This article first appeared    on the Cato Institute site.  
    With the seemingly never-ending stream of embarrassments,    travesties, and demagoguery that erupt from the Trump White    House on a daily basis, what difference does a sonnet make?      
    From Trumps precedent-shattering tweets threatening members of    his own cabinet to the ongoing Mueller investigation, which    seems as if it will ultimately reveal that the    administration is guilty of gross executive incompetence at    best and potential treason at worst, what difference do    fourteen-lines written in 1883 possibly make?  
    Daily Emails and    Alerts - Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox  
    On Wednesday August, 2, White House senior policy adviser    Stephen Miller, who has a lengthy history of supporting far    right and white nationalist political causes, got into an    argument with CNN anchor Jim    Acosta over Emma Lazaruss poem inscribed on the base of the    State of Liberty.  
    Miller had been carted out to brief the press on Trumps    draconian new immigration proposals, which would drastically    reduce legal immigration, and make knowledge of English a    prerequisite to even initiating naturalization (knowledge of    the language is already required for those taking the    citizenship test).  
    Acosta queried whether the new legislation was in keeping with    Lazaruss poem, whose conclusion implores the world to Give me    your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe    free.  
    Miller responded to Acosta that the poem that youre referring    to was added later. Its not actually part of the Statue of    Liberty.  
            A placard    of the Statue of Liberty held by a protester at a rally outside    the National Assembly March 25, 2003 in Seoul, South Korea.    S Chung    Sung-Jun/Getty  
    For those keeping score, Miller is literally correct, if    completely wrong about the obvious historical connection    between verse and statue which has accrued for more than a    century.  
    Whether Miller is lying or merely poorly informed is a matter    between him and his confessor, to be given over to whatever    conscience he may have.  
    Trumps legislation  which in severity is reminiscent to the    Johnson-Reed Act of 1924    that severely limited southern and eastern European immigration    while entirely freezing that from Asia and Africa, and which    was only overturned in 1965  has almost no chance of passing    in Congress.  
    Whether paper tigers such as this proposed legislation, not to    mention Trumps transgender military ban, are simply red meat    for his base thrown out to distract from his ongoing    administrative failures or born from a genuine (if noxious)    ideological commitment is up for debate, but ultimately that    probably doesnt matter much.  
    What does matter is the crucial need to push back on every lie    promoted by agents of this administration, and fabricated    comments about history and culture are just as important to    dispute as their lies about policy  maybe more so.  
    That Miller would claim Lazaruss New Colossus simply has an    incidental relationship to the Statue that it frames is not    just an issue of misinterpretation, its a callous fabrication,    one with real-world implications, and it behooves us to defend    both Lazarus and Liberty.  
    The Statue of Liberty was of course a gift from the French    government that was erected in New York Harbor in 1886, and    Lazaruss lyric wasnt added until 1903, a difference of less    than two decades  though it should be pointed out that the    poem was written as part of a fundraising campaign for the    erection of the statue, three years before Libertys beacon    would light out over the Manhattan skyline.  
    By 1903 the statue had become firmly intertwined in the minds    of Americans with images of immigrants arriving by boat to    Ellis Island only a few miles away from the New Colossus.  
    In the century since, both the poem and Frdric Auguste Bartholdis    massive sculpture have become a central part of American    identity and the personal stories of millions of Americans.  
    Its the height of disingenuousness to claim that the poem is    not actually part of the Statue of Liberty. In the first    decade-and-a-half of the twentieth century, Ellis Island    welcomed close to twelve million new Americans, and it has been    estimated that close to a third of Americans are descended from    somebody who passed by Lazaruss poem chiseled on that pedestal    (three times more than can claim Mayflower ancestry).  
    The arrival of Catholic and Jewish immigrants, born in Italy,    Ireland, Germany, Greece, Poland, Austria-Hungary, Russia, and    a multitude of other locations has incalculably altered and    made American culture great, transforming our literature,    music, cuisine, and language while birthing an inestimably    richer nation  as indeed new groups of immigrants continue to    do today.  
    And the generations descended from that great wave of    immigration have ascended to the heights of politics, business,    technology, the military, academe, and the arts, not to mention    working as skilled laborers, helping to improve every aspect of    the United States.  
    The Statue of Liberty figures in the family legends of millions    of us, maybe even the reader of this article.  
    Perhaps even the stories of the Glotzer family, Belarussian    Jews escaping pogroms who immigrated shortly after Lazaruss    words were permanently affixed at the base of that beautiful    copper-green statue, and from whom one of their descendants now    has the opportunity to work in the White House, a man named    Stephen Miller.  
    Rarely do poems, especially old ones, make front-page news in    the United States, and even if its for a dubious reason it    warms my literary scholars heart to see The New Colossus    discussed in the public arena.  
    Lazarus was a student of American transcendentalism, a    correspondent with Ralph Waldo Emerson, and a    celebrated poet and playwright in her own lifetime, with her    biographer Esther Schor arguing that the poet was crucial in    inventing the role of an American Jewish writer, and was a    prophetess of multicultural America.  
    Her lyric has become such a central part of American civil    observance (despite Millers spurious claims)  recited by    school children, referenced in popular culture, and read by    millions of tourists every year  that its easy to forget the    aesthetic majesty of the poem.  
    Contrary to Roberto Suros contention in    Politico that the poem is simply a schmaltzy sonnet,    Lazaruss verse is an underrated triumph. That its an example    of Victorian sentimentalism, which is a critique often leveled    to silence past female writers, is of no import.  
    A perfectly crafted Petrarchan sonnet which fuses the Hellenic    and Hebraic themes which constitute Western culture while    gesturing to something even more universal, The New Colossus    has been underappreciated for its literary qualities.  
    She rejects the brazen giant of Greek fame in the Colossus of    Rhodes, for the American statue does not have conquering    limbs. Rather, she glows green with world-wild welcome    looking out on twin cities with mild eyes.  
    The Statue of Liberty may be a product of the Old World, but    within her bosom she demonstrates the dreams of a New World,    from the huddled masses yearning to breathe free, /The    wretched refuse of your teeming shore.  
    Lazaruss Liberty is the Mother of Exiles, a name printed in    all capitals like the covenant carved into tablets at Sinai,    like Gods name I AM.  
    She is the welcoming, matronly, caring, powerful visage of    Liberty, whose golden door welcomed the grandparents and    great-grandparents of fully a third of this nation, some of    whom sadly wish to close that door behind them.  
    What a poorer country we would be, culturally, spiritually,    intellectually, not to mention economically, had those twelve    million who found succor at the Statues feet been denied that    entrance?  
    Speaking of the grandchildren of Italian, Irish, German, and    eastern European immigrants who sailed through New York Harbor,    Millers friend and former classmate the white nationalist    Richard Spencer tweeted,    Its offensive that such a beautiful, inspiring statue was    ever associated with ugliness, weakness, and deformity.  
    The ugliness, weakness, and deformity he speaks of are those    of you, those of us, whose ancestors left from Naples, Hamburg,    Liverpool, Dublin, Warsaw, and Minsk. Some of those    descendants, tragically, voted for the current occupant of the    White House. They should remember that people like Miller, and    worse, have his ear.  
    But if were to be pedantic literalists, and ignore the    association with immigration which the Statue of Liberty has    developed over the past twelve decades, then by all means lets    return to her original purpose if we must.  
    That was when the statue was commissioned and designed by the    inheritors of the radical French Jacobin tradition and given as    a gift to the United States in honor of the abolition of    slavery and the defeat of the shameful slaving nation of the    Confederacy.  
    Note that there are broken chains at her feet representing the    triumph of abolitionism and the sacred contention that all    people are created equal. Whether as Mother of Exiles, or as    profound symbol of anti-slavery, the glow of Libertys beacon    cant be extinguished by historical obfuscation and lies.  
    Lazaruss poem written as with lightning at the base of that    triumphant statue is arguably the creed of our multicultural    covenant, an expansive, universalist understanding of America    as not just a country of blood and soil like any other country,    but rather a repository for the dreams, aspirations, and    striving of all humankind, everywhere and for everyone.  
    Ed Simon is a senior editor at    The Marginalia Review of Books, a channel of The Los    Angeles Review of Books.  
See the rest here:
Why Did Stephen Miller Deride the Noble Words at the Base of the Statue of Liberty? - Newsweek