Child's poor decision-making skills can predict later behavior problems, research shows

Children who show poor decision-making skills at age 10 or 11 may be more likely to experience interpersonal and behavioral difficulties that have the potential to lead to high-risk health behavior in their teen years, according to a new study from Oregon State University psychology professor.

"These findings suggest that less-refined decision skills early in life could potentially be a harbinger for problem behavior in the future," said Joshua Weller, an assistant professor in the School of Psychological Science in OSU's College of Liberal Arts.

However, if poor decision-making patterns can be identified while children are still young, parents, educators and health professionals may have an opportunity to intervene and help those children enhance these skills, said Weller, who studies individual differences in decision-making.

"This research underscores that decision-making is a skill and it can be taught," he said. "The earlier you teach these skills, the potential for improving outcomes increases."

His findings were published recently in the Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. Co-authors are Maxwell Moholy of Idaho State University and Elaine Bossard and Irwin P. Levin of the University of Iowa. The research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation.

The researchers wanted to better understand how pre-adolescent children's decision-making skills predicted later behavior. To do so, they conducted follow-up assessments with children who had participated in a previous decision-making study.

About 100 children, ages 10 and 11, participated in the original study, where they answered questions that helped assess their decision-making skills. They were evaluated based on how they perceived the risks of a decision, their ability to use appropriate decision-making rules and whether their confidence about a decision matched their actual knowledge on a subject.

For the new study, researchers invited the original study participants -- now 12 and 13 years old -- and their parents back for a follow-up. In all, 76 children ages participated in the second study, which included a behavior assessment that was completed by both the parent and the child.

The behavior assessment included questions about emotional difficulties, conduct issues such as fighting or lying and problems with peers. Those kinds of behavioral issues are often linked to risky health behavior for teens, including substance abuse or high-risk sexual activity, Weller said.

Researchers compared each child's scores from the initial decision-making assessment to the child's and their parent's behavioral reports. They found that children who scored worse on the initial decision-making assessment were more likely to have behavioral problems two years later.

Visit link:
Child's poor decision-making skills can predict later behavior problems, research shows

MD Anderson Cancer Center's Guillermina Lozano and David Piwnica-Worms Elected to Institute of Medicine

Contact Information

Available for logged-in reporters only

Editors Note: This release is being resent. An earlier version contained an incorrect listing of all Institute of Medicine members currently at MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Newswise Two leaders at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center have been elected to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academies in recognition of their contributions to medical science and health care.

Election of Guillermina Lozano, Ph.D., chair of the department of genetics, and David Piwnica-Worms, M.D., Ph.D., chair of the department of cancer systems imaging by members of the elite institution was announced today by the IOM.

Membership in the Institute of Medicine is powerful recognition by outstanding peers of the impact Dr. Lozano and Dr. Piwnica-Worms have had as researchers and leaders in advancing our understanding and treatment of cancer, said Ethan Dmitrovsky, M.D., provost and executive vice president at MD Anderson.

Their election demonstrates the remarkable achievements of Guillermina Lozano, a recognized leader in the field of cancer genetics and David Piwnica-Worms, an exceptional scientist who excels at translating molecular research to the clinic where it directly helps our patients, Dmitrovsky said.

Membership in the IOM recognizes people who have demonstrated outstanding professional achievement and commitment to service.

Lozano, a leader in deciphering the physiological relevance of the p53 tumor suppressor pathway, discovered the importance of p53 inhibitors, Mdm2 and Mdm4, in development and tumorigenesis. She illuminated cell cycle arrest and senescence as wild-type p53 tumor suppressive mechanisms, and defined mutant forms of p53 activities in tumorigenesis.

Piwnica-Worms was a founder of the field of molecular imaging. He pioneered strategies with genetically encoded luminescent reporters, PET reporters, and activatable peptides to enable visualization of cell biology, signaling pathways, protein processing and drug action within cells and living animals in vivo, as well as translating these into the clinic.

See more here:
MD Anderson Cancer Center's Guillermina Lozano and David Piwnica-Worms Elected to Institute of Medicine

Jerrold Meinwald wins National Medal of Science

University Photography file photo

Jerrold Meinwald, the Goldwin Smith Professor of Chemistry Emeritus, has received the National Medal of Science in chemistry.

