Established in August 2012 & located in the heart of Londons Mayfair, Hedonism is a fine wine& spirits boutique which has already become the most talked about wine project of recent times.

The hedonistic way of thinking originated in the early Greek philosophic schools where it was believed that pleasure was the only intrinsic good. However, we firmlybelieve that there are many things which one should enjoy in life& with the word hedonism frequently used in tasting notes wine is certainly one of them. What better name for a shop which stocks the finest& rarest wines& spirits?

The UKs best buyers have sourced around 6,500 wines& 3,000 spirits, taking the crme de la crme from each region of the world whilst carefully checking the provenance of every bottle.

From classics including the Macallan 1946 Select Reserve, Highland Park 50YO,Ararat Noyan Tapan 70YO & a magnum of Domaine delaRomane ContiRomaneConti 1966toavast collection ofthe outrageous& quirky Sine Qua Non, acomplete vertical ofMasseto, Torbreck The Laird 2006 ina spectacular27-litre bottle& a whole host of old & rare liqueurs, gins & vodkas.

We are also delighted to offer guests the opportunity to sample nearly 50 wines on site using our 5 Enomatic machines. Tasting highlights in the past have included Screaming Eagle 2010, Latour 1996, 2002 & 2008, Lafite-Rothschild 1959 & 2004, Chteau Rayas 2005, Sine Qua Non Midnight Oil, Atlantis Syrah, B20, Sublime Isolation, Hoodoo Man & The Monkey, Masseto 1994 & 2002, Chteau d'Yquem 1981, 1983, 1999 & 2001, Gaja Barbaresco 1985 & many more...

Alongside this, we also regularly host tastings with top winemakers & distillers giving guests a unique insight in the production, history & expertise in each & every bottle on our shelves. Over the years, we have been lucky to welcome some of the stars of the wine & spirits world to the shop & have hosted such tastings as Harlan Estate with Don Weaver, Screaming Eagle with Mary Margaret McCamic MW, Chteau Haut Brion with Prince Robert of Luxembourg, The Balvenie with Kirsten Grant, Dom Prignon with Richard Geoffroy &Staglin with Garen & Shari Staglin.

Each ofour guests can expect toreceive the very highest level ofcustomer service from our dedicated wine specialists, many ofwhom are former sommeliers from top Michelin starred restaurants. With apassion for Hedonism project our extremely friendly& knowledgeable team understand how tomake our guests feel welcome. They are always looking tobehelpful& gothe extra mile. In line with this, we also offer expressshipping to over 60 countries worldwide & delivery within the hour in central London.

Furthermore, if(although highly unlikely) wedonot have the bottle you are after, wewill try our very hardest tosource itfor you.

Should you wish your wine tobedelivered toyou either inLondon, theUK oroverseas wewill get ittoyou asquickly and carefully aspossible. With deliveries within one hour incentral London, our wine specialists are also available tocome toyou should you need their advice and expertise.

Given that itmight take some time tobrowse our entire collection, donot beafraid tobring your children with you asthey can have fun inour kids area. With parking always being aproblem wehave spaces for Hedonism Wines guests.

Being a team of perfectionists, we wanted to create the leading wine shop in the world and, as such, we have made no compromises in terms of quality. Our space is fully temperature& humidity controlled with heat free lights in order to keep the wines in pristine condition. However, please do not worryto keep warm you can wrap up in a nice throw& taste some exquisite fine wines from our Enomatic machines at our cosy tasting table.

Since 2012, we have been nominated for & won many awards for our selection of wines & spirits & our customer service, these include Drinks Retailing Awards' Independent Wine Retailer of the Year 2015, Mayfair Awards' Best Speciality Food & Beverage Store 2014 & 2015, Decanter Awards' London Wine Merchant of the Year 2013 & Luxury Retailer of the Year 2017 & The Drinks Business Awards' Independent Retailer of the Year 2015.

We look forward to seeing you in our beautiful store in the near future & helping you find that perfect bottle, whatever your tastes & whatever your preference.

Originally posted here:

Hedonism Wines Hedonism Wines

In the interest of developing a core Alternative Right philosophy upon which others can build.

The patron saint of conservatives, Russell Kirk, wrote: "The great line of demarcation in modern politics, Eric Voegelin used to point out, is not a division between liberals on one side and totalitarians on the other. No, on one side of that line are all those men and women who fancy that the temporal order is the only order, and that material needs are their only needs, and that they may do as they like with the human patrimony. On the other side of that line are all those people who recognize an enduring moral order in the universe, a constant human nature, and high duties toward the order spiritual and the order temporal."

This is no longer true, assuming it ever was. The great line of demarcation in modern politics is now a division between men and women who believe that they are ultimately defined by their momentary opinions and those who believe they are ultimately defined by their genetic heritage. The Alt Right understands that the former will always lose to the latter in the end, because the former is subject to change.

The 16 Points in other languages:

Labels: #AltRight, philosophy

Original post:

Vox Popoli: What the Alternative Right is

In the interest of developing a core Alternative Right philosophy upon which others can build.

The patron saint of conservatives, Russell Kirk, wrote: "The great line of demarcation in modern politics, Eric Voegelin used to point out, is not a division between liberals on one side and totalitarians on the other. No, on one side of that line are all those men and women who fancy that the temporal order is the only order, and that material needs are their only needs, and that they may do as they like with the human patrimony. On the other side of that line are all those people who recognize an enduring moral order in the universe, a constant human nature, and high duties toward the order spiritual and the order temporal."

