CRISPR crops focused on sustainable farming could soften African … – Genetic Literacy Project

[Nteranya Sanginga is director general of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture.]

The role of genetic engineering in agriculture and food has generated enormous interest and controversies, with large-scale embrace by some nations and wholesale bans by others.

Many studies have been done and much research remains to be done on the impact genetically modified organisms (GMO) can have on broader food systems.

Fast-moving developments, however, suggest that lines drawn in the sand both for or against the broader use of GMOs risk becoming a distraction, particularly in Africa.

It appears we are on the brink of a deluge of new discoveries many of which may not need the kind of capital-intensive agricultural operations where GMOs were first developed and can instead directly address the needs of smallholders in developing countries and the specific food and nutrition security and climate change challenges they face.

Genome editing can now economically be applied to the crop cultivars that farmers in a given locale prefer, consisting of highly targeted interventions that can address specific challenges, and dont take years of breeding to consolidate.

Its a new world. Lets have a new debate, not the old one.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post:The Challenge Ahead: Harnessing Gene Editing to Sustainable Agriculture

For more background on the Genetic Literacy Project, read GLP on Wikipedia

Read the original here:

CRISPR crops focused on sustainable farming could soften African ... - Genetic Literacy Project

Marthlize Tredoux: Why genetic engineering is not all bad – Wine Magazine

My previous post on pesticides attracted some interest, so I wanted to follow up with simple to digest bits about the upsides of genetic engineering. Ill tie it back to why it might eventually be a critical technology for application in the vineyards too (since this is WineMag). Pass the smelling salts for everyone who just fainted at that and lets get started.

Again, a quick clarification on some terms used.

Since RoundUp/glyphosate is quickly becoming a straw man in this whole debate, Ill pull in a few different examples of existing and potential advancements. There are, of course, concerns about GE tech. Maybe Ill round out this tangent with a third piece focusing on the real issues vs the imagined ones. But for today, I want to focus on the good stuff:

Bt crops with built-in pesticidesBt toxins (proteins from a bacteria called Bacillus thuringiensis) have been inserted into transgenic crops to confer resistance against certain insects. In 2013, Bt brinjals were introduced commercially in Bangladesh as part of GM trials. To date, it has been planted on 12 ha across 120 farms. These farmers have cut pesticide use by 80% so far a rate which would not only alleviate negative environmental effects but also the health of farmers. Farmers are also reporting unprecedented increases in yield, which bodes well for their economic well-being.

Golden Rice the unavailable lifesaverThis one kills me. But not literally. Not like Vitamin A deficiency kills thousands of children annually, and leaves many thousands more disabled. Between 250,000 350,000 children go blind each year due to Vitamin A Deficiency. Golden Rice a GE cultivar enriched with Vitamin A has been available since 2002. Syngenta had been key in developing the technology and essentially made it freely available for use, in an attempt to bypass opposition from the anti-GMO lobby. It didnt work. The technology was opposed and Golden Rice remains unused aside from a handful of free licenses for subsistence farming not nearly the potential scale to make a significant difference in communities severely affected by malnutrition.

Organic cotton a celebrity gets it wrongIn 2016, Emma Watson wore a Calvin Klein dress, made in collaboration with green consultancy Eco-Age. Via Instagram, Ms Watson extolled the virtues of organic cotton above conventional, specifically that organic cotton is farmed without using harmful chemicals. It seems that Hermione didnt do her homework this time around though. The Bt technology I mentioned previously is also in cotton. While not as harmful as, say, copper sulfate, organic cotton farmers do spray their crops with Bt and other substances to battle severe crop damage from insects. Farmers growing Bt cotton have reduced their insecticide spraying significantly. States like Oklahoma report yields doubling over the past 20 years, improved fibre quality, better weed control and insecticide use down by more than 50%. You know what that is? Thats an improvement in sustainability. Impressive, no?

What about grapevine?The potential for GE technology in grapevine (including whats being worked on and what has been proposed) is a topic for discussion all on its own. It should definitely be noted that the potential application for GE technology is not limited to pest control. The creeping effects of climate change will eventually irrevocably change the viticulture landscape. The ability of different regions to produce quality grapes will change as rainfall and temperatures rise or fall outside the ideal conditions for grape growing.

If a technology was available to mitigate these effects a grapevine that can deal with increased CO2 levels, or one that is able to produce equivalent yield at higher temperatures and prolong a wine regions lifespan in the face of major climate shifts, isnt that something we need to consider reasonably, and without hysteria?

Tagged Marthlize Tredoux

More here:

Marthlize Tredoux: Why genetic engineering is not all bad - Wine Magazine

Genetic engineering could damage export market – Stuff.co.nz

PETER MCDONALD

Last updated10:25, March 29 2017

TIM CRONSHAW/FAIRFAX NZ

Genetically engineered cows at AgResearch's Animal Containment Facility at the Ruakura Research Centre in 2009.

There seems to be some big issues appearing on the horizon for New Zealand agriculture. Two of these being our status in regard to Genetic Engineering (GE) and the realisation that on farm animal emissions will need to be addressed in the near future.

While many may think these are issues to be dealt separately some believe that the two are linked and one may fix the other.

Is our central government putting too much faith into the premise that potential GE technologies may have a significant impact on reducing animal emissions?

READ MORE:Big meat processors to face consequences of smaller sheep flock

We would be foolish to pin all our hopes on technologies that aren't even developed yet.The enormity of the issue regarding "farm emissions" will dictate that the methods employed to mitigate will have to be broader.

My greatest concern however about GE in agriculture as a nation reliant on exports, is how will we be viewed by our customers? Whether these overseas consumers of our products are informed or uniformed it doesn't really matter,what matters is what they believe. To blindly brush aside our consumer's beliefs then move forward with GE without a thorough understanding of potential in market effects would be reckless.

Could we do long term damage to our exporting base overnight with a "flick of the GE switch?"

Following on, would we then as a country be consigned to the global commodity "bargain bin"?

All the currenttalk is about elevating ourselves out of the commodity mind-set into one of value. If New Zealand wasto embrace GE my question would be, can we then go on to compete with other large producing nations, all wrestling for positions exclusively on price? These countries most likely are closer to large consuming populations and do not have the costs of compliance surrounding employment and environment.

If we decide to try to take on these competitors on cost, we will fail. The benign introduction of GE technologies into our agricultural systems may well make this decision for us in the value versus volume debate.

In 1970 one of the greatest people that you may never have heard of wasDr Norman Borlag,described as the father of the "green revolution". In his Nobel Laureate lecture on the eve of receiving his prize, he was very clear when he said in regards to global food demand:"I've only given the world a 30 year breathing space before other technologies must present themselves".

He also went on to say:"For the genetic improvement of food crops to continue at a pace sufficient to meet the needs of humankind in the future both conventional breeding and biotechnology methodologies will be needed"

Is GE part of these new technologies Dr Borlag spoke of? Most probably so.

Does New Zealand need to uptake this technology so as to feed the world? Not necessarily.

-Stuff

View original post here:
Genetic engineering could damage export market - Stuff.co.nz

Will toxin-blocking biotech corn help win over skeptics of genetic … – Genetic Literacy Project

Aflatoxin is a well-known global health threat. This poison, produced by the Aspergillus fungus, is common in corn, wheat, rice and many other crops. Hot climates and inadequate storage practices augment the spread of the fungus and its accompanying toxin. It has also proved extremely difficult to eliminate or even reduce. A new gene-based approach could change that.

[U]p to a quarter of all liver cancer cases worldwide could be due to aflatoxin exposure.

This approach has a lot of potential, says [Nancy] Keller [who studies fungal pathogens at the University of Wisconsin-Madison]. But she questions whether it will gain widespread acceptance due to the skepticism surrounding genetically modified organisms, or GMOs. The government bureaucracy and public opinion are significant hurdles for the experimental corn to overcome. Keller wonders if the severity of the health hazards could be enough to overcome the reluctance. Can people accept something like this because its genetically engineered? asks Keller. Maybe its better to have this new strainand not get cancer.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post:A genetically modified corn could stop a deadly fungal poison if we let it

For more background on the Genetic Literacy Project, read GLP on Wikipedia

Read more:
Will toxin-blocking biotech corn help win over skeptics of genetic ... - Genetic Literacy Project

We may soon resurrect extinct species with genetic engineeringbut is it ethical? – Genetic Literacy Project

Scientists just might revive the woolly mammothby splicing genes from ancient mammoths into Asian elephant DNABut heres a sad irony to ponder: What if that dream came at the expense of todays Asian and African elephants, whose numbers are quickly dwindling because of habitat loss and poaching?

Recently, Joseph Bennett, an assistant professor and conservation researcher at Carleton University, confronted a new question: If molecular biologists can potentially reconstruct extinct species, such as the woolly mammoth, should society devote its limited resources to reversing past wrongs, or on preventing future extinctions?

If you have the millions of dollars it would take to resurrect a species and choose to do that, you are making an ethical decision to bring one species back and let several others go extinct, Dr. Bennett said. It would be one step forward, and three to eight steps back.

[Ben Novak, the lead researcher for the nonprofit Revive & Restore argues that] funding for de-extinction and conservation is a zero-sum game, noting that all of the funding for Revive & Rescues biotechnologies comes from private donors or institutional grants outside the realm of conservation efforts.

[The study can be found here.]

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post:We Might Soon Resurrect Extinct Species. Is It Worth the Cost?

For more background on the Genetic Literacy Project, read GLP on Wikipedia.

See the rest here:
We may soon resurrect extinct species with genetic engineeringbut is it ethical? - Genetic Literacy Project

Genetically modified mosquito use under consideration in Houston – CBS News

Officials in Houston, Texas, are contemplating the use of genetically-modified mosquitoes to fight Zika and other viruses transmitted by the insect.

Jim Gathany, Scientific Photographer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Officials are considering releasing genetically modified mosquitoes in Houston as part of the fight against the insects known to carry diseases such as the Zika virus.