Jerrold Meinwald, the Goldwin Smith Professor of Chemistry Emeritus, has received the National Medal of Science, the nations highest honor for achievement in science and engineering. Meinwald received the medal in chemistry; other awards were bestowed in behavioral and social sciences, biology, engineering, mathematics and physical sciences, the White House announced Oct. 3.

Over his long career, Meinwald, who joined Cornells faculty in 1952 as an instructor in chemistry, has made fundamental discoveries of how chemicals act as repellants and attractants between organisms. He and the late Thomas Eisner, a longtime friend and colleague who won the National Medal of Science in 1994, are credited with establishing the field of chemical ecology the science that deals with the many ways animals, plants and microorganisms chemically interact.

Its a very nice thing, Meinwald said of the award. Its maybe a representation of a growing interest in the field of chemical ecology.

Meinwalds research has involved the isolation and identification of biologically active compounds from insect and other arthropod sources; pheromone systems of some amphibian and mammal species; and identification of messenger molecules involved in such systems and the understanding of underlying signal transduction pathways.

Meinwald has helped decipher the intricate chemical strategies that insects use for a variety of activities: mating, location of food, protection of offspring and defense against attackers. Throughout his decades-long scientific partnership with Eisner, Eisner, a biologist, conducted most of the biological experiments, while Meinwald and his research group of undergraduates, graduate students and postdocs provided the essential chemical expertise.

Chemicals of unforeseen potential have been among Meinwalds findings over the years. He helped discover that birds and spiders reject fireflies because of lucibufagins, a family of steroids, which Meinwald isolated for the first time. These compounds have proved to have cardiotonic and antiviral effects, with potential therapeutic value for humans.

Meinwald began his career as a conventional organic chemist, he said, but moved on to do collaborative chemistry with Eisner. Meinwald is an active advocate for chemists who seek scientific partnerships outside of chemistry, whether in biology, physics or other fields.

My own award represents a career built in large part on collaboration, he said.

Read the rest here:
Jerrold Meinwald wins National Medal of Science

8 Science-Backed Ways to Find Happiness

Everyone's looking for that elusive happiness, but science has got it figured out.

Are you happy? Many people struggle to answer that question. Everyones ultimate goal is to be happy, and they usually search for that elusive happiness in their own way. Some dig around for gold, believing that riches will plant a permanent smile on their faces. Others collect friendships, relishing in the constant activity of a vast social network.

Whatever your method, in the end we are all yearning for that feeling of happiness, of ultimate contentment. There are of course, many ways to attain it. Happiness is a very personal matter, but there are scientifically-proven ways to make yourself and your body feel better. Do yourself some good and try them out:

1. Create something, anything

We are becoming a society of purely consumers. From the moment we open our eyes, we turn on our phones to read (and consume) what others have produced, then we go to work, listening to music that have also been penned down by others. We watch charity videos and contribute by sharing a link on our page, not thinking to do anything else. Its an easy life. Convenient, entertaining, effortless. But there are also plenty of moments of emptiness, of feeling like you havent done anything of consequence.

The science

See, the reason we sometimes feel restless is because humans thrive on achievements. A study published in 2009 showed that mastering a skill may stress us out in the moment, but eventually gets us to a happier place.

Get happy

You dont have to create anything major, or bring peace to the universe. Start small, perhaps instead of buying herbs at the supermarket, start your own herb garden. Instead of just reading blogs, pen down some of your thoughts. Learn to paint and come up with your own masterpieces. Arrange for an outing instead of always waiting on your friends. The possibilities to create are endless!

See original here:
8 Science-Backed Ways to Find Happiness

The GOP Intensifies Its Attacks On The National Science Foundation

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), the Chairman of the House Science Committee on Science, Space and Technology has repeatedly denounced the National Science Foundation for squandering taxpayer money on frivolous research. Now he's gone a step further, demanding personal political scrutiny of peer-reviewed research grants.

Smith has used several hearings this year as an opportunity to publicly lambast the National Science Foundation (NSF)including a combative March 26 hearing where he lectured White House Science Advisor John Holdren on the "lack of transparency and accountability at the agency" by singling out grants such as a study of the ecological consequences of early human-set fires in New Zealand. (That research promises to yield insights into anthropogenic climate changenot a popular topic for Smith and fellow GOP representatives on the committee.)

