Donald Trump to help Senate with health care bill vote – Washington Times

President Trump may be called upon once again to deliver support for a Republican health care bill as the Senate angles for a vote next week.

For weeks, Mr. Trump has given Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky breathing room to write a bill, cheering on the effort from the sidelines. But with a floor showdown looming, the president plans to ratchet up his involvement with the sorts of phone calls and tweets that helped get a bill through the House last month.

I think it helps when he speaks to the specifics of what were trying to accomplish here, said Sen. Thom Tillis, North Carolina Republican.

Senate Republicans have been writing their bill in secret, but Mr. McConnell plans to release a discussion draft Thursday. Republican lawmakers are hoping for a bill that lowers customers premiums and chases fewer people out of the health care markets than the House bill.

But Republicans will need near unanimity to pass the bill, and resistance is strong among a sizable chunk of Senate Republicans, who dislike the process or the substance of the legislation.

I personally think that holding a vote on this next week would definitely be rushed, Sen. Ron Johnson, Wisconsin Republican, said on CNN. I cant imagine, quite honestly, that Id have the information to evaluate and justify a yes vote just within a week.

He received a tacit rebuke from Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who said Republicans will have no excuses if they balk at their primary chance for repeal.

Republicans insist that Obamacare is collapsing and say they are on what amounts to a rescue mission. They say the choice is between their solution and a disaster.

The Affordable Care Acts woes deepened Wednesday as insurer Anthem said it was largely exiting Wisconsin and Indiana.

This law has failed our state, said House Speaker Paul D. Ryan, Wisconsin Republican.

He harnessed Mr. Trump and other top administration officials this year to bridge gaps among House Republicans and deliver passage of a plan that would lower costs for younger, healthier Americans though it would free insurers to raise costs for those approaching Medicare eligibility, and would leave tens of millions fewer people insured within a decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Mr. Trump has been increasing his efforts on the Senate side in recent days. Last week, he hosted more than a dozen Senate Republicans at the White House to build unity ahead of the bills unveiling.

The White House launched a webpage to encourage Obamacare repeal, and the administration has deployed Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price to highlight the rising rates and declining choices in Obamacares exchanges.

It is clear that Obamacare needs to be fixed, and that is what we are focusing on. Our team here is working with Senate leadership to support them as they work though proposing a bill that will work for all Americans, said White House deputy press secretary Lindsay Walters.

At a rally in Iowa on Wednesday, Mr. Trump said passing a repeal bill is achievable, even if its an uphill struggle.

We have a very slim, 52-48 [majority.] That means we basically cant lose anybody, Mr. Trump said. I think and I hope I cant guarantee anything but I hope were going to surprise you with a really good plan.

He also took credit for urging senators to reinvest federal savings into from the House bill into the Senate plan, saying he wants a bill with heart.

Earlier Wednesday, senior White House officials attended an HHS listening session with health care consumers, including retirees, business owners, doctors and insurance agents.

Kellyanne Conway, counselor to the president, told the gathering that repealing and replacing Obamacare was not just a campaign promise, but an imperative for the president.

Yet the headwinds are growing.

A Politico-Morning Consult poll released Wednesday said opposition to the Republican health care plan has doubled from 15 percent to 30 percent among Republican voters since late April, shortly before the House passed its version.

Democrats are calling on Republicans to help sink the bill next week. Just a few defections from the 52-seat Republican majority could doom the repeal effort.

If three of them will step up and say this is wrong then we can roll up our sleeves and do the right thing for America, said Sen. Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat.

Among the items conservative Republican lawmakers will be looking for in the draft bill is a provision to gut as many of Obamacares strictures as possible. Moderate Republicans, meanwhile, are looking for a gradual phaseout of Obamacares vast expansion of Medicaid, hoping to shield states from a major funding cliff.

Some thorny social issues are also rearing their heads.

Mr. Tillis said drafters are researching ways to ban consumers from using refundable tax credits offered in the plan to pay for abortions. The House version contained a prohibition, but the Senate parliamentarian is likely to rule that it flouts the budget rules that govern the debate.

Barring the use of taxpayer assistance for abortion is key for conservatives, who say the overall plan already is falling short of expectations.

Democrats, meanwhile, are ratcheting up their resistance, hoping to apply enough eleventh-hour pressure to sink the Republican effort.

Sen. Bernard Sanders, Vermont independent, told progressive demonstrators on Capitol Hill on Wednesday to rally the American people, to tell the Republican leadership, Yes, let us improve Obamacare, but were not going to destroy it.

Democrats say Medicaid cuts in the Republican plan will be devastating and that Obamacares struggling exchanges can be salvaged with more federal spending to beef up subsidies and backstop insurers losses.

Despite the widespread exodus of insurers from the program, an online startup called Oscar announced Wednesday that it would expand next year into five states: Ohio, Texas, New Jersey, Tennessee and California. It will also continue to sell products in New York.

Their decision to expand follows a move by Centene Corp. to expand into Kansas, Missouri and Nevada next year and reach further into Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Ohio, Texas, and Washington.

Read this article:

Donald Trump to help Senate with health care bill vote - Washington Times

Edwardsville man charged with threatening to assassinate President Trump – Belleville News-Democrat


Belleville News-Democrat
Edwardsville man charged with threatening to assassinate President Trump
Belleville News-Democrat
An Edwardsville man posted on Facebook that he wanted to assassinate President Donald Trump, and is now facing federal charges. Joseph Lynn Pickett was charged for threatening the president of the United States on June 15. U.S. Secret Service Special ...

and more »

Here is the original post:

Edwardsville man charged with threatening to assassinate President Trump - Belleville News-Democrat

Donald Trump’s Net Worth and Approval Ratings Are Both Steadily Declining – Newsweek

Donald Trumps net worth is in decline as his New York real estate portfolio struggles to keep up with the citys evolving landscape and competition, according to Bloomberg Billionaires Index, which compiled the presidents mortgage documents, debt forms and a new financial disclosure released Friday.

Trump, who repeatedly bragged about his wealth and successes as a business mogul along the campaign trail to help propel him to the Oval Office, is also suffering a dip in approval ratings, as his administration battles accusations of collusion with the Kremlin. The presidents job approval hovers at nearly 36 percent, a CBS poll released Tuesday indicated.

The presidents purported net worth slipped from 3 billion in 2016 to 2.9 billion in 2017. Trump has regularly claimed his total assets were worth at least 10billion.

Daily Emails and Alerts- Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox

Related: Heres how Trump could actually be impeached

The Trump properties across New York City are having a difficult time attracting new clientele, as the Big Apples commercial real estate trends move toward skyscrapers and modern, innovative buildings. Trump Tower, along with the presidents several other luxe buildings, like 40 Wall Street and 1290 Avenue of the Americas, are consistently underperforming since Trump took office.

Were in the biggest development pipeline in Manhattan since the 1980s, Keith DeCoster, director of real estate analytics at Savills Studley, told Bloomberg Tuesday. Older buildingscirca 1980s, 1990sare having a tougher time competing.

The presidents millions in losses coincides with his continued decline in approval ratings, as Trump seeks to quiet the noise surrounding multiple federal investigations into Russias meddling in last years presidential elections and claims he obstructed justice when firing ex-FBI Director James Comey. The presidents approval rating peaked just above 40 percent during his first international trip as commander-in-chief, before returning to a controversial and stalled GOP health-care bill, as well as continued probes into his campaign and White House administration.

But not all Trump properties are suffering massive losses: Business at Mar-a-Lago, Trumps Winter White House,isbooming ever since he took office and membership rates reportedly rose to more than$200,000 annually. Meanwhile, nearly 200 Democrats have sued the president, claiming hes blatantly violating the Constitution by not giving up ownership of the Trump organization. The lawsuit also demands further transparency regarding the presidents international business deals.

The bottom line is, we have no clue as to most of the investors and partners of Donald Trump around the world, the lawsuit states. We have no accurate and complete knowledge about all those payments and benefits because he has made no disclosure.

