Investment in UK cell and gene therapy manufacturing set to continue – European Pharmaceutical Review

An additional 6,000m2 of cell and gene therapy manufacturing space is expected to become available within the next 12 months, according to new data.

New data shows that a 60 percent increase in cell and gene manufacturing space reported in 2018 has since become fully functional, reports Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult (CGT Catapult).

This growth is also reflected in a surge in jobs in the cell and gene therapy manufacturing industry; numbers have expanded from 150 in 2014, to 500 in 2018 and doubling to over 1,000 staff in 2019, found the researchers.

With significant additional capacity planned, it is essential that skilled personnel are available

The manufacturing capacity in the UK is due to increase even further in 2020, with around 6,000m2 becoming available. Oxford Biomedica and the CGT Catapult are the main contributors, with 4,200m2 opening at Oxford Biomedicas new Oxbox facility and a 1,200m2 expansion of the CGT Catapult. Additional space is set to come from expansions at Great Ormond Street, Cobra Biologics, The Rayne Cell Therapy facility at Kings College London, NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) and Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service (SNBTS).

Further extensions are also expected in 2021 from RoslinCT and in 2022 from The University of Birmingham and the Rayne Cell Therapy Facility at Kings College London. With more plans likewise being announced by Karoo Therapeutics, Exmoor Pharma, University of Oxford CBF, MeiraGTx and Immetacyte, cell and gene therapy manufacturing growth is set to continue.

These facilities coming on stream now are evidence of the acceleration of cell and gene therapies towards commercialisation. With significant additional capacity planned, it is essential that skilled personnel are available. The Advanced Therapies Apprenticeship Community, designed specifically to train and upskill individuals for the sector, setup in partnership with the Medicines Manufacturing Industry Partnership (MMIP), will become increasingly important, claimed Keith Thompson, Chief Executive Officer CGT Catapult.

Link:

Investment in UK cell and gene therapy manufacturing set to continue - European Pharmaceutical Review

Biomanufacturing and Supply Chain Standardization Key to Success in Cell and Gene Therapy Industry Boom – BioBuzz

The Wild West. Like changing the engine of acar while driving down the highway.

This was how several cell and gene therapy industry leaders characterized the fields rapidly developing Biomanufacturing and supply chain environment at this years Maryland Tech Council (MTC) BIO Conference held in the BioHealth Capital Region (BHCR).

Cell and gene therapy is so new that itsmanufacturing and supply chain processes and best practices are stillcalcifying, leaving many organizations to learn on the fly as they attempt tobuild the efficiency and standardization necessary for the industry to trulytake off.

Put simply, cell and gene therapy companiesare doing something thats basically never been done before. Only a handful ofcompanies have successfully taken a cell and gene therapy product to market.Gene and cell therapy manufacturing and supply chain is truly a new frontierthat is just starting to be explored and mapped.

Earlier this year at the Bio Innovation Conference during a panel entitled, New Frontiers of Biomanufacturing, had a vigorous discussion about the evolving state of cell and gene therapy manufacturing and innovation. Panelists included Vigenes Chief Manufacturing Officer Jeffrey Hung, Ph.D.; Aaron Vernon, VP of Engineering and Supply Chain at Autolus; John Rowley, Ph.D., Founder, and Chief Product Officer at Rooster Bio; Chris McDonald, VP of Manufacturing at Kite Pharma and Robert Lindblad, Chief Medical Officer at Emmes Corporation, and was moderated by John Walker, Manufacturers Extension Liaison at NIIMBL (National Institute for Innovation in Manufacturing Biopharmaceuticals).

When asked, What keeps you up at night?,Jeffrey Hung of Vigene perfectly captured the conundrum facing those operatingin the cell and gene therapy field: What keeps me awake at night is thecontinued demand for clinical trial materials and commercial product while wekeep having to innovate at a fast pace. Its like trying to change a carsengine while driving it down the highway.

Other panelists cited what seemed likeinherent contradictions faced by a nascient cell and gene therapy industry. Inessence, these companies are learning on the fly without an established set ofrules to follow or even question. Production needs conflict with innovation;personalization is anathema to standardization; and being cutting edge oftenmeans they lack the tools, materials and the well-worn paths to regulatoryapproval already established in other biotech sectors.

As a supporter of manufacturerswhat we see is that everyone wants to innovate but at some point, you have to just bite the bullet and lock down your process to get reliable manufacturing techniques to move it along the regulatory pathway. Every tweak you do requires a lot of other work. You can work on innovation in the second stage of your product, stated Robert Lindblad of Emmes.

In the new frontier space, there are no reagents and no GMP reagents. You cant source GMP reagents so you have to qualify reagents just for your product and your indication, which is not adequate to get a certificate of analysis from the FDA. As you are on the cutting edge, you dont have the equipment to create a closed system, you dont have the reagents you need to have GMP manufacturing, so you have to be creative and work with the agencies to get through the regulatory pathways to commercialization, he added.

The personalized nature of cell and genetherapy also creates challenges for manufacturing standardization and supplychain. The one batch, one patient equation of autologous cell therapy makes ita unique and highly challenging manufacturing process.

When you think about designing and building aplant you cant build inventory. Biologic manufacturing allows for 2 or 3 yearsof inventory. For us, you can never take the plant down, stated Chris McDonaldof Kite Pharma. He added that in many ways building a cell therapymanufacturing plant is a lot easier than running one due to the challengespresented by personalization, constant production, lack of inventory and theoverall newness of the industry.

Rooster Bio has built its business model around solving some of the fields efficiency and standardization issues. Rooster is making great strides in its efforts to standardize parts of the manufacturing and supply chain processes by becoming the Intel of cell banking. By creating off-the-shelf, high-quality media and cells-similar in concept to what the Intel microchip did for the computer industry-Rooster hopes to help standardize an important segment of cell and gene therapy manufacturing process and supply chain, thereby increasing manufacturing efficiency while lowering the cost of cell and gene therapy costs to patients.

One bad reagent going into a cell bank thats supposed to last for a few years can be really debilitating. This is what makes the Rooster Bio business model possible. Innovation cant happen without quality. On the innovation side were in the middle of the process of living cells transitioning from being just a tool for research into technology itself, stated John Rowley of Rooster Bio.

He also cited Moores Law as an apt parallel for whats currently developing in the cell and gene therapy field right now. Moores Law states that the capacity of microchips would likely double every year while computers would decrease in cost. Rowley drew a link between Moores Law, the rapid increase in monoclonal antibody manufacturing capacity and cost reductions of the 1990s and what is going on now in cell and gene therapy manufacturing and supply chain.

While improving the manufacturing and supply chain is critical, Aaron Vernon of Autolus reminded the audience of the real-world impact of cell and gene therapy development failure or success. He emphasized the need for stronger cell and gene therapy manufacturing and supply standardization because of the direct link between personalized therapies and impacts on individual patients.

We have to have zero tolerance for manufacturing failures because of their direct impact on patients. There are a lot of moving parts and things get more complex over time. This doesnt scale easily, he stated. We want to innovate all the time but we dont decisions made early in the research process that hamper supply chain for a very long time.

Because personalized medicine is tailored for specific patients-i.e. one batch, one patient-the stake, while always high in biotech manufacturing, are higher in cell and gene therapy manufacturing and supply chain.

This makes solving the industrysmanufacturing and supply chain questions even more pressing. Having morecompanies successfully commercialize their cell and gene therapy products andincreased information sharing, even among competing companies, are critical tothe industrys future.

Theres a huge amount of knowledge out therebut theres a black box that only gives us information about whats workedand what hasnt really late in the game. We only learn from the FDA after thefact, stated McDonald.

Instead of relying on the FDA, Walker wonderedabout the possibility of sharing successes and failures among cell and genetherapies competing for market share.

Walker offered the following thoughts to thepanel, Different companies know whats working and whats not but because ofIP no one is sharing. As cell therapy is trying to move forward everyone istrying to protect their own space so they are not sharing failures. If youretrying to move the field forward scientifically thats one thing, but right noweveryone is thinking commercially and everyone is in their silo, which istotally understandable

Vernon noted that the Standards Coordinating Body and other organizations are working to develop manufacturing and supply chain standards for the industry and are actively seeking input from companies in the space.

What Ive learned more than anything recentlyis that these organizations need more industry engagement. There are certainthings-how we qualify shipping lanes, logistics, freezing, microbial testing,method validation-that are absolutely inefficient when we are reinventing thewheel all the time at different companies, stated Vernon.

Because this industry is so new-we only have4 or 5 approved cell and gene therapy approved commercial products-its reallyjust too early to be able to standardize, added Hung.

Because it is in fact too early tostandardize, cell and gene therapy organizations find themselves confronting aCatch-22. Manufacturing demand will compete with the need to innovate. Thepersonalized nature of cell and gene therapy will be at odds with the push tostandardize manufacturing and supply chain best practices. The push to beat thecompetition to market will inherently limit the data sharing necessary touplift the entire industry.

While these manufacturing and supplychallenges appear daunting, they always are when it comes to revolutionizingmedicine. Its the energy created by these contradictions that will driveprogress and foment innovation; its the immense challenges of frontierindustries like cell and gene therapy that will ensure the very best of thebest rise to success to pave the way forward for the organizations thatfollow. And its success that will breedmore success, as the conflict between these seemingly opposing forces will onlyresolve itself over time as more companies take therapies to market and thestories of their struggles and successes become public knowledge.

It seems like the Wild West now but conquering new territory is always complex and messy. The car will eventually have time to slow down and get in the shop to fine-tune its engine, offering a smoother, more efficient and faster ride to its destination.

The BHCR regions burgeoning cell and gene therapy cluster, as represented by those on the New Frontiers in Biomanfucturing panel, will clearly play a leading role in fulfilling the promise of cell and gene therapies to deliver high-quality therapies and cures to patients in need while driving down costs over time.

