Gene Therapy Biotech Founded to Save the CEO’s Daughter Goes Public in France – Labiotech.eu (blog)

Lysogene has raised 22.6M from its IPO on EuronextParis that will contribute to the completion of clinical trials to treat the rare genetic diseases.

Karen Aiach, CEO of Lysogene, started the company back in 2009 to develop a life-saving treatment forher daughter Ornella withSanfilippo A. This rare genetic disease severely affects the nervous system of children, who often dont reach adulthood.

No treatment beyond palliative care exists as of today, but Lysogene wants to change that. The company is developing a gene therapy toreplace thefaulty gene causing the disease. Lysogene entered the clinical stage in a record time and is now getting ready for a pivotal Phase II/III trial, the last step before commercialization.

Two-thirdsof the funds raised in its IPO will be used to support the completion of this trial, while a quarter will be invested in a Phase I/II study for GM1 gangliosidosis, another rare neurodegenerative disease. The rest will be directed towards further R&D programs.

Of note,22.6Mis close to the minimum the company was expecting to raise, with a maximum of up to39.7M. A potential reason might be that investors are waryof the small patient population that could benefit from the therapy. Only around 3,000 people worldwide have been diagnosed with Sanfilippo A.

Still, the company is backed by top VCs that seem confident in it.Of the total funds raised, 15Mcame from Lysogenes existing investors Sofinnova Partners, BpiFrance Investissement (InnoBio) and Novo A/S.

The IPO has set the companys market cap at82.1Mand will support its next steps towards commercialization. We were surprised to see it was launched in Paris rather than on the Nasdaqsince the company is very active in Boston and the US stock market is generally more welcoming for biotechs.Maybe Lysogene is saving it for a future time.

For more info, read our interview with Karen Aiach or watch her speaking in arare disease panel at Labiotech Refresh:

Images from Lysogene

Read the original:

Gene Therapy Biotech Founded to Save the CEO's Daughter Goes Public in France - Labiotech.eu (blog)

Audentes Therapeutics: This Gene Therapy Story Could Deliver Significant Upside In 2017 – Seeking Alpha

Shares of Audentes Therapeutics (Pending:BOLD) have finished flat over the past year. As a very early stage biotech focused on progressing its innovative gene therapy products through the clinic, I hadn't given the company much thought as I felt there were no material catalysts on the radar that made it a buy.

BOLD data by YCharts

However, recently it popped up on my radar again, and I believe now the story is much more compelling for 2017.

On February 1st, the company announced FDA clearance of its IND (investigational new drug application) for drug candidate AT342 with the intent of treating patients with Crigler-Najjar Syndrome. This disease is a rare genetic disorder (hundreds of patients worldwide, prevalence 1-9 / 100 000)whereby patients' bodies are unable to convert and clear bilirubin. These patients consequently develop abnormally high levels of bilirub in the blood and can in some cases result in severe or life threatening symptoms, including neurological damage.

The drug candidate is an AAV8 vector containing a functional copy of the UTG1A1 gene. In a mouse model of the disease a single administration of AT342 clinically relevant decreases in total bilirubin levels in a durable manner that showed higher doses had higher efficacy.

The company now plans to launch a multi-center ascending dose phase 1/2 study, dubbed VALENS, with initial data due by the end of the year. Also, the company will initiate a clinical-assessment and run-in study, dubbed LUSTRO, which will enroll 16 to 18 Crigler-Najjar patients. The latter study will aid the company in finding patients for the VALENS study, as well as serve as a within patient control.

Primary endpoints for the VALENS study include safety and efficacy, with the latter measuring serum changes in bilirubin and tracking number of hours on phototherapy within a 24 hour period. Key secondary endpoints to keep an eye on include percentage of patients successfully weaned off phototherapy and DNA and RNA levels from liver biopsy at 24 weeks.

Phototherapy is the current standard of care for the condition, where the patient is exposed to a blue LED light in an apparatus- the light breaks bilirubin down into substances that are not toxic. However, as it is a lengthy process that requires 10 to 12 hours of treatment per day and diminishes quality of life, one can see why patients would prefer an alternative.

I would be remiss to mention the company's promising stable of gene therapy candidates, which includes AT132 for X-Linked Mytubular Myopothy (XLMTM), AT982 for Pompe Disease, and AT307 for CASQ2-Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia ( CASQ2-CPVT).

AT132 has shown promising data in preclinical studies, including improved disease symptoms and survival rates. An ongoing phase 1/2 trial is enrolling twelve patients and initial data will be reported around year end as well. XLMTM is a monogenic disease in which patients experience severe muscle weakness, respiratory failure and early death, with half dying by 18 months of age. Management has pointed out that in one study effects from a single administration of AT132 were seen to last four years to date.

In January, the company announced full year guidance and other important developments, including the initiation of large scale cGMP production at its own manufacturing facility. This plant would meet FDA and EMA guidelines and allow the company to manufacture the drugs in its pipeline when commercialized.

As for AT982 in Pompe disease, the company expects to report data from an investigator sponsored phase 1/2 study by year end. Pompe disease is currently treated by enzyme replacement therapy (NASDAQ:ERT), with current treatment Lumizyme generating over 650 million in 2015.

I believe AT309 is intriguing but a nonfactor this year, as the company plans to file an IND by the end of 2017 and only in 2018 will we see this candidate in the clinic.

With $119 million of cash as of September 30th and a market capitalization of around $340 million, it appears the company's gene therapy pipeline is being assigned a minimal valuation of only around $200 million when cash is backed out. The company expects its cash position to provide a runway into late 2018, but I expect a non-dilutive funding, partnership, or secondary offering by year end.

Shares of Audentes Therapeutics are a buy in my opinion, worth establishing a position in the near term. Shares could run considerably into data year end, at which point prior to read out investors might want to take partial profits to take risk off the table. I wouldn't be opposed to holding some shares longer term too, as there is considerable upside here if even one of its drug candidates posts positive results.

Risks include the above mentioned possibility of a dilutive financing, as well as any disappointing data in clinical candidates or unforeseen adverse safety events in early trials. As the company has multiple clinical candidates, downside caused by negative results in one would be cushioned to an extent by its deep pipeline and cash position.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, but may initiate a long position in BOLD over the next 72 hours.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

More:

Audentes Therapeutics: This Gene Therapy Story Could Deliver Significant Upside In 2017 - Seeking Alpha

For people with congenital hearing loss, gene therapy successful in mice offers promise – Genetic Literacy Project

An improved gene therapy vector restores hearing and balance in genetically deaf mice, according to Bostons Childrens Hospital researchers[T]he mices levels of hearing are reported to be able to detect sounds as soft as 25 decibels, which is comparable to a whisper.

The new study found that [the newly developed synthetic vector] Anc80 could successfully transfer genes to the harder-to-reach areas of the outer hair cells when introduced into the cochlea.

We have shown that Anc80 works remarkably well in terms of infecting cells of interest in the inner ear, says [Konstantina Stankovic of Massachusetts Eye and Ear]. With more than 100 genes already known to cause deafness in humans, there are many patients who may eventually benefit from this technology.

This strategy is the most effective one weve tested, says [Gwenalle Gloc, Ph.D., of the department of otolaryngology at Bostons Childrens Hospital]. We now have a system that works well and rescues auditory and vestibular function to a level thats never been achieved before.

The researchers also discovered that the gene therapy restored balance in the mice and eliminated erratic movements.

[The study can be found here.]

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post:Groundbreaking gene therapy restores hearing, balance

Go here to read the rest:

For people with congenital hearing loss, gene therapy successful in mice offers promise - Genetic Literacy Project

Two Infants Achieve Leukemia Remission After Gene Therapy – Oncology Nurse Advisor


Oncology Nurse Advisor
Two Infants Achieve Leukemia Remission After Gene Therapy
Oncology Nurse Advisor
"This bridge-to-transplantation strategy demonstrates the therapeutic potential of gene-editing technology." The approach is more practical than older allogenic approaches because the premanufactured CAR-T cells can be used "off the shelf"; they need ...

Visit link:

Two Infants Achieve Leukemia Remission After Gene Therapy - Oncology Nurse Advisor

Stanford scientists describe stem-cell and gene-therapy advances in scientific symposium – Scope (blog)

Using stem cells and gene therapy to treat orcure disease may still sound like science fiction, but a scientific meeting here last week emphasizedall the fronts onwhich it is moving closer and closer to fact.

Were entering a new era in medicine, said Lloyd Minor, MD, dean of the School of Medicine, in his opening remarks at the first annual symposium of the schools new Center for Definitive and Curative Medicine. Stanford researchersare poised to use stem cells and gene therapy to amelioratea wide swath of diseases, from common diagnoses such as diabetes and cancerto rare diseases ofthe brain, blood, skin, immune system and other organs. Ultimately, the goal is to create one-time treatments that can provide lifetime cures; hence the definitive and curative part of the centers name. Stanford is a leader in this branch of medical research, Minor said, addingThis is a vital component of our vision for precision health.

Stanford has a long history of leading basic-science discoveries in stem cell biology, andis now engaged in studyingmany different ways those discoveries couldbenefit patients, saidMaria Grazia Roncarolo, MD, who leads the new center.Our job is to produce clinical data so compelling that industry will pick up the product and take it to the next stage, Roncaraolo told the audience.