The Houston Chronicle reports that Harris County, Texas, officials are negotiating with a British biotech company, Oxitec, to release mosquitoes that have been genetically engineered to produce offspring that die.

Oxitec has yet to try out its technology in the U.S. A proposed trial in a Florida Keys suburb never got off the ground last year amid residents concerns about genetic engineering.

Play Video

Millions of genetically-modified mosquitoes are being released in the Brazilian town of Piracicaba with the hope that they'll take out Zika-infec...

There have been no documented cases of Zika being locally transmitted in the Houston region. The only homegrown Zika cases in Texas have been in Cameron County, on the border with Mexico.

Mustapha Debboun, director of the Harris County Mosquito Control Division, said working with Oxitec could provide another tool in the fight against Zika and other mosquito-borne illnesses. Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, which carry the Zika virus, dengue fever and chikungunya, among other deadly illnesses, are common in the Houston region.

Deric Nimmo, principal scientist at Oxitec, called the release of mosquitoes to control mosquitoes an important change in the approach.

Oxitec has conducted field trials in Brazil, Panama and the Cayman Islands and says it has reduced the Aedes mosquito populations by up to 90 percent in each location.

In August, the Food and Drug Administration gave approval to a proposed field trial in Key Haven, a Florida Keys suburb, finding that it would have no significant impacts on human health, animal health or the environment. Residents in Monroe County, Florida, voted in a nonbinding resolution in favor of working with Oxitec. But Key Haven residents voted nearly 2-to-1 in November against the trial.

According to the FDA, if Oxitec wanted to conduct a field trial in Texas Harris County, the company would have to submit an environmental assessment to the agency.

2017 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Read the rest here:
Genetically modified mosquito use under consideration in Houston - CBS News

A revolutionary genetic experiment is coming to rural Burkina Faso – PRI

This story was originally published on STAT.

BANA, Burkina Faso This small village of mud-brick homes in West Africa might seem the least likely place for an experiment at the frontier of biology.

Yet scientists here are engaged in what could be the most promising, and perhaps one of the most frightening, biological experiments of our time. They are preparing for the possible release of swarms of mosquitoes that, until now, have been locked away in a research lab behind doublemetal doors and guarded 24/7.

The goal: to nearly eradicate the population of one species of mosquito, and with it, the heavy burdenof malaria across Africa.

These scientists are planning to release mosquitoes equipped with gene drives, a technology that overrides natures genetic rules to give every baby mosquito a certain trait that normally only half would acquire. Once such an insect gets out into the wild, it will move indiscriminately and spread its modified trait without respect for political borders.

No living thing no mammal, insect, or plant with a gene drive has ever been set free. But if all goes as planned, it mighthappen here, in a remote village of about a thousand people, where the residents dont even have a word for gene.

Despite such barriers, this is in some ways the most logical place to carry out the experiment. Nowhere does malaria exact a higher toll than here in sub-Saharan Africa, where hundreds of thousands die from the disease every year. And Burkina Faso already houses one of Africashighest-profile malaria research laboratories.

It may be six years before the gene drive mosquitoes are actually released in Burkina Faso, but scientists are already working around the clock to prepare the community for their release. Researchers in Mali and Uganda are also working toward the same goal under the banner of the Target Malaria project, propelled by $70 million from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and support from research laboratories in England and Italy.

Speaking through interpreters, residents across Burkina Faso told STAT that they are grateful for the scientists work, and are eagerly looking forward to eliminating the dreaded disease.

But scientists still face achallenge: making sure that people understand and accept thenewfangled genetic technology behind it all. That means building trust and doing basic education explaining not only the impact of genetically engineered insects arriving in their homes, but also what genetics is in the first place.

*****

Driving west from Bobo-Dioulasso, the sleepy regional capital that is Burkina Fasos second-largest city, the pavement fades away into an undulating dirt path. Traffic dissolves into a trickle of motorbikes whose drivers wear surgical-style masks to protect them from the dust. Donkey carts plod along under the weight of flattened grass, outpacing camels weighed down by saddlebags.

At the height of the dry season in late December, eight scientists and social scientists pulled off the dirt road,carrying a box of a hundred adult mosquitoes and a 1-liter bottle filled with wriggling larvae.

For the past few years, the scientists from the Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Sante (IRSS) in Bobo-Dioulasso, where the countrys Target Malaria team is based,have been teaching Bana residents basic mosquito facts, including that the bugs transmit malaria. Many in Burkina Faso believe that malaria can be spread by eating too many greasy or sweet foods, said Lea Pare, the anthropologist who is leading a national effort to engage local citizens in Target Malaria.

Beyond live mosquitoes, the team also uses pictures to help explain the complicated scientific information: a set of thirteen cards, laminated like giant placemats, which detail the different phases of the project. In Bana, they talk through the first four of these cards, which show gigantic female mosquitoes biting humans, with small red squiggles flowing through the proboscis and into the persons body. On the fourth card, a scientist wearing a white coat is looking at those mosquitoes under a microscope.

White coats are very familiar to residents of Bana. For the last three years, a team of researchers has lived part-time in the village, sleeping in an old cement house retrofitted into a scientific base camp. These technicians, with the help of local volunteers, count the number of mosquitoes in the homes, observe the mating swarms at dusk, and dust mosquitoes with colored powder to track where they travel around the village.

They are gathering data on the mosquito population to feed into intricate computer models that will help them determine how the gene drive mosquitoes should be released.

When the technicians stepped into one home on a recent day, they laid thick sheets across the floor of a bedroom and filled it with acrid-smelling insecticide spray. After 10 minutes, they hauled the sheets out, opened them up, and crouched over a small pile of dirt specks: only one male mosquito.

For low mosquito season, it wasnt surprising. During the rainy season, however, which starts in June, there might be a few hundred mosquitoes in each room, said technician Ibrahim Diabate.

Men living in the treated homes were excited, even jubilant, that the researchers were working in the village. They understood that the scientists had a longer-term plan to battle the mosquitoes, but they were also happy for the insecticide spray in the present moment.

Since you started this work, praise God, malaria has been reduced, because mosquitoes dont bite us anymore, said Ali Ouattara, one elder in the community.

In the next phase of the project, scientists will have to explain to Ouattara why theyre actually releasing more mosquitoes.

Going straight from zero to gene drives would be too extreme, so scientists are planning to release regular genetically engineered mosquitoes first either here in Bana or in one of two other villages nearby.

Those mosquitoes, which could be released next year, are sterile males: Most of them are male, and they cannot have offspring. A field release is not intended to reduce the prevalence of malaria; rather, it is to prepare the scientists and the locals for the eventual arrival of the gene drive mosquitoes, said Delphine Thizy, who directs the work of engaging local, national, and international leaders for the project.

The outreach teams have started talking about DNA with their flash cards. But they arent saying anything yet to the locals about the much more powerful, and complicated, idea of a gene drive.

Partly thats because researchers didnt want the residents of Burkina Faso to expect that a miracle solution to the malaria epidemic isjust around the corner, Thizy said. Scientists in London havent yet created the gene drive mosquitoes that would be used, and field trials of such mosquitoes are years away.

Also, she said, gene drives are hard to understand.

To be fair, even in Europe and in North America, its complex to understand gene drives in one shot.

If gene drive mosquitoes arrive in Burkina Faso, it will be thanks to the vision of Abdoulaye Diabate, a soft-spoken medical entomologist with a singular mission: to stop malaria.

The disease is ever-present in thiscountry mosquito nets hang for sale by the roadside, and hotel proprietors lay out smoldering coils in the courtyards to ward off mosquitoes as dusk falls.

Diabate, who is deeply involved in malaria eradication efforts worldwide, became dismayed when, in the 1990s, he realized that mosquitoes were building up resistance against the insecticide used on bed nets here.

If this is the only tool we have in hand, then forget about malaria elimination, Diabate said.

But,in 2012, he received an invitation to a meeting about the Target Malaria project, which was focused on solutions involving genetic engineering. He jumped at the chance.

Today he is leading the Burkina Faso team, trying to get the whole world from remote villages to international diplomats on board with his ambitious research.

Meanwhile, thousands of miles away in the United Kingdom, geneticists at Imperial College London are working on designing the gene drive mosquitoes. Specifically, theyre studying two different ways to disrupt the reproductive system of one particular species, Anopheles gambiae: reduce the number of female babies (only females bite and spread the disease) or stop the mosquitoes from having offspring in general.

To make the population predominantly male, Austin Burt, Target Malarias primary investigator, and collaborators are studying an X shredder a gene that destroys the X chromosome in sperm, making all offspring males. Alongside that, theyre looking at reducing the number of mosquitoes of both sexes by creating genes that make them sterile.

Either approach might lead to massive population collapse within two to eight years, according to Charles Godfray, a University of Oxford professor and biologist who works on modeling for the Target Malaria project.

But the insects wouldnt go extinct, scientists say. The gene drive mosquitoes currently under consideration would only reduce the population of Anopheles gambiae enough to stop the transmission of malaria.

The foundation is not interested in eliminating Anopheles mosquitoes, said Dr. Scott Miller, who leads malaria research and development for the Gates Foundation. Were interested in eliminating malaria.

It will take years to reach the point that scientists will be ready to test the gene drive mosquitoes in the wild. In the meantime, they are facing the challenge of winning over local residents who might be wary of these new creatures.

Mariam Pare was initially frightened. A commanding woman who teaches in a Koranic school, Pare livesacross the street from the IRSS in Bobo-Dioulasso. Shesaid that when she first heard about mosquito research going on at the lab, she feared that the scientists were breeding mosquitoes to let loose on the locals. But after meetings and discussions with project staff, she came to understand that theyare instead trying to fight against the mosquito.

She even took a tour of the insectary that currently holds the gene-edited sterile male mosquitoes, and could eventually hold the gene drive ones. She saw fans that would suck away mosquitoes if they happened to escape from their cages, and a hot water bath where unnecessary mosquitoes go to die.

Because I saw what was going on in there, I believe and trust the people that work in there, she said.

