Women of Color Face a Staggering Amount of Harassment in … – Gizmodo

The sciences are overwhelminglyhostile to women, and in astronomy, its doubly bad for women of color. New research published yesterday in The Journal of Geophysical Research affirms what these women have been saying for years: As a result of persistent harassment by their male colleagues, many women of color feel unsafe at work, attending conferences, and conducting field research.

Kate Clancy, an associate professor at the University of Illinois, has been researching discrimination within the sciences for years. In 2014, she and her team published a study in PLOS One that found of the 600 women field researchers they surveyed, 71 percent said they had experienced inappropriate sexual remarks while in the field and 26 percent said they had experienced sexual assault.

In her new study, Clancy and her team surveyed 474 astronomers and planetary scientists between 2011 and 2014. All subjects identified as women or non-binary, and came from various races and career rank categories such as graduate, post doc, and more. Subjects were asked about everything from verbal harassment to physical assault. Not only did the study find depressingly high rates of harassment among all women surveyed, it concluded that women of color experienced the highest rates of negative workplace experiences, including harassment and assault.

40 percent of women of color reported feeling unsafe in the workplace as a result of their gender or sex, and 28% of women of color reported feeling unsafe as a result of their race, the researchers wrote. Finally, 18% of women of color, and 12% of white women, skipped professional events because they did not feel safe attending, identifying a significant loss of career opportunities due to a hostile climate.

Sexual assault is among the most underreported crimes in America. While the reasons why women choose not to report their assaults or even harassment within the workplace are myriad and complex, the hurdles within academia can make the process even more excruciating. Since permanent staff positions are difficult to come by, many women dont want to risk their career by being branded as the one who complained.

There are a lot of barriers to reporting, and there are severe consequences for victims who dare to report because its re-traumatizing, Clancy told Gizmodo. It requires [victims] to do things in an official capacity, when maybe they just want to talk to somebody about it and sort out their feelings. But there are very few opportunities for those intermediate conversations, because in most academic settings, the second you talk to somebody about what happened, the university requires you to report it up the chain.

For many scientists who have experienced harassment or assault, theres also the fear that the perpetrator wont be reprimanded. Even if the perpetrator is held accountable, it often happens too late.

In astronomy, the case of former Berkley professor Geoff Marcy is probably the most widely reported instance of this in recent years. The potential Nobel laureate resigned in 2015 after a six-month investigation by his university found he had violated sexual harassment policies by kissing, groping, and inappropriately touching his female students. It took Berkeley almost a decade to do anything in an official capacity.

About a year after Marcys case, Representative Jackie Speiera Democrat from Californiaproposed legislation that would better address problem professors who resigned or were expelled due to gender-based harassment. Meanwhile, women in astronomy had begun using the hashtag #AstroSH, or astronomy sexual harassment, to share their experiences in the field.

#AstroSH has grown into a collection of voices speaking out against injustice. But its critical to note that women of color across the sciences have been speaking out about this for years.

Its hard, Dr. Chanda Prescod-Weinstein, a theoretical astrophysicist who has written extensively about racial and gender inequality in STEM, told Gizmodo. I think in our macho-oriented culture, being right and winning is usually an exciting thing. But this is a hard thing to be right about.

While Clancys study focused on astronomy and related fields, its unclear whether astronomy is particularly misogynistic, or if cases like Marcys have brought more media attention to this area of study. Clancy says she and her team will be conducting qualitative analyses on 20 interviews theyve already conducted to better answer this question.

It seems to methough this is anecdotalthat the physical sciences, partly because theyre historically more male-dominated, have a very different workplace environment in terms of whats considered acceptable behavior, Clancy said. Bullying and intimidation are a workplace norm in some of these places...my guess is while its maybe not a great workplace for everybody, it might be especially bad for folks who are underrepresented minorities.

While its important to interrogate workplace culture within astronomy, its also critical to investigate how other fields of sciences treat women, particularly women of color, who are woefully underrepresented across the sciences. A study from the National Science Foundation found that between 1973 and 2012, 22,172 white men received physics PhDs. Over the same period, 66 Black women received physics PhDs.

Why is it that the number of women in physics in graduate programs seems to be lower in physics than in astronomy, but were hearing far fewer stories [about sexual harassment and assault] in physics, Prescod-Weinstein said. Do we really think thats because it doesnt happen in physics, or is it because the culture in physics is even more toxic in silencing?

Clancys new study is not a revelation to the women of color living these experiences, but it is an affirmation that they are heard and believed.

I think that the lesson that needs to be taken away from this study is that data is important and useful, but actually one of the most important things that this report could be doing is providing affirmation to the women who already knew it was true, Prescod-Weinstein said.

[Journal of Geophysical Research]

Go here to read the rest:

Women of Color Face a Staggering Amount of Harassment in ... - Gizmodo

Smallest-ever star discovered by astronomers – Phys.Org

July 12, 2017 Credit: Amanda Smith

The smallest star yet measured has been discovered by a team of astronomers led by the University of Cambridge. With a size just a sliver larger than that of Saturn, the gravitational pull at its stellar surface is about 300 times stronger than what humans feel on Earth.

The star is likely as small as stars can possibly become, as it has just enough mass to enable the fusion of hydrogen nuclei into helium. If it were any smaller, the pressure at the centre of the star would no longer be sufficient to enable this process to take place. Hydrogen fusion is also what powers the Sun, and scientists are attempting to replicate it as a powerful energy source here on Earth.

These very small and dim stars are also the best possible candidates for detecting Earth-sized planets which can have liquid water on their surfaces, such as TRAPPIST-1, an ultracool dwarf surrounded by seven temperate Earth-sized worlds.

The newly-measured star, called EBLM J0555-57Ab, is located about six hundred light years away. It is part of a binary system, and was identified as it passed in front of its much larger companion, a method which is usually used to detect planets, not stars. Details will be published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.

"Our discovery reveals how small stars can be," said Alexander Boetticher, the lead author of the study, and a Master's student at Cambridge's Cavendish Laboratory and Institute of Astronomy. "Had this star formed with only a slightly lower mass, the fusion reaction of hydrogen in its core could not be sustained, and the star would instead have transformed into a brown dwarf."

EBLM J0555-57Ab was identified by WASP, a planet-finding experiment run by the Universities of Keele, Warwick, Leicester and St Andrews. EBLM J0555-57Ab was detected when it passed in front of, or transited, its larger parent star, forming what is called an eclipsing stellar binary system. The parent star became dimmer in a periodic fashion, the signature of an orbiting object. Thanks to this special configuration, researchers can accurately measure the mass and size of any orbiting companions, in this case a small star. The mass of EBLM J0555-57Ab was established via the Doppler, wobble method, using data from the CORALIE spectrograph.

"This star is smaller, and likely colder than many of the gas giant exoplanets that have so far been identified," said von Boetticher. "While a fascinating feature of stellar physics, it is often harder to measure the size of such dim low-mass stars than for many of the larger planets. Thankfully, we can find these small stars with planet-hunting equipment, when they orbit a larger host star in a binary system. It might sound incredible, but finding a star can at times be harder than finding a planet."

This newly-measured star has a mass comparable to the current estimate for TRAPPIST-1, but has a radius that is nearly 30% smaller. "The smallest stars provide optimal conditions for the discovery of Earth-like planets, and for the remote exploration of their atmospheres," said co-author Amaury Triaud, senior researcher at Cambridge's Institute of Astronomy. "However, before we can study planets, we absolutely need to understand their star; this is fundamental."

Although they are the most numerous stars in the Universe, stars with sizes and masses less than 20% that of the Sun are poorly understood, since they are difficult to detect due to their small size and low brightness. The EBLM project, which identified the star in this study, aims to plug that lapse in knowledge. "Thanks to the EBLM project, we will achieve a far greater understanding of the planets orbiting the most common stars that exist, planets like those orbiting TRAPPIST-1," said co-author Professor Didier Queloz of Cambridge' Cavendish Laboratory.

Explore further: Temperate earth-sized worlds found in extraordinarily rich planetary system (Update)

More information: Alexander von Boetticher et al. 'A Saturn-size low-mass star at the hydrogen-burning limit.' Astronomy & Astrophysics (2017). arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/1706.08781

Astronomers have found a system of seven Earth-sized planets just 40 light-years away. They were detected as they passed in front of their parent star, the dwarf star TRAPPIST-1. Three of them lie in the habitable zone and ...

With two suns in its sky, Luke Skywalker's home planet Tatooine in "Star Wars" looks like a parched, sandy desert world. In real life, thanks to observatories such as NASA's Kepler space telescope, we know that two-star systems ...

For the first time, astronomers have discovered seven Earth-size planets orbiting a single nearby starand these new worlds could hold life.

Proxima Centauri, the closest star to the Earth (only 4.28 light-years away) is getting a lot of attention these days. It hosts a planet, Proxima Cen b, whose mass is about 1.3 Earth-mass (though it could be larger, depending ...

University of Texas at Austin astronomer Andrew Mann and colleagues have discovered a planet in a nearby star cluster which could help astronomers better understand how planets form and evolve. The discovery of planet K2-25b ...

Researchers have found a new way to measure the pull of gravity at the surface of a star. For distant stars with planets orbiting them, this information is key in determining whether any of those planets can harbour life.