Among otherevent highlights:

More coverage of the days events is available in a story from the San Jose Mercury News that describeshowAnthonyOro, MD, PhD, and his colleagues are fighting epidermolysis bullosa, a devastating genetic disease of the skin. Oro closed his talk with a slightly goofy photo of a man getting a spray tan. It got a laugh, but his point was serious: Our goal for the cell therapy of the future is spray-on skin to correct a horrible genetic disease.

Ambitious? Yes. Science fiction? In the future, maybe not.

Previously: One of the most promising minds of his generation: Joseph Wu takes stem cells to heart,Life with epidermolysis bullosa: Pain is my reality, pain is my normaland Rat-grown mouse pancreases reverse diabetes in mice, say researchers Photo of Matthew Porteus courtesy of Stanford Childrens

See the article here:

Stanford scientists describe stem-cell and gene-therapy advances in scientific symposium - Scope (blog)

Gene Therapy to Restore Hearing – Anti Aging News

Posted on Feb. 8, 2017, 6 a.m. in Gene Therapy Sensory

Harvard Medical School scientists have perfected a form of gene therapy that has enabled genetically deaf mice to hear sounds as quiet as a whisper.

Harvard Medical School scientists have perfected gene therapy to the point that it can restore hearing. Their research and experiments have shown that the hearing of genetically deaf mice can be restored to the point that they hear noises at 25 decibels. This decibel level is equivalent to that of a soft whisper.

The Nuances of Gene Therapy for Improved Hearing

Harvard's gene therapy researchers state the most important aspect of their gene therapy breakthrough is a vector they created known as "Anc80". This vector brings a therapeutic gene to the cells within the cochlea's outer ear that are quite difficult to access. These outer hair cells boost sound, empowering inner hair cells to transmit a much more powerful communication to the brain. Gwenalle Gloc of Boston Children's Hospital's Department of Otolaryngology and F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, states the new system functions quite well by rescuing vestibular and auditory function to a degree that was not previously achieved in medical history. Research Details

Harvard's research team includes scientists employed by Massachusetts Eye and Ear. The group tested its gene therapy technique on mice with Usher Syndrome. This is a genetic disease that harms hearing as well as vision. Humans who are saddled with this disease are afflicted with a gene mutation that makes the protein harmonin ineffective. As a result, the hair cells responsible for accepting auditory signals and transmitting them to the brain are rendered useless.

The research team tapped into the power of its new vector to transmit an improved version of the gene, referred to as Ush1c, directly into the ear. It didn't take long for the ear's outer and inner hair cells to generate effective harmonin. Subsequent hearing tests conducted on mice proved that animals born deaf could hear. Some of these mice could even pick up on uber-soft auditory signals just like their normal peers.

The Magic of Gene Therapy

The scientific community is abuzz over gene therapy. Some believe gene therapy will ultimately prove to be the cure for deafness. It was only two years ago when scientists and investigators from Harvard and the University of Michigan's Hearing Research Institute found that the hearing-associated protein, NT3, can be stimulated through gene therapy. Additional approaches are geared toward stimulating the regeneration of hair cells within the ear. As an example, Harvard researchers have found that drugs referred to as Notch inhibitors can spur existing ear cells to transition into hair cells that improve hearing in mice.

The Harvard team reports its latest success with gene therapy made use of a similar technique that heightened hearing in 2015. However, these researchers now believe their newly generated vector will restore an even higher level of auditory ability. They also noted that the Ush1c gene applied to deaf mice served to heighten their balance. Mice with Usher Syndrome typically suffer from such poor balance. The Future of Gene Therapy

The future looks quite bright for those who suffer from hearing deficiencies. The research described above is fantastic news for those who suffer from hearing loss. It is possible that gene therapy will eventually supplant cochlear implants that are currently used to improve hearing in young patients. Though Cochlear implants have served patients quite well, there is still room for improvement.

Patients would like to hear an extended range of frequencies and the direction of a sound's source. They would also like to be able to differentiate between the auditory nuances of background noise, voices, music etc. The added benefit of heightened physical balance will serve to enhance Usher Syndrome patients' balance and mobility.

Read more here:

Gene Therapy to Restore Hearing - Anti Aging News

Gene therapy’s latest benefit: New skin – Daily Democrat

Small sheets of healthy skin are being grown from scratch at a Stanford University lab, proof that gene therapy can help heal a rare disease that causes great human suffering.

The precious skin represents growing hope for patients who suffer from the incurable blistering disease epidermolysis bullosa and acceleration of the once-beleaguered field of gene therapy, which strives to cure disease by inserting missing genes into sick cells.

It is pink and healthy. Its tougher. It doesnt blister, said patient and research volunteer Monique Roeder, 33, of Cedar City, Utah, who has received grafts of corrected skin cells, each about the size of an iPhone 5, to cover wounds on her arms.

More than 10,000 human diseases are caused by a single gene defect, and epidermolysis bullosa is among the most devastating. Patients lack a critical protein that binds the layers of skin together. Without this protein, the skin tears apart, causing severe pain, infection, disfigurement and in many cases, early death from an aggressive form of skin cancer.

The corrected skin is part of a pipeline of potential gene therapies at Stanfords new Center for Definitive and Curative Medicine, announced last week.

The center, a new joint initiative of Stanford Healthcare, Stanford Childrens Health and the Stanford School of Medicine, is designed to accelerate cellular therapies at the universitys state-of-the-art manufacturing facility on Palo Altos California Avenue. Simultaneously, it is aiming to bring cures to patients faster than before and boost the financial value of Stanfords discoveries before theyre licensed out to biotech companies.

With trials such as these, we are entering a new era in medicine, said Dr. Lloyd B. Minor, dean of the Stanford University School of Medicine.

Gene therapy was dealt a major setback in 1999 when Jesse Gelsinger, an Arizona teenager with a genetic liver disease, had a fatal reaction to the virus that scientists had used to insert a corrective gene.

But current trials are safer, more precise and build on better basic understanding. Stanford is also using gene therapy to target other diseases, such as sickle cell anemia and beta thalassemia, a blood disorder that reduces the production of hemoglobin.

There are several diseases that are miserable and worthy of gene therapy approaches, said associate professor of dermatology Dr. Jean Tang, who co-led the trial with Dr. Peter Marinkovich. But epidermolysis bullosa, she said, is one of the worst of the worst.

Advertisement

It took nearly 20 years for Stanford researchers to bring this gene therapy to Roeder and her fellow patients.

It is very satisfying to be able to finally give patients something that can help them, said Marinkovich. In some cases, wounds that had not healed for five years were successfully healed with the gene therapy.

More:

Gene therapy's latest benefit: New skin - Daily Democrat

Cellino wins Startup Challenge with pitch for photonics gene therapy – Optics.org

08Feb2017

IC Touch and Lumedica take second and third in new-product pitch contest at SPIE Photonics West 2017.

Marinna Madrid, Chief Scientific Officer, made the pitch for the Harvard team. Cellino has developed laser-activated nanodevices to efficiently and effectively deliver novel gene therapies to cells, to cure viral or genetic diseases such as leukemia and HIV that affect the blood.

She told optics.org that one of the first projects her company will be tackling in 2017 using Cellinos therapeutic system will be the treatment of HIV in mice.

Second-placed Zeev Zalevsky, Bar Ilan University and IC Touch CTO and founder, pitched his companys device that allows blind or visually impaired people to see by translation of visual information captured by a camera to spatial tactile stimulation of the cornea.

Adam Wax, President and Chief Scientist at third-placed Lumedica, pitched Lumedica's OQ EyeScope, accessible and affordable medical imaging technology.

Other finalists in the competition were:

Jenoptik sponsored the cash prizes including $10,000 for first place, $5,000 for second place, and $2,500 for third place. The first-place winner also received $5,000 worth of products from Edmund Optics.

The breadth and business potential of the finalists was really impressive said Jay Kumler, President of Jenoptik Optical Systems, after the final round of pitches on February 1st. All of the finalists should be congratulated on the exciting companies that they have launched. SPIE President Glenn Boreman added, These entrepreneurs are doing the hard work of bringing these technologies out of the lab so they can benefit the public.

During the semi-final competition earlier in the week, Rick Schwerdtfeger, Director of the NSF SBIR/STTR Photonics Division, presented travel awards to Luis Moutinho of the Universidade de Aveiro and NU-RISE, and Madrid and colleague Nabiha Saklayen of Harvard and Cellino.

Moutinho made a pitch in the semi-finals for NU-RISEs technology for controlling radiological doses for breast and prostate cancer treatment.

Finals judges were: Jason Eichenholz, Open Photonics, Inc.; Marc Himel, Jenoptik Optical Systems; Andreas Popp, Trumpf; Jenny Rooke, 5 Prime Ventures; Samuel Sadoulet, Edmund Optics; and Homan Yuen, NewGen Capital.

