These five women were starting businesses in Lynn. Then COVID-19 hit, and the challenges multiplied – The Boston Globe

The other newbie owners echo her sentiments. Rachel Miller, who had been chef at the former Clio in Boston, opened Nightshade Noodle Bar last December in a tiny space in downtown Lynn, serving the Vietnamese and Asian-inspired dishes for which she had gained a pop-up following. Sommelier Sarah Marshall started Lucille Wine Shop in January, wagering that Lynn and surrounding communities were ready for her specialty wine and beer, plus tastings and classes. And Estefani Orellana Garcia and her mother, Fidelina Garcia, opened Estefanis, serving Central American and Mexican specialties on bustling Union Street, just a few weeks before the governor temporarily closed down indoor dining in Massachusetts.

The shock to hospitality businesses everywhere continues as restaurateurs assess whether offering takeout and opening dining rooms at reduced capacity makes financial sense, all while worrying about the health of customers and employees. These owners have the same concerns. Miller tells of crazy, long days after Nightshade Noodle pivoted in early spring to takeout and delivery and she reduced her staff to only a few people. The first two weeks were slow, but then rocked, and since then she figures she and her tiny staff sell just as much as before with half the staff. There is now a little patio with a pickup window, a rarity in the neighborhood, and takeout Wednesday through Sunday.

But, she adds, Ive definitely found a new sense of purpose. Miller, who was drawn to Lynn for its diversity, also found a deeper sense of community, donating a portion of profits in June to the North Shore Juneteenth Association and the NAGLY, the North Shore Alliance of GLBTQ Youth.

Mulfords Uncommon Feasts has become not just a takeout and delivery restaurant but a retail space for products from farmers who lost other restaurant accounts. She wanted to support them and offers their products on her takeout menus along with prepared foods. Ive completely shifted my perspective, she says. Catering and larger events are off the table, and in fact she cant see opening her airy dining room again in the near future because we cant do service the way we want. But artists in the Lydia Pinkham Building where the restaurant is located have presented online shows. The small patio is surrounded by the bustle of Western Avenue, she says, where trucks rumble by and children play in nearby spaces. It all feels fun and vibrant.

Estefani Orellana Garcia grew up in Lynn and is fiercely proud of that. After graduating from Bentley University and spending several years working in accounting and finance, she decided she hated the corporate world, and realized she wanted something more fulfilling.

With her mother, she opened Estefanis in the heart of the city, on the first floor of a residential building that her family owns. Their goal, she says, has always been to make their city better. The restaurant serves dishes of her Guatemalan and Salvadoran heritage, plus popular Mexican specialties, and its very much a family affair with her cousins husband as chef, her mother running the kitchen, and Orellana Garcia dealing with social media, customers, and everything else. Since reopening in early May, theyve been doing takeout and delivery, but the restaurant space is large so Orellana Garcia is considering trying indoor seating.

Marshall, of Lucille Wine Shop & Tasting Room, was able to stay open throughout the shutdowns, but found she also had to find new ways of doing business. It was almost like starting a second business, she says, as she added curbside pickup and home delivery, substituted in-store tastings with online events, and began to put her eclectic inventory online. The first couple of weeks were very stressful, Marshall, who was formerly sommelier for Oleana in Cambridge and Sarma in Somerville, says. But there were silver linings, she adds. I wasnt planning to do e-commerce for a year or so but now that shes got online ordering up and running, shes glad thats out of the way.

Now after months when every single week was a new animal, she is beginning to feel more confident that customers will gravitate to her very personal customer service and curated inventory. The neighborhood and her customers have been loyal and supportive, ordering cases of wine and joining in virtual tastings. More clients now are feeling more confident about coming into the store, and shes getting calls about private events (16 people or fewer) in the future.

The other women also found loyalty in customers. People deliberately shop with us weekly, Mulford of Uncommon Feasts says, adding that, surprisingly, shes even getting new customers. Its growing our connection to Lynn, she says.

The difficulties are real, too. Orellana Garcia says that when Estefanis reopened to offer takeout, there were shortages of supplies every week. One week it was trays, another week bags, another food compartment boxes. One week there were no containers anywhere, she says, and she had to figure out ways of getting supplies. Although she had waitressed in college and her mother had been a banquet waitress, the whole restaurant business was so new to them that she admits to Googling how to open a restaurant. Now shes getting comfortable with social media as Estefanis birria tacos, with slow-roasted beef and a Mexican favorite in Los Angeles, is taking off, attracting customers from as far away as Maine and New York.

One benefit, all the owners say, is a sense of women working together. When Orellana Garcia couldnt find supplies for takeout at Restaurant Depot, she said, Rachel [Miller of Nightshade] said she would share some. Mulford, Miller, and Marshall also talked of earlier collaborations with other women owners.

The owners have formed like a little club, says Miller. Its huge to have women-owned businesses.

For, as Marshall of Lucille Wine Shop says: If I can survive opening through a pandemic, I can do anything.

Alison Arnett can be reached at arnett.alison@gmail.com.

Read the original:

These five women were starting businesses in Lynn. Then COVID-19 hit, and the challenges multiplied - The Boston Globe

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-17-2020 – 10 AM – West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

TheWest Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR) reports as of 10:00 a.m., on July 17,2020, there have been 219,947 total confirmatory laboratory results receivedfor COVID-19, with 4,710 total cases and 100 deaths.

DHHR has confirmed the death of an 84-yearold male from Cabell County. We are deeply saddened by this news, a loss toboth the family and our state, said Bill J. Crouch, DHHR Cabinet Secretary.

In alignment with updated definitions fromthe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the dashboard includes probablecases which are individuals that have symptoms and either serologic (antibody)or epidemiologic (e.g., a link to a confirmed case) evidence of disease, but noconfirmatory test.

CASESPER COUNTY (Case confirmed by lab test/Probable case):Barbour (24/0), Berkeley (537/19), Boone(52/0), Braxton (5/0), Brooke (31/1), Cabell (205/7), Calhoun (4/0), Clay(15/0), Fayette (96/0), Gilmer (13/0), Grant (21/1), Greenbrier (74/0),Hampshire (44/0), Hancock (50/3), Hardy (48/1), Harrison (134/1), Jackson(149/0), Jefferson (261/5), Kanawha (464/12), Lewis (24/1), Lincoln (15/0),Logan (41/0), Marion (122/3), Marshall (74/1), Mason (26/0), McDowell (12/0),Mercer (67/0), Mineral (69/2), Mingo (39/2), Monongalia (643/15), Monroe(14/1), Morgan (19/1), Nicholas (19/1), Ohio (174/0), Pendleton (18/1),Pleasants (4/1), Pocahontas (37/1), Preston (88/21), Putnam (96/1), Raleigh(89/3), Randolph (194/2), Ritchie (3/0), Roane (12/0), Summers (2/0), Taylor(26/1), Tucker (7/0), Tyler (10/0), Upshur (31/2), Wayne (141/2), Webster(2/0), Wetzel (39/0), Wirt (6/0), Wood (190/11), Wyoming (7/0).

As case surveillance continues at thelocal health department level, it may reveal that those tested in a certaincounty may not be a resident of that county, or even the state as an individualin question may have crossed the state border to be tested.

Pleasenote that delays may be experienced with the reporting of information from thelocal health department to DHHR.

Please visit thedashboard at http://www.coronavirus.wv.gov for more detailed information.

Read this article:

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-17-2020 - 10 AM - West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

6 burning questions for Covid-19 vaccine developers headed to the House – STAT

Some drug companies say well have a coronavirus vaccine by the winter. Others say thats an irresponsible prediction. Some promise to forgo profits on a vaccine, but others believe theyre entitled to their monetary due.

Now, lawmakers can force the industry to get its story straight. On Tuesday, executives from five drug companies leading the vaccine race are due at a congressional hearing to talk about their progress in developing a product the entire world desperately needs. Representatives from AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Moderna, and Pfizer will appear in front of the House Energy and Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee.

People weary of the constraints Covid-19 is placing on lives are pinning a lot of hopes on the promises those companies have made, particularly when it comes to when a vaccine might be ready. But there are still looming questions, from who will get a successful vaccine first to how much it might cost.

advertisement

Here are six burning questions the panel could pose.

Most of the manufacturers in the hunt for Covid-19 vaccines are making very bold promises about how quickly vaccines will be ready to be deployed and how rapidly theyll be able to produce their vaccines to the kind of scale needed to combat the pandemic. Many are promising tens, even hundreds of millions of doses by early 2021, and some even predict they can scale to the billion-dose range within the next calendar year.

advertisement

But in a recent interview with Harvard professor Tsedal Neeley, Merck CEO Ken Frazier warned that these predicted timelines are doing a grave disservice to the public.

For one thing, he said, vaccine development takes time. The fastest vaccine ever developed before now was the mumps vaccine, which took four years.

Cutting corners is a risky business, Frazier suggested: If youre going to use a vaccine in billions of people, you better know what that vaccine does.

Implied in the statement is the risk that any problems that might arise from use of the vaccines would throw fuel on the fire of the anti-vaccine movement, which is already sowing doubts about the safety of these fast-tracked Covid-19 vaccines.

Frazier also warned that giving people the sense a vaccine may be coming soon allows politicians to downplay other tools that can suppress spread of the disease, such as [wearing] the damn masks.

The most pressing question facing the drug industry is how soon it can come up with an effective vaccine. But right behind that is just how much itll cost. And the industry could answer now by committing to a price before a vaccine is approved.

The U.S. government has some leverage for such a demand. With the exception of Pfizer, each of the companies at the table has received substantial federal funding to support its vaccine development. Through the governments Operation Warp Speed project, taxpayers are on the line for more than $3 billion in research support, and the National Institutes of Health is picking up the tab for at least three massive vaccine studies.

So, what does the American public get in exchange? Some manufacturers have promised to sell their vaccines on a not-for-profit basis, at least for the extent of the pandemic. Others have not. Either way, its looking increasingly likely that the novel coronavirus will not simply vanish once the current crisis subsides, meaning there will demand for vaccines for years to come. If thats the case, will companies come to charge whatever the market will bear? Or are they willing to make pricing commitments now?

Since the start of the crisis, news about vaccine trials has made global headlines, moved markets, and seeped into politics. But the process of disseminating that data has been inconsistent. In May, Moderna put out a press release with vague positive language about its early-stage trial, frustrating experts who wanted more. Pfizer chose to upload its data to a preprint server, where scientific papers are posted without peer review, while AstraZeneca is holding out for publication in the Lancet.

A working vaccine is key to restoring anything resembling normalcy, and the public is desperate for information on the process. But without standardizing the current system, the public is left to parse press releases, rumors, and, worst of all, Twitter. Can the companies developing vaccines establish a system whereby the world gets clear, timely updates on their progress?

