Global CRISPR And CRISPR-Associated Genes Market Insights 2019 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Editas Medicine, Caribou Biosciences, CRISPR therapeutics,…

Apex Market Research provides market research reports from more than four years. Here we have issued the research report on Global CRISPR And CRISPR-Associated Genes Market Market. The report shows the all leading market players profiles. The report represents the full market analysis of the CRISPR And CRISPR-Associated Genes market with SWOT analysis, fiscal status, present development, acquisitions, and mergers. The CRISPR And CRISPR-Associated Genes market report represents the major challenges and newer opportunities. In-depth the newer growth tactics influenced by the industry manufactures the shows the international competitive scale of this market sector. The report gives the closer views to the global vendors to understand the CRISPR And CRISPR-Associated Genes market trends and meanwhile, generate important tactical actions to boost their business. The report investigates industry growth and risk factors as well as keep updates regarding development task happening in the globe market.

Get Sample PDF for More Professional and Technical Insights at: https://www.apexmarketreports.com/Life-Science/global-crispr-and-crispr-associated-genes-market-by-451326#sample

Major Industry Player Profiles That Included by CRISPR And CRISPR-Associated Genes Market Research Report:

Thermo Fisher ScientificEditas MedicineCaribou BiosciencesCRISPR therapeuticsIntellia therapeutics, Inc.CellectisHorizon Discovery PlcSigma AldrichPrecision BiosciencesGenscriptSangamo Biosciences Inc.Lonza Group LimitedIntegrated DNA TechnologiesNew England BiolabsOrigene Technologies

Detailed view of CRISPR And CRISPR-Associated Genes Market:

For staying consistent in businesses and new initiate in the market, it is very essential to have a complete structure of the market holder. While thinking about this factor, the analysts provide a detailed view of the competitive strategies and landscape accepted by the principal players. The major feature of the market covered in this CRISPR And CRISPR-Associated Genes market report focused on opportunities, restraints, obstructions, global and regional distribution, market driving factors, and growth limiting factors.

The CRISPR And CRISPR-Associated Genes market report provides detailed data to mentor industry players while forming important business decisions. To provide this the report has used different analytical tools and procedures. In an aggressive market landscape, the report concentrate on every players detailed profile along with their product details, capacity, price, revenue, gross and contact information. CRISPR And CRISPR-Associated Genes market report consumes the production, import and export forecast by type, applications, and region with uniquely generated graph by our research team.

Market Type,

Genome EditingGenetic engineeringGRNA Database/Gene LibrarCRISPR PlasmidHuman Stem CellsGenetically Modified Organisms/CropsCell Line Engineering

Market Application,

Biotechnology CompaniesPharmaceutical CompaniesAcademic InstitutesResearch and Development Institutes

Customize Report And Inquiry For The CRISPR And CRISPR-Associated Genes Market Report: https://www.apexmarketreports.com/Life-Science/global-crispr-and-crispr-associated-genes-market-by-451326#inquiry

Regional Segmentation:

The report focuses on regional segmentation to assist clients to understand region-wise analysis of CRISPR And CRISPR-Associated Genes market report. The report includes the case study of the top producers and consumers, focuses on product capacity, production, value, consumption, market share and growth opportunity in these key regions, covering North America (United States, Canada and Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia), South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia etc.), Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa.

Key Objectives of This Report:

To redeem complete information to entrepreneurs about future products and technologies to be introduced in the market.To deliver access to unique information about top players of the Automotive Tyre market.The report focuses on feature about long-term and short-term strategies adopted by major players of the market along with their key developments.The report provides a country-wise analysis of the market helps to understand the market more precisely.To offer demand and growth trends of the market and segregation into segments.

See the original post here:
Global CRISPR And CRISPR-Associated Genes Market Insights 2019 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Editas Medicine, Caribou Biosciences, CRISPR therapeutics,...

Next generation cell and gene therapies: fine tuning the promise – Business Weekly

On 19 November, the UK BioBeat19 summit goes to Stevenage to discuss the potential of cell and gene therapy and how to accelerate these transformational medicines.

Victoria Higgins of GSK and Miranda Weston-Smith from BioBeat spoke to two panellists who gave a sneak peek of their remarks and agree wholeheartedly that the discovery side and clinical side work best when they are teamed up.

Sophie Papa, an oncologist at Guys Cancer at Guys and St Thomas NHS Trust, and Aisha Hasan, a clinical development lead at GSK, both recognise the big challenge ahead for cell therapy researchers: to dial up efficacy and dial down toxicity.

Cell and gene therapies, with their remarkable potential to transform medicine, have seen some important but hard-won milestones: it took 20 years of combined academic and industry research to deliver the first gene therapy approval in 2016 and today there are two CAR-Ts approved for haematological malignancies.

Whilst CAR-Ts recognise proteins expressed on the tumour cell surface, making them ideal for targeting blood cancers, more complicated but with greater potential to address solid tumours are the gene modified TCR-T technologies.

These harness the power of T cells to specifically target and destroy tumours even on the inside of cells. TCR-Ts come with an additional level of complexity, but potentially open the door to a range of untreatable cancer types.

Looking at the TCR opportunity is where Sophie Papa sees the inherent trade-off between risk and benefit as an academic clinician whos now evaluating modified T-cell based therapies in clinical trials.

Sophie urges her peers to take courage. It is important to be brave and tolerant of certain toxicities. Academic clinicians and drug researchers need to work closely together to engage the regulators in early discussion, so that we can move cell therapies earlier in treatment schedules as soon as feasible.

Timing is critical to enable patients to be treated when they are physically fit so they can better tolerate these complex and potentially toxic treatments.

From her perspective, this is not an either/or, but an area where discussion and open dialogue will allow us to make the most of the opportunity. By allowing clinical academics to play a lead role in developing guidelines to manage patient safety, we can address legitimate concerns but not let them stand in the way of clinical development, she says.

Aisha brings the perspective of drug discovery and development and starts by asking what is in the realm of the possible from a design perspective.

She says: A superior T-cell therapy will require engineering approaches that enhance efficacy on one-end while also incorporating switches to minimise toxicity.

For example, in a counter-intuitive way, a T-cell with high-killing capacity actually can create dangerous levels of inflammation in the body, due to the rapid death of cancer cells. But the beauty of drug design opens up options:By building a switch within the engineered T-cells, researchers can inactivate the T-cells and prevent harm to the patient, says Aisha.

But this creative problem solving requires open dialogue between clinicians and pharma. Aisha says: The more we talk about clinical need and toxicity benchmarks, the more sophisticated we can be when developing the next generation of enhanced engineered cell therapies.

Theres no doubt that the challenges of delivering cell and gene therapy span the full spectrum of issues related to medicine development. However, the potential for both curative therapy and commercial opportunity is tremendous.

The scientific, clinical, technical, regulatory and commercial challenges are all surmountable when everyone in the ecosystem work together towards a shared goal, united by an unwavering focus on the patient.

Sophie and Aisha are speaking about the translational journey from science to bedside at the BioBeat19 summit.

The BioBeat19 summit on Accelerating cell and gene therapy, 1-6pm, Tuesday 19 November, GSK Stevenage. Guarantee your place by registering at http://www.biobeat19.org

See the article here:
Next generation cell and gene therapies: fine tuning the promise - Business Weekly

Novartis’ Zolgensma gene therapy study halted on animal safety concerns – STAT

The Food and Drug Administration has halted a clinical trial of Novartis Zolgensma gene therapy due to a safety concern found in an animal study, the company said Wednesday.

The hold affects the Novartis (NVS) clinical trial known as STRONG, which was testing a higher dose of Zolgensma administered by spinal injection to older children with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). It does not affect the already approved treatment of infants and children.

Novartis said its subsidiary AveXis informed regulators about findings from an animal study that showed dorsal root ganglia (DRG) mononuclear cell inflammation, sometimes accompanied by neuronal cell body degeneration or loss. The clinical significance of this adverse safety signal is not known, but it can be associated with sensory effects, the company added.

advertisement

Halting the STRONG clinical trial is a setback for Novartis effort to expand the use of Zolgensma to older patients with SMA. Biogens Spinraza treatment is already approved for older SMA patients. Roche (RHHBY) is expected to secure approval of its own SMA treatment next year.

Novartis said it has seen no reports of sensory effects in patients and is working with the FDA to resolve safety concerns and resume dosing of Zolgensma in the clinical trial.

The FDAs action on Wednesday follows a controversy involving manipulation of data used to support Zolgensmas approval. In an unusual rebuke, the agency said in August that AveXis knew that preclinical data had been falsified before the drug was approved in May, but did not inform the agency until later. The agency said that the drug should stay on the market, but the scandal sparked anger from lawmakers and a pledge from Novartiss CEO, Vas Narasimhan, to move more quickly on disclosing issues around data integrity.

Zolgensma carries a price tag of $2.1 million, making it the worlds most expensive medicine. Earlier this month, Novartis said the gene therapy had been used to treat 100 patients since its launch and brought in $160 million in the third quarter, beating analysts expectations.

Visit link:
Novartis' Zolgensma gene therapy study halted on animal safety concerns - STAT

CRISPR editing is advancing precision medicine, this time …

Scientists from Boston University School of Medicine and Klogene Therapeutics have made precision medicine news this week by showing efficient transcriptional activation of the anti-aging multifunctional gene Klotho by CRISPR-dCas9, as reported in a paper published today in the "Journal of Molecular Neuroscience."

CRISPR is a gene editing tool first introduced six years ago. It works like a pair of scissors that can cut DNA, inserting or reordering bits of genetic code. Currently, it is being used in cancer treatment clinical trials. Scientists expect more clinical trials in the next five years.

[Also:New CRISPR version could make precision medicine even more precise]

Klotho is a naturally occurring pleiotropic human protein that has been shown to have potential therapeutic effects in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's as well as multiple sclerosis, kidney disease, certain cancers and others. Higher levels of Klotho are associated with longevity and improved cognitive functions.

"We are excited to be the first to demonstrate feasibility of CRISPR-based Klotho gene regulation using single-guided RNA, targeting the promoter region," said Cidi Chen, MD, senior research scientist at Klogene and a research associate professor at Boston University School of Medicine.

[Also:Regenerative medicine, gene editing markets are growing]

Klogene has assembled a team with skills in small molecule drug development, gene therapy, genome editing and biologics and is applying all of these capabilities, and its technologies, to the company's mission of curing debilitating diseases by enhancing the expression of the Klotho gene, said Menachem Abraham, founder, chairman and CEO of Klogene which has signed a number of research agreements with academic institutions and a small biotech firm.

"We have active collaborations, including pre-clinical studies in disease models, in Europe, Israel and the United States," Abraham said. "In addition to our own lab, on the Boston University School of Medicine campus, we make extensive use of contract research organizations, leading academic laboratories in our field, as well as other focused biotech startups."

Twitter:@SiwickiHealthITEmail the writer: bill.siwicki@himssmedia.com

Read more from the original source:
CRISPR editing is advancing precision medicine, this time ...

We’ve Already Got Socialized Medicine – Scientific American (blog)

On July 12, an FDA panel recommended approval of the first genetically engineered T cell for commercial sale to treat childhood leukemia, a blood cancer. The biologic could cost $300,000 per patient, leaving questions of whether some insurance companies will pay for it. Such cancer therapies can run into sizable costs for patient follow-ups. But, in the coming years, engineered T cells will be in high demand, even more so if they can be applied to solid tumors.

The Trump administration keeps threatening to repeal the Affordable Care Act, which suggests new inequalities to health care access. This will only be made worse by expensive new drugs, which test the limits of insurance reimbursement. However, even a single-payer system is unlikely to help to ensure access to such staggeringly expensive biologics. For instance, the National Health Services in Britain will be hard pressed to reimburse for six-figure biologics. If so, the only ethical action would be to use the power of the state to force down the cost of such cancer drugs.

A conservative argument against socialized medicine is based on the tragic vision of human nature, which suggests that people are guided by innate self-interests, and that societyand, by implication, biotechrequires constraint through moral and legal checks. The reality is that many of us do harbor a genetic variant that predicts a rare genetic disorder, or cancer, and we certainly cant afford to correct every anomaly in nature. However, a counter-position is that we are already participating in socialized medicine through funding the National Institutes of Health, which subsidizes the risk and cost of investigating drug targets and tools, not to mention results in generous salaries for many scientists.

In 2004, Noam Chomsky noted that Eisenhowers military-industrial complex was a misnomer, arguing that the actual purpose of taxpayer support is to boost economic prospects for investors, including those at life science companies. If you walk around MIT today, around Kendall Square, you see small biotech companies, spin-offs of government-sponsored research in what will be the cutting edge of the economy, namely, biology-based industries.

If you looked around 40 years ago (then to the newly developing Route 128 corridor), you would have seen small electronics firms, spin-offs of what was then the cutting edge of the economy, electronics, under military cover. So Eisenhowers military-industrial complex is not quite what is generally interpreted. In part, yes, its military. But a main function of the military, or the National Institutes of Health, or the rest of the federal system, is to provide some device to socialize costs, get the public to pay the costs, to take the risks. Ultimately, if anything comes out, you put it into private pockets.

