Adverum Biotechnologies to Present Additional Data from the OPTIC Phase 1 Trial with ADVM-022 Intravitreal Gene Therapy in Wet AMD at the…

REDWOOD CITY, Calif., Jan. 28, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc. (Nasdaq: ADVM), a clinical-stage gene therapy company targeting unmet medical needs in ocular and rare diseases, today announced the presentation of 24-week data from the second cohort of patients (n=6; 2 x 1011 vg/eye) as well as an update from the first cohort of patients (n=6; 6 x 1011 vg/eye) in the OPTIC Phase1 clinical trial of ADVM-022 intravitreal gene therapy in wet AMD at the Angiogenesis, Exudation, and Degeneration 2020 Meeting.

Adverum plans to issue a press release relating to the presentation and post the presentation on Adverums website at http://www.adverum.com in the Investors section under the Events and Presentations page at the beginning of the data presentation at Angiogenesis.

KOL Event Details:In addition, Adverum will host an event with expert retinal specialists to discuss the OPTIC data presented at Angiogenesis and the potential opportunity for ADVM-022. The discussion will be held on Sunday, February 9, 2020 beginning at 10:00 am EST. The event will be webcast live from Adverums website at http://www.adverum.com in the Investors section under the Events and Presentations page. A replay of the webcast will be archived and available for replay following the event.

About Adverum BiotechnologiesAdverum Biotechnologies (Nasdaq: ADVM) is a clinical-stage gene therapy company targeting unmet medical needs in serious ocular and rare diseases. Adverum is evaluating its novel gene therapy candidate, ADVM-022, as a one-time, intravitreal injection for the treatment of its lead indication, wet age-related macular degeneration. For more information, please visit http://www.adverum.com.

More:
Adverum Biotechnologies to Present Additional Data from the OPTIC Phase 1 Trial with ADVM-022 Intravitreal Gene Therapy in Wet AMD at the...

3 trends in biotech to watch in 2020 – STAT

For biotech, 2019 ended like the penultimate episode of a prestige TV show. We got answers to some weighty questions, but mostly, the year left a breadcrumb trail to some major reveals.

The IPO window stayed open, helping scores of companies go public. Futuristic therapies proved their worth in clinical trials, pointing to a new era in medicine. And the markets ended the year on a high, buoyed by a Food and Drug Administration that seems ever more flexible when it comes to approving new drugs.

Now, with 2020, well get the more important answers. Sure, theres a lot of public biotech companies now, but what if thats a bad thing? Yes, cell and gene therapies look transformational, but what if they never make any money? And since when is everyone so confident they understand whats going on inside the FDA?

advertisement

Here are three trends to watch in biotech in 2020, a year that looks to be laden with opportunities and stumbling blocks for the drug industry.

While every biotech startup is undoubtedly special in the eyes of the venture capitalists quoted in its press releases, 2020 could be a year marked by fatigue for the outside public.

More than 140 biotech companies have gone public since 2017, according to the analysts at Evercore ISI, and now theres upward of 500 of them trading on the Nasdaq. Keeping tabs on them all is essentially impossible, and its become fairly commonplace for biotech types to see the name of a given company for the first time by reading about its implosion.

Thats arguably a good problem to have in societal terms. More biotech companies means more efforts to treat human disease. But it could be problematic for the herd. Drug development remains an expensive proposition, and the majority of the biotech companies that went public in the past three years have negligible or nonexistent revenue. That means theyre going to have to go back to the market with follow-on offerings, and they may not like what they find.

According to Cowens biotech thermometer, a regular update on Wall Street sentiment, investors are increasingly selective when it comes to equity offerings, spooked by slumping IPO returns and a glut of supply. If that trend continues into 2020, some of those 500-plus biotech companies might need to look for other means of keeping the doors open, including mergers that thin the flock.

Much of the conversation around cell and gene therapies has focused on how much they cost, and understandably so. Two million dollars is, objectively, a lot of dollars. But the anxiety in biotech circles is a bit different: Is anyone going to make money on these things?

Take, for instance, CAR-T cancer therapy. For some patients, a single dose erases any trace of aggressive, otherwise untreatable cancer. For every patient, a single dose costs about $400,000. That sounds like a lot, but churning out a genetically engineered immune cell is hardly akin to widget manufacture. CAR-T companies dont disclose their underlying costs, but these therapies are understood to be low-margin products.

Theyre also considered commercial disappointments. The first two approved CAR-Ts, Kymriah and Yescarta, have underperformed analyst expectations to date. And that has stoked concern that a coming wave of gene therapies could face similar commercial difficulties.

Like CAR-T, gene therapy is costly to make, can be administered only at certain sites, and has made headlines for its six- or seven-figure list prices. Biotech companies and their investors have staked billions of dollars on the idea that such one-time treatments can become lucrative products. If that assumption is incorrect and the industry cant figure out how to make money in therapy, there could be a painful knock-on effect for biotech.

Handily, theres a one-company test case to follow in 2020. Novartis (NVS) sells a CAR-T in the form of Kymriah and a gene therapy called Zolgensma. Furthermore, thanks to a recent $9.7 billion acquisition, it will likely soon sell an RNAi treatment for high cholesterol. Each endeavor is a bet that futuristic science can turn into money-making medicines. By the end of the year, well have a decent idea of whether its a wise one.

Remember 2015, when the FDA would approve or reject a drug, and people would form an opinion and move on? That all changed the following year when the agency approved eteplirsen, now called Exondys 51, which is a treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy from a company called Sarepta Therapeutics (SRPT).

Without relitigating the whole ordeal, its fair to say Sareptas case relied on scant, debatable evidence from a small trial. To some, the FDAs decision to approve eteplirsen anyway was a sign of forward-thinking regulation that put patients first. To others, it was a dereliction of duty that threatened to erode decades of pharmaceutical jurisprudence. And to a great many, it was reason to get on the internet and be churlish, conspiratorial, and even threatening.

On Twitter, the fight over eteplirsen has never really ended, just taken on different forms, like a biotech analog to Gamergate. Earlier this year, the debate over a heart drug made by Amarin (AMRN) quickly metastasized into eteplirsen redux, with name-calling, accusations of bad faith, and armchair psychoanalysis of FDA staff. There were smaller but similar fights over Axovant Sciences, Clovis Oncology (CLVS), and nearly every biotech company with a sizable short interest.

Its at least somewhat understandable why eteplirsen marked such a shift in biotech discourse. Where FDA past decisions seemed to come down from Mount Sinai with little in the way of transparency, the messy eteplirsen process made public internal infighting and clashing personalities at the agency. The FDAs top drug evaluator even considered Sareptas balance sheet while evaluating the drug, a departure from the agencys hands-off approach to the business of biopharma and evidence that approval decisions can be about more than benefits and risks.

Theres no evidence that the FDA was fundamentally changed by a single decision, as organizations that employ 17,000 people rarely are. But that peek behind the curtain was enough to give credence to seemingly any biotech bull case online. Where the FDA once appeared monolithic, now there were heroes and villains within, actors whose imagined biases could support any conspiracy theory. Formerly anonymous public servants became the topic of vicious debate among strangers with alphanumeric Twitter handles and pictures of dogs as online avatars. One even got called a cuck.

With all that as a backdrop, next year, Biogen (BIIB) is going to ask the FDA to approve aducanumab, a treatment for Alzheimers disease. The supporting data are confusing, drawn from a pair of terminated trials with divergent results. The agencys decision will have major implications for the drug industry, the health care system, and the more than 5 million Americans with Alzheimers.

And, on the fractious little planet that is biotech Twitter, aducanumab presents an opportunity to play out the eteplirsen debate on the grandest scale yet, with more kremlinology, more circular logic, and more vitriol. Be nice to one another out there.

Read the rest here:
3 trends in biotech to watch in 2020 - STAT

Attention Vegetable Haters: It Could Be In Your Genes – CBS Boston

By Sandee LaMotte, CNN

(CNN) If certain vegetables have always made you gag, you may be more than a picky eater. Instead, you might be what scientists call a super-taster: a person with a genetic predisposition to taste food differently.

Unfortunately, being a super-taster doesnt make everything taste better. In fact, it can do the opposite.

Super-tasters are extremely sensitive to bitterness, a common characteristic of many dark green, leafy veggies such as broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage and Brussels sprouts, to name a few.

The person who has that genetic propensity gets more of the sulfur flavor of, say, Brussels sprouts, especially if theyve been overcooked, said University of Connecticut professor Valerie Duffy, an expert in the study of food taste, preference and consumption.

So that [bitter] vegetable is disliked, and because people generalize, soon all vegetables are disliked, Duffy said. If you ask people, Do you like vegetables? They dont usually say, Oh yeah, I dont like this, but I like these others. People tend to either like vegetables or not.

In fact, people with the bitter gene are2.6 times more likely to eat fewer vegetables than people who donot have that gene, according to a new study presented Monday at the annual meeting of the American Heart Association.

We wanted to know if genetics affected the ability of people who need to eat heart-healthy foods from eating them, said study author Jennifer Smith, a registered nurse who is a postdoc in cardiovascular science at the University of Kentucky School of Medicine.

While we didnt see results in gene type for sodium, sugar or saturated fat, we did see a difference in vegetables, Smith said, adding that people with the gene tasted a ruin-your-day level of bitterness.

Our sense of taste relies on much more than a gene or two. Receptors on our taste buds are primed to respond to five basic flavors: salty, sweet, sour, bitter and umami, which is a savory flavor created by an amino acid called glutamate (think of mushrooms, soy sauce, broth and aged cheeses).

But its also smelling through the mouth and the touch, texture and temperature of the food, Duffy said. Its very difficult to separate out taste from the rest. So when any of us say the food tastes good, its a composite sensation that were reacting to.

Even our saliva can enter the mix, creating unique ways to experience food.

When we come to the table, we dont perceive the food flavor or the taste of food equally, Duffy said. Some people live in a pastel food world versus others who might live in a more vibrant, neon food world. It could explain some of the differences in our food preference.

While there are more than 25 different taste receptors in our mouth, one in particular has been highly researched: the TAS2R38, which has two variants called AVI and PAV.

About 50% of us inherent one of each, and while we can taste bitter and sweet, we are not especially sensitive to bitter foods.

Another 25% of us are called non-tasters because we received two copies of AVI. Non-tasters arent at all sensitive to bitterness; in fact food might actually be perceived as a bit sweeter.

The last 25% of us have two copies of PAV, which creates the extreme sensitivity to the bitterness some plants develop to keep animals from eating them.

When it comes to bitterness in the veggie family, the worst offenders tend to be cruciferous vegetables, such as broccoli, kale, bok choy, arugula, watercress, collards and cauliflower.

Thats too bad, because they are also full of fiber, low in calories and are nutrient powerhouses. Theyre packed with vitamins A and C and whats called phytonutrients, which are compounds that may help to lower inflammation.

Rejecting cruciferous or any type of vegetable is a problem for the growing waistline and health of America.

As we age as a population, vegetables are very important for helping us maintain our weight, providing all those wonderful nutrients to help us maintain our immune system and lower inflammation to prevent cancer, heart disease and more, Duffy said.

Food scientists are trying to develop ways to reduce the bitterness in veggies, in the hopes we can keep another generation of super-tasters from rejecting vegetables.

Theres been some success. In fact, the Brussels sprouts we eat today are much sweeter than those our parents or grandparents ate. Dutch growers in the 90s searched their seed archives for older, less bitter varieties, then cross-pollinated them with todays higher yielding varieties.

People who already reject vegetables might try to use various cooking methods that can mask the bitter taste.

Just because somebody carries the two copies of the bitter gene doesnt mean that they cant enjoy vegetables, Duffy said. Cooking techniques such as adding a little fat, a little bit of sweetness, strong flavors like garlic or roasting them in the oven, which brings out natural sweetness, can all enhance the overall flavor or taste of the vegetable and block the bitterness.

The-CNN-Wire & 2019 Cable News Network, Inc., a WarnerMedia Company. All rights reserved.

Read the original here:
Attention Vegetable Haters: It Could Be In Your Genes - CBS Boston

UCLA study shows inhibition of gene helps overcome resistance to immunotherapy – UCLA Newsroom

Cancer immunology drugs, which harness the bodys immune system to better attack cancer cells, have significantly changed the face of cancer treatment. People with aggressive cancers are now living longer, healthier lives. Unfortunately, cancer immunology therapy only works in a subset of patients.

Now, a new study from scientists at the UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center helps explain why some people with advanced cancer may not respond to one of the leading immunotherapies, PD-1 blockade, and how a new combination approach may help overcome resistance to the immunotherapy drug.

The UCLA study, published today in the inaugural issue of the new scientific journal Nature Cancer, showed that genetic and pharmacological inhibition of the oncogene PAK4 overcomes resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in preclinical models.

One of the main reasons patients do not respond to PD-1 blockade is because the T cells never make it into the tumor to attack the cancer cells, said lead author Gabriel Abril-Rodriguez, a doctoral candidate in the departments of pharmacology and medicine in the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. We found that biopsies of patients who did not respond to PD-1 blockade showed an overexpression of PAK4, so that led us to believe it played a role in suppressing the immunotherapy treatment.

PAK4 has been known previously to be involved in cell migration and proliferation. The new research from UCLA demonstrates that high expression of this oncogene also correlates with a lack of immune cells migrating into the tumors to destroy the cancer cells.

Using biopsies from people with advanced melanoma who received the immune checkpoint blocking antibody pembrolizumab, UCLA researchers performed RNA sequencing to characterize the phenotype of the tumors. They saw that the tumors that did not respond to PD-1 blockade had a high expression of PAK4 and were not infiltrated by immune cells, meaning that the immune cells had not found their way to the tumor to attack the cancer cells.

The team then inhibited PAK4 in cell lines by either using a drug inhibitor or a gene editing technique called CRISPR-Cas9. The scientists found that deleting PAK4 increased the migration of tumor-specific immune cells and sensitized tumors to PD-1 blockade immunotherapy,reversing the resistance.

Developing new and improved combination treatments like this one for people who do not initially respond to anti-PD-1 treatment is the next step forward in our efforts to make immunotherapy work better for more people, said Dr. Antoni Ribas, the studys senior author, a professor of medicine at the Geffen School and director of the Jonsson cancer centers Tumor Immunology Program. The results from this study could also be expanded to other tumor types that are notoriously resistant to PD-1 blockade, such as pancreatic cancer.

The PAK4 inhibitor used in the study is already being tested in a phase one trial. The combination treatment with anti-PD-1 will be tested in a clinical trial setting in the near future.

The study was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health and the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Read the original:
UCLA study shows inhibition of gene helps overcome resistance to immunotherapy - UCLA Newsroom

Editas Medicine In The Realm Of Designer Humans – Seeking Alpha

Comparison is the essential valuation activity

Readers familiar with our work may want to skip to the "Comparing Details" section below.

Advances in Genome understanding and prospective adjustments continue at a startling pace. Equity investments provide a means of maintaining perspective and other SA contributors help with the industry development details.

This article rewards investors who choose to direct their investments of TIME and capital to those alternatives with the highest likelihood of successful rates of return among ones compared under identical important measures.

Now, Editas Medicine (EDIT) provides attractive answers to these questions:

These are questions often neither asked nor answered by many investment analysis reports. The commonplace approach is to present those aspects of one investment which may set it apart from others, but fail to make the essential decision-supporting step of comparing alternatives on an equal-measure basis.

Instead of limiting a value-search to industry competitors, our focus is on the alternatives which may address the investor's objectives of his investing mission, not necessarily of a stock candidate's competitive industry concerns.

To that end we turn to an information expert on what is currently of importance to investors - YAHOO Finance - and what also diverts the attention of investors initially interested in the stock of Editas Medicine. From its website traffic records Yahoo lists five other stocks "People also watch." They are NTLA, SGMO, BLUE, ONCE, and CLLS.

With the alternative investment choices in hand, we then turn to folks involved every market day with making bets (usually big bets) about how far their prices are likely to get pushed - both up and down. Those price limits are defined in the choices they make in the way they will protect their capital which must be exposed to market risk as they conduct their every-day market-making activities in large-volume "block trade" transactions.

Price range forecasts are being made in separate hedging deals over time periods defined by the contract lives of the derivative securities involved. Those judgments contain the updated "fundamentals" of interest to all evaluators, collected 24x7 by armies of market-maker (MM) employees world-wide.

Such forecasts are constantly being refined every moment investment markets are operating, and are made part of every market-day's closing records. They provide an historical record (in subsequent market price actions) of how well the "smart money" can make useful forecasts - for specific stocks, ETFs, and indexes.

Present-day markets are driven by major investing organizations commanding multi-billion dollar portfolios with stock contents which can only be adjusted by negotiated volume (block) trades between peers, not by "open auction". Such trades set and move posted prices.

The individual investor typically is merely along for the ride. He/she needs to have a sense of where the negotiators are likely to head, pricewise. Conventional analysis often provides superficial descriptions and little linkage between operating minutia and price forecasts. As an example here is how Yahoo Finance reports on EDIT.

Editas Medicine, Inc. operates as a clinical stage genome editing company. The company focuses on developing transformative genomic medicines to treat a range of serious diseases. It develops a proprietary genome editing platform based on CRISPR technology to target genetically addressable diseases and therapeutic areas. The company develops EDIT-101 for Leber Congenital Amaurosis type 10, a genetic form of vision loss that leads to blindness in childhood. It also develops other therapies for eye diseases, such as Usher Syndrome 2A, which is a form of retinitis pigmentosa that also includes hearing loss; Retinitis Pigmentosa, a progressive form of retinal degeneration; and Herpes Simplex Virus 1 that causes lifelong infections leading to ocular and oral disease.

In addition, the company develops hematopoietic stem cells for treating sickle cell disease and beta thalassemia. It has a research collaboration with Juno Therapeutics, Inc. to develop engineered T cells for cancer; strategic alliance and option agreement with Allergan Pharmaceuticals International Limited to discover, develop, and commercialize new gene editing medicines for a range of ocular disorders; and strategic research collaboration and cross-licensing agreement with BlueRock Therapeutics to combine their respective genome editing and cell therapy technologies to discover, develop, and manufacture engineered cell medicines. The company also has a strategic research collaboration agreement with Editas Medicine, Inc. to explore in vivo delivery of genome editing medicines to treat neurological diseases. The company was formerly known as Gengine, Inc. and changed its name to Editas Medicine, Inc. in November 2013. Editas Medicine, Inc. was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Not much help, is it?

Instead, here is what the MMs' hedging actions tell today about how high (and low) the stocks might get priced, and how they each behaved subsequent to prior forecasts like the ones now being seen:

Figure 1

The essence of valuation is in comparison, which requires that the compared measures be as close to identical as possible. To that end we place all of our valuations in a carefully defined set of measures, and describe them in as parallel set of comparisons as is possible.

To do so often presents what many readers recognize as text and ideas they have encountered before, as they have in our just-published comparison between Microsoft and Boeing. The use of the heading for this section of the article as an accelerant to reading provides for experienced readers an economy of time and effort, while leaving for the newly-initiated the opportunity for an important introduction.

What is important to us in this analysis is how big a price gain is in prospect, column [E], and how likely is today's RI forecast to produce a profit [H] as a proportion of the [L] sample of such forecasts. That combination result appears in the [I] %payoff which includes loser forecasts as well as the 82% winners. The size of [I] relative to [E] is a measure of [E]'s credibility in [N].

Time required [J] to accomplish the payoff is another important dimension for any investment mission. The retirement, tuition, or health emergency clock won't patiently wait for "long-term-trend" investments to be "sure" (like EK, GM, GE, and others) of their "passive investment" buy&hold strategy results. Compound Annual Gain Rates (CAGR) are the essential measures [K]. Figure 3's rows are ranked by the historical results (of today's RI) statistic.

One additional complication of being time-efficient in an investment strategy is that the score-keeping can't be easily sliced up into uniform time periods. That is not what happens to holdings in an active investment strategy. Gains (and losses) occur in irregular lumps of time, and we need to evaluate likely prospects in the way they may be accumulated.

What is done in proper financial analysis of any capital commitment is to anticipate the RATE of gain or cost in units of change per time of involvement. The most commonly used measure is basis points per day, where a basis point is 1/100th of a percent.

That's a tiny unit, but is what works best. Put together and maintained each day for a year, 19 of them would double your investment. They can be powerful.

In Figure 1 we use the Odds of gain [H] as a weight for the average prior payoffs [I], and take the complement of [H] ( 100 - H ) as a weight for the risk prospect [F]. Put together as [O] + [P] in [Q] we have an odds-weighted net outcome of each row's prior MM RI forecast sample [L]. Then by converting those [Q] nets into bp/day in [R] we have a guide to making investment selection decisions across a broader array of alternatives.

Taking measurements into such precision where the potentials are great for errors in forecasting may only serve to point out the limits of their usefulness. And where the differences between alternatives are great, the efforts involved may not be practical. But the fact remains that investors and investment organizations are determined to risk capital in these uncertain ventures, and progress in some areas of the unknown need guide-rails.

So figure 1 may tell us that if the future is repeated then in this case EDIT is a superior portfolio choice to any of the five alternatives generally being considered by investors consulting Yahoo Finance's data. EDIT's stock superiority lies principally in that in the next 3 months it has better odds of seeing a price +19% higher while encountering interim price drawdowns not significantly worse than any of the alternative stock investments, and do it in approximately the next 8 weeks.

That rate of gain is a CAGR of +201%, which compares to a probable parallel investment in the S&P 500 index ETF (SPY) of some +15%. Out of a population of over 2,700 other coming price range forecasts from the same source an average CAGR of +17% involves roughly equal interim risk exposure of -10% which is typically not only encountered, but also suffered in terms of actual capital loss experience, reducing that forecast population's expected +14% gain to only +3% in the process.

