8 Of The Coolest Things Elon Musk Has Done That Make Us Wish We Were Him – MensXP.com

Elon Musk is something else, I don't even know how to describe it. He's, obviously, our favourite eccentric billionaire and even though we all probably have the 'eat the rich' attitude after watching Parasite, no one is specifically coming for him.

He's one of the coolest, most-famous people right now and he does so many wacky and unexpected things, people just love how unpredictable he is. Sure, everyone wants to be rich, but Elon is so much more than that, he makes everyone wish they were like him.

I mean, you have billions of dollars and yet you're on Twitter asking for 'dank memes' from people and fully embracing each and every meme made on you. Now, that's the kind of rich person everyone should aspire to be.

Ah, the high Elon Musk, my personal favourite Elon Musk. Only he can go viral for just smoking a joint, and then become a meme because of it.

Reddit

He sold flamethrowers, like legit flamethrowers and actually earned $10,000 millions of dollars with it. Who cares about a car company or a space company when you can earn money by selling flamethrowers to people.

Twitter

No one can argue that he's better at Twitter than most people. He's hilarious, he's up to date with everything and regularly changes his name on the website when there's a new meme. Safe to say that he's basically a Twitter celeb.

Tesla

He actually freaking did it, he sent a car to space. How does he even come up with such stuff? We all probably think of weird stuff, but we obviously can't follow through. I'm so glad there's a rich guy out there doing so many random things, like sending a car to space, and making good use of his money.

Twitter

When the Cybertruck was launched, I thought it genuinely looked like that weird-looking car we all drew when we were kids and I stand by it. He brought that car to life and even though people have to wait to get their hands on it, till then, we can just watch Elon driving it around and knocking over stuff.

He's obsessed with Mars,no one knows why. But, what we do know is that he legit wants to move to the red planet and I believe he's going to actually do it. If there's one person who can move to a different planet, it's Elon.

Pretty obvious, but also pretty envious. The dude owns rockets, like proper rockets.

Twitter

He made a really cool and exciting company that will help reduce traffic. It's basically aiming to build a network of tunnels that will transport vehicles using electric skates. Sounds so futuristic, right? A company like that deserves an equally cool name, right? Nope, Elon being Elon called it 'Boring Company' even though the entire thing is anything but boring.

Photo: Reuters (Main Image)

Here is the original post:

8 Of The Coolest Things Elon Musk Has Done That Make Us Wish We Were Him - MensXP.com

Elon Musk shares the science fiction book series that inspired him to start SpaceX – CNBC

As a teenage boy, Elon Musk felt a "personal obligation" for the fate of mankind, according to the book "Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future" by Ashlee Vance.

Musk's loveof books and the lessons he took from them inspired him to create "cleaner energy technology or [build] spaceships to extend the human species's reach" in the future, according to Vance.

One set of those books Musk still recommends today: theseven-book "Foundation" science fiction series by scientist and author Isaac Asimov.

"Worth reading Asimov's Foundation," the SpaceX and Tesla CEO tweeted on Wednesday, "in the order that they were written."

Asimov's "Foundation" saga is about "the collapse and rebirth of a vast interstellar empire in the universe of the future," according to Encyclopedia Britannica.

"The lesson I drew from [the "Foundation" saga] is you should try to take the set of actions that are likely to prolong civilization, minimize the probability of a dark age and reduce the length of a dark age if there is one," Musk told Rolling Stone in 2017.

Musk also said it taught him that "civilizations move in cycles," influencing him to pursue space exploration and further mankind's "upward cycle," he toldThe Guardianin 2013.

"Given that this is the first time in 4.5 billion years where it's been possible for humanity to extend life beyond Earth, it seems like we'd be wise to act while the window was open and not count on the fact it will be open a long time," Musk said.

As a result, Musk started SpaceX in 2002 (after his second start-up, X.com which later became PayPal, sold to eBay for $1.5 billion).

"Foundation Series & Zeroth Law are fundamental to creation of SpaceX," Musk tweeted in June 2018, referring to Asimov's Zeroth Law of robotics.

In 2003, Musk started Tesla, then Neuralink in 2016 and The Boring Company in 2017. Today, he is worth $42.3 billion, according to Forbes.

Check out:

Don't miss:

Read the original post:

Elon Musk shares the science fiction book series that inspired him to start SpaceX - CNBC

Bill Gates can buy any car he wants but maybe Elon Musk should care it’s a Porsche and not a Tesla – Business Insider Nordic

Tesla CEO Elon Musk started a minor fight with Microsoft co-founder and retired CEO Bill Gates recently when Gates said he'd bought a new Porsche Taycan, not a Tesla.

Musk tweeted that he'd found his interactions with Gates to be "underwhelming," presumably rendering a verdict on Gates' automotive choice.

Musk's view, far from being merely petty, indicated that he might, justmight,be concerned about the Taycan, a $100,000-plus, all-electric four-door that's taking aim at the high end of the EV market. That's not because the Taycan is that much better than, say, a top-of-the-line Tesla Model S.

Rather, it's because Tesla doesn't currently have a brand-new, attention-getting performance machine for sale. The Model S has been around since 2012, and the forthcoming new Tesla Roadster remains ... forthcoming.

Meanwhile, who cares if Gates bought a Taycan? The guy is already a noted Porsche enthusiast, as are many successful folks of his generation (to quote Tom Cruise in "Risky Business": "There is no substitute"), and the Taycan is definitely the go-fast electric vehicle to have right now. I'm wildly curious about the thing, and eagerly looking forward to testing it out in 2020.

The Porsche Taycan. Porsche

The larger issue here is that every little darn thing about Tesla has become sort of grouchy at this point. You'd think Musk would be able to relax after printing, in the past three months, a market capitalization larger than General Motors and Ford combined. Tesla also just announced plans to raise $2 billion by issuing new shares. Ka-ching, right?

Perhaps Musk's irritation could be traced to Gates, a tech pioneer, sticking with his brand rather than endorsing Tesla.

OK, sure, but Taycan ownership doesn't preclude Tesla ownership. I think Gates is flush enough to stock his garage with several different EVs. That he pulled the trigger on the current coolest one was a personal decision.

Stated another way: It's a free country, Elon.

That said, Gates' Porsche enthusiasm does indicate a failure of imagination. The old saw about Microsoft being boring and Apple being interesting applies here, as choosing Porsches doesn't entail a lot of risk taking. Gates has owned the manufacturer's 911 sports car, arguably the greatest ever built by human hands on planet earth not exactly a demanding decision. But wouldn't you know it, the late Steve Jobs was also a fan.

(Gates also acquired a rare Porsche 959 in the 1980s and endured a lengthy saga before he was actually able to drive it.)

Tesla and Musk has crafted a reality-distortion field to rival Jobs' legendary Jedi mind tricks. Tesla makes nice cars, but of late, its focus has been on an affordable four-door, the Model 3 "affordable" meaning $40,000 for the least-expensive configuration, of course.

In that context, the Taycan naturally looks sexier. It's a Porsche; you don't buy one of those because you're in the market for a daily driver.

Bill Gates, Porsche enthusiast. Afolabi Sotunde / Reuters

Gates might have stumbled into a not-wildly-discussed dynamic involving the Tesla brand. The unveiling of the new Roadster a few years back was intended to revive Tesla's high-performance mojo in a properly flashy package; up to that point, Tesla has been content to engineer supercar-level specs into the Model S.

More recently, Tesla rolled out the over-the-top Cybertruck, alleging that it would combine of you guessed it Porsche performance with all-American pickup capability, with a design that appeared to have been borrowed from an unproduced Ridley Scott film.

But Tesla is trying to grow, grow, and grow some more. Last year, it delivered 367,500 vehicles worldwide, outdoing Porsche's 280,000. In the US, Porsche was quite happy to sell just over 61,000 cars and SUVs. But that's how Porsche wants to roll: The German company isn't really trying to save the world, while Tesla and Musk quite explicitly are.

In fact, even with the Taycan and its enviable carbon footprint, the objective at Porsche isn't to sell a bunch of EVs but to prove that it's possible to build an all-electric car worthy of the Porsche badge.

You could call that "underwhelming." But if you step on the accelerator, you might change your mind.

Read this article:

Bill Gates can buy any car he wants but maybe Elon Musk should care it's a Porsche and not a Tesla - Business Insider Nordic

Bill Gates bought a Porsche, and then Elon Musk talked trash about him – The Verge

Bill Gates bought an electric car. But while hes given Tesla credit for pushing other carmakers to go electric, it does seem notable that he didnt buy from the company that pushed the innovation. He bought a Porsche Taycan.

Someone alerted Elon Musk to this development, of course. And that got us a bitchy tweet from Musk: My conversations with Gates have been underwhelming tbh. Its true that Musk likes beef; after all, hes made cracks about Facebooks Mark Zuckerberg and Amazons Jeff Bezos. (Actually, it seems like Musk and Bezos have a lively rivalry going.)

But the Gates fight strikes me as different precisely because Musks dismissal of him is so broad. Both Musk and Gates are admirers of Nick Bostrom, the Swedish philosopher who has warned in his 2014 book Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies that machine intelligence could surpass human intelligence. Both men have appeared on The Big Bang Theory. Perhaps significantly, though, Musk is frequently compared not to Gates, but to Apples late CEO, Steve Jobs.

The Taycan is also something of a sore spot for Musk, even though it has a smaller range than Teslas comparable vehicles. But the Taycan Turbo set the four door electric sports car lap record at Germanys Nrburgring. (Though Musk has suggested on Twitter that the use of Turbo by Porsche is a misnomer.) And, apparently in response, Musk announced Tesla would run a Model S around the track. In November, Musk also picked a fight with Top Gear, a TV show that depicted a Taycan beating a Model S in a race.

View original post here:

Bill Gates bought a Porsche, and then Elon Musk talked trash about him - The Verge

This disturbingly realistic deepfake puts Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk in a Star Trek episode – The Verge

A new deepfake puts Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and Tesla CEO Elon Musk in the pilot episode of the original Star Trek, The Cage and I kind of love it. In this particular AI-powered face swap, Bezos plays a Talosian alien with a huge bald head, while Musk plays Captain Christopher Pike (who is the captain of the USS Enterprise before James T. Kirk).

Heres a very short version of whats going on in this scene, if youre wondering: in this episode, the Talosian aliens capture Pike to enslave him and use him to breed humans that will be used to rebuild a destroyed society. Pike tries to escape throughout the episode, and eventually, the Talosians decide that humans resistance to captivity wont make them a good fit for that plan.

The conversation is kind of hard to follow, and thats probably because the clips from the episode are stitched together to make it seem like its only the Talosian alien and Captain Pike having a conversation. In the actual episode, there are a number of other characters who are critical to the conversation that this deepfake doesnt show.

But even though the scene is confusing, I think the deepfake is scarily impressive, particularly the unsettling-looking Bezos as a Talosian alien. It marks the second Star Trek cameo for the Amazon CEO: he appeared in 2016s Star Trek Beyond, also as a big-headed alien.

Continued here:

This disturbingly realistic deepfake puts Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk in a Star Trek episode - The Verge

Grimes says going to Mars is one of her main goals – Business Insider – Business Insider

Musician Grimes appears to have an interest in going to Mars, much like her boyfriend, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk.

In a candid new interview with British fashion and culture magazine The Face, Grimes discussed everything from her pregnancy to the harmful effects of social media. She also touched on her ambitions for the future, including her dreams of going to Mars.

Interviewer Michelle Lhooq asked Grimes whether she'd "rather go to Mars or upload your consciousness to the cloud," Grimes described going to Mars as one of "the main things I'm trying to do."

Here's her response in full:

"WOW, what a question. Ummmmm.. I would very much like to do both of these things. Like, these are the main things I'm trying to do. I guess I'd like to upload my consciousness, and then when it's technologically possible, have my consciousness live in some kind of humanoid vessel that can speak and move freely, and then that body can go to Mars and other planets with my mind inside it."

Mars is also the focus of Grimes' boyfriend, Elon Musk's, rocket company, SpaceX. Musk founded the company in 2002 with the goal of making spaceflight cheaper by a factor of 10. SpaceX's long-term goal is to make colonizing Mars affordable, and Musk has said that the company won't file for an initial public offering until what Musk calls the "Mars Colonial Transporter" is flying regularly.

Musk currently has plans to send 1 million people to Mars by 2050 and build a city there. The plan includes building 1,000 fully reusable spaceships, called Starships, over the next 10 years. Eventually, the goal is to launch three Starships each day.

"Needs to be such that anyone can go if they want, with loans available for those who don't have money," Musk recently wrote.

Musk and Grimes have been together since 2018, debuting their relationship at that year's Met Gala. Since then, the couple has weathered the storm of Musk's "funding secured" fiasco at Tesla, have shown up for each other's big career moments, and may now be expecting a baby together. Grimes has said that she's seven months pregnant, but more details about the pregnancy, such as whether she is having the baby with Musk, are not clear.

Read Grimes' full interview with The Face here.

Continued here:

Grimes says going to Mars is one of her main goals - Business Insider - Business Insider

Charlie Munger: Boeing Will Survive, and Elon Musk Isn’t Wrong All the Time – Yahoo Finance

Charlie Munger (Trades, Portfolio), Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio)'s long time business partner at Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A) (NYSE:BRK.B) and chairman of The Daily Journal (DJCO), recently talked to a large audience as part of the Journal's annual meeting.

Munger can be hugely entertaining because he isn't always practicing social tact at Warren's level - no doubt on purpose. He is a genius investor with more experience than most.

The first question Munger answered was a very interesting one about value investing:

"Well, both are important. But basically, all investment is value investment in the sense that you're always trying to get better prospects than you're paying for.But you can't look everywhere at once any more than you can run a marathon in twelve different states at once.

So you have to have some system of picking some place to look which is your hunting ground - but you're looking for value in every case.

What is interesting to me is I don't agree with you. I think the strongest companies are not in America. I think the Chinese companies are stronger than ours and they're growing faster.

I have investments in them and you don't. And I'm right and you're wrong.

Well, you can laugh but I just spoke a simple truth.

Li Lu is here. I just saw his face in the audience. He's the most successful investor in the whole damn room. Where does he invest? China. And boy was he smart to do that."

Li Lu runs Himalaya Capital and keeps a very low profile. Munger first invested in his fund a long time ago. The current 13-f shows that Himalaya Capital Management LLC's top holdings are Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MU) , Baidu, Inc. (NASDAQ:BIDU) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE:BABA). Li Lu concentrates his portfolio, but it is likely that he also invests in foreign companies that don't show up on the 13-f.

I don't agree with Munger's statement that China has stronger companies than the U.S. Speaking on a very general level can be dangerous. However, I think it's fair to say that China has protected many of its industries and sheltered national companies to be able to get to scale. Alphabet (GOOG) (GOOGL) is an example of a company that was unable to break into the Chinese market due to national protection of homegrown companies. It's the only major territory in the world where they don't dominate the internet search market.

In the talk, Munger continued:

"Is he good at it? It really helps if you know which hunting ground to look in. In fact, we all do better when we go hunting where the hunting is easy.

I have a friend who's a fisherman. He says: "I have a simple rule for success in fishing. Fish where the fish are."

You want to fish where the bargains are. It's that simple.

If the fishing is really lousy where you are, you should probably look for another place to fish."

This goes into the current debate whether value investing is dead. For about the last ten years, value strategies haven't worked as well as in the past. Berkshire didn't do so great either over the past ten years. Meanwhile, U.S. large-cap growth has been flying.

Historically, that's been one of the worst performers you can find. Munger sort of suggests going with an approach that works. I think that's very dangerous because value investing works precisely because it doesn't work all of the time. There will be annoying stretches where everyone is buying random story stocks and running circles around you and no one cares about balance sheets.

I remember 2009, and it was all everyone could talk about: balance sheet this and balance sheet that. Everyone was a value investor by 2009. Nowadays, nobody talks about balance sheets. Value investing is questioned and even many value investors don't like to identify as such, even holding positions in companies like Netflix (NFLX) and AMZN (AMZN) in their portfolios. Changing strategies now does not sound like a great idea to me, but maybe I've got ten tough years coming.

This is where Munger is asked about Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA):

"My thoughts are two: I would never buy it, and I would never sell it short.

I have a third comment. Howard Amundsen once said something that I've taken to heart: "Never underestimate the man who overestimates himself."

I think Elon Musk is peculiar and he may overestimate himself but he may not be wrong all the time."

Story continues

Regarding the current market environment, Munger said:

"Nifty Fifty is an interesting question. At the heights of the Nifty Fifty crazness, which was created by the Morgan bank of all places, it had a home-sewing company that was trading at 50 times earnings. Home-sewing, great god.

We are not that crazy yet. So a lot of what's happened is not that crazy. I think a lot of these companies are very valuable, though they may be selling at too high prices.

But home-sewing was sure to fail. I don't think our leading tech companies are at all sure to fail. The current situation is not nearly as crazy. Nifty Fifty was absolute dementia."

Munger seems to think things can get nuttier still, although I'm not sure if he's aware of all the weird pockets of irrationality that are going on in markets well outside of the size Berkshire play at.

One question at the talk was about electric vehicles and BYD. "Why are electric vehicle sales at BYD down 50% to 70% while Tesla is growing 50% and what does the future hold for BYD?" Munger answered:

"Well, I'm not very sure I'm the world's expert on the future of electric vehicles, except I think they're coming generally and somebody's going to make them.

BYD's sales went down because the Chinese reduced the incentives they were giving to buyers of electric cars.

Tesla's sales went up because Elon has convinced people that he can cure cancer."

Berkshire owns BYD Company (BYDDF) and has an investment in General Motors (GM). I don't know why the questioner thinks Tesla is growing 50% because year-over-year revenue is up 2%, but on a sequential quarterly basis it's down.

"Well, I don't like to jump on Boeing.

Boeing is a great company that had one of the great success rates in safety records of the world. They lost their way, they made some dumb mistakes. I think that's generally the way of things too if you're trying to do something very complicated with hundreds of thousands of people. Occasionally, there will be slip-up.

In most places, if you actually look at them, they have some near-misses. Boeing had a near-miss a few years ago when the rudder stuff failed and they had a few crashes. I was on the Safety Committee at US Air when that happened and nobody could figure it out for months. Something in the rudder was not working, and it caused three crashes. It took them something like six months to figure it out and they must've put an army on it.

Well they survived that one and they'll no doubt survive this one but it's really expensive to make a big safety mistake. Of course, they should be avoided."

I'm getting the impression here that Munger really likes the company and thinks its problems are solvable. I think he navigated the question very carefully. Boeing is down about 25% from highs prior to the 737 MAX crisis. I'm guessing they still think it's too expensive, but they may have a chance to buy if there's more bad news.

Disclosure: the author is short TSLA

Read more here:

Not a Premium Member of GuruFocus? Sign up for a free 7-day trial here.

This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Continued here:

Charlie Munger: Boeing Will Survive, and Elon Musk Isn't Wrong All the Time - Yahoo Finance

Elon Musk’s SpaceX aiming to raise $250 million, taking valuation to around $36 billion: Report – Firstpost

ReutersFeb 24, 2020 10:22:32 IST

Elon Musk's SpaceX is looking to raise about $250 million (192.7 million pounds), taking the private rocket company's valuation to about $36 billion, CNBC reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the financing.

The company plans to raise the amount at a price of $220 per share and the latest funding round is not expected to close until the second week of March, according to the report.