Visit link:

Donald Trump's Net Worth and Approval Ratings Are Both Steadily Declining - Newsweek

Donald Trump’s New York Golf Club Seeks to Avoid Tax Bogeyman – Newsweek

President Donald Trumps Organization wants to see its tax bill for a New York golf club cut in half. The company, which is now being run byhis sons Donald and Eric, is seeking a property tax break of $250,000 for Trump National Golf Club in Westchester, New York, town officialshave said,ABC Newsreported Wednesday.

The Trump Organization has long sought lower corporate tax bills, and its latest attempthas not been received well by local residents. It is very difficult when you see someone who has all these assets at his disposal who would rather pay lawyers to avoid his civic duty of paying taxes,Gloria Fried, a Democrat who collects taxes for Briarcliff Manor, where the course is based, told the news channel.

President Donald Trump at The Trump International Golf Links Course, Aberdeen, Scotland, on July 10, 2012. Ian MacNicol/Getty

Sports Emails and Alerts- Get the best of Newsweek Sports delivered to your inbox

The Trump Organization values the course, which covers 143 acres of Westchester County, at $7.5 million, according to the report, but the town saysit should be closer to $15.1 million.Trump bought the land in 2009 for $8 million and built the 18-hole golf course, along with a housing development.

The Trump Organization has regurlarly challenged property valuations in the pastto gain tax reductions. Tax assessors rated Trump National at $15 million in 2016, while Trumps lawyers claimed it was worth just $1.35 million. Neither Trumps lawyer nor his spokesperson responded to ABCs request for comment.

The president is a big golf fan and has golf courses around the world, from Los Angeles to Scotland and Dubai.He has been photographedplayingwith world No.2 Rory McIlroy.

In April, The Independent reported that Trump had played golf 16 times since becoming president, despite promising not to play much golf. Trump criticized his predecessor President Barack Obama on Twitter for how often he played the sport.

Excerpt from:

Donald Trump's New York Golf Club Seeks to Avoid Tax Bogeyman - Newsweek

Trump spikes the ball after Georgia election win – Politico

Rattled by Donald Trumps tumultuous first five months in office, the Republican Party breathed a collective sigh of relief Tuesday after a much-needed special election victory in Georgia. The White House also exhaled: After Republican Karen Handel was declared the victor in a race billed as a referendum on the new president, Trump fired off a series of celebratory tweets.

Well, the Special Elections are over and those that want to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN are 5 and O! All the Fake News, all the money spent = 0, wrote Trump.

Story Continued Below

In the run-up to the Georgia race, Republicans worried that a loss could be the harbinger of a 2018 train-wreck. There were fears that a Handel loss could ripple across the political landscape, spurring GOP retirements, dampening candidate recruitment, and turbo-charging Democrats looking to bounce back following the soul-crushing 2016 election.

The contest, the most expensive House race ever, was viewed by many as the first major strength test of the Democratic resistance to Trump. In the final days before the election, several White House aides said they didnt know if Handel would be able to fend off Jon Ossoff, a 30-year-old filmmaker and former congressional aide who became a cause celebre among liberals nationwide.

Your guide to the permanent campaign weekday mornings, in your inbox.

By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

But she did, and the presidents supporters viewed the outcome as proof that Trump continues to connect with voters.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, an informal Trump adviser and a past occupant of the Georgia seat, contended that the handful of special elections this year revealed that voters were tuning out the Russia scandal that has consumed Washington. He argued that the political establishment, much as it did during the 2016 campaign, continued to underestimate the connection many Americans felt with the president.

He may be resonating with people in a way that some dont get, Gingrich said. Maybe theres a whole new conversation taking place in a way that none of us understand.

It would be a mistake to say Republicans are in the clear. With Trump confronting an expanding federal probe into his 2016 campaigns ties to Russia, party strategists concede they are still facing serious headwinds in their efforts to retain the House majority in 2018.

And Tuesdays results werent entirely rosy. Handels win disguised the fact that the party only narrowly held onto a Republican-oriented Georgia seat, and barely won another race Tuesday for a conservative South Carolina seat that few thought would be competitive. Both outcomes could easily be interpreted as warning signs for the GOP.

Still, given the national spotlight on Georgia, Republicans breathed easier after the race was called for Handel.

The Democrats threw the kitchen sink at this deal and theyve come up empty again. They havent won an election all year, and they probably wont until November in New Jersey, said Scott Reed, the chief political strategist at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which spent more than $1 million on ads boosting Handel.

On Tuesday evening, Trump, who previously traveled to Georgia to appear with the Republican candidate, weighed in with four tweets highlighting Handels performance and one congratulating Ralph Norman in South Carolina. A text message sent to Trump supporters noted that Democrats lose again (0-4). Total disarray. The MAGA Mandate is stronger than ever.

Handels win could have immediate implications for her party, possibly helping to dissuade veteran lawmakers some of whom have been spooked by Trumps underwater approval ratings - from foregoing reelection bids. Hoping to nudge along Republican retirements, Democrats have been recruiting challengers to longtime GOP House members like California Reps. Ed Royce and Dana Rohrabacher and New Jersey Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen, who havent faced serious challenges in recent years but are likely to in 2018. The approach is similar to the one Republicans used with success in 2010, the year the GOP recaptured the House majority.

The Georgia outcome could also give a boost to Republican recruiting, which stalled as the political environment worsened for the party. Several blue-chip GOP recruits, including Wisconsin Rep. Sean Duffy and Indiana Rep. Susan Brooks, had announced they would not be running for Senate choosing to run for reelection to safe House seats rather than pursue Senate seats in an uncertain environment. Now, as Republicans try to convince other House members to run for Senate, including Fred Upton in Michigan and Luke Messer in Indiana, the Georgia outcome could offer reassurance.

For Republicans confronting the hurdle of running in areas where Trump is unpopular, Handels campaign seemed to offer a template for how to run. In a suburban Atlanta district filled with upper income and highly educated voters, Handel managed to win over Republican voters who had cooled on Trump. In days leading up to the election, one GOP poll found that Trumps approval rating in the district had plummeted to 45 percent.

Handel maneuvered carefully, declaring her support for the president without fully embracing him. She had Trump and Vice President Mike Pence to the district, but chose to hold private fundraisers with them rather than public rallies. On the trail, Handel said that she wouldnt be an extension of the White House.

Rather than talking about Trump, Handel focused her fire on Ossoff, casting him as a liberal and tying him to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a reviled figure in conservative districts like the one he was running in.

But the biggest source of relief for Republicans was the revelation that the partys base hasnt abandoned the president.

While Trump has failed to follow through on many of his big-ticket campaign promises, polling continues to show that most bedrock Republicans approve of the job he is doing. That dynamic played out in Georgia where, confronting a mammoth Democratic turnout operation and an energized liberal base, GOP voters turned out in droves.

Whats still unclear is whether the Georgia win will encourage GOP lawmakers to get behind Trumps troubled legislative agenda. The president has vowed to pass health care and tax reform and an infrastructure package yet all three face high hurdles on Capitol Hill.

As they digested Tuesdays results, Republicans cautioned that electoral peril still lies ahead they pointed out that special elections like the one in Georgia are often poor indicators of the political environment.

In the leadup to the 2010 election, for example, Republicans fell short in a special election for an upstate New York congressional seat the party had held since Reconstruction. At the time, operatives and analysts duly issued doomsday predictions. When the midterms arrived, Republicans captured 63 seats and the House majority.

Republicans continue to see plenty of reason for concern. They note that historical trends arent favorable, either. During a closed-door meeting with lawmakers last week, House Speaker Paul Ryan reminded the GOP conference that midterms are traditionally unkind for the party in power during a presidents first term.

I dont care who the Republican president is, we know the history of midterm elections, said Vin Weber, a former GOP congressman and longtime party strategist. Regardless of the president, were going to see a substantially more energized Democratic base next year. The question is, do we lose the majority or come close to losing the majority?