Meanwhile, the best 20 candidate stock investments from that population actually achieved +19% gains, better than the +14% expected, and by being alert to day-by-day price moves accomplished them in the same 8 week average holding period of EDIT, for CAGR rewards at a 342% rate.

Will all these price changes be repeated? Probably not precisely, but at least you have some norms to compare with.

To provide a sense of how EDIT price range forecasts by MMs have been trending recently Figure 2 shows daily expectations for the past 6 months and Figure 3 shows once-a-week excerpts over the past two years.

Figure 2

The small blue picture here shows the distribution of forecast Range Indexes during the past 5 years' 1261 market days. Recording the daily balance between expected upside and downside price changes likely, the current measure of 29 is clearly below its visual average, supporting the 82/100 odds of higher coming prices.

Figure 3

Editas Medicine presents evidences of coming price change prospects which are superior to many relevant equity investment alternatives, and justify its buy as a near-term wealth-building investment.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, but may initiate a long position in EDIT over the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: Peter Way and generations of the Way Family are long-term providers of perspective information, earlier helping professional investors and now individual investors, discriminate between wealth-building opportunities in individual stocks and ETFs. We do not manage money for others outside of the family but do provide pro bono consulting for a limited number of not-for-profit organizations.

We firmly believe investors need to maintain skin in their game by actively initiating commitment choices of capital and time investments in their personal portfolios. So, our information presents for D-I-Y investor guidance what the arguably best-informed professional investors are thinking. Their insights, revealed through their own self-protective hedging actions, tell what they believe is most likely to happen to the prices of specific issues in coming weeks and months. Evidences of how such prior forecasts have worked out are routinely provided in the SA blog of my name.

View post:
Editas Medicine In The Realm Of Designer Humans - Seeking Alpha

HFE gene – Genetics Home Reference – NIH

Mutations in the HFE gene can increase the risk of developing a condition called porphyria. Porphyria is a group of disorders caused by abnormalities in the chemical steps that lead to heme production. Heme is a vital molecule for all of the body's organs, although it is most abundant in the blood, bone marrow, and liver. Heme is a component of several iron-containing proteins called hemoproteins, including hemoglobin (the protein that carries oxygen in the blood). HFE gene mutations are found more frequently in people with the most common form of porphyria, known as porphyria cutanea tarda, than in unaffected people.

Researchers suspect that HFE gene mutations may trigger this type of porphyria by increasing the absorption of iron. A buildup of excess iron, in combination with other genetic and nongenetic factors, interferes with the production of a molecule called heme. Heme is a component of iron-containing proteins called hemoproteins, including hemoglobin (the protein that carries oxygen in the blood). A blockage in heme production allows other compounds called porphyrins to build up to toxic levels in the liver and other organs. These compounds are formed during the normal process of heme production, but excess iron and other factors allow them to accumulate to toxic levels. The abnormal buildup of porphyrins leads to the characteristic features of porphyria cutanea tarda.

See the rest here:
HFE gene - Genetics Home Reference - NIH

Rare Disease Fund now covers Pompe disease, a rare inherited neuromuscular disorder – The Straits Times

SINGAPORE - The Rare Disease Fund (RDF) now covers Singaporeans with Pompe disease - a rare inherited neuromuscular disorder where patients can incur medical expenses in excess of $500,000 each year.

The committee overseeing the fund announced on Sunday (Nov 3) that citizens can now apply for financial aid to help with their medical expenses for the disease which affects about one in every 40,000 live births.

With the addition, the fund now covers four conditions including primary bile acid synthesis disorder; Gaucher disease; and hyperphenylalaninaemia due to tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) deficiency.

The fund has approved two applications for financial support so far. One of the beneficiaries is Mr Geoffrey Toi, a public servant whose three-year-old son Christopher suffers from primary bile acid synthesis disorder.

The condition interferes with the production of bile acids and if untreated, can lead to liver failure.

The fund covers a larger portion of Christopher's medication costs, which is currently about $6,250 a month, as compared to Medifund Junior, which had previously subsidised part of his medical fees.

"It was a blessing when this fund was announced, because it specifically covered his condition. Every bit of help matters," said Mr Toi, 35.

The fund was launched by the Ministry of Health (MOH) and SingHealth Fund in July this year. It combines community donations and Government-matched contributions to provide aid for Singapore citizens with specific rare diseases.

Senior Minister of State for Health and Law Edwin Tong said on Sunday that the fund recently received significant support from Temasek and the Tsao Family Fund.

"The listing of Pompe is possible because we have so many generous benefactors who have stepped forward selflessly, with a lot of compassion, to donate to the RDF," he added.

The fund has grown from $70 million last July to about $90 million, with the government matching community donations by three to one.

In addition, the Government is funding all operational expenses involved in managing the fund, ensuring that all donations received will be used solely for supporting patients.

"We hope that philanthropists, companies, community groups and individuals will continue to come forward as a society, as a community to help support patients with rare diseases... As more funds are raised, the Rare Disease Fund can be expanded further to cover even more types of treatments and more patients in future," said Mr Tong, who was attending a community carnival organised by Mount Alvernia Hospital in support of the RDF.

The carnival in Punggol raised more than $200,000 for beneficiaries of the fund. The sum includes three-to-one government matching.

Rare diseases are defined by MOH as conditions that affect fewer than one in 2,000 people, and mostly are genetic and often surface during childhood. There are no official numbers on how many people in Singapore have such rare diseases.

In some cases, effective treatments are available and the medicines can substantially increase patients' life expectancies and improve quality of life.

However, MOH noted that these medicines can be very costly, going up to hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, and patients will often need to take them for the rest of their lives.

Pompe disease is caused by a defective gene that results in a deficiency of an enzyme.

It results in the excessive build-up of a substance called glycogen, a form of sugar that is stored in a specialised compartment of muscle cells throughout the body.

Symptoms of the disease include extreme muscle weakness and breathing difficulties. The progressive nature of the disease means that it worsens over time, with the speed of progression varying from patient to patient.

Mr Kenneth Mah, whose 10-year-old daughter Chloe has Pompe disease, cheered the move to cover the disease under the RDF.

While insurance covers much of her treatment cost now - which is in excess of $40,000 a month - it may not be enough in future as she gets older and needs more of medicine.

"It gives us a greater peace of mind," said Mr Mah, 49, who ended his mobile phone business to become the main caregiver for Chloe.

Mr Mah is also the co-founder of the Rare Disorders Society Singapore.

"We hope that the fund will be able to cover all rare disorders in the future, as it gets more support from society."

More information on the RDF is available at http://www.kkh.com.sg/rarediseasefund

Here is the original post:
Rare Disease Fund now covers Pompe disease, a rare inherited neuromuscular disorder - The Straits Times

Gene-editing scientists to share $500K Albany Med prize – Albany Times Union

Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D. , professor, Molecular and Cell Biology and Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley. (UC-Berkeley)

Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D. , professor, Molecular and Cell Biology and Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley. (UC-Berkeley)

Luciano Marraffini, Ph.D., associate professor, Laboratory of Bacteriology, The Rockefeller University, New York City. (Mario Morgado)

Luciano Marraffini, Ph.D., associate professor, Laboratory of Bacteriology, The Rockefeller University, New York City. (Mario Morgado)

Gene-editing scientists to share $500K Albany Med prize

Albany

Five scientists whose work on the revolutionary gene-editing technology CRISPR will share the 2017 Albany Medical Center Prize in Medicine and Biomedical Research.

The decision by the Albany Prize National Selection Committee to award the $500,000 prize to these researchers stands out from recent announcements of the prestigious award, which have acknowledged scientists for groundbreaking work leading to current medical advances. While developments using CRISPR have exploded this year, its use in humans remains a promise, but one with far-reaching effects.

"The committee saw this technology as having huge potential for eradicating human disease," said Dr. Vincent Verdile, dean of Albany Medical College and chair of the prize committee.

CRISPR (pronounced "crisper") stands for "clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats." It is a DNA sequence that simple bacteria use to defend themselves against viruses by snipping out part of the virus DNA so it can be recognized by the bacteria's own immune systems. The technology based on it lets scientists "edit" genes at specific locations by removing, adding or altering parts of the DNA sequence.

In the last year, CRISPR technology has been used to remove a gene linked to heart disease from human embryos and to create a cancer-killing gene that shrinks tumors in mice. Last week, scientists revealed in the journal Science that they had created piglets stripped of viruses that could cause disease in humans; the technique could open the door for eventual transplantation of livers, hearts and other organs from pigs to people.

The scientists who will share the Albany Prize are:

Emmanuelle Charpentier of the Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology in Germany. Charpentier is co-inventor and co-owner of the intellectual property comprising the CRISPR gene-editing system, and co-founder of two companies developing the technology for biotech and biomedical applications.

Jennifer Doudna of the University of California, Berkeley. Five years ago, Doudna described a simple way of editing the DNA of any organism using an RNA-guided protein founded in bacteria.

Luciano Marraffini of Rockefeller University in New York City. Marraffini discovered that CRISPR works by severing DNA and was the first to propose that it could be used to edit genes in organisms other than bacteria. With Feng Zhang, he performed the first successful CRISPR gene-editing experiment in human cells.

Francisco J.M. Mojica of the University of Alicante in Spain. Mojica's work has led to the development of tools used in the genetic manipulation of any living being, including humans.

Feng Zhang of the Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University. Zhang pioneered the development of gene editing tools for use in human cells from bacterial CRISPR systems.

The Albany Prize Committee's selection of five scientists to share the award this year reflects an increasing trend in science toward collaboration, where information is shared and groups of researchers move knowledge forward in ways that no one of them could do alone, Verdile said. It's a major change since the days when a single scientist would be credited with, say, the discovery of a vaccine.

"That's more of where the future of biomedical research is going what's good for the good of mankind, not me personally," Verdile said.

News reports in recent years have focused on the ethical aspects of CRISPR technology, which in addition to its potential to prevent devastating diseases, could also be used for cosmetic purposes or have unintended consequences that affect the descendants of the person whose genes are edited. The Albany Prize Committee did not consider such "what if" scenarios, Verdile said, leaving those conversations for future ethicists and policymakers as specific medical techniques are developed.

The Albany Prize, one of the nation's largest for science and medicine, was established in 2000 by the late Morris "Marty" Silverman, a New York City businessman and philanthropist who grew up in Troy. A commitment of $50 million from the Marty and Dorothy Silverman Foundation allows for the prize to be awarded annually for 100 years.

Albany Med released the 2017 award recipients' names Tuesday morning. The recipients will formally receive their awards at a Sept. 27 ceremony in Albany.

chughes@timesunion.com 518-454-5417 @hughesclaire

Visit link:
Gene-editing scientists to share $500K Albany Med prize - Albany Times Union

Groundbreaking study demonstrates promise and controversy of gene editing in embryos – ABC News

In a groundbreaking experiment, an international team of scientists on Wednesday officially reported the successful elimination of a genetic disease from human embryos.

Its potentially a huge step for medicine -- but also a controversial one. While these embryos, which a team led by researchers at the Oregon Health and Science University edited using a novel gene-editing procedure known as CRISPR-Cas9, were destroyed rather than implanted into a womb, some say this type of genetic manipulation opens the door to other possibilities in human engineering.

Below are answers to some of the common questions about this research.

In short, this experiment showed that it is potentially possible to correct a genetic disease in an embryo with a high chance of success. In order to show this, the researchers created human embryos designed to have a specific genetic mutation responsible for a type of heart disease known as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. This genetic disease, which occurs in one out of 500 people, can cause sudden death, as well as a host of other cardiac problems such as heart failure and arrhythmias.

Using a technique known as CRISPR-Cas9, the scientists were able to target the faulty genes as the cells in the embryo divided -- swapping them out for a properly functioning form of the gene. What was novel about this study is that researchers were able to nudge the embryo to use its own native machinery to perform the repair with a high degree of efficiency using a correct form of the gene already present in the cell. In this particular experiment, the researchers used CRISPR-Cas9 on 58 embryos containing the mutation. After the procedure, they found that the mutation was corrected in 42 embryos -- a success rate of 72 percent.

If a feat similar to that seen in this experiment could be achieved in an afflicted embryo that was allowed to develop into a person, it would prevent the condition in this individual -- and it would also prevent their future sons and daughters from inheriting this condition as well.

Moreover, there are thousands of genetic diseases, ranging from cystic fibrosis to sickle cell anemia, for which such a procedure could be relevant. Tests currently exist to diagnose many diseases prior to birth; however, at this time there is no therapy in use that actually alters the DNA of embryos prior to birth. Of course, the use of such a technique would inevitably raise the prospect of exerting all kinds of control over human reproduction -- as well as a host of new ethical questions.

Its not likely, at least for now. Currently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is barred from reviewing investigational medical studies involving editing of human embryos -- something which would be required in order to proceed with moving this research into practice. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health, which is an important source of science research funding in the United States, will not financially support research on gene editing of embryos. The research in this study was not supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health.

Right now, it is unclear. Importantly, even though this experiment was considered to be successful, it is not known how this method would perform in other cases -- for example, a case in which both copies of the gene were mutated rather than just one, which was the case in this experiment. Also, since the scientists destroyed these embryos at a very early stage of development, it is not possible to tell for sure how viable these embryos would actually have been in the long run, or whether there would have been any unforeseen complications with their development.

But along with these scientific questions are also big ethical questions -- ones that will only be answered as scientists, ethicists and the public reflect further on this groundbreaking step.

Will Garneau, M.D., is an internal medicine resident at the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

The rest is here:
Groundbreaking study demonstrates promise and controversy of gene editing in embryos - ABC News

Gene Editing for ‘Designer Babies’? Highly Unlikely, Scientists Say – New York Times

Thats because none of those talents arise from a single gene mutation, or even from an easily identifiable number of genes. Most human traits are nowhere near that simple.

Right now, we know nothing about genetic enhancement, said Hank Greely, director of the Center for Law and the Biosciences at Stanford. Were never going to be able to say, honestly, This embryo looks like a 1550 on the two-part SAT.

Even with an apparently straightforward physical characteristic like height, genetic manipulation would be a tall order. Some scientists estimate height is influenced by as many as 93,000 genetic variations. A recent study identified 697 of them.

A new technique known as Crispr has revolutionized humans ability to edit DNA. See you if you can identify whether a given development has already happened, could eventually happen or is pure fiction.

You might be able to do it with something like eye color, said Robin Lovell-Badge, a professor of genetics and embryology at the Francis Crick Institute in London.

But if people are worried about designer babies, theyre normally thinking of doing special different things than the normal genetic stuff.

The gene-modification process used in the new study also turns out to be somewhat restrictive. After researchers snipped the harmful mutation from the male gene, it copied the healthy sequence from that spot on the female gene.

That was a surprise to the scientists, who had inserted a DNA template into the embryo, expecting the gene to copy that sequence into the snipped spot, as occurs with gene editing in other body cells. But the embryonic genome ignored that template, suggesting that to repair a mutation on one parents gene in an embryo, a healthy DNA sequence from the other parent is required.

If you cant introduce a template, then you cant do anything wild, Dr. Lovell-Badge said. This doesnt really help you make designer babies.

Talents and traits arent the only thing that are genetically complex. So are most physical diseases and psychiatric disorders. The genetic message is not carried in a 140-character tweet it resembles a shelf full of books with chapters, subsections and footnotes.

So embryonic editing is unlikely to prevent most medical problems.

But about 10,000 medical conditions are linked to specific mutations, including Huntingtons disease, cancers caused by BRCA genes, Tay-Sachs disease, cystic fibrosis, sickle cell anemia, and some cases of early-onset Alzheimers. Repairing the responsible mutations in theory could eradicate these diseases from the so-called germline, the genetic material passed from one generation to the next. No future family members would inherit them.

But testing editing approaches on each mutation will require scientists to find the right genetic signpost, often an RNA molecule, to guide the gene-snipping tool.

In the study reported this week, it took 10 tries to find the right RNA, said Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte, a co-author and geneticist at the Salk Institute.

Dr. Greely noted that while scientists work to get human embryonic editing ready for clinical trials (currently illegal in the United States and many countries), alternate medical treatments for these diseases might be developed. They may be simpler and cheaper.

How good one technique is depends on how good the alternatives are, and there may be alternatives, he said.

The authors of the new study do not dismiss ethical implications of their work. In fact, Dr. Belmonte served on a committee of the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine that in February endorsed research into gene editing of human embryos, but only to prevent serious diseases and conditions, and as a last resort.

In theory this could lead to the kind of intervention which, of course, Im totally against, said Dr. Belmonte. The possibility of moving forward not to create or prevent disease but rather to perform gene enhancement in humans.

For example, soon we will know more and more about genes that can increase your muscle activity, he said. The hormone EPO, which some athletes have been disciplined for taking, is produced by a gene, so you could in theory engineer yourself to produce more EPO.

That is the kind of genetic engineering that raises alarm.

Allowing any form of human germline modification leaves the way open for all kinds especially when fertility clinics start offering genetic upgrades to those able to afford them, Marcy Darnovsky, executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society, said in a statement. We could all too easily find ourselves in a world where some peoples children are considered biologically superior to the rest of us.

Scientists and ethicists share the concerns about access. Any intervention that goes to the clinic should be for everyone, Dr. Belmonte said. It shouldnt create inequities in society.

Unequal access is, of course, a question that arises with almost any new medical intervention, and already disparities deprive too many people of needed treatments.

But there is a flip side to ethical arguments against embryo editing.

I personally feel we are duty bound to explore what the technology can do in a safe, reliable manner to help people, Dr. Lovell-Badge said. If you have a way to help families not have a diseased child, then it would be unethical not to do it.

Genetic engineering doesnt have to be an all or nothing proposition, some scientists and ethicists say. There is a middle ground to stake out with laws, regulation and oversight.

For example, Dr. Lovell-Badge said, Britain highly regulates pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, in which a couples embryos are screened for certain harmful mutations so that only healthy ones are implanted in the womans womb.

They allow sensible things to be done, and they dont allow non-sensible things, he said. And every single embryo is accounted for. If someone tries to do something they shouldnt have done, they will find out, and the penalties for breaking the law are quite severe.

According to a 2015 article in the journal Nature, a number of countries, including the United States, restrict or ban genetic modification of human embryos.

Other countries, like China, have guidelines but not laws banning or restricting clinical use, the article noted. Chinese researchers have conducted the only previously published gene editing experiments on human embryos, which were much less successful.

In the future, will there be nations that allow fertility clinics to promise babies with genetically engineered perfect pitch or .400 batting averages? Its not impossible. Even now, some clinics in the United States and elsewhere offer unproven stem cell therapies, sometimes with disastrous consequences.

But R. Alta Charo, a bioethicist at University of Wisconsin-Madison, who co-led the national committee on human embryo editing, said historically ethical overreach with reproductive technology has been limited.

Procedures like I.V.F. are arduous and expensive, and many people want children to closely resemble themselves and their partners. They are likely to tinker with genes only if other alternatives are impractical or impossible.

You hear people talking about how this will make us treat children as commodities and make people more intolerant of people with disabilities and lead to eugenics and all that, she said.

While I appreciate the fear, I think we need to realize that with every technology we have had these fears, and they havent been realized.

View post:
Gene Editing for 'Designer Babies'? Highly Unlikely, Scientists Say - New York Times

Thousands of genes influence most diseases – Stanford Medical Center Report

A core assumption in the study of disease-causing genes has been that they are clustered in molecular pathways directly connected to the disease. But work by a group of researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine suggests otherwise.

The gene activity of cells is so broadly networked that virtually any gene can influence disease, the researchers found. As a result, most of the heritability of diseases is due not to a handful of core genes, but to tiny contributions from vast numbers of peripheral genes that function outside disease pathways.

Any given trait, it seems, is not controlled by a small set of genes. Instead, nearly every gene in the genome influences everything about us. The effects may be tiny, but they add up.

The work is described in a paper published June 15 in Cell. Jonathan Pritchard, PhD, professor of genetics and of biology, is the senior author. Graduate student Evan Boyle and postdoctoral scholar Yang Li, PhD, share lead authorship.

The researchers call their provocative new understanding of disease genes an omnigenic model to indicate that almost any gene can influence diseases and other complex traits. In any cell, there might be 50 to 100 core genes with direct effects on a given trait, as well as easily another 10,000 peripheral genes that are expressed in the same cell with indirect effects on that trait, said Pritchard, who is also a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator.

Each of the peripheral genes has a small effect on the trait. But because those thousands of genes outnumber the core genes by orders of magnitude, most of the genetic variation related to diseases and other traits comes from the thousands of peripheral genes. So, ironically, the genes whose impact on disease is most indirect and small end up being responsible for most of the inheritance patterns of the disease.

This is a compellingpaper that presents a plausible and fascinatingmodel to explain a number of confusing observations from genomewide studies of disease, said Joe Pickrell, PhD, an investigator at the New York Genome Center, who was not involved in the work.

Until recently, said Pritchard, he thought of genetically complex traits as conforming to the polygenic model, in which genes have direct effects on a trait, whether that trait is something like height or a disease, such as autism.

Read this article:
Thousands of genes influence most diseases - Stanford Medical Center Report

Genomic Vaccines – Scientific American

Standard vaccines to prevent infectious diseases consist of killed or weakened pathogens or proteins from those microorganisms. Vaccines that treat cancer also rely on proteins. In contrast, a new kind of vaccine, which is poised to make major inroads in medicine, consists of genes. Genomic vaccines promise to offer many advantages, including fast manufacture when a virus, such as Zika or Ebola, suddenly becomes more virulent or widespread. They have been decades in the making, but dozens have now entered clinical trials.