That cancer patients should be criticized for depending on socialized medicine on the consumer end conceals the fact that scientists depend on taxpayers to subsidize their careers, while developing many of the technologies in academic settings and then profiteering them out. The high profile patent battle over CRISPR gene editing system was one of these situations, which resulted in a mix of philanthropic and public money paying for the invention of a technology that is now enrapt in a web of financial dealings not to mention bitter rivalries. Editas Medicine, a spinout of Harvard and MITs Broad Institute, which claims exclusive rights to medical applications of CRISPR-Cas9, signed a highly profitable $737 million deal with cancer T-cell company Juno Therapeutics.

If we are already participating in socialized medicine, the only tragedy will be if the socialism stops on the consumer side. One suggestion I have made previously is to no longer fund academic scientists and their partners who have established a strong foothold in the economy. Novartis (the company with the cancer biologic expected to price up to $300,000, compared with the $25,000 cost to actually manufacture it) recently completed a$600 million campus in Cambridge. The Broad Institute is seeded with $1.4 billion in wealth. The state of the union of life science is strong. If cutting taxpayer subsidies to scientists is too sensitive an idea, then we can use the power of the state to contain the costs of biologics, which we effectively subsidize.

A drug price fairness initiative is on the ballot in Ohio, and would enable public payers such as Medicaid to pay 20 percent under market price; transparency laws, established in Vermont make the costs of drugs clear; indeed, we may even cap the cost of biologics by executive order.

Entrepreneurial scientists are moving ahead with some exciting work on making use of CRISPR to disable genes in our T cells, which could prevent cancer cells from shutting down an immune response, and by adding bits of code to our immune cells to enable them to attach to abnormal protein fragments on solid tumors. If we take a tragic view of nature, these drugs will be priced as high as the market will allow. We can use the power of the state to change that.

Read the original post:
We've Already Got Socialized Medicine - Scientific American (blog)

In a first, scientists rid human embryos of a potentially fatal gene … – Los Angeles Times

Using a powerful gene-editing technique, scientists have rid human embryos of a mutation responsible for an inherited form of heart disease thats often deadly to healthy young athletes and adults in their prime.

The experiment marks the first time that scientists have altered the human genome to erase a disease-causing mutation not only from the DNA of the primary subject but from the genes of his or her progeny as well.

The controversial procedure, known as germ-line editing, was conducted at Oregon Health and Science University in Portland using human embryos expressly created for the purpose. It was reported Wednesday in the journal Nature.

Scientists ultimate goal is to fix gene mutations that lead to debilitating or fatal diseases, and to prevent the propagation of those mutations to future generations. Study leader Shoukhrat Mitalipov, a biologist at OHSU, said the new findings might correct genetic variants that can cause breast and ovarian cancer, cystic fibrosis and muscular dystrophy in those who inherit them.

But others fret that the technique may be used for less noble purposes, such as creating designer babies with desired traits like green eyes, an athletic build or an aptitude for mathematics.

In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration currently forbids any use of germ-line editing outside of a research setting.

But recent history has shown that people who want access to such techniques can find people willing to perform them in venues where theyre able to do so, said Jeffrey Kahn, who directs Johns Hopkins Universitys Berman Institute of Bioethics.

It will happen whether we discuss it or not, and we need to talk about these things before they happen, said Kahn. Thats now.

The new research comes less than six months after the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine recommended that scientists limit their trials of human germ-line editing to diseases that could not be treated with reasonable alternatives at least for the time being.

In a bid to make the experiment relevant to the real-life problems faced by parents who carry disease-causing mutations, the researchers focused on a gene variant that causes inherited hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

In this condition, a parent who carries one normal and one mutated copy of the MYBPC3 gene has a 50-50 chance of passing the faulty copy on to his or her offspring. If the child inherits the mutation, his or her heart muscle is likely to grow prematurely weak and stiff, causing heart failure and often early death.

In diseases in which one parent carries a gene like this, a couple will often seek the assistance of fertility doctors to minimize the risk of passing the mutation on to a child. A womans eggs and mans sperm meet in a lab using in vitro fertilization. Then specialists inspect the resulting embryos, cull the ones that have inherited an unwanted mutation, and transfer unaffected embryos into a womans uterus to be carried to term.

In the new research, researchers set out to test whether germ-line gene editing could make the process of choosing healthy embryos more effective and efficient by creating more of them.

It could. The targeted correction of a disease-causing gene carried by a single parent can potentially rescue a substantial portion of mutant human embryos, thus increasing the number of embryos available for transfer, the study authors reported.

The fix was made possible by a system known as CRISPR-Cas9, which has been sweeping through biology labs because it greatly simplifies the gene-editing process. It uses a small piece of RNA and an enzyme to snip out unwanted DNA and, if desired, replace it with something better.

If the process is found to be safe for use in fertility clinics, it could potentially decrease the number of cycles needed for people trying to have children free of genetic disease, said Dr. Paula Amato, a coauthor and professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Oregon Health and Science University.

The team encountered several scientific surprises along the way. Long-feared effects of germ-line editing, including collateral damage to off-target genetic sequences, scarcely materialized. And mosaicism, a phenomenon in which edited DNA appears in some but not all cells, was found to be minimal.

Mitalipov called these exciting and surprising moments. But he cautioned that there is room to improve the techniques for producing mutation-free embryos. Clinical trials would have to wait until the DNA editing showed a near-perfect level of efficiency and accuracy, he said, and could be limited by state and federal regulations.

There is still a long road ahead, said Mitalipov, who heads the Center for Embryonic Cell and Gene Therapy at OHSU.

Oregon Health & Science University

Human embryos developing into blastocysts after being injected with a gene-correcting enzyme and sperm carrying a mutation for a potentially fatal disease of the heart muscle.

Human embryos developing into blastocysts after being injected with a gene-correcting enzyme and sperm carrying a mutation for a potentially fatal disease of the heart muscle. (Oregon Health & Science University)

Oregon Health & Science University

Individual blastomeres within the early embryos two days after the co-injection. Each new cell in the developing embryos was uniformly free of the disease-causing mutation.

Individual blastomeres within the early embryos two days after the co-injection. Each new cell in the developing embryos was uniformly free of the disease-causing mutation. (Oregon Health & Science University)

Biologists, fertility doctors and ethicists have long anticipated that scientists would one day manipulate the DNA of human embryos. Now that the milestone has been reached, it drew a mix of praise and concern from experts in genetic medicine.

Dr. Richard O. Hynes, who co-chaired the National Academies report issued in February, called the new study very good science that advances the understanding of genetic repair on many fronts. Hynes, who was not involved with the research effort, said he was pleasantly surprised by the Oregon-based teams clever modifications and their outcomes.

Its likely to become feasible, technically not tomorrow, not next year, but in some foreseeable time. Less than a decade, Id say, said Hynes, a biologist and cancer researcher at MIT and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

UC Berkeley molecular and cell biologist Jennifer Doudna, one of pioneers of the CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing system, said the new research highlights a prospective use of gene editing for one inherited disease and offers some insights into the process. But she questioned how broadly the experiments results would apply to other inherited diseases.

Doudna also said she does not believe using germ-line editing to improve efficiency at fertility clinics meets the criteria laid out by the National Academies of Sciences, which urged that the technology be explored only in cases in which its needed essentially as a last resort.

Already, 50% of embryos would be normal, she said. Why not just implant those?

Doudna said she feared that the new findings will encourage people to proceed down this road before the scientific and ethical implications of germ-line editing have been fully considered.

A large group of experts concluded that clinical use should not proceed until and unless theres broad societal consensus, and that just hasnt happened, she said. This study underscores the urgency of having those debates. Because its coming.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff/Oregon Health & Science University

Study leader Shoukhrat Mitalipov with coauthors Hong Ma, left, and Nuria Marti-Gutierrez.

Study leader Shoukhrat Mitalipov with coauthors Hong Ma, left, and Nuria Marti-Gutierrez. (Kristyna Wentz-Graff/Oregon Health & Science University)

The study authors a multinational team of geneticists, cardiologists, fertility experts and embryologists from OHSU, the Salk Institute in La Jolla, and labs in South Korea and China tested a number of innovations in an effort to improve the safety, efficiency and fidelity of gene editing. And most yielded promising results.

After retrieving eggs from 12 healthy female volunteers, the researchers simultaneously performed two steps that had never been combined in a lab: fertilizing the eggs with sperm and introducing the CRISPR-Cas9 repair machinery.

The resulting embryos took up the gene-editing program so efficiently and uniformly that, after five days of incubation, 72.4% of the 58 embryos tested were free of the MYBPC3 mutation. By comparison, when there was no attempt at gene editing, just 47.4% of embryos were free of the mutation responsible for the deadly heart condition.

The researchers believe their method prompted the embryos to rely on the healthy maternal copy of the gene as a model for fixing the MYBPC3 mutation, and not a repair template that used DNA from the sperm donors normal version of the gene. Only one of the 42 embryos used the introduced template for repair. The scientists contrasted this process to stem cells, which do use repair templates.

The embryos cells divided normally as they matured to the blastocyst stage, the point at which they would usually be ready for transfer to a womans uterus. After extensive testing, the embryos were used to make embryonic stem-cell lines, which are stored in liquid nitrogen and can be used in future research.

Researchers also noted that genetic mosaicism a concern raised by earlier experiments in gene-editing was virtually absent from 41 of the 42 embryos that were free of the disease-causing mutation.

MITs Hynes said such findings offer important insights into how human embryos grow, develop and respond to anomalies, and will help families facing infertility and inherited illnesses.

Human embryogenesis is clearly different from that of a mouse, which we know a lot about, Hynes said. That needs to be studied in human embryos, and theres no other way to do it.

At the same time, he downplayed fears that embryologists would soon tinker with such attributes as looks, personality traits and intelligence in human children.

Were not looking at designed babies around the corner not for a long time, he said.

melissa.healy@latimes.com

@LATMelissaHealy

MORE IN SCIENCE

The DNA of ancient Canaanites lives on in modern-day Lebanese, genetic analysis shows

You can predict how many blacks are killed by police by measuring the racism of whites, research finds

Is it Alzheimers or another dementia form? Why doctors need to distinguish and how they might do so

UPDATES:

3:50 p.m.: This story has been updated with comments from Jeffrey Kahn of Johns Hopkins Universitys Berman Institute of Bioethics.

This story was originally published at 10 a.m.

Excerpt from:
In a first, scientists rid human embryos of a potentially fatal gene ... - Los Angeles Times

Gene editing fixes harmful mutation in human embryos – CBS News

WASHINGTON -- For the first time, researchers in the U.S. have safely repaired a disease-causing gene in human embryos, targeting a heart defect best known for killing young athletes a big step toward one day preventing a list of inherited diseases. The breakthrough is also prompting debate about the ethics of altering DNA for generations to come.

Scientists from Oregon Health and & Science University used the gene-editing tool CRISPR to target the mutation that causes hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, a common genetic heart disease that can cause sudden cardiac death and heart failure.

The research, published in the journal Nature, demonstrates a new method of fixing a disease-causing mutation and preventing it from being passed down to future generations.

"Every generation on would carry this repair because we've removed the disease-causing gene variant from that family's lineage," senior author Shoukhrat Mitalipov, Ph.D., who directs the Center for Embryonic Cell and Gene Therapy at OHSU in Portland, Oregon, said in a statement. "By using this technique, it's possible to reduce the burden of this heritable disease on the family and eventually the human population."

The successful experiment involved altering defective embryos in a lab; they were not implanted or allowed to develop.

This type of gene editing technology is already used every day in fields ranging from agriculture to drug development. The tools enable scientists to alter the DNA of living cells from plants, animals, and now, potentially, even humans more precisely than ever before. Think of it as a biological cut-and-paste program. Here is a closer look at the science.

While scientists have long been able to find defective genes, fixing them has been so cumbersome that it's slowed development of genetic therapies. There are several gene editing methods, but a tool called CRISPR-Cas9 has sparked a boom in research as laboratories worldwide adopted it over the past five years because it's faster, cheaper, simple to use with minimal training and allows manipulation of multiple genes at the same time.

Pieces of RNA are engineered to be a guide that homes in on the targeted stretch of genetic material. The Cas9 is an enzyme that acts like molecular scissors to snip that spot. That allows scientists to delete, repair, or replace a particular gene.

The fresh attention comes from research involving human embryos. In laboratory experiments, a team lead by Oregon researchers used CRISPR to successfully repair a heart-damaging gene in human embryos, marking a step toward one day being able to prevent inherited diseases from being passed on to the next generation. But there's wide agreement that more research is needed before ever testing the technique in pregnancy.

The biggest everyday use of CRISPR so far is to engineer animals with human-like disorders for basic research, such as learning how genes cause disease or influence development and what therapies might help.

But promising research, in labs and animals so far, also suggests gene editing might lead to treatments for such diseases as sickle cell, cancer, maybe Huntington's by altering cells and returning them to the body. Another project aims to one day grow transplantable human organs inside pigs.

Safety is a key question because gene editing isn't always precise enough; there's the possibility of accidentally cutting DNA that's similar to the real target. Researchers have improved precision in recent years, but out-of-body treatments like using cells as drugs get around the fear of fixing one problem only to spark another.

Altering genes in sperm, eggs or embryos can spread those changes to future generations, so-called "germline" engineering. But it's ethically charged because future generations couldn't consent, any long-term negative effects might not become apparent for years, and there's concern about babies designed with enhanced traits rather than to prevent disease.

Earlier this year, an ethics report from the prestigious National Academy of Sciences opened the door to lab research to figure out how to make such changes but said if germline editing ever is allowed, it should be reserved for serious diseases with no good alternatives and performed under rigorous oversight.