This is no longer true, assuming it ever was. The great line of demarcation in modern politics is now a division between men and women who believe that they are ultimately defined by their momentary opinions and those who believe they are ultimately defined by their genetic heritage. The Alt Right understands that the former will always lose to the latter in the end, because the former is subject to change.

The 16 Points in other languages:

Labels: #AltRight, philosophy

See original here:

What the Alt Right is - Vox Day

The AltRight term received a lot of attention recently thanks to a US presidential candidate targeting it in a speech. This has given a lot of air to the movement, further accelerating its capture of the right. As the New Right captures hearts and minds, the AltRight will drop the Alt and simply become the Right.

NRx has received some recognition in the past few years, as part of the Dark Enlightenment. But its effects have been far outstripped by the AltRight. And thats OK, because of the division of labor of cognition. They play separate, but related, roles.

Humans exist in classes which are formed on a biological basis, and which are most easily divided by IQ, though this is nothing more than a convenient marker. At the bottom of this post I have provided Curts original post and my slightly modified version of it. This is a table of the various classes of the New Right. I think it would be valuable to further complete this mapping of the members of the various classes because we need each class to repackage and present the same message in terms that their class can interpret. We also need to create hierarchical linkages in order to move the messages downstream effectively and spread them throughout the Right.

According to Curts table, NRx is middle class. Some might take offense and argue that it is upper-middle class. Sure, the leaders of NRx are likely upper-middle class, but the average NRxer is solidly middle class. Software engineering is a middle class profession. People who run teams of middle class professionals are upper-middle class (CTOs, CIOs, CEOs, Directors, etc). The middle class is not a salary range: it is an ability range. The middle class are those who have the ability to engage in the system of production. This is why the middle class seeks liberty: because given freedom to choose their means of production, they will choose and perform, because they can. As an aside, this is why working classes are less interested in liberty, because they simply cant capitalize on it within the system of production to nearly the level of the middle class. And the lower and under classes have zero interest in liberty, because they are completely unable to capitalize within the system of production; they desire security, not liberty (and thats what self-interested politicians trade them in return for votes).

We can argue about the parameters of classes, and we should. We should define them. We need to understand their roles and to define the behaviors that makes one a good member of any class, because these behaviors and actors do exist in every class. We just need to incentivize them properly, which is why we must define and understand them.

The middle class has certain behaviors which make them middle class.They follow norms of propriety. I was right when I wrote that NRx is Right Brahmin Signalling. From the SJW encyclopedia: Brahmin is a varna (caste) in Hinduism specialising as priests, teachers (acharya) and protectors of sacred learning across generations. NRx is a group of teachers and priests, solidly middle class and exhibiting middle class mores and norms, such as the prohibition on ridicule, mockery, libel and slander.

The working classes do not share the middle class values and prohibitions on ridicule, mockery, libel and slander. I have seen very clearly the revulsion of NRx to the coarse meming of the AltRight. The NRx aspersions about populism of the AltRight. This is simply the middle class reaction to working class norms.

The thing is: the middle class needs the working class. They will do the jobs that the middle class just wont do. Say, for example, openly attack with vitriolic hostility the enemies of Western Civilization using Pepe and Le Happy Merchant memes. Or say, engage in high energy physical activities which raise the cost of the status quo on the controlling elite. Once the cost of the status quo is high enough, then that controlling elite will accede to the demands of the Right. Who will formulate these demands? Ultimately, the aristocratic class will, with large input from the scholarly classes. Who will implement these demands at the local levels? Obviously, the people who organizeall production, the middle class, under the direction of the upper middle class, with the real work being done by the working classes at the direction of the middle class.

We have a problem with moral license. Typically, our Churches have granted us moral license to defend the West, but the modern Churches are corrupt and useless. Our current set of priests will never grant us moral license to defend ourselves. Waiting for them is suicide. Alternatively, our politicians could grant us moral license to defend ourselves, but they are corrupt and useless and waiting on them is suicide.

The working class (and the lower classes) are the first to feel the affects of diversity. They are not nearly as insulated from it as the middle and upper classes. For this reason, they were the first to grant themselves moral license. This is the AltRight: the working class which has declared war on the Left and on those who pretend to be our leaders (the cucks) who refuse to grant us moral license to self-defense.

Their weapon is (currently) mockery, ridicule, libel and slander. This weapon is off the table for the middle class for normative reasons, thus it was unavailable to NRx, which instead uses Continental and Cosmopolitan philosophy, using myth and critique, respectively. Priests use myth and teachers use critique.

We are in the process of granting full moral license to ourselves for the purpose of defending our civilization. NRx will become an integral part in granting this moral license, or it will fade into irrelevancy. They will use narrative, myth and critique to justify our Holy War for the survival of our people, or they will become nothing.

Im currently working on ideas for reforming Christianity. NRx is full of the religious, but they have neglected this topic, possibly because they do not understand that this is an essential step, and that only we on the right will undertake it. Does that sound ambitious enough for you?

There are many excellent religious scholars among NRx. Their job is to re-invigorate the Germanic Initiatic Oath within Christianity: Dont lie, Dont steal, and protect the commons (every man a sheriff, reciprocal insurance). They must also understand clearly the Morality of Transcendence: man is directing his own evolution, transcending out of savagery to become closer to God and to live in Gods will (I am speaking in your voice here, NRx). They should create the narrative, using the Bible, that our new era of truthful scientific language is demanded by God (dont lie)(Testimonialism), and our prohibition of parasitism (dont steal)(no welfare state) is Gods law, and that we must become closer to God by promoting the best of our species, and limiting theworst (transcendence/domestication).

