Donald Trump’s ‘Civil War’ Tweet Is Seditious and a ‘Grave Crime,’ Retired Army Officer Says – Newsweek

A retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel and former Fox News analyst has accused President Donald Trump of sedition for tweeting about the threat of civil war if the ongoing impeachment investigation eventually unseats him.

Retired Lieutenant Colonel Ralph Peters was once a regular contributor to Fox News as a military analyst. He has described the network as "amoral" and "opportunistic" since severing ties with Fox News and becoming a fierce critic of both the network and of Trump.

On Sunday, Trump tweeted a quote from evangelical pastor Robert Jeffress. "If the Democrats are successful in removing the President from office (which they will never be), it will cause a Civil War like fracture in this Nation from which our Country will never heal," the tweet read, attributed to Jeffress.

Speaking with host Anderson Cooper on CNN on Monday, Peters said the president is inciting violence and undermining the Constitution.

Cooper asked Peters what his reaction to the tweet was, to which the retired officer replied, "One word: sedition."

"Trump is inciting violence against the legitimate government of the United States and the constitutional order," he continued. "And, Anderson, that is a grave crime. You can argue about the meaning of treason, what constitutes it, what doesn'tsedition is very clear cut."

"Also I have to say there's not going to be a civil war," Peters added. "Knock that off. I've been hearing people on the extreme right saying it for years." The retired officer also noted "the irony of a draft-dodger talking up war."

Trump's civil war tweet was just one of a flurry of messages sent over the weekend, lashing out at the nascent impeachment investigation announced last week. Peters suggested the president's belligerence is evidence of his difficult position, beset by multiple investigations and facing a tough re-election campaign.

"Trump, he's afraid. He's a frightened, frightened man," Peters told Cooper. "If he loses the electionand it's not a forgone conclusion that he will but if he doeshe'll face the rest of his life in courtrooms...perhaps in prison." Peters added that Trump is "an embarrassment that cannot be measured."

Peters also had harsh words for the Republican lawmakers who are still backing the president, despite the embarrassing and incriminating revelations of recent weeks. Peters described the party as a "terrible disappointment" that has abandoned the rule of law and the constitution.

"You see Republicans on Capitol Hill just cowering, just cowering, afraid of Donald Trump, this bloated old charlatan who never served in any capacity," Peters said.

"And all these Republican patriots who served, they're running to make excuses for him, cringing," he continued, acknowledging that his "views are strong on this."

Trump's now-infamous phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky showed that he pressed Zelensky to investigate 2020 candidate Joe Biden over debunked allegations of corruption. Critics have cited the exchange as yet more evidence of Trump's transactional approach to politics and the prioritization of his own personal interests.

"With this president, it's always been said everything is transactional, relationships are transactional," Cooper said.

Peters concurred, replying: "Trump is all about Trump is all about Trump. And I really feel sorry for the people who voted for him who convinced themselves that this man is a patriot." But Peters also defended those Trump supporters who he argued had been deserted by the two main parties.

"They were abandoned by both political parties as the Republicans became the party of high finance, the Democrats became the party of high society," Peters told Cooper. "People went ignored, utterly ignored."

Read more:

Donald Trump's 'Civil War' Tweet Is Seditious and a 'Grave Crime,' Retired Army Officer Says - Newsweek

Donald Trump’s wary White House deals with the threat of impeachment – USA TODAY

Impeaching a U.S. president might not be the be-all-end-allfor their career. We explain why this is the case. Just the FAQs, USA TODAY

WASHINGTON As the White House sought to convey a semblance of normalcy in the face of a growing crisis Thursday, President Donald Trump again attacked a new impeachment inquiry as a"disgrace" and a "terrible thing for our country."

It shouldnt be allowed there should be a way of stopping it,maybe legally through the courts,"Trump said as he returned to Washington after a week of activities with the United Nations in New York.

The whistleblower's complaint that sparked an impeachment inquiry into President Trump has been released. USA TODAY

Trump and his aides moved into communication overdrive in response to the threat of impeachment. They seekto counter the newly released complaint from an unidentified whistleblower andclaims that Trump improperly pressured Ukraine's president to investigate Democratic political rival Joe Biden.

After a high-profile House Intelligence Committee hearing on the whistleblower's allegations, Trump attacked the committee chairman, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and his colleagues.

"Here we go again," Trump said. "It's Adam Schiff and his crew making up stories and sitting there like pious, whatever you want to call them."

Schiff mocked the complaints:Im always flattered when Im attacked by someone of the presidents character."

As some White House aides tried to move the conversation back to other issues, Trump operating as his own communicationdirector hammered Democrats, the whistleblower and the media.

Some of his aides, privately,expressed anxiety about the furor.While televisions throughout the West Wing were tuned to the House Intelligence Committee hearing, they said they tryto stay focused on doing their jobs, part of which involves defending the president.

In statements and emails throughout the day, atthe White House and within Trump's reelection campaign, aides argued that the complaint doesn't go much beyond what wasn't already known.Butthe whistleblower'sreport alleged Ukraine officials were aware that Trump wanted to discuss the issue before the July 25 call at the center of the controversy and said aides tried to "lock down" notes from Trump's call to Ukraine.

President Donald Trump accuses the news media of blowing up a "nothing" call.(Photo: Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)

Nothing has changed with the release of this complaint, which is nothing more than a collection of third-hand accounts of events and cobbled-together press clippings all of which show nothing improper,"White House spokeswomanStephanie Grisham said in a statement less than a half-hour after the whistleblower document was released.

Some White House aides expressed frustration that reporters were focused on Ukraine and impeachment rather than the economy and immigration.

"I know theres a big hullabaloo, White House economic adviserLarry Kudlow said as he faced a litany of questions about theimpeachment inquiry. I dont see anything.

Trump declined to take questions throughout the day. White House reporters were summoned to the South Lawn for an unscheduled event Thursday evening that turned out to be a photo-op with the president and law enforcement officials.The officers broke out into applause and chants of "U-S-A" asTrump waved to reporters, who shouted unanswered questions about the whistleblower.

Later,administration officials announced the U.S. will dramatically reduce the number of refugees allowed to resettle in the country next year permitting no more than 18,000peoplefleeing war, violence and persecution.

And Trump's campaign announced a rally in Minneapolis next month.

Refugees: Trump sets lowest cap ever on refugees

'I thought it was dead': Trump says he thought threat ended with Mueller report

Grisham and other aidesstressed that the whistlebloweracknowledged he did not witness most of the events described, relying on statements from unidentified White House officials.

Aides noted that Trump released a summary of thephone call between him and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

The whistleblower complaint provides moredetails of Trump's interactions with the Ukrainianleaderand suggests that Trump and aides tried to cover up his pushfora foreign country to investigate a rival before the 2020 election by storing the notes of the call in a separate computer system reserved for highly sensitive material.

The whistleblower said some administration officials expressed concern that Trump "used the power of his office" to benefit himselfand his reelection campaign.

Some officials were "deeply disturbed" by Trump's actions and discussed how to treat details of the call because they feared "they had witnessed the president abuse his office for personal gain," the whistleblower said.

President Donald Trump says there was nothing improper in his discussions with Ukraine's president.(Photo: SAUL LOEB, AFP/Getty Images)

Team Trump pushed back on these contentions in a variety of ways, including bombarding reporters and voters with emails, commentsand social media postings.

"The president released the full transcript of his phone call yesterday. It showed nothing inappropriate, despite false media reports to the contrary," tweeted Matt Wolking, deputy director of communicationfor rapid response with Trump's reelection campaign.

In addition to his brief remarks to reporters,Trump used his standard method of communication: Twitter.

Though not directly addressing the whistleblower's claims, Trump sent out a string of tweets and retweets defending himself and denouncing the impeachment drive.

He wrote,"THE DEMOCRATS ARE TRYING TO DESTROY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AND ALL THAT IT STANDS FOR. STICK TOGETHER, PLAY THEIR GAME, AND FIGHT HARD REPUBLICANS. OUR COUNTRY IS AT STAKE!"

At Joint Base Andrews after returning from New York, Trump said the phone call to Ukraine "was perfect," and "the president yesterday of Ukraine said there was no pressure put on him whatsoever, none whatsoever."

Skeptics said Trump and his communicationteam have their work cut out for them.

"They are just going after the process and the messenger," said Mimi Rocah, a former federal prosecutor in New York. "Because if the message in the complaint is accurate and everything suggests it is, including the White House call summaryits devastating."

Trump and other administration officials sought to project the idea of business as usual, from presidential fundraisers in New York to an immigration briefing at the White House though Trump said Democrats are getting in the way.

"They're going to tie up our country," he said. "We can't talk about gun regulation. We can't talk about anything, because frankly they're so tied up."

As Washington was glued to the testimony of acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire, the White House trotted out nearly a dozen federal and local law enforcement and immigration officials to discuss a favorite topic: immigration and so-called sanctuary city policies.

Flanked by county sheriffs, acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement Matthew Albence blasted cities and counties that ignore federal requests to hold in jail immigrants in the country illegally.

Trump and other Republicans pointed to crimes committed by immigrants released by cities. The federal requests are the subject of litigation, and leaders of sanctuary jurisdictions noted their power to hold a person in jail for a civil immigration violation is murky.

Its time to publicly call out those who would put politics over public safety, Albence told a sparsely populated briefing room in the White House.

Albence dismissed questions about the timing of the news conference, given the other news story consuming Washington.

We started planning this several weeks ago, he said.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/09/26/donald-trumps-wary-white-house-deals-with-the-threat-of-impeachment/3772927002/

Read the original here:

Donald Trump's wary White House deals with the threat of impeachment - USA TODAY

How the Trump White House is Abusing the Record-Keeping System – POLITICO

Susan Walsh/AP Photo

1600 Penn

By SAMANTHA VINOGRAD

September 29, 2019

Samantha Vinograd is a CNN national security analyst. She served on the White House National Security Council for four years under President Barack Obama and in the Treasury Department under President George W. Bush. Follow her on Twitter @sam_vinograd.

Heavy public attentionas well as congressional scrutinyis focused on President Donald Trumps engagements with foreign leaders. Its now public that, after 2 years of having controversial conversations with his counterparts, Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate one of his political rivals: former Vice President Joe Biden. The now-declassified call readout and the complaint filed by a whistleblower who had concerns about the call have unlocked a Pandoras box of potential abuses of power, including extraordinary steps by the presidents team to restrict access to readouts of his conversations or not to document them at all.

According to new reporting, Trumps teamwe dont know whether it was at his direction or notmisused and abused the process for documenting and distributing readouts of several of his conversations, including his July 25 call with Zelensky and other calls with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Russian President Vladimir Putin. This is on top of earlier reports that Trump concealed the contents of meetings with Putin, including in 2017 when he reportedly took an interpreters notes and instructed the interpreter not to share a readout with other administration officials. That same reporting indicated there is no detailed record of five of Trumps encounters with Putin over the past two years.

Story Continued Below

Presidents dont get to pick and choose whether they accurately document their conversations for the record. The Presidential Records Act requires that they do so. Tampering with readouts or failing to file them at all breaks that law.

The process of reading out and documenting presidential conversations isnt just a matter of upholding the Presidential Records Act, though. Its critical to ensuring that relevant officials on the U.S. national security team have the information they need to effectively perform their responsibilities. When presidents dont keep their team in the loop, national security suffers.

Heres how its supposed to work: During presidential calls and video conferences, staff from the White House Situation Room take notes in real time. Those note-takers compare their notes with those taken by other officials authorized to listen to the call often a director or senior director from the National Security Council who has responsibility for the country the president is speaking withand together they work to compile an official readout. These memorandums, which should be drafted and reviewed soon after the call while its contents are fresh in everyones minds, are intended to be as close to verbatim as possible. Thats why there is more than one note-taker assigned to the callso that note-takers can compare notes for accuracy.

The draft readout should then be sent to the national security advisers office for review. The national security adiviser historically has been either physically present or on the line for presidential calls so he or she may also have some edits to the draft readout. If former national security adviser John Bolton was not included in Trumps calls, that would be a major break with past practice. According to the whistleblower complaint, several White House staff were on the presidents call with Zelensky, but we dont yet know if Bolton was one of them.

Once the national security adviser approves the final readout for the recordoften called a MEMCON or memorandum of conversationhe or she also approves a distribution list. This step is important: It ensures U.S. officials have the information they need to perform their responsibilities, while also making sure those without a need to know what happened dont.

The distribution list should typically include certain key officials, including the director of national intelligence, CIA director and secretary of State. The list should also include other officials named on the call or who have follow ups from it. For example, Trump and Zelensky discussed military sales on their July 25 call, which means Secretary of Defense Mark Esper should have seen the readout so he could follow up with the Ukrainians regarding those sales.

Attorney General William Barr was specifically named to follow up during Trumps call with Zelensky. Trump told the Ukrainian president that Barr and Trumps personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani would call Zelensky. Yet the Department of Justice claims Barr didnt hear about the calls contents until weeks after, and that when he did get a readout he was surprised and angry that Trump grouped him with Giuliani. The reported failure to get Barr a readout is a major process foul. For one, he was named as a point of contact for Zelenskys team. But also, White House officials should have had legal concerns after Trump asked Zelensky to do him a favor by looking into Biden. The national security adviser should have flagged these legal concerns to Barr, even if Barr hadnt been assigned to call Zelensky.

According to the whistleblower complaint, while Barr did not get a readout, multiple White House officials had direct knowledge of the call and were deeply disturbed by it. Hearing about the call, White House lawyersprobably concerned with the presidents potential abuse of powerworked to lock down the official written readout of the call so that fewer people could see it.

How did White House officials work to lock down the call? They reportedly moved the readout to the codeword systema system with highly restricted access only available to people with very specific and top level access to intelligence. The codeword system is supposed to be used only for readouts, memos and communications that are classified at a codeword level. It is separate from the top secret level system in which readouts are usually drafted and distributed, informally called the high side by White House staff.

The MEMCON of the Zelensky call, which didnt deal with sensitive intelligence information, was classified as secret, according to the header at the top of the now declassified document. That level is well below codeword. And yet the readout was inappropriately sent to the codeword system. The White House is claiming its actions were motivated by a desire to limit leaks, but its also possible it wanted to hide information that could be damaging to the president.

The Trump White House has also reportedly abused the process for documenting in-person meetings with foreign leaders. In Trumps infamous 2017 Oval Office meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrovin which he shared sensitive intelligence about an ongoing intelligence operationsomeone should have been assigned to take notes and send a draft readout to the national security adviserH.R. McMaster in this casefor review and distribution.

Then, the national security adviser should have approved and distributed a MEMCON to relevant officials, and the MEMCON should have been filed for the presidential record. This time, because Trump reportedly shared codeword-level intelligence with the Russians, the MEMCON should likely have been written and distributed on the codeword-level system. Recent reporting indicates that Trump also said during that meeting he was unconcerned about Russian election interference. Comments like that make distributing a MEMCON to appropriate personnel particularly important.

But, a readout of the meetingwe dont know if it was a formal written readout or a verbal onewas reportedly limited to an "unusually" small group of people, which could indicate a failure to get the readout to those who needed it to do their jobs. The departments of Justice, Homeland Security and State and members of the intelligence community needed to know that the president had undercut their efforts to secure our elections so that they could regroup and figure out next steps, not to mention to try to convince him of how dangerous his comments were from a national security standpoint. Furthermore, if anyone failed to brief relevant officials on what transpired, that would mean that our own team didnt know something that the Russians did. The Russians could use that to manipulate or bribe the president.