Earning Pares trust was particularly important for the team because she lives so close to the insectary, her consent was required to import the sterile male mosquitoes. That requirement isnt a legal one, but one that the Target Malaria project has put in place. The Gates Foundation has also said that gene drive mosquitoes will only be released if the host country agrees.

Lassina Diarra, a tailor whose turquoise-walled shop is down the road from the research lab, also had to give his consent. Sitting on the corner of a table among scraps of fabric and hand-tailored suits, he said that he was impressed by the scientists transparency and reliability. Two outreach workers recruited him to serve on a group of 12 local leaders who communicateinformation about the project to the citys residents, dubbed the relay group, along with a different committee to address community grievances. Every few weeks, he knocks on doors up and down the streets, updating his neighbors on the scientists progress.

In June, Diarra and Pare both signed off on the arrival of the sterile males. So did Kadidia Ouattara, one of the relay group members and the president of multiple neighborhood associations. She recalled a joyous gathering filled with dance and song.

Ni fonyon douma ni bora mi? they sang in Dioula. Ni fonyon douma ni bora mi?

The song translates to, Where did this good air come from? and, more colloquially, means, This is too good to be true!

Ouattara said that it is a traditional song commemorating good news a wedding, the birth of a baby, the success of a student in her exams. And on that day, it was celebrating the impending arrival of genetically modified mosquitoes.

Burkina Faso has experience with genetically modified organisms. One of the first associations some residents make with genetic engineering is Monsanto, which has been selling genetically modified cotton seeds to Burkinabe farmers since the 2000s. But the countrys growers association stopped buying the seeds in 2016 in the wake of concerns about the cottons quality and country-wide protests against the company.

One resident of Bobo-Dioulasso complained that genetically modified food rots quickly, and said that he hopes the mosquitoes suffer the same fate: an early death.

The fight against malaria is a big concern, but the solutions are sometimes scary, said Sylvestre Tiemtore, the director of an organization that represents over half of the nongovernmental organizations in Burkina Faso. The group met with Target Malaria in July, a discussion which was very heated, he said.

In movies he cited Jurassic Park weve seen some research that went out of control, he said.

The mouthparts of a female Anopheles gambiae mosquito. (Jim Gathany/CDC)

Scientists familiar withthe effort here say defining the idea of genetically modified to residents here might be of limited use, because it wont help people understand what the mosquitoes are or what they will really do, said Javier Lezaun, deputy director of the Institute for Science, Innovation, and Society at the University of Oxford, who is not involved in the Target Malaria project. In fact, the phrase might just serve to distract and scare he spoke of another community in Tanzania who thought that a swarm of mosquitoes that invaded a hospital were genetically modified (they werent), and of others in Brazil who thought that Zika arrived as a result of genetically modified mosquitoes (it didnt).

As long as you explain something about the specific capabilities of the mosquitoes, or the limitations of these particular mosquitoes and how theyre supposed to behave in the wild or in the facilities, I think that serves the purpose of explaining genetic modification, Lezaun said.

And thats what many people are curious about. At the July meeting with NGOs, hosted by the Secrtariat Permanent des Organisations Non Gouvernementales (SPONG for short), attendees wanted to know: What would happen to the local ecosystem? And might these engineered mosquitoes be able to transmit other diseases?

Some of these questions dont yethave answers, but others do. A risk assessment commissionedby the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, a US nonprofit that supports the federal agency, found that the risk of the sterile mosquitoes currently in Bobo-Dioulasso transmitting other diseases was incredibly low; the modified mosquitoes probably wont spread more malaria than their wild cousins; and the genetic modification probably wont spread from the mosquito to other animals.

Outside scientists, convened by the FNIH in May, had previously concluded that Anopheles gambiae is not a keystone species, meaning that if its population shrank dramatically, the ecosystem would not be substantially impacted.

But the meetings continue. Tiemtore, SPONGs director, said that he would like to have a meeting with representatives of different health-related NGOs that are based in Burkina Fasos 13 different regions, to educate them about the project. But that requires money to bring them to the capital, and to cover the costs of the meeting itself.

They might need to rent a room, Tiemtore said. They might need to offer some coffee breaks. That costs money. Who pays for that? If you dont do all of those things, your mosquitoes are going to come out, but they wont be released in the regions, because the people will not agree with it, because they didnt have enough information on it, and they will have the right to be afraid.

The development of powerful new genetic engineering technologies, often outstripping regulators ability to keep up, is forcing scientists to reckon with the ethics of their work in a new way.

Of course, humans have been making potentially irreversible changes to our environment for a long time: clearing forests for farming, building power plants that change the composition of the atmosphere, and producing untold tons of synthetic materials like plastic that will stay in the environment for hundreds of years.

But gene drives lend these questions a different sort of urgency. The genetic technology can quickly change the properties of an entire population of a species, undoing millennia of evolution in a handful of years. And once you let them out of the cage, theres no going back other world-altering technologies have not been self-perpetuating like gene drive animals would be.

So scientists are treading carefully and doing what they can to keep the rest of the world involved. This has led to difficult questions: Who needs to give them permission to do certain things? What does it mean for residents to be fully informed? In answering them, there arent a lot of models to follow. There are only a fewgene drive projects underway in the world, and none has yet resulted in the release of the animalsinto the wild.

Academic research on how to effectively include non-scientists in global healthdecisions is also lacking, said Jim Lavery, an Emory University professor of global health and ethics who has worked with the Target Malaria project in the past.

Right now, Lavery said, scientists can count the number of phone calls they make and the number of people who show up at community meetings, but we dont even have an understanding at a proxy level of what those things are supposed to represent in terms of effectiveness of engagement.

While researchers like Lavery are trying to determine how to measure success, research is plowing ahead. Some scientists are thinking about releasing gene drive mice halfway across the world, in New Zealand, to eliminate invasive species. AndKevin Esvelt, a gene drive guru based at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is flying to Argentina in September to talk about using gene drives to get rid of flesh-eating flies.

He has said that gene drives are more important as a societal tool to change the way that science is done it should be open to and inclusive of the people it will impact. To that extent, he praised Target Malarias community work. I honestly dont see how you could do it any other way, he said, citing the language and cultural barriers that the project is working to overcome.

How the project is going to introduce gene drive mosquitoes, though, is an open question. National regulators and international organizations like the World Health Organization are still working on developing guidelines for introducinggenedrive animals.

And in Burkina Faso, Thizy said she hasnt even yet put a lot of thought into what it will mean for local leaders to understand a release of gene drive mosquitoes. She said it will probably include knowing that the modified mosquitoes will stay in the environment and grow in number, until some point at which the population of Anopheles gambiae will be reduced.

But, said Thizy, exactly how the gene drive works may matter less to the people than the impact it will have on them and their lives.

She pointed, by way of analogy, to her previous work as a consultant for a mining company in the Ivory Coast: It wasnt how big is the hole, how many holes, and how does the machine work that the area residents were worried about, she said, but rather how they would be compensated and what jobs would be created.

On a dusty Wednesday morning earlier this year, Kadidia Ouattara arrived at an outdoor market, eager to chat with the vendors about genetically engineered mosquitoes.

As a woman spooned tomato sauce from a gigantic aluminum can onto plastic sheets for individual sale, Ouattara told her about the insect lab just a few minutes walk down the street.

The researchers who work there are trying to reduce the population of mosquitoes, she said. Dont be afraid I saw the inside of the lab and all of the research. There are public meetings where they explain what they are doing, and if there is another one, I will let everybody know.

The woman was delighted. May God help the project be a success, she said.

Farther along, she came upon a butcher who she knew to be particularly recalcitrant. He thinks were getting money from the white people, Ouattara said. But thats not true shes a volunteer.

Ouattara walked up to the man, who was hacking at a piece of meat with a foot-long knife, bits of gristle flying everywhere and flies swarming. Rivulets of blood ran along the dusty ground.

If there is a meeting about the project, I am begging you to come, she said.

Scarcely taking his eyes off of the meat, the butcher mumbled some kind of assent.

Ouattaras enthusiasm was undimmed; she strode off to a woman selling onions. And shed be back soon with more news to share.

Eric Boodman and Kate Sheridan contributed reporting.

Special thanks to Housmane Sereme and Steve Sanou for translation services.

Follow this link:
A revolutionary genetic experiment is coming to rural Burkina Faso - PRI

Genetic Engineering Can Help Us Save Animals’ Lives – malaysiandigest.com

Details Published on Monday, 20 March 2017 13:31

Manipulating Genetics With or Without CRISPR

From tackling cancer to eradicating single-gene mutations, the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing tool is often portrayed as the eighth wonder of the world by many. We look to CRISPR regarding how it affects us as a species, but the implications of the CRISPR Cas-9 system extend far beyond just humanity. The gene editing tools precision and efficacy can be implemented in manipulating the genetics of our agriculture as well as animals. It would be wrong, however, to think that this is humanitys first attempt at the genetic manipulation of crops and pets aliketo be fair, we have been doing it since the inception of human civilization itself.

Thirty thousand years ago, our ancestors were the first individuals to manufacture genetically modified organisms (GMOs) before it was cool. Through selective breeding or artificial selection, wild wolves in East Asia were selected for docility. With more obedient animals at their side, humans from 32,000 BCE could optimize their hunter/gatherer lifestyles. After several millennia, the artificially-selected wolves began to resemble the dogs we see today. Crops werent spared from our genetic coercion either. In fact, humans had domesticated several forms of wheat since 7800 BCE. However, our greatest success in genetic modification through artificial selection comes from corn. Corns is derived from a wild grass known as teosinte, which only occurred when humans at the time selectively planted corn kernels that displayed desirable traits. Over time, this behavior reconciled the five-gene difference between corn and teosinte and led to the desirable crop that we use to this day.