(Phys.org)An international team of astronomers reports the discovery of a new "hot Jupiter" exoplanet with a short orbital period of just three and a half days. The newly detected giant planet, designated KELT-20b, circles ...

The smallest star yet measured has been discovered by a team of astronomers led by the University of Cambridge. With a size just a sliver larger than that of Saturn, the gravitational pull at its stellar surface is about ...

Astronomers studying the distant Universe have found that small star-forming galaxies were abundant when the Universe was only 800 million years old, a few percent of its present age. The results suggest that the earliest ...

In the search for planets similar to our own, an important point of comparison is the planet's density. A low density tells scientists a planet is more likely to be gaseous like Jupiter, and a high density is associated with ...

A new model giving rise to young planetary systems offers a fresh solution to a puzzle that has vexed astronomers ever since new detection technologies and planet-hunting missions such as NASA's Kepler space telescope have ...

Brown dwarf stars are failed stars. Their masses are so small, less than about eighty Jupiter-masses, that they lack the ability to heat up their interiors to the roughly ten million kelvin temperatures required for normal ...

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Article completely skips over how they know it's a star, what its temperature is and how they measured it etc...

Twinkle twinkle little star,how I wonder what you are.

@avandesande2000, click the link at the bottom, everything is there. Including why they don't know the temperature. How they know it's a star; from astrophysical models and comparison with data from other objects.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

See more here:

Smallest-ever star discovered by astronomers - Phys.Org

A star watch and astronomy night at the Rancocas Nature Center – Burlington County Times

Just three days before this decades complete solar eclipse, Friends of the Rancocas Nature Center in Westampton will co-host with the West Jersey Astronomical Society, a Third Annual Star Watch/Astronomy Night, on Aug. 18.

The event starts at 7:30 p.m. with an indoor demonstration, before heading outdoors, to the meadow. The Astronomical Society will bring its big array of telescopes and other optics to guide beginners and experienced star gazers through the summer night sky.

Guests are encouraged to bring flashlights, lawn chairs and binoculars.

Registration is required for this program, and can be completed by calling 609-261-2495. The cost for RNC members is $10 per person or $25 per family of five or less, and nonmembers are $15 or $40 for a family.

The Rancocas Nature Center is situated at 794 Rancocas Road, on a 210-acre piece of the Rancocas State Park. It features three miles of hiking trails through varied habitats including meadows, forest, and wetlands, plus access to Rancocas Creek. It has been operating for 38 years, providing environmental education for the surrounding community with programs both on- and off-site for groups including schools, scouts, libraries, senior citizens, as well as the general public.

The Nature Center building includes a nature gift shop, high quality bird seed for sale, live animals, natural history displays, and restrooms. Grounds include a picnic area, dragonfly pond, frog pond, beehives, and childrens, pollinator and display gardens. The land has important environmental, historical and cultural significance dating back to the American Revolution. Go to RancocasNatureCenter.org for more information.

As part of its mission to promote stewardship and provide environmental education for the Rancocas State Park and surrounding communities through the operation of the Rancocas Nature Center, the Friends of the RNC continues its quarterly events to expand public participation and enrichment.

The RNC is supported through the partnership of the Burlington County Board of Chosen Freeholders, the NJ State Park Service Division of Parks & Forestry, Westampton Township, Friends of Rancocas Nature Center, and the Rancocas Conservancy.

Go here to read the rest:

A star watch and astronomy night at the Rancocas Nature Center - Burlington County Times

For Minority Female Astronomers, a New Research Effort Backs Up Anecdotes of Harassment – The Chronicle of Higher Education

Women working in astronomy and planetary sciences have long spoken up about workplace harassment; a new paper now has data to back up those anecdotes.

Published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, the paper, "Double Jeopardy in Astronomy and Planetary Science: Women of Color Face Greater Risks of Gendered and Racial Harassment," surveyed 474 astronomers and planetary scientists about their workplace experiences from 2011 to 2015. A standout statistic: Forty percent of women of color who responded said they felt unsafe at work because of their gender or sex, while 28 percent said they had felt unsafe because of their race.

Among all the scientists surveyed, women from minority racial and ethnic groups reported the highest rates of harassment, assault, and negative experiences. Although there is no one factor that explains why so many women responded that they have been harassed, two of the papers co-authors said that some of the problems may stem from aspects specific to the field of astronomy.

Kathryn B.H. Clancy, an associate professor of anthropology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and one of the papers co-authors, said the field has been dominated with male leaders department heads, deans, and prominent scientists for longer than fields like the social sciences or life sciences. Getting over the hurdles that come with years of male-dominated leadership can be tough, even when a new female leader is appointed.

"I think theres high prevalence of sexual harassment and other types of harassment across all of these places," Ms. Clancy said. "But I think women have more social support and more means to work against some of these type of hostile workplaces when theres higher representation."

Increasing the number of female leaders in these departments can seem like an easy fix, but too often women in leadership positions are selected for their willingness to adopt the norms of the men who led before them, Ms. Clancy said. And its usually white women, not women of color, appointed to these leadership positions, she added.

"Just generally speaking, diversity programs and affirmative-action programs: Who have they benefited the most over the last several decades? White women, right?" Ms. Clancy said. "So, again, I think the bigger issue for me is I want to see more women of color in leadership positions."

Women in the field are reaching points in their careers where leadership roles are available and having new leaders tackle issues like harassment is key, said Christina Richey, a former chair of the American Astronomical Societys Committee on the Status of Women in Astronomy and one of the papers co-authors.

The nature of the field may also explain why harassment is so prevalent, Ms. Richey said. For example, when scientists are participating in an observatory run, or when astronomers travel to an observatory to study planets, stars, and galaxies for multiple nights at a time, they are taking notes after looking through a telescope with only one other person. This type of research forces moments of isolation between a woman and maybe just one colleague, likely a man.

The solutions come a lot more from listening to people, and from in particular listening to people of color, than it does from, you know, running stats.

Such interactions arent limited to faculty members. Graduate students may also deal with forced socialization during poster sessions at conferences, Ms. Richey said. If a noted scholar comes up to a female graduate student to ask questions about her poster or paper and begins to act inappropriately, the student has to get through the uncomfortable moment on her own.

Leaders, male or female, have to keep the fields unique situations in mind when setting policies to deal with harassment in the discipline, she said. "You have these forced isolation and socialization moments, but Ill be perfectly honest with you I dont believe astronomy and planetary science is separate from the issues that society at large is dealing with," Ms. Richey said.

This paper, including its recommendations to help mend the hostile workplace that women from minority groups face in astronomy and planetary sciences, is just the first step of these authors research on the issue. In its suggested solutions the paper echoed and cited proposals published by women of color about the topic.

Ms. Richey said shed like to see further research on what type of training, from bystander intervention to hands-on style lessons, gives the best results. "Which of these techniques is the one that is seen as, shall I say, the most proven effective, so that we can then start to make that the standard protocol instead of just checking boxes."

Ms. Clancy said the research team also conducted interviews to go with the data, and plans to publish a paper that digs into more of those responses. Exploring the narratives and interviews will hopefully help more people understand the challenges women face in the discipline. "The solutions come a lot more from listening to people, and from in particular listening to people of color, than it does from, you know, running stats."

Fernanda Zamudio-Suarz is a breaking-news reporter. Follow her on Twitter @FernandaZamudio, or email her at fzamudiosuarez@chronicle.com.

Continued here:

For Minority Female Astronomers, a New Research Effort Backs Up Anecdotes of Harassment - The Chronicle of Higher Education

Ten things you don’t know about asteroids (and impacts thereof) – SYFY WIRE (blog)

Tonight (Wednesday July 12, 2017 at 9/8 Central), the CBS television network premiers the first episode of a new series called Salvation. Its a drama - part science fiction and part political thriller - about an asteroid discovered on a collision course with Earth. In the show, we have just six months before impact.

I am very pleased to let yall know that I am the science consultant for the show! Its my first big-time consultation (Ive done quite a few before, but usually for one-offs, pilots that never get made, and oh, yeah, a big Hollywood movie where I literally changed one word in the script).

Ive seen the first episode (you can watch the first 15 minutes here) and I have to say, its pretty good. Lots of intrigue and, while I wont spoil anything, I will say that there are plenty of twists and turns to the plot as story unfolds. Its been a lot of fun to come up with real (or near-real) solutions to some of the plot points the characters find themselves in. In some cases, I did as best I could to be as realistic and scientifically accurate as possible, but thats not always the way it works out. As any science consultant will tell you, the story must come first! If the science needs to be bent a little bit to make that happen, well, you cant be too stiff, or else youll break.

Im OK with that, because without a story youve got nothing. Let science add what it can where it can, and dont sweat it too much if you have to lean more on the fiction side of science fiction.

[Credit: CBS]

With that in mind, and in honor of the Salvation premier, I thought it would be fun to make a short list of ten facts, trivia, and misconceptions people have about asteroids and asteroid impacts. Some of these will tie directly into the show, so read this and keep it in mind when you watch the premier tonight (at 9/8 Central, remember, and check your local listings). How did we do? Leave comments below! And for more info about the show, follow SalvationCBS on Twitter.

So:

1) Mostly, asteroids spend their time in the Main Belt. Mostly.

Asteroids are chunks of rock, metal, or a mixture of both. Theres no real lower limit to their size its weird to call something the size of a basketball an asteroid, but there you go and the biggest (Ceres and Vesta) are so large theyre called protoplanets.

The vast majority orbit the Sun between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter, far from Earth. But not all of them do. Some share Jupiters orbit, for example, and are called Trojan asteroids. Others have looping elliptical orbits, usually yanked into those paths by Jupiters mighty gravity.

[The main belt asteroid Vesta as seen by the Dawn spacecraft. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCAL/MPS/DLR/IDA]

Others pass close to the Earth. We call those near-Earth asteroids, or NEAs, because sometimes astronomers lack imagination when it comes to etymological coinagement. They come in lots of different groups, generally classified by the semi-major axis of their orbit (the long diameter of an ellipse divided by two, analogous to a circles radius).

If the semi-major axis of an asteroids orbit is greater than Earths distance from the Sun, we call it an Apollo asteroid (named after the asteroid 1862 Apollo, the first of its kind to be found). If the semi-major axis is less than Earths distance to the Sun, its an Aten asteroid. There are also Amors (which have orbits that keep them at least just outside Earths orbit), Atiras (also called Apohele asteroids), which stay well inside Earths orbit, and some others. There may even be asteroids that stay inside Mercurys orbit, called Vulcanoids, but they are currently theoretical; none has been seen.

Which brings us to

2) An asteroid on an impact course may not come from deep space. It may be a neighbor thats getting too friendly.

In 2004, an asteroid was discovered, later named Apophis. It was found to be an NEA, on an orbit just about 0.9 Earth years long. Its an Aten with an orbit that crosses ours, and it was soon discovered that in the year 2029 it will pass so close to Earth it will be under our geosynchronous satellites! Itll pass no less than 31,000 kilometers over our surface. A close call, but a clean miss.

But theres more. During that encounter, Earths gravity will bend the orbit of Apophis. For a while it wasnt clear how much. But it was quickly found that if it passed at exactly the right distance (going through a region of space astronomers call a keyhole), its orbit would change just enough that seven years later, in 2036, it would impact the Earth!

That caused a lot of concern, obviously. However, more recent observations show conclusively that it will miss the keyhole, and will therefore miss the Earth in 2036 by a substantial margin. Phew! But it was a wake-up call that not all asteroid threats come from far away, and that the keyhole is an important concept in asteroid science.

In Salvation, the asteroid comes from deep space. Thats not impossible, but there are other ones we need to keep our eyes on. But then, how do we find them? Well

3) Asteroids arent usually discovered by people. Theyre found in automated surveys.

It used to be that astronomers found asteroids literally by drawing maps by hand, then noting which stars moved (the name asteroid, after all, means star-like). The first, Ceres, was discovered that way!

Then we invented photography, and asteroids betrayed their existence by their motion around the Sun, leaving little streaks in the images.

Now, though, we have electronic detectors and telescopes that can see wide swaths of the sky. This means we can survey huge chunks of celestial real estate, looking for things that move and that can be done using software that is much faster than humans.

The vast majority of asteroids are now found this way. The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, or WISE, was a space telescope designed in part to look for asteroids, catching their warm glow in infrared. It found quite a few before the mission ended; it was so successful it was revived and renamed to NEOWISE, for Near-Earth Object WISE.

[WISE image of the asteroid Santa Claus. Yes, seriously. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA]

New observatories are coming online now and in the near future that will find tremendous numbers of asteroids, too.

But how many are there? Well

4) There are billions of asteroids. But the asteroid belt is actually pretty empty.

The main asteroid belt has over a million asteroids bigger than 1 km across, and there are likely more than a billion 100 meters across. Despite that, the main belt is mostly empty space! The total volume of asteroids is less than the Earths Moon, and theres a huge amount of space out there, more than a quintillion square kilometers (and vastly more if you include the volume, not the area, of space available).

Its also not clear how many NEAs there are. Well over 16,000 are known, and there are probably about 1000 a kilometer or more in size (statistics indicate weve found 90% of those already). There are probably a million NEAs bigger than about 40 meters in size out there. Weve only discovered about 1% of them.

That sounds scary, but were looking for them! Thats the first step in preventing them hitting us, after all.

Speaking of which

5) An asteroid doesnt have to physically hit the ground to be a big problem.

Sure, youve seen movies where some gigantic asteroids slams into the Earth, creating devastation and all kinds of horribleness. But really big asteroids are very rare (the one in Salvation is big enough that very few like it exist). The smaller they are, the more common they are.

Really small ones just burn up in Earths atmosphere. Were hit by about 100 tons of material every day, most smaller than a grain of sand! When that happens, we see a shooting star, or more technically a meteor.

If an asteroid is mostly metal, than it can get through the atmosphere and hit the ground hard enough to do real damage if its bigger than roughly 20 meters in size or so. The one that carved out Meteor Crater in Arizona was probably 30-50 meters across.

If its rock, then its more fragile, and wont hit the ground; itll disintegrate high up in the atmosphere. But thats still a problem! Salvation opens (no spoilers) discussing the asteroid that blew up in the air over the Russian city of Chelyabinsk in 2013. That was a real event. The asteroid was rocky, and about 19 meters in diameter. Its power was tied to its kinetic energy, the energy of motion. That depends on the asteroids mass and its velocity (actually the velocity squared), and it was moving fast, about 20 kilometers per second. All that energy was released as the asteroid was stopped by Earths air, and the result was an explosion equivalent to 500,000 tons of TNT. Thats the same as a small atomic bomb.

Thats why astronomers are so intent on finding these things and preventing them from hitting us. But how do we do that?

6) Blowing up an asteroid is NOT the best way to prevent an impact. It may even be the worst.

In the movies, they usually try to blow up the asteroid, creating a cloud of zillions of little rocks that burn up harmlessly in the atmosphere.

But thats a terrible idea. First of all, that doesnt help. As I said, the kinetic energy of an asteroid (and thus its impact energy) depends on its mass and velocity. If you blow it up and all the pieces still hit, you havent changed the impact energy at all! Youve just spread it around. For a really big asteroid that doesnt help, and in fact could make things worse, creating damage over a larger area.

So, you might think blowing it up is a better idea if the asteroid is still far away, letting it disperse. But, nope. Explosions are hard to get right, and you might create several somewhat smaller pieces still on a collision course. Now, you dont have one problem, you have many. And if you use a nuke, now you have many radioactive problems.

A better idea is to try to nudge it into a path that misses the Earth. There are lots of ways of doing this. Perhaps the best is whats called a gravity tractor, a small spacecraft that uses its tiny gravity to slowly tug an asteroid into a new orbit (you can find more technical detail here). But that takes a long time. If the clock is running out, you can simply slam a spacecraft into the asteroid, whats called a kinetic impact, to try to change its velocity enough to miss, us as well (without breaking it up!). Most likely youd need both a kinetic impactor and a gravity tug to make sure the asteroid misses.

There are lots of other techniques being discussed now. The problem is, none has been tested very well. Thats something Id actually like to see NASA do; fund a series of missions to try different methods on asteroids to see what works best, and what we need to do to iron the kinks out.

By the way, the B612 Foundation is a group of astronomers, engineers, and astronauts dedicated to characterizing the asteroid threat and doing something about it. Many other groups exist as well. Like I said, we take this threat seriously.

One thing well need to know in advance is what the asteroid is made of. They can be full of surprises! For example

7) Some asteroids are not much more than piles of rubble.

You probably think of asteroids as being monolithic, literally one big chunk of stuff. But weve learned thats not always the case.

A rocky asteroid orbiting the Sun isnt alone; there are lots of other asteroids out there. Over billions of years, a typical asteroid will suffer many impacts from those other rocks. If the collision is high speed, and the intruder big enough, they can both shatter. But a small rock moving relatively slowly will hit the bigger one hard, but not hard enough to disrupt it. Instead, the impact can create cracks in the big one that can run very deep. After lots of such encounters, the asteroid can be so riddled with fissures its really nothing more than a pile of rubble held together by its own gravity (and other weak forces).

Weve actually found several asteroids like this. Its possible this structure would affect how we try to deflect it, and what happens should one hit Earth, so astronomers are very intently studying these weird objects.

Speaking of weird

8) Most asteroids arent round. Some are shaped like bowling pins!

In movies, asteroids are usually depicted as round. Lots of them are! Especially if theyre big; their gravity can be strong enough to shape them into a sphere. Think of it this way: Imagine a mountain on Earth. If it gets too big the rock inside it isnt strong enough to support it against gravity, so it collapses. It smooths out. Now imagine a million mountains all over the Earth like that: They all collapse, flattening out. The overall shape that would form is a sphere.

But most asteroids are way too small for their gravity to be strong enough to do that. So they come in all kinds of shapes. Many weve seen up close are elongated, like potatoes. Some are even shaped like bowling pins, or like cartoon dog bones! Those may be formed when two small asteroids impact at slow enough speed that they stick together. Its also possible that over time, various forces can spin an asteroid up, making it rotate faster and faster, until it breaks apart. Then the pieces can reform, creating a dumbbell shape. We see that in many of the comets weve visited with spacecraft; comets and asteroids are very similar.

There are other things that can result from this breakup, too. For example

9) Many asteroids have moons.

Some asteroids have come close enough to Earth recently that astronomers have pinged them with radar. Using sophisticated techniques they can learn a lot about them that way, including their size, how fast they spin, and whether theyre alone.

Yup: Just like planets, asteroids can have moons! In fact, something like 16% of NEAs larger than about 200 meters across have small companions. They may form when a bigger asteroid spins up and breaks apart, or undergoes a smallish impact that sends debris into space around it.

[The asteroid 1998 QE2 imaged by radar shows the motion of its small moon. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/GSSR]

An asteroid with a moon provides incredibly useful information: by measuring how long it takes the moon to orbit, the mass of the big asteroid can be found (because the gravity of the asteroid depends on its mass, and its that gravity that controls the orbit of the moon). Thats nearly impossible to determine otherwise. Thats one way we know that many asteroids are rubble piles; they have way too little mass for a solid rock their size. Theyre full of holes!

But thats not all theyre full of. In fact

10) Asteroids are a threat. But they can also be oursalvation.

We almost always hear about asteroids in terms of how harmful they are if they impact Earth. But theyre not all doom and gloom!

Many asteroids have water ice inside them. Weve detected it in several, and its possible quite a few have ice and other useful substances in them.

Useful? Yup. Humans need water to survive, of course, but you can also use electricity (supplied by solar panels, say) to break water molecules up into oxygen and hydrogen. Oxygen is rather useful for breathing, and hydrogen is great as a fuel. So, right there, you have three critical components to inhabiting space!

Scientists are very interested on figuring out whether we can harvest asteroids for materials. If you can mine them and store those materials, they can become space depots, floating way stations for astronauts exploring deep space. Water is very heavy, so launching it into space is difficult and expensive. If its already there, you can save a huge amount of effort and money.

They also have metals in them that are useful for building spaceships and structures, too. They could very well be one-stop shopping places for future astronauts. Some private companies have even been started in the hopes of doing this!

I love this idea. It makes space travel far easier, and can provide humanity with the tools and raw materials needed to not only explore space, but to stay there.

If we do nothing, eventually a large enough asteroid will hit us, and could do a lot of damage; destroying a city, collapsing our civilization, or even causing our extinction.

[Someday, some human will have this view. Credit: Erik Wernquist, from his magnificent short film "Wanderers".]

By learning how to divert asteroids we can prevent this from happening. By tapping into asteroids as a resource we can simultaneously ensure humanity wont get wiped out by any single cause. If we become a true space faring race our future will be long indeed, and will include seeing us stepping foot on other planets, hopefully to live there. Permanently.

Extinction, or salvation? The choice is ours.

[Top image credit: Shuttertstock / solarseven]

The rest is here:

Ten things you don't know about asteroids (and impacts thereof) - SYFY WIRE (blog)

An oddball planet has astronomers scratching their heads … – Astronomy Magazine

HIP 65426 is weird. The star rotates at clip 150 times the rotation rate of the Sun, and despite a young age (14 million years), it has no debris disk. Oh, and it has an oddball gas giant sitting out 100 times the distance between Earth and the Sun, at a time (indicated by its age) before most planets migrate out that far.

Many planets seem to challenge formation mechanisms of planets altogether, at least according to the press releases. But this much is true: nothing weve seen thus far is much like HIP 65426.

Max Planck Institute for Astronomy researchers directly imaged the planet using the Spectro-Polarimetric High-contrast Exoplanet REsearch (SPHERE) instrument, which blots out light from the home star to draw out reflected light from the planet. This is the first object discovered by the instrument, and is currently the only planet discovered in the system. The work has been accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics.

The planet is still warm from its formation, with an estimated temperature of 2,400 degrees Fahrenheit (1,300 Celsius). Its between 6 and 12 Jupiter masses, which would place it firmly in the planetary range (rather than a brown dwarf, or failed star).

Most gas giants dont have an orbit that far out unless their orbit has been disrupted which, indeed, is one of the scenarios researchers are exploring for its formation. In this scenario, the planet formed close in, while the orbit of another forming planet in the system became destabilized. That planet fell in toward the star, shooting HIP 65426b outward to 100 AU. The other possibility researchers are exploring is that the star and the planet formed at the same time, which is thus far unheard of.

Either way, this system still has a lot of explaining to do for how it got this way.

Read more here:

An oddball planet has astronomers scratching their heads ... - Astronomy Magazine

There’s a lot of bias in astronomy and women of color are hurt the … – The Verge

Nearly half of women of color working in astronomy have felt unsafe because of their gender, says a new study.

Researchers gave a survey to 474 astronomers and planetary scientists. The results, published today in the Journal of Geophysical Research, show that women especially non-white women often face a negative environment at work. Women of color felt unsafe 40 percent of the time due to gender, and 28 percent of the time due to race. In addition, 18 percent of women of color and 12 percent of white women reported that theyd skipped fieldwork, class, or professional events because they seemed unsafe. Given that these events are important for networking and career advancement, there is a real cost to being forced to opt out.

Recent years have brought more attention to sexual harassment in academia. For instance, well-known UC Berkeley astronomer Geoff Marcy violated sexual harassment policies for years, while a Caltech professor who harassed two women was allowed to return to campus. There have, of course, been other papers on the negative experiences of minorities in academia, including one in 2014 about the experiences of women doing field work, by Kathryn Clancy, a professor of anthropology at the University of Illinois and a co-author of this new paper.

But this is one of the first to focus on women of color in science.

Were following the lead of women of color, who have been trying to say this for decades and havent been heard, says Clancy. Its presumed that its mostly white women who are the victim, and we really wanted to make it clear that thats simply not the case. Instead, women of color in the sciences have been missing for far too long, partly because their absolute numbers are small.

Were going to keep publishing these papers, but what are these disciplines going to do with this information?

For the study, the researchers adapted a 2011 survey conducted by the American Physical Society about the workplace climate in physics. They recruited participants (both men and women) through various newsletters such as the AAS Division for Planetary Sciences. Because there are so few women in astronomy to begin with, the scientists intended to get more women than is representative, so they also used outlets like the Women in Astronomy blog and American Astronomical Society Women Newsletter. As a result, 84 percent of the sample were white, which is about representative of national data, but 67 percent were female, which is much higher than average.

Participants took the 39-question survey from January to March 2015. They provided demographic information gender, ethnicity, whether they were able-bodied and career position, and answered questions about how often they felt unsafe, whether they experienced racist or sexist remarks, and whether they heard negative language or comments about not being masculine or feminine enough. (You can see the list of questions here.)

Overall, 88 percent of everyone surveyed reported having a negative experience relating to gender, race, or physical ability at work. Across nearly every significant finding, women of color faced the most discrimination and harassment.

There are some limitations to the study. People werent randomly recruited, so its possible that the people who responded were more likely to have already experienced harassment. In addition, the study uses terms like verbal harassment and physical harassment, meaning that people had to think of the events as harassment. This may seem like nitpicking, but studies have suggested that cultural differences mean that minorities may report harassment at different rates.

The authors say that this research highlights the double jeopardy situation that women of color find themselves in, receiving harassment for both their race and their gender. Clancy says that she is aware of other groups who are interested in doing studies on the experiences of women and minorities in their own fields. But raising awareness is not sufficient, she adds. There will be more, and were going to keep publishing these papers, but what are these disciplines going to do with this information?

They suggest changes such as a code of conduct, diversity training, and responding quickly to allegations of harassment, but acknowledge that, ultimately, no one solution alone is enough.

Original post:

There's a lot of bias in astronomy and women of color are hurt the ... - The Verge

In astronomy, women of color face the most discrimination – Engadget – Engadget

The study, published in the Journal of Geophysical Research, surveyed nearly 500 astronomers and planetary scientists between 2011 and 2015. 40 percent of women of color reported feeling unsafe in the workplace due to their gender or sex, while 28 percent of women of color felt unsafe due to their ethnicity. 18 percent of them skipped professional events due to a "hostile climate," with 12 percent of white women reporting the same. The study's authors point out that this results in a "significant loss of career opportunities."

This isn't the first study into gender or racial bias in the sciences. The study's authors point out other papers that show a host of other examples in the literature, including gendered language on science curriculum, implicit bias related to gender and race in mentorship opportunities and an outsider experience that leads to women faculty of color having their views validated less often than their colleagues. The community of scientists still needs to figure out how to combat this bias, of course. For now, the current study's authors conclude that the results represent "a significant failure in the astronomical community to create safe working conditions for all scientists."

See the article here:

In astronomy, women of color face the most discrimination - Engadget - Engadget

How Eclipse Anxiety Helped Lay the Foundation For Modern Astronomy – Smithsonian

NASA's Earth-orbiting satellite Hinode observes the 2011 annual solar eclipse from space.

In August, a total solar eclipse will traverse Ameica for the first time in nearly a century. So many tourists are expected to flood states along the eclipses path that authorities are concerned about illegal camping, wildfire risks and even devastating porta-potties shortages.Theres a reason for all this eclipse mania.A total solar eclipsewhen the moon passes between the sun and the Earthis a stunning natural event. For a few breathtaking minutes, day turns to night; the skies darken; the air chills. Stars may even appear.

As awe-inspiring as an eclipse can be, it can also evoke a peculiar fear and unease. It doesnt seem to matter that science has reassured us that eclipses present no real dangers (aside from looking straight into the sun, of course): When that familiar, fiery orb suddenly winks out, leaving you in an eerie mid-day darkness, apprehension begins to creep in.

So its perhaps not surprising that theres a long history of cultures thinking ofeclipses as omens that portend significant, usually bad happenings. The hair-raising sense that something is off during these natural events has inspired a wealth of myths and rituals intended to protect people from supposed evils. At the same time, eclipse anxiety has also contributed to a deeper scientific understanding of the intricate workings of the universeand even laid the foundation for modern astronomy.

The idea of eclipses as omens stems from a belief that the heavens and the Earth are intimately connected. An eclipse falls outside of the daily rhythms of the sky, which has long been seen as a sign that the universe is swinging out of balance. When anything extraordinary happens in nature ... it stimulates a discussion about instability in the universe, says astronomer and anthropologist Anthony Aveni, author ofIn the Shadow of the Moon: The Science, Magic, and Mystery of Solar Eclipses.Even the biblical story of Jesus connects Christs birth and death with celestial events: the first by the appearance of a star, the secondby a solar eclipse.

Because eclipses were considered by ancient civilizations to be of such grave significance, it was of utmost importance to learn how to predict them accurately. That meant avidly monitoring the movements of the sun, moon and stars, keeping track of unusual celestial events and using them to craft and refine calendars. From these records, many groupsthe Babylonians, the Greek, the Chinese, the Maya and othersbegan to tease out patterns that could be used to foretell when these events occurred.

The Babylonians were among the first to reliably predict when an eclipse would take place. By the eighth century B.C., Babylonian astronomers had a firm grasp of the pattern later dubbed theSaros cycle: a period of 6,585.3 days (18 years, 11 days, 8 hours) in which sets of eclipses repeat. While the cycle applies to both lunar and solar eclipses, notes John Dvorak, author of the bookMask of the Sun:The Science, History and Forgotten Lore of Eclipses,its likely they could only reliably predict lunar eclipses, which are visible to half of the planet each time they occur. Solar eclipses, by contrast, cast a narrow shadow, making it much rarer to see the event multiple times at any one place.

Babylonians believed that an eclipse foretold the death of their ruler, leading them tousethese predictions to put kingly protections in place. During the period of time that lunar or solar eclipses might strike, the king would be replaced with a substitute. This faux ruler would be dressed and fed like royaltybut only for a brief time. According toancient Babylonian astronomers inscriptions on cuneiform tablets, the man who was given as the kings substitute shall die and the bad omens will not affect that [ki]ng.

The Babylonian predictions, though accurate, were all based purely on observations, says Dvorak; as far as scholars know, they never understood or sought to understand the mechanism behind planetary motions. It was all done on the basis of cycles, he says. It wasntuntil 1687, when Isaac Newton published thetheory of universal gravitationwhich drew heavily on insights from Greek astronomersthat scientists began to truly grasp the idea ofplanetary motion.

Surviving records from the ancient Chinese make up the longest continuous account of celestial happenings. Beginning around the 16th century B.C., Chinese star-gazers attempted to read the skies and foretell natural events using oracle bones. Ancient diviners would carve questions on these fragments of tortoise shell or oxen bone, and then heat them till they cracked. Similar to the tradition of reading tea leaves, they would then seek divine answers among the spidery network of fractures.

These methods may not have been scientific, but they did have cultural value. The sun was one of the imperial symbols representing the emperor, so a solar eclipse was seen as warning. When an eclipse was foretold to be approaching, the emperor would prepare himself by eating vegetarian meals and performing sun-rescuing rituals, while the Chinese people would bang pots and drums to scare off the celestial dragon that was said to devour the sun. This long-lived ritual is still part of Chinese lore today.

As far as accurate astronomical prediction, it would be centuries until Chinese predictions improved. By the first century AD they were predicting eclipses with fair accuracy using what is known as the Tritos cycle: a period of eclipse repetition that falls one month short of 11 years.Historians debate how exactly each culture developed its own system of eclipse prediction, says Dvorak, but the similarities in their systems suggest that Babylonian knowledge may have contributed to the development of others. As he writes inMask of the Sun, what the Babylonians knew about eclipses was diffused widely. It moved into India and China and then into Japan.

In ancient India, legend had itthat a mythical demon named Swarbhanu once attempted to outsmart the gods, and obtain an elixir to make himself immortal. Everything was going to plan, but after Swarbhanu had already received several drops of the brew, the sun and moon gods recognized the trick and told the supreme god Vishnu, who had taken the form of a beautiful maiden Mohini. Enraged, she beheaded Swarbhanu. But since the beast had already become immortal, its head lived on as Rahu and its torso as Ketu.

Today, according to the legend, Rahu and Ketu continue to chase the Sun and the Moon for revenge and occasionally gulp them down. But because Swarbhanus body is no longer whole, the eclipse is only temporary; the moon slides down his throat and resumes its place in the sky.

Eclipses in India were seen as a time when the gods were in trouble, says Dvorak, and to counter these omens land owners donated land to temples and priests. Along with the sun, moon and five brightest planets, they tracked Rahu and Ketus movement through the sky. In 499 AD, Indian mathematician and astronomer Aryabhata included these two immortal beings, dubbed dark planets, in his accurate description of how eclipses occur. His geometric formulation showed thatthe beasts actually represent two lunar nodes: positions in the sky in which the paths of sun and moon crossto produce a lunar or solar eclipse.

They followed the nine wanderers up in the sky, two of them invisible, says Dvorak. From that, it was not a big step to predicting lunar eclipses. By the sixth century A.D.whether through independent invention, or thanks to help from the Babyloniansthe Indians were successfully predicting eclipses.

...

Eclipse fears aren't just limited to ancient times. Even in the modern era, those seeking signs of Earthly meaning in the movements of the heavens have managed to find them. Astrologists note that Princess Dianas fatal car crash occurred in the same year as a solar eclipse. An eclipse darkened England two days before the British King Henry I departed for Normandy; he never graced Englands shores again. In 1918, the last time an eclipse swept from coast-to-coast across the United States, an outbreak of influenza killed up to 50 million people worldwide and proved one of the deadliest pandemics in history.

Of course, there is no scientific evidence that the eclipse had anything to do with the outbreak, nor the other events. Thousands of people are born and die every dayand solar and lunar eclipses are far from rare. In any given year, up to four solar and three lunar eclipses darken the surface of the Earth. Because of this, as Dvorak writes, it would be surprising if there were no examples of monarchs dying on or close to days of eclipses.

In their time, ancient Babylonians werent trying to create the foundation of modern mathematics. But in order to predict celestial eventsand thus, from their perspective, better understand earthly happeningsthey developed keen mathematical skills and an extensive set of detailed records of the cosmos. These insights were later adopted and expanded upon by the Greeks, who used them to make a lasting mark on geometry and astronomy as we know it. Today, astronomers still use these extensive databases of ancient eclipses from Babylon, China and India tobetter understandEarth's movements through the ages.

So if you feel a little uneasy when the sun goes dark on August 21st, youre not alone. Just remember: It was this same unease that helped create modern astronomy as we know it.

The rest is here:

How Eclipse Anxiety Helped Lay the Foundation For Modern Astronomy - Smithsonian

Australian Astronomy Just Got A $129 Million Boost | Gizmodo … – Gizmodo Australia

Good news, Australian Scientists!

Australia is set to team up with the European Southern Observatory in a Government-led "big science" partnership, aiming to provide Aussie astronomers with long-term access to the world's best optical telescopes - and keep us at the forefront of global optical astronomy. (That's astronomy, the science - not astrology, the not-science.)

First announced in the 201718 budget, the deal was formally signed today, with the Government investing $129 million over 10 years in the partnership.

The partnership starts in 2018, and will allow Australian astronomers to use the 8-metre telescopes at ESO's La Silla and Paranal Observatories in the Atacama Mountains of Chile, which is among the world's best sites for optical astronomy.

The Department of Industry, Innovation and Science says this agreement answers calls from the Australian astronomy community over several years for long-term access to large optical-infrared telescopes.

"This important partnership with a world-class organisation will allow Australia to maintain its research excellence in this era of global astronomy, and provides crucial opportunities for Australian influence and technical and scientific input, stimulating international research and industry collaborations," the department says.

But the benefits of this partnership will be felt beyond the research community, with new opportunities opening up for small and medium businesses to tender for contracts ranging from heavy engineering, electrical and mechanical engineering to the design and development of precision optics, electronics, sensors, and complex instrumentation.

The department says commercialisation of astronomy technologies can also mean future applications in areas like medicine, telecommunications, and manufacturing.

The Director General of ESO, Professor Tim de Zeeuw, said the collaboration would lead to fundamental new advances in science and technology that neither could hope to achieve alone.

"Australia has a long and rich history of internationally acclaimed astronomical research. The already very active and successful astronomical community will undoubtedly thrive with long-term access to ESO's cutting-edge facilities," Prof de Zeeuw said.

Prof de Zeeuw pointed out that Australia's expertise in astronomical technology (including advanced adaptive optics and fibre-optics) is ideally matched with ESO's instrumentation programme, and that Australia will benefit from access to industrial, instrumentation and scientific opportunities at ESO's La Silla Paranal Observatory.

"By working together, we can sustain and strengthen Australia's world-leading astronomy capability and seize this unprecedented opportunity to secure the future of optical astronomy in this country," Prof de Zeeuw said.

Please log in or register to gain access to this feature.

Last week South Australian Premier Jay Weatherill announced he would take Elon Musk up on his offer to power the state, with the world's largest lithium ion battery set to be installed in collaboration with French renewable company Neoen and the State Government. But will it solve the state's power woes? Australian experts weigh in below.

Tailgating is the leading cause of rear-end crashes, with half of drivers failing to keep a safe following distance, a new report has revealed.

See original here:

Australian Astronomy Just Got A $129 Million Boost | Gizmodo ... - Gizmodo Australia

BepiColombo Mercury mission tested for journey into ‘pizza oven … – Astronomy Now Online

A view of the BepiColombo spacecraft stacked in launch configuration at the European Space Agencys ESTEC test center in the Netherlands. The sunshield cover for Japans Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter is pictured at lower right. Credit: Airbus Defense and Space

Three spacecraft built in Europe and Japan have completed their final joint tests to ensure they are ready for departure to Mercury on an Ariane 5 rocket late next year on the nearly 1.5 billion BepiColombo mission to survey the Solar Systems innermost planet.

Officials displayed the BepiColombo spacecraft to the media last week in the Netherlands, where engineers are putting the probe to the test in the extreme thermal, acoustic and vibration environments it will encounter in flight.

Readying the mission to survive the searing temperatures at Mercury proved to be one of the biggest challenges in BepiColombos two-decade development.

We have to survive 10 times the solar radiation we are experiencing at Earth, plus surface temperatures of up to 450 degrees Celsius (842 degrees Fahrenheit), said Ulrich Reininghaus, ESAs BepiColombo project manager, in a press briefing last week.

The European Space Agency-led project will dispatch two scientific orbiters to Mercury with instruments to map the planets landscapes and topography, peer into darkened craters that may contain water ice and a mysterious frozen organic sludge, and probe the scorched worlds interior structure by measuring its magnetic field.

I think our two spacecraft we send to Mercury will, first of all, do a very comprehensive and thorough investigation of the planet and its environment, said Johannes Benkhoff, BepiColombo project scientist at ESA. It will help to unveil the mysteries of Mercury and hopefully provide clues to better understand the formation history of the planet and of our Solar System.

A propulsion module will go along on the 7.2-year trip to Mercury to steer the robotic science probes through the solar system with the aid of four ion engines.

Scheduled for launch in October 2018, the tandem mission developed by ESA and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency is the most ambitious expedition to Mercury yet mounted, and the first time the blazing hot planet will be visited by a spacecraft not owned by NASA.

Two previous NASA missions Mariner 10 and MESSENGER previously explored Mercury. Mariner 10 zipped by Mercury three times in the 1974 and 1975, photographing less than half of the planet before MESSENGER made its own flybys and eventually entered orbit in March 2011 for a four-year global science campaign.

BepiColombo will follow on MESSENGERs results and get even more details (about Mercury), Benkhoff said. We will be able to answer many, many of the questions that were raised by the MESSENGER mission.

Those questions include the nature of water ice deposits hidden deep inside permanently-shadowed craters near Mercurys poles, and the source of the planets unexpected magnetic field.

BepiColombos European-built Mercury Planetary Orbiter carries 11 instruments, a suite comprising a high-resolution mapping camera, a laser altimeter, an accelerometer, and a set of spectrometers on a downward-facing science deck that will remain pointed toward the planet throughout each orbit.

The Japanese-made Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiters five science sensors will study the plasma environment around Mercury, attempt to image the planets sodium-rich tenuous atmosphere, and measure Mercurys magnetic field.

The Mercury Transfer Module will shepherd the two science orbiters on the 5.5-billion-mile (8.9-billion-kilometre) voyage from Earth to Mercury. The engine section hosts no science instruments, but its two electricity-generating solar panels each stretching nearly 40 feet (12 metres) long will produce power for four rear-mounted xenon-fueled electric thrusters.

The ion engines, which can fire two at a time, will provide more than half the impulse BepiColombo needs for the one-way trip. The spacecraft will also use nine gravity boosts from flybys with Earth, Venus and Mercury to line up for orbital insertion at the innermost planet.

Named for Giuseppe Bepi Colombo, the Italian mathematician and engineer who helped design Mariner 10s Mercury flyby trajectory, the mission is due to arrive at its destination in December 2025.

The flight plan calls for the spacecraft to jettison the transfer module and fire rocket engines to slip into orbit around the planet. Japans magnetospheric orbiter, cocooned in a protective sunshield during the missions interplanetary transit, will be released in an egg-shaped elliptical orbit stretching up to 7,232 miles (11,640 kilometres) above Mercury.

Then the sunshield will be ejected as the European orbiter spirals closer to Mercury, eventually ending up in a tighter orbit ranging between about 300 miles (480 kilometres) and 930 miles (1,500 kilometres) from the planet.

The dual spacecraft will spend at least a year observing Mercury.

ESA and JAXA officials said last week the mission is on track for liftoff at the opening of an eight-week launch window Oct. 5, 2018.

BepiColombos launch window opens the same month the James Webb Space Telescope a U.S.-European-Canadian observatory that will succeed Hubble is set for blastoff on a different Ariane 5 rocket from Kourou, French Guiana.

Arianespace officials will meet with managers from both projects in September to determine which high-profile science mission will go first.

Engineers last month simulated the vibration and noise BepiColombo will experience during its rocket ride from Earth, capping a series of tests on the combined spacecraft in its launch configuration, which towers around 20 feet (6 metres) tall.

The ground team will disassemble the spacecraft in the coming months, conduct additional electrical checks, then place BepiColombos transfer module in a space environment simulator modified to mimic the extreme temperatures at Mercury. The propulsion sections thermal test follows up similar exposure verifications already completed on the European and Japanese orbiters.

ESA originally intended to launch the BepiColombo in 2009 when the mission was formally selected by the agencys science committee in 2000.

Crafting a spacecraft capable of withstanding the hot temperatures at Mercury turned out to be tough, officials said.

Engineers had to design new solar cells, develop heat-resistant pointing mechanisms for BepiColombos antennas and solar panels, and install mirrors to reflect sunlight and infrared heat.

Much of the technology had to be invented just for BepiColombo.

The challenge was to develop a solar cell assembly that was capable of withstanding high temperatures and ultraviolet radiation at the same time, said Markus Schelkle, BepiColombo program manager at Airbus Defense and Space in Germany, the missions prime contractor. This was (something) we learned, and due to that, we had a really hard, long way to find a solution.

BepiColombo also carries ceramic thermal coatings and titanium parts covered in silver and gold to ensure its communications antenna can function in the furnace-like temperatures at Mercury.

We had several delays, Reininghaus said. Work on the solar cells and high-temperature mechanisms cost us much more time than we expected, he said.

The database on materials we had, even for qualified products, was good up to 125 degrees Celsius (257 degrees Fahrenheit), Reininghaus said.

That was not good enough for BepiColombo.

Were flying into a pizza oven, Reininghaus said. This is why we had to test materials at very high temperature regimes, sometimes with very unwanted results.

Email the author.

Follow Stephen Clark on Twitter: @StephenClark1.

View original post here:

BepiColombo Mercury mission tested for journey into 'pizza oven ... - Astronomy Now Online

Local astronomer sets lens on public outreach – Nogales International

Local astronomer Michael Schwartz may have a contract with NASA, but his real passion lays in teaching the community about the solar system.

In Patagonia Im known as Astronomer Michael, he said.

Schwartz, 67, travels to deliver lectures and host astronomy nights in Patagonia from his home on top of a hill in the rural, rugged terrain between Patagonia Lake and Rio Rico.

The public is curious but also unafraid to ask about astronomy, he said.

When he travels to Patagonia, Schwartz brings along a portable telescope. But back at home, which doubles as his so-called Tenagra Observatories, two large, automated professional telescopes scan the night sky for near-Earth objects (NEOs) satellites and comets that travel close to our planet.

Every night before he goes to bed, Schwartz sends computer codes from the control room inside his house telling the telescopes where to look in the sky.

One of those telescopes, the Tenagra II, a blue, custom-made 32-inch model, sends the images it collects to NASA for general study and monitoring. If the data shows that a deadly NEO will impact the Earth, NASA can then re-direct or blow the object up.

Theres a very real asteroid threat, but its a kind of pseudo-real, Schwartz said. It can happen tomorrow or it could happen within the next 50,000 years.

Schwartz, a largely self-taught astronomer, was awarded a grant with NASA in 2015. Hes one of the few people not affiliated with a university to have received one, he said.

Schwartzs interest in space began when, as a 12-year-old, he was playing at his schools playground and a stranger with a telescope asked him if he wanted to take a look. Peering into the telescope, he saw Saturn.

I fell in love (with astronomy). I saw something perfect and I never fell out of love, said Schwartz, who recently got an orange tattoo of Saturn on his forearm.

I only hope that Im one of those people to someone else, he said of the stranger that introduced him to astronomy.

Growing up in New Jersey, Schwartz said, he would operate small telescopes and frequently visit astronomy museums.

I practically grew up in the Hayden Planetarium in New York City, he said.

While he took a few astronomy courses in college, Schwartz said, he ultimately graduated with degrees in anthropology and physics before going on to found a successful software company.

After selling his company, he turned his attention to professional astronomy, inventing automated computer-controlled telescopes and selling access to his images to universities.

Schwartz said after driving all across Arizona and New Mexico, he opened Tenagra Observatories named after an island in Star Trek in 2000 because of Santa Cruz Countys clear skies and proximity to amenities in Rio Rico and the community in Patagonia. He said prime spots for astronomy are often remote, but this location lets him conduct his studies while having a normal life.

When his grant with NASA runs out at the end of the year, Schwartz will hand the control of his telescopes to Gianluca Masi, an astrophysicist who will program and monitor the Tenagra telescopes from Italy. Schwartz described Masi as the Neil deGrasse Tyson of Italy, referencing the popular American science commentator and director of the Hayden Planetarium.

Once his grant ends, Schwartz said, he will focus on total public outreach and education.

He said hes committed to volunteering at places like the Patagonia Public Schools or the Tin Shed Theater, partly in response to what he sees as a huge dumbing-down of America.

My own pet peeve is conspiracy theorists as they relate to things astronomical, he said.

Continue reading here:

Local astronomer sets lens on public outreach - Nogales International

AstroFest to offer four evenings of astronomy activities during Arts Festival – Penn State News

UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. Penn State will be holding its annual AstroFest program from 8:30 to 11:30 p.m. each night from Wednesday, July 12, through Saturday, July 15, during the Central Pennsylvania Festival of the Arts. All ages are encouraged to participate in the festivities. The events are free and will take place on the fifth floor of Davey Lab on the University Park campus. All activities will occur rain or shine, except the rooftop observing, which will be weather permitting.

On clear nights, several telescopes will be open on the roof of Davey Lab for viewing stars and planets, including Saturn and Jupiter. "The rings of Saturn and the moons of Jupiter are so vivid, people often ask if we have painted them on the end of the telescope," said Jane Charlton, a professor in the Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics and the founding organizer of AstroFest. "It is so rewarding to see the looks on people's faces when they first see their favorite planets in such amazing detail."

When they arrive, visitors will be greeted with several activities taking place in front of Davey Lab where they can launch bottle rockets, walk across a simulated gooey alien planet surface (called "oobleck"), and watch sound waves converted to fire and electricity in a Ruben's Tube and a Tesla Coil.

In the lobby of Davey Lab, visitors can watch as subatomic particles and other cosmic rays pass through a cloud chamber, leaving a streak of air to mark their passage. The lobby is also where kids can pick up their AstroFest Activity Passport. After receiving stamps on their passports for the activities they attend, kids can collect science-themed prizes, such as glow-in-the-dark putty, light-up toys, and dinosaur excavation kits.

Up the elevators, visitors will find the majority of the activities for AstroFest, including stations to "make your own comet," answer quiz questions to win astronomy posters and bookmarks at the "Astronomy Question and Answer" booth, and, for those with an artistic side, design Astrogami postcards based on actual astronomical images. The popular "Finding Planets" lab provides a hands-on exploration of how astronomers look for planets beyond our solar system. The current exoplanet count is above a thousand! Five-minute tours of a scale model of the solar system or of the evolution of the Universe are also available.

Featured presentations will also take place throughout the night. Topics will vary over the course of the week, and range from the upcoming solar eclipse, to detection of gravitational waves from LIGO, to dark energy. "Solar eclipses have captured the imagination of humans for millennia. All of us here are thrilled to be having AstroFest this year right before an eclipse of our own," said Chris Palma, senior lecturer in astronomy and astrophysics and co-coordinator of AstroFest.

"We are so excited about the program that we are putting together for AstroFest this year," said Charlton. "We hope that we will have many new visitors, and maybe even some future astronomers. Returning visitors will also have plenty of new things to see and do, since astronomers are always learning about new and exciting aspects of our universe."

For more information, visit the AstroFest webpage, follow us on Facebook @PennStateAstronomy, or contact the Penn State Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics (by phone at 814-865-0418 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. or by email).

View original post here:

AstroFest to offer four evenings of astronomy activities during Arts Festival - Penn State News

WVXU Launches ‘Looking Up’ Astronomy Podcasts – WVXU

Dean Regas and Anna Hehman from the Cincinnati Observatory will voice Cincinnati's newest podcast, "Looking Up," starting Wednesday, July 12.

The 20- to 25-minute program -- the first produced by WVXU-FM exclusively as a downloadable audio file and not for a broadcast -- will be available on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month, says Kevin Reynolds, the Cincinnati Public Radio community relations manager who produces the podcast.

It was a marriage made in the stars for Cincinnati Public Radio andRegas, outreach astronomer for the Cincinnati Observatory and co-host of PBS' "Star Gazers" series. Reynolds says Regas "was looking for the right partner for a podcast." Regas says he had "been working with WVXU for a long time, and they thought astronomy would be a big hit."

"Looking Up" will be for everyone, not just astronomy experts. "Innate curiosity is all you need," says Regas, who will appear on WVXU-FM's "Cincinnati Edition" at 1 p.m. Wednesday talking about the Mars rover.

Hehman, the observatory's development director, will make sure Regas doesn't drift too deep into space. "She works at the observatory, but she's not an astronomer. She's our non-expert, our audience representative," Reynolds says.

"It's something people can listen to on their way home to pick up some information and a few laughs," Reynolds says.

Regas has a long association with Cincinnati Public Radio. He did recorded interviews for the old weekend version of "Cincinnati Edition," before live weekday broadcasts began four years ago. Here's a link to his 2012 interview with Bill Prady,co-creator and executive producer of CBS' hit "Big Bang Theory" sitcom.

Josh Elstro engineers "Looking Up" with producer Reynolds. They produce and engineer the Cincinnati StoryCorps segments airing Wednesdays on WVXU-FM (91.7) and WMUB-FM (88.5) and available online at wvxu.org and on the WVXU mobile app.

You can subscribe to "Looking Up" on iTunes or go to the "Looking Up" page on the WVXU website.

PBS' "Star Gazers" showwith Regas and James Albury, produced by the WPBT-TV in Miami, Fla., airs on WCET-TV (Channel 48) and WPTO-TV (Channel 16).

Here is the original post:

WVXU Launches 'Looking Up' Astronomy Podcasts - WVXU

Astronomers Directly Image Super-Jupiter around HIP 65426 – Sci-News.com

Using an adaptive optics system and coronagraphic facility at ESOs Very Large Telescope, an international team of astronomers has discovered and directly imaged a warm super-Jupiter exoplanet around the young star HIP 65426.

An artists rendering of a super-Jupiter exoplanet. Image credit: NASAs Goddard Space Flight Center / S. Wiessinger.

The new world, dubbed HIP 65426b, is about 6 to 12 times more massive than Jupiter and has a radius of approximately 1.5 Jupiter radii.

As a giant planet larger than Jupiter, its classified as a super-Jupiter.

HIP 65426b orbits the A2-type star HIP 65426, which is almost 3,000 degrees Kelvin hotter and twice as massive as the Sun.

Also known as HD 116434, the star lies 363 light-years away in the constellation Centaurus.

The massive planet orbits HIP 65426 in about 600 years and is 92 AU (astronomical units) from the star, which is three times further than Neptunes distance from the Sun.

It has an estimated temperature of 1,300-1,600 degrees Kelvin and is much hotter than Jupiter.

Given its physical and spectral properties, HIP 65426b occupies a rather unique placement in terms of age, mass and spectral-type among the currently known imaged planets, the astronomers said.

It represents a particularly interesting case to study the presence of clouds as a function of particle size, composition, and location in the atmosphere, to search for signatures of non-equilibrium chemistry, and finally to test the theory of planet formation and evolution.

HIP 65426b was discovered with the Spectro-Polarimetric High-Contrast Exoplanet Research (SPHERE) instrument at ESOs Very Large Telescope in Chile, which took the direct image of the planet.

Direct images of exoplanets are still very rare, but they contain a wealth of information about planets such as HIP 65426b, said team member Dr. Thomas Henning, of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Germany.

The analysis of the direct light of the planet allows us to constrain the composition of the planets atmosphere with great confidence.

The SPHERE observations indicate the presence of water vapor and reddish clouds, similar to Jupiters.

The photo of the super-Jupiter HIP 65426b (lower left). Image credit: ESO / SPHERE Consortium / G. Chauvin et al.

Dr. Henning and colleagues estimate the planetary system is only 14 million years old.

We would expect a planetary system this young to still have a disk of dust, which could show up in observations, said team member Dr. Gael Chauvin, from the Universities of Grenoble and Chile.

HIP 65426 does not have such a disk known for the moment a first indication that this system doesnt quite fit our classical models of planetary formation.

Using ESOs HARPS instrument, we realized that HIP 65426 was a young star and was turning very fast on itself, about 150 times faster than the Sun two elements that raise the question of the formation of the planet, the scientists said.

The team is offering two scenarios to explain the formation of HIP 65426b.

Initially, HIP 65426b would have formed much closer to the star, and at least one other massive body would have formed as well. At some point, HIP 65426b and that other body would have come close enough for HIP 65426b to be catapulted outwards (up to its current great distance) and the other body moving inwards and merging with the star (causing the stars rapid rotation). The planets traversing the system could also have destabilized the disk, explaining why it did not survive long enough to be observed, they said.

An alternative explanation would involve particular dynamics of the protoplanetary disk, with both the star and the planet forming by collapse at the same time by fragmentation which would still require an explanation for why the disk was so short-lived to have vanished by now.

A research paper reporting this discovery will be published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics. The paper is also publicly available at arXiv.org.

_____

G. Chauvin et al. 2017. Discovery of a warm, dusty giant planet around HIP 65426. A&A, in press; arXiv: 1707.01413

View original post here:

Astronomers Directly Image Super-Jupiter around HIP 65426 - Sci-News.com

Maybe Trump and Pence should steer clear of astronomy altogether – MSNBC


MSNBC
Maybe Trump and Pence should steer clear of astronomy altogether
MSNBC
A week later, the administration kept its focus on astronomy, dispatching Mike Pence to the Kennedy Space Center, where he was photographed putting his hand on equipment that featured a prominent sign that read, Critical Space Flight Hardware: Do Not ...

and more »

Read more:

Maybe Trump and Pence should steer clear of astronomy altogether - MSNBC

Amateur Astronomers Association of New York

Welcome to the Amateur Astronomers Association of New York

UPCOMING EVENTS

Note: only the next scheduled observing event for each location is shown. For a complete list, see our Observing page or consult our Calendar.

Jul 6 (THU) - Observing, Brooklyn Bridge Park, Brooklyn - see map for new location [CANCELLED]

Jul 7 (FRI) - Observing, Hunters Point Park, Queens

Jul 7 (FRI) - Observing, Carl Schurz Park, Manhattan

Jul 7(FRI) - Observing, Lincoln Center, Manhattan

Jul 8 (SAT) - Observing, Tanabata Festival, Manhattan

Jul 8 (SAT) - Observing, Lincoln Center, Manhattan

Jul 8 (SAT) - Observing, Riverside Park South, Manhattan

Jul 9 (SUN) - Observing, Pioneer Works, Brooklyn

Jul 11 (TUE) - Solar Observing, High Line, Manhattan

Jul 11 (TUE) - Observing, High Line, Manhattan

Jul 13 (THU) - Observing, Brooklyn Bridge Park, Brooklyn - see map for new location

Jul 16 (SUN) - Solar Observing, Central Park, Manhattan

Jul 22 (SAT) - Dark Sky Observing, North South Lake

Jul 29 (SAT) - Observing, Great Kills, Staten Island

Jul 30 (SUN) - Solar Observing, Riverside Park South, Manhattan

Aug 1 (TUE) - Observing, Riverdale, Bronx

Aug 5 (SAT) - Observing, Brooklyn Museum Plaza, Brooklyn

Sep 22 (FRI) - Observing, Floyd Bennett Field, Brooklyn

Oct 14 (SAT) - Solar Viewing, Brooklyn Central Library

JUNE'S SKY

SEE FULL CALENDAR

BECOME A MEMBER

MEMBER PORTAL (RENEW MEMBERSHIP)

Read the original post:

Amateur Astronomers Association of New York

Mars may be more toxic to life than we thought – Astronomy Magazine

Life on Mars does it exist? Depending on when you last checked in with news about the Red Planet, you could probably be convinced either way. As we discover more and more about the composition and planetary dynamics of Mars, there has been cause for both elation and disappointment regarding the likelihood that organic life could manage to eke out a living on the planet.

The pendulum swung back toward the no side today with the release of a study examining how a special kind of salt on Mars interacts with ultraviolet radiationthere. Martian soil islaced with perchlorates, an ioncomposed of one chlorine and four oxygen atoms, and which binds to a number of different elements to form various compounds. Its classified as a salt, and was initially cause for celebration among extraterrestrial hopefuls because it drastically lowers the freezing point of water, meaning that liquid H20 might conceivably exist on the surface. It can also be used to produce rocket fuel and oxygen, another plus for future settlers.

It turns out that these perchlorates are actually highly toxic to life when bathed in UV radiation that pummels Mars. Researchers from theUnited Kingdom Centre for Astrobiology at the University of Edinburgh exposed a strain of bacteria commonly found on spacecraft to levels of perchlorates and UV light found on the Red Planet and found that nearly all of them were dead within a minute. They tried this with several different kinds of perchlorate, and found similar results every time. Adding in additional environmental factors found on Mars like low temperatures, additional minerals found on Mars and a lack of oxygen also failed to keep the bacteria alive.

This was a bit surprising for the researchers because the strain of bacteria used,Bacillus subtilis, belongs to a genus that actually does fine in the presence of perchlorates, as studies of the microbesinterrestrial environmentshave confirmed. These findings were initially good news for researchers looking for extraterrestrial life, as they suggested that some forms of life could survive in Martian analogue conditions.

Theres more to Mars than just the soil though, and when the Edinburgh researchers added in a few more Mars-like factors UV specifically the bacteria died in short order. They think this happens because the UV light breaks apart the perchlorate molecules into more reactive ions that wreak havoc on living cells. This hypothesiswas backed up by the observation that low temperatures, which slow down chemical reactions, extended the lifespan of the bacteria in the perchlorates but still resulted in them dying. If they cant survive there, it significantly lowers our chances of finding life on Mars life that looks similar to organisms on Earth at least. The researcherspublished their findingsThursday inNature Scientific Reports.

While its a blow to the possibility of finding life on Mars, there is at least one upside to the news: NASA regularly worries about the possibility of contaminating other planets with Earthly bacteria, even going so far as tocrash probes into Saturnso that they dont hit the planets moons. If Mars is so hostile to bacteria that they cant even make it a minute on the surface, our fears of contamination could be pretty much resolved.

This article originally appeared on Discover.

Read the original:

Mars may be more toxic to life than we thought - Astronomy Magazine

JAXA, NASA approve replacement for failed Hitomi astronomy satellite – Spaceflight Now

Artists concept of the failed Hitomi satellite. Credit: JAXA

The Japanese space agency is moving ahead with a smaller-scale X-ray astronomy satellite to replace the failed Hitomi observatory, which spun out of control about a month-and-a-half after its launch last year.

The X-ray Astronomy Recovery Mission, or XARM, could launch as soon as March 2021, filling a potential gap in astronomers X-ray vision of the universe, according to the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, or JAXA.

NASA has agreed to a junior partner in XARM pronounced charm and supply X-ray telescopes and a spectrometer instrument for the Japanese-led mission, according to Paul Hertz, directory of NASAs astrophysics division.

The Japanese Diet approved spending on XARM for the Japanese governments current fiscal year, which started in April, and officials are in the final stages of formally kicking off development of the mission, Hertz said in a recent interview with Spaceflight Now.

The Hitomi satellite failed in March 2016 after a series of attitude control problems caused the orbiting observatory to spin up and shed segments of its power-generating solar panels. Ground controllers lost contact with the satellite as it orbited more than 350 miles (575 kilometers) above Earth.

Astronomers viewed the roughly $400 million mission as a stepping stone between current flagship-class X-ray telescopes, like NASAs Chandra X-ray Observatory and the European Space Agencys XMM-Newton, and an upgraded, more sensitive X-ray observatory called Athena due for launch in the late 2020s.

Hertz said XARM will not have the observing range of Hitomi, which carried four scientific instruments sensitive to a range of X-ray wavelengths and gamma-rays, exposing astronomers to the workings of some of the most extreme events and environments in the cosmos, such as black holes, neutron stars and the creation of galaxies in the distant, ancient universe.

XARM will instead carry replacements for Hitomis two lower-energy instruments the Soft X-ray Imager and the Soft X-ray Spectrometer. Both instruments contain critical parts provided by NASA, and the spectrometer is primarily a U.S.-developed payload.

The mission will not be a carbon copy (of Hitomi), but the NASA contribution will be a carbon copy, Hertz said in an interview. The XARM mission is going to have only two of the four instruments that Hitomi had. It will have the Soft X-ray Spectrometer and the Soft X-ray Imager. The latter is a JAXA instrument, but we provided the telescope for both of those.

XARM will not need an extendable 20-foot (6-meter) boom like Hitomi, Hertz said, because it will fly without the hard X-ray instruments that needed the deployable arm. Hard X-rays are at the higher-energy, shorter-wavelength end of the spectrum of X-ray light.

That makes it a simpler mission, so although our part will be built-to-print, there will obviously be some changes on the bus, Hertz said.

The Soft X-ray Imager on XARM will also have improved resolution over the instrument on Hitomi, JAXA officials said.

JAXA managers said NASAs NuSTAR telescope, which sees the universe in hard X-rays, could fill in for the missing high-energy instruments on XARM. The two observatories could conduct coordinated, tandem observations to help realize Hitomis original science objectives.

NASA will spend between $70 million and $90 million on its part of the XARM observatory, according to Hertz. Flight spares at NASAs Goddard Space Flight Center from the original Hitomi development will help save some money, he said.

The European Space Agency is also a minor partner in Hitomis replacement mission.

A Japanese government document dated May 30 indicated JAXA would set up a project team and select a manufacturer for the XARM spacecraft within one year.

Email the author.

Follow Stephen Clark on Twitter: @StephenClark1.

Continued here:

JAXA, NASA approve replacement for failed Hitomi astronomy satellite - Spaceflight Now