Elon Musk Reveals Best Place To Get ‘Great Deals’ For Fixing, Upgrading Cars – International Business Times

KEY POINTS

"Mom, you're embarrassing me!" is a plaint often heard from teenagers when their moms proudly show-off old photos of them in awkward poses or situations they'd rather forget.

Well, Elon Musk is no exception. His mom, Maye, did just that in a single tweet that's drawing a lot of comments.

Maye Musk was a famous celebrity long before Elon was born. Born in Canada in 1948, Maye Musk has been a model for over 50 years. She's appeared on the covers of many magazines, including Time, Elle Canada and New York magazine, where she posed nude with a fake pregnant belly.

In September 2017, she became CoverGirl's oldest spokesmodel at age 69. The New York Post declared she's "a star in her own right" because she earned her fame the hard way. Elon's mom calls herself "Mother of Invention" because of her famous son.

I was famous until Elon became famous, said Maye in an interview with The New York Times in 2016.

On Tuesday, Maye posted an old color photo of a 24-year-old Elon sitting inside a beat-up, rundown relic of a car. Turns out, the car belonged to Elon. The caption she wrote to accompany the photo reads: "@elonmusk #1995 And people said you knew nothing about carrs. #FoundThisPhoto."

To which Elon was forced to reply, "Couldnt afford to pay for repairs, so I fixed almost everything on that car from parts in the junkyard. Ironically, thats me replacing broken side window glass. The circle is complete lol."

Renata Konkoly then asked, "How did the window break?"

And Elon replied, "They smashed the window to steal the radio, which was worth maybe $20. Got a replacement from junkyard. Btw, great deals available from junkyards! Its pretty fun fixing/upgrading cars."

And the tweet thread went on and on.

Because of his mom's well meaning old photo, we now have confirmation Elon owned an old beat-up sedan and that his car got broken into. We now also know where the best place is to get the cheapest car parts. The Tesla CEOpreferred to go to junkyards for replacement parts. All thanks to mom.

Elon Musk's mother, Maye Musk, has written a book about her life and her son's childhood. Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk and mother Maye Musk attend the premiere of "Revenge of the Electric Car" during the 10th annual Tribeca Film Festival at SVA Theater on April 22, 2011 in New York City. Photo: Getty Images/Charles Eshelman

More here:

Elon Musk Reveals Best Place To Get 'Great Deals' For Fixing, Upgrading Cars - International Business Times

Folks Are Going Wild Over Elon Musk Sitting Next to Ikumi Nakamura at The Game Awards – Comicbook.com

(Photo: The Game Awards)

During The Game Awards 2019, a wild Elon Musk appeared. Yes, that's right, Elon Musk is at the world's biggest gaming awards show. Why? Nobody knows, but as you would expect, the camera panned to Musk after he briefly stood up to applaud the performance of Grimes, who was showing off a track that will be in Cyberpunk 2077. And of course, the moment the camera panned to the Tesla boss, the Internet went wild, which it does every time Musk does anything.

That said, the biggest talking point around this brief camera pan is that he's sitting next Ikumi Nakamura, one of the most beloved developers in the industry, who left Bethesda and Tango Gameworks only a few months ago. Of course, some people were thrilled to see this unexpected duo, but others were not pleased.

As always, feel free to leave a comment letting us know what you think or hit me up on Twitter @Tyler_Fischer_ and let me know over there. Why do you think Elon Musk is at The Game Awards, and what did you think of his quick cameo?

Read this article:

Folks Are Going Wild Over Elon Musk Sitting Next to Ikumi Nakamura at The Game Awards - Comicbook.com

Vergecast: Tesla Cybertruck first ride, Elon Musks bad tweets trial, and the departure of Googles founders – The Verge

The Vergecast is back after a Thanksgiving break and our Pirate Radio series with a new tech news roundup for the week. This weeks theme: billionaires doing weird billionaire things.

Dieter Bohn, Casey Newton, Andrew Hawkins, and Paul Miller begin the show discussing Teslas event when it unveiled its new electric pickup truck the Cybertruck, as well as Ford revealing its first electric Mustang. Who among the crew is on board for this weird billionaire thing?

In the second half of the show, deputy editor Liz Lopatto joins us from Los Angeles where she is covering Elon Musks defamation trial regarding Musks bad tweets. Liz explains how this lawsuit came to be and what has happened at the trial so far.

Theres a whole lot more in between all of that from Pauls weekly segment In the apocalypse, we dont need space bars to Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin kind of leaving Alphabet so listen through to get it all.

Stories discussed in this episode:

2:00- Tesla Cybertruck first ride: inside Elon Musks electric pickup truck

23:55 - Fords Mustang Mach-E is an electric SUV with up to 300 miles of range

30:30 - No, e-bikes arent cheating

37:03 - Elon Musk tries to explain Twitter in pedo guy defamation case

1:00:55 - Pauls weekly segment In the apocalypse, we dont need space bars

1:03:23 - Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin relinquish control of Alphabet to CEO Sundar Pichai

1:19:05 - Qualcomms new Snapdragon 865 flagship is here without integrated 5G

The Vergecast

See the article here:

Vergecast: Tesla Cybertruck first ride, Elon Musks bad tweets trial, and the departure of Googles founders - The Verge

Elon Musk revives his plan to power the United States entirely on solar – Inverse

Could you meet the United States entirely from solar energy? Sure, claims tech entrepreneur Elon Musk.

The Tesla CEO, whose company provides solar panel solutions like the Solar Roof, shared a video via Twitter on Saturday of the electricity-generating tiles taking a beating from a hammer. One fan responded to Musks video with a 2011 quote from Bill Gates, who described solar and similar technologies as cute, but that the answer is in nuclear power.

Musk hit back at the quote by describing Gates assertion as def wrong.

Hes def wrong. Solar power is a Gigawatt per square km! All you need is a 100 by 100 mile patch in a deserted corner of Arizona, Texas or Utah (or anywhere) to more than power the entire USA.

Its a revival of an idea Musk has shared several times, that enough solar panels could power the entire United States. Its an idea he shared in 2015, and reiterated in 2017.

The batteries you need to store the energy, so you have 24/7 power, is 1 mile by 1 mile. One square-mile, Musk said in 2017. He continued that its a little square on the U.S. map, and then theres a little pixel inside there, and thats the size of the battery park that you need to support that. Real tiny.

The plan itself is clearly a flawed idea collecting and storing electricity in one small patch of land is just a storm away from knocking the entire country offline but it illustrates a more realistic proposal that people can meet their electricity demands from zero-emissions sources.

When Musk outlined the plan at the National Governors Association meeting in July 2017, he outlined a system where the panels would provide the power and batteries would store the electricity for use round-the-clock. By Musks calculations, the panels would require a patch of land measuring 100 miles by 100 miles (or 10,000 square miles). The battery would requite one square mile of land.

Does it work? University College London explored Musks idea in 2015 to see if it would work. They used EIA figures that showed the United States used 3,725 Terawatt-hours in one year in 2013, or the equivalent rate of 425 gigawatts.

They then looked at the average photovoltaic yield in Amarillo, Texas. A one-kilowatt system would offer 1,838 kilowatt-hours per year, the equivalent of 210 watts, which gives an efficiency rating of 21 percent. As the highest-efficiency solar module at the time offered 24 percent efficiency, that gives an efficiency of 0.24 gigawatts per square kilometer.

The UCL analysis assumes Musk was proposing a square that measures 100 kilometers on each side, or 62 miles. But even under these more conservative figures, the analysis suggests it should work: 10,000 square kilometers, multiplied by 0.24 gigawatts per square kilometer, multiplied by 0.21 gives us just over 500 gigawatts. Thats higher than the countrys annual electricity consumption rate of 425 gigawatts.

Of course, Musk clarified these figures two years later so the patch of land would measure 10,000 square miles, or 25,900 square kilometers. Putting that figure into the equation results in 1,305 terawatts.

This also corresponds with analysis from Modern Survival Blog published in March 2019. This found that covering a 1,939-square-mile patch of land, 44 miles each side, with 250-watt Sharp ND-250QCS solar panels would be enough to meet energy demands.

The idea is impractical for a number of reasons. What if a natural disaster strikes the countrys only source of electricity? What about the dependence created on the infrastructure transmitting that electricity? Would the locals perhaps have something to say about thousands of square miles of land getting transformed into a shiny solar-collecting surface?

Indeed, much like the idea to power the world by covering the Sahara Desert in solar panels, or putting a giant floating wind farm in the Atlantic Ocean, the suggestion isnt so much a call to pick up a shovel and start covering a chunk of the Earths surface. Its more to highlight how humanity has the technology to offer zero-emissions electricity.

With that in mind, the question then becomes, how do we deploy this on a large scale?

Go here to see the original:

Elon Musk revives his plan to power the United States entirely on solar - Inverse

Tesla has announced major overhaul of sales and delivery teams – Business Insider

Tesla has begun the process of merging the roles of its sales and delivery employees, four current and former employees told Business Insider. The employees asked for anonymity due to a fear of reprisal from the electric-car maker.

Announced internally in October, the initiative, called One Motion, is designed to give each customer a single point of contact when buying a vehicle, the current and former employees said. That means one employee would handle sales, paperwork, and delivery. (At Tesla, a delivery can involve driving a vehicle to a customer's home, or guiding a customer through the final stages of the buying process at one of the company's delivery centers.)

Screenshots of an internal website viewed by Business Insider that include information about One Motion list the following six steps sales and delivery employees should take with potential customers: "connect & understand," "build value," "ask for the sale," "checkout," "support," and "delivery."

"You are the primary owner of the customer's experience up to and beyond the moment they become an owner," a video published on the website and sent in a text to Business Insider says.

The merger between Tesla's sales and delivery departments was in its beginning stages as early as July, when a former salesperson said delivery employees at his location were receiving training to sell cars.

"We've been told in no uncertain terms that we are one team and we will all be doing the same job," he said at the time.

But the transition is not yet complete. A current delivery employee said she has not yet received formal sales training, and a current sales employee said she has yet to deliver any vehicles this quarter. Both employees said they aren't sure how One Motion will be implemented.

One current and one former salesperson expressed skepticism about One Motion, saying it's better to let employees specialize in the tasks that are best suited to their skillsets.

"In practice, it took half, if not more of my productive time and tied it up in paperwork, scheduling, vehicle walkthroughs, customer complaints," the former salesperson said. "Essentially, they took somebody that could have dedicated 100% of his time to selling cars and basically chopped that time, effectively, in half."

Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.

Unlike other automakers, Tesla owns and operates its own stores, rather than outsourcing sales to third-party dealerships. The demands placed on the company's delivery department have grown over time, as Tesla has set quarterly delivery records in eight of the past nine quarters, and expects to do the same in the fourth quarter of this year.

Tesla has in the past recruitedemployees from a variety of departments to deliver vehicles at the end of a quarter, suggesting that the company's delivery staff has at times not been large enough to handle peak workloads. In one case, CEO Elon Musk even asked for assistance from Tesla customers.

Combining the roles of sales and delivery employees is just the latest change in what has been a tumultuous year for Tesla's sales operation. In February, the company said it would close most of its stores, though it partially reversed that announcement a few weeks later when it said it would close only low-performing locations.

Tesla has also changed the compensation structure for its sales employees multiple times and shifted from Salesforce to a proprietary customer-relationship-management system.

Are you a current or former Tesla employee? Do you have an opinion about what it's like to work there? Contact this reporter atmmatousek@businessinsider.com. You can ask for more secure methods of communication, like Signal or ProtonMail, by email or Twitter direct message.

Original post:

Tesla has announced major overhaul of sales and delivery teams - Business Insider

Did Elon Musk approve this? U.S. company sending cannabis and coffee to space aboard a SpaceX mission – The GrowthOp

When were finally forced to abandon the planet, at least well be bringing hemp and coffee with us.

Agriculture biotech company Front Range Biosciences will be sending the first plant cultures of the two products into space aboard a SpaceX mission that will leave the planet for the International Space Station in March, according to Vice.

This is the first time anyone is researching the effects of microgravity and spaceflight on hemp and coffee cell cultures, said Jonathan Vaught, co-founder and CEO of Front Range Biosciences. There is science to support the theory that plants in space experience mutations. This is an opportunity to see whether those mutations hold up once brought back to earth and if there are new commercial applications.

The company which has partnered on the endeavour with the University of Colorado, Boulder, and a startup called Space Cells plans to send almost 500 cultures into the vast unknown to see if exposure to the hostile environment can have useful applications back home.

Theres no danger of astronauts having a little too much fun with the experiments, hemp contains minuscule amounts of the high-inducing THC found in cannabis, but the plant is extremely versatile for use in the production of products such as paper, clothes and textiles. It also contains CBD, a cannabinoid that has shown the potential to provide relief from stress, anxiety and other medical issues common on and off planet Earth.

They will, if nothing else, provide useful info into how these crops can be made more resilient in hostile environments.

This is just the beginning, according to Louis Stodieck, director of BioServe Space Technologies at the University of Colorado, Boulder. In the future, we plan for the crew to harvest and preserve the plants at different points in their grow-cycle, so we can analyze which metabolic pathways are turned on and turned off, he said in a statement. This is a fascinating area of study that has considerable potential.

There is no word yet if Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX and person most likely to be high when the rocket takes off, has weighed in on the experiment. Musk was famously chastised after lighting up a joint last year while being interviewed on The Joe Rogan Experience. Its fair to say the experience proved negative as the companys shares started dropping before the smoke cleared the room, prompting an expensive, invasive safety review of the company by NASA. Musk later warned employees of the dangers of using cannabis at work.

Unless, of course, youre in space.

Want to keep up to date on whats happening in the world of cannabis?Subscribeto the Cannabis Post newsletter for weekly insights into the industry, what insiders will be talking about and content from across the Postmedia Network.

Continue reading here:

Did Elon Musk approve this? U.S. company sending cannabis and coffee to space aboard a SpaceX mission - The GrowthOp

Watch Elon Musk lose it after Tesla Cybertruck Armor Glass …

Tesla unveiled its next game-changing vehicle last night. The Tesla Cybertruck is a fully electric pickup-ish vehicle with an undeniably futuristic look and a whole laundry list of great features. One of those features is Tesla Armor Glass which is supposed to be impact-resistant. It is not impact-resistant.

In a demonstration, a separate piece of Teslas glass was compared to a chunk of standard auto glass. The Tesla glass held up to an impact while the other piece cracked. Then, Tesla boss Elon Musk tempted fate, asking one of his fellow presenters to attempt to break the glass installed on the Cyber Truck prototype on stage. That was a bad idea.

The small metal sphere that was pitched at the truck hit the window dead center and completely destroyed it. The projectile didnt puncture the glass, which appears to be laminated, but it did completely shatter it. This was clearly an unexpected result, as Musk quickly uttered Oh my f**king God before joking that maybe the throw was a bit too hard.

With a lighter touch, the sphere was then thrown at the trucks rear window. It was an attempt to save face, and it was obvious that the impact was lighter this time around. It didnt matter, and the rear window shattered just the same. The crowd giggled and Musk promised theyd work on it.

Now, its important to keep in mind that this is a pre-production vehicle. If Tesla wants to make its windows impact resistant, it certainly has the ability to make that happen. Still, it wasnt a great look, and perhaps the worst part was that there was still plenty of presentation left to go, and Musk spent the rest of the event talking about all of the Cybertrucks highly advanced features while standing in front of a vehicle with two busted windows. Oof.

Image Source: Tesla

Visit link:

Watch Elon Musk lose it after Tesla Cybertruck Armor Glass ...

Elon Musk says the Tesla 2020 Roadster ‘maybe won’t need a key at all’ – Business Insider

A Tesla fan tweeted at Elon Musk Wednesday with a modest request for the new Tesla Roadster: a socket near the driver meant to hold the key fob.

The Tesla founder and CEO responded by teasing a feature of the next Roadster: owners "maybe won't need a key at all."

The new Tesla Roadster was unveiled in 2017 and touted as an upgraded version of Tesla's original Roadster, which was produced between 2008 and 2012. The new Roadster will do 0-60 mph in 1.9 seconds, the company said, and its base model will start at $200,000.

It's not clear whether Musk was serious about his claim that the car might not require keys, or whether keys would be replaced with an app or some other way of identifying the driver. Musk has previously teased other Tesla features on Twitter he tweeted in October that future Teslas may allow drivers to customize their car horn, replacing it with fart or goat sound effects.

The new Roadster was initially expected to arrive in 2020, but Musk has hinted that it may come later he Tweeted in September that the next Model S will go into production in late 2020 and that the next Roadster will "come later."

A Tesla spokesperson was not immediately available for comment.

Read the rest here:

Elon Musk says the Tesla 2020 Roadster 'maybe won't need a key at all' - Business Insider

Elon Musk Ordered to Stand Trial in Cave Explorers Defamation Case – The New York Times

A federal judge delivered a pair of legal setbacks to the tech billionaire Elon Musk this week, rejecting Mr. Musks attempt to throw out a defamation lawsuit brought against him by a British cave explorer whom Mr. Musk had accused on Twitter of being a pedo guy.

The judge, Stephen V. Wilson in United States District Court in Los Angeles, also ruled that the explorer, Vernon Unsworth, was not a public figure meaning the bar will be lower for him to prove defamation.

Judge Wilson ordered Monday that a jury trial begin on Dec. 3. He denied Mr. Musks argument that the case should be tossed because his statement, a shortened version of the word pedophile, was a throwaway insult not to be construed as fact.

Mr. Musk had also argued that Mr. Unsworth was a public figure because of his participation in a high-profile rescue of a youth soccer team trapped in a cave in Thailand last year. Public figures need to meet a high legal bar called actual malice essentially knowing a statement is false when the statement is made and making it anyway to prove defamation.

But in an 18-page order, Judge Wilson said that Mr. Unsworth was a private figure, who needed only to meet a lower bar that Mr. Musk acted negligently to recover some damages.

This case creates the perfect storm, where a jury is going to tell us what they think about this kind of conduct on social media, said L. Lin Wood, a lawyer for Mr. Unsworth. If they do what I believe they must under the evidence, the message is going to be strong: Dont do this, and to Musk: Dont do it again.

In response to questions about Judge Wilsons ruling, a lawyer for Mr. Musk, Alex Spiro, said, We look forward to the trial.

Mr. Unsworth sued Mr. Musk in September 2018, months after the two clashed over the cave rescue. The children, who were part of a soccer team, and their coach were trapped by rising water.

Mr. Musk had sent a team of engineers from the companies he leads Tesla, SpaceX and the Boring Company to help retrieve the children. The engineers produced three miniature submarines that Mr. Musk thought could have helped with the rescue, according to Judge Wilson, but the head of the search operation rejected the idea as impractical.

In an interview with CNN in July 2018, Mr. Unsworth called the submarine idea a P.R. stunt.

He can stick his submarine where it hurts, Mr. Unsworth said. It just had absolutely no chance of working.

Mr. Musk lashed out at Mr. Unsworth on Twitter in a series of posts and called him a pedo guy. Mr. Musk later deleted and apologized for those messages.

In an email to a BuzzFeed reporter about Mr. Musks statements, Mr. Musk urged the reporter to stop defending child rapists and suggested that Mr. Unsworth had had a child bride. Mr. Unsworth has denied all of Mr. Musks accusations.

Both the email and the tweets are part of Mr. Unsworths defamation claim. He is seeking damages in excess of $75,000.

Laura Prather, a First Amendment lawyer with the law firm Haynes and Boone who is not involved in the case, said the determination that Mr. Unsworth was a private figure made it much easier for him to succeed in trial.

With actual malice, you have to basically have known that what you were saying was false, she said. With negligence, its just whether or not you exercised due care.

Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California, Berkeley, school of law, said that Mr. Musk had faced an uphill battle to get the suit thrown out. Mr. Unsworth is not a well-known public figure and an accusation of being a pedophile is very damning.

Mr. Chemerinsky, who teaches First Amendment law, said the facts of the case were so distinctive that it would be difficult to predict what could happen going forward.

What you have here is, the plaintiff being involved in a tragedy, Elon Musk accusing him of being a pedophile, the plaintiff not really being a public figure and Elon Musk being a huge public figure, he said. Id be very cautious about generalizing because its such a unique set of facts.

More:

Elon Musk Ordered to Stand Trial in Cave Explorers Defamation Case - The New York Times

Elon Musk Just Retweeted A Ford Announcement And It Was A Classy (And Hugely Strategic) Move – Forbes

SpaceX chief Elon Musk answers questions after the 2019 SpaceX Hyperloop Pod competition at the ... [+] SpaceX headquarters in Los Angeles on July 21, 2019. - 21 teams from around the world competed in the event which sees their pods race on the 1.25 kilometer Hyperloop test track. (Photo by Mark RALSTON / AFP) (Photo credit should read MARK RALSTON/AFP/Getty Images)

In business, there are two possible scenarios when it comes to competition.

On the one hand, when a major company enters your market segment, it can cause quite an uptick in interest (and sales) for all parties involved. The axiom a rising tide lifts all boats applies here. The best example of this in recent years is the large-screen television market. No one player is dominant. Were all looking for a way to watch Netflix. Theres plenty of room in the market for companies like Hisense and TCL to compete with Sony and Samsung.

Yet, theres also another scenario: A worthy upstart can steal away customers and market share. Ive always wondered if the Apple iPhone (released in 2007) would have been even more dominant than it is now if Google had not invented the Android phone (in 2008). In reality, there are way more Android phones in use today than iPhones by a large margin. One recent report mentioned how almost 75% of all smartphones use Android.

Its too soon to say what will happen with electric vehicles. According to the EEI, EVs still only account for about 2% of all cars sold. In Q1 of this year, only about 61,000 of them were sold.

What do we know for sure? Elon Musk is going with scenario one above. And, all it took is one tweet.

Recently, the famous entrepreneur retweeted an announcement by Ford Motor Company. Although Ford has dabbled in the electric car market for years and toyed with the idea, the announcement of the 2021 Mustang Mach-E SUV made a big splash. The car looks awesome, and Musk seemed to agree. He congratulated Ford on the announcement and welcomed the competition.

You might wonder: Why is that?

Musk is not at all afraid to share his opinions. He does not mince words. However, he is also smart enough to know that a major new addition to the market tends to capture attention even from those who have never thought about buying an electric car. And maybe those same customers will reconsider a Tesla vehicle instead.

All boats, youve been lifted.

One of my favorite unofficial stats is that Ford sells more trucks in one day than Tesla sells for all of their makes and models for the entire year. Im sure that changes year to year and month to month, so theres no way to really verify it as accurate, but the point is that Ford is a major automaker and Tesla is a startup.

Its a curious thing from a social media standpoint. My views have changed over the years about what is worth sharing and what is worth keeping private, and what helps a brand and what hinders one. The trolls are alive and well. Musk retweeted the congratulations in a public setting (he has almost 30 million followers).

Now well see if this is the tweet that jumpstarts an industry.

Read more here:

Elon Musk Just Retweeted A Ford Announcement And It Was A Classy (And Hugely Strategic) Move - Forbes

Elon Musk Says They’re Working On Plugging The 4,400-Mile Supercharger Gap Between Europe And Asia – Jalopnik

A few hours before Elon Musk debuted the delightfully deranged Cybertruck, he tweeted something less delightful but equally deranged. When a Twitter user asked him about getting some Superchargers in Ukraine, Musk replied, why stop at Ukraine?

A full Supercharger route from London to Shanghai?! That would certainly be neat.

Lets put aside the fact that the United Kingdom is a series of islands so, strictly speaking, one cannot drive from there to Shanghai. In any event, this got us wondering, approximately how many more Superchargers does Tesla need to install to complete this modern Silk Road?

The answer: 30, at least.

That is a screenshot from Teslas Supercharger network map. Red dots are Superchargers. On the route from London to Shanghai (which the Tesla routing system and Google Maps cannot complete) the easternmost Supercharger in Europe is in Katowice, Poland.

Meanwhile, the westernmost Supercharger in Chinaif approaching from Kazakhstan via Ukraine, which Musk clearly alluded to in the tweet replyis in Xian, although in the future one might be better off taking the yet-to-exist highway through Russia.

So, as the bird flies, Tesla must plug a roughly 4,400 mile gap in the Supercharger network in order to make London-to-Shanghai a theoretically possible electric car journey.

Of course, thats as the (very tired and likely dehydrated) crow flies. Driving will add hundreds of miles if not more to the route by taking, ya know, roads. But lets call it at 4,400 miles for now.

The lowest-range Tesla for sale right now is the base Model 3 with an advertised range of 250 miles. But due to vagaries in terrain, wind, weather, and a host of other factors that could influence range, including people driving older Tesla models, even putting Superchargers every 200 miles might be cutting it a little close. After all, I hear AAA service is pretty poor in the Gobi desert. Lets call it at 150 miles just to be on the better-safe-than-sorry side.

So, Tesla would have to install 30 Superchargers to make London-to-Shanghai a reality, assuming there are no other gaps in the network.

That might not sound like a lot, and if we were talking about charging stations in major metro areas, it wouldnt be. But putting a Supercharger in the middle of the goddamn desert or unpopulated high plains or mountain passes is a tad more logistically complicated than in a Southern California shopping center.

And for what? Who is actually going to drive from Europe to China? Who is going to use the Tesla Superchargers in the middle of nowhere?

I dont mean to jump to conclusions, but it is possible, slightly possible, Elon Musk something without thinking it through.

Read more:

Elon Musk Says They're Working On Plugging The 4,400-Mile Supercharger Gap Between Europe And Asia - Jalopnik

It Took Elon Musk Exactly 5 Words to Reveal What He Looks for in Every New Hire (and It’s Not a College Degree) – Inc.

As CEO of Tesla and Space X, Elon Musk is leading two of the most innovative companies in the world. But even someone as smart and talented as Musk knows you don't innovate alone.

"You want to make sure that...if somebody great wants to join the company that they actually get an interview. This is actually one of my big worries. Like, if Nikola Tesla was alive today, could he get an interview? And if not, we're doing something wrong. And I'm not totally sure he would get an interview. So, if one of the most brilliant engineers who ever lived could maybe not get an interview, we should fix that and make sure we're not barring the doors from talent, or that we're looking at the right things.

"Generally, look for things that are evidence of exceptional ability. I don't even care if somebody graduated from college or high school or whatever... Did they build some really impressive device? Win some really tough competition? Come up with some really great idea? Solve some really tough problem?"

Musk concluded the point with a remarkablequestion:

"What did they do that was clear evidence of exceptional ability?"

Five words that should be memorized by every hiring manager and recruiter, in every company:

Clear evidence of exceptional ability.

So, what matters more than a degree? Intelligence, for one--along with emotional intelligence. The desire and ability to consistently learn and improve. And the hard skills needed to do the job at hand.

The more "exceptional ability" a candidate can demonstrate in these areas, the greater their potential to contribute to your company.

So, what does evidence of exceptional ability look like? And how can you make finding it part of your hiring practices?

It's easy to say "you'll know it when you see it," but the truth is that's not always the case. It's easy for recruiters and hiring managers to miss said evidence if they don't know how (or where) to look.

Here arethree suggestions to help your organization identify clear evidence of exceptional ability in job candidates:

Ask them to solve a problem.

To help sift through your crop of candidates, pose a problem they'll need to solve. It could be a typicalproblem they'dbe dealing with on any given day of the week (like how to deal with an irate customer). Or, it could be a more complex problem that your company is grappling with on a larger scale.

As you analyze candidates' answers, lookfor critical thinking skills, and the ability to clearly articulate thoughts and solutions.

Hold a contest.

A contest can be a great way to identify job candidates with potential to excel.

For example, every year Microsoft hosts a hackathon duringits One Weekfestival, which is part science fair and part tech expo. Employees are encouraged to bring their "world-changing ideas" to life. One Week is extremely popular among Microsoft employees, and has helped transform the company's reputation into a "cool employer."

Of course, your company's contest can focusonnew hires. But Microsoft's hackathon is a perfect example of how to identify current employees with potential to advance. This is important for two reasons:

"This feels like, collectively, we're building toward more creativity," said one longtime Microsoft employee about the One Week hackathon. "It's why we're here."

Test for skills.

Rather than focus on what school someone went to or what type of degree they have, a handful of companies have discovered that exceptional talent comes from various backgrounds.

For example, a few years ago LinkedIn pioneered REACH, an engineering apprenticeshipthat gives opportunities to candidates "who are passionate about coding, have a strong interest in continuing to independently learn and grow, and are willing to put in the work to achieve their goals and better their community."

To be considered, applicants should expect to complete both an essay application and a coding challenge, to help recruiters determine their skill level.

What's not required from candidates? A college degree.

Of course, what qualifies as an ideal candidate will likely be different for your company than for others, and will also depend heavily on the position you're looking to fill.

But great companies know that no position is permanent--and there's always room forgreat talent. So,if you're interested in hiring people who can help improve your company and move it forward, remember those five simple words:

Clear evidence of exceptional ability.

The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

Original post:

It Took Elon Musk Exactly 5 Words to Reveal What He Looks for in Every New Hire (and It's Not a College Degree) - Inc.

To many, the strategy adopted by Elon Musk and Tesla seems chaotic but its actually brilliant – Scroll.in

Few companies have attracted as much praise, derision, scepticism and enthusiasm as Telsa Motors and its founder Elon Musk. Having interviewed Elon Musk and the Tesla leadership as part of my research, one of the questions Im asked most frequently is: how can you make sense of Teslas wild strategies? The latest example is the move to create a Gigafactory for car batteries just outside Berlin.

Part of the challenge in understanding Teslas strategy are the commentators. These range from short-selling to star worship. Many ask the wrong questions, such as why Tesla isnt making any money a question appropriate for a mature business, but not a growth one. While all businesses must be sustainable in the long run, Tesla is like most rapid growth companies that eat up more cash flow than they produce while in the early growth phase.

But the biggest part of the challenge may simply be understanding Teslas strategy. Why would a new company, already taking on the Herculean task of introducing an entirely new type of car to the market, also take on the incredible risk of building some of the worlds largest battery factories? Or for that matter, a dealership and repair network? Or a charging network? Or, even crazier, a solar power business?

On the surface, it makes no sense and there is no doubt that it introduces more risk to the company, increasing its chances of failure. But when viewed through the lens of the decades of research on technology strategy, Teslas approach takes on a different light.

The big challenge to understanding Teslas strategy is that most of us only look at it from one level of analysis. Namely, when we see Tesla, we see a company that produces cars. But when I teach executives how to invest in future technology, I encourage them to think at multiple levels of the technology stack: not just products, but also components and systems. So lets take a closer look at Tesla.

At the level of the product, although a Tesla looks the same as other vehicles, underneath the hood the vehicle has a fundamentally different architecture both in terms of hardware and software. This matters because a long research tradition underscores that when incumbents face a new technology architecture, they struggle to understand and adapt.

Even though they can see what the technology is, they struggle to adapt both because they are reluctant to give up the existing capabilities they have perfected over decades and to fully integrate the new ones. Although incumbents may imitate the new architecture, they have a hard time overcoming the way they have done things in the past and to match the superior performance of the new, purpose-built architecture.

You can see evidence of this playing out in the auto industry. Early electric vehicles produced by incumbents on internal combustion engine architectures paled in comparison to the Tesla, and even newer blank slate efforts sometimes dont quite measure up. Its always the little things that get in the way such as the fact that most vehicles built by other manufacturers have up to five separate software systems rather than a single integrated system like a Tesla, which gives a performance advantage.

If we lower our level of analysis to the level of components, rather than products, we see the Tesla strategy in a different light again. What we know about technical systems is that, as they mature, the value migrates to the bottlenecks that control the systems performance.

This is why in the PC industry, Intel has made so much money for decades while hard drive and modem manufacturers made peanuts. Intel controlled the bottleneck to the performance of the PC whereas hard drive manufacturers did not.

The bottleneck for electric vehicles now and in the future is the batteries. If Tesla can dramatically lower the prices of batteries by manufacturing at scale, they lower the barriers to adoption for electric vehicles. But more importantly, the battery bottleneck isnt going away any time soon, which means, if they succeed, Tesla controls the biggest profit pool in the future of auto manufacturing.

Lastly, if we raise our level of analysis above components and products, to the level of systems, we see Tesla in yet another light. The truth is that consumers dont want products, they want solutions. Most car makers deliver products. But Tesla tries to deliver a complete experience: car, upgrades, charging, insurance the whole bundle. And as a result, the majority of Tesla owners talk in glowing terms about their Tesla, both because it is a great car, but also a great solution. In what other vehicle do you wake up in the morning to find new self-driving features?

Lets be clear the risks are high. Tesla has compounded major bet upon major bet by having a multi-level strategy that targets components, products and systems. Everything has to go well to succeed. But if the stars align, its a brilliant strategy at all levels.

This article first appeared on The Conversation.

Follow this link:

To many, the strategy adopted by Elon Musk and Tesla seems chaotic but its actually brilliant - Scroll.in

Elon Musk Just Tweeted a Response to Ford’s New Electric Mustang Announcement, and It’s Most Excellent – Inc.

Ford made headlines this weekend when it unveiled the Ford Mustang Mach-E, an all-electric crossover SUV. The Mach-E is the beginning of a new EV strategy that will compete directly with Tesla's upcoming Model-Y, a new SUV that is scheduled to begin production next summer.

Elon Musk quickly took to Twitter to respond to Ford's announcement. Did he chide his competitor for taking so long to develop its electric vehicle technology? Did he take a shot at Ford for its interior, which features a large center display screen that looks much like the one featured in most Tesla models?

If you're surprised by Musk's response to Ford, you shouldn't be. For years, the famous CEO has insisted he's not competing with larger automakers. Rather, he's trying to spur them on.

Musk reiterated this point in a remarkable blog post way back in 2014. It was then that Musk announced that Tesla would, "in the spirit of the open source movement...not initiate patent lawsuits against anyone who, in good faith, wants to use our technology."

Musk went on to explain that Tesla initially pursued patents out of concern that larger car companies like Ford would copy its technology and then use their massive resources to overwhelm Tesla. But Musk soon realized that the opposite had become reality: At the time, EV programs at the major automakers were "small to non-existent."

"Given that annual new vehicle production is approaching 100 million per year and the global fleet is approximately twobillion cars, it is impossible for Tesla to build electric cars fast enough to address the carbon crisis," Musk continued. "By the same token, it means the market is enormous. Our true competition is not the small trickle of non-Tesla electric cars being produced, but rather the enormous flood of gasoline cars pouring out of the world's factories every day."

Fast forward to today. Musk's plan seems to have worked: Several major auto manufacturers have announced plans to release electric vehicles in the upcoming years. In the meantime, Tesla's position as market leader has only strengthened. And despite some serious turnover in its senior employee ranks, Tesla still has a reputation for attracting some of the world's best and brightest engineers. (That might have something to do withits CEO's hiring philosophy.)

Considering all this, it seems we can take Musk's tweet at face value: genuine encouragement for a challenger making strides in a market that's long overdue for more competition.

In other words, now the real fun starts.

The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

View post:

Elon Musk Just Tweeted a Response to Ford's New Electric Mustang Announcement, and It's Most Excellent - Inc.

Peter Thiel says Elon Musk is a ‘negative role model’ because he’s too hard to emulate – CNBC

Peter Thiel, co-founder of Palantir.

Photographer | CNBC

Facebook board member and Presidential Donald Trump supporter Peter Thiel called Elon Musk a "negative role model" because his many innovations make him difficult to emulate.

Thiel, who called himself a "good friend" of the Tesla and SpaceX CEO, made the comment during a debate on stage at UCLA's Internet50 event Tuesday. Thiel was debating Robert Metcalfe, a professor of innovation and entrepreneurship at the University of Texas at Austin, on the question, "Has true innovation stalled?"

Thiel argued in the positive, while Metcalfe took the other side.

"Elon is the counterexample" to the argument that true innovation has stalled, Thiel said, comparing him to former Apple CEO Steve Jobs as a singular great innovator.

"It's a very weird thing where that the go-to story is we have one person who helped develop electric cars and reusable rockets," Thiel said. "But if you tell a young person, 'Why don't you be like Elon?' it's a negative role model where the basic response is, 'Well that's too hard, I can't do that.'"

Thiel said it may be easier to suggest that a young person "start a computer internet company from your college dorm room," which could be an allusion to Facebook's origin story.

Thiel and Musk go way back: Thiel is the co-founder of PayPal, which later merged with Musk's financial services company.

WATCH: Elon Musk's new underground tunnel project will transport cars at 125 mph

Go here to see the original:

Peter Thiel says Elon Musk is a 'negative role model' because he's too hard to emulate - CNBC

Tesla is unveiling a 3rd version of its solar roof this week, Elon Musk says – Business Insider

Tesla plans to unveil a third version of its solar-roof product, CEO Elon Musk said on the company's third-quarter earnings conference call Wednesday evening.

"Tomorrow afternoon we will be releasing version three of the Tesla solar roof," the CEO said at the end of his prepared remarks. "I think this is a great product. Versions one and two we were still figuring things out version three is finally ready for the big time."

Tesla's other solar-energy product, its more traditional solar panels, are under fierce scrutiny following a lawsuit from Walmart. The retailer claims Tesla's solar panels caught fire on the roofs of seven stores across the US. Tesla has not responded to requests for comment about the suit since it was filed but is required to respond to Walmart by Friday.

"There's no money down and you instantly save on your utility bill and there's no long-term contract," Musk said later on the call, in which Tesla also announced a surprise profit for the quarter, blowing past Wall Street's estimates."It's really a no-brainer. Do you want something that prints money? And if it doesn't print money, we'll fix it or take it back."

Musk also pointed to a recently released study by Zillow, a real-estate website, that said solar panels increased home values by about 4%.

Since Walmart's suit was filed, Business Insider reported the existence of a Tesla initiative called Project Titan. The move sought to replace as many faulty Amphenol connectors in previously installed solar equipment as quickly and quietly as possible.

Read more: Tesla solar panels have become a nightmare for some homeowners, especially for one Colorado woman whose roof went up in flames

Tesla told Business Insider at the time that its software-monitoring applications found that a "small number" of the connectors experienced failures and disconnections higher than their standards allowed.

Go here to read the rest:

Tesla is unveiling a 3rd version of its solar roof this week, Elon Musk says - Business Insider

Elon Musk should send people to Mars on a keto diet to save money, according to a doctor who studies ketosis – INSIDER

Before Elon Musk sends people to Mars, he might want to consult Dr. Stephen Phinney about what the space explorers should eat.

Phinney, a nutritional biochemist and chief medical officer of diabetes-reversal company Virta Health, has been studying nutrition, and particularly ketosis, for decades.

He's learned that it may be easier for some people to excel in extreme endurance pursuits if they carry lots of fuel in their bodies, as the keto diet allows, rather than on their backs, bikes or in their spaceships.

"It's going to cost a heck of a lot less to send people [to Mars] on a ketogenic diet," Phinney said at the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' annual Food and Nutrition Conference on Sunday in Philadelphia.

The keto diet is a low-carb, high-fat eating pattern that forces the body to burn fat, rather than carbs, for fuel.

While the plan is controversial in the nutrition community, it's especially counterintuitive for endurance athletes, who have long been known to need quick energy in the form of carbohydrates.

Phinney cited several examples of elite endurance athletes who broke records after going keto, suggesting that part of the diet's power for them was the ability to stop carrying carbs in the form of bagels, bananas, and goos.

Space travelers could potentially benefit from this as well, he said.

Back in 2012, ultra-endurance runner Tim Olsen won a 100-mile race, taking 21 minutes off the previous course record. He switched to a keto diet in order to avoid the digestive distress he'd previously experienced consuming the necessary 6,000 calories in carbs on the course, Phinney said.

Olsen won again the next year.

Then there's Mike Morton, who set a record running the most miles (172.5) over the course of 24 hours, as well as Sami Inkinen and Meredith Loring, the couple who made history rowing from California to Hawaii in 45 days. All were "keto-adapted," meaning their bodies had learned to use fat for fuel.

Phinney also discussed research suggesting that the keto diet is at least no worse than a higher-carb eating plan for some endurance athletes.

In one of his studies, he and colleagues compared 10 elite ultra-endurance male runners who were eating a traditional high-carb diet to 10 other (physically similar) elite ultra-endurance male runners who were eating a low-carb diet.

Over the course of six months, the researchers found that the low-carb athletes used mostly fat as fuel while the higher-carb group's bodies used mostly carbohydrates.

Surprisingly, there was little difference in the two group's "resting muscle glycogen or depletion" during and after a three-hour run, meaning somehow the low-carb group's muscles were still able to store and replenish sugars without actually eating much sugar.

The results suggests athletes who are given long enough in this case, six months to get their bodies well-adapted to fueling with fat may be able to make what they need for fuel.

There's a healthy and unhealthy version of every eating plan. Shutterstock

Phinney and his fellow presenter Louise Burke, a sports dietitian who had a more cautious view of keto, said there's much more work to be done to understand exactly if, how, and why a keto diet can work for some endurance athletes, and to better understand why some people excel on it while others lag.

The overall takeaway is that "any diet can be followed in good and bad forms," Burke said.

Keto with plenty of vegetables and healthy fats is good. "Dirty keto" or "lazy keto" with a menu packed with "fat bombs" is bad.

"You've got to do it the right way if you're going to do it," she said.

Phinney isn't the only researcher to ponder the usefulness of keto in space. In 2017, a researcher tested the keto diet while participating in an undersea NASA experiment designed to simulate Mars living. His theory was that the diet could one day help protect people from the neurological risks of traveling in space.

The rest is here:

Elon Musk should send people to Mars on a keto diet to save money, according to a doctor who studies ketosis - INSIDER

Elon Musk’s hearing over Thai cave diver ‘pedo guy’ slur to begin amid ‘con man’ investigation – ABC News

Updated October 29, 2019 06:13:20

An academic in South Africa has cast doubt on Elon Musk's defence that the term "pedo guy" is a common insult in Pretoria and therefore not defamatory, ahead of Tuesday's hearing and his legal counsel doubling-down on the stance to the ABC.

A Los Angeles court will decide on Tuesday (7:30am AEDT) whether to go ahead with a defamation case against Mr Musk, brought by British caver Vernon Unsworth, who played a key role in last year's Thai cave rescue operation.

In a television interview, Mr Unsworth suggested Mr Musk's offer to provide a submersible rescue pod was grandstanding and said Mr Musk "can stick his submarine where it hurts".

The founder of Tesla and SpaceX took to Twitter in response, ending a volley of angry tweets with "sorry pedo guy, you really did ask for it" he later apologised and deleted the tweets.

Mr Unsworth sued two months later in a Los Angeles federal court, saying Mr Musk falsely branded him a paedophile and child rapist.

Mr Musk has not provided any evidence to back his allegation and is instead arguing that he relied on information provided by a private investigator which he did not know to be false at the time and did not intend to publicly brand Mr Unsworth a paedophile.

Mr Unsworth has strongly denied any accusation of paedophilia and has sued for defamation, looking for $111,000 in damages.

However, Mr Musk is trying to have the case thrown out before trial on several legal grounds.

"Mr Musk testified that 'pedo guy' was a common insult used in South Africa during his youth," wrote Mr Musk's attorneys, in court documents.

"It is synonymous with 'creepy old man' and aimed at mocking a person's appearance and demeanour, not an accusation of paedophilia," the attorneys wrote.

The ABC contacted several linguists from universities in Pretoria where Mr Musk lived until he was 17 years old to check the claim.

Most did not feel appropriately qualified to address the issue, but Molly Brown, the head of the Department of English at the University of Pretoria, said the term was not well known.

"I think I can confirm that 'pedo-guy' is not a commonly used insult in South Africa," she told the ABC.

"A quick look at the local twitter sphere confirms this the only tweets I can find in support of Mr Musk's assertion come from men who attended his school," she said.

"This might mean that the term was current in his particular school environment."

"I also think that just as most of us would rather die than dress as we did at school, so the average person abandons school slang as a means of public communication within a surprisingly short time after leaving school behind."

In a statement to the ABC, Alex Spiro, one of the lawyers representing Mr Musk, doubled down on the supportive tweets as evidence that "the term or insult 'pedo guy' was commonly used in Mr Musk's school in South Africa".

"Mr Musk deleted the tweet and apologised," he said.

While part of the legal appeal seems to try to distance Mr Musk from the paedophile allegation.

Mr Musk spent more than $US50,000 ($74,000) on a private investigator, who offered his services to "dig deep" into Mr Unsworth's past.

The investigator travelled to Thailand and sent back reports with unverified claims, which Mr Musk appears to have taken as fact.

"The investigator reported that Mr Unsworth was a fixture in Pattaya Beach, Thailand a locale notorious for prostitution and child trafficking, that he had a taste for young Thai girls," wrote Mr Musk's attorneys in the court documents.

The attorneys wrote that according to the investigator: "He whore-mongered his way through the go-go bars of Thailand, that his only friends were his 'sexpat' peers, and that he married his Thai wife when she was a teenager, after starting a relationship when she was a young girl."

Again, no evidence was presented to Mr Musk, or to the court in the recent documents.

In their response to the court, Mr Unsworth's lawyers say that, contrary to the investigator's reports, he met his wife in London in 2011 when she was 32 years old and he only made his first trip to Thailand to visit her in 2018.

"Like the bully that he is, Musk chose to lash out publicly at the criticism only by falsely attacking Unsworth, a relatively unknown individual, and publicly challenging him to sue for libel," Mr Unsworth's attorney Lin Wood wrote.

"Musk's motion is based principally on the antithetical bases that, on the one hand, he was not calling Unsworth a paedophile, while on the other hand, he did not harbour serious doubts as to whether Unsworth was actually a paedophile."

Based on these verbal reports from the so-called investigator, Mr Musk emailed comments to a BuzzFeed News reporter that were meant to be off the record, referring to Mr Unsworth as a "child rapist".

Mr Musk's lawyers are now arguing the billionaire should not be held liable for his comments because he did not believe them to be false.

"Because Mr Musk based this tweet on information concerning which he did not have serious doubts, Mr Unsworth cannot establish it was written with actual malice," wrote Mr Musk's attorneys.

"Although it turns out that the investigator lacked solid evidence of Mr Unsworth's behaviour, that does not matter here."

In their response to the court, Mr Unsworth's lawyers say Mr Musk did not vet the investigator, James Howard-Higgins, for reliability and say Mr Musk himself now acknowledges that Mr Howard-Higgins was a "con man just taking us for a ride".

The defamation case against Mr Musk has been set for December 2.

Topics:law-crime-and-justice,world-politics,thailand,south-africa,england,united-states

First posted October 28, 2019 15:45:27

Excerpt from:

Elon Musk's hearing over Thai cave diver 'pedo guy' slur to begin amid 'con man' investigation - ABC News

Watch Elon Musk unveil his latest plan for conquering Mars – Business Insider

Following is a transcript of the video.

Narrator: Elon Musk has a giant new addition to his plans for colonizing Mars. The Starship Rocket. For years, this rocket was merely a concept on paper.But not anymore.On Saturday, September 28 Musk stood in front of a fully-assembled prototype of the rocket as he unveiled SpaceX's future plans.

Elon Musk: Which future do you want? Do you want the future where we become a space-ranked civilization and are in many worlds and out there among the stars? Or one where we are forever confined to Earth. And I say it is the first.

Narrator: If all goes according to plan, when Starship is complete it will tower 387 feet tall, measure 30 feet in diameter, and be capable of transporting people to Mars. For comparison, it will be about 5.5 times taller than SpaceX's first successful rocket, the Falcon 1. Starship is the rocket that Musk has aspired to build ever since he founded SpaceX in 2002. And after years of modeling, multiple changes to the rocket's design, and a substantial investment from Japanese billionaire Yusaku Maezawa it has come out looking unlike anything SpaceX has ever built before.For example, SpaceX's Falcon 9 rockets are covered by an aluminum-lithium alloy.But as you can see, Starship is covered with something different, which Musk called the best design decision of the entire project.

Musk: The best design decision on this whole thing, is 301 stainless steel. Because at cryogenic temperatures, 301 stainless actually has about the same effective strength as an advanced composite or aluminum-lithium. Unlike most steels which get brittle at low temperature, 301 stainless gets much stronger.

Narrator: And unlike the nine engines on SpaceX's Falcon 9 rockets, Starship will fly on six, more powerful, Raptor engines.

Musk: The ship will have a total of six engines. Three of the sea level variety of Raptor. Those are actually on the rocket right now. So we've got the three sea level Raptor engines and they gimbal, which means that the whole engine moves. So the way a rocket steers is by moving the entire engine. So whereas an aircraft engine is static and you move by moving the control surfaces like the ailerons and rudder and elevator and flaps, this rocket when the engines are powered you move the entire engine to steer it. The Starship will have three sea level engines that will move up to 15 degrees angle and three vacuum engines that will optimize for efficiency that will not move, they will be fixed in place.

Narrator: Musk said that within the next one to two months, SpaceX will launch this Starship prototype, called Mk 1 (pronounced Mark), to 12.5 miles in the air and then land it back home in Boca Chica, Texas.After that ...

Musk: Our next flight after that might actually just be all the way to orbit with a booster and the ship.

Narrator: The prototype shown here will probably never reach orbit.That mission will go to an upgraded version of the rocket, called Mk 3, which SpaceX could start constructing as soon as next month, according to Musk. And by next year? Musk says SpaceX could be launching people to space on this thing.Whether that's actually the case, we'll just have to wait and see.In the meantime, Musk remains optimistic.

Musk: To Mars!

View original post here:

Watch Elon Musk unveil his latest plan for conquering Mars - Business Insider

Elon Musk Just Unveiled Wild Starship Plans For "The Moon, Mars, And Beyond" – ScienceAlert

Elon Musk, the founder and CEO of SpaceX, addressed planet Earth on Saturday night about his latest plans to "extend consciousness beyond Earth" using a towering steel spaceship.

Standing between two rockets that represented both the future of SpaceX and its nail-biting past, Musk delivered his talk to more than 100 people from the company's fast-developing launch site in Boca Chica, southeast Texas.

Behind Musk was a shorter rocket called Falcon 1, which after three catastrophic failures in 2006, 2007, and 2008 finally delivered a small payload into space for the first time. That mission's success also prevented Musk and SpaceX from going broke.

"Eleven years ago today SpaceX made orbit for the first time," Musk said of that first successful Falcon 1 launch, on September 28, 2008. "If that fourth launch had not succeeded, there would have been curtains. But fate smiled upon us that day."

Yet as he spoke, all eyes were fixed on the 164-foot-tall (50-metre-tall), stainless-steel rocket ship behind Musk that SpaceX had finished assembling only hours before his speech.

"I think this is the most inspiring thing I've ever seen," Musk said of the vehicle, called Starship Mark 1: a critical prototype for a planned system called Starship.

A complete Starship may stand 40 stories tall at a launch pad, ferry dozens of people into orbit at a time, and eventually send crews to the Moon and Mars.

"There are many troubles in the world, of course, and these are important, and we need to solve them. But we also need things that make us excited to be alive," Musk said.

"Becoming a space-faring civilisation being out there among the stars this is one of the things that I know makes me be glad to be alive."

"Do you want the future where we become a space-faring civilisation and are on many worlds, and are out there among the stars? Or one where we're forever confined to Earth?" he said.

"I say it is the first."

But Musk's audacious vision needs a vehicle to carry it out, and to him that vessel is Starship.

In September 2018, Musk presented a carbon-fibre version of a Mars vehicle called Big Falcon Rocket. He also introduced Yusaku Maezawa, a Japanese fashion billionaire, as a major funder of the system's development and the person who will fly around the Moon in a SpaceX rocket in 2023.

A couple of months later, though, SpaceX abandoned the carbon-fibre design and switched to a stainless-steel variant. Musk announced the reimagined spacecraft as Starship that December.

Since then, SpaceX built and launched a crude prototype called Starhopper and finished Starship Mk 1 (which Musk said may fly in a month or so). Those prototypes are work toward a Starship system that's fully reusable that way, no multi-million-dollar rocket parts are wasted, and the only major cost to launch is fuel.

"The critical breakthrough that is required for us to become a space-faring civilisation is to make space travel like air travel," Musk said. "This is basically the holy grail of space travel."

SpaceX posted a video to Twitter (below) on Saturday that imagines how Starship would work.

In the animation, a Starship vessel is stacked on top of a giant rocket booster, called Super Heavy, that's equipped with up to several dozen car-size Raptor rocket engines. The booster hauls Starship much of the way toward orbit, detaches, and falls back to Earth.

Once refueled, the booster then launches another Starship to meet the first one in orbit, refuel it with methane and oxygen liquids Musk says can be mass-manufactured on Earth as well as Mars using carbon dioxide, water, and solar energy and send it on its way.

The biggest changes to Starship's design include a refinement of its lower wings, flipper-like upper canards, and the addition of hexagon-shaped heat shield tiles lining the spacecraft's belly.

SpaceX got rid of three wings that also functioned as landing legs. Instead, Starship as currently envisioned now has six pop-out landing legs and two canard-like wings.

The wings and tiles are crucial to safeguarding Starship as it returns to Earth at 25 times the speed of sound and plows through the planet's atmosphere. This phase, called reentry, generates a searing-hot plasma that can destroy an unprotected spacecraft.

"For a reusable ship, you're coming in like a meteor. You don't want something that melts at a high temperature," Musk said, emphasising the need for steel (most rockets use aluminium or carbon-fibre). He also noted that stainless steel is about 50 times cheaper by weight than carbon-fibre composites.

Starship's redesigned wings should help the vehicle maintain lift, slow down more gradually, and spread out the heat of reentry, while the thermal tiles absorb that energy.

Once the ship reaches denser atmosphere, Musk said the wings will help steer Starship as it falls toward a landing pad.

"It just falls like a skydiver, and controls itself, and then it turns and just lands," Musk said. "It will be totally nuts to see that thing land."

Kimi Talvitie a spaceflight enthusiast, software engineer, and artist built an impressive 3D model of a "skydiving" Starship (below) using details Musk shared ahead of his presentation.

Though Starship may be years away from being fully realised, Musk shared some shocking notions about how it may stack up against all other rockets even SpaceX's own partly reusable Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launchers.

Musk calculated that, in an ideal scenario, one Starship system could launch to space and return three times per day, or about 1,000 times a year. Assuming each launch can fly about 150 tons of payload into orbit, that works out to about 150,000 tons per year.

That's more than 333 times the mass of the football field-size International Space Station.

Meanwhile, he said, all of Earth's rockets launching today might together deliver no more than 300 tons into space.

"We're talking about something that is, with a fleet of Starships, 1,000 times more than all Earth capacity combined. All other rockets combined would be 0.1 percent, including ours," Musk said.

"But you kind of need that if you're going to build a city on Mars. It's gotta be done."

The rapid reusability of the system, when Musk emphasised is essential, could also move Starship into an operational state much faster.

"I think we could potentially see people fly next year," Musk said. "We can do many flights to prove out the reliability very quickly."

Musk said SpaceX hasn't yet figured out how it plans to keep people alive inside its Starships, in terms of oxygen, food, water, and waste, let alone on the surface of Mars. But he added there's a definite need for "regenerative" life support systems, which recycle and conserve all the supplies humans need.

"I think for sure you'd want to have a regenerative life support system," Musk said. "Regenerative is kind of a necessity. I actually don't think its super hard to do that, relative to the spacecraft itself."

Despite Musk's optimism, though, fully functional regenerative life support systems have yet to be achieved in elaborate facilities on Earth, let alone in spacecraft.

Musk's drive in creating Starship is not just about feeling good about the future, but also, in his mind, rescuing humanity from certain doom.

"As far as we know, this is the only place in this part of the galaxy, the Milky Way, where there is consciousness," Musk said of planet Earth.

He explained that it took about 4.5 billion years for that "consciousness" we humans to evolve, but that we have maybe a few hundred millions years left before our ageing Sun begins to expand, heat up Earth, and make our home planet uninhabitable.

Musk referred to this as a window of time for consciousness.

"That's all we've got, OK? Several hundred million years," Musk said. "If it took life an extra 10 percent longer for conscious life to evolve, it wouldn't have evolved at all, because it'd be incinerated by the Sun."

Though this or other humanity-destroying calamities are a long way off, Musk doesn't want to waste any time while our window to spread among the stars, as is evidenced by the frenetic pace of SpaceX's Starship rocket development program.

"I'm optimistic by nature, but there's some chance that window will not be open for long," Musk said. "I think we should become a multi-planet civilisation while that window is open.

"And if we do, I think the probable outcome for Earth is even better because then Mars could help Earth one day. I think we should really do our very best to become a multi-planet species, and we should extend consciousness beyond Earth, and we should do it now."

This article was originally published by Business Insider.

More from Business Insider:

Original post:

Elon Musk Just Unveiled Wild Starship Plans For "The Moon, Mars, And Beyond" - ScienceAlert