The large share of this application aspects to the large level of commercialization in the healthcare sector for drug delivery, in vivo imaging, biomaterial, in vitro diagnostic, active implants, and drug therapy.

North America region accounted for the largest share of 12.2%, in terms of value, of the nanorobotics market globally. Presence of many nanotechnology companies, well-developed healthcare infrastructure, and government initiatives to create patient awareness are factors driving the market. The U.S is anticipated to contribute to market revenue owing to the increase in cardiovascular diseases and the rising elderly populace.

REQUEST FOR FREE SAMPLE REPORT:https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/request-sample/30888

Europe follows North America as the second biggest nanorobotics market. Presence of chronic diseases and the burgeoning population are factors expected to indicate the Europe nanobots market. Establishment of organizations to develop standards pertaining to nanotechnology can expand market growth. In 2018, DNA-Robotics, an organization including 12 European companies, has outlined steps to expedite production of nanobots on a large scale. These standards can help scale the market exponentially in the upcoming years.

A recent development in nanorobotics market: In March 2018, Thermo Fisher Scientific acquired Gatan, an exclusively owned subsidiary of Roper Technologies. Gatan is an electron microscopy solutions provider in the U.S, which accompaniments the Thermo Fisher Scientifics electron microscopy solutions business.In March 2017, Oxford Instruments (U.K) Asylum Research introduced its new SurfRider HQ-Series of high quality, budget-priced AFM probes, which are also existing in a model suitable for nanomechanical image mode.

The objective of the report is to present a comprehensive assessment of the market and contains thoughtful insights, facts, historical data, industry-validated market data and projections with a suitable set of assumptions and methodology. The report also helps in understanding Global Nanorobotics Market dynamics, structure by identifying and analyzing the market segments and project the global market size. Further, the report also focuses on the competitive analysis of key players by product, price, financial position, product portfolio, growth strategies, and regional presence. The report also provides PEST analysis, PORTERs analysis, SWOT analysis to address the question of shareholders to prioritizing the efforts and investment in the near future to the emerging segment in the Global Nanorobotics Market.

DO INQUIRY BEFORE PURCHASING REPORT HERE:https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/inquiry-before-buying/30888

Scope of the Global Nanorobotics Market

Global Nanorobotics Market, By Type

Nanomanipulatoro Electron Microscope (EM) Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM)o Scanning Probe Microscope (SPM) Atomic Force Microscopes (AFM) Scanning Tunneling Microscope (STM) Bio-Nanorobotics Magnetically Guided Bacteria-Based

Global Nanorobotics Market, By Application

Nanomedicine Biomedical Mechanical Others

Global Nanorobotics Market, By Region

North America Europe Asia Pacific Middle East and Africa South America

Key players operating in Global Nanorobotics Market:

Bruker JEOL Thermo Fisher Scientific Ginkgo Bioworks Oxford Instruments EV Group Imina Technologies Toronto Nano Instrumentation KlockeNanotechnik KleindiekNanotechnik Xidex Synthace Park Systems Smaract Nanonics Imaging

Key Innovators:

Novascan Technologies Angstrom Advanced Hummingbird Scientific NT-MDT Spectrum Instruments Witec

Browse Full Report with Facts and Figures of nanorobotics Market Report at:https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/market-report/global-nanorobotics-market/30888/

MAJOR TOC OF THE REPORT

Chapter One: nanorobotics Market Overview

Chapter Two: Manufacturers Profiles

Chapter Three: Global nanorobotics Market Competition, by Players

Chapter Four: Global nanorobotics Market Size by Regions

Chapter Five: North America nanorobotics Revenue by Countries

Chapter Six: Europe nanorobotics Revenue by Countries

Chapter Seven: Asia-Pacific nanorobotics Revenue by Countries

Chapter Eight: South America nanorobotics Revenue by Countries

Chapter Nine: Middle East and Africa Revenue nanorobotics by Countries

Chapter Ten: Global nanorobotics Market Segment by Type

Chapter Eleven: Global nanorobotics Market Segment by Application

Chapter Twelve: Global nanorobotics Market Size Forecast (2019-2026)

About Us:

Maximize Market Research provides B2B and B2C market research on 20,000 high growth emerging technologies & opportunities in Chemical, Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals, Electronics & Communications, Internet of Things, Food and Beverages, Aerospace and Defense and other manufacturing sectors.

Contact info:

Name: Lumawant Godage

Organization: MAXIMIZE MARKET RESEARCH PVT. LTD.

Email: sales@maximizemarketresearch.com

Contact: +919607065656/ +919607195908

Website: http://www.maximizemarketresearch.com

Continue reading here:
Global Nanorobotics Market : Industry Analysis and Forecast (2018-2026) - The Market Expedition

IBM Research: Ninja polymers

Creating a hydrogel from the polymers

Through the precise tailoring of the ninja polymers, researchers were able to create macromolecules - molecular structures containing a large number of atoms - which combine water solubility, a positive charge, and biodegradability. When mixed with water and heated to normal body temperature, the polymers self-assemble, swelling into a synthetic hydrogel that is easy to manipulate.

When applied to contaminated surfaces, the hydrogel's positive charge attracts negatively charged microbial membranes, like stars and planets being pulled into a black hole. However, unlike other antimicrobials that target the internal machinery of bacteria to try to prevent it from replicating, this hydrogel destroys the bacteria by rupturing the bacteria's membrane, rendering it completely unable to regenerate or spread.

The hydrogel is comprised of more than 90 percent water, making it easy to handle and apply to surfaces. It also makes it potentially viable for eventual inclusion in applications like creams or injectable therapeutics for wound healing, implant and catheter coatings, skin infections or even orifice barriers. It is the first-ever to be biodegradable, biocompatible and non-toxic, potentially making it an ideal tool to combat serious health hazards facing hospital workers, visitors and patients.

The IBM scientists in the nanomedicine polymer program along with the Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology have taken this research a step further and have made a nanomedicine breakthrough in which they converted common plastic materials like polyethylene terephthalate (PET) into non-toxic and biocompatible materials designed to specifically target and attack fungal infections.BCC Research reported that the treatment cost for fungal infections was $3 billion worldwide in 2010 andis expected to increase to $6 billion in 2014. In this breakthrough, the researchers identified a novel self-assembly process for broken down PET, the primary material in plastic water bottles, in which 'super' molecules are formed through a hydrogen bond and serve as drug carriers targeting fungal infections in the body. Demonstrating characteristics like electrostatic charge similar to polymers, the molecules are able to break through bacterial membranes and eradicate fungus, then biodegrade in the body naturally. This is important to treat eye infections associated with contact lenses, and bloodstream infections like Candida.

Follow this link:
IBM Research: Ninja polymers

CCNE | Northeastern University

Welcome!

The NIH-funded Northeastern University Center for Translational Cancer Nanomedicine (CTCN) was established in September 2010 as part of Phase 2 of the National Cancer Institute's Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer program with collaborators at Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital; Harvard Medical School; Tufts University, Auburn University and Nemucore Medical Innovations, Inc. The CTCN will utilize the support and facilities of the NU-based Center for High-rate Nanomanufacturing.

Northeastern University CTCN is one of only nine Centers of Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence (CCNE) across the country that has been awarded a five-year $13.5 million grant from the NCI Alliance in an open nationwide competition.

Building upon Northeasterns strong base of interdisciplinary nanotechnology research, the center will create new drugs that target cancer cells, advance technology on how nanocarriers deliver these drugs, and utilize imaging tools that track how they travel through the body. To enable the translation of these nanomedicines from bench to bedside, test batches of the nanopreparations will be developed for preclinical use to meet FDA standards for further clinical testing. The team will also develop semi-industrial and industrial processes to scale up their production.

Cross-disciplinary collaboration will enable integration of the fundamental biological knowledge base with physical science and engineering approaches for intimate involvement in scale-up and manufacture to rapidly translate bench research into animal testing and GMP production and to narrow the gap between discovery and development of anticancer therapeutics. The CTCN will concentrate on multifunctional, targeted devices that will bypass current biological barriers to delivery of multiple therapeutic agents at high local concentrations, with appropriate timing, directly to cancer cells.

Read the original:
CCNE | Northeastern University

Ethical Issues & Stakeholders Attitudes Towards Code of Conduct in Nanomedicine – Video


Ethical Issues Stakeholders Attitudes Towards Code of Conduct in Nanomedicine
Lecture of Dr. Iona Ispas, Advisor Bioethics, Genomic Health at the Ministry of National Education of Romania. The lecture was performed at the Training Wo...

By: Michael Beigel

Read more:
Ethical Issues & Stakeholders Attitudes Towards Code of Conduct in Nanomedicine - Video

Bankrupt biopharmas are rare. 2019 has some worried that’s changing. – BioPharma Dive

Editors note: This is part of a series about bankruptcy in the biopharma industry. Click here to see a running list of 2019 biopharma bankruptcies, and click here to see 31 biopharmas at high risk of bankruptcy for 2020.

Six years ago, Bind Therapeutics was flying high, with little idea how hard it would soon crash.

Headed into a public stock offering in 2013, the biotech, founded by top MIT and Harvard researchers, generated buzz with its lofty scientific ambitions. Company executives believed its nanomedicine platform, while only through Phase 1 tests, represented the next advance in cancer therapies.

Those dreams came undone within three years. As its experimental therapies struggled in clinical testing, Bind was punished by the market, and debt repayments forced the company into bankruptcy in 2016.

Bind may be a cautionary story in todays life sciences ecosystem, one that features biotechs going public at earlier stages and with heightened ambitions.

While bankruptcy is a rare outcome for biopharmas, 2019 has bucked that trend with an uptick in Chapter 11 filings. Eleven companies have declared bankruptcy so far this year, compared to an average of four per year during the past decade, according to a review of data tracked by the firm BankruptcyData.

That increase may forewarn of more companies falling to zero, industry experts said in interviews with BioPharma Dive, especially at a time of rising legal and political headwinds for the sector. After a decade of booming growth, the ballooning ranks of newly public biotechs may struggle to withstand market pressures.

I think theres a turning point now, said Andrew Hirsch, the former CEO of Bind, in an interview. I think its not sustainable.

Hirsch highlighted the rising prominence of early-stage platform companies, like Bind, going public in greater numbers and at larger valuations. That can bring steeper downside, he warned.

Things arent always going to work the first time, thats just the rule in this industry. A lot of times, companies are valued for perfection, said Hirsch, now Agios Pharmaceuticals chief financial officer.

If they are lucky and it works, thats great. But if you have a setback because youre doing novel things, the public markets can be a cruel place to be.

Biotech vastly outperformed the broader stock market over the past decade, and a steady inflow of capital supported more companies going public at rich valuations.

But those tides have turned. A leading biotech index has fallen more than 15% since peaking in the summer of last year, while the S&P 500 has ticked up nearly 13% in the same timeframe. The capital required for funding biopharmas ambitions is leaving too, with one Wall Street firm calculating $8.7 billion in net capital outflows this year rivaling a stretch in late 2015 and early 2016.

After years of outperformance, biotech has lagged the market for the past year

Price per share of a leading biotech index (XBI) and the S&P 500 (SPX) from January 2018 to October 2019 (indexed)

The base value of the index is trading value on Jan. 2, 2018.

Nami Sumida/BioPharma Dive

Investor anxiety is rising at a time when more companies are fighting for funding than in past decades. Evercore ISI analyst Josh Schimmer said this year hes noticed a marked shift in investor attitudes.

When they stumble, the markets are more unforgiving than ever, Schimmer said in an interview. They arent given second chances the way they used to be given. That may be a factor that does lead to a higher rate of bankruptcies.

And small biotechs arent the only ones facing elevated bankruptcy risk. The weight of thousands of lawsuits related to opioid marketing has already taken down Purdue Pharma and Insys Therapeutics. Several others, like Teva Pharmaceutical, Mallinckrodt and Amneal, are at risk of joining them.

The legal uncertainty has made these companies perceived as uninvestable, SVB Leerink analyst Ami Fadia said in an interview. Additionally, many of these pharmas are highly leveraged and face issues in generating cash going forward, she added.

Its pretty obvious that some of these companies are at high risk of bankruptcy, said Fadia, who covers several of these drugmakers including Mallinckrodt and Amneal.

To be sure, the effect of opioid liabilities is constrained to a comparatively small set of companies. But heading into an election year with drug pricing as a top issue, worries about capital fleeing the industry and a legal crackdown on opioid makers could be exacerbated by political threats as well.

Industry lobbyists have blasted HR3, the leading Democratic drug pricing proposal, saying it would trigger a nuclear winter by eroding the upside of biopharmas high-risk, high-reward investment premise.

If HR3 becomes law, it is lights out for a lot of very small biotech companies that are pre-revenue and depend on attracting capital, PhRMA CEO Stephen Ubl said at a recent media briefing.

Industry-specific concerns, of course, come against the backdrop of fears of a broader economic slowdown. Financial analysts have flagged recession signals in the U.S., which, if materialized, would further squeeze the industry.

It may be coming, in which capital itself is scarcer for companies, said Bob Eisenbach, a lawyer at Cooley specializing in bankruptcies. And when that happens, it puts pressure even on good companies.

Biopharmas are structured to avoid bankruptcies. Pre-revenue companies typically carry little debt and have little to restructure through a bankruptcy court if their pipeline fizzles.

Privately held biotechs that suffer clinical failures can also avoid bankruptcy by having their financial backers buy them out, saving face for those venture capitalists.

It just disappears into this great maw of the biotech universe, said Kevin Kinsella, a venture capitalist and founder of Avalon Ventures, referring to distressed biotechs in an interview.

Having launched more than 100 biopharmas, including prominent names like Vertex, Neurocrine and Onyx, Kinsella said hes been lucky enough to avoid getting entangled in any bankruptcies.

Someone absolutely failing, shutting the doors and turning off the lights, you dont really see that a lot in our industry, he said.

Drug companies, both young and old, derive value from ideas and hope more than tangible assets or resources. Just last year, early-stage platform companies like Moderna Therapeutics and Rubius Therapeutics went public with multi-billion dollar valuations despite lacking profits and significant clinical data.

But investor attitudes appear to have shifted. Rubius stock, for instance, has dropped more than 70% since its IPO. While up this month, shares in Moderna are 30% off their 52-week high in May.

Speaking generally about platform companies, Binds former CEO said market sentiment has turned.

Investors have lost their appetite for companies going public with preclinical data, Hirsch said.

Youre probably going to see more of these situations going forward, where a company is preclinical, went public and is left on their own and has to raise additional money from the public markets and they flounder.

Yet even floundering biotechs can persist for years, even decades. Long-standing industry veterans like Xoma, Novavax and Geron have survived in as-yet fruitless searches for their first drugs, suffering clinical failures along the way. Despite accumulated deficits exceeding $1 billion, these companies can find the necessary capital to keep chugging along.

Theres always someone else whos willing to bet the next discovery is around the corner, or the next asset, or if we get this clinical trial enrolled and finished, all will be good, Kinsella said. Theres always hope.

Besides selling hope, biopharmas, like all businesses, have practical options to stave off bankruptcy. Restructuring and raising cash are the main focuses, turnaround experts said.

Corporate restructurings typically shrink the business, either by laying off employees, selling assets or killing off R&D projects. Raising capital can include licensing rights to experimental therapies, taking on debt or tapping the public markets for secondary stock offerings.

If those options are exhausted, M&A can be another way out for shareholders. Firms like Deerfield Management, Hercules Capital and Highbridge Capital Management often aid distressed biotechs in such endeavours.

Deerfield, for instance, reached deals to finance R&D costs for Dynavax and helped fund Melinta Therapeutics acquisition of an infectious disease business.

A last resort can be merging with another struggling biotech, or becoming the shell in a reverse merger for another company seeking an easy path to a public listing.

Both happened in just the past few weeks. Foamix Pharmaceuticals and Menlo Therapeutics merged into one dermatology company, while NewLink Genetics was the shell through which Lumos Pharma joined public markets.

These strategies act as moats that insulate a high-risk industry from bankruptcy. In recent years, they have worked tremendously well. Among the 333 biopharmas that have gone public since 2012, just 3% filed for bankruptcy while 6% became reverse merger shells and 10% exited via M&A, according to data tracked by Evercore ISI.

But with 2019 looking shaky for biopharma, some have begun to wonder how markets will respond.

The last few years have featured record levels of capital raising, according to the investment bank Jefferies, which tallied 100 initial public offerings and 270 follow-on raises in 2018 and 2019 that drummed up tens of billions in cash.

At the same time, the number of public small and mid-sized biotechs has doubled in the past decade. There arent just more of these smaller firms; they also are worth more and consume more capital on average. From 2010 to present, these companies have seen their typical market values double, R&D budgets triple and cash burn rates quadruple, Jefferies found.

The annual burn rate for these biotechs, which includes market values from $200 million to $5 billion, has increased from $20 million to $80 million. Jefferies analyst Michael Yee credited that to free-flowing capital, more platform companies and an arms race in oncology.

Biotechs impressive market performance has made that possible. A leading biotech index, for instance, outperformed the S&P 500 by 30% since the market bottomed out in March 2009.

But of late, biotech has struggled, creating a tougher environment to raise cash.

The question is whether this is sustainable if market and macro conditions get tougher and political uncertainty gets more obvious, forcing companies to tighten their belts to ride out 2020, Yee wrote.

2019 has brought an uptick in industry bankruptcy filings

Credit: Data from Bankruptcy Data

Conditions have clearly worsened by some metrics, such as the amount of money invested in healthcare- or biotech-dedicated funds. Data tracked by a Piper Jaffray found $8.7 billion in investment has left such funds in 2019. Ten of the past 12 weeks have registered net capital outflows, a streak a Piper Jaffray analyst called seemingly the new normal.

Billions of dollars flowed out of biotech in 2015 and 2016, too, at a time when many biotech shares were falling and the prospect of a Hillary Clinton presidency had raised investor fears on drug pricing.

Biotech weathered that storm, with few companies entering bankruptcy, and has grown since. Going forward, a critical question will be gauging whether the sector is on a new trajectory or if it will emerge from this period relatively unscathed.

Getting investor attention is harder than ever to begin with, said Evercores Schimmer. For a company that has faltered, even if they are doing the right thing, its a struggle.

Read more:
Bankrupt biopharmas are rare. 2019 has some worried that's changing. - BioPharma Dive

Nanomedicinecenter.com – Nanomedicine, bionanotechnology …

A lot of patients suffering from colon cancer might well present no symptoms or signs during the earliest stages of the condition. When symptoms do eventually present, they can be many and varied, and can very much depend upon the size of the affliction, how far it has spread and also its actual location. It might be that some symptoms that present are as a result of a condition other than cancer itself, ranging from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and occasionally diverticulosis. Also, such problems as abdominal pain or swelling can be symptomatic of colon problems and may well require further investigation.

You may also notice that, upon going to the lavatory, you have some blood in your stools, and this can be a symptom of cancer. Of course, having black poop doesnt ultimately mean that cancer is present. It can, however, also be indicative of other conditions and problems. For example, the kind of bright red blood that you may see on your toilet tissue could be as a result of hemorrhoids or anal fissures. It should also be remembered that various food items can also result in red poop, and these include beetroot and red liquorice. Some medications can also be culprits, and some can also turn the stools black-including iron supplements. Irrespective, any sign of blood or change in your stools should prompt you to seek advice from your GP, as it is always best to be sure that it is not a sign of a more serious condition, and with any cancer,early detection and treatment is essential to a successful recovery.

You should also note-if you are currently concerned-any change in the regularity of your stools-including whether or not they are more thin or irregular than usual-especially over a period of several weeks. Also, be mindful if you have diarrhea for several days in a row or, conversely, constipation.

You might also experience pain in your lower abdomen-including a feeling of hardness. You may also experience persistent pain or discomfort in your abdominal region, and this can include wind and cramps. You may also get the sensation that, when evacuating your bowels, that the bowel doesnt empty fully. Another symptom that you might recognize is colored stool mainly black stool, but could be green stool too. Also, if you have an iron deficiency (or anemia), it may be an indication that there is bleeding in your colon. Also, as in most cases and types of cancer, you should seek medical advice immediately if you experience any sudden and unexpected or unexplained weight loss, as this is one of the principal red flags. Also be aware of more vague, seemingly incidental symptoms, such as fatigue. IF you have a couple of symptoms and also feel fatigued for days in a row inexplicably, then this is also another warning sign and you should seek medical advice. It is important not to panic, but just to be aware of what might be going on.

Remember, cases of colon cancer account for around 90% of all cases of intestinal cancers, and also account for more deaths every year of men and women from cancer. Early treatment is an absolute must.

Originally posted here:

Nanomedicinecenter.com - Nanomedicine, bionanotechnology ...

Global Nanorobotics Market : Industry Analysis and Forecast (2018-2026) – Markets Gazette 24

Global Nanorobotics Marketwas valued at US$ 3.7 Bn in 2017 and is expected to reach US$ 9.2Bn by 2026, at a CAGR of 12.06%during a forecast period.Global Nanorobotics MarketDevelopments in nanotechnology coupled with demand for minimally aggressive procedures are expected to drive market growth over the forecast period. Nanobots possess likely in the medical sector for destroying cancerous cells at the genetic level. Increasing support for nanomedicine by many nations and the increasing geriatric population are factors which can augur market demand.

Utilization of nanobots in the ranostics can be beneficial for the market in the near future. A rise in miniaturization and demand for automation across various sectors are anticipated to fuel market growth. Training of new personnel to use nanobots can restrain market growth in the upcoming years.Nanomedicine application segment to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period. Nanorobotics is widely used in nanomedicine owning to its healthcare features. The large share of this application aspects to the large level of commercialization in the healthcare sector for drug delivery, in vivo imaging, biomaterial, in vitro diagnostic, active implants, and drug therapy.

North America region accounted for the largest share of 12.2%, in terms of value, of the nanorobotics market globally. Presence of many nanotechnology companies, well-developed healthcare infrastructure, and government initiatives to create patient awareness are factors driving the market. The U.S is anticipated to contribute to market revenue owing to the increase in cardiovascular diseases and the rising elderly populace.

REQUEST FOR FREE SAMPLE REPORT:https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/request-sample/30888

Europe follows North America as the second biggest nanorobotics market. Presence of chronic diseases and the burgeoning population are factors expected to indicate the Europe nanobots market. Establishment of organizations to develop standards pertaining to nanotechnology can expand market growth. In 2018, DNA-Robotics, an organization including 12 European companies, has outlined steps to expedite production of nanobots on a large scale. These standards can help scale the market exponentially in the upcoming years.

A recent development in nanorobotics market: In March 2018, Thermo Fisher Scientific acquired Gatan, an exclusively owned subsidiary of Roper Technologies. Gatan is an electron microscopy solutions provider in the U.S, which accompaniments the Thermo Fisher Scientifics electron microscopy solutions business.In March 2017, Oxford Instruments (U.K) Asylum Research introduced its new SurfRider HQ-Series of high quality, budget-priced AFM probes, which are also existing in a model suitable for nanomechanical image mode.

The objective of the report is to present a comprehensive assessment of the market and contains thoughtful insights, facts, historical data, industry-validated market data and projections with a suitable set of assumptions and methodology. The report also helps in understanding Global Nanorobotics Market dynamics, structure by identifying and analyzing the market segments and project the global market size. Further, the report also focuses on the competitive analysis of key players by product, price, financial position, product portfolio, growth strategies, and regional presence. The report also provides PEST analysis, PORTERs analysis, SWOT analysis to address the question of shareholders to prioritizing the efforts and investment in the near future to the emerging segment in the Global Nanorobotics Market.

DO INQUIRY BEFORE PURCHASING REPORT HERE:https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/inquiry-before-buying/30888

Scope of the Global Nanorobotics Market

Global Nanorobotics Market, By Type

Nanomanipulatoro Electron Microscope (EM) Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM)o Scanning Probe Microscope (SPM) Atomic Force Microscopes (AFM) Scanning Tunneling Microscope (STM) Bio-Nanorobotics Magnetically Guided Bacteria-Based

Global Nanorobotics Market, By Application

Nanomedicine Biomedical Mechanical Others

Global Nanorobotics Market, By Region

North America Europe Asia Pacific Middle East and Africa South America

Key players operating in Global Nanorobotics Market:

Bruker JEOL Thermo Fisher Scientific Ginkgo Bioworks Oxford Instruments EV Group Imina Technologies Toronto Nano Instrumentation KlockeNanotechnik KleindiekNanotechnik Xidex Synthace Park Systems Smaract Nanonics Imaging

Key Innovators:

Novascan Technologies Angstrom Advanced Hummingbird Scientific NT-MDT Spectrum Instruments Witec

Browse Full Report with Facts and Figures of nanorobotics Market Report at:https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/market-report/global-nanorobotics-market/30888/

MAJOR TOC OF THE REPORT

Chapter One: nanorobotics Market Overview

Chapter Two: Manufacturers Profiles

Chapter Three: Global nanorobotics Market Competition, by Players

Chapter Four: Global nanorobotics Market Size by Regions

Chapter Five: North America nanorobotics Revenue by Countries

Chapter Six: Europe nanorobotics Revenue by Countries

Chapter Seven: Asia-Pacific nanorobotics Revenue by Countries

Chapter Eight: South America nanorobotics Revenue by Countries

Chapter Nine: Middle East and Africa Revenue nanorobotics by Countries

Chapter Ten: Global nanorobotics Market Segment by Type

Chapter Eleven: Global nanorobotics Market Segment by Application

Chapter Twelve: Global nanorobotics Market Size Forecast (2019-2026)

About Us:

Maximize Market Research provides B2B and B2C market research on 20,000 high growth emerging technologies & opportunities in Chemical, Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals, Electronics & Communications, Internet of Things, Food and Beverages, Aerospace and Defense and other manufacturing sectors.

Contact info:

Name: Lumawant Godage

Organization: MAXIMIZE MARKET RESEARCH PVT. LTD.

Email: sales@maximizemarketresearch.com

Contact: +919607065656/ +919607195908

Website: http://www.maximizemarketresearch.com

See the rest here:
Global Nanorobotics Market : Industry Analysis and Forecast (2018-2026) - Markets Gazette 24

Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) Market 2019 Industry Outlook, Comprehensive Insights, Growth and Forecast 2025 – WindStreetz

The company provides a detailed analysis of the market and future aspects of the Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) Market. It focuses on critical and critical data that makes it a very important tool for research, experts, analysts, and managers to achieve ready-to-access analysis. The report provides an inclusive analysis of the Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) market size forecast from 2018-2025.

Sample report can be viewed in a PDF form by visiting @ researchunt.com/report/global-healthcare-nanotechnology-nanomedicine-market-size-status-and-forecast-2019-2025/#Free-Sample-Report

The report embraces the complete information of the key players involved in the worldwide Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) market. In addition, it provides its market share by various regions with the company and product introduction and their position in the Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) market. In addition, the report takes into account recent marketing developments as well as their marketing strategies along with an overall business overview. In addition, the report covers market growth factors and restraints of this market.

Prominent players of Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) market:

Product Type Coverage (Market Size & Forecast, Major Company of Product Type etc.):

Application Coverage (Market Size & Forecast, Different Demand Market by Region, Main Consumer Profile etc.):

Regional Segmentation for Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) market:

There are 10 chapters to put on view for Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) market:

Chapter 1: Consumption by Regions

Chapter 2: Production, By Types, Revenue and Market share by Types

Chapter 3: Consumption, By Applications, Market share (%) and Growth Rate by Applications

Chapter 4: Complete profiling and analysis of Manufacturers

Chapter 5: Manufacturing cost analysis, Raw materials analysis, Region-wise manufacturing expenses

Chapter 6: Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers

Chapter 7: Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders

Chapter8: Market Effect Factors Analysis

Chapter9: Market Forecast

Chapter 10: Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) Research Findings and Conclusion, Appendix, methodology and data source

Check here for the discount@ researchunt.com/report/global-healthcare-nanotechnology-nanomedicine-market-size-status-and-forecast-2019-2025/#Buying-Enquiry

Customization of the Report:This report can be customized to meet the clients requirements. Please connect with our sales team (sales@researchunt.com), who will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs.

Gareth Jenkinson

Gareth Jenkinson is a journalist and radio presenter based in Durban, South Africa. When hes not talking about sport on the airwaves - hes got his eye on the Cryptocurrency market.

See the rest here:
Healthcare Nanotechnology (Nanomedicine) Market 2019 Industry Outlook, Comprehensive Insights, Growth and Forecast 2025 - WindStreetz

Nanomedicine Market 2020 by Industry Growth And Competitive Landscape Trends, Segmentation SRI International (US), Aditech Ltd. (UK), Anviz Global,…

Introduction:

This exclusive research report on global Nanomedicine market initiated by Orbis Pharma Reports is an demonstrative replica of diverse market relevant factors dominant across historical and current timelines. The report is anticipated to aid market players willing to upscale their business models and ROI. The report carries out a deep analytical study to identify and understand the potential of core factors that stimulate high end growth. In this report, expert research analysts at Orbis Pharma Reports categorically focus on the pre and post pandemic market conditions to equip readers with ample cues on market progression based on which frontline vendors and other contributing players can successfully design and deploy accurate business decisions and apt growth strategies to secure a healthy footing amidst stringent market competition, fast transitioning regulatory framework and vendor preferences.

Get sample copy of Nanomedicine Market report @ https://www.orbispharmareports.com/sample-request/81199

Major Company Profiles operating in the Nanomedicine Market:

CIC biomaGUNESwedNanoTechBiotechrabbitChemConnectionLTFNAffilogicIstec CNREndomagneticsCarlina technologiesVicomtechVITO NVGrupo PraxisCIBER-BBNGIMACTecnaliaBraccoCristal TherapeuticsTeknikerFraunhofer ICT-IMMBergmannstrostMaterials Research CentreContiproDTIIMDEA

Scope:

The report also includes specific details on core developments such as pricing strategies and manufacturer investments towards selecting growth appropriate business decisions, understanding core methodologies, market size, dimensions as well as share, and market CAGR inputs and investments that collectively illuminate growth favorable route in global Nanomedicine market.Based on market research endeavors and gauging into past growth milestones, seasoned in-house researchers at Orbis Pharma Reports are suggesting an impressive comeback of global Nanomedicine market, significantly offsetting the implications of the global pandemic and its aftermath.

Browse the complete report @ https://www.orbispharmareports.com/global-nanomedicine-market-report-2019-competitive-landscape-trends-and-opportunities/

Nanomedicine Market Product Type:

Type 1Type 2Type 3

Nanomedicine Market Application:

Application 1Application 2Application 3

Segmentation by Type and ApplicationThe end-use application segment is thoroughly influenced by fast transitioning end-user inclination and preferences. Product and application-based segments clearly focus on the array of novel changes and new investments made by market forerunners towards improving product qualities to align with end-use needs. Additionally, this report by Orbis Pharma Reports also includes a dedicated section on various categorization of the market based on product type and diversification. Each of the product and service offerings are maneuvered to undergo rapid transitions to improve growth scope and investment returns in the coming years.

Report Offerings in a Gist:

1.The report by Orbis Pharma Reports outlines crucial attributes of the global Nanomedicine market with detailed understanding of major innovations and events, also highlighting growth plot chalked by leading players2.A decisive overview of macro and micro economic factors have also been highlighted in the report to understand major influences and drivers3.An in-depth impression of crucial technological milestones and a value-based and volume-based output of the same have also been pinned in the report.4.Rife predictions on segment performance and opportunity analysis have also been minutely addressed in the report to decipher growth process and futuristic possibilities.

For Any Query on the Nanomedicine Market: https://www.orbispharmareports.com/enquiry-before-buying/81199

About Us :

At Orbispharma we curate the most relevant news stories, features, analysis and research reports on the important challenges undertaken by the pharmaceutical and related sectors. Our editorial philosophy is to bring you sharp, focused and informed perspective of industries, the end users and application of all upcoming trends into the pharma sector. Orbispharma believes in conversations that can bring a change in one of the most crucial economic sectors in the world. With these conversations we wish our customers to make sound business decisions with right business intelligence.

Contact Us :

Here is the original post:
Nanomedicine Market 2020 by Industry Growth And Competitive Landscape Trends, Segmentation SRI International (US), Aditech Ltd. (UK), Anviz Global,...

Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Journals | Peer Review | OMICS

NLM ID: 101562615 Index Copernicus Value: 4.22

You can find a clear view of peer review process by clicking here.

Nanotechnology is the engineering of functional systems at the molecular scale. It is the study and application of extremely small things and can be used across all the other science fields, such as chemistry, biology, physics, materials science, and engineering.

Related Journals of Nanotechnology Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Letters, Journal of Nanomedicine & Biotherapeutic Discovery, IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience, Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, Photonics and Nanostructures - Fundamentals and Applications

Nanobiotechnology is the application of nanotechnology to the life sciences: The technology encompasses precision engineering as well as electronics, and electromechanical systems as well as mainstream biomedical applications in areas as diverse as gene therapy, drug delivery and novel drug discovery techniques.

Related Journals of Nanobiotechnology Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, Research Journal of Nanoscience and nanotechnology, Nature Nanotechnology Journal, Nanomaterials & Molecular Nanotechnology, Nature Nanotechnology, Nano Letters, Advanced Materials, Nano Today

A Nanocomposite is a multiphase solid material where one of the phases has one, two or three dimensions of less than 100nm, or structure having nano-scale repeat distance between the different phases that make up the material.

Related Journals of Nanocomposites

Journal of Nanomaterial and Nanotechnology, International Journal of Nanotechnology Impact Factor, Journal of Nanomedicine & Biotherapeutic Discovery, Scripta Materialia, Nanoscale, Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry and Biology, Materials Science & Engineering A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing

The Integrated Project Nanobiopharmaceutics aims at the development of innovative multidisciplinary approaches for the design, synthesis and evaluation of functionalised nano-carriers and nano-particle-based micro-carriers for the treatment of various diseases based on targeted, controlled delivery of therapeutic peptides and proteins (biopharmaceutics).

Related Journals of Nanobiopharmaceutics Journal of Nanomedicine & Biotherapeutic Discovery, Journal of Nanobiomedical Impact Factor, Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, Journal of Homotopy and Related Structures, Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases

Nanoelectronics is one of the major technologies of Nanotechnology. It plays vital role in the field of engineering and electronics.

Related Journals of Nanoelectronics Journal of Nanotechnology and Electrophysics, Nano Research & Applications, ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, International Journal of Nanotechnology Applications, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine

Nanomedicine is the medical application of nanotechnology. Nanomedicine ranges from the medical applications of nanomaterials, to nanoelectronic biosensors, and even possible future applications of molecular nanotechnology.

Related Journals of Nanomedicine Nanomaterials & Molecular Nanotechnology, Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, International Journal of Nanomedicine, Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, Journal of Nanomedicine Research, European Journal of Nanomedicine

Nanotoxicology is a branch of toxicology concerned with the study of the toxicity of nanomaterials, which can be divided into those derived from combustion processes (like diesel soot), manufacturing processes (such as spray drying or grinding) and naturally occurring processes (such as volcanic eruptions or atmospheric reactions).

Related Journals of Nanotoxicology Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Journal Lists, Nano Journal Impact Factor, Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, Microelectronic Engineering, Nano Biomedicine and Engineering, Nano-Micro Letters

Nanoengineering is the practice of engineering on the nanoscale. It derives its name from the nanometre, a unit of measurement equalling one billionth of a meter. Nanoengineering is largely a synonym for nanotechnology, but emphasizes the engineering rather than the pure science aspects of the field.

Related Journals of Nanoengineering Journal of Nanoresearch, Review in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Nature Nanotechnology Journal, Research & Reviews: Journal of Pharmaceutics and Nanotechnology, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, Nanotoxicology, Precision Engineering, Nanomedicine, Nanotechnology

The spontaneous association of molecules under equilibrium conditions into stable, structurally well-defined aggregates.

Related Journals of Nanofabrications Journal of Nanotechnology Impact Factor, Nanotechnology Journal Lists, Journal of Nano, Nanomaterials & Molecular Nanotechnology, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, International Journal of Nanomedicine, Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology

Nanofluidics is often defined as the study and application of fluid flow in and around nanosized objects.

Related Journals of Nanofluidics Research Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Nano Journal Impact Factor, Journal of Nanotechnology and Electrophysics, Journal of Bionanoscience, Nanotechnology, Science and Applications, Journal of Nanobiotechnology, Plasmonics, Biomedical Microdevices

Nanohedron aims to exhibit scientific images, with a focus on images depicting nanoscale objects. The work ranges from electron microscopy images of nanoscale materials to graphical renderings of molecules. Scientific images lying outside the realm of nanoscience such as algorithmic art or confocal microscopy images of cells will also be considered.

Related Journals of Nanohedron Biomicrofluidics, Nanotechnology Journal Lists, Nano Journal Impact Factor, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering

Nano Cars Into the robotics is new technology which is useful for designing robots. Difference in exisiting robotics and nano cars is this system works as nervous system where as in existing system stepper motors are used.

Related Journals of Nanocars Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, Journal of Nanobiomedical Impact Factor, Review in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology,Nanomedicine & Biotherapeutic Discovery, ACS Nano, Advanced Functional Materials, Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, Biomaterials, Small, Nano Research

Nanothermite, as the name suggests, is thermite in which the particles are so small that they are measured in nanometers is an ultra-fine-grained (UFG) variant of thermite that can be formulated to be explosive by adding gas-releasing substances.

Related Journals of Nanothermite Nanoscale Research Letters, Journal of Nanobiomedical Impact Factor, International Journal of Nanoscience, Microelectronics and Reliability, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, AIP Advances

A sequence of nanoscale C60 atoms arranged in a long thin cylindrical structure. Nanotubes are extremely strong mechanically and very pure conductors of electric current. Applications of the nanotube in nanotechnology include resistors, capacitors, inductors, diodes and transistors.

Related Journals of Nanotubes Nanotechnology journals, Nature Nanotechnology Journal, Nano Journal Impact Factor, ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems, Science of Advanced Materials, Journal of Nanophotonics

Having an organization more complex than that of a molecule.

Realated Journals of Supramolecule Plasmonics, Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, International Journal of Nanoscience, Journal of Nanobiomedical Impact Factor, Biomedical Microdevices, Biomicrofluidics, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology

Nanoionics is the study and application of phenomena, properties, effects and mechanisms of processes connected with fast ion transport (FIT) in all-solid-state nanoscale systems.

Related Journals of Nanoionics Journal of Nanoresearch, Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, Nanomedicine, Nanotechnology, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, International Journal of Nanomedicine

Nanolithography is the branch of nanotechnology concerned with the study and application of fabricating nanometer-scale structures, meaning patterns with at least one lateral dimension between 1 and 100 nm.

Related Journals of Nanolithography International Journal of Nanotechnology, Journal of Nanotechnology Impact Factor, Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Letters, Nano Research, Scripta Materialia, Nanoscale, Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry and Biology

Nanoparticles are particles between 1 and 100 nanometers in size. In nanotechnology, a particle is defined as a small object that behaves as a whole unit with respect to its transport and properties. Particles are further classified according to diameter.

Related Journals of Nanoparticles Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, International Journal of Nanoscience, Journal of Nanomaterial and Nanotechnology, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, Journal of Nanoparticles, International Journal of Nanoparticles,

Exploitation of biomaterials, devices or methodologies on the nanoscale.

Related Journals of Bionanoscience Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, Journal of Nanobiomedical Impact Factor, Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, Recent Patents in Nanotechnology, Journal of Bionanoscience, BioNanoScience, Nanomedicine, Nanotechnology, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials

See the article here:
Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Journals | Peer Review | OMICS

Nanomedicine – an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

17.8 Commentary on Hurdles in Clinical Translation of Various Nanotechnology Products

Research regarding nanoconstructs development in the cancer treatment field has witnessed a noticeable increase after discovery of the EPR effect. However, the number of anticancer drugs that actually reached the market was considered extremely low, as out of 200,000 anticancer drugs only 15 made it by 2017 (Greish et al., 2018). The reasons why most of the nanomedicines cannot even reach the market are the hardship or inability to maintain detailed characterization of these products, unsuccessful manufacturing on large scales, and issues in their safety and efficacy. These hurdles require many developmental processes to overcome them including a precise understanding of every component and all the possible interactions between them, determination of key characteristics to understand in which possible ways they affect performance, and the extent of it. If key characteristics can be replicated under manufacturing conditions (scaling up), the efficacy of targeting at the site of action and their stability and sterility can be enhanced and/or assessed (Desai, 2012). The majority of these hurdles are summarized in Table 17.5 (Tinkle et al., 2014).

Table 17.5. Major Hurdles That Face the Commercialization of Nanomedicine

Lack of standard nano nomenclature: imprecise definition for nanomedicines

Currently used compounds/components for nanodrug synthesis often pose problems for large-scale good manufacturing (cGMP) production

Lack of precise control over nanoparticle manufacturing parameters and control assays

Lack of quality control: issues pertaining to separation of undesired nanostructures (byproducts, catalysts, starting materials) during manufacturing

Reproducibility issues: control of particle size distribution and mass

Scalability complexities: enhancing the production rate to increase yield

High fabrication costs

Lack of rational preclinical characterization strategies via multiple techniques

Biocompatibility, biodistribution and toxicity issues: lack of knowledge regarding the interaction between nanoparticles and biosurfaces/tissues

Consumer confidence: the publics general reluctance to embrace innovative medical technologies without clearer safety or regulatory guidelines

The relative scarcity of venture funds

Ethical issues and societal issues are hyped up by the media

Big Pharmas continued reluctance to seriously invest in nanomedicine

Patent review delays, patent thickets, and issuance of invalid patents by the US Patent and Trademark Office

Regulatory uncertainty and confusion due to baby steps undertaken by US Food and Drug Administration: a lack of clear regulatory/safety guidelines

One of the major concerns related to NPs is their potential incompatibility and toxicity. Studies showed that inhaling NPs can cause pulmonary inflammation as well as inducing endothelial dysfunction that might lead to further complications in the cardiovascular system. A study for evaluation of iron oxide toxicity showed that monocyte-mediated dissolution and phagocytosis of the NPs have caused severe endothelial toxicity by initiating oxidative stress. Nanomaterials used in oral DDS have been shown to accumulate in hepatic cells, which might induce the immune response and eventually cause permanent damage to the liver. The accumulation of NPs in cells has been found to cause cancer by transforming cells into the tumorous state (Jain et al., 2018; Riehemann et al., 2009). Thus, handling these nanosystems requires special equipment and caution, which increases the cost of the production process and requires further investigations of the safety of nanomaterials to have a better understanding and optimize safety during manufacturing (Hammed et al., 2016). Production of NPs in the laboratory often requires complex, multistep synthesis processes to yield the nanomaterials with the required properties. Aside from the complexity of the process, controlling conditions such as temperature and concentrations precisely is significant to achieve homogeneity of NPs in terms of desired characteristics. However, retaining temperature and concentration in large systems is harder to achieve resulting in NPs with different characteristics (Gomez et al., 2014).

NPs tend to aggregate forming clusters with several microns in size. Aggregation of NPs alters their characteristics such as reactivity, transport, toxicity, and risk in the environment. Dissolution reduces when aggregation occurs due to the decrease in available surface area that will eventually reduce the activity of NPs. For example, dechlorination rate of CT (carbon tetrachloride) by magnetite NPs has shown to decrease when aggregation of the NPs increases resulting in an inverse relationship between dechlorination rate of carbon tetrachloride and aggregation of magnetite NPs (Hotze et al., 2010; Hou and Jafvert, 2009).

All these requirements are extremely important because the majority of the nanomedicines have failed to reach the commercialization step even though their efficacy in animal models was considerably high. Due consideration must be given regarding the several difficulties such as their low targeting, low safety, low efficacy, heterogeneity of disease between individuals, inability to scale-up successfully, and unavailability in determining a convenient characterization methods (Agrahari and Agrahari, 2018; Hare et al., 2017; Kaur et al., 2014). These hurdles that face the research process of accelerated translation are summarized in Fig. 17.8 (Satalkar et al., 2016).

Figure 17.8. Major issues that face accelerated translation process of nanoparticles.

Therefore, more understanding in all aspects of nanomedicine production, characterization, and clinical processes must be fulfilled to control and improve the development processes, and increase the efficacy of the translational methods. Other significant hurdles hindering clinical translation are the insignificant incentives regarding technology transfer, as well as socioeconomic uncertainties along with the safety problems faced. In the majority of cases, consideration of commercialization aspects in early stages of development is hardly even considered thus eliminating the market-oriented development (Rsslein et al., 2017).

Nanomedicines face tough, challenging concerns when it comes to determining the applicable analytical tests in terms of chemical, physical, or biological characterization. This is mainly achieved due to their complex nature in comparison with other pharmaceutical products. Hence, there is a need for more complex and advanced levels of testing to ensure a full accurate characterization of nanomedicine products. Quantification of each component of nanomedicine is considered essential alongside the identification and evaluation of interactions between them. For more possibility in achieving successful manufacturing processes with reproducibility, these products should be investigated and understood more during the early developmental stages to identify their key characteristics. The challenges for nanomedicine during scale-up and manufacturing are considered relatively unique because other pharmaceutical manufacturing processes systems are not three-dimensional multicomponent in nature on the nanometer scale. Therefore, a certain series of obstacles in the scale-up process is required. To reach the desired safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters to produce the therapeutic effect are needed. These are further determined by the proper selections of the essential components, determination of the critical manufacturing steps, and key characteristics identification. Several methods of orthogonal analysis are essential for in-process quality controls of nanoparticle products and any deviations from key parameters could result in a significant negative impact on both the safety and efficacy of nanomedicines (Desai, 2012).

Each step in the manufacturing process of NPs must be understood extensively with the need of experienced technicians. The development process also requires more enhancements in both complexity and cost. Inadequate data regarding scaling-up processes of nanomedicine products is a major concern in the commercialization step as there are only a few reports supporting scaling-up developments. Many formulation methods have been developed for manufacturing nanomedicine products. The most common methods are nanoprecipitation and emulsion-based approaches. Generally, formulations are prepared either by precipitating the dissolved molecules (bottom-up method) or by reducing the size of larger drug particles (top-down method). Removal of the solvent in the bottom-up method is not an easy process and it cannot be controlled well either, thus explaining why this method is less often applied in industrial manufacturing (Agrahari and Agrahari, 2018; Vauthier and Bouchemal, 2009). Investments in innovative projects face several issues with the major one being the knowledge that should be obtained from the innovation. Its confidentiality is easily breached when a company uses that knowledge as it cannot prevent other companies from using it. Thus, investors are not attracted to this type of project because the total return on the investment cannot be easily appropriated (Morigi et al., 2012).

The complexities in formulating nanoproducts on large scales are due to the inability of optimization of formulation processes and achieving reproducibility. Whereas formulation steps including size reduction, homogenization, centrifugation, sonication, solvent evaporation, lyophilization, extrusion, and sterilization can be easily optimized on small-scales, its still a challenging process on large-scales. Accordingly, variations between batches cannot be controlled sufficiently thereby limiting the possibility of nanomedicine to get through commercial translation (Anselmo et al., 2017; Desai, 2012).

Another problem is that even slight changes in either the formulation or the manufacturing process can have a significant effect on the nanomedicine physiochemical properties (crystallinity, size, surface charge, release profile), which will ultimately influence the therapeutic outcome. Most of the pharmaceutical industrial facilities cannot manufacture nanomedicines because of the lack of the right equipment for the process. As nanomedicine manufacturing usually involves the use of organic solvents, the ability to correctly process and handle nanoproducts is crucial to control their safety and sterility (Anselmo et al., 2017; Desai, 2012; Kaur et al., 2014). These steps require an expensive and complicated equipment, well-trained staff, and precise control to get the required product in the right quality (Desai, 2012; Kaur et al., 2014; Ragelle et al., 2017).

To date, only 58 nanoformulations are approved based on their clinical efficacy but only a quarter of them are meant for cancer treatment. Majority of the nanoformulations could not even be reproduced successfully due to several factors including the study design, overall analysis, protocols, data collection, and the quality and purity of materials used. Besides, the poor establishment of the correlation and prediction of safety and efficacy of the nanomedicine on patients hinders the successful DDS. Targeting and drug accumulation of anticancer drugs in the site of action is considered relatively poor in mouse models. Many nanoformulations were faced with failure in different clinical trial phases. Some of them got approved but then withdrawn from the market such as peginesatide. Unfortunately, the increased failures will most probably affect the development movement in the pharmaceutical industry (Greish et al., 2018).

At the present time, regulatory agencies such as the FDA and EMEA are examining every new nanomedicine on a product-by-product basis. They are considered a unique category due to the fact that there are no true standards in their examination process (Desai, 2012). Two of the major regulatory issues that emerged at the start of nanomedicine is the lack of scientific experts in the FDA and the difficulty in classifying the product (Morigi et al., 2012). The unique characteristics of nanomedicines are directly related to their regulation hurdles, which is the same as other pharmaceutical systems such as liposomes and polymeric systems (Sainz et al., 2015).

Researchers keep investigating nanomedicines when attached to prodrugs, drugs, tracking entities, and targeting molecules. Development of robust methods and assays in quality control of nanomedicines are required for more effective monitoring and characterizations. Also, estimation of their overall performance in releasing drugs, binding to proteins, and the specificity in cellular uptake must be considered (Sainz et al., 2015; Tinkle et al., 2014).

Nanomedicine products are both complex and diverse requiring explanation of challenges to have a clear definition and an effective regulation. The lack of regulatory guidelines for these products hinders their clinical potential. Drug regulatory authorities must keep up with the rapid pace of the knowledge and technological development as they play a major role translating nanomedicines towards the market. The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) and the FDA have different requirements in evaluating new nanomedicines as well as different definitions regarding nanomedicine. Agreeing on specific regulatory procedures internationally is very important to ease the translational researches of nanomedicines. Also, better long-term monitoring of toxicity should be achieved by prolonging postmarketing surveillance especially for a patient with chronic diseases (Sainz et al., 2015; Tinkle et al., 2014).

Nanomedicines just like any other pharmaceutical formulations must offer higher value to patients to become commercially successful, and have better efficacy and safety. New nanomedicine products follow the same steps in clinical trials as other drugs. It starts with preclinical tests, then be submitted to get the IND (investigational new drug) approval and following that it enters the three stages of clinical trials, one after another to evaluate safety and efficacy of the new drug (Agrahari and Agrahari, 2018).

In recent years, toxicities caused by nanomedicines have drawn attention and been recognized to be unique to nanoparticulate systems. Hence, a minimum set of measurements for the nanoparticle like surface charge, size, and solubility are monitored so as to predict the possible toxicity of NPs. Besides, NPs can stimulate the immune system by acting as an antigen. Immunogenicity is mainly affected by the size of the nanoparticle, its surface characteristics, hydrophobicity, charge, and solubility. Hematologic safety concerns have also been observed such as hemolysis and thrombogenicity (Desai, 2012).

In vivo and in vitro studies provide the proper characterization of the interactions between the product and the biological system. The problem is that the data attained from current toxicity tests are not from clinical trials and it cannot always be extrapolated to humans. Monolayers of cell cultures are currently used to characterize immunogenicity, drug release, cellular uptake, and toxicity. However, the cellular uptake process of nanoformulations is majorly influenced by physicochemical characteristics. Thus, 3D cell systems will probably provide better outcomes (Gupta et al., 2016). More caution should be given when handling any nanosized powder due to the ability of such particles to penetrate the skin and because it can also show pulmonary toxicity (Agrahari and Hiremath, 2017; Nel et al., 2006).

See more here:
Nanomedicine - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

Nanomedicine Market To Reach USD 343.8 Billion By 2026 | CAGR of 12.6% – PharmiWeb.com

Disclaimer: You are now leaving PharmiWeb.com website and are going to a website that is not operated by us. We are not responsible for the content or availability of linked sites.

ABOUT THIRD PARTY LINKS ON OUR SITE

PharmiWeb.com offers links to other third party websites that may be of interest to our website visitors. The links provided in our website are provided solely for your convenience and may assist you in locating other useful information on the Internet. When you click on these links you will leave the PharmiWeb.com website and will be redirected to another site. These sites are not under the control of PharmiWeb.com.

PharmiWeb.com is not responsible for the content of linked third party websites. We are not an agent for these third parties nor do we endorse or guarantee their products. We make no representation or warranty regarding the accuracy of the information contained in the linked sites. We suggest that you always verify the information obtained from linked websites before acting upon this information.

Also, please be aware that the security and privacy policies on these sites may be different than PharmiWeb.com policies, so please read third party privacy and security policies closely.

If you have any questions or concerns about the products and services offered on linked third party websites, please contact the third party directly.

See original here:
Nanomedicine Market To Reach USD 343.8 Billion By 2026 | CAGR of 12.6% - PharmiWeb.com

Nanotechnology for disease diagnosis and treatment earns Florida Poly professor international award – Yahoo Finance

Florida Poly assistant professor Dr. Ajeet Kaushik has received the 2019 USERN Prize in biological sciences, an international award recognizing his work in the field of nanomaterials for the detection and treatment of diseases.

LAKELAND, Fla., Nov. 18, 2019 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ -- Dr. Ajeet Kaushik is determined to make detecting and treating diseases easy, accessible, and precise through the use of nanomaterials for biosensing and medicine.

His extensive work and resolute desire to improve the delivery of healthcare has earned Kaushik the prestigious Universal Scientific Education Research Network (USERN) Prize. He was named a laureate in the field of biological sciences during the group's fourth annual congress on Nov. 8 in Budapest, Hungary.

USERN, a non-governmental, non-profit organization and network dedicated to non-military scientific advances, is committed to exploring science beyond international borders.

"I was speechless for a while," said Kaushik, who is an assistant professor of chemistry at Florida Polytechnic University.

Kaushik did not attend the awards ceremony in person but did submit a video to be played at the event. He was among hundreds vying for the prize and one of five people who were recognized in different areas of study.

His submitted project, Nano-Bio-Technology for Personalized Health Care, focuses on using nanomaterials to create biosensors that will detect the markers of a disease at very low levels.

"Biosensing is not a new concept, but now we are making devices that are smarter and more capable," Kaushik said.

He cited the recent zika virus epidemic that affected pregnant women and their fetuses, leading to significant health complications upon birth. "There was a demand to have a system that could detect the virus protein at a very low level, but there was no device. There was no diagnostic system," he said.

Kaushik worked on the development of a smart zika sensor that could detect the disease at these low levels. "The kind of systems I'm focusing on can be customized in a way that we carry like a cell phone and do the tests wherever we need to do them," he said.

In addition to using nanotechnology for the detection of diseases like zika, his research on nanoparticles is advancing efforts to precisely deliver medicine to a specific part of the body without affecting surrounding tissue or other parts of the body.

"The drugs we use now do not go only where they need to go, or sometimes they have side effects. We are treating one disease but creating other symptoms," Kaushik said. "I'm exploring nanotechnology that can carry a drug, selectively go to a place, and release the drug so we avoid using excessive drugs."

This nanomedicine could be used to precisely target brain tumors or other difficult-to-treat conditions. He has published papers in scientific journals about this work and also holds multiple patents.

"My whole approach is using smart material science for better health for everybody, which is accessible to everybody everywhere," Kaushik said.

In addition to his USERN prize, Kaushik was named a USERN junior ambassador for 2020 and will work to advance the organization's mission in the United States.

For the most recent university news, visit Florida Poly News.

About Florida Polytechnic University:

Florida Polytechnic University is accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges and is a member of the State University System of Florida. It is the only state university dedicated exclusively to STEM and offers ABET accredited degrees. Florida Poly is a powerful economic engine within the state of Florida, blending applied research with industry partnerships to give students an academically rigorous education with real-world relevance. Connect with Florida Poly online at http://www.floridapoly.edu.

Visit link:
Nanotechnology for disease diagnosis and treatment earns Florida Poly professor international award - Yahoo Finance