If NRx has a place in this movement, it is to reform the Church and grant ourselves moral license to defend Western Civilization, by any means necessary. The AltRight and the working class are preparingto march.

(These folk know exactly what theyre doing by the way. They have adopted leftist ridicule and are actively manufacturing desensitization as a means of combating the falsehoods and pseudoscience of political correctness)

Like Loading...

Related

View post:

NRx vs AltRight: What now? | Poseidon Awoke: Realist

The American Alt-Right is at an important juncture in history. America is not that far from becoming majority-minority. It is difficult to map out a set of policies that could restore the historic American nation. One could suggest a complete end to all non-white immigration; a reversal of the incorrect interpretation of a constitutional amendment that gave rise to birthright citizenship; the encouragement of mass immigration from Europe; expulsion of Puerto Rico from US control; and an end to the reception of refugees in America. One could also add bringing in official English (with all states and cities prevented from providing services in other languages); an end to positive discrimination; an end to the collection of any data on racial disparities (which data are used in Left-wing agitation); the routine use of the death penalty (without years on Death Row) in all serious crimes; and the criminalisation of the promotion of multiculturalism in any company or educational establishment. Ultimately it would be desirable (but probably unfeasible) to remove citizenship from people without European ancestry.

None of these things would definitely produce a sustainable white majority. They might delay minority status. They might ensure that white identity survived minority status, so that the white minority was able to advance its own interests over the longer term in America. But one thing is for sure: there is a relatively limited window of time to implement any of this. The significance of Donald Trump and his presidency is that it has led to the rise of a genuine sense of white identity. At the moment, whites are a majority, and a majority ethnic group with a strong identity could achieve much to cement its position over the longer term. Yet there is little sign that the AltRight, centred on the AltRight.com website, is equipped to advance a white-identity movement that can seize the opportunity now presenting itself to them.

I want to examine the AltRights attitude towards homosexuality, and its inability to keep focus on the key issue of white identity. Some parts of the AltRight trace their origins to neo-fascist organisations or other organisations that openly admire central European leaders of the 1930s and 1940s. Others have seemed to project a more modern image. Richard Spencer, in particular, comes across as urbane, presentable, and aware of the need to be able to appeal to a broader sense of white identity than simply the assorted remnants of tiny fringe parties. I admire Spencer and the tone he has taken in all of his videos and podcasts on the Internet. He is hard to smear as simply a neo-Nazi. He has also on a number of occasion expressed a willingness to work with a number of non-traditional elements on the Right, such as the occasional homosexual. I think he had to row back pretty strongly after Milo Yiannopoulos comments on his (Milos) molestation by a older man as a teenager. But before that, Spencer did appear to see the value of the work being done by Milo.

I would like here to draw a distinction between a party with specific goals on the one hand and a broader counterculture that contains varying interests and disparate groups focusing on different issues on the other. The Left is a broad movement that includes a wide range of groups, from Communists to Greens to libertarians of various stripes. Racial, sexual, gay and now transgender groups are all present. These groups may not all see eye to eye on everything. The Muslims and the transgender activists are not really on the same page. But the Left has depth in that there are a wide range of groups that all advance their own causes. The Left is not just a political party or parties, but a thriving culture, including films, TV programmes, magazines, art, captured educational establishments, etc.

A Right counterculture appears to be in the very embryonic stages of being formed. Not all elements in the Right will support each other, and ultimately if some of the wilder elements of the Right got their way there would be something of a reckoning between them. A key issue is the AltRights disdain for the AltLite, people who dont go as far as them, but have in fact done much more to create the grounds for white identity than anyone around Richard Spencer has. Let us think of who these people might be. Milo Yiannopoulos is one: as a gay man, he can fly under radar to a certain extent, making comments that a straight, white male would not get away with. The fact that certain people can say more and get away with it reflects the dominant identity politics narrative on the Left and is a major problem for us. Ultimately, it shouldnt matter who says what; what should matter alone is the quality of the argumentation.

We are confronted with an absurdity. Milo would not be welcome in Richard Spencers ethnostate. Yet he opposes Black Lives Matter, controls on free speech and the nonsense of feminism much more effectively and with a much greater public profile than anyone on the AltRight. The AltLite and Milo in particular have played a vital role in expanding political space for wider discussion. One approach would be to accept the role of such people on certain issues as part of the wider counterculture, but not to accept that these people are or could be part of a white ethnostate. But Milo is white. Why wouldnt he be admitted to the white ethnostate if he chose to move within its bounds and submit to its regulations?

A number of other people with colourful sexual orientations are prominent in the counterculture. In the US context, you could cite Jack Donovan, a gay man who has rejected the gay culture. If I understand it correctly, he would still be someone who likes men (an androphile), but not someone who will be told which hairstyle and pop music he must like, and not someone who would approve of gay marriage either. Greg Johnson, the editor of Counter Currents, has come in for personal attacks by the AltRight for publishing on homosexuality, including the book The Homo and the Negro. It is stated on AltRight forms that he is gay, although Im not aware that he has put his sexuality into the public domain, and I cant think of a reason why he or anyone else should feel they have to do so. In Europe, there are analogues. The flamboyant gay politician Pim Fortuynmurdered for opposing the Islamisation of Hollanddid more to create a movement against Muslim immigration than any neo-Nazi, and ended up being smeared as far-right by all and sundry himself too. The English gay historian, David Starkey, has often upset black groups by making truthful comments on TV. Another English gay, Douglas Murray, is also personally doing much to oppose immigration and Islamisation as deputy editor of the Spectator. In Germany and France, Alternative fr Deutschland (AfD)and Le Front National receive considerable support from homosexuals reluctant to fall under Islamic shariah law. The AfD is led by a lesbian, and an Irish lesbian recently fairly narrowly failed to win the leadership of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) on an anti-Islam platform.