Missing out on the latest scoops? Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

Follow this link:

Trump spikes the ball after Georgia election win - Politico

President Trump Is Returning to Iowa, Where He May Find Remorseful Independent Voters – TIME

(DES MOINES, Iowa) Iowa independents who helped Donald Trump win the presidency see last year's tough-talking candidate as a thin-skinned chief executive and wish he'd show more grace.

Unaffiliated voters make up the largest percentage of the electorate in the Midwest state that backed Trump in 2016, after lifting Democrat Barack Obama to the White House in party caucuses and two straight elections. Ahead of Trump's visit to Iowa on Wednesday several independents who voted for Trump expressed frustration with the President.

It's not just his famous tweetstorms. It's what they represent: a president distracted by investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 election and a court battle over his executive order barring refugees from majority-Muslim countries at the expense of tangible health care legislation and new tax policy.

"He's so sidetracked," said Chris Hungerford, a 47-year-old home-business owner from Marshalltown. "He gets off track on things he should just let go."

And when he does spout off, he appears to lack constraint, said Scott Scherer, a 48-year-old chiropractor from Guttenberg, in northeast Iowa.

"Engage your brain before you engage your mouth," Scherer advised, especially on matters pertaining to investigations. "Shut up. Just shut up, and let the investigation run its course."

Scherer said he would vote again for Trump, but pauses a long time before declining to answer when asked if he approves of the job the president is doing.

Cody Marsh isn't sure about voting for Trump a second time. The 32-year-old power-line technician from Tabor, in western Iowa, says, "It's 50-50."

"People don't take him seriously," he said.

Unaffiliated, or "no party" voters as they are known in Iowa, make up 36 percent of the electorate, compared with 33 percent who register Republican and 31 percent registered Democrat. Self-identified independents in Iowa voted for Trump over Democrat Hillary Clinton by a 13-percentage-point margin last year, according to exit polls conducted for the Associated Press and television networks

They helped him capture 51.8 percent of the overall vote against Clinton.

Nationally, exit polls showed independents tilted toward Trump over Clinton by about a 4-percentage-point margin in November, but an AP-NORC poll conducted in June found that about two-thirds of them disapprove of how he's handling his job as president.

In North Carolina, Republican pollster Paul Shumaker says he has seen internal polling that has warning signs for his state, where Trump prevailed last year. Independent voters are becoming frustrated with Trump, especially for failing so far to deliver on long-promised household economic issues such as health care, said Shumaker, an adviser to Republican Sen. Richard Burr.

Inaction on health care and any notable decline in the economy will hurt Trump's ability to improve his numbers with independents, with broad implications for the midterm elections next year, Shumaker said. At stake in 2018 will be majority control of the House. A favorable map and more Democrats up for re-election make the GOP more likely to add to its numbers in the Senate.

"How the president and members of Congress move forward and address the kitchen-table issues facing the American voters will determine the outcome of the 2018 elections," he said.

In Iowa on Wednesday, Trump will be rallying his Republican base in Cedar Rapids.

Earlier this month, Vice President Mike Pence attended Republican Sen. Joni Ernst's annual fundraiser, where he talked about job growth and low unemployment since the start of the year, although economists see much of it as a continuation of Obama policies.

Trump has only been in office five months.

It's a message the Republican establishment is clinging to, especially those looking ahead to 2018.

Gov. Kim Reynolds, installed last month to succeed new U.S. Ambassador to China Terry Branstad, said last week of Iowa voters: "I think they are confident that President Trump and this administration are doing the job that they said that they would do, going out there and making America great again."

But Trump has to worry about people like Richard Sternberg, a 68-year-old retired high school guidance counselor from Roland, in central Iowa, who voted for Trump. But is Sternberg satisfied? "Not completely."

He is bothered by Trump's proposed cut to vocational education, an economic lift for some in rural areas.

"We, especially in Iowa, need those two-year technically trained people," Sternberg said.

More broadly, Trump needs to act more "presidential," he said.

"Trump speaks before he thinks," Sternberg said. "He doesn't seem to realize what the president says in the form of direct communication or Twitter carries great weight and can be misconstrued if not carefully crafted."

See original here:

President Trump Is Returning to Iowa, Where He May Find Remorseful Independent Voters - TIME

President Trump Expected to Reveal This Week If Secret Comey Tapes Exist – Fortune

President Donald Trump is expected to make an announcement in the coming days on whether any recordings exist of his private conversations with former FBI Director James Comey, potentially bringing to an end one of the central mysteries of the ongoing probe that has consumed his White House .

White House press secretary Sean Spicer said Tuesday that he expects an announcement "this week" on the possibility of tapes. The president fired Comey in May and then tweeted that the lawman, who was overseeing the investigation into possible contacts between Trump's campaign and Russian officials, "better hope that there are no 'tapes' of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press."

Trump and his aides have since then steadfastly refused to clarify that extraordinary if ambiguous warning. The president last month told reporters that "I'll tell you about that maybe sometime in the near future" but offered no hints as to whether the tapes exists, except saying that some journalists would "be very disappointed" to find out the answer.

The House intelligence committee has asked White House counsel Don McGahn to provide an answer to the question about tapes by Friday. Under a post-Watergate law, the Presidential Records Act, recordings made by presidents belong to the people and can eventually be made public. Destroying them would be a crime.

Comey testified before the Senate that Trump asked for his loyalty and asked for him to drop the probe into former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn. Some have raised the possibility that Trump's request constituted obstruction of justice, but the president has yet to produce the tapes that could theoretically clear his name.

The investigation was originally launched to look into Russia's meddling in the 2016 election. Trump has at times cast doubt on that conclusion, and Spicer said Tuesday that he has yet to discuss with the president whether he believes that Moscow was behind the election interference.

"I have not sat down and talked to him about that specific thing," Spicer said.

America's top intelligence officials have concluded that Russia undoubtedly interfered in America's 2016 presidential campaign. Characterizing it as the "high-confidence judgment of the entire intelligence community," Comey testified that there is no doubt that the Russians meddled "with "purpose," ''sophistication" and technology. Trump, meanwhile, has dismissed investigations into the meddling and potential collusion with his campaign associates as a "witch hunt."

Robert Mueller, the special counsel now overseeing the investigation, met Tuesday with the leaders of the House Intelligence committee. Reps. Mike Conaway, R-Texas, and Adam Schiff, D-Calif., issued a brief statement confirming the meeting but providing no details about their discussion.

Mueller is slated to meet Wednesday with top members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, including the chairman, GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, and the top Democrat, Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California. He'll also meet with Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I.

One reason for the Capitol Hill meetings is to ensure there is no conflict between Mueller's probe and the work of the congressional committees.

Excerpt from:

President Trump Expected to Reveal This Week If Secret Comey Tapes Exist - Fortune

Qatar et al.: Donald Trump as a Saudi lobbyist – Salon

Donald Trump is stooping to new lows. He evidently has no reservations about making himself, the sitting U.S. President, into the Saudis chief global lobbyist.

That Trump bought the Saudi line about the Qataris funding terrorism is very telling.

Both countries, respectively, support Wahhabist or Salafist insurgencies in various places, but that is not what the Saudis find objectionable.

The Saudis try to distract from their own actions

There is no question about the Saudis longstanding willingness to fund and arm specific terrorist groups as needed, mainly to advance allied autocracies and send young hotheads abroad, often to the West.

The Qataris pursue a different approach in the terrorism financing business.

They tend to make longer-term investments in other religious or ideological factions. And yes, these do pose an existential threat to Saudi interests.

For that reason, it is fully comprehensible why the Saudis would want to direct attention to Qatar.

What is not comprehensible is that President Trump has fallen for that very transparent act of distraction.

Trump worries about regime change too

At the same time, it is important to recognize that to be horrified by regime change is something that Donald Trump immediately gets and a fear he instinctively shars with the Saudis. No wonder he regards them as soulmates.