The second a coronavirus vaccine proves to be safe and effective, the entire world is going to be calling its manufacturer. The U.S. has already moved to secure millions of future doses, and the European Union is reportedly negotiating to do the same, but whats the plan for the world at large?

Scaling up manufacturing is a time-consuming process, meaning drug makers will be dealing with a constrained supply in the months following a vaccines approval. Beyond the wealthy nations that are already locking in bids, how can countries in the developing world ensure they get access?

That may seem like a question beyond the scope of a House hearing, but the U.S. has a public health interest in vaccines being widely available. With an economy deeply reliant on global trade and travel the U.S. will be at risk of another Covid-19 outbreak as long as the virus persists anywhere in the world.

Some manufacturers are suggesting that there may be enough data to warrant emergency use authorizations as soon as October. If that happens, vaccines destined for use in potentially billions of people will be deployed after mere months of human testing.

In the U.S., manufacturers are shielded from liability if a vaccine or drug developed in response to a health emergency causes injuries to people who receive it. That protection comes from the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act of 2005.

If that protection were not in place, would vaccine manufacturers be willing to roll out vaccines on such a slight evidence base? Will they make them available to countries that dont offer similar protection against liability?

The major manufacturers are all making vaccine at-risk, meaning they are already working to produce at commercial scale, even before they determine whether their vaccine candidate actually works. The goal is to have large amounts available for use as soon as the Food and Drug Administration green-lights a vaccine. If some candidates fail to clear the FDAs bar, that product will be destroyed.

But manufacturing vaccines is a notoriously unpredictable enterprise. During the 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic, the start of mass vaccination was delayed by several months because the manufacturers had trouble scaling up production. The doses arrived as the fall wave of the pandemic was subsiding in the U.S. That happened with a vaccine that manufacturers had decades of experience producing. So it wouldnt be surprising if some of the companies have or will hit snags. In fact, it would probably be surprising if all the projects sailed through on the very ambitious timelines that have been laid out.

See the original post:

6 burning questions for Covid-19 vaccine developers headed to the House - STAT

Safe Pregnancy As COVID-19 Surges: What’s Best For Mom And Baby? – NPR

Pregnancy is a time of hope and dreams for most women and their families even during a pandemic. Still, their extra need to avoid catching the coronavirus has meant more isolation and sacrifices, too. Leo Patrizi/Getty Images hide caption

Pregnancy is a time of hope and dreams for most women and their families even during a pandemic. Still, their extra need to avoid catching the coronavirus has meant more isolation and sacrifices, too.

Carissa Helmer and her husband had been trying to get pregnant for five or six months by early April, when COVID-19 started to spike in the Washington, D.C., area where they live. Maybe, they mused, they should stop trying to conceive for a few months.

But then a pregnancy test came back positive.

"We were, like, 'Oh well I guess it's too late for that!' " Helmer says, laughing.

In some ways, she says, there are a few convenient aspects to being pregnant now starting with being able to work from home. Before the pandemic, she and her husband both commuted 90 minutes each way to their jobs in the city driving to the subway, then taking the train downtown. Because she's now working from home in her job in the subscriptions department at the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, Helmer is able to get more sleep and has been able to combat morning sickness with ginger ale and crackers. "On the Metro, you're not allowed to eat or drink at all," she says.

But other aspects of the pregnancy have been tougher than she expected. For one thing, she's had to go to all of her doctor's appointments by herself.

"It's completely understandable," Helmer says, "but I think that that's something ... we hadn't anticipated in a first pregnancy that my husband wouldn't be able to be in the room."

Carissa Helmer and her husband, Timothy, had been trying to get pregnant for months when COVID-19 first spiked in the Washington, D.C., area where they live. Helmer says she's found a few things convenient about being pregnant now: being able to work from home, getting more sleep, and not having to deal with morning sickness on the subway. Deborah Helmer hide caption

Then there's the delicacy required in making rules about visits from relatives.

"We've been trying to be really strict with them," Helmer says, advising extended family: " 'You know, it's really important that you're quarantining for 14 days before you come and visit us.' I think that's been a little hard to explain to some folks, just to tell them that I'm more at risk, and it's not anything against them."

Though she sounds relaxed, Helmer tells me that she's worried about getting the coronavirus.

"I'm terrified," she says. "My husband's still going to the grocery store, and that's pretty much the only place that he goes. And the only place that I go is the doctor's office."

Digging into the data about COVID-19 and pregnancy

How worried should expecting parents be about any extra risks the coronavirus might pose to the mom or developing fetus?

The answer and advice may continue to change, public health officials say, as the evidence rolls in. In June, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a study showing pregnant women may be more likely to develop a severe case of COVID-19 than other women their age when they become infected with the virus. And just this week, physicians in France published a case study that strongly suggests a newborn caught the coronavirus before birth from his mother via the placenta.

"Where you can, you need to decrease your exposures. But that has to be practical," says Dr. Laura Riley, an OB-GYN at New York-Presbyterian Hospital who chairs the department of obstetrics and gynecology at Weill Cornell Medicine, and has been involved in devising pandemic guidelines for practitioners and patients on behalf of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Because this coronavirus is relatively new to humans, the evidence about the added risks it imposes on a pregnancy is scant. The June CDC analysis was partly reassuring, suggesting that women who get COVID-19 when pregnant are at no greater risk of dying from the virus than nonpregnant women their age, though they do seem to be at somewhat greater risk of developing a severe case of the illness.

The study reviewed more than 91,000 U.S. women of reproductive age who had a lab-confirmed coronavirus infection; of those, roughly 8,200 were pregnant at the time. Compared with other women of reproductive age who tested positive for the virus, pregnant women more often went into the intensive care unit and were more likely to need mechanical ventilation.

The data also showed that pregnant women who are Hispanic or Black may be at higher risk of infection than white pregnant women. (Black and Hispanic people in the U.S. have been found to be at greater risk of contracting the coronavirus and at higher risk of death from COVID-19.)

But there were limits to the CDC study that are worth noting, Riley says limits that may have made the added COVID-19 risk to pregnant women look bigger than it is.

First, pregnancy status was only known for 28% of the women of reproductive age who tested positive in the study. That means some infected women who went on to deliver perfectly healthy babies were likely not counted. And for those whose pregnancy status was known, data on race and ethnicity, symptoms, underlying conditions and outcomes were missing for a large proportion of cases. That, too, may have skewed their findings, the researchers who did the analysis say.

Then there's the matter of hospitalization rates for pregnant women. Many hospitals have implemented universal coronavirus screening for anyone admitted to a hospital's labor and delivery unit. What the evidence analyzed by the CDC doesn't reveal, Riley points out, is whether a pregnant woman was being hospitalized because of symptoms of COVID-19, or because she was going into labor.

"You can't tell from this data who came in because they were sick with COVID, and who came in because they were just going to deliver and were oh, by the way, COVID-positive," Riley says.

Plus, she says, it's hard to tell from the CDC data whether a pregnant woman was admitted to the ICU because her case of COVID-19 was severe, or because that particular hospital was only equipped to handle a pregnancy involving COVID-19 in an ICU.

There was one finding in the CDC data that does stand out to Riley as potentially worrisome: "It seemed pregnant women were more likely to need the mechanical ventilation, which suggests more severe disease."

Still, even there, she says, the number of coronavirus-positive pregnant women in the study who were sick enough to need a ventilator was quite small: 42 women out of 8,207 that's half of 1%.

Riley says her own OB-GYN practice includes many high-risk pregnancies including some older women, some who are pregnant with twins or triplets, and some who have underlying health conditions such as chronic hypertension or diabetes. So does this new data change what she tells her patients about pregnancy in the age of COVID-19?

Not really, she says.

"What it underscores, and what I tell my patients," Riley says, "is you just need to remain diligent in terms of all those things that we know work [to prevent infection with the virus]. We know social distancing works. We know that wearing a mask works. We know that washing your hands frequently works." Guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also advise "limiting contact with other individuals as much as practicable" and urge patients to "maintain an adequate supply of preparedness resources including medications."

Where it can get harder for her patients, she says, is that, to keep the mother-to-be protected, partners and other members of the household need to take those same precautions. "That may not be so easy," Riley says, "but it's absolutely critical."

If pregnant women do have symptoms of COVID-19 or have been exposed to the coronavirus, they need to let their doctors know so they can be tested and receive appropriate care, Riley advises.

''Am I just going to be housebound the whole of pregnancy?''

Taking every precaution can mean staying close to home.

Kate Bernard lives in Austin, Texas, where she works at a music nonprofit and sings with her band KP and the Boom Boom. Originally from Yorkshire, England, she met her husband 10 years ago on a trip to Austin, and they married 2 1/2 months later.

Kate Bernard met her husband, David, a decade ago on a trip to Austin, Texas, and became pregnant in March. These days, she says, she's grateful to be able to do her work for a music nonprofit from home. Kate Bernard hide caption

Their world changed suddenly in mid-March: "The coronavirus lockdowns were just being announced that week that we got pregnant," she says.

The pandemic led to canceling the gigs the band had scheduled, and Bernard says she's not sure how she would have fared if she'd had to perform, considering her pregnancy-induced nausea and the Texas heat. These days, Bernard says, just 20 minutes outside in the heat makes her queasy, "and some of those gigs were outdoor gigs where you're playing for an hour, two hours."

To try to steer clear of the coronavirus, she's doing her nonprofit job from home. Bernard says she's grateful that's an option she has been able to work in bed whenever the sciatic pain in her back flares.

"I just can't imagine having to get dressed and get myself together" to go to the office, she says she figures she would have felt compelled to keep her pregnancy under wraps at work until the end of the first trimester.

Not that concealing it would have been easy in her small, open-plan office. "We've just got one bathroom, and they'd have heard the puking," she says, laughing. "They'd have known."

Bernard says her life has been a roller coaster since March, and the current surge of coronavirus cases in Texas only adds to her concern.

"We don't know when this is going to end, and it doesn't give you hope when the numbers are going up in the state that you live in," she says. "Am I just going to be housebound the whole of the pregnancy?"

Before the new CDC data came out last month, Bernard had been encouraging her husband to go places such as a downtown park or swimming at Austin's aquifer-fed Barton Springs Pool. And she had been hoping to swim in the pool at their apartment complex and engage in other activities that bring her joy. But now she feels like they'll both need to be more cautious, and the pools have closed in light of the pandemic. In addition to being pregnant, Bernard has asthma another risk factor that can make COVID-19 more severe.

"I like to make my own mind up about things," she says, adding that she and her husband both "try and think outside the box and live our life alternatively. But I just think it's just better to be safe than sorry at the moment."

Undeterred by COVID-19

So, do pregnant women really need to be housebound for nine months? Riley, the New York OB-GYN, says that would not be realistic.

For one thing, they need prenatal care. "Yes, we can do some prenatal care by telehealth, but we can't do it all that way. We can't assess your baby with you at home."

Plus, there are many other reasons to get out and move your body, she says: "Your mental well-being is not to be ignored." The need for fresh air or to take a walk are part of staying healthy, and going to work may be necessary financially, Riley says.

Dr. Carroll Medeiros is a professor at Brown University's Alpert Medical School and an OB-GYN at Southern New England Women's Health. She says many of her patients in Providence, R.I., don't have the luxury of working from home during the pandemic. Many are also Hispanic or African American.

Classified as essential workers, a number of her patients are still going in to do their jobs often at hospitals or nursing homes, she says or they live with an essential worker, and that, too, increases their risk of exposure to the virus.

Some of Medeiros' patients work in a factory where roughly 70 employees became infected with COVID-19.

"These people are mostly Black and brown," Medeiros says, "and it just shows the inequality. You have less of a chance of having a really good job in this country if you are Black and brown."

Many of her pregnant patients are worried about catching the virus, Medeiros says, but "it's hard for them to take off time when they feel like they are most at risk. You take off time you might lose your job."

Despite all the anxieties and the unknowns, Medeiros says she hasn't seen indications in her practice that people are avoiding pregnancy out of fear of the pandemic.

"They are very few and far between people who have told me, 'Oh, you know, we've changed our mind. We're not going to do it right now,' " Medeiros says. "People have come to have their intrauterine devices removed and to start trying. I don't think it's deterred anybody. But they have a lot of concerns about it."

''That hopefulness of having a child''

In Austin, Bernard anticipates that when her baby is due in December, the U.S. will still be grappling with the risks and effects of COVID-19.

And the current unrest over racial injustice and policing has added extra stress, Bernard says.

"I've just got to have hope for the new life," she says, "that bringing a baby in, we're going to teach it right from wrong. I think that's what I'll be holding on to that hopefulness of having a child. And rather than it being doom and gloom in the current times, having hope that the next generations will do a better job."

More here:

Safe Pregnancy As COVID-19 Surges: What's Best For Mom And Baby? - NPR

Golf legend Jack Nicklaus reveals he and his wife tested positive for Covid-19 in March – CNN

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Jack Nicklaus is arguably the greatest golfer the world has ever seen. His record 18 major titles and 19 runner-up spots have set an almost impossible target for the rest.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus was born in Ohio in January 1940 and took up golf at the age of 10. He won the US Amateur title in 1959 and 1961 and finished second behind Arnold Palmer in the 1960 US Open while still an amateur.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

He turned pro at the age of 21 in 1961 and won his first title in the paid ranks at the 1962 US Open, beating Palmer in an 18-hole play-off. So began one of golf's greatest rivalries as as this young upstart threatened to usurp the hero of Arnie's Army.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

In 1966 Nicklaus won his third Masters and then added a sixth major title at the British Open at Muirfield in Scotland. All by the age of 26.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Another British Open title came at St Andrews in 1970 at the age of 30 for Nicklaus' eighth major, taking him ahead of Palmer.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

By the summer of 1977 Nicklaus was on 14 majors but hadn't won one for two years. At the British Open at Turnberry he and reigning Masters champion Tom Watson were forced to take shelter from a storm on the third day before both shooting 65s to rocket clear of the field.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

In what became known as the Duel in the Sun, Nicklaus and Watson went head-to-head on a scintillating final day, but the younger Watson prevailed for his second Open and third major title.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus re-ignited his major charge with victory at the 1978 British Open back at St Andrews at the age of 38.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus and Watson fought plenty of battles against each other but they also came together as team-mates in the 1981 Ryder Cup at Walton Heath in England, winning all three of their matches together as the US won 18.5 - 9.5.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus was named captain for the 1983 Ryder Cup and led his side to a narrow victory against Europe at Palm Beach Gardens in Florida. It would be the final chapter in the US winning streak that had stretched back to 1959.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus bagged two more majors at the age of 40, but by 1986, aged 46, he hadn't won one for six years. A newspaper article ahead of the Masters said he was "done, washed up, through." Trailing leader Greg Norman by four going into the final day, Nicklaus summoned some old magic. A famous birdie putt on the 17th gave him the lead for the first time.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus' back-nine charge sparked roars the like of which Augusta hasn't heard since and his homeward 30 gave him a sixth Green Jacket and 18th major title.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus was again captain for the US Ryder Cup side at his Muirfield Village course in Ohio in 1987, but the Americans crashed to their first ever defeat on home soil.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Since Tiger Woods burst onto the scene with his first major title at the Masters in 1997 he has chased Nicklaus' major mark. But Woods has been stranded on 14 victories since 2008.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus was awarded the Congressional Gold medal in 2015 for his services to his sport and philanthropy.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus' early career was characterized by his rivalry with Arnold Palmer (left) and Gary Player (right). Known as the "Big Three", the trio became honorary starters at the Masters.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Palmer died on September 25, 2016 at the age of 87 and Nicklaus delivered a eulogy to his friend. "He was the king of our sport," Nicklaus said. "And he always will be."

See the article here:

Golf legend Jack Nicklaus reveals he and his wife tested positive for Covid-19 in March - CNN

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-17-2020 – 5 PM – West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

The West Virginia Department of Health andHuman Resources (DHHR)reports as of 5:00 p.m., on July 17, 2020, there have been 222,427 totalconfirmatorylaboratory results received for COVID-19, with 4,783 totalcases and 100 deaths.

Inalignment with updated definitions from the Centers for Disease Control andPrevention, the dashboard includes probable cases which are individuals that havesymptoms and either serologic (antibody) or epidemiologic (e.g., a link to aconfirmed case) evidence of disease, but no confirmatory test.

CASESPER COUNTY (Case confirmed by lab test/Probable case):Barbour (24/0), Berkeley (539/19), Boone(53/0), Braxton (6/0), Brooke (35/1), Cabell (207/7), Calhoun (4/0), Clay(15/0), Fayette (98/0), Gilmer (13/0), Grant (21/1), Greenbrier (76/0),Hampshire (46/0), Hancock (51/3), Hardy (48/1), Harrison (133/1), Jackson(149/0), Jefferson (262/5), Kanawha (472/12), Lewis (24/1), Lincoln (19/0),Logan (42/0), Marion (124/3), Marshall (77/1), Mason (26/0), McDowell (12/0),Mercer (68/0), Mineral (69/2), Mingo (48/2), Monongalia (654/15), Monroe(14/1), Morgan (19/1), Nicholas (19/1), Ohio (173/0), Pendleton (18/1),Pleasants (4/1), Pocahontas (37/1), Preston (90/24), Putnam (99/1), Raleigh(92/3), Randolph (196/2), Ritchie (3/0), Roane (12/0), Summers (2/0), Taylor(26/1), Tucker (7/0), Tyler (10/0), Upshur (31/2), Wayne (144/2), Webster(2/0), Wetzel (40/0), Wirt (6/0), Wood (192/10), Wyoming (7/0).

Ascase surveillance continues at the local health department level, it may revealthat those tested in a certain county may not be a resident of that county, oreven the state as an individual in question may have crossed the state borderto be tested. Such is the case of Harrison and Ohiocounties in this report.

Please note that delays may be experiencedwith the reporting of information from the local health department to DHHR.

Please visit the dashboard at http://www.coronavirus.wv.gov for more detailed information.

Additional report:

To increaseCOVID-19 testing opportunities, the Governor's Office, the Herbert HendersonOffice of Minority Affairs, WV Department of Health and Human Resources, WVNational Guard, local health departments, and community partners today providedfree COVID-19 testing for residents in counties with high minority populationsand evidence of COVID-19 transmission.

Todays testing resulted in 914 individuals tested: 279 inBerkeley County; 416 in Jefferson County; and 219 in Mercer County. Please notethese are considered preliminary numbers.

Testingwill be held tomorrow in Berkeley, Jefferson and Monongalia counties in these locations.

See more here:

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-17-2020 - 5 PM - West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

Germany’s Economy Will Triumph in the Post-Covid-19 World – The New York Times

Yet Germany is not dropping its commitment to balanced budgets. Since much of this spending will be drawn from savings, Germanys public debt is expected to rise, but only to 82 percent of G.D.P. a much lighter debt burden than that of the United States and other highly developed countries, which are spending far less on economic rescue packages.

Doubters say that Germany is now dangerously reliant on industrial exports, particularly to China, in a time of slowing global trade. Well aware of these vulnerabilities, Germany is pushing to modernize its leading exporters, the big car companies. Through regulation and public shaming, it is pressuring the carmakers to turn from the still highly profitable combustion engine to the electric cars of the future. Stuttgart, home to Porsche and Mercedes-Benz, has banned older diesel motors within city limits.

Germany is also making a big if somewhat belated push to become a more competitive tech power. It devotes as much to research and development as the United States does (around 3 percent of G.D.P.) and has a long-term plan to create an entrepreneurial ecosystem akin to Silicon Valley, in which venture capitalists fuel promising start-ups. Germanys technology industry is not without its setbacks, such as the recent and sudden collapse of the financial technology company Wirecard, which has raised questions about the vigilance of Germanys financial regulator. But many of the industrys first successes, copies of American online-shopping and food-delivery companies, are scaling up rapidly.

The German economic rescue plan includes $56 billion for start-ups that can digitize traditional industries, using artificial intelligence and other new technologies. Alongside France, Germany recently announced what its economics minister called a digital moonshot, which aims to create a European internet cloud to rival those of America and China.

Germany is an aging, conservative society, but critics who assume it is too slow to change have been proved wrong before. In the early 2000s, when Germany was dismissed as the proverbial sick man of Europe, it adopted labor market reforms that restored its status as the continents most stable economy. As the pandemic accelerates the pace of digitalization and de-globalization and drives up the worlds debts, Germany stands out for its relative lack of weakness to those challenges, and for a government prepared to handle them.

Ruchir Sharma is the chief global strategist at Morgan Stanley Investment Management, the author, most recently, of The Ten Rules of Successful Nations and a contributing Opinion writer. This essay reflects his opinions alone.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. Wed like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And heres our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

Continued here:

Germany's Economy Will Triumph in the Post-Covid-19 World - The New York Times

COVID-19: Up the nose and into the brain? See what a UC researcher found – The Cincinnati Enquirer

Dr. Ahmad Sedaghat looks into the nasal passage of a patient. Sedaghat is associate professor of otolaryngology and director of rhinology, allergy and anterior skull base surgery at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine.(Photo: Provided.)

You can't smell anything. Taste is botched. How depressing, right?

Well, yes, that is right. But the realquestion is, why do you feel depressed when you have COVID-19 with smell loss? The answer could be that the disease caused by the novel coronavirus might be attacking your brain.