SpaceX did not immediately respond to Reuters request for comment.

SpaceX has been launching Starlink satellites in batches of 60 since May and currently has 240 orbiting Earth. The company aims to make the broadband internet service operational by the end of 2020.

Welcome to Tech2 Innovate, Indias most definitive youth festival celebrating innovation is being held at GMR Grounds, Aerocity Phase 2, on 14th and 15th February 2020. Come and experience an amalgamation of tech, gadgets, automobiles, music, technology, and pop culture along with the whos who of the online world. Book your tickets now.

Read more here:

Elon Musk's SpaceX aiming to raise $250 million, taking valuation to around $36 billion: Report - Firstpost

The Tech Weekender: Elon Musk slams Bill Gates, Google indexing WhatsApp group chat links, Bezos fights climate change, and Pixel 4 arrives in India -…

Apple obtained a temporary restraining order against a man of Indian origin, who allegedly stalked and harassed CEO Tim Cook and other company executives. Rakesh 'Rocky' Sharma, a San Francisco resident, reportedly made threatening phone calls to the Cupertino-based company. According to the court documents uncovered by OneZero's Dave Gershgorn, Sharma began calling Apple executives and leaving "disturbing" voicemails. Sharma was directed by the court to steer clear of Apple executives, the company's headquarters as well as Tim Cook and his property. The restraining order is effective until March 3, which is the same day the hearing on the case is scheduled to take place.

Twitter recently tweaked its user interface to make it easier to add new tweets to old threads. With the new feature, you can easily thread multiple tweets together while you compose them. You will no longer have to go digging through your tweets to reply to one with a recent update. While this has been possible for quite some time now, the new feature just makes it easier to connect an in-progress tweet to an earlier post.

Elon Musk dissed Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates in a tweet saying, "My conversations with Gates have been underwhelming tbh". Musk's remarks came after an unofficial Tesla news account expressed disappointment with the Microsoft billionaire's recent decision to buy a Porsche Taycan instead of a Tesla. At $103,800, the Taycan is a direct competitor to several Tesla models. The tweets came after Gates revealed that he bought his first-ever electric vehicle, a Porsche Taycan, in an interview with popular YouTuber Marques Brownlee. While Gates seemed excited about his first electric vehicle, he also said that Tesla is the frontrunner in the passenger car industry addressing climate change.

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos recently committed $10 billion of his personal fortune to set up the new Bezos Earth Fund to tackle climate change. In the fight for the planet, Bezos' commitment of $10 billion dwarfed the $4 billion that 29 philanthropic organisations had pledged to fighting climate change in 2018. While Bezos' decision does seem like a monumental step forward, it isn't all that surprising, with many summing it up as no more than a publicity gimmick. Amazon is paying a corporate tax rate of barely one percent, which gives Bezos the freedom to invest in philanthropic ventures. Additionally, Politico reported that Amazon's convenient deliveries and massive data centres emitted around 44.4 million metric tons of carbon dioxide in 2018. Last year, Amazon employees took to the streets to voice their complaints about Amazon's carbon footprint. While Google, Amazon and Microsoft have been vocal about their efforts to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels, they are currently teaming up with the fossil fuel industry to help companies squeeze as much oil and gas out of the ground as possible by using artificial intelligence to get the best results in fracking.

Jordan Wildon, a journalist at DW, recently noticed that Google is indexing some WhatsApp group invitations in its search. This will allow random people to discover and join a range of private WhatsApp group chats with a simple search. While group administrators can invalidate a link to a chat if they want, Wildon discovered that WhatsApp generates a new link in such a case and doesn't necessarily disable the original link. Although many of these are relatively harmless, Motherboard found a private group using specific Google searches which did include some sensitive data. The group they joined was apparently intended for NGOs accredited by the UN where it was possible to access the list of participants and their phone numbers.

In a surprising development, the Google Pixel 4 and Pixel 4XL found its way onto Amazon shelves in India. The Pixel 4 starts from Rs 69,990 in India, while the XL variant is priced at Rs 76,997. When Google launched the Pixel 4 series in October 2019, the devices didn't arrive in India because of issues surrounding the Soli Radar chip. What's even more surprising is that the Pixel 4 handsets are being sold with the "Amazon Fulfilled" assurance, which means that the e-commerce giant directly handles delivery, customer service, and returns.

While prices of Samsung's Galaxy S20 series have been unveiled in India, there aren't any details about a sale. However, the South Korean electronics giant unveiled the price of the foldable Galaxy Z Flip in the country and already made it available for pre-order on February 21. But, despite its Rs 1,09,999 price, the Z Flip went out of stock within minutes in the country. Pre-bookings are currently on hold and will re-open soon. The pre-booking could be made through Samsung's official site and select retail stores in the country. Those who managed to order the Galaxy Z Flip will start getting the phones from February 26.

First Published on Feb 22, 2020 06:59 pm

Read the original post:

The Tech Weekender: Elon Musk slams Bill Gates, Google indexing WhatsApp group chat links, Bezos fights climate change, and Pixel 4 arrives in India -...

‘Terrifying’ deepfake puts Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk in ‘Star Trek’ – The Daily Dot

Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk have gone head-to-head in a new deepfake centered in the world of Star Trek.

The video, uploaded to YouTube by deepfake creator The Fakening this week, has already been watched more than 320,000 times.

In the clip, taken from the originalStar Trekpilot, the Amazon CEO takes the form of one of the Talosians, a sentient humanoid native to the planet Talos IV.

The face of the Tesla and SpaceX CEO, on the other hand, can be seen on the body of Enterprise captain Christopher Pike.

In a copy of the video posted to his Twitter page, The Fakening states that Musk in the not too distant future will save humanity from the captivity of Bezos Amazon illusion.

While the videos commentary may be more appealing to fans of the sci-fi franchise, the deepfake itself perfectly showcases how far the technology has come.

The idea for the clip appears to have originated, at least in part, from South Park. The Comedy Central show famously depicted Bezos as a large-brained Talosian in a December 2018 episode that took aim at Amazon.

The deepfake is not the first from The Fakening to include the Tesla CEO. In May of last year, Musk was terrifying transformed not only into a giggling baby but also into Hollywood actor Charlie Sheen.

Other prominent deepfake creators have similarly turned Musk into everyone, from Tony Stark to Dr. Evil.

READ MORE:

H/T Mashable

Excerpt from:

'Terrifying' deepfake puts Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk in 'Star Trek' - The Daily Dot

Elon Musk and SpaceX Could Finally Let You Own a Piece of the New Space Race – Motley Fool

Hey guys, guess what? Elon Musk did something pretty cool last week.

Wait, no, sorry. That's just Elon being Elon on Twitter, as usual.

The CEO of SpaceX had an extremely active day on Twitter on Feb. 6, tweeting about several things, including the silly sci-fi pulp magazine cover. But one thing he didn't tweet about that day -- which would've been of far greater interest to investors everywhere -- was SpaceX's announcement that it might someday spin off its Starlink satellite division.

A Starlink IPO would finally give investors a second way to invest in the unique genius of Elon Musk, while also expanding the rather limited opportunities currently available for investing in space-centric companies.

SpaceX is currently valued at roughly $33 billion on private markets, up from about $30.5 billion last year. However, Musk has been far more adamant about keeping his rockets away from Wall Street than he was with Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), which went public in 2010 at a market cap of roughly $2.2 billion, or SolarCity, which reached a market cap of nearly $1 billion after its 2012 IPO (SolarCity is now part of Tesla).

If SpaceX ever does go public, its valuation will likely be much higher than that $33 billion estimate. Musk has made clear that he doesn't want to IPO SpaceX until it has established a steady stream of crewed routes to Mars. A SpaceX that could make a Mars trip feel more like a JFK-to-Dulles shuttle flight could easily be worth more than Tesla is today, all before ever going public. But it also implies that SpaceX will be well established by the time it might IPO.

Starlink, on the other hand, has a lot of runway left.

Musk said he plans to launch anywhere from 12,000 to 42,000 Starlink satellites to create an orbiting scaffold of internet connectivity. No specific timeline was given for reaching this goal. There are perhaps 200 to 240 Starlink satellites now in orbit, and the FCC has already given Starlink a deadline of November 2027 to launch the "first" 12,000 of Musk's grand plan. If Starlink reaches Musk's stated targets, it would represent an increase of anywhere from 4,900% to 20,900% in the number of near-Earth internet hotspots under its control. That's a lot of growth potential.

A Starlink rocket launches, carrying satellites. Image source: SpaceX

There are currently two major publicly traded satellite internet providers: EchoStar's (NASDAQ:SATS) HughesNet and ViaSat (NASDAQ:VSAT). HughesNet caps subscriber data access at 50 gigabytes per month, at a cost of over $120 per month, according to BroadbandNow. ViaSat has an "unlimited-bandwidth" plan, but it costs $150 per month, and your download speed gets throttled after using about 100 gigabytes of data.

Between them, these two providers serve about 2 million subscribers with 13 orbiting satellites. Every SpaceX-Starlink launch places several times as many satellites into orbit as the combined fleets of EchoStar and ViaSat.

Last month, Starlink became the operator of the largest commercial satellite fleet in the world. Based on the Union of Concerned Scientists' latest count, Starlink now operates roughly 10% of all satellites orbiting the Earth, and roughly a third of all U.S.-operated commercial satellites. By the time it's done, Starlink satellites would vastly outnumber all other satellite fleets in orbit combined.

Other companies are planning to similarly seed the skies with bandwidth-beaming satellites in the near future.

OneWeb is part-owned by Softbank and operating a joint venture manufacturing subsidiary with Airbus called OneWeb Satellites. The company plans to put about 382 satellites into orbit by the end of 2020, according to Foolish aerospace specialist Rich Smith.

Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN) has its own satellite broadband venture, Project Kuiper, with ambitions to connect most of the world with a network of 3,236 satellites.