As is the case with the Saudi monarchy itself, Trumps entire political being is based on the conviction that anybody who dares stand in his way in any fashion is guilty of lse majest, if not worse.

That is why he had no qualms about taking sides in the bataille royale.

Europe as collateral damage: So what?

Trump also had no problems with the fact that the fallout of an actual Saudi-Qatar war is bound to go far beyond the Gulf region and the wider Middle East. It would definitely, quite literally, hit European capitals and cities.

As Mr. Trump has made plain in his pompous appearance at NATO headquarters, he is not one to worry much about the U.S.s NATO allies.

In his disturbed mind, he might even think that the Europeans who still owe him billions of dollars basically deserve a hit. So why worry? Any avenue taken to make them come to their senses is welcome.

The fallout from absolving the Saudis

Trumps sycophantic support notwithstanding, the real damage of his words is not just that Trump absolves the Saudis of any of their own responsibility for terror.

What is widely overlooked in that regard is that Trumps full-scale blessing has effectively killed the however hesitant move toward domestic reform in Saudi Arabia.

Given the deteriorating economic regime, the Saudi royals were getting ready to reform themselves, not least because, under President Obama, they no longer had reflexive U.S. backing.

Now that the Saudis arent just back in favor in Washington, but get to run Trumps table, who in Riyadh is to worry about reforms other than cosmetic ones?

Link:

Qatar et al.: Donald Trump as a Saudi lobbyist - Salon

James Corden Sends 297 Copies Of ‘Philadelphia’ To Donald Trump – HuffPost

James Cordenblasted President Donald TrumpTuesday for ignoring the HIV/AIDS crisis but hes come up with a humorous solution to educate him.

Following a report that six members of thePresidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDSresigned in protestagainst Trumps lack of policies to fight the epidemic, Corden urged Trump to readjust his attitude.

Corden became serious as he pointed out that nearly 60 percent of the more than 1.1 million people in the U.S. who live with HIV and AIDS are unable to access lifesaving medications, and questioned whether the president cared.

Then The Late Late Show host changed gears, surmising that this was perhaps because Trump has never seen the acclaimed 1993 AIDS drama Philadelphiastarring Tom Hanks and Denzel Washington. The film enlightened Corden, and he thinks it could have the same effect on the president.

So Cordens staff, at first rebuffed by the White House, sent 297 copies of Philadelphia to Trumps Mar-a-Lagoin Florida.

We hope that if Trump watches Philadelphia, hell understand two things: One, Tom Hanks definitely deserved that Oscar, Corden said. And number two, we hope that hell realize that HIV and AIDS is something that you or any president of the United States or any world leader for that matter can never afford to ignore.

Watch the segment above and hope that Trump takes the time to watch this memorable character below.

Read the original post:

James Corden Sends 297 Copies Of 'Philadelphia' To Donald Trump - HuffPost

The Donald Trump hiring crisis means America’s got no talent – USA TODAY

Brian Klaas, Opinion contributor 3:18 a.m. ET June 21, 2017

President Trump in the Cabinet Room on June 13, 2017.(Photo: Susan Walsh, AP)

The United States government is suffering from a new phenomenon: the Trump Brain Drain. For the first time in memory, the American government is havingdifficulty recruitingthe best and the brightest at thehighest levelsof power.

Qualified public servants areturning downplum government jobs because they don't want to be exposed to the risks of serving in President Trump'sWhite House. West Wing power-brokers are lawyering up (even Trumps lawyer hashireda lawyer). A special counsel is reportedly investigating the president himself for possibly obstructing justice.

The reputational risk of working for Trumps administration is enormous, and it's not just because of the endless spiralingscandals. There's alsothe now routineTrumpian ritual of sacrificing his staff on his altar of self-sabotage.We all know the drill: Sean Spicer or Sarah Huckabee Sanders or another sacrificial lamb offers up a flimsy lie to protect Trump. (He fired Comey because he was toohard on HillaryClinton!) Trump repays the favor by contradicting his staff almost immediately on Twitter or TV. (I fired him because of the Russia thing.)

Yet working for this president has become a bewildering exercise in trying to figure out whats worse: paying exorbitant legal fees, being tossed under the proverbial bus by your boss, orrisking becoming a national punchline (we almost feel sorry for you, Sean). The loyalty that Trump infamously demands from subordinates is clearly not a two-way street.

At least there are job perks. Build your CV with the unique experience of being subpoenaed by Congress. Practice your leader worship skills as youre forced to proclaimyour fawning admiration for Trump during a public Cabinet meeting. And if those dont entice you, who wouldnt jump at the chance to work for a beleaguered president withrecord low approval ratings, a hot temper, and a stalled legislative agenda?

The United States is less safe and government is less effective when top talent must think twice about serving the president.

It's a witch hunt for Trump, whos acting like a witch

Conservatives should love the Trump presidency, but he makes it hard

Less than five months into the Trump presidency, there is a record number of vacancies. Of 558 key presidential appointments requiring Senate confirmation, only43 have beenfilled(less than 8% of the total). And before you echo the frequently tweeted but incorrect Trump accusation that this is due to Democrat "OBSTRUCTIONISTS, remember that405of the 558 positionsdont even have a nominee yet. This snails pace of selecting peoplewhich involves getting them to agree to serveis unprecedented in modern history.

When the post of FBI director opened up (through, shall we say, questionable means), at least fivededicated public servants publicly withdrew from consideration.Several seasoned veterans pulled themselves out of therunningto replace Michael Flynn as national security adviser. EvenKellyanne Conways husbandwithdrewfrom consideration for a powerful Justice Department role (perhaps he had learned some alternative factslife inside the Trump administration from a well-placed counselor?).

The Trump Brain Drain is sapping talent beyond the White House, too. Six cyber security executives toldReutersthat Trumps caustic attacks on intelligence agencies had provoked a marked surge in skilled hackers and cyber talent leaving government agencies to pursue careers in the private sector.Even lawyers, who used to flock to Trump like moths to a litigious orange flame, are now staying away. Four different law firmsdeclinedto represent Trump not only because they feared that Trump wont listen to their legal advice but also because working with Trump wouldkill recruitmentfor their firms the trickle-down economics of the Trump Brain Drain in action.

Of course, there are many, many excellent and experienced public servants in the Trump administration (Defense Secretary James Mattis, National Security AdviserH.R. McMasterand Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao spring to mind). But Trumps top day-to-day advisers are no dream team. We must call an unqualified spade an unqualified spade.

POLICING THE USA:Alook atrace, justice, media

Donald Trump's business ties explain a lot of his dictator worship

There's hardly anyone on Trump's senior staff who hasushered abill through Congress. White House chief of staff Reince Priebus, the former Republican Party chairman, has never held elective officeand came to his job withvirtually no experienceat the federal level. Two of Trumps top advisers now some of the most influential people in the world arewoefully unqualified relatives. And former Breitbart chief Steve Bannon has as much business being in the Oval Office as Russian ambassadorSergey Kislyak, yet here we are.

It gets worse. You could start a joke by saying A neurosurgeon and a wedding planner walked into a bar but there's a real-world punchline. Last week, Trumpappointedhis familyswedding planner to run federal housingin New York. Her boss, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson, is an impressive neurosurgeon, but its hard to see how operating on brains is a relevant qualification for his post.

In other words, Trumps hiring decisions are compounding the recruitment brain drain because many people he selects are unprepared for their roles. Unless he changes his ways, his presidency will continue to languish from the one-two punch of his own incompetence and the governments inability to recruit top talent.

Brian Klaas is a fellow in comparative politics at the London School of Economics and Political Science and author ofThe Despot's Accomplice: How the West is Aiding and Abetting the Decline of Democracy. Follow him on Twitter@brianklaas.