Where you live determines if, or what kind of, research can be performed on human embryos. Some countries, especially in Europe, ban germline research. Britain allows basic lab research only.

In the U.S., scientists can perform laboratory embryo research only with private, not federal taxpayer, funding, as the Oregon team did. Any attempt to study germline editing in pregnant women would require permission from the Food and Drug Administration, which is currently prohibited by Congress from reviewing any such request.

Researchers also are using gene editing to hatch malaria-resistant mosquitoes, grow strains of algae that produce biofuels, improve crop growth, even make mushrooms that don't brown as quickly.

More:
Gene editing fixes harmful mutation in human embryos - CBS News

Medicine Is Getting More Precise For White People – FiveThirtyEight

Every human on earth is unique our genes are different, we eat different things, we live in different places. As a result, medical treatments tend to work differently on different people. Depending on your genes, a drug might cure your sickness or it might cause a side effect that makes you sicker.

In the past, many of humanitys individual variations were invisible to us, but today, new technology offers us a way to peer into each persons genome, allowing doctors to personalize treatments for each patient. This approach, called precision medicine, has been a major focus of research and investment in the last few years.

But precision medicine only works if scientists have studied people who are similar to you. If your genes are rare or unusual compared to those researchers have examined in the past, you could end up getting the wrong treatment. Since the vast majority of genetics studies are done on people of European ancestry, members of other racial groups may lose out on the benefits of precision medicine entirely. Those same groups already often receive worse health care in the United States than people of European descent get, and personalized medical treatment could make the gap in care larger.

Precision medicine is based on the idea that genes can be linked to diseases. To study this, scientists assemble a group of people, some with a disease and some without, and identify their genetic differences. If particular differences are common among the people who have the disease and absent from the people without it, then scientists can infer that those genetic patterns might be involved in the disease.

But each person has their own catalogue of genetic characteristics. Some are common in people of certain ancestral backgrounds and rare in those from other backgrounds. If scientists exclusively study individuals of one ethnic group, they may not know how to refine their treatments for a person from a different group.

A 2009 analysis of the studies that can link a genetic variant to a disease or trait showed that fully 96 percent of participants were of European descent. In a 2016 commentary in the journal Nature, Alice Popejoy and Stephanie Fullerton, respectively a graduate student and a professor at the University of Washington, showed that these studies had grown more diverse and people of European ancestry now account for 81 percent of research subjects. Things are getting better, and its still pretty darn slow, Fullerton said in an interview. And of the progress that has been made, much of it is attributable not to an increase in diversity in U.S. research but to studies conducted in Asian countries, which involve local participants.

Disparities in biomedical research exacerbate an existing gap in U.S. health care. African-Americans and Latinos are less likely to have health insurance and more likely to suffer from chronic diseases. Even controlling for wealth differences between populations, African-Americans receive worse health care.

The science underlying precision medicine threatens to make these disparities worse because it could leave any genetic differences that primarily affect nonwhite groups unstudied. Some genetic differences are prevalent in one population and rare in another. A prominent example is a gene called APOL1. Differences in this gene are common in people whose ancestors are from sub-Saharan Africa but rare in those of other backgrounds. Some of these variations increase the risk of developing kidney disease more than sevenfold, but they also seem to confer protection against African sleeping sickness. Knowing a patients APOL1 genetic makeup might be useful for guiding kidney disease treatment, and APOL1 is likely one of many genes that must be studied within a nonwhite population.

Its possible to solve the problem of underrepresentation. The National Institutes of Health fund a number of large-scale genetic research projects in the United States, and scientists there consider this a major issue. We are aware of this situation, and work is being funded to rectify the situation, said Charles Rotimi, an investigator at NIH. He pointed to initiatives like Human Heredity and Health in Africa and the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology Consortium. These projects are developing more diverse study populations to address the underrepresentation of people of non-European ancestries, in some cases going to African countries to collect genetic data. In the United States, individual investigators can also apply for smaller-scale NIH grants to study particular diseases.

Even when scientists make a conscious effort to recruit a diverse study population, they can run into hurdles. For very good reason, minority populations can be more skeptical and concerned about being involved in biomedical research, said professor Danielle Dick of Virginia Commonwealth University, who studies how genetics contribute to a persons risk of substance abuse. The good reason Dick referred to is a long history of biomedical researchers mistreating people of color, including in the Tuskegee trials and through the forced sterilization of Puerto Ricans. Dicks team and others have tried to address issues of underrepresentation by visiting various hospitals to recruit Hispanic or African-American study participants, providing educational materials about genetics research, arranging to collect samples when patients may be off work, and taking other measures to encourage participation.

But the imbalance in samples is so severe, and the rush to develop precision medicine is so swift, that the problem may not be solved before treatments are developed, and as a result, those treatments will likely predominantly help people of European ancestry. The time horizon for a lot of therapies is typically in the 10- to 15-year range, Fullerton said. Could we solve it in that time frame? Possibly. But genetic differences may already be causing disparities in treatment results between groups. Some genetic variants that are common to certain racial or ethnic groups can affect a patients tolerance for drugs, for example, so knowing about a patients genetic code can guide a physicians prescription. Doctors are observing these phenomena in the clinic already, said Nishadi Rajapakse, an NIH administrator at the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities.

Clinical differences in health care are only likely to become more severe as precision medicine advances. New drugs are already targeting certain genetic differences, although none that would function primarily in one ethnic group and not in others. In the long run, people of European ancestry could benefit from ever more specialized treatments while people of color are left behind.

Go here to see the original:
Medicine Is Getting More Precise For White People - FiveThirtyEight

Genetic counseling field to rapidly expand – CNBC

As a college student at the University of Mount Union in Alliance, Ohio, Megan McMinn studied biology, hoping to one day become a physician's assistant.

But a desire to interact even more with patients led her down a different path in genetic counseling.

"What genetic counseling gave me was a good split between patient care and the hard science research end of things," McMinn said.

At Geisinger Health System in Danville, Pa., McMinn sees about six patients a day, working in oncology. Soon, she'll move onto a cardiology clinic, helping to identify genetic risks for individuals and potentially their families. The system currently has 25 genetic counselors on staff, but anticipates needing hundreds more as genetic testing becomes cheaper and more accessible.

The trend extends far beyond Geisinger, as the field has grown dramatically in the past decade, touching all aspects of health-care as medicine becomes more personalized.

"Genetics permeates everythingthere won't be enough genetic counselors to see every patient who gets genetic information," said Mary Freivogel, president of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC).

As a result, the Bureau of Labor Statistics projects the occupation will grow by 29 percent through 2024, faster than the average for all occupations

"I think [a genetic counselor] will become a key member of the team, discussing with patients and families what to do next, how to figure out how the genome is going to interact with your lifestyle and make decisions about what you want to do medically," said Dr. David Feinberg, president and CEO of Geisinger Health System.

Genetic counselors typically receive a bachelor's degree in biology, social science or a related field, and then go on to receive specialized training. Master's degrees in genetic counseling are offered by programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling, offered at some 30 schools in the U.S. and Canada, according to the NSGC.

Those who want to be certified as genetic counselors must obtain a master's degree from an accredited program, but do not need to be doctors.

The NSGC is also working to recruit new talent by doing outreach in middle and high schools to let younger students know the field is an option in the future. Pay is competitive as wellon average, counselors make around $80,000 a year, but that can increase up to $250,000 annually depending on specialty, location and expertise, Freivogel said.

Health insurance often pays for genetic counseling, and for genetic testing when recommended by a counselor or doctor. However, it's important to check with insurers before scheduling any tests as coverage levels vary. Cost also varies greatly, for example, as multi-gene cancer panels can range from $300 to $4,000 depending on the type of test, the lab used and whether the patient goes through his or her insurance or pays out of pocket.

And while at-home tests like 23andMe are typically less expensive, those taking them still need to see a genetic counselor to explain their results.

Part of the reason more counselors will be needed in the future at Geisinger is because the health system is home to the MyCode Community Health Initiative, one of the largest biobanks of human DNA samples of its kind, according to Amy Sturm, director of Cardiovascular Genomic Counseling at Geisinger. The project has consent from more than 150,000 patients to participate in having their entire DNA code sequenced and synced with their electronic medical records, to look for new causes of disease and different ways to treat conditions.

"We are figuring out and researching the best way to deliver this information back to our patients and also back to families with the ultimate goal of preventing disease and improving the healthcare system," Sturm said.

Keeping up with the latest in genomics, where new developments happen almost daily, can be a challenge. Yet counselors like McMinn say the ability to impact more than just the patient by studying the genome makes the job well worth it.

"We are able to bring to the forefront the fact that we're not just taking care of the patient, but we're taking care of the entire family," McMinn said.

Go here to read the rest:
Genetic counseling field to rapidly expand - CNBC

Man’s best mend Gene therapy reverses muscular dystrophy symptoms in dogs – Digital Trends

Why it matters to you

Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a horrible disease which slowly attacks every muscle in the body. Gene therapy could help treat it -- whether you're a dog or a human.

As difficult as it is when our beloved pet dogs get old, its a whole lot worse if their decline is the result of a horrible disease like Duchenne muscular dystrophy, a genetic disorder characterized by progressive muscle degeneration and weakness. Fortunately, a team of gene-editing researchers from France and the U.K. have been working to develop gene therapy as an answer and its one that could help humans, too.

Their solution involves using gene therapy to restore muscle strength and stabilize clinical symptoms. This is achieved by way of a shortened version of the dystrophin gene, containing just 4,000 base pairs, which is combined with a viral vector and injected into patients.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a debilitating muscle-wasting disease affecting young boys and male animals, which is caused by inheritance of a damaged gene, George Dickson, professor of molecular cell biology at University of London, told Digital Trends. There is currently no very effective cure. Our work has involved producing a healthy functioning copy of the damaged gene in the lab, and then using a harmless virus to carry the gene into the affected muscles, a so-called gene therapy.

Please enable Javascript to watch this video

The gene treatment has so far been tested on twelve golden retrievers affected by Duchenne muscular dystrophy. After a single dose, the dogs dystrophin production the protein responsible for maintaining the integrity and strength of muscles returned to its normal levels. Best of all, the trial was carried out a few years back, and all signs point to this being a lasting treatment. A paper describing the work was recently published in the journal Nature Communications.

We now have treated a number of dogs affected by this condition with a single round of gene therapy, Dickson continued. At the correct dose, the results have been very encouraging with dogs looking very active and healthy over 3 years after the treatment. The treatment involves a simple intravenous infusion, a one-off treatment, and we have been very pleased and quite surprised at how effective the gene therapy has been given that muscle is a major tissue spread all over the body.

Next up, the researchers hope to extrapolate the findings to human children, since they they are roughly the same weight and display similar clinical symptoms to canines.

The goal is to expand this gene therapy treatment into human patients, boys suffering from the Duchenne muscular dystrophy disease, Dickson said. We have to scale up production of the gene therapy medicine for human use, complete more safety tests, and then embark on recruiting patients into full-scale clinical trials.

Should all go according to plan, itll be another reminder of why gene therapy is the future of medicine as we know it.

More:
Man's best mend Gene therapy reverses muscular dystrophy symptoms in dogs - Digital Trends

Estimating Alzheimer’s disease causative genes by an evolutionary medicine approach – Medical Xpress

June 27, 2017

Alzheimer's disease patients are increasing with the aging of the world's population, becoming a huge health care and social burden. To find the cause of various diseases, in recent years, scientists have focused within the human genome on copy number variations (CNVs), which are changes in the number of genes within a population.

Likewise, a group of genes responsible for a gene number change has also been reported for Alzheimer's disease, but to date, it has not been easy to identify a causative gene from multiple genes within the pathogenic CNV region.

Now, a new approach to finding Alzheimer's disease (AD) causative genes was estimated by paying attention to special duplicated genes called "ohnologs" included in the genomic region specific to AD patients. Human ohnologs, which are vulnerable to change in number, were generated by whole genome duplications 500 million years ago.

In a new study published in the advanced online edition of Molecular Biology and Evolution, Mizuka Sekine and Takashi Makino investigated the gene expression and knockout mouse phenotype for ohnologs, and succeeded in narrowing down the genetic culprits. The narrowed gene group had a function related to the nervous system and a high expression level in the brain which were similar to characteristics of known AD causative genes.

Their findings suggest that the identification of causative genes using ohnologs is a promising and effective approach in diseases caused by dosage change.

Explore further: Characterizing the mouse genome reveals new gene functions and their role in human disease

More information: Molecular Biology And Evolution (2017). DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msx183

The first results from a functional genetic catalogue of the laboratory mouse has been shared with the biomedical research community, revealing new insights into a range of rare diseases and the possibility of accelerating ...

An algorithm developed by Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) scientists has the potential to help patients with mysterious ailments find genetic causes for their undiagnosed diseases.

Geneticists from Trinity College Dublin have used our evolutionary history to shine light on a plethora of neurodevelopmental disorders and diseases. Their findings isolate a relatively short list of genes as candidates for ...

Although a family history of Alzheimer's disease is a primary risk factor for the devastating neurological disorder, mutations in only three genes the amyloid precursor protein and presenilins 1 and 2 have been established ...

Using a new and powerful approach to understand the origins of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, researchers at Mayo Clinic in Florida are building the case that these diseases are primarily caused ...

Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are two of the most prevalent forms of neurodegenerative disorders. In a study published online today in Genome Research, researchers have analyzed changes ...

(Medical Xpress)Via genetic analysis, a large international team of researchers has found rare, damaging gene variants that they believe contribute to the risk of a person developing schizophrenia. In their paper published ...

Using a new skin cell model, researchers have overcome a barrier that previously prevented the study of living tissue from people at risk for early heart disease and stroke. This research could lead to a new understanding ...

Whole genome sequencing involves the analysis of all three billion pairs of letters in an individual's DNA and has been hailed as a technology that will usher in a new era of predicting and preventing disease. However, the ...

Researchers have found that genes for coronary heart disease (CAD) also influence reproduction, so in order to reproduce successfully, the genes for heart disease will also be inherited.

When Ricky Ramon was 7, he went for a routine checkup. The pediatrician, who lingered over his heartbeat, sent him for a chest X-ray, which revealed a benign tumor in the top-left chamber of his heart. For Ramon, it was the ...

Gene mutations accumulating in cells are typical of the development of cancer. Finnish researchers have found that a similar accumulation of mutations occurs also in some patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Alzheimer's is triggered by pheromone insult. Anger closes erectile tissues in the upper and middle meati, explaining this behavior among sufferers as defensive. Lesions progress rostro-centrally along the olfactory and accessory olfactory nerves. Healthy adult male facial skin surface lipid liquid pheromone by mouth diminishes symptoms, laughing usually returns for instance. (N=2, so this is obviously just anecdotal, but the partial recovery was welcome.)

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Read more here:
Estimating Alzheimer's disease causative genes by an evolutionary medicine approach - Medical Xpress

gene therapy facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia …

Gene therapy is a rapidly growing field of medicine in which genes are introduced into the body to treat diseases. Genes control heredity and provide the basic biological code for determining a cell's specific functions. Gene therapy seeks to provide genes that correct or supplant the disease-controlling functions of cells that are not, in essence, doing their job. Somatic gene therapy introduces therapeutic genes at the tissue or cellular level to treat a specific individual. Germ-line gene therapy inserts genes into reproductive cells or possibly into embryos to correct genetic defects that could be passed on to future generations. Initially conceived as an approach for treating inherited diseases, like cystic fibrosis and Huntington's disease, the scope of potential gene therapies has grown to include treatments for cancers, arthritis, and infectious diseases. Although gene therapy testing in humans has advanced rapidly, many questions surround its use. For example, some scientists are concerned that the therapeutic genes themselves may cause disease. Others fear that germ-line gene therapy may be used to control human development in ways not connected with disease, like intelligence or appearance.

Gene therapy has grown out of the science of genetics or how heredity works. Scientists know that life begins in a cell, the basic building block of all multicellular organisms. Humans, for instance, are made up of trillions of cells, each performing a specific function. Within the cell's nucleus (the center part of a cell that regulates its chemical functions) are pairs of chromosomes. These threadlike structures are made up of a single molecule of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid), which carries the blueprint of life in the form of codes, or genes, that determine inherited characteristics.

A DNA molecule looks like two ladders with one of the sides taken off both and then twisted around each other. The rungs of these ladders meet (resulting in a spiral staircase-like structure) and are called base pairs. Base pairs are made up of nitrogen molecules and arranged in specific sequences. Millions of these base pairs, or sequences, can make up a single gene, specifically defined as a segment of the chromosome and DNA that contains certain hereditary information. The gene, or combination of genes formed by these base pairs ultimately direct an organism's growth and characteristics through the production of certain chemicals, primarily proteins, which carry out most of the body's chemical functions and biological reactions.

Scientists have long known that alterations in genes present within cells can cause inherited diseases like cystic fibrosis, sickle-cell anemia, and hemophilia. Similarly, errors in the total number of chromosomes can cause conditions such as Down syndrome or Turner's syndrome. As the study of genetics advanced, however, scientists learned that an altered genetic sequence also can make people more susceptible to diseases, like atherosclerosis, cancer, and even schizophrenia. These diseases have a genetic component, but also are influenced by environmental factors (like diet and lifestyle). The objective of gene therapy is to treat diseases by introducing functional genes into the body to alter the cells involved in the disease process by either replacing missing genes or providing copies of functioning genes to replace nonfunctioning ones. The inserted genes can be naturally-occurring genes that produce the desired effect or may be genetically engineered (or altered) genes.

Scientists have known how to manipulate a gene's structure in the laboratory since the early 1970s through a process called gene splicing. The process involves removing a fragment of DNA containing the specific genetic sequence desired, then inserting it into the DNA of another gene. The resultant product is called recombinant DNA and the process is genetic engineering.

There are basically two types of gene therapy. Germ-line gene therapy introduces genes into reproductive cells (sperm and eggs) or someday possibly into embryos in hopes of correcting genetic abnormalities that could be passed on to future generations. Most of the current work in applying gene therapy, however, has been in the realm of somatic gene therapy. In this type of gene therapy, therapeutic genes are inserted into tissue or cells to produce a naturally occurring protein or substance that is lacking or not functioning correctly in an individual patient.

In both types of therapy, scientists need something to transport either the entire gene or a recombinant DNA to the cell's nucleus, where the chromosomes and DNA reside. In essence, vectors are molecular delivery trucks. One of the first and most popular vectors developed were viruses because they invade cells as part of the natural infection process. Viruses have the potential to be excellent vectors because they have a specific relationship with the host in that they colonize certain cell types and tissues in specific organs. As a result, vectors are chosen according to their attraction to certain cells and areas of the body.

One of the first vectors used was retroviruses. Because these viruses are easily cloned (artificially reproduced) in the laboratory, scientists have studied them extensively and learned a great deal about their biological action. They also have learned how to remove the genetic information that governs viral replication, thus reducing the chances of infection.

Retroviruses work best in actively dividing cells, but cells in the body are relatively stable and do not divide often. As a result, these cells are used primarily for ex vivo (outside the body) manipulation. First, the cells are removed from the patient's body, and the virus, or vector, carrying the gene is inserted into them. Next, the cells are placed into a nutrient culture where they grow and replicate. Once enough cells are gathered, they are returned to the body, usually by injection into the blood stream. Theoretically, as long as these cells survive, they will provide the desired therapy.

Another class of viruses, called the adenoviruses, also may prove to be good gene vectors. These viruses can effectively infect nondividing cells in the body, where the desired gene product then is expressed naturally. In addition to being a more efficient approach to gene transportation, these viruses, which cause respiratory infections, are more easily purified and made stable than retroviruses, resulting in less chance of an unwanted viral infection. However, these viruses live for several days in the body, and some concern surrounds the possibility of infecting others with the viruses through sneezing or coughing. Other viral vectors include influenza viruses, Sindbis virus, and a herpes virus that infects nerve cells.

Scientists also have delved into nonviral vectors. These vectors rely on the natural biological process in which cells uptake (or gather) macromolecules. One approach is to use liposomes, globules of fat produced by the body and taken up by cells. Scientists also are investigating the introduction of raw recombinant DNA by injecting it into the bloodstream or placing it on microscopic beads of gold shot into the skin with a "gene-gun." Another possible vector under development is based on dendrimer molecules. A class of polymers (naturally occurring or artificial substances that have a high molecular weight and formed by smaller molecules of the same or similar substances), is "constructed" in the laboratory by combining these smaller molecules. They have been used in manufacturing Styrofoam, polyethylene cartons, and Plexiglass. In the laboratory, dendrimers have shown the ability to transport genetic material into human cells. They also can be designed to form an affinity for particular cell membranes by attaching to certain sugars and protein groups.

In the early 1970s, scientists proposed "gene surgery" for treating inherited diseases caused by faulty genes. The idea was to take out the disease-causing gene and surgically implant a gene that functioned properly. Although sound in theory, scientists, then and now, lack the biological knowledge or technical expertise needed to perform such a precise surgery in the human body.

However, in 1983, a group of scientists from Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, proposed that gene therapy could one day be a viable approach for treating Lesch-Nyhan disease, a rare neurological disorder. The scientists conducted experiments in which an enzyme-producing gene (a specific type of protein) for correcting the disease was injected into a group of cells for replication. The scientists theorized the cells could then be injected into people with Lesch-Nyhan disease, thus correcting the genetic defect that caused the disease.

As the science of genetics advanced throughout the 1980s, gene therapy gained an established foothold in the minds of medical scientists as a promising approach to treatments for specific diseases. One of the major reasons for the growth of gene therapy was scientists' increasing ability to identify the specific genetic malfunctions that caused inherited diseases. Interest grew as further studies of DNA and chromosomes (where genes reside) showed that specific genetic abnormalities in one or more genes occurred in successive generations of certain family members who suffered from diseases like intestinal cancer, bipolar disorder, Alzheimer's disease, heart disease, diabetes, and many more. Although the genes may not be the only cause of the disease in all cases, they may make certain individuals more susceptible to developing the disease because of environmental influences, like smoking, pollution, and stress. In fact, some scientists theorize that all diseases may have a genetic component.

On September 14, 1990, a four-year old girl suffering from a genetic disorder that prevented her body from producing a crucial enzyme became the first person to undergo gene therapy in the United States. Because her body could not produce adenosine deaminase (ADA), she had a weakened immune system, making her extremely susceptible to severe, life-threatening infections. W. French Anderson and colleagues at the National Institutes of Health's Clinical Center in Bethesda, Maryland, took white blood cells (which are crucial to proper immune system functioning) from the girl, inserted ADA producing genes into them, and then transfused the cells back into the patient. Although the young girl continued to show an increased ability to produce ADA, debate arose as to whether the improvement resulted from the gene therapy or from an additional drug treatment she received.

Nevertheless, a new era of gene therapy began as more and more scientists sought to conduct clinical trial (testing in humans) research in this area. In that same year, gene therapy was tested on patients suffering from melanoma (skin cancer). The goal was to help them produce antibodies (disease fighting substances in the immune system) to battle the cancer.

These experiments have spawned an ever growing number of attempts at gene therapies designed to perform a variety of functions in the body. For example, a gene therapy for cystic fibrosis aims to supply a gene that alters cells, enabling them to produce a specific protein to battle the disease. Another approach was used for brain cancer patients, in which the inserted gene was designed to make the cancer cells more likely to respond to drug treatment. Another gene therapy approach for patients suffering from artery blockage, which can lead to strokes, induces the growth of new blood vessels near clogged arteries, thus ensuring normal blood circulation.

Currently, there are a host of new gene therapy agents in clinical trials. In the United States, both nucleic acid based (in vivo ) treatments and cell-based (ex vivo ) treatments are being investigated. Nucleic acid based gene therapy uses vectors (like viruses) to deliver modified genes to target cells. Cell-based gene therapy techniques remove cells from the patient in order to genetically alter them then reintroduce them to the patient's body. Presently, gene therapies for the following diseases are being developed: cystic fibrosis (using adenoviral vector), HIV infection (cell-based), malignant melanoma (cell-based), Duchenne muscular dystrophy (cell-based), hemophilia B (cell-based), kidney cancer (cell-based), Gaucher's Disease (retroviral vector), breast cancer (retroviral vector), and lung cancer (retroviral vector). When a cell or individual is treated using gene therapy and successful incorporation of engineered genes has occurred, the cell or individual is said to be transgenic.

The medical establishment's contribution to transgenic research has been supported by increased government funding. In 1991, the U.S. government provided $58 million for gene therapy research, with increases in funding of $15-40 million dollars a year over the following four years. With fierce competition over the promise of societal benefit in addition to huge profits, large pharmaceutical corporations have moved to the forefront of transgenic research. In an effort to be first in developing new therapies, and armed with billions of dollars of research funds, such corporations are making impressive strides toward making gene therapy a viable reality in the treatment of once elusive diseases.

The potential scope of gene therapy is enormous. More than 4,200 diseases have been identified as resulting directly from abnormal genes, and countless others that may be partially influenced by a person's genetic makeup. Initial research has concentrated on developing gene therapies for diseases whose genetic origins have been established and for other diseases that can be cured or improved by substances genes produce.

The following are examples of potential gene therapies. People suffering from cystic fibrosis lack a gene needed to produce a salt-regulating protein. This protein regulates the flow of chloride into epithelial cells, (the cells that line the inner and outer skin layers) that cover the air passages of the nose and lungs. Without this regulation, patients with cystic fibrosis build up a thick mucus that makes them prone to lung infections. A gene therapy technique to correct this abnormality might employ an adenovirus to transfer a normal copy of what scientists call the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, or CTRF, gene. The gene is introduced into the patient by spraying it into the nose or lungs. Researchers announced in 2004 that they had, for the first time, treated a dominant neurogenerative disease called Spinocerebella ataxia type 1, with gene therapy. This could lead to treating similar diseases such as Huntingtons disease. They also announced a single intravenous injection could deliver therapy to all muscles, perhaps providing hope to people with muscular dystrophy.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) also is an inherited disease, resulting in the inability to process cholesterol properly, which leads to high levels of artery-clogging fat in the blood stream. Patients with FH often suffer heart attacks and strokes because of blocked arteries. A gene therapy approach used to battle FH is much more intricate than most gene therapies because it involves partial surgical removal of patients' livers (ex vivo transgene therapy). Corrected copies of a gene that serve to reduce cholesterol build-up are inserted into the liver sections, which then are transplanted back into the patients.

Gene therapy also has been tested on patients with AIDS. AIDS is caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which weakens the body's immune system to the point that sufferers are unable to fight off diseases like pneumonias and cancer. In one approach, genes that produce specific HIV proteins have been altered to stimulate immune system functioning without causing the negative effects that a complete HIV molecule has on the immune system. These genes are then injected in the patient's blood stream. Another approach to treating AIDS is to insert, via white blood cells, genes that have been genetically engineered to produce a receptor that would attract HIV and reduce its chances of replicating. In 2004, researchers reported that had developed a new vaccine concept for HIV, but the details were still in development.

Several cancers also have the potential to be treated with gene therapy. A therapy tested for melanoma, or skin cancer, involves introducing a gene with an anticancer protein called tumor necrosis factor (TNF) into test tube samples of the patient's own cancer cells, which are then reintroduced into the patient. In brain cancer, the approach is to insert a specific gene that increases the cancer cells' susceptibility to a common drug used in fighting the disease. In 2003, researchers reported that they had harnessed the cell killing properties of adenoviruses to treat prostate cancer. A 2004 report said that researchers had developed a new DNA vaccine that targeted the proteins expressed in cervical cancer cells.

Gaucher disease is an inherited disease caused by a mutant gene that inhibits the production of an enzyme called glucocerebrosidase. Patients with Gaucher disease have enlarged livers and spleens and eventually their bones deteriorate. Clinical gene therapy trials focus on inserting the gene for producing this enzyme.

Gene therapy also is being considered as an approach to solving a problem associated with a surgical procedure known as balloon angioplasty. In this procedure, a stent (in this case, a type of tubular scaffolding) is used to open the clogged artery. However, in response to the trauma of the stent insertion, the body initiates a natural healing process that produces too many cells in the artery and results in restenosis, or reclosing of the artery. The gene therapy approach to preventing this unwanted side effect is to cover the outside of the stents with a soluble gel. This gel contains vectors for genes that reduce this overactive healing response.

Regularly throughout the past decade, and no doubt over future years, scientists have and will come up with new possible ways for gene therapy to help treat human disease. Recent advancements include the possibility of reversing hearing loss in humans with experimental growing of new sensory cells in adult guinea pigs, and avoiding amputation in patients with severe circulatory problems in their legs with angiogenic growth factors.

Although great strides have been made in gene therapy in a relatively short time, its potential usefulness has been limited by lack of scientific data concerning the multitude of functions that genes control in the human body. For instance, it is now known that the vast majority of genetic material does not store information for the creation of proteins, but rather is involved in the control and regulation of gene expression, and is, thus, much more difficult to interpret. Even so, each individual cell in the body carries thousands of genes coding for proteins, with some estimates as high as 150,000 genes. For gene therapy to advance to its full potential, scientists must discover the biological role of each of these individual genes and where the base pairs that make them up are located on DNA.

To address this issue, the National Institutes of Health initiated the Human Genome Project in 1990. Led by James D. Watson (one of the co-discoverers of the chemical makeup of DNA) the project's 15-year goal is to map the entire human genome (a combination of the words gene and chromosomes). A genome map would clearly identify the location of all genes as well as the more than three billion base pairs that make them up. With a precise knowledge of gene locations and functions, scientists may one day be able to conquer or control diseases that have plagued humanity for centuries.

Scientists participating in the Human Genome Project identified an average of one new gene a day, but many expected this rate of discovery to increase. By the year 2005, their goal was to determine the exact location of all the genes on human DNA and the exact sequence of the base pairs that make them up. Some of the genes identified through this project include a gene that predisposes people to obesity, one associated with programmed cell death (apoptosis), a gene that guides HIV viral reproduction, and the genes of inherited disorders like Huntington's disease, Lou Gehrig's disease, and some colon and breast cancers. In April 2003, the finished sequence was announced, with 99% of the human genome's gene-containing regions mapped to an accuracy of 99.9%.

Gene therapy seems elegantly simple in its concept: supply the human body with a gene that can correct a biological malfunction that causes a disease. However, there are many obstacles and some distinct questions concerning the viability of gene therapy. For example, viral vectors must be carefully controlled lest they infect the patient with a viral disease. Some vectors, like retroviruses, also can enter cells functioning properly and interfere with the natural biological processes, possibly leading to other diseases. Other viral vectors, like the adenoviruses, often are recognized and destroyed by the immune system so their therapeutic effects are short-lived. Maintaining gene expression so it performs its role properly after vector delivery is difficult. As a result, some therapies need to be repeated often to provide long-lasting benefits.

One of the most pressing issues, however, is gene regulation. Genes work in concert to regulate their functioning. In other words, several genes may play a part in turning other genes on and off. For example, certain genes work together to stimulate cell division and growth, but if these are not regulated, the inserted genes could cause tumor formation and cancer. Another difficulty is learning how to make the gene go into action only when needed. For the best and safest therapeutic effort, a specific gene should turn on, for example, when certain levels of a protein or enzyme are low and must be replaced. But the gene also should remain dormant when not needed to ensure it doesn't oversupply a substance and disturb the body's delicate chemical makeup.

One approach to gene regulation is to attach other genes that detect certain biological activities and then react as a type of automatic off-and-on switch that regulates the activity of the other genes according to biological cues. Although still in the rudimentary stages, researchers are making headway in inhibiting some gene functioning by using a synthetic DNA to block gene transcriptions (the copying of genetic information). This approach may have implications for gene therapy.

While gene therapy holds promise as a revolutionary approach to treating disease, ethical concerns over its use and ramifications have been expressed by scientists and lay people alike. For example, since much needs to be learned about how these genes actually work and their long-term effect, is it ethical to test these therapies on humans, where they could have a disastrous result? As with most clinical trials concerning new therapies, including many drugs, the patients participating in these studies usually have not responded to more established therapies and often are so ill the novel therapy is their only hope for long-term survival.

Another questionable outgrowth of gene therapy is that scientists could possibly manipulate genes to genetically control traits in human offspring that are not health related. For example, perhaps a gene could be inserted to ensure that a child would not be bald, a seemingly harmless goal. However, what if genetic manipulation was used to alter skin color, prevent homosexuality, or ensure good looks? If a gene is found that can enhance intelligence of children who are not yet born, will everyone in society, the rich and the poor, have access to the technology or will it be so expensive only the elite can afford it?

The Human Genome Project, which plays such an integral role for the future of gene therapy, also has social repercussions. If individual genetic codes can be determined, will such information be used against people? For example, will someone more susceptible to a disease have to pay higher insurance premiums or be denied health insurance altogether? Will employers discriminate between two potential employees, one with a "healthy" genome and the other with genetic abnormalities?

Some of these concerns can be traced back to the eugenics movement popular in the first half of the twentieth century. This genetic "philosophy" was a societal movement that encouraged people with "positive" traits to reproduce while those with less desirable traits were sanctioned from having children. Eugenics was used to pass strict immigration laws in the United States, barring less suitable people from entering the country lest they reduce the quality of the country's collective gene pool. Probably the most notorious example of eugenics in action was the rise of Nazism in Germany, which resulted in the Eugenic Sterilization Law of 1933. The law required sterilization for those suffering from certain disabilities and even for some who were simply deemed "ugly." To ensure that this novel science is not abused, many governments have established organizations specifically for overseeing the development of gene therapy. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Institutes of Health require scientists to take a precise series of steps and meet stringent requirements before proceeding with clinical trials. As of mid-2004, more than 300 companies were carrying out gene medicine developments and 500 clinical trials were underway. How to deliver the therapy is the key to unlocking many of the researchers discoveries.

In fact, gene therapy has been immersed in more controversy and surrounded by more scrutiny in both the health and ethical arena than most other technologies (except, perhaps, for cloning) that promise to substantially change society. Despite the health and ethical questions surrounding gene therapy, the field will continue to grow and is likely to change medicine faster than any previous medical advancement.

Cell The smallest living unit of the body that groups together to form tissues and help the body perform specific functions.

Chromosome A microscopic thread-like structure found within each cell of the body, consisting of a complex of proteins and DNA. Humans have 46 chromosomes arranged into 23 pairs. Changes in either the total number of chromosomes or their shape and size (structure) may lead to physical or mental abnormalities.

Clinical trial The testing of a drug or some other type of therapy in a specific population of patients.

Clone A cell or organism derived through asexual (without sex) reproduction containing the identical genetic information of the parent cell or organism.

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) The genetic material in cells that holds the inherited instructions for growth, development, and cellular functioning.

Embryo The earliest stage of development of a human infant, usually used to refer to the first eight weeks of pregnancy. The term fetus is used from roughly the third month of pregnancy until delivery.

Enzyme A protein that causes a biochemical reaction or change without changing its own structure or function.

Eugenics A social movement in which the population of a society, country, or the world is to be improved by controlling the passing on of hereditary information through mating.

Gene A building block of inheritance, which contains the instructions for the production of a particular protein, and is made up of a molecular sequence found on a section of DNA. Each gene is found on a precise location on a chromosome.

Gene transcription The process by which genetic information is copied from DNA to RNA, resulting in a specific protein formation.

Genetic engineering The manipulation of genetic material to produce specific results in an organism.

Genetics The study of hereditary traits passed on through the genes.

Germ-line gene therapy The introduction of genes into reproductive cells or embryos to correct inherited genetic defects that can cause disease.

Liposome Fat molecule made up of layers of lipids.

Macromolecules A large molecule composed of thousands of atoms.

Nitrogen A gaseous element that makes up the base pairs in DNA.

Nucleus The central part of a cell that contains most of its genetic material, including chromosomes and DNA.

Protein Important building blocks of the body, composed of amino acids, involved in the formation of body structures and controlling the basic functions of the human body.

Somatic gene therapy The introduction of genes into tissue or cells to treat a genetic related disease in an individual.

Vectors Something used to transport genetic information to a cell.

Abella, Harold. "Gene Therapy May Save Limbs." Diagnostic Imaging (May 1, 2003): 16.

Christensen R. "Cutaneous Gene TherapyAn Update." Histochemical Cell Biology (January 2001): 73-82.

"Gene Therapy Important Part of Cancer Research." Cancer Gene Therapy Week (June 30, 2003): 12.

"Initial Sequencing and Analysis of the Human Genome." Nature (February 15, 2001): 860-921.

Kingsman, Alan. "Gene Therapy Moves On." SCRIP World Pharmaceutical News (July 7, 2004): 19:ndash;21.

Nevin, Norman. "What Has Happened to Gene Therapy?" European Journal of Pediatrics (2000): S240-S242.

"New DNA Vaccine Targets Proteins Expressed in Cervical Cancer Cells." Gene Therapy Weekly (September 9, 2004): 14.

"New Research on the Progress of Gene Therapy Presented at Meeting." Obesity, Fitness & Wellness Week (July 3, 2004): 405.

Pekkanen, John. "Genetics: Medicine's Amazing Leap." Readers Digest (September 1991): 23-32.

Silverman, Jennifer, and Steve Perlstein. "Genome Project Completed." Family Practice News (May 15, 2003): 50-51.

"Study Highlights Potential Danger of Gene Therapy." Drug Week (June 20, 2003): 495.

"Study May Help Scientists Develop Safer Mthods for Gene Therapy." AIDS Weekly (June 30, 2003): 32.

Trabis, J. "With Gene Therapy, Ears Grow New Sensory Cells." Science News (June 7, 2003): 355.

National Human Genome Research Institute. The National Institutes of Health. 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 496-2433. http://www.nhgri.nih.gov.

Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. Online genetic testing information sponsored by National Center for Biotechnology Information. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim/.

Continue reading here:
gene therapy facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia ...

You Can Get Your Whole Genome Sequenced. But Should You? – WIRED

8NB0dG)CPK3NX -x#K~ fjq*Q5wo m3}[yG#a(G%`j'NX98 ,2$j 3av)FSJrkO4ld4asv?$!n_, ed!?o5YLj$b@(6}RDU '_[W9<}F,cmIl9KXa^jmj5GT3J9][0`:[{S~Rz CNd -v!I<5g_Zn-6X 2n1Ka hjUAHG/mziX,&a s~lBM i B3{$E(t *ve)-6:^,$tvnv*=iAAYF" (RCH K$nr.TW,(Z9(#)KzugpC<4En2D/RNEioz`8HkMm* +s. z Bj]9-eaP|Y0bfB(9XCm;mgR dbfe#FwlLR=D;ZU(: MVN<4=sJsZ<4ZtLijPNATu Hb>OPC3~jg+QOP%r~8H>vpn#3.#xmuzSt4v* vLb)8RR]&7}/&3F~U3Ub]k@ X[ZX^_4qLXxkDNu:n{u9Z;*RXmk5~R-kX ^' 22?i s / X"+/g9qlWFcG^48-<9Ujp^Rv6J_H:H,[}`;?'Aj|/@N^ ^XlL{udJkl1;1lx}[VkJQ8&[?9&i+^8G q{uZ_W7S{__h=?T,@ow8bMrM] h3]!,Xv95U/O|0F5@}4,V,sYTJhO32mpE&2#A=Mqp][V3Hyo,|>F9I&m-E"- /d*2|v8gb" FQw0Gb2&iY:[=)KmoUH+2rUDG^ _ FUFzS~#H0@&zk]E{~aUA!|ieyyxkM_QEZKvPEA,vm,Huh(CKk{vj<{,k$!VPoj-9xcDp~G-k/b+%hZ{Oou&fXp5;d{)YZmZm-UlSHWpE@p c?ZUnuV_1n0p+jH {5BK_]:Yd/u"%? ^gU5VXQF&Dk:8}3QMm8| T+8!B"Zo!';Fg #)h&jHoc6'3c,#km =po;doLVWG0h#zH >|PjJAK&vWs1.x=x6vB&iUQU :gj:`-.N`qO^jZ"=s@l5N[#H?I1A ;4^p6:XMr{P]+.3ZH1eD"T722Wl8=@e1c_g^*tO-K8Sl'8~cg}38' #koA8C,{f_&X  +: d_~bzW/UA?kiaSuR|zur*Wn6c|: |/,#ko!^Y7*d|`qYxIgR R w~7:g}KIc};g[n !|HE z36xf>[S]VcC>cF)w_{ r.] ZC[-/BUE]KOKOc6 $44/- .- miphkx53n?r|k9{FOD:_oa(ZK8XC_eicG4Q%h`5X/?9rC.F9{d9UiC]Ik_:FRQ'jg9&Sz?3Hu=}Au 6T,*+jdgc| vmha> Vbavv;z9Ky*UPrB;w|(seu{Ddz0-^~!}8B;61=/?F~4FMp' BDMQ!8&n^9}`,RCo/Ld3Qx:}1- 97,wX2dqaK=6)< }UZc<^$f=t5n8-Vk3QF(}.Eoly^!o !k$muXkL-w V3w'mZU_gvpYHeD8Vg$-n k/|S=m~=y)7-q[!ERUIT+^&rrF~ySkT{W=; Qo>{"d<4ock}`~}[COAK9 jz-hDi=;6yS9vj~_gTEx*2QkP9E@&dXq7]c70"]c;Vwuc}|4q@:,n MjI%0> *Q2 @/+A?)VR,,]nXYxw&oBF?;5,XZUo9XbEp&ELJs"|u[xNvwI=~FqeS tMFX7 E4JxZwAn)nP6sCg/'yx'HRW,TbB M9z!TWSr4g*-:n)Tf$:]4"? EdRo-p3~%|ocK(VC?>k<:4A@3yjBo1tM#Rt$KU>lyyF,Hf.7% ClG3EgBb%@/)&B+CoZQ 8(>S+N$_]z'xs(tg#^-Wtj,0+2v>|?"~ T@2[I9ZrVNKAe*(B>~[*,/,WLr&)e%XYF,gby5C z< ^R[M G=l;R|y6iV2~= 'nimMY7J$z|'%; 1,yu.BB,-/9J)Y(B))Kjnz4m[gV?I;>$he.4j@qoz;+%Ry|w|p)g!1}rMhlxr#)#@hcI*? 66idp/OT3:Q9Z9>wXj%@o%M lEqo^PO>Qpwy<[C?9va6 |Ge 88{@ zC^_ UK{KXBao*S~bf?~u(I6n460.!8{4E]e0rpcTD0)iQ@=8oq *rSwCjI%)P$ISd{X.6"Sx'k)K$-M&U]*MrFpU7mn? N *p'_e{no)gH4ID `|@IHN&J,z;,}Nf)38^La,D7yX^|uB4L1 "{PZ'8B@43E KS,;Ies}+)D["AYBwN5w#($Ro0bj!=%E&6GDI#V$2=bB4r0(DLyd(9fDgW:yJ9R !_ VV7 6I_G [%*,D66.~B-E"_(x<+oI QD~nXFb,1(.{X2":r5k)mgCG^bj_XKumhbIs]N;XNvlOJG ), Mq3@qv!I|nM{G$9"231Tqp lFRGE{^4uyi|+1Sr]Z{Gn{@ :y_&&&&&&&&&&&&.U.UJUZC;ybfS/A3* N*~'Ec9Iw3 &^mJM@+wZuFnz p&&h0]|z >7}LtRR2ZoU3=TR3|Ao4r|(v_ZN: uSM1f>0p1R?~hufGDSkV4k]F_+vW#nv-I%th]v]Jj`8n23^UwYIo:`q'-*n*9cL}eR1hczw;{6JTu[*gl[Fn 7yQ`2lz2OQ5F78hh%5OSRoh+W1/Xv>l5Wnb70iKR%0ux L+^|!b6=~Y #ua+},ZWC;Abb8cl&Ue::vsb%*Jg"Iu0a,SC~.v{L.@f C;c-T^g{ fn7y`2lz2O]5F;h7E3Uz:f~mkp]z]r(.~'>Oy8WQ.?vO} A-YeO[fj2ZLeYfjaN9,s<5=MPuN{ro&:"{6p6UW9YEA#E"~"oJTE~t[~{(yK8L8w[ybAZ7Qv7 e7QZs!SOn(? ~w4#i&tMXm6pzjBf{5 6Vmv{dC s4"" H&DJFJJ a?HJU;J_mdZ8Uh/.uj[56>Ot`M'|Ry5Y,YwTDt 10EO+V)|{iPN/U&7^b0*3{_Q3CI?ZV-5%|pC&~YBH%s2'HwJb3/iYv@Z6>m-<v3 .#Z@F*8p I)+Z4z{NZ$^T5S$D? gRR?a+(i_Y`rj6Gg!~Rq ^|N|l*fH@&QHQ,yQX$U I)5C0MOYX6PU>0AP.WH4 nwoiQ.M%KD2uh7h/~f,,!Bl6 [?pc[$eSZ{we9NYCgRSz7}UNo0%Zghqk&Ph$HEmV/i0P94.ON69qa"8JThZPNIf+Vf-Re^z7_X55FVu A,f{tjD$AOoAjQl+$B<5/tT*c@.e!TI US!/)[5;< j ^1,S~&8B@FZdl:_#C=Bb?03ILG]rw 2 4w~5 )$/b,VZ-"5h4AHG T9Socq2!T;9$X,,R"< P"s;;C*8DaEBQo siIVMC*5o^Q.j&QPV> GSmcy@f)Pj*=@OiKY mcT1@:JHbo%Y~xA[c+]:^$1} c)0 6"4[:06|`UGC6={gJJ+gLd~g" ,/u3 /1w^2m0!9k-!kx:r;dZ4eYkkSFlRPH7;D"OPkx(]xm)F4:gfa*6]yd$5Gha#,v] wN$'M^[U^+D@soSf . T{c9AJkjPq'J;t5ii:qqe B"Ku& x]tD(?TLPX9y86 -U. mHz|g61%afK=g,.cudGmJfbA8xRfl;&B_E4.m| XDF%I,M$#N~# 3t3'6K[8I0=^M:Pj0Z.Z J{FeihQsak8%5T,y@wZG;P[alR)8_Ir; -n_P.J#U`{$

= [mEg/Q.hz,1m206c'Y1ZF2).?n_wd4#3NCQ%k.I],!Ib1}.#>(cG"v&!DbH!3`+p}]39=(2 ULN=Z{ M2cE%P!}kF4}v8YMT!;0&5)],WZ/WufNF-2YlU4i)O,RQyLEaA9<%|$e0|;iaJBHh7f=0 EV$_w( 1X*Isgvn;vpQWC3D# 98&L,7P0+@0 4ep@s9R@r0@3|w$6.-Emw00f(b5;v)oA 1o#j(@ dMHsGF4H>(b>X^ .w$_2@zn4I-L/(c57e,%-7kD1CCBo) A%@W=QMwVR:1O*q,Yph^aAtlF9@DF)6oIbhIrZq_y Nd"~~N0O(qpzL(PsYA, Xl@bPYr[$N eEuS@[r6Ky=4:W@q:Qdf3;gv!YLVpRs> =: ^-dQ0{/e 29:>W - 8Ls{^R6>KimH$^%@JR9@/=37y}4JY1gcI0sb}BdVbkgdP*^BG/.B`v!Qy(=npi:H/.z'MZNQk%&Ja-N:6wOx,:Zr_2[$tuiGo/T.ynZi+FS2JzU|vS^rrX'miwNLvrB^x?T(sftp9-E:btC&.nrTh8(0TS7N:tIAE5pbp`Jo*;.R*|zWiks3Uq(f23uUez#_>^/?|}lw!5G83$>z~;%5XRDTQp]]_/emVIXiwK:^l9g7l9g}xz6A/#w_vMB#[]e 4{5v:WcDqHUT W<|'gf:|aUt/^>mo"t#QOue]R,T`Zo 8:;t`q-wlfyD' v|WYa|:<`a) XUG4=87ms?R'OS>1BsF;:aX>c 3@fr{|pZHS::cTc}>=e3^5~sXsJOP_Ubumj hk#gTs6k%{9c$`:/NoCHFW-|J/DtLo"I{5v"UZG.$uul^}']EmzKz=C*7]mgk{QIZk{-2Jo IuW>u O>U{Y tVj?- }T8sj~gM0W%O!#O}NlY4%w`'Z5F oMn;Pvm9Se>>49!5@^4a8f7TF7 JQ](:MSF2ub|vgb&b'|"El>fw#Jn!1|(+'[f/dGub9KeEx|#pTy~J{JkNJ ovQ^7aM ?ov'<(f Wim<8n"{T/53^BXA89;'q["RS01=j6+;XY;b&< :jc;OBV

Read more:
You Can Get Your Whole Genome Sequenced. But Should You? - WIRED

Modalis Obtains Access to Foundational CRISPR IP – BioSpace

TOKYO & CAMBRIDGE, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Modalis Therapeutics Corporation (Modalis) today announced that the company has entered into a license agreement with Editas Medicine, Inc., under which Modalis has obtained a license to certain intellectual property that is controlled by Editas Medicine. Modalis is utilizing its proprietary epigenetic gene modulation technology, CRISPR-GNDM (Guide Nucleotide Directed Modulation), to treat patients with serious genetic disorders. Additional details including financial terms of the agreement were not disclosed.

"Our goal is to create CRISPR based gene therapies for genetic disorders, most of which fall into the orphan disease category. There should be no disease that is ignored because of its small patient population, and our mission to develop disease modifying treatments for these diseases reflects our belief that Every Life Deserves Attention. We are proud to be the pioneer in CRISPR based gene modulation therapy, said Haru Morita, Chief Executive Officer of Modalis.

We are pleased to establish this license agreement with Modalis Therapeutics as their mission is aligned with our mission to make transformative medicines for people living with serious diseases of unmet clinical need. CRISPR technology has many uses and applications, and we are pleased to include Modalis in our expanding portfolio of licensees so the greatest number of patients may benefit in the future from transformative medicines, said Cynthia Collins, president and chief executive officer, Editas Medicine.

About Modalis

Modalis Therapeutics is developing precision genetic medicines through epigenetic gene modulation. Founded by Osamu Nureki and leading scientists in CRISPR gene editing from University of Tokyo, Modalis is pursuing therapies for orphan genetic diseases using its proprietary CRISPR-GNDM technology which enables the locus specific modulation of gene expression or histone modification without the need for double-stranded DNA cleavage, gene editing or base editing. Modalis is focusing initially on genetic disorders caused by loss of gene regulation resulting in excess or insufficient protein production which includes more than 660 genes that are currently estimated to cause human disease due to haploinsufficiency. Headquartered in Tokyo with laboratories and facilities in Cambridge, Massachusetts, the company is backed by leading Japanese investors including Fast Track Initiative, SBI Investment, UTokyo-IPC, SMBC Venture Capital, and Mizuho Capital. For additional information, visit http://www.modalistx.com.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200331005248/en/

Read more from the original source:
Modalis Obtains Access to Foundational CRISPR IP - BioSpace

Current research: 2020 Latest Report on Exosome Diagnostics Market Report Technologies, Analyze the Pipeline Landscape and Key Companies – WhaTech…

Exosome Diagnostics Market Report analysis including industry Overview, Country Analysis, Key Trends, Key Retail Innovations, Competitive Landscape and Sector Analysis for upcoming years.

ReportsnReports added a new report on The Exosome Diagnostics Market Technologies report delivers the clean elaborated structure of the Report comprising each and every business related information of the market at a global level. The complete range of information related to the Exosome Diagnostics Market Technologies is obtained through various sources and this obtained the bulk of the information is arranged, processed, and represented by a group of specialists through the application of different methodological techniques and analytical tools such as SWOT analysis to generate a whole set of trade based study regarding the Exosome Diagnostics Market Technologies.

Download a Free PDF Sample of Exosome Diagnostics Market Technologies Research Report at:

http://www.reportsnreports.com/contactme=1781607

Top Companies mentioned in this report are Capricor Therapeutics Inc, Evox Therapeutics Ltd, ReNeuron Group Plc, Stem Cell Medicine Ltd, Tavec Inc, Codiak Biosciences Inc, Therapeutic Solutions International Inc, ArunA Biomedical Inc, Ciloa 85.

This latest report is on Exosome Diagnostics Market Technologies which explores the application of exosome technologies within the pharmaceutical and healthcare industries. Exosomes are small cell-derived vesicles that are abundant in bodily fluids, including blood, urine and cerebrospinal fluid as well as in in vitro cell culture.

These vesicles are being used in a variety of therapeutic applications, including as therapeutic biomarkers, drug delivery systems and therapies in their own right. Research within this area remains in the nascent stages, although a number of clinical trials have been registered within the field.

Exosomes have several diverse therapeutic applications, largely centering on stem cell and gene therapy.

Exosomes have been identified as endogenous carriers of RNA within the body, allowing for the intracellular transportation of genetic material to target cells.

As such, developers have worked to engineer exosomes for the delivery of therapeutic miRNA and siRNA-based gene therapies. As RNA is highly unstable within the body, a number of different biological vector systems have been developed to enhance their transport within the circulation, including viruses and liposomes.

Similarly, exosomes derived from stem cells have also been identified for their therapeutic applications, particularly in the treatment of cancer and cardiovascular disease. Exosome technologies offer several advantages over existing biologic-based drug delivery systems.

Reasons to buy this Report:

Develop a comprehensive understanding of exosome technologies and their potential for use within the healthcare sector, Analyze the pipeline landscape and gain insight into the key companies investing in exosomes technologies, Identify trends in interventional and observational clinical trials relevant to exosomes.

Get this Report @ http://www.reportsnreports.com/purchasme=1781607

Scope of this Report:

What are the features of the exosome lifecycle?,How are therapeutic exosomes prepared?,How do exosome therapies in development differ in terms of stage of development, molecule type and therapy area?,Which companies are investing in exosome technologies?,How many clinical trials investigate exosomes as biomarkers, therapeutics and vectors?

Table of contents for Exosome Diagnostics Market Technologies:

1 Table of Contents 4

1.1 List of Tables 6

1.2 List of Figures 7

2 Exosomes in Healthcare 8

2.1 Overview of Exosomes 8

2.2 Drug Delivery Systems 9

2.2.1 Modified Release Drug Delivery Systems 9

2.2.2 Targeted Drug Delivery Systems 10

2.2.3 Liposomes 12

2.2.4 Viruses 14

2.2.5 Exosomes 17

2.3 The Exosome Lifecycle 18

2.4 Exosomes in Biology 18

2.5 Exosomes in Medicine 19

2.5.1 Biomarkers 19

2.5.2 Vaccines 20

2.6 Exosomes as a Therapeutic Target 20

2.7 Exosomes as Drug Delivery Vehicles 21

2.8 Therapeutic Preparation of Exosomes 21

2.8.1 Isolation and Purification 22

2.8.2 Drug Loading 22

2.8.3 Characterization 23

2.8.4 Bioengineering 23

2.8.5 Biodistribution and In Vivo Studies 23

2.8.6 Advantages of Exosome Therapies 24

2.8.7 Disadvantages of Exosome Therapies 24

2.9 Exosomes in Therapeutic Research 25

2.9.1 Exosome Gene Therapies 25

2.9.2 Exosome in Stem Cell Therapy 26

2.10 Exosomes in Oncology 27

2.10.1 Immunotherapy 27

2.10.2 Gene Therapy 28

2.10.3 Drug Delivery 29

2.10.4 Biomarkers 30

2.11 Exosomes in CNS Disease 30

2.11.1 Tackling the Blood-Brain Barrier 30

2.11.2 Exosomes in CNS Drug Delivery 31

2.11.3 Gene Therapy 32

2.12 Exosomes in Other Diseases 33

2.12.1 Cardiovascular Disease 33

2.12.2 Metabolic Disease 33

3 Assessment of Pipeline Product Innovation 36

3.1 Overview 36

3.2 Exosome Pipeline by Stage of Development and Molecule Type 36

3.3 Pipeline by Molecular Target 37

3.4 Pipeline by Therapy Area and Indication 38

3.5 Pipeline Product Profiles 38

3.5.1 AB-126 - ArunA Biomedical Inc. 38

3.5.2 ALX-029 and ALX-102 - Alxerion Biotech 39

3.5.3 Biologics for Autism - Stem Cell Medicine Ltd 39

3.5.4 Biologic for Breast Cancer - Exovita Biosciences Inc. 39

3.5.5 Biologics for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis - Regenasome Pty 39

3.5.6 Biologic for Lysosomal Storage Disorder - Exerkine 39

3.5.7 Biologics for Prostate Cancer - Cells for Cells 40

3.5.8 CAP-2003 - Capricor Therapeutics Inc. 40

3.5.9 CAP-1002 - Capricor Therapeutics Inc. 41

3.5.10 CIL-15001 and CIL-15002 - Ciloa 42

3.5.11 ExoPr0 - ReNeuron Group Plc 42

3.5.12 MVAX-001 - MolecuVax Inc. 43

3.5.13 Oligonucleotides to Activate miR124 for Acute Ischemic Stroke - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 44

3.5.14 Oligonucleotides to Inhibit KRAS for Pancreatic Cancer - Codiak BioSciences Inc. 44

3.5.15 Proteins for Neurology and Proteins for CNS Disorders and Oligonucleotides for Neurology - Evox Therapeutics Ltd 44

3.5.16 TVC-201 and TVC-300 - Tavec Inc. 45

4 Assessment of Clinical Trial Landscape 48

4.1 Interventional Clinical Trials 48

4.1.1 Clinical Trials by Therapy Type 48

4.1.2 Clinical Trials by Therapy Area 49

4.1.3 Clinical Trials by Stage of Development 50

4.1.4 Clinical Trials by Start Date and Status 50

4.2 Observational Clinical Trials 51

4.2.1 Clinical Trials by Therapy Type 51

4.2.2 Clinical Trials by Therapy Area 51

4.2.3 Clinical Trials by Stage of Development 52

4.2.4 Clinical Trials by Start Date and Status 53

4.2.5 List of All Clinical Trials 54

5 Company Analysis and Positioning 67

5.1 Company Profiles 67

5.1.1 Capricor Therapeutics Inc. 67

5.1.2 Evox Therapeutics Ltd 72

5.1.3 ReNeuron Group Plc 73

5.1.4 Stem Cell Medicine Ltd 77

5.1.5 Tavec Inc. 78

5.1.6 Codiak Biosciences Inc. 80

The rest is here:
Current research: 2020 Latest Report on Exosome Diagnostics Market Report Technologies, Analyze the Pipeline Landscape and Key Companies - WhaTech...

The Next Generation’s Genes – The Regulatory Review

Scholars are divided on how to regulate heritable genome editing.

Heritable genome editing refers to changing human reproductive cells so that the resulting fetus has genetic changes that its future offspring may inherit.

Proponents of heritable gene-editing champion the possibility of editing out incurable heritable diseases, but others caution that gene editing may have unintended effects. For example, an edit to prevent a child from inheriting a disease might also reduce that childs immunity to other diseases, a concern that is amplified by the fact that any changes to immunity would be heritable.

The debate is no longer theoretical. Shortly after reports of the first live births of gene-edited babies surfaced in 2018, a number of prominent scientists called for a ban on any further experimentation that would result in live births, at least until regulatory schemes were put in place.

This weeks Saturday Seminar explores scholarly works on current and proposed regulatory approaches to heritable gene-editing, as well as the unique challenges to effective regulation given factors like the medical tourism industry.

Read more:
The Next Generation's Genes - The Regulatory Review

UC Davis leads in innovative gene editing research with NIH grants – The Aggie

Researchers strive to address societal health issues through gene editing

In October, three researchers at UC Davis were awarded a $1.5 million grant to fund their project which attempts to demonstrate the effectiveness of gene editing through use of CRISPR, a powerful technology that allows alteration of DNA sequences to change gene function.

This kind of design can help enhance personalized medicine, said R. Holland Cheng, a professor of molecular and cellular biology in the College of Biological Sciences. Specific patients with specific illnesses can be treated in specific ways.

Cheng, along with Kit Lam, a distinguished professor and chair of the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine in the School of Medicine, and David Segal, a professor in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, were awarded this highly competitive and sought-after grant from the National Institute of Health (NIH).

UC Davis is part of the NIHs Somatic Cell Genome Editing (SCGE) consortium which has awarded grants to 45 other research institutes across the nation so they can begin groundbreaking work on gene editing. Through this consortium, the NIH hopes to find an efficient and safe way to conduct gene editing. Research programs are investigating the best delivery mechanism as well as the most dynamic gene editing tool.

The major problem with gene editing currently is the inability of cells to be edited within a living organism. It has become fairly easy and efficient to edit genes in a cell culture outside of the body but extremely difficult to do the same processes inside the body. Cheng, Lam and Segal are focused on changing this.

The question is how to do it inside of an animal and eventually a human, Lam said.

They are answering this question by utilizing Chengs work in engineering a non-toxic nanoparticle that they hope can transport the gene editing tool CRISPR into the cells of a living organism. Cheng has been able to create a Hepatitis E viral nanoparticle (HEVNP) that when manipulated could be a delivery system for CRISPR. They plan to take this nanoparticle and encase CRISPR inside of it, producing a mechanism for delivery of CRISPR.

The Hepatitis E nanoparticle has the capacity to be a highly efficient way to deliver gene editing to cells in the body due to its unique nature. HEVNP is resistant to the gastric acid environment of the intestines and stomach, enabling it to survive once its entered the body. Given its resistant abilities, HEVNP can be taken orally, making it a useful form of medicine. If able to successfully get HEVNP to the target cells in the body and deploy CRISPR, gene editing abilities could drastically change.

The addition of a cell-type specific targeting ligand to the HEVNP would code the nanoparticle to deliver CRISPR to a specific cell. The abilities of this method to be precise and safe will determine its success.

With five years of funding from the NIH, these three researchers are eager to begin work on this project and see the strides that can be made in gene editing. They have impressive goals for this research, as it has the capacity to reshape medicine.

This will redefine precision medicine as currently there is broad medicine that can cause side effects to people and not be effective, yet by making it specialized it is becoming more precise and effective, Cheng said.

As more effective and safe tools to cure illnesses are being tested and created, the benefits to society could be expansive. With so much potential to help improve the health of society, the NIH is dedicated to coming to new solutions at a quick rate. All programs that received grants will be required to share and utilize the research occurring at other funded programs. The NIH is hoping to eliminate the private nature of research through enforcing the sharing of ideas, as scientists are often constrained by the institutions they work for. It is their hope that by having communication between the programs, positive results will arise faster.

I think this is great because scientists inherently want to work with each other but have real world concerns especially with money, Segal said.

The research results, when groundbreaking, can provide incredible monetary gains and credibility to the institutions that made the discovery. Ultimately, scientists collaborating with one another will serve society as people are able to benefit earlier from this innovative research.

We want the public to know that we are working in their best interest, Segal said.

The NIH grant is competitive and still the third research program to join the consortium at UC Davis. Innovation has never been more prevalent than in this field at UC Davis. With three different programs researching gene editing, UC Davis stands out as a hotspot for this field of research.

Written by: Alma Meckler-Pacheco science@theaggie.org

Read this article:
UC Davis leads in innovative gene editing research with NIH grants - The Aggie

Editas Medicine Announces Third Quarter 2019 Results and Update – GlobeNewswire

Amended Celgene collaboration to focus on engineered alpha-beta T cell medicines with a $70 million payment to Editas Medicine

Appointed Judith R. Abrams, M.D., as Chief Medical Officer

EDIT-101 (AGN-151587) for LCA10 first patient dosing expected by early 2020

EDIT-301 for hemoglobinopathies in vivo pre-clinical data to be presented at ASH

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Nov. 12, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Editas Medicine, Inc. (Nasdaq: EDIT), a leading genome editing company, today reported business highlights and financial results for the third quarter of 2019.

"Our momentum in 2019 remains strong in advancing our pipeline of in vivo CRISPR and engineered cell medicines," said Cynthia Collins, Chief Executive Officer of Editas Medicine. We announced this morning an amended agreement with Celgene to further expand and accelerate our oncology pipeline. In hemoglobinopathies, we look forward to presenting in vivo pre-clinical data for EDIT-301 at ASH that supports its potential as a best-in-class medicine. Finally, we eagerly anticipate first patient dosing with EDIT-101 for LCA10 in the coming months.

Recent Achievements and OutlookIn VivoCRISPR Medicines

Engineered Cell Medicines

Corporate

Upcoming Events

Editas Medicine will participate in the following investor events:

Editas Medicine will present pre-clinical data for EDIT-301 to address sickle cell disease and beta-thalassemia in at the 61st American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition. Details are as follows:

Abstract Number: 4636Title: EDIT-301: An Experimental Autologous Cell Therapy Comprising Cas12a-RNP Modified mPB-CD34+ Cells for the Potential Treatment of SCDPresenter: Edouard De Dreuzy, Ph.D.Session: 801. Gene Therapy and Transfer: Poster III Time: Monday, December 9, 2019: 6:00 PM-8:00 PMLocation: Hall B, Orange County Convention Center, Orlando, FL

Third Quarter 2019 Financial Results

Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities at September 30, 2019, were $332.6 million, compared to $369.0 million at December 31, 2018. The $36.4 million decrease was primarily attributable to operating and capital expenses related to our on-going preclinical and clinical activities, patent costs and license fees, and employee-related costs, partially offset by $42.1 million in proceeds from financing activities.

For the three months ended September 30, 2019, net loss was $32.9 million, or $0.66 per share, compared to $15.2 million, or $0.32 per share, for the same period in 2018.

Conference Call

The Editas Medicine management team will host a conference call and webcast today at 8:00 a.m. ET to provide and discuss a corporate update and financial results for the third quarter of 2019. To access the call, please dial 844-348-3801 (domestic) or 213-358-0955 (international) and provide the passcode 6577216. A live webcast of the call will be available on the Investors & Media section of the Editas Medicine website at http://www.editasmedicine.com and a replay will be available approximately two hours after its completion.