Read this article:

Cellino wins Startup Challenge with pitch for photonics gene therapy - Optics.org

Gene therapy restores hearing in deaf mice, down to a whisper – Science Daily


Science Daily
Gene therapy restores hearing in deaf mice, down to a whisper
Science Daily
In the summer of 2015, a team at Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School reported restoring rudimentary hearing in genetically deaf mice using gene therapy. Now the Boston Children's research team reports restoring a much higher level of ...

and more »

Continue reading here:

Gene therapy restores hearing in deaf mice, down to a whisper - Science Daily

Gene therapy: Deaf to hearing a whisper – BBC News


Medical News Today
Gene therapy: Deaf to hearing a whisper
BBC News
Deaf mice have been able to hear a tiny whisper after being given a "landmark" gene therapy by US scientists. They say restoring near-normal hearing in the animals paves the way for similar treatments for people "in the near future". Studies, published ...
Groundbreaking gene therapy restores hearing, balanceMedical News Today
Scientists restore hearing in deaf mice using advanced gene therapyRT
A better gene therapy vector out of Harvard is credited with restoring normal hearing in miceEndpoints News
FierceBiotech -Yahoo News -Daily Mail
all 18 news articles »

Read this article:

Gene therapy: Deaf to hearing a whisper - BBC News

Cardiovascular Angiogenic Gene Therapy Gets Fast Track Status – Monthly Prescribing Reference (registration)

Cardiovascular Angiogenic Gene Therapy Gets Fast Track Status
Monthly Prescribing Reference (registration)
The trial is intended to examine Generx as a one-time treatment for improving exercise tolerance in patients who have angina that is refractory to standard medical therapy and not amenable to conventional revascularization procedures (coronary artery ...

Read the rest here:

Cardiovascular Angiogenic Gene Therapy Gets Fast Track Status - Monthly Prescribing Reference (registration)

Gene Therapy for Heart Disease Wins Fast-Track Status – P&T Community

Gene Therapy for Heart Disease Wins Fast-Track Status
P&T Community
The FDA has granted a fast-track designation for a phase 3 study of Generx (Ad5FGF-4, Angionetics Inc.) cardiovascular angiogenic gene therapy as a one-time treatment for improving exercise tolerance in patients with angina that is refractory to ...

and more »

More here:

Gene Therapy for Heart Disease Wins Fast-Track Status - P&T Community

Stanford team is growing healthy skin for ill patients – The Mercury News

var _ndnq = _ndnq || []; _ndnq.push();

Small sheets of healthy skin are being grown from scratch at a Stanford University lab, proof that gene therapy can help heal a rare disease that causes great human suffering.

The precious skin represents growing hope for patients who suffer from the incurable blistering disease epidermolysis bullosa and acceleration of the once-beleaguered field of gene therapy, which strives to cure disease by inserting missing genes into sick cells.

It is pink and healthy. Its tougher. It doesnt blister, said patient and research volunteer Monique Roeder, 33, of Cedar City, Utah, who has received grafts of corrected skin cells, each about the size of an iPhone 5, to cover wounds on her arms.

More than 10,000 human diseases are caused by a single gene defect, and epidermolysis bullosa is among the most devastating. Patients lack a critical protein that binds the layers of skin together. Without this protein, the skin tears apart, causing severe pain, infection, disfigurement and in many cases, early death from an aggressive form of skin cancer.

The corrected skin is part of a pipeline of potential gene therapies at Stanfords new Center for Definitive and Curative Medicine, announced last week.

The center, a new joint initiative of Stanford Healthcare, Stanford Childrens Health, and the Stanford School of Medicine, is designed to accelerate cellular therapies at the universitys state-of-the-art manufacturing facility on Palo Altos California Avenue. Simultaneously, itisaiming to bring cures to patients faster than before and boost the financial value of Stanfords discoveries before theyre licensed out to biotech companies.

With trials such as these, we are entering a new era in medicine, said Dr. Lloyd B. Minor, dean of the Stanford University School of Medicine.

Gene therapy was dealt a major setback in 1999 when Jesse Gelsinger, an Arizona teenager with a genetic liver disease, had a fatal reaction to the virus that scientists had used to insert a corrective gene.

But current trials are safer, more precise and build on better basic understanding. Stanford is also using gene therapy to target other diseases, such as sickle cell anemia and beta thalassemia,a blood disorder that reduces the production of hemoglobin.

There are several diseases that are miserable and worthy of gene therapy approaches, said associate professor of dermatology Dr. Jean Tang, who co-led the trial with Dr. Peter Marinkovich. But epidermolysis bullosa, she said, is one of the worst of the worst.

Reading this on your phone or tablet? Stay up to date on Bay Area health and science news with our new, free mobile app. Get it from the Apple app store or the Google Play store.

It took nearly 20 years for Stanford researchers to bring this gene therapy to Roeder and her fellow patients.

It is very satisfying to be able to finally give patients something that can help them, said Marinkovich.In some cases, wounds that had not healed for five years were successfully healed with the gene therapy.

Before, he noted, there was only limited amounts of what you can do for them. We can treat their wounds and give them sophisticated Band-Aids. But after you give them all that stuff, you still see the skin falling apart, Marinkovich said. This makes you feel like youre making a difference in the world.

Roeder seemed healthy at birth. But when her family celebrated her arrival by imprinting her tiny feet on a keepsake birth certificate, she blistered. They encouraged her to lead a normal childhood, riding bicycles and gentle horses. Shes happily married. But shes grown cautious, focusing on photography, writing a blog and enjoying her pets.

Scarring has caused her hands and feet digits to become mittened or webbed. Due to pain and risk of injury, she uses a wheelchair rather than walking long distances.

Every movement has to be planned out in my head so I dont upset my skin somehow, she said. Wound care can take three to six hours a day.

She heard about the Stanford research shortly after losing her best friend, who also had epidermolysis bullosa, to skin cancer, a common consequence of the disease. Roeder thought: Why dont you try? She didnt get the chance.

The team of Stanford experts harvested a small sample of skin cells, about the size of a pencil eraser, from her back. They put her cells in warm broth in a petri dish, where they thrived.

To this broth they added a special virus, carrying the missing gene. Once infected, the cells began producing normal collagen.

They coaxed these genetically corrected cells to form sheets of skin. The sheets were then surgically grafted onto a patients chronic or new wounds in six locations. The team reported their initial results in Novembers Journal of the American Medical Association.

Historically, medical treatment has had limited options: excising a sick organ or giving medicine, said Dr. Anthony E. Oro of Stanfords Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine. When those two arent possible, theres only symptom relief.

But the deciphering of the human genome, and new tools in gene repair, have changed the therapeutic landscape.

Now that we know the genetic basis of disease, we can use the confluence of stem cell biology, genome editing and tissue engineering to develop therapies, Oro said.

Its not practical to wrap the entire body of a patient with epidermolysis bullosa in vast sheets of new skin, like a mummy, Oro said.

But now that the team has proved that gene therapy works, they can try related approaches, such as using gene-editing tools directly on the patients skin, or applying corrected cells like a spray-on tan.

A cure doesnt take one step, said Tang. It takes many steps towards disease modification, and this is the first big one. Were always looking for something better.

Follow this link:

Stanford team is growing healthy skin for ill patients - The Mercury News

The experimental gene therapy treatment that helped one woman fight cancer – Today.com

share

pin

email

February is National Cancer Prevention Month. It's a disease that more than a million Americans are diagnosed with each year, according to the National Cancer Institute. This morning in our special series "War on Cancer," TODAY takes a look at the latest advances in the fight against this deadly disease.

Celine Ryan, a 51-year-old engineer and mother of five, was diagnosed with stage 4 colon cancer three years ago. After undergoing surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, doctors discovered cancer in her lungs seven tumors that threatened her life.

Ryan, who lives in Michigan, read about a clinical trial using gene therapy at the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, and decided to apply. The trial is headed up by Dr. Steven Rosenberg, a leading researcher in immunotherapy at the institute. She decided the treatment would be a birthday present to herself.

Getting into the trial wasn't simple because her tumors, though numerous, weren't large enough for the form of treatment being tested, but she was finally accepted in March 2015.

RELATED: Keytruda, the drug that helped Jimmy Carter, also can stop lung cancer

The treatment involves removing cells from a tumor your body's own cancer-fighting cells multiplying them by billions in a lab, then returning them back to your body to fight the tumor.

Celine Ryan is being referred to as an historic figure in medicine.

After spending a month in the hospital and letting the treatment run its course, six of her seven tumors had completely disappeared. The last tumor started to grow eight or nine months later and the decision was to remove it through surgery.

RELATED: 10 things I wish I knew before I was diagnosed with breast cancer

The treatment isn't widely available now, and not all patients experience the positive results Ryan had.

"Many have not responded," Rosenberg said. "But from every patient that we treat, whether... their cancers go away or not, we learn something."

Today, Celine Ryan is ten months cancer-free.

Thanks to Ryan's unusual genetic makeup, researchers were able to identify how to attack the mutation that causes common cancers. This experimental treatment may not be the solution for everyone, but for Ryan, it's meant ten months of being cancer-free.

"We can do, and are planning to do, that kind of gene therapy using the exact receptor we got from Celine's cells to treat other people," Rosenberg explained.

See the article here:

The experimental gene therapy treatment that helped one woman fight cancer - Today.com

Scientists restore hearing in deaf mice using advanced gene therapy – RT

Scientists have restored hearing in deaf mice down to a whisper using an improved gene therapy in what is being described as a landmark study with unprecedented results.

A research team from the Boston Childrens Hospital initially conducted a study with Harvard Medical School in 2015 that restored rudimentary hearing in genetically deaf mice using gene therapy.