New research led by Dr. Ahmad Sedaghat, an ear, nose, throat specialist and internationally recognized expert in rhinology at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, indicates that COVID-19 may not only be knocking out the sense of smell for somebut also using the olfactory tract as a way to get into the brain.

And once in the central nervous system, the illness might be causing the depression and anxiety that those with smell loss exhibit. No one will know that for sure until more research is done.

"It's our hypothesis," Sedaghat said lastweek.

The ideacame to him after he and his teamlooked at the results of a phone study in which people with the diseasewere asked about feelings of depression and anxiety.

The patients reporting psychological distress were those with smell inhibition and problems associated with it.

Labored breathing? Days of high fever? These life-threatening symptoms weren't linked with depression or anxiety.

"It is kind of absurd and ridiculous given how severe and how dire these symptoms are," said Sedaghat, associate professor of otolaryngology and director of rhinology, allergy and anterior skull base surgery at Unversity of CincinnatiCollege of Medicine.

[ We can't do work like this without our supporters.Please consider a subscription to Cincinnati.com. ]

"I would've guessed that the symptoms that would be most associated with depressed mood and anxiety would be severe, dire symptoms: shortness of breath, coughing, fever," Sedaghat said.

A car comes into a drive-through testing site outside UC Health on Burnet Avenue on March 27. The new coronavirus pandemic testing has increased dramatically in recent weeks in Ohio and Kentucky as more tests have become available.(Photo: Liz Dufour/The Enquirer)

He called the results of the research "shocking."

But then again, there's been previous evidence that other coronaviruses, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) of the2003 outbreak,have the potential to infect the brain. Mouse studies showed the virus can enter the brain when inoculated intranasally.

Sedaghat, who works with European specialists in his field, was among researchers who'd studied the COVID-19 symptom of smell loss during the early weeks when the novel coronavirus was hitting the United States. Europe had been experiencing more cases at first and identified the possible symptom, which has become commonly known.

Sedaghat noted that people were experiencing smell loss early in the disease. That meant it could be used as a screening tool, he said, to identify them as possible COVID-19 sufferers who should stay distanced from other people. The symptom is now commonly considered an indicator of the disease.

The latest phone questionnaire that Sedaghat headed is available online at The Laryngoscope. Itlooked atcharacteristics and symptoms of 114 patients actively infected withCOVID-19 over six weeks at Kantonsspital Aarau in Aarau, Switzerland.

About47% of respondents reported at least several days of depressed mood per week, with 21% reporting depressed mood nearly every day. Nearly 45% reported mild anxiety and 10.5%, severe anxiety.

Sedaghat said his research isn't an end.

"This study raises more questions than produces answers," he said. But he added,"It gives insight into what is going on with the disease.

If you'd like us to ask a question of a COVID-19 doctor about what they're doing or not doing during the pandemic with their families, email our health reporter, Anne Saker, asaker@enquirer.com or Terry DeMio, tdemio@enquirer.com.

Read or Share this story: https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2020/07/19/covid-19-smell-loss-brain-attack-depression-anxiety-university-cincinnati-research/5451349002/

See the article here:

COVID-19: Up the nose and into the brain? See what a UC researcher found - The Cincinnati Enquirer

Breast cancer care becomes troubling casualty of COVID-19 pandemic – ABC News

As many hospitals and doctor's offices limited patient appointments and surgeries during the coronavirus pandemic, a concerning side effect of the shutdown began to emerge. With fewer screening exams, patient visits and surgical procedures, breast cancer care took a frightening hit.

Regular breast cancer screenings save lives, but early in the pandemic, the American Cancer Society recommended that doctors postpone any routine breast cancer screenings or intervention to protect at-risk patients from potential exposures or illness.

"No one should go to a health care facility for routine cancer screening at this time," Dr. Richard Wender, chief cancer control officer for the ACS, said in a statement on April 29.

But delaying those appointments didn't just mean delaying regular breast exams. For some, it meant delaying preventative treatments, such as chemotherapy, designed to keep cancer from coming back. And as weeks turned into months, ACS eventually shifted its policy, encouraging women to talk to their doctor before potentially resuming their regular appointments.

The most recent statement, released on July 2, encouraged women to resume their usual screening mammograms, but suggested that some women can choose to wait for two years for their next screening mammogram based on their individual history and breast cancer risk factors.

Though the earlier advice has now changed, we don't know the effect these delays might have on breast cancer patients in the future.

Dr. Paulomi Shroff, a board-certified breast surgeon in Marietta, Georgia, has experienced the impact of the shutdown on her patients firsthand.

"Originally, an issue was that we couldn't get mammograms for about six weeks in Georgia," she said. Many other places around the country had even longer delays meaning that "women who had breast lumps would get pushed back in terms of getting them investigated."

In this July 31, 2012, file photo, a radiologist compares an image from earlier, 2-D technology mammogram to the new 3-D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis mammography.

Stopping mammograms did not just affect the women with breast lumps. Shroff said that it also affected women scheduling their yearly mammograms to screen for breast cancer.

"Really the problem with not having mammography in that time period is that women are skipping their mammograms," Shroff said. Because many women make a habit of getting their mammograms at a certain time of year, "if they were supposed to have their mammogram in May and didn't get it, they may just wait until next May," she added.

Altogether, the delays in mammograms could mean even more trouble for women down the road.

For patients diagnosed with breast cancer before the pandemic, the shutdown impacted their access to physicians, medications and surgeries. "A lot of different centers de-prioritized breast surgery," Shroff said.

This is a concern, she said, because by performing surgery "as early as possible, we are reducing the metastasis risk."

While patients waited for surgery, some who had certain types of cancer could be prescribed medications that would help keep their cancer from worsening.

Once elective surgeries were resumed, the pandemic had an impact on the decisions women made for having their breast cancers removed. In an effort to conserve hospital beds and to avoid overnight hospital stays, many patients and surgeons opted for less-invasive surgeries.

"In patients who might have otherwise wanted a mastectomy, if we could get away with a lumpectomy, we got away with a lumpectomy," Shroff said.

For those considering having a plastic surgeon reconstruct their breasts after having their breast cancers removed, Shroff said, "If they needed reconstruction we tried to do the minimum possible" to avoid an overnight hospital stay.

Even for patients without cancer, but with a high-risk change in their breast tissue called atypia, the pandemic caused problems. Shroff told ABC News that she had one patient with atypia who had to wait three months for surgery. By the time she had her surgery, it had progressed into cancer.

"I effectively sat on it without treatment for three months, which is not something I would have done in a non-COVID era," Shroff said.

In this May 6, 2010 file photo, a radiologist checks mammograms in Los Angeles.

Fortunately, multiple national societies are providing guidance to doctors making decisions about breast cancer care.

"Our society, along with four other societies ... wrote really literature-based guidelines about what to do with breast cancer patients during the pandemic," said Dr. Jill Dietz, president of the American Society of Breast Surgeons.

In addition to recommendations for virtual visits, streamlined in-person visits, masks, screening and preoperative testing, the guidelines prioritize patients' cancer care based on their individual risk of breast cancer progression or of serious illness should they contract COVID-19. Dietz said, "All of those factors are playing a role."

In terms of resuming mammograms, Dr. Lynn Baxter, director of breast imaging for Northside Radiology Associates at Northside Hospital in Atlanta, said that even though mammograms are back up and running at her facility, not everyone should be rushing to be seen.

"Let's say someone is older and has COPD -- if it's just a regular screening, it might be in the best interest of her health to wait. ... Let's say that same lady felt a lump, I would say, no, she really needs to come in and get that taken care of."

Most importantly, Baxter recommended that women "think about their individual risk and talk with their providers."

Along with these prioritization strategies, Shroff wants women across the country to know: "You don't need to be scared to go the doctor's in the pandemic, as long as you practice good personal hygiene, wear a mask, wash your hands. Don't not seek medical care because of this."

Stephanie E. Farber, M.D., is a plastic surgeon in Atlanta and is an ABC News Medical contributor.

Read the rest here:

Breast cancer care becomes troubling casualty of COVID-19 pandemic - ABC News

Only 209 new COVID-19 cases on Sunday in Oklahoma; 13 more in Garfield County – Enid News & Eagle

ENID, Okla. Oklahoma only saw 209 new COVID-19 cases on Sunday, but 15 of those were in Northwest Oklahoma counties, according to Oklahoma State Department of Health data.

There were no deaths reported Sunday by OSDH.

Eleven of the 13 Garfield County cases were in Enid, and two additional positive tests were confirmed in Kingfisher County by the OSDH. Other communities gaining a case in Northwest Oklahoma were Lahoma, Hennessey and Kingfisher.

Of the 25,265 cumulative COVID-19 cases, 5,348 are active, representing a single-day decrease of 71. There have been 19,466 Oklahomans who have recovered, according to OSDH, which definesrecovered as "not hospitalized or deceased and 14 days after onset/report."

State numbers

Increases in cases per age group reported Sunday were 81 in the 18-35 age group, 47 in the 36-49 age group, 38 in the 50-64 age group, 21 in the 65 and older age group, 16 in the 5-17 age group and six in the 0-4 age group.

Cumulative totals as of Sunday were 552 in the 0-4 age group, 1,953 in the 5-17 age group, 9,230 in the 18-35 age group, 5,524 in the 36-49 age group, 4,413 in the 50-64 age group and 3,593 in the 65 and older age group.

Of those testing positive, 12,942, or 51.23%, have been female, and 12,245 or 48.47%, have been male. There are 78 listed as "unknown" gender, according to OSDH data on Sunday.

Of the overall 451 deaths in the state, 360 or 79.82%, have been 65 and older; 69 or 15.30%, have been in the 50-64 age group; 14, or 3.10%, have been in the 36-49 age group; 7, or 1.55%, have been in the 18-35 age group; and one, or .22%, has been in the 5-17 age group. More men, 238, than women, 213, have succumbed to the virus, according to OSDH on Saturday. The average age of those who have died is 75.1.

Data shows deaths in 49 of Oklahoma's 77 counties, with 84 in Tulsa County; 77 in Oklahoma County; 40 in Cleveland County; 39 in Washington County; 19 each in Delaware and Wagoner counties; 14 in Muskogee County; 13 in McCurtain County; 11 in Caddo County; 10 in Rogers County; 9 each in Comanche, Creek, Kay and Osage counties; 7 each in Greer and Texas counties; 5 each in Grady, Mayes and Pottawatomie counties; 4 each in Adair, Canadian, McClain and Seminole counties; 3 each in Carter, Garvin, Jackson, Pawnee, Pittsburg and Sequoyah counties; 2 each in Cotton, Garfield, Lincoln, Ottawa, Payne and Pontotoc counties; and 1 each in Bryan, Cherokee, Choctaw, Hughes, Kiowa, Latimer, Leflore, Logan, Major, McIntosh, Noble, Nowata, Stephens and Tillman counties.

