Finas Act must be reformed to protect freedom of expression CIJ and FFN – Malay Mail

JULY 24 We, the undersigned organisations and individuals, welcome Communication and Multimedia Minister Saifuddin Abdullahs pledge that the government will not be using the National Film Development Corporation Malaysia Act 1981 (Finas Act or Akta 244) to infringe on personal freedom on social media.

This comes after his shocking statement in Parliament yesterday that all film production in Malaysia, be it by mainstream media broadcasting or personal social media, must have a filming license.

He has since affirmed that social media users will be free to produce and upload videos online without needing a license or being in fear of prosecution from the National Film Development Corporation Malaysia (Finas), the central government authority for the development of the local film industry.

He iterated that there is a need for many of the laws under the purview of his ministry, including the Finas Act, to be reviewed and updated. He has also pledged to amend the Finas Act to keep with the times.

In that spirit, we would like to highlight some pertinent issues and related suggestions:

1. The licensing jurisdiction in the Finas Act needs to be clearly defined. Currently, the law could be interpreted to cover all forms of film productions; its definition of films includes feature films, short films, trailers, documentaries, moving images, films that have sound or do not and films that are meant for public viewing or otherwise. It is also silent on platforms so it could cover cinema, digital, public or private film production and screening. This means that film production could technically refer to a home-made video shot on a handphone to a multi-million ringgit movie production for cinema screening. The definition of film production will have to be amended and clearly defined to prevent the risk of the Finas Act being used arbitrarily depending on the intentions of the government.

2. There needs to be a clear justification of the purpose of licensing for instance, for collecting data, planning or filmmaker funding purposes. These requirements should also be matched and limited to stated needs. The Finas Acts current requirement for companies to have at least RM50,000 paid-up capital in order to qualify for a film or video production licence has long caused anxiety and dissatisfaction among young and independent filmmakers making non-commercial films who do not have the financial requirements. This requirement will have to be removed from the law. Otherwise, it will result in a drop in the number and quality of films, including documentaries, and severely impact the growth of the film industry in Malaysia.

3. News production companies such as Al Jazeera should not fall under the purview of the Finas Act if they are already accredited as media by the Information Department. It is also noteworthy that any decision on the case of the Al Jazeera Locked Up In Malaysias Lockdown documentary will act as a precedent and has the potential for misuse as it could be used arbitrarily on any production, including those screened online, as long as it is deemed as questioning or being critical of the State. Furthermore, it has the potential to create a climate of fear and censorship among filmmakers and drive away international production and film companies from investing and setting up operations in Malaysia.

4. The licensing of films by Finas must not be used as a form of control and censorship. The recent reported remark by Zakaria Abdul Hamid, the chairperson of Finas, that all video recordings must have a licence from his agency to ensure said video recordings do not incite unrest or cause a public nuisance is very telling of how Finas perceives its role. This is also clearly indicative of: (i) an overlap of roles between Finas, the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission and the Film Censorship Board; (ii) a breach of the covenant of industry self-regulation under the Communications and Multimedia Act, and; (iii) a double layer of censorship and film content control.

We appeal to Finas to stay true to its role of uplifting, nurturing and facilitating the development of the Malaysian film industry, as stated in Section 6 (1) of the Finas Act, and not function against the interest of filmmakers. If Finas enforces regulations under the law to censor and penalise filmmakers, it will go against its own objective and purpose. It is imperative that Finas not allow itself to be used as a tool by the current regime to silence dissent and target media companies like Al Jazeera simply because their documentary places the State in an unfavourable light.

On the other hand, the Communications and Multimedia Minister must immediately uphold his pledge to amend the Finas Act to protect freedom of expression and media freedom. As key and invested stakeholders and allies, we are willing to engage in a dialogue with the minister in order to seek a sustainable roadmap to align our laws to protect the right of freedom of expression and public interest.

*This statement is issued by the Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ) and Freedom Film Network (FFN).

Endorsed by the following organisations:

1. EMPOWER Malaysia2. Gerakan Media Merdeka (Geramm)3. Global Bersih4. Justice for Sisters5. Komuniti Filem Titiwangsa (Komfit)6. KRYSS Network7. Malaysian Documentary Association (MYDOCS)8. North-South Initiative (NSI)9. Our Journey10. Pangrok Sulap11. Persatuan Sahabat Wanita Selangor (PSWS)12. Pusat Komas13. ReformARTsi (An arts coalition comprising 117 members, of which 55 are from art groups or companies)14. Sabah Reform Initiative (SARI)15. Sisters in Islam (SIS)16. Taskforce Against Kaiduan Dam (TaKaD)17. The Instant Cafe Theatre Company

Endorsed by the following individuals:

1. Amir Muhammad [Kuman Pictures Sdn Bhd]2. Azmyl Yunor [Artist and academician]3. Bea Tanaka [Producer]4. Iskander Azizuddin [Feisk Productions]5. Jerome Kugan6. Loo Hong Chuang [Academician]7. Nadira Ilana [Telan Bulan Films]8. Susan Lankester [Actor, producer and director, BWC Pictures]9. Yow Chong Lee [Filmmaker and academician]

**This is the personal opinion of the writer(s) or organisation(s) and does not necessarily represent the views ofMalay Mail.

Go here to read the rest:

Finas Act must be reformed to protect freedom of expression CIJ and FFN - Malay Mail

Rev. C.T. Vivian, Freedom Rides organizer and key adviser to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., dies at 95 – Richmond Free Press

ATLANTA - The Rev. C.T. Vivian, an early and key adviser to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. who organized pivotal civil rights campaigns and spent decades advocating for justice and equality, died Friday, July 17, 2020, the same day as fellow civil rights leader Congressman John Lewis of Georgia.

The 95-year-old Rev. Vivian, a former interim president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference that Dr. King co-founded, began staging sit-ins against segregation in Peoria, Ill., in the 1940s a dozen years before lunch counter protests by college students made national news. He met Dr. King soon after the budding civil rights leader spearheaded the 1955 Montgomery bus boycott, and helped translate ideas into action by organizing the Freedom Rides that forced federal intervention across the South.

Rev. Vivian boldly challenged a segregationist sheriff while trying to register Black voters in Selma, Ala., where hundreds, then thousands, later marched across the Edmund Pettus Bridge.

You can turn your back now and you can keep your club in your hand, but you cannot beat down justice. And we will register to vote because as citizens of these United States we have the right to do it, Rev. Vivian declared, wagging his index finger at Sheriff Jim Clark as the cameras rolled.

The sheriff then punched him, and news coverage of the assault helped turned a local registration drive into a national phenomenon.

Former diplomat and Congressman Andrew Young, another close confidante of Dr. King, said Rev. Vivian was always one of the people who had the most insight, wisdom, integrity and dedication.

Former President Obama, who honored Rev. Vivian with the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2013, tweeted last Friday that Rev. Vivian was always one of the first in the action a Freedom Rider, a marcher in Selma, beaten, jailed, almost killed, absorbing blows in hopes that fewer of us would have to.

He waged nonviolent campaigns for integration across the South, and campaigns for economic justice throughout the North, knowing that even after the Voting Rights Act and Civil Rights Act that he helped win, our long journey to equality was nowhere near finished, President Obama wrote.

He also drew a direct line from Rev. Vivian and all the heroes in that Civil Rights Generation to todays generation of activists, saying, I have to imagine that seeing the largest protest movement in history unfold over his final months gave the Reverend a final dose of hope.

Speaking with students in Tennessee 50 years after the Voting Rights Act was signed into law, Rev. Vivian urged them to act strategically as they advocated for justice and equality. The Civil Rights Movement was effective not only because of its nonviolence, but because activists made sure their messages were amplified, he said.

This is what made the movement: Our voice was really heard. But it didnt happen by accident; we made certain it was heard, Rev. Vivian said.

Born Cordy Tindell Vivian on July 28, 1924, in Howard County, Mo., Rev. Vivian moved as a young boy to Macomb, Ill., with his mother. He studied theology alongside future civil rights leader and U.S. Congressman John Lewis at the American Baptist College in Nashville, Tenn., where they trained waves of activists in nonviolent protest.

More:

Rev. C.T. Vivian, Freedom Rides organizer and key adviser to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., dies at 95 - Richmond Free Press

West Ham have to play with freedom in finale Johnson – Romford Recorder

PUBLISHED: 09:00 24 July 2020

Manchester United's Marcus Rashford (left) and West Ham United's Ben Johnson in action during the Premier League match at Old Trafford

PA Wire/PA Images

Young defender Ben Johnson says West Ham need to lay down a marker for next season as they complete the delayed 2019-20 Premier League campaign against Aston Villa on Sunday.

Email this article to a friend

To send a link to this page you must be logged in.

The Hammers ensured their safety with a 1-1 draw against Manchester United in midweek, as full-back Johnson impressed at Old Trafford.

And David Moyes men will look to end on a high at London Stadium against a Villa side still fighting for their own survival.

Johnson told whufc.com: Its about looking at next season. Weve got to enjoy the draw. We probably couldve won with the chances we had.

I think just play with freedom on Sunday and continue it to next season and build on that, because I think well only have three weeks off and then well be back in pre-season.

So its not really a long break. We can build momentum from Sunday. You see Sheffield Unitedhaving a wonderful season, so why cant we do that?

With our keeper Lukasz Fabianski and the back four, the foundation we have allows to build. And the front three have shown we can goals from the restart, so who knows?

The 20-year-old Johnson had looked assured in the crucial 3-1 win over fellow strugglers Watford last Friday and kept Marcus Rashford quiet for long spells on Wednesday.

And the academy graduate said it was a relief to have stayed up after the three-month break due to the coronavirus pandemic, adding: Weve come back and learned from our manager. Hes give us results and were just delighted to mathematically be safe.

Having so long a break, there was uncertainty in the squad, but I think weve dug deep, weve played football like we can we can go to another level as well and just getting results is what we want and what we can do.

Weve had a difficult seasno, not the season we expected, but in the last couple of games weve shown what we can do and that we can go up a notch, so its just delightful to see us playing with freedom and together as a team.

Attacking-wise were dangerous and defensively were strong, so hopefully well just bring that into next season.

Sundays game against Aston Villa kicks off at 4pm and is being shown live on BT Sport from 3pm.

If you value what this story gives you, please consider supporting the Romford Recorder. Click the link in the orange box below for details.

See more here:

West Ham have to play with freedom in finale Johnson - Romford Recorder

Dudley coronavirus heroes granted Freedom of the Borough – Dudley News

WORKERS on the frontline of the coronavirus pandemic in the Dudley borough have been granted Freedom of the Borough as a mark of recognition for their dedication during the crisis.

Councillors voted to bestow the honour at Thursday night's virtual full council meeting following a request put forward by councillor Keiran Casey.

The honour has been granted to staff working in the NHS, public health, adult social care, children's services, bereavement services and voluntary sector workers in the Dudley borough as a mark of thanks for their work and sacrifice during the Covid-19 pandemic.

The accolade is the highest award the council can bestow and former recipients include RAF Cosford, the 63 Military Intelligence Company in Stourbridge, Dudley's own Sir Lenny Henry and Halesowen tennis ace Jordanne Whiley.

Councillor Casey said: "It's brilliant news that this request has been approved by the council.

"This is the highest honour the council can give and I think it's really important we continue to show our thanks and appreciation to those on the very frontline of this fight, who without a moments hesitation go in to our hospital wards to treat patients, in to our care homes to look after our elderly and vulnerable and out in the community to ensure that people have the help and support they need.

"For me, this is about recognising on mass, the hundreds and hundreds of people in these areas who work tirelessly right across our Borough and showing them how truly grateful we are for the work they have and continue to do.

"It's about us as a Borough saying very simply, thank you and there is no doubt that we owe more than words can say to those on the very frontline of this fight."

Councillor Patrick Harley, leader of Dudley Council, said: "Whilst the fight against the pandemic is not yet over, we believe its important to recognise the continuing efforts of all those people who are helping us all.

"We will now work cross party to find the best way to recognise these achievements. There are so many people to acknowledge, we want to make sure we do this in a meaningful way and will be announcing how we will due this over the coming months."

The news comes as work to build a permanent monument in honour of care and key workers outside Russells Hall Hospital gains pace.

Donations have so far reached 12,000 in a matter of weeks since Councillor Casey launched the project, which will see the creation a rainbow monument covered in personalised colours hearts as a lasting tribute.

Organisations including Dudley College, the University of Wolverhampton, Interserve, South Staffs Water and the University of Birmingham have so far pledged support.

Councillor Casey, who represents Upper Gornal and Woodsetton added: "I've also been blown away by the support I've received from local people and organisations on the project for a permanent monument in Dudley and thought this would be a way of having a lasting tribute to everyone that has done so much for us, in some cases paying the ultimate sacrifice".

Originally posted here:

Dudley coronavirus heroes granted Freedom of the Borough - Dudley News

Beaver County schools to begin new year online – WKBN.com

Superintendent Jeffrey Fuller said the online start will allow the district more flexibility in its planning

Posted: Jul 24, 2020 / 05:12 AM EDT / Updated: Jul 24, 2020 / 05:22 AM EDT

Credit: Klaus Vedfelt/DigitalVision/Getty Images

FREEDOM, Pa. (WKBN) The Freedom Area School District in Beaver County voted to start the new school year entirely online.

According to CBS affiliate KDKA, the school board voted Thursday night 8 to 1 in favor of the plan.

Superintendent Jeffrey Fuller said the online start will allow the district more flexibility in its planning.

Four models are being explored by the district that could be implemented at any time and include:

In a video provided to the district explaining the reopening options, Fuller said the Virtual (All out) plan would be implemented if state authorities said it would not be safe for students to be in the classroom.

There are two models for virtual learning which are synchronous and asynchronous. Synchronous would mean all students attend class online together. Asynchronous means that students would watch recorded lessons and may be able to log on and have conversations and chat with the teacher. Fuller said the district is leaning toward the synchronous model.

Link:

Beaver County schools to begin new year online - WKBN.com

Hoover’s Branson honored as 2020 Freedom Award winner – Shelby County Reporter – Shelby County Reporter

HOOVER Retired U.S. Army Lt. Col. Ginger Branson was honored as the Hoover Area Chamber of Commerces 2020 Freedom Award recipient at a presentation held Thursday, July 16 at Aldridge Gardens and via Facebook Live.

Branson was lauded for her 28 years of military service as a nurse, including two years of active duty in the Gulf War in Operation Desert Storm, and for her ongoing post-military work to support other veterans and their families.

She lives and breathes patriotism in everything she does, retired U.S. Army Gen. Paul Pocopanni said of Branson. Theres no one who works harder and longer to take care of and honor our veterans than Ginger Branson.

Branson serves as the commander of American Legion Post 911 in Hoover and as the American Legion 21st District commander.

Branson also represents the American Legion on the Veterans Administration Voluntary Services Committee.

Also on Bransons extensive list of community involvement that Pocopanni read during the award presentation were the following: Branson serves as local director of Wreaths Across America; she will be inducted into the Alabama Senior Citizens Hall of Fame in the near future; she was awarded the Positive Maturity Volunteer Spirit Award in 2019; she is a published author and parish nurse at Avondale UMC; she knits shawls with a group at Canterbury United Methodist Church; she has made hundreds of masks during the pandemic; and she is a member of the Support Committee for the Alabama National Cemetery.

Pocopanni described Branson as a hard worker and multitasker known for her steadfast volunteerism and love and devotion for veterans causes.

The Hoover Freedom Award was designed for someone like Lt. Col. Ginger Branson to be honored and recognized for her selfless dedication to the community, to the state and to our nation, Pocopanni said. Her professionalism, both as a nurse and an army officer, and her steadfast desire to help our veterans, are unmatched.

Branson said the most enjoyable time for her during the COVID-19 quarantine the last four months has been her daily phone calls with veterans.

Every afternoon I choose one or two World War II or Korean War veterans, and I just call them, she said. I introduce myself, ask them if they need anything, how theyre doing, and then I just listen to them. Heres the thing like all of us, they cant go anywhere, not even to church, which is for a lot of them their lifeline. But unlike most of us, if they contract COVID-19, theyre exponentially more likely to die from it. So, while for me sequestration has been an opportunity, for many solitude has brought about loneliness, and loneliness for months on end is agony and can lead to hopelessness and despair.

Branson encouraged those who are able to go through their contact lists and check in with people who might be coping with isolation.

I promise you there are people on there you havent talked to in a very, very long time, she said. Please call them and just tell them, Hey Im doing a buddy check, wondering how youre doing and if you need anything. Listen to them, and then of course invite them to have a blessed day. Please do your part to help turn someones lonely day into a brighter one.

The sponsor of this years Freedom Awards luncheon was Medical West, which will open a primary care facility in the Brocks Gap community this fall, Medical West CEO Keith Pennington wrote in a statement shared during the award presentation.

Were thrilled to be able to offer this service to families in the Hoover area, Pennington wrote. Medical West is also excited to once again be a supporter of the Hoover Bucs. As we work through the reopening of schools and sports programs, we plan to work with Hoover High School to see how our funds can best be used to support their students.

American Village Development Director Jeremy Ward served as speaker at the presentation and provided an overview of programs and activities offered at the American history and civics education center located in Montevallo.

Our mission is to strengthen and renew the foundations of American liberty and constitutional self-government by engaging and inspiring citizens and leaders, especially with emphasis on programs for young people, Ward said. The American Village is committed to telling the incredible stories of Americas struggle for independence and examining how the lessons contained within those stories are still vitally relevant today in our roles as private citizens.

Ward said the American Villages primary goals are: To teach youth the vital lessons of liberty; to remember the price of liberty and honor those who have paid it; to promote public regard for the Constitution and Americas chartered freedom; to engage citizens and leaders in the stewardship of liberty; and to foster renewal of the American spirit of E pluribus unum, or from many, one.

Ward said work is underway on the first phase of a multi-phase project to bring a full-scale replica of Philadelphias Independence Hall to the American Villages 188-acre campus.

During the venues closure amid the COVID-19 pandemic, staff are working to restructure many on-campus educational offerings in preparation for the 2020-2021 school year.

We are currently planning for a very different school year, Ward said. We will continue to offer our engaging programs on campus. Those will be available for public, private, homeschools. We are working very diligently to offer many of our educational programs virtually and are producing several short, easily accessed videos in line with Alabama Course of Study for social studies to be offered at little to no cost.

Every year, Freedom Award recipients are selected from nominees, each of whom are:

We want to support our country, our laws, and particularly the men and women that lay their lives down each and every day so that we would have these wonderful freedoms that we certainly enjoy, Hoover Mayor Frank Brocato said. I am grateful for those who did serve for us.

Excerpt from:

Hoover's Branson honored as 2020 Freedom Award winner - Shelby County Reporter - Shelby County Reporter

Letter to the editor Two kinds of freedom – WV News

The United States is number one. We have more cases and more deaths from the coronavirus than any other country. Brazil is number two, but the United States has 135 percent more cases and 119 percent more deaths. Of the 20 countries with the most cases, the death rate per 100,000 population in the United States is third highest. We cannot travel to Canada or Europe. Are you tired of winning yet?

Last week, a county employee stood up for the staff of establishments in the county trying to enforce the requirement to wear a mask when people ignore that requirement. This is happening all over the United States. Trump says he will not impose a national requirement to wear masks because he wants people to have a certain freedom. But one must ask, freedom for who?

Our Constitution enshrines critical freedoms for all Americans. The first amendment says that Congress cannot pass laws prohibiting the free exercise of religion, abridge the freedom of speech or of the press. Freedom defines what America is. But these freedoms are not absolute. You cannot yell fire in a crowded movie theater, or use words to incite violence against others, or print things in the paper that libel others.

The Constitution declares, We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. A well-functioning government is responsible for our common defense and our general welfare.

We are under attack by this virus. It has killed almost three times more Americans than died during the Vietnam War. Government must provide for our common defense. Similarly, everyone should be free to safely vote in elections, work to support our families, have safe working conditions, a good public education, and public health and a long life. The government must promote our general welfare. Trumps government is failing. Big time.

Wendell Berry, the rural philosopher, says there are two kinds of freedom: the freedom of the community and the freedom of the individual. The community confers on its members freedoms implicit in familiarity, mutual respect, mutual affection, and mutual help; it gives freedom its proper aims; and prescribes or shows the responsibilities without which no one can be legitimately free

He continues, Freedom defined strictly as individual freedom tends to see itself as an escape from the constraints of community life. The unconstrained pursuit of individual freedom operates invariably to the detriment of community life and community values.

Thus, freedom has two aspects: freedom to pursue your individual interests to be all you can be, and freedom from things that can keep you from moving forward. Be a patriot. Step up to your responsibility as a citizen. Wear a mask so your neighbors can work to support their families and live a safe and healthy life.

More here:

Letter to the editor Two kinds of freedom - WV News

Five arrested in drug bust on Patersons Freedom Boulevard – NorthJersey.com

Joe Malinconico, Paterson Press Published 2:21 p.m. ET July 21, 2020

Just a block from Broadway on Auburn Street in Paterson, the influence of drugs is apparent. NorthJersey

PATERSON An apartment building where 82 people were arrested in one day in 2018 was the target of a Paterson police drug bust on Monday during which a loaded gun, 200 packets of heroin and 25 vials of crack cocaine were seized, authorities said.

Mondays bust at 83 Auburn Street underscored the relentless nature of the narcotic trade on the block, one of Patersons notorious open-air drug markets, police said. From 2014 through 2016, Paterson police made more than 200 drug arrests on the block, authorities.

In 2015, city narcotics detectives arrested 87 people on narcotics charges at 90 Auburn Street, the building across the street from where Mondays bust took place, and in 2017 two teenagers were shot one fatally in what police said was a drug-related dispute at 87 Auburn Street.

Paterson: City sees 36% drop in public complaints against police officers in 2019

North Brunswick NJ shooting: Suspect Roy Hollander eyed in fatal shooting of California attorney

Lawsuit: Lawsuit claims Paterson cops, hospital responsible for death of Jameek Lowery

After the homicide, Paterson police put a patrol vehicle in front of the building where the killing happened and Auburn Street quieted down for a few weeks. But eventually, the drug trade and gun violence returned.

In Mondays bust, police arrested two suspected drug dealers from Paterson and three alleged customers from Wayne, Clifton and the city of Passaic, according to Public Safety Director Jerry Speziale.

People regularly hang out in front of 83 Auburn Street. Authorities said they saw the three suspected buyers walk up to the building and engaged in drug transactions with young men outside.

City officials designated Auburn Street Freedom Boulevard" in honor of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.s 1968 visit to a church there just days before he was assassinated.

Joe Malinconico is editor of Paterson Press. Email: editor@patersonpress.com

Read or Share this story: https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/paterson-press/2020/07/21/five-arrested-drug-bust-paterson-nj-freedom-boulevard/5480680002/

Follow this link:

Five arrested in drug bust on Patersons Freedom Boulevard - NorthJersey.com

A champion for freedom: A nation mourns the passing of John Lewis – STLtoday.com

U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Missouri: John Lewis, follower of Jesus, fighter for justice, lover of America. Rest In Peace. Resurgam.

Missouri Governor Mike Parson: Congressman John Lewis was a civil rights pioneer who fought for the good of this nation and produced important changes. Rest In Peace, John Lewis.

Bernice King, the daughter of civil rights icon Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.: Farewell, sir. You did, indeed, fight the good fight and get into a lot of good trouble. You served God and humanity well. Thank you. Take your rest.

Former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: John Lewis gave all he had to redeem Americas unmet promise of equality and justice for all, and to create a place for us to build a more perfect union together.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California: John Lewis was a titan of the civil rights movement whose goodness, faith and bravery transformed our nation from the determination with which he met discrimination at lunch counters and on Freedom Rides, to the courage he showed as a young man facing down violence and death on Edmund Pettus Bridge, to the moral leadership he brought to the Congress for more than 30 years.

Nathan Law, Hong Kong pro-democracy activist and former legislator: RIP Congressman John Lewis. Thank you for your support. Thank you for your activism. Thank you for your lessons.

Go here to see the original:

A champion for freedom: A nation mourns the passing of John Lewis - STLtoday.com

Lizard people and freedom of expression – Daily Maverick

David Icke is an anti-Semite and conspiracy theorist who claims to believe, among other things, that an inter-dimensional race of reptilian beings called theArchons have hijacked the earth and are stopping humanity from realising its true potential, and that theBritish royal familyare shape-shifting lizards. The controversy about his recent appearance on an eNCA show quickly morphed into a wrong-headed argument about freedom of expression, diverting attention from the ethical accountability of the host.

In his 1994 book, There Is No Such Thing as Free Speech and Its a Good Thing,Too, Stanley Fish argued that neo-conservatives often use sacred abstractions such as freedom of expression to present their partisan political commitments as a universal imperative, as a call to moral arms so perspicuous that only the irrational or the godless (two categories often conflated) could refuse it.

In this view, the sacred abstraction of freedom of expression is used to shield individuals from the consequences of their own (ideologically driven) beliefs and actions. As if by magic, politics is made to disappear, replaced by the chanting of the high-minded quasi-religious slogans associated with the unconditional support for the idea of freedom of expression. The point is not that censorship is acceptable or that freedom of expression is not valuable, but that the latter is often used to obscure political sympathies and to avoid meaningful discussion about the very issue in whose name the right is being invoked.

Freedom of expression is not the only sacred abstraction deployed in this way. Think of the argument that the removal of the statues of slave owners, colonisers and a variety of assorted racists, will erase history, thus allowing defenders of the history and culture (of which these statues remain powerful symbols) not to have to admit to, or defend, the fact that they are defending, or are sympathetic to, this history and culture. Similarly, AfriForum can pretend that their defence of the apartheid flag is not a defence of apartheid or a nostalgic yearning for a return to the past, but rather a defence of the sacred abstraction of freedom of expression.

The use of sacred abstractions to shield individuals against criticism and against the consequences of their actions is, of course, not limited to neo-conservatives. But the unsophisticated deployment of a caricatured version of freedom of expression does seem to find particular favour with people on the right of the political spectrum. The discussion on Twitter (by which I mean shouting) sparked by the decision to host David Icke on an eNCA programme, illustrates this point nicely. It is impossible to address all the misconceptions (as I see it) relied on by the defenders of the former reality TV personalitys decision to invite Icke, so I will touch on only a few here.

imagine you lived in Rwanda in early 1994 and you were asked whether you supported the appearance of Leon Mugesera, a politician who described Tutsis as cockroaches and called for their extermination, on a local television programme. If you answered yes, you are a monster. If you answered no, you cannot claim that you believe in platforming all voices.

When Giulietta Talevi, Money editor at the Financial Mail, was criticised for appearing on the same programme (but in a different segment) as David Icke, she responded as follows: And, though I dont agree with the man at all, I totally agree with a platform that airs all voices, however abhorrent. And @GarethCliff is doing his job by interrogating them/us. While many people believe that they hold this view, it is my contention that none of them actually do.

This is really a self-evident point, which is why it is so strange that so many people still believe that they believe this. All that is required to substantiate my argument, is to identify a specific example of a person that you would never give a platform to. My example is the following: imagine you lived in Rwanda in early 1994 and you were asked whether you supported the appearance of Leon Mugesera, a politician who described Tutsis as cockroaches and called for their extermination, on a local television programme. If you answered yes, you are a monster. If you answered no, you cannot claim that you believe in platforming all voices.

But just to be safe, I provide another example. Would you support a decision by the former reality TV personality to interview Andre Slade about his belief expressed in an Equality Court case that the Bible classifies black people as animals? If you do, you believe debating whether some people are human is a meaningful activity and that would make you a monster. If you do not, then you cannot claim to believe that all people should be given a platform.

We will, of course, all draw the line differently when deciding on who should not be given a platform, but we all have a line beyond which we will not be prepared to go. But admitting this will require you to justify why you draw the line where you draw it. And if you have to justify your decision, it will, in turn, reveal something about your world view, ethical principles, and ideology which you might prefer to remain hidden, and you may know would be difficult to defend. (What is revealed is not your support for the person being given a platform, but what kinds of bigotry you are prepared to legitimise.) Better then for some rather to shout: free speech!

Giulietta Talevi also tweeted in her own defence: David Icke is clearly as mad as a balloon. And repugnant to boot. But you know what, its @GarethCliffs show and he can have who the fuck he pleases on it. This is the opposite view from the one expressed by critics of no-platforming, who argue that it infringes on freedom of expression if an institution or event (broadcaster, radio station, university, book festival, professional organisation) refuses to host a specific person or changes its mind and disinvites a person. Curiously, some defenders of free expression support both positions, which does not appear to be coherent.

Strictly speaking, the claim made by Giulietta Talevi is not correct, as the former reality TV personality is not free to have anyone he pleases on the show.

First, he is constrained by the brief given to him by the broadcaster hosting the show. If he strays from this brief, he will be fired.

Second, like any other broadcaster, eNCA has to adhere to its licencing conditions which constrains who could be invited.

The reality TV personality has probably calculated that there are enough viewers who are interested in spectacle and showboating as Jerry Springer showed so spectacularly and that the platforming of someone like Icke would boost ratings.

Third, the law of defamation and hate speech also constrains his choices.

Fourth, the host of a current affairs programme is supposed to be constrained by the basic rules of journalism, editorial judgment and ethics. Applying these rules would preclude the platforming of individuals merely for the purpose of reality television-like spectacle. (All these considerations are seemingly absent from the decision to invite Icke).

But potentially the most crucial constraint which an appeal to freedom of expression attempts to circumvent is the constraint imposed by the (not really free) marketplace. If your choices as programme host lead to severe criticism and protest, the inability to attract credible interviewees, and the withdrawal of advertising, your programme will be cancelled. The reality TV personality has probably calculated that there are enough viewers who are interested in spectacle and showboating as Jerry Springer showed so spectacularly and that the platforming of someone like Icke would boost ratings. (Which is why he will probably avoid inviting Andre Slade for a sit-down interview.)

Of course, the most astute way to minimise the impact of this constraint and to avoid accountability for ones journalistic choices is to invoke freedom of expression and pretend that the performance of freedom of expression (and not the content of the expression) is the only thing that matters.

This does not mean that freedom of expression concerns are necessarily absent from decisions on who to platform and who not. But the matter is slightly more complicated than the sloganeers imagine. Let me explain.

In some contexts, refusing to platform someone would raise serious freedom of expression concerns, while in other contexts it would not. If SABC news refused to platform someone because she is an opposition politician, or queer, or an atheist, or critical of the SABC, it would be a serious freedom of expression matter. This is because the SABC is the public broadcaster, has a statutory mandate to provide a diversity of views and inform and entertain the public, and is by far the most influential and widely consumed source of news in South Africa.

A claim that the suspension of an account by Facebook or Twitter will never raise freedom of expression concerns would therefore be difficult to sustain. But while the suspension of an account may in some circumstances limit the right to freedom of expression, this limitation may be justified by law or by other considerations.

A decision by SABC news not to platform a person for non-journalistic reasons would arguably limit the right of everyones freedom of expression, as it would deprive millions of South Africans of their freedom to receive potentially meaningful information. But this does not give individuals the unqualified right to be platformed on the SABC news, as the corporation also has a duty to exercise editorial discretion to meet its statutory obligations and the minimum journalistic standards. If it exercises this discretion badly, it would not normally implicate freedom of expression. In such a case people will rightly criticise the SABC news, but criticism should then rightly be focused on what really matters the actual editorial decision.

For similar reasons, private companies like Facebook and Twitter present a special problem. Although these companies are private, their platforms fulfil a quasi-public function in the modern age and decisions by these companies to block individual users may, in some instances, limit the rights of those users and the rights of others who will be deprived of their right to receive information. (To illustrate, to suspend Donald Trumps Twitter account will limit his freedom of expression and that of his followers in quite a fundamental manner.)

A claim that the suspension of an account by Facebook or Twitter will never raise freedom of expression concerns would therefore be difficult to sustain. But while the suspension of an account may in some circumstances limit the right to freedom of expression, this limitation may be justified by law or by other considerations.

The situation will be different when a university, a book festival, or your local pensioners current affairs club decides to no-platform a specific speaker. The impact of these decisions will be minimal on the condition that the speaker has access to other widely accessible platforms and it would therefore be rather difficult to argue that the refusal amounts to censorship. This does not mean that the decision of such an institution is not open to robust criticism. It just means that it should not be sufficient to cloak the criticism in the sacred abstractions of free speech; the criticism will actually have to engage with the question of why it is important that this particular speaker with these particular views should or should not be platformed by a specific institution.

So, the next time an individual defends the platforming of some or other bigot, conspiracy theorist or medical charlatan (to name but a few), be aware that this individual may invoke freedom of expression to avoid having to talk about why the views of the bigot, conspiracy theorist or medical charlatan, are valuable or worth discussing or debating. DM

Pierre De Vos teaches Constitutional law at the University of Cape Town Law Faculty, where he serves as deputy dean and as the Claude Leon Foundation Chair in Constitutional Governance. He writes a regular blog, entitled 'Constitutionally Speaking', in which he attempts to mix one part righteous anger, one part cold legal reasoning and one part irreverence to help keep South Africans informed about Constitutional and other legal developments related to the democracy.

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or if you are already an Insider.

The rest is here:

Lizard people and freedom of expression - Daily Maverick

ZAXX breaks year-long hiatus with help from Proximity and Musical Freedom on ‘Unforgetting’ – Dancing Astronaut

by: Ross GoldenbergJul 23, 2020

Rewind to the summer season a half-decade ago, and ZAXX was riding the high from Alpha, his inaugural release on Music Freedom, his mentors label. With a handful of Musical Freedom appearances in the time since, the New York-bred talent has mainly focused on discovering his true form, making a move more towards the indie-electronic front. After finally receiving clearance for his two highly-coveted versions of Boys Like Girls The Great Escape and Snow Patrols Chasing Cars at the end of 2019, ZAXX is partnering back up with Tistos Musical Freedom and Proximity for his debut single of the year, Unforgetting.

Self-described as the most 80s-style influenced song that hes produced, ZAXX opens up on Unforgetting, designing an introspective synthwave-inspired aesthetic that fits graciously into the summers beginning decline. ZAXX says it took him three-years from the starting point of the single to cross the finish line and considering the first-class result, the wait was well worth it. The dance music godfather himself shared a message on his mentees anticipated return to his label:

Very excited to work with our friends over at Proximity to showcase the new Zaxx music to the world. We love the team over at Proximity who are just as passionate as I am about finding and showcasing great music. We wanted to work on something together for a long time and the Zaxx music is a great start. Zaxx is a super talented producer who has been releasing on Musical Freedom since 2015, its been great to see him evolve his sound into something super unique that we hope fans of both Musical Freedom and Proximity can equally connect to!

Watch the full Unforgetting music video below via Proximity.

Featured image: ZAXX/Twitter

Tags: Musical Freedom, proximity, tiesto, Unforgetting, Zaxx

Categories: Music

Read the original:

ZAXX breaks year-long hiatus with help from Proximity and Musical Freedom on 'Unforgetting' - Dancing Astronaut

Letter to the Editor: Another perspective on the Freedom Rock | The Standard Newspaper – Waukon Standard

To the Editor:

I would like to share some facts and information with the public about the Freedom Rock.

It is my understanding that Ardie Kuhse commissioned the artist (Bubba Sorensen) to do a Freedom Rock for us here in Allamakee County. Ardie submitted a lot of the requirements needed to start the Freedom Rock project. She says she started this project back in 2016.

With that being said, only a few choice people heard about it until recently when its deadline is fast approaching. She mentioned previously about putting it in her husbands hometown but was persuaded out of that and into putting it in the county seat, which is Waukon. She has a place picked out at our city park. She noted there was a lot of parking, restrooms, picnic areas along with space to develop and enhance the scope (landscaping) of the tourism project.

The only things that were not mentioned was the park will close in the fall, with no snow removal over winter, along with the restrooms, and the plumbing will be shut off. Another thing is the removal of a shelter. The rock will be a short distance from the childrens play area and the rocket slide. Will the children think the rock offers another place to climb?

The only way to view this tourist attraction is to drive through the entire park to see it. It can not be viewed from the highway because of the bushes. Ardie made the comment this will have to be noted in the Freedom Rock tourist guide. Another thing, with all the vandalism going on these days, will there be enough lights and patrol coverage?

Ardie has been approached by numerous veterans and Allamakee residents about placing the Freedom Rock between the Vets Club and museum. She feels she put a lot of work into this project and there is too little time to change the placement of the rock.

Dont take me wrong, Ardie did do a lot of work and Im not denying that, but the placement is where the disagreement comes into play. She also made the statement that since she submitted the application it was her decision as to the placement of the rock, if she wanted to, she could put it on her farm.

Another statement made was if we didnt act upon this immediately, we would be the only county to not have a rock. Also the artist planned to finish all 99 counties this year. Due to circumstances out of his control, he will not be able to finish all 99 this year. He is hoping to finish them all in 2021.

Speaking about tourism, to me it makes more sense to have the tourist come through our downtown to see our new downtown plaza, our downtown businesses, and maybe visit our museum.

Other counties that have the Freedom Rock had a lot of publicity in their local newspapers, radio and TV advertisements. They also had fundraisers. Linn County has been working to raise $20,000 the last two years. They are raising this amount to quote, bring this large-scale project to successful fruition. Then in the summer of 2020

Freedom Rock artist Bubba Sorenson will paint the Linn County image on the rock. This could have been the way the Allamakee County Freedom Rock project went. Instead, the community is learning about it at the near deadline.

Never would have I also dreamed that such a meaningful and beautiful piece of artwork honoring the Veterans be placed in a childrens play area. This is just one Allamakee County resident with her own opinion.

Sincerely,

Julie JohnsonWaukon

More here:

Letter to the Editor: Another perspective on the Freedom Rock | The Standard Newspaper - Waukon Standard

Chinese activist uses art to convey a message of freedom – Martha’s Vineyard Times

Playing both live and virtually at the M.V. Film Center this weekend is the documentary Ai Weiwei: Yours Truly. A 2019 film about Chinese artist and activist Ai Weiwei, Yours Truly depicts the connections that develop as the artist creates an extraordinary work of socially engaged art remotely, as he is under house arrest in Beijing. The films director, Cheryl Haines, organized in 2014 a huge exhibit at Alcatraz Island in San Francisco Bay, where the former penitentiary is now a national park.

The scope of the project, with larger-than-life Lego portraits of prisoners of conscience from around the world, was immense, and nearly a million visitors viewed the exhibition. The story behind the vast artistic undertaking is Weiweis weaving his own history into it. His father, a well-known poet, was imprisoned in a remote work camp in the late 1950s. Part of the value of Ai Weiwei is the insights the director gives of his family life as told by his mother, Geo Ying, who describes Weiweis life growing up in exile. A poet, his father was mistreated and detained in the 1950s. Ying describes how Weiwei was told of the 100,000 people put in detention when he was just a child. There are also interviews with his brother and other members of his family.

He and his mother and brother remember the impact a postcard expressing support had on them, and this carries over into Weiweis extensive Yours Truly exhibit, as it also consists of beautifully illustrated postcards with national birds and flowers of the other prisoners countries. Visitors to the exhibit were invited to write messages of hope to the imprisoned or detained activists onto the postcards. Even more inspiring, after the more than 90,000 postcards were sent to prisoners and their families, they began writing back.

The film follows the postcards around the globe, and Haines interviews a number of the activists. Included were Egypts Ahmed Maher, cofounder of the April 6 Youth Movement which marked the beginning of the end of Hosni Mubaraks government. Also interviewed is Ebrahim Sharif al Sayeds family. Al Sayed is the former Secretary General of the Bahraini democratic reformist party.

By the films end, Ai himself is finally free, seeing his own exhibit in public for the first time. He meets with former prisoner Chelsea Manning, and other activists express their wonder at all the connections Ai has made, and the strangers who sent the encouraging messages around the world.

Ultimately, Ai Weiwei: Yours Truly is a call to action, extending the extraordinary reach of the artists exhibit to its viewers.

Information and tickets to Ai Weiwei: Yours Truly, either at the Film Center or virtually, are available at mvfilmsociety.com.

Original post:

Chinese activist uses art to convey a message of freedom - Martha's Vineyard Times

The risk of too many freedom of navigation operations – The Japan Times

For the second time since June, a U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer conducted a "freedom of navigation operation" (FONOP) in the Caribbean Sea off the coast of Venezuela on July 15. For the first time in three decades, U.S. warships in May conducted FONOPs in the Barents Sea near Russias northern coast. And with increasing regularity, U.S. Navy warships press the envelope of challenging Chinese maritime claims with FONOPs as close as 12 nautical miles from Chinese-claimed territory.

Washington Before a mistake or miscalculation results in an armed clash involving a U.S. naval vessel which could draw the United States into a serious conflict we need to examine the utility of aggressive FONOPs.

The ultimate purpose for any military operation away from U.S. shores ought to be the security and prosperity of the country. Any operation or action contributing to that objective should be given serious consideration, but anything that has an unacceptable chance of harming U.S. interests should be rejected. FONOPs, as currently practiced, are increasing the chances the U.S. will one day stumble into a war.

Given the expansion in the number of FONOPs against China, the increase in such operations targeting Russia, and the now-expanding operations into South America, the assumption would be that multiple navies are threatening U.S. freedom on the seas. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Civilian maritime traffic worldwide is shared online to give a real-time update of where global trade is taking place on the seas. You dont have to be an expert to look at the live map at any time to see that there are no gaps near Russia, China, or Venezuela that would signal the need for a muscular American naval response. No one is threatening to block traffic.

To the contrary, China and Russia especially are highly dependent on international trade and need sea traffic to continue unimpeded; they would be the first to lose should either engage in shutting down traffic on the seas.

Like any military organization, it is a necessity to exercise the U.S. Navy to maintain proficiency in its core warfighting skills. They need to be ready, on a moments notice, to defend the U.S. global interests, to repulse any attack, and to viciously punish any who dare strike us. This level of proficiency allows the U.S. to effectively deter any attack but also provides the muscle to defeat any opponent if deterrence fails.

To maintain this level of deterrence and war-winning capacity, the U.S. Navy needs to conduct regular, prudent global patrols and exercises to maintain warfighting proficiency. Doing so will ensure security and economic freedom for U.S. companies and business interests without unnecessarily provoking adversaries to take action against our interests.

One doesnt have to be an apologist for any foreign power to recognize that continual patrols with powerful warships close to their shores is going to precipitate a response. If the Chinese Navy were to challenge U.S. supremacy in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans by building naval bases near the U.S. coast and regularly sailing within 12 miles of U.S. shores, Washington would not passively acknowledge their rights of transiting international waters.

Perhaps more critically, Washington should encourage friendly regional states and allies to enhance their own security via anti-access, area denial (A2/AD) self-defense capabilities. China has become an expert at A2/AD technologies and has made any attack on its territory or forces to be an expensive and deadly prospect.

The best way the U.S. can accomplish its objectives in the Asia-Pacific region is to encourage allies and other friendly states to invest much more heavily in their own A2/AD capabilities that would deter China from attempting to take any of them by military force. Doing so places the responsibility for self-defense more heavily on each country where it belongs and less on asking the U.S. Navy and Air Force to underwrite regional security for states that can afford to invest more in their own defense needs.

FONOPs have a place in Americas tool chest, but only if used sparingly and wisely. Relying too heavily on such operations disincentivizes allied and friendly countries from investing in their own defense, placing an unnecessary burden on U.S. forces and increases the risk the United States may one day be sucked into a war it should never have fought.

Former U.S. Army Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis is a senior fellow for Defense Priorities. Follow him @DanielLDavis1

. 2020, the Diplomat; distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC

Read more:

The risk of too many freedom of navigation operations - The Japan Times

SECDEF Esper: US Will ‘Keep Up the Pace’ of South China Sea Freedom of Navigation Operations – USNI News

USS Gabrielle Giffords (LCS-10) conducts routine operations near the Panamanian flagged drill ship, West Capella on May 12, 2020. US Navy Photo

Esper, speaking at an online event hosted by the International Institute for Strategic Studies, said the U.S. policy has always been backed up by its actions like FONOps and other presence operations. Last year marked the greatest number of freedom of navigations operations in the South China Sea in the 40-year history of the FONOps program, and we will keep up the pace this year.

The Navy conducted nine FONOps operations in the South China Sea in 2019. Six FONOps have been conducted in the South China Sea this year, starting with the Littoral Combat Ship USS Montgomery (LCS-8) in January, destroyer USS McCampbell (DDG-85) in March, cruiser USS Bunker Hill (CG-52) and destroyer USS Barry (DDG-52) in separate operations in April, destroyer USS Mustin (DDG-89) in May and destroyer USS Ralph Johnson (DDG-114) in the latest operation on July 14.

Esper reiterated the United States governments rejection of Chinas maritime claims and that the new U.S. policy on the South China Sea plainly states that our recognition of maritime claims is consistent with international law, favors the sovereign rights of Southeast Asian partners and rejects the PRCs excessive and unlawful maritime claims that have been used to bully smaller countries from accessing offshore resources in their own Exclusive Economic Zones.

Secretary of Defense Mark Esper speaks to the media during in the Pentagon Briefing Room on April 14, 2020. DoD Photo

Recent dual-carrier strike force exercises in the South China Sea have been a clear and powerful signal that the U.S. will operate wherever international law allows. Later on in the session, he challenged Chinese claims that the U.S. carriers were only allowed to operate in the South China Sea because the Peoples Liberation Army allowed it to.

I dont know what the Chinese meant by that hollow statement about American carriers being there by the pleasure of the PLA. Look, American aircraft carriers have been in the South China Sea and the Indo Pacific since World War II, and we will continue to be there, and were not going to be stopped by anybody. Were going to sail, fly and operate where international law allows, he said, adding that the United States does so to assert international laws and rights and to support the sovereignty of its friends and partners and reassure them that the United States will be there in support of such.

Esper declined to answer what privately communicated red lines he would communicate to Beijing in relation to its maritime claims. He would only to state that the U.S. would defend international norms and rules and live up to its commitments that it has made in the Indo-Pacific. Esper added that the United States was committed to Taiwan and will continue to conduct arms sales to it and continue to conduct FONOps in the Taiwan Straits. He also stated, though, in the case of Taiwan and also the rest of the Indo-Pacific region, it was China that was aggravating the situation

Esper stated that the U.S. was not in search of a conflict but was committed to a constructive and result-orientated relationship with China in regard to the defense relationship, to open lines of communication and to reduce risk. But at the same time, the United States firmly believe no single nation can or should dominate the public commons, and we will continue to work alongside our allies and partners to support a prosperous and secure Indo-Pacific for all.

Related

Read the original:

SECDEF Esper: US Will 'Keep Up the Pace' of South China Sea Freedom of Navigation Operations - USNI News

Observing 200 Nights of Freedom – Shepherd Express

Yeah, the 1960s. America was known as a hotbed of radicalism, not just in politics, but also when dealing with human rights as well as the general attitude of people. In spite of Milwaukees proud history of Socialist mayors, the systemic mistreatment of black and brown folks meant that here, there were more changes to come.

These were just some of the attributes that proved Milwaukee was in the vanguard of a cultural revolution, with some later referring to it as the Selma of the North. Not only were black folk marching and demanding change, but the Latino/a/x community as well, looking to and being inspired by the housing freedom marches. Throughout the 1940s through the 1960s, Milwaukee had one of the most prosperous black communities in the entire country, a statement you do not hear often. The population went from 7,500 in 1930 to 105,000 by 1970 because of the amount of opportunity here, says Milwaukee activist Adam Carr.Too many of us have forgotten or never learned about the Black-and-Latinx-led activism in the city, and as the protests unfold in 2020, there is no better time to connect with this important local history.

What we remember as a thriving Black-majority Walnut Street neighborhood stretched from 3rd to 12th Streets. Since almost all of the buildings have been demolished, Elm and Roosevelt are relevant landmarks for pointing to where it used to be. There were no laws in place that held landlords accountable and people of color were crammed into dense and undesirable living conditions. Housing discrimination was legal and widely practiced in Milwaukee.

The NAACP Youth Council of Milwaukee held protests and were joined by Father James Groppi. Soon after, Vel Phillips, Milwaukees first female and first Black alderman, presented a bill in the Common Council to introduce fair housing in Milwaukee. After it was voted down, she formed a partnership with the Youth Council and was ready to march alongside them. At the forefront were The Commandos, a group created as a security detail for the Youth Council, a necessary force to defend the youngsters. The bills Philips presented were continually voted down, so on August 28, 1967, the Youth Council marched across the16th St.Viaduct to protest residential segregation. They made it to Koscziusko Park but were continually met by angry mobs looking to uphold the whiteness of the city, particularly on the South Side. Counter-protesters held White Power signs brandishing Nazi symbology. The second day of marching saw tragedy as the MPD burned down the NAACPs Milwaukee headquarters, the Freedom House. They claimed they saw a sniper on the roof and shot tear gas canisters into the building, which lit a fire. Protests went on for 200 nights in total, stretching all over the city.

LEARN MORE

Dr. Robert Smith and Adam Carr came together as part of the 50th anniversary of the open housing marches in 2016. It is a subject they are both passionate about, and it became a rich collaboration, collecting stories from leaders, Commandos and the community that was involved. They realized that this history was critically important, not just as a piece of Milwaukee history, but as a pivotal event in the civil rights movement. When it comes to Milwaukee, those are generally overlooked.

Many people involved in the fair housing marches are still here, and were enthusiastic about sharing their stories, as well as contributing to having a coordinating community to honor their history. Just as their plans were coming to fruition, the Sherman Park unrest unfolded and they diverted their attention to uplifting voices and supporting grassroots organizations at that time. They soldiered on, brainstorming ideas as to what they could do to honor the events, and decided on 200 nights honoring the marches. The events ranged from potlucks, to film screenings and storytelling, complete with appearances by Commandos and key players from the day. Schools in Milwaukee have added the 200 nights of freedom marches to their curriculum, something that is truly important. Smith and Carr go to these schools as well and give their presentation, thoughtfully, with their extensive knowledge at the forefront.

During these times, the 200 nights presentation provides a glimmer of hope to people who are sadly still marching for fair treatment. While fists are raised to a seemingly unresponsive system, recalling the events of the past show us that with our continued efforts, monologue can become dialogue, which will lead to changes that are so desperately needed.

To read more Milwaukee history articles, click here.

To read more articles by Juan Miguel Martinez, click here.

View original post here:

Observing 200 Nights of Freedom - Shepherd Express

Duchess Meghan’s freedom to ‘speak from the heart’ after quitting as senior royal – Opelika Auburn News

Duchess Meghan has more freedom to speak "from the heart" on topics such as racial injustice and gender, since she is no longer a senior royal.

The 38-year-old royal - who stepped down from her royal role earlier this year, along with her husband Prince Harry, and moved to Los Angeles - is carving out a new career as a public speaker and Meghan can now give "punchier" speeches as she is not constrained by royal protocol.

Speaking on the 'Heirpod' podcast, Omid Scobie, author of 'Finding Freedom: Harry and Meghan, and the Making of a Modern Royal Family', said: "[The Girl Up Leadership Summit speech] was Meghan really being able to talk without the constraints of some of the things you might have to bear in mind when writing a speech as a working member of the royal family.

"I understand she spent a long time preparing for this speech. Usually we see members of the royal family reading from very tight scripts when they go up onto a stage, I understand Meghan had bullet points.

"She was perhaps a little punchier than we've seen in the past. She spoke more from the heart than from a script."

And Scobie revealed that Meghan's recent speech for the Girl Up Leadership Summit was a sign of what fans can expect of her in the future.

He explained: "I had an interesting conversation with Team Sussex after this happened. They said this speech really spoke to many of the issues she will continue to focus on passionately moving forward, gender equity, racial injustice, youth empowerment...

"This worked as a really great preview for the Duchess of Sussex and some of her future speaking engagements."

Visit link:

Duchess Meghan's freedom to 'speak from the heart' after quitting as senior royal - Opelika Auburn News

Why protesters are fed up with Sudan’s tricky transition – Toward Freedom

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

In the last few weeks, tens of thousands of people have, once again, taken to the streets of Sudans major cities to demand freedom, peace and justice, the rallying cry for the protesters who ousted Omar al-Bashir in 2019.

The big difference is that this time they are marching against the civilian-military Sovereign Council, demanding a greater role for civilians in the countrys transition towards democracy and faster reform.

A year ago the people of Sudan were heralding the fall of Bashir, the countrys long-serving strongman. A mass uprising led by the Sudan Professional Association and Resistance Committees had eventually managed to precipitate the deposing of the president. A host of grievances fanned the protests. Among them were endemic corruption, a struggling economy, human rights violations, and a failed health system.

Why then have the protests returned to the street so soon after they vacated them in triumphant euphoria?

The answer lies in the fact that the balance of power in the transition period that follows the fall of a despot is always tricky. This was evident in Tunisia, Algeria and Egypt. When reformers are relatively weak and those determined to protect the status quo are strong, substantive change will be demonstrably lethargic and long-winded. It will sometimes be stalled, and even reversed in certain instances.

Entrenched status quo elites will be reluctant to change because this poses a threat to their interests.

Events in Sudan point to this tension.

Following Bashirs ouster, a civilian-military sovereign council headed by a civilian prime minister, Abdalla Hamdok, and made up of six civilians and five military officers, was instituted. Its immediate challenge was ensuring security and stability, negotiating peace with Darfur rebels, and repairing Sudans battered economy.

So what is on its report card a year on?

For starters, the systematic jailing of opponents has stopped, and arbitrary arrests from the security bureau have largely ceased. Censorship and the muzzling of the press has all but stopped. And the public order law has been repealed. This law was notorious for giving police disproportionate powers of arrest and punishment including for moral and religious infractions.

In rebuilding institutional trust, the police chief and his deputy have also been fired, after protesters demanded more measures against officials linked to Bashir.

In addition, serious effort have been made to meet another core protest demand the end to incessant conflicts in Sudan. Peace efforts have been pursued with the rebel Sudan Revolutionary Front. These efforts produced a preliminary peace accord, including the drawing down of the UN peace keeping mission in Darfur.

Most recently, an anti-corruption body to trace ill-gotten wealth and provide accountability has been set up. The confiscation of almost $4 billion of assets from Bashir, his family and associates signals a move in the right direction.

In addition, the transitional government has actively sought to change Sudans standing in the world by shedding its image as a pariah state. This was not of primary concern to the protest movement, which was focused more on issues of bread and butter. But the transitional government nevertheless has acted to mend fences in the hope that it will deliver dividends for the country.

To this end, it has actively lobbied the US government to remove it from the list of state sponsors of terrorism. Washington is still considering this request. In the meantime it has removed the country from a black list of states endangering religious freedom. It has also lifted sanctions on 157 Sudanese firms.

And, for the first time in 23 years, the two countries have exchanged ambassadors.

For its part, Sudan has reduced the number of troops it has in Yemen by two thirds.

But the expectations of last years popular uprising have not been met. The reason for this is that substantive reforms have been slow.

One area of clear frustration has been the snails pace at which civilian control is taking place. The civilian governance footprint on the countrys body politic is not yet evident. Instead, the military elite continues to have de facto control and influence, sidelining the civilians and often pushing for greater compromises from civilian partners.

Examples of this include the fact that a legislative transitional council has yet to be installed. This would have provided a degree of counterweight to the military dominated sovereign council. Legislation is thus being done in an ad hoc manner.

In addition, civilian governors havent been appointed to replace military ones in the various provinces, which would signal another move away from military governance.

The lack of urgency in bringing Bashir and his henchmen to trial is also frustrating people. It appears to be a marginal priority, and in some instances deliberately frustrating.

Nor have the countrys economic woes been addressed. People still queue for three to six hours to buy bread, or fill their tanks at petrol stations. Electricity reliability is still sketchy, with power cuts the norm. Accessing domestic gas is also a problem.

The economy has been contracting and oil revenues have slumped due to falling oil prices and low production capacity. This has affected public expenditure and the investment needed to jumpstart the economic recovery.

COVID-19 has done even more damage.

Sudan has competing power structures that are inhibiting coherent and far reaching reforms. In the one camp are the reformers, in the other those who wish to defend the status quo. Reformers are constantly having to negotiate and make strategic calculations about what changes can be made and how fast.

This game of political brinkmanship is beginning to take its toll.

Clearly the civilian half of the transitional government has struggled to assert or leverage its moral authority or popular legitimacy in the face of military intransigence.

But the prime minister Abdalla Hamdor remains popular. In seeking to placate the demonstrators, he recently admitted that the transitional authority had to correct the revolutions track. This was tacit acknowledgement that on his watch things have gone off the desired path.

But does he have the leverage to correct this diversion from the expectations of the street?

That answer might sadly be, not to a great extent.

For now, the reality that the protesters and civilian elite have to contend with is that after a long and destructive authoritarian legacy, change will not come easily. Nor can it be fast-tracked. Rather it is a product of patience, compromise and above all perseverance.

Author Bio:

David E. Kiwuwa is Associate Professor of International Studies at the University of Nottingham.

Link:

Why protesters are fed up with Sudan's tricky transition - Toward Freedom

Unalienable Rights and the Securing of Freedom – US Embassy and Consulate in Kazakhstan

SPEECH

MICHAEL R. POMPEO, SECRETARY OF STATE

PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER

JULY 16, 2020

AMBASSADOR GLENDON:I am Mary Ann Glendon. Im chair of the Commission on Unalienable Rights, and on behalf of my fellow commissioners, some of whom are here today, I want to welcome you to this presentation of ourreport.

I came in here earlier this morning, and when I saw the seating arrangement, it reminded me of Giacomettis Figures in a Public Square. Those seats looked so distant from one another and so lonely, and of course, that whole sculpture was meant to be an evocation of estrangement of modern man. But now that I see people in the seats, its really just the opposite, and I want to thank you so many of you for having come here today. I know that travel is difficult, and I know youre all here because you care about public life, unlike Giacomettis estranged figures.

So a year ago, when Secretary Pompeo established this commission, he gave us only two very terse instructions: One was to ground our work in the principles of the U.S. founding and in the principles of the international human rights project specifically the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; and the second was to keep our work at the level of policy Im sorry, of principle and not to get involved in policy, where the State Department is already very well supplied with policymakers. And at the time a year ago, many people wondered, well, whats the point of having a commission that doesnt concern itself with the burning issues of the day?

And one answer possibly an answer to that is something that former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said many years ago. He said when I was a professor, I could work on whatever subjects I wanted and take as much time as I wanted, and a policymaker is always under pressure, has to make decisions in haste sometimes, sometimes on very limited information. And the risk, he said, for the policymaker is that the urgent will sometimes drive out the important. That risk, of course, will never be fully eliminated, but Secretary Pompeo did take a step toward alleviating it when he asked for a study about going back to basics and looking at the principles behind the United States commitment to human rights internationally.

Still, some people asked why now, when so many other matters are pressing for attention. Why have such a study now? And Ill just suggest a few answers. You can think of more, perhaps, but certainly one is the information we got from Freedom Houses report this spring where they told us that political and civil rights worldwide have declined this year for the 14th consecutive year and that half the worlds population 4 billion people currently live under autocratic or quasi-authoritarian regimes.

And perhaps thats why some powerful countries are now openly challenging the basic premises of the great post-World War II human rights project, and by challenging the premises, they are undermining the already fragile international consensus behind the ideas that no nation should be immune from outside scrutiny of how it treats its own citizens and that every human being is entitled to certain fundamental rights simply by virtue of being human.

China, in particular, is aggressively promoting a very different concept in which national priorities of various sorts prevail over the basic rights of speech, assembly, religious freedom, and free elections.

Another set of threats to human freedom and dignity are emerging in technological advances artificial intelligence, biotechnology, data collection, sophisticated surveillance techniques.

I could go on. But what hasnt changed what hasnt changed is the fact that millions of women and men are suffering arbitrary imprisonment, torture, and those women and men are looking to the United States as a beacon of hope and encouragement.

For the commissioners over these past several months, its been humbling as well as moving to see American flags in the hands of so many of the Hong Kong protesters. And it was the fact for us that so many people in so many places count so much on the United States yes, even in the ways that our country falls short of its own ideals, it was that fact that led us to our principal conclusion, which was that as a nation that came into being by affirming certain unalienable rights that belong to everyone everywhere, the United States must now rise to the challenges with the same energy and spirit that it brought to the building of a new international order in the post-World War period.

I hope that those of you who would like to hear more about the report will join us at 4 oclock this afternoon for the public meeting, but now we must turn to todays program, where were very fortunate to have with us Timothy Cardinal Dolan, Archbishop of New York, who will present the invocation; after which we will hear the remarks of the Secretary of State, Michael Pompeo; which will be followed by a conversation between the Secretary and myself in which he may reveal whether the commissions report did or did not come close in any way to what he expected of it.

Please join me in welcoming Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo and Cardinal Timothy Dolan. (Applause.)

And please remain standing for the National Anthem, which will be performed by Army Sergeant First Class Charis Strange.

(The National Anthem was sung.)

CARDINAL DOLAN:Well done. Thanks, Sergeant. Here we go, Mary Ann.

Let us pray, and pray we must, we citizens who cherish this one nation under God, a duty flowing from our bold confession. In God we trust.

So we readily praise the creator who has bestowed upon and ingrained into the very nature of his creatures certain inalienable rights, acknowledged by the founders, enshrined in our countrys normative documents, defended with the blood of grateful patriots. You you, dear Lord have bestowed these inalienable rights not kings, tyrants, or any government; rights flowing from the innate human dignity of the person and the sacredness of all human life. You have made self-evident in reason and nature celebrated in your own revelation.

And while we will never give up beseeching you, dear God, to mend our every flaw, we renew our gratitude for this homeland founded on these inalienable rights, asking your blessing upon this noble project initiated by Secretary Pompeo and Ambassador Glendon and your guidance as we renew our sense of duty to share our countrys wisdom on rights inherent to the very nature of the human person never, ever to be trampled.

To the sovereign of the nations, creator of all, bestower of rights, be honor and glory for ever and ever, amen.

AMBASSADOR GLENDON:Now its my great pleasure to introduce the person whose idea it was to have a study that would help to ground American diplomacy in the principles of our founding and in the principles of the international human rights project, and it is my great pleasure, Mr. Secretary, to present you with a copy of our report.

Ladies and gentlemen, the Secretary of the United States Michael R. Pompeo. (Applause.)

SECRETARY POMPEO:Good afternoon, everyone. It is wonderful to be here. Its beautiful. Its absolutely beautiful here.

Thank you, Mary Ann, for that lovely introduction. I am confident that when we first met and I was a 27-year-old former Army captain that Id be standing here today with you in this beautiful place talking about this important moment.

I was very moved by the rendition of the National Anthem. Lets give a round of applause again to Sergeant First Class Charis Strange. (Applause.) None of you should be surprised that I chose an Army person to come give the opening singing.

Cardinal Dolan, thank you. Bless you for being here today. We are blessed to have you here.

I want to express too my appreciation for the National Constitution Center for hosting us. It took some doing to organize. This isnt how this is normally laid out. Lets give the people who made this all happen from this institution a big round of applause as well. (Applause.)

Im happy too that so many of you took the time to come to Philadelphia a place intentionally chosen even if we do have to be socially distanced. And to those watching livestream atstate.gov, welcome.

A special welcome today too to the commission members who could make it here: Paolo Carozza and David Pan, and to Peter Berkowitz, the commissions executive secretary and the head of the State Departments Policy Planning Staff. We also have Duncan Walker and the rapporteur for the committee Cart Weiland here. I know that all of you and your colleagues put a lot of hard work into this report, and thank you so much for that.

I want to take just a second as well to acknowledge the commissioners who could not be here today: Kenneth Anderson, Russell Berman, Hamza Yusuf Hanson, Jacqueline Rivers, Katrina Lantos-Swett, Rabbi Meir Soloveichik, and Christopher Tollefsen. I value deeply the contributions that each of you made to this important report.

I want to thank too there were lots of public comments. We had a number of public meetings. There were many people who voiced a diverse set of opinions. I want to thank people who contributed, like Martha Minow, Cass Sunstein, and Orlando Patterson, who came to share with us their thinking about how we should write this report.

I know too that the commission is welcoming and providing a further opportunity for public input as we complete our work later this afternoon.

And a special thanks to you, Professor Glendon. You are amongst the most significant inspirations for this report that were unveiling here today.

Many of you will know this, but I spent a few years a few years under Mary Anns tutelage. I was a research assistant for her. She paid me 7 bucks an hour. I thought I was rich. (Laughter.) It was one of my greatest gifts in life.

Ive now read nearly everything youve written. I dont agree with all of it (laughter) but we had a fun time. We debated human rights. We agreed on the big things, the important things, the things that really matter about this remarkable nation.

We agreed that our founders traveled to this great land to enjoy the fruit of freedom, not to spread subjugation.

We agreed, as Professor Glendon, the former 1960s civil rights advocate, wrote in her great workRights Talk,that A rapidly expanding catalog of rightsnot only multiplies the occasion for risks of collision, but risks trivializing core American values.

We agreed that the Declaration of Independence itself is the most important statement of human rights ever written. It made human freedom and human equality our nations central ideas.

And as I said to the Claremont Institute now just over a year ago, we agreed that America draws strength and goodness from her founding ideals and that our foreign policy must be grounded by those ideals as well.

But we know this: We cant do good at home or abroad if we dont precisely know what we believe and why we believe it.

And thats why I asked Professor Glendon to form a commission composed of some of the most distinguished scholars and activists. I asked them not to discover new principles, but to furnish advice on human rights grounded in our nations founding principles and the principles of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Because without this grounding without this grounding our efforts to protect and promote human rights is unmoored and, therefore, destined to fail.

And so the Commission on Unalienable Rights was born.