You can readdiverse opinions from ourBoard of Contributorsand other writers ontheOpinion front page,on Twitter@USATOpinionand in our dailyOpinion newsletter.To submit a letter, comment or column, check oursubmission guidelines.

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2sOUjLn

Read the original:

The Donald Trump hiring crisis means America's got no talent - USA TODAY

Donald Trump, Classy As Always – Mother Jones

Kevin DrumJun. 20, 2017 6:33 PM

Lets see. So far President Obama has (a) wiretapped Trump, (b) deliberately planned the destruction of Obamacare for 2017, (c) caused the Mike Flynn debacle by failing to properly vet Flynn,1 (d) personally organized anti-Trump protests around the country, and (e) caused the death of Otto Warmbier because he was too weak-kneed to stand up to North Korea.

Its standard practice for new presidents to declare that things are even worse than I thought, usually offered up as an excuse for why the country hasnt blossomed under new leadership within the first month.2 Its also standard to attack your predecessors policies. But its decidedly not standard to accuse your predecessor personally of illegal, unethical, and cowardly acts.

I suppose Obama will continue to stay quiet about this, partly because its tradition, partly because thats who he is, and partly because speaking up might be counterproductive at the moment. But Im pretty sure Im not the only one who wishes hed toss tradition aside and just lay into Trump. Id pay to see it.

1For the record, Flynn was fired by Obama in 2014 because he had become deranged. Obama personally warned Trump about this.

2Also newly elected governors, mayors, district attorneys, sheriffs, dogcatchers, and PTA presidents.

Mother Jones is a nonprofit, and stories like this are made possible by readers like you. Donate or subscribe to help fund independent journalism.

Visit link:

Donald Trump, Classy As Always - Mother Jones

Donald Trump No Longer Wants to ‘Stay Out’ of Syria – The Atlantic

During the 2016 election, many voters were dismayed by both major-party candidates. Hillary Clinton was the personification of the Washington establishment foreign-policy hawk, with her dismal track record of urging ill-conceived military interventions. And Donald Trump, who railed against squandering American blood and treasure abroad, possessed neither the knowledge nor the experience nor the discipline nor the character to steer Americas approach to geopolitics in a better direction.

As if those choices weren't dispiriting enough, I fretted that for all Donald Trumps denunciations of the Iraq War and promises to spend money at home rather than abroad, a careful assessment of his words showed that his own instincts were interventionistthat he was no less likely than his opponent to blunder into a major war.

In Syria today, President Trump is risking just such a conflict.

American forces and American allies are not only taking territory from ISIS, theyre holding that territory against regime forces, David French writes at National Review. Theres a word for what happens when a foreign power takes and holds territory without the consent of the sovereign state invasion. In many ways, current American policy is a lighter-footprint, less ambitious version of the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Were using local allies, but our own boots are on the ground, and were directly defending our forces and our allies from threats from Syrias own government. In his estimation, the key warring parties increasingly face a stark choiceagree to a de facto partition of the country or inch toward a great-power conflict.

To wit, an American fighter shot down a Syrian warplane on Sunday, the first time the American military has downed a Syrian aircraft since the start of the civil war in 2011. Observers immediately called the incident a marked escalation in the conflict.

And their view was quickly vindicated: Russia on Monday condemned the American militarys downing of a Syrian warplane, suspending the use of a military hotline that Washington and Moscow have used to avoid collisions in Syrian airspace and threatening to target aircraft flown by the United States and its allies over Syria.

Those skeptical of U.S. intervention in the Syrian civil war have long warned that it could escalate into a civilization-warping conflict between nuclear powers. But neither Vietnam nor Afghanistan nor Iraq nor Libya has persuaded todays hawks to sufficiently weight the unintended consequences that plague all complex military interventions. And there are so many varieties of hawks that are urging action.

The complexity of the civil war in Syria is underscored by the fact that the ascendant pro-war faction inside the Trump administration is composed of Iran hawks. According to reporters Kate Brannen, Dan De Luce and Paul McLeary at Just Security, antagonism toward Iran is causing two officials in the Trump White House to push for broadening the conflict, against the advice of officials at the Pentagon:

Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the senior director for intelligence on the National Security Council, and Derek Harvey, the NSCs top Middle East advisor, want the United States to start going on the offensive in southern Syria Their plans are making even traditional Iran hawks nervous, including Defense Secretary James Mattis, who has personally shot down their proposals more than once, the two sources said Despite the more aggressive stance pushed by some White House officials, Mattis, military commanders and top U.S. diplomats all oppose opening up a broader front against Iran and its proxies in southeastern Syria, viewing it as a risky move that could draw the United States into a dangerous confrontation with Iran, defense officials said. Such a clash could trigger retaliation against U.S. troops deployed in Iraq and Syria, where Tehran has armed thousands of Shiite militia fighters and deployed hundreds of Revolutionary Guard officers.

Put another way, Iran hawks in the Trump White House want to broaden the conflict there in a manner that pits the U.S. against another country that also seeks the defeat of ISIS, the ostensible reason the U.S. is involved in Syria in the first place.

Meanwhile, hawks in Iran are escalating that countrys role in Syria: Iran announced Sunday the Iran Revolutionary Guards had launched ballistic missile strikes on Saturday against ISIS targets in Syria, dramatically escalating the countrys role in the Syrian conflict. The mid-range ground-to-ground missiles targeted militants in eastern Syria in retaliation for the deadly terrorist attacks in Tehran earlier this month.

The American public does not want a major intervention in Syria.

There has never been a congressional vote authorizing U.S. military operations in Syria against anyone, and there has been scant debate over any of the goals that the U.S. claims to be pursuing there, Daniel Larison notes. The U.S. launches attacks inside Syria with no legal authority from the U.N. or Congress, and it strains credulity that any of these operations have anything to do with individual or collective self-defense.

And the push for escalation is a particular betrayal for Trump voters who supported the candidate based on rhetoric about quickly defeating ISIS and otherwise eschewing war. Here is what Trump had to say back when President Obama was contemplating a greater U.S. role in Syria: What I am saying is stay out of Syria AGAIN, TO OUR VERY FOOLISH LEADER, DO NOT ATTACK SYRIA - IF YOU DO MANY VERY BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN & FROM THAT FIGHT THE U.S. GETS NOTHING!

Today, escalation in Syria risks those very bad things, along with American lives and treasure, but Trumps current rhetoric suggests he is more focused on his ongoing feud with the news media, Hillary Clinton, and whether he is under investigation. His approach carries all the risks of Washington establishment hawkery with none of the steadiness, experience or discipline that helps to mitigate them.

Were inching toward an outright invasion and extended occupation of northern Syria, French writes at National Review. All without congressional approval. All without meaningful public debate. Will Trumps base stand for this betrayal? So long as he is commander in chief, the U.S. will suffer from the worst qualities of the establishment and its antagonists. It is hard to imagine a president less fit to avoid catastrophe.

See the article here:

Donald Trump No Longer Wants to 'Stay Out' of Syria - The Atlantic

To stop Donald Trump, defeat the Republicans who enable him – Chicago Tribune

Jonathan Rauch in Lawfare writes on Republicans' continued devotion to President Donald Trump:

"Perhaps there are limits to Republicans' tolerance, but if Trump hasn't already triggered them, it is hard to imagine where they are. The firing of a special prosecutor? An indictment? Possibly, but one wonders if it might be literally true that Trump could, as he once boasted, shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and retain Republican support.

"The numbers support no predictions, but they offer a hint. Even under a worst-case scenario of presidential malfeasance, removing Trump would be no easy or quick task. It would require a sea-change in Republican partisans' attitude, a change of which there is no sign today. And it would require Republican leaders to take political risks that few have shown any appetite for."

GOP defeats in 2018 might give the Democrats the majority in the House, expediting impeachment, but removing Trump would require a vote of two-thirds of the Senate. Without substantial GOP defections, Trump will be there for the remainder of his four-year term.

Could Trump be forced to resign if, for example, the choice was between resignation and being held in contempt of court for refusal to turn over financial records? Perhaps, but it's far from clear that such a standoff would occur. If it did, Trump and his fleet of lawyers could certainly delay and appeal, in essence running out the clock on his presidency.

Whether in 2020 or before, the only surefire means to protect the country from Trump is to defeat his followers, and eventually him. A third-party candidate, as my colleague Michael Gerson recognizes, could throw the race to the Democrat. My reaction to that possibility is: So? We've made the case here and been proved correct that Trump's flaws as a human being and president surpass matters of policy and put the republic at risk.

While it is true that a primary has never defeated a sitting president in more than 100 years (Lyndon Johnson chose not to run in 1968, Jimmy Carter beat back Ted Kennedy and Gerald Ford held off Ronald Reagan), Trump is helping to rewrite the political playbook. An anti-Trump Republican unsullied by sycophancy and presenting a credible program for uniting the country and addressing policy problems that have befuddled Trump would have a historic opportunity.

In the short term, the most effective way of removing Trump is to defeat again and again lawmakers who refuse to remove him, thereby advancing the prospects for impeachment and putting optimum pressure on Republican senators. (Republicans pledging to vote for impeachment or removal in the Senate based on the facts available at the time might spare themselves.)

With Georgia's special election Tuesday in the 6th Congressional District, we'll get our first inkling of just how vulnerable Republicans might be in 2018. Between now and 2018, Democrats, independents and the small cadre of #NeverTrump Republicans need to pursue two tracks simultaneously keeping the special counselor in place (and assisting in the fact-finding process with open hearings, when possible) and generating momentum to defeat the greatest possible number of Trump protectors. That might entail fielding third-party candidates and primary challenges. Democrats certainly will need to keep their base energized, field an all-star list of candidates and make the case against the extreme Trump agenda while presenting reasonable alternatives of their own.

The only real guarantee, you see, of reversing the debacle of 2016 is to defeat Trump and his minions at the polls. The solution to democracy gone astray is always more democracy.

Jennifer Rubin writes the Right Turn blog for The Post, offering reported opinion from a conservative perspective.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Republicans, beware. The tables will turn.

My application to replace Sean Spicer

Trump's voters were more motivated by nationalism than economic hardship

If Republicans lose the House, Trump will be impeached

Visit link:

To stop Donald Trump, defeat the Republicans who enable him - Chicago Tribune

Donald Trump’s Approval Rating Plummets to New Low as Republicans Grow Wary Amid Russia Investigation – Newsweek

Another day, another low point for Donald Trump. The president's approval rating, which has proved historically bad since he took office, has sunk again.

The latest survey from CBS Newsout Tuesday found his approval rating had hit a new low of 36 percent, while 57 percent disapproved of the job he is doing. Trump's approval rating has declined over the last few monthsin the CBS News poll. Forty-three percent approved of him in early April, a number that dropped to 41 percent by late April and now has hit the new low of 36 percent in late June. The previous low for Trump was 39 percent in February.

Trump's support among Republicans might have been a factor in the drop. Seventy-two percent of GOP respondents approved of the president's job performancewhich sounds like a lotbut actually represents an 11-percentage-point fall compared with April.

Daily Emails and Alerts- Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox

The poll found that the investigation into Trump's potential ties with Russia, the country that interfered in the 2016 election as it aimed to helpget the GOP candidate into office, hasdragged down his popularity. His firing of FBI Director James Comey and comments suggesting the move was connected to the bureau's Russia probe, as well as his near-constant focus on the investigation, might not be helping him with the American people.Just 28 percent of respondents approved of the way he's handled the probe, according to CBS, while 63 percent disapprove. About one-third said Trump's approach on the process has left them thinking less of the president. Fifty-sevenpercent of GOP respondents approved of Trump's handling of the Russia investigation.

Thirty-nine percent of all respondents thought the Russia investigation was a critical national security issue, while 32 percent thought it was a distraction. Twenty-seven percent thought it was a serious issue but not as serious as other issues.

The CBS News survey, conducted bySSRS,sampled1,117 adults across the country though telephone interviews from June 15 through June 18. It had a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points for the full sample.

Other recent surveys haven't brought good news for Trumpeither. The tracking poll from the generallyright-leaning Rasmussen Reports, a survey often cited by the president on Twitter, found Trump's approval rating had fallen 2 percentage points over the weekend, to 48 percent. Gallup's tracking poll, meanwhile, pegged Trump's approval at just 38 percent Monday, closing in on the president's lowest point in the survey35 percentwhich he hit in late March.

The weighted average from data-focused website FiveThirtyEighthad Trump's approval rating at 38.7 percent Tuesday morning, while his disapproval stood at 55.3 percent. FiveThirtyEightaggregates public polls to come up with the average figure and accounts for each survey's quality, timeliness, sample size and any partisan leanings.

Read the original:

Donald Trump's Approval Rating Plummets to New Low as Republicans Grow Wary Amid Russia Investigation - Newsweek

Stephen Colbert Mocks Donald Trump’s Lawyer For Botching Investigation Denial – Deadline


Deadline
Stephen Colbert Mocks Donald Trump's Lawyer For Botching Investigation Denial
Deadline
UPDATED with video: President Donald Trump spent Father's Day Weekend at Camp David where, Stephen Colbert speculated, it must have been nice to get away from the Russia investigation. Last week Washington Post reported POTUS is under ...
Seth Rogen and Stephen Colbert Show Us the Best Way to Troll Donald Trump Jr.Slate Magazine (blog)
Seth Rogen and Stephen Colbert Troll Donald Trump Jr. With Twitter DMsHollywood Reporter
Stephen Colbert and Seth Rogen Just Trolled Donald Trump Jr. on TwitterTIME
EW.com -NewsBusters (press release) (blog) -Daily Beast
all 39 news articles »

Read this article:

Stephen Colbert Mocks Donald Trump's Lawyer For Botching Investigation Denial - Deadline

Sean Spicer: No Chance Yet To Ask Donald Trump About Russia Election Tampering – Deadline


Deadline
Sean Spicer: No Chance Yet To Ask Donald Trump About Russia Election Tampering
Deadline
Asked for a yes/no answer to the question, Does Trump believe the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election, Spicer pulled out his I have not sat down and talked to his about that specifically gag, adding, I will be glad to ...
It's Not Sean SpicerU.S. News & World Report
What Donald Trump and Sean Spicer can learn from Al FrankenVox
Sean Spicer wants to stop doing Donald Trump's press briefingsThe Independent

all 474 news articles »

Link:

Sean Spicer: No Chance Yet To Ask Donald Trump About Russia Election Tampering - Deadline

Who Is Jay Sekulow, and Why Is He Defending Donald Trump? – Slate Magazine

Jay Sekulow hosting an event at the Allen Arena at Lipscomb University on April 29, 2014, in Nashville, Tennessee.

Rick Diamond/Getty Images for GMA

Jay Sekulow had one job. He didnt do it. In fact, he did the opposite. The newest member of Donald Trumps private legal team, Sekulow was supposed to explain that, counter to the Washington Posts reporting, the president is not under investigation,. Instead, he told Fox News Chris Wallace that Trump is under investigationtwicebefore denying hed said any such thing.

This embarrassing flap raises two questions: Who is Jay Sekulow, and why is he defending Trump?

The first question is more easily answered than the second. Sekulow is a conservative litigator who has spent his career dismantling the constitutional separation of church and state. In 1986, he persuaded the Supreme Court to strike down an ordinance barring Jews for Jesus from proselytizing in Los Angeles International Airport. The issue was close to Sekulows heart: Although he was raised Jewish, he became a Messianic Jew while attending Atlanta Baptist College (now Mercer University). As he explained in an essay, Sekulow commit[ted] [his] life to Jesus at a performance by the Liberated Wailing Wall, the Jews for Jesus music group.

Sekulow served as the Jews for Jesus general counsel for several years and founded a nonprofit, Christian Advocates Serving Evangelism, or CASE, to fund his legal work. In 1991, he moved to the American Center for Law & Justice, a conservative Christian advocacy group founded by Pat Robertson to counteract the American Civil Liberties Union. In his capacity as ACLJ chief counsel, Sekulow continued to argue cases at the Supreme Court, usually defending school prayer and government subsidization of religion. Sekulow also repeatedly attacked buffer zones around abortion clinics that prevent protesters from accosting women. He lost that fight but won several high-profile religion cases by asserting that restrictions on religion in schools violate freedom of speech.

Sekulows profile rose precipitously in the 1990s thanks in large part to Paul and Jan Crouch, owners of the Trinity Broadcast Network. (Jan Crouch, the Los Angeles Times reported in 1993, referred to Sekulow as our little Jew.) The Crouches gave him a talk show on the network called Call to Action: Legal Issues Facing Christians Today, a platform that cemented his reputation as a top evangelical attorney. According to the LAT, donations to Sekulows nonprofit, CASE, quadrupled after he mentioned it on air.

Sekulows hiring may have been a gesture of goodwill to a group whose support Trump cannot afford to lose.

Over the next 15 years, Sekulow also transformed himself into a minor Republican powerbroker, working with the Bush White House to select conservative judicial nominees and push them through the Senate. In 2005, however, the Legal Times Tony Mauro published an investigative piece revealing that Sekulow had through the ACLJ and a string of interconnected nonprofit and for-profit entities built a financial empire that generates millions of dollars a year and supports a lavish lifestylecomplete with multiple homes, chauffeur-driven cars, and a private jet that he once used to ferry Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

While Sekulow struggled to maintain his image and fundraising capabilities, other groups began to outshine the ACLJ. The Alliance Defending Freedom and the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, for example, became key players in conservative Christian litigation, creating a network of supporters and donors through more traditional channels. Sekulow retreated from the front lines of church-state lawsuits; he argued his last Supreme Court case in 2008.

But Sekulow and the ACLJ have continued advocating for their peculiar vision of evangelical conservatism. In 2011, the ACLJwhich purports to support religious and constitutional freedomssued New York to block the construction of what it called the Ground Zero mosque. Sekulow, who still serves as the organizations chief counsel, vocally supported the effort and contributed to both the lawsuit and the appeal. He lost.

In recent years, Sekulow has served as an informal adviser to Mitt Romneys 2012 presidential campaign, hosted a radio show, and contributed to the ACLJs blog. He has also used the ACLJs resources to promote conservative values in Africa. In 2010, Sekulow and his son set up ACLJ offices in Zimbabwe and Kenya as both countries were in the midst of revising their constitutions. The ACLJ lobbied for the inclusion of constitutional bans on homosexuality, same-sex marriage, and abortioneven in cases where the mother will die unless her pregnancy is terminated. While neither country wrote total bans on abortion or homosexuality into their constitutions, Zimbabwe did include a prohibition on same-sex marriage. (Homosexuality is already illegal in both countries by statute.)

Top Comment

" to block the construction of what it called the Ground Zero mosque." You know, because religious freedom. The hypocrisy of the current religious right is just pathetic. They wallow in it, like stink on a turd. More...

Sekulows career arc looks similar to that of a Trump hanger-on like Rudy Giuliani: fame and relevance followed by intense controversy and flagging fortunes that are suddenly reversed by affiliation with the president. Despite this surface resemblance, it might seem odd that Trump hired Sekulowa First Amendment lawyerto defend him against possible obstruction of justice charges. But the hire makes sense if Trump views Sekulow as less a litigator than a messenger. While Sekulow may not be an expert in obstruction, impeachment, or executive privilege, he seems to remain popular among the Christian right. His hiring may have been a gesture of goodwill to a group whose support Trump cannot afford to lose.

Whatever logic justified Sekulows recruitment was shattered on Sunday, when the fiery culture warrior of the 1990s was reduced to an incoherent propagandist. He tripped and stammered, then grew furious with Wallace, his relatively friendly interlocutor, for noting his contradictory statements. It was a humiliating performance, one that likely disqualified him from future TV appearances. Sekulows deflating stint as a surrogate-attorney serves as a reminder that Trumps habit of hiring unqualified, unprepared advisors doesnt just hurt the country. Sometimes, it hurts the president, too.

Read the rest here:

Who Is Jay Sekulow, and Why Is He Defending Donald Trump? - Slate Magazine

The Many Foreign Policies of Donald Trump – NBCNews.com

Russia officially hung up on the United States on Monday, suspending the "hotline" between Moscow and Washington a day after the U.S. military shot down a Syrian air force jet. It was the latest signal of deteriorating relations between the superpowers, following the zigzagging path of U.S. foreign policy under President Donald Trump.

The dispute stems from the United States' support for Syrian President Bashar Assad's opponents a relatively new policy that Trump enunciated after having spent a year on the campaign trail repeatedly inveighing against intervening in Syria.

The disagreement is in keeping with numerous reversals by Trump, which seem to have made life difficult for Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and U.S. diplomats.

On the campaign trail, for example, Trump repeatedly inveighed against intervening in Syria, where Assad's regime has used banned chemical weapons on its own citizens. In his October debate against Hillary Clinton, Trump went so far as to suggest aligning the United States with Syria against ISIS disagreeing with his own running mate, Mike Pence. But then, on April 7, U.S. carriers fired 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at Syria in response to another alleged chemical weapons attack by Assad's regime, which killed more than 100 people.

"I dont think we've seen a Trump strategy develop," Nicholas Burns, the former undersecretary of state for political affairs under President George W. Bush, told Andrea Mitchell of NBC News in a recent interview. "There was the one airstrike on the airbase outside of Damascus after the chemical weapons attack. But other than that, you havent seen the president explain to the American people what is at stake."

Earlier this month, following moves by Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Saudi Arabia to break diplomatic relations with Qatar, Trump accused Qatar of being a "funder of terrorism at a very high level," urging the nation's leader to "stop teaching people to kill other people" and to "stop filling their heads with hate."

But by last Wednesday, the United States agreed to sell Qatar $12 billion worth of fighter jets, a deal that a State Department official told NBC News was "a prime example of our enduring commitment to regional stability."

Such quick shifts are widely believed to have contributed to some remarkable public comments last month by Dana Shell Smith, then the U.S. ambassador to Qatar. Smith tweeted on May 10 that it was "increasingly difficult to wake up overseas to news from home, knowing I will spend today explaining our democracy and institutions."

Smith who, as a career diplomat, not a political appointee, is traditionally supposed to be nonpartisan ended her three-year term as ambassador on May 31.

Other examples of inconsistencies in foreign policy:

The whiplashes have complicated matters for Tillerson, the man in charge of defining and explaining U.S. foreign policy.

While "I will never compromise my own values," Tillerson said last month on NBC's "Meet the Press," "I am devoted to helping the president achieve his objectives, helping him be successful."

Even as Trump appears to make policy on the spur of the moment and then to announce it to the world on Twitter Tillerson reassured Americans: "I understand what his objectives are.

"When I'm not clear on what his objectives are, we talk about it," he said.

View original post here:

The Many Foreign Policies of Donald Trump - NBCNews.com

Why won’t Donald Trump rush to tweet criticism of attacks against Muslims? – Washington Post

Donald Trump tweeted about the terrorist attacks in Paris in November 2015 about3 hours after they occurred. The following month, he tweeted about the mass shooting in San Bernardino, Calif., 90 minutes afterthe violence began. It took fewer than 12 hours from the time an EgyptAir flight went missing in May 2016for Trump to speculate publicly that the attack was terror-related. More than a year later, its still not clear what happened to the plane.

When terrorists drove a van into a crowd on London Bridge earlier this month, Trump tweeted about the need to be smart, vigilant and tough even before authorities identified terror as the motive behind the attack.

About 15 hours ago, as of this writing, a man drove a van into a group of Muslims near a mosque in London. The attack, which killed one person and injured 10 others, is being treated as terror-related by authorities in Britain. Prime Minister Theresa May described the attack as every bit as sickening as the attacks at the London Bridge and, earlier this year, on Westminster Bridge.

[Van strikes crowd near London mosques in terrorist attack]

Trump tweeted his condolences to the victims of those twoearlier attacks both linked to the Islamic State the same day they happened.Trump has nottweeted about Sunday nights attack on Muslims.

President Trump tends to quickly tweet about potential terrorist attacks, but he has drawn criticism for reacting slowly to recent attacks in Oregon and Kansas. (Bastien Inzaurralde/The Washington Post)

In response to a crisis, one of the simplest responses from a president is a carefully worded statement of support, condolence or outrage. Simpler still is a brief message on social media. Trump built his political career in part on his willingness to jump into any number of frays by tweeting about them. As weve noted in the past, he shows little reticence to tweet about things he sees on television right after he sees them. Yet, Monday morning: silence.

Trumps use of Twitter betrays his interests and disinterests. On Sunday, Fathers Day, Trump tweeted, in order:

That Trumphasnt mentioned the attacks on Muslims in London isnt surprising, mind you. It took days for him to praise the two men who were stabbed to death in Portland, Ore., while defending Muslim women on a train. It took almost a week for him to speak out about the shooting of two Indian men in Kansas by someone who thought that they were Muslim. In one sense, its odd that Trump hasnt tweeted condolences to the victims in London, given the criticism hes received for his slow response to the above attacks but, again, its not surprising that he hasnt, given his history.

The Washington Post's Karla Adam explains how an attack near two mosques in London on June 19 is effecting the city's Muslim residents. (Karla Adam,Sarah Parnass/The Washington Post)

[Brave and selfless Oregon stabbing victims hailed as heroes for standing up to racist rants]

The broader question is why Trump remains uninterested in acknowledging such attacks.

One likely explanation is that Trump seesattacks by people of the Muslim faith through the lens of a rampant anti-Western ideology but views attacks on Muslims as being one-off examples of bad actors. The emergence of al-Qaeda and the Islamic State reinforced the idea that theres a substantial, organized subset of the worlds Muslim population focused on political violence.

Absent those groups, attacks like the one on Westminster Bridge or at Orlandos Pulse nightclub might more easily be treated as aberrant individual actions in the way that the attack on Muslims in London will be treated in some quarters. That theres a strong but largely disorganized anti-Muslim undercurrent in Western societies that can make Muslims a target of violence lacks the sort of readily identifiable markers as a coordinated terror group, especially for those unwilling to see them.

[An attack on Muslims leaving a mosque in London is exactly what ISIS wanted]

In June 2015, when a white gunman shotnine black worshipers dead at a church in Charleston, S.C., shortly after Trump announced his presidential candidacy, Trump tweeted about it.

It was incomprehensible in the sense that murdering nine people at church is an affront to our sense of humans as rational creatures. It was entirely comprehensible in the sense that a white man who held racist views might target black people in a shooting spree.

To view attacks by Muslims as part of what being Muslim is about but attacks on Muslims as being distinct from the identities of the perpetrators demands seeing those two groups as fundamentally different. Trump has a presumption of guilt for Muslims that he doesnt for the white peoplewho committed the crimes in Kansas, Portland and at the London mosque.

[Londons Muslim mayor ignores Trumps latest taunts, despite ongoing feud]

Its interesting to compareTrumpsresponse to the Charleston shooting with his response to the 1980s rape of a white woman in Central Park, for which a group of black and Hispanic teenagers were arrested and which prompted Trump to buy a full-page ad calling for thedeath penalty for the accused.

Those teenagers were later exonerated when another man admitted to the crime. But Trump, even as recently as last October, seemed to believethat the teenagers werethe perpetrators. They admitted they were guilty. The police doing the original investigation say they were guilty, Trump said last year eliding the critical point that the confessions were obtained under duress. In Trumps eyes, those teenagers are guilty despite the judicial system rescinding that verdict.

Trumps presidential campaign and therefore his presidency relied on the idea that America was under threat from terrorism and crime, apoint of view that necessarily overlapped with Americas complex racial history. Thats the other reason Trump highlights terrorist acts by Muslims and ignores those against them: He has reapedpolitical rewards from it.

Trump views terrorism through a very particular lens, and hewon the presidency by articulating that lens. That its reflected in his Twitter account, then, isnot a surprise.

Follow this link:

Why won't Donald Trump rush to tweet criticism of attacks against Muslims? - Washington Post

Is bragging about the Panama Canal Trump’s latest gaffe? The Internet thinks so. – Washington Post

President Trump declines to respond when asked if he's under investigation by Robert Mueller, the special counsel handling the Russia probe. (Reuters)

As the cameras flashed, President Trump said that he and the Panamanian president seated beside him had lots of things to discuss but he seemed to home in on just one specific thing.

The Panama Canal is doing quite well. I think we did a good job building it, right a very good job. Trump said.

President Juan Carlos Varela interjected: Yeah, about 100 years ago.

But things are going well in Panama, Trump continued later, hammering home his point.

Within minutes, Twitter had seized on what it deemed the latest Trump gaffe.

A brief recap. On Monday, Trump was hosting Varela and his wife, Lorena a relatively routine meeting of heads of state at the White House. Statements were made. Pictures were taken.

About 103 years before that, the United States completed construction on the Panama Canal, a 50-mile ribbon of water across the Central American nation thatconnected the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, providing an all-water route for ships traversing the globe.

[Sweden has no idea what Trump meant when he said, You look at whats happening in Sweden]

The United States ceded control of the canal to Panama in 1999. An expanded canal that holds bigger ships opened last year.

It's still too early to tell where Trump's Panama remarks will fit in the pantheon of the president's verbal gaffes.

It would be hard to unseat the covfefe incident from last month. Just after midnight May 31, Trump tweeted, despite the constant negative press covfefe, and then, apparently, hit send and went to bed.

Someone deleted the sentence fragment hours later, but not before covfefe spread like wildfire. It trended on Twitter and inspired a thousand memes.

And the Panama Canal comments haven'tinspired the same animosity as Trump's Frederick Douglass remarks on the first day of Black History Month. That's when the Internet was fairly certain that Trump believed Douglass was a person who was still alive. (For the record, he's not.)

Frederick Douglass is an example of somebody whos done an amazing job and is getting recognized more and more, I notice, the president said. He made the statement during a listening session with black voters.

President Trump and press secretary Sean Spicer highlighted Frederick Douglass on Feb. 1, the first day of Black History Month. Trump said that Douglass, the former slave, abolitionist, author and vice-presidential candidate, "is an example of somebody who's done an amazing job and is being recognized more and more, I notice." (The Washington Post)

And Trump was lampooned for talking about a terrorist attack in Sweden that never actually happened.

At a Florida rally in February,Trump mentioned several countries that had been attacked by terrorists after taking in refugees.

Weve got to keep our country safe, he said. You look at whats happening in Germany. You look at whats happening last night in Sweden. Sweden, who would believe this?

Apparently, no one. No attack occurred there.

The Late Show host Stephen Colbert even published a video montage, encouraging his viewers to never fjorget the people who didn't perish in the Swedish attacks.

Then a video montage flashed images of the Swedes who were not lost: Swedish Fish, Ikea, the pop group Abba even the Muppet known as the Swedish Chef.

Read more:

Trump implied Frederick Douglass was alive. The abolitionists family offered a history lesson.

A pastor wrote a book about being a better man. Weeks later, he was caught naked, in an affair.

An ex-NFL player claims he inspired a Gears of War character and he wants a cut

Stephen Colbert calls Donald Trump a liar over and over and over again

Read more here:

Is bragging about the Panama Canal Trump's latest gaffe? The Internet thinks so. - Washington Post