COVID-19 data released Sunday for Northwest Oklahoma counties shows Garfield with 173 cases, 114 recovered andtwo deaths,a woman in the 36-49 age groupin June and an86-year-old from Garfield Countyin April; Kingfisher with 62 cases, 43 recovered; Noble with 59 cases, 46 recovered and one death; Blaine with 23 cases, 17 recovered;Woodward with 18 cases, 14 recovered; Major with 16 cases, 13 recovered and one death, awoman in18-35 age groupin April; Woods with 12 cases, eight recovered;Grant with four cases, two recovered; and Alfalfa with one recovered case.

CumulativeCOVID-19 cases by city or townin Northwest Oklahoma include 159 in Enid (54 active); 25 in Kingfisher (eight active); 16 in Hennessey (five active); 15 each in Okarche (three active) and Woodward, (three active); 10 each in Alva (two active) and Watonga (two active); seven each in Cashion and Fairview (one active); six in Geary (one active); five in Ringwood (one active); four each in Dover (three active), Garber (one active), Lahoma (one active) and Longdale (two active); two each in Freedom (two active), Laverne (one active), Meno, Pond Creek (two active), Seiling and Waukomis (one active); and one each in Billings (one active), Canton (one active), Fort Supply, Hitchcock, Jet, Lamont, Medford, Mooreland and Okeene, according to data released by OSDH on Sunday. Residents living in areas with under 100 in population or those with unknown addresses may be recorded as "other."

In Enid, there have been 80 cases with 55 recovered, from the 73701 Zip Code, primarily the eastern half of the city, and 79 cases with 49 recovered from 73703, or the western half, according to OSDH data on Sunday. There also has been one recovered case in the 73705 Zip Code, which is listed as Vance Air Force Base athttps://www.unitedstateszipcodes.org/.

COVID-19 cases per county in Oklahoma as reported by the Oklahoma State Department of Health Sunday, July 19, 2020. SOURCE: OSDH

COVID-19 cases per city in Oklahoma as reported by the Oklahoma State Department of Health Sunday, July 19, 2020. SOURCE: OSDH

Nursing homes with resident- or staff-related COVID-19 cases have remained light in Northwest Oklahoma, according to OSDH reports, with eight in Enid three atThe Arbors, one of which was reported July 14 in the OSDH's Executive Report;two at The Commons in April; and one atGarland Road Nursing&Rehabilitation, which officials at the facility say subsequently tested negative.Golden Oaks Retirement Community verified July 3that a contract employee had tested positive for COVID-19 and on July 15 that another contract employee had tested positive, but the facility is not listed on the OSDH report.

Positive tests in long-term care facilities in the area include one each in Blaine, Woods and Woodward counties, five in Kingfisher County and five at Center of Love in Okarche in Canadian County. There have been two in Major County, including one staff member at Seiling Nursing Centerwho lived in Major County, tested positive and diedin April, according to OSDH data.

State Health Department officials areencouraging Oklahomans to get testedfor COVID-19, saying recently that due to adequate supplies, residents no longer need to exhibit symptoms or report exposure to someone with the virus to get in line for testing.

Free testing for COVID-19 is ongoing at the Garfield County and other state Health Departments. Testing is by appointment only for Blaine County, 521 W. 4th, Watonga, (580) 623-7977; Garfield County, 2501 S. Mercer, Enid, (580) 233-0650; Grant County, 115 N. Main, Medford, (580) 395-2906; Kingfisher County, 124 E. Sheridan, courthouse annex room #101, Kingfisher, (405) 375-3008; Major County, 501 E. Broadway, Fairview, (580) 227-3362; Noble County, 300 Fir St., Perry, (580) 336-2257; Woods County, 511 Barnes St., Alva, (580) 327-3192; and Woodward County, 1631 Texas Ave., Woodward, (580) 256-6416. For a full list of county drive-through testing, go tohttps://coronavirus.health.ok.gov/drive-thru-testing. Some health department also advise the public to check their Facebook pages for more information regarding testing.

Emergency warning signs for COVID-19 are trouble breathing, persistent pain or pressure in the chest, new confusion or inability to arouse, bluish lips or face, according to the CDC. More information can be found athttps://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/symptoms-testing/symptoms.html.

Those with symptoms of COVID-19 should call ahead to local emergency rooms. Those with minor symptoms should contact their regular physicians.

Resources and information on COVID-19 can be obtained by calling 211 or going tohttps://covidresources.ok.gov/.

BREAKING NEWSon the COVID-19 threat and its impact is available athttps://www.enidnews.com/virusand isfree for all readers. That includes information on closings and cancellations.

Get full-access breaking news via text alerts at https://enidnews.com/textalerts.

For more local, state, national and global COVID-19 pandemic news, go tohttps://enidnews.com/news/covid19.

All breaking news is fully accessible on theEnid News & Eaglewebsite.

Information also can be found athttps://coronavirus.health.ok.gov/andhttps://www.cdc.gov/.

We are making critical coverage of the coronavirus available for free. Please consider subscribing so we can continue to bring you the latest news and information on this developing story.

Excerpt from:

Only 209 new COVID-19 cases on Sunday in Oklahoma; 13 more in Garfield County - Enid News & Eagle

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-13-2020 – 6 PM – West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

TheWest Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR)reports as of 6:00 p.m., on July 13, 2020, there have been 211,006total confirmatorylaboratory results received for COVID-19, with 4,313 totalcases and 97 deaths.

DHHR has confirmed the death of an 85-yearold female from Ohio County. Pleasejoin with me as we grieve the loss of another West Virginian, said DHHRCabinet Secretary Bill J. Crouch.

In alignment with updated definitions fromthe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the dashboard includes probablecases which are individuals that have symptoms and either serologic (antibody)or epidemiologic (e.g., a link to a confirmed case) evidence of disease, but noconfirmatory test.

CASESPER COUNTY (Case confirmed by lab test/Probable case):Barbour(20/0), Berkeley (518/19), Boone (34/0), Braxton (5/0), Brooke (27/1), Cabell(192/7), Calhoun (4/0), Clay (12/0), Fayette (84/0), Gilmer (13/0), Grant(21/1), Greenbrier (71/0), Hampshire (42/0), Hancock (41/3), Hardy (46/1),Harrison (122/0), Jackson (148/0), Jefferson (253/5), Kanawha (421/12), Lewis (21/1),Lincoln (9/0), Logan (39/0), Marion (106/3), Marshall (65/1), Mason (25/0),McDowell (8/0), Mercer (63/0), Mineral (66/2), Mingo (29/2), Monongalia(554/14), Monroe (14/1), Morgan (19/1), Nicholas (19/1), Ohio (147/0),Pendleton (15/1), Pleasants (4/1), Pocahontas (37/1), Preston (81/21), Putnam(90/1), Raleigh (80/3), Randolph (188/2), Ritchie (2/0), Roane (12/0), Summers(2/0), Taylor (22/1), Tucker (6/0), Tyler (10/0), Upshur (31/2), Wayne (127/1),Webster (1/0), Wetzel (37/0), Wirt (6/0), Wood (179/9), Wyoming (7/0).

As case surveillance continues at thelocal health department level, it may reveal that those tested in a certaincounty may not be a resident of that county, or even the state as an individualin question may have crossed the state border to be tested.Such is the case of Cabell, Lewis, Logan, Marion, Mingo, Nicholas, Ohio, andPreston counties in this report.

Please visit thedashboard at http://www.coronavirus.wv.gov for more detailed information.

Continue reading here:

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-13-2020 - 6 PM - West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-15-2020 – 5 PM – West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

TheWest Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR)reports as of 5:00 p.m., on July 15, 2020, there have been 217,786total confirmatorylaboratory results received for COVID-19, with 4,557 totalcases and 98 deaths.

DHHR has confirmed the death of a 77-yearold male from Wood County. Thepassing of this West Virginian is reported with great sadness and we extend oursympathies to his loved ones, said Bill J. Crouch, DHHR Cabinet Secretary.

In alignment with updated definitions fromthe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the dashboard includes probablecases which are individuals that have symptoms and either serologic (antibody)or epidemiologic (e.g., a link to a confirmed case) evidence of disease, but noconfirmatory test.

CASESPER COUNTY (Case confirmed by lab test/Probable case):Barbour(23/0), Berkeley (531/19), Boone (46/0), Braxton (5/0), Brooke (32/1), Cabell(197/7), Calhoun (4/0), Clay (13/0), Fayette (89/0), Gilmer (13/0), Grant(20/1), Greenbrier (74/0), Hampshire (45/0), Hancock (47/3), Hardy (47/1),Harrison (131/0), Jackson (148/0), Jefferson (256/5), Kanawha (442/12), Lewis(23/1), Lincoln (12/0), Logan (41/0), Marion (116/3), Marshall (71/1), Mason(26/0), McDowell (12/0), Mercer (67/0), Mineral (68/2), Mingo (34/2),Monongalia (624/14), Monroe (14/1), Morgan (19/1), Nicholas (19/1), Ohio(158/0), Pendleton (17/1), Pleasants (4/1), Pocahontas (37/1), Preston (86/21),Putnam (93/1), Raleigh (83/3), Randolph (192/2), Ritchie (2/0), Roane (12/0),Summers (2/0), Taylor (22/1), Tucker (7/0), Tyler (10/0), Upshur (31/2), Wayne(136/1), Webster (1/0), Wetzel (38/0), Wirt (6/0), Wood (186/9), Wyoming (7/0).

As case surveillance continues at thelocal health department level, it may reveal that those tested in a certaincounty may not be a resident of that county, or even the state as an individualin question may have crossed the state border to be tested.

Pleasenote that delays may be experienced with the reporting of information from thelocal health department to DHHR.

Please visit thedashboard at http://www.coronavirus.wv.gov for more detailed information.

Excerpt from:

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-15-2020 - 5 PM - West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

I Wont Return to the Classroom, and You Shouldnt Ask Me To – The New York Times

SEDRO-WOOLLEY, Wash. Every day when I walk into work as a public-school teacher, I am prepared to take a bullet to save a child. In the age of school shootings, thats what the job requires. But asking me to return to the classroom amid a pandemic and expose myself and my family to Covid-19 is like asking me to take that bullet home to my own family.

I wont do it, and you shouldnt want me to.

I became an educator after a career as a nurse. I teach medical science and introduction to nursing to 11th and 12th graders at a regional skills center that serves students from 22 different high schools in 13 different school districts.

My school district and school havent ruled out asking us return to in-person teaching in the fall. As careful and proactive as the administration has been when it comes to exploring plans to return to the classroom, nothing I have heard reassures me that I can safely teach in person.

More than 75 New York Department of Education employees have died of Covid-19. CDC guidelines say a return to traditional schooling with in-person classes would involve the highest risk for Covid-19 spread. But even in-person classes with students spaced apart and prevented from sharing materials are categorized as leading to more risk. The lowest risk for spread, according to the CDC, is virtual learning. I cant understand why we would choose more risk than is necessary.

Its impossible to hear about the way parties, day camps and church services have led to outbreaks this summer without worrying about what will happen if kids and adults gather in the fall. It scares me to think of how many more lives will be lost. It terrifies me that I could be among those who lose their lives.

I completely understand why parents and administrators want kids to return to school. When we first started online learning in March, it was miserable pointless, even. Eventually, we established parameters, and I figured out how to teach kids across the northwest corner of Washington State virtually. During summer school, Ive live-streamed my lectures into campgrounds, living rooms and bedrooms decorated with twinkly lights or festooned with posters. My virtual classroom includes pets and younger siblings.

Yes, it has been hard. Yesterday, as several really adorable teenage faces laughed through the computer screen at my use of a Tyrannosaurus Rex to explain the sympathetic nervous system and the feeling of impending doom it can cause, I thought, I miss them. I wished I was standing in my favorite place in the world, my classroom because, frankly, that T-Rex analogy is much better when accompanied by my dino walk.

But it amazes me how fast students adapted to remote learning. I teach a particularly hands-on class. This summer, Ive managed to teach them to type blood, to suture wounds and how the sensory system works. Ive taught them all about infection control and epidemiology they can not only tell you that you should wear a mask, but they can show you how to do it correctly. I used to put my hand over students hands to guide them through certain lessons. Now I use a GoPro camera. Its hard, but they are learning.

Most important, we students and teacher are safe.

If Im asked to return to the classroom as the pandemic rages, I will have to walk away. As deeply as I love teaching, I will not risk spreading this virus in a way that could hurt a child or a family member of a child. While children make up a small proportion of U.S. coronavirus cases and they are less likely to become seriously ill than adults, the virus might be linked to multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Plus, many of my students struggle with poverty or are from multigenerational households. I will not risk passing a virus to them that they might pass to their vulnerable loved ones. I wont do it.

It isnt fair to ask teachers to buy school supplies; we arent the government. But we do it anyway. It isnt fair to ask us to stop a bullet; we arent soldiers. But we go to work every day knowing that if theres a school shooting, well die protecting our students.

But this is where I draw the line: It isnt fair to ask me to be part of a massive, unnecessary science experiment. I am not a human research subject. I will not do it.

Rebecca Martinson is a teacher at Northwest Career & Technical Academy in Mount Vernon, Wash.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. Wed like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And heres our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

Read more here:

I Wont Return to the Classroom, and You Shouldnt Ask Me To - The New York Times

Covid-19 data is a public good. The US government must start treating it like one. – MIT Technology Review

Earlier this week as a pandemic raged across the United States, residents were cut off from the only publicly available source of aggregated data on the nations intensive care and hospital bed capacity. When the Trump administration stripped the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of control over coronavirus data, it also took that information away from the public.

I run a nonpartisan project called covidexitstrategy.org, which tracks how well states are fighting this virus. Our team is made up of public health and crisis experts with previous experience in the Trump and Obama administrations. We grade states on such critical measures as disease spread, hospital load, and the robustness of their testing.

Why does this work matter? In a crisis, data informs good decision-making. Along with businesses, federal, state, and local public health officials and other agencies rely on us to help them decide which interventions to deploy and when workplaces and public spaces can safely reopen. Almost a million people have used our dashboards, with thousands coming back more than 200 times each.

To create our dashboards, we rely on multiple sources. One is the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), run by the CDC. Prior to July 14, hospitals reported the utilization and availability of intensive care and inpatient beds to the NHSN. This information, updated three times a week, was the only publicly available source of aggregated state-level hospital capacity data in the US.

With 31 states currently reporting increases in the number of hospitalized covid-19 patients, these utilization rates show how well their health systems will handle the surge of cases.

Having this information in real time is essential; the administration said the CDCs system was insufficiently responsive and data collection needed to be streamlined.The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) directed hospitals (pdf) to report their data to a new system called HHS Protect.

Unfortunately, by redirecting hospitals to a new system, it left everyone else in the dark. On July 14, the CDC removed the most recent data from its website. As we made our nightly update, we found it was missing. After significant public pressure, the existing maps and data are backbut the agency has added a disclaimer that the data will not be updated going forward.

This is unacceptable. This critical indicator was being shared multiple times a week, and now updates have been halted. US residents need a federal commitment that this data will continue to be refreshed and shared.

The public is being told that a lot of effort is going into the new system. An HHS spokesman told CNBC that the new database will deliver more powerful insights on the coronavirus. But the switch has rightly been criticized because this new data source is not yet available to the public. Our concerns are amplified by the fact that responsibility for the data has shifted from a known entity in the CDC to a new, as-yet-unnamed team within HHS.

I was part of the team that helped fix Healthcare.gov after the failed launch in 2013. One thing I learned was that the people who make their careers in the federal governmentand especially those working at the center of a crisisare almost universally well intentioned. They seek to do the right thing for the public they serve.

In the same spirit, and to build trust with the American people, this is an opportunity for HHS to make the same data its sharing with federal and state agencies available to the public. The system that HHS is using helps inform the vital work of the White House Coronavirus Task Force. From leaked documents, we know that reports for the task force are painstakingly detailed. They include county-level maps, indicators on testing robustness, and specific recommendations. All of this information belongs in the public domain.

This is also an opportunity for HHS to make this data machine readable and thereby more accessible to data scientists and data journalists. The Open Government Data Act, signed into law by President Trump, treats data as a strategic asset and makes it open by default. This act builds upon the Open Data Executive Order, which recognized that the data sets collected by the government are paid for by taxpayers and must be made available to them.

As a country, the United States has lagged behind in so many dimensions of response to this crisis, from the availability of PPE to testing to statewide mask orders. Its treatment of data has lagged as well. On March 7, as this crisis was unfolding, there was no national testing data. Alexis Madrigal, Jeff Hammerbacher, and a group of volunteers started the COVID Tracking Project to aggregate coronavirus information from all 50 state websites into a single Google spreadsheet. For two months, until the CDC began to share data through its own dashboard, this volunteer project was the sole national public source of information on cases and testing.

With more than 150 volunteers contributing to the effort, the COVID Tracking Project sets the bar for how to treat data as an asset. I serve on the advisory board and am awed by what this group has accomplished. With daily updates, an API, and multiple download formats, theyve made their data extraordinarily useful. Where the CDCs data is cited 30 times in Google Scholar and approximately 10,000 times in Google search results, the COVID Tracking Project data is cited 299 times in Google Scholar and roughly 2 million times in Google search results.

Sharing reliable data is one of the most economical and effective interventions the United States has to confront this pandemic. With the Coronavirus Task Force daily briefings a thing of the past, its more necessary than ever for all covid-related data to be shared with the public. The effort required to defeat the pandemic is not just a federal response. It is a federal, state, local, and community response. Everyone needs to work from the same trusted source of facts about the situation on the ground. Data is not a partisan affair or a bureaucratic preserve. It is a public trustand a public resource.

Ryan Panchadsaram is a cofounder of covidexitstrategy.org and United States Digital Response. He currently works at Kleiner Perkins and was formerly the deputy chief technology officer for the United States.

See the rest here:

Covid-19 data is a public good. The US government must start treating it like one. - MIT Technology Review

‘Carbon savings’ from Covid-19 lockdown halve within weeks – The Guardian

The UKs carbon emissions have begun to rebound following the easing of Covid-19 lockdown measures, causing the carbon savings triggered by the coronavirus to halve within weeks.

Greenhouse gas emissions from the energy and transport industries climbed last month as more people returned to work, raising demand for fossil fuels from record lows in April when strict lockdown measures were in place, according to new data.

An analysis by Sia Partners, seen by the Guardian, shows that the UKs carbon emissions fell by 36% in the first four weeks of the lockdown compared to the most recent official carbon emissions data collected in 2018.

But by June Britains total emissions savings had dwindled to a 16% drop as more cars returned to its roads and demand for energy began to rise.

Chlo Depigny, a senior manager at Sia Partners, said the data underlines the fragility of the UKs short-term carbon savings during the coronavirus, and the need for ambitious fundamental changes to the economy if the government hopes to meet its long-term carbon targets.

The data reveals that at the start of the lockdown Britain recorded a 90% collapse in carbon emissions from the aviation sector, a 60% fall in emissions from passenger vehicles and a 30% decline in emissions from Britains energy system.

In the last month the emissions savings from road use shrank from 60% to 30% of typical levels, and the decrease from the energy system contracted from 30% to 15%.

If lockdown measures are removed entirely by early October the total carbon savings from the coronavirus may erode to 10% below normal levels over the year as a whole, down 1 percentage point from the consulting firms previous full-year forecasts earlier this year.

In order to meet the UKs net zero target by 2050 the UK needs to cut 12 megatonnes of CO2 every year this is the equivalent of 3% of the emissions in 2018. So 10% is definitely a significant fall, she said.

However, from a climate point of view if this only occurs in 2020 and normal emissions return in 2021 then these savings will mean only a very small dent to emissions in the end. We saw this in the 2008 financial crisis; emissions very quickly returned to pre-crisis levels, she added.

One of the greatest threats to the UKs carbon savings this year is a surge in demand for road travel as more people opt to use passenger vehicles over public transport to avoid contact with the coronavirus.

This is one of the big uncertainties as we emerge from lockdown, said Depigny. If everyone is concerned about using public transport, and chooses to switch to using cars, then road emissions may well explode over the second half of the year, and could cause even a 10% emissions cut to disappear within a few months.

Another threat to carbon reductions in the wake of the coronavirus outbreak is the number of people who may continue to work from home during the winter months.

The report predicts that the carbon footprint of British homes is expected to be 6% higher than normal in 2020 based on the assumption that many people working from home will make a gradual return to office spaces from October. But a second lockdown during the colder months could mean far higher residential carbon emissions than currently forecast, Depigny said.

We have been lucky that lockdown has happened during warm summer months. If there was a second lockdown during the winter, homes would rely on gas-heating to keep their homes warm all day, which would produce far more emissions than during the summer. It would probably counter most of the savings from less commuting, she said.

Continued here:

'Carbon savings' from Covid-19 lockdown halve within weeks - The Guardian

Weather forecasts are less accurate because of Covid-19, a new study reveals – CNN

The study found that the "accuracy of surface meteorology forecast in March-May 2020 decreases remarkably" as flight density drops due to Covid-19.