These rights, these unalienable rights, are essential. They are a foundation upon which this country was built. They are central to who we are and to what we care about as Americans.

Now, I think Cardinal Dolan referred to this, but Americas founders didnt invent the unalienable rights, but stated very clearly in the Declaration of Independence that they are held as self-evident that human beings were created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights among [those] are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

So too did these bright men know that each human being has inherent worth, just by virtue of his or her own humanity a deeply Biblical idea. As Alexander Hamilton wrote, The sacred rights of mankindare written, as with a sun beamby the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased or obscured by mortal power.

Now, that may seem commonplace to some of you, but this was a momentous idea. Until 1776, human beings pretty much everywhere were ruled by might and brutality.

The founders changed the course of history when they established a nation built on the premise that government exists not to diminish or cancel the individuals rights at the whims of those in power, but to secure them.

Ill never forget Ill never forget being spellbound by the founders ideas for the first time. As a cadet, too many years ago now, at West Point, I was issued uniforms, a rifle, and the Federalist Papers. I still have that copy. Some have seen it on my desk. Its a bit more tattered now. But Ive continued to go back to that and harken back to those central ideas that these men brought to this great nation. And its important its important for every American, for every American diplomat, to recognize how our founders understood unalienable rights.

As youll see when you get a chance to read this report, the report emphasizes foremost among these rights are property rights and religious liberty. No one can enjoy the pursuit of happiness if you cannot own the fruits of your own labor, and no society no society can retain its legitimacy or a virtuous character without religious freedom.

Our founders knew. Our founders knew that faith was also essential to nurture the private virtue of our citizens. The report speaks to that.

In his now famous letter from 1790, a letter to the Jews of Newport, George Washington proudly noted that the United States gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance.

Our founders also knew the fallen nature of mankind. Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist 10: Men are ambitious, vindictive, rapacious.

So in their wisdom, they established a system that acknowledged our human failings, checked our worst instincts, and ensured that government wouldnt trample on these unalienable rights.

Limited government structured into our documents protects these rights. As the report states, majorities are inclined to impair individual freedom, and public officials are prone to putting their private preferences and partisan ambitions ahead of the public interest.

The genius the genius of our founders was evident to one man in particular. In 1838, a 29-year-old 28-year-old lawyer gave a speech to the local young mans lyceum in Springfield, Illinois.

Abraham Lincoln said, quote, We find ourselves under the government of a system of political institutions, conducing more essentially to the ends of civil and religious liberty, than any of which the history of former times tells us.

This is still true. This is still true of America today. America is fundamentally good and has much to offer the world, because our founders recognized the existence of God-given, unalienable rights and designed a durable system to protect them.

But I must say, these days, even saying that America is fundamentally good has become controversial.

The commission was never intended to time the release of this report to the current societal upheavals that are currently roiling our nation. Nevertheless, the report touches on this moment, and so will I, because todays unrest directly ties to our ability to put our founding principles at the core of what we do as Americans and as diplomats all across the world.

Now, its true that at our nations founding our country fell far short of securing the rights of all. The evil institution of slavery was our nations gravest departure from these founding principles. We expelled Native Americans from their ancestral lands. And our foreign policy, too, has not always comported with the idea of sovereignty embedded in the core of our founding.

But crucially crucially the nations founding principles gave us a standard by which we could see the gravity of our failings and a political framework that gave us the tools to ultimately abolish slavery and enshrine into law equality without regard to race.

You dont always hear these ground truths today. Nor do you hear about the greatest strides our nation has made to realize the promise of our founding and a more perfect union.

From Seneca Falls, to Brown vs. Board of Education, to the peaceful marches led by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Americans have always laid claims to their promised inheritance of unalienable rights.

And yet today, the very core of what it means to be an American, indeed the American way of life itself, is under attack. Instead of seeking to improve America, too many leading voices promulgate hatred of our founding principles.

President Trump spoke about this at Mount Rushmore on the Fourth of July. And our rights tradition is under assault.

TheNew York Timess 1619 Project so named for the year that the first slaves were transported to America wants you to believe that our country was founded for human bondage.

They want you to believe that Americas institutions continue to reflect the countrys acceptance of slavery at our founding.

They want you to believe that Marxist ideology that America is only the oppressors and the oppressed. The Chinese Communist Party must be gleeful when they see theNew York Timesspout this ideology.

Some people have taken these false doctrines to heart. The rioters pulling down statues thus see nothing wrong with desecrating monuments to those who fought for our unalienable rights from our founding to the present day.

This is a dark vision of Americas birth. I reject it. Its a disturbed reading of history. It is a slander on our great people. Nothing could be further from the truth of our founding and the rights about which this report speaks.

The commission reminds us its got a quote from Frederick Douglas, himself a freed slave, who saw the Constitution as a glorious, liberty document. That it is.

America is special. America is good. America does good all around the world.

In recent weeks, Ive had the chance to walk around Arlington Cemetery a few times, as I was thinking about today. And Ive been reminded of the hundreds of thousands of young men America sacrificed during the Civil War. We forget them at our peril.

And that grand struggle for rights wasnt the only one in American history. There are many remarkable Americans still engaged in the drive to fulfill the Declarations promises.

One of them is here with us today, David Hardy. David was the founding CEO of Boys Latin School a charter right here in Philadelphia. Hes still very involved in the charter school community.

At Boys Latin, and other schools like it, aspiring young men, nearly all of them from some of the most difficult parts of Philadelphia, have a better chance to pursue their happiness. Eighty-nine percent of the students there matriculate to college.

He David has devoted the great part of his adult life to equal opportunities for a good education, often called the civil rights movement of our time.

Mr. Hardy, please stand. And lets give him a round of applause. (Applause.) David, thank you again for being with us here today.

Our nation, too, has the responsibility to inculcate our founding values and reward their adoption. C.S. Lewis said it best when he lamented that we make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst.

We must do better. America must build on its founding ideals and its leader must fearlessly defend them.

It is clear and this report makes it even more so it is clear that unalienable rights are central to who we are as Americans. But heres where I come in as Secretary of State. They have to underpin our foreign policy.

The Declaration itself is a foreign policy matter. It was written to explain why our nation broke away from British tyranny.

If we truly believe if we truly believe that rights are unalienable, inviolate, enduring, indeed, universal, just as the founders did, then defending them ought to be the bedrock of our every diplomatic endeavor.

Indeed, our own commitment to unalienable rights at home has proved a beacon of hope for men and women abroad pursuing their own liberties.

The examples are countless. Ill just give a couple.

Natan Sharansky when he heard of President Reagans Evil Empire speech while imprisoned, he said it was a ray of hope in the darkness of his punishment cell.

Last year Professor Glendon referred to this Hong Kong waved the American flag as they protested a communist crackdown. There is no symbol of freedom more recognizable all around the world.

Today, Im proud to have with us Wei Jingsheng, who is considered the father of todays Chinese democracy movement. On December 5th, 1978, the young electrician from Beijing Zoo shook the world by bravely posting an eloquent essay on Beijings short-lived Democracy Wall.

Mr. Wei boldly insisted that the CCPs Four Modernizations in industry, agriculture, defense, and science werent enough to truly make China a modern a modern and civilized nation.

Hearkening back to the May Fourth Movement, generations earlier, he said China needed a fifth modernization: democracy.

The Chinese Communist Party repeatedly threw Mr. Wei in jail for his advocacy.

In 1997, he emigrated. He emigrated to America, where he has continued his courageous call for the Chinese Communist Party to honor the unalienable rights that God has given to every Chinese citizen from Tibet to Tiananmen and from Hong Kong to Hubei.

Mr. Wei, please stand and be recognized. (Applause.) Its a blessing to have you with us here today. Thank you, again.

Now, if you believe our founding principles should inform foreign policy, and especially the promotion of unalienable rights, we have to lay down a framework a framework for how to think about this around the world.

Now, we have to be realistic, because our first duty is, of course, to secure American freedoms. Thats what I raised my right hand to do, when I was sworn in as Americas Secretary of State.

Read more from the original source:

Unalienable Rights and the Securing of Freedom - US Embassy and Consulate in Kazakhstan

Officer involved crash investigation underway in the Freedom Division – WCNC.com

CMPD is investigating a collision that occurred shortly after 3 a.m. on Tuesday morning.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Departments Major Crash Investigation Unit are investigating a crash from early Tuesday morning.

Officers responded to the crash that involved a CMPD officer near the 1300 block of Toddville Road in the Freedom Division.

When officers arrived, they located a marked Ford Explorer police vehicle and a 2006 Hyundai Sonata. The officer and two others from the Hyundai were transported to the hospital with serious injuries.

Police say Officer Lindsey Stapleton was travelling northbound on Toddville Road when the driver of the Hyundai, who was travelling southbound, crossed the center line and entered the northbound lane of travel. The Hyundai then hit Officer Stapleton head-on.

Detectives say Officer Stapleton was on-duty patrolling the area at the time of the accident. The driver of the Hyundai was Rayford Charles Robinson Jr. After evaluation, impairment is suspected to be a contributing factor for the crash.

Robinson has been charged with driving while impaired and has active warrants for two counts of felony serious injury by a vehicle.

This investigation is active and ongoing.

Anyone who witnessed the crash or has information about this case is asked to call Detective Pressley at 704-432-2169.

The public can also leave information anonymously with Crime Stoppers at 704-334-1600 or http://charlottecrimestoppers.com/.

Stay with WCNC Charlotte for the latest on this ongoing investigation.

OTHER STORIES ON WCNC

See the rest here:

Officer involved crash investigation underway in the Freedom Division - WCNC.com