While much attention is being paid to written readouts of presidential calls and meetings, they are not the only way readouts are delivered. Because these formal readouts take time to finalize, the national security adviser or an authorized member of his or her team often gives verbal readouts to key officials. This way there isnt a lag in passing on information about the presidents conversations that require immediate follow up and key officials are as up to speed as their foreign counterparts. Some State Department officials reportedly got a verbal readout of the presidents July 25 call with Zelensky. According to the whistleblower, State officials met with the Ukrainians the day after the call to navigate the Presidents demands, eventually connecting Giuliani with the Ukrainians.

By restricting access to call readouts, not writing them at all, and apparently not even giving relevant Cabinet officials verbal readouts when they were discussed on a presidential call, the presidents team made some major process fouls. But, if this looks like a comedy of errors, it is likely a well-orchestrated one. Only senior White House officialslike the national security adviser, chief of staff or the president himselfhave the authority to disturb the process in these damaging ways.

See the original post here:

How the Trump White House is Abusing the Record-Keeping System - POLITICO

Donald Trump’s windmill hatred is a worry for booming industry – New York Post

BLOCK ISLAND, R.I. The winds are blowing fair for Americas wind power industry, making it one of the fastest-growing US energy sources.

Land-based turbines are rising by the thousands across America, from the remote Texas plains to farm towns of Iowa. And the US wind boom now is expanding offshore, with big corporations planning $70 billion in investment for the countrys first utility-scale offshore wind farms.

We have been blessed to have it, says Polly McMahon, a 13th-generation resident of Block Island, where a pioneering offshore wind farm replaced the islands dirty and erratic diesel-fired power plant in 2016. I hope other people are blessed too.

But theres an issue. And its a big one. President Donald Trump hates wind turbines.

Hes called them disgusting and ugly and stupid, denouncing them in hundreds of anti-wind tweets and public comments dating back more than a decade, when he tried and failed to block a wind farm near his Scottish golf course.

And those turbine blades. They say the noise causes cancer, Trump told a Republican crowd last spring, in a claim immediately rejected by the American Cancer Society.

Now, wind industry leaders and supporters fear that the federal government, under Trump, may be pulling back from what had been years of encouragement for climate-friendly wind.

The Interior Department surprised and alarmed wind industry supporters in August, when the agency unexpectedly announced it was withholding approval for the countrys first utility-scale offshore wind project, a $2.8 billion complex of 84 giant turbines. Slated for building 15 miles (24 kilometers) off Marthas Vineyard, Massachusetts. Vineyard Wind has a brisk 2022 target for starting operations. Its Danish-Spanish partners already have contracts to supply Massachusetts electric utilities.

Investors backing more than a dozen other big wind farms are lined up to follow Vineyard Wind with offshore wind projects of their own. Shells renewable-energy offshoot is among the businesses ponying up for federal leases, at bids of more than $100 million, for offshore wind farm sites.

The Interior Department cited the surge in corporate interest for offshore wind projects in saying it wanted more study before moving forward. It directed Vineyard Wind to research the overall impact of the East Coasts planned wind boom.

Interior Department spokesman Nicholas Goodwin said offshore energy remains an important component in the Trump administrations energy strategy. But the strategy includes ensuring activities are safe and environmentally responsible, Goodwin said in a statement.

Wind power now provides a third or more of the electricity generated in some Southwest and Midwest states. And New York, New Jersey and other Eastern states already are joining Massachusetts in planning for wind-generated electricity.

Along with the US shale oil boom, the rise in wind and solar is helping cushion oil supply shocks like the recent attack on Saudi oil facilities.

But the Interior Departments pause on the Vineyard Wind project sent a chill through many of the backers of the offshore wind boom. Critics contrast it with the Republican administrations moves to open up offshore and Arctic areas to oil and gas development, despite strong environmental concerns.

That I think is sort of a new bar, for the federal government to require developers to assess the impact of not just their projects but everyones, said Stephanie McClellan, a researcher and director of the Special Initiative on Offshore Wind at the University of Delaware. That worries everybody.

Thomas Brostrom, head of US operations for Denmarks global offshore wind giant Orsted and operator of the pioneering Block Island wind farm, said that the last three, four years have seen unbelievable, explosive growth, much more than we could have really hoped for, in the US, compared to Europes already established wind power industry.

Given all the projects in development, we hope that this is a speed bump, and certainly not a roadblock, Brostrom said.

Wind power and the public perception of it have changed since Americas first proposed big offshore wind project, Cape Wind off Cape Cod, Massachusetts, died an agonizing 16-year death. Koch and Kennedy families alike, along with other coastal residents, reviled Cape Wind as a potential bird-killing eyesore in their ocean views.

But technological advances since then mean wind turbines can rise much farther offshore, mostly out of sight, and produce energy more efficiently and competitively. Climate change and the damage it will do these same coastal communities also has many looking at wind differently now.

Federal fisheries officials have been among the main bloc calling for more study, saying they need to know more about the impacts on ocean life. Some fishing groups still fear their nets will tangle in the massive turbines, although Vineyard Winds offer to pay millions of dollars to offset any harm to commercial fishing won the support of others. At least one Cape Cod town council also withheld support.

A rally for Vineyard Wind after the Interior Department announced its pause drew local Chamber of Commerce leaders and many other prominent locals. Massachusetts Republican governor, Charlie Baker, has been traveling to Washington and calling Interior Secretary David Bernhardt to try to win his support.

At Cape Cod Community College in West Barnstable, instructor Chris Powickis Offshore Wind 101 classes and workshop have drawn nuclear and marina workers, engineers, young people and others. People are hoping wind will provide the kind of good-paying professions and trades they need to afford to stay here, Powicki says.

Cape Cod has always been at the end of the energy supply line, or at least ever since we lost our dominance with the whale oil industry after the 19th century, the community college instructor said. So this is an opportunity for Cape Cod to generate its own energy.

On land, the wind boom already is well established. By next year, 9% of the countrys electricity is expected to come from wind power, according to the US Energy Information Administration. The wind industry already claims 114,000 jobs, more than twice the number of jobs remaining in US coal mining, which is losing out in competition against cleaner, cheaper energy sources despite the Trump administrations backing of coal.

The Trump animosity to wind power has gone beyond words in some states, especially in Ohio. A Trump campaign official was active this summer in winning a state ratepayer subsidy for coal and nuclear that also led to cutting state incentives for wind and solar.

But despite the steady gales of condemnation from the countrys wind-hater in chief, wind is booming most strongly in states that voted for Trump.

Then-Texas Gov. Rick Perry, now Trumps energy secretary, pushed his state to one of the current top-four wind power states, along with Oklahoma, Kansas and Iowa.

In Iowa, home to nearly 4,700 turbines that provided a third of the states electricity last year, winds popularity is such that Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley had a drone film him as he sat, grinning, atop one of the countrys biggest wind turbines.

Grassley had no patience for Trumps claim in April that wind turbines like Iowas beloved ones could cause cancer.

Idiotic, Grassley said then.

On the East Coast, many developers and supporters of offshore wind politely demur when asked about Trumps wind-hating tweets and comments.

But not on Block Island.

Were very fortunate that we got it. Very fortunate. Its helped us, McMahon, the retiree on Block Island, said of wind energy. And dont worry about the president. Hes not a nice man.

Continued here:

Donald Trump's windmill hatred is a worry for booming industry - New York Post

Forget impeachment. Donald Trump needs to resign – The Boston Globe

As the historian Rick Perlstein, author of The Invisible Bridge: The Fall of Nixon and the Rise of Reagan, pointed out to me, in the weeks and months after the Saturday Night Massacre in October 1973, prominent members of Congress from both parties called on President Nixon to resign, including Senator Walter Mondale, a Minnesota Democrat, and Senator Edward Brooke, a Massachusetts Republican. Time magazine made the same demand in its first-ever editorial.

After the release of the smoking gun tape that showed Nixon had participated in a criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice, Republican senators, led by Barry Goldwater, solemnly trekked to the White House to tell Nixon he must relinquish the presidency.

In 1998, when the Starr Report was released with its exhaustive tale of President Bill Clintons affair with Monica Lewinsky, 115 newspapers penned editorials calling on Clinton to resign. This week, just a couple of editorial boards have made a similar demand of Trump.

The summary of Trumps phone conversation with Zelensky suggests a malfesance thats arguably worse than Nixons. Yet, not only have Republicans failed to call for resignation, few are even willing to acknowledge that what the president did was wrong. Democrats have been equally reluctant to use the r word.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand infamously helped to push Al Franken out of the Senate by calling for him to resign. Not long after, she was among a group of Democrats who called on Trump to step down over a series of sexual assault allegations in what looked like an attempt to show consistency after the Franken imbroglio.

Earlier this year, when pictures emerged of Governor Ralph Northam of Virginia in blackface, Democrats fell over each other making similar calls. Same with the states lieutenant governor, Justin Fairfax, after allegations of sexual assault were made against him. Neither man resigned and considering that Frankens decision to leave the Senate is now viewed by many Democrats as a mistake, perhaps the new normal is simply to weather the storm.

But with Trump, the lack of resignation calls almost certainly has more to do with the fact that everyone knows hed never do it. Why bother making an ask that will just be cited by Republican as evidence of partisan intent and ignored?

Heres one reason: A call for resignation is a statement of principle that Trumps actions so clearly violate the public trust that his position in office has become untenable. Its an acknowledgment that the president has lost his moral standing and must do the right thing and surrender power. Perhaps above all, its drawing a line in the sand and saying that this behavior is egregious and theres only one right course of action for the president.

A call for resignation is as much about the moral and ethical standards of the person making the demand as the target himself or herself.

Of course, the standard of doing whats best for the country is a quaint nostrum in Trumps America.

When you have a president so completely immune from shame; and when he is enabled by a political party so infected by partisanship that winning is more important than acknowledging wrongdoing and holding leaders accountable, the idea of a selfless political act has become almost laughably antiquated.

Perhaps the most dispiriting element of the whistle-blowers complaint is that multiple individuals around the president all of whom swore an oath to uphold the Constitution appear to have understood he committed a grave abuse of power, and then went to great lengths to cover it up. The heroism of the whistle-blower is sadly matched by the cowardice of Trumps enablers.

Democrats are, of course, right to call for Trumps impeachment. Same goes for the nations editorial boards. But are they so inured to the presidents unending malfeasance, corruption, and law-breaking that they cant make the obvious call for resignation?

Trump should of course step down. He should have done it a long time ago. Its not a close call. Stating that publicly is not an example of partisan bomb-throwing, rather its the precise opposite: a principled recognition that some things are more important than politics.

Michael A. Cohens column appears regularly in the Globe. Follow him on Twitter @speechboy71.

Original post:

Forget impeachment. Donald Trump needs to resign - The Boston Globe

NY Republican and Trump ally to change his plea in corruption case – MSNBC

When Rep. Chris Collins (R-N.Y.) was brought up on federal felony charges last year, he initially tried to back out of his re-election campaign. When state laws got in the way, the New York Republican reversed course and local voters re-elected him anyway in the single reddest congressional district in the northeast.

After pleading not guilty three weeks ago, Collins said he hadnt yet decided whether to run again in 2020. It now appears his future plans have taken an unexpected turn. NBC News reported this morning:

The first member of Congress to announce his support for Donald Trumps presidential bid is likely to plead guilty Tuesday to charges relating to insider trading, according to documents filed in federal court Monday.

Rep. Chris Collins, R-N.Y., is scheduled to appear for a change of plea hearing in a Manhattan courtroom at 3 p.m. Tuesday. Collins pleaded not guilty to insider trading and several other charges when he was first indicted in 2018. Experts say the hearing means he is likely changing his plea to guilty.

Assuming there isnt another dramatic shift, when Collins changes his plea, the legal process will likely advance to the sentencing phase. If the GOP lawmaker ends up in prison, its a safe bet hell have to give up his House seat, though its too soon to say how quickly this might happen. [Update: see below.]

Broadly speaking, there are a couple of angles to the controversy to keep in mind. The first is that the evidence against Collins was pretty brutal.

As regular readers may recall, Collins was a major investor in an Australian biomedical firm called Innate Immunotherapeutics he also sat on the companys board while allegedly pushing legislation intended to benefit the company.

The Daily Beast reported last year that Collins has sponsored several bills that would have benefited Innate Immunotherapeutics, while also trying to make changes to a government program that would save the company millions of dollars if its drug is approved by the FDA.

That came on the heels of a New York Times report, based on findings from the Office of Congressional Ethics, which said that Collins may have violated federal law by sharing nonpublic information about a company on whose board he served, and may have broken House ethics rules by meeting with the National Institutes of Health and asking for help with the design of a clinical trial being set up by the company.

According to prosecutors, Innate Immunotherapeutics CEO emailed the congressman a couple of summers ago, letting Collins know about an unsuccessful clinical trial, which would inevitably push the companys stock lower. Within six minutes, the lawmaker allegedly reached out to his son, who in turn contacted his fiances father, all of whom engaged in timely trades of the companys stock.

As NBC News reported a while back, On June 26, news of the failed drug trial was made public and the stock took a nosedive. The defendants managed to avoid more than $768,000 in losses, prosecutors allege.

According to the Buffalo News, Collins co-defendants also plan to change their plea.

Meanwhile, the other thing to remember about this case is that Donald Trump, whose 2016 candidacy Collins championed, complained publicly about the New York congressmans indictment, suggesting the Justice Department should have considered the Republican Partys electoral interests ahead of the 2018 midterms.

I continue to believe it was among the most indefensible moments of his presidency to date.

Update: Collins today submitted his letter of resignation. It takes effect tomorrow.

More:

NY Republican and Trump ally to change his plea in corruption case - MSNBC

Trump and Zelensky talked about his hotel – Vox.com

The Trump-Ukraine scandal has pushed most House Democrats to favor impeachment and properly focuses on President Donald Trumps systematic assault on American democracy. But the quasi-transcription of the phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky also sheds light on another aspect of Trump-era governance that has never achieved the level of attention it deserves: Trumps petty and not-so-petty corruption.

Trump, after telling Zelensky that he should expect future phone calls from Attorney General William Barr and personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, observes in his hazy Trumpian way that I have many Ukrainian friends, theyre incredible people.

Zelensky then takes the opportunity to pivot: I would like to tell you that I actually have a lot of Ukrainian friends that live in the United States. Actually, the last time I traveled to the United States I stayed in New York near Central Park and I stayed at the Trump Tower.

This is probably a reference to the Trump International Hotel and Tower near Columbus Circle in Manhattan rather than to Trump Tower itself, which is a few blocks away from the park and not a hotel. And its important not exactly because its surprising but because its a clear illustration of a dynamic thats become all too commonplace in Trumps Washington: People who want things from the American government make direct financial payments to companies the president runs.

Its an absurd and infuriating situation, and its toleration is at the core of Americas current political unraveling.

Back at the beginning of the month, when much of the news cycle was dominated by Trump lying about hurricane forecasts, Vice President Mike Pence was dispatched to Poland for a state visit so that Trump could spend more time golfing while pretending to be focused on the hurricane.

On his way back from Poland, Pence decided it would make sense for him to stop over in Ireland on his way back, stay two nights, and do a day of meetings. The meetings were, of course, in Dublin, which is both the capital of Ireland and by far its largest city.

But Pence, curiously, didnt stay in Dublin. Instead, his two nights were spent at a Trump-owned luxury resort thats about a three-hour drive away from the capital city commuting cross-country to make the meetings work.

This wasted a ton of time and cost almost $600,000 in limo rentals alone, but it helped line Trumps pockets. That scandal was soon overtaken by the revelation that the Air Force had been increasingly booking rooms at Trumps hotel in Scotland when service members needed to make overnight stopovers near Glasgow Prestwick Airport.

The airport, like basically every other airport in the world, is near a whole bunch of hotels. The Trump Turnberry Resort is 40 minutes away and much more expensive than the more conveniently located accommodations.

Trump also has subordinates in his organization kicking money up to him through his hotels. Barr hosting a $30,000 family holiday party at Trumps hotel in DC is the best-known example of this corruption. But, as David Fahrenthold, Jonathan OConnell, and Anu Narayanswamy reported last fall, its become commonplace for people in Republican politics to make sure the boss gets a cut on all kinds of political activities.

They identified a staggering $4.2 million in spending at Trump-owned properties by GOP congressional campaigns during the 2018 midterm cycle. Thats just money we happen to know about because federal political campaigns are required to itemize their expenses. Tons of other politics-related spending has no such requirements, and since Trump wont do any financial disclosures of his own we have no idea how much money is flowing into his pockets. But what we can tell from lobbying disclosures is that the total amount is not small, and much of it comes from people trying to influence the government.

Funneling public money into Trumps pocket by having the Secret Service rent Trump golf carts is bad. Wasting the vice presidents time, along with tons of public money, in order to have him stay at inconveniently located Trump properties is also bad. Detouring military personnel to out-of-the-way golf resorts is, similarly, a waste of time and money.

The IRS list of public corruption scandals is full of various, often obscure state and local government officials who get prosecuted and sent to jail for this kind of pocket-lining. Preventing theft of public funds is good and important, and its a bad sign though a telling one that public corruption prosecutions are down generally in the Trump era.

But this kind of graft doesnt necessarily distort the policymaking process in the way the other kind of graft where people who want favors from Trump pay him money does.

Yet thats exactly what the Ukrainians have been up to. As OConnell and Fahrenthold reported earlier this week, beyond Zelenskys stay we know that Giuliani and a top Zelensky aide met at Trumps D.C. hotel in July while a lobbyist who registered as an agent of Zelenskys with the U.S. government hosted a $1,900 event at the D.C. hotel in April according to properly filed lobbying paperwork. But whats more, internal hotel listings of VIP guests at the hotel, obtained by The Washington Post, show that Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, associates of Giulianis in his efforts to build connections with Ukraine, stayed at the hotel in April 2018 and were listed as Trump loyalty-card members and repeat customers.

In this particular case, the fact that the Ukrainians were trying to curry favor with Trump seems perhaps not so bad since their underlying cause is sympathetic. As weve seen from the Trump-Zelensky phone call, the basic dynamic here seems to be extortion: Trump refusing to give Ukraine aid money that Congress had appropriated unless Zelensky did him favors. Funneling a few thousand dollars of hotel fees and minibar charges into the coffers of the Trump Organization is frankly less destructive than concocting corruption charges against Joe Biden.

But Ukraine isnt the only country out there. Trump appears to be awash in Persian Gulf money, with existing reporting revealing multiple instances of six-figure checks from Saudi lobbyists or the Kingdom itself landing in Trumps hotels. We have no idea at all whats happening with his golf resort in Dubai. An Iraqi sheik whos been pushing for US military strikes on Iran spent 26 nights at Trumps hotel in DC.

Much of the reporting on this subject focuses on the question of people with links to foreign governments staying at Trump properties. Thats because this triggers legalistic issues related to the emoluments clause of the Constitution. But make no mistake, American influence peddlers from the oil lobby to the vaping lobby and beyond are paying Trump, too.

The problem with viewing this in an excessively legalistic way is that making a formal bribery case is extremely difficult.

As Sen. Robert Menendezs (D-NJ) acquittal shows, under current Supreme Court jurisprudence you need to demonstrate an incredibly clear and literal quid pro quo in order to win a bribery case. Thats difficult in almost any circumstance, but its completely impossible without things like extensive surveillance or a cooperating witness.

Youre obviously not going to get the FBI to bug the Oval Office as part of an ongoing corruption probe targeting the president of the United States, and even when you do have cooperators, its simply extremely rare for the nexus of money and political favors to involve the level of explicitness that current law requires.

The saving grace is that in general there are ethics rules binding public officials. If a police officer is accepting large cash gifts from a drug dealer or if a guy is paying city officials kids tuition at private school while winning lucrative city contracts, thats illegal right there whether or not you can establish the quid pro quo.

Federal conflict of interest law, however, specifically exempts the president and vice president from the normal legal rules. The theory is that politics ought to constrain their behavior. But in practice, the political system focuses very heavily on the legal details. There is a constitutional prohibition on the president receiving emoluments from foreign governments, so the lure of illegality has focused a lot of attention there. The OConnell/Fahrenthold reporting on Ukrainian payments to Trump goes out of its way to say it remains unclear whether the stays were illegal because of various questions about the exact details of the timing.

This says more about the backward state of American law and politics than anything else. Its not appropriate for the president to be receiving direct cash payments from people with business before the federal government. Hes given wide legal attitude to do so on the apparent theory that the political system will constrain presidential misconduct.

But that doesnt work if Congress and the public are trained to assess presidential conduct in narrow legalistic terms. You need common sense: The president of the United States should not be taking money from people who are asking him for favors.

The House Intelligence Committee released the whistleblower complaint minutes before Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire began his testimony before Congress.

Looking for a quick way to keep up with the never-ending news cycle? Host Sean Rameswaram will guide you through the most important stories at the end of each day.

Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Overcast, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

Link:

Trump and Zelensky talked about his hotel - Vox.com

Rouhani reportedly refused to take call with Trump and Macron during UN stay – The Guardian

Emmanuel Macrons efforts to persuade Hassan Rouhani to talk to his US counterpart went as far as installing a secure telephone line on the same hotel floor where the Iranian president was staying, it was reported on Monday.

Rouhani, however did not take the call offered by Macron last week, and stayed in his New York hotel room when the French president arrived to try to coax him into a conversation with Donald Trump, according to several accounts.

The story was first published in the New Yorker on Monday, and then the New York Times. It was confirmed to the Guardian by sources familiar with Tuesdays events, who stressed that at no point did Rouhani show interest in such a conversation with Macron and Trump.

In a desperate bid to engineer a three-way conversation, Macron had French technicians set up a line last Tuesday evening in a meeting room at the Millenium Hotel, across the road from the UN general assembly.

Rouhani was informed that as soon as he entered the room the conversation could start.

For months, Macron has been promoting a plan aimed at defusing tensions in the Persian Gulf, exchanging US sanctions relief for full Iranian compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal and Tehrans agreement to pursue broader talks.

Trump, however, has been ratcheting up sanctions in recent weeks and announced more punitive measures in his speech to the UN earlier the same day Macron wanted Rouhani to talk to him.

Irans economy has been hard hit by a US oil and banking embargo, and diplomatic sources in New York said it was never remotely likely Rouhani would speak to Trump without sanctions relief.

The Iranian president spoke by phone to Barack Obama at the UN in 2013 without the prior consent of Irans supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, and was heavily criticised after returning home.

Rouhani said on Monday that a return was possible to multilateral talks established at the time of the 2015 nuclear deal, that would include the US as part of a group of six major powers known as the P5+1.

According to the Entekhab news site, Rouhani said there was some readiness created for the P5+1 and that all 7 countries [Iran and the US] reached agreement over the P5+1 framework.

Rouhani said he would reveal more details at a cabinet meeting on Wednesday.

Iranian officials said that any direct contacts with the US would only be possible after sanctions imposed by the US over the past year are removed.

See the original post:

Rouhani reportedly refused to take call with Trump and Macron during UN stay - The Guardian

Donald Trump – IMDb

2008-2017The Apprentice(TV Series) (executive producer - 16 episodes)- Bon Voyage(2017)... (executive producer - as Donald J. Trump)2007Pageant Place(TV Series) (executive producer - 1 episode)2006Miss USA 2006(TV Special) (producer - as Donald J. Trump)2011Horrorween(Video)Forbes Cover Billionaire1997NightMan(TV Series)Donald Trump1996EddieDonald Trump2012H3 All Access(TV Series) (very special thanks - 3 episodes)2011Tower Heist(special thanks - as Donald J. Trump)2012-2019Hannity(TV Series)Himself / Himself - Presidential Candidate / Himself - Republican Presidential Nominee / ...2018-2019Credlin(TV Series)Himself2019History(TV Series documentary)2015-2019Face the Nation(TV Series)Himself - Presidential Candidate / Himself - GOP Presidential Candidate / Himself - 2016 GOP Presidential Candidate / ...- Episode #66.5(2019)... Himself - President of the United States of America (as President Donald Trump)2012-2019Justice w/Judge Jeanine(TV Series)Himself / Himself - Presidential Candidate / Himself - Republican Presidential Nominee / ...2018Outsiders(TV Series)Himself - US President / Himself- Episode #3.53(2018)... Himself - US President (as Donald J. Trump)2018BBC News 24(TV Series)Himself - George H. W. Bush Funeral Attendee (US President)- 05/12/2018 18:30(2018)... Himself - George H. W. Bush Funeral Attendee (US President)2018Six O'Clock News(TV Series)Himself - George H. W. Bush Funeral Attendee (US President)2015-2018Fox News Sunday(TV Series)Himself - Presidential Candidate / Himself - 2016 GOP Presidential Candidate / Himself - U.S. President / ...- Episode #23.46(2018)... Himself - U.S. President (as President Donald Trump)2017-2018BBC Weekend News(TV Series)Himself - US President / Himself - President of the United States of America2017-2018Sky World News(TV Series)Himself - President of the United States of America2018ITV Evening News(TV Series)Himself - President of the United States of America2015-201860 Minutes(TV Series documentary)Himself - President (segment "President Trump") / Himself - President Elect / Himself - Republican Presidential Candidate / ...2012-2018Fox and Friends(TV Series)Himself - Phone Interview / Himself / Himself - Presidential Candidate / ...2017-2018News at Ten(TV Series)Himself - President of the United States of America2016-2018Good Morning Britain(TV Series)Himself - President of the United States of America / Himself - President-Elect2017CNN Newsroom(TV Series)Himself / Himself - US President2017Panorama(TV Series documentary)Himself2006-2017Inside Edition(TV Series documentary)Himself / Himself - Author, Crippled America / Himself - 2016 Presidential Candidate2017Breakfast(TV Series)Himself - President of the United States of America2017Today(TV Series)Himself - US President2005-2016Extra(TV Series)Himself / Himself - Presidential Candidate / Himself - Republican Presidential Nominee / ...2016America Decides(TV Mini-Series)Himself - Republican Presidential Candidate / Himself - Republican Presidential Nominee- Episode #1.6(2016)... Himself - Republican Presidential Nominee- Episode #1.5(2016)... Himself - Republican Presidential Candidate (uncredited)- Episode #1.4(2016)... Himself - Republican Presidential Candidate- Episode #1.3(2016)... Himself - Republican Presidential Nominee- Episode #1.2(2016)... Himself - Republican Presidential Candidate (uncredited)2004-2016The O'Reilly Factor(TV Series)Himself / Himself - Presidential Candidate / Himself - Republican Presidential Candidate / ...2015-2016Media Buzz(TV Series)Himself - 2016 GOP Presidential Candidate / Himself - Republican Presidential Nominee / Himself - GOP Presidential Candidate / ...2015-2016This Week(TV Series)Himself - Presidential Candidate / Himself - 2016 GOP Presidential Candidate / Himself - Republican Presidential Nominee1990-2016Good Morning America(TV Series)Himself - 2016 GOP Presidential Candidate / Himself - 2016 Republican Presidential Candidate / Himself - Guest / ...2016SnowdenHimself (uncredited)2012-2016Feherty(TV Series)Himself2007-2016Today(TV Series)Himself - Guest / Himself - 2016 GOP Presidential Candidate / Himself - 2016 GOP Presidential Presumptive Nominee / ...2012-2016On the Record w/ Brit Hume(TV Series)Himself / Himself - Presidential Candidate / Himself - 2016 Presidential Candidate2007-2016Jimmy Kimmel Live!(TV Series)Himself - GOP Presidential Candidate / Himself - Presidential Candidate / Himself2015-2016Meet the Press(TV Series)Himself - Presidential Candidate / Himself - GOP Presidential Candidate / Himself - 2016 Presidential Candidate / ...201520/20(TV Series documentary)Himself - Presidential Candidate2014-2015Cashin' In(TV Series)Himself - 2016 GOP Presidential Candidate / Himself2004-2015The View(TV Series)Himself - Guest / Himself - 2016 GOP Presidential Candidate2015Metropolis(TV Mini-Series documentary)Himself2008-2013Real Sports with Bryant Gumbel(TV Series)Himself - Real Estate Developer (segment "Trump") / Himself - Real Estate Developer (segment "Par for the Course")2012Katie(TV Series)Himself - Guest2007-2012WWE Raw(TV Series)Himself1987-2010Larry King Live(TV Series)Himself / Himself - Interviewee / Himself - Guest200930 for 30(TV Series documentary)Himself - Owner, New Jersey Generals1994-2007Biography(TV Series documentary)Himself2006Getaway(TV Series documentary)Himself2005Martha(TV Series)Himself1992Charlie Rose(TV Series)Himself - Interviewed- Donald Trump(1992)... Himself - Interviewed (as Donald J. Trump)1989-1990Primetime(TV Series documentary)Himself / Himself - Guest (segment "Dressed for Excess")

More:

Donald Trump - IMDb

Seastead Institute, Ocean Builders promote seasteading: What …

Thai naval officers inspecting a a floating dwelling in the Andaman Sea.(Photo: Royal Thai Navy)

Seasteading, living on floating dwelling on oceans outside nation boundaries,is beingpromoted by groups that want to test new ideas on communal living in a utopian experiment.

One groupchampioning it is the Seasteading Institute, which claims that the sea, through "floating cities,"is a way to "allow the next generation of pioneers to peacefully test new ideas for how to live together."

Another is Ocean Builders a group that describes itself as "a team of engineering focused entrepreneurs who have a passion for seasteading and plans to sell dwellings.

A floating dwelling, 12 nautical miles off the coast of Phuket, Thailand, is part of a controversy involving a Michigan native and his girlfriend.(Photo: Royal Thai Navy)

Butthis week,Chad Elwartowski, a Michigan man who sought to live on the ocean in a prototype,octagon-shaped dwellingwith his girlfriend, a Thai citizen,is in deep water with theThai government, which alleges that he infringing on its national sovereignty.

Elwartowski said he is is now on the run, and could bebe imprisoned for life or suffer the death penalty if he and his girlfriend are caught.

The Seasteading Institute says that living in international waters on permanent platformsarea way to "allow the next generation of pioneers to peacefully test new ideas for how to live together."

Read more:

Michigan man living in ocean has desperate plea: Thai government 'wants us killed'

American cultural icon Smokey Bear gets a new look and voice for his 75th birthday

The institute was founded in 2008 by Patri Friedman a political economic theorist who also is the grandson of Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman and technology entrepreneur Peter Thiel.

It also is encouraging countries to pass legislation that could lead to moreseasteading projects.

Elwartowski, who moved into a seastead built by Ocean Builders,has suggestedthat seasteading efforts allow people a chanceto start over.

"It's basically a blank slate," he says in a YouTubevideo, promising that 20 more seasteads would be built based on what his experience. "Hopefully, with this great blank slate, we can create some great governance."

Contact Frank Witsil: 313-222-5022 or fwitsil@freepress.com.

Read or Share this story: https://www.freep.com/story/news/world/2019/04/18/seasteading-institute-chad-elwartowski/3509205002/

Read more:

Seastead Institute, Ocean Builders promote seasteading: What ...

Seasteading Bitcoin Fans Say They’re ‘On the Run’ From Thai …

It was supposed to be the first seastead in international watersa small white box protruding from the waves off the coast of Phuket, Thailand, occupied by two would-be pioneers who decided to live there in the pursuit of a new life unfettered by national laws.