Most vaccines work by teaching the immune system to recognize a foe. They accomplish this trick by delivering a dead or weakened pathogen; the immune system recognizes that certain bits of protein, called antigens, on the surface of the pathogen are foreign and prepares to pounce the next time it encounters them. (Many modern vaccines deliver only the antigens, leaving out the pathogens.) To treat cancer, doctors may deliver other proteins that enhance immune responses. These proteins can include the immune systems own guided missilesantibodies.

Genomic vaccines take the form of DNA or RNA that encodes desired proteins. On injection, the genes enter cells, which then churn out the selected proteins. Compared with manufacturing proteins in cell cultures or eggs, producing the genetic material should be simpler and less expensive. Further, a single vaccine can include the coding sequences for multiple proteins, and it can be changed readily if a pathogen mutates or properties need to be added. Public health experts, for instance, revise the flu vaccine annually, but sometimes the vaccine they choose does not match the viral strains that circulate when flu season comes. In the future, investigators could sequence the genomes of the circulating strains and produce a better-matched vaccine in weeks. Genomics also enables a new twist on a vaccination approach known as passive immune transfer, in which antibodies are delivered instead of antigens. Scientists can now identify people who are resistant to a pathogen, isolate the antibodies that provide that protection and design a gene sequence that will induce a persons cells to produce those antibodies.

With such goals in mind, the U.S. government, academic labs and companies large and small are pursuing the technology. A range of clinical trials to test safety and immunogenicity are under way, including for avian influenza, Ebola, hepatitis C, HIV, and breast, lung, prostate, pancreatic and other cancers. And at least one trial is looking at efficacy: the National Institutes of Health has begun a multisite clinical trial to see if a DNA vaccine can protect against Zika.

Meanwhile researchers are working to improve the technologyfor example, by finding more efficient ways to get the genes into cells and by improving the stability of the vaccines in heat. Oral delivery, which would be valuable where medical personnel are scarce, is not likely to be feasible anytime soon, but nasal administration is being studied as an alternative and is under study. Optimism is highthat any remaining obstacles can be solved.

Here is the original post:
Genomic Vaccines - Scientific American

Abeona Therapeutics Stakeholder Letter in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic – Citybizlist Real Estate

NEW YORK and CLEVELAND, March 27, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The COVID-19 pandemic has created extraordinary challenges across all aspects of healthcare. Many institutions and their brave staff of providers are now focused on caring for patients stricken by the virus. We at Abeona are thankful for their sacrifices and efforts, and stand behind these healthcare institutions whose resources are focused on the greater good. We are dedicated to being a good global citizen in doing our part by following guidance from local health officials in New York, Cleveland, and Madrid, and where remote employees reside.

Above all, we will take every reasonable measure to ensure the safety of our patients and employees, while sustaining our business operations during this uncertain time. Abeona is fully focused on getting through the pandemic by working closely with our clinical trial sites to ensure that patient safety remains paramount.

Clinical DevelopmentWe remain committed to advancing our clinical programs, but recognize delays are inevitable in these uncertain times, especially as healthcare resources are justly redirected to those who need them most. We are continually assessing the dynamic situation and implementing plans to minimize disruption. We are also constantly reviewing these plans and associated processes and policies to ensure our patients and employees are safe, and continuity in our scaled back operations remains.

While the full impact on our clinical programs cannot be quantified at this point, what we do know is that all current clinical trial sites remain active. We can say with certainty that some sites have paused screening and delays are expected as the situation evolves globally. What we wont know for the foreseeable future is the long-term impact. However, we remain dedicated to communicating frequently and openly with our stakeholders as more information becomes available, including updates on material changes to prior guidance as we continue to follow applicable government, regulatory and institutional guidelines.

Business OperationsLooking inward, the safety of our employees is a top priority. We have instituted additional protective measures since news of COVID-19 broke, and we frequently assess and improve our safety practices and policies. Operations at our Cleveland manufacturing facility have been significantly scaled back to ensure that employees and those around them have the best chance to remain safe, and to accommodate reduced clinical development activities. Only employees deemed essential by senior management to maintaining the manufacturing operation are entering the facility and under strict safety protocols to mitigate their risk. More traditional means of risk mitigation including a global work from home policy and suspended business travel are also in place.

As we try to rationalize the unprecedented developments sweeping the globe, please be assured that Abeona is doing all it can to protect our patients, employees, and the communities around us. This includes company operations that underpin our aspirations to bring new medicines to patients in need.

Abeona is about great Science and great People, and its important we continue to do everything we can to preserve both.

We will get through this but only if we work together.

About Abeona Therapeutics

Abeona Therapeutics Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing gene and cell therapies for serious diseases. The Companys clinical programs include EB-101, its autologous, gene-corrected cell therapy for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, as well as ABO-102 and ABO-101, novel AAV9-based gene therapies for Sanfilippo syndrome types A and B (MPS IIIA and MPS IIIB), respectively. The Companys portfolio of AAV9-based gene therapies also features ABO-202 and ABO-201 for CLN1 disease and CLN3 disease, respectively. Abeona has received numerous regulatory designations from the FDA and EMA for its pipeline candidates, including Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy designation for two candidates (EB-101 and ABO-102). http://www.abeonatherapeutics.com

Read more:
Abeona Therapeutics Stakeholder Letter in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic - Citybizlist Real Estate

How Exercise May Protect the Brain From Alzheimer’s Disease – TIME

Regular exercise may offer some protection against Alzheimer's disease, even for people who are genetically at risk, according to recent research.

In the study, published in the Journal of Alzheimers Disease, people who did more moderate-intensity physical activity were more likely to have healthy patterns of glucose metabolism in their brainsa sign of healthy brain activitythan those who did less. Light-intensity physical activity, on the other hand, was not associated with similar benefits.

The study involved 93 adults with an average age of 64, all of whom had at least one parent with Alzheimers disease, at least one gene variation linked to Alzheimers disease, or both. This put them at high risk for developing the disease themselves, although none showed any cognitive impairment at the time of the study.

To illuminate the relationship between brain activity and exercise levels, everyone wore an accelerometer for a week to measure their daily physical activity and received PET scans to measure glucose metabolism, which reveals neuron health and activity, in several regions of the brain. For people with Alzheimers disease, these regions tend to have depressed glucose metabolism.

Researchers found that people who spent at least 68 minutes a day engaged in physical activity at a moderate levelthe equivalent of a brisk walkhad better glucose metabolism in all of those regions than those who spent less time doing so.

The amounts of time spent being sedentary or doing less-intense physical activity (like slow walking) were not associated with changes in any of the brain regions studied. Vigorous activity was linked to better glucose metabolism in one brain regionthe hippocampus but not in the others.

Larger doses of high-intensity exercise may be needed to provide the benefits of just a modest increase in moderate activity, the authors wrote, suggesting that you don't have to exercise to the extreme to get brain benefits. Past research comparing the brain-boosting power of moderate- and vigorous-intensity exercise has been mixed, says lead author Ozioma Okonkwo, assistant professor of medicine at the University of Washington School of Medicine and Public Health. But in general, he says, the evidence suggests that light activity is insufficient, and vigorous activity might be unnecessary.

Being able to quantify the connection between moderate-intensity activity and brain health is an exciting and important step in Alzheimers research, the researchers say, although further studies are needed in order to show a cause-and-effect relationship between exercise and glucose metabolismand to demonstrate real-life benefits. (The team is currently recruiting people with concerns about their brain health for a clinical trial to help determine the right dose of exercise for people with mild memory problems.)

But Okonkwo points out that previous research has already established a connection between glucose metabolism and cognitive function. Were showing now that a moderate-intensity active lifestyle actually boosts neuronal function, he says. "I dont think its too much of a leap to make the argument that this probably is one of the pathways through which exercise prevents cognitive decline in middle life.

Okonkwo says this research offers reassurance that people can take steps to protect themselves against Alzheimers disease, even if they are at high genetic risk. The evidence shows that its never too late to take up and maintain a physically active regimen, he says. It also suggests that the earlier you begin and the longer you continue it, the more benefits you tend to accrue.

Continued here:
How Exercise May Protect the Brain From Alzheimer's Disease - TIME

Twelve Women Who Have Shaped The History of the BioHealth Capital Region – BioBuzz

The BioHealth Capital Region (BHCR) and its life science ecosystem have a rich and deep history of pioneering scientific innovation, research, development, and commercialization. The regions history has been written by life science anchor companies, scientific research universities, government research organizations, rich startup culture, and serial entrepreneurs, all of whom have played critical roles in transforming the BHCR into one of the most innovative and productive biocluster in the world.

Contributions to the BHCRs legacy of life science achievement have emerged from all staffing levels, various labs, countless executive teams, numerous entrepreneurs and biohub support organizations. Contributions have arisen from an intricate tapestry of backgrounds and cultures.

Women, in particular, have had a strong hand in shaping the history of the BHCR. In celebration of Womens History Month, were taking a closer look at the achievements of female life science leaders that have laid the groundwork for the next generation of women trailblazers in the BHCR and made the region what it is today.

Dr. Fraser is one of the most influential figures in BHCR history. In 1995, she was the first to map the complete genetic code of a free-living organism while at the Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) in Rockville, Maryland. It was there that the automation of the DNA sequencing process made the idea of large-scale sequencing efforts tangible. As President and Director of TIGR, Fraser and her team gained worldwide public notoriety for its involvement in the Human Genome Project, which was completed in 2000 with the presentation of a working draft of the fully sequenced human genome.

As a leader, Fraser provided her researchers with the infrastructure to collaborate and apply multi-disciplinary team science and empowered them to think big. She is also most importantly known for how she challenged her team to ask the right questions, which is the root of scientific progress and success.

Her work at TIGR and as part of the Human Genome Project are foundational events in the regions history, as it marked the BHCR as the epicenter of genomic research and helped spark the regions biotech boom. In fact, it was a controversial partnership with TIGR that gave Human Genome Sciences(HGSi) the first opportunity to utilize any sequences emerging from TIGR labs. The mass of genetic information and sequences, especially that associated with diseases, that HGSi acquired catapulted them into biotech history and an important anchor company within the region.

Dr. Fraser is widely viewed as a pioneer and global leader in genomic medicine; she has published approximately 320 scientific publications and edited three books; she is also one of the most widely cited microbiology experts in the world. She founded the Institute for Genome Sciences at the University of Maryland in 1997. The institute currently holds 25 percent of the funding thats been awarded by the Human Microbiome Project and has been referred to as The Big House in genetics.

Dr. Judy Britz is yet another female life science pioneer that put the BHCR on the map. While working as a research scientist at Electro-Nucleonics Inc., Dr. Britz developed one of the first licensed blood screening tests for HIV, and launching a storied career that has spanned approximately 25 years. She is also a serial entrepreneur that has successfully raised $50M in capital and served as the top executive for two highly successful Maryland-located companies.

Dr. Britz was the first woman to lead the states biotech initiative as the first announced Executive Director of the Maryland Biotech Center. The center was launched under the Maryland Department of Commerce to deploy a strategic life science economic development plan under Governor Martin OMalleys $1.3B, 2020 Vision and to be a one-stop-shop and information center to promote and support biotechnology innovation and entrepreneurship in Maryland.

Judy was the first woman to lead Marylands life sciences initiative, bringing industry experience and perspective to the states economic development activities, a focus still maintained under Governor Hogans leadership today, shared Judy Costello, Managing Director, Economic Development BioHealth Innovation, Inc., who served as Deputy Director under Dr. Britz.

Much of the work done by Dr. Britz and her team laid the foundation and seeded the commercialization efforts that have blossomed into the thriving #4 Biotech Hub that we have today.

GeneDx was founded by Dr. Bale and Dr. John Compton in 2000. The company recently celebrated its 20th anniversary. Since its founding, GeneDx has become a global leader in genomics and patient testing. Under her leadership, the Gaithersburg, Maryland company has played an important role in the history of genetic sequencing and the rise of the BHCR as a global biohealth cluster.

GeneDx was the very first company to commercially offer NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) testing in a CLIA (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments) lab and has been at the leading edge of genetic sequencing and testing for two decades. The companys whole exome sequencing program and comprehensive testing capabilities are world-renowned.

Prior to launching GeneDx, Dr. Bale spent 16 years at NIH, the last nine as Head of the Genetic Studies Section in the Laboratory of Skin Biology. She has been a pioneer during her storied career, publishing over 140 papers, chapters and books in the field. Her 35-year career includes deep experience in clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular genetics research.

Prior to being named CEO and Chair of the Board of Sequella in 1999, Dr. Nacy was the Chief Science Officer and an Executive VP at EntreMed, Inc. EntreMed was one of the most influential BHCR companies in the 1990s. EntreMed, MedImmune, Human Genome Sciences and Celera Genomics all played critical roles in creating the globally recognized, top biocluster that the BHCR has become.

After earning her Ph.D. in biology/microbiology from Catholic University, Nacy did her postdoc work at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in the Department of Rickettsial Diseases; her postdoc performance earned a full-time position at Walter Reed that started a 17-year career at the institute. After a highly successful run, Nacy left Walter Reed to join EntreMed.

Today, Dr. Nacy leads Rockville, Marylands Sequella, a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company focused on developing better antibiotics to fight drug-resistant bacterial, fungal and parasitic infections. Sequellas pipeline of small molecule infectious disease treatments have the potential to improve the treatment and outcomes for the over 3 billion people worldwide that are impacted by increasingly drug-resistant infectious diseases.

Emmes Corporation is the largest woman-led organization in the BHCR and is headed by Dr. Lindblad, who started her career at Emmes in 1982 as a biostatistician. She has been with Emmes for nearly 40 years, ascending to become VP in 1992, Executive VP in 2006 and ultimately the companys CEO in late summer of 2013.

Dr. Lindblad has published more than 100 publications and presentations has served as a reviewer of grant and contract applications for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and has chaired or served on Safety and Data Monitoring Committees across multiple disease areas. Emmes is a life science anchor company for the BHCR, employing more than 600 staff globally with its headquarters in Rockville, Maryland.

Under Kings leadership, GlycoMimetics (GMI), an oncology-focused biotech, went public, secured an exclusive global licensing agreement with Pfizer and was instrumental in raising significant amounts of capital for the company. She was also the first woman Chair of Biotechnology Innovation Associations (BIO, 2013-14), where she still plays an active role on BIOs Executive Committee.

A graduate of Dartmouth College and Harvard Business School, King has had a celebrated career in both biopharma and finance. Prior to becoming CEO of GMI, King served as an Executive in Residence for New Enterprise Associates (NEA), one of the leading venture capital firms in the U.S. She has also held the position of Senior Vice President of Novartis-Corporation. King joined Novartis after a remarkable ten year run with Genetic Therapy, Inc. where she was named CEO after helping Genetic Therapy navigate the organization through various growth stages, including the companys sale to Novartis. King was named the Maryland Tech Councils Executive of the Year in 2013, the Top 10 Women in Biotech by FierceBio and has served on multiple boards across her career.

Dr. Connolly has had a pioneering career in the life sciences. She was the very first woman to graduate from Johns Hopkins Universitys Biomedical Engineering Doctoral Program in 1980. She was also a member of the first female undergraduate class entering Stevens Institute of Technology in 1971.

For decades, Dr. Connolly tirelessly worked to build up what is now known as the BHCR. In 1997, shortly before the region gained wider recognition as a biotech hub, she was the first person to be designated the state of Marylands biotechnology representative. Dr. Connollys career has spanned academia, government, and industry, including co-founding a startup and working as the Business Development Director for EntreMed, Inc., an original BHCR anchor company. She is the former Director of Maryland Industrial Partnerships Program (MIPS) and was inducted into the College of Fellows by the American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering (AIMBE) in 2013.

Dr. Kirschstein played an enormous role in shaping the BHCR as NIH Deputy Director from 1993 to 1999 during the regions early formative years. She also served as Acting Director of NIH in 1993 and from 2000 to 2002. A pathologist by training, she received her medical degree from Tulane University in 1951 and went on to a long, successful career at the Division of Biologics Standards that lasted from 1957 to 1972.

While at the Division of Biologics Standards, Dr. Kirschstein played an important role in testing the safety of viral vaccines and helped select the Sabin polio vaccine for public use. She eventually ascended to Deputy Director of the group in 1972 and was later appointed the Deputy Associate Commissioner for Science at the FDA. In 1974 she became the Director of the National Institute of Medical Sciences at NIH and served in that role for 19 years.

Her awards and accolades are too numerous to list, but one notable honor came in 2000 when she received the Albert B. Sabin Heroes of Science Award from the Americans for Medical Progress Education Foundation.

Lastly, we want to recognize four additional women for their contributions to launching an organization that has impacted thousands of women by promoting careers, leadership, and entrepreneurship for women in the life sciences Women In Bio.

Women In Bio (WIB), one of the most important and influential support organizations for women in the life sciences, was founded in 2002 to help women entrepreneurs and executives in the Baltimore-Washington-Northern Virginia area build successful bioscience-related businesses. WIB started as a BHCR organization but has expanded its footprint to 13 chapters across the U.S. with 225 volunteer leaders and 2,600 members. The non-profit group has created a forum for female life science entrepreneurs and executives based on its core philosophy of women helping women.

WIB founders are Anne Mathias, a local venture capitalist and current Senior Strategist with Vanguard;

Elizabeth Gray, co-founder of Gabriel Pharma and current Partner at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP;

Robbie Melton, former Director of Entrepreneurial Innovation at TEDCO and current Director of Kauai County, Hawaiis Office of Economic Development;

and Cynthia W. Hu, COO, and General Counsel at CASI Pharmaceuticals.

In conclusion, we can not fairly capture the true history of life science and the BioHealth Capital Region without giving special recognition to Henrietta Lacks. In 1951 a Johns Hopkins researcher created the first immortal human cell line from cervical cancer cells taken from Lacks. That cell line, known as HeLa, is the oldest and most commonly used human cell line which was essential in developing the polio vaccine and has been used in scientific landmarks such as cloning, gene mapping and in vitro fertilization.

Though she was a black tobacco farmer from southern Virginia, her impact on science and medicine is unquestionable. She never knew that the Doctor took a piece of her tumor that would be used by scientists who had been trying to grow tissues in culture for decades without success. For some reason, that is still unknown, but her cells never died and the first immortal human cell line was born.

Thank you to all of the women who have been so influential in shaping the field of science, the industry of biotechnology and the BioHealth Capital Region.

Steve has over 20 years experience in copywriting, developing brand messaging and creating marketing strategies across a wide range of industries, including the biopharmaceutical, senior living, commercial real estate, IT and renewable energy sectors, among others. He is currently the Principal/Owner of StoryCore, a Frederick, Maryland-based content creation and execution consultancy focused on telling the unique stories of Maryland organizations.

Excerpt from:
Twelve Women Who Have Shaped The History of the BioHealth Capital Region - BioBuzz

Fact check: Were elderly Italians left to die? And is socialized health care to blame? – USA TODAY

The Associated Press visited a new intensive care ward in Brescia, one of the hardest-hit provinces in Lombardy. Dr. Sergio Cattaneo, the hospitals head of anesthesiology and intensive care, says hes seen many changes to fight the pandemic. (March 18) AP Domestic

Various claims thatItalians over the age of 80 would be "left to die" have surfaced within the past week on social media, with some posts saying the blame falls on Italy's socialized health care system.

Italy's COVID-19 fatality rate of 5% is higher than the global average of 3.5%. As the country's confirmed cases continue to surge, health officials are scrambling to find adequate resources.

Despite a countrywide lockdown,Italy reached a grave milestone this week when the country's death tollsurpassed China's as of March 19,3,405 people have died.

Italy has an older population,with a median age of 47.3, compared to 38.3 in the United States. Older populations are much more susceptible to complications from COVID-19, and many of the reported deaths in Italy have been people in their 80s and 90s.

The claims of Italy abandoning its elderly population began to surface following a report in the Telegraph about a document prepared by a crisis management unit in Turin, a northern Italiancity hit hard by the virus.

A man wearing a mask rides a scooter in Milan, Italy, March 11, 2020. Italy is mulling even tighter restrictions on daily life and has announced billions in financial relief to cushion economic shocks from the coronavirus. (Photo: Luca Bruno, AP)

The document seen by the Telegraph is a guideline for if and when it"becomes impossible to provide all patients with intensive care service,according to the news outlet, which did not publish a copy of it.

If the crisis reaches a point where health careaccess is too strained and needs to be limited, the document lays out plans for how to prioritize patients.

According to the Telegraph, the document's criteria for intensive therapy in emergency cases includes an age of less than 80 or a score of less than five on the Charlson Comorbidity Index, which indicates a patient's other medical conditions and mortality.

Luigi Icardi, a councilor for health in Piedmont, told the Telegraph that he never wantedthe crisis to reach this point, but that the document "will be binding and will establish, in the event of saturation of the wards, a precedence code for access to intensive care,based on certain parameters such as potential survival."

Italy surpasses China in deaths.(Photo: USA TODAY)

Despite the tentative guidelines in the document, it is not true that Italy as a whole has decided not to treat their elderly for the coronavirus.

The truth is, instead, that overwhelmed Italian health officials are planning for the worst, given the recent influx of cases and lack of available resources. If cases continue to surge, officials might be forced to prioritize care for those with "the best chance of success" and the "best hope of life."

The second part of theclaim that stemmed from the Telegraphreport blamed Italy's socialized health care for the lack of available resources and went viral on Facebook.

One person who posted that claim and saw it go viral, Gene Ballinger,did not respond to request for comment.

Throughout the pandemic, Italy's Prime Minister Giuseppe Contehas remained consistent on his health care promises for all Italians.

"We live in a system in which we guarantee health and the right of everyone to be cured. It's a foundation, a pillar, and I'd say a characteristic of our system of civilization," Conte said in a public statement on March 9. "And thus, we can't allow ourselves to let our guard down."

Health care officials in China were faced with a similar dilemma when the number of cases surpassed the capability of the existing treatment options. As hospitals in China became overwhelmed, patients were forced to wait extended periods of time for treatment.

In the U.S., health care is not socialized.But officials across the country are preparing to facethe same dilemma seen in Italy as cases continue to multiply and available resources deplete.

A new Harvard analysis reveals thathospitals throughout the United States will not have enough beds for patients if the virus continues to spread and capacity is not adequately expanded.

According to the analysis, in 40% of marketsaround the country, hospitals will not be able to make enough room for all patients who fall ill from the coronavirus.

Medical staff work at one of the emergency structures that were set up to ease procedures at the Brescia hospital in northern Italy, March 16, 2020.(Photo: Luca Bruno, AP)

This statistic reflects a "moderate" scenario by the analysis team's standards andassumes 40% of adults will become infected with the virus over the next 12 months.

These numbers are not exact and do not take into account various efforts from hospitals across the country including sending home patients with less critical conditions.

The global push for social distancing, self-isolation and self-quarantine is a preemptive effort to prevent overwhelming health care systems.

The longer the disease takes to spread, the more time hospitals have to accommodate patients. In the United States, officials are attempting to "flatten the curve" and not overwhelm the health care system by closing businesses and schools and canceling large events.

Blaming Italy's socialized health care system for the lack of availableresources doesn't hold up because nonsocialized health care systems, such as those in the United States, are facing similarshortages.

While some Italian health officials are planning for the worst, the health care prioritizationguidelines have not yet been implemented and are influenced bymultiple factors including age, preexisting conditions and available resources. As forthe second claim about socialized health care,Italy's system has become overwhelmed due to the sheer amount of cases and patients, not because of its design. We rate these claims as "false," based on our research.

However, should Italy implement its protocol that triages patients based on age and other conditions, we would change the rating of these claims to "partly false."

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/03/20/fact-check-were-italians-left-die-socialized-medicine-blame-coronavirus/2887743001/

Read the rest here:
Fact check: Were elderly Italians left to die? And is socialized health care to blame? - USA TODAY

Rapidly Progressing Neurocognitive Disorder in a Male with FXTAS and A | CIA – Dove Medical Press

Elber Yuksel Aydin, 1, 2 Andrea Schneider, 1, 3 Dragana Protic, 1, 4 Jun Yi Wang, 1, 5 Veronica Martnez-Cerdeo, 1, 6 Flora Tassone, 1, 7 Hiu-Tung Tang, 7 Susan Perlman, 8 Randi J Hagerman 1, 3

1Medical Investigation of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (MIND) Institute, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA; 2Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey; 3Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA; 4Department of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; 5Center for Mind and Brain, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA; 6Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Institute for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine and Shriners Hospital, Sacramento, CA, USA; 7Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA; 8Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Correspondence: Randi J HagermanMIND Institute UCDMC, 2825 50th Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USAEmail rjhagerman@ucdavis.edu

Abstract: Fragile Xassociated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) is a neurodegenerative disorder that usually begins in the early 60s and affects carriers of premutation expansion (55 200 CGG repeats) of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene. Additional disorders can co-occur with FXTAS including Alzheimers disease (AD). Here we discuss a case report of a male with 67 CGG repeats in FMR1 who had mild late-onset FXTAS symptoms followed by neurocognitive disorder symptoms consistent with AD. The patient has developed tremor and ataxia that are the two characteristic symptoms of FXTAS. In addition, he shows rapid cognitive decline, brain atrophy most substantial in the medial temporal lobe, and decreased metabolism in the brain regions that are the characteristic findings of AD. The purpose of this study is to describe a patient profile with both diseases and review the details of an overlap between these two diseases.

Keywords: FXTAS, Alzheimers disease, cognitive decline, neurocognitive disorder, premutation, neurogenetics

This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Excerpt from:
Rapidly Progressing Neurocognitive Disorder in a Male with FXTAS and A | CIA - Dove Medical Press

Hoth Initiates Preclinical Gene Therapy Program with NC State for the Treatment of Asthma and Allergic Inflammation – P&T Community

NEW YORK, Feb. 4, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --Hoth Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOTH), a biopharmaceutical company focused on unique targeted therapeutics for patients suffering from dermatological indications ranging from atopic dermatitis, psoriasis and acne along with gene therapy treatment for asthmatics, is pleased to announce the initiation of a preclinical study for the treatment of asthma and allergic inflammation in collaboration withNorth Carolina State University(NC State).

The study has begun thedelivery and distribution of nebulized particleswhich willenable the therapeutic oligonucleotide (oligo), short DNA and RNA molecules that have a wide range of applications in gene testing.Hoth has appointed Dr. Glenn Cruse to its Scientific Advisory Board and will oversee the Company's gene therapy programs advancements.

Mr.Robb Knie, Chief Executive Officer of Hoth Therapeutics, Inc. commented,"We are extremely pleased that our gene therapy program with NC State has officially begun and that Dr. Cruse who is overseeing the advancement ofexperimentshas joined our Scientific Advisory Board. Commencement of this initiative is an important step in the development and growth of our company. Dr. Cruse's expertise asa leading mast cell biologist in allergic and inflammatory diseases will be invaluable for the preclinical development of Splice-switching oligonucleotides (SSOs) for asthma."

In November 2019 Hoth entered into a licensing agreement with North Carolina State University (NC State) to study NC State's Exon Skipping Approach for Treating Allergic Diseases. This Exon Skipping Approach was developed by Dr. Glenn Cruse, Principal Investigator and Assistant Professor in the Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences at the NC State College of Veterinary Medicine. During Dr. Cruse's research, a new approach for the technique of antisense oligonucleotide-mediated exon skipping to specifically target and down-regulate IgE receptor expression in mast cells was identified. These findings set a breakthrough for allergic diseases as they are driven by the activation of mast cells and the release of mediators in response to IgE-directed antigens.

Glenn Cruse completed his Ph.D. at Glenfield Hospital, The University of Leicester, UK in 2009. He then moved to the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland in January 2010 to start a visiting postdoctoral fellowship in the Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, NIAID, In January 2015, Dr. Cruse was appointed as a Research Fellow in the same laboratory. Dr. Cruse joined the Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences at NC State in January 2016 as an Assistant Professor.

Dr. Cruse is a mast cell biologist that has authored and co-authored over 30 publications including articles in top journals such as the New England Journal of Medicine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA and Immunity. The Cruse lab is interested in the role that mast cells play in allergic and inflammatory diseases and identifying novel therapeutics that target mast cells. Since mast cells act as sentinel cells that participate in both innate and acquired immunity, particularly at biological barriers, emphasis on diseases in tissues at the interface with the environment such as the lung, skin, gastrointestinal tract and even the neuro-immune axis are the main focus of the lab.

About Hoth Therapeutics, Inc.Hoth Therapeutics, Inc. isa clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing new generation therapies for dermatological disorders. HOTH's pipeline has the potential to improve the quality of life for patients suffering from indications including atopic dermatitis, chronic wounds, psoriasis, asthma and acne. To learn more, please visitwww.hoththerapeutics.com.

Forward Looking StatementsThis press release includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements in this press release include, but are not limited to, statements that relate to the advancement and development of the BioLexa Platform, the commencement of clinical trials, the availability of data from clinical trials and other information that is not historical information. When used herein, words such as "anticipate", "being", "will", "plan", "may", "continue", and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements or information that refer to expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, performance or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking. All forward-looking statements are based upon Hoth's current expectations and various assumptions. Hoth believes there is a reasonable basis for its expectations and beliefs, but they are inherently uncertain. Hoth may not realize its expectations, and its beliefs may not prove correct. Actual results could differ materially from those described or implied by such forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, including, without limitation, market conditions and the factors described under the caption "Risk Factors" in Hoth's Form 10K for the period endingDecember 31, 2018, and Hoth's other filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Consequently, forward-looking statements should be regarded solely as Hoth's current plans, estimates and beliefs. Investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Hoth cannot guarantee future results, events, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Hoth does not undertake and specifically declines any obligation to update, republish, or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect new information, future events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrences of unanticipated events, except as may be required by law.

ContactsInvestor Relations Contact:Phone: (646) 756-2997Email:investorrelations@hoththerapeutics.comwww.hoththerapeutics.com

KCSA Strategic CommunicationsValter Pinto (212) 896-1254Hoth@kcsa.com

View original content to download multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hoth-initiates-preclinical-gene-therapy-program-with-nc-state-for-the-treatment-of-asthma-and-allergic-inflammation-300998521.html

SOURCE Hoth Therapeutics, Inc.

Here is the original post:
Hoth Initiates Preclinical Gene Therapy Program with NC State for the Treatment of Asthma and Allergic Inflammation - P&T Community

How one woman became the exception to her familys Alzheimers history – Science News

A cruel twist of genetic fate brought Alzheimers disease to a sprawling Colombian family. But thanks to a second twist, one member of the clan, a woman, managed to evade the symptoms for decades. Her escape may hold the key to halting, or even preventing, Alzheimers.

The inherited version of Alzheimers disease erodes peoples memories early, starting around age 40. In this family and others, a mutation in a gene called presenilin 1 eventually leaves its carriers profoundly confused and unable to care for themselves. Locals around the Colombian city of Medelln have a name for the condition: la bobera, or the foolishness.

The woman in the afflicted family who somehow fended off the disease carried the same mutation that usually guarantees dementia. And her brain was filled with plaques formed by a sticky protein called amyloid. Many scientists view that accumulation as one of the earliest signs of the disease. Yet she stayed sharp until her 70s.

Researchers were stumped, until they discovered that the woman also carried another, extremely rare genetic mutation that seemed to be protecting her from the effects of the first one. This second mutation, in a different Alzheimers-related gene called APOE, seemed to slow the disease down by decades, says Joseph Arboleda-Velasquez, a cell biologist at Harvard Medical School.

Headlines and summaries of the latest Science News articles, delivered to your inbox

There was this idea of inevitability, he says. But the womans circumstances bring a different perspective one in which amyloid buildup no longer guarantees problems. Arboleda-Velasquez and colleagues reported the details of the womans exceptional case November 4 in Nature Medicine, omitting the womans name and precise age to protect her privacy.

Although the discovery is based on one person, it points to a biological weak spot in the degenerative disease that affects an estimated 5.8 million people in the United States alone. So far, nearly every clinical trial designed to slow or stop the disease has failed. Those heartbreaking disappointments have prompted scientists to expand their search for treatments.

Perhaps this unusually resilient woman in Colombia shows a way to halt the disease, or at least slow it down. Can we come up with a drug that does this to people who dont have a mutation? asks Arboleda-Velasquez. The potential for that is tremendous.

The vast majority of people with Alzheimers have a sporadic form of the disease with no clear genetic culprit. These people often reach their 70s or 80s before signs of dementia appear. Mutations that cause trouble much earlier, such as the Paisa mutation found in the Colombian family, are unusual. But despite their different origins and different timelines, these two versions of Alzheimers are thought to progress in somewhat similar ways.

Normally, presenilin 1 makes a protein that helps chop up the long, sticky amyloid precursor protein. One of the resulting small bits is called amyloid-beta. Those smaller pieces are harmlessly washed out of the brain. The mutated presenilin 1 gene found in the Colombian family, however, creates a kink in the chopping process that leads to an abundance of a version of amyloid that knits itself into plaques between brain cells.

This pileup is already visible in brain scans of people in their 20s who carry the mutation. By their mid-40s, many of these people have trouble remembering; they typically develop full-blown dementia by age 50.

Inheriting just one copy of the mutation is enough to lead to excess amyloid, and ultimately dementia. The mutations powerful effect in this family is one of the strongest arguments for the fact that amyloid plays a critical role in Alzheimers, says immunologist and aging expert Richard J. Hodes, director of the National Institute on Aging in Bethesda, Md. Since taking on the role in 1993, Hodes has helped set the course for U.S.-funded Alzheimers research, allocating support for promising projects, including studies happening in Colombia.

The Colombian family, 5,000 members strong, includes an estimated 1,000 or so people who carry the Paisa mutation in the presenilin 1 gene. Their involvement in the research has been invaluable. Access to hundreds of people known to be at high risk for the disease allows scientists to study how Alzheimers unfolds, particularly at its earliest stages, and has led to reports of early signs of Alzheimers, both in the brain and the blood. Family members have gone to great lengths to help, walking or taking a bicycle to the nearest bus stop, and then taking a bus to a train, for many hours, to come to the clinic, Hodes says.

During Hodes recent visit to the Medelln area, a resident told him how the disease is just a part of their lives: If I have the disease, I know that my family, my brother and my sister, will take care of me. And if I dont, I will take care of them.

When Colombian researchers learned of the woman who stayed sharp until her 70s, they arranged for her to travel to Boston in the summer of 2016, accompanied by family members and a research assistant. There, neuroimaging researcher Yakeel T. Quiroz and her colleagues used brain scans to measure levels of amyloid and other markers of brain health, including another Alzheimers-related protein called tau, which can tangle up inside nerve cells.

Those scans revealed a brain loaded with amyloid, says Quiroz, of Harvard Medical School. This woman had most likely been accumulating amyloid for decades. On a scale commonly used to quantify amyloid in the brain, she scored 1.96, well above the threshold of 1.2 that signifies extensive amyloid buildup. Her score was, pretty much the highest that we have seen in anybody we have scanned so far, Quiroz says.

Genetic analyses revealed that the woman had whats called the Christchurch mutation in both copies of her APOE gene. Further tests suggested that this mutation, named for the New Zealand city where it was first found, was shielding her from the disease. The fact that the woman had huge amounts of amyloid in her brain, yet didnt seem impaired until her 70s, is extremely surprising, interesting, provocative and potentially very, very informative, Hodes says.

Scientists need to do more work to confirm that the APOE Christchurch mutation protected her brain. Still, the results reveal a simple truth, Hodes says. Amyloid itself is not necessarily sufficient to cause dementia.

Studies outside of the Colombian family also make clear that amyloid isnt the whole story. Other cellular actors contribute to the death of nerve cells and memory loss that Alzheimers brings. Nerve cellclogging tangles of tau and other signs of brain illness are tightly linked to brain decline, research from many studies has shown. Thats reflected in observations from a study of 480 people age 60 and older who live around Rochester, Minn.

These people, none of whom showed signs of dementia, were randomly chosen to be invited into the study, an unbiased selection that offered researchers a glimpse of brain health in the wider population.

To find out which brain changes best predict future memory loss, neuroradiologist Clifford R. Jack Jr. of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester and colleagues tested volunteers memory performance while measuring their amyloid levels and other brain signals. Amyloid seemed to be closely involved in memory decline over about five years but only in the right context, the team reported in June 2019 in JAMA.

Without either of two other troublesome markers tau tangles or brain shrinkage amyloid didnt predict memory loss. In other words, amyloid might be setting up the shot, but then it passes the ball.

Amyloid in the head is the first stage of what will ultimately lead to full-blown Alzheimers disease, Jack says. But there can be a lot of time between that early stage of amyloid accumulation and the development of symptoms.

Among the Colombian family members, that interval lasts around 10 to 15 years. The same is roughly true for people with the sporadic form of Alzheimers. But for the woman described in the report in Nature Medicine, that lag seemed twice as long.

That suggests that at least its possible to live with amyloid not just for 15 years, but for many decades, says Paul Aisen, director of the University of Southern Californias Alzheimers Therapeutic Research Institute in San Diego. Living healthy longer: Thats very exciting.

The protective effect of the womans mutation seems to come from an extremely specific change. In the Christchurch variant, a single spot in the APOE gene is tweaked. The resulting protein has a serine amino acid swapped in for the standard arginine.

The swap prevents the APOE protein from binding to some sugar-dotted proteins called heparan sulfate proteoglycans, or HSPGs, experiments on the isolated proteins revealed. Earlier studies showed that HSPGs may promote amyloid accumulation and nudge nerve cells to slurp up more toxic tau.

But to misbehave, HSPGs might need to partner with the APOE protein. The Christchurch mutation could have protected the womans brain by scrambling that nefarious relationship, the researchers suspect. Without that specific connection between APOE and HSPGs, the disease process gets stalled, Arboleda-Velasquez says. This really puts a block on the cascade of events.

Fleshing out the APOE proteins normal biological cascade, and how that changes with the Christchurch mutation, is going to allow for much more finely targeted drug development, says Aisen, who also works as a consultant for Biogen, a biotechnology company in Cambridge, Mass. The company is developing an amyloid-targeting drug called aducanumab and is expected to apply for approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration this year (SN: 1/18/20, p. 8).

As one of the strongest genetic risk factors for dementia, the APOE gene has long been scrutinized as a possible target for Alzheimers drugs. People who carry a version of the gene called APOE4 have a higher risk of Alzheimers.

The APOE2 version dramatically lowers the risk, Quiroz, Arboleda-Velasquez and colleagues report in preliminary research posted online November 2 at medRxiv.org. APOE3 usually brings an average risk of Alzheimers, with the notable exception of the version with the Christchurch mutation carried by the Colombian woman.

In the general population, old age is the biggest risk factor for Alzheimers. As the number of older people balloons, so too will the number of people with dementia. By 2050, an estimated 13.8 million people in the United States will have Alzheimers. Worldwide, an estimated 50 million people have dementia; Alzheimers accounts for the bulk of those cases.

The family in Colombia continues to help. A clinical trial testing a drug that is designed to lower amyloid is under way in Colombia. People who have the Paisa mutation but have not shown Alzheimers symptoms, as well as people without the mutation, are receiving the drug. The drug, crenezumab, is an antibody thats thought to mark amyloid for destruction by immune cells. Its being developed by Roche/Genentech.

Quiroz and her colleagues also plan to follow the Colombian woman and other members of the family over time, as part of a research exchange between Fundacin Universidad de Antioquia in Medelln, which has led the studies on this family, and Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

Each month, the project, called COLBOS, for Colombia-Boston, flies a new group of about five adult participants to Boston for extensive evaluation, including thinking and memory tests, brain scans and measurements of smelling ability, fitness and music perception. Participants being studied in Colombia are as young as 9 years old.

The project may yield insights about how Alzheimers takes hold early on. But in a way, the initial trigger might not even matter. It could be that the cause or more likely, causes of Alzheimers might ultimately be poor targets for drugs, Arboleda-Velasquez says.

People with loved ones suffering from Alzheimers, including the Colombian family, dont necessarily care what causes the disease, Quiroz says. They are more interested in seeing if there is anything that can help them to get better. Thats what the patients and families are waiting for.

Continued here:
How one woman became the exception to her familys Alzheimers history - Science News

Akouos Announces New Data at the Association for Research in Otolaryngology Midwinter Meeting – Business Wire

BOSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Akouos, a precision genetic medicine company developing gene therapies to potentially improve and preserve hearing, announced today that data from its inner ear gene therapy platform will be presented during the 43rd Annual Midwinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology (ARO), being held January 25 to January 29, 2020 in San Jose, CA.

Akouos continues to advance our platform for inner ear disorders, and we are excited to share our progress with the scientific community, said Greg Robinson, Ph.D., chief scientific officer of Akouos. The data presented at ARO further substantiates Akouoss use of AAVAnc80 vector technology and its potential to address many forms of hearing loss.

SYMPOSIUM

Title: The Adeno-associated Viral Anc80 (AAVAnc80) Vector - Precision Genetic Medicines to Address Hearing LossPresenter: Michelle Valero, Ph.D., Director, Anatomy & Physiology, AkouosSession: Symposium 11Date and Time: Saturday, January 25, 3 p.m. (PST)

POSTER PRESENTATIONS

Title: The Adeno-associated Viral Anc80 Vector Efficiently Transduces Inner Ear Cells in Olive Baboons (Papio anubis)Day and Time: Monday, January 27, 1 p.m. (PST)

Title: The Adeno-associated Viral Anc80 Vector Efficiently Transduces Inner Ear Cells in Cynomolgus Macaques (Macaca fascicularis)Day and Time: Monday, January 27, 1 p.m. (PST)

Title: Dual Adeno-associated Viral Anc80 Vector Efficiently Transduces Inner Ear Cells in Non-human PrimatesDay and Time: Monday, January 27, 1 p.m. (PST)

About Akouos

Akouos is a precision genetic medicine company dedicated to developing gene therapies with the potential to improve and preserve hearing. Leveraging its adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector-based gene therapy platform, Akouos is focused on developing precision therapies for forms of sensorineural hearing loss. Headquartered in Boston, the Company was founded in 2016 by world leaders in the fields of neurotology, genetics, inner ear drug delivery, and AAV gene therapy. Akouos has strategic partnerships with Massachusetts Eye and Ear and Lonza, Inc. For more information, please visit http://www.akouos.com.

About AAVAnc Technology

Ancestral AAV (AAVAnc) technology was developed in the laboratory of Luk Vandenberghe, Ph.D., Director of the Grousbeck Gene Therapy Center at Harvard Medical School. AAVAnc technology uses computational and evolutionary methods to predict novel conformations of the adeno-associated viral particle. AAVAnc80, one of 40,000 AAVAnc vectors, has demonstrated preliminary safety and effective gene delivery in both mice and non-human primates in numerous preclinical studies.

Read more here:
Akouos Announces New Data at the Association for Research in Otolaryngology Midwinter Meeting - Business Wire