In this new study, however, the Boston team managed to restore hearing in deaf mice down to 25 decibels - or the equivalent of a whisper - using an advanced gene therapy developed at Massachusetts Eye and Ear.

Read more

The team said they sought to advance gene therapy to treat genetic deafness as there is currently no biological treatments for hearing loss.

We focused on Usher syndrome, a devastating genetic disorder that causes blindness, balance disorders and profound deafness,read the study, published in Nature Biotechnology Monday.

Using a synthetic adeno-associated viral vector, the team transduced 80-90 percent of sensory hair cells, resulting in a recovery of gene and protein expression, restoration of sensory cell function, rescue of complex auditory function and recovery of hearing and balance behavior to near wild-type levels.

The end result of the study saw an unprecedented recovery of inner ear function that suggests the biological therapies may be suitable to treat deafness in humans with genetic inner ear disorders.

"With more than 100 genes already known to cause deafness in humans, there are many patients who may eventually benefit from this technology,"said Dr. Konstantina Stankovic, a senior investigator in the first study with Harvard Medical School.

READ MORE: Rat-mouse interspecies transplant brings hope human organs could be grown in animals

The next step toward treating human patients is to test the gene therapy in larger animals.

"This is a landmark study,"says Dr. Jeffrey R. Holt, director of otolaryngology research at Boston Children's Hospital, and co-author on the paper.

"Here we show, for the first time, that by delivering the correct gene sequence to a large number of sensory cells in the ear, we can restore both hearing and balance to near-normal levels."

Read the original post:

Scientists restore hearing in deaf mice using advanced gene therapy - RT

Gene Therapy, RNA and Pens at European Hemophilia Congress in … – Labiotech.eu (blog)

The hottest biotechs in the field of hemophilia are stealing the show at this years edition of the EAHAD hemophilia congress in Paris.

A disorder for which no cure is available, hemophilia is caused by absent or defective genes coding for blood clotting factors, turning simple injuries intohealth risks and causing spontaneous bleeding. Researchers and companies worldwide working to improve hemophilia therapy are meeting this week in Paris for the10th Annual Congress of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD).

We recently reviewed the latest advances in hemophilia, a field teeming with innovative solutions and technology.Among the most interesting presented at the congress are new results on gene therapy and RNAi, a pen to treat hemophilia and many companies fighting to reduce thedosing frequency of prophylactic therapy. On top of that, Shire has reported that current estimates of people suffering from the disease could be completely wrong

Novo Nordisk ismaking plans to use its famous insulin pens to deliver hemophilia drugs. According to astudy evaluating user experience with the pens presented at the congress, participants liked the device as it is easy to use, well designed, more portable and involving fewer steps than their current kits for hemophilia.

The ultimate goal of the Danish company is to use its FlexTouch pen to deliverconcizumab, an antibody againsttissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) currently in Phase I for both hemophilia A and B.

Shire has presented a study revealing that the incidence of hemophilia could be more than three times higherthan current estimates. It also showed that only 25% of hemophiliacs receive adequate treatment. These findings might push efforts to put an end to this situation and stimulate market growth.

Shirepresented positive results from a Phase II/III trial for Adynovate (BAX 855) in children with hemophilia A. Interestingly, the company also showed early stage in vitro results for combination therapies with a biosimilar of Roches emicizumab (ACE910). It looks like the antibody, not yet in the market, already has strong competitors getting ready for when its patent expires.

Sobi, inSweden, has co-developed recombinant clotting factors with an extended half-life in partnership with Biogens spin-offBioverativ. To do so, they fuse the clotting factor to the Fc portion immunoglobulin G1 proteins.

The team has presented positive long-term safety and efficacy results forEloctatein hemophilia A andAlprolixin hemophilia B. Both are already in the market and reduce dosing frequency to weekly injections.

OPKO Biologics, in Israel, follows a strategy similar to Sobis. ItsCTP technologyextends the half-life of proteins by fusing them with theC-terminal peptide of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG).

The company has presented data forMOD-5014(FVIIa-CTP) supporting the advance intoPhase II/IIItrials. The drug is intended for delivery twice a week, which is double of that from Sobis products.

Spark Therapeuticsis one of the leaders in the development ofgene therapy for hemophiliaanduniQures main competitor. The American company will report results from itsPhase I/IItrial forSPK-9001in hemophilia B showing sustained activity of the therapy after12 weeks, with only one reported bleeding.

Despite good results, Spark is facing strong competition from the DutchuniQure. Its gene therapyAMT-060has already shown sustained effects for at least52 weeksin a patient subpopulation. Both companies nowhavebreakthrough designation from the FDA and therace to reach the market is tight.

Sanofis partner, Alnylam, is conducting clinical trials across the UK, Switzerland and Bulgaria to test its unique RNAi technology for hemophilia. Its candidate fitusiran, which blocks antithrombin to improve clotting,is proving safe and effective inPhase I/IItrials.

This unique treatment has the potential to reduce dosing to a monthly basis and is suitable for patients with both hemophilia A and B, also including those that have developed resistanceto standard treatments.

Among the companies presenting are many others includingGenentech, Bayer and Catalyst Biosciences. The sheer number of innovative approaches under development is great news. Such a wide arrange of solutions could provide a better quality of life for hemophilia patients, each treatment suited for the particular needs of differentpatients. Especially now that, thanks to Shire, scientists know the number of patients suffering from the condition could actually be much higher.

Images from Sashkin, nobeastsofierce, Roberta Canu, Mond Duang,Art tools, LeonP,Pakpoom Nunjui /Shutterstock.com

Visit link:

Gene Therapy, RNA and Pens at European Hemophilia Congress in ... - Labiotech.eu (blog)

Investors Sour on Data Debut For Dimension’s Hemophilia Gene Therapy – Xconomy

Xconomy Boston

Despite the early and in some cases stunning results produced by gene therapy treatments in handfuls of hemophilia patients, significant questions remain about their durability, safety, and how broadly theyll be used if they are ultimately shown to work. The first human data produced by Dimension Therapeutics, one of several companies developing hemophilia gene therapies, are the latest example.

Shares of Cambridge, MA-based Dimension (NASDAQ: DMTX) tumbled more than 49 percent on Tuesday on early data from a Phase 1/2 trial of DTX101, its experimental gene therapy for hemophilia B.

DTX101 boosted the levels of the blood-clotting protein Factor IX in six patients. Those on the higher of two tested doses havent needed other drugs since getting treatment. But five of the six patientsand all three on the higher of the two tested dosesalso saw a rise in liver enzyme levels, indicating an immune reaction to the gene therapy. While none of the five patients have had any safety problems, the liver enzyme spikes have caused a delay for Dimension. The company wont test an even higher dose of DTX101 in patients until it gets feedback from the FDA.

Gene therapy offers the potential of a long-lasting, if not permanent treatment for hemophilia patients, whodepending on how severe their disease ismay need frequent infusions of preventative drugs to stave off dangerous bleeds. A group of experimental gene therapies have been creeping their way forward in clinical trials, accumulating data in dribs and drabs. Spark Therapeutics (NASDAQ: ONCE) and UniQure (NASDAQ: QURE) are the furthest along in hemophilia B, while BioMarin Pharmaceutical (NASDAQ: BMRN) leads the way in the more common hemophilia A.

Each experimental therapy has shown promise helping patients produce meaningful levels of the clotting proteins Factor IX and Factor VIII, respectivelymore than 5 percent of the levels found in normal patients, which many view as the minimum bar for successover the course of a year or more. And Spark and BioMarin have seen much higher numbers than that, in some cases. But there are caveats: Those results have come in small sample sizes, and they have varied patient to patient. Data today from Dimension show the three patients on a low dose of DTX101 had roughly 3 to 4 percent of normal Factor IX levels a year after treatment. The results are earlier for those on a higher dose: 5 and 8 percent, respectively, for two patients 12 weeks post-treatment; 7 percent for a third patient 7 weeks after DTX101.

Additionally, so far, liver enzyme increases have been seen in clinical tests for each of the hemophilia gene therapies. Such increases could indicate that patients immune systems were attacking their liver cells, which are the ones that take up the therapeutic gene and churn out the new clotting protein. Theyre typically treated with a short course of immunosuppressive steroids and havent caused bad side effects so far. But in some cases theyve stifled a response to gene therapy, which is important because it means that certain gene therapies may not workor at least wont work as well as they couldfor some patients who develop neutralizing antibodies. It also means that patients who develop those antibodies wont be eligible for a second dose if the gene therapy wears off. This phenomenon reduces the potential market for the firms developing hemophilia gene therapies. Such immune responses were the impetus behind a deal Spark cut last year with Selecta Biosciences (NASDAQ: SELB), for example.

We continue to explore the therapeutic window for DTX101 as our data mature and in light of the [liver enzyme] rises that appear to be associated with a decline in [Factor IX] activity, CEO Annalisa Jenkins said in a statement.

Heres more on Dimension, and the technical differences between each of the companies developing gene therapies for hemophilia.