But now, Chad Elwartowski and Supranee Thepdet (AKA Nadia Summergirl), say theyre on the run.

According to the Bangkok Post, the Royal Thai Navy filed a criminal complaint with police under a section of the criminal code that concerns threats to national sovereignty. Violations of this section of the criminal code are punishable by life in prison or death, the Post noted.

The six-meter wide structure, known as XLII, was supposed to be the first real application of seasteading, a libertarian idea that advocates for new societies to form on structures floating in international waters. According to Ocean Builders, the startup behind the project, the structure was allegedly located in international waters, 12 miles off the coast but still within Thailands exclusive economic zone.

After it launched in early 2019, Elwartowski and Thepdetvolunteers, according to Ocean Buildersmoved in. Elwartowski, a Bitcoin enthusiast, told me he had enough in cryptocurrency holdings to retire and Thepdet posts online as Bitcoin Girl Thailand. Joe Quirk, president of the Seasteading Institute advocacy group, directed a short documentary series about the pair, titled The First Seasteaders.

We were very enthusiastic about the idea of being able to live on the new frontier, Elwartowski told me in an email. It has been my dream for 10 years to live on a seastead. Nothing will take away the fact that I was able to be free for a few moments.

Trouble started, Elwartowski said, when the couple saw news reports about the government cracking down on their home while celebrating the ongoing Thai holiday of Songkranwhich began on Saturdayon land. Fearing the potentially stiff consequences, the pair bugged out, Elwartowski told me, a phrase that essentially means fleeing. When I first contacted Elwartowski through Ocean Builders site admin email, he said, We are on the run.

According to the Bangkok Post, the Royal Thai Navy sent officers to the XLII structure on Saturday and attempted to make radio contact with the occupants, but nobody replied.

Thai officials claim that XLII obstructs a shipping route, the Post reported. Elwartowski disputed this in an email, noting that the structure is small, located in an area rife with fishing boats, and outfitted with a solar anchor light as well as a navigation beacon for nearby ships.

When Motherboard contacted the US embassy in Thailand, an after-hours duty officer did not have any information to share.

The origins of Ocean Builders are murky, apparently intentionally so. Despite Elwartowski and Thepdet arguably being the faces of the XLII project, and Elwartowski responding to the companys main email account, even while on the run, a company statement described the pair merely as volunteers excited about the prospect of living free.

In an email, Elwartowski told me he and Thepdet arrived to the project in September of last year and repeatedly referred to the companys founder as "Seatoshi," evoking Bitcoin's pseudonymous inventor, Satoshi Nakamoto. Ocean Builders describes itself as a team of engineering focused entrepreneurs.

In a statement, Ocean Builders acknowledged that the project team is made up of early Bitcoin adopters, but that Elwartowski didnt fund the project personally and moved in with his own sheets and dishware.

What is clear is that the modest XLII structure was hardly the end of Ocean Builders plans. The company had planned to start a pre-sale on 20 more units on Mondaya sale that is now postponed, according to a statement by Ocean Builders. A minimal, barebones structure was to sell for $150,000 USD, according to the company.

According to Elwartowski, Ocean Builders didnt liaise with the Thai government before the planned sale, and instead intended to wow officials with an impressive lineup of prospective buyers.

We wanted to see if there was enough interest before going to the Thai government, he told me. The key was we needed to show them how much money we planned on bringing in for our project. We couldn't just go to them with the hopes of something happening. So we figured we would do the sale, see if there was enough interest then get started building with the permission of the Thai tourism authority and Board of Investment.

Elwartowski said that he and Thepdet are now seeking safety and asylum.

We just want to be alive somewhere not fleeing, he told me. I may be able to get to the US embassy but Nadia is Thai. She has to leave her family behind. Her son, her mom.

If the pair do make it through, they may decide to leave seasteading behind and simply live peacefully in their new location, Elwartowski said.

Get six of our favorite Motherboard stories every day by signing up for our newsletter.

See the rest here:

Seasteading Bitcoin Fans Say They're 'On the Run' From Thai ...

Navy to remove ‘seasteading’ floating home off Phuket coast …

This floating living platform, built off the coast of Phuket by an American man and his Thai wife, will be removed within one week, says the Third Navy Area commander. (Supplied photo via Achadtaya Chuenniran)

PHUKET: The Royal Thai Navy Third Navy looks set to remove "seasteading'' couple's living platform, 12 nautical miles from this island province, within a week.

Authorities have filed a complaint with Wichit police station over the floating platform set up in international waterssoutheast of Racha Yai island, said Vice Adm Sitthiporn Maskasem, commander of the Third Area, during a media briefing on Wednesday.

Representatives from concerned agencies met to discuss legal procedures to be taken against those who set up the floating structure, said Vice Adm Sitthiporn.

In the police complaint, authorities accused American national Chad Andrew Elwartowski and his Thai wife, Supranee Thepdet, with an English alias of Nadia Summergirl, of breaching Section 119 of the Criminal Code.

The section concerns acts that cause the country or parts of it to fall under the sovereignty of a foreign state, and deterioration of the state's independence.

The complaint has been filed against them for breaching Section 119 of the Criminal Code as there is evidence showing that they have publicly invited people on social media to stay at the site, which is adjacent to our territorial waters...we have laws to deal with this. It affects our sovereignty, said the Third Naval Area commander.

Officials hold a media briefing about a plan to remove the floating living structure 12 nautical miles off the coast of Phuket. (Photo by Achataya Chuenniran)

Preparations were already made to remove the floating structure from the sea as soon as possible, he said.

The structure hindered shipping navigation since fishing trawlers and cargo vessels ply the route to transport goods to Phuket, he said.

We have already prepared a vessel, equipment and manpower to move the structure. We will try to move it within a week said Vice Adm Sitthiporn.

Phuket deputy governor Supoj Rodruang Na Nong Khai said the American national, who set up the floating structure, had entered Thailand in November last year and had a temporary residence in tambon Rawai of Muang district, Phuket.

An investigation found that the man had run a Bitcoin trading business and wanted to set up an independent nation by exploiting legal loopholes, said the deputy governor.

The pair reportedly aimed to set up a permanent shelter out of any state territories by exploiting a loophole in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

The practice of attempting to establish micronations that claim to be independent but are not recognised by world governments or major international organisations is expanding globally, particularly among those who become rich from cryptocurrency trading, according to officers.

Earlier, the Maritime Enforcement Coordination Centre's third area command held a news conference about the seastead, attracting coverage in both domestic and foreign media.

Read more:

Navy to remove 'seasteading' floating home off Phuket coast ...

‘We just want to live.’ MI man on the run from Thai gov. for …

(WXYZ) A Michigan man and Bitcoin fan who wanted a life free of international laws is on the run from the Thai government for living in the first seastead off the countrys coast.

Chad Elwartowski and Supranee Thepdet (AKA Nadia Summergirl) are facing criminal charges punishable by death related to living in the waterborne structure, according to the Bangkok Post.

Chad and his wife Nadia were meant to be pioneers of seasteading an idea popular in the Libertarian culture, which advocates for societies to be set up on floating structures in international waters.

Instead, the couple, who say theyve made enough with Bitcoins to retire, is on the run.

They're accused of trying to lay claim to Thai maritime territory with their seastead, according to the Bangkok Post, that also reported that their source said officers "found evidence which led them to believe the couple was engaging in the setting up of an independent state. Such an act would have a negative impact on the country's shoreline."

The couple volunteered to be the first tenants of Ocean Builders first structure, and documented the process on video .

They moved into the floating six-meter wide structure, located 12 nautical miles off the coast of Phuket, Thailand, in March.

Trouble started when the couple saw media reports about the government cracking down, and then on Saturday, the Royal Thai Navy attempted to make radio contact with occupants of the seastead, but nobody replied, the Bangkog Post reported.

Shortly after that, Chad posted on his public Facebook page.

"I'll say it right here. Nadia and I did not design, construct or pay to have the seastead constructed. We promoted it and lived on it. We helped out by giving the builder updates and we participated in the launch. We did not decide where to put the seastead."

Yesterday, Chad updated his friends saying he and his wife are safe and in hiding.

But as long as Nadia and I are able to live through this that is all that matters to us right now. We just want to live, he posted.

Read more:

'We just want to live.' MI man on the run from Thai gov. for ...

Bitcoin Couple Nadia Thepdet and Chad Elwartowski Face Death …

Nadia Thepdet takes beautiful photos of the ocean. One recent picture on her Instagram shows the sun setting over the waves. In another, she stands on a boat off Thailands coast, holding a golden coin with bitcoin logo.

But Thepdets love of bitcoin and the sea could cost her her life.

She and her boyfriend Chad Elwartowski are cryptocurrency evangelists who tried to live out the libertarian idea of seasteading. The concept, beloved by tech types like Peter Thiel, proposes a set of floating islands in international waters. The idea is to escape countries and laws.

Now the law is coming for Thepdet and Elwartowski. The couple moved into the first off-shore house by seasteading company Ocean Builders earlier this year. Their new home was located atop an oil rig-like structure 12 miles off the Thai coast, technically in international watersbut Thailand says they werent far enough from the coast. Thai authorities accuse the couple of breaching a law prohibiting acts that endangers Thai sovereignty, according to the Bangkok Post.

Breaking the law is punishable by death, or life in prison. Now Thepdet and Elwartowski say theyre on the run.

This is ridiculous, Elwartowski wrote in a Monday Facebook post. We lived on a floating house boat for a few weeks and now Thailand wants us killed.

At its heart, seasteading is like living on a glorified houseboat. The idea has a strong fan base among a certain fringe of libertarians and anarcho-capitalists who believe in establishing a new society with little to no government.

One of seasteadings earliest and most notorious failures was Operation Atlantis, a 1968 effort to build libertarian civilization aboard a boat in international waters. The plan sank with the boat, which caught fire while leaving New York and went belly-up in a hurricane near the Bahamas. (The plans founder later tried to build paradise on an offshore oil rig that was also swept away in a hurricane.)

More modern visions of seasteading have imagined entire cities built across boats or oil rigs. Ocean Builders, which is run by early bitcoin adopters, says it wants to build the first seasteading homes. If all goes according to plan, those houses might become the beginning of a city at sea.

Some of seasteadings biggest backers come from the cryptocurrency community, where Thepdet was a minor celebrity, posting as Bitcoin Girl Thailand. The pair claimed to have generated their wealth from the untraceable digital currency, which is a favorite of libertarians.

In a Facebook post last year, Thepdet envisioned luxury homes floating on the ocean. The reality was less glamorous.

In February, Ocean Builders announced it had constructed the worlds first seastead in international waters 12 nautical miles out from Phuket, Thailand. Thepdet and Elwartowskis new home was very basic: a short, round room atop stilts.

It was also very illegal, Thailand authorities allege. If it is left untouched, it will hinder ship navigation since the route is used for the transport of oil to Phuket, a government source told the Bangkok Post. The government reportedly alleges the structure was in Thai maritime waters.

One seasteader said the couples plan to live 12 nautical miles off the coast came with legal setbacks.

12nm [nautical miles] is not the high seas, Patri Friedman, founder of the Seasteading Institute, wrote on Facebook. It is the Contiguous Zone, where a state has many rights, several of which seem likely to pertain here. Do not listen to anyone who tells you that the high seas starts at 12nm; it means they havent even spent 5 minutes reading Wikipedia.

Friedman, who has pushed an anti-democratic brand of libertarianism, is one of seasteadings leading proponents and previously led an aborted effort to create a libertarian city in Honduras.

Even the actual high seas (roughly 200+ nm from land) are not a magical realm of freedom where you can just plant a flag and be an independent polity, he continued on Facebook.

With Thai authorities searching for them, the couple is now denying allegations that they tried to undermine Thai sovereignty.

Nadia and I did not design, construct or pay to have the seastead constructed, Elwartowski wrote on Facebook. We promoted it and lived on it. We helped out by giving the builder updates and we participated in the launch. We did not decide where to put the seastead. We are enthusiastic supporters of the project who were lucky enough to be the first ones to stay on it.

The couple were back on the mainland when they started reading news reports about Thai officials raiding the seastead, they told Motherboard.

In a follow-up Facebook post, Elwartowski said he and Thepdet were safe, and that they were trying to find a way out of the country. Elwartowski is a U.S. citizen, but Thepdet is Thai and might try to apply for asylum in the U.S., he said.

Hunting us down to our death is just plain stupid and highlights exactly the reason someone would be willing to go out in middle of the ocean to get away from governments, he said.

Follow this link:

Bitcoin Couple Nadia Thepdet and Chad Elwartowski Face Death ...

Donald Trump – biography.com

Who Is Donald Trump?

Donald John Trump is the 45th and current President of the United States; he took office January 20, 2017. Previously, he was a real estate mogul, and a former reality TV star.

Born in Queens, New York, in 1971, Trump became involved in large, profitable building projects in Manhattan. In 1980, he opened the Grand Hyatt New York, which made him the city's best-known developer.

In 2004, Trump began starring in the hit NBC reality series The Apprentice, which also spawned the offshoot The Celebrity Apprentice. Trump turned his attention to politics, and in 2015 he announced his candidacy for president of the United States on the Republican ticket.

After winning a majority of the primaries and caucuses, Trump became the official Republican candidate for president on July 19, 2016. That November, Trump was elected the 45th President of the United States, after defeating Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton.

Donald Trump was born on June 14, 1946, in Queens, New York.

According to a September 2017 Forbes estimate, Donald Trumps net worth is $3.1 billion. Of that, $1.6 billion is in New York real estate; $570 million is in golf clubs and resorts; $500 million is in non-New York real estate; $290 million is in cash and personal assets; and $200 million is in brand businesses. Thats down from $3.7 billion in 2016, according to Fortune, mostly due to declining New York real estate values.

Over the years, Trumps net worth has been a subject of public debate. In 1990, Trump asserted his own net worth in the neighborhood of $1.5 billion. However the real estate market was in decline, reducing the value of and income from Trump's empire; a Forbes magazine investigation into his assets revealed that his existing debt likely brought the number closer to $500 million.

In any event, the Trump Organization required a massive infusion of loans to keep it from collapsing, a situation which raised questions as to whether the corporation could survive bankruptcy. Some observers saw Trump's decline as symbolic of many of the business, economic and social excesses that had arisen in the 1980s.

Donald Trump eventually managed to climb back from a reported deficit of nearly $900 million, claiming to have reached a zenith of more than $2 billion. However, independent sources again questioned his math, estimating his worth at something closer to $500 million by 1997.

Over the course of his 2016 presidential run, Trumps net worth was questioned and he courted controversy after repeatedly refusing to release his tax returns while they were being audited by the Internal Revenue Service. He did not release his tax returns before the November election the first time a major party candidate had not released such information to the public since Richard Nixon in 1972.

Donald Trump attends the 'All Star Celebrity Apprentice' finale in2013 in New York City. (Photo: Michael Stewart/WireImage)

Donald Trump was raised Presbyterian by his mother, and he identifies as a mainline Protestant.

The fourth of five children, Donald Trumps parents were Frederick C. and Mary Anne MacLeod Trump. Frederick Trump was a builder and real estate developer who specialized in constructing and operating middle-income apartments in Queens, Staten Island and Brooklyn.

Mary MacLeod immigrated from Tong, Scotland, in 1929 at the age of 17. She married Fred Trump in 1936, and the couple settled in Jamaica, Queens, a neighborhood that was, at the time, filled with Western European immigrants.

In the 1950s the Trumps wealth increased with the postwar real estate boom, and Mary became a New York socialite and philanthropist. Fred died in 1999, and Mary passed away the following year.

Donald J. Trump has had three wives and is currently married to former Slovenian model Melania Trump(ne Knauss), over 23 years his junior. In January 2005, the couple married in a highly-publicized and lavish wedding.

Among the many celebrity guests at the wedding were Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton. Melania gave birth to their son, Barron William Trump, in March 2006.

In 1977, Trump married his first wife Ivana Trump, (ne Zelnickova Winklmayr) a New York fashion model who had been an alternate on the 1972 Czech Olympic Ski Team. After the 1977 birth of the couple's first of three children, Donald Trump Jr., Ivana Trump was named vice president in charge of design in the Trump Organization and played a major role in supervising the renovation of the Commodore and the Plaza Hotel.

The couple had two more children together Ivanka Trump (born 1981) and Eric Trump (born 1984) and went through a highly publicized divorce which was finalized in 1992.

In 1993 Trump married his second wife, Marla Maples, an actress with whom he had been involved for some time and already had a daughter, Tiffany Trump (born in 1993).

Trump would ultimately file for a highly publicized divorce from Maples in 1997, which became final in June 1999. A prenuptial agreement allotted $2 million to Maples.

Trump's sons Donald Jr. and Eric work as executive vice presidents for The Trump Organization, and took over the family business while their father serves as president.

Trump's daughter Ivanka was also an executive vice president of The Trump Organization, but left the business and her own fashion label to join her father's administration and become an unpaid assistant to the president. Her husband, Jared Kushner, is also a senior adviser to President Trump.

Donald Trump gives two thumbs up to the crowd on the fourth day of the Republican National Convention on July 21, 2016 at the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Donald was an energetic, assertive child. His parents sent him to the New York Military Academy at age 13, hoping the discipline of the school would channel his energy in a positive manner.

Trump did well at the academy, both socially and academically, rising to become a star athlete and student leader by the time he graduated in 1964.

He then entered Fordham University and two years later transferred to the Wharton School of Finance at the University of Pennsylvania, from which he graduated in 1968 with a degree in economics.

During his years at college, Trump worked at his fathers real estate business during the summer. He also secured education deferments for thedraftfor theVietnam Warand ultimately a 1-Y medical deferment after he graduated.

Trump began his political career by seeking the nomination for the Reform Party for the 2000 presidential race and withdrew; he again publicly announced he would be running for president in the 2012 election.

However, it wasnt until the 2016 election that Trump became the official Republican nominee for president and, defying polls and media projections, won the majority of electoral college votes in a stunning victory on November 8, 2016.

Despite losing the popular vote to Hillary Clinton by almost 2.9 million votes, Trump's electoral win 306 electoral college votes to Clinton's 232 clinched his victory as the 45th president of the United States.

After one of the most contentious presidential races in U.S. history, Trump's rise to the office of president was considered a resounding rejection of establishment politics by blue-collar and working-class Americans.

In his victory speech, Trump said: I pledge to every citizen of our land that I will be president for all Americans." About his supporters, he said: "As Ive said from the beginning, ours was not a campaign, but rather an incredible and great movement made up of millions of hard-working men and women who love their country and want a better, brighter future for themselves and for their families.

On July 21, 2016, Trump accepted the presidential nomination at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland. In a speech lasting one hour and 15 minutes, one of the longest in recent history, Trump outlined the issues he would tackle as president, including violence in America, the economy, immigration, trade, terrorism, and the appointment of Supreme Courtjustices.

On immigration, he said: We are going to build a great border wall to stop illegal immigration, to stop the gangs and the violence, and to stop the drugs from pouring into our communities.

He also promised supporters that he would renegotiate trade deals, reduce taxes and government regulations, repeal the Affordable Care Act (otherwise known as Obamacare), defend Second Amendment gun rights, and rebuild our depleted military, asking the countries the U.S. is protecting "to pay their fair share."

On October 7, 2016, just two days before the second presidential debate between Trump and Clinton, the Republican presidential nominee was embroiled in another scandal when theWashington Post released a 2005 recording in which he lewdly described kissing and groping women, and trying to have sex with then-married television personality Nancy ODell.

The three-minute recording captured Trump speaking to Billy Bush, co-anchor of Access Hollywood, as they prepared to meet soap opera actress Arianne Zucker for a segment of the show.

"Ive gotta use some Tic Tacs, just in case I start kissing her, Trump said in the recording which was caught on a microphone that had not been turned off. You know Im automatically attracted to beautiful I just start kissing them. Its like a magnet. Just kiss. I dont even wait. And when youre a star they let you do it. You can do anything."

He also said that because of his celebrity status he could grab women by their genitals. In response, Trump released a statement saying: This was locker room banter, a private conversation that took place many years ago. Bill Clinton has said far worse to me on the golf course not even close. I apologize if anyone was offended.

Trump later posted a videotaped apology on Facebook in which he said: Ive never said Im a perfect person, nor pretended to be someone that Im not. Ive said and done things I regret, and the words released today on this more than a decade-old video are one of them. Anyone who knows me knows these words dont reflect who I am. I said it, I was wrong, and I apologize.

The backlash was immediate with some top Republicans, including Senators John McCain, Kelly Ayotte, Mike Crapo, Shelley Moore Capito and Martha Roby, withdrawing their support for Trump. House Speaker Paul Ryan reportedly told fellow GOP lawmakers that he would not campaign with or defend the presidential candidate.

Some GOP critics also called for Trump to withdraw from the race, including former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Trump remained defiant, tweeting that he would stay in the race.

Around the same time as the video leak, numerous women began speaking publicly about their past experiences with Trump, alleging he had either sexually assaulted or harassed them based on their looks.

Throughout the election, Trump vehemently denied allegations he had a relationship with Russian PresidentVladimir Putin and was tied to the hacking of the DNC emails.

In January 2017, a U.S. intelligence report prepared by the CIA, FBI and NSA concluded that Putin had ordered a campaign to influence the U.S. election. Russias goals were to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump," the report said.

Prior to the release of the report, President-elect Trump had cast doubt on Russian interference and the intelligence communitys assessment. Trump received an intelligence briefing on the matter, and in his first press conference as president-elect on January 11, he acknowledged Russias interference.

However, in subsequent comments he again refused to condemn Russia for such activity, notably saying on multiple occasions that he believed Putin's denials.

In March 2018, the Trump administration formally acknowledged the charges by issuing sanctions on 19 Russians for interference in the 2016 presidential election and alleged cyberattacks. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin delivered the announcement, with thepresident remaining silent on the matter.

In July, days before President Trump was to meet with Putin in Finland, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced additional charges against12 Russian intelligence officers accused of hacking the DNC and the Clinton campaign.

On January 20, 2017, Trump was sworn in as the 45th president of the United States by Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts. Trump took the oath of office placing his hand on the Bible that was used at Abraham Lincoln's inauguration and his own family Bible, which was presented to him by his mother in 1955 when he graduated from Sunday school at his family's Presbyterian church.

In his inaugural speech on January 20th, Trump sent a populist message that he would put the American people above politics. What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people, he said. January 20, 2017, will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again.

He went on to paint a bleak picture of an America that had failed many of its citizens, describing families trapped in poverty, an ineffective education system, and crime, drugs and gangs. This American carnage stops right here and stops right now," he said.

The day after Trump's inauguration, millions of protesters demonstrated across the United States and around the world. The Women's March on Washington drew over half a million people to protest President Trump's stance on a variety issues ranging from immigration to environmental protection.

Activists and celebrities taking part in the protests includedGloria Steinem, Angela Davis, Madonna,Cher, Ashley Judd, Scarlett Johansson, America Ferrera, Alicia Keys and Janelle Mone. The president tweeted in response:

The first 100 days of Trumps presidency lasted from January 20, 2017 until April 29, 2017. In the first days of his presidency, President Trump issued a number of back-to-back executive orders to make good on some of his campaign promises, as well as several orders aimed at rolling back policies and regulations that were put into place during the Obama administration.

Several of Trumps key policies that got rolling during Trumps first 100 days in office include his Supreme Court nomination; steps toward building a wall on the Mexico border; a travel ban for several predominantly Muslim countries; the first moves to dismantle the Affordable Care Act; and the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement.

In addition, Trump signed orders to implement a federal hiring freeze, withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and reinstate the Mexico City policy that bans federal funding of nongovernmental organizations abroad that promote or perform abortions.

He signed an order to scale back financial regulation under the Dodd-Frank Act, created by the Obama administration and passed by Congress after the financial crisis of 2008. And he called for a lifetime foreign-lobbying ban for members of his administration and a five-year ban for all other lobbying.

On March 16, 2017, the president released his proposed budget. The budget outlined his plans for increased spending for the military, veterans affairs and national security, including building a wall on the border with Mexico.

It also made drastic cuts to many government agencies including the Environmental Protection Agency and the State Department, as well as the elimination of the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the Community Development Block Grant program which supports Meals on Wheels.

On January 31, 2017, President Trump nominated Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. The 49-year-old conservative judge was appointed by President George W. Bush to the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver.

Judge Gorsuch was educated at Columbia, Harvard and Oxford and clerked for Justices Byron White and Anthony Kennedy. The nomination came after Merrick Garland, President Obama's nominee to replace the late Antonin Scalia, was denied a confirmation hearing by Senate Republicans.

As Gorsuch's legal philosophy was considered to be similar to Scalia's, the choice drew strong praise from the conservative side of the aisle. "Millions of voters said this was the single most important issue for them when they voted for me for president," President Trump said. "I am a man of my word. Today I am keeping another promise to the American people by nominating Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court."

After Gorsuch gave three days of testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in March, the Senate convened on April 6 to advance his nomination. Democrats mostly held firm to deny the 60 votes necessary to proceed, resulting in the first successful partisan filibuster of a Supreme Court nominee.

But Republicans quickly countered with another historic move, invoking the "nuclear option" to lower the threshold for advancing Supreme Court nominations from 60 votes to a simple majority of 50. On April 7, Gorsuch was confirmed by the Senate to become the 113th justice of the Supreme Court.

The following year, President Trump had another opportunity to continue the rightward push of the Supreme Court with the retirement of Justice Kennedy. On July 9, 2018, he nominated Brett Kavanaugh, another textualist and orginalist in the mold of Scalia. Democrats vowed to fight the nomination, and Kavanaugh was nearly derailed by accusations of sexual assault, before earning confirmation in a close vote that October.

Trump issued an executive order to build a wall at the United States border with Mexico. In his first televised interview as president, President Trump said the initial construction of the wall would be funded by U.S. taxpayer dollars, but that Mexico would reimburse the U.S. 100 percent in a plan to be negotiated and might include a suggested import tax on Mexican goods.

In response to the new administration's stance on a border wall, Mexican president Enrique Pea Nieto cancelled a planned visit to meet with President Trump. "Mexico does not believe in walls," the Mexican president said in a video statement. "I've said time again; Mexico will not pay for any wall."

After funding for the wall failed to materialize, from either Mexico or Congress, Trump in April 2018 announced that he wouldreinforce security along the U.S. border with Mexico by using American troops because of the "horrible, unsafe laws" that left the country vulnerable. The following day, the president signed a proclamation that directed National Guard troops to the U.S.-Mexico border.

The Department of Homeland Security said that the deployment would be in coordination with governors, that the troops would "support federal law enforcement personnel, including [Customs and Border Protection]," and that federal immigration authorities would "direct enforcement efforts."

In December 2018, shortly before a newly elected Democratic majority was set to take control of the House, Trump announced he would not sign a bill to fund the government unless Congress allocated $5.7 billion toward building his long-promised border wall. With Democrats refusing to give in to his demand, a partial government shutdown ensued for a record 35 days, until all sides agreed to another attempt at striking a compromise.

On February 14, 2019, one day before the deadline, Congress passed a $333 billion spending package that allocated $1.375 billion for 55 miles of steel-post fencing. After indicating that he would sign the bill, the President made good on his threat to declare a national emergency the following day, enabling him to funnel $3.6 billion slated for military construction projects toward building the wall.

In response, a coalition of 16 states filed a lawsuit that challenged Trump's power to circumvent Congress on this issue.

"Contrary to the will of Congress, the president has used the pretext of a manufactured 'crisis' of unlawful immigration to declare a national emergency and redirect federal dollars appropriated for drug interdiction, military construction and law enforcement initiatives toward building a wall on the United States-Mexico border," the lawsuit said.

As part of attempts to seal the U.S. border with Mexico, the Trump administration in 2018 began following through on a "zero-tolerance" policy to prosecute anybody found to have crossed the border illegally. As children were legally not allowed to be detained with their parents, this meant that they were to be held separately as family cases wound through immigration courts.

A furor ensued after reports surfaced that nearly 2,000 children had been separated from their parents over a six-week period that ended in May 2018, compounded by photos of toddlers crying in cages. President Trump initially deflected blame for the situation, insisting it resulted from the efforts of predecessors and political opponents."The Democrats are forcing the breakup of families at the Border with their horrible and cruel legislative agenda," he tweeted.

The president ultimately caved to pressure from the bad PR, and on June 20 he signed an executive order thatdirected the Department of Homeland Security to keep families together.

"I didnt like the sight or the feeling of families being separated," he said, adding that it remained important to have "zero tolerance for people that enter our country illegally" and for Congress to find a permanent solution to the problem. In the meantime, the DHS essentially revived the "catch-and-release" system that the zero-tolerance policy was meant to eradicate, while dealing with the logistics of reuniting families.

President Trump signed one of his most controversial executive orders on January 27, 2017, at the Pentagon, calling for "extreme vetting" to "keep radical Islamic terrorists out of the United States of America." The president's executive order was put into effect immediately, and refugees and immigrants from seven predominantly Muslim countries traveling to the U.S. were detained at U.S. airports.

The order called for a ban on immigrants from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen for at least 90 days, temporarily suspended the entry of refugees for 120 days and barred Syrian refugees indefinitely. In an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network, President Trump also said he would give priority to Christian refugees trying to gain entry into the United States.

After facing multiple legal hurdles, President Trump signed a revised executive order on March 6, 2017,calling for a 90-day ban on travelers from six predominantly Muslim countries including Sudan, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. Iraq, which was included in the original executive order, was removed from the list.

Travelers from the six listed countries, who hold green cards or have valid visas as of the signing of the order, will not be affected. Religious minorities would not get special preference, as was outlined in the original order, and an indefinite ban on Syrian refugees was reduced to 120 days.

On March 15, just hours before the revised ban was going to be put into effect, Derrick Watson, a federal judge in Hawaii, issued a temporary nationwide restraining order in a ruling that stated the executive order did not prove that a ban would protect the country from terrorism and that it was issued with a purpose to disfavor a particular religion, in spite of its stated, religiously neutral purpose. At a rally in Nashville, President Trump responded to the ruling, saying: "This is, in the opinion of many, an unprecedented judicial overreach.

Judge Theodore D. Chuang of Maryland also blocked the ban the following day, and in subsequent months, the ban was impeded in decisions handed down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia, and the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals once again.

However, on June 26, 2017, Trump won a partial victory when the Supreme Court announced it was allowing the controversial ban to go into effect for foreign nationals who lacked a "bona fide relationship with any person or entity in the United States." The court agreed to hear oral arguments for the case in October, but with the 90-to-120-day timeline in place for the administration to conduct its reviews, it was believed the case would be rendered moot by that point.

On September 24, 2017, Trump issued a new presidential proclamation, which permanently bans travel to the United States for most citizens from seven countries. Most were on the original list, including Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, while the new order included Chad, North Korea and some citizens of Venezuela (certain government officials and their families). The tweak did little to pacify critics, who argued that the order was still heavily biased toward Islam.

The fact that Trump has added North Korea with few visitors to the U.S. and a few government officials from Venezuela doesnt obfuscate the real fact that the administrations order is still a Muslim ban, said Anthony D. Romero, the executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union.

On October 10, the Supreme Court cancelled a planned hearing on an appeal of the original travel ban. On October 17, the day before the order was to take effect, Judge Watson of Hawaii issued a nationwide order freezing the Trump administrations new travel ban, writing that the order was a poor fit for the issues regarding the sharing of public-safety and terrorism-related information that the president identifies.

On December 4, 2017, the Supreme Court allowed the third version of the Trump administrations travel ban to go into effect despite the ongoing legal challenges. The courts orders urged appeals courts to determineas quickly as possible whether theban was lawful.

Under the ruling, the administration could fully enforce its new restrictions on travel from eight nations, six of them predominantly Muslim. Citizens of Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea, along with some groups of people from Venezuela, would be unable to unable to emigrate to the United States permanently, with many barred from also working, studying or vacationing in the country.

On June 26, 2018, the Supreme Court upheld the president's travel ban by a 5-4 vote.Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said that Trump had the executive authority to make national security judgments in the realm of immigration, regardless of his previous statements about Islam. In a sharply worded dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said that the outcome was equivalent to that of Korematsu v. United States, which permitted the detention of Japanese-Americans during World War II.

The Valentine's Day 2018 shooting atMarjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, which left a total of 17 students and faculty dead, sparked a strong response from President Trump.

He ordered the Justice Department to issue regulations banning bump stocks, and suggested he was willing to consider a range of measures, from strengthening background checks to raising the minimumage for buying rifles. He also backed an NRA-fueled proposal for arming teachers, which drew backlash from many in the profession.

The president remained invested in the issue even as the usual cycle of outrage began diminishing: In a televised February 28 meeting with lawmakers, he called for gun control legislation that would expand background checks to gun shows and internet transactions, secure schools and restrict sales for some young adults.

At one point he called outPennsylvania Senator Pat Toomey for being "afraid of the NRA," and at another he suggested thatauthorities should seize guns from mentally ill or other potentially dangerous peoplewithout first going to court. "I like taking the guns early," he said. "Take the guns first, go through due process second."

His stances seemingly stunned the Republican lawmakers at the meeting, as well as the NRA, which previously considered the president as a strong supporter. However, within a few days, Trump was walking back his proposal to raise the age limit and mainly pushing for arming select teachers.

In early August 2017, intelligence experts confirmed that North Korea successfully produced a miniaturized nuclear warhead that fits inside its missiles, putting it one step closer to becoming a nuclear power. Around the same time, the North Korean state news agency said they were "examining the operational plan" to strike areas around the U.S. territory of Guam with medium-to-long-range strategic ballistic missiles.

U.S. experts estimated North Koreas nuclear warheads at 60 and that the country could soon have an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching the United States. Trump responded that North Korea would be met with fire and fury if the threats continued and that the U.S. military was locked and loaded.

See the original post here:

Donald Trump - biography.com

President Donald J. Trump – Biography

Who Is Donald Trump?

Donald John Trump is the 45th and current President of the United States who took office January 20, 2017. Previously, he was a real estate mogul, and a former reality TV star. Born in Queens, New York, in 1971 Trump became involved in large, profitable building projects in Manhattan. In 1980, he opened the Grand Hyatt New York, which made him the city's best-known developer. In 2004, Trump began starring in the hit NBC reality series The Apprentice, which also spawned the offshoot The Celebrity Apprentice. Trump turned his attention to politics, and in 2015 he announced his candidacy for president of the United States on the Republican ticket. After winning a majority of the primaries and caucuses, Trump became the official Republican candidate for president on July 19, 2016. That November, Trump was elected the 45th President of the United States, after defeating Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton.

Thanks for watching!Visit Website

Donald Trump was born on June 14, 1946, in Queens, New York.

According to a September 2017 Forbes estimate, Donald Trumps net worth is $3.1 billion. Of that, $1.6 billion is in New York real estate; $570 million is in golf clubs and resorts; $500 million is in non-New York real estate; $290 million is in cash and personal assets; and $200 million is in brand businesses. Thats down from $3.7 billion in 2016, according to Fortune, mostly due to declining New York real estate values.

Thanks for watching!Visit Website

Thanks for watching!Visit Website

Over the years, Trumps net worth has been a subject of public debate. In 1990, Trump asserted his own net worth in the neighborhood of $1.5 billion. However the real estate market was in decline, reducing the value of and income from Trump's empire; a Forbes magazine investigation into his assets revealed that his existing debt likely brought the number closer to $500 million. In any event, the Trump Organization required a massive infusion of loans to keep it from collapsing, a situation which raised questions as to whether the corporation could survive bankruptcy. Some observers saw Trump's decline as symbolic of many of the business, economic and social excesses that had arisen in the 1980s.

Donald Trump eventually managed to climb back from a reported deficit of nearly $900 million, claiming to have reached a zenith of more than $2 billion. However, independent sources again questioned his math, estimating his worth at something closer to $500 million by 1997.

Over the course of his 2016 presidential run, Trumps net worth was questioned and he courted controversy after repeatedly refusing to release his tax returns while they were being audited by the Internal Revenue Service. He did not release his tax returns before the November election the first time a major party candidate had not released such information to the public since Richard Nixon in 1972.

Donald Trump attends the 'All Star Celebrity Apprentice' finale in2013 in New York City. (Photo: Michael Stewart/WireImage)

Donald Trump was raised Presbyterian by his mother, and he identifies as a mainline Protestant.

The fourth of five children, Donald Trumps parents were Frederick C. and Mary Anne MacLeod Trump. Frederick Trump was a builder and real estate developer who specialized in constructing and operating middle-income apartments in Queens, Staten Island and Brooklyn. Mary MacLeod immigrated from Tong, Scotland, in 1929 at the age of 17. She married Fred Trump in 1936, and the couple settled in Jamaica, Queens, a neighborhood that was, at the time, filled with Western European immigrants. In the 1950s the Trumps wealth increased with the postwar real estate boom, and Mary became a New York socialite and philanthropist. Fred died in 1999, and Mary passed away the following year.

Donald J. Trump has had three wives and is currently married to Slovenian model Melania Knauss (now Trump), over 23 years his junior. In January 2005, the couple married in a highly-publicized and lavish wedding. Among the many celebrity guests at the wedding were Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton. Melania gave birth to their son, Barron William Trump, in March 2006.

In 1977, Trump married his first wife Ivana Zelnickova Winklmayr, a New York fashion model who had been an alternate on the 1972 Czech Olympic Ski Team. After the 1977 birth of the couple's first of three children, Donald John Trump Jr., Ivana Trump was named vice president in charge of design in the Trump Organization and played a major role in supervising the renovation of the Commodore and the Plaza Hotel. The couple had two more children together Ivanka Trump (born in 1981) and Eric Trump (born in 1984) and went through a highly publicized divorce which was finalized in 1992.

In 1993 Trump married his second wife, Marla Maples, an actress with whom he had been involved for some time and already had a daughter, Tiffany Trump (born in 1993). Trump would ultimately file for a highly publicized divorce from Maples in 1997, which became final in June 1999. A prenuptial agreement allotted $2 million to Maples.

Trump's sons Donald Jr. and Eric work as executive vice presidents for The Trump Organization, and took over the family business while their father serves as president. Trump's daughter Ivanka was also an executive vice president of The Trump Organization, but left the business and her own fashion label to join her father's administration and become an unpaid assistant to the president. Her husband, Jared Kushner, is also a senior adviser to President Trump.

Donald Trump gives two thumbs up to the crowd on the fourth day of the Republican National Convention on July 21, 2016 at the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Donald was an energetic, assertive child. His parents sent him to the New York Military Academy at age 13, hoping the discipline of the school would channel his energy in a positive manner. Trump did well at the academy, both socially and academically, rising to become a star athlete and student leader by the time he graduated in 1964.

He then entered Fordham University and two years later transferred to the Wharton School of Finance at the University of Pennsylvania, from which he graduated in 1968 with a degree in economics. During his years at college, Trump worked at his fathers real estate business during the summer. He also secured education deferments for the Vietnam War draft and ultimately a 1-Y medical deferment after he graduated.

Trump began his political career by seeking the nomination for the Reform Party for the 2000 presidential race and withdrew; he again publicly announced he would be running for president in the 2012 election. However it wasnt until the 2016 election that Trump became the official Republican nominee for president and, defying polls and media projections, won the majority of electoral college votes in a stunning victory on November 8, 2016. Despite losing the popular vote to Hillary Clinton by almost 2.9 million votes, Trump's electoral win 306 votes to Clinton's 232 votes clinched his election as the 45th president of the United States.

After one of the most contentious presidential races in U.S. history, Trump's rise to the office of president was considered a resounding rejection of establishment politics by blue-collar and working class Americans. In his victory speech, Trump said: I pledge to every citizen of our land that I will be president for all Americans." About his supporters, he said: "As Ive said from the beginning, ours was not a campaign, but rather an incredible and great movement made up of millions of hard-working men and women who love their country and want a better, brighter future for themselves and for their families.

On July 21, 2016, Trump accepted the presidential nomination at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland. In a speech lasting one hour and 15 minutes, one of the longest in recent history, Trump outlined the issues he would tackle as president, including violence in America, the economy, immigration, trade, terrorism, and the appointment of Supreme Court Justices.

On immigration, he said: We are going to build a great border wall to stop illegal immigration, to stop the gangs and the violence, and to stop the drugs from pouring into our communities. He also promised supporters that he would renegotiate trade deals, reduce taxes and government regulations, repeal the Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare, defend Second Amendment gun rights, and rebuild our depleted military, asking the countries the U.S. is protecting "to pay their fair share."

On October 7, 2016, just two days before the second presidential debate between Trump and Clinton, the Republican presidential nominee was embroiled in another scandal when The Washington Post released a 2005 recording in which he lewdly described kissing and groping women, and trying to have sex with then-married television personality Nancy ODell. The three-minute recording captured Trump speaking to Billy Bush, co-anchor of Access Hollywood, as they prepared to meet soap opera actress Arianne Zucker for a segment of the show. "Ive gotta use some Tic Tacs, just in case I start kissing her, Trump said in the recording which was caught on a microphone that had not been turned off. You know Im automatically attracted to beautiful I just start kissing them. Its like a magnet. Just kiss. I dont even wait. And when youre a star they let you do it. You can do anything."

He also said that because of his celebrity status he could grab women by their genitals. In response, Trump released a statement saying: This was locker room banter, a private conversation that took place many years ago. Bill Clinton has said far worse to me on the golf course not even close. I apologize if anyone was offended.

Trump later posted a videotaped apology on Facebook in which he said: Ive never said Im a perfect person, nor pretended to be someone that Im not. Ive said and done things I regret, and the words released today on this more than a decade-old video are one of them. Anyone who knows me knows these words dont reflect who I am. I said it, I was wrong, and I apologize.

The backlash was immediate with some top Republicans, including Senators John McCain, Kelly Ayotte, Mike Crapo, Shelley Moore Capito and Martha Roby, withdrawing their support for Trump. House Speaker Paul Ryan reportedly told fellow GOP lawmakers that he would not campaign with or defend the presidential candidate. Some GOP critics also called for Trump to withdraw from the race, including former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Trump remained defiant, tweeting that he would stay in the race.

Around the same time as the video leak, numerous women began speaking publicly about their past experiences with Trump, alleging he had either sexually assaulted or harassed them based on their looks.

Throughout the election, Trump vehemently denied allegations he had a relationship with Russian PresidentVladimir Putin and was tied to the hacking of the DNC emails. In January 2017, a U.S. intelligence report prepared by the CIA, FBI and NSA concluded that Putin had ordered a campaign to influence the U.S. election. Russias goals were to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump," the report said.

Prior to the release of the report, President-elect Trump had cast doubt on Russian interference and the intelligence communitys assessment. Trump received an intelligence briefing on the matter, and in his first press conference as president-elect on January 11, he acknowledged Russias interference. However, in subsequent comments he again refused to condemn Russia for such activity, notably saying on multiple occasions that he believed Putin's denials.

In March 2018, the Trump administration formally acknowledged the charges by issuing sanctions on 19 Russians for interference in the 2016 presidential election and alleged cyberattacks. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin delivered the announcement, with thepresident remaining silent on the matter.

In July, days before President Trump was to meet with Putin in Finland, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced additional charges against12 Russian intelligence officers accused of hacking the DNC and the Clinton campaign.

On January 20, 2017, Trump was sworn in as the 45th president of the United States by Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts. Trump took the oath of office placing his hand on the Bible that was used at Abraham Lincoln's inauguration and his own family Bible, which was presented to him by his mother in 1955 when he graduated from Sunday school at his family's Presbyterian church.

In his inaugural speech on January 20th, Trump sent a populist message that he would put the American people above politics. What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people, he said. January 20, 2017, will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again.

He went on to paint a bleak picture of an America that had failed many of its citizens, describing families trapped in poverty, an ineffective education system, and crime, drugs and gangs. This American carnage stops right here and stops right now," he said.

The day after Trump's inauguration, millions of protesters demonstrated across the United States and around the world. The Women's March on Washington drew over half a million people to protest President Trump's stance on a variety issues ranging from immigration to environmental protection. Activists and celebrities including Gloria Steinem, Angela Davis, Madonna, Cher, Ashley Judd, Scarlett Johansson, America Ferrera, Alicia Keys and Janelle Mone participated. The president tweeted in response:

The first 100 days of Trumps presidency lasted from January 20, 2017 until April 29, 2017. In the first days of his presidency, President Trump issued a number of back-to-back executive orders to make good on some of his campaign promises, as well as several orders aimed at rolling back policies and regulations that were put into place during the Obama administration. Several of Trumps key policies that got rolling during Trumps first 100 days in office include his supreme court nomination; steps toward building a wall on the Mexico border; a travel ban for several predominantly Muslim countries; the first moves to dismantle the Affordable Care Act (a.k.a. Obamacare); and the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement.

In addition, Trump signed orders to implement a federal hiring freeze, withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and reinstate the Mexico City policy that bans federal funding of nongovernmental organizations abroad that promote or perform abortions. He signed an order to scale back financial regulation under the Dodd-Frank Act, created by the Obama administration and passed by Congress after the financial crisis of 2008. And he called for a lifetime foreign-lobbying ban for members of his administration and a five-year ban for all other lobbying.

On March 16, 2017, the president released his proposed budget. The budget outlined his plans for increased spending for the military, veterans affairs and national security, including building a wall on the border with Mexico. It also made drastic cuts to many government agencies including the Environmental Protection Agency and the State Department, as well as the elimination of the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the Community Development Block Grant program which supports Meals on Wheels.

On January 31, 2017, President Trump nominated Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. The 49-year-old conservative judge was appointed by President George W. Bush to the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver. Judge Gorsuch was educated at Columbia, Harvard and Oxford and clerked for Supreme Justices Byron White and Anthony Kennedy. The nomination came after Merrick Garland, President Obama's nominee to replace the late Antonin Scalia, was denied a confirmation hearing by Senate Republicans.

As Gorsuch's legal philosophy was considered to be similar to Scalia's, the choice drew strong praise from the conservative side of the aisle. "Millions of voters said this was the single most important issue for them when they voted for me for president," President Trump said. "I am a man of my word. Today I am keeping another promise to the American people by nominating Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court."

After Gorsuch gave three days of testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in March, the Senate convened on April 6 to advance his nomination. Democrats mostly held firm to deny the 60 votes necessary to proceed, resulting in the first successful partisan filibuster of a Supreme Court nominee. But Republicans quickly countered with another historic move, invoking the "nuclear option" to lower the threshold for advancing Supreme Court nominations from 60 votes to a simple majority of 50. On April 7, Gorsuch was confirmed by the Senate to become the 113th justice of the Supreme Court.

The following year, President Trump had another opportunity to continue the rightward push of the Supreme Court with the retirement of Justice Kennedy. On July 9, 2018, he nominated Brett Kavanaugh, another textualist and orginalist in the mold of Scalia. Democrats vowed to fight the nomination, though their options remained limited as the minority party.

Trump issued an executive order to build a wall at the United States border with Mexico. In his first televised interview as president, President Trump said the initial construction of the wall would be funded by U.S. taxpayer dollars, but that Mexico would reimburse the U.S. 100 percent in a plan to be negotiated and might include a suggested import tax on Mexican goods.

In response to the new administration's stance on a border wall, Mexican president Enrique Pea Nieto cancelled a planned visit to meet with President Trump. "Mexico does not believe in walls," the Mexican president said in a video statement. "I've said time again; Mexico will not pay for any wall." Trump and Pea Nieto spoke on the phone after their in-person meeting was cancelled, and "agreed at this point not to speak publicly about this controversial issue," according to a statement from the Mexican government.

After funding for the wall failed to materialize, from either Mexico or Congress, Trump in April 2018 announced that he wouldreinforce security along the U.S. border with Mexico by using American troops because of the "horrible, unsafe laws" that left the country vulnerable. The following day, the president signed a proclamation that directed National Guard troops to the U.S.-Mexico border.

The Department of Homeland Security said that the deployment would be in coordination with governors, that the troops would "support federal law enforcement personnel, including [Customs and Border Protection]," and that federal immigration authorities would "direct enforcement efforts." The exact number of troops and duration of deployment had yet to be determined.

As part of attempts to seal the U.S. border with Mexico, the Trump administration in 2018 began following through on a "zero-tolerance" policy to prosecute anybody found to have crossed the border illegally. As children were legally not allowed to be detained with their parents, this meant that they were to be held separately as family cases wound through immigration courts.

A furor ensued after reports surfaced that nearly 2,000 children had been separated from their parents over a six-week period that ended in May 2018, compounded by photos of toddlers crying in cages. President Trump initially deflected blame for the situation, insisting it resulted from the efforts of predecessors and political opponents."The Democrats are forcing the breakup of families at the Border with their horrible and cruel legislative agenda," he tweeted.

The president ultimately caved to pressure from the bad PR, and on June 20 he signed an executive order thatdirected the Department of Homeland Security to keep families together. "I didnt like the sight or the feeling of families being separated," he said, adding that it remained important to have "zero tolerance for people that enter our country illegally" and for Congress to find a permanent solution to the problem. In the meantime, the DHS essentially revived the "catch-and-release" system that the zero-tolerance policy was meant to eradicate, while dealing with the logistics of reuniting families.

President Trump signed one of his most controversial executive orders on January 27, 2017, at the Pentagon, calling for "extreme vetting" to "keep radical Islamic terrorists out of the United States of America." The president's executive order was put into effect immediately, and refugees and immigrants from seven predominantly Muslim countries traveling to the U.S. were detained at U.S. airports. The order called for a ban on immigrants from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen for at least 90 days, temporarily suspended the entry of refugees for 120 days and barred Syrian refugees indefinitely. In an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network, President Trump also said he would give priority to Christian refugees trying to gain entry into the United States.

After facing multiple legal hurdles, President Trump signed a revised executive order on March 6, 2017,calling for a 90-day ban on travelers from six predominantly Muslim countries including Sudan, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. Iraq, which was included in the original executive order, was removed from the list. Travelers from the six listed countries, who hold green cards or have valid visas as of the signing of the order, will not be affected. Religious minorities would not get special preference, as was outlined in the original order, and an indefinite ban on Syrian refugees was reduced to 120 days.

On March 15, just hours before the revised ban was going to be put into effect, Derrick Watson, a federal judge in Hawaii, issued a temporary nationwide restraining order in a ruling that stated the executive order did not prove that a ban would protect the country from terrorism and that it was issued with a purpose to disfavor a particular religion, in spite of its stated, religiously neutral purpose. At a rally in Nashville, President Trump responded to the ruling, saying: "This is, in the opinion of many, an unprecedented judicial overreach.

Judge Theodore D. Chuang of Maryland also blocked the ban the following day, and in subsequent months, the ban was impeded in decisions handed down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia, and the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals once again.

However, on June 26, 2017, Trump won a partial victory when the Supreme Court announced it was allowing the controversial ban to go into effect for foreign nationals who lacked a "bona fide relationship with any person or entity in the United States." The court agreed to hear oral arguments for the case in October, but with the 90-to-120-day timeline in place for the administration to conduct its reviews, it was believed the case would be rendered moot by that point.

On September 24, 2017, Trump issued a new presidential proclamation, which permanently bans travel to the United States for most citizens from seven countries. Most were on the original list, including Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, while the new order included Chad, North Korea and some citizens of Venezuela (certain government officials and their families). The tweak did little to pacify critics, who argued that the order was still heavily biased toward Islam. The fact that Trump has added North Korea with few visitors to the U.S. and a few government officials from Venezuela doesnt obfuscate the real fact that the administrations order is still a Muslim ban, said Anthony D. Romero, the executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union.

On October 10, the Supreme Court cancelled a planned hearing on an appeal of the original travel ban. On October 17, the day before the order was to take effect, Judge Watson of Hawaii issued a nationwide order freezing the Trump administrations new travel ban, writing that the order was a poor fit for the issues regarding the sharing of public-safety and terrorism-related information that the president identifies.

On December 4, 2017, the Supreme Court allowed the third version of the Trump administrations travel ban to go into effect despite the ongoing legal challenges. The courts orders urged appeals courts to determineas quickly as possible whether theban was lawful.

Under the ruling, the administration could fully enforce its new restrictions on travel from eight nations, six of them predominantly Muslim. Citizens of Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea, along with some groups of people from Venezuela, would be unable to unable to emigrate to the United States permanently, with many barred from also working, studying or vacationing in the country.

On June 26, 2018, the Supreme Court upheld the president's travel ban by a 5-4 vote.Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said that Trump had the executive authority to make national security judgments in the realm of immigration, regardless of his previous statements about Islam. In a sharply worded dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said that the outcome was equivalent to that of Korematsu v. United States, which permitted the detention of Japanese-Americans during World War II.

The Valentine's Day 2018 shooting atMarjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, which left a total of 17 students and faculty dead, sparked a strong response from President Trump. He ordered the Justice Department to issue regulations banning bump stocks, and suggested he was willing to consider a range of measures, from strengthening background checks to raising the minimumage for buying rifles. He also backed an NRA-fueled proposal for arming teachers, which drew backlash from many in the profession.

The president remained invested in the issue even as the usual cycle of outrage began diminishing: In a televised February 28 meeting with lawmakers, he called for gun control legislation that would expand background checks to gun shows and internet transactions, secure schools and restrict sales for some young adults. At one point he called outPennsylvania Senator Pat Toomey for being "afraid of the NRA," and at another he suggested thatauthorities should seize guns from mentally ill or other potentially dangerous peoplewithout first going to court. "I like taking the guns early," he said. "Take the guns first, go through due process second."

His stances seemingly stunned the Republican lawmakers at the meeting, as well as the NRA, which previously considered the president as a strong supporter. However, within a few days, Trump was walking back his proposal to raise the age limit and mainly pushing for arming select teachers.

In early August 2017, intelligence experts confirmed that North Korea successfully produced a miniaturized nuclear warhead that fits inside its missiles, putting it one step closer to becoming a nuclear power. Around the same time, the North Korean state news agency said they were "examining the operational plan" to strike areas around the U.S. territory of Guam with medium-to-long-range strategic ballistic missiles. U.S. experts estimated North Koreas nuclear warheads at 60 and that the country could soon have an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching the United States. Trump responded that North Korea would be met with fire and fury if the threats continued and that the U.S. military was locked and loaded.

On August 15, Korean leader Kim Jong-un said hed "watch a little more the foolish and stupid conduct of the Yankees," which Trump tweeted was a very wise and well reasoned decision. However on August 20, North Korea warned that the U.S. was risking an "uncontrollable phase of a nuclear war" by following through with military drills with South Korea.

On August 28, North Korea launched a missile over Japan. The following day, Trump said all options were on the table. At the United Nations General Assembly on September 19, Trump pejoratively called Kim Jong-un Rocketman and said he would totally destroy North Korea if it threatened the United States or its allies, hours after the group voted to enact additional sanctions against the country.

Two days later, Trump widened American economic sanctions; three days later North Korea threatened to shoot down American airplanes even if they were not in its airspace, calling Trumps comments a declaration of war. A week later, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said the U.S. and North Korea were in direct communication and looking for a non-militarized path forward.

On October 20, CIA Director Mike Pompeo warned that North Korea was in the "final step" of being able to strike mainland America with nuclear warheads and the U.S. should react accordingly. However some foreign policy experts were concerned that war between the U.S. and North Korea was increasingly possible.

Following the 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang, South Korea, during which North Korea made a show of unity with the host country, its officials also relayed interest in opening up communications with Washington.President Trump leaped at the opportunity, announcing that he was willing to sit down with Kim.

On June 12, 2018, Trump and Kim met at the secluded Capella resort in Singapore, marking the first such encounter between a sitting U.S. president and North Korean leader. The two held private talks with their interpreters, before expanding the meeting to include such top staffers as Pompeo (now U.S. secretary of state), National Security Adviser John Bolton and White House Chief of Staff John Kelly.

Afterward, in a televised ceremony, the leaders signed a joint statement in which Trump "committed to provide security guarantees" to North Korea and Kim "reaffirmed his firm and unwavering commitment to complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula." Although their talks marked an early step in a diplomatic process that some predicted could take years to complete, the president said he believed denuclearization on the peninsula would begin "very quickly."

"We're very proud of what took place today," Trump said. "I think our whole relationship with North Korea and the Korean Peninsula is going to be a very much different situation than it has in the past."

Two weeks after the meeting with Kim, the White House announced that Trump would hold his first formal discussions with Russian President Vladimir Putin inHelsinki, Finland, on July 16, 2018.

The two men met on the heels of Trump's heavily scrutinized summit with NATO leaders, and shortly after the Justice Department announced the indictment of 12 Russian operatives for interfering in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Prompted to address the issue of election hacking in a joint news conference for the two leaders,President Trump refused to point a finger at his counterpart. "I think we've all been foolish. I think we're all to blame," he said, adding that"President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today."

The comments drew a harsh response stateside, with several notable Republicans joining their Democratic colleagues to question why the president was siding with Putin over his intelligence agencies.Senator McCain called it "one of the most disgraceful performances by an American president in memory," and even Trump ally Newt Gingrich weighed in with strong words, tweeting, "It is the most serious mistake of his presidency and must be corrected immediately."

Trump sought to quiet the furor after returning to the White House, insisting that he had misspoken when saying he didn't see why Russia should be blamed and reminding that he has "on numerous occasions noted our intelligence findings that Russians attempted to interfere in our elections," though he again suggested that other parties could be responsible.

Around that time, it was revealed that Trump had instructed Bolton, his national security adviser, to invite Putin to the White House that fall, news that caught Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats off guard. Bolton soon disclosed that he would postpone the invitation until the conclusion of the special counsel investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Additionally, it was learned that the soccer ball gifted to President Trump from Putin, to commemorate the recently completed World Cup, was embedded with a transmitter chip. It turned out that the chip was a standard feature for the product, designed to provide access toplayer videos and other content for people using their mobile devices near the ball.

In May 2018, over the objections of European allies, President Trump announced that he was withdrawing the U.S. from theIran nuclear deal enacted by his predecessor and reimposing sanctions on the Middle Eastern country.

The announcement initially drew a tepid response from Iran, but PresidentHassan Rouhani had stronger words on the issue while addressing diplomats in July, noting that "war with Iran is the mother of all wars" and warning his American counterpart to"not play with the lion's tail, because you will regret it eternally."

That seemingly enraged Trump, who fired off an all-caps tweet addressed to Rouhani: "Never, ever threaten the United States again or you will suffer consequences the likes of which few throughout history have ever suffered before," he wrote. "We are no longer a country that will stand for your demented words of violence & death. Be cautious!"

One of President Trumps first executive orders in office was calling on federal agencies to "waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay" aspects of the Affordable Care Act to minimize financial burden on states, insurers and individuals.

On March 7, 2017, House Republicans, led by Speaker Paul Ryan, introduced the American Health Care Act, a plan to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA). However, the controversial bill ultimately didn't have enough Republican votes and was withdrawn a few weeks later, representing amajor legislative setback for Speaker Ryan and President Trump.

After intense negotiations among party factions, a new Republican health care plan was brought to a vote in the House of Representatives on May 4, 2017, and passed by a slim margin of 217 to 213. That passed the buck to the Senate. Almost immediately after a draft was unveiled on June 22, conservative senators such as Ted Cruz declared they could not support the bill's failure to significantly lower premiums, while moderates like Susan Collins voiced concerns over its steep cuts to Medicaid. On June 27, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell elected to delay his planned vote for the bill. When the third, so-called skinny repeal, bill finally went to a vote on in the Senate July 28, it failed by three votes.

In September, a new bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act was put forth by Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana. However on September 26, Senate republicans announced they would not move forward with the current plan, as they were short of the required votes. We are disappointed in certain so-called Republicans, Trump responded.

On October 12, 2017 Trump signed an executive order in a move that could dismantle the ACA without Congresss approval, expanding health insurance products mostly less comprehensive plans through associations of small employers and more short-term medical coverage. He also announced that he would get rid of health insurance subsidies. Known as cost-sharing reduction payments, which lower the cost of deductibles for low-income Americans, they were expected to cost $9 billion in 2018 and $100 billion over the next decade.

On October 6, 2017, the Trump administration announced a rollback of the birth control mandate put in place by the Obama administrations Affordable Care Act, which required insurers to cover birth control at no cost without copayments as a preventive service. For years, the mandate was threatened by lawsuits from conservative and religious groups.

The Trump administration said the new exemption applies to any employer that objects to covering contraception services on the basis of sincerely held religious beliefs or moral convictions. The change is in line with Trumps promises as a candidate to ensure that religious groups are not bullied by the federal government because of their religious beliefs. Opponents of the measure say that it could potentially affect hundreds of thousands of women, and that access to the affordable contraception the mandate provided prevents unintended pregnancies and saves womens lives.

On April 26, 2017, just days away from his 100th day in office, President Trump announced his tax plan in a one-page outline that would dramatically change tax codes. The plan called for streamlining seven income tax brackets to three 10, 25 and 35 percent. However, the initial outline did not specify which income ranges would fall under those brackets. The plan also proposed to lower the corporate tax rate from 35 to 15 percent, eliminate the alternative-minimum tax and estate tax, and simplify the process for filing tax returns. The proposal did not address how the tax cuts might reduce federal revenue and increase debt.

On December 2, 2017, Trump achieved the first major legislative victory of his administration when the Senate passed a sweeping tax reform bill. Approved along party lines by a 51-49 vote, the bill drew criticism for extensive last-minute rewrites, with frustrated Democrats posting photos of pages filled with crossed-out text and handwriting crammed into the margins.

Among other measures, the Senate bill called for the slashing ofthe corporate tax rate from 35 to 20 percent, doubling personal deductions and ending the Obamacare mandate.It also included a controversial provision that allowed for "unborn children" to be named as beneficiaries of college savings accounts, which critics called an attempt to support the pro-life movement.Despite estimates by the Congressional Budget Office that the bill would cost $1.5 trillion over a decade, GOP senators insisted that charges would be offset by a growing economy.

After the bill's passage, President Trump tweeted: Biggest Tax Bill and Tax Cuts in history just passed in the Senate. Now these great Republicans will be going for final passage. Thank you to House and Senate Republicans for your hard work and commitment!On December 20, the final tax bill formally passed both chambers of Congress, needing only the president's signature to give him his first major legislative victory.

Following partisan battles over a spending bill in early 2018, which resulted in a brief government shutdown and stopgap measures, President Trump threatened to torpedo a $1.3 trillion spending bill with a last-minute veto. Reportedly angry that the bill did not fully fund his long-promised Mexican border wall, he nevertheless signed the bill into law on March 23, hours before another government shutdown would have gone into effect.

On March 1, 2018, after the conclusion of a Commerce Department investigation, President Trump announced that he was imposing tariffs of 25 percent on steel imports and 10 percent on aluminum. The following month, the administration said it was adding a 25 percent tariff on more than 1,000 Chinese products to penalize the country for its trade practices, though Trump ultimately granted temporary exemptions to China, the European Union, Canada and Mexico as he sought to renegotiate deals.

His actions resulted in new agreements with South Korea and multiple South American countries to restrain their metal exports, but talks with China, the E.U. and the border countries stalled. In late May, the administration announced that it was moving forward with all tariffs, including a tax on $34 billion worth of Chinese goods that went into effect in July.

The move drew a harsh response from the E.U., Canada and Mexico, which announced retaliatory measures. With Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau condemning Trump's "unacceptable actions" and French President Emmanuel Macron threatening to isolate the U.S. from the Group of 7, the president faced a frosty reception at the G-7 summit in Quebec in June. He ultimately left the summit early, making headlines on the way out by announcing he would not sign a communique between the seven nations and taking shots at Trudeau on Twitter. In July, Trump again had harsh words for allies at the NATO summit in Brussels, Belgium, including accusations that Germany was "captive" to Russia for its dependence on Russian natural gas, and followed with criticism of U.K. Prime MinisterTheresa Mayfor herhandling of Brexit.

Back home, the president attempted to head off the political fallout of a potentially costly trade war with the announcement that the administration would provide up to $12 billion in emergency relief funds for U.S. farmers.

On February 22, 2017 the Trump administration rolled back federal protection for transgender students to use bathrooms that correspond to their gender identity, allowing states and school districts to interpret federal anti-discrimination law. On March 27, 2017 President Trump signed several measures under the Congressional Review Act to reverse regulations related to education, land use and a "blacklisting rule" requiring federal contractors to disclose violations of federal labor, wage and workplace safety laws.

On December 6, 2017, President Trump announced that the U.S. was formally recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, and would move the American embassy there from its current location in Tel Aviv. The declaration broke decades of precedent, in which the U.S. refused to take sides in the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians over territorial rights to the city.

Read the original here:

President Donald J. Trump - Biography

Donald Trump Moves to Deport Vietnam War Refugees – The Atlantic

The White House unilaterally reinterpreted the agreement in the spring of 2017 to exempt people convicted of crimes from its protections, allowing the administration to send back a small number of pre-1995 Vietnamese immigrants, a policy it retreated from this past August. Last week, however, James Thrower, a spokesperson for the U.S. embassy in Hanoi, said the American government was again reversing course.

Washington now believes that the 2008 agreement fails to protect pre-1995 Vietnamese immigrants from deportation, Thrower told The Atlantic. This would apply to such migrants who are either undocumented or have committed crimes, and this interpretation would not apply to those who have become American citizens.

The United States and Vietnam signed a bilateral agreement on removals in 2008 that establishes procedures for deporting Vietnamese citizens who arrived in the United States after July 12, 1995, and are subject to final orders of removal, Thrower said. While the procedures associated with this specific agreement do not apply to Vietnamese citizens who arrived in the United States before July 12, 1995, it does not explicitly preclude the removal of pre-1995 cases.

The about-turn came as a State Department spokesperson confirmed that the Department of Homeland Security had met with representatives of the Vietnamese embassy in Washington, D.C., but declined to provide details of when the talks took place or what was discussed.

Katie Waldman, a spokeswoman for DHS said: We have 5,000 convicted criminal aliens from Vietnam with final orders of removalthese are non-citizens who during previous administrations were arrested, convicted, and ultimately ordered removed by a federal immigration judge. Its a priority of this administration to remove criminal aliens to their home country.

Spokespeople for the Vietnamese embassy did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

But the Southeast Asia Resource Action Center, a Washington, D.C., advocacy group, said in a statement that the purpose of the meeting was to change the 2008 agreement. That deal had initially been set to last for five years, and was to be automatically extended every three years unless either party opted out. Under those rules, it was set to renew next month. Since 1998, final removal orders have been issued for more than 9,000 Vietnamese nationals.

When it first decided to reinterpret the 2008 deal, Donald Trumps administration argued that only pre-1995 arrivals with criminal convictions were exempt from the agreements protection and eligible for deportation. Vietnam initially conceded and accepted some of those immigrants before stiffening its resistance; about a dozen Vietnamese immigrants ended up being deported from the United States. The August decision to change course, reported to a California court in October, appeared to put such moves at least temporarily on ice, but the latest shift leaves the fate of a larger number of Vietnamese immigrants in doubt. Now all pre-1995 arrivals are exempt from the 2008 agreements protection.

Read the rest here:

Donald Trump Moves to Deport Vietnam War Refugees - The Atlantic

Donald Trump Moves to Deport Vietnam War Refugees – The …

The White House unilaterally reinterpreted the agreement in the spring of 2017 to exempt people convicted of crimes from its protections, allowing the administration to send back a small number of pre-1995 Vietnamese immigrants, a policy it retreated from this past August. Last week, however, James Thrower, a spokesperson for the U.S. embassy in Hanoi, said the American government was again reversing course.

Washington now believes that the 2008 agreement fails to protect pre-1995 Vietnamese immigrants from deportation, Thrower told The Atlantic. This would apply to such migrants who are either undocumented or have committed crimes, and this interpretation would not apply to those who have become American citizens.

The United States and Vietnam signed a bilateral agreement on removals in 2008 that establishes procedures for deporting Vietnamese citizens who arrived in the United States after July 12, 1995, and are subject to final orders of removal, Thrower said. While the procedures associated with this specific agreement do not apply to Vietnamese citizens who arrived in the United States before July 12, 1995, it does not explicitly preclude the removal of pre-1995 cases.

The about-turn came as a State Department spokesperson confirmed that the Department of Homeland Security had met with representatives of the Vietnamese embassy in Washington, D.C., but declined to provide details of when the talks took place or what was discussed.

Katie Waldman, a spokeswoman for DHS said: We have 5,000 convicted criminal aliens from Vietnam with final orders of removalthese are non-citizens who during previous administrations were arrested, convicted, and ultimately ordered removed by a federal immigration judge. Its a priority of this administration to remove criminal aliens to their home country.

Spokespeople for the Vietnamese embassy did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

But the Southeast Asia Resource Action Center, a Washington, D.C., advocacy group, said in a statement that the purpose of the meeting was to change the 2008 agreement. That deal had initially been set to last for five years, and was to be automatically extended every three years unless either party opted out. Under those rules, it was set to renew next month. Since 1998, final removal orders have been issued for more than 9,000 Vietnamese nationals.

When it first decided to reinterpret the 2008 deal, Donald Trumps administration argued that only pre-1995 arrivals with criminal convictions were exempt from the agreements protection and eligible for deportation. Vietnam initially conceded and accepted some of those immigrants before stiffening its resistance; about a dozen Vietnamese immigrants ended up being deported from the United States. The August decision to change course, reported to a California court in October, appeared to put such moves at least temporarily on ice, but the latest shift leaves the fate of a larger number of Vietnamese immigrants in doubt. Now all pre-1995 arrivals are exempt from the 2008 agreements protection.

Link:

Donald Trump Moves to Deport Vietnam War Refugees - The ...

Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.

Federal law requires us to use our best efforts to collect and report the name, address, occupation, and employer of individuals whose contribution exceeds $200 in an election cycle.

By clicking "Donate," I certify that the following statements are true and accurate:* I am a U.S. Citizen or lawfully admitted permanent resident* This contribution is made from my personal funds, not from an account maintained by a corporation, labor union, or national bank, and is not being reimbursed by another person or entity.* I am not a federal government contractor.

The maximum amount an individual may contribute is $2,700 per election. Your contribution (up to $2,700) will be designated for the primary election. The next $2,700 will be designated for the general election.

Contributions to Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes. Contributions from corporations, labor unions, federal contractors, and foreign nationals are prohibited.

By providing your phone number, you are consenting to receive calls and SMS/MMS msgs, including autodialed and automated calls and texts, to that number from Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. Msg&data rates may apply. Terms & conditions/privacy policy apply sms-terms.com/88022.

Mail: To contribute by mail, please send a personal check made payable to the "Donald J. Trump for President, Inc." to:

Donald J. Trump President, IncC/O Trump Tower725 5th AvenueNew York, NY 10022

Please include your full name, address, email address, occupation and employer in the envelope.

Privacy Policy

See the original post:

Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.

Bush’s Funeral Wasn’t About Trump. But Of Course It Was …

The memorial service for George H.W. Bush was a perfectly civil and eminently civilized event, and if one was listening in a literal-minded way it all sounded like a grand exception to life in modern Washingtontwo hours of stories and tributes that were entirely bereft of political tension.

The only way to listen in a literal frame of mind, of course, was through some equivalent of self-lobotomyto be willfully oblivious of context, guileless in a way that certainly does not describe Bush or any of the people he chose to speak at his farewell.

Story Continued Below

The service was replete with praise for the 41st president that could, with just the slightest nudge of interpretation, be heard as implied rebuke of the 45th president. But only implied, never explicitthis, unlike almost everything else in American politics today, was not about Donald Trump.

And yet it very much was. Speakers rhapsodized about Bushs natural good cheer and optimism; his willingness to share credit and accept blame; his preference for self-deprecating humor; his gift for personal diplomacy; his loyalty to friends when they were down; his talent at assembling international coalitions; his mistrust of unthinking partisanship; his inaugural address in which he said that Americans must judge our lives by kindness to friends and neighbors rather than the pursuit of a bigger car, a bigger bank account; his commitment to truth and to living up to the obligations of a gentleman.

Who wouldnt admire these traits? Or expect that any president should try to emulate them?

To be political while sounding apolitical is a lost art in contemporary times, and it would be hard for President Trump to claim injury because his name was never mentioned. President George W. Bushwho, like his father, broke with his party in not supporting Trumpswerved skillfully around that by starting his remarks by thanking distinguished guests and then, with seeming emphasis, adding including our presidents and first ladies but mentioning none of them by name.

The four living ex-presidents other than George W. Bush all sat together in the front row and the cameras caught Trump in a pose that, if he were a child, might have gotten him a whispered correction from a parentdont cross your arms in a church service! Thats a pretty minor sinwho among hasnt fidgeted in our seats or snuck a furtive glance at our phones?and hardly detracted from the general mood of Washington on best behavior.

Hillary Clinton likewise deserves some forbearance on body language. When Trump arrived he shook hands with former President Obama, with whom he has not spoken in some two years, and former President Bill Clinton looked over with what seemed to be the slightest nod of recognition while his wife looked straight ahead. Some social media commenters said this was rude. But the rap on Clinton as candidate was that she was supposedly calculating and un-genuine. It was hard not to appreciate the sincerity of her straight-ahead stare, avoiding eye contact with the man who led crowds in chants of lock her up and still assails her regularly on Twitter. Given the heat of everyday political discourse, the coldness of the moment was in its own way more compelling.

Three months ago, the same spacethe Washington National Cathedralhosted another memorial service after the passing of Sen. John McCain. Like Bush, he had the lead time to carefully plan his own service, which became weaponized after a dying McCain made clear that he did not want the man who derided him for having been captured in Vietnam to be present. The Bush family, by contrast, was willing to set aside its disdain for Trumpthe taunts of low-energy Jeb, the relentless criticism of George W.s Iraq war. Whether out of respect for the office or a desire to avoid another politicized Washington funeral, they made it clear that their leader had very much wanted the current president to be there, and in remarks in recent days family members had emphasized that Trump has been very gracious. Assuming that comment to be entirely sincere, it is still a shrewdly effective way to shift the weeks events toward groundpolite, decorous, devoid of controversythat is hardly Trumps natural terrain. One supposes that he was not sorry when the plane that is normally Air Force One lifted off to carry the 41st president back to Texas for burial, allowing Washington to return to normal business for the first time since Friday evening.

The commentariats focus on Bushs contrast with Trump tended to take attention from what might otherwise have been the dominant motif of the memorial service: the contrast, and communion, between generations.

Like many people his age, Bushwho was born in 1924reached adulthood in accelerated fashion, with the onset of war and the self-possession that comes with facing ultimate danger in combat, the sense of perspective from knowing plenty of young people who never came home.

But, also like many people his age, Bush in some ways became an old person in accelerated fashion. By the time he was in early middle age, at age 40, one of the themes of his public career was already taking shapea tension with a younger generation who challenged the establishment values that Bush held dear, who didnt share his faith the old verities.

This generational jostling took place in his own family. George W. Bush, born in 1946, never joined the counterculture but he did dabble in the spirit of rebellion and libertinism that defined the 1960s, and he didnt join in the Bush family tradition of professional overachievement until he was approaching age 40.

And the elder Bush was never comfortable with baby boomer values as they became ascendant in politics. After his victory in the first Persian Gulf War in 1991, Bush boasted, We have finally kicked the Vietnam syndromehis derisive term for people who were skeptical of the efficacy and virtue of American military force. (That notion, of course, proved overly optimistic decades later in the broiling sands of Iraq.)

A year later, Bush was mystified to be beaten by someone his supporters disdained as the personification of flabby baby boomer values: Bill Clinton. During Clintons presidency Bushand, in particular, former first lady Barbara Bushmade plain at key intervals their dim appraisal of Clintons character. It was only later, after Clinton left office, that a genuine friendship between the two men blossomed.

W. cited this post-presidential bond during his remarks, calling Bill Clinton one of several brothers from other mothers.

One advantage of living to 94 is that one gets to witness even people regarded as impertinent youngsters become old men. George W. Bush and Bill Clinton are both now 72 and look it.

And that perhaps was another one of the enduring conclusions of Bushs elegant memorial service: Public figures, including presidents, tend to live awfully long these days. Joining Bush, Clinton and Obama among the living ex-presidents in attendance was Jimmy Carter, age 94, who if he lives into April of next year will surpass George H.W. Bush as the oldest ex-president ever.

Joining George W. Bush and historian Jon Meacham in the eulogies were former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, who will turn 80 in March, and former Sen. Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.) who is 87. There were references in remarks to George H.W. Bushs longtime friend, James A. Baker III, age 88, who wept in a reference to his visit to Bushs deathbed in Houston.

This trend toward longevity has been evident for a while. Ronald Reagan died in 2004 at age 93; Gerald Ford died in 2006, also at 93. This recent record may obscure how unusual this is. George H.W. Bush lived more than twice as long as John F. Kennedy, the youngest president to die. And such icons as Theodore Roosevelt, who died at 60, Franklin D. Roosevelt, who died at 63, or Lyndon B. Johnson, at age 64. Even Richard Nixon, who seemed like quite an old man at his death in 1994, made it only to 81.

Perhaps the living presidents in the cathedral Wednesday had the same thought: With a combination of good genes and good luck it is now reasonable to suppose they may, like Bush, live long enough to see the process of historical reappraisal take place in their own lifetimes.

And perhaps, as he folded his arms and listened to the encomiums for his predecessor, that was what Trump was thinking, too.

John F. Harris is editor-in-chief of POLITICOand author of"The Survivor: Bill Clinton in the White House."

Continue reading here:

Bush's Funeral Wasn't About Trump. But Of Course It Was ...