With eviction freeze extension, Florida landlords wonder how they’ll recover lost rent – Florida Trend

With eviction freeze extension, Florida landlords wonder how theyll recover lost rent

Gov. DeSantis ordered the statewide stay on evictions April 2 and has twice extended it. The move was to prevent out-of-work renters from becoming homeless, though his office has stressed that it does not cancel rent obligations altogether for tenants. Hundreds of eviction cases have stacked up in Florida courts since then, leaving landlords fretting whether they will be able to recover the thousands they are owed from unemployed tenants who may be unable to pay ballooning back payments. Some also fear their tenants are taking advantage. [Source: Tampa Bay Times]

Orlando is America's top travel destination: How hard has its real estate market been hit?

The loss of jobs portends far-reaching economic impacts on the Orlando area, including the real estate market. Until the coronavirus pandemic, it was one of the fastest-growing metros in the U.S., a southeastern bellwether for housing. Then, as in most parts of the country, home sales fell off a cliff. Now experts are wondering: How quickly will the housing market come backand what will the new normal look like? [Source: Realtor]

Florida Trend Exclusive Villa Del Ray Golf Course makes way for homes

13th Floor Homes is planning 436 residences at the old Villa Del Ray Golf Course in Delray Beach. Miami-based 13th Floor Homes acquired the closed 120-acre Villa Del Ray Golf Course in Delray Beach, where it plans a 436-home, 55-plus development called Delray Trails. 13th Floor, the home-building division of Miami-based 13th Floor Investments, specializes in converting golf courses into home communities. [Source: Florida Trend]

South Florida rents are declining as coronavirus chases tenants away from downtowns

The coronavirus pandemic might be chasing people away from living on top of each other in apartments. Rents are gradually declining, suggesting that tenants are looking elsewhere for room to work at home and stay healthy. In 30 South Florida cities, the rent for 62% of one-bedroom units are either flat or declining, according to Zumper, a national apartment search firm. The percentage increases to 69% for two-bedroom prices. [Source: South Florida Sun-Sentinel]

Inside Virgin Hotels $330M vision for South Beach and how it vanished

Virgin Hotels had been looking for the right redevelopment opportunity in South Beach for years, and appeared to have found it a few months ago in HFZ Capital Groups Shore Club. But discussions were sidelined and the timeline abandoned, as the coronavirus began to spread and eventually led to the statewide shutdown of nonessential businesses. A Virgin Hotels spokesperson this week sounded an optimistic note about the future, but with tourism only beginning to creep back and financing opportunities slim for hotel acquisitions, it is unclear whether negotiations will resume. [Source: The Real Deal]

ALSO TRENDING:

Land swap brings American Dream Miami mega mall closer to 2021 groundbreaking [Miami Herald]The American Dream mega mall is on track, thanks to a land swap with the Graham Companies. Canadian developer Triple Five Group acquired about 25 acres within the footprint of American Dream Miami after trading 27 acres with Miami Lakes-based Graham Companies.

Disney yet again sues Orange County appraiser over Florida tax assessments [The Real Deal]Its that time of year again. Disney is suing Orange County Property Appraiser Rich Singh. The company filed 12 lawsuits this week against Singh, claiming the countys tax assessment of its Orlando-area properties, including Disney World, were too high. Disney has sued Singh over tax assessments every year since 2016, according to the Orlando Sentinel.

Former Kennedy estate sells for $70 million in Palm Beach, deed shows [Northwest Florida Daily News]The former Kennedy family estate in Palm Beach has been sold for a recorded $70 million by a company controlled by asset manager and billionaire Jane Goldman, who extensively renovated the property. The estate known to millions as President John F. Kennedys winter White House faces the beachfront at 1095 N. Ocean Blvd. Palm Beach in the last few years has acquired another winter White House: President Donald Trumps Mar-a-Lago on the other side of town.

Rebirth for Regency Square Mall? Nearly vacant retail center under contract [Jax Daily Record]There could be new life for an old mall and a new beat in the heart of Arlingtons retail center. Regency Square Mall, developed a half-century ago to fanfare as the largest regional enclosed mall, could be redeveloped. Commercial real estate developer Rimrock Devlin said it has a contract to buy the 53-year-old largely vacant Regency Square Mall and redevelop the 77.11-acre property into mixed uses. Its not a done deal, but its on the table.

Tags:Real Estate eNews

Previous Real Estate Updates:

Read more here:

With eviction freeze extension, Florida landlords wonder how they'll recover lost rent - Florida Trend

New Bridge Program Involves Incoming Students in the Future of Agriculture | Newsroom – UC Merced University News

Incoming first-year and transfer students will have a new resource for success and an introduction to research starting next summer, thanks to a four-year, $400,000 grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Civil and environmental engineering Professor Colleen Naughton is heading up the USDAs Research and Extension Experiential Learning for Undergraduates (REEU) program, which will provide a bridge for incoming students. The Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society (CITRIS) at UC Merced will host the program.

The six-week summer immersion program will connect five undergraduates and five transfer students each year with faculty mentors from all three schools to work on projects related to food security and provide tools, research and a highly educated workforce to benefit the agriculture, natural resources, technology, and human sciences fields.

We want to get students interested and give them a jump-start into university life and research, Naughton said. We are focused on sustainable agriculture and what it will be in 2050, and the challenges of food security for 9 billion people around the world. We are developing technology to meet those challenges. The students can think of this bridge program as pre-training.

Naughton said there is already a lot of important and exciting research happening at UC Merced, and she wants to offer a diverse group of REEU students a variety of research opportunities. Their varied backgrounds and life experiences will bring many different voices to bear on the projects, and they will get practical immersion in food production to fully understand and develop the technology that will address food security needs.

The six-week bridge includes on-campus housing, 30 hours a week of paid research, research supplies, field trips to area farms, workshops and more. Though the program is led by faculty in the School of Engineering, the program offers a diverse array of research projects for students to participate in, including agroecology and food production; nutrition and food security; digital agriculture and spatial analysis; mechatronics and embedded systems; environmental and agricultural economics; soil biogeochemistry, microbiome and soil remediation; integrated pest management; robotics and machine learning; life cycle assessment; and hydrology and water management.

Students are encouraged to follow the CITRIS website for updates, as recruiting for next summer begins soon.

CITRIS is excited to support this endeavor because it not only advances our expertise in ag-food-technology and research in climate-smart practices, but also develops critical skills for our students to give back to our local community, said CITRIS Director Professor Joshua Viers, a co-principal investigator and one of the faculty mentors.

Naughton was a first-generation student herself, and knows incoming students need more than just research and academics, so the program will also offer peer-to-peer mentoring and training in life skills such as budgeting, studying and stress management all needed for success at the university. Additionally, transfer students are often older than their incoming peers, and can feel isolated. The program will help them acclimate to the university and network with others to build community.

This proposal was one of 26 selected for funding across the nation and is part of the National Institute of Food and Agricultures Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Workforce Development.

Our ultimate goal is to train a diverse and competitive agricultural workforce that will increase agricultural productivity and food security for those who need it most, Naughton said.

See the article here:

New Bridge Program Involves Incoming Students in the Future of Agriculture | Newsroom - UC Merced University News

Life inside Pluto? Hot birth may have created internal ocean on dwarf planet – The Conversation UK

Pluto, along with many other dwarf planets in the outer solar system, is often thought of as dark, icy and barren with a surface temperature of just 230C. But now a new study, published in Nature Geoscience, suggests that the body has had a warm interior ever since it formed, and may still have a liquid, internal ocean under its icy crust.

It could mean that other sizeable icy dwarf planets may have had early internal oceans too, with some possibly persisting today. This is exciting, as where theres warm water, there could be life.

As soon as NASAs New Horizons probe began to send back its haul of pictures and other data from its 2016 flyby of Pluto, it became clear that this is one of the most interesting worlds ever seen. Beneath its haze-layered atmosphere is a frigid, cratered surface of impure water-ice and one major impact basin (Sputnik Planitia) that has been flooded by frozen nitrogen.

The water-ice crust is cut by numerous fractures, all of which appear to be the result of stretching of the surface. Those cracks in the ice provided the first hints that there might be liquid water flowing underneath, in the form of an internal ocean between the icy shell and rocky core. More evidence soon emerged in favour of this, such as hints that the icy shell has been able to re-orient itself, gliding over an essentially frictionless (hence liquid) interior.

If it does have an internal ocean, Pluto is far from unique. Evidence for present-day oceans inside icy moons such as Jupiters Europa, and Saturns Titan and Enceladus is so strong that few scientists doubt the likelihood of an ocean inside Pluto for at least part of its history.

The insight offered by the new study comes from studying maps of Plutos shape and features. The researchers discovered that cracks in its surface are of all ages right back to the most remote times we can see, soon after the surface formed, possibly 4.5 billion years ago.

Scientists have assumed that Pluto grew by slowly accumulating icy material that condensed when the outer solar system was forming. In such a scenario, no internal ocean could have formed until trapped heat generated by radioactive decay in the rocky core had built up sufficiently to melt the overlying ice.

In that situation, the oldest geological faults on the surface would have certain specific characteristics (dubbed compressional features). This is because turning the lower part of the ice into liquid water, which is denser and occupies less volume, would have placed the overlying ice into compression.

Other types of fractures interpreted as extensional cracks could begin to form only when the top of this ocean began to freeze as its heat escaped to space. The pressure of the ice forced the interior to expand slightly, stretching and cracking the surface a little. However, Plutos surface is cut by what appear to be extensional cracks only, right back to the most ancient times.

The authors therefore argue that the young Pluto grew to its present size by accumulating tiny pieces of material in a so-called pebble accretion process that was energetic and rapid enough to cause melting at the base of the ice layer. This is termed a hot start, though all it means is just warm enough for water-ice to melt.

The crust, from the first moment that it became stable, never experienced compression. Instead, its surface suffered extension as liquid water at top of the ocean froze onto the base of the ice shell during Plutos first half billion years.

Ocean freezing may then have paused for about the next billion years because the build-up of radioactive heat was temporarily able to balance the rate of heat escape to space. But ever since then, as Plutos radioactive heat production dwindled over time, the roof of the ocean continued to freeze. The thickness of the ice shell has maybe doubled to about 180km. The surviving ocean is likely a 200km thick layer between the ice and the rock.

Internal oceans are fascinating, not just because of how changes in volume can stretch or compress the surface, but because they are potential habitats for life. It is irrelevant that Plutos surface temperature is extremely low, because any internal ocean would be warm enough for life.

This could not be life depending on sunlight for its energy, like most life on Earth, and it would have to survive on the probably very meagre chemical energy available within Pluto. So while we cant rule out there could be life inside Pluto, Europa and Enceladus are likely to be better contenders, since they have more chemical energy available.

Read more: Stunning, crystal-clear images of Pluto but what do they mean?

Read more: NASA mission brings Pluto into sharp focus but it's still not a planet

Follow this link:

Life inside Pluto? Hot birth may have created internal ocean on dwarf planet - The Conversation UK

Coronavirus: Sunday opening hours extension to be ditched amid threats of Tory revolt – The Independent

Plans to extend Sunday opening hours to help stores recover from the coronavirus lockdown look set to be ditched amid threats of revolt by Tory backbenchers.

Boris Johnsons official spokesman told reporters that Sunday trading laws were under review.

But with a new Covid bill set to be introduced to parliament before the end of this week, there is not enough time for the result of any review to be incorporated into a new law.

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

Reports suggested that as many as 50 Conservative MPs were ready to vote against extended opening on Sundays - enough to defeat Mr Johnson in the House of Commons.

The Prime Ministers official spokesman, when asked whether plans to widen Sunday trading had been ditched, said: We have said we will keep measures such as extending Sunday trading hours under review as they can support shops with social distancing and allow shoppers to buy food and other items more conveniently.

Asked if the suggested plans were now on the back burner, the No 10 spokesman added: There is a Covid Bill which will look at new ways of working as the country recovers from the disruption caused by coronavirus and which is intended to help businesses through the summer months, in particular.

I would expect that Bill to be introduced this week.

He continued: In terms of what is in the Bill, it is right that that will go to Parliament first but, as I say, at the heart of it will be legislation to enable businesses to adjust to new ways of working and to help them to capitalise on the summer months.

It will look to support business to implement safer ways of working to manage the ongoing risks of coronavirus and in particular the need for social distancing.

The legislation, known as the Business and Planning bill, is expected to be introduced by business secretary Alok Sharma and to include relaxation of planning rules to allow innovative methods of maximising the amount of trade venues can carry out, such as expanding pavement cafes and other outdoor dining and drinking areas.

Shopworkers' union Usdaw welcomed the climbdown.

General secretary Paddy Lillis said: We appreciate the desire to help the retail sector, but the proposal to undo a long-held and workable compromise on Sunday trading was misguided and overwhelmingly rejected by shopworkers. We welcome reports that the government has rejected the proposal to make shopworkers work longer on Sundays.

What the retail sector needs now is a tripartite approach of unions, employers and government sitting down talking about what a retail recovery plan will look like. We have long called for an industrial strategy for retail to help a sector that was already struggling before the coronavirus emergency.

The latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox

"The government needs to level the playing field on taxation between online and the High Street, as well as enable councils to breathe new life into town centres and make them community hubs."

A letter to the Prime Minister signed by seven Tory MPs including Fiona Bruce, David Amess and Bob Blackman warned Mr Johnson this weekend that over 50 MPs were known to be opposed to the plans.

The group warned: We stand squarely behind your ambition to stimulate economic growth and revitalise British high streets, but removing Sunday trading hours will not achieve this."

Opposition among Tory MPs saw off an earlier attempt by David Cameron to introduce longer Sunday opening hours in 2016.

Read more:

Coronavirus: Sunday opening hours extension to be ditched amid threats of Tory revolt - The Independent

Jamal Adams ‘trying’ to force trade to Cowboys, putting Jets in impossible situation – Sporting News

Jamal Adams is dead-set on Dallas.

In an Instagram video posted over the weekend, someone had spotted the All Pro safety (and potentialfuture former Jet) in his car, when the person asked Adams whether he was "coming to Dallas."

Adams' response: "I'm trying, bro."

A move to Dallas won't be easy, as the Cowboys are going to be up against the cap number. And with Dak Prescott and Dallas reportedly negotiating a long-term contract extension, it's unclearwhere Adams is going to get his big payday.

MORE: The inside story on the 'Madden 21' cover

The Jets-Adams breakup has been brewing since late 2018, with Adams openly criticizing the Jets' roster and the powers that be for having a weak roster devoid of "dogs."The team went to great lengths to getAdams those "dogs" in Florham Park, signing C.J. Mosley, Le'Veon Bell and Jamison Crowder before the 2019 season.

The relationship between player and team was further fractured around the trade deadline in 2019, when Jets general manager JoeDouglas reportedly answered trade offers for Adams, but put theprice so high that he wasconsidered virtuallyuntouchable.

Really, to a certain point, you understand Adams' frustrations. He's been a winning player his entire football life, a vocal leader on the front lines of championship-caliber teams through college. Unfortunately, that hasn't been the case with the Jets, as they've finished under .500 for the three seasons he's been on the team. The Jets are a "maybe" playoff contender for the upcoming season, which clearly isn't good enough for Adams, whose desire to be traded to a championship contender is apparent.

While the Jets aren'tcontenders,Douglas has never been short to praise Adams in public when it comes to his talents and has beenadamant that the plan is for Adams to stay a Jet for life.

It certainly seems like Adams hasn't read the situation well. Good NFL general managers answer calls for players all the time. Douglas is in Year 2 of his plan to build a title contender, and the teamhaslittle impetus to rush a contract extension with a less-than-premium defensive position on the field.

Of the 2017 draft class, not even Deshaun Watson or Patrick Mahomes has received a contract extensionyet, and Mahomes just came off a Super-Bowl winning season and is a former league MVP. Only Christian McCaffrey has gotten an extension, and even that was met with some skepticism.

For a player who has often said he loves facing adversity, it's certainly amessage to send when you want to be the first sailor jumping off a sinking ship. Even then, equating the Jets to a sinking ship or a crashingplane, if you want to stay on brand here is inaccurate.

In a 7-9 year, the Jets finished strong, going 6-2 in their last eight games with quarterback Sam Darnold showing flashes of being the answer to the quarterback question the Jets have been asking for decades. Douglas has garnered praise from all corners of the NFL sphere for his approach to roster building, including his handling of the Adams situation. And even Adam Gase who certainly has critics and deserves criticism deserves a small bit of credit for helping navigate a team from a 1-7 start to a 7-9 finish.

So either there's a massive disconnect between the public, front-facing persona that a first-time GM is displaying or Adams justwants to wear a new uniform in 2020.

It's not going to be easy for either side, though: Adams wants to be paid top dollar, upwards of $17 million per year (and some reports have said Adams wants more than $20 million per season), while the Jets have little reason to pay him that money in the immediate. While Adams istwo-time All Pro, he'sunder team control for two more seasons, giving the Jets all the leverage in the world.

To that end, it's apparent that Adamshasput the Jets in an impossible situation: The organization clearly admires, respects and appreciates Adams and his talents, but given the uncertainty of the future salary cap, Adams' reported exorbitant contract demands and his apparent desire to escape from New York, there's no clear flight path for New York moving forward.

Had the Jets truly wanted to trade Adams, he would have been gone by or during 2020 NFL Draft, when the organizationcertainly would have had suitors;that New York held onto Adams after the draft should tell you that the organization has minimal inclination to trade him.

After all, various reports and Douglas himself have said that the team has no plans to trade Adams. Will that mean they'll satiate his contract demands? Or just continue to playhardball? While Adams' camp reportedly said it was expecting a contract offer to come from the Jets early in 2020, it sounds like he's going to have to wait longer.

Adams has made the situation more complicated than it needed to be. Players certainly deserve to find the best situation for themselves, but maybe Adams should showcase as muchawareness at the negotiating table as he does on the football field.

The rest is here:

Jamal Adams 'trying' to force trade to Cowboys, putting Jets in impossible situation - Sporting News

10sBalls Wishes Happy 100th Birthday To Tennis Star Robert Ryland – 10sBalls

Editors note: This special Behind The Racquet with Bob Ryland is from was originally published in June, 2019.

10sBalls thanks Noah Rubin for giving us permission to repost these great stories. We wish him and this endeavor the best of luck. Great seeing Noah wearing K-Swiss and playing Solinco Strings.

#MyBTR- I was the first black professional tennis player & today I turn 99. I say it is no big deal, no cause for celebration, just another year. There are many things I can not do now, but I accept that. I enjoy doing what I can do. I have played tennis all my life: Played on my high school team in Chicago and was a finalist in state singles. Played at Wayne State in Detroit and was one of the first black players to compete in the NCAA Championships and the first to reach the quarterfinals. In college I wasnt allowed to eat in restaurants with my teammates. They would bring me my food on the bus, where I sometimes would sleep. I wasnt bitter, all I wanted was to play tennis.

After winning the American Tennis Association Mens title I was given a wild card to play at the USLTA Nationals (US Open) at Forest Hills in 1955, as one of the first few African Americans to play there. In 1959 I was invited to join Jack Marchs World Pro Tennis Championships, becoming the first black pro player.

When he was a kid, Arthur Ashe said I was his hero and he wanted to be good enough to beat me. I was a teaching pro and coached many young talented players and celebrities all over the world. In 1994 I had the opportunity to coach the Williams sisters a brief time before they became famous. Venus, I believe was 14. I dont play tennis anymore. My balance is bad. I do Yoga. I watch so many new players in person and on TV. At the courts, I enjoy giving pointers to anyone who will listen. There is a Paver at the BIllie Jean King National Tennis Center and it says, Bob Ryland: Coach and Friend. I tell my wife Nancy she can go there to remember me when I am gone. Last week I had a check up on my pacemaker. The doc said the battery is good for another 8 years. It made me feel like I have an eight year life extension. Next year, June 16, 2020, I will be 100. No Big Deal. Robert Ryland

****

Read more:

10sBalls Wishes Happy 100th Birthday To Tennis Star Robert Ryland - 10sBalls

What’s the Value of a Virtual Education? | Opinion – Harvard Crimson

Adjusting to the shift to remote education after the campus evacuation in March was difficult for everyone. Professors struggled to adapt to Zoom, club activity wrenched to a standstill, and student engagement essentially fell off a cliff.

Last Monday, Dean of the College Rakesh Khurana and Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences Claudine Gay offered us a vague promise of a partial return to campus. The plan highlighted by Dean Gay, which is one of three options still under consideration, would leave 60-70 percent of undergraduates fully remote for at least the fall semester. Furthermore, regardless of the decision about residential life, almost all classes will be fully remote, at least for the fall. Before further decisions are made, however, we need to seriously consider what our tuition is paying for and the resources needed to maintain the quality of our education.

There is no denying that online classes are of a lower quality than a traditional college education. A Brookings Institute study comparing the shift to online education at a four-year college concluded that the least-prepared students are disproportionately negatively impacted. On average, the drop in grading for a single course is equivalent to the shift from a B-minus to a C. In the long run, grade point averages in one subject area can drop by as much as 0.42.

Several structural issues remain in place moving into next semester, stemming from a lack of transparency. We know administrators like Registrar of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences Michael P. Burke are working hard to address these concerns, but their plans and processes have not been made clear to students.

Theres been no word on how the College plans to address inequitable access to technology and WiFi among students. No one knows how decisions about who is permitted to return to campus will be made, engendering concerns of unfairness. Questions over how international students are to adapt to time-zone issues with live classes still havent been answered. And theres been worryingly little clarity on the remote obligations of academic and thesis advisors.

Besides introducing discrepancies in living and learning environments, online education also deprives us of one of the biggest attractions of a Harvard education: the life-changing relationships we form with our classmates and professors.

Harvard requires students to participate in an unlimited meal plan because the warmth and vibrance of our dining halls foster life-long friendship networks and engender the intimate feeling of family and community. After spending even part of a semester remotely, we agree with Harvard: Its impossible to replicate these substantive relationships that only occur in-person and on-campus.

But those life-long networks begin in the classroom, not the dining hall. And just as our meal plans pay for more than food, our tuition pays for more than classes.

Taking all of this together, its clear that an online education is simply worth less than a traditional one. But dont take our word for it. Take Harvards.

An online undergraduate education looks remarkably similar to the Extension School, which offers an online degree program to students who are living at home and who often have significant career and family obligations. Based on the Undergraduate Councils comparison of Extension School courses to Harvard College courses, there are at least 150 identical or nearly identical courses and at least 95 more that are roughly equivalent. These courses are a good representation of the breadth of Harvards course offerings, ranging from large lectures (Economics 10: Principles of Economics) to intimate seminars (Arrivals: British Literature from 700 to 1700).

For each of these identical classes, a remote Harvard College student paying full tuition last year would have paid over $5,966.25 per class, while students at the Extension School paid just $1,840 per class a mere 31 percent of our tuition.

What does this $4,126.25 per class tuition premium pay for? It cant be resources. Extension School students are offered a number of resources also offered to Harvard College students, including personalized academic and career advising, access to the Writing Center and Harvard libraries, and several clubs that overlap with undergraduate student organizations. Any additional resources offered to undergraduates (House tutoring systems, Counseling and Mental Health Services, Harvard University Health Services, etc.) all come out of the Student Services Fee and various health-related fees separate from our tuition.

So, the $4,126.25 tuition premium can only pay for two intangible things: the brand of Harvard College and the life-changing moments and conversations we have with our peers.

Shifting online might not reduce the value of the Harvard College brand, but it does severely diminish, if not fully impede, our ability to make connections. Though its hard to place a numerical value on these intangibles, if we value both equally, its only ethical for Harvard College to reimburse students approximately $2,000 per class, or $16,000 for the academic year one half of the tuition premium.