Ben Fidler is Xconomy's Deputy Biotechnology Editor. You can e-mail him at bfidler@xconomy.com

Originally posted here:

Investors Sour on Data Debut For Dimension's Hemophilia Gene Therapy - Xconomy

gene therapy facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia.com …

Gene therapy is a rapidly growing field of medicine in which genes are introduced into the body to treat diseases. Genes control heredity and provide the basic biological code for determining a cell's specific functions. Gene therapy seeks to provide genes that correct or supplant the disease-controlling functions of cells that are not, in essence, doing their job. Somatic gene therapy introduces therapeutic genes at the tissue or cellular level to treat a specific individual. Germ-line gene therapy inserts genes into reproductive cells or possibly into embryos to correct genetic defects that could be passed on to future generations. Initially conceived as an approach for treating inherited diseases, like cystic fibrosis and Huntington's disease, the scope of potential gene therapies has grown to include treatments for cancers, arthritis, and infectious diseases. Although gene therapy testing in humans has advanced rapidly, many questions surround its use. For example, some scientists are concerned that the therapeutic genes themselves may cause disease. Others fear that germ-line gene therapy may be used to control human development in ways not connected with disease, like intelligence or appearance.

Gene therapy has grown out of the science of genetics or how heredity works. Scientists know that life begins in a cell, the basic building block of all multicellular organisms. Humans, for instance, are made up of trillions of cells, each performing a specific function. Within the cell's nucleus (the center part of a cell that regulates its chemical functions) are pairs of chromosomes. These threadlike structures are made up of a single molecule of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid), which carries the blueprint of life in the form of codes, or genes, that determine inherited characteristics.

A DNA molecule looks like two ladders with one of the sides taken off both and then twisted around each other. The rungs of these ladders meet (resulting in a spiral staircase-like structure) and are called base pairs. Base pairs are made up of nitrogen molecules and arranged in specific sequences. Millions of these base pairs, or sequences, can make up a single gene, specifically defined as a segment of the chromosome and DNA that contains certain hereditary information. The gene, or combination of genes formed by these base pairs ultimately direct an organism's growth and characteristics through the production of certain chemicals, primarily proteins, which carry out most of the body's chemical functions and biological reactions.

Scientists have long known that alterations in genes present within cells can cause inherited diseases like cystic fibrosis, sickle-cell anemia, and hemophilia. Similarly, errors in the total number of chromosomes can cause conditions such as Down syndrome or Turner's syndrome. As the study of genetics advanced, however, scientists learned that an altered genetic sequence also can make people more susceptible to diseases, like atherosclerosis, cancer, and even schizophrenia. These diseases have a genetic component, but also are influenced by environmental factors (like diet and lifestyle). The objective of gene therapy is to treat diseases by introducing functional genes into the body to alter the cells involved in the disease process by either replacing missing genes or providing copies of functioning genes to replace nonfunctioning ones. The inserted genes can be naturally-occurring genes that produce the desired effect or may be genetically engineered (or altered) genes.

Scientists have known how to manipulate a gene's structure in the laboratory since the early 1970s through a process called gene splicing. The process involves removing a fragment of DNA containing the specific genetic sequence desired, then inserting it into the DNA of another gene. The resultant product is called recombinant DNA and the process is genetic engineering.

There are basically two types of gene therapy. Germ-line gene therapy introduces genes into reproductive cells (sperm and eggs) or someday possibly into embryos in hopes of correcting genetic abnormalities that could be passed on to future generations. Most of the current work in applying gene therapy, however, has been in the realm of somatic gene therapy. In this type of gene therapy, therapeutic genes are inserted into tissue or cells to produce a naturally occurring protein or substance that is lacking or not functioning correctly in an individual patient.

In both types of therapy, scientists need something to transport either the entire gene or a recombinant DNA to the cell's nucleus, where the chromosomes and DNA reside. In essence, vectors are molecular delivery trucks. One of the first and most popular vectors developed were viruses because they invade cells as part of the natural infection process. Viruses have the potential to be excellent vectors because they have a specific relationship with the host in that they colonize certain cell types and tissues in specific organs. As a result, vectors are chosen according to their attraction to certain cells and areas of the body.

One of the first vectors used was retroviruses. Because these viruses are easily cloned (artificially reproduced) in the laboratory, scientists have studied them extensively and learned a great deal about their biological action. They also have learned how to remove the genetic information that governs viral replication, thus reducing the chances of infection.

Retroviruses work best in actively dividing cells, but cells in the body are relatively stable and do not divide often. As a result, these cells are used primarily for ex vivo (outside the body) manipulation. First, the cells are removed from the patient's body, and the virus, or vector, carrying the gene is inserted into them. Next, the cells are placed into a nutrient culture where they grow and replicate. Once enough cells are gathered, they are returned to the body, usually by injection into the blood stream. Theoretically, as long as these cells survive, they will provide the desired therapy.

Another class of viruses, called the adenoviruses, also may prove to be good gene vectors. These viruses can effectively infect nondividing cells in the body, where the desired gene product then is expressed naturally. In addition to being a more efficient approach to gene transportation, these viruses, which cause respiratory infections, are more easily purified and made stable than retroviruses, resulting in less chance of an unwanted viral infection. However, these viruses live for several days in the body, and some concern surrounds the possibility of infecting others with the viruses through sneezing or coughing. Other viral vectors include influenza viruses, Sindbis virus, and a herpes virus that infects nerve cells.

Scientists also have delved into nonviral vectors. These vectors rely on the natural biological process in which cells uptake (or gather) macromolecules. One approach is to use liposomes, globules of fat produced by the body and taken up by cells. Scientists also are investigating the introduction of raw recombinant DNA by injecting it into the bloodstream or placing it on microscopic beads of gold shot into the skin with a "gene-gun." Another possible vector under development is based on dendrimer molecules. A class of polymers (naturally occurring or artificial substances that have a high molecular weight and formed by smaller molecules of the same or similar substances), is "constructed" in the laboratory by combining these smaller molecules. They have been used in manufacturing Styrofoam, polyethylene cartons, and Plexiglass. In the laboratory, dendrimers have shown the ability to transport genetic material into human cells. They also can be designed to form an affinity for particular cell membranes by attaching to certain sugars and protein groups.

In the early 1970s, scientists proposed "gene surgery" for treating inherited diseases caused by faulty genes. The idea was to take out the disease-causing gene and surgically implant a gene that functioned properly. Although sound in theory, scientists, then and now, lack the biological knowledge or technical expertise needed to perform such a precise surgery in the human body.

However, in 1983, a group of scientists from Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, proposed that gene therapy could one day be a viable approach for treating Lesch-Nyhan disease, a rare neurological disorder. The scientists conducted experiments in which an enzyme-producing gene (a specific type of protein) for correcting the disease was injected into a group of cells for replication. The scientists theorized the cells could then be injected into people with Lesch-Nyhan disease, thus correcting the genetic defect that caused the disease.

As the science of genetics advanced throughout the 1980s, gene therapy gained an established foothold in the minds of medical scientists as a promising approach to treatments for specific diseases. One of the major reasons for the growth of gene therapy was scientists' increasing ability to identify the specific genetic malfunctions that caused inherited diseases. Interest grew as further studies of DNA and chromosomes (where genes reside) showed that specific genetic abnormalities in one or more genes occurred in successive generations of certain family members who suffered from diseases like intestinal cancer, bipolar disorder, Alzheimer's disease, heart disease, diabetes, and many more. Although the genes may not be the only cause of the disease in all cases, they may make certain individuals more susceptible to developing the disease because of environmental influences, like smoking, pollution, and stress. In fact, some scientists theorize that all diseases may have a genetic component.

On September 14, 1990, a four-year old girl suffering from a genetic disorder that prevented her body from producing a crucial enzyme became the first person to undergo gene therapy in the United States. Because her body could not produce adenosine deaminase (ADA), she had a weakened immune system, making her extremely susceptible to severe, life-threatening infections. W. French Anderson and colleagues at the National Institutes of Health's Clinical Center in Bethesda, Maryland, took white blood cells (which are crucial to proper immune system functioning) from the girl, inserted ADA producing genes into them, and then transfused the cells back into the patient. Although the young girl continued to show an increased ability to produce ADA, debate arose as to whether the improvement resulted from the gene therapy or from an additional drug treatment she received.

Nevertheless, a new era of gene therapy began as more and more scientists sought to conduct clinical trial (testing in humans) research in this area. In that same year, gene therapy was tested on patients suffering from melanoma (skin cancer). The goal was to help them produce antibodies (disease fighting substances in the immune system) to battle the cancer.

These experiments have spawned an ever growing number of attempts at gene therapies designed to perform a variety of functions in the body. For example, a gene therapy for cystic fibrosis aims to supply a gene that alters cells, enabling them to produce a specific protein to battle the disease. Another approach was used for brain cancer patients, in which the inserted gene was designed to make the cancer cells more likely to respond to drug treatment. Another gene therapy approach for patients suffering from artery blockage, which can lead to strokes, induces the growth of new blood vessels near clogged arteries, thus ensuring normal blood circulation.

Currently, there are a host of new gene therapy agents in clinical trials. In the United States, both nucleic acid based (in vivo ) treatments and cell-based (ex vivo ) treatments are being investigated. Nucleic acid based gene therapy uses vectors (like viruses) to deliver modified genes to target cells. Cell-based gene therapy techniques remove cells from the patient in order to genetically alter them then reintroduce them to the patient's body. Presently, gene therapies for the following diseases are being developed: cystic fibrosis (using adenoviral vector), HIV infection (cell-based), malignant melanoma (cell-based), Duchenne muscular dystrophy (cell-based), hemophilia B (cell-based), kidney cancer (cell-based), Gaucher's Disease (retroviral vector), breast cancer (retroviral vector), and lung cancer (retroviral vector). When a cell or individual is treated using gene therapy and successful incorporation of engineered genes has occurred, the cell or individual is said to be transgenic.

The medical establishment's contribution to transgenic research has been supported by increased government funding. In 1991, the U.S. government provided $58 million for gene therapy research, with increases in funding of $15-40 million dollars a year over the following four years. With fierce competition over the promise of societal benefit in addition to huge profits, large pharmaceutical corporations have moved to the forefront of transgenic research. In an effort to be first in developing new therapies, and armed with billions of dollars of research funds, such corporations are making impressive strides toward making gene therapy a viable reality in the treatment of once elusive diseases.

The potential scope of gene therapy is enormous. More than 4,200 diseases have been identified as resulting directly from abnormal genes, and countless others that may be partially influenced by a person's genetic makeup. Initial research has concentrated on developing gene therapies for diseases whose genetic origins have been established and for other diseases that can be cured or improved by substances genes produce.

The following are examples of potential gene therapies. People suffering from cystic fibrosis lack a gene needed to produce a salt-regulating protein. This protein regulates the flow of chloride into epithelial cells, (the cells that line the inner and outer skin layers) that cover the air passages of the nose and lungs. Without this regulation, patients with cystic fibrosis build up a thick mucus that makes them prone to lung infections. A gene therapy technique to correct this abnormality might employ an adenovirus to transfer a normal copy of what scientists call the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, or CTRF, gene. The gene is introduced into the patient by spraying it into the nose or lungs. Researchers announced in 2004 that they had, for the first time, treated a dominant neurogenerative disease called Spinocerebella ataxia type 1, with gene therapy. This could lead to treating similar diseases such as Huntingtons disease. They also announced a single intravenous injection could deliver therapy to all muscles, perhaps providing hope to people with muscular dystrophy.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) also is an inherited disease, resulting in the inability to process cholesterol properly, which leads to high levels of artery-clogging fat in the blood stream. Patients with FH often suffer heart attacks and strokes because of blocked arteries. A gene therapy approach used to battle FH is much more intricate than most gene therapies because it involves partial surgical removal of patients' livers (ex vivo transgene therapy). Corrected copies of a gene that serve to reduce cholesterol build-up are inserted into the liver sections, which then are transplanted back into the patients.

Gene therapy also has been tested on patients with AIDS. AIDS is caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which weakens the body's immune system to the point that sufferers are unable to fight off diseases like pneumonias and cancer. In one approach, genes that produce specific HIV proteins have been altered to stimulate immune system functioning without causing the negative effects that a complete HIV molecule has on the immune system. These genes are then injected in the patient's blood stream. Another approach to treating AIDS is to insert, via white blood cells, genes that have been genetically engineered to produce a receptor that would attract HIV and reduce its chances of replicating. In 2004, researchers reported that had developed a new vaccine concept for HIV, but the details were still in development.

Several cancers also have the potential to be treated with gene therapy. A therapy tested for melanoma, or skin cancer, involves introducing a gene with an anticancer protein called tumor necrosis factor (TNF) into test tube samples of the patient's own cancer cells, which are then reintroduced into the patient. In brain cancer, the approach is to insert a specific gene that increases the cancer cells' susceptibility to a common drug used in fighting the disease. In 2003, researchers reported that they had harnessed the cell killing properties of adenoviruses to treat prostate cancer. A 2004 report said that researchers had developed a new DNA vaccine that targeted the proteins expressed in cervical cancer cells.

Gaucher disease is an inherited disease caused by a mutant gene that inhibits the production of an enzyme called glucocerebrosidase. Patients with Gaucher disease have enlarged livers and spleens and eventually their bones deteriorate. Clinical gene therapy trials focus on inserting the gene for producing this enzyme.

Gene therapy also is being considered as an approach to solving a problem associated with a surgical procedure known as balloon angioplasty. In this procedure, a stent (in this case, a type of tubular scaffolding) is used to open the clogged artery. However, in response to the trauma of the stent insertion, the body initiates a natural healing process that produces too many cells in the artery and results in restenosis, or reclosing of the artery. The gene therapy approach to preventing this unwanted side effect is to cover the outside of the stents with a soluble gel. This gel contains vectors for genes that reduce this overactive healing response.

Regularly throughout the past decade, and no doubt over future years, scientists have and will come up with new possible ways for gene therapy to help treat human disease. Recent advancements include the possibility of reversing hearing loss in humans with experimental growing of new sensory cells in adult guinea pigs, and avoiding amputation in patients with severe circulatory problems in their legs with angiogenic growth factors.

Although great strides have been made in gene therapy in a relatively short time, its potential usefulness has been limited by lack of scientific data concerning the multitude of functions that genes control in the human body. For instance, it is now known that the vast majority of genetic material does not store information for the creation of proteins, but rather is involved in the control and regulation of gene expression, and is, thus, much more difficult to interpret. Even so, each individual cell in the body carries thousands of genes coding for proteins, with some estimates as high as 150,000 genes. For gene therapy to advance to its full potential, scientists must discover the biological role of each of these individual genes and where the base pairs that make them up are located on DNA.

To address this issue, the National Institutes of Health initiated the Human Genome Project in 1990. Led by James D. Watson (one of the co-discoverers of the chemical makeup of DNA) the project's 15-year goal is to map the entire human genome (a combination of the words gene and chromosomes). A genome map would clearly identify the location of all genes as well as the more than three billion base pairs that make them up. With a precise knowledge of gene locations and functions, scientists may one day be able to conquer or control diseases that have plagued humanity for centuries.

Scientists participating in the Human Genome Project identified an average of one new gene a day, but many expected this rate of discovery to increase. By the year 2005, their goal was to determine the exact location of all the genes on human DNA and the exact sequence of the base pairs that make them up. Some of the genes identified through this project include a gene that predisposes people to obesity, one associated with programmed cell death (apoptosis), a gene that guides HIV viral reproduction, and the genes of inherited disorders like Huntington's disease, Lou Gehrig's disease, and some colon and breast cancers. In April 2003, the finished sequence was announced, with 99% of the human genome's gene-containing regions mapped to an accuracy of 99.9%.

Gene therapy seems elegantly simple in its concept: supply the human body with a gene that can correct a biological malfunction that causes a disease. However, there are many obstacles and some distinct questions concerning the viability of gene therapy. For example, viral vectors must be carefully controlled lest they infect the patient with a viral disease. Some vectors, like retroviruses, also can enter cells functioning properly and interfere with the natural biological processes, possibly leading to other diseases. Other viral vectors, like the adenoviruses, often are recognized and destroyed by the immune system so their therapeutic effects are short-lived. Maintaining gene expression so it performs its role properly after vector delivery is difficult. As a result, some therapies need to be repeated often to provide long-lasting benefits.

One of the most pressing issues, however, is gene regulation. Genes work in concert to regulate their functioning. In other words, several genes may play a part in turning other genes on and off. For example, certain genes work together to stimulate cell division and growth, but if these are not regulated, the inserted genes could cause tumor formation and cancer. Another difficulty is learning how to make the gene go into action only when needed. For the best and safest therapeutic effort, a specific gene should turn on, for example, when certain levels of a protein or enzyme are low and must be replaced. But the gene also should remain dormant when not needed to ensure it doesn't oversupply a substance and disturb the body's delicate chemical makeup.

One approach to gene regulation is to attach other genes that detect certain biological activities and then react as a type of automatic off-and-on switch that regulates the activity of the other genes according to biological cues. Although still in the rudimentary stages, researchers are making headway in inhibiting some gene functioning by using a synthetic DNA to block gene transcriptions (the copying of genetic information). This approach may have implications for gene therapy.

While gene therapy holds promise as a revolutionary approach to treating disease, ethical concerns over its use and ramifications have been expressed by scientists and lay people alike. For example, since much needs to be learned about how these genes actually work and their long-term effect, is it ethical to test these therapies on humans, where they could have a disastrous result? As with most clinical trials concerning new therapies, including many drugs, the patients participating in these studies usually have not responded to more established therapies and often are so ill the novel therapy is their only hope for long-term survival.

Another questionable outgrowth of gene therapy is that scientists could possibly manipulate genes to genetically control traits in human offspring that are not health related. For example, perhaps a gene could be inserted to ensure that a child would not be bald, a seemingly harmless goal. However, what if genetic manipulation was used to alter skin color, prevent homosexuality, or ensure good looks? If a gene is found that can enhance intelligence of children who are not yet born, will everyone in society, the rich and the poor, have access to the technology or will it be so expensive only the elite can afford it?

The Human Genome Project, which plays such an integral role for the future of gene therapy, also has social repercussions. If individual genetic codes can be determined, will such information be used against people? For example, will someone more susceptible to a disease have to pay higher insurance premiums or be denied health insurance altogether? Will employers discriminate between two potential employees, one with a "healthy" genome and the other with genetic abnormalities?

Some of these concerns can be traced back to the eugenics movement popular in the first half of the twentieth century. This genetic "philosophy" was a societal movement that encouraged people with "positive" traits to reproduce while those with less desirable traits were sanctioned from having children. Eugenics was used to pass strict immigration laws in the United States, barring less suitable people from entering the country lest they reduce the quality of the country's collective gene pool. Probably the most notorious example of eugenics in action was the rise of Nazism in Germany, which resulted in the Eugenic Sterilization Law of 1933. The law required sterilization for those suffering from certain disabilities and even for some who were simply deemed "ugly." To ensure that this novel science is not abused, many governments have established organizations specifically for overseeing the development of gene therapy. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Institutes of Health require scientists to take a precise series of steps and meet stringent requirements before proceeding with clinical trials. As of mid-2004, more than 300 companies were carrying out gene medicine developments and 500 clinical trials were underway. How to deliver the therapy is the key to unlocking many of the researchers discoveries.

In fact, gene therapy has been immersed in more controversy and surrounded by more scrutiny in both the health and ethical arena than most other technologies (except, perhaps, for cloning) that promise to substantially change society. Despite the health and ethical questions surrounding gene therapy, the field will continue to grow and is likely to change medicine faster than any previous medical advancement.

Cell The smallest living unit of the body that groups together to form tissues and help the body perform specific functions.

Chromosome A microscopic thread-like structure found within each cell of the body, consisting of a complex of proteins and DNA. Humans have 46 chromosomes arranged into 23 pairs. Changes in either the total number of chromosomes or their shape and size (structure) may lead to physical or mental abnormalities.

Clinical trial The testing of a drug or some other type of therapy in a specific population of patients.

Clone A cell or organism derived through asexual (without sex) reproduction containing the identical genetic information of the parent cell or organism.

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) The genetic material in cells that holds the inherited instructions for growth, development, and cellular functioning.

Embryo The earliest stage of development of a human infant, usually used to refer to the first eight weeks of pregnancy. The term fetus is used from roughly the third month of pregnancy until delivery.

Enzyme A protein that causes a biochemical reaction or change without changing its own structure or function.

Eugenics A social movement in which the population of a society, country, or the world is to be improved by controlling the passing on of hereditary information through mating.

Gene A building block of inheritance, which contains the instructions for the production of a particular protein, and is made up of a molecular sequence found on a section of DNA. Each gene is found on a precise location on a chromosome.

Gene transcription The process by which genetic information is copied from DNA to RNA, resulting in a specific protein formation.

Genetic engineering The manipulation of genetic material to produce specific results in an organism.

Genetics The study of hereditary traits passed on through the genes.

Germ-line gene therapy The introduction of genes into reproductive cells or embryos to correct inherited genetic defects that can cause disease.

Liposome Fat molecule made up of layers of lipids.

Macromolecules A large molecule composed of thousands of atoms.

Nitrogen A gaseous element that makes up the base pairs in DNA.

Nucleus The central part of a cell that contains most of its genetic material, including chromosomes and DNA.

Protein Important building blocks of the body, composed of amino acids, involved in the formation of body structures and controlling the basic functions of the human body.

Somatic gene therapy The introduction of genes into tissue or cells to treat a genetic related disease in an individual.

Vectors Something used to transport genetic information to a cell.

Abella, Harold. "Gene Therapy May Save Limbs." Diagnostic Imaging (May 1, 2003): 16.

Christensen R. "Cutaneous Gene TherapyAn Update." Histochemical Cell Biology (January 2001): 73-82.

"Gene Therapy Important Part of Cancer Research." Cancer Gene Therapy Week (June 30, 2003): 12.

"Initial Sequencing and Analysis of the Human Genome." Nature (February 15, 2001): 860-921.

Kingsman, Alan. "Gene Therapy Moves On." SCRIP World Pharmaceutical News (July 7, 2004): 19:ndash;21.

Nevin, Norman. "What Has Happened to Gene Therapy?" European Journal of Pediatrics (2000): S240-S242.

"New DNA Vaccine Targets Proteins Expressed in Cervical Cancer Cells." Gene Therapy Weekly (September 9, 2004): 14.

"New Research on the Progress of Gene Therapy Presented at Meeting." Obesity, Fitness & Wellness Week (July 3, 2004): 405.

Pekkanen, John. "Genetics: Medicine's Amazing Leap." Readers Digest (September 1991): 23-32.

Silverman, Jennifer, and Steve Perlstein. "Genome Project Completed." Family Practice News (May 15, 2003): 50-51.

"Study Highlights Potential Danger of Gene Therapy." Drug Week (June 20, 2003): 495.

"Study May Help Scientists Develop Safer Mthods for Gene Therapy." AIDS Weekly (June 30, 2003): 32.

Trabis, J. "With Gene Therapy, Ears Grow New Sensory Cells." Science News (June 7, 2003): 355.

National Human Genome Research Institute. The National Institutes of Health. 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 496-2433. http://www.nhgri.nih.gov.

Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. Online genetic testing information sponsored by National Center for Biotechnology Information. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim/.

The rest is here:

gene therapy facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia.com ...

Mesothelioma Gene Therapy | Additional Treatment Options

Gene therapy attempts to fix a problem with the genetic structure or function of a cell. As one of the most promising emerging treatments today, gene therapy is actively being tested in clinical trials to treat mesothelioma and other types of cancer.

The concept behind cancer gene therapy is easy to grasp. Cancer is generally caused by a genetic malfunction or mutation of some kind that causes cells to multiply more rapidly than normal cells. Gene therapy works by replacing the faulty genes in these cells with one that work as they are supposed to.

There are potentially a great many types of gene therapy available; however, in practice, only a few genetic approaches to treating cancer have shown any effectiveness. The most common approaches are summarized below.

Imaging Tests

Blood Tests

Biopsies

Gene transfer works by injecting foreign genetic material into cancer cells to trigger certain effects, such as programmed death (suicide genes) or statis

This treatment focuses on stopping angiogenesis the growth of new blood cells effectively starving tumors. This can slow tumor growth, and in some cases even shrink the tumors.

This form of therapy uses genetically modified viruses to seek out and destroy cancer cells. These oncolytic (cancer-killing) viruses are designed to be harmless to healthy cells.

One of the most common ways of delivering gene therapy is through the use of viral vectors that is, viruses that are genetically modified to attack only cancer cells. Viruses that have been used as viral vectors include adenovirus, retrovirus, lentiviruses, and vaccinia.

Gene therapy has undergone considerable research as a treatment for mesothelioma. Although still considered to be emerging treatments, various types of gene therapy are clinical trialscontinuing to study the effects of different types of gene therapy on an ongoing basis.

One of the most interesting ways that gene therapy has been used is through triggering so-called suicide genes that is, genes that cause the cell to die when activated. With one specific type of suicide gene therapy, called gene-directed enzyme-producing therapy (GDEPT), cancer cells are modified to produce an enzyme that causes their own death.

Cytokines are proteins released by some cells that act as signals for the cells around them. Cytokine gene therapy focuses on triggering immune-related cytokines release in tumor cells, which causes the immune system to attack those cells.

The p53 protein is known to be defective in nearly all forms of cancer, leading some researchers to believe that the ability to repair the p53 gene sequence could be the key to finding a cure or at least a much more effective treatment for cancer.

While gene therapy and immunotherapy are sometimes thought of as separate forms of mesothelioma treatment, in actuality they can be one and the same thing. Gene therapy has to do with modifying genetic code, and immunotherapy uses the bodys immune to attack cancer cells.

There are some types of gene therapy that trigger the bodys immune system response, making those treatments both gene therapy and immunotherapy or immunogenic therapy, as it is sometimes called. Cytokine gene therapy is one example of immunogenic therapy, as the purpose of the genetic modification is to induce an immune system response.

American Cancer Society. Whats new in malignant mesothelioma research and treatment? Cancer.org. Created May 18, 2015. Updated February 17, 2016.

Cross D, Burmester JK. Gene Therapy for Cancer Treatment: Past, Present and Future. Clinical Medicine and Research. September 2006;4(3):218227.

Kotova S, Wong RM, Cameron RB. New and emerging therapeutic options for malignant pleural mesothelioma: review of early clinical trials. Cancer Management and Research. January 23, 2015;7:51-63. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S72814

Kubo S, Takagi-Kimura M, Kasahara N. Combinatorial anti-angiogenic gene therapy in a human malignant mesothelioma model. Oncology Reports. June 12, 2015. 633-638. doi: 10.3892/or.2015.4058

Tandle A, Blazer DG, Libutti SK. Antiangiogenic gene therapy of cancer: recent developments. Journal of Translational Medicine. June 25, 2004;2:22. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-2-22

Vachani A, Moon E, Wakeam E, Albelda SM. Gene Therapy for Mesothelioma and Lung Cancer.

Link:

Mesothelioma Gene Therapy | Additional Treatment Options

Could gene therapy become biotechs growth driver in 2017 …

Despite bouncing off a 2-year low, biotech is still an unpopular sector and investors are rightfully concerned about its near-term prospects. Recent drug failures, growing pricing pressure and the potential impact of biosimilars all contribute to the negative sentiment, but the main problem is the lack of growth drivers for the remainder of 2016 (and potentially 2017).

The biotech industry relies on innovation cycles to create new revenue sources. This was the case in the 2013-2014 biotech bull market, which was driven by a wave of medical breakthroughs (PD-1, HCV, CAR/TCR, oral MS drugs, CF etc.). These waves typically involve new therapeutic approaches coupled with disruptive technologies as their enablers.

In oncology, for example, the understanding that cancer is driven by aberrant signaling coupled with advances in medicinal chemistry and antibody engineering led to the development of kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies as blockers of signaling. A decade later, insights around cancer immunology gave rise to the immuno-oncology field and PD-1 inhibitors in particular, which are expected to become the biggest oncology franchise ever.

Gene therapy ticks all the boxes

While there are several hot areas in biotech such as gene editing and microbiome, most are still early and their applicability is unclear. Gene therapy, on the other hand, is more mature and de-risked with tens of clinical studies and the potential to treat (and perhaps cure) a wide range of diseases where treatment is inadequate or non-existent. The commercial upside from these programs is huge and should expand as additional indications are pursued.

As I previously discussed, the past two years saw a surge in the number of clinical-stage gene therapies, some of which already generated impressive efficacy across multiple indications. This makes gene therapy the only truly disruptive field which is mature enough not only from a technology but also from a clinical standpoint. Importantly, most studies are conducted by companies according to industry and regulatory standards, in contrast to historical gene therapy studies that were run by academic groups.

To me, the striking thing about the results is the breadth of technologies, indications and modes of administrations evaluated to date. This versatility is very important for the future of gene therapy as it reduces overall development risk and increases likelihood of success by allowing companies to tailor the right product for each indication. Parameters include mode of administration (local vs. systemic vs. ex vivo), tropism for the target tissue (eye, bone marrow, liver etc.), immunogenicity and onset of activity.

Building a diversified gene therapy basket

Given the early development stage and large number of technologies, I prefer to own a basket of gene therapy stocks with a focus on the more clinically validated ones: Spark (ONCE), Bluebird (BLUE) and Avexis (AVXS).

Bluebird and Spark are the most further along (and also the largest based on market cap) gene therapy companies and should be the basis for any gene therapy portfolio. With two completely different technologies, the two companies have strong clinical proof-of-concept for their respective lead programs.

Avexis is less advanced without a clinically validated product, but recent data for its lead program are too promising to ignore.

Spark Clinical validation for retinal and liver indications

Sparks lead programs (SPK-RPE65) will probably become the first gene therapy to get FDA approval. In October, the company reported strong P3 data in rare genetic retinal conditions caused by RPE65 mutations, the first randomized and statistically significant data for a gene therapy. The company is expected to complete its BLA submission later in 2016 which should lead to FDA approval in 2017. Sparks second ophthalmology program for choroideremia is in P1 with efficacy data expected later in 2016.

Earlier this month, Spark released an encouraging update for its Hemophilia B program, SPK-9001 (partnered with Pfizer [PFE]). A single administration of SPK-9001 led to a sustained and clinically meaningful production of Factor IX, a clotting factor which is dysfunctional in Hemophilia B patients. All four treated patients experienced a clinically significant increase in Factor IX activity from <2% to 26%-41% (12% is predicted to be sufficient for minimizing incidence bleeding events). Due to the limited follow up (under 6 months), durability is still an open question.

Spark intends to advance its wholly-owned Hemophilia A program (SPK-8011) to the clinic later in 2016 with initial data expected in H1:2017. Results in the Hemophilia B should be viewed as a positive read-through but Hemophilia A still presents certain technical challenges (e.g. missing protein is several fold larger) which required Spark to use a different vector. Hemophilia A represents a $5B opportunity compared to $1B for Hemophilia B.

Bluebird

Despite being one of the worst biotech performers, Bluebird remains the largest and most visible gene therapy company. In contrast to most gene therapy companies, Bluebird treats patients cells ex-vivo (outside of the body) in a process that resembles stem cell transplant or adoptive cell transfer (CAR, TCR). Progenitor cells are collected from the patient, a genetic modification is integrated into the genome followed by infusion of the cells that repopulate the bone marrow. This enables Bluebird to go after hematologic diseases like beta thalassemia and Sickle-cell disease (SCD) where target cells are constantly dividing.

Sentiment around Bluebirds lead program, Lenti-globin , plummeted last year after a series of disappointing results in a subset of beta-thal patients and preliminary data in SCD, which represents the more important commercial opportunity. Particularly in SCD patients, post-treatment hemoglobin levels were relatively low and although some increase has been noted with time, it is still unclear what the maximal effect would be. Market reaction was brutal, sending shares down 75% in just over a year.

Next update for Lenti-globin is expected at ASH in December. Despite the disappointing efficacy observed in SCD and beta-thal, I am cautiously optimistic about Bluebirds efforts to optimize treatment protocols and regimens. These include specific conditioning regimens and ex-vivo treatment of cells that may improve transduction rate and hemoglobin production in patients. Some of these modifications are already being implemented in newly recruited patients and hopefully longer follow up will lead to higher hemoglobin levels in already-reported patients.

The only clinical update so far in 2016 was for Lenti-D in C-ALD, a rare neurological disease that affects infants in their first years. Results demonstrated that of 17 patients treated to date (median follow-up of 16 months), all remain alive and free of major functional deterioration (defined as major functional disabilities, MFD). The primary endpoint, defined as no MFD at 2 years, was reached for 3/3 patients with sufficient follow-up and assuming the trend continues Bluebird may be in a position to file for approval in H2:2017.

Lenti-Ds commercial opportunity is limited (200 patients diagnosed each year in developed countries) so investors understandably focus on Lenti-globin, which is being developed for beta thal (~20k patients in developed countries) and SCD (~160k patients).

Bluebird is expected to end 2016 with ~$650M in cash. Current market cap is $1.7B.

Avexis

Avexis is developing AVXS-101 for Spinal muscular atrophy Type 1 (SMA1), a rapidly deteriorating and fatal neuro-muscular disease. SMA1 is characterized by rapid deterioration in motor and neuronal functions with 50% of patients experiencing death or permanent ventilation by their first anniversary. Most patients die from respiratory failure by the age of two. SMA Type 2 and Type 3 are also caused by SMN1 mutations and are characterized by a later onset and milder disease burden (but unmet need is still significant in these indications). The US prevalence of SMA is 10,000, 600 of which are SMA1.

In contrast to Bluebird and Spark, Avexis does not have conclusive proof it can lead to expression of the missing protein (SMN1) in the target tissue nor does it have randomized clinical data but the results generated to date are simply too provocative to ignore.

At the most recent update, Avexis presented data for 15 patients who received AVXS-101 in their first months of life. 3 patients were treated with a low dose and 12 were treated with a high dose. Strikingly, none of the children experienced an event (defined as ventilation or death), including patients who reached 2 years of age. All 9 patients with sufficient follow up, reached the age of 13.6 months without an event in contrast to historical data that show an event-free survival of 25%. AVXS-101 also led to a dose dependent increase in motor function which had a quick onset especially at the higher dose.

As with any results from an open label study without a control arm, these data should be analyzed with caution, as they need to be corroborated by large controlled studies (expected to start next year). Still, the data point to an overwhelming benefit in a very aggressive disease. One of the most exciting aspects of this program is the fact that it is given systemically via IV administration, which implies the treatment reaches the neurons in the CNS. Avexis plans to start a trial in SMA2 in H2:16 using intrathecal delivery (directly to the spinal canal). This decision is surprising given the results with IV administration in SMA1 and the fact that the BBB immaturity hypothesis in babies is not considered relevant anymore. (See this review)

AVXS-101s main competitor is Biogens (BIIB) and Ionis (IONS) nusinersen, an antisense molecule that needs to be intrathecally injected 3-4 times a year. As both drugs generated encouraging clinical data in small non-randomized studies, it is hard to compare them, however, AVXS-101 has an obvious advantage of being a potentially one time IV injection. Nusinersen is in P3 with topline data expected in mid-2017.

AVXS-101 is based on an AAV9 vector developed by REGENXBIO (RGNX), which licensed the technology to Avexis. Beyond the 5%-10% in royalties REGENXBIO is eligible to receive, data for AVXS-101 bode well for the companys proprietary programs in MPS-I and MPS-II, two other rare diseases with neurological involvement where BBB penetration is crucial. These programs are also based on REGENXBIOs AAV9.

Beyond AVXS-101, REGENXBIO has an impressive partnered pipeline which includes collaborations with Voyager (VYGR), Dimension (DMTX) , Baxalta and Lysogene.

Portfolio updates Immunogen, Marinus, Esperion

June was a rough month for three of my holdings. Immunogen (IMGN) had a disappointing data set at ASCO, Marinus (MRNS) reported a P3 failure in epilepsy and most recently, Esperion was dealt a regulatory blow from the FDA that may push development timelines by several years. I am selling Immunogen and Marinus due to the lack of near-term catalysts although long-term their respective drugs could still be valuable. I decided to keep Esperion as I still find ETC-1002 very attractive and hope that PCSK9s CVOT data will soften FDAs concerns about LDL-C reduction as an approvable endpoint.

Three additional companies with important binary readouts in the coming months are Array Biopharma (ARRY), SAGE (SAGE) and Aurinia (AUPH). Array will have P3 data for selumetinib (partnered with AstraZeneca) in KRAS+ NSCLC. SAGE will report data from a randomized P2 in PPD following a promising single-arm data set. Aurinia will report results from the AURA study in lupus nephritis patients, where there is a strong rationale for using the companys drug (voclosporin) but limited direct clinical validation.

Portfolio holdings July 4, 2016

.

Read more from the original source:

Could gene therapy become biotechs growth driver in 2017 ...