About Editas MedicineAs a leading genome editing company, Editas Medicine is focused on translating the power and potential of the CRISPR/Cas9 and CRISPR/Cpf1 (also known as Cas12a) genome editing systems into a robust pipeline of treatments for people living with serious diseases around the world. Editas Medicine aims to discover, develop, manufacture, and commercialize transformative, durable, precision genomic medicines for a broad class of diseases. For the latest information and scientific presentations, please visit http://www.editasmedicine.com.

About EDIT-101 (AGN-151587)EDIT-101 is a CRISPR-based experimental medicine under investigation for the treatment of Leber congenital amaurosis 10 (LCA10). EDIT-101 is administered via a subretinal injection to reach and deliver the gene editing machinery directly to photoreceptor cells.

About Leber Congenital AmaurosisLeber congenital amaurosis, or LCA, is a group of inherited retinal degenerative disorders caused by mutations in at least 18 different genes. It is the most common cause of inherited childhood blindness, with an incidence of two to three per 100,000 live births worldwide. Symptoms of LCA appear within the first years of life, resulting in significant vision loss and potentially blindness. The most common form of the disease, LCA10, is a monogenic disorder caused by mutations in the CEP290 gene and is the cause of disease in approximately 2030 percent of all LCA patients.

About the Editas Medicine-Allergan AllianceIn March 2017, Editas Medicine and Allergan Pharmaceuticals International Limited (Allergan) entered a strategic alliance and option agreement under which Allergan received exclusive access and the option to license up to five of Editas Medicines genome editing programs for ocular diseases, including EDIT-101 (AGN-151587). Under the terms of the agreement, Allergan is responsible for development and commercialization of optioned products, subject to Editas Medicines option to co-develop and share equally in the profits and losses of two optioned products in the United States. In August 2018, Allergan exercised its option to develop and commercialize EDIT-101 globally for the treatment of LCA10. Additionally, Editas Medicine exercised its option to co-develop and share equally in the profits and losses from EDIT-101 in the United States. Editas Medicine is also eligible to receive development and commercial milestones, as well as royalty payments on a per-program basis. The agreement covers a range of first-in-class ocular programs targeting serious, vision-threatening diseases based on Editas Medicines unparalleled CRISPR genome editing platform, including CRISPR/Cas9 and CRISPR/Cpf1 (also known as Cas12a).

Forward-Looking StatementsThis press release contains forward-looking statements and information within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words anticipate, believe, continue, could, estimate, expect, intend, may, plan, potential, predict, project, target, should, would, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Forward-looking statements in this press release include statements regarding the Companys plans with respect to the Brilliance Phase 1/2 clinical trial for EDIT-101 (AGN-151587), including the Companys expectations regarding the timing of dosing a patient by early 2020. The Company may not actually achieve the plans, intentions, or expectations disclosed in these forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including: uncertainties inherent in the initiation and completion of pre-clinical studies and clinical trials and clinical development of the Companys product candidates; availability and timing of results from pre-clinical studies and clinical trials; whether interim results from a clinical trial will be predictive of the final results of the trial or the results of future trials; expectations for regulatory approvals to conduct trials or to market products and availability of funding sufficient for the Companys foreseeable and unforeseeable operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements. These and other risks are described in greater detail under the caption Risk Factors included in the Companys most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and in other filings that the Company may make with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the future. Any forward-looking statements contained in this press release speak only as of the date hereof, and the Company expressly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events or otherwise.

Investor ContactMark Mullikin(617) 401-9083mark.mullikin@editasmed.com

Media ContactCristi Barnett(617) 401-0113cristi.barnett@editasmed.com

See the rest here:
Editas Medicine Announces Third Quarter 2019 Results and Update - GlobeNewswire

Your hatred of heart-healthy veggies could be genetic – WPMT FOX 43

If certain vegetables have always made you gag, you may be more than a picky eater. Instead, you might be what scientists call a super-taster: a person with a genetic predisposition to taste food differently.

Unfortunately, being a super-taster doesnt make everything taste better. In fact, it can do the opposite.

Super-tasters are extremely sensitive to bitterness, a common characteristic of many dark green, leafy veggies such as broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage and Brussels sprouts, to name a few.

The person who has that genetic propensity gets more of the sulfur flavor of, say, Brussels sprouts, especially if theyve been overcooked, said University of Connecticut professor Valerie Duffy, an expert in the study of food taste, preference and consumption.

So that [bitter] vegetable is disliked, and because people generalize, soon all vegetables are disliked, Duffy said. If you ask people, Do you like vegetables? They dont usually say, Oh yeah, I dont like this, but I like these others. People tend to either like vegetables or not.

In fact, people with the bitter gene are2.6 times more likely to eat fewer vegetables than people who donot have that gene, according to a new study presented Monday at the annual meeting of the American Heart Association.

We wanted to know if genetics affected the ability of people who need to eat heart-healthy foods from eating them, said study author Jennifer Smith, a registered nurse who is a postdoc in cardiovascular science at the University of Kentucky School of Medicine.

While we didnt see results in gene type for sodium, sugar or saturated fat, we did see a difference in vegetables, Smith said, adding that people with the gene tasted a ruin-your-day level of bitterness.

Our sense of taste relies on much more than a gene or two. Receptors on our taste buds are primed to respond to five basic flavors: salty, sweet, sour, bitter and umami, which is a savory flavor created by an amino acid called glutamate (think of mushrooms, soy sauce, broth and aged cheeses).

But its also smelling through the mouth and the touch, texture and temperature of the food, Duffy said. Its very difficult to separate out taste from the rest. So when any of us say the food tastes good, its a composite sensation that were reacting to.

Even our saliva can enter the mix, creating unique ways to experience food.

When we come to the table, we dont perceive the food flavor or the taste of food equally, Duffy said. Some people live in a pastel food world versus others who might live in a more vibrant, neon food world. It could explain some of the differences in our food preference.

While there are more than 25 different taste receptors in our mouth, one in particular has been highly researched: the TAS2R38, which has two variants called AVI and PAV.

About 50% of us inherit one of each, and while we can taste bitter and sweet, we are not especially sensitive to bitter foods.

Another 25% of us are called non-tasters because we received two copies of AVI. Non-tasters arent at all sensitive to bitterness; in fact food might actually be perceived as a bit sweeter.

The last 25% of us have two copies of PAV, which creates the extreme sensitivity to the bitterness some plants develop to keep animals from eating them.

When it comes to bitterness in the veggie family, the worst offenders tend to be cruciferous vegetables, such as broccoli, kale, bok choy, arugula, watercress, collards and cauliflower.

Thats too bad, because they are also full of fiber, low in calories and are nutrient powerhouses. Theyre packed with vitamins A and C and whats called phytonutrients, which are compounds that may help to lower inflammation.

Rejecting cruciferous or any type of vegetable is a problem for the growing waistline and health of America.

As we age as a population, vegetables are very important for helping us maintain our weight, providing all those wonderful nutrients to help us maintain our immune system and lower inflammation to prevent cancer, heart disease and more, Duffy said.

Food scientists are trying to develop ways to reduce the bitterness in veggies, in the hopes we can keep another generation of super-tasters from rejecting vegetables.

Theres been some success. In fact, the Brussels sprouts we eat today are much sweeter than those our parents or grandparents ate. Dutch growers in the 90s searched their seed archives for older, less bitter varieties, then cross-pollinated them with todays higher yielding varieties.

People who already reject vegetables might try to use various cooking methods that can mask the bitter taste.

Just because somebody carries the two copies of the bitter gene doesnt mean that they cant enjoy vegetables, Duffy said. Cooking techniques such as adding a little fat, a little bit of sweetness, strong flavors like garlic or roasting them in the oven, which brings out natural sweetness, can all enhance the overall flavor or taste of the vegetable and block the bitterness.

Read the original here:
Your hatred of heart-healthy veggies could be genetic - WPMT FOX 43

Why Designing Our Own Biology Will Be the Next Big Thing in Medicine – Singularity Hub

Its hard to watch a loved one get sick. Their eyes go glassy. Their breathing is punctuated by body-wracking coughs. Feverish and aching, they struggle to get out of bed.

Hard as these symptoms are to witness, theyre so familiar you dont need a medical degree to know its probably a bad cold and maybe the flu. Get some rest, hydrate, pop some ibuprofen, see a doctor if the symptoms significantly worsenand wash your hands, for heavens sake.

For most of history, however, even the finest physicians only slowly advanced beyond the basics of biology and medicine we take for granted. There have long been forms of diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, but these were rudimentary at best and superstitious at worst.

The history of innovation is not that excitinguntil you get to the 20th century, Jane Metcalfe, cofounder of Wired and founder of Neo.Life, told the audience at Singularity Universitys Exponential Medicine in San Diego this week.

Since then, biology and medicine have been on a tear, Metcalfe said. Early last century, doctors mastered blood transfusions and complex surgeries. They began controlling and eradicating infectious disease with sterilization, antibiotics, and vaccines and found drugs to manage pain.

Then, around the middle of the century, scientists began amassing a deep body of biological knowledgeknowledge were now using to manipulate the fundamental processes of living things.

Its a familiar story, but one that suggests something radical. Just as physics and chemistry have given humans power over the world of the inanimate, biology is giving us the ability to engineer living systems, from viruses and bacteria to animals and people.

Which is why Metcalfe thinks design could be the next big thing in medicine.

Well combat disease and improve human health by designing biological systems from the ground up. We can design embryos. We can edit genes in humans. We have synthetic biology. And so we really are looking at designing future humans, Metcalfe said.

The best known bio-design tool to date is undoubtedly CRISPR genome editing. With CRISPR, scientists are closer than ever to manipulating genes down to the letter.

There are now a number of increasingly refined CRISPR-based systems, the latest of which, CRISPR prime editing, has been described as a word processor for gene editing. Meanwhile, the first approved gene therapies are making their way (at times painfully) into cancer treatment.

Just last year, Metcalfe said, the world was shocked to learn a scientist in China, Dr. He Jiankui, had used CRISPR to edit human embryos and confer immunity to HIV (and potentially other unintended traits in the process). He went even further by implanting the embryos, and the first genetically modified babies were born in China in 2018. Hes work was universally condemned by the scientific community as sloppy and unethical. Yet, another scientist, this time in Russia, has since made public his intentions to use CRISPR to edit human embryos too.

The ethics quite clearly havent caught up to the science, and the tools themselves are still being sharpened, but its likely only a matter of time before scientists, researchers, and doctors begin more responsibly snipping out disease-causing genes and, perhaps, even splicing in beneficial ones.

George Church is anticipating that day.

George is probably the most prolific bioengineer of our time, Metcalfe said. [There] are fifty different alleles that hes tracking that are beneficial to humans. These variants include genes that help protect against cardiovascular disease and Alzheimers disease. Others may improve memory and learning and extend your telomeres.

But our design abilities wont be limited to existing genes, Metcalfe said. Scientists are assembling entirely new synthetic biological systems from scratch too.

Were writing DNA codeand weve been doing this for a whilebut were starting to get good at it, said Andrew Hessel, Humane Genomics CEO and nanotechnology/biotechnology faculty at Singularity University, in a talk following Metcalfes.

Hessel pointed to Twist Bioscience a synthetic biology company that went public in late 2018. Twist manufactures short custom sequences of DNA (oligos) at scale. Customers can design and order sequences and have them delivered by Fedex. With tools like this, synthetic biologists have begun creating synthetic enzymes and proteins, some of which have even proven themselves functionallike their natural siblingsin bacteria.

Scientists are thinking bigger too.

Craig Venter, already famed for his work sequencing the first human genome, announced the first reproducing synthetic bacteria back in 2010. He followed up with a streamlined minimal synthetic cell in 2016. Boasting the smallest known genome, it has no natural counterpart. Then this year, another group announced theyd made synthetic E. coli bacteria with a four million base-pair genomefour times longer than Venters 2010 achievementand using just 61 codons instead of 64. Currently, scientists are working with yeast to make the first synthetic eukaryotic cells.

The ultimate goal is writing whole human genomes from scratch, and Hessel cofounded Genome Project-write (GP-write) to convene the worlds top synthetic biologists to do just that.

There are obviously big hurdles that still need clearingincluding software that can make design more accurate and efficient and DNA synthesis tools that assemble longer base-pair sequencesand Hessels group recently published a paper outlining the challenges. Nonetheless, Hessel said the group doesnt think any of these will take more than a decade to solve.

Literally in 10 years weve gone from making proteins synthetically to making a eukaryote, he said. As soon as we can start making whole chromosomes, well, weve only got 23 of them. Its not going to take very long until you end up bumping up against the human genome.

The pace of change in biology and medicine has been swift, Metcalfe said.

Researchers discovered DNAs structure in 1953, the first IVF baby was born in 1978, and we met Dolly the sheep, the first cloned animal, in 1996.

In just the last two decades, scientists went from sequencing the human genome at great cost and effort to sequencing it for under $1,000 in a day. Now there are an estimated million-plus complete human genomes on the books.

Weve graduated from complex and costly gene editing tools to tools that can be sold in a kit for a few hundred bucks. Scientists are building genomes from scratch and booting them up.

The question is no longer whether well be able to design our own biologythe tools are already herethe question is can we handle the responsibility?

This technology is going to touch every business, every sector, every government, every person, Hessel said. This isnt a presentation for now, its the start of a conversation with all of you for the future.

Image Credit:gustavo centurion /Unsplash

See the original post:
Why Designing Our Own Biology Will Be the Next Big Thing in Medicine - Singularity Hub