Its clear that humanitys days of artificial selection arent behind us, as most major crops today are genetically engineered for our benefit. Rather than waiting around a few thousand years for evolution to do its work, we are now able to immediately manipulate the genetic information of organisms; an idea first executed in 1973 by Stanley Cohen, Herbert Boyer, Annie Chang, and Robert Helling to provide anti-bacterial resistance to a certain strain of bacteria. Since then, gene editing has exploded in all directions. Thanks to genetic engineering, we now dehorn cattle, produce disease-resistant pigs, and herd goats that grow longer hair, all in the name of productivity.

CRISPR and Animal Regulation: Do We Need It?

So how does CRISPR work? Unlike other gene editing tools in the past, CRISPR works to propagate sequences through generations at a 97% effectiveness rate. The system is naturally found in viruses, but researchers were able to manipulate the tool to essentially work as a copy and paste function for any desirable genetic information. The advent of CRISPR is revolutionizing business, with corporations taking advantage of the easy-to-use genetic engineering to even edit pets to sell. However, while CRISPR does essentially accelerate mankinds ability to artificially select traits for organisms that we find beneficial, people like David Ishee, a Mississippi kennel operator, believe that we can reverse the negative side effects of artificial selectionparticularly hyperuricemia (an abnormally high level of uric acid in the blood) in Dalmatians. While David feels that its a relatively simple request to utilize gene editing in the hopes of ameliorating a human-caused condition in the breed of dogs, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) feels differently.

Ishee, and many others like him who wish to genetically modify animals, face the FDAs newly drafted regulations from January 2017. While Ishees plan to modify the malfunctioning genes of Dalmatians and re-insert them into healthy sperm before fertilization isnt outlawed by the FDA, its distribution is.

If Ishee manages to produce healthy Dalmatians without the disease, he would not be able to sell or distribute them for breeding purposes, according to the FDA. With that said, Ishees hope of spreading his movement far and wide might just be curtailed by government regulation.

The new measures by the FDA might just be a response to the emerging fear that CRISPR and other gene editing techniques can be utilized as weapons of mass destruction. While there are those who dont intend on adhering to the regulations, hoping the new administration would absolve them entirely, there are others like Ishee who are stonewalled against even starting their projects. However, the benefits of being able to use CRISPR on animals DNA could be huge; just looking at dogs and cats alone, selective breeding has introduced some unfortunate side effects. We could help our pets live longer, more comfortable lives in the future. Dalmatians shouldnt have to suffer because humans wanted a dog that had spots, and perhaps we can undo some of the damage weve done in the name of purebred dogs and cats. Scientists and others who want to use this technology also argue that doing this is completely different than splicing two animals DNA together, for example.

-Futurism

See original here:
Genetic Engineering Can Help Us Save Animals' Lives - malaysiandigest.com

From skin to brain: Stem cells without genetic modification – Science Daily


Science Daily
From skin to brain: Stem cells without genetic modification
Science Daily
A discovery, several years in the making, by a University at Buffalo research team has demonstrated that adult skin cells can be converted into neural crest cells (a type of stem cell) without any genetic modification, and that these stem cells can ...

and more »

Visit link:
From skin to brain: Stem cells without genetic modification - Science Daily

UC Davis alumni revolutionize genetic engineering – The Aggie

Arshia Firouzi, left, and Gurkern Sufi, right. (COURTESY)

Biology meets engineering to increase production of transgenic organisms

Of the thousands of students that attend UC Davis, Arshia Firouzi and Gurkern Sufi met one another in Tercero Hall in 2011. Bright-eyed freshmen at the time, they had yet to embark on the exhilarating journey that would lead to their founding of Ravata Solutions a company dedicated to making transgenics, the field of biology that results in genetically engineered organisms, easier for genetic engineering.

Sufi has a degree in biotechnology and Firouzi in electrical engineering and the intersect between these two sciences is what intrigued them the most. Under the guidance of UC Davis professor Marc Facciotti, they gained a VentureWell grant in 2015 to begin tinkering with their project and conducting basic research in Translating Engineering Advances to Medicines (TEAM) Molecular Prototyping and Bioinnovation Laboratory.

We had put together a lab space and equipment where people can come and explore the various types of technology that are associated with engineering biology, Facciotti said. Connected to that is an award from a foundation called VentureWell, and VentureWell gave some money to help facilitate this general idea, and Ive been using it to seed projects that students are coming up with.

The initial idea revolved around micro-electrical components and biology together, but the application that came out of it was not the original plan.

We had been working on single-cell electroporation, [using an electric field to increase absorption of foreign materials into cells], for a while with exploring potential applications in a variety of cells, Sufi said. We asked, What are some high-value, high priority cells that researchers cant risk losing large quantities of when they want to do a transformation? Naturally, we fell upon embryos.

And thus, Ravata Solutions was born. Ravata is dedicated to creating a device that will transform transgenics. This automated device would take the place of microinjection, the classic technique used to manually insert DNA into an embryo. While microinjection does ultimately result in the production of transgenic animals, it has critical flaws. A real limitation of microinjection is the time it takes to make a successfully transgenic organism, Sufi said. It is also an outdated field [that] you cant find many skilled professionals in anymore.

Ravatas device increases the efficiency and viability of producing transgenic animals with the incorporation of electroporation and single-cell sensing. This new technology results in up to 1,000 embryo transformations per hour with over 80 percent viability and over 80 percent efficiency. This is important because it allows researchers to rapidly conduct embryo transformations and know if they are on the right path.

The rate-limiting step in creating transgenic animals is embryo transformation, Firouzi said. What Ravata is doing is enabling production of embryo engineering by allowing input of the process of embryo transformation to increase 100-fold.

Ravata was accepted into the IndieBio accelerator program in San Francisco in October of 2016, and partnered with the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, VIB Life Sciences and the UC Davis Mouse Biology Program. They are currently testing pilot programs and plan to launch the product in 2018.

We are excited to launch and also start exploring the many other applications of our technology in plants, Firouzi said. At the end of the day, our device doesnt transform just embryos, it can transform any cell type with a high efficiency and high viability. Written by: Harnoor Gill science@theaggie.org

Excerpt from:
UC Davis alumni revolutionize genetic engineering - The Aggie

Genetic Engineering Beyond Pesticides

Background

Genetic Engineering is an area that has gotten Beyond Pesticides attention in light of the pesticide paradigm that is being pushed in the form of genetically engineered food crops. Whether it is the incorporation into food crops of genes from a natural bacterium (Bt) or the development of a herbicide resistant crop, the approach to pest management is short sighted and dangerous.

Beyond Pesticides publicizes the serious health and pest resistance problems associated with the approach and provides important links to activists working in the pesticide community. Over 70% of all genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are altered to be herbicide-resistant. Increased planting of Herbicide-resistanat GE crops has led to a dramatic increase in herbicide use. The over use of Herbicide-resistant crops has also led to "super weeds", and the destructuion of pollinator habitat.

Our goal is to push for labeling as a means of identifying products that contain genetically engineered ingredients, seek to educate on the public health and environmental consequences of this technology, and generate support for sound ecological-based management systems. This technology should be subject to complete regulatory review, which is currently not the case.

As we move forward, we are united in opposing genetically engineered organisms in food production and believe that pressure to stop the proliferation of this contaminating technolgy must be focused on the White House and Congress. The companies responsible for this situation are the biotech companies whose GE technology causes genetic drift and environmental hazards that are not contained as the deregulation of genetically engineered alfalfa goes forward. The organic community stands together with consumer, farmer, environmental and business interests to ensure practices that are protective of health and the environment.

(August 1, 2016) President Signs Weak Product Labeling Law on Genetically Engineered Ingredients, Preempts States

(July 7, 2016) U.S. Senate Moves to Limit GMO Labeling

(April 20, 2016) GAO Finds USDA Regulation of Genetically Engineered Crops Deficient

(March 24, 2016) More Companies To Label for GE Ingredients, While Maintaining Their Safety

(March 21, 2016) Boulder County, Colorado to Phase Out GE Crops on Public Land

To read more, visit the GE section of our Daily News blog.

You can also find further information on the United States Department of Agriculture's website.

(2013 National Pesticide Forum)

As the emergent GE labeling movement challenges industrial agriculture, USDA continues to deregulate GE crops. This workshop was part of "Sustainable Families, Farms, and Food: Resilient communities through organic practices," Beyond Pesticides 31st National Pesticide Forum, April 5-6, 2013, Albuquerque, NM.

See the article here:
Genetic Engineering Beyond Pesticides

From skin to brain: Stem cells without genetic modification – UB News Center

BUFFALO, N.Y. A discovery, several years in the making, by a University at Buffalo research team has proven that adult skin cells can be converted into neural crest cells (a type of stem cell) without any genetic modification, and that these stem cells can yield other cells that are present in the spinal cord and the brain.

The applications could be very significant, from studying genetic diseases in a dish to generating possible regenerative cures from the patients own cells.

Its actually quite remarkable that it happens, says Stelios T. Andreadis, PhD, professor and chair of UBs Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, who recently published a paper on the results in the journal Stem Cells.

The identity of the cells was further confirmed by lineage tracing experiments, where the reprogrammed cells were implanted in chicken embryos and acted just as neural crest cells do.

Stem cells have been derived from adult cells before, but not without adding genes to alter the cells. The new process yields neural crest cells without addition of foreign genetic material. The reprogrammed neural crest cells can become smooth muscle cells, melanocytes, Schwann cells or neurons.

In medical applications this has tremendous potential because you can always get a skin biopsy, Andreadis says. We can grow the cells to large numbers and reprogram them, without genetic modification. So, autologous cells derived from the patient can be used to treat devastating neurogenic diseases that are currently hampered by the lack of easily accessible cell sources.

The process can also be used to model disease. Skin cells from a person with a genetic disease of the nervous system can be reprogrammed into neural crest cells. These cells will have the disease-causing mutation in their chromosomes, but the genes that cause the mutation are not expressed in the skin. The genes are likely to be expressed when cells differentiate into neural crest lineages, such as neurons or Schwann cells, thereby enabling researchers to study the disease in a dish. This is similar to induced pluripotent stem cells, but without genetic modification or reprograming to the pluripotent state.