Learn more about working at Kite from Chris McDonald, VP of Manufacturing and Site Lead.

Steve has over 20 years experience in copywriting, developing brand messaging and creating marketing strategies across a wide range of industries, including the biopharmaceutical, senior living, commercial real estate, IT and renewable energy sectors, among others. He is currently the Principal/Owner of StoryCore, a Frederick, Maryland-based content creation and execution consultancy focused on telling the unique stories of Maryland organizations.

More here:

Biomanufacturing and Supply Chain Standardization Key to Success in Cell and Gene Therapy Industry Boom - BioBuzz

Research targets gene therapy for exudative AMD patients – Modern Retina

Abstract / Synopsis:

Two anti-VEGF gene therapies are being investigated in clinical trials of patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration. Initial efficacy and safety results are encouraging.

Anti-VEGF gene therapy for exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) has transformative potential for reducing treatment burden and improving patient outcomes, according to Szilrd Kiss, MD.

Two investigational anti-VEGF gene therapies are currently being investigated in clinical trialsRGX-314 (Regenxbio) and ADVM-022 (Adverum). Dr. Kiss described the two technologies and reviewed some preliminary clinical trial results that support their promise for providing sustained benefit with a single injection.

Considering the treatment burden of anti-VEGF therapy for other ocular diseases, we can imagine that exudative AMD is just the first indication that will be targeted for anti-VEGF gene therapy, said Dr. Kiss, chief, Retina Service, associate professor of ophthalmology, and associate dean at Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.

RGX-314 delivers a gene for an anti-VEGF fab protein that is similar to ranibizumab. It uses adeno-associated virus-8 (AAV8) as a vector and is administered in the operating room as a subretinal injection.

AAV is the most common viral vector carrier used for gene therapy. Different AAV serotypes have different tissue selectivity, Dr. Kiss explained. AAV8 is a wild type AAV that has the propensity for greater transfection of retinal cells compared with AAV2 following subretinal gene therapy delivery.

RELATED:AAO 2019: Encouraging results revealed from early trial of subretinal gene therapy for wet AMD

Disclosures:

Szilrd Kiss, MDe: [emailprotected]This article was adapted from Dr. Kiss presentation at the 2019 meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Dr. Kiss is a consultant to RegenxBio and Spark Therapeutics and is a consultant and equity owner in Adverum.

Read the original here:

Research targets gene therapy for exudative AMD patients - Modern Retina

Magenta Therapeutics Demonstrates First-ever Successful Gene Therapy Transplant Without Chemotherapy in Primates Using a Single Dose of Antibody-drug…

CAMBRIDGE, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Magenta Therapeutics (NASDAQ: MGTA), a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing novel medicines to bring the curative power of immune reset to more patients, today announced that new results from its CD117-ADC patient preparation program were presented at the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH). These results, which were highlighted in an oral presentation at ASH by John Tisdale, M.D., Director, Molecular and Clinical Hematology Section, National Institutes of Health, showed the first-ever successful transplant of gene-modified cells in non-human primates using a targeted, single-agent antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), without the use of chemotherapy or radiation.

Todays conditioning regimens involve high doses of chemotherapy, often paired with radiation, to remove the disease-causing cells. As a result, patients undergoing gene therapy or stem cell transplant are all faced with a difficult choice: whether to endure severe toxicity and risk infertility and cancer for the chance for a cure. Magentas portfolio of targeted ADCs represents an extremely promising new option to prepare patients for gene therapy or transplant with no need for toxic chemotherapy or radiation, said Dr. Tisdale. The results presented today show that a single dose of single agent CD117-ADC achieves the same level of depletion as four doses of busulfan chemotherapy to enable successful engraftment and persistence of stem cells modified with the -globin gene, the gene that causes sickle cell disease and -thalassemia when mutated. Importantly, the animals undergoing preparation with CD117-ADC showed none of the damaging toxicities associated with busulfan conditioning.

Magenta is the only company with the people, platforms and a product engine committed to comprehensively transforming immune and blood system reset, which includes revolutionizing the toxic methods that are used to prepare patients for gene therapy and transplant today. said Jason Gardner, D.Phil., Chief Executive Officer and President, Magenta Therapeutics. The gene therapy field has learned that higher levels of stem cell depletion, which meant higher doses of busulfan, were needed to ensure long-term engraftment of the gene-modified cells and persistence of gene therapy. Across all the modalities we have tested, we have seen that ADCs are most effective at achieving these high levels of stem cell depletion without chemotherapy to enable engraftment and long-term durability of the transplant. Todays impressive results provide important validation of the ADC approach as well as the CD117 target for patient preparation and underscore Magentas leadership in the field of conditioning.

Results from the CD117-ADC Patient Preparation Program

Title: A Single Dose of CD117 Antibody Drug Conjugate Enables Autologous Gene-Modified Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (Gene Therapy) in Nonhuman Primates (Abstract #610)Presenter: John Tisdale, M.D., Director, Molecular and Clinical Hematology Section, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

Magentas most advanced patient preparation program, CD117-ADC, targets CD117, a protein expressed on hematopoietic stem cells. CD117-ADC is designed to remove the genetically mutated cells in the bone marrow that cause certain genetic diseases, such as sickle cell disease, enabling curative stem cell transplant or gene therapy.

Results presented by Dr. Tisdale showed:

About Magenta Therapeutics

Magenta Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing medicines to bring the curative power of immune system reset through stem cell transplant to more patients with autoimmune diseases, genetic diseases and blood cancers. Magenta is combining leadership in stem cell biology and biotherapeutics development with clinical and regulatory expertise, a unique business model and broad networks in the stem cell transplant world to revolutionize immune reset for more patients.

Magenta is based in Cambridge, Mass. For more information, please visit http://www.magentatx.com.

Follow Magenta on Twitter: @magentatx.

Forward-Looking Statement

This press release may contain forward-looking statements and information within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. The use of words such as may, will, could, should, expects, intends, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, projects, seeks, endeavor, potential, continue or the negative of such words or other similar expressions can be used to identify forward-looking statements. The express or implied forward-looking statements included in this press release are only predictions and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including, without limitation risks set forth under the caption Risk Factors in Magentas Registration Statement on Form S-1, as updated by Magentas most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and its other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this press release may not occur and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Although Magenta believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot guarantee that the future results, levels of activity, performance or events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur. Moreover, except as required by law, neither Magenta nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements included in this press release. Any forward-looking statement included in this press release speaks only as of the date on which it was made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

View post:

Magenta Therapeutics Demonstrates First-ever Successful Gene Therapy Transplant Without Chemotherapy in Primates Using a Single Dose of Antibody-drug...

GenEdit and Editas Medicine Enter into Exclusive License and Collaboration Agreement for Nanoparticle Gene Therapy Delivery – Business Wire

BERKELEY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--GenEdit, Inc., a developer of a novel polymer nanoparticle technology platform for non-viral- and non-lipid-based delivery of gene therapies, today announced that it has entered into a worldwide, exclusive license and collaboration agreement with Editas Medicine, Inc., a leading genome editing company. GenEdit has developed a comprehensive delivery system for CRISPR-based therapeutics, including gene knockout and gene repair therapies, to enable safer delivery options with improved efficiency.

"This license and collaboration agreement further validates the strength of our intellectual property portfolio and the potential of GenEdits technology," said Kunwoo Lee, Ph.D., co-founder and chief executive officer of GenEdit. "We are pleased to establish our relationship with Editas Medicine as they leverage our technology to develop potential genomic medicines."

Under the terms of the agreement, GenEdit has granted Editas Medicine an exclusive worldwide license, with rights to sublicense, to GenEdits Cpf1-based technologies. In return for these rights, GenEdit will receive undisclosed upfront and development milestone payments, including royalties on net sales of products incorporating the licensed intellectual property. In addition, GenEdit and Editas Medicine will collaborate on evaluating delivery of Cpf1-based technologies with GenEdits nanoparticle platform. Editas Medicine will provide research funding and have an option to continue development after the initial collaboration period.

GenEdits nanoparticle platform consists of a proprietary non-viral, non-lipid library of polymers that efficiently encapsulate and deliver cargo [RNA, DNA, protein and/or ribonucleic acid-protein complexes (RNP)] to specific tissues. The company screens the library to identify initial hits and then uses computational analysis and medicinal chemistry for iterative lead optimization. The company has used this platform to identify multiple candidate polymers for efficient and specific delivery of gene editing to a range of tissues.

"Compared to viral vectors and lipid-based nanoparticles, our approach has the potential for better targeting, more cargo, and lower manufacturing cost," said Timothy Fong, Ph.D., chief scientific officer of GenEdit. "In particular, our approach has the potential to enable in vivo gene editing of multiple tissues with CRISPR and expand the potential of gene therapies to treat more diverse sets of diseases."

About GenEdit

GenEdit was founded to transform the delivery of gene and gene editing therapies. We have synthesized the NanoGalaxy library of polymers that can encapsulate RNA, DNA, protein and/or RNP. Through advanced screening methods, computational analysis and iterative medicinal chemistry, we have demonstrated efficient delivery of gene editing cargo to specific tissues. We seek development partnerships for specific tissues and/or gene targets while advancing our internal pipeline of gene editing therapies.

For more information, please visit http://www.genedit.com.

Read more:

GenEdit and Editas Medicine Enter into Exclusive License and Collaboration Agreement for Nanoparticle Gene Therapy Delivery - Business Wire

First 2 Adults with Severe Hemophilia A Respond Well to Gene Therapy BAY 2599023 in Clinical Trial – Hemophilia News Today

Bayersinvestigationalgene therapy BAY 2599023 safely and effectively increased the levels ofclotting factor VIII (FVIII) and prevented or lessened bleeding in the first two people with severe hemophilia A treated ina Phase 1/2 clinical trial, preliminary data show.

The ongoing trial (NCT03588299; 2017-000806-39) is enrolling up to 30 eligible adult patients. More information, including recruiting sites in the U.S. and Europe, is availablehere.

These early results will be presented in the poster, First-in-human Gene Therapy Study of AAVhu37 Capsid Vector Technology in Severe Hemophilia A, at the 61st American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting & ExpositionrunningDec. 710 in Orlando, Florida.

BAY 2599023 initially by Dimension Therapeutics as DTX201 is being developed by Bayer in collaboration with Ultragenyx Pharmaceuticals. The potential gene therapy aims to promote a sustained production of FVIII and overcome its deficit in hemophilia A patients, reducing or eliminating the need for prophylatic, or preventive, FVIII replacement therapy and the occurrence of bleeding events.

Administered as a single infusion, the therapy uses a modified and harmless version of the adeno-associated virus (AAV), called AAVhu37, to deliver a shorter but functionalcopy of the FVIII gene to liver cells, where clotting factors are produced. This version of the FVIII gene is known as B-domain deleted FVIII gene.

Preclinical studies showed that AAVhu37 effectively delivered the FVIII gene to liver cells, had a favorable distribution, and induced a durable FVIII production.

In addition, preclinical data showed that BAY 2599023 had a good safety profile, and the potential to promote FVIII production to levels considered to be therapeutic over a long period of time.

The ongoing, dose-establishingPhase 1/2 trial (NCT03588299; 2017-000806-39) is evaluating the safety, tolerability and early effectiveness of three ascending doses of BAY 2599023 in adult men with severe hemophilia A who have been previously treated with FVIII products.

It is the first clinical trial to evaluate a gene therapy based on the AAVhu37.

Up to 30 enrolled patients will be given a single intravenous infusion of one of three doses of BAY 2599023. The studys primary goal is to measure safety through reports of adverse events. Secondary goals include measuring FVIII activity and assessing the number of patients who reach more than 5% of FVIII production at six and 12 months after treatment at the different doses.

Data on the first two men treated at BAY 2599023s starting dose (0.5 x 1013 gene copies/kg) will be presented at the meeting. These men had more than 150 days of treatment with FVIII products, no history of FVIII inhibitors, and no detectable immune response against AAVhu37.

No adverse events were reported after more than 15 weeks of safety evaluations (about four months). Blood levels of liver enzymes also remained within a normal range, and either of these patients needed to be treated with corticosteroids.

The first man reached a stable FVIII production of around 5%, and was free of bleeding events or a need for prophylactic treatment for six weeks. The second patient, who had 99 bleeds in the year before receiving the gene therapy, reached a stable FVIII production of around 17%, and has been bleed-free for more than 5.5 months (at the time of data collection).

These preliminary data suggest that BAY 2599023 is safe and effective in promoting the production of FVIII and in reducing or preventing the occurrence of bleeding events and the need for prophylactic treatment, the researchers wrote.

Overall, data generated from this first dose cohort demonstrate that successful translation from pre-clinical to clinical development and proof-of-mechanism for BAY 2599023 was achieved, they concluded.

Marta Figueiredo holds a BSc in Biology and a MSc in Evolutionary and Developmental Biology from the University of Lisbon, Portugal. She is currently finishing her PhD in Biomedical Sciences at the University of Lisbon, where she focused her research on the role of several signalling pathways in thymus and parathyroid glands embryonic development.

Total Posts: 121

Margarida graduated with a BS in Health Sciences from the University of Lisbon and a MSc in Biotechnology from Instituto Superior Tcnico (IST-UL). She worked as a molecular biologist research associate at a Cambridge UK-based biotech company that discovers and develops therapeutic, fully human monoclonal antibodies.

Go here to read the rest:

First 2 Adults with Severe Hemophilia A Respond Well to Gene Therapy BAY 2599023 in Clinical Trial - Hemophilia News Today

New Anti-Aging Clinical Trial Begins. For $1 Million, You Can Be a Participant. – Livescience.com

An American biotech company has launched clinical trials in Colombia to test a new therapy designed to reverse the aging process, and in turn, treat age-related diseases, according to news reports.

But to steal a sip from this purported fountain of youth, participants in the trial must first fork over $1 million a fee that seems even more astronomical when you consider that most clinical trials are either free or provide participants with financial compensation, according to a report by OneZero, a Medium publication about tech and science.

The pricey trial is being run by Libella Gene Therapeutics, a Kansas-based company whose website proclaims that "the future is here." The company announced its intention to test its anti-aging remedies in Cartagena, Colombia, in 2018, and began recruiting for the trials in October of this year. Using a single-gene therapy, Libella aims to "prevent, delay, or even reverse" the general effects of aging, as well as treat diseases that emerge in old age, such as Alzheimer's, according to ClinicalTrials.gov.

In fact, in its own press release, the company boasted, without evidence, that its gene therapy "may be the world's first cure for Alzheimer's disease." The bold claim raises an obvious question: Will the treatment actually work?

Short answer: No one really knows, but the fact that Libella shipped its operation beyond the reach of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) doesn't inspire confidence, experts told OneZero.

Related: 5 Reasons Not to Fear Getting Older

Unlike anti-aging face creams that soften the superficial signs of aging, the Libella therapy aims to reverse aging from the ground up, so to speak, starting at the level of our genes. Specifically, the gene therapy is intended to lengthen patients' telomeres structures that cap the tips of chromosomes and prevent the genetic material inside from fraying. Telomeres grow shorter each time a cell divides, and when the structures reach a critical length, cells either stop dividing or perish, according to Stanford Medicine.

The theory goes, if you rebuild the body's shortened telomeres, the process of aging might be thrown in reverse. This is not a new idea. Several studies in mice suggest that using gene therapy to lengthen telomeres can reverse certain signs of aging in the animals. A 2015 study from Stanford prompted similar effects in isolated human cells; the treatment lengthened cells' telomeres by fiddling with a close cousin of DNA, called RNA, which helps cells build proteins.

The Libella therapy aims to help cells rebuild telomeres by activating a gene in their DNA that would normally be switched "off." The gene, called TERT, contains instructions to build a protein called "telomerase," an enzyme that adds molecules to the end of telomeres and prevents the structures from shortening during cell replication, according to a 2010 report in the journal Biochemistry.

Libella's lead scientific officer, molecular biologist William Andrews, originally helped identify the human telomerase enzyme at the biotech firm Geron. Later, he licensed a gene therapy based on the finding to Libella, according to OneZero. "I can't say [telomere shortening is] the only cause of aging, but it plays a role in humans," Andrews told the publication.

Related: 8 Tips for Healthy Aging

Andrews' therapies will soon be put to the test in Colombia, where one 79-year-old will receive the anti-aging treatment in next month, according to OneZero. The anti-aging trial will include four more participants over age 45 and focus on verifying that the treatment is "safe and tolerable," meaning it does not harm patients or cause unacceptable side effects.

Two more trials will use the same therapy but aim to "prevent, delay, or even reverse the development" of Alzheimer's disease and critical limb ischemia, an age-related condition in which a person's arteries become severely obstructed. Participants in these trials must already be diagnosed with the disorders.

After treatment, participants in all three trials will remain in the clinic for 10 days for further monitoring, and then return at regular intervals for checkups over the following year.

Libella's gene therapy involves a one-time injection delivered through an IV; the Alzheimer's therapy uses the same formula but doctors inject the product into the patient's spinal fluid. Within the product, a modified virus carries the TERT gene into cells and injects the genetic material into their DNA. The modified viruses cannot transmit diseases to people, but in high enough doses, the germs could provoke a harmful immune response in the patient, according to a 2018 animal study. Libella representatives declined to say how high a dose their clinical trial participants will receive.

"All I can say is, it's a lot," Andrews told OneZero.

Potential side effects aside, the fact that the Libella treatment will be administered beyond the purview of the FDA is telling, according to one expert. Leigh Turner, a bioethicist at the University of Minnesota, told OneZero that "even though the company is based in the United States, they've managed to find a way to evade U.S. federal law by going to a jurisdiction where it's easier to engage in this activity."

The $1 million entry fee is also alarming, Turner said, given that most clinical trials don't charge patients anything to enter. Andrews told OneZero that the fee is justified because it costs the company hundreds of thousands of dollars to make enough product to treat just one person.

The appearance of the trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, an official registry maintained by the National Institutes of Health, does not boost their credibility, she added. The automated database can be easily manipulated and "can basically be used as a marketing platform," she said.

Other stakeholders in the telomere-lengthening business are concerned, too. Michael Fossel, founder and president of the biotech startup Telocyte, told OneZero that his company's own therapy is similar to the Libella treatment the difference is that Telocyte is seeking approval through the FDA. "We're afraid that something will go wrong [with the Libella trials], whether it's from a safety or efficacy standpoint," he said.

Related: Extending Life: 7 Ways to Live Past 100

But even in a best case scenario, wherein no patients come to harm, the Libella therapy still might not deliver any notable health benefits. Some research suggests that no link exists between telomere length and aging.

For instance, a study published this year examined more than 261,000 people between age 60 and 70, and found no correlation between participants' telomere lengths and their age-related health outcomes, including their overall cognitive function, muscular integrity and the age of their parents. Long telomeres were associated with a lowered risk of coronary heart disease as compared with short telomeres, but longer telomere length was also linked to a heightened risk of cancer.

"Telomere lengthening may offer little gain in laterlife health status" and lead to an increased risk of cancer, the authors noted.

It remains to be seen whether Libella has truly tapped the fountain of youth, but given the dubious nature of their clinical trials, potential participants may want to exercise caution before relocating to Colombia and shelling out $1 million for a chance to live longer.

Originally published on Live Science.

Read the rest here:

New Anti-Aging Clinical Trial Begins. For $1 Million, You Can Be a Participant. - Livescience.com

Watch out, Keytruda. Ferring’s bladder cancer gene therapy rival has new dataand they look competitive – FiercePharma

On the heels of an FDA speedy review for Keytrudas potential use in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), its close rival, a gene therapy by Ferring Pharmaceuticals spinout FerGene, has posted late-stage data. By the looks of it, the two drugs are up for a fight.

Among patients with high-risk NMIBC superficial disease thats unresponsive to standard-of-care Bacillus Calmette-Gurin (BCG), nadofaragene firadenovec eliminated tumors in 53%, or 55 of 103 patients,at month three in a phase 3 study, FerGene unveiled Thursday at the Society of Urologic Oncology meeting.

By comparison, in Keytrudas own registrational trial on the same target patient population, the Merck & Co. PD-1 completely cleared tumors in 41.2%, or 42 of 102 patients, after three months, according to an update at the European Society for Medical Oncology annual meeting in September.

Simplify and Accelerate Drug R&D With the MarkLogic Data Hub Service for Pharma R&D

Researchers are often unable to access the information they need. And, even when data does get consolidated, researchers find it difficult to sift through it all and make sense of it in order to confidently draw the right conclusions and share the right results. Discover how to quickly and easily find, synthesize, and share informationaccelerating and improving R&D.

The length of time responses lasted appeared similar between the two drugs in their separate studies. For Keytruda, 24 patients (23.5%) continued to show no signs of disease after a year. As for nadofaragene firadenovec, 24.3%, or 25 patients, were still tumor-free at month 12.

In terms of safety, Keytruda recorded Grade 3/4 side effects in12.7% of patients, while FerGene said there were no Grade 4/5 events in its study.

We are pleased with these Phase 3 data results, including the complete response rates and favorable safety profile seen with nadofaragene firadenovec, Nigel Parker, scientific founder of FKD Therapies, said in a statement. The data have also helped FKD'snew drug application earn an FDA priority review.

RELATED:Merck's Keytruda is bound for new bladder cancer territory. But can it hold up against gene therapy?

Ferring recently gained commercial rights to the gene therapy from FKD, and, with $400 million in help from Blackstone Life Sciences, spun it into FerGene. Interestingly, it was Merck that licensed the drugout to FKD in the first place in 2011 in return for an equity stake in the then-newly formed Finnish company.

Priority reviews in hand, the two companies could be looking at FDA approvals soon. The burning question is, how does FerGene plan to price a gene therapy, which belongs to a class of drug thats notoriously costly? In a statement sentto FiercePharma, Ferring said it's too early to discuss pricing, that its top priority is still to get nadofaragene firadenovec approved andinvest into R&Dto study the product in more indications.

Keytruda is meant to be given ata fixed dose every three weeks. Nadofaragene firadenovec, which uses an adenovirus vector to deliver the gene interferon alfa-2b to stimulate an innate immune response to fight cancer, is administered into the bladder every three months.

Merck does have an upper hand against FerGene. The Big Pharma has been the sole supplier of BCG in the U.S. and several other key markets globally for several years now. So, it could offer BCG and Keytruda as a one-two punch for NMIBC, similar to the wayBayer is billing Nexavar and Stivarga as a part of the same continuumin first- and second-line liver cancer.

RELATED:Merck limits orders for bladder cancer drug as demand outstrips supply

There are other players eyeing the same patient population. Sesen Bio has Vicinium, an antibody-drug conjugate that targets epithelial cell adhesion molecule antigens on the surface of tumor cells to deliver a toxin payload. In its own phase 3 trial dubbed Vista also in high-risk, BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, Vicinium eradicated tumors in 40% of 89 patients at month three, according to an update the company provided in August. However, its response seems to wane over time more quickly than its rivals', as only 17% of patients showed no signs of tumor activity after 12 months.

The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based biotech recently held two meetings with the FDA and confirmed a submission process, including the design for a post-marketing confirmatory trial. It would enroll BCG-refractory patients who, because of supply constraints, haven't received an optimal BCG dose, which the company said represents a broader patientpopulation in light of anongoing shortage.

Sesen now expects to submit a biologics license application under rolling review by year-end with potential approval in 2020.

As for its pricing, during a presentation at the H.C. Wainwright investor conference in September, Sesens president and CEO Thomas Cannell pointed out that PD-1/L1s would cost about $150,000 to $200,000 per patient per year in NMIBC.

Weve done two rounds of market research with payers, and they think thats reasonable, he said. They think at those levels, there will probably be minimal prior authorization or step edits in terms of restricting a treatments use.

Assuming an official launch in 2021, Jefferies analysts, in a Nov. 12 note to clients, pegged $167.5 million for Viciniums U.S. sales in 2024. Before the priority designation, SVB Leerinks Daina Graybosch predicted a Keytruda launch in NMIBC in 2022 and forecastU.S. sales of $250 million in the indication for the Merck PD-1 inhibitor in 2025.

Editor's Note: The story has been updated with a statement from Ferring Pharma.

Read more here:

Watch out, Keytruda. Ferring's bladder cancer gene therapy rival has new dataand they look competitive - FiercePharma

Solid Biosciences Stock Crashes Over Safety Concerns About Its Gene Therapy – Barron’s

Text size

Solid Biosciences showed signs Tuesday morning of facing serious setbacks for its Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene therapy, sending the biotechs shares down about 70% in early trading.

Solid (ticker: SLDB) said the Food and Drug Administration had put its Phase I/II study of its experimental gene therapy treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy on clinical hold after one of the six patients dosed with the treatment suffered acute kidney injury, among other serious side effects.

This is the second clinical hold placed on this study. In March 2018, the FDA held the study after a patient in the low-dose cohort was hospitalized.

We are encouraged that this patient is recovering, Solid Biosciences CEO Ilan Ganot said in a statement. We remain committed to bringing meaningful new therapies to the Duchenne community and continue to believe in the differentiated construct of SGT-001 and the potential benefits it may offer to patients.

Solid is one of a number of companies seeking to be the first to bring to market a gene therapy to cure Duchenne muscular dystrophy, a genetic disorder that produces muscle weakness and dramatically shortens the life expectancy of people who suffer from it. Wall Street has increasingly seen Sarepta Therapeutics (SRPT) as having the leading Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene therapy candidate, after Solid released disappointing data earlier this year.

Pfizer (PFE) is also developing a competing gene therapy.

Ganot founded the company after his son was diagnosed with the disease. Safety concerns have long dogged Solid. In January of 2018, gene therapy pioneer James Wilson resigned from the companys scientific advisory board, according to a company filing, over emerging concerns about the possible risks of high systemic dosing of AAV, the viral vector used to deliver the gene therapy.

In its Tuesday morning statement, Solid said three patients given a lower dose of the experimental gene therapy continue to do well, as do two of the three patients given a higher dose. But one of the patients who received the higher dose fell ill.

The third patient...dosed in late October, experienced a serious adverse event (SAE) deemed related to the study drug that was characterized by complement activation, thrombocytopenia [low blood platelet count], a decrease in red blood cell count, acute kidney injury, and cardio-pulmonary insufficiency, the company said.

In a note out Tuesday morning, SVB Leerink analyst Joseph P. Schwartz noted that the new adverse event resembles the one from March 2018.

The safety profile of SGT-001 will most likely be under increased scrutiny, Schwartz wrote.

Solid Biosciences stock was recently trading 68.6% lower at $3.45.

Write to Josh Nathan-Kazis at josh.nathan-kazis@barrons.com

Visit link:

Solid Biosciences Stock Crashes Over Safety Concerns About Its Gene Therapy - Barron's

Solid’s Duchenne gene therapy trial halted after patient suffers toxicity – STAT

The Food and Drug Administration has halted a clinical trial involving a Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene therapy from Solid Biosciences (SLDB) after a patient suffered serious kidney and blood-related injuries, the company said Tuesday.

This is the third time that the Cambridge, Mass.-based Solid has run into a serious safety problem with its gene therapy, called SGT-001. The FDA placed similar clinical holds on the same clinical trial after each prior incident, but later allowed the company to proceed with patient dosing.

SGT-001 uses an inactivated virus to deliver a miniaturized but functional version of the dystrophin gene to muscle cells. The gene therapy is designed to be a one-time and potentially curative treatment for all Duchenne patients, regardless of the mutation that causes their disease.

advertisement

Sarepta Therapeutics (SRPT) and Pfizer (PFE) are also developing their own gene therapies targeted at Duchenne.

Six patients have been dosed with SGT-001, starting with three at a lower dose; interim results in those patients were previously reported and found to be disappointing. Three more patients were then treated at a higher dose of SGT-001.

The sixth patient became ill soon after being treated in October, experiencing an over-activation of the immune system, an acute kidney injury, reductions in platelets and red blood cells, and cardio-pulmonary insufficiency, Solid said.

All of the toxicities were deemed related to SGT-001 by the patients treating doctor. The patient is being treated and is recovering, Solid said.

Solid reported the patients status to the FDA, which then placed the clinical trial on hold. In a statement, the company said it will work with the FDA in an effort to resolve the hold and determine next steps for the clinical trial.

Pfizers Duchenne gene therapy has also been tied to similar immune system over-activation and related kidney toxicity, although its clinical trial remains active.

Go here to read the rest:

Solid's Duchenne gene therapy trial halted after patient suffers toxicity - STAT

Gene Therapy in Neurology: 2019 Overview & Forecast Report – Yahoo Finance

Dublin, Nov. 12, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Gene Therapy in Neurology" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

Gene therapy is an evolving area in healthcare that promises to revolutionize the treatment landscapes across various therapy areas.

In this report, the focus will be on neurology indications. The report provides an analysis of the overall gene therapy pipeline that is being developed for various neurology indications with an emphasis on late-stage pipeline products. In addition to pipeline analysis, the report also focuses on trends observed in clinical trials in this area, unmet needs and challenges, as well as partnership strategies adopted by pharmaceutical companies to keep up with developments in the field of gene therapies.

Recently approved gene therapies for spinal muscular atrophy have reinvigorated the potential of such therapies to transform patient care. While various methodologies can be adopted in order to deliver therapeutic benefits of gene therapy including gene augmentation, gene suppression, and gene editing, an important component of gene therapy is whether to use viral or non-viral vectors in order to deliver such therapies to the point of care.

Ongoing collaborations between different industry players and a buildup of real-world evidence establishing safety and efficacy are expected to drive the growth of gene therapies for neurology indications. Of the 38 pipeline products that are currently in development, 45% are adeno-associated virus (AAV) based delivery platforms. Other types include Lentiviral, which accounts for 13%.

A majority of the current pipeline products are in Phase II development and the most common neurology indications - for which gene therapies are currently being evaluated - include Parkinson's disease, pain and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The dominance of viral vectors is expected to continue as such platforms account for the bulk of these pipeline products, with adeno-associated virus being the most common among the viral vectors.

In terms of completed, ongoing and planned clinical trials, academic institutes account for 21% of these trials, despite industry sponsors being most dominant. A deeper analysis of these clinical trials also suggest that across most indications, the average trial duration for a viral based product is longer compared to a non-viral based product such as oligonucleotides or plasmid DNA.

There are also challenges associated with the development of gene therapies, most prominent being their high price points. Key opinion leaders (KOLs) interviewed highlighted the need to create sustainable funding solutions so that such therapies become accessible to patients everywhere irrespective of where patients are located. In terms of unmet needs, KOLs highlighted the need for a favorable route of administration that is both sustainable in terms of usage of healthcare resources and favorable from a patient perspective.

While development of gene therapies are expected to pick up pace, the next wave of such therapies are expected to be ones that target diseases that are more frequent. While monogenic rare diseases are the obvious first-to-go choice for which gene therapies can be developed, targeting more frequent diseases will need a holistic approach in order to address a wider mechanism of action. If gene therapies for frequent diseases do become available, then that will result in a more pronounced effect on healthcare not only in terms of providing better treatment options for patients but also test the ability of healthcare organizations to adapt with high price points of these therapies.

Scope

Reasons to Buy

Key Topics Covered

1 Preface

2 Executive Summary2.1 Key Findings2.2 KOL Insights on Competitive Landscape for Gene Therapy for Neurology Indications

3 Overview - Gene Therapy in Neurology3.1 Objectives of Gene Therapy 3.2 Gene Therapy Versus Conventional Therapies3.3 Optimization of Gene Expression3.4 Gene Transfer Methods and Vectors Used for Gene Therapy3.5 Classifications of Gene Therapy3.6 Sources

4 Gene Therapy in the 8MM4.1 Global Regulatory Agencies' Definitions of Gene Therapy4.2 Gene Therapy in the US 4.3 Gene Therapy in the EU4.4 Gene Therapy in Japan4.5 Gene Therapy in China4.6 Currently Marketed Gene Therapies in Neurology4.7 Sources

5 Pipeline Assessment in the 8MM 5.1 Pipeline Overview 5.2 Pipeline Products - Phase III5.3 Pipeline Products - Phase II5.4 Orchard Therapeutics' OTL-200 5.5 Biogen's Tofersen Sodium5.6 Roche's RG-5.7 Sylentis' Tivanisiran5.8 ViroMed's Donaperminogene Seltoplasmid5.9 Sources

6 Clinical Trials Mapping and Design6.1 Clinical Trial Mapping for all Pipeline Products by Phase, by Sponsor, and by Location6.2 Clinical Trial Mapping for all Pipeline Products by Status and by Indication6.3 Clinical Trial Mapping by Phase and Indication for Phase III Therapies6.4 Clinical Trial Mapping by Phase for Phase II Therapies6.5 Clinical Trial Duration by Indication for Phase III Therapies (By Types of Molecules)6.6 Clinical Trial Duration by Indication for Phase II Therapies (By Types of Molecules)6.7 Ongoing Clinical Development of Phase III Gene Therapies

7 Unmet Needs, Barriers, and Key Company Strategies 7.1 Unmet Needs Within Gene Therapy for CNS Indications7.2 Challenges and Other Factors to Consider During Different Stages of Product Development7.3 Key Company Strategies: Acquisitions7.4 Key Company Strategies: Strategic Partnerships7.5 Sources

8 Payer Perspective on Gene Therapies in Neurology8.1 Current Neurology Space8.2 Challenges Associated with Reimbursement of Novel Gene Therapies8.3 Cost of Gene Therapies8.4 Strategies to Tackle the Cost of Gene Therapies8.5 Innovative Reimbursement Models and Clinical Comparators

9 Market Outlook9.1 Phase III Gene Therapy Pipeline for Neurology9.2 Key Launch Dates for Phase III Gene Therapy Pipeline Products

Companies Mentioned

Story continues

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/7amvqe

Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.

CONTACT: ResearchAndMarkets.comLaura Wood, Senior Press Managerpress@researchandmarkets.comFor E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

Visit link:

Gene Therapy in Neurology: 2019 Overview & Forecast Report - Yahoo Finance

How Gene Therapy Is Evolving to Tackle Complex… – Labiotech.eu

Gene therapy has traditionally been applied to well-understood diseases where a single genetic mutation was to blame. A new generation of technology is expanding the potential of gene therapy to treat conditions that were previously unreachable.

Since the first gene therapy clinical trials in the 1990s, the technology has made its way into the market for conditions ranging from blindness to cancer.

Gene therapy has the potential to fix any genetic mutation causing disease by inserting a new copy of the faulty gene. However, its reach has historically been limited.

Weve been constrained with the things we can do with gene therapy, said Dmitry Kuzmin, Managing Partner at 4BIO Capital, a London-based VC that specifically invests in advanced therapies. If you look across the successes in gene therapy in the last five years, most of these were in diseases that are pretty straightforward from the engineering perspective.

Technical limitations have meant that gene therapy has been restricted to rare diseases caused by a single genetic mutation, as well as to certain areas of the body, such as the eye and the liver.

According to Kuzmin, there have been so far three generations of gene therapy technology. Generation one would be classic single-gene replacement, such as Luxturna, a gene therapy to fix a specific genetic mutation causing blindness. Generation two would consist of using gene therapy to introduce new functions. An example is Kymriah, where immune cells are equipped with a molecule that helps them hunt down cancer cells.

The third generation is the one that could hold the key to unlocking the full potential of gene therapy. It englobes several technologies that can be used to introduce a new drug target into the patient, making it possible to turn the therapy on and off as well as to tune its intensity.

As the first two generations get optimized and the third generation enters the clinic, we are now expanding our reach into areas that have been previously rather inaccessible, Kuzmin told me. One of them is the brain.

Treating the brain has long been a huge challenge for medicine. Take epilepsy, for example.

Epilepsy affects 1% of the whole population and about 30% of people with seizures of epilepsy continue to have seizures despite medication, said Dimitry Kullmann, Professor at University College London. Theres a paradox. We have a good understanding of the mechanisms behind epilepsy, but were unable to suppress seizures in a significant proportion of people with epilepsy.

The reason is that the molecules that we use for drugs dont target the epileptic zone of the brain; they bathe the entire body with medication, Kullmann told me. These drugs dont differentiate between neurons and synapses that derive the seizures, and those parts of the brain that are responsible for memory, sensory functions, motor functions and balance.

Gene therapy could provide a solution for this problem. Kullmanns group has been researching this approach for years and is now getting ready to start the first clinical trial in humans within a year.

A gene therapy can be directly injected in the area of the brain causing seizures. Furthermore, using DNA sequences called promoters, it is possible to restrict the effect of gene therapy to specific neurons within that area. In the case of epilepsy, gene therapy can be used to decrease the activity of only excitatory neurons, which cause epileptic seizures when they are overactive.

Another approach that Kullmans group is testing is chemogenetics. The idea here is to use gene therapy to put a specific receptor into the neurons, explained Kullmann. This receptor is designed to respond to a drug that, when given to the patient, decreases the activity of the neuron to suppress seizures.

The advantage is that you can switch on and off the therapeutic effect on demand by just giving, or not giving the drug, Kullmann said. This approach can thus make gene therapy more precise, being able to tune it to the specific needs of each patient. In addition, it reduces the big challenge of getting the dose right in a one-off treatment.

Ultimately, this technology could allow scientists to target a wide range of conditions that come under the umbrella of epilepsy, rather than just a specific form of the condition caused by a genetic mutation.

The approach could be extended to other conditions involving the brain, such as Parkinsons, ALS and pain. However, this kind of research is still at an early stage and it will take a while until its potential is proven in humans.

Blindness has been a major target of gene therapy because of the fact that the eye is an ideal target for this technology. The activity of the immune system is suppressed in the eye, minimizing the chances of rejection. In addition, unlike other cells in the body, those involved in vision are not renewed over time, being able to retain the injected DNA for years.

However, there are hundreds of genetic mutations that can cause blindness. With the classical gene therapy approach, a different therapy would have to be developed from scratch for each mutation. While some companies are doing just this for the most common mutations causing blindness, many other less frequent mutations are being left behind.

Others are turning to new generations of gene therapy technology. We figured out that it would be very, very difficult to use the classical gene therapy approach in each individual mutation, said Bernard Gilly, CEO of GenSight, a Parisian biotech developing gene therapies for blindness.

While the companys leading programs follow this classical approach, the company has also started clinical trials using a technology called optogenetics. Following a similar principle to gene therapy, optogenetics consists of introducing a protein that reacts to light into a cell.

GenSight is using optogenetics to develop a single therapy for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa. This genetic condition can be caused by mutations in any of over 200 genes and results in progressive vision loss in children due to the degeneration of photoreceptor cells that perceive light and send signals to the brain.

With optogenetics, it would be possible to transfer the lost photoreceptor function to the cells in the retina that are responsible for relaying visual information to the brain. Using specialized goggles, the images captured by a camera are transformed into light patterns that stimulate these cells in the precise way needed for the brain to form images.

The company is currently testing this approach in clinical trials. We believe that this approach will allow us to restore vision in those patients who became blind because of retinitis pigmentosa, Gilly told me.

Optogenetics would not work a miracle, but it might be able to give people back the ability to navigate an unknown environment with a certain level of autonomy. Recognizing faces is a more challenging goal; although reading is not yet on the horizon, according to Gilly.

Still, the potential of optogenetics to address multiple genetic mutations with a single treatment might be revolutionary. As long as the neurons responsible for sending light signals to the brain are intact, this approach could be extended to other forms of blindness. In addition, conditions affecting the brain such as epilepsy, Parkinsons or ALS could be treated with this approach by introducing an implant to shine light on the target neurons.

However, approaches applying optogenetics to the brain are still further down the line. While optogenetics technology has been around for over 20 years, its application in humans is still very limited and in the early stages of research.

Chemogenetics and optogenetics are just two out of a wave of new technologies addressing the historical limitations of gene therapy. Other approaches are in development, such as using thermogenetics, which consists of introducing proteins that are activated by the heat created by infrared light.

With a growing range of tools available, it is becoming easier than ever for scientists to develop gene therapies that can address the specific challenges of different conditions affecting areas of the body. Traditionally, locations such as the heart, the lungs or the pancreas have been particularly difficult to target with gene therapy. That might soon stop being the case.

As we go forward, were interested in taking gene therapy out of this little box and trying to use all the knowledge we have to benefit patients in larger indications, said Kuzmin.

As gene therapy expands into more mainstream conditions, it could take precision medicine to a whole new level and help address the big variability that is often seen across patients with the same diagnosis.

See the original post:

How Gene Therapy Is Evolving to Tackle Complex... - Labiotech.eu

Lonza taps Cryoport to bolster cell and gene therapy delivery – BioPharma Dive

Dive Brief:

Lonza is betting big on the future of gene and cell therapy and trying to offer customers an end-to-end solution to meet the complex challenges that come with the field.

Every stage of cell therapy, from patient apheresis through transport, genetic engineering and reinfusion comes with critical requirements for temperature control, speed and chain of identity.

Cryoport operates in more than 100 countries and supports more than 413 clinical trials. Notably, the company also supports three approved therapies: Gilead's Yescarta(axicabtagene ciloleucel), Novartis' Kymriah(tisagenlecleucel) and Bluebird bio's Zynteglo.

Demand for specialized manufacturing and distribution services is growing as researchers figure out new ways to manipulate cells so they can fight cancer and other diseases, Cryoport CEO Jerrell Shelton said in the statement.Cryoport's temperature-controlled supply chain systems fit well with Lonza's manufacturing services, he added.

For Lonza, cell and gene therapies are a new focus, part of a broader turn to the pharmaceutical side of the contract manufacturer's business.

In April 2018, the Swiss CDMO opened the doors to a 300,000 square-foot plant in Texas dedicated to producing the complex treatments.

CEO Marc Funk told BioPharma Dive in an interview earlier this year that Lonza has now worked with over 45 customers seeking supply of viral vectors, which are used to deliver gene therapies.

Read the original:

Lonza taps Cryoport to bolster cell and gene therapy delivery - BioPharma Dive

Pfizer’s ‘brainstorming’ payment deals as gene therapies advance, exec tells Bloomberg – FiercePharma

Gene therapies offer a "world of wonders" for patients, but with some 10,000 of the pricey therapies in development, pharma companies and payers need to get outcomes-based payments nailed down, a top Pfizer exec told Bloomberg.

What's more, Pfizer biopharma president Angela HwangtoldBloomberg's Cynthia Koons, gene therapies present some unique scientific and manufacturing challenges.

Gene therapies currently target monogenic diseases, or diseases that are characterized by a single genetic mutation, Hwang said. There are about 3,000 such disorders, and they're all considered rare diseases. Pfizer itself has three gene therapies in development for hemophilia A, hemophilia B and Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

OTC Innovation to Avoid Stagnation: Survey Insights, Expert Advice, and Latest Technologies to Boost Your Products Performance

Join us for a complimentary webinar on November 13 at 11am ET / 8am PT. Listen to industry experts as they analyze the critical role of innovation in OTC products, and strategies for achieving it.

Overall, there are 10,000 gene therapy programs in development,Hwang said. If 10% of them end up working,you start to see that potentially gene therapy can become a mainstaytherapyin how we manage diseases," she said in the Bloomberg interview.

That necessitates the key question about payment.Currently, payment systems are centered on paying for individual drug doses. Hwang said the industry needs to get outcomes-based payments worked out, adding that the process could become easier as science advances and data collection improves.

RELATED:Pfizer amps up gene therapy manufacturing with another North Carolina facility

Looking ahead, new gene therapy launches will necessarily drive us to come up with different solutions other than the ones we have today, Hwang said in the interview, referencingsubscription-based payments as one option.Her company is already brainstorming with payers, she added.

There are just two launched U.S. gene therapiesNovartis'Zolgensmaand Spark Therapeutics' Luxturna. Roche is in the process of acquiring Spark, but the buyout has been held up by antitrust regulators.

With already approved gene therapies, the market is adapting. Novartis has offered to allow payers to fund its spinal muscular atrophy gene therapyZolgensmawhich costs $2.125 millionover a period of five years. Thedrugmakerhas also proposed pay-for-performance deals.

Bluebird bio recently won European approval for itsbeta-thalassaemiagene therapyZyntegloand is allowing payers to pay for the drug over several yearsas long asthe med continues to workfor patients.

For its part, Pfizer is buildinga gene therapy manufacturing plant in North Carolina to manufacture clinical trial supplies and potential commercial products following approvals.

Read more:

Pfizer's 'brainstorming' payment deals as gene therapies advance, exec tells Bloomberg - FiercePharma

Next generation cell and gene therapies: fine tuning the promise – Business Weekly

On 19 November, the UK BioBeat19 summit goes to Stevenage to discuss the potential of cell and gene therapy and how to accelerate these transformational medicines.

Victoria Higgins of GSK and Miranda Weston-Smith from BioBeat spoke to two panellists who gave a sneak peek of their remarks and agree wholeheartedly that the discovery side and clinical side work best when they are teamed up.

Sophie Papa, an oncologist at Guys Cancer at Guys and St Thomas NHS Trust, and Aisha Hasan, a clinical development lead at GSK, both recognise the big challenge ahead for cell therapy researchers: to dial up efficacy and dial down toxicity.

Cell and gene therapies, with their remarkable potential to transform medicine, have seen some important but hard-won milestones: it took 20 years of combined academic and industry research to deliver the first gene therapy approval in 2016 and today there are two CAR-Ts approved for haematological malignancies.

Whilst CAR-Ts recognise proteins expressed on the tumour cell surface, making them ideal for targeting blood cancers, more complicated but with greater potential to address solid tumours are the gene modified TCR-T technologies.

These harness the power of T cells to specifically target and destroy tumours even on the inside of cells. TCR-Ts come with an additional level of complexity, but potentially open the door to a range of untreatable cancer types.

Looking at the TCR opportunity is where Sophie Papa sees the inherent trade-off between risk and benefit as an academic clinician whos now evaluating modified T-cell based therapies in clinical trials.

Sophie urges her peers to take courage. It is important to be brave and tolerant of certain toxicities. Academic clinicians and drug researchers need to work closely together to engage the regulators in early discussion, so that we can move cell therapies earlier in treatment schedules as soon as feasible.

Timing is critical to enable patients to be treated when they are physically fit so they can better tolerate these complex and potentially toxic treatments.

From her perspective, this is not an either/or, but an area where discussion and open dialogue will allow us to make the most of the opportunity. By allowing clinical academics to play a lead role in developing guidelines to manage patient safety, we can address legitimate concerns but not let them stand in the way of clinical development, she says.

Aisha brings the perspective of drug discovery and development and starts by asking what is in the realm of the possible from a design perspective.

She says: A superior T-cell therapy will require engineering approaches that enhance efficacy on one-end while also incorporating switches to minimise toxicity.

For example, in a counter-intuitive way, a T-cell with high-killing capacity actually can create dangerous levels of inflammation in the body, due to the rapid death of cancer cells. But the beauty of drug design opens up options:By building a switch within the engineered T-cells, researchers can inactivate the T-cells and prevent harm to the patient, says Aisha.

But this creative problem solving requires open dialogue between clinicians and pharma. Aisha says: The more we talk about clinical need and toxicity benchmarks, the more sophisticated we can be when developing the next generation of enhanced engineered cell therapies.

Theres no doubt that the challenges of delivering cell and gene therapy span the full spectrum of issues related to medicine development. However, the potential for both curative therapy and commercial opportunity is tremendous.

The scientific, clinical, technical, regulatory and commercial challenges are all surmountable when everyone in the ecosystem work together towards a shared goal, united by an unwavering focus on the patient.

Sophie and Aisha are speaking about the translational journey from science to bedside at the BioBeat19 summit.

The BioBeat19 summit on Accelerating cell and gene therapy, 1-6pm, Tuesday 19 November, GSK Stevenage. Guarantee your place by registering at http://www.biobeat19.org

Read more:

Next generation cell and gene therapies: fine tuning the promise - Business Weekly

Vertex invests in gene therapy manufacturing – BioPharma-Reporter.com

Across 2019, Vertex has struck deals intended to yield a new generation of breakthrough medicines.

In June, Vertex agreed to pay $245m (220m) upfront to acquire Exonics Therapeutics for its gene editing technology and pipeline of programs targeting diseases including Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Months later, Vertex put up another $950m to buy Semma Therapeutics and its cell therapy treatment for type I diabetes.

The acquisitions moved Vertex, which started out in small molecules, into new areas, and building out capabilities in those areas will cost money.

In recent years, Vertex has grown its annual operating expenses by 10% to 14%. Talking on a recent quarterly results conference call, Vertex CFO Charles Wagner warned investors to expect costs to rise faster in 2020.

Wagner said, Our current expectation is that the rate of growth will be somewhat higher in 2020 as we invest in research and preclinical manufacturing for selling genetic therapies in support of our programs in type I diabetes, DMD and other diseases.

The move into type I diabetes also takes Vertex into territory that, to some observers, looks different than the areas the company has targeted historically.

Asked by an analyst about the shift in focus, Vertex CEO Jeff Leiden downplayed the differences, noting that type I diabetes is treated in the US in a relatively small number ofcenters that can be targeted by a speciality sales force.

Researchers have achieved positive, long-term outcomes by transplanting cadaveric islets into patients but two barriers have stopped companies from industrialising that approach.

Firstly, there are too few cadaveric islets to treat all type I diabetics. Secondly, immunosuppression is needed to stop patients from rejecting the transplanted cells.

Semma is trying to tackle the problems by differentiating stem cells and using a device to protect them from the immune system. Vertex thinks these technologies are the breakthroughs the field needs to industrialize the concept.

Leiden said, We were watching companies who are addressing those two problems for the last two, three years. And over the last six to eight months, we were convinced that Semma has actually solved both of those problems.

Vertex reached that conclusion on the strength of preclinical data. Now, Vertex is set to invest to find out whether the idea works in the clinic.

Original post:

Vertex invests in gene therapy manufacturing - BioPharma-Reporter.com

Scientists are using gene therapy to treat a heart disease in dogs. Could humans be next? – 10News

Scientists are working to eliminate a type of heart disease in dogs using gene therapy.

They're zoning in on a heart condition called mitral valve disease thats common in 6% of dogs.

Scientists are using Cavalier King Charles spaniels for the research.

They tend to develop it at a younger age.

Scientists at Tufts University have already tested gene therapy in mice.

A virus is injected into them to deliver DNA to cells which causes them to create a protein.

What it essentially does is stops the heart valve from getting thicker, stopping the valve from leaking.

Researchers are now moving on to testing this in dogs.

But they think the treatment could go beyond just canines.

Many of the dog diseases are naturally occurring and really great models for human disease, says Dr. Vicky Yang, a veterinary cardiologist and research assistant professor at Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University. And I can see this, if it becomes successful in dogs, potentially going into thinking about treatment for humans for mitral valve disease.

The biotech company behind the treatment agrees. It says it could also expand beyond heart problems.

I think a larger question, though, is if we are able to prove this thesis of treating aging, making the animal generally healthier, could also treat heart failure, what other diseases could we treat in dogs? says Daniel Oliver, the CEO of Rejuvenate Bio. And could we progress this treatment onto past dogs and other animals and possibly humans?

The gene therapy would only be used for dogs just starting to experience heart problems.

Researchers still need to make sure the gene therapy is safe for all breeds before they make it available to the public.

See the article here:

Scientists are using gene therapy to treat a heart disease in dogs. Could humans be next? - 10News

Updated Alta Trial Results Support SB-525 Gene Therapy for Hemophilia A – Hemophilia News Today

Updated results from the Alta trial show that a single infusion with the highest dose of SB-525, an investigational gene therapy, yields dose-dependent and durable increases in clotting factor VIII (FVIII). The trial, in adults with severe hemophilia A , found no bleeding episodes up to 24 weeks following the infusion.

That highest dose of SB-525 31013 vector genomes, vg/kilogram, kg led patients to reach normal FVIII activity. Participants no longer needed replacement therapy following a short preventive course post-SB-525-administration.

With these promising results, Pfizer has initiated a lead-in study (NCT03587116) to support SB-525 advancement to a Phase 3 registrational clinical trial. The six-month study will evaluate the current efficacy and safety of preventive replacement therapy in the usual care setting. It is currently recruiting participants worldwide.

The Alta trials most recent findings will be shared at the upcoming 61st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH), to be held Dec. 7-10 in Orlando, Fla.

Data will be featured in a poster titled Updated Follow-up of the Alta Study, a Phase 1/2, Open Label, Adaptive, Dose-Ranging Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of SB-525 Gene Therapy in Adult Patients with Severe Hemophilia A.

SB-525 is a gene therapy candidate to treat hemophilia A thats being developed by Sangamo Therapeutics in collaboration with Pfizer. It consists of a DNA sequence coding for the production of a working FVIII the clotting factor missing in hemophilia A. That FVIII is carried and delivered to liver cells, where clotting factors are produced, using a harmless adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector.

The goal of the therapy is for patients to regain the ability to continuously produce the coagulation factor, and reduce or eliminate the need for FVIII replacement therapy.

The therapys safety and effectiveness for the treatment of adults with severe hemophilia A are currently being evaluated in the open-label Phase 1/2 Alta trial (NCT03061201).

The study is testing a single infusion into the vein (intravenous) of one of four ascending doses of SB-525: 91011 vg/kg; 21012 vg/kg; 11013 vg/kg; and 31013 vg/kg. Two people have been dosed per group, except for the highest dose group, which was expanded to five patients.

Updated trial data now released show the results for the two patients dosed in the third group those given 11013 vg/kg and the five individuals receiving the highest dose of 31013 vg/kg.

In the third group, a single infusion of SB-525 resulted in stable and clinically relevant increases in FVIII activity.

Stronger results were seen with SB-525s highest dose. Of the five patients treated, data were available for four. For these participants, a single infusion with the highest dose of SB-525 led to normal FVIII levels with no bleeding events reported up to 24 weeks post-administration. These individuals no longer needed replacement therapy after the initial prophylactic period of up to about three weeks after SB-525 dosing.

In addition, preliminary tests from the high-dose group indicate similar activity of SB-525-derived FVIII and the clotting factor provided by Xyntha, Pfizers recombinant therapy for hemophilia A.

As to safety, one patient had treatment-related serious adverse events, namely low blood pressure and fever, occurring about six hours after infusion. These effects resolved with treatment within 24 hours, with no loss of FVIII expression.

Some patients also showed elevated blood levels of liver enzymes(ALT, alanine aminotransferase). However, these were reported to be mild and temporary increases, which were treated in a timely manner with corticosteroids.

Dosing in the fourth group is ongoing. At the upcoming meeting, Sangamo will disclose additional analyses of the trial data, including a follow-up of approximately 4 to 11 months after treatment.

The rapid kinetics of Factor VIII expression, durability of response, and the relatively low intra-cohort variability in the context of a complete cessation of bleeding events and elimination of exogenous Factor VIII usage continues to suggest SB-525 is a differentiated hemophilia A gene therapy, Bettina Cockroft, MD, MBA, chief medical officer of Sangamo said in a press release.

We are pleased with the progress of the program toward a registrational Phase 3 study led by Pfizer, who announced it has enrolled its first patient in the 6-month Phase 3 lead-in study. We have recently completed the manufacturing technology transfer to Pfizer and initiated the transfer of the IND [investigational new drug].

Ana is a molecular biologist enthusiastic about innovation and communication. In her role as a science writer she wishes to bring the advances in medical science and technology closer to the public, particularly to those most in need of them. Ana holds a PhD in Biomedical Sciences from the University of Lisbon, Portugal, where she focused her research on molecular biology, epigenetics and infectious diseases.

Total Posts: 121

Margarida graduated with a BS in Health Sciences from the University of Lisbon and a MSc in Biotechnology from Instituto Superior Tcnico (IST-UL). She worked as a molecular biologist research associate at a Cambridge UK-based biotech company that discovers and develops therapeutic, fully human monoclonal antibodies.

View original post here:

Updated Alta Trial Results Support SB-525 Gene Therapy for Hemophilia A - Hemophilia News Today

Sangamo Announces Gene Therapy and Ex Vivo Gene-Edited Cell Therapy Data Presentations at the American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting – Business…

BRISBANE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sangamo Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: SGMO), a genomic medicine company, today announced that hemophilia A gene therapy clinical data and hemoglobinopathies ex vivo gene-edited cell therapy data will be featured in poster presentations at the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH). The ASH abstracts, which were submitted on August 3, 2019, were released online this morning. The conference will take place in Orlando, FL, from December 7-10, 2019.

Gene Therapy

The SB-525 poster will show updated Alta study data including durability of Factor VIII (FVIII) levels, bleeding rate, factor usage, and safety, for all five patients in the high dose cohort of 3e13 vg/kg, with approximately 4 months to 11 months of follow-up after treatment with SB-525.

As of the abstract submission date, four patients in the 3e13 vg/kg cohort achieved FVIII levels within the normal range with no bleeding events reported up to 24 weeks post-administration. These patients did not require FVIII replacement therapy following the initial prophylactic period of up to approximately 3 weeks post-SB-525 administration. The fifth patient in the 3e13 vg/kg cohort had only recently undergone treatment with SB-525 at the time of the abstract submission. As previously reported, one patient had treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) of hypotension and fever, which occurred approximately 6 hours after completion of the vector infusion and resolved with treatment within 24 hours, with no loss of FVIII expression. SB-525 is being developed as part of a global collaboration between Sangamo and Pfizer.

The rapid kinetics of Factor VIII expression, durability of response, and the relatively low intra-cohort variability in the context of a complete cessation of bleeding events and elimination of exogenous Factor VIII usage continues to suggest SB-525 is a differentiated hemophilia A gene therapy, said Bettina Cockroft, M.D., M.B.A., Chief Medical Officer of Sangamo, commenting on the published abstract. We are pleased with the progress of the program toward a registrational Phase 3 study led by Pfizer, who announced it has enrolled its first patient in the 6-month Phase 3 lead-in study. We have recently completed the manufacturing technology transfer to Pfizer and initiated the transfer of the IND.

Ex Vivo Gene-Edited Cell Therapy

The ST-400 beta thalassemia poster will show preliminary results from the first three patients enrolled in the Phase 1/2 THALES study. In this study, hematopoietic stem progenitor cells (HSPCs) are apheresed from the patient, edited to knock out the erythroid specific enhancer of the BCL11A gene, and cryopreserved prior to infusion back into the patient following myeloablative conditioning with busulfan. The first three patients all have severe beta thalassemia genotypes: 0/0, homozygous for the severe + IVS-I-5 (G>C) mutation, and 0/+ genotype including the severe IVS-II-654 (C>T) mutation, respectively.

As of the abstract submission date, Patient 1 and Patient 2 had experienced prompt hematopoietic reconstitution. Patient 1 had increasing fetal hemoglobin (HbF) fraction that contributed to a stable total hemoglobin. After being free from packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions for 6 weeks, the patient subsequently required intermittent transfusions. Patient 2 had rising HbF levels observed through 90 days post-infusion. For both patients, as of the most recent follow-up reported in the abstract, on-target insertions and deletions (indels) were present in circulating white blood cells. Patient 3 had just completed ST-400 manufacturing at the time of abstract submission. As previously disclosed, Patient 1 experienced an SAE of hypersensitivity during ST-400 infusion considered by the investigator to be related to the product cryoprotectant, DSMO, and which resolved by the end of the infusion. No other SAEs related to ST-400 have been reported and all other AEs have been consistent with myeloablation. No clonal hematopoiesis has been observed. Longer follow-up will be required to assess the clinical significance of these early results. ST-400 is being developed as part of a global collaboration between Sangamo and Sanofi, along with support through a grant from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM).

The first three patients enrolled in the THALES study all have severe beta thalassemia genotypes that result in almost no endogenous beta globin production. The increases in fetal hemoglobin and presence of on-target indels in circulating blood cells suggests successful editing using zinc finger nucleases. The results are preliminary and will require additional patients and longer-term follow-up to assess their clinical significance, said Adrian Woolfson, BM., B.Ch., Ph.D., Head of Research and Development. It is important to note that myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation reboots the hematopoietic system, and that sufficient time is required for the stem cells to fully repopulate the marrow and for new blood cells to form. In other myeloablative conditioning studies in a similar patient population, full manifestation of the effects of gene modification in the red blood cell compartment has taken as long as 12 months or more to become evident.

Sanofis in vitro sickle cell disease poster details a similar approach to ST-400, using mobilized HSPCs from normal donors and SCD patients and utilizing the same zinc finger nuclease for gene editing, delivered as transient non-viral RNA, and designed to disrupt the erythroid specific enhancer of the BCL11A gene, which represses the expression of the gamma globin genes, thereby switching off HbF synthesis. Results from ex vivo studies demonstrated enriched biallelic editing, increased HbF, and reduced sickling in erythroid cells derived from non-treated sickle cell disease patients. Sanofi has initiated a Phase 1/2 trial evaluating BIVV003, an ex vivo gene-edited cell therapy using ZFN gene editing technology to modify autologous hematopoietic stem cells using fetal hemoglobin to produce functional red blood cells with higher BhF content that are resistant to sickling in patients with severe sickle cell disease. Recruitment is ongoing.

About the Alta study

The Phase 1/2 Alta study is an open-label, dose-ranging clinical trial designed to assess the safety and tolerability of SB-525 gene therapy in patients with severe hemophilia A. SB-525 was administered to 11 patients in 4 cohorts of 2 patients each across 4 ascending doses (9e11 vg/kg, 2e12 vg/kg, 1e13vg/kg and 3e13vg/kg) with expansion of the highest dose cohort by 3 additional patients. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted Orphan Drug, Fast Track, and regenerative medicine advanced therapy (RMAT) designations to SB-525, which also received Orphan Medicinal Product designation from the European Medicines Agency.

About the THALES study

The Phase 1/2 THALES study is a single-arm, multi-site study to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ST-400 autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant in 6 patients with transfusion-dependent beta thalassemia (TDT). ST-400 is manufactured by ex vivo gene editing of a patient's own (autologous) hematopoietic stem cells using non-viral delivery of zinc finger nuclease technology. The THALES study inclusion criteria include all patients with TDT (0/0 or non- 0/0) who have received at least 8 packed red blood cell transfusions per year for the two years before enrollment in the study. The FDA has granted Orphan Drug status to ST-400.

About Sangamo Therapeutics

Sangamo Therapeutics, Inc. is focused on translating ground-breaking science into genomic medicines with the potential to transform patients' lives using gene therapy, ex vivo gene-edited cell therapy, in vivo genome editing, and gene regulation. For more information about Sangamo, visit http://www.sangamo.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements regarding Sangamo's current expectations. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the Company's ability to develop and commercialize product candidates to address genetic diseases with the Company's proprietary technologies, as well as the timing of commencement of clinical programs and the anticipated benefits therefrom. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Factors that could cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited to, the outcomes of clinical trials, the uncertain regulatory approval process, uncertainties related to the execution of clinical trials, Sangamo's reliance on partners and other third-parties to meet their clinical and manufacturing obligations, and the ability to maintain strategic partnerships. Further, there can be no assurance that the necessary regulatory approvals will be obtained or that Sangamo and its partners will be able to develop commercially viable product candidates. Actual results may differ from those projected in forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties that exist in Sangamo's operations and business environments. These risks and uncertainties are described more fully in Sangamo's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and Sangamo's most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Forward-looking statements contained in this announcement are made as of this date, and Sangamo undertakes no duty to update such information except as required under applicable law.

More here:

Sangamo Announces Gene Therapy and Ex Vivo Gene-Edited Cell Therapy Data Presentations at the American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting - Business...

Modified Protein Enhances the Accuracy of CRISPR Gene Therapy – DocWire News

A new protein that can enhance the accuracy of CRISPR gene therapy was recently developed by researchers from City University of Hong Kong (CityU) and Karolinska Institutet. This work, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, could potentially have a strong impact on how gene therapies are administered in the future.

CRISPR-Cas9, often referred to as just CRISPR, is a powerful gene-editing technology that has the potential to treat a myriad of genetic diseases such as beta-thalassemia and sickle cell anemia. As opposed to traditional gene therapies, which involve the introduction of healthy copies of a gene to a patient, CRISPR repairs the genetic mutation underlying a disease to restore function.

CRISPR-Cas9 was discovered in the bacterial immune system, where it is used to defend against and deactivate invading viral DNA. Cas9 is an endonuclease, or an enzyme that can selectively cut DNA. The Cas9 enzyme is complexed with a guide RNA molecule to form what is known as CRISPR-Cas9. Cas9 is often referred to as the molecular scissors, being that they cut and remove defective portions of DNA. Being that it is not perfectly precise, the enzyme will sometimes make unintended cuts in the DNA that can cause serious consequences. For this reason, enhancing the precision of the CRISPR-Cas9 system is of paramount importance.

Two versions of Cas9 are currently being used in CRISPR therapies: SpCas9 (derived from the bacteriaStreptococcus pyogenes) and SaCas9 (derived fromStaphylococcus aureus). Researchers have engineered variants of the SpCas9 enzyme to improve its precision, but these variants are too large to fit into the adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector that is often used to administer CRISPR to living organisms. SaCas9, however, is a much smaller protein that can easily fit into AAV vectors to deliver gene therapy in vivo. Being that no SaCas9 variants with enhanced precision are currently available, these CityU researchers aimed to identify a viable variant.

This recent research led to the successful engineering of SaCas9-HF, a Cas9 variant with high accuracy in genome-wide targeting in human cells and preserved efficiency. This work was led by Dr. Zheng Zongli, Assistant Professor of Department of Biomedical Sciences at CityU and the Ming Wai Lau Centre for Reparative Medicine of Karolinska Institutet in Hong Kong, and Dr. Shi Jiahai, Assistant Professor of Department of Biomedical Sciences at CityU.

Their work was based on a rigorous evaluation of 24 targeted human genetic locations which compared the wild-type SaCas9 to the SaCas9-HF. The new Cas9 variant was found to reduce the off-target activity by about 90% for targets with very similar sequences that are prone to errors by the wild-type enzyme. For targets that pose less of a challenge to the wild-type enzyme, SaCas9-HF made almost no detectable errors.

Our development of this new SaCas9 provides an alternative to the wild-type Cas9 toolbox, where highly precise genome editing is needed, explained Zheng. It will be particularly useful for future gene therapy using AAV vectors to deliver genome editing drug in vivo and would be compatible with the latest prime editing CRISPR platform, which can search-and-replace the targeted genes.

Dr. Shi and Dr. Zheng are the corresponding authors of this publication. The first authors are PhD student Tan Yuanyan from CityUs Department of Biomedical Sciences and Senior Research Assistant Dr. Athena H. Y. Chu from Ming Wai Lau Centre for Reparative Medicine (MWLC) at Karolinska Institutet in Hong Kong. Other members of the research team were CityUs Dr. Xiong Wenjun, Assistant Professor of Department of Biomedical Sciences, research assistant Bao Siyu (now at MWLC), PhD students Hoang Anh Duc and Firaol Tamiru Kebede, and Professor Ji Mingfang from the Zhongshan Peoples Hospital.

Link:

Modified Protein Enhances the Accuracy of CRISPR Gene Therapy - DocWire News