And now, as Jeffrey Mervis at ScienceInsider reports:

Four times this past summer. two congressional staffers spent hours poring over material relating to 20 research projects that NSF has funded over the past decade. Each folder contained confidential information that included the initial application, reviewer comments on its merit, correspondence between program officers and principal investigators, and any other information that had helped NSF decide to fund the project.

The visits from the staffers, who work for the U.S. House of Representatives committee that oversees NSF, were an unprecedentedand some say bizarreintrusion into the much admired process that NSF has used for more than 60 years to award research grants.

The Republican aides were looking for anything that Representative Lamar Smith.could use to support his ongoing campaign to demonstrate how the $7 billion research agency is "wasting" taxpayer dollars on frivolous or low-priority projects, particularly in the social sciences.

There's no end in sight: The visits are expected to continue into the fall, because NSF has accededafter some resistanceto Smith's request to make available information on an additional 30 awards.

As Mervis notes, Smith's request created a serious dilemma for NSF Director France Crdova. While Congress has the authority to obtain information as part of its job to oversee federal agencies, the NSF promises researchers that the peer-review process of their proposals will remain confidential.

More:
The GOP Intensifies Its Attacks On The National Science Foundation

Q69. Why is it important for people with HIV to get medical care? – Video


Q69. Why is it important for people with HIV to get medical care?
From the HIV Avatar Project, posted by the Department of Behavioral Science and Community Health at the University of Florida hiv-avatar-project.com http://b...

By: UF Behavioral Science and Community Health

The rest is here:
Q69. Why is it important for people with HIV to get medical care? - Video

Cafe Scientifique: Psychological Trauma and Resilience: Victim Rehabilitation & Trauma Psychiatry – Video


Cafe Scientifique: Psychological Trauma and Resilience: Victim Rehabilitation Trauma Psychiatry
with Daryn Reicherter, MD, Clinical Associate Professor, Psychiatry Behavioral Science, Stanford University School of Medicine War crimes stemming from pol...

By: Stanford Blood Center

Continue reading here:
Cafe Scientifique: Psychological Trauma and Resilience: Victim Rehabilitation & Trauma Psychiatry - Video

Q32. Are health care workers or people in other occupations at risk for HIV? – Video


Q32. Are health care workers or people in other occupations at risk for HIV?
From the HIV Avatar Project, posted by the Department of Behavioral Science and Community Health at the University of Florida hiv-avatar-project.com http://b...

By: UF Behavioral Science and Community Health

Follow this link:
Q32. Are health care workers or people in other occupations at risk for HIV? - Video

NASA To Study Deep Space Behavioral Health and Performance Issues

NASA's Human Research Program (HRP) will fund three proposals to help investigate questions about behavioral health and performance on future deep space exploration missions. Research like this may help astronauts as they venture farther into the solar system than ever before to explore an asteroid and, eventually, Mars.

The selected proposals are from three institutions in two states and will receive a total of about $3.2 million during a three-year period.

The three projects were selected from 11 proposals received in response to the research announcement "Human Exploration Research Opportunities - Behavioral Health and Performance." Science and technology experts from academia and government reviewed the proposals.

Two proposals will investigate neurobehavioral conditions and standardized behavioral measures relevant to exploration class missions. One proposal will evaluate the neurobehavioral effects of a dynamic lighting system on the International Space Station.

HRP research provides knowledge and technologies to reduce crew health and performance risks during space exploration.

It also develops potential countermeasures for problems experienced during space travel. Mission planners and system developers can use these potential countermeasures to monitor and mitigate the risks to crew health and performance.

While the program's research goals are to ensure astronauts living off the Earth safely complete their challenging space missions and preserve their long-term health, these same research studies can also lead to advancements in human health understanding and treatments for patients on Earth.

See original here:
NASA To Study Deep Space Behavioral Health and Performance Issues

NASA Selects Three Proposals to Support Behavioral Health and Performance on Deep Space Missions

NASA's Human Research Program (HRP) will fund three proposals to help investigate questions about behavioral health and performance on future deep space exploration missions. Research like this may help astronauts as they venture farther into the solar system than ever before to explore an asteroid and, eventually, Mars.

The selected proposals are from three institutions in two states and will receive a total of about $3.2 million during a three-year period. The three projects were selected from 11 proposals received in response to the research announcement "Human Exploration Research Opportunities - Behavioral Health and Performance." Science and technology experts from academia and government reviewed the proposals.

Two proposals will investigate neurobehavioral conditions and standardized behavioral measures relevant to exploration class missions. One proposal will evaluate the neurobehavioral effects of a dynamic lighting system on the International Space Station.

HRP research provides knowledge and technologies to reducecrew health and performance risksduring space exploration. It also develops potential countermeasures for problems experienced during space travel.Mission planners and system developers can use these potential countermeasures to monitor and mitigate the risks to crew health and performance.

While the programs research goals are to ensure astronauts living off the Earth safely complete their challenging space missions and preserve their long-term health, these same research studies can also lead to advancements in human health understanding and treatments for patients on Earth.

For a complete list of the selected principal investigators, organizations and proposals, visit:

http://go.nasa.gov/1rX1Qzr

For information about NASA's Human Research Program, visit:

http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/humanresearch

See original here:
NASA Selects Three Proposals to Support Behavioral Health and Performance on Deep Space Missions

The science behind why our inboxes are so full of political losers

If it appears that your favorite candidate has been flooding your e-mail box with tales of woe lately, here's one reason why: New research shows that the Internet loves an underdog candidate.

Apair of behavioral scientists, Todd Rogers of the Harvard Kennedy School of Government and Don A. Moore of the University of California at Berkeley, examined whether campaign donors are more likelyto open theirwalletsfora candidate who's projected to win or one who's projected to lose.

Working with theonline fundraising and digital marketing firm Anne Lewis Strategies, the researcherstracked the outcomes of e-mails sent ontwodays in June to the e-mail list of the Democratic Governors Association. The e-mails were aimed at fundraising around the gubernatorial race pittingFlorida Democrat Charlie Crist againstRepublican Rick Scott. The e-mails were identicalexcept for the first line: One said: "We've fallen behind Rick Scott in the latest polls," while the other said: "Rick Scott is LOSING in three straight polls."

Luckily for science, the polling on the race has been tight enough to justify either interpretation of the state of the contest.

The down-by-a-hair e-mails turned out to be the big winner, with people far more likely to support a candidate who is barely losing than one just barely winning. The underdog e-mails raised 60 percent more money than those that suggested that the race was still close but that the preferred candidate had pulled ahead, according to the study released last week, "The Motivating Power of Under-Confidence."

"This constant testing of widely varying messages could generate the pattern we observe: messages highlighting that the candidate is barely losing may tend to dominate other messages," the study says.

This makes some intuitive sense. Voters have little interest in spending money to ensure victory. But there are wrinkles. For supporters, the idea that your candidate is losing is appealing. But the pitch doesn't work on uncommitted voters.

Rogers and Moore also found that would-be voters were more likely to support a fictional candidate when they were first presented with positive statements about their candidacy. The researchers attribute that to the behavioral practice of "herding," in whichwe humans are likely to throw our lots in with those who others seem to believe are likely to succeed.

"Talking to uncommitted voters," says Lewis, "is like going on a first date. You want them to think you're a winner. But after you've been married for 20 years, you can be a little more like, 'Yikes, I need help.'"

That helps explain one dichotomy of politics. On television, where candidates are appealing to a general audience, they're likely to talk about the strength of their campaign. But their online mailing lists tend to be made up of supporters -- one reason that candidates often appear far more sad sack in our e-mail inboxes than on our TV sets.

See the original post here:
The science behind why our inboxes are so full of political losers

Q47. Is there a 100% effective way to prevent sexual transmission of HIV? – Video


Q47. Is there a 100% effective way to prevent sexual transmission of HIV?
From the HIV Avatar Project, posted by the Department of Behavioral Science and Community Health at the University of Florida hiv-avatar-project.com http://bsch.phhp.ufl.edu/

By: UF Behavioral Science and Community Health

Go here to read the rest:
Q47. Is there a 100% effective way to prevent sexual transmission of HIV? - Video

Former Carnegie director Sean Solomon wins National Medal of Science

PUBLIC RELEASE DATE:

6-Oct-2014

Contact: Tina McDowell tmcdowell@carnegiescience.edu Carnegie Institution @carnegiescience

Washington, D.C.Sean Solomon, director of Carnegie's Department of Terrestrial Magnetism from 1992 until 2012, will receive the nation's highest scientific award, the National Medal of Science at a White House ceremony later this year.

Sean Solomon's career has been characterized by an uncommon combination of science and leadership. He established important new paradigms in the Earth and planetary sciences, while simultaneously leading the field of geophysics. Solomon is the principal investigator and creative force behind the MESSENGER (MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging) mission to Mercury, which has had a bounty of discoveries that have changed what we thought we knew about the innermost planet. He is an acknowledged leader in the fields of seismology, geophysics, and planetary geology. His scientific research has ranged from oceanographic expeditions on Earth to spacecraft missions to Venus, Mars, Mercury, and the Moon. His fundamental contributions have changed our understanding of the structure and geodynamics of Earth, the Moon, and the terrestrial planets.

President Obama remarked in a statement: "These scholars and innovators have expanded our understanding of the world, made invaluable contributions to their fields, and helped improve countless lives. Our nation has been enriched by their achievements and by all the scientists and technologists across America dedicated to discovery, inquiry, and invention."

After Carnegie, Solomon became the director of Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. In addition to his intellectual contributions and scientific leadership, Solomon has also been tireless in his service to the scientific community and the interests of society as a whole. He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and has served as President of the American Geophysical Union, the world's largest professional society in the Earth sciences, among many other appointments. Over his long career, he has been a supportive advisor to a large number of universities, research groups, and other scientific organizations and has been a selfless mentor to students and younger colleagues, many of whom have become leaders in their fields.

Solomon received his B.S. from Caltech and his Ph. D. from MIT. Before joining Carnegie he was Professor of Geophysics at MIT.

###

The National Medal of Science was established by the 86th Congress in 1959 as a Presidential Award to be given to individuals "deserving of special recognition by reason of their outstanding contributions to knowledge in the physical, biological, mathematical, or engineering sciences." In 1980 Congress expanded this recognition to include the social and behavioral sciences.

More:
Former Carnegie director Sean Solomon wins National Medal of Science

Q33. Can I get HIV from contact with my doctor, dentist, or other health care professionals? – Video


Q33. Can I get HIV from contact with my doctor, dentist, or other health care professionals?
From the HIV Avatar Project, posted by the Department of Behavioral Science and Community Health at the University of Florida hiv-avatar-project.com http://b...

By: UF Behavioral Science and Community Health

View original post here:
Q33. Can I get HIV from contact with my doctor, dentist, or other health care professionals? - Video

Science of fear: Clowns, dead things can terrorize, traumatize

Editors note: This is the first in a four-part series about fear.

A rainbow-headed clown in floppy red shoes twisting a balloon into the shape of a dog is amusing to some people.

But others see that red nose, and their hearts pound, they feel faint or dizzy and their instinct tells them to run.

From clowns and ghosts to escalators, cockroaches and even vomit, fear can take almost any shape.

When it interferes with everyday functioning, that's when people tend to seek professional help, said Heather Chik, a clinical psychologist and director of the Anxiety & OCD Behavioral Health Center in Munster.

"Specific phobias are the most treatable anxiety problem out of all the anxiety disorders," Chik said.

An effective treatment is exposure therapy and often can be done in one full-day session. She described a "fear ladder" or hierarchy, in which the patient and psychologist establish challenges to overcome, which gradually become more intense.

If a person is afraid of dogs, the therapy might start by looking at pictures of dogs, then looking at videos of them, then going to a pet store, then touching the glass and eventually taking a dog for a walk, Chik said.

"We never go to the next level until they're comfortable with the level before that," she said.

Exposure therapy teaches patients that anxiety does not last forever.

See the article here:
Science of fear: Clowns, dead things can terrorize, traumatize

Q52. Do male and female condoms provide the same protection against HIV? – Video


Q52. Do male and female condoms provide the same protection against HIV?
From the HIV Avatar Project, posted by the Department of Behavioral Science and Community Health at the University of Florida hiv-avatar-project.com http://b...

By: UF Behavioral Science and Community Health

Excerpt from:
Q52. Do male and female condoms provide the same protection against HIV? - Video