The discovery was a gradual process, Andreadis says, as successive experiments kept leading to something new. It was one step at a time. It was a very challenging task that took almost five years and involved a wide range of expertise and collaborators to bring it to fruition, Andreadis says. Collaborators include Gabriella Popescu, PhD, professor in the Department of Biochemistry in the Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at UB; Song Liu, PhD, vice chair of biostatistics and bioinformatics at Roswell Park Cancer Institute and a research associate professor in biostatistics UBs School of Public Health and Health Professions; and Marianne Bronner, PhD, professor of biology and biological engineering, California Institute of Technology.

Andreadis credits the persistence of his then-PhD student, Vivek K. Bajpai, for sticking with it.

He is an excellent and persistent student, Andreadis says. Most students would have given up. Andreadis also credits a seed grant from UBs office of the Vice President for Research and Economic Developments IMPACT program that enabled part of the work.

The work recently received a $1.7 million National Institutes of Health grant to delve into the mechanisms that occur as the cells reprogram, and to employ the cells for treating the Parkinsons-like symptoms in a mouse model of hypomyelinating disease.

This work has the potential to provide a novel source of abundant, easily accessible and autologous cells for treatment of devastating neurodegenerative diseases. We are excited about this discovery and its potential impact and are grateful to NIH for the opportunity to pursue it further, Andreadis said.

The research, described in the journal Stem Cells under the title Reprogramming Postnatal Human Epidermal Keratinocytes Toward Functional Neural Crest Fates, was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health.

View post:
From skin to brain: Stem cells without genetic modification - UB News Center

A Revolutionary Genetic Experiment is Planned for a West African Village If Residents Agree – Scientific American

BANA, Burkina Faso This small village of mud-brick homes in West Africa might seem the least likely place for an experiment at the frontier of biology.

Yet scientists here are engaged in what could be the most promising, and perhaps one of the most frightening, biological experiments of our time. They are preparing for the possible release of swarms of mosquitoes that, until now, have been locked away in a research lab behind doublemetal doors and guarded 24/7.

The goal: to nearly eradicate the population of one species of mosquito, and with it, the heavy burdenof malaria across Africa.

These scientists are planning to release mosquitoes equipped with gene drives, a technology that overrides natures genetic rules to give every baby mosquito a certain trait that normally only half would acquire. Once such an insect gets out into the wild, it will move indiscriminately and spread its modified trait without respect for political borders.

No living thing no mammal, insect, or plant with a gene drive has ever been set free. But if all goes as planned, it mighthappen here, in a remote village of about a thousand people, where the residents dont even have a word for gene.

Despite such barriers, this is in some ways the most logical place to carry out the experiment. Nowhere does malaria exact a higher toll than here in sub-Saharan Africa, where hundreds of thousands die from the disease every year. And Burkina Faso already houses one of Africashighest-profile malaria research laboratories.

It may be six years before the gene drive mosquitoes are actually released in Burkina Faso, but scientists are already working around the clock to prepare the community for their release. Researchers in Mali and Uganda are also working toward the same goal under the banner of the Target Malaria project, propelled by $70 million from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and support from research laboratories in England and Italy.

Speaking through interpreters, residents across Burkina Faso told STAT that they are grateful for the scientists work, and are eagerly looking forward to eliminating the dreaded disease.

But scientists still face achallenge: making sure that people understand and accept thenewfangled genetic technology behind it all. That means building trust and doing basic education explaining not only the impact of genetically engineered insects arriving in their homes, but also what genetics is in the first place.

Driving west from Bobo-Dioulasso, the sleepy regional capital that is Burkina Fasos second-largest city, the pavement fades away into an undulating dirt path. Traffic dissolves into a trickle of motorbikes whose drivers wear surgical-style masks to protect them from the dust. Donkey carts plod along under the weight of flattened grass, outpacing camels weighed down by saddlebags.

At the height of the dry season in late December, eight scientists and social scientists pulled off the dirt road,carrying a box of a hundred adult mosquitoes and a 1-liter bottle filled with wriggling larvae.

For the past few years, the scientists from the Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Sante (IRSS) in Bobo-Dioulasso, where the countrys Target Malaria team is based,have been teaching Bana residents basic mosquito facts, including that the bugs transmit malaria. Many in Burkina Faso believe that malaria can be spread by eating too many greasy or sweet foods, said Lea Pare, the anthropologist who is leading a national effort to engage local citizens in Target Malaria.

Beyond live mosquitoes, the team also uses pictures to help explain the complicated scientific information: a set of thirteen cards, laminated like giant placemats, which detail the different phases of the project. In Bana, they talk through the first four of these cards, which show gigantic female mosquitoes biting humans, with small red squiggles flowing through the proboscis and into the persons body. On the fourth card, a scientist wearing a white coat is looking at those mosquitoes under a microscope.

White coats are very familiar to residents of Bana. For the last three years, a team of researchers has lived part-time in the village, sleeping in an old cement house retrofitted into a scientific base camp. These technicians, with the help of local volunteers, count the number of mosquitoes in the homes, observe the mating swarms at dusk, and dust mosquitoes with colored powder to track where they travel around the village.

They are gathering data on the mosquito population to feed into intricate computer models that will help them determine how the gene drive mosquitoes should be released.

When the technicians stepped into one home on a recent day, they laid thick sheets across the floor of a bedroom and filled it with acrid-smelling insecticide spray. After 10 minutes, they hauled the sheets out, opened them up, and crouched over a small pile of dirt specks: only one male mosquito.

For low mosquito season, it wasnt surprising. During the rainy season, however, which starts in June, there might be a few hundred mosquitoes in each room, said technician Ibrahim Diabate.

Men living in the treated homes were excited, even jubilant, that the researchers were working in the village. They understood that the scientists had a longer-term plan to battle the mosquitoes, but they were also happy for the insecticide spray in the present moment.

Since you started this work, praise God, malaria has been reduced, because mosquitoes dont bite us anymore, said Ali Ouattara, one elder in the community.

In the next phase of the project, scientists will have to explain to Ouattara why theyre actually releasing more mosquitoes.

Going straight from zero to gene drives would be too extreme, so scientists are planning to release regular genetically engineered mosquitoes first either here in Bana or in one of two other villages nearby.

Those mosquitoes, which could be released next year, are sterile males: Most of them are male, and they cannot have offspring. A field release is not intended to reduce the prevalence of malaria; rather, it is to prepare the scientists and the locals for the eventual arrival of the gene drive mosquitoes, said Delphine Thizy, who directs the work of engaging local, national, and international leaders for the project.

The outreach teams have started talking about DNA with their flash cards. But they arent saying anything yet to the locals about the much more powerful, and complicated, idea of a gene drive.

Partly thats because researchers didnt want the residents of Burkina Faso to expect that a miracle solution to the malaria epidemic isjust around the corner, Thizy said. Scientists in London havent yet created the gene drive mosquitoes that would be used, and field trials of such mosquitoes are years away.

Also, she said, gene drives are hard to understand.

To be fair, even in Europe and in North America, its complex to understand gene drives in one shot.

If gene drive mosquitoes arrive in Burkina Faso, it will be thanks to the vision of Abdoulaye Diabate, a soft-spoken medical entomologist with a singular mission: to stop malaria.

The disease is ever-present in thiscountry mosquito nets hang for sale by the roadside, and hotel proprietors lay out smoldering coils in the courtyards to ward off mosquitoes as dusk falls.

Diabate, who is deeply involved in malaria eradication efforts worldwide, became dismayed when, in the 1990s, he realized that mosquitoes were building up resistance against the insecticide used on bed nets here.

If this is the only tool we have in hand, then forget about malaria elimination, Diabate said.

But,in 2012, he received an invitation to a meeting about the Target Malaria project, which was focused on solutions involving genetic engineering. He jumped at the chance.

Today he is leading the Burkina Faso team, trying to get the whole world from remote villages to international diplomats on board with his ambitious research.

Meanwhile, thousands of miles away in the United Kingdom, geneticists at Imperial College London are working on designing the gene drive mosquitoes. Specifically, theyre studying two different ways to disrupt the reproductive system of one particular species, Anopheles gambiae: reduce the number of female babies (only females bite and spread the disease) or stop the mosquitoes from having offspring in general.

To make the population predominantly male, Austin Burt, Target Malarias primary investigator, and collaborators are studying an X shredder a gene that destroys the X chromosome in sperm, making all offspring males. Alongside that, theyre looking at reducing the number of mosquitoes of both sexes by creating genes that make them sterile.

Either approach might lead to massive population collapse within two to eight years, according to Charles Godfray, a University of Oxford professor and biologist who works on modeling for the Target Malaria project.

But the insects wouldnt go extinct, scientists say. The gene drive mosquitoes currently under consideration would only reduce the population of Anopheles gambiae enough to stop the transmission of malaria.

The foundation is not interested in eliminating Anopheles mosquitoes, said Dr. Scott Miller, who leads malaria research and development for the Gates Foundation. Were interested in eliminating malaria.

It will take years to reach the point that scientists will be ready to test the gene drive mosquitoes in the wild. In the meantime, they are facing the challenge of winning over local residents who might be wary of these new creatures.

Mariam Pare was initially frightened. A commanding woman who teaches in a Koranic school, Pare livesacross the street from the IRSS in Bobo-Dioulasso. Shesaid that when she first heard about mosquito research going on at the lab, she feared that the scientists were breeding mosquitoes to let loose on the locals. But after meetings and discussions with project staff, she came to understand that theyare instead trying to fight against the mosquito.

She even took a tour of the insectary that currently holds the gene-edited sterile male mosquitoes, and could eventually hold the gene drive ones. She saw fans that would suck away mosquitoes if they happened to escape from their cages, and a hot water bath where unnecessary mosquitoes go to die.

Because I saw what was going on in there, I believe and trust the people that work in there, she said.

Earning Pares trust was particularly important for the team because she lives so close to the insectary, her consent was required to import the sterile male mosquitoes. That requirement isnt a legal one, but one that the Target Malaria project has put in place. The Gates Foundation has also said that gene drive mosquitoes will only be released if the host country agrees.

Lassina Diarra, a tailor whose turquoise-walled shop is down the road from the research lab, also had to give his consent. Sitting on the corner of a table among scraps of fabric and hand-tailored suits, he said that he was impressed by the scientists transparency and reliability. Two outreach workers recruited him to serve on a group of 12 local leaders who communicateinformation about the project to the citys residents, dubbed the relay group, along with a different committee to address community grievances. Every few weeks, he knocks on doors up and down the streets, updating his neighbors on the scientists progress.

In June, Diarra and Pare both signed off on the arrival of the sterile males. So did Kadidia Ouattara, one of the relay group members and the president of multiple neighborhood associations. She recalled a joyous gathering filled with dance and song.

Ni fonyon douma ni bora mi? they sang in Dioula. Ni fonyon douma ni bora mi?

The song translates to, Where did this good air come from? and, more colloquially, means, This is too good to be true!

Ouattara said that it is a traditional song commemorating good news a wedding, the birth of a baby, the success of a student in her exams. And on that day, it was celebrating the impending arrival of genetically modified mosquitoes.

Burkina Faso has experience with genetically modified organisms. One of the first associations some residents make with genetic engineering is Monsanto, which has been selling genetically modified cotton seeds to Burkinabe farmers since the 2000s. But the countrys growers association stopped buying the seeds in 2016 in the wake of concerns about the cottons quality and country-wide protests against the company.

One resident of Bobo-Dioulasso complained that genetically modified food rots quickly, and said that he hopes the mosquitoes suffer the same fate: an early death.

The fight against malaria is a big concern, but the solutions are sometimes scary, said Sylvestre Tiemtore, the director of an organization that represents over half of the nongovernmental organizations in Burkina Faso. The group met with Target Malaria in July, a discussion which was very heated, he said.

In movies he cited Jurassic Park weve seen some research that went out of control, he said.

Scientists familiar withthe effort here say defining the idea of genetically modified to residents here might be of limited use, because it wont help people understand what the mosquitoes are or what they will really do, said Javier Lezaun, deputy director of the Institute for Science, Innovation, and Society at the University of Oxford, who is not involved in the Target Malaria project. In fact, the phrase might just serve to distract and scare he spoke of another community in Tanzania who thought that a swarm of mosquitoes that invaded a hospital were genetically modified (they werent), and of others in Brazil who thought that Zika arrived as a result of genetically modified mosquitoes (it didnt).

As long as you explain something about the specific capabilities of the mosquitoes, or the limitations of these particular mosquitoes and how theyre supposed to behave in the wild or in the facilities, I think that serves the purpose of explaining genetic modification, Lezaun said.

And thats what many people are curious about. At the July meeting with NGOs, hosted by the Secrtariat Permanent des Organisations Non Gouvernementales (SPONG for short), attendees wanted to know: What would happen to the local ecosystem? And might these engineered mosquitoes be able to transmit other diseases?

Some of these questions dont yethave answers, but others do. A risk assessment commissionedby the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, a US nonprofit that supports the federal agency, found that the risk of the sterile mosquitoes currently in Bobo-Dioulasso transmitting other diseases was incredibly low; the modified mosquitoes probably wont spread more malaria than their wild cousins; and the genetic modification probably wont spread from the mosquito to other animals.

Outside scientists, convened by the FNIH in May, had previously concluded that Anopheles gambiae is not a keystone species, meaning that if its population shrank dramatically, the ecosystem would not be substantially impacted.

But the meetings continue. Tiemtore, SPONGs director, said that he would like to have a meeting with representatives of different health-related NGOs that are based in Burkina Fasos 13 different regions, to educate them about the project. But that requires money to bring them to the capital, and to cover the costs of the meeting itself.

They might need to rent a room, Tiemtore said. They might need to offer some coffee breaks. That costs money. Who pays for that? If you dont do all of those things, your mosquitoes are going to come out, but they wont be released in the regions, because the people will not agree with it, because they didnt have enough information on it, and they will have the right to be afraid.

The development of powerful new genetic engineering technologies, often outstripping regulators ability to keep up, is forcing scientists to reckon with the ethics of their work in a new way.

Of course, humans have been making potentially irreversible changes to our environment for a long time: clearing forests for farming, building power plants that change the composition of the atmosphere, and producing untold tons of synthetic materials like plastic that will stay in the environment for hundreds of years.

But gene drives lend these questions a different sort of urgency. The genetic technology can quickly change the properties of an entire population of a species, undoing millennia of evolution in a handful of years. And once you let them out of the cage, theres no going back other world-altering technologies have not been self-perpetuating like gene drive animals would be.

So scientists are treading carefully and doing what they can to keep the rest of the world involved. This has led to difficult questions: Who needs to give them permission to do certain things? What does it mean for residents to be fully informed? In answering them, there arent a lot of models to follow. There are only a fewgene drive projects underway in the world, and none has yet resulted in the release of the animalsinto the wild.

Academic research on how to effectively include non-scientists in global healthdecisions is also lacking, said Jim Lavery, an Emory University professor of global health and ethics who has worked with the Target Malaria project in the past.

Right now, Lavery said, scientists can count the number of phone calls they make and the number of people who show up at community meetings, but we dont even have an understanding at a proxy level of what those things are supposed to represent in terms of effectiveness of engagement.

While researchers like Lavery are trying to determine how to measure success, research is plowing ahead. Some scientists are thinking about releasing gene drive mice halfway across the world, in New Zealand, to eliminate invasive species. AndKevin Esvelt, a gene drive guru based at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is flying to Argentina in September to talk about using gene drives to get rid of flesh-eating flies.

He has said that gene drives are more important as a societal tool to change the way that science is done it should be open to and inclusive of the people it will impact. To that extent, he praised Target Malarias community work. I honestly dont see how you could do it any other way, he said, citing the language and cultural barriers that the project is working to overcome.

How the project is going to introduce gene drive mosquitoes, though, is an open question. National regulators and international organizations like the World Health Organization are still working on developing guidelines for introducinggenedrive animals.

And in Burkina Faso, Thizy said she hasnt even yet put a lot of thought into what it will mean for local leaders to understand a release of gene drive mosquitoes. She said it will probably include knowing that the modified mosquitoes will stay in the environment and grow in number, until some point at which the population of Anopheles gambiae will be reduced.

But, said Thizy, exactly how the gene drive works may matter less to the people than the impact it will have on them and their lives.

She pointed, by way of analogy, to her previous work as a consultant for a mining company in the Ivory Coast: It wasnt how big is the hole, how many holes, and how does the machine work that the area residents were worried about, she said, but rather how they would be compensated and what jobs would be created.

On a dusty Wednesday morning earlier this year, Kadidia Ouattara arrived at an outdoor market, eager to chat with the vendors about genetically engineered mosquitoes.

As a woman spooned tomato sauce from a gigantic aluminum can onto plastic sheets for individual sale, Ouattara told her about the insect lab just a few minutes walk down the street.

The researchers who work there are trying to reduce the population of mosquitoes, she said. Dont be afraid I saw the inside of the lab and all of the research. There are public meetings where they explain what they are doing, and if there is another one, I will let everybody know.

The woman was delighted. May God help the project be a success, she said.

Farther along, she came upon a butcher who she knew to be particularly recalcitrant. He thinks were getting money from the white people, Ouattara said. But thats not true shes a volunteer.

Ouattara walked up to the man, who was hacking at a piece of meat with a foot-long knife, bits of gristle flying everywhere and flies swarming. Rivulets of blood ran along the dusty ground.

If there is a meeting about the project, I am begging you to come, she said.

Scarcely taking his eyes off of the meat, the butcher mumbled some kind of assent.

Ouattaras enthusiasm was undimmed; she strode off to a woman selling onions. And shed be back soon with more news to share.

Eric Boodman and Kate Sheridan contributed reporting.

Special thanks to Housmane Sereme and Steve Sanou for translation services.

Republished with permission fromSTAT. This articleoriginally appearedon March 14, 2017

See original here:
A Revolutionary Genetic Experiment is Planned for a West African Village If Residents Agree - Scientific American

Genetic Engineering – Hutchinson News

MANHATTAN Richard Dick Janssen of Ellsworth was named the 2017 Kansas Stockman of the Year during the 47th annual Stockmens Dinner in Manhattan.

Industry friends recognized Janssen for his contributions to the beef industry, and speakers described him as a visionary and an accomplished cattleman.

He is one of the most courageous and daring genetic engineers on the planet, said fellow Angus breeder Mary Ferguson.

Dan Moser, president of Angus Genetics Inc., said Janssen is making the investment in new technology and seeing the benefits and costs with his own eyes, with his own cattle and his own checkbook. Dick has positioned his business and those of his customers to take maximum benefit of these new tools.

Janssen started raising and showing his own Angus cattle in 4-H when he was 11, and hes been involved in the registered Angus business ever since. A 1964 graduate of Kansas State University with a degree in animal science, Janssen returned home and joined in a partnership with his brother, Arlo.

They farmed 1,200 acres of wheat, milo and alfalfa and managed their Angus herd. They also custom-fit and showed cattle nationwide. In 1969, Arlo transitioned to fitting and showing cattle full-time while Richard stayed in Kansas to manage his division of Green Garden Angus and farming.

In 1974, he married Shelly and they continued to expand their cattle operation, which now has 350 head. The couple had two children, Ben and Elizabeth.

In 1989, John Brethour, beef cattle scientist at K-States Ag Research Center-Hays, used the Green Garden herd to perfect ultrasound measurements of cattle.

In 2000, they were one of the first herds to use GeneStar DNA mapping and today they are using 50K DNA testing for yearling bulls and heifers.

In 2010, the Janssens sent their bulls to Hays Development Center in Diagonal, Iowa, to be evaluated for average daily gain, dry-matter intake, feed-to-gain and residual feed intake.

They used the testing station for three years and in 2013 they installed their own GrowSafe feed intake system so they can test all of their yearling bulls and heifers at home.

Janssen also served as Kansas Angus Association president in 1980, served two terms as an American Angus Association director and was the 1989-90 president. He also was chairman of the Certified Angus Beef (CAB) board of directors from 1988-89.

In 2000, Richard, Shelly, Ben and Elizabeth formed a limited family partnership, and since 2010 Ben, Elizabeth and their spouses have been running the operation, with Richard and Shelly acting as advisers.

The Stockman of the Year Award is presented annually by the Livestock and Meat Industry Council.

See more here:
Genetic Engineering - Hutchinson News

The Role of Small Species in Genetic Modification, at UNCW – WHQR

Listen to this story here

Most of us know very little about the organisms in our own backyard, bedroom, roommate or even on our bodies. Rob Dunn, a Professor of Applied Ecology at North Carolina State University, will try to change that when he speaks tomorrow night at UNCW.

Professor Dunns work focuses on ecology and evolution, with a keen interest on the small species that live all around us and the role they play in the world.

One is the extent to which everything about how our bodies work is really contingent on all the species that live in and on our bodies.

In addition, Dunn will discuss how in the age of genetically-modified crops and foods, nature and what lives in the wild still have a large role to play.

And so you might imagine that if you can genetically-engineer all kinds of new crops that you dont need wild nature anymore, but it turns out that most of our tricks for engineering those crops come from new genes that we found somewhere in the wild.

Also on Wednesday Dunn will be unveiling his new book, titled Never Out of Season.

The lecture will be followed by a question and answer session and book-signing.

Professor Dunns talk is at 7 p.m., this Wednesday, in the Warwick Ballroom at UNCW.

Go here to read the rest:
The Role of Small Species in Genetic Modification, at UNCW - WHQR

Shortcuts? Insulin, other medicines developed faster with genetic engineering – Genetic Literacy Project

Given that its accomplishments include the domestication of plants and animals, biotechnology is practically synonymous with civilization itselfOver the last couple of centuries, a more systematic approach has been devised.

An explosion of discoveries in the 19th and 20th centuries ushered in the modern era of biotechnologyLearning about everything from enzymes to hormones to vitamins meant medical researchers could deliberately design drugs to target specific problems. The new information also showed them how to go about producing these medications by tapping into natural biological processes.

The main steps of biotech medication development consist of determining the biologic source of a desired medication, mass-producing the source, extracting and purifying the medication, and preparing the medication for use.

The introduction of genetic engineering has altered the first step in creating biotech medicine. Instead of simply identifying a biological entity that produces the desired substance, an organism is literally created for this purpose.

For more sophisticated pharmaceuticals, engineered animal cells are used instead of bacteria.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post: How are Biotechnology Medicines Made?

See more here:

Shortcuts? Insulin, other medicines developed faster with genetic engineering - Genetic Literacy Project

A new tool for genetically engineering the oldest branch of life – Phys.Org

March 8, 2017 G. William Arends Professor of Microbiology and theme leader of the IGB's Mining Microbial Genomes theme Bill Metcalf, left, with IGB Fellow Dipti Nayak. Credit: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

A new study by G. William Arends Professor of Microbiology at the University of Illinois Bill Metcalf with postdoctoral Fellow Dipti Nayak has documented the use of CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing in the third domain of life, Archaea, for the first time. Their groundbreaking work, reported in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has the potential to vastly accelerate future studies of these organisms, with implications for research including global climate change. Metcalf and Nayak are members of the Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology at Illinois.

"Under most circumstances our model archaeon, Methanosarcina acetivorans, has a doubling time of eight to ten hours, as compared to E. coli, which can double in about 30 minutes. What that means is that doing genetics, getting a mutant, can take monthsthe same thing would take three days in E. coli," explains Nayak. "What CRISPR-Cas9 enables us to do, at a very basic level, is speed up the whole process. It removes a major bottleneck... in doing genetics research with this archaeon.

"Even more," continues Nayak, "with our previous techniques, mutations had to be introduced one step at a time. Using this new technology, we can introduce multiple mutations at the same time. We can scale up the process of mutant generation exponentially with CRISPR."

CRISPR, short for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, began as an immune defense system in archaea and bacteria. By identifying and storing short fragments of foreign DNA, Cas (CRISPR-associated system) proteins are able to quickly identify that DNA in the future, so that it can then quickly be destroyed, protecting the organism from viral invasion.

Since its discovery, a version of this immune systemCRISPR-Cas9has been modified to edit genomes in the lab. By pairing Cas9 with a specifically engineered RNA guide rather than a fragment of invasive DNA, the CRISPR system can be directed to cut a cell's genome in an arbitrary location such that existing genes can be removed or new ones added. This system has been prolifically useful in editing eukaryotic systems from yeast, to plant, to fish and even human cells, earning it the American Association for the Advancement of Science's 2015 Breakthrough of the Year award. However, its implementation in prokaryotic species has been met with hurdles, due in part to their different cellular processes.

To use CRISPR in a cellular system, researchers have to develop a protocol that takes into account a cell's preferred mechanism of DNA repair: after CRISPR's "molecular scissors" cut the chromosome, the cell's repair system steps in to mend the damage through a mechanism that can be harnessed to remove or add additional genetic material. In eukaryotic cells, this takes the form of Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ). Though this pathway has been used for CRISPR-mediated editing, it has the tendency to introduce genetic errors during its repair process: nucleotides, the rungs of the DNA ladder, are often added or deleted at the cut site.

NHEJ is very uncommon in prokaryotes, including Archaea; instead, their DNA is more often repaired through a process known as homology-directed repair. By comparing the damage to a DNA template, homology-directed repair creates what Nayak calls a "deterministic template"the end result can be predicted in advance and tailored to the exact needs of the researcher.

In many ways, homology-directed repair is actually preferable for genome editing: "As much as we want CRISPR-Cas9 to make directed edits in eukaryotic systems, we often end up with things that we don't want, because of NHEJ," explains Nayak. "In this regard, it was a good thing that most archaeal strains don't have a non-homologous end joining repair system, so the only way DNA can be repaired is through this deterministic homologous repair route."

Though it may seem counter-intuitive, one of Nayak and Metcalf's first uses of CRISPR-Cas9 was to introduce an NHEJ mechanism in Methanosarcina acetivorans. Though generally not preferable for genome editing, says Nayak, NHEJ has one use for which it's superior to homologous repair: "If you just want to delete a gene, if you don't care how ... non-homologous end joining is actually more efficient."

By using the introduced NHEJ repair system to perform what are known as "knock-out" studies, wherein a single gene is removed or silenced to see what changes are produced and what processes that gene might affect, Nayak says that future research will be able to assemble a genetic atlas of M. acetivorans and other archaeal species. Such an atlas would be incredibly useful for a variety of fields of research involving Archaea, including an area of particular interest to the Metcalf lab, climate change.

"Methanosarcina acetivorans is the one of the most genetically tractable archaeal strains," says Nayak. "[Methanogens are] a class of archaea that produce gigatons of this potent greenhouse gas every year, play a keystone role in the global carbon cycle, and therefore contribute significantly to global climate change." By studying the genetics of this and similar organisms, Nayak and Metcalf hope to gain not only a deeper understanding of archaeal genetics, but of their role in broader environmental processes.

In all, this research represents an exciting new direction in studying and manipulating archaea. "We began this research to determine if the use of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in archaea was even possible," concludes Nayak. "What we've discovered is that it's not only possible, but it works remarkably well, even as compared to eukaryotic systems."

Explore further: Modifying fat content in soybean oil with the molecular scissors Cpf1

More information: Dipti D. Nayak et al, Cas9-mediated genome editing in the methanogenic archaeon, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2017). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1618596114

A team from the Center for Genome Engineering, within the Institute for Basic Research (IBS), succeeded in editing two genes that contribute to the fat contents of soybean oil using the new CRISPR-Cpf1 technology: an alternative ...

Although the genome editing system known as CRISPR/Cas has revolutionized genetic research in cell lines, its overall efficiency has been relatively poor when used to generate genetically altered animals for disease modeling. ...

Researchers from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) have harnessed the power of CRISPR/Cas9 to create more-potent chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells that enhance tumor rejection in mice. The unexpected findings, ...

Rest easy, folks. Armies of genetically modified super-species are unlikely to conquer Earth anytime soon.

A unique gene-editing method that efficiently inserts DNA into genes located in dividing and non-dividing cells of living rats has been developed by a team of international researchers, including scientists from KAUST.

CRISPR-Cas9 is a powerful new tool for editing the genome. For researchers around the world, the CRISPR-Cas9 technique is an exciting innovation because it is faster and cheaper than previous methods. Now, using a molecular ...

A team of researchers with members from several institutions in India has found evidence of ostrich relatives living in India as far back as 25,000 years ago. In their paper uploaded to the open access site PLOS ONE, the ...

A new mathematical model could help clarify what drove the evolution of large brains in humans and other animals, according to a study published in PLOS Computational Biology.

A global research team has built five new synthetic yeast chromosomes, meaning that 30 percent of a key organism's genetic material has now been swapped out for engineered replacements. This is one of several findings of ...

Led by Tianjin University Professor Ying-Jin Yuan, TJU's synthetic biology team has completed the synthesis of redesigned yeast chromosomes synV and synX with the two studies published in Science on March 10, 2017.

A small fly the size of a grain of rice could be the Top Gun of the fly world, with a remarkable ability to detect and intercept its prey mid-air, changing direction mid-flight if necessary before sweeping round for the kill.

A specific protein inside cells senses threatening changes in its environment, such as heat or starvation, and triggers an adaptive response to help the cell continue to function and grow under stressful conditions, according ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

See more here:
A new tool for genetically engineering the oldest branch of life - Phys.Org

Venter discusses genetic engineering, human longevity – The Daily Princetonian

In a quote written on a chalkboard in the Caltech archives, Richard Feynman said, What I cannot create, I do not understand.

This quote is the root of inspiration for geneticist J. Craig Venters research and scientific mission. Genomics is at an exciting stage today where what we understand about the genome can be applied directly to human health, Venter said in a lecture titled From Synthetic Life to Human Longevity on Wednesday.

Venter explained that there was no point in increasing lifespan alone, but the challenge was to increase an individuals healthspan. He stated that 40 percent of men and 24 percent of women between the ages of 50-74 in the United States do not reach the age of 74. A third of this population dies of cardiovascular disease and another third of cancer, leaving all other causes of death to just a third of the overall percentage, he said.

Venter, co-founder of Human Longevity, Inc., said that his goal was to change medicines approach to being proactive, predictive, personalized, and preventative by using whole genome sequencing and cutting-edge imaging and measurement technology. Early detection is literally lifesaving, he said, explaining that over 40 percent of people who entered his lab thinking they were healthy turned out not to be.

He said that his own genome showed an increased risk for prostate cancer, which he corroborated with a measure of his testosterone levels. While men with over 22 triplet repeats of a certain sequence on their X chromosome have very low incidences of prostate cancer, Venter said he only had six, which placed him on the extremely low end of the spectrum. He said that based on his genome sequence and testosterone readings, he underwent a prostatectomy a few months ago.

Early prediction of diseases like Alzheimers, which can be predicted 20 years in advance of the first symptoms by using whole-genome sequencing and neuro-quant data, can be prevented with the right drugs, Venter noted. He added that the same could be done with cancer tumors, and there was the potential to move to entirely preventative cancer vaccines, something that already exists for some forms of the disease.

Venter said that genotype could predict not only disease but also other phenotypes. His Face Project uses machine learning to reconstruct a three-dimensional human face from the genome alone, he noted. Venter also said that recordings of a voice could be used to predict the speakers age, sex, and height.

All of this information comes from about 40,000 genome sequences that has produced over 20 petabytes of data, Venter explained. He added that the sequencing of one million human genomes could produce one quintillion bytes of data, an amount that nobody in the world knows how to handle, yet the government could not be convinced that genomics was a big data problem. Sequencing the first human genome, a project whose private arm was spearheaded by Venter, took over nine years, cost more than a billion dollars, and, in 1999, had the third largest computer in the world built solely for that purpose, he explained.

Venters other major project was the synthesis of a living organism from scratch, which he and his team at the J. Craig Venter Institute accomplished in 2008 by converting digital binary bits into an organism that could live on its own.

The day we announced this, both the President and the Pope released statements, with the President calling for this to be the number one priority of the bioethics committee, and the Pope reassuring people that we had not actually created life, but just changed one of lifes motors, he said.

Venters team also discovered that the genome could be modularized so that entire sets of genes could be classified as metabolism, for example, and inserted into the genome. He said that to distinguish this synthetic life from existing organisms, into the genome of the organism was coded the names of the forty scientists that worked on the project, and quotations from James Joyce, Robert Oppenheimer, and Feynman.

Venter explained that despite having created an entirely new organism, scientists still do not understand the functions of a third of the genes, only that they appear throughout the biological tree and are necessary for the organisms survival.

Like any good science, we found out how little we know rather than how much we know, Venter said.

The event, part of the Princeton Public Lectures Vanuxem Lecture Series, was attended by members of the community in addition to Princeton students and faculty. The lecture took place in McCosh 50 at 6 p.m. on Wednesday.

See the rest here:
Venter discusses genetic engineering, human longevity - The Daily Princetonian

The world is running out of water. But genetic engineering can help – CityMetric

In the village of Kafr on the western edge of Greater Cairo you can see this almost color-coded conflict.

Its not a village in the traditional sense though. Brick high-rises stretch ten or 12 stories into the air between fields of alfalfa and leeks.

This is the most ubiquitous architecture of Egypts capital: unpainted red brick buildings that, when combined with their concrete beams and columns, look like Brutalist takes on plaid. Until the 1970s most bricks came from nearby, made from Nile silt, which also provided the rich topsoil that provided the foundation for agriculture in Egypt.

These brick buildings and farmland are now in direct competition with each other for space.

Most new construction in Egypt is on that agricultural land, despite a complete ban on the practice. Each year, 16,000 acres of agricultural land are built on, according to 10 Tooba, an independent urbanism organization.

The fertile Nile Delta, at the base of which Cairo sits, seen from space. Image: NASA

With only 2.75 per cent percent of Egypts land suitable for farming, and decreasing on a per capita basis, the land becomes more precious each day.

Kamel Sayyed moved to Kafr six years ago from another nearby village to take advantage of the cheaper rents. He rented an apartment then for 300 Egyptian pounds (EGP) a month, or 45 at the time.

Soon though, growth exploded. Building was long illegal and enforcement piecemeal, but when Hosni Mubarak was overthrown in 2011, a security vacuum started a blitz on illegal building.

Sayyed says that almost immediately after Mubarak was forced from office, heavy machinery started digging foundations. Steel, concrete, and brick prices increased overnight. Egypts Informal Settlements Development Fund, a government organization, said there was a 10 to 20 per cent increase in three years.

South of Cairo, hundreds of smoke stacks extend to the horizon for as far as the eye can see. Each of these furnaces can churn out 250,000 red bricks everyday, feeding the citys appetite for housing and development. This summer, only two or three were operating, as fuel prices were outpacing how much the factoriescould sell.

Development in Cairo has become sprawling and indiscriminate. Image: Allan Doyle

The government has encouraged development on desert land, in new satellite cities, and suburban-gated communities. One former Egyptian prime minister even referred to the escape from the Nile Valley as a matter of life and death.

These new cities, as they are known in Egypt, get 29.8 billion EGP in investment, while existing cities got 28.4 billion. New cities only host about two per cent of Egypts population, though.

For the 16,000 acres of rural land thats built on each year, Shawkat says that only 4,000 acres of desert land are developed. Rural growth rates are doing something in Egypt that doesnt happen in most of the Global South outpacing urban growth. Still, Cairo is listed as the fastest growing city worldwide in terms of population.

Part of building on agricultural land is because there is need, says Yahia Shawkat of 10 Tooba. There is a human, other part, which is speculation: land prices or property prices are really the only thing sort of rising in terms of value in Egypt.

Urbanizing agricultural land is much, much more profitable than tilling it.

With 52 per cent of farmers in the country being small farmers, the difference in profit presents a straightforward economic choice for many, for the time being.

Building on agricultural land in Kafr has become an industry. Sitting in his office in Kafr, Hany Mahmouf Hafez, who works in construction, says that a single apartment can fetch at least 6,950, while a floor can cost between 900 and 1,400 to build. By comparison, an acre of land can bring in 90 or 140 a year. A woman picking out paint interrupted to say that its the best way to make money in the town.

Whether agricultural land will remain less profitable is up for debate.

Since Egypt floated its currency, agriculture seems more profitable, with food exports rising and imports declining.

For many, real estate was seen as a hedge against a declining currency. With the floatation, real estate might not be as good an investment in the short or medium term.

The Nile runs through Cairo's heart.Image: Blueshade

The proposed legislation is an outright ban on building on agricultural land, but that is far from the reality. The idea is to freeze the encroachment of cities into farmland and push it out into the desert, hence the massive investment into new cities.

But informal settlements that encroached onto farmland had what the new communities didnt. They were near existing networks of water, sewage, and electricit, and even though they couldnt be connected legally, a contractor could pay a bribe.

Contractors can pay 230 for an apartment to get power, or 900 for a full building to be connected to the grid. In order to prevent the huge drains on the power grid, the Egyptian government has put these informal settlements in a legal grey area by a partial legalization of unofficial power meters.

Its a tricky problem. The outright ban isnt working due to a lack of so-called soft infrastructure. The government has built roads, pipes, and power lines, but hasnt provided enough schools, hospitals, and cultural activities to make living there make sense.

Its difficult to think about how to allow rural growth, when ideally it would be minimized. Shawkat says there are ways to build in growth in a way that is sustainable.

Ill do it in a certain density and a certain way that would actually I would lose maybe ten acres, but Im going to save 50.

Whether the government plans to do that isnt clear, and the long-term plan for food security is similarly hazy.

In the longer term, Egypt may need to learn to break with thousands of years of tradition, and start growing horizontally east to west, rather than north to south along the Nile.

If it cant, Egypts burgeoning cities will choke the fertile farmland of the Nile on which its heritage was built.

Want more of this stuff? Follow CityMetric onTwitterorFacebook.

Continued here:

The world is running out of water. But genetic engineering can help - CityMetric

Environmentalists should embrace ‘green genetic engineering’ of crops using CRISPR, German organic researchers says – Genetic Literacy Project

[Editors note: The following is a Q&A with Urs Niggli, director of the Research Institute for Organic Agriculture in Germany. It has been translated from German by Google.]

New techniques are currently revolutionizing genetic research. They allow extremely precise changes to the genome. This so-called genetic surgery changes the debate about the risks and chances of interventions in the genome.

Urs Niggli

Mr. Niggli is currently discussing a new form of Green Genetic Engineering . The so-called CRISPR/Cas method is the focus of the debate.

What could be achieved with this procedure?

[T]here are already new varieties of wheat, maize, millet, rice and tomato. For farmers even for eco-farmers the new method opens up many opportunities: plants that are better suited to difficult environmental conditions such as drought, soil dampness or salinization can be bred. The fine root architecture could be improved so that the roots absorb more nutrients such as phosphorus or nitrogen from the soil. Tolerance or resistance to diseases and parasites, storage and quality of food and feed could also be improved. Critics like to dismiss these possibilities as empty promises. I think these are obviously ecological improvements that can reduce the big problems of conventional agriculture.

I strongly advocate a case-by-case approach and am opposed to a general demonization of the new genetic engineering.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post:Eco-researcher: I am against a general demonization of the new genetic engineering (IN GERMAN)

Read more here:

Environmentalists should embrace 'green genetic engineering' of crops using CRISPR, German organic researchers says - Genetic Literacy Project