We can also cite involvement in Right-wing politics by those not classifiable as white Christians. Paul Gottfried, a Jewish academic, in fact invented the term alternative right, and has written many articles about the vindictive tone of organised Jewish groups (note: I do not say all individual Jews, and Im always careful to treat people as I find without prejudging them) towards white identity. The admirable Jewish speaker Ben Shapiro is one of the best speakers of the AltLite, making campus visits across the country and speaking out on issues such as gay rights, transgender rights, Black Lives Matter and gun control from a perspective that many Right-wingers could not fail to agree with. American Renaissance, led by the splendid Jared Taylor, also hosts Jewish speakers at its conferences. Other podcasters, such as Stefan Molyneux, appear to have to work overtime to conceal some Jewish ancestry to retain a hearing on the Right. The Jewish Stephen Miller is also doing what he can to defend Americas borders from within the Trump administration. Jared Taylor was recently interviewed by a great black lady, who goes by the name of Tree of Logic on Youtube. She appears favourable to white identity politics. An Iranian man, Jason Reza Jorjani, was until recently on the board of AltRight.com and argued for a bizarre plan to realign Iran with Europe.

It is in the nature of any broad counterculture that it will allow participation from many groups. I wouldnt reject allies where they can be found, particularly as there are only a certain number of years left in which to build support for policy changes that could reverse demographic transformation in America (and many other European nations). Nevertheless, the reality is that many of these AltLite figures will always cleave closer to the mainstream than much of the AltRight. Their participation may serve to dilute the Right or to wean it away from its principles. We saw this recently in the Jorjani episode, when the Iranian kept promising money from anonymous monied backers, before flouncing out and denouncing the whole thing because he was not allowed to control the AltRight corporation. I dont know whether Greg Johnson is gay or not, but an article on AltRight.com claimed he wanted to control Arktos media publishing, and attacked Daniel Friberg, who ended up in control. There seems to be a degree of turmoil in the cricle around Richard Spencer on AltRight.com, and Im not sure any account on that site will be accurate. If Johnson is gay, a Rightwinger could infer a gay hissy fit in his behaviour. Or possibly an attempt to recruit the AltRight and turn it into the AltLite. Certaintly, the argument in The Homo and the Negro that somehow gay men are central to the revival of the West appears aburdly overstated. Johnsons own views are not notably centrist (he appears more rightwing than the AltLite as such)he recently stated on camera that Jews in America should be deported en masse to Israeland his falling out with the AltRight may reflect, not an attempt to water down the AltRight, but rather frustration with the domination of the AltRight by people failing to focus on the key racial/demographic issue.

To varying degrees, the incorporation of non-traditional Rightists into the alternative right will rub up against an unwillingness of many on the Right to modernise their views on some issues in order to focus on the main task at hand. Here we face a difficult problem: what to do about more extreme groups that the media will realise are part of the Right, and whose presence simply holds everyone back. To a certain extent, everyone who is opposed to immigration will realise that extreme acts by some young Rightwingers are an inchoate response to a situation contrived by the Left, that of our national dispossession. We can think of people like Anders Behring Breivik in Norway and James Alexander Fields in the US (who knocked down a woman after the Charlottesville protest). But while these peoples crimes are a response to a situation the Left had no right to bring about, these people are poison to the movement. We have to face the fact that a small number of mentally imbalanced people can play an outsized role in discrediting opposition to immigration. If Richard Spencer and the AltRight want to accomplish anything at all, they have to focus on creating a movement that can realistically achieve something. This means rejecting the participation of the few real extremists. Yet their website has recently insisted that Fields may be innocent. AltRight commenters argue the woman he knocked down may have deserved it because she was obese. Against this background, it is understandable that more rational voices have sought to rein in the AltRight on to more defensible territory.

There is much discussion on the Right of the left-wing habit of refusing to punch left. The Left refuse to condemn Communists, or the Alt-Left, or Antifa. It is suggested that we should refuse to punch right, and thus not be cornered into condemning neo-Nazis and the like. I would argue refusal to draw a line at criminal acts such as murder is both bizarre and wrong. For a start, the Left is in power, and their refusal to punch left is glossed over by the authorities. A failure to be clear on our part that murder is not what we are seeking will only be seized upon with glee by the media and the courts. Some point out that multiculturalism may in fact be pushing us towards civil warEnoch Powell made this pointbut that is not to say that this is a desirable outcome. We need to be clear that we advance immigration restriction to prevent this outcome. In a real civil war, the extremists might make themselves useful, as a civil war becomes a thuggish free-for-all, but how much better to adopt policies that provide for long-term political stability!

This unwillingness to break with the (very, very small) groups of real extremists who hold the movement back marks something of a dividing point between the AltRight and the so-called AltLite. There are people on Gab and the Daily Stormer (Andrew Anglins Hitler-admiring organ) that openly celebrated the death of Heather Heyer at Charlottesville. I will agree the Unite the Right should have been allowed their rally, and that the Charlottesville police and Virginia governor conspired to foment violence on the day by pushing the AltRight into the arms of Antifa, waiting with baseball bats and pepper spray. As far as I know the AltRight gave the Antifa more than they bargained forand why not, in self-defence? But those who celebrate the knocking down of a woman have some kind of problem mentally or psychologically. Those who condemned the murder are not cucks or normies, but decent human beings.

I would argue the AltRight should not dally with extremism, and should welcome the contributions of all the groups I have mentioned above, including gay men, Jews, blacks and others. They are all part of a counterculture that can create space for a white identity. Whether, in the very unlikely event that an ethnostate were created, all of these groups would be welcomed to join in is another question, and really one that cannot be answered right now. For a start, should an ethnostate be 100% white? or would a small and stable minority of around 1% of traders and restaurant-owners be accepted? Would it be North Korea (with no interaction with the outside world) or somewhere like China (an ethnostate that trades globally, with small numbers of foreigners allowed in on extendable business visas)? It may be that small and stable numbers of well-disposed members of the ethnic minorities (enough to staff ethnic restaurants, teach language skills and facilitate international trade, and no more) would be allowed, but in any case we are not in the position to draw up the constitution of a state unlikely to ever be built. Even those on the Right who are obsessed with the role of organised Jewry should put their prejudices aside and accept any contribution by people like Ben Shapironot on every issue, but on specific issuesat least to the extent of being prepared to talk to the guy. Such people are proving useful, and that should be recognised. Right-wing websites like Vdare.com, which I greatly admire, also host articles by a variety of well-disposed minority writers, including Paul Gottfried and others (I recall an American Indian who used to write there). We should be clear that nationalism is about valuing our race and traditions, and not hating others as such.

When it comes to white homosexuals, the argument for seeing a role for them on the Right is even stronger, as they are part of the white race. Note that Im not ignoring the fact that homosexuals are said to be less than 2% of the population, with relatively few of even them willing to come all the way over to the Right. Yet individual gay men can prove rather impervious to strictures on speech, weaponising flamboyance in order to breach speech codes. As pointed out above many gay men do say the unsayable on cultural/racial issues. The few who are genuinely making a clear contribution in discrete areas (Milo et al) are often much more culturally significant than their numbers indicate. It doesnt make any sense to refuse to see such people as part of the wider culture were trying to create.

I have to agree that there is a problem with people like Milo, in that he fails to maintain public decorum and frequently speaks of his love for black cock. In my view, it is unpleasant to hear someone speaking in this smutty manner at public gatherings. The fact that he meets black men for sex is for me a non-issue; the fact that he loves to taunt audiences with this is. Although he may be accepted as part of a broad and deep counterculture along with the AltRightas a broad counterculture will include elements we dont fully agree withhe couldnt really be AltRight until he accepts that such smuttiness is not acceptable. His recent gay marriage also rules him out of the AltRight as such, although he can still serve as a useful idiot expanding the bounds of what is sayable on other issues. Important requirements for genuine membership of the AltRight ought to be opposition to gay marriage; opposition to gay adoption of children; and opposition to employment tribunals to police discrimination against gays. Children should not be exposed to gay propaganda in schools. There should be no sex-change operations. Toilets and other changing facilities should always be single-sex. If a homosexual man agrees with all of that, he is potentially AltRight. A white ethnostate ought not to be governed by a version of shariah law. Private behaviour in the bedroom should not be policed.

There is a good reason why the family has to be the centrepoint of national survival. We have a culture that doesnt wish to survive. Homosexuality, abortion, feminism and divorce work together to promote a culture of hedonism and low birth rates. While the English have less than 2 children, their Pakistani neighbours have 5 or 6. They have a culture that is set to survive and flourish and even overtake ours. For this reason, a man who can be straight would be best advised to be straight and to have English children. Im not sure it makes any sense to tell men who are strongly on the homosexual end of the spectrum to get married and have children: would that be fair to the wives? But those with ambiguous sexuality who could cope with a relationship with a wife should reproduce.

We understand male sexuality better than when we were under strict Christian laws. A recent survey in England showed that only 46% of 18-24-year-olds claim to be exclusively heterosexual. There is only a small number of exclusively gay men, but a continuum of bisexuality in between. While it is true to say that homosexuality is not the norm, neither is being exclusively heterosexual a statistical norm either. Most men are mainly attracted to women, with some limited degree of attraction to men: that is the norm. Having said that, there is much to be said for the view that homosexuality is a barren lifestyle that is a dead-end for the individuals concerned and for their nations. Anecdotal evidence shows that gay men in his 40s or 50s are likely to be single, often without ties to their biological families, without any connection to younger gay men, and with no children and grandchildren. Propaganda about gay pride aside, they will be aware of the essentially sad and unfulfilling nature of the sexuality they have espoused. Gay sexuality is a young mans culture, in other words, a culture whose negative side unfolds itself gradually over the decades of a mans life, until he is left in his old age in a nursing home with no visitors.

Homosexuality is thus a microcosm of what is happening to white culture more broadly, as our societies choose not to survive. Nevertheless, to the extent that a man with a colourful sexual past accepts the primacy of the family and chooses to work for the survival of his nation (albeit a nation that will survive without his descendants among them), it would be counterproductive to reject his service. particularly in the case of an individual who (unlike Milo) maintains decorum in public. This is because many gay men are highly motivated and intelligent propagandisers. Gay men are not normies in the sense that they have already stepped outside social norms, and are often willing to reject the liberal pieties on race and culture. A question arises as to the availability of leadership roles on the Right to men who dont have families. The role of Jorjani shows that non-traditional fraternisers of the Right can be a problem. What has been written of Greg Johnson by the AltRight is also presented as another example of the potentially disruptive nature of involvement by gay men. I think it only natural that gay men have to prove themselves in the nationalist movement.

However, none of us knows who the gay and bisexual men among us are. If they are truly 54% of the whole (when people who are marginally bisexual are included), then the idea of imposing a sexuality test on the right becomes absurd. The chances are greater than even that any individual member of the AltRight will have some degree of attraction to men. We have traditionally been able to provide social roles for homosexual men (e.g. as priests), suggesting there is something artificial about advocating a restoration of a form of white culture that never really existed. In mediaeval England, homosexuality faced penalties administered by the church, but some researchers have claimed the punishments were trivial, on a par with those handed out for being drunk. The reality is that this form of behaviour was largely regarded for centuries as a foible. In a moral sense, a man who cheats on his wife is risking an impact on the lives of his children, and if homosexuality is to be banned, then should not adultery/fornication be regarded as even more worthy of proscription? Adultery is much more nation-destroying than homosexuality. Yet we do not read of any attempt by the AltRight to drum fornicators out of their ranks. In fact, appetite for a restoration of Christian morality appears very low in all the European nations.

A much more sensible approach would be to focus on the main issue of demographic survival. All who are willing to work for that are genuinely part of the Alternative Right, if not part of AltRight.com. Those who oppose propaganda on feminism, sexuality and transgender issues are working for the survival of our nations. This amounts to a broader understanding of what it means to be Right than is common among the remnants of the Klan and tiny neo-Nazi grouplets, but one more likely to be able to take root in the newly more favourable environment for white identity. How can I emphasise the point? Gay rights is not an issue that is consistent with the survival of the Western nations, but in the end, white men are part of their white nations. Racial survival means exactly what is sounds like: all white men should be able to rally to that standard. If Richard Spencer, in a bid to deflect accusations that he has engaged in homosexual behaviour, cannot keep focus on the main demographic issue on AltRight.com, then I think he is failing to modernise the alternative right in a way that would be clearly marketable to a wider swathe of the American white population. The alternative right may be in danger of becoming large enough as a subculture to provide a comfort zone or zone of enjoyment for its leaders, a subculture large enough to allow its leadership to coast and enjoy their lives doing so. The trick now is to move the national question out of a subculture into the mainstream white population.

Like Loading...

Go here to see the original:

Can the AltRight be a modern alternative? Immigration ...

On January 4, 2017 in Chicago, a mentally disabled white man was abducted and tortured by a group of black teenagers, supposedly for being a Trump supporter. The young man was beaten, his mouth duct taped shut, his scalp cut and the wound used as an ashtray, while the black hooligans around him laughed, insulted him, and aped about, saying Fuck white people, fuck Trump. His evil idiot captors streamed his torment live to Facebook, resulting in their quick arrest. View the full, disturbing video here.

Its the same old story. Blacks engage in appallingacts of violence and depravity towards whites, and the media tries to smother the outrage instead of whipping into a frenzy like they would if the victim was black.

Amanda Blackburn, 28, mother, 3 months pregnant. Morgan Harrington, 20, student, artist. Jessica Chambers, 19, recent high school graduate, jewel of her fathers heart. These threebeautiful blonde women havea ghastly thing in common: they were all murdered by black thugs. Unless you were following local news or Internet fake news, you will not have heard ofthese tragic stories. They arent worthy of national conversations about race.

Amanda Blackburn, a pregnant mother, was shot in the head while her pastor husband was at the gym, byLarry Jo Taylor, Jr., 18, and Jalen Watson, 21, in 2015. Amanda fought back bravely, desperate to defend her three year old son who was also in the house, but Taylor and Jalen made short work of her.They shot her in the head, stripped her, and watched her bleed.Amanda died the next day, along with her and her husbandsunborn baby.

Morgan Harrington, a sensitive and talented young artist, was abductedon her taxi ride home from a Metallica concert in Charlottesville, VA, in 2009.The driver, Jesse Matthew, dragged Harrington into a field wherehebrutally raped and murdered her.Matthewlater went on torape and murder Hannah Graham, an 18 year old UVA student, before being caughtin 2014. Though Matthew was sentenced to four consecutive life sentences, Morgansparentsstruggle to proceed in a world devoid of joy.

Jessica Chambers, 19, was burned alive on the side of the road in her car. Her killer, Quentin Tellis, a 27 year old black thug who Chambers hadrecently broken upwith,doused her in gasoline, squirted it up her nose, and poured accelerant down her throat. Tellisthen set her ablaze inside of her car and left her to burn to death on the side of the road. Jessica was found wandering near her car, her body entirely covered in burns except for the bottoms of her feet. Jessicas father said of her, She was so bubbly. You never had a bad day around her. She was always cracking jokes. She was full of life and joy. She had no enemies. Today, I feel like I am in a dream.

17 black male criminals were arrestedas a result of theinvestigation into Chambers death (18 including her killer). Blacks in Panola County were remarkably uncooperative with law enforcement: We were all amazed at the total lack of information coming from our street sources, said Champion. In fact, moronic blacks in Panola County accused Chamberss father of her murder. Teanna Rudd, a black girl and one of Jessicas former classmates, expressed her general opinion on whiteson Facebook:

Somebody needs to rape all they kids in front of them then set them on fire there learn then white bitches need to be dead.

Whydoes the media cover up that living with blacks is so dangerous? Why are blacksso enthusiasticabout sadism against whites? Why do they hurt usfor fun?

You probably havent seen this videofrom Rowlett, Indiana, either:A young white woman sitson a park bench with her friend and three year oldniece, minding their own business, whenthey are accosted byagroupof black teenagers barking at them to leave. That they are in thewrong park. The ringleader black commands the girl holding the baby,toput down the baby and fight. The black boys filming snicker in the background: She keepin that baby cuz she dont wanna get her ass beat.

The black teen screechesGET UP!, before suddenly lunging forward and attacking the white girl, pulling her off of the bench and smashing the toddlerinto the concrete.The little girlthwacks her head on the stone, her wailsof terror and pain competing in the audio with the excited amusementof the videographer.The little girlflees desperately as her auntis flung around in midair by her hair and beaten savagely in front of her.

A black onlookerdoes a little jig as the girland toddlerscream.

All mainstream media coverage of the video carefullyomitted the race of the perpetrator and denied any possible racial motive for the crime, except to deny that it was racially motivated. In the interest of sacred equality, we must ask ourselves: If premature speculation on motives is kosher for some perpetrators, why is it not kosher for all?

The unnamed juvenileattacker, whose parents were initially not cooperating with law enforcement (big surprise there), was charged with misdemeanor assault and felony assault of a child. She is variously described as US girl (Daily Mail), Texas teen (New York Daily News), and girl (Fox News). Fox News quoted a detective who ruled out the possibility of racial motivation for the crime:

In the now viral video, two teenage girls are outside an elementary school when theyre confronted by some classmates. Its not clear why.

While the police and the media werein cahoots to deny racial motivation for the crime, the white public was not so easily fooled.The majority of the over 300respondentsto the Rowlett County Police Departments post on the matter (describing the girl and her family as having gone into hiding, rather than evading arrest), see the crime as clearly racially motivated. The comments sections attest to most white Americans having negative experiences with racially hostile blacks, and being outraged atthe glaringdouble standard of brushing the story under the rugwhen whitesare the victims.When the commentary isnt carefully controlled by the (((media))), the truth about race and crime comes out.

Dont take it from me that uncivilized behavior is canonizedin urbancommunities. Take it from Reverend Charles Harrison of the Ten Point Coalition:

This is glamorized, this is glorified, this brings them street cred, this brings them notoriety, ya know? Shes tough, shes going to beat somebody up, said Harrison. Its almost like they plan these fights, they want these fights to be on tape where they can put it on social media. This is horrible.(Fox News)

Its not horrible to them. Its entertainment.Abducting a mentally disabled white man, taping his mouth shut with duct tape, cutting his scalp and making him drink toilet water is how they get their kicks.

Violent tests of dominance and subjugation are integral to hood culture. Being skurred (scared) is grounds for, ironically, beatings. Anyone who has lived in the same area ashoodblacks,or gone to public schools they attend, has profited overabundantly from the delightful enrichment they offer to civic life. Those who dont adopt the affectations of hoodculture for self-defense are threatenedin the hallways, the cafeteria, and the classroom alike.Why would blacks observe a culturalimperative to subjugate white people? A dangerous question, with an even more dangerous, if patently obvious, answer. The New Black Panthers are here toenlighten you that white deaths arejustice, not tragedy:

We gonna have to kill some cracker babies. To hell with what National Geographic puttin out, Im tellin you to your face tonight, we gon have to kill some little Penelopes, and some little Robbies. You wanna be free, dont you?

In the link appendix at the bottom of this article, you will find three instances of blacks killing white babies and children, honoring theblack nationalist call to arms. The Confederate flag burns in South Carolina as Malik Shabazz calls for a white genocide in the capitol shadows. This is what we have to show for equal rights.

White Americans have been systemically brainwashedthat the underprivileged and underservedare a nobly oppressed group to whom they owe the fruits of their labor for the sins of their ancestors; that black rage is righteous; that it is racist to observe personal safety precautionsaround young black men,despite their record of being responsible for the majority of homicides in this country despite accountingfor only 13% of the population. Not only are blacks responsible almost exclusively for black homicides, they are responsiblefor the majority of interracial violence as well.

Here are the real HateFactson interracial violence, dropped by everyones favorite blonde bugbear, Ann Coulter,andcurated byKathy Shaidle:

In a country of more than 300 million people, everything will happen eventually. That doesnt make it a trend. Go up to any ordinary, sentient person and ask: Which race assaults the other race more? ()

Ask around. You might be surprised at how many whites you know have been physically attacked by a black person at least once in their lives. The FBIs crime victimization surveys tell a very different story, one more in line with a normal persons life experience.

In 2008, the most recent year for which such data seems to have been collected, FBI surveys show that, out of 520,161 interracial violent crimes, blacks committed 429,444 of them against whites, while whites committed 90,717 of them against blacks.

In other words, blacks commit more than 80 percent of all interracial violent crime.

Impromptu street assaults have increasingly been wielded as a racial weapon against non-black Americans. Polar bear hunting, that is, tracking down and beatingwhite people, is one popular pastime, as writers like Colin Flaherty and Thomas Sowell have revealed. An example can be found inthis disturbing Richmond, Virginia videoof a group of young black malessavagely beatingan unlucky single white male who made the mistake of walking home while white. The videos of the beatingsareposted to social media for bragging rights. Herea white teenage girl is assaulted on a bus ride by a group of blackteenagers to the excitement of those filming and participating. Trading fight videos gets blacksturnt up:

Had theyoung people whose grisly deaths I must reluctantly addressnot been kept purposefully in the dark about the realities of black crime and hatredof whites, they might have taken more precautions. If they had been encouraged by their parents and schoolteachersto discriminate white from blackinstead ofnot to see color,they may be alive today.You probably havent heard of these unsung young lives, prematurely ended in the name of righteous black rage (as Brittney Cooperat Salon, AKA Professor Crunk, would claim):

Texas A&M students Denton James Wardand Tanner Giesen were entertaining their lady friends on a date night on the town. They stopped at a McDonalds to use the restroom, and exited their vehicle and went inside despite the hundreds of milling black males congregated in the parking lot and inside the establishment. This would prove to be a fatal misjudgment. Ayoung black male threatened Ward and Glieson: Youre in the wrong neck of the woods, cowboys. The two young white menwere then both savagely attacked. Ward wascurb stomped within an inch of his life until the girlfriends managed todisentangle him from the mob and drag himback into their SUV.

The students fled the areain a panic, fatefully runninga red light. Wards girlfriend, Lauren Bailey Crisp, who was desperately trying to keep him upright in the backseat, was killed in the crash. Ward was declaredby multiple pathologists at trial to have died from the injuries sustained by his mass beating. Gieson and his girlfriend survived the crash with injuries.

Or have you heard about the cold-blooded rape and murder of Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian? I am loatheto evenwrite about it out of respect for their families. The young Tennessee lovebirds were walking to their friends apartment when they were attacked by a malicious gang of blacks. Newsom was bound, gagged with a sock, sodomized, beaten, shot in the neck and consequently paralyzed, and eventually murdered viaan execution-style shot in the head. Christian was brought back to a house, repeatedly raped and beaten for hours, force-fed bleach (this is how theythought they couldget their DNA off of her), and stowed away in a garbage can for hours, where she asphyxiated.

Theirtorture and deathsdid not receive (((mainstream media))) attention and weremostly covered by online bloggers and conservative news sites, with the unlikely defender the Daily Mail positing that political correctness was to blame for the cover-up. Leonard Pitts, a black syndicated columnist, callouslydeclaredof the shocking, ghastly case: Blacks and Latinos are underrepresented in news media as victims of crime and significantly overrepresented as perpetrators, and white Americans who felt victimized by the perceived underreporting could cry me a river. His sentiments are eerily similar to those of Nobel Prize Winner Toni Morrisons recent race comments: I want to see a cop shoot a white unarmed teenager in the back. The black literary genius doesnt stop there. Senselessly celebrated New Jersey Poet Laureate and black radical Amiri Baraka bloodthirstilywrote, Rape the white girls. Rape their fathers. Cut the mothers throats.

Black killers can explicitly state that hatred of whites is their criminal motivation, and self-styled tolerance warriors will not bat a steely eye. When Ferguson, MO burned, Bosnian immigrant Zemir Begins black assailants screamed, Fuck the white people, kill white people, as they bludgeoned him to death with hammers after dragging him out of his car ashis blonde fianc stood helplessly by in horror. The St. Louis Bosnian community furiouslyinsisted the racial hatred element of the crime was being deliberately covered upby the media. While nary a blasphemous peep shook the hollow chests of the (((media elites in New York))), even the normally well-trained BBC wondered,Are the media ignoring another St. Louis killing?

He loved America, his sister, Denisa Begic, 23, told the newspaper. We come from Bosnia because we were getting killed and our homes and families were getting destroyed. Never in my life did I think he would get murdered. (Huffington Post)

The Bosnians (and in general, everyone else who lives apart from blacks) underestimate the ethnic strife in the United States, becausethey have no experience of it and the issue is ferociously suppressed. The right is too afraid to lose elections over it, and the left is a moral cesspool. Both are to blame for the third world that the United States is becoming. The Bosnians thought they escapedbeing political targets in Bosnia, only tocome to the United States to remain political targets as whites.

White violence (usually self-defense) against blacks is over-reported and always a cause for a national conversation about so-called systemic racism against blacks. However, black violence against whites is seldom reported, though it is far more frequent, and more grotesque. The media that everyone despises is owned and operated not just by leftists, as is commonly thought, but by an ethnoreligious group, the Jews, who regard whites as their politicalenemies, and who use their control of the media as a weapon against us. The Jews use blacks as their shock troops, stirring them to violence using their media monopoly. It may sound shocking, but I challenge you to take thisinformation with an open mind. Im a millennialwoman who discovered all of this with disbeliefat first, just like you. Do your own research. Start asking yourself the ethnicity of the writer the next time you see anti-white propaganda in the media.

Follow the #altright for ways to protect yourself and your family from the deck that is stacked against us.

WHITES HAVE TO STICK TOGETHER.

For more HateFacts about black on white violence and media complicity, reference these:

>Group of 40 black Americans recorded jumping 5 white people; No national attention

>Mob of 60 black Americans recorded rioting in suburbs during Baltimore riots, targeting white Americans homes; No national attention

>Black mob of 30 beats white family in Alabama; No national attention

>Group of at least 20 black Americans during Baltimore riots recorded beating a 61 year old man man to an inch of his life; No national attention

>Group of five black Americans carjack, kidnap, rape, sodomize, torture and burn alive a white couple while the torment went on for days; No national attention

>White man stops a robber then a crowd of black Americans jump him, chanting Trayvon; Also recorded on tape, also no national attention

>9 black Americans attack a single white teenage girl on a bus; No national attention

>Black Americans murder a baby in stroller because he looked White; No national attention(Were still investigating the motive; were trying to turn every stone to make sure we get a motive)

>Manager for the Department of Homeland Security publicly says white people need to die in order for black people to live; No national attention

>Black American bus driver for a school coaxed the schoolchildren to attack a white family when they dropped her kid off, then allowed them back on the bus to escape; No national attention

>Black American kills 6-year-old white child, claims child was racist as his defense; No national attention (Child was murdered on Christmas Eve)

>Black American tