Piracy RPG ‘King of Seas’ announced for fall this year – Micky News

According to dev 3DClouds, King of Seas is their most ambitious project to date. The game, much like many modern titles, have a Zelda-esque vibe to it. Subsequently, the art is not only beautiful, but the announcement trailer shows as much.

Piracy and naval warfare games have propped up a ton over the last few years. Devs gained confidence with the genre through the success of Assassins Creed IV: Black Flag. Above all, naval games have become better than ever as technology improves.

According to a press release, 3DClouds wants players to enjoy the genre even further. They want to set sail on a deadly adventure set in the golden age of pirates.

We are thrilled that after a year of hard work, we are finally ready to unveil King of Seas, our most ambitious project to date, said Francesco Bruschi, Founder, and CEO of 3DClouds. We have poured all our creative talent into creating this stunning pirate world and cant wait to share more with you in the coming weeks.

There is sparse detail about King of Seas so far. However, the games description is one thing to consider. King of Seas dynamic game world will react to your every action forcing you to evaluate your strategy at every turn and adapt to the new challenges facing you, says the description. Naval routes might change meaning you will need to look for new ways to conquer settlements or adverse weather conditions might require new, more dangerous routes to be navigated when heading to islands to trade goods or upgrade your ships.

Engage with an intriguing cast of characters who may steer you towards hidden treasures or lead you into deadly traps as other pirates look to plunder your gold. One thing is for certain, there are adventures to be had and battles to fight as you shape your empire on the high seas.

From what is available on the trailer, it seems the game is a reactive world. The game feel for the title seems to revolve around a robust and colorful world full of adventures.

Every decision will likely have its consequences on the environment. Furthermore, this can be a superb source of adventure, action, and lore. King of Seas does not have an official release date as of yet.

Featured image courtesy of 3DClouds/Official Press Release

See original here:

Piracy RPG 'King of Seas' announced for fall this year - Micky News

Breaking News – Nickelodeon’s Brand-New Preschool Series "Santiago of the Seas" Sets Sail for Action-Packed Adventures, Friday, Oct. 9, aT…

PIRATAS AHOY!

NICKELODEON'S BRAND-NEW PRESCHOOL SERIES "SANTIAGO OF THE SEAS" SETS SAIL FOR ACTION-PACKED ADVENTURES, FRIDAY, OCT. 9, AT 12:30 P.M. (ET/PT)

BURBANK, Calif.-July 14, 2020-Preschoolers will set sail for swashbuckling adventures in Nickelodeon's brand-new animated series Santiago of the Seas, premiering Friday, Oct. 9, at 12:30 p.m. (ET/PT). Infused with a Spanish-language and Latino-Caribbean culture curriculum, the action-adventure series (20 episodes) follows 8-year-old Santiago "Santi" Montes, a brave and kind-hearted pirate, as he embarks on daring rescues, searches for treasures and keeps the high seas safe in a fantastical Caribbean world. Following the U.S. launch, Santiago of the Seas will roll out on Nickelodeon and Nick Jr. channels internationally.

In the series, Santiago's (Kevin Chacon) steadfast and loyal crew consists of: Toms (Justice Quiroz), his clumsy energetic cousin whose magical guitar can be used to harness the wind; and Lorelai (Alyssa Cheatham), a knowledgeable mermaid who can speak to sea creatures and transform into a young human girl. Together, Santi and his best mates sail the seas on the majestic ship El Bravo, using their smarts, pirate skills and moral compasses to guard their home of Isla Encanto from villains like the nefarious pirate Bonnie Bones (Kyndra Sanchez) and her Palm Crow sidekick Sir Butterscotch (John Leguizamo).

In the Santiago of the Seas series premiere, "The Legend of Capitn Calavera," Santiago and his friends become the new pirate protectors of Isla Encanto after discovering the lost treasure of the legendary Capitn Calavera. Following the premiere, NickJr.com and the Nick Jr. App will feature original short-form content and full-length episodes. Episodes will also be available on Nick Jr. On Demand and Download-To-Own services.

Santiago of the Seas is created by Niki Lpez, Leslie Valdes and Valerie Walsh Valdes. Valdes and Walsh Valdes (Dora the Explorer) serve as executive producers with Lpez co-executive producing. Santiago of the Seas is produced by Nickelodeon Animation Studio in Burbank, Calif., with production overseen by Eryk Casemiro, Senior Vice President, Nickelodeon Preschool.

Nickelodeon, now in its 41st year, is the number-one entertainment brand for kids. It has built a diverse, global business by putting kids first in everything it does. The brand includes television programming and production in the United States and around the world, plus consumer products, digital, location based experiences, publishing and feature films. Nickelodeon and all related titles, characters and logos are trademarks of ViacomCBS Inc. (Nasdaq: VIACA, VIAC).

Go here to read the rest:

Breaking News - Nickelodeon's Brand-New Preschool Series "Santiago of the Seas" Sets Sail for Action-Packed Adventures, Friday, Oct. 9, aT...

Nothing is certain, but it’s a good time to plan your future travel – The News Star

About the only thing certain in the travel business right now is that nothing is certain.

Last week, the president and CEO of Carnival Cruise Corporation, which operates a fleet of over 100 ships including such popular brand names as Carnival, Princess, Holland America, Cunard, Seabourn, Costa, and Windstar, announced the sell off of 13 of his ships and the delay in the delivery of 5 of the 9 new builds they had expected to be sailing the high seas in 2021, the ripples of disappointment and shock was heard all across the travel industry.

Alas, we all understood too well his goal to "emerge a leaner, more efficient company, to optimize cash generation, to pay down debt, and to return to providing strong returns to our shareholders," but, still, this mega-giant's painful decision certainly gave me reason to pause and ponder.

Pausing and pondering is not an easy thing to do.

I learned that at a very early age, because it was my mother's favorite form of discipline. You see, I was the middle child in a family of 3 girls.My older sister was only 9 months older than I so we were pretty much inseparable playmates.Then, just as we got old enough to "run" the neighborhood, ride bikes and play pretty much unsupervised, mom threw our younger sister into the mix.

The fact that she was too small, too slow, too whining, and too much of a tattle tale created serious challenges for the dynamic duo thing we had going. So, because we sometimes had trouble sharing or including her, Mama created pause and ponder. Today's woke parents would call it time-out. For us, it was something to be avoided like the plague. Slowing down to ponder the why, what, and when that caused the pause was simply not in our DNA: we were born to play--not ponder.

Yet, when Miss Helen, my Sunday School teacher, explained the Christmas story, beginning with Mary and the "yes" that changed the world forever, I, too, had an epiphany. The wonder of it all became so vivid, so beautifully dramatic in my young mind: the donkey ride to Bethlehem, the manger, the star, the shepherds, the wisemen, the angels.

I loved the whole event, but my epiphany came when Miss Helen ended our lesson with this Bible scripture.And Mary kept all these things and pondered them in her heart.

At that moment,I got it!I suddenly realized Mama's "pause and ponder" sessions were not designed to be punishment. Rather, like Mother Mary, they were an opportunity to treasure, reflect, and think carefully about something.

During this time of almost zero revenue for the travel industry, I will admit to having a lot more time to pause and ponder. I worry about the children and the parents who are facing difficult decisions about school and the missed opportunities of sports and other events we have grown to love.I worry about seeing businesses, like mine, stumble, eke by, or remain closed.I worry about the economy and if it can sustain such a blow...and I ponder on and on.

I have never met the president of Carnival Cruise Line, but my heart breaks that travel has devolved to the point that it is necessary to divest themselves of 13 ships to stay afloat. These are strange and scary times.There seems to always be a low-lying cloud just hanging over us lately, which is probably why I like Mother Mary!

Mary's road was certainly not an easy one. How hard it must have been for her to let go of the special child she had loved, nurtured and cared for every step of the way and, then, following God's instructions, turn Him over to a world that was not always kind.

Even with Jesus,I am sure Mary had some of those "pause and ponder" moments . You know, those times as parents when we scratch our heads and go hmmmm as we second guess the decisions or choices we must face. Certainly, having God as the Father would have had some challenges too!

Yet, from Bethlem to Golgatha, Mary was always there. It seems only fitting that she was the first to see His resurrection and the one chosen to tell the disciples He had risen! Needless to say, that's another reason I really like Mary: she always just showed up!

So, my friends, during this lifequake experience that is Covid, maybe we all need to be a little more like Mary. We need to follow instructions and, every now and then, we should just pause and ponder all the good things that we have enjoyed and can still enjoy. We need to hold them close to our heart, and just keep on showing up.

I am trying to do that, and, luckily, I can honestly say even at Monroe Travel Service, I am beginning to see a glimmer of hope for an industry shattered by COVID-19.We are starting to book trips for late fall, 2021, and even 2022, and would love to send you away.

Maybe it's time to start kicking the tires again and seeing what's out there!I don't think travel will be resurrected in 3 days, but I believe it's coming!

Dianne Newcomer is a travel agent at Monroe Travel Service. At this time, our office is closed and our travel advisors are working from home. Please call 318 323 3465 or email us at dianne@monroetravel.com for help with your future travel plans. We would love to send you away!

Read or Share this story: https://www.thenewsstar.com/story/life/2020/07/17/nothing-certain-but-its-good-time-plan-your-future-travel/5442698002/

Original post:

Nothing is certain, but it's a good time to plan your future travel - The News Star

State Library of Kansas announces the 2020 Kansas Notable Books – Leavenworth Times

TOPEKAState Librarian Eric Norris announced today the 15th annual selection of Kansas Notable Books. The fifteen books feature quality titles with wide public appeal, written either by a Kansan, set in Kansas, or about a Kansas related topic.

"I am proud to present the 2020 Kansas Notable Book list. This years list covers a wide swath of our cultural and natural history," said Eric Norris, State Librarian. "The rich array of works on this years list examine petroglyphs across the prairie and go on fantastical high seas adventures with pirates; explore the careers of academics, athletes, and aviators; and consider the importance of family from the viewpoint of a young Exoduster in the 1880s and as a world traveler in a present day small western Kansas town. This years list will both educate and entertain. I encourage every Kansan to contact their local public library and celebrate the artists and artistry of Kansas."

A committee of librarians, academics, and historians nominated titles from a list of eligible books, and state librarian Eric Norris selected the final list. In 2006, the first Kansas Notable Books list was announced. Since then more than 200 books have been recognized for their contribution to Kansas literary heritage.

Kansas Notable Books is a project of the Kansas Center for the Book. The Kansas Center for the Book is a program at the State Library of Kansas and the state affiliate of the Library of Congress Center for the Book. The Kansas Center for the Book exists to highlight the states literary heritage and foster an interest in books, reading, and libraries.

For more information about Kansas Notable Books, visit https://kslib.info/2020KNB, call 785-296-3296, or email infodesk@ks.gov.

2020 Kansas Notable Books

Birds, Bones, and Beetles: The Improbable Career and Remarkable Legacy of University of Kansas Naturalist Charles D. Bunkerby Charles H. Warner (Lawrence) University Press of Kansas

A Constellation of Rosesby Miranda Asebedo (Manhattan) HarperTeen

Crumbled! (The Misadventures of Nobbin Swill)by Lisa Harkrader (Tonganoxie) Yellow Jacket

Follow Me Down to Nicodemus Townby A. LaFaye (Glen Carbon IL), illustrations by Nicole Tadgell (Oxford MA) Albert Whitman & Company

Headwinds: A Memoirby Edna Bell-Pearson (Overland Park) Meadowlark

The Healer's Daughter: A Novelby Charlotte Hinger (Hoxie) Five Star Publishing

How to Be a Family: The Year I Dragged My Kids Around the World to Find a New Way to Be Togetherby Dan Kois (Arlington VA) Little, Brown and Company

Journey to a Promised Land: A Story of the Exodusters(I Am America) by Allison Lassieur (Schenectady NY) Jolly Fish Press

Kansas City Chiefs Legends: The Greatest Coaches, Players and Front Office Execs in Chiefs Historyby Jeff Deters (Lawrence) Deters Publications

A Perfect Silhouetteby Judith Miller (Overland Park) Bethany House Publishers

Petroglyphs of the Kansas Smoky Hillsby Rex C. Buchanan (Lawrence), Burke W. Griggs (Lawrence), Joshua L. Svaty (Ellsworth) University Press of Kansas

The Reckless Oath We Made: A Novelby Bryn Greenwood (Lawrence) G.P. Putnams Sons

Steel Tide: A Seafire Novelby Natalie C. Parker (Lawrence) Razorbill

The Topeka School: A Novelby Ben Lerner (Brooklyn NY) Farrar, Straus and Giroux

What Color Is Night?by Grant Snider (Wichita) Chronicle Books

The State Library of Kansas To learn more, visit kslib.info.

Continued here:

State Library of Kansas announces the 2020 Kansas Notable Books - Leavenworth Times

The CDC Has Banned This One Thing Until October, Thanks to COVID – Best Life

The travel industry has taken an unprecedented hit thanks to the coronavirus pandemic, with airlines reporting record losses and tourism-related businesses such as hotels and restaurants held in limbo due to forced shutdowns and travel restrictions. But the cruise industry may be the most affected in both the short and long term, as the large ships that were once the early flashpoint sites of COVID-19 outbreaks have been legally unable to set sail since mid-March. Now, it would appear that they'll be sitting in port for even longer: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says it's extending its ban on cruises through September 30, thanks to increased COVID-19 cases.

While the agency's current moratorium on cruising through U.S. waters was set to lapse on July 24, recent figures have highlighted the danger of hitting the high seas before it's safe to do soespecially as an environment that is already known to spread contagious diseases. With 2,973 reported coronavirus infections and 34 COVID-19-related deaths on cruise ships in 2020, CDC Director Robert Redfield, MD, said in a statement that the numbers "revealed a total of 99 outbreaks on 123 different cruise ships, meaning that 80 percent of ships within U.S. jurisdiction were affected by COVID-19."

The CDC's no-sail order was originally issued on March 14, then extended the first time on April 15 before this most recent extension. The agency's decision comes weeks after the Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA), whose members include the largest cruise lines in the world, voluntarily extended their own agreement to suspend operations through September 15.

"Although we are confident that future cruises will be healthy and safe, and will fully reflect the latest protective measures, we also feel that it is appropriate to err on the side of caution to help ensure the best interests of our passengers and crewmembers," they announced in their June 19 press release, saying they would also be consulting with the CDC on appropriate safety measures.

RELATED: For more up-to-date information, sign up for our daily newsletter.

Cruise lines are now struggling with a way to update their experiences for a new post-pandemic future. The $45 billion industry is currently grappling with the fact that the older demographic that makes up the bulk of their repeat business is also the most likely to be seriously affected by coronavirus.

"The cruise industry is taking a holistic approach to planning for COVID-19 safety, when sailing is allowed, that would ideally entail a door-to-door strategy beginning at the time of booking through the passengers' return home," Bari Golin-Blaugrund, a spokeswoman for CLIA, toldThe New York Times in late June. However, in regard to any concrete plans or ideas on how to make the high seas safer for cruise passengers, she replied, "We're not there yet." And for more on how travel has been impacted by coronavirus, check out 13 Things You May Never See on Airplanes Again After Coronavirus.

See more here:

The CDC Has Banned This One Thing Until October, Thanks to COVID - Best Life

Coastal flooding in US will continue to increase as seas rise, report says – USA TODAY

Not all flood alerts are the same. Here's what you should take seriously. USA TODAY

It doesn't take a storm to inundate the coast with potentially ruinous floodwaters.

"Nuisance" or "sunny day" high-tide flooding is becoming more commonplace in the U.S., and a federal report released Tuesday by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration warns that such flooding will worsen in the decades to come as seas continue to rise.

Americas coastal communities and their economies are suffering from the effects of high-tide flooding, and its only going to increase in the future, said Nicole LeBoeuf, acting director of NOAAs National Ocean Service.

As sea-level rise continues, damaging floods that decades ago happened only during a storm now happen more regularly, such as during a full-moon tide or with a change in prevailing winds or currents, according to NOAA.

Although not mentioned in the report Tuesday, seas are rising in part because of climate change: According to an online NOAA fact sheet, "The two major causes of global sea level rise are thermal expansion caused by warming of the ocean (since water expands as it warms) and increased melting of land-based ice, such as glaciers and ice sheets."

In a call with reporters Tuesday, LeBoeuf saidthat "climate change and carbon emissions are a factor at play when we look at how tides are rising.

In 2019 alone, 19 locations along the east coast and Gulf coast set or tied records where rapidly increasing trends in high-tide flooding have emerged, NOAA said.

Evidence of a rapid increase in sea-level rise related flooding started to emerge about two decades ago, and now is very clear, the report said. NOAAs National Weather Service is issuing record numbers of watches (and) warnings for coastal flooding. This will become the new normal unless coastal flood mitigation strategies are implemented or enhanced.

Last year, the Southeast saw a threefold increase in flooding days compared to 2000. For example, Charleston, S.C., had 13 days where flooding reached damaging levels, compared to the two days that were typical in 2000.

Rob Kramer removes debris from a drain as tidal flooding inundated many downtown streets in Charleston, S.C., on Oct. 27, 2015, in Charleston, S.C. Just weeks after historic rains drenched the state, more flooding along the South Carolina coast brought another round of astronomical high tides often called king tides.(Photo: Paul Zoeller, AP)

And along the western Gulf coast, percentage increases were the highest, greater than fivefold. In Texas, Sabine Pass and Corpus Christi had 21 and 18 flooding days in 2019, and in 2000 those locations would typically only experience about one and three days, respectively.

"As a Chesapeake Bay resident, I see the flooding firsthand, and it is getting worse," said William Sweet, a NOAA oceanographer with the National Ocean Service and lead author of the report. "Records seem to be set every year. Communities are straddled with this growing problem."

By 2030, long-term projections show seven to 15 days of high-tide flooding for coastal communities nationally. By 2050, it rises to 25 to 75 days, suggesting high-tide flood levels may become the new high tide.

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/07/14/coastal-flooding-continue-increase-noaa-report-says/5437524002/

See more here:

Coastal flooding in US will continue to increase as seas rise, report says - USA TODAY

Ammonia could be the fuel of the future for shipping – Telegraph.co.uk

Typically, ammonia is made in a process known as steam reforming. Hydrogen is generated from a reaction involving methane, water and air, and then combined with nitrogen in a process known as the Haber method. However,carbon dioxide is produced as a byproduct.

Dr John Constable, director of the Renewable Energy Foundation, sees one fix for this that banks on carbon capture and storage, a relatively unproven technology that reels carbon dioxide from the air and stores it deep underground. If you can capture the carbon from steam methane reforming, it may be clean at the point of consumption, he says.

Another method picking up traction from Wrtsil involves the use of electricity generated by wind farms to split water into its constituent components of hydrogen and oxygen through a process known as electrolysis.

That hydrogen can then be combined with nitrogen pulled from the atmosphere to create ammonia in a way that has cut carbon emissions altogether. For years, the method has proved too costly given the high price of renewable energy, but it is getting cheaper. Hystad claims 400gW of wind turbines are due to be installed in the North Sea between now and 2050, more than 20 times the current output.

With clean options of generating ammonia emerging, the next challenge involves turning it into a form that can be used as fuel. Wrtsil is exploring the possibility of pumping ammonia 70m below sea level where high pressure can turn it into a liquid, while another option involves cooling the gas to -40 degrees C to liquefy it.

Once in a liquid form, ammonia can be used in a retrofitted internal combustion engine, such as the ones Wrtsil are looking at in existing ships, or can generate electricity in a reaction driven by a device known as a fuel cell.

The ability to create green ammonia is opening up potential applications far beyond the high seas too. A study led by Davennes team in Harwell has been investigating the potential for ammonia to replace kerosene as the go-to fuel in the aviation industry.

At a cruising altitude, ammonia could sit in the wings of a plane as a liquid, given the sub-zero temperatures 30,000ft in the air, and the engine would need few changes to accommodate for ammonia according to their research.

But there are some real hurdles to overcome to get ammonia working as a fuel.

In planes, ammonia could struggle as its energy density is a lot lower than kerosene, meaning much more fuel will be needed onboard. On the ground, wings would have to be refrigerated as ammonia is a gas in that atmosphere, Davenne says.

Read more from the original source:

Ammonia could be the fuel of the future for shipping - Telegraph.co.uk

New players emerge in Venezuelas oil industry amid U.S. sanctions – Global News

As U.S. sanctions scare away the worlds largest shippers from Venezuelas oil industry, new players are willing to brave the heightened risks and help keep socialist leader Nicolas Maduro afloat, according to a new report.

In the first year since the Trump administration imposed crushing economic sanctions on Venezuelas oil industry, port calls to Venezuela plunged by 46 per cent, according to C4ADS and IBI Consultants, two Washington-based think tanks focused on national security issues that authored the report.

But while overall tanker activity is down, less-scrupulous carriers are filling the void.

Relying on data from tracking systems that are mandatory on tankers, C4ADS identified 214 vessels that visited Venezuela in the year after sanctions were imposed, but not in the previous 12 months. Collectively, those ships accounted for 33 per cent of the countrys maritime traffic since the U.S. banned Americans from doing business with Venezuelas oil sector on Jan. 28, 2019. Almost half of those vessels visited Venezuela for the first time.

Story continues below advertisement

As the Trump administration has sought to deprive Maduro of easy cash from Venezuelas vast oil reserves, it has sanctioned more than 50 vessels. Its also issued new guidelines urging the maritime industry to beef up its vigilance for sanctions-busting activity on the high seas.

Some ship captains and their employers have responded by turning off their transponders and going dark for weeks to hide tankers brimming with crude. The ships then frequently unload their hidden cargo on the high seas in risky ship-to-ship transfers, making it harder for authorities to track their ultimate destination.

Trending Stories

Meanwhile, domestic fuel shortages have led Venezuela to seek relief from Iran, which in May sent five tankers of gasoline to the South American country.

While U.S. sanctions succeeded in reducing the aggregate volume of recorded port calls in Venezuela, persistent dark voyage activity, the continued importance of particular routes, and the entry of new players showed the limits of enforcement, the report said.

Story continues below advertisement

China, India and Cuba replaced the U.S. as the top destinations for Venezuelas heavy crude, making up a combined 37 per cent of all voyages from Venezuela in the year following sanctions. Still, traffic to those three countries was down by around 20 per cent in the year following sanctions. In total, nine countries including Bahrain, South Africa and Portugal emerged as new destinations that had not appeared in the previous year.

The report is based on satellite tracking data from maritime analytics firm Windward and corporate data provided by IHS Markit. It covers the effects of sanctions on shipping networks from Jan. 28, 2019 when the U.S. imposed sanctions in support of opposition leader Juan Guaidos campaign to remove Maduro and doesnt include the effects on activity from the coronavirus pandemic.

The 103 tankers visiting Venezuela for the first time appear to be owned by just 41 companies, according to the report. Three companies with the largest fleets belong to TMS Tankers Limited, Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited and Delta Tankers Limited, C4ADS and IBI said. The three Greece-based companies, none of which are sanctioned, did not respond to an AP request for comment.

2020 The Canadian Press

View post:

New players emerge in Venezuelas oil industry amid U.S. sanctions - Global News

How Covid-19 has disrupted shipping operations and seafarers’ lives – BusinessLine

Dhyan Ramakrishnan, 28, a seafarer of third officer rank hailing from Payyoli, a municipal town in Keralas Kozhikode district, does farming and gardening for his physical and mental well-being.

He has been ashore for ten months. His efforts to join a ship have been delayed due to travel restrictions imposed by governments world over to deal with the Covid-19 pandemic.

Dhyan is frustrated at the long wait to join a ship on his next contract, managing his finances tightly in the absence of any income.

In Varanasi, Varsha, wife of chief officer Pankaj Gupta, is disappointed that her husband is not home after his original contract ended in mid-March.

Seafarers are keeping the global supply chain moving and fulfilling the needs of nations but are not allowed to disembark on completion of their contracts.

I am not just talking about my husband, there are thousands of people who are still stranded on ships. Neither are they able to work properly on the ship nor can they come back home, she explains to BusinessLine.

Varsha lives with her three-year-old son and 75-year-old father-in-law, who underwent surgery in January. The child also had a surgery in February and was admitted to hospital for three days. I managed all this alone. Now, I am also diagnosed with uterus tuberculosis. I have to visit the doctor frequently. At this time of epidemic, I cannot go outside with a child. Now it is very difficult to manage this situation alone, she says.

Due to Covid-19 and the lockdown, it was not practical for Guptas company to sign him off, though his reliever is already on-board. Now, governments and many companies are taking the initiative for crew change, but I am not seeing any positive response and efforts from his company, Varsha says. They are waiting for resumption of international flights while saying the Vande Bharat Mission flights are not for seafarers.

I cant explain my physical and mental condition. With every passing day, I am getting more and more frustrated. I want my husband at home. We really need him, she adds.

The outbreak of coronavirus and the consequent travel restrictions across the world and the lockdown in India have hit the maritime industry hard in terms of crew change and repatriation of seafarers.

Travel restrictions have also doused the job prospects of Indian seafarers working on foreign-flag ships due to their inability to join ships at foreign ports. The restlessness of crew working on board and those waiting on land for their next assignment is palpable. Seafarers on board were unable to sign off from ships after their contract ended due to stoppage of international flights to return home. They had their tenures extended, posing a humanitarian crisis to the global shipping industry, not to mention the safety of ships and the cargo.

Shipping is one of the very few industries that continue to run, carrying cargo including essentials such as medicines, food and energy, during the worst pandemic to have hit the world in many decades. While the virus has ravaged businesses and taken away tens of thousands of jobs on land, shipping is one industry where employment is still available. This is because of the nature of the industry where crew rotation every 4-8 months on ships is the global rule.

Each ship has a minimum manning number stipulated by global laws. If that is breached, the ship is considered unseaworthy and cannot sail.

Government authorities and industry representatives have sensed they have a problem on their hands. After all, India is one of the top suppliers of crew to the global shipping industry. The country has 2,08,800 seafarers employed on Indian and foreign-flag ships, accounting for about 10 per cent of the global seafarers and is ranked the third largest supplier of crew to the global shipping industry.

Indias role in world trade is small in relation to its shipping workforce, as a result of which ships are not contracted to touch Indian shores too often. However, due to the breakdown of logistics (air travel and visa clearances) worldwide, Indian staff are not able to hand over duty to those on the next leg of the trip. Their contracts are extended for months on end. This leads to crew fatigue, with serious implications for ship safety and cargo.

India was the first to design a detailed standard operating procedure to enable crew change of Indian seafarers at Indian ports and anchorages. It is also the only industry whose employees have been allowed to travel abroad for the purposes of crew change using chartered flights.

These efforts have eased the situation only a wee bit as the complex, time-consuming approval processes for bringing back seafarers on the return leg of chartered flights, the challenges involved in moving seafarers from distant places to airports in Delhi, Mumbai and Chennai for onward journey and vice versa, the constantly changing rules in crew change hubs overseas, lack of visas due to closure of embassies and visa offices and the closure of maritime training institutes, critical for revalidation of seafarers certificates continue to roil the industry.

Ship owners and managers have also resorted to the last and expensive option of diverting ships from their normal course to the anchorages of Indian ports just to drop off crew and for on-board replacements. The diversions entail loss of revenue to the ship owner as the ship is considered to be off-hired during such detour, besides the extra insurance costs.

The situation has eased substantially as far as backlog cases are concerned. However, crew change being an on-going process, the effort needs to continue on a sustained basis, says Amitabh Kumar, Director General of Shipping.

More than 1,00,000 Indian seafarers are on board ships at any given point. Between May 19 and July 9, 224 charter flights run by ship management and crewing firms have helped 15,538 seafarers (including staff employed on cruise liners) to return home and about 7,610 to join ships overseas. Besides, some 17,000 seafarers have signed off from ships calling at Indian ports and some 7,000 have boarded ships since March 23.

The difference in the number of seafarers who have signed off and signed on is an indication of the number of jobs lost by Indians, say industry officials.

Four months into the lockdown, the shipping industry is still waiting for the world to recognise seafarers as key workers. A call by several international agencies, including the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), the International Labour Organisation and even the United Nations, to designate seafarers as key workers to facilitate their free movement has fallen on deaf ears of governments, including in India.

This treatment to an industry that carries over 90 per cent of world trade only shows how little has been done, says Deepak Singh, a Delhi-based third engineer waiting for his next ship since August last year.

Many companies cannot afford charter flights. In fact, seafarers working in smaller companies are forced by their manning agents to extend contracts, says Kolkata-based Captain Kunal Das, who has been at sea on board a bulk carrier for over eight months now.

Depression, anxiety, stress and insecurity are at highest levels in seafarers both on-board and ashore.

It is difficult to understand why, even as they deliver the products we need to survive the current crisis, seafarers are being denied basic human rights, says Captain Rajesh Unni, Founder and CEO of ship management firm Synergy Group.

To all intents and purposes, seafarers are enslaved to global trade. By denying them freedom of movement, seafarers are imprisoned in their place of work, he says.

The shipping industry has done everything in its power to bang the drum loud and hard about their plight, but progress is proving painfully slow. We need a systematic approach to crew changeovers, not ad hoc sticking plasters. We need airports opened up, and aircraft landing slots and clearances granted with far more urgency. We need visas to be fast-tracked. And, more than anything, we need politicians and civil servants to help us cut through the red tape, Unni adds.

Whatever the Indian government has done, the bottom line is that its all too little too late, says Kalpesh Dave, a third mate, from Pune.

We are chartering flights, pooling ships to and from ports and mobilising enormous resources and efforts for very little gain, says Bjorn Hojgaard, chief executive officer at Hong Kong-based Anglo-Eastern Univan Group, one of the worlds top ship management companies.

Despite IMO together with industry having served up the operating procedures for safe crew change to governments worldwide and despite the repeated appeals from industry organisations about the need to act now, the relaxations that we have seen are not enough to even catch up with the backlog of delayed relief. As a consequence, stress and anxiety, both with the people on board the ships but certainly also with their colleagues ashore who have been anxiously waiting for a contract and a ship, continue to grow, says Hojgaard.

The closure of maritime training institutes is another key area of concern for seafarers whose employment certificates have expired or are expiring soon and need to be revalidated.

To provide relief and facilitate jobs, the Directorate General of Shipping (DG Shipping) has extended the validity of seafarers certificates that are expiring on or before December 31 till December 31, 2021. The DG Shipping has also framed the standard operating procedure for revalidation of certificates of seafarers intending to join ships prior to October 31.

This is because seamen whose certificates are expiring in January, February and March 2021 are not being considered for allotment of ships and will remain jobless. Employers typically demand at least 6 to 12 months validity of all certificates prior to joining.

Seafarers say that resuming international flights is the only solution for smooth signing off and joining ships. This is a call the government has to take. But this does not look like happening in the near future. For the time being, the ordeal of crew on the high seas continues.

Originally posted here:

How Covid-19 has disrupted shipping operations and seafarers' lives - BusinessLine

‘Greyhound’ director says the movie was made without any water – Insider – INSIDER

Gone are the days when movie productions would have to film on a large body of water to tell stories set out in the ocean. But it's still rare not to use any water to make that kind of movie.

Turns out that's what the Tom Hanks World War II high seas movie "Greyhound" (available now on Apple TV Plus) pulled off thanks to a mix of dazzling CGI and game developer tech.

Director Aaron Schneider ("Get Low") admits he's always been taken by the tech side of the business before directing he was a cinematographer for years. But while teaming with Hanks to direct the star's script about an inexperienced US Navy captain (Hanks) whose destroyer leads a merchant ship convoy against German U-boats during World War II, Schneider got to go full-on geek.

Though Schneider and Hanks had been talking about making "Greyhound" since late 2017, the urgency by Steven Spielberg to make "The Post" (in which Hanks plays Washington Post editor-in-chief Ben Bradlee) put things on hold.

That turned out to be a huge benefit for Schneider. He used that time to heavily research the battleships and submarines that took part in the "Battle of the Atlantic," which is what "Greyhound" is loosely based on.

Instead of reading a few books and watching a couple of World War II movies, Schneider built a website of everything he needed to know about US Navy battleships and German submarines.

"Greyhound" director Aaron Schneider. Robyn Beck/Getty

"Pictures, YouTube links, Wikipedia pages, high-resolution Navy archive photographs. I collected all these things and built a research website that was indexed and categorized in a way that as the crew came on the movie, they could take a deep dive into whatever they wanted," Schneider told Insider.

Then he went a step further. The director and a friend flew to Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and took around 10,000 photographs of the retired USS Kidd, which is one of the last existing destroyers still in World War II configuration.

Those photos were then used to create a photogrammetry essentially a 3D model of the entire destroyer. Schneider used the model to figure out where he would place the camera when shooting the movie while keeping the claustrophobic feel of being on a destroyer.

Finally, it was time to shoot the movie in early 2018, but the tech didn't end.

"Every drop of water in the movie is digital," Schneider said. "Anything you see out the window or over Tom's shoulder. In fact, most of the fire is digital, too."

Typically a movie set at sea will at some point have scenes shot in a giant water tank, but that wasn't the case with "Greyhound." The chilly Atlantic Ocean, the thrilling battles between the destroyers and U-boats, and even the ice that builds up outside the ship's pilothouse was all created with CGI.

Thanks to the photogrammetry of the USS Kidd, the production knew the layout of every inch of a World War II-era destroyer. That was vital in how it built the pilothouse and balconies that we see Hank's Commander Ernest Krause character navigate through most of the movie, which was all built on a soundstage surrounded by a green screen.

Those scenes were then matched by CGI shots of the rest of the massive ship.

"Greyhound." Apple TV Plus

To really get the feel that Krause and his destroyer were at sea, Schneider used NVIDIA WaveWorks, a plug-in program usually used by game developers that provides interactive ocean simulation.

"It creates an open ocean and floats an object on the ocean based on the physical mass," Schneider said. "So if I type in the model type of a boat, it will float that object the way it would be on the ocean."

In other words, the program provided realistic blocking for the movie's boats based on real-life physics. The location of the destroyers, merchant ships, and the U-boats and battle sequences were all done through WaveWorks.

"The goal was always to use real physics into believing that this was actually photographed in a real-world kind of way," Schneider said. "If you wanted a big close shot where the ship goes by, well, if you were doing that in real life you could be on a little Zodiac, but a Zodiac floats differently on the water than a big camera ship, so you tell the program, 'float me on a Zodiac' and then all of a sudden the sea is affecting your camera ship much differently but still in a physically real way."

The result is a thrilling 90-minute movie of non-stop battles on the high sea. But as we've learned here, the real bit of movie magic was that Tom Hanks was dry and warm the whole time while filming his scenes.

"Greyhound" is currently available on Apple TV Plus.

Continued here:

'Greyhound' director says the movie was made without any water - Insider - INSIDER

Is the President Aware this House is Falling? – THISDAY Newspapers

BY DELE MOMODU

Fellow Nigerians, before the general elections of last year, I thought I had seen enough of the shenanigans of those in power. Things got so bad that I simply gave up. I even vowed to stay on my lane and let the heavens fall on all of us, if it must. Any independent and impartial observer would have concluded that those elections would be neither free nor fair. Any objective Nigerian watching from the inside, and participating, would also have felt the same. Both major parties were guilty of denying the Nigerian people the fair elections they desired, but the major culprit in ensuring the elections were certainly not free was the ruling Party. What we therefore ultimately witnessed was not an election. It was a shambolic, reckless and irresponsible act of crass political brigandage.

The leading political parties prepared for all-out war and it just happened that the bigger rigger won using all the power, force and might of the military, police and security agencies which were absolutely at its beck and call and ready disposal. It was no surprise, given the way the whole farce of an election had been set up, that those who control the appurtenances of power sought to completely obliterate anyone who stood in their paths.

Notwithstanding the shoddy and shameful elections, I was ready to excuse the excesses of the government in the first four years with the hope that once the second term had been achieved, we would hopefully see a government with drive and purpose. I should have known better. A leopard does not change its spots. So, by now, over one year into the second term, it is disgraceful that the leading political parties are yet to settle seriously into the onerous business of governance and indeed, opposition. The opposition has obviously capitulated without as much as a whimper, and the hapless Nigerian citizens are left practically voiceless.

In the first four years of the APC government, it was easy to place all the blame for the failure of the past on the previous ruling party, PDP. No worries. However more than a year into the second coming of the government, the current ruling party has not performed any better. Some would say that its fared even worse especially when you consider the goodwill and sheer weight of expectations that trailed the government when it first attained power.

Im sure those who know how to deceive every government in power would be telling our President that all is well. They would congratulate him on having been able to fix most of the intractable problems of the country and virtually call him the Messiah. It is almost impossible for the President of Nigeria not to be afflicted with the Messianic Complex given the hero worshipping and idolising that goes with the bootlicking that is prevalent and all-pervading amongst our political class. No matter what the praise singers cry and drum out, all is not well in the polity and in our country as I will demonstrate in a jiffy, before offering my suggestions, as always. If after over five years, our country is still tottering, wobbling and virtually on the brink of collapse, the President in particular, and our political gladiators in general, must be told, without any atom of ambiguity, that Nigeria is haemorrhaging to death, at the speed of light. I will now lay out my reasons one by one.

The foundation of any government such as ours is supposed to be DEMOCRACY. Can anyone in good conscience say what we have today is close to that? The answer is a capital NO. The foundation of Democracy itself is FREEDOM. Can anyone say Nigerians enjoy freedom of thought, association and choice in Nigeria today? The answer is NO. The foundation of freedom is TOLERANCE. Has this government tolerated the plurality of the different nationalities and religions that make up Nigeria? The answer is NO. The foundation of tolerance is COMPASSION. Is this government compassionate towards the sufferings and cries of the generality of the people of Nigeria? The answer is NO. The unfolding crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic which the government is clearly incapable of handling with any degree of competence is a clear example of a government that is unserious in the extreme. The people deserve much more than the grave injustice being done to them at the altar of expediency by people who do not know how to handle a simple dilemma not to talk of a major emergency or calamity. The foundation of compassion is HUMILITY. Is our leader humble enough to appreciate the citizens and reach out to them directly, like he did, even if only to a limited extent, during political campaigns? The answer, unfortunately, again is NO. It seems the people have been used, abused, dumped and discarded. Soldiers and civilians are dying like rats and theyve become hidden statistics, because the Government is neither brave nor bold to tell the public the truth. Either as a result of the war against criminal insurgency and banditry in the North East of the country or the nationwide catastrophe caused by the Corona Virus pandemic, lives are being wasted and people are falling like flies that have been sprayed with Shelltox. Even dogs and other pets enjoy obituaries and decent burials in some countries. Not anymore in Nigeria. Shallow graves and unceremonious body disposals as well as mass burials have become the order of the day, yet we are still being kept in the dark about these sad and unfortunate incidents.

Lets now rewind and go back to the issue of Democracy. We are an extravagant lot. The variant of Democracy we chose is not what we can afford. We are operating an American Presidential system which thrives on political and corporate largesse when we have neither of these in our armoury. We are practising Capitalism without capital. We are wasting and frittering away our scarce resources on massaging human parasites called politicians instead of building our infrastructure deficit and servicing our desperate and unreasonable debts. If I didnt have the opportunity of visiting other African countries, I would have thought this is how they all squander their resources. But that is not the situation. Other African countries are more prudent even if there is some corruption in their administration. They certainly are not brazen in the manner in which they go about that sort of nefarious activity. In Nigeria, our politicians actually legitimise their looting by passing legislation to give effect to the grand larceny that they are performing under the nose of the forlorn and wretched citizenry. Our matter is now looking like a curse was cast on us by a spellbinder or sorcerer and the man has since thrown the padlock and its key into the Atlantic Ocean and there is no one to set us free.

Political systems, philosophy, and principles are sustained by ideology. Sadly, we have none because weve kept our country on the spot. We enthrone mediocres, the criminal elements or worse. Some say we are on autopilot and that is what is making us continue as a nation. I dont know about that. What I do know is that we are radarless and rudderless. We have no direction. We are like a shipwrecked vessel on the high seas bobbing and drifting about from one direction to the other, simply surviving because no strong waves have yet come to overturn it and end the misery of the ill-fated souls of passenger and crew.

So, politicians can wake up in APC and go to bed in PDP and vice versa. Lets leave PDP alone for now, they now appear to more composed and comported than APC. Who would have thought that five years ago? The ruling party has become a monumental nuisance, disgrace and unmitigated disaster to our dear beloved country. Barely one year into second term, the APC apparatchik are already positioning themselves for the 2023 general elections. They have thrown caution and decorum to the winds. Thats the basis for the spate of unashamed and unabashed political fisticuffs and brawls ongoing in most parts of the country.

APC started its reign in 2015 with a bad omen. Instead of quickly putting its house in place and getting its acts together, they spent a total of four years pursuing and fighting some parts of the union of strange bedfellows that formed APC. They became so riotously cantankerous that people wondered if they thought they were still in opposition. It was so shocking that a Party that fought so much to attain power could not manage its victory and glory even for a day. The centre had been broken from the first day when they could not even agree on their Principal officers in the National Assembly.

As if it was not bad enough in the first term of this Presidency, the infighting in the seat of power in Abuja during this second term is atrociously unbelievable and abominable. There are factions in the Presidents political and personal families, operating directly under his nose, and he appears to be helpless and hapless. What could be worse than being treated like a lame duck this early in your second term. Im aware that, on paper, the President has been sold many laudable projects that could catapult Nigeria truly to the next level, but unspeakable stealing, perfidious conduct and an irrational war of attrition wont let them ever achieve a meaningful part of them. How tragic.

The main cardinal reasons some of us fell for the Buhari Presidency were as follows. That PDP had overstayed its welcome in power and was speedily leading Nigeria towards Golgotha. Buhari was seen as the last Saint standing who would have the moral right to fight corruption to its marrow and rid us of this cankerworm. That Buhari was antisocial and would curb the excessive proclivity of our politicians for outlandish lifestyles. That Buhari as a retired military Major General would chase Boko Haram and other bandits to the pits of hell and our security challenges would be over. That Buhari would put all the monies saved from different sources to judicious use and good causes. I leave you my readers to reach your personal conclusions on where we are with the expectation and hope. Mine is that our hopes were grossly misplaced and have been unfortunately dashed. I doubt if the NPN and its offspring PDP performed this woefully. Those who wish to bury their heads in sand like the proverbial ostrich are truly welcome to do so. We are at a sorry pass and nothing seems to matter anymore.

My message to President Muhammadu Buhari is that this house built with spittle and dew is collapsing and only a miracle can sustain it any further. The current battle for the soul of the cash cow, called NDDC, is so grisly that this government may not recover from it in a while, if ever. And even worse is the unceremonious manner the former Acting EFCC Chairman was abducted in James Bond fashion in broad daylight and whisked off to the Presidential villa for a phantom investigation by jurists and personalities who should know from past experience that what goes around comes around, while other security agents were busy denying the obvious story. I have no doubt that some people in government have picked on a wrong customer this time. This Ibrahim Magu has been on their wanted list for a long time. They should have muscled enough firepower to remove him during the screening. Once they missed that chance, they automatically turned him into a scorched snake. So, he already knew who his enemies were and has had ample time and resources to plan a rematch and plot the undoing of his traducers and adversaries. Again, they botched it by not finishing what they started very promptly.

I foresee torrents of salacious and scurrilous tales flying around sooner than later. The theatre of the absurd has already commenced in earnest. Fake and false news abound. Social media is agog and awash with moonlight tales of the good, the bad and the ugly. Trust me, it will get worse and uglier! The child who says his mother wont have a good sleep must also stay awake all night. The genies and the worms are already crawling out of the Pandora boxes and cans. I see this house collapsing, like a pack of cards, like a straw hut blown away by the mere breath of the big bad wolf! Corruption is indeed fighting back, but from the inside, and against itself!

The spectators have ordered more popcorns

Excerpt from:

Is the President Aware this House is Falling? - THISDAY Newspapers

State library announces the 2020 Kansas Notable Books – GREAT BEND TRIBUNE – Great Bend Tribune

TOPEKA State Librarian Eric Norris announced the 15th annual selection of Kansas Notable Books. The 15 books feature quality titles with wide public appeal, written either by a Kansan, set in Kansas, or about a Kansas related topic.

I am proud to present the 2020 Kansas Notable Book list. This years list covers a wide swath of our cultural and natural history, said Eric Norris, State Librarian. The rich array of works on this years list examine petroglyphs across the prairie and go on fantastical high seas adventures with pirates; explore the careers of academics, athletes, and aviators; and consider the importance of family from the viewpoint of a young Exoduster in the 1880s and as a world traveler in a present day small western Kansas town. This years list will both educate and entertain. I encourage every Kansan to contact their local public library and celebrate the artists and artistry of Kansas.

A committee of librarians, academics, and historians nominated titles from a list of eligible books, and state librarian Eric Norris selected the final list. In 2006, the first Kansas Notable Books list was announced. Since then more than 200 books have been recognized for their contribution to Kansas literary heritage.

Kansas Notable Books is a project of the Kansas Center for the Book. The Kansas Center for the Book is a program at the State Library of Kansas and the state affiliate of the Library of Congress Center for the Book. The Kansas Center for the Book exists to highlight the states literary heritage and foster an interest in books, reading, and libraries.

For more information about Kansas Notable Books, visit https://kslib.info/2020KNB, call 785-296-3296, or email infodesk@ks.gov.

2020 Kansas Notable Books

Birds, Bones, and Beetles: The Improbable Career and Remarkable Legacy of University of Kansas Naturalist Charles D. Bunkerby Charles H. Warner (Lawrence) University Press of Kansas

A Constellation of Rosesby Miranda Asebedo (Manhattan) HarperTeen

Crumbled! (The Misadventures of Nobbin Swill)by Lisa Harkrader (Tonganoxie) Yellow Jacket

Follow Me Down to Nicodemus Townby A. LaFaye (Glen Carbon IL), illustrations by Nicole Tadgell (Oxford MA) Albert Whitman & Company

Headwinds: A Memoirby Edna Bell-Pearson (Overland Park) Meadowlark

The Healers Daughter: A Novelby Charlotte Hinger (Hoxie) Five Star Publishing

How to Be a Family: The Year I Dragged My Kids Around the World to Find a New Way to Be Togetherby Dan Kois (Arlington VA) Little, Brown and Company

Journey to a Promised Land: A Story of the Exodusters(I Am America) by Allison Lassieur (Schenectady NY) Jolly Fish Press

Kansas City Chiefs Legends: The Greatest Coaches, Players and Front Office Execs in Chiefs Historyby Jeff Deters (Lawrence) Deters Publications

A Perfect Silhouetteby Judith Miller (Overland Park) Bethany House Publishers

Petroglyphs of the Kansas Smoky Hillsby Rex C. Buchanan (Lawrence), Burke W. Griggs (Lawrence), Joshua L. Svaty (Ellsworth) University Press of Kansas

The Reckless Oath We Made: A Novelby Bryn Greenwood (Lawrence) G.P. Putnams Sons

Steel Tide: A Seafire Novelby Natalie C. Parker (Lawrence) Razorbill

The Topeka School: A Novelby Ben Lerner (Brooklyn NY) Farrar, Straus and Giroux

What Color Is Night?by Grant Snider (Wichita) Chronicle Books

Excerpt from:

State library announces the 2020 Kansas Notable Books - GREAT BEND TRIBUNE - Great Bend Tribune

This cute lil’ underwater drone just spent 4 years ~ vibing ~ in the Atlantic – The Next Web

Credit: Teledyne Marine - Edited

When it comes to autonomous vehicles, theres a lot of focus on American electric vehicle manufacturer Tesla at the moment. But I want you to cast your net a little wider, and divert your attention to the high seas for just a moment.

Out in the Atlantic Oceans choppy waters, anautonomous underwater drone has just completed a circumnavigationcompletely unaided by humans. The Slocum G2 Glider, named Silbo, took over four years, 1,273 days to be exact, to complete its journey.

[Read: Theres yet another proposal for an EV charger emoji]

It undertook the journey in four legs. In 2016, after having receiving modifications to its energy bay and thruster, Slibo set sail from Cape Cod, Massachusetts with Ireland in its sights. It covered the 6,557 km journey in 330 days.

From here Silbo then went to the Canary Islands covering 3,695 km in 178 days, which was a bit of a homecoming for the AUV. The Canaries were Silbos original destination during its maiden voyage back in 2011, after it set off for the first time from its home in Iceland, where it wasmanufactured by Teledyne Marine, an autonomous underwater vehicle maker.

From the Canary Islands, Silbo flew 6,256 km across the Atlantic Ocean again heading to St. Thomas on the US Virgin Islands. The unit was recovered by local university students and Teledyne technicians that replaced its batteries and set it out for its final leg in under 24 hours.

After St. Thomas, Silbo headed on a 6,236 km trip back to Marthas Vineyard, an island off the coast of Massachusetts, which took 348 days. In total, the underwater autonomous glider covered 22,744 km.

Throughout its journey, various scientists from around the globe interacted with Silbo and used the data it was gathering for a variety of applications.

Over the course of its four-year voyage, Silbo mostly collected weather data about hurricanes, storms, and ocean conditions, taking more than 5,000 data readings that helped with metalogical forecasting. Its also helped researchers better understand the demands of long distance unmanned underwater explorations.

Despite the long period of time spent at sea, Silbo only required the occasional battery change and cleaning, and suffered one scratch to its hull that needed repair.

Ill be honest, I dont know much about autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV), but Silbo has certainly sparked my curiosity. One thing is for sure, the AUV community seems pretty stoked about it.

An Epic mission! A technological achievement, a global team building achievement, with data impact on hurricanes and others. A 4-year mission for the record books. Congrats to all involved! said Scott Glenn, Board of Governors Professor Rutgers University.

Read next: Facebook gears up to take on TikTok with Instagram Reels' worldwide launch

Do you want to get the sassiest daily tech newsletter every day, in your inbox, for FREE? Of course you do: sign up for Big Spam here.

Read the original post:

This cute lil' underwater drone just spent 4 years ~ vibing ~ in the Atlantic - The Next Web

Exclusive: U.S. turns screws on maritime industry to cut off Venezuela’s oil – Reuters

LONDON/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several companies that certify vessels are seaworthy and ship insurers have withdrawn services to tankers involved in the Venezuelan oil trade as the United States targets the maritime industry to tighten sanctions on the Latin American country.

FILE PHOTO: An oil tanker is seen in the sea outside the Puerto La Cruz oil refinery in Puerto La Cruz, Venezuela July 19, 2018. Picture taken July 19, 2018. REUTERS/Alexandra Ulmer/File Photo

U.S. sanctions have driven Venezuelas oil exports to their lowest levels in nearly 80 years, starving President Nicolas Maduros socialist government of its main source of revenue and leaving authorities short of cash for essential imports such as food and medicine.

The sanctions are part of U.S. efforts to weaken Maduros grip on power after Washington and other Western democracies accused him of rigging a 2018 re-election vote. Despite the countrys economic collapse, Maduro has held on and frustrated the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump.

Maduros government says the United States is trying to seize Venezuelas oil and calls the U.S. measures illegal persecution that heap suffering on the Venezuelan people.

Washington has honed in on the maritime industry in recent months in efforts to better enforce sanctions on the oil trade and isolate Caracas, Washingtons special envoy on Venezuela Elliott Abrams told Reuters.

What you will see is most shipowners and insurance and captains are simply going to turn away from Venezuela, Abrams told Reuters in an interview.

Its just not worth the hassle or the risk for them.

The United States is pressuring shipping companies, insurers, certifiers and flag states that register vessels, he said.

Ship classification societies, which certify safety and environmental standards for vessels, are feeling the heat for the first time.

The United States is pressuring classifiers to establish whether vessels have violated sanctions regulations and to withdraw certification if so as a way to tighten sanctions further, a U.S. official told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Without certification, a vessel and its cargo become uninsured. Ship owners would also be in breach of commercial contracts which require certificates to be maintained. In addition, port authorities can refuse entry or detain a ship.

London-headquartered Lloyds Register (LR), one of the worlds leading ship classifiers, said it had withdrawn services from eight tankers that were involved in trade with Venezuela.

In accordance with our programme for complying with sanctions laws, where we become aware of vessels operating in breach of relevant sanctions laws, LR classification has been withdrawn, a Lloyds Register spokeswoman said.

Abrams said the pressure on the maritime industry was working.

We have had a number of shippers that come to us and say, We just had our insurance company withdraw the insurance, and the ship is on the high seas and weve got to get to port. Could you give us a license for one week?, Abrams said.

In June, the United States designated six shipping companies - two of them based in Greece - and six tankers they owned for participating in proscribed Venezuelan trade.

Another leading ship classifier, Hamburg-headquartered DNV GL Maritime, said it had suspended services for three of those vessels in June.

The company resumed services when the United States removed those vessels from the list of sanctioned entities after the shipping companies that own and operate the vessels agreed to cease trade with Venezuela.

The United States has threatened sanctions on any company involved in the oil trade with Venezuela, and that has had a chilling effect even on trade permitted under sanctions.

Some oil companies are refusing to charter vessels that have called at Venezuelan ports in the past year, even if the voyage was exempt from sanctions.

The shipping sector has been at the receiving end of U.S. action on Venezuela and it has caused much uncertainty as no one knows who will be next, one shipping industry source said.

Insurers are also in a bind. They have been conservative in their interpretation of U.S. sanctions to avoid any potential violations, said Mike Salthouse, chairman of the sanctions sub-committee with the International Group association. The group represents companies that insure about 90% of the worlds commercial shipping.

If there is ambiguity as to what is lawful and what is unlawful it makes it almost impossible for an insurer to say whether someone has cover or not, he said.

Even after ships and companies are removed from the sanctions list, they may face difficulties, Salthouse said.

The stigma associated with a designation may last some time, he said.

Oil majors, for example, may review relationships with companies that own or manage vessels that the United States had designated and then removed to avoid any possible problems with other vessels, he said.

Venezuela is on the list of high risk areas set by officials from Londons insurance market.

If a vessel sails to Venezuela they have to notify the underwriter and it may be that the underwriter will not be able to cover them, said Neil Roberts, head of marine underwriting at Lloyds Market Association, which represents the interests of all underwriting businesses in Londons Lloyds market.

The industry faces the direct and real threat of having its trade stopped by a watchful U.S. administration because of an inadvertent infringement, he said.

This risk alone is enough to fuel the multiplication of compliance checks.

Some of the biggest global flag registries including Panama and Liberia are also looking more closely at ships that were involved in Venezuela trading as they come under U.S. pressure to withdraw registration for ships violating sanctions.

Maritime lawyers in Panama said its registry is fining vessels that do not comply with the U.S. maritime guidance issued in May. The registry is mostly de-flagging vessels targeted by multilateral sanctions rather than unilateral U.S. sanctions, the lawyers said.

Officials at Liberias registry did not respond to requests for comment.

U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, a former investor in shipping, helped craft the strategy targeting the maritime sector, sources said.

A Commerce Department spokesperson acknowledged Ross had worked with other government agencies to determine how to best hold accountable those who are evading U.S. sanctions on Venezuela.

Abrams vowed to keep up the pressure.

There are people who dont cooperate ... Well go after the ship, the ship owner, the ship captain.

Additional reporting by Marianna Parraga in Mexico City and Elida Moreno in Panama City; Editing by Simon Webb and Daniel Wallis

The rest is here:

Exclusive: U.S. turns screws on maritime industry to cut off Venezuela's oil - Reuters

Submarine Cables in the Law of Naval Warfare – Lawfare

No technology is as profoundly important to the global economy as the internet, which is dependent on the security of a vast network of some 750,000 miles of seabed cables that criss-cross the oceans depths. The interdependence of global submarine communication systems means that a break in one cable can have cascading effects on internet access to distant states. While the rules to protect this critical infrastructure in peacetime should be refurbished, the need to further develop the rules to secure this global infrastructure during periods of armed conflict is perhaps even more compelling. Although several peacetime treaties protect submarine cables from disruption and criminal acts, albeit weakly, the rules that apply during naval war are even more antiquated. Because the law of naval warfare is principally based on custom and state practice rather than treaties, there is considerable uncertainty over how submarine cables would fare in conflict at sea.

The internet facilitates $10 trillion in international financial transactions daily; submarine cables are the backbone of this distributed, global infrastructure. The critical importance of cables underscores the debate within Western states over the prudence of working with the Chinese communications conglomerate Huawei Marine. Russia and China both view submarine cables as strategic assets and could either tap them or sever them in any future conflict. Russias surface ship Yantar, for example, is monitored by Western naval forces since it is outfitted with cable-cutting gear and deep-sea submersibles.

The principal treaty governing submarine cables, adopted in 1884, sets forth an enlightened and balanced approach that is still followed today. The treaty is supplemented by the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf and the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). While Article 2 of the 1884 treaty criminalizes the breaking or injury of submarine cables done intentionally or through culpable negligence that results in disruption of telecommunication services, Article 4 requires cable owners and operators to indemnify each other for damaged cables and, under Article 7, pay for lost anchors and fishing nets sacrificed in order to avoid cutting a cable.

The 1958 convention recognizes that coastal states have sovereign rights over the resources of the seabed. These rights inhere to the coastal state, regardless of its ability to occupy the seabed, access the resources or exercise control over the area. This recognition of coastal state rights codified the U.S. claim in the 1945 Truman Proclamation, which had crystallized into customary international law. Article 4 of that treaty ensures that coastal states may not impede the laying or maintenance of submarine cables or pipelines on their continental shelves. Laying submarine cables is a high seas freedom, and Article 2(4) of the treaty recognizes that all states have a right to do so, while exercising reasonable regard for other statessuch as the coastal state. The act of laying submarine cables is also a high seas right under the peacetime rules reflected in Article 112 of UNCLOS. States are required to adopt necessary laws and regulations to address willful or culpably negligent damage to cables in accordance with Article 113. Articles 114 and 115 of UNCLOS reflect the long-standing regime of liability and indemnity and are derived from the 1884 treaty. Even in peacetime, as set forth by the rules reflected in UNCLOS, the submarine cable system is fragile. The International Cable Protection Committeean industry group that represents 97 percent of submarine cableshas reported coastal state delays and exorbitant costs, such as those imposed by India and Indonesia, that hinder undersea cable repairs on their continental shelves. China has a lax record of enforcement against its fishing vessels that cut submarine cables.

While Article 10 of the 1884 treaty specifies that warships and other government vessels have a right to verify the nationality of a merchant vessel if it is suspected of having broken a submarine cable, this provision is a departure from the concept of exclusive flag state jurisdiction over ships, as embodied in Article 92 of UNCLOS. Still, it is also possible to suggest that Article 10 persists even now by virtue of Article 30 of the 1958 convention, which states that prior agreements already in force shall continue. Thus, the rule that states may approach and visit merchant vessels to investigate cut or damaged cables may still apply to states party to the 1884 convention and the 1958 convention, or perhaps more broadly under customary international law.

While these peacetime instruments are rather dated and would benefit from new agreements to increase penalties for tampering and other criminal acts that disrupt their operation, the rules that apply during armed conflict are perhaps even more uncertain. The 1907 Hague Regulations forbid seizure or destruction of submarine cables connecting an occupied territory to a neutral territory, except in the case of absolute necessity. Furthermore, cut cables must be restored and compensation paid once the conflict is over. Not only does this exception practically negate the rule, but the regulations themselves apply only to war on landoccupied land at thatand are silent on destruction of cables in the open sea. State practice is clear, however, that cables connecting two points in enemy territory (or two enemy states) may be cut. (See p. 95 of volume 50 of International Law Studies, of the Stockton Center for International Law at the U.S. Naval War College.)

Article 15 of the 1884 treaty states that the rules on submarine cables do not affect the liberty of action of belligerent states during armed conflict. This is amplified in Rule 37 in the influential San Remo Manual on the Law Applicable to Conflict at Sea, which states that parties to a conflict shall take care to avoid damaging submarine cables and pipelines laid on the seabed that serve neutral states. Article 54 of the 1913 Oxford Manual of the Laws of Naval War prohibits cutting cables in neutral waters connecting neutral states with an enemy state. Such cables may be cut on the high seas only if the belligerent state doing so is conducting an effective blockade of the enemy state. Yet, even the Oxford Manual cautions that seizure or destruction of a submarine cable may not be done unless there is an absolute necessity. This rule applies without discrimination as to nationality of the owner of the cable, whether a natural person or corporate entity. Recently, the 2020 Oslo Manual on Select Topics on the Law of Armed Conflict recognized in Rule 67 that states that have laid submarine cables or pipelines, or whose nationals have done so, are entitled to take protective measures to prevent or terminate harmful interference of them.

It is unclear, however, the extent to which the rules set forth in the Oxford, San Remo and Oslo manuals, weak as they are, reflect the understanding of states. In short, the content of the law is murky. Further, the willingness of states to acknowledge even the rather circumspect restraints from customary law on their conduct during armed conflict at sea is doubtful. And while legal practitioners and scholars might devise some clarity, such as through the ongoing revision process of the San Remo Manual, the challenge of more crisply defining rights and duties of states concerning submarine cables is daunting. In the meantime, states may expect that adversaries plans to disrupt international submarine cables during naval warfare are limited only by their national laws and their imagination.

Read more:

Submarine Cables in the Law of Naval Warfare - Lawfare

The Wyvill family who were "an enemy of slavery" and the admiral who took the fight to end it to the high seas – The Northern Echo

OUR recent series on slavery shows how, even though the North-East is not associated with the trade, its tentacles and its riches reached into our communities.

But the trade also had its opponents, like the Wyvill family of Constable Burton, near Bedale, in North Yorkshire.

The Reverend Christopher Wyvill was nominally in charge of the parish of Black Notley in Essex but he very shrewdly married his cousin, Elizabeth, who was more than 20 years older than him but was the heir to the family hall.

When her father, Sir Marmaduke, died in 1774, he inherited Constable Burton Hall and an income comfortable enough for him to be able to give up his parish.

However, he was desperately keen to see improvements in Britain and in 1779 formed the Yorkshire Association, a group of hundreds of independent members of the gentry which lobbied for economic and Parliamentary reform. Among the many reforming causes to which he gave his support was William Wilberforces crusade to end slavery.

On his death in 1822, his eldest son, also Marmaduke, inherited Constable Burton.

He was the MP for York from 1820 to 1830 and he, too, sided with Wilberforce, declaring himself an enemy of slavery. In 1829, he presented a petition to Parliament signed by hundreds of people in York demanding freedom for slaves.

Admiral Christopher Wyvill, who crusaded against slavery on the east coast of Africa. Picture courtesy of Charles Wyvill

The reverends second son was Admiral Christopher Wyvill who in the 1840s commanded HMS Cleopatra. He took the battle against slavery to the high seas.

He was stationed off the Cape of Good Hope, patrolling the east coast of Africa, where Portuguese traders still harvested slaves in Mozambique and sold them to the plantations of the Americas.

The admiral would chase after the slavers. Some he would capture and liberate hundreds of captives; others, though, would flee from him and in their desperation to escape would run aground. The crew would get away but the human cargo beneath the battened hatches might not be so lucky.

HMS Vestal, the sister ship of HMS Cleopatra which was commanded in the 1840s by Admiral Christopher Wyvill on an anti-slavery crusade

Then the admiral took the fight onland.

The Portuguese, like the Lascelles family of Northallerton MPs whose story we told last week, would pen the Africans in a makeshift prison until there was a ship to sail them off to slavery.

The admiral would destroy these slave factories the permanently moored prison ships pioneered by Henry Lascelles MP or he would land and burn the barracoons the stockades where the captives were incarcerated.

At the end of a long naval career, the admiral retired to The Grange, which is opposite Bedale sports ground, where he died in 1863 aged 71.

See the article here:

The Wyvill family who were "an enemy of slavery" and the admiral who took the fight to end it to the high seas - The Northern Echo

Crew kidnappings on the rise off West Africa – defenceWeb

The International Maritime Bureau (IMB) has warned that violent attacks against ships and their crews have increased this year, with the Gulf of Guinea becoming increasingly dangerous for commercial shipping as it accounts for 90% of maritime kidnappings worldwide.

The Bureau on 15 July said that so far this year, 77 seafarers have been taken hostage or kidnapped for ransom since January, according to its latest piracy report.

Violence against crews is a growing risk in a workforce already under immense pressure, said IMB Director Michael Howlett. In the Gulf of Guinea, attackers armed with knives and guns now target crews on every type of vessel. Everyones vulnerable.

So far this year, 49 crew have been kidnapped for ransom in the Gulf of Guinea and held captive on land for up to six weeks. Rates are accelerating, with 32 crew kidnapped in the past three months alone. And incidents are happening further out to sea: two-thirds of the vessels were attacked on the high seas from around 20 to 130 nautical miles off the Gulf of Guinea coastline, the IMB said.

We need to change the risk-to-reward ratio for pirates operating within the Gulf of Guinea. Without an appropriate and proportionate deterrent, pirates and robbers will get more ruthless and more ambitious, increasing the risk to seafarers, said Howlett.

In one recent case commended by the IMB, the Nigerian Navy responded promptly to a distress call from a fishing vessel boarded and hijacked by armed assailants in Ivory Coast waters. As a result the crew were saved and the ship was prevented from being used as a possible mother vessel to carry out further attacks.

In another incident, a product tanker was attacked while underway around 127 nautical miles off Bayelsa, Nigeria. Eight armed pirates kidnapped ten crew as well as stealing cash, personal valuables, and ships property. The IMBs Piracy Reporting Centre contacted regional and international authorities, and a Nigerian Navy Security Vessel was dispatched. A nearby sister vessel helped the four remaining crewmembers to sail the tanker to a safe port. The kidnapped crew were released three weeks later.

Overall, the IMB said global ship hijackings are at their lowest since 1993. In total, IMBs Piracy Reporting Centre recorded 98 incidents of piracy and armed robbery in the first half of 2020, up from 78 in the second quarter of 2019.

Somalia was for many years the epicentre of maritime piracy, but this year no incidents were reported off Somalia. Vessels are urged to continue implementing Best Management Principles (BMP5) recommended practices while transiting these waters. The Somali pirates still maintain the capability for carrying out attacks, the IMB cautioned.

Visit link:

Crew kidnappings on the rise off West Africa - defenceWeb

Is it the End of the Road for India in the Enrica Lexie Incident? – The Wire

The award of the ad-hoc arbitral tribunal constituted under Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of Sea (UNCLOS), only the operative portions of which were publicly released last week, appears to have brought to an end, an eight year long tussle between New Delhi and Rome on the exercise of criminal jurisdiction over two Italian marines accused of manslaughter.

As many would remember, on February 15, 2012, two Italian marines Sgt. Massimiliano Latorre and Sgt. Salvatore Girone, deployed on board an oil tanker MV Enrica Lexieflying the Italian flag en route from Sri Lanka to Egypt, at roughly 20.5 nautical miles off the Indian coast, opened fire, killing two Indian fisherman on board an Indian vessel St. Antonyafter claiming to have mistaken them for pirates.

Soon after the incident, the Indian Coast Guard intercepted the Italian ship and directed it to shore.

The marines were then arrested and charged with murder by the Indian authorities. The Italian government, which claimed to have started its own criminal investigations, strongly contested Indias exercise of criminal jurisdiction over the marines and in any case argued that the marines, having been officially deployed with an anti-piracy mandate, enjoyed sovereign immunity.

Also read: Enrica Lexie: Did India Lose Case Against Italy Because of Lapses By its Own Supreme Court?

The incident and the detention of the marines greatly soured the relationship between Italy and India, with the former deciding to initiate arbitration proceedings under Annex VII of the UNCLOS.

Lotus 2.0?

The incident itself bore strong resemblance with another infamous high seas incident decades earlier that was the subject of a decision rendered by the permanent court of international justice (PCIJ). In the SS Lotus case, following a collision between a French steamer and a Turkish vessel on high seas, resulting in the death of eight Turkish nationals, France objected to Turkeys attempt to criminally prosecute the captain of the French steamer for his role in the collision.

The SS Lotus. Photo: http://www.alchetron.com

The PCIJ, equating the Turkish vessel to Turkish territory, held that under customary international law Turkey was entitled to assert jurisdiction over the persons responsible for the collisions since its effects have taken place on Turkish territory.

The decision thus laid down the foundation for the principle of objective territoriality. Many saw the decision as relevant to the Enrica Lexie incident, with Italy taking the place of France and India that of Turkey. However, there were some notable differences.

First, the Enrica Lexie incident did not take place on the high seas; rather it took place in an area beyond Indias territorial sea called the contiguous zone, where India exercises limited sovereign rights.

Second, the basis of the decision in SS Lotus was overruled through treaty law, specifically Article 97 of the UNCLOS which provided that in the event of a collision or any other incident of navigation on the high seas, involving penal responsibility of any person in the service of the ship, only the flag state or state of which the person is a national would be entitled to assert penal jurisdiction.

Third, the captain of the French vessel SS Lotus was not an agent of the French state. In contrast, the two marines were members of the Italian armed forces specifically deployed as per Italian law framed pursuant to anti-piracy resolutions passed by the United Nations Security Council.

Each of these differences appears to have ultimately proved critical to the outcome of the case. The Tribunal dismissed the reliance placed by Italy on Article 97 of the UNCLOS to argue that only Italy as the flag state was entitled to assert jurisdiction over the marines, presumably since the incident did not take place on the high seas and/or did not involve collision or other incident of navigation but rather shooting across vessels.

The Tribunal also found that by firing upon St. Antony, Italy effectively, interfered with an Indian vessels freedom of navigation under Articles 87 and 90 of the UNCLOS, and was entitled to pay compensation to India in connection with the loss of life, physical harm and material damage to the Indian vessel St. Antony and its crew.

Also read: Enrica Lexie: In Setback for India, Tribunal Says Countrys Courts Cant Try Italian Marines

Finally, although under the tribunals award India could exercise concurrent jurisdiction over the marines, as per the tribunal it was precluded from doing so on account of the immunity enjoyed by the marines as sovereigns state officials exercising sovereign functions, presumably under the rules of customary international law.

On immunity

It is this last part of the award finding that the marines are entitled to sovereign immunity that has proved particularly controversial. Under customary international law, as also reflected in the commentary to the Draft Articles on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their property, states (including its organs) and its property, subject to limited exceptions, enjoy immunity from the jurisdiction of the courts of another state.

One significant exception recognised in international law to such jurisdictional immunity, is with regard to the commercial activities of the state and over their commercial assets It is equally well accepted that the armed forces of a state, as an organ of the state, enjoy such jurisdictional immunity, for acts committed in their official functions. This underlying idea of sovereign immunity is also reflected in Articles 95 and 96 of the UNCLOS, which provide that warshipsand ships owned or operated by the state on governmental non-commercial service, enjoy complete immunity from the jurisdiction of any state other then the flag state.

Also read:India, Italy Spar Over Marines Issue Again as Ad-hoc Tribunal Reviews Enrica Lexie Case

However in the Enrica Lexie incident although the marines were indisputably members of Italian armed forces, they had been deputed on board a private Italian oil tanker, with an anti-piracy mandate. Thus according to India, Italy by deploying its armed forces on a private charter was acting in its commercial capacity, and the positions of the marines were equivalent to that of private armed security on board a vessel. However it is important to remember that, and as stressed by the Italians, the marines had been deployed under an Italian law framed pursuant to certain UN Security Council resolutions and had to adhere to rules of command, engagement, etc.

The majority of the tribunal appears to have found favour with the Italian position, whereas the dissenting members appear to have accepted that the Italian state (or its organs) was carrying on commercial activity.

Accordingly the majority of the tribunal, after taking note of the commitment made by Italy during the arbitral proceedings to resume criminal investigation against the marines for the incident, directed India to take steps to cease its exercise of criminal jurisdiction over the marines.

The road ahead

Naturally, as a result of losing jurisdiction over the marines, the award has not been met with much enthusiasm in India, especially in the state of Kerala where the deceased fishermen hailed from.

Enrica Lexie. Photo: Wikipedia/CC BY 3.0

However contrary to the expectations expressed in some quarters, the award of the tribunal at Hague is final and not subject to appeal in terms of Article 11 of Annexure VII to the UNCLOS read with the agreed rules of procedure. As an international law abiding nation, the Indian government has correctly decided to abide by the ruling of the tribunal and its application to the Supreme Court should be viewed in this context.

Having said that, the Indian governments role in this matter is far from over. Although the legal phase of the matter is over, the Indian government should continue to exercise diplomatic pressure on Italy, to ensure that the marines are subjected to a fair trial in Italy for their roles in the incident.

The government must also ensure that the compensation to be agreed with Italy, in terms of the directions of the tribunal, accurately reflects the material and moral loss caused to St. Antony and its crew. In the event no agreement on compensation is reached diplomatically between New Delhi and Rome, expect another round before the arbitral tribunal.

Jay Manoj Sanklecha is a lawyer specialising in international law. Views are personal.

Follow this link:

Is it the End of the Road for India in the Enrica Lexie Incident? - The Wire

The albatrosses who catch pirates on the high seas – BBC News

As a result, the albatross data had unintentionally revealed the potential extent and scale of illegal fishing in the Southern Ocean.

Its difficult to imagine a human patrol boat being able to cover enough area to efficiently track illegal fisheries. But each wandering albatross could potentially cover the same area of ocean as a boat, and when its logger detects a fishing boat with its AIS turned off, it can relay that information to the authorities, who can alert nearby vessels to investigate.

Data collection on this scale would not only improve our ability to detect and manage illegal fisheries, but also to identify high risk areas for conservation. This would help conserve fish stocks, protect albatrosses and other seabirds, and manage the marine ecosystem as a whole.

As ocean sentinels, it turns out that albatrosses have a unique ability to collect the data needed for their own conservation.

--

Samantha Patrick is a senior lecturer in marine biology at the University of Liverpool.

This articleoriginally appearedon The Conversation, and is republished under a Creative Commons licence.This is also why this story does not have an estimate for its carbon emissions, as Future Planet stories usually do.

--

Join one million Future fans by liking us onFacebook, or follow us onTwitterorInstagram.

If you liked this story,sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called The Essential List. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Worklife, and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

Read more from the original source:

The albatrosses who catch pirates on the high seas - BBC News

India-China conflict: A move from the Himalayas to the high seas? – The Interpreter

Last months clash between Indian and Chinese troops in Ladakh was the most significant conflict between the two countries since 1967. Despite signs of a partial tactical pullback in some places, there is considerable risk of further confrontations and even escalation along the disputed border. Some have been urging the Indian government to respond to Chinas moves in the Himalayas by placing pressure on Beijing in the Indian Ocean. What are Indias options and how likely is it to take such actions?

The Indian Ocean holds a particular place in the India-China strategic relationship. In almost every dimension, whether it be economic, nuclear or the conventional strategic balance along the Line of Actual Control in the Himalayas, India is probably at a considerable strategic disadvantage to China. Only in the Indian Ocean, which includes Chinas vital energy routes from the Persian Gulf and Africa, does India have the upper hand.

This has important implications for the strategy dynamic. Decades ago, prominent US Sinologist John Garver argued that in the event of a conflict between the two countries, India might be tempted to escalate from the land dimension, where it may suffer reverses, to the maritime dimension, where it enjoys substantial advantages, and employ those advantages to restrict Chinas vital Indian Ocean trade.

In strategic jargon, the Indian Ocean represents interior lines for India where the Indian Navy is close to its own bases and logistics and exterior lines for China, where its navy is operating with limited logistical support, away from home. Strategists tell us that you should meet your adversary in your own interior lines and their exterior lines. (That is the reason the Indian Navy is far from keen to get into any confrontation with China in the South China Sea.)

Short of all-out war, or perhaps an Indian Ocean equivalent of the Cuban Missile crisis, any attempt to interfere with trade would be subject to massive pushback from countries around the world.

This vulnerability gives the maritime dimension of the relationship a special significance. For example, the 2012 Non-Alignment 2.0 report by leading Indian strategic thinkers advocates that India should leverage potential opportunities that flow from peninsular Indias location in the Indian Ocean as part of an asymmetric strategy towards China.

These considerations have driven the Indian Navy to adopt a strategy of building its naval capabilities near the Indian Ocean chokepoints, particularly around the Malacca Strait, to create an implicit threat of interdiction of Chinas sea lines of communication. The navy considers that its previous threats of blockade made against Pakistan in several previous conflicts had a significant impact.

Indeed, in the aftermath of the Ladakh clashes in June, the Indian Navy was placed in a heightened state of alert and reportedly deployed additional ships to sea, although it is not clear precisely where. In recent weeks, Indian naval commentators have suggested that while India would have a difficult time imposing a blockade on Chinese shipping, it should nevertheless consider interdicting Chinese tankers as they pass near Indias Andaman and Nicobar Islands, or otherwise deter, delay or divert shipping traffic to and from China.

Others have also noted the potential for Washington to move its carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt into the Malacca Straits/Bay of Bengal area to deter any serious escalation of conflict in the Himalayas. (Which, incidentally, would be an interesting replay of President John F. Kennedys decision to send the carrier USS Kitty Hawk to support India during the 1962 Sino-Indian war.)

This has not gone unnoticed in Beijing. According to Chinas Global Times, the PLA Navys Southern Theatre Command (which has responsibility for Chinas operations in the Indian Ocean) responded with naval drills in the South China Sea on 18 June.

Putting aside all this sabre-rattling, what are the realistic options for India (or others) to pressure Chinas trading routes in the Indian Ocean?

In fact, some naval analysts are deeply sceptical of the ability of any navy to impose a distant blockade of China in the Indian Ocean. Short of inspecting every ship which would be a huge task how could a blockade identify those that are actually headed to Chinese ports? What is to stop ships being rerouted in transit, a common event even in normal times? Even if a blockade could be successfully imposed, could China obtain sufficient energy supplies from other sources (which currently includes an epic 73 million barrels of oil reserves floating off the coast of China)? Just as importantly, what is to stop China retaliating with its own blockade or interdictions?

Even more important than these practical considerations, the political and diplomatic costs to India would be enormous. Short of all-out war, or perhaps an Indian Ocean equivalent of the Cuban Missile crisis, any attempt to interfere with trade would be subject to massive pushback from countries around the world including from Indias most important strategic partners.

In short, the Indian Navy might (or might not) have the capability to block Chinese trade through the Indian Ocean, but would Beijing take the threat seriously?

This article is part of a two-year project being undertaken by the National Security College on the Indian Ocean, with the support of the Department of Defence.

View post:

India-China conflict: A move from the Himalayas to the high seas? - The Interpreter