Ultimately, if Harvard cannot guarantee the essentials of an equitable, high-quality education a fair and transparent return-to-campus lottery, equal access to classes regardless of students location, a solution to WiFi inequity, accountable and accessible advising, and College-led facilitation of student engagement and interaction we believe that a tuition reimbursement of approximately $16,000 for the upcoming academic year is the next best course of action.

We chose Harvard not just because it has the best education in the world, but also because it has the best people. It is our hope that, even remotely, every undergraduate continues to get the best of both.

Rukmini Ganesh 22, the UC Finance Committee Chair, is a Statistics concentrator living in Eliot House. M. Thorwald Thor Larson 21, the UC Finance Committee Vice Chair, is an Applied Mathematics concentrator living in Lowell House. Fernando Urbina 22, the UC Academic Life Committee Chair, is a Government concentrator living in Currier House. The authors are writing on behalf of the Undergraduate Council. This statement was endorsed and passed unanimously by the Council on Wednesday, June 17, 2020.

Read this article:

What's the Value of a Virtual Education? | Opinion - Harvard Crimson

Honeybee lives shortened after exposure to two widely used pesticides – Cannon Beach Gazette

The lives of honeybees are shortened with evidence of physiological stress when they are exposed to the suggested application rates of two commercially available and widely used pesticides, according to new Oregon State University research.

In a study published in the journal PLOS ONE, honeybee researchers in OSUs College of Agricultural Sciences found detrimental effects in bees exposed to Transform and Sivanto, which are both registered for use in the United States and were developed to be more compatible with bee health.

The western honeybee is the major pollinator of fruit, nut, vegetable and seed crops that depend on bee pollination for high quality and yield.

Coupled with other stressors such varroa mites, viruses and poor nutrition, effects from these pesticides can render honeybees incapable of performing their tasks smoothly. Beekeepers and some environmental groups have raised concerns in recent years about these insecticides and potential negative effects on bees.

According to the researchers, this is the first study to investigate sub-lethal effects of sulfoxaflor, the active ingredient in Transform, and flupyradifurone, the active ingredient in Sivanto. Sub-lethal effects mean that the bees dont die immediately, but experience physiological stress resulting in shortened lifespan.

In the case of Transform, the bees lives were severely shortened. A majority of the honeybees exposed to Transform died within six hours of being exposed, confirming the severe toxicity of the pesticide to bees when exposed directly to field application rates recommended on the label, the researchers said.

Study lead author Priyadarshini Chakrabarti Basu, a postdoctoral research associate in the Honey Bee Lab in OSUs College of Agricultural Sciences, emphasized that the researchers arent calling for Sivanto or Transform to be taken off the market.

We are suggesting that more information be put on the labels of these products, and that more studies need to be conducted to understand sublethal effects of chronic exposure, Basu said.

Sivanto and Transform are used on crops to kill aphids, leaf hoppers and whiteflies, among other pests. Many of these same crops attract bees for pollination. There are some restrictions on their use. For example, Transform cant be applied to crops in bloom, for example.

Honeybees might be exposed indirectly through pesticide drift, said study co-author Ramesh Sagili, associate professor of apiculture and honeybee Extension specialist in OSUs College of Agricultural Sciences.

The average life span of a worker honeybee is five to six weeks in spring and summer, so if you are reducing its life span by five to 10 days, thats a huge problem, Sagili said. Reduced longevity resulting from oxidative stress could negatively affect colony population and ultimately compromise colony fitness.

For the study, the researchers conducted two contact exposure experiments: a six-hour study and a 10-day study in May 2019. The honeybees were obtained from six healthy colonies at the OSU apiaries. In each experiment, groups of 150 bees were placed in three cages. One group was exposed to Transform, a second to Sivanto and the third was a control group that wasnt exposed to either pesticide.

Honeybee mortality, sugar syrup and water consumption, and physiological responses were assessed in bees exposed to Sivanto and Transform and compared to bees in a control group. Mortality in each cage was recorded every hour for the six-hour experiment and daily for the 10-day experiment.

While Sivanto was not directly lethal to honeybees following contact exposure, the 10-day survival results revealed that field-application rates of Sivanto reduced adult survival and caused increased oxidative stress and apoptosis in the honey bee tissues. This suggests that even though Sivanto is apparently less toxic than Transform, it might also reduce honeybee longevity and impart physiological stress, according to the study authors.

Co-authors on the study included graduate student Emily Carlson and faculty research assistant Hannah Lucas, who both conduct research in the Honey Bee Lab; and Andony Melathopoulos, assistant professor and pollinator health Extension specialist.

Read the original:

Honeybee lives shortened after exposure to two widely used pesticides - Cannon Beach Gazette

Gran left in building hell over unfinished extension had ‘no choice’ but to sell family heirlooms – Daily Post

A 78-year-old grandmother left with a leaking roof and a half-built extension says she has had 'no choice' but to sell her family keepsakes to raise cash.

Conwy Council ordered for Sandra Robinson's 13,000 extension to be torn down after she was left with water flowing through her unfinished roof, damage to her kitchen and disruption to the electrics, with the builders no longer answering her calls.

The pensioner had spent her life savings and money saved for her funeral to provide an en-suite bathroom and balcony for her friend Andy Hey, who is unwell and is cared for by Mrs Robinson at her home in Glan Conwy.

A group of kind-hearted local builders rallied around earlier this year to demolish the structure and said they were willing to donate their time for free and would come back again when planning permission for a new extension had been granted.

Conwy Council has now granted that permission, and she now hopes the tradespeople who helped her will come together once more to assist her.

The former secretary who helped bring up her two grandchildren following her daughter's death to cancer, said: "I just can't quite believe what has happened, it's been a complete and utter nightmare.

"All my money has gone, including my funeral pot. I've had to sell a lot of family heirlooms, furniture that used to belong to my grandmother and mother, but it had to be done there was just no choice.

"I've also now discovered I've got to buy a new septic tank that's going to cost 3,500, the nightmare never ends."

She added: "It's just that I have nothing to show for it. When it rains I dread it as the water comes pouring into the kitchen and then the electrics go out.

"The house is also very cold as there are now so many drafts. If I could just get a roofer to help that would be amazing."

A knight in shining armour did come to Sandra's immediate aid, when he saw the state of the extension, in the guise of David Spencer, a local bricklayer. He put her plight on Facebook, and quickly rallied around a small army of builders who were willing to work for free.

David said: "I think many who offered to help have perhaps forgotten hence the need to relaunch the project.

"It would be great if local merchants and so on could be involved again."

He added: "I truly think we can make a happy ending to this woeful tale and show that many tradesmen are good guys."

If you can help, please call David Spencer on 07922448779.

Trading Standards have told North Wales Live they are keeping in touch with Mrs Robinson and her daughter, and the investigation is ongoing.

Read more:

Gran left in building hell over unfinished extension had 'no choice' but to sell family heirlooms - Daily Post

Mixed reaction to border closing extension | State News | nny360.com – NNY360

Some northern New Yorkers bemoaned Tuesdays long-hinted announcement that the Canada-U.S. border will be closed for a fourth month, until July 21. Others saw it as the right call. Others had mixed feelings.

The border closure, intended to slow the spread of the coronavirus, does not block what is considered essential travel, which includes trade, commuting to work or school, and returning to home countries. But it bans tourism and visiting. Cross-border tourism is a major part of the north country economy, especially in summer. Also in this part of the world, many peoples personal lives overlap the border.

Guido and Kerri Langer live in Cobourg, Ontario, and have been coming to the Adirondacks to ski and camp since the early 1970s. They bought a house in Saranac Lake in 2013 and normally spend most weekends there. They were there in March when the border closed, and Guido said he would have liked to stick out the quarantine in Saranac Lake except they had obligations back in Cobourg.

He said Tuesday that he felt less comfortable when they returned home than he had felt in Saranac Lake.

We would love to come back, he said. Were looking at maybe late fall.

Their son and his fiancee were scheduled to get married atop Whiteface Mountain in Wilmington this summer, but now they are looking at having a civil ceremony in Ontario this summer and the Whiteface wedding next summer, Guido said.

Nevertheless, he thinks extending the border closure is the right thing to do. He said hes been paying attention to U.S. news and is impressed with the way New York Gov. Andrew Andrew Cuomo has been managing the crisis; he feels the same way about Ontario Premier Doug Ford.

We feel that we need to be a team player and go by whatever were being told by the people weve elected and have given the authority to do those things, he said.

Not everyone feels that way. Linda Comito Moore of Saranac Lake posted on the Enterprise Facebook page that she would rather have seen travelers screened at the border for COVID-19 symptoms than to block them entirely.

This will have a big negative impact on our tourist towns as well miss the Canadian visitors and the vacation dollars they invest here for lodging, dining and retail shopping, she wrote.

Our small businesses need that traffic to survive because revenue from local patrons is so low.

If visitors are coming from NYC and other areas, theres no reason why they couldnt come from Quebec and Ontario.

The North Country Chamber of Commerce, based in Plattsburgh, criticized the decision Tuesday, saying the countries should have worked out a plan to reopen the border incrementally, in phases.

We fully expected another thirty day extension, chamber President Garry Douglas said in a press release, but hoped there would be an accompanying commitment to develop potential phases for reopening linked to facts and performance rather than fear and feelings. It is an act of bi-national economic and social mismanagement of the worlds most important social and economic partnership to again act so simplistically without providing any conceptual pathway forward.

Douglas is glad that commercial shipping between the U.S. and Canada remains uninterrupted, but he added, Canada-U.S. business is not merely about the movement of boxes but about relationships, meetings, site and sales visits and face to face partnering. It is not a fact to say the economic connections are unaffected because they are more and more affected each passing week. And the continued tearing of the special social fabric that binds our two peoples is also, as we have said, profoundly sad and very damaging.

New York state Assemblyman Billy Jones, a Democrat from Plattsburgh, issued a statement warning that the extended border closure will have dire consequences.

It has been 87 excruciating days since the border restrictions have been put in place, he said. The continuation of this directive will undoubtedly have long-lasting consequences on both countries tourism industry, and on our economies as a whole. Further, as a region with strong international ties, there is a plethora of residents with family members who live in the opposite country. While it is encouraging that immediate family members can now cross, most cannot afford to be quarantined for 14 days.

Sylvie Nelson lives in Saranac Lake with her husband and two children, works in Plattsburgh as executive director of the North Country Workforce Development Board, and has for many years spent two or three weekends a month in Quebec, where she grew up. Her family has a cottage there, as well as many friends and family members.

She has not been to her native country since early March, shortly before the pandemic lockdown began.

Its hard, she said of the border closure. I understand why its there, but its just disruptive to our way of life.

She plans to return in July to help a friend recover from cancer treatments and so her daughter can go to a horse-riding camp.

She plans to work from there, just as she is now working from home, and isolate herself in their cottage as much as possible.

She agreed with Douglas that a phased reopening would help people make plans, especially businesses. She noted that Canadian businesses rely on American tourists, too.

A silver lining has been that since she and her family are not going to Canada on weekends, and since she and her husband are not commuting to work, they are getting out hiking in the Adirondacks more than ever before.

It has enabled our own family to discover our own backyard, she said.

Read the original:

Mixed reaction to border closing extension | State News | nny360.com - NNY360

How COVID-19 might affect US nuclear weapons and planning – Brookings Institution

The Department of Defense has begun to ratchet up spending to recapitalize the U.S. strategic nuclear triad and its supporting infrastructure, as several programs move from research and development into the procurement phase. The projected Pentagon expenditures are at least $167 billion from 2021-2025. This amount does not include the large nuclear warhead sustainment and modernization costs funded by the Department of Energy, projected to cost $81 billion over the next five years.

Nuclear forces require modernization, but that will entail opportunity costs.In a budget environment that offers little prospect of greater defense spending, especially in the COVID19 era, more money for nuclear forces will mean less funding for conventional capabilities.

That has potentially negative consequences for the security of the United States and its allies. While nuclear forces provide day-to-day deterrence, the Pentagon leadership spends most of its time thinking about how to employ conventional forces to manage security challenges around the world. The renewed focus on great power competition further elevates the importance of conventional forces. It is important to get the balance between nuclear and conventional forces right, particularly as the most likely path to use of nuclear arms would be an escalation of a conventional conflict. Having robust conventional forces to prevail in or deter a conventional conflict in the first place could avert a nuclear crisis or worse.

For the foreseeable future, the United States will continue to rely on nuclear deterrence for its security and that of its allies (whether we should be comfortable with that prospect is another question).Many U.S. nuclear weapons systems are aging, and replacing them will cost money, lots of money.The Pentagons five-year plan for its nuclear weapons programs proposes $29 billion in fiscal year 2021, rising to $38 billion in fiscal year 2025, as programs move from research and development to procurement.The plan envisages a total of $167 billion over five years.And that total may be understated; weapons costs increase not just as they move to the procurement phase, but as cost overruns and other issues drive the costs up compared to earlier projections.

The Pentagon knew that the procurement bow wave of nuclear weapons spending would hit in the 2020s and that funding it would pose a challenge.In October 2015, the principal deputy undersecretary of defense said Were looking at that big bow wave and wondering how the heck were going to pay for it and probably thanking our stars that we wont be here to have to answer the question.

The Pentagons funding request for fiscal year 2021 includes $4.4 billion for the new Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine that will replace Ohio-class submarines, which will begin to be retired at the end of the decade; $1.2 billion for the life extension program for the Trident II submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM); $1.5 billion for the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent, an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) to replace the Minuteman III ICBM; $2.8 billion for the B-21 stealth bomber that will replace the B-1 and B-2 bombers; $500 million for the Long-Range Standoff Missile that will arm B-52 and B-21 bombers; and $7 billion for nuclear command, control and communications systems.

The Pentagon funds primarily go to delivery and command and control systems for nuclear weapons.The National Nuclear Security Administration at the Department of Energy bears the costs of the warheads themselves. It seeks $15.6 billion for five nuclear warhead life-extension and other infrastructure programs in fiscal year 2021, the first year of a five-year plan totaling $81 billion.The fiscal year 2021 request is nearly $3 billion more than the agency had earlier planned to ask, which suggests these programs are encountering significant cost growth.

Some look at these figures and the overall defense budget (the Pentagon wants a total of $740 billion for fiscal year 2021) and calculate that the cost of building and operating U.S. nuclear forces will amount to only 6-7 percent of the defense budget.That may be true, but how relevant is that figure?

By one estimate, the cost of building and operating the F-35 fighter program for the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy and U.S. Marines over the programs lifetime will be $1 trillion.Amortized over 50 years, that amounts to $20 billion per year or only 2.7 percent of the Defense Departments fiscal year 2021 budget request.The problem is that these percentages and lots of other small percentages add up.When one includes all of the programs, plus personnel and readiness costs as well as everything else that the Pentagon wants, the percentages will total to more than 100 percent of the figure that Congress is prepared to appropriate for defense.

The defense budget is unlikely to grow.Opportunity costs represent the things the Pentagon has to give up or forgo in order to fund its nuclear weapons programs.The military services gave an indication of these costs with their unfunded priorities lists, which this year total $18 billion.These show what the services would like to buy if they had additional funds, and that includes a lot of conventional weapons.

The Air Force, for example, would like to procure an additional twelve F-35 fighters as well as fund advance procurement for an additional twelve F-35s in fiscal year 2022. It would also like to buy three more tanker aircraft than budgeted.

The Army is reorienting from counter-insurgency operations in places such as Afghanistan and Iraq to facing off against major peer competitors, that is, Russia and China.Its wish list includes more long-range precision fires (artillery and short-range surface-to-surface missiles), a new combat vehicle, helicopters and more air and missile defense systems.

The Navy would like to add five F-35s to its aircraft buy, but its bigger desire is more attack submarines and warships, given its target of building up to a fleet of 355 ships. The Navy termed a second Virginia-class attack submarine its top unfunded priority in fiscal year 2021.It has set a requirement for 66 attack submarines and currently has about 50.However, as older Los Angeles-class submarines retire, that number could fall to 42. Forgoing construction of a Virginia-class submarine does not help to close that gap.

Moreover, the total number of Navy ships, now 293, will decline in the near term, widening the gap to get to 355.The Navys five-year shipbuilding program cut five of twelve planned Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, and cost considerations have led the Navy to decide to retire ten older Burke-class destroyers rather than extend their service life for an additional ten years.This comes when China is rapidly expanding its navy, and Russian attack submarines are returning on a more regular cycle to the Atlantic Ocean.

The Navy has said that funding the first Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine forced a cut-back in the number of other ships in its fiscal 2021 shipbuilding request.The decision not to fund a second Virginia-class attack submarine appears to stem directly from the unexpected $3 billion plus-up in funding for the National Nuclear Security Administrations fiscal year 2021 programs.

These are the opportunity costs of more nuclear weapons:fewer dollars for aircraft, ships, attack submarines and ground combat equipment for conventional deterrence and defense.

The principal driving factor behind the size of U.S. nuclear forces comes from Russian nuclear forces and doctrine.Diverse and effective U.S. nuclear forces that can deter a Russian nuclear attack should suffice to deter a nuclear attack by any third country.In contrast to the Cold War, the U.S. military no longer seems to worry much about a bolt from the bluea sudden Soviet or Russian first strike involving a massive number of nuclear weapons designed to destroy the bulk of U.S. strategic forces before they could launch.That is because, under any conceivable scenario, sufficient U.S. strategic forcesprincipally on ballistic missile submarines at seawould survive to inflict a devastating retaliatory response.

The most likely scenario for nuclear use between the United States and Russia is a regional conflict fought at the conventional level in which one side begins to lose and decides to escalate by employing a small number of low-yield nuclear weapons, seeking to reverse battlefield losses and signal the strength of its resolve.Questions thus have arisen about whether Russia has an escalate-to-deescalate doctrine and whether the 2018 U.S. nuclear posture review lowers the threshold for use of nuclear weapons.

If the United States and its allies have sufficiently robust conventional forces, they can prevail in a regional conflict at the conventional level and push any decision about first use of nuclear weapons onto the other side (Russia, or perhaps China or North Korea depending on the scenario).The other side would have to weigh carefully the likelihood that its first use of nuclear weapons would trigger a nuclear response, opening the decidedly grim prospect of further nuclear escalation and of things spinning out of control.The other sides leader might calculate that he/she could control the escalation, but that gamble would come with no guarantee. It would appear a poor bet given the enormous consequences if things go wrong.Happily, the test has never been run.

This is why the opportunity costs of nuclear weapons programs matter. If those programs strip too much funding from conventional forces, they weaken the ability of the United States and its allies to prevail in a conventional conflictor to deter that conflict in the first placeand increase the possibility that the United States might have to employ nuclear weapons to avert defeat.

For the United States and NATO members, that could mean reemphasis on an aspect of NATOs Cold War defense policy. In the 1960s, 1970s and early 1980s, NATO allies faced Soviet and Warsaw Pact conventional forces that had large numerical advantages, and NATO leaders had doubts about their ability to defeat a Soviet/Warsaw Pact attack at the conventional level.NATO policy thus explicitly envisaged that, if direct defense with conventional means failed, the Alliance could deliberately escalate to nuclear weapons.That left many senior NATO political and military officials uneasy.Among other things, it raised uncomfortable questions about the willingness of an American president to risk Chicago for Bonn.

Russia found itself in a similar situation at the end of the 1990s.With a collapsing economy following the break-up of the Soviet Union, the Russian government had to cut defense spending dramatically.As its conventional capabilities atrophied, Moscow adopted a doctrine envisaging first use of nuclear weapons to compensate.(In the past fifteen years, as Russias defense spending has increased, a significant amount has gone to modernizing conventional forces.)

The United States and NATO still retain the option of first use of nuclear weapons.If the U.S. president and NATO leaders were to consider resorting to that option, they then would be the ones to have to consider the dicey bet that the other side would not respond with nuclear arms or that, if it did, nuclear escalation somehow could be controlled.

Assuring NATO allies that the United States was prepared to risk Chicago for Bonn consumed a huge amount of time and fair amount of resources during the Cold War.At one point, the U.S. military deployed more than 7000 nuclear weapons in Europe to back up that assurance.Had NATO had sufficiently strong conventional forces, the Alliance would have been able to push that risky decision regarding nuclear first use onto Moscowor even have been able to take comfort that the allies conventional power would suffice to deter a Soviet/Warsaw Pact attack.

In modernizing, maintaining and operating a safe, secure and effective nuclear deterrent, the United States should avoid underfunding conventional forces in ways that increase the prospect of conventional defeat and/or that might tempt an adversary to launch a conventional attack.If Washington gets the balance wildly out of sync, it increases the possibility that the president might face the decision of whether to use nuclear weapons firstknowing that first use would open a Pandoras box of incalculable and potentially catastrophic consequences.

This means that the Department of Defense and Congress should take a hard look at the balance.The Pentagon presumably has weighed the trade-offs, though it is not a unitary actor. Nuclear weapons are our top priority has been the view of the leadership.The trade-offs have been easier to manage in the past several years, when nuclear programs were in the research and development phase, and defense budgets in the first three years of the Trump administration grew.As nuclear programs move into the more expensive procurement phase and the fiscal year 2021 budget shows little increase, the challenge of getting the balance right between nuclear and conventional spending has become more acute.It is not apparent that the Pentagon has weighed the opportunity costs over the next ten-fifteen years under less optimistic budget scenarios.

As for Congress, which ultimately sets and approves the budget, no evidence suggests that the legislative branch has closely considered the nuclear vs. conventional trade-offs.

All that was before COVID19.The response to the virus and dealing with the economic disruption it has caused have generated a multi-trillion-dollar budget deficit in 2020 and likely will push up deficits in at least 2021.It would be wise now to consider the impact of COVID19.

Having added trillions of dollars to the federal deficit, and facing an array of pressing health and social needs, will Congress be prepared to continue to devote some 50 percent of discretionary funding to the Department of Defenses requirements?Quite possibly not.If defense budgets get cut, the Pentagon will face a choice: shift funds from nuclear to conventional force programs, or accept shrinkage of U.S. conventional force capabilities andas the United States did in the 1950s and early 1960srely on nuclear deterrence to address a broader range of contingencies. In the latter case, that would mean accepting, at least implicitly, a greater prospect that the president would have to face the question of first use of nuclear weapons, i.e., a conventional conflict in which the United States was losing.

This is not to suggest that the U.S. military should forgo the strategic triad.Trident II SLBMs onboard ballistic missile submarines at sea remain the most survivable leg of the strategic deterrent.The bomber/air-breathing leg offers flexibility and can carry out conventional missions.The ICBM leg provides a hedge against a breakthrough in anti-submarine warfare.Moreover, if in a crisis or a conventional conflict, the Russian military were to develop the capability to attack U.S. ballistic missile submarines at sea, the Kremlin leadership might well calculate that it could do so without risking a nuclear response.Attacking U.S. ICBMs, on the other hand, would necessitate pouring hundreds of nuclear warheads into the center of America.A Russian leader presumably would not be so foolish as to think there would be no nuclear retaliation.

While sustaining the ICBM leg, one can question whether maintaining 400 deployed ICBMs, as the current plan envisages, is necessary.Reducing that number for the Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent (GBSD) would achieve budget savings, albeit later in the production run. Another question is whether some way might be found to extend the service life of some portion of the current Minuteman III force that would allow delaying the GBSD program, which is projected to cost $100 billion, by ten-fifteen years and postponing those costsfreeing up funds in the near term for conventional force requirements.

Another issue concerns the Long-Range Standoff Missile (LRSO) and its cost, estimated at some $20 billion when including the nuclear warheads.The B-21 bomber will incorporate stealth and advanced electronic warfare capabilities allowing it to operate against and penetrate sophisticated air defenses.The LRSO, to be deployed beginning in 2030, is intended to replace older air-launched cruise missiles carried by the B-52 bomber and could later equip the B-21 if it loses its ability to penetrate.

An alternative plan would convert B-52s in 2030 to conventional-only missions and delay the LRSO to a future point if/when it appeared that the B-21s ability to penetrate could come into question.By 2030, the Air Force should have a significant number of B-21s (the B-21 is scheduled to make its first flight in 2021 and enter service in 2025).With at least 100 planned, the Air Force should have a sufficient number of B-21s for the 300 nuclear weapons it appears to maintain at airfields where nuclear-capable bombers are currently based.

These kinds of ideas would free up billions of dollars in the 2020s that could be reallocated to conventional weapons systems.Delaying the GBSD and LRSO and their associated warhead programs by just one year (fiscal year 2021) would make available some $3 billionenough money for a Virginia-class attack submarine. Delaying those programs for ten-fifteen years would make tens of billions of dollars available for the militarys conventional force needs.

All things being equal, it is smarter and more efficient to choose to make decisions to curtail or delay major programs rather than to continue them until the money runs out and forces program termination. As it examines the administrations proposed fiscal year 2021 defense budget, Congress should carefully consider the trade-offs and press the Pentagon to articulate how it weighed the trade-offs between nuclear and conventional forces. In the end, Congress should understand whether it is funding the force that is most likely to deter not just a nuclear attack, but to deter a conventional conflict that could entail the most likely path to nuclear war.

Read more:

How COVID-19 might affect US nuclear weapons and planning - Brookings Institution

The best supplements to look after your mind and mental health – Get The Gloss

Good nutrition is vital for building up mental resilience in trying times. These are the mood-boosting vitamins and minerals to have in your mental first aid kit, says nutritionist Rob Hobson

Our minds have a lot to deal with; be it overscheduled lives, the need to succeed running us into the ground both, or the rise of burnout in the workplace. That's even before we get into the uncertainty of the current Covid-19 health crisis. According to research by the Health Survey for England approximately one in four of us in the UK will experience a mental health problem in any given year and experts are predicting numbers will rise in response to lockdown and the effects of Covid-19 on the workforce and the economy.

In Mental Health Awareness Week this week, Archbishop Justin Welby, who has talked openly about his own mental health issues, summed up the national mood when he told the BBC that there was "an overwhelming sense the world is getting more and more difficult and gloomy".

There's a lot we can do to look after our mental health and nutrition is one of the frontline ways we can support ourselves, to help build-up not just physical immunity but what psychologist Dr Meg Arrol calls 'psychological immunity'.

A strong mind is just the same as a strong immune system in that it means being able to cope well with lifes demands and with the current landscape shifting so greatly and quickly its beneficial to build up what I call psychological immunity," says Dr Arroll, a chartered psychologist working with supplement brand Healthspan.

"There are many strategies we can use to help build psychological immunity," she says, "including only checking reputable sourcing of information and talking about our feelings and taking good care of our physical health. Taking supplements that have been shown to support the mind is also a good way to help boost psychological immunity as chronic stress and traumatic experiences can deplete important vitamins and minerals."

The links between diet and mood are well documented and there are many key nutrients that play a role in maintaining energy levels and reducing the risk of depression, but it's not always easy to eat well. Low mood and poor mental health can take their toll on the food choices you make, and this can leave gaps in the diet. This is where the sensible use of supplements can be really helpful

B vitamins support the nervous system and are a key 'strong mind' ally. They can help you feel less tired, help memory and altogether make you feel like you have more clarity. They are essential for energy production in cells, including brain cells, where they help make neurotransmitters (the brains communication chemicals). They also help with nerve conduction - meaning that they help make sure messages are passed on.

When you're stressed and anxious, your B vitamins can become rapidly depleted, which can even make your stress symptoms worse. Lack of B vitamins can lead to anxiety and irritability. All the more reason to keep your levels healthy.

What the research says: Women with low levels of vitamin B1 (thiamin) are less likely to feel composed and confident and more likely to be depressed than those with higher levels, according to researchers. When they increased their intake of vitamin B1, however, they reported a marked improvement in mood and self-confidence as their thiamin levels increased. Other studies show that correcting low levels of vitamin B2 (riboflavin), vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) and vitamin B12 has beneficial effects on well-being, self-confidence and mood.

Try: Healthspan High Strength Vitamin B Complex, 8.95 for 120 tablets, Solgar Megasorb B Complex high potency, 13.99 for 50

A good nights sleep goes a long way to promoting good mental health and mood during the day. Magnesium is involved in the production of melatonin, the hormone that controls our sleep cycle. It's a mineral that's essential for energy metabolism, reducing tiredness and fatigue and is also vital for the normal functioning of the nervous system and psychological health.

Like B vitamins, magnesium is more rapidly depleted during times of stress and anxiety creating a vicious cycle - low levels of magnesium also exacerbate these feelings. During times of stress and anxiety, a magnesium supplement may be useful to balance mood and mental wellbeing.

If you suffer from PMS, magnesium is your friend. Magnesium levels appear to be significantly lower. Taking magnesium supplements every day for two months significantly improved symptoms associated with pain and bloating, one study found. Other research has shown how supplementing with magnesium may also help to relieve premenstrual mood changes.

MORE GLOSS: Why you need magnesium in midlife more than ever

Try: Healthspan Opti-Magnesium, 10.95 for 90 tablets or Magnesium Flakes Bath Soak, 9.95, 1kg pouch. NeuroMag for brain health by Life Extension 32 for 50.

You probably know that probiotics are live bacteria that have beneficial effects on digestive health and general immunity. More recent research suggests they may also influence our psychological health, the gut-brain axis.

Although research is in its early stages, probiotic bacteria are now believed to have indirect effects on our brain by regulating the production of serotonin within the gut wall. Serotonin helps to lift mood and improve anxiety and depression. As much as 95 per cent of our serotonin is made within the lining of our digestive tract.

Try: Symprove Liquid probiotic, from 21.95

MORE GLOSS: Which probiotics to eat, drink and buy - and why

5-Hydroxytryptophan, or 5-HTP, is an amino acid that is found naturally in the body and which can be converted into serotonin that regulates mood as well as melatonin, which helps to regulate the sleep cycle.

5-HTP appears to improve the structure of your sleep by extending the amount of time you spend in REM sleep in which your brain processes memories. Getting sufficient REM sleep is essential for feeling rejuvenated during the day which will inevitably impact on your mental state and ability to perform your daily tasks.

Several studies show that 5-HTP supplements have a positive effect on low mood and are better than placebo in treating depression, with benefits usually occurring within two weeks

One study, involving 60 people with a first episode of depression, showed that is was almost as good as prescription antidepressants. It compared the effects of 5-HTP with the prescribed antidepressant drug, fluoxetine, for eight weeks. Both groups showed a significant and nearly equal improvement in depression, starting from the second week of treatment and increasing over the eight weeks. By the end of the study, 73 per cent of those taking 5-HTP and 80 per cent taking fluoxetine felt significantly better.

Try: 5-HTP, 13.95 for 60 tablets or Serotone 5-HTP by Higher Nature 32.70 for 90 capsules

I've tackled these together because omega-3 fish oils and vitamin D work hand in hand to optimise serotonin (good mood hormone) levels in the brain. You don't need to know the science but if you're interested...

Serotonin needs an amino acid, called tryptophan (see 5HTP above) to convert it to a usable form in the brain. That conversion is activated by vitamin D.

Once serotonin is made, EPA (one of the long-chain omega-3 fatty acids found in fish oils) helps brain cells release it into their communication gaps (synapses) to stimulate surrounding brain cells. Once serotonin arrives at a new brain cell, the presence of another long-chain omega-3 fish oil, DHA, helps the serotonin message to be received by increasing the fluidity of the cell membrane fluidity. Good levels of vitamin D and both omega-3s are therefore needed for optimum brain function.

Researchers have suggested that lack of vitamin D, EPA or DHA contributes to a number of psychiatric disorders and depression. Clinical trials suggest that omega-3 fish oils can improve depression, prolong periods of remission from depressive episodes and improve the short-term course of the illness in those affected.

How much omega 3 do you need to take to get a beneficial anti-depressive effect? Look for 650mg total DHA and EPA per day. Adding fish oils (2g per day) to usual drug treatment for depression has also been shown to significantly improve symptoms within two weeks, compared with placebo.

Try: Healthspan High Strength Omega 3, 11.95 for 360 capsules, Bare Biology Lion Heart Pure Omega 3, 28.50 and Healthspan Super Strength Vitamin D3, 8.95 for 120 capsules, D-Lux 3000 Vitamin D Spray 7.99

MORE GLOSS: The best vitamin D supplements to support your immune system right now

NB: Supplements do have a role to play in maintaining overall health and especially people who do not manage to eat a well-balanced diet. Exploring the use of supplements to complement your mood and overall health regime may be a good option but do check if you are on any SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor, SSRI are antidepressants) or medication and look for supplements that are made to GMP (good manufacturing practice) such as those made by Healthspan which means they are made to high pharmaceutical standards so simply put, what it says is on the packet is actually in the product you are taking. Rob Hobson is a Registered Nutritionist and Head of Nutrition for Healthspan.

Read this article:

The best supplements to look after your mind and mental health - Get The Gloss

We’re Part Of The Indoor Farm Revolution – Mashable India

NOTE FOR 2020 READERS: This is the eleventh in a series of open letters to the next century, now just 80 years away. The series asks: What will the world look like at the other end of our kids' lives?

Dear 22nd Century,

For all the pain, grief and economic hardship the 2020 coronavirus pandemic has sown, a handful of green shoots seem to have taken root in its blighted soil.

Green being the operative word, because many of these developments could be a net positive for the planet. In lockdown, many of us are seeing what our cities look like without smog. Office workers are experiencing office life without the office; just last week, Twitter announced that most of its employees could work from home forever, while much of Manhattan is reportedly freaking out about what could happen to commercial real estate. Thousands of companies just discovered they can still function, and maybe even function better, when they dont chain employees to desks or force them to make a soul-crushing, carbon-spewing commute 10 times a week.

And what do more people do when theyre spending more time at home? Well, if youre like my wife, you start literally planting green shoots. Our house is filling up with them as I write this: lettuce, chard, tomatoes, basil, strawberries, to name the first five shoots poking out of dozens of mason jars now taking up residence on every windowsill. Shes hardly alone; garden centers and seed delivery services are reporting as much as 10 times more sales since the pandemic began. Even the mighty Wal-Mart has sold out of seeds. Ifviral Facebook postsand Instagram hashtags are any guide, pandemic hipsters have moved on from once-fashionable sourdough starters to growing fresh fruit and veg.

Another one of our cyclical back to the land movements seems to be underway, just like during the 1960s and the Great Depression before that. Only this time, we dont need land. We dont need soil. We dont need pesticide of any kind. We dont even need natural light. Thanks to giant leaps forward in the science of hydroponics and LED lighting, even people in windowless, gardenless apartments can participate in the revolution. With a number of high-tech consumer products on the way, the process can be automated for those of us without green thumbs.

In previous letters Ive discussed the inevitable rise of alternative meat, a process that has been acceleratedby the pandemic. I talked about the smaller, more nutritious plant-based meals we're going to need for life extension; I assumed such meals would be delivered by drone. But now I see a future with no food deserts, in which every home is filled with rotating space-station-like hydroponics run by artificial intelligence a cornucopia of push-button farming providing the side salad to your plant-based meat.

Even if you dont grow your own, robot-run vertical farms and community agrihoods, now springing up everywhere, will make amazing-tasting produce abundant and cheap. The locavores of our era like to boast about their 100-mile diet. Yours will look more like a 100-yard diet.

Its worth remembering that it wasnt supposed to be this way. The 2020s, in fact, is when we were slated for starvation, food riots, and big business quietly processing our corpses into food.

Thats the plot of the 1973 movie Soylent Green, set in the year 2022. Fruit and veg have all but vanished. In one scene, Charlton Heston's detective hero smuggles home a single tomato and a wilted stick of celery, enough to reduce his roommate Sol (Edward G. Robinson) to tears. On the other end of the future, in a lighter but equally depressing vein, the 2006 comedy Idiocracy showed the Americans of 2500 running out of crops because they couldnt figure out that water, not "Brawndo" (a spoof on colorful sports drinks), is what plants crave.

But these dismal future visions are receding thanks to the science of hydroponics which dates back to the 19th century, no matter its present-day association with growing marijuana. By the 1930s, wed figured out that what plants crave is surprisingly minimal: nitrogen, a handful of minerals, something to anchor the roots like rock wool or coconut husks, and H2O. Early hydroponic farms helped feed U.S. soldiers as they hopped through the Pacific during World War II.

Minimalist methods multiplied, and are still multiplying. Were tweaking the spectrum of LED lights for maximum growth, and figuring out ways to use progressively less water and nutrients. My wifes mason jar seedlings use something called the Kratky method, where you don't even need to change the water. It turns out this method wasinvented by a Hawaiian scientist as recently as 2009. And its the closest science has yet given us to a free lunch.

Im nowhere near as excited by hydroponics as my wife is. But during our quarantine time, even my head has been turned by the Rotofarm, which Ive come to think of as the iPhone of gardening. Its a beautiful device inspired by NASA research on growing plants in space. It uses anti-gravity literally, when the wheel rotates around its LED light source and the plants are hanging upside down to grow plants faster. A magnetic cover reduces the glare and increases the internal humidity. You manage it via an app.

Humankinds oldest technology turns out to be the most efficient use of space for growing plants; even in this 15-inch-wide wheel, you can really pack them in. At the bottom of the wheel, plants dip their roots into the water and nutrient tanks. An owners only job is to refill the tanks every week or so, and to snip off their dinner with scissors a few weeks after germination. Some leafy greens, like my favorite salad base arugula, can be regrown without replanting.

Still, to be fully self-sufficient, a future apartment is going to need to have multiple Rotofarm-style devices on the go at once but theyre designed to live anywhere you can plug in, on coffee tables, on desks, on walls, as eye-catching as artwork.

The main problem with the Rotofarm: It isnt actually on sale yet. It feels like weve done everything in reverse, Rotofarm creator Toby Farmer said when I reached him via video chat from his home in Melbourne. Weve got the patents, weve got the design awards, weve got the customers. Now we need to finish the prototypes. (One key tweak: reducing Rotofarms energy requirements, which as it stands could double many users household electricity bills.)

Still, orders have come from as far afield as Japan and the Netherlands, from retailers and regular users alike. Farmers biggest regret: When Ron Howards production company called, hoping to use eight Rotofarms in an upcoming Nickelodeon show set in space, Farmer didnt have enough to spare.

Rotofarm has been in the works for a few years, but acrowdfunded Indiegogocampaign that closed last month exceeded its $15,000 goal by a third of a million dollars. Farmer, despite his name, had no experience in this area; just 23 years old, he had been a web designer since the age of 12. But hes scaling up fast, hiring teams in LA and Singapore, soaking up their knowledge (he was keen to assure me hed hired a lot of 40-somethings for this very reason).

After a projected 2021 release date, Rotofarms business model involves making money on proprietary seed pods though Farmer admits that theres a DIY aspect where customers can make their own. His hope is that official Rotofarm pods will be competitive because theyll have fewer germination failures, but he'd rather see a world where more people own the device itself. In that spirit, hes making it modular the LED light bar can be upgraded separately, for example, rather than making customers buy a whole new device. (As for cost, Farmer says he can't comment yet though Indiegogo backers were able to secure one for $900 a pop.)

Might the Rotofarm fail? Of course, just like any other crowdfunded project. Much depends on its price point, as yet unannounced. But its far from the only next-level, set-it-and-forget-it hydroponic station taking aim at your kitchen. Theres a Canadian Kickstarter called OGarden that also grows food on a wheel, albeit a much larger wheel. The OGarden was funded in its first six minutes online and is set to cost around $1,000 per unit. Theres Farmshelf, a $4,900 pre-order hydroponic device that looks like a see-through refrigerator, backed by celebrity chef Jose Andres. Users will pay a $35 monthly subscription to get all the seeds they need.

One of these models is the future; maybe all of them are. Right now, these are high-end devices aimed at early adopters (and restaurants, which get a lot of benefit out of showing off how fresh their produce is as customers walk in). But with scale, with time, and with the growing desire for grow-your-own food that Rotofarm and its brethren have revealed, they will get cheaper and more widespread.

After all, the first Motorola cellphone, in 1983, cost $4,000. It looked like a brick and had 30 minutes of talk time. Now sleek, supercomputer-driven smartphones are accessible to pretty much everyone. The same process will happen in home hydroponics.

Give it 80 years, and I can see apartments with built in hydroponic farms provided as a standard utility, much as a fridge is seen as a standard feature today. As more humans move to urban environments two out of every three people will be in cities by 2050, according to the latest UN estimate the need for such devices will only grow.

We strongly believe the future of gardening is indoor gardening and more individual gardens, OGarden CEO Pierre Nibart told us last year. Stopping mass agriculture and starting to produce their own little stuff at home. He said this while demonstrating his family's daily OGarden routine: His kids harvest most of what they need for dinner from the spinning wheel.

Mass agriculture hasnt exactly covered itself in glory where produce is concerned. And in the post-coronavirus age, we are surely going to become less tolerant of the disease its intensive farming methods have caused.

Food poisoning caused by romaine lettuce, which makes up a quarter of all leafy greens sold in the U.S., has become depressingly familiar. The 2018 E coli outbreak was the worst it sickened 240 people in 37 states, hospitalized almost half of them, and killed five. But the CDC has logged 46 E coli outbreaks since 2006, and says that every reported case of infection is likely matched by 26 unreported ones. And theyre only just starting to figure out the most likely cause: groundwater contaminated by nearby cattle manure. There could also be infection from passing birds, another major vector of bacteria.

Never mind the wet markets of Wuhan that likely caused the coronavirus pandemic. Were already sickening ourselves on the regular with a problem that is baked directly into our food system and its affecting vegans as much as meat eaters.

I have no doubt youll look at our barbaric farming methods and shake your heads. Why did they use so much water? Why did they transport produce an average of 1,500 miles? Why did they grow it outdoors, where its vulnerable to pests, and then use pesticides that had to be washed off? Why did they think triple washing did anything to remove bacteria (it doesnt)? Why did they bother using soil, for goodness sake? Didnt they know what plants crave?

The force of legacy agriculture is strong, but an increasing number of companies are figuring out a better way: the vertical farm, so named because they can stack hydroponic produce in shelves or towers. As I write this, there are more than 20 vertical farm operations being constructed and tested around the country. They use around 90 percent less water than regular soil farms, can grow roughly 10 times more food per acre than regular soil farms, and using precision software they can harvest their produce 30 percent faster than regular soil farms.

Sure, theyre spending more on electricity, but theyre also spending nothing on pesticide. The economics seem irresistible.

Last year, less than 20 miles from where I write this, in highly urbanized South San Francisco, a company called Plenty unveiled its flagship operation, a vast vertical farm named Tigris. Its sheer scale invites the correct usage of Californias favorite word, awesome. Tigris can grow a million plants at once, harvesting 200 of them every minute. With $226 million in funding, Plenty says it has already farmed 700 varieties of produce. Right now, the cost to consumers is comparable to non-hydroponic products (I can get their baby arugula at my nearest Safeway for a dollar an ounce); in the long run, it should be cheaper.

And they are far from the only success story. A Chinese startup, Alesca Life, is turning disused parking lots into vertical farms as well as selling plug-and-play shipping container farms. Back in Silicon Valley, a company called Iron Ox is developing robot arms for indoor farmwork. The future looks green, and bountiful, and mostly automated (which is yet another reason youre going to need Universal Basic Income).

Which is not to say that outdoor agriculture is going away completely; its just going to shrink to the size of a community garden. Thats the basis of new urban developments called agrihoods, or multihome communities centered around a professionally managed farm; a just-published book called Welcome to the Agrihoodrepresents their first directory.

Rooftop organic farms, urban allotments: These are places where city dwellers can connect to the land and feel the satisfaction of nurturing their seeds from scratch. Soil may not be necessary to feed us, but sometimes its good to feel the dirt in your fingers. Similarly, farmer's markets are unlikely to go away. In a world where grocery stores are increasingly becoming delivery centers for services like Instacart, there will still be value in meeting and buying direct from the growers of high-end produce.

With big agribusiness heading indoors, with our apartments growing much of what we need and vertical farms providing backup in every city, well also be able to let most of our present-day farmland go fallow. That in itself should take care of a chunk of climate change, considering the amount of carbon-soaking vegetation that springs up on fallow land. Lab-grown and plant-made meat will remove the need for those disease-ridden feedlots. Aquaponics, another discipline where the science is expanding by leaps and bounds, may even let us grow our own fish for food, reducing the strain on our overfished oceans.

No doubt it wont be all smooth sailing. No doubt we, as humans, will stumble upon fresh ways to mess up the planet and make life worse. But from where Im sitting, surrounded by soilless germinating jars, the future looks very green and nutritious indeed.

Yours in leafy goodness,

2020

Originally posted here:

We're Part Of The Indoor Farm Revolution - Mashable India

Colts Wideout T.Y. Hilton Wants to Be a Colt for LifeBoth Sides Have Had Extension Talks – Stampede Blue

Indianapolis Colts star wide receiver T.Y. Hilton said on Wednesday that he wants to be a Colt for life, and that both sides have already had a handful of contract extension discussions before COVID-19 hitbut have yet to come to an actual agreement (via 1070 The Fans Kevin Bowen and The Athletics Zak Keefer):

The 30 year old wideout had a down season in 2019, catching 45 receptions for 501 receiving yards (11.1 ypr. avg.) and 5 touchdown receptions during 10 startsas he was limited by injuries (including a torn calf) and lukewarm starting quarterback play.

However, the 4x Pro Bowl wideout is just a year removed from recording 76 receptions for 1,270 receiving yards (16.7 ypr. avg.) and 6 touchdown receptions during 14 starts in 2018.

Hilton ranks 4th all-time in Colts franchise history in receptions (552) and receiving yards (8,598), and is also 7th in receiving touchdowns (45) from his 8 standout seasons in Indianapolis.

The hope is that by being paired with a veteran quarterback upgrade, Philip Rivers, that Hilton will have a bounce back season in Indianapoliswith a wily proven gunslinger whos willing to take chances and throw the ball downfieldas Hilton excels as an elite deep threat.

Hilton is in the last season of a 5-year, $65 million contract extension that he signed with the Colts back in August of 2015. Hes due for a $14.542 million cap hit in 2020.

With a rebound season, the franchise great should be a strong candidate to be re-signedbut those discussions could just depend on his underlying health during his 31 year old campaign.

However, Hilton and the Colts could always reach a contract extension agreement even sooner.

Read the original here:

Colts Wideout T.Y. Hilton Wants to Be a Colt for LifeBoth Sides Have Had Extension Talks - Stampede Blue

Atascosa County upcoming events and educational opportunities – Pleasanton Express

During these unprecedented times we are faced with the unique challenge of finding new ways to deliver educational material to our constituents to achieve Texas A&M Agri- Life Extensions vision to Help Texans Better Their Lives. With that we are offering some distance learning opportunities so you can learn more, but in the safety and comfort of your own home.

May 15 Online Beef Cattle and Forage Management Program will be held from 9 a.m.-12 p.m. on May 15. The program, presented by Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service offices in Atascosa, Bexar, Guadalupe and Wilson counties, will offer one general Texas Department of Agriculture continuing education unit for attendees.

The cost is $10. Attendees will need a laptop or desktop computer and internet access. To register, email Chris Lambert at christopher.lambert@ ag.tamu.edu. Once registered, attendees will be provided the link for participation. Make checks payable to Bexar County Ag and Natural Resources Committee and mail to:

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, 3355 Cherry Ridge, Suite 212, San Antonio, TX 78230.

Program Topics and presenters will be:

COVID-19 and Its Potential Impact on the Cattle Market, David Anderson, Ph.D., AgriLife Extension economist.

Purchasing Replacement Females How to Invest My Dollars, Joe Paschal, Ph.D. AgriLife Extension livestock specialist.

Tips for Getting the Most Return out of Pastures, Josh McGinty, Ph.D., Agri- Life Extension agronomist.

Cost-Saving Tips for Managing Brush, Bob Lyons, Ph.D., AgriLife Extension range specialist.

Biosecurity with Animal Issues During and After a Disaster, Bryan Davis, AgriLife Extension disaster assessment and recovery agent.

May 19 Wildlife Damage Management Series This session will cover Skunks, Coons, Opossumsand More. Presenters are Dr. Maureen Frank and Dr. John Tomecek, Extension Wildlife Specialists. The series will be conducted online from 12-1 p.m. Cost is $10 per session. Checks should be made payable and mailed to Atascosa Wildlife and Fisheries Committee, P.O. Box 379, Leming, Texas 78050. Each session will offer one (1.0) I.P.M. continuing education credit for Private, Commercial and Non-Commercial Applicators. Certificates of completion will be mailed after participant attendance is verified and payment is processed. Please RSVP by the Friday prior to each event by calling 830-569-0034.

Reproduction Management Workshop previously scheduled for May 20 is postponed to October 2020.

Contact the office if you need CEU hours for pesticide applicator license holders.

See the original post here:

Atascosa County upcoming events and educational opportunities - Pleasanton Express

Fight emerges over unemployment benefits in next relief bill | TheHill – The Hill

A recent boost to unemployment benefits is shaping up to be a major flashpoint in negotiations over the next coronavirus relief package.

For weeks, out-of-work Americans have been eligible to receive an extra $600 a week on top of regular jobless benefits from their state. The extra amount was part of the $2.2 trillion pandemic response bill signed into law by President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump slams Fox after hydroxychloroquine warning: 'Looking for a new outlet' Trump threatens permanent freeze on WHO funding without 'major' reforms within 30 days Schumer: Trump's statements on hydroxychloroquine 'is reckless, reckless, reckless' MORE in late March.

Now, Democrats are eager to extend that benefits bump beyond the end of July, when the program is slated to expire. And theyre drawing battle lines ahead of talks between the White House and Congress on another rescue package.

The virus and its impact on the economy will extend beyond July 31, Sen. Jack ReedJohn (Jack) Francis ReedJob losses approach Depression territory as election looms Overnight Defense: Navy secretary nominee: Service in 'rough waters' after 'failure of leadership'| Senate fails to override Trump's Iran war powers veto| Top Armed Services Republican expects to address Pentagon border wall funds in defense policy bill Navy secretary nominee: Service in 'rough waters' after 'failure of leadership' MORE (D-R.I.), who has introduced legislation to extend the benefits, told The Hill on Monday. Youll still have people that are in a very difficult situation, and their jobs are not available, they really cant find alternate employment and they have to support their families.

In addition, it will provide the kind of support for our economy that is necessary, he added. This money typically is going to the family and then being spent on groceries, on essentials immediately, and thats keeping the economy moving.

On the other side of the aisle, many Republicans are concerned the enhanced benefits are serving as a disincentive for people to return to work at a time when the economy is struggling to stabilize.

Calls from Democrats to extend unemployment bonuses will kill small businesses and make long-term unemployment much worse, Sen. Ben SasseBenjamin (Ben) Eric SasseSasse rips 'thugs in China' in high school graduation speech Commerce Department cracks down on Huawei's access to chips Sasse wins Republican Senate primary MORE (R-Neb.) said in a statement. Everyone wants to help workers who lost their jobs, but we shouldnt make it impossible for small businesses to hire again by pitting them against a crummy government system that makes not working pay more than working.

Unemployment benefits are administered at the state level, and states vary in both how much money they provide and who is eligible. Regular employment benefits typically are not 100 percent wage replacement.

In 2019,states' average weekly amounts ranged from $213 in Mississippi to $536 in Hawaii, according to the Labor Department.

The coronavirus pandemic has led to a dramatic increase in joblessness, as many businesses have been forced to close or scale back operations at least temporarily or have laid off workers due to scant revenue.

More than 36 million new unemployment claims have been filed since mid-March. In the week ending May 2, there were 22.8 million continuing claims filed, the Labor Department said.

Lawmakers chose to boost weekly benefits by $600 in the March legislation signed by Trump known as the CARES Act in an effort to replace 100 percent of wages for the average worker when the benefits are added to regular unemployment benefits. They decided to increase benefits by a flat amount across the board in order to minimize the administrative burdens on states, letting states distribute the enhanced benefits as quickly as possible.

As a result, some people are receiving more in unemployment benefits than they were in wages. A paper from researchers at the University of Chicago found that 68 percent of jobless workers eligible for unemployment insurance will get benefits that exceed lost earnings.

Republicans and Democrats differ in how to help unemployed workers weather the coronavirus storm.

Democrats argue that expanded benefits are crucial and should be extended. A $3 trillion coronavirus relief package House Democrats passed on Friday would extend the extra $600 per week through Jan. 31.

Many Democrats have also expressed interest in linking the expanded benefits to health and economic conditions. For example, a proposal from Reed, Sen. Michael BennetMichael Farrand BennetJob losses approach Depression territory as election looms An evidence-based response to rising child poverty reform and expand the Child Tax Credit Bipartisan group of senators asks Treasury, SBA to loosen coronavirus loan restrictions MORE (D-Colo.) and Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) would extend the $600 boost until 30 days after the coronavirus crisis ends; recipients would then receive smaller additional amounts ranging from $200 per week to $450 per week depending on the unemployment rate in their state. Those amounts would continue until the jobless rate comes down to levels that are close to those from before the coronavirus.

Passing emergency relief legislation that incorporates automatic triggers will strengthen unemployment benefits to sustain people whose lives have been upended through no fault of their own until they can safely go back to work, Bennet said.

Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiTop Democrat to introduce bill to limit Trump's ability to fire IG's Pelosi says 'morbidly obese' Trump taking hydroxychloroquine 'not a good idea' Senate Republicans demand answers from Trump on IG firing MORE (D-Calif.) said during a press conference last week that there is broad support in her caucus for automatic extensions of benefits depending on economic conditions, but that the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) uses a methodology that results in these types of proposals being scored as expensive.

I do think it's more efficient to have the stabilizers, the CBO notwithstanding, she said.

Republicans, however, argue that the benefits are too generous and discourage people who were laid off from reentering the workforce.

Before the CARES Act passed, several Republicans unsuccessfully tried to amend the legislation so that benefits would be capped at 100 percent of a workers wages before they were laid off. Since implementation, GOP lawmakers have continued to express concerns about the $600 increase to unemployment insurance (UI), and have criticized the extension of the boost in House Democrats bill.

Was it necessary to do something to pump up UI? Absolutely, Sen. Rob PortmanRobert (Rob) Jones PortmanSenate Republicans demand answers from Trump on IG firing Bipartisan lawmakers call on Pompeo to defend Israel against ICC probes Senate GOP crafting wishlist for next coronavirus package MORE (R-Ohio) said on CNBC last week. But the level that we took it to makes it very difficult for many small businesses in Ohio and around the country to bring their employees back.

The White House has also raised concerns.

The Trump Administration supports policies that get people back to work our concerns with UI have not changed as it incentivizes people to stay home, raising the unemployment rate, a senior administration official said. Well continue to work with Congress to sort out details.

Republicans are floating changes theyd like to see. Some still want to cap payments at 100 percent of a recipients pre-unemployment wages, though lawmakers didnt take that step in the CARES Act because it would be difficult for states to administer.

Portman and Rep. Kevin BradyKevin Patrick BradyKey House Republican calls Democrats' coronavirus bill a 'recipe for a prolonged recession' Battle brewing over how to get more relief money to Americans Second NJ man accused of stealing N95 masks intended for hospital MORE (Texas), the top Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee, have suggested allowing people to keep getting some amount of benefit for a set amount of time when they return to work, in an effort to encourage reentry into the workforce.

Democratic lawmakers and outside groups backing the boost to unemployment benefits say they are open to allowing people to keep some or all of their extra weekly payment when they go back to work. They also countered GOP concerns about the fact that some people are getting more in unemployment benefits than they were getting in wages, with Beyer arguing its likely that millions of people will still be unemployed at the end of the year because their jobs havent come back yet, not because they could get more money by collecting unemployment benefits.

Weve got to concentrate on all the people who really do need it, who are not going to be hired back, he said.

Beyer added that those getting more in unemployment payments than they were in wages before they lost their jobs have not had a lot of advantages in life to begin with.

How unemployment payments are treated in any subsequent coronavirus relief law remains to be seen. While Democrats have expressed interest in quick action on another package, Republicans have been in less of a rush. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said Monday that another package may not be needed.

A spokesman for Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck GrassleyCharles (Chuck) Ernest GrassleySchumer on Trump IG firing: What is GOP going to do about it? Senate Republicans demand answers from Trump on IG firing Pelosi wants Trump to justify sacking of State IG MORE (R-Iowa) said the governments response needs to match conditions on the ground.

No one can say with certainty what the economy will look like months from now when funding runs out, especially with 50 different state responses, the spokesman added.

More:

Fight emerges over unemployment benefits in next relief bill | TheHill - The Hill

As Suncor ponders Terra Nova’s future, N.L. offshore workers worry about their own – CBC.ca

The union representing some 400 workers on the Terra Nova FPSOoil platform is sounding the alarm about a scenario that could see the vessel not produce any oil for the next two years.

"The members are very worried about their future, and the future of Newfoundland (and Labrador)," said Unifor Local 2121 president Dave Mercer.

Companies that supply the offshore are also feeling the pinch from an oil industry that has been thrown into crisis by a global pandemic.

"The impact directly is the loss of some supply ships that we supply. They're tied up or moved on somewhere else. We don't have that business or as much," said Gary Squires, manager at St. John's-based Campbell's Ship Supplies, which providessupplies to supply ships and drill rigs in the offshore.

Campbell's has a workforce of 25, and so far has been able to avoid any layoffs, said Squires.

His comments reflecta moodnow permeating an industry that represents some 30 per cent of the value of the province's gross domestic product, and uncertainty about the future of the Terra Nova FPSO is the latest dark cloud to cast a shadow over the offshore sector.

"Now it's time for the government to step up," said Mercer, whose union represents nearly 800 workers on the Terra Nova and Hibernia oil platform.

Workers on the Hebron and SeaRose FPSO platforms are not unionized.

Suncor, the majority owner and operator of Terra Nova, confirmed this week that it was unable to formalize a Plan B for a life extension overhaulof the aging floating, production, storage and offloading vessel, which has been producing oil on the Grand Banks since 2002.

As a result,the partnership that owns the vessel has decided to remove the Terra Nova from the offshore by this summer,and sail it to port at a location yet to be named, for an unknown duration.

"Obviously we're very concerned about the impacts to industry, the impacts to employment, the impacts to Newfoundlanders and Labradorians of the challenges that the industry is facing," said provincial Natural Resources Minister Siobhan Coady.

Coadyhas been in discussions with the operator, but said there's no indication yet how many jobs will be lost, or when the Terra Nova might return to the offshore and resume production, but she acknowledged it could very well be 2022.

Mercer said the union is also scrambling for information.

"It's all so fluid," he said.

Suncor released a statement Tuesday that said, "No decisions have been made to shut down production operations on Terra Nova until 2022."

But with so much uncertainty caused by the global pandemic, oil markets that are extremely volatile, and the immense planning that goes into a refit like the one proposed for the Terra Nova, insiders predict a lengthy shutdown for the vessel.

The Terra Nova was supposed to be at a dockyard in Spain by now, undergoing a half-billion-dollar life extension refit that would extend the oil field for 10 years, and allow the vessel to produce an additional 80 million barrels of oil.

But with Spain hit hard by the COVID-19 virus, those plans have been scuttled, and when Suncor was unable to come up an with an alternative plan, the decision was made to mothball the vessel.

That means the number of producing fields in the offshore will fall from four to three, and the hundreds of workers whose livelihoods are connected to the Terra Nova are now in doubt.

"There's only so much we can say. It's becoming very difficult to take care of our members," said Mercer.

The Terra Nova hasn't produced oil since it was ordered late last year to suspend operations by the board that regulates the offshore for a safety infraction.

There were hopesthat Suncor could resume production and carry out the refit at a later date, but sources say some partners were unwilling to spend the money required to recertify the Terra Nova, at a time when companies are slashing spending in order to manage through a collapse in the market.

Suncor was engaged in ongoing talks with the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board about a plan to restart production, but a resolution was never reached.

"As of yesterday we were still in very active discussions with Suncor on their recent proposal to resume production and thought those discussions were continuing," the C-NLOPB wrote in a statement to CBC.

"While we sympathize with the workforce affected by yesterday's announcement, we are not privy to the commercial considerations faced by Suncor and its partners."

Meanwhile, calls for the federal government to offer a lifeline to the oil sector continue.

"Wereally need is an investment in accelerating exploration in offshore Newfoundland and Labrador," said Coady.

The province and industry groups want Ottawa to offer tax breaks and other incentives to encourage oil companies to keep looking for new discoveries, similar to those offered in Norway and the United Kingdom.

Federal Natural Resources Minister Seamus O'Regansaid Wednesday he is in talks with the province and those in the industry.

"We are looking for options," said O'Regan, who specifically referenced "incentive-based exploration."

But O'Regan would not put a timeline on when those measures might be announced.

"We want to make sure we get it right," he said

Read more from CBC Newfoundland and Labrador

Link:

As Suncor ponders Terra Nova's future, N.L. offshore workers worry about their own - CBC.ca

Induction Healthcare to get a new zest for life with acquisition – Digital Health

Induction Healthcare has announced it intends to acquire the cash and shares of health tech company Zesty Limited in a deal worth about 13million.

Subject to the approval of shareholders, the deal will see Zesty founder James Balmain become joint-CEO of the enlarged business alongside Inductions CEO, Hugo Stephenson.

The proposed acquisition comprises of 500,000 in cash plus shares equivalent to 41.9% of the existing company and approximately 29.5% of the enlarged share capital. It is estimated to be worth 12.7million.

London-based Zestys platform provides an integration layer with a hospitals electronic patient record (EPR) or patient administration system (PAS) and through its portal, allows patients to manage their hospital outpatient appointments, read their administrative and clinical correspondence, attend a video based consultation and store a personal copy of their clinical record.

In 2017, the company was named among 50 of the most forward-thinking digital UK companies in the 2018 Digital Innovators Power List.

While Induction has an app, which allows doctors to access basic information (e.g. extension numbers) instantly.

This acquisition will form a platform which connect patients, clinicians and healthcare information together in one place.

Balmain said: I see the frustration that clinical teams and patients feel every day. Basic things, like updating a patient record or booking an appointment are just not easy enough. So an app for doctors, connected to an app for patients makes total sense.

Induction and Zesty coming together can help improve the way healthcare is delivered.

I am excited by the reach and capability of the new combined Induction Group. We will be working as hard as we can to help bring clinical teams and patients together, in an efficient and low-friction way.

The deal is expected to be completed in June 2020.

Stephenson, CEO of Induction, said: Zesty has demonstrated that it can improve patient experience while saving hospitals time and money through its market leading patient portal and outpatient bookings engine.

In the process, Zesty has solved the problem of integrating with different electronic patient record systems.

Connecting the most used app by NHS doctors (Induction) and the most used app by NHS trusts (MicroGuide) with patients and their health records, has the potential to deliver the right resources to the right places at the right time a transformational opportunity for healthcare.

Follow this link:

Induction Healthcare to get a new zest for life with acquisition - Digital Health

The economy on life support: Business leaders respond to budget 2020 – The Spinoff

Budget 2020: The government has unveiled a massive $50bn spending package, including an eight week extension to the wage subsidy. Duncan Greive asks the business community: is it enough?

The government this afternoon unveiled a massive new $50bn programme of spending much bigger than anyone expected, according to Kiwibank senior economist Jeremy Couchman. The centrepiece for business is an eight-week extension to the wage subsidy scheme for the hardest-hit firms that are able to prove a loss of revenue of 50% or more over the previous month.

When presenting it to parliament, finance minister Grant Robertson was at pains to place employment at the heart of the matter. This budget is about jobs, he said. Keeping people in their jobs whenever we can. Supporting businesses and sectors to create new jobs through infrastructure, housing and more. Directly creating jobs that help restore our environment and conservation estate. And training and retraining people for new jobs at a scale we have never seen before.

Beyond the wage subsidy extension, key elements included a:

Economists and business representatives are broadly supportive of a budget they describe as strange and non-traditional, in part because it was pulled together really quickly. Yet KPMGs Riria Te Kanawa described herself as a bit underwhelmed by the precision and ambition of its spending targeting Mori business.

While the scale of the budget, which projects an increase of debt to debt to 53.6% of gross domestic product by 2023, was generally thought commensurate to the challenge of the Covid-19 economic crisis, there was some disquiet about what was characterised as putting the economy on life support. Economists spoken to by The Spinoff wondered whether the support was too thinly spread, and too reliant on stimulus spending versus unleashing private sector investment.

The government is projecting a government-led recovery, said Eric Crampton of think tank the New Zealand Initiative, who expressed disappointment at what he saw as a lack of evidence that it is looking for opportunities that New Zealands relatively Covid-free status can provide.

Kirk Hope of sector advocacy group Business NZ was more positive, grading the budget at 7.5/10 from a business perspective, singling out the focus on infrastructure and education training and re-training and a continuing emphasis on R&D as critically important. He wondered whether the kinds of programmes targeted at growing businesses were large enough to make a difference, citing a $10m ecommerce transition scheme as seeming inadequate to the scale of what will be required of retail.

Lockdown was catastrophic for the economy, particularly the retail sector. Stats NZs just-released Eftpos data for April revealed a drop in spending at once extraordinary and entirely predictable.

May will be less awful but still a long way down, with the first half operating under level three. June was set to be when reality bit when the first tranche of the wage subsidy was set to run out and we got a sense of which businesses were fit to survive the winter. An extension to the wage subsidy, targeting those businesses which have suffered a catastrophic 50% drop in revenues, will push that date of reckoning out into the beginning of August, just weeks out from Septembers general election.

Business NZs Hope said his membership would welcome that extension. It gives you another two months cover, he said, adding that the big question is: how quickly will we get demand back into the economy? He believes that will define the extent to which the most-impacted industries, like hospitality and retail, will be able to survive once the subsidy finally and inevitably runs out.

The budgets targeted employment spending for Mori was largely contained in a $200m employment spend. We have listened and today have announced the establishment of a $50 million Mori trades training fund, which is part of a wider Mori employment package of more than $200 million, said employment minister Willie Jackson. Government will work in partnership with iwi and Mori to help grow job opportunities in the regions together.

KPMGs Riria Te Kanawa says that despite a $33m expansion of MBIEs Vision Mtauranga programme, she was underwhelmed by the budgets business-focussed spending for Mori. If you look at megatrends, like tech, theres not a lot there. Some Pasifika spending for STEM, but I didnt see an equivalent for Mori. She wanted to see a focus on fostering entrepreneurship, and also believes the emphasis on cadetships is backwards-looking [Some of those jobs] are likely to be automated over time.

At the other end of the employment spectrum, Te Kanawa says that many Mori were already doing it tough before Covid, and that rather than simply pushing towards job training, much more needs to be done on helping long-term unemployed gain work-readiness. Some of our people arent job ready, she says. We need to teach them how to grow their own kai, repair their homes. That will build their self-worth.

The New Zealand Initiatives Crampton was frustrated by a lack of vision for export-led growth, believing more consideration should have been given to sectors which could bring in export earnings as a result of New Zealands elimination of the virus. He cited the screen production sector as having huge potential to host major productions while much of the rest of the world battles the virus, and was curious about why the government was still putting $12m in to promote New Zealand as a production destination without any ability to bring key workers in to make those productions.

Crampton added that the projected migration numbers suggest that the government think borders should remain closed to overseas workers for at least a year before slowly opening up. Despite boosts to the education sector through major trades and retraining programmes, he said the lack of ability for international students to enter and quarantine would prevent our exploiting that opportunity.

The backdrop to the budget is a visceral disruption to economic life as we know it. The New Zealand economy is projected to shrink by 4.6% in the year to June, the worst such contraction since the 30s. The Great Depression is etched into our collective memory for good reason it was the 20th centurys most profound period of human suffering to occur in peacetime. Poverty was abject, with few social safety nets around to catch the masses of unemployed.

In New Zealand, the real unemployment rate women and Mori were then-excluded from official statistics was thought to have reached 30%. GDP per capita collapsed, taking seven years to surpass 1929s level. Riots broke out in Auckland, Wellington and Dunedin with unemployed men sent to remote labour camps.

This is what haunts todays budget a sense of government wanting to pull whatever levers it can to avoid creating a modern sequel to that level of pain. The 1930s saw the election of New Zealands first Labour government, with Michael Joseph Savage sewing social safety nets which remain to this day that are reinforced in some places and fraying in others.

The big difference between 1929 and 2020 is that rather than austerity, the prescription announced today is the countrys biggest-ever stimulus. This budgets stated ambition is to protect as many jobs as possible, and lay the groundwork for the creation of tens of thousands of new ones to replace those lost.

Prior to the budget, prime minister Jacinda Ardern underlined this, describing employment as the governments number one priority. She characterised its reasoning for this by leaning on another Labour government.

It harks back to the sentiment of Norman Kirk, that all anyone ever needs is something to do, somewhere to live, someone to love and something to hope for, said Ardern. Employment helps form a foundation. It supports families, pays the bills, helps provide self-value and worth, and when times are tough like this, workplaces can provide an important support network.

While the state employs hundreds of thousands, job losses will be almost entirely confined to the private sector, and thus any recovery depends in large part on how the business community makes it through the rest of the year. Based on the verdict of those well-placed to understand its fears and hopes, this budget is of a scale commensurate to the challenge. What the business sector requires is certainty and confidence, said Business NZs Hope. This provides a continuation of the governments view that business is going to be central to the recovery.

The Spinoff Daily gets you all the days' best reading in one handy package, fresh to your inbox Monday-Friday at 5pm.

Read more here:

The economy on life support: Business leaders respond to budget 2020 - The Spinoff

Reliance Foundation gives a new lease of life to womenfolk in Gujarat – Times Now

Reliance Foundation gives a new lease of life to womenfolk in Gujarat 

The lockdown imposed in the wake of the novel coronavirus pandemic has entered its fourth phase in India, and with the extension the challenges do not seem to be easing out for the marginalised communities anytime soon. Out of jobs and with very little or no money, these underprivileged people are desperate to get back to their work and normal life. Talking about a particular case in Jasdan, Gujarat, several self-help group (SHG) members have lost their usual source of income during the lockdown. However, despite the difficulties, the members didnt lose their spirit and were keen to keep working in order to sustain their families and contribute to their community.

Reliance Foundation the philanthropic arm of Reliance Industries came to the forefront to help these people revive their livelihoods. Focusing on the women folk, the organisation identified those women who had their own sewing machines and helped in aligning them with various government initiatives.

Under the National Rural Livelihood Mission programme a poverty alleviation project implemented by the Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India, five women from the self-help groups in three villages of Jasdan were given orders to stitch face masks. Setting a positive example, these women have stitched over 1500 masks till now. These masks are being sold to the public and the income generated is helping the women sustain their families during the lockdown.

This is just one of the many initiatives that Reliance Foundation has undertaken to help people from the marginalised communities to sail through the current challenging times. From donating ration and dry food kits, distributing free fuel for ambulances, setting up dedicated COVID-19 hospital, feeding stray animals, helping stranded migrants reach their homes to supporting self-help groups under various initiatives, Reliance Foundation is doing all this and more to ease the impact of the lockdown.

Check the latest facts on Covid-19here. Times Fact India Outbreak Report by TIMES NETWORK and Protiviti is a comprehensive analysis that highlights the impact of the pandemic in India and projects the possible number of active cases in the weeks ahead.

See the original post:

Reliance Foundation gives a new lease of life to womenfolk in Gujarat - Times Now