Neither of these competitors seems to offer the same opportunities as a publicly traded Starlink. OneWeb offers, at best, limited and indirect opportunities to invest in its space race efforts. Amazon is likely to track Project Kuiper as just another line item on its expansive earnings reports.

Neither of these Starlink competitors has access to a dedicated fleet of launch rockets. SpaceX, on the other hand, has enough payload capacity that it's invited other satellite operators to hitch a ride on its own launches (for a price, of course).

A starlink rocket is shown taking off from a SpaceX facility. Image source: SpaceX

The only other pure-play space investment you can buy right now is Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic (NYSE:SPCE), which is currently unprofitable. While SpaceX isn't required to report financials, a 2017 report showed the company eking out a (narrow) profit on its space-launch operations.

Unlike SpaceX, Virgin Galactic is focused on "space tourism," offering rich folks the chance to reach near-Earth orbit for about $250,000 a pop.

Virgin Galactic's long-term play seems to be based on helping the wealthy get around the world faster with rockets, according to Fool analyst Travis Hoium. This has been tried before -- remember the Concorde? -- and it's always been a tough sell from a commercial and regulatory standpoint.

If we assume Virgin Galactic's market is limited to ultra-high-net-worth individuals with more than $30 million in assets, its total addressable market is about 265,000 people, and many of them may fly only once, just to say they did it. SpaceX's plans for affordable satellite-based internet connectivity could benefit millions, if not billions, of people worldwide.

There are anywhere from 24 million to 163 million people in the United States alone who can't currently use the internet at broadband speeds, according to conflicting reports from the FCC and Microsoft. Nearly four billion people worldwide have no regular internet access at all.

Providing even a fraction of this unconnected population with steady and speedy online access would easily be worth billions of dollars in annual subscription fees to Starlink.

These details make Starlink seem like an IPO worth getting into, especially if its public debut occurs sooner rather than later.

Read the original:

Elon Musk and SpaceX Could Finally Let You Own a Piece of the New Space Race - Motley Fool

Teslas Leaked Employee Handbook Is As Unconventional As Founder Elon Musk – Forbes

(AP Photo/Jae C. Hong, File)

Elon Musk, the founder and CEO of Tesla, is known for his iconoclastic, unconventional personality and management style. Tesla's employee handbook, which mirrors the style of Musk, was leaked and then published by Business Insider.

If you are a Tesla human resources professional or in-house counsel, the employee manual must cause great anxiety. For workers, it's amazing.

The handbook offers a disclaimer to all employees:

If youre looking for a traditional employee handbook filled with policies and rules, you wont find one. Policies and rules tell you where the bottom isthey tell you how poorly you can perform before you get shown the door. Thats not us.

Usually employee handbooks are long, boring, jargon-laden and written in an authoritarian tone. It's not clear if anyone in the history of corporations has ever completely read and understood their companys manual. The exception is when there is an issue, then you search for it, start reading and quickly give up because it's incomprehensible, dense and confusing.

Teslas handbook is like its founderno-nonsense, direct and to the point, holds people accountable and sets forth the requirements clearly and concisely.

Musk seeks out smart and motivated people and holds them accountable. He is open-minded as to a persons background, but requires people to show up on time and produce. Tesla has high expectations for its employees to live up to its standards of excellence.

According to Musk, it's not imperative that employees come from top-tier universities. He believes, If somebody graduated from a great university, that may be an indication that they will be capable of great things, but its not necessarily the case. If you look at, say, people like Bill Gates or Larry Ellison, Steve Jobs, these guys didnt graduate from college, but if you had a chance to hire them, of course that would be a good idea. Musk once tweeted, A PhD is definitely not required, and followed that statement up by saying, Dont care if you even graduated high school.

Musk seeks out individuals who demonstrate evidence of exceptional ability. And if there is a track record of exceptional achievement, then it is likely that that will continue into the future.

According to the handbook, trust is mission critical. The company offers its employees its full faith and trust and provides them with important responsibilities. It's believed that people who are imbued with respect and trust will rise up to the challenge and maintain the highest degree of professionalism.

The most important thing, according to the handbook, is that it's everyones job to help make the company successful. Each employee needs to act as if they are owners. This means that if they have a good idea on how things can be done differently or better, they should share it with the appropriate managers. Employees are free to go up the chain of command, including Musk himself, if they believe that they have something of value to offer. This edict empowers everyone to take ownership of their job, career and the future of Tesla.

One of the rules in the handbook is all about having fun at work. Employees are encouraged to make new friends, strive to be the best that they can be and take on new and exciting challenges. The company wants everyone to work hard, love what they do and enjoy themselves.

The forthright tone of the handbook is refreshing. You can almost hear Musks voice behind the manuals admonishment that arriving to work late every Monday morning because you stayed up late watching football is inexcusable because there are people depending on you. Traffic accidents happen, we get that, but they dont happen every Monday during football season.

There is an understanding that if youre sick, you stay home. Dont get the rest of us sick, the handbook states.

Our assumption will be that if you dont call and dont show up for work, youre a jerk.

Ironically, some of the companys requirements have been slightlyand at times flagrantlyignored by Musk himself. Over the years, he has transgressed some of Teslas own principles. This includes calling a scuba diving expert who was rescuing children from a cave in Thailand a pedo, a remark that landed him in court for defamation. (The jury ultimately ruled in Musks favor.) To be fair, it's not clear about name-calling in the handbook.

When the company was undergoing some difficult times, Musk claimed that he had buyers secured for the company at $420 per share, which was a substantial premium from where the stock price traded at that time. It was believed that he slightly exaggerated about the mysterious buyer. Some claim that he completely made up the story about the fictitious buyer. The stock price now trades at about $800 per share, so the critics have somewhat relented.

Musk drew attention when he drank whiskey and smoked pot on the popular Joe Rogan podcast, which was watched and listened to by millions of people. His antics were questioned by corporate ethics experts.

There is a contingency of short-sellers on Twitter that maintain Musk is a modern day P.T. Barnum who overhypes his company and its stock price. They contend that Tesla shares are valued higher than several of the largest automakers combined and that the price cant possibly remain at that premium and will ultimately crash. They allege that Tesla vehicle accidents, spontaneous fires and fatalities are caused by software that hasnt been perfected yet.

Musk allegedly hired investigators to hack an employees phone, spied on his messages and misled police about a potential mass shooting, according to Sean Gouthro, a former security manager at the companys Nevada Gigafactory. Musk claimed in an email that an employee attempted to engage in damaging sabotage to our operations, and accused Wall Street short-sellers, oil & gas companies or the multitude of big gas/diesel car company competitors may have been behind the activities.

While the handbook calls for safety and the company wants you to go home every day in the same condition you arrived, there have been allegations of violations of safety. Employees reportedly called 911 regularly, citing dangerous working conditions, such as head injuries from unsecured construction debris blowing off the roof in a windstorm and people falling through holes in the floor.

Tesla and Musk are an anomaly in the business world. Many loyal customers and investors love the company and its flamboyant CEO, who also exhibits humility at times. They steadfastly stand by Tesla and root for its continued success.

Their faith remains unshaken despite the many times its founder steps out of bounds. The handbook should probably contain a passage that permits Musk to partake in questionable behaviors as long as he keeps growing the company, increasing the value of Tesla for its shareholders and offers a great product for their customers.

Teslas human resources staff, corporate attorneys and board of directors will continue to have headaches and never-ending work to do in keeping up with their larger-than-life CEO.

Originally posted here:

Teslas Leaked Employee Handbook Is As Unconventional As Founder Elon Musk - Forbes

Elon Musks New Nemesis: Rivian Founder R.J. Scaringe Has A $3 Billion War Chest And Tesla In His Headlights – Forbes

Its 8 oclock on a January morning, and the temperature in Normal, Illinois, just a few hours south of Chicago, is well below freezing. The small pond in front of Rivian Automotives assembly plant has turned to ice, the grass is covered with frost and there is snow in the forecast. Its not much warmer inside the plant. Nearly the entire 2.6-million-square-foot facility is a construction zone, undergoing a massive $750 million renovation to prepare for the end of the year, when it expects to start rolling out battery-powered trucks, vans and SUVs. So minor details like heat are not exactly a top priority.

The only finished areaa second floor at the front of the building that overlooks the factoryis where the plants previous owner, Mitsubishi, had its executive offices. Back then, access to this floor was restricted to the suits. Now its a giant open workspace, accessible to all, with a cafeteria, polished concrete floors and lots of natural light, just like the floor plan at Rivians research and design center in Plymouth, Michigan. The concept for both offices was to merge industrial and outdoor aesthetics that mirror the companys brandan automaker that builds sustainable vehicles usable in off-road settings. Rivian, which was founded in 2009 but is finally releasing its first vehicle this year, also has operations in San Jose and Irvine, California, where it develops its technology and batteries.

When were done cleaning, painting and installing the equipment, says Rivians 37-year-old founder and CEO, Robert Joseph Scaringe (better known as just R.J.), we will eventually be able to produce 250,000 vehicles per year by mid-decade.

Starting an independent car company is not easy. Among the roadkill in automotive history are Preston Tucker, who challenged Detroit in the late 1940s, and John DeLorean, who failed to take the Motor City back to the future in the early 1980s. Producing a line of mass-market vehicles in the 21st century is even more difficult than it was for Tucker and DeLorean, and considerably more perilous in the EV category.

With the emergence of Rivian, the electric vehicle market is no longer a one-horseless-carriage race. Indeed, the 2020s are gearing up to be the decade of the EV. According to research at Oppenheimer, EVs and plug-in electric hybrids accounted for a mere 2.2 percent of all U.S. vehicles sold in the last quarter of 2019. And only a third of those were purely electric. But that is changing rapidly. While only 5.1 million electric cars were sold worldwide in 2018, that figure is expected to surge throughout the decade21 million units are projected to be sold in 2020, 98 million in 2025 and 253 million in 2030.

Building a new EV, however, requires investing in cutting-edge research into components like battery packs and powertrains. The only company that has been remotely successful is, of course, Teslaand even its had a rough go of it.

Ride and Seek: Rivians adventure SUV can accommodate seven people, and the company has also filed for a patent to adapt a seat for first responders.

We spent a lot of time looking at and understanding how different [automakers] were built, Scaringe says. And we spent a lot of time understanding the risks associated with how to build and scale a business, and the working capital thats [required]. Over the past 13 months, he and his team have raised $2.85 billion to fund Rivians future. First Amazon (and others) invested $700 million in February 2019. Then Ford ponied up $500 million two months later.

Cox Automotive, whose brands include Autotrader and Kelley Blue Book, came through with another $350 million in September. And if that werent enough to turbocharge Scaringes outsize ambitions, just before Christmas Eve, money management behemoth T. Rowe Price led yet another investment round worth more than $1.3 billion.

That early infusion of capitalon top of investments of nearly $500 million, including from JIMCO, the investment arm of Abdul Latif Jameel, a Saudi corporation that has bet big on energy and mobilityhas given Rivian a valuation just north of $5.5 billion. Scaringe is estimated to own slightly more than 20% of the company, making him the latest automotive billionaire. The funding has also allowed Scaringe to nearly triple the size of Rivians workforce, from around 700 in 2018 to more than 2,000 today, which is how he can scale production this year.

The question is: Even with $3 billion, does Rivian have enough to realize Scaringes electric dreams?

Until now, its been a far smoother road than the one Elon Musk faced with his first vehicle. Tesla raised around $100 million between 2003 and 2008 to produce the Roadster, which was soon abandoned in favor of the Model S, and the Model S required more than $350 million in funding (including a 2010 IPO that valued the company at $1.7 billion). The journey of the Model 3 was particularly rocky. Supply-chain issues and Musks desire to completely disrupt the manufacturing process led to a two year-plus delay delivering cars to customers and a slew of quality-control issues. The fallout from these problems reportedly cost the EV maker hundreds of millions of dollars. (Tesla did not respond to multiple requests for comment.) The company then took on estimated billions in debt as it scaled its production for the mass market.

So if the mighty Tesla has faced so many detours and potholes, what makes Scaringe think that Rivian, which hasnt made a single car, can have a smooth ride? He doesnt. Things will go wrong, admits the young CEO. And Scaringe, who comes across like a mild-mannered Clark Kent type compared to Musks manic Tony Stark, is confident he can overcome any perils or roadblocks. After all, Rivian is built for treacherous terrain.

R.J. Scaringe first dreamed of starting his own car company when he was in high school. But unlike most teenage gearheads with the same ambition, Scaringe backed it up by studying engineering. His vision changed in 2007 while he was attending MITs prestigious Sloan Automotive Lab, where he attained a doctorate in mechanical engineering and the skills he would need to build the vehicle he imagined in his head. As I became increasingly aware of how many problems were born out of the automobilegeopolitical, climate, air quality and moreit became a huge source of internal conflict for me, he recalls. So he scrapped his plan for a gas-powered sports car for one that was battery-powered, much like Teslas original Roadster.

After graduating with his doctorate in 2009, Scaringe returned home to Melbourne, Florida, where he founded the company that became Rivian. He and his team spent four years developing a speedster-like EV before Scaringe found what he thought was an obvious gap in electric vehicles and one that spoke to his outdoorsy interestsa truck and a luxury SUV.

Scaringe also spent nearly a decade developing its innovative skateboard platforma chassis that contains the battery pack, suspension, electric motors for propulsion and a computer to control it all. Finally, in November 2018, Rivian unveiled its two prototypes at the Los Angeles Auto Show: The R1S, an electric SUV that seats seven, and the R1T, an electric pickup truck. The so-called adventure vehicles look like the love children of a Range Roverrugged, capable and luxuriousand are packed with the latest amenities such as internet connectivity and a host of driver-assist safety features.

The company expects to deliver an ambitious 20,000 units (combined truck and SUV) in 2021 and 40,000 in 2022, which could translate to approximately $1.4 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively, if all goes according to plan. By comparison, Tesla sold 25,000 units of the Model X in 2016, its first full year of release.

Beyond its first two releases, Scaringe says there will be three more vehicles in the Rivian portfolio by 2024. Though he is cautious about providing details, Scaringe admits that one will be smaller in size and all will be considerably lower in price. Its a strategy akin to what Land Rover does with its Defender and top-of-the-line Range Roversi.e., the same base model with fewer amenities. And if Scaringe can truly keep the price below $50,000, it will cause far worse headaches for Musk than a broken shatterproof window on his Franken-vehicle, the Cybertruck.

Tesla, of course, now dominates the EV marketby one estimate it represents nearly 80% of sales in the United Statesand Rivian will face stiff competition in the luxury battery-powered SUV segment from other automakers. The R1S SUV will enter a market in the fall that includes the Mercedes-Benz EQC (starting at $67,900); the Audi e-tron SUV ($74,800); the Jaguar i-Pace ($69,500); and, of course, the Tesla Model X ($84,990). Other automakers such as Hyundai and Kia will offer more affordable options, such as the Kona EV and Niro EV, starting at $37,190 and $38,500, respectively.

Prime Opportunity: As part of Amazon's $700 million investment, Rivian will produce electric delivery vans, expected to go into service in 2021.

Rivian should be without real competition in the truck category, however. Despite Teslas highly public debut of the Cybertruck, its not expected to be produced until 2022. And both Ford and General Motors have promised to release electric pickups in the next few years.

The opportunities [in the EV market] are pretty substantial, says Ed Kim, a market analyst for AutoPacific, an automotive research and consulting firm based in California. If Rivian becomes a threat to Tesla dominance, it could energize the category and set up a true EV rivalry. Some experts have been predicting this for a while, and I think there are a few key factors happening now that [are leading to further] penetration of the EV, says Steven Low, a professor of computer science and electrical engineering at Caltech. One is that vehicle range is expanding. Another is the availability of more charging facilities. And the third element is price.

Rivian claims its R1S and R1T will offer outstanding performance, including a range of just over 400 miles, or nearly 75 miles more than any other existing EV. Both will be able to sprint from zero to 60 mph in about three seconds. Above all, Rivian promises genuine off-road capability. Try driving your Tesla on the beach or into the woods.

The company also plans to build out a charging infrastructure, much like Teslas Superchargers. We are developing them in parallel, Scaringe says. As for the cost, Rivians pickup will have a base price around $69,000, the SUV $72,500 (and both come with a federal tax incentive). Scaringe hints that these prices will come down closer to release but wouldnt reveal a precise figure

Much will depend on Rivians new deep-pocketed partners.

Having built a $3 billion war chest from Amazon, Ford and Cox in a short time is certainly an impressive start for Scaringe, but if Teslas history is an example, that wont be enough funding to scale production to compete with Musk. Then again, those brands see opportunity in Rivian that Tesla could never provide.

The partnerships Scaringe forged werent just about the cash. In Fords case, the two companies will also build an electric vehicle together. Were providing the platform, Scaringe says. They will provide the body and the interior. Although Scaringe is reticent in talking about the project, the vehicle will be a luxury SUV with Fords Lincoln brand.

Rivian hopes the Ford alliance will allow the company to grow beyond its own consumer electric vehicle offerings. For its part, Ford is seemingly doing it to keep the companys options open, as it often does, to pursue the best option with which to achieve its electrification goals: 40 electric vehicle models by the end of 2022. Besides the Lincoln with Rivian, Ford is working on the electric Mustang-inspired Mach-E SUV and both a hybrid and all-electric version of the Ford F-150, Americas bestselling vehicle. Ford is also working with Volkswagen to develop EVs on its new EV platform.

The New Normal: Rivians complex in Illinois was formerly a Mitsubishi factory, many of whose workers have returned.

Amazon, meanwhile, is looking to Rivian to develop a battery-powered delivery van as part of its pledge to be net-zero carbon across all its businesses by 2040 and use 100% renewable energy to power those businesses by 2030. Consequently, Amazon ordered 100,000 vans from Rivian. At least 10,000 should be on the road by late 2022, and all are expected to be operating in Amazons fleet by 2024. The vans will presumably become part of an end-to-end logistics network that Amazon has been working on since 2015. If so, expect more Rivian orders to come down the road.

But its the Cox partnership that could prove the most troubling for Musk. While Tesla has more than 100 service centers in 30 states, Cox handled more than 55 million service appointments in 2019 at its sprawling network of commercial and dealer partner service centers across the United States. If something goes wrong with an R1T or R1S, the idea, presumably, is that a customer will be able to take the vehicle to a Cox service center like Pivet to have it repaired correctly and in a timely fashion, something that Tesla has struggled with since its inception.

Cox is also playing the long game with Rivianas more vehicles come to market, it wants to control secondary sales. My hope is with the skills that we have, says Cox president Sandy Schwartz, and with all the things that were learning, that well be the chief wholesale remarketer for all Rivians someday.

Now they just have to build some.

The name of the Illinois town that Rivian calls home is the perfect adjective to describe Scaringe himself and differentiate him from Musk: Normal. Whereas Teslas cofounder is all bravado and showmanshiphe has weaponized his Twitter account and turned it into a de facto marketing divisionScaringe is soft-spoken and low-key. While Musk is photographed with models and pop stars, Scaringe is a family man, even if he rarely sees his family lately. These days, he lives out of a suitcase, spending five days a week traveling among the companys four offices to make sure things are on schedule. His wife, Meagan, and their three boys (all under 5) see him from Friday night to Sunday evening in their unassuming three-bedroom house near Irvine, California. On Sunday evening, he boards a plane to Michigan and repeats the process to ensure that his larger vision is being realized: thinking globally and acting locally.

When the Mitsubishi plant closed in July 2015, for example, the mood in Normal was decidedly funereal. It hurt, says Mayor Chris Koos. It left over 1,000 people out of work, which causes a ripple effect throughout the community.

Even after the plant was sold to Rivian for $16 million in 2017, residents remained skeptical. That negative sentiment soon changed, however. Rivian showed interest in the lifestyle of the community, the quality of education, affordable housing and access to transportation, Mayor Koos says. The company even had a preview day in Normal last summer to answer any questions from local residents. It made a big impact on Normals perception of Rivian and, not surprisingly, proved valuable when it came to recruiting employees.

With the town onboard, Scaringe is now on a mission to lead Rivian through its first production cycle and expand its line. Though its too early to tell who will win the EV wars, Rivian is one of just a couple of companies that has a strong chance not only to survive, but also thrive, according to Navigants Sam Abuelsamid. He thinks Rivian might even be in a better position going forward than Tesla: If youre talking about whos going to have potentially the most volume, getting more vehicles to market in the near- to mid-term, [Id say] probably Tesla. But from an actual business standpoint, Rivian is in the better position to succeed because of the nature of the products they have.

But first, the rubber has to hit the road.

Get Forbes daily top headlines straight to your inboxfor news on the worlds most important entrepreneurs and superstars, expert career advice and success secrets.

See original here:

Elon Musks New Nemesis: Rivian Founder R.J. Scaringe Has A $3 Billion War Chest And Tesla In His Headlights - Forbes

Why Elon Musk’s SpaceX Is Thinking Bigger – The Motley Fool

In a world of big-thinking tech CEOs, Elon Musk thinks bigger than most.

Seemingly single-handedly, Musk first pioneered and then advanced the acceptance of electric cars as mass-market vehicles, solar power as an alternative to oil, and ... the possibility that Mars could be colonized.

But as revolutionary as all those ideas may sound, it's Elon Musk's plans for his space company SpaceX that could be the real earth-shaker.

Actual photo -- not an "artist's depiction" -- of SpaceX Starship MK1. Image source: SpaceX.

Specifically, his plans for the new "Starship" spacecraft that SpaceX is currently developing.

To refresh your memory, Starship is the new working title for the reusable rocket that SpaceX once called "BFR," and that it plans to test-fly later this year. It's designed to be built in two parts: Starship proper, which will carry up to 100 passengers, 100 tons of cargo, or a combination of the two, will stand 160 feet tall and have a diameter of 30 feet. Equipped with six Raptor engines, Starship will be able to launch from, land on, and travel between planets with low gravity -- even landing back on Earth.

Boosting Starship into orbit from Earth will be a SuperHeavy rocket that's even bigger -- 223 feet by 30. Powered by 37 Raptor engines, SuperHeavy will be the most powerful rocket in history (meaning it can carry more payload, and travel farther). In fact, with a liftoff thrust of 72 meganewtons, SuperHeavy will be twice as powerful as the Saturn V rocket that carried Americans to the moon.

Combined with Starship, the combined vessel will stand 20 feet taller than the Saturn V.

In a series of tweets published across Twitter last month, Musk laid out some big numbers for what he expects Starship to accomplish in the coming months and years.

Now, to be clear, Starship hasn't even launched yet, although an "MK1" version was assembled and stood up at SpaceX's Boca Chica, Texas, test site, and abbreviated versions of the craft dubbed "Starhoppers" have taken short "hop" test flights. But overlooking that minor detail, in January Musk tweeted out his hope that SpaceX will eventually be building as many as 100 reusable Starships per year, building toward a fleet numbering 1,000 Starships or more.

Now, if you read the rest of that tweet, you know that Musk also predicted that each of these reusable Starships will be designed to accomplish three flights to orbit (and back) per day on average, carrying up to 100 tons of cargo on each trip. The idea is to rapidly shuttle cargo from Earth to Earth orbit, there to be loaded aboard other Starships that will eventually travel from Earth to Mars caravan-style.

Thus, many of the Starships Musk wants to build will be parked in orbit, accepting and stowing away cargo from the shuttles flying to and fro beneath them, preparing for the day when the caravan departs Earth. The actual shuttling of cargo will be done by 10 or so workhorse Starships. (And about 10 years after all this begins, in what's sure to be one heck of a fireworks display, 1,000 Starships may launch over a period of just a few days, carrying up to 100,000 colonists who will accompany the supplies on a trip to colonize Mars.)

Let's put a pin in that Mars idea, though, which seems so ambitious that even tech fans like CNET say getting all the moving parts to work would verge on the "miraculous."

Consider just the more practical numbers:

100 Starships built per year. To wrap your head around how astounding that prediction is, last year every country on Earth, combined, built and launched only 103 rockets -- none anywhere near as big as Starship, and none, except those built by SpaceX, reusable.

Starships flying three times per day. Most space companies today (which is to say everyone other than SpaceX) build their rockets and throw them away after just one use.

Three flights per day ... for 20 to 30 years. In one final tweet, Musk revealed that SpaceX is designing Starship to have a 20- to 30-year lifespan -- "like aircraft."

Not to put too fine a point on it, but if even a fraction of what Musk is promising comes to pass, SpaceX is soon going to be entirely in a class by itself. With its operating costs reduced to essentially the cost of refueling his spaceships, "changing the oil, and rotating the tires" after each launch -- while everyone SpaceX is competing against has to build an entirely new spaceship for each and every launch -- no other company on Earth is going to be able to come close to competing with SpaceX on price.

So whether the future for SpaceX is "Mars colonization" or supplying a moon base for NASA, putting satellites into orbit cheaper, or even transporting people and cargo by rocketship from point to point on Earth, this company's costs are going to be pennies on the dollar compared to what everyone else has to charge.

If I were CEO of a company that competes with SpaceX today -- or of one even contemplating competing with SpaceX on any of these endeavors in the future -- right now, I'd be very nervous indeed.

Read this article:

Why Elon Musk's SpaceX Is Thinking Bigger - The Motley Fool

Why Jeff Bezos might run for president to spite Elon Musk and Donald Trump – The Next Web

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos is suing Donald Trump over the Pentagons decision to award a lucrative military artificial intelligence and cloud services contract to Microsoft instead of his company. Normally these kinds of lawsuits are yawn-inducing, but this case has some interesting caveats.

And, if youll let me set the stage first, Ill explain why Im convinced the court case will lead to a successful presidential campaign for Jeff Bezos in 2024.

ICYMI: Amazon prepares to strike back after Microsoft wins $10B JEDI contract

The Pentagon started shopping for a partner to build a cloud services suite meant to work as anAI and weapons platform for drone deployment and other battlefield technologies a few years back and, naturally, Amazon was the immediate front-runner. Amazon Web Services is a core technology thats, arguably, far and away ahead of the competition. Nearly every tech expert on record figured the contract was tailor-made for Amazon.

In fact, Oracle sued the government for stacking the deck against everyone else as a response to both the stringent qualifications and the fact that its pretty stupid to use a single-provider cloud service for military infrastructure. Most companies that wanted the contract simply couldnt qualify for it, so everyone assumed Amazon would win.

But Amazon didnt win. And former Secretary James Mattis claims that this was because President Trump ordered him to screw Amazon out of the JEDI contract.

Now, as reported by CNBC on Monday, Amazons lawyers arent just suing the White House over what they consider an improper snub, they are demanding that Donald Trump and former Defense Secretary James Mattis be deposed in court. The big idea here is that Trumps personal vendetta against Jeff Bezos and Amazon is relevant and the Commander in Chief should be held accountable.

The alleged personal vendetta supposedly has a lot to do with The Washington Posts negative coverage of President Trump and, of course, Jeff Bezos owns the Post.

Bezos may not need a big government payout his company is among a handful of businesses valued at over a trillion dollars and hes one of the richest people in the world but he desperately wants one. Hes reportedly jealous of Elon Musks ability to talk the Trump administration and local governments around the US into big-ticket, huge budget deals and yearns to land one of his own.

The companys HQ2 project was supposed to provide that for Bezos and Amazon after drumming up excitement with a reality TV-style contest to see which city would host the new headquarters. Eventually New York and Virginia were to split the campus, but Amazons failure to court local politicians ultimately doomed the deal and Bezos, once again, failed to net the Muskian payout he apparently craves.

Read: Amazons negotiation strategy for HQ2 was called Fuck you. Were Amazon

And that brings us to this seemingly silly lawsuit thats attempting to get the president to sit down for a deposition.

Were this pipe-dream of a legal stipulation to occur, it would mean that President Trump would have to appear in person to answer questions about his alleged feud with Jeff Bezos.

Without spending too much time on legalese and jargon, the odds of a sitting president getting deposed in court in this kind of case are so close to zero as to make it pointless to speculate any further. Its not going to happen.

Trumps being accused of purposefully influencing a $10 billion Defense contract to satisfy a personal vendetta. Arguably, that would be high treason. At a minimum, its something a democratic country would consider illegal.

Amazons reasoning for the suit and the deposition request is, according to court documents, to protect the country from the kind of misuse and abuse of authority the president allegedly exercised in his oversight of the Project JEDI contract process.

A company spokesperson told CNBC:

President Trump has repeatedly demonstrated his willingness to use his position as President and Commander in Chief to interfere with government functions including federal procurements to advance his personal agenda. The preservation of public confidence in the nations procurement process requires discovery and supplementation of the administrative record, particularly in light of President Trumps order to screw Amazon.

The brass tacks that all this comes down to, however, is its either a flex by Amazon and Jeff Bezos just wants to tie up taxpayer dollars and waste President Trumps time (rather, his legal teams), or its a political move paving a path for a 2024 Bezos presidential run.

Okay thats wild speculation, but its not entirely unfeasible. Trumps the best friend that the one-percent has ever had. Simply put: if Bezos cant get a giant payout to throw in Musks face during Trumps second act, he may as well give it up. None of the Democrats running in 2020 are likely to be kind to big tech if theyre elected. And there certainly arent any Republicans in sight whod be chomping at the bit to get in bed with Amazon after the companys tried to depose the King.

As The Wires fictional Omar Little once quipped, You come at the King, you best not miss. And if Amazon thinks that screwing with Trump in court is going to get it any modicum of justice or payback, then the companys genius is severely over-rated. In this case, I think Bezos is smarter than that. Hes stirring up the hornets nest on purpose to prep the media and the public for his political coming out.

Instead of running against Trump in the 2020 race, hell run against Trumps phantom in 2024. Just like Trumps continued to vilify Hillary Clinton at every rally hes held since being elected the first time, Bezos could Trump his political rivals both Democrat and Republican by making his campaign all about Trump. Its a strategy thats worked extremely well for The Donald.

Well, that and digitally gerrymandering the election using Facebook, Twitter, and Cambridge Analytica. However, Jeff Bezos isnt exactly Hillary Clinton his tech savvy and resources might make a bigger difference than other democratic candidates assuming of course Bezos runs as a Dem. Im thinking he might try to pull a Ross Perot and resurrect the idea of a strong third-party candidate.

If Bezos spends the next four years drumming up his feud with Trump during speaking engagements and media appearances, well get the opportunity to see if the smartest person in the room can win against the biggest bully. It could set the stage for a Bezos versus the field election atmosphere in 2024.

And, in a world where hearts and minds are won online, itll be interesting to see how the CEO of one of the worlds largest AI companies does in that arena against the Tweeter in Chief.

Id say its about 50-50 whether Bezos runs. Trumps made the Emoluments Clause obsolete, so Bezos wouldnt have to lose money or divest, hed just stop being CEO of his companies for his term. And, lets not forget that alongside the Post and Amazon, Bezos owns a spaceship company called Blue Origin thats played second fiddle to Elon Musks SpaceX when it comes to government contracts. Theres plenty of incentive for the Amazon chief to take his shot in 2024.

Then again, Bezos has also gone on the record saying he was too happy with his life and running his companies to consider the presidency. So maybe its a scenario too outrageous even for US politics. Lets hope so.

Whats left of US democracy may not withstand the threat wed face with the head of the company that owns Ring and provides law enforcement with facial recognition software getting himself elected just to stick it to his enemies.

Youre here because you want to learn more about artificial intelligence. So do we. So this summer, were bringing Neural to TNW Conference 2020, where we will host a vibrant program dedicated exclusively to AI. With keynotes by experts from companies like Spotify, RSA, and Medium, our Neural track will take a deep dive into new innovations, ethical problems, and how AI can transform businesses. Get your early bird ticket and check out the full Neural track.

Published February 12, 2020 21:18 UTC

Here is the original post:

Why Jeff Bezos might run for president to spite Elon Musk and Donald Trump - The Next Web

Elon Musk and Donald Trump Are on Their Way to a Moonstruck Bromance – The Daily Beast

President Donald Trump has been fretting about Boeing for some time. Its a very disappointing company, he said while at the Davos World Economic Forum last month. This is one of the greatest companies of the world, lets say as of a year ago, and all of a sudden things happened.

And they just keep happening.

We just learned that Boeings new Starliner space capsule designed to take U.S. astronauts to the International Space Station had flawed software that could have led to a catastrophic failure. This only emerged as NASA was investigating another flaw that in December sent an unmanned test flight off course and caused it to be curtailed without reaching deep space.

As first reported by Space News, the newly uncovered flaw was so serious that Paul Hill, a member of NASAs Safety Advisory Panel, said, The panel has a larger concern with the rigor of Boeings verification processes. Further, with confidence at risk for a spacecraft that is intended to carry humans in space, the panel recommends an even broader Boeing assessment of, and corrective actions in, the testing.

This is a pretty stunning development, since it was problems with new software that were at the heart of the biggest crisis ever to hit Boeing, following two crashes of the Boeing 737MAX jet that killed 346 peoplea crisis that has severely damaged the companys reputation and led to a grounding of the airplane that has so far cost it at least $16 billion.

Trump wants Americans back on the moon before the end of what he confidently expects to be his second term, by 2024.

What is particularly alarming about the new revelations is that the failures occurred in another and entirely separate Boeing division, the aerospace division contracted by NASA to provide a new generation of launch vehicles that ultimately are intended to return U.S. astronauts to the moon.

This suggests that the failure to detect flawed engineering that has a specific and direct bearing on safety, whether of airline passengers or astronauts, is endemic throughout Boeing, and not just the commercial airplane division.

And this is where Trumps disenchantment with Boeing becomes hugely consequential. He wants Americans back on the moon before the end of what he confidently expects to be his second term, by 2024. That deadline has put NASA under intense pressure. Until Trump set his own deadline they were not planning to be able to put boots on the Moon until at least 2026indeed, one anonymous NASA engineer said that all that they could deliver to the moon by 2024 was a pair of boots.

But as Boeings star falls in Trumps reckoning another has risen with the panache and confidence of a true disruptor: Elon Musk. In fact, be prepared for an unlikely bromance between Trump and Musk.

This was foreshadowed when the president, in an interview with CNBC, also at Davos, delivered a remarkable, if somewhat incoherent, encomium of Musk: He likes rockets. And he does good at rockets, too, by the way. I never saw where the engines come down with no wings, no anything, and theyre landing. I said Ive never seen that before. Hes one of the worlds great geniuses, we have to protect all of these people that came up with originally the light bulb and the wheel and all of these things. And hes one of our very smart people, and we want to cherish those people.

Musk has been getting the presidents attention because his SpaceX company is disrupting the conventional space launch business as much as his car company, Tesla, is disrupting the conventional auto industry. Boeings latest fiasco serves to show just how that contest is playing out.

Once NASA decided to outsource space launches to private industry, albeit under its own supervision, two groups were contracted to provide the booster rockets and the vehicles required for three things: to carry astronauts, to carry cargo, and to launch the next generation of government satellites. The two groups were the United Launch Alliance, ULA, combining Boeing and Lockheed Martinand SpaceX .

Musk decided to offer something the ULA could notbooster rockets that were reusable, rather than ending their only flight as pieces of junk falling into the ocean. So far SpaceX has done this 44 times, using some of the boosters as many as three times. Nobody else in the world has that ability. SpaceX has designed, built and launched three generations of rockets into orbit and is building a fourth, as well as launching 60 small satellites into orbit.

And while the Boeing Starliner capsule is now grounded awaiting fixes to its software, Musks rival Dragon capsule has already made a successful six-day unmanned test flight to the International Space Stationand demonstrated that in the event of an aborted launch because of a failed booster the capsule can self-eject and return the astronauts safely to earth. Its only a matter of months now before the SpaceX capsule will be ready to fly astronauts.

Patricia Sanders, head of the NASA Safety Review Panel, said last week that its assessment of the SpaceX program is at a point where there is not a question of whether they will be flying crew in the near term, but when, and under what risk conditions.

Boeings problems with NASA run deep. The flawed software governed the capsules critical re-entry into the earths atmosphere at the end of a mission. If undetected the flaws would have fired the wrong thrusters when the capsule separated from its service module (which remains in orbit while the capsule carrying the astronauts is put into a very precise trajectory for re-entry).

That would have caused a collision that, the NASA investigation showed, could have damaged the capsules heat shield and sent it tumbling into space, dooming the crew.

The discovery of this flaw was taken so seriously that NASA was forced to reassess its own oversight procedures. Our oversight was insufficient said Douglas Loverro, the associate administrator for human explorations. This problem echoes what happened with the 737MAX program, where the FAA had to admit that its oversight of Boeing had been far too lax. The message is clear: every new Boeing project has now to be closely watched by regulators.

Boeings problems with NASA run deep.

Boeing has already said it is taking a $419 million charge against earnings to cover the cost of having to make a second uncrewed flight with the capsule before it can advance to a manned flight. Boeing said it accepted the suggestions from the NASA panel as well as recommendations from a separate NASA review team.

Lets be clear. SpaceX is not solely the work of one of the worlds great geniuses. Musk is clearly a visionary but he is also the kind of leader who builds a successful company culture by giving other talents the chance to prove themselves. From its beginning SpaceX has been significantly steered by Gwynne Shotwell, who is now the president and chief operating officer and responsible for the quality of its engineers.

She told an investor conference last October: I think engineers think better when theyre pushed hardest to do great things in a very short period of time, with very few resources. She pointedly made the contrast between SpaceX and the industry behemoths that she competes with: Boeing and Lockheed like their cushy situation.

Trump needs all the help he can get if he is to fulfill his aim of returning American astronauts to the moon by 2024. Who else is there for him to turn toand to cherishbut a man he thinks might re-invent the wheel?

Read the original:

Elon Musk and Donald Trump Are on Their Way to a Moonstruck Bromance - The Daily Beast

Cuomo’s business czar says Tesla’s Buffalo site is ‘hustling and bustling’ – Times Union

ALBANY - Will Elon Musk's visit to Tesla's "Buffalo Billion" solar panel factory be as much of a flop as his Cybertruck fiasco?

New York state economic development officials are hoping it won't be.

Musk is personally planning to visit Tesla's so-called Gigafactory 2 at the RiverBend campus in Buffalo in April, the same month when the plant must meet a key employment goal or pay a $41.2 million penalty to the state.

Back in November, Tesla stock tanked more than five percent after the car maker's chief designer was able to smash the windows of the new Cybertruck that were supposed to be bullet-proof. Following the episode, Musk's personal fortune fell $768 million in one day due, or about as much as it cost the state to build Gigafactory 2.

RiverBend was part of Gov. Andrew Cuomo's so-called Buffalo Billion strategy that saw the state spend nearly a billion dollars to build the facility for Tesla in a project that was rife with corruption and led to the downfall of SUNY Polytechnic Institute founder Alain Kaloyeros and a Buffalo area developer.

April is an important month for the company, which is required under the terms of its lease with the state of New York to have 1,460 employees working at the solar panel factory by April 30.

Members of the Legislature grilled Empire State Development CEO Eric Gertler on Thursday at a state budget hearing, asking him whether he was prepared to fine Telsa the $41.2 million penalty should the company miss the deadline.

"Will you enforce this clawback and tell us how you are going to (verify) the 1,460 jobs?" Buffalo-area Democrat Assemblyman Robin Schimminger asked Gertler.

Gertler did not directly answer Schimminger's question.Instead, he said he had visited the RiverBend facility last week and liked what he saw.

"I was pleased to see the facility hustling and bustling," Gertler replied. "To see a facility that is focusing on the green economy, which is an industry of the future, was exciting to see."

Although Gertler said that as of last year the Telsa factory had 500 employees, he did not say how many people worked there now.

However, Buffalo Mayor Byron Brown has reportedly said that Tesla is now at 1,100 workers at RiverBend with two months to go to add 360 additional workers. Telsa officials couldn't immediately be reached to confirm its employment numbers at the Buffalo solar panel factory.

"I can tell you they are doing a lot of hiring," Gertler said. "They've hired individuals from some of the training centers in and around Buffalo. There was a lot of money that's been dedicated to that, and we're in the business of jobs. If by April 30, they do not reach the 1,460 jobs, then as you pointed out, we're going to move to enforce that penalty. ... The ESD team is focused on making sure they do that hiring."

Republican Assemblyman Christopher Friend, who is from the Southern Tier but attended school in Buffalo, quizzed Gertler also about the Tesla deal, asking him how much of the 1.2-million-square-foot RiverBend facility is being used by Tesla.

"From what I saw, it was being well-used," Gertler said. "They've added a lot of different lines."

One of the new lines is not a solar panel line but a Tesla car charging station production line. Telsa has also sublet some of the facility to Panasonic.

"They're doing other things," Gertler said about what he saw when he toured the facility last week. "Is the facility being used? It is. It seemed to be pretty full."

Link:

Cuomo's business czar says Tesla's Buffalo site is 'hustling and bustling' - Times Union

Elon Musk Says He’s About to Deliver the Future of High-Speed Internet – Inc.

Elon Musk has been saying for years that he believes the future of the internet resides in space. And nowhe's planning to make a major change that could facilitate that transition sooner rather than later.

"Right now, we are a private company, but Starlink is the right kind of business that we can go ahead and take public," Gwynne Shotwell, SpaceX's chief operating officer, said on Thursday, according to Bloomberg. "That particular piece is an element of the business that we are likely to spin out and go public."

Starlink is SpaceX's name for a satellite-based internet service. The company envisions sending thousands of satellites into space that can beam internet access back to the ground. Those satellites will come together in a cluster over highly populated areas to ensure they deliver enough coverage. They'll also beam internet to less-populated parts of the world where people still aren't online.

So far, SpaceX has shipped 240 Starlink satellites into space, and plans to deliver many thousand more in the coming years. Musk has already tested the service, but it's not currently available to the public.

On Thursday, Shotwell didn't provide specifics, but did say that the service will be substantially cheaper than what existing internet access costs and will deliver speeds that are five to 10 times faster that what you get now, potentially putting it in the same game-changingclass as 5G.

Shotwell didn't say when Starlink would go public, but all signs are pointing to sooner rather than later. And it makes sense.

As part of SpaceX, Starlink is just a component in a broader business. And while it gets attention at SpaceX, it's not the company's main focus. By spinning it off, SpaceX can have a company in Starlink that's focused solely on building an internet service in space. And perhaps most important, it could help to expedite a process of upgrades that could take years to develop terrestrially.

For investors, it also means an opportunity to have a stake in SpaceX, a company that has remained private since its inception. As recent Tesla gains have proved, there's money to be made in Elon Musk's companies. And with Starlink's help, investors might be able to do it again.

Better yet for Starlink, it's an opportunity to raise much-needed cash.

Still, plenty of questions surrounding Starlink and SpaceX abound. And there's no guarantee that the company will actually go public. But look for more to come on that front -- and for satellites to be beaming internet to your house sooner rather than later.

Published on: Feb 7, 2020

The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

Read more from the original source:

Elon Musk Says He's About to Deliver the Future of High-Speed Internet - Inc.

Tracks of the week reviewed: Lpsley, Gorillaz, Elon Musk – The Guardian

Lpsley Womxn

Four years ago, the then-19-year-old emo-synth singer Holly Lapsley released a debut album that was a) Really quite incredible (yay!), and b) Largely ignored (boo!). Thankfully, she didnt decide to sack it all off, and her second album campaign kicks off with this undulating, thumping doom-pop battle cry. Happily, it also includes the straight-up greatest sound of the 1980s a Tango in the Night-era Fleetwood Mac faux-woodwind toot.

Damon Albarn has spent the past 30 years pretending he is an ancillary member of Madness, so the ska-funk shuffle of Momentary Bliss should come as no surprise. A proper boys-going-down-the-dogs-and-sinking-loads-of-pints knees-up, it features guest ois from Slaves (lads!) and Slowthai (lad!) and runs a very real risk of spinning for eternity on the jukebox of Camden Towns Good Mixer.

Born in Italy but based in Manchester, there is a deep 1960s Europop energy to Julia Bardo, who, had she been born 50 years ago, would no doubt be constantly turning down offers of a breathy collaboration with Serge Gainsbourg. Sure, I Wanna Feel Love doesnt really go anywhere, but neither will you after you joyfully put this on after skipping back from Aldi with a wicker basket full of cheap bottles of Chianti.

Finally, after what seemed like maybe 13 days longer than usual, the eternal January has come to an end. And what better way to celebrate the finish of the draggiest of all months than with one of Caribous slinky dancefloor destroyers. Plinky piano house shuffles up against actually quite depressing lyrics so what, though? January is over! to give you the first real reason to go out dancing since New Years Eve.

Perhaps even more awkward than calling a selfless diver rescuing some kids trapped in a cave a pedo guy is this, Elon Musks attempt to make like the missus and release his own silky electronica ballad. If the thought of the fabulously wealthy Tesla boss whispering into your ear mid-comedown keeps you awake at night, avoid this sinister EDM soul-sucker at all costs. Grimes: please can you password-protect your Ableton software the next time you nip out to a neighbouring dimension?

Continued here:

Tracks of the week reviewed: Lpsley, Gorillaz, Elon Musk - The Guardian

Maye Musk was a dietitian for 45 yearswhy she doesn’t believe in fad diets like keto or intermittent fasting – CNBC

While many people recognize Maye Musk as the oldest model to become the face of CoverGirl or as the mother of Tesla co-founder and CEO Elon Musk, she also had a successful career as a registered dietitian for 45 years and still keeps up her credentials.

Though some of her son Elon's Silicon Valley contemporaries, like Twitter and Square CEO Jack Dorsey, are fans of internet-famous diets like intermittent fasting, gluten-free diets and the ketogenic diet, Maye Musk is not sold: "I never did the fad diets, I have to stick to science," Musk tells CNBC Make It.

Maye Musk, 71, is the a dietician and at 69 became the CoverGirl model.

Photo credit Mark Seliger

Intermittent fasting, an eating pattern that entails alternating between periods of fasting and eating, has become mega-popular among high-profile figures from Dorsey, who says it makes him more productive, to actress Jennifer Aniston. But while studies on mice suggest that intermittent fasting could help with weight loss, help slow the effects of aging, improve cognition and possibly protect the brain against neurodegenerative diseases, overall, experts agree that there needs to be more research done on humans to determine whether it's safe and maintainable.

As for the ketogenic diet, it is a high-fat, extremely low carbohydrate diet that was originally intended to treat epilepsy. The point of this diet is to put your body into a state of "ketosis," which means that you're burning fat instead of carbs for energy. Some mice studies suggest that a low-carb diet could improve brain function, and many people use the "keto" diet to lose weight. However given how restrictive it is, it can be challenging to follow and could lead to nutritional deficiencies.

You have to think "...is it sustainable? Is it foods you like? And are you fun to be around?" Musk says of restrictive diets.

Gluten-free diets have been popular but are really only a medical necessity for people with Celiac disease.

"I've had to teach myself in social situations not to talk about anything relating to diet because everybody has their own theory," Musk says.

But there are a few healthy diets Musk approves of, including the Mediterranean diet, which emphasizes vegetables, whole grains, legumes and olive oil; the DASH diet, a low sodium diet aimed at lowering blood pressure; and the flexitarian diet, a mostly plant-based diet.

Musk's own diet is closest to the flexitarian diet: Musk says she typically has high-fiber cereal and 1% milk for breakfast. Then she'll have a snack of yogurt and fruit, and a salad and whole wheat bread, or sushi for lunch. Her afternoon snack is a latte and fruit, and for dinner, she likes to "keep my evenings very light" with a bean soup, or cooked vegetables with protein and a starch like potatoes, rice or whole wheat bread.

"Healthy eating is easy with a knowledge, but avoiding poor eating is hard," Musk says. She loves sweet foods, such as chocolates and cookies, but says that she doesn't like to keep them in her home "because I will finish them off."

The best thing people can do to improve their diet is pretty simple, Musk says. "You have to really use common sense and enjoy the foods you eat, and you have to be aware," she says.

Reporting by Cat Clifford and Jessica Leibowitz

Like this story? Subscribe to CNBC Make It on YouTube!

Don't miss:

Excerpt from:

Maye Musk was a dietitian for 45 yearswhy she doesn't believe in fad diets like keto or intermittent fasting - CNBC