The research examined weather forecasts from March 2020 and compared them to actual observed weather in the same time frame.

"It is the temperature forecast where accuracy went down," says Chen. Patterns of hot and cold air are critical in hurricane formation and prediction. If temperatures cannot be tracked accurately, it could be more challenging to identify hotspots early on.

The forecasts that meteorologists create for hurricanes rely in part on computer models. These models are only as good as the data that is put into them.

This data comes from a variety of tools, including aircraft, cruise ships, satellites, buoys, weather balloons, ground stations, and radar. The Covid-19 outbreak has significantly reduced the amount of data we get from two of those tools -- aircraft and cruises.

More importantly, meteorologists find themselves at a greater disadvantage, especially over water, where these observation tools are already limited. Over land, they can just launch extra weather balloons or add additional ground stations to help make up the loss of flight data.

But they can't do that over water. Buoys are unevenly distributed and are notorious for data errors. These floating devices alone can't provide a complete and accurate picture of a particular region of the ocean. Meteorologists need the combination of all available tools to accurately understand the state of the atmosphere across the globe at a given point in time.

How it affects forecasts

One way to make up for some of that data loss is having other observation tools gather additional data.

"When the National Weather Service is anticipating high impact weather events, such as a possible tornado outbreak or a potential landfalling hurricane, (it) will usually conduct 'special' weather balloon launches to take additional weather measurements in the upper levels of the atmosphere," explains Kyle Theim, a meteorologist with the NWS in Atlanta. "The accuracy and precision of our weather models are paramount, and these additional observations can then help weather models and forecasters predict how extreme weather events will unfold."

"We find that the reconnaissance soundings have significant beneficial impact." Data collected by hurricane hunter reconnaissance flights is especially effective and can help make up the loss caused by the drop in commercial flights and cruises.

This is especially important for tropical systems where temperature and wind observations are fundamental in getting a more accurate forecast.

Forecasts were better and worse in different areas

The study found that the differences vary by location. Remote areas like Greenland and Siberia saw the greatest issues with lower flight numbers.

"This is because assimilation of aircraft observations provides a much larger improvement in forecasts over regions where very limited conventional observations are available," says the study. It is already difficult to forecast for these remote regions, so the loss of flight data has a greater impact.

A similar effect hurts forecasting in the Southern Hemisphere.

"Degradation of the weather forecast is more substantially in the Northern Hemisphere than the Southern Hemisphere," says Chen. The Northern Hemisphere has more population and significantly more flights than the Southern Hemisphere. A drop in flights over the Northern Hemisphere is consequently more impactful on the ability to accurately forecast the weather.

Forecasts could get worse

The results of the study actually go against normal predictions of accuracy improvement over time.

"A similar analysis for February 2020 suggests that the forecast accuracy of surface meteorology could have been expected to improve in 2020 compared with 2017-2019, if aircraft observations were carried out as usual," the study says. This hit to accuracy comes at a time when Covid-19 is exacerbating the effects of severe weather on vulnerable populations.

The research warns that the issue of accuracy will only get worse as the Covid-19 pandemic continues.

"Further worsening of weather forecasts may be expected and that the error could become larger for longer-term forecasts," says Chen. "This could handicap early warning of extreme weather and cause additional hardship for daily life in the near future."

See the rest here:

Weather forecasts are less accurate because of Covid-19, a new study reveals - CNN

Alaska does more COVID-19 tests with fewer positives than most other states. That doesn’t tell the whole story. – Anchorage Daily News

We're making coronavirus coverage available without a subscription as a public service. But we depend on reader support to do this work. Please consider joining others in supporting local journalism in Alaska for just $3.23 a week.

Alaska conducts more COVID-19 tests per capita than almost any other state in the country, a fact Gov. Mike Dunleavy mentions often at community briefings.

Alaskas testing positivity rate the number of positive tests out of total tests performed has also remained far below the national average, even though its rising slightly as time goes on. The states death rate among people with coronavirus is the nations second lowest.

Yet the states new COVID-19 case counts in communities like Anchorage and Fairbanks are soaring right now. New cases, especially among younger people, prompted health officials to warn of significant community transmission around the state.

Do the testing numbers tell the whole story? Not entirely.

Comparing Alaska to other states is complicated by the states unique strategy to screen travelers and seafood workers that adds a large pool of healthy people less likely to test positive for the virus.

Alaskas unique geographic isolation and fragile health care resources also prompted state health officials to adopt an aggressive testing strategy early on.

The positivity numbers are promising indicators the state is generally doing enough testing, officials say.

But they dont account for the dramatic increases showing up in new daily cases.

We do believe that weve got increasing community spread, not just increasing testing, Dr. Anne Zink, the states chief medical officer, said this week.

By Friday, Alaska was the third most-tested state in the nation. Only New York and Louisiana test more people per capita.

According to a national data initiative run by Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Alaska currently tests about a quarter of its total population or 21,167 tests for every 100,000 residents which is more tests per capita than all but those two states.

Widespread testing is crucial to gauge the spread of COVID-19 and to catch potentially contagious infected people with few if any symptoms, health officials say.

The current best guess is that about 40% of COVID-19 infections involve people without symptoms, said Dr. Jay Butler, Alaskas former chief medical officer who is now deputy director for infectious diseases at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

That number may very well change as we learn more about this disease, Butler said in an interview from Anchorage, where he was working remotely for a week after helping head the national COVID-19 response. Also, theres a lot of very mild disease that occurs that may not be detected apart from very aggressive testing.

Alaskas testing is certainly aggressive when taken as a whole. But comparing our testing rates to that of other states is complicated.

Brennan Martin removes the cap of the vial for his COVID-19 test swab, taken at the testing site in the Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport on July 17, 2020. (Emily Mesner / ADN)

For one, the state adopted an unusually broad testing policy almost from the start of the pandemic to identify cases early and minimize the odds that a surge would overwhelm hospitals with limited resources, officials say.

One-fifth of acute care hospital beds in Alaska are in hospitals off the road system, in difficult-to-reach parts of the state, according to the Alaska State Hospital and Nursing Home Association. Alaskas ratio of hospital beds to people is on the low end of the spectrum. It can also be a struggle just getting testing swabs to rural villages.

Alaska struggled initially but then took steps to ramp up testing capacity faster than many other states given our small population size. That sets our rates apart.

It does make it hard to compare our state with other states, Zink said during a science briefing Wednesday. But its also hard to compare our hospital capacity with other states.

Another factor that really makes Alaskas numbers hard to compare is the large number of relatively healthy people tested this summer due to screening mandates for travelers and seafood workers. That makes for a higher number of tests, but probably also more people with negative results because theyre not sick.

Under a state health mandate that went into effect in June, travelers into Alaska must either show proof of a negative test, get tested at the airport or agree to quarantine.

In five weeks, Alaska screened more than 78,000 people as part of airport testing, Zink said on social media earlier this week. More than 27,000 tested before traveling, nearly 27,000 were tested at an airport, more than 8,800 chose to quarantine and more than 16,000 were involved in a screened industry or a previous COVID-19 case.

There were a total of just 134 positive test results.

Seafood industry and other workers are also required to get tested multiple times during their time in Alaska. In March, state health officials estimated that industry would need between 140,000 and 160,000 tests this summer.

So far, the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services has distributed about 65,000 testing kits, said state pharmacist Coleman Cutchins. The industry used most of them, Cutchins said.

State testing data also lumps together Alaska residents tested out of state, nonresidents in Alaska, travelers and seafood workers getting tested when they arrive, according to Dr. Louisa Castrodale, the states infectious disease program manager. But the state isnt able to separate percent positive rates in residents and nonresidents, who may be skewing the numbers.

Those are tricky things to try and figure out, Castrodale said.

Coronavirus cases are spiking in Alaska, especially in Anchorage and Fairbanks, due to a combination of increased travel and group activities including churches, residential living facilities, workplaces, bars and social gatherings, state officials say.

Young people who officials say may be more likely to socialize and go to work, and less likely to mask up or social distance are driving the uptick: Most recent new cases have been people in their 20s and 30s.

A state update for the week reported more than a fifth of all the infections in Alaskans since the pandemic began were discovered last week, suggesting a large increase in transmission in the state.

Generally, the states worst indicators remain relatively low. Seventeen Alaskans have died with the virus.

A total of 96 residents have been hospitalized since March, giving the state a relatively good hospitalization rate. But early this week, physicians reported an increase in COVID-19 patients showing up at emergency rooms, a potential indicator for future hospitalizations. Nineteen people were hospitalized with the virus in Anchorage on Friday and another 13 patients were categorized as under investigation.

State officials say any gathering, especially indoor ones, poses an exposure risk. They urge people to keep their social circles small, wear face coverings and avoid large groups unless they can stay at least 6 feet apart ideally outside.

Despite the states soaring case counts, Alaskas positivity rate late this week was 1.78% over a seven-day average, the seventh lowest in the country.

Health authorities track testing positivity rate because its an important indicator of whether a community or state is doing enough testing to find coronavirus infections and stop the spread of the virus. The World Health Organization has said countries with broad testing should have a positivity rate that stays below 5% for 14 days.

A high positivity rate Fairbanks hit 14% this week can indicate that only the sickest people are getting tested and milder cases or asymptomatic cases are getting missed.

A lower positivity Alaskas overall rate this week was 1.85% and Anchorage was at 2.2% can indicate a community is including people with mild or no symptoms.

Karrington Hamilton swabs the inside of her nostril during a COVID-19 test at the testing site in the Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport on July 17, 2020. (Emily Mesner / ADN)

Public health officials have said that more testing is a good thing, because it allows for a more complete picture of where and how the virus is spreading. But it doesnt tell the whole story.

Looking at percent positive can be useful, because it can tell you if youre testing enough of the population, said Tom Hennessy, director of Arctic Investigations, a local subset of the Centers for Disease and Control.

A positive rate of over 10% indicates that you may not be testing enough, he said, citing the World Health Organization.

It doesnt tell us if testing is getting to all the people who need it, or if there are populations that arent getting tested, he said.

That is why looking at an overall testing positivity rate is just a crude measure, he explained.

The state plans to add to the COVID-19 data dashboard a metric that breaks down the percentage of positive cases by region, according to Zink. The more specific the data, the easier it can be to spot trends.

This week, officials said, they noticed that Fairbanks percent positive rate had creeped up to 14%, even though the states 14-day average was just under 2%.

The high rate prompted state epidemiologist Joe McLaughlin and others to meet with Fairbanks leaders to discuss testing there to make sure that were doing a good enough job, he said.

Thats another story Alaskas numbers dont tell.

Go here to read the rest:

Alaska does more COVID-19 tests with fewer positives than most other states. That doesn't tell the whole story. - Anchorage Daily News

Millennials, teens are Utah’s biggest sources of COVID-19 infections, and the state hasn’t been able to stop that – Salt Lake Tribune

Editors note: The Salt Lake Tribune is providing free access to critical stories about the coronavirus. Sign up for our Top Stories newsletter, sent to your inbox every weekday morning. To support journalism like this, please donate or become a subscriber.

So 16-year-old Zander was careful to not contract the virus until he wasnt.

The teen acknowledged Friday that he got lax about social distancing. He started hanging around more of his friends. They showed symptoms first. Then Zander felt sick.

He got word of his test result July 9. He has COVID-19.

I dont think we were really worried about it, Zander said, until one of our friends actually got it.

People ages 15 to 44 account for about 60% of Utahs coronavirus cases, according to the state health department. Lowering their infection rates would mark a major victory in reducing the spread, but Utah has seen little if any success in trimming those numbers.

While new cases among Utahns between ages 25 and 44, essentially millennials, have declined as a percentage of new infections, that trend has been offset by new infections among teens and those in their early 20s, who since schools let out in the spring have become the biggest source of new cases on a per 100,000 population basis.

Through their lens, it is not a serious disease, said Sue Jackson, a professor and head of the Department of Public and Community Health at Utah Valley University. It is more of an annoyance to their lives.

Utahns ages 15 to 44 who have been sickened have a hospitalization rate of about 3% and a fatality rate below 1%. Still, they can spread the virus to older people at higher risk of complications or death.

The teens, 20- and 30-somethings dont seem to appreciate how contagious they can be, Jackson said. She noted that age group includes many of the parents who have complained about masks being required in public schools.

Jackson, whose own children attend the Alpine School District, where angry adults on all sides of the masks-in-schools debate addressed the school board last week, said Friday she is feeling defeated about Utahs ability to contain the coronavirus.

I dont know how you fix this, Jackson said. I dont know how you get people to take this seriously.

In Salt Lake County, residents who are ages 20 to 29 represent the biggest segment of new coronavirus cases on a per 100,000 population basis, said Michelle Vowles, an epidemiologist with the county health department.

While that group often is seen as synonymous with nightlife, Vowles said there are no reports of anyone in Salt Lake County contracting COVID-19 in, say, a bar.

So it may not be a case of the young and the reckless. Instead, Vowles said, information from contact tracing shows these adults may be getting the virus at food, retail, warehouse and construction jobs where social distancing may be more difficult.

That age group, Vowles said, tends to be our workers.

When the pandemic struck, the average infected Salt Lake County resident was 43 years old, Vowles said. Now, he or she is 36.

The solution for the younger adults, she added, is the same as it is for everyone wash your hands, physically distance and, when you cant ensure that space, wear a mask.

New data shows how effective Salt Lake Countys recent mask mandate has been in reducing the spread of the virus, but Vowles said early reports indicate that more people are, at least, wearing face coverings.

A lot of times, she said, its hard to change behavior just by knowledge alone.

Jackson said a public service blitz targeted at people ages 15 to 44 might prove effective. Utah has already had campaigns to reduce suicide and alcohol use among young people.

Any COVID-19 push, Jackson said, cant just tell young people how many the virus has killed, but should tell personal stories of those who have died.

Thats so much more impactful, she said, than just sheer numbers.

Zander Moodys grandparents Carol and John Moody contracted COVID-19 in early May. Carol Moody died May 21 at age 71. John Moody is recovering.

The virus spread to Zanders parents and uncles over May, but not to the teenager or his sister. Zander began to feel a fever and sore throat July 8.

When his mother, Hilary Moody, took him to Alta View Hospital for testing, she said she started crying and had a panic attack in the parking lot. Its the same place she took her in-laws for testing when they were sick.

It just kind of brought it all back, she said.

After Zander tested positive, the family members did what they did in May. The patient Zander stayed in his room. His mother brought him food. She, Zanders father and sister are all in quarantine to ensure they cant infect others.

Hilary said the Salt Lake County Health Department warned her that she and her husband could contract COVID-19 again. Her 13-year-old daughter has not had the virus yet and fears contracting it after what happened to her grandmother and seeing others in her family so sick.

Before he fell ill, Zander was spending time only with a few friends, his mother said, but she believes that created a false sense of security.

You dont factor in that those kids are going to football or another school where they could get it, the mom said.

Zander said fatigue is his only remaining symptom. Not spending time with friends has been the hardest part of the pandemic for kids like him.

Were teenagers, he said. Its kind of what we do.

Tribune reporter Erin Alberty contributed to this story.

Continued here:

Millennials, teens are Utah's biggest sources of COVID-19 infections, and the state hasn't been able to stop that - Salt Lake Tribune

S.D. County Reports More Than 600 COVID-19 Cases For Second Time – KPBS

Photo by Alexander Nguyen

Above: A playground in San Diego County closed to reduce the spread of coronavirus in this undated photo.

The number of daily COVID-19 cases in San Diego County has crossed 600 for the second time as the number of total cases rose to 23,114.

County public health officials reported 625 new cases Saturday and six additional deaths, raising the death count to 478.

Of the six deaths, four were women and two were men. They died between July 8 and 16 and ranged in age from 60 to mid-90s. All had underlying health conditions.

The county recorded 10,290 tests Saturday, 6% of which returned positive. Saturday's test numbers were the second-highest numbers reported, trailing only Friday's figures. The 14-day rolling average is now 6%. The state's target is below 8% positive test rate.

One new community outbreak was identified, in a healthcare setting on July 10. In the past seven days, 17 community outbreaks were identified. The number of community outbreaks remains more than double the trigger of seven or more in seven days.

A community outbreak is defined as three or more COVID-19 cases in a setting and in people of different households.

Of the total positive cases, 2,180 or 9.4% have been hospitalized and 567 or 2.5% of cases have been admitted to an intensive care unit.

A new record of 153.2 of every 100,000 San Diegans are testing positive for the illness as of Thursday's data, well above the state's criterion of 100 per 100,000.

San Diego County COVID-19 data from July 18, 2020

Download document

The last metric the county has failed to maintain is the percentage of cases that have been handled by a contact investigator within 24 hours of it being reported. There are more than 500 investigators employed by the county, and although 98% of all cases had been investigated in that time frame as recently as June 25, that rate has dropped to a dismal 37%. The county metric is to reach 71% of new cases in a day's span.

Dr. Wilma Wooten, San Diego County's public health officer, said in response to these flagging rates, the county is attempting to hire more contact investigators. In just a three-hour period after the job posting went online Wednesday, more than 300 applications came in.

To help the South Bay increase testing capability, the county Health and Human Services Agency and County Board of Supervisors Chairman Greg Cox opened a new testing site in Imperial Beach Thursday morning.

The free, drive-up testing site is in the parking lot of Mar Vista High School, at 505 Elm Ave. The site will offer up to 185 appointments per day.

This new location brings the total number to six testing sites in South County and is part of the County's South Bay Saturation strategy. Additional testing sites are located in San Ysidro, two in Chula Vista and two in National City.

The number of cases continues to rise in people between the ages of 20 and 49 and particularly in people in their 20s, prompting the county to make efforts at educating younger people.

San Diego residents between 20 and 29 years old account for 25% of the county's cases, the highest percentage of any age group, according to county data.

"While it's true that the mortality for younger people is lower, it's also true that the rate is not zero," said Dr. Scott Eisman, pulmonologist at Scripps Memorial Hospital Encinitas. "The complications from this illness are far greater, much longer lasting and far more serious than the flu."

Eisman said in studies of the outbreaks of SARS and MERS other coronaviruses people who had the disease and showed symptoms sometimes didn't regain original lung capacity until a year or longer after the symptoms began.

"All indications lead us to expect it to be at least as serious as those diseases and much more aggressive," he said, adding that even otherwise healthy people could see months of complications from the illness.

Eisman also said heart attacks, strokes and serious blood clots were increasing among younger people confirmed to have COVID-19. A total of 58% of those confirmed to have the disease in the county were between the ages of 20 and 49.

Following Gov. Gavin Newsom's updated health order Monday, all indoor operations ceased at midnight Tuesday in gyms, houses of worship, non-critical office businesses, hair salons and barber shops, indoor malls and personal care services, such as massage businesses and tattoo parlors.

The Del Mar Thoroughbred Club canceled its racing program for Saturday and Sunday after 15 jockeys recently tested positive for COVID-19. Racing is slated to resume July 24.

KPBS' daily news podcast covering local politics, education, health, environment, the border and more. New episodes are ready weekday mornings so you can listen on your morning commute.

To view PDF documents, Download Acrobat Reader.

See the rest here:

S.D. County Reports More Than 600 COVID-19 Cases For Second Time - KPBS

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-15-2020 – 10 AM – West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

TheWest Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR)reports as of 10:00 a.m., on July 15, 2020, there have been 215,450total confirmatorylaboratory results received for COVID-19, with 4,463 totalcases and 97 deaths.

In alignment with updated definitions fromthe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the dashboard includes probablecases which are individuals that have symptoms and either serologic (antibody)or epidemiologic (e.g., a link to a confirmed case) evidence of disease, but noconfirmatory test.

CASESPER COUNTY (Case confirmed by lab test/Probable case):Barbour(23/0), Berkeley (530/19), Boone (42/0), Braxton (5/0), Brooke (31/1), Cabell(196/7), Calhoun (4/0), Clay (13/0), Fayette (86/0), Gilmer (13/0), Grant(20/1), Greenbrier (74/0), Hampshire (45/0), Hancock (43/3), Hardy (47/1),Harrison (128/0), Jackson (148/0), Jefferson (254/5), Kanawha (430/12), Lewis(22/1), Lincoln (10/0), Logan (40/0), Marion (113/3), Marshall (69/1), Mason(26/0), McDowell (12/0), Mercer (63/0), Mineral (68/2), Mingo (29/2),Monongalia (604/14), Monroe (14/1), Morgan (19/1), Nicholas (19/1), Ohio(151/0), Pendleton (16/1), Pleasants (4/1), Pocahontas (37/1), Preston (84/21),Putnam (91/1), Raleigh (81/3), Randolph (191/2), Ritchie (2/0), Roane (12/0),Summers (2/0), Taylor (22/1), Tucker (7/0), Tyler (10/0), Upshur (31/2), Wayne(128/1), Webster (1/0), Wetzel (37/0), Wirt (6/0), Wood (185/9), Wyoming (7/0).

As case surveillance continues at thelocal health department level, it may reveal that those tested in a certaincounty may not be a resident of that county, or even the state as an individualin question may have crossed the state border to be tested.

Pleasenote that delays may be experienced with the reporting of information from thelocal health department to DHHR.

Please visit thedashboard at http://www.coronavirus.wv.gov for more detailed information.

See original here:

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-15-2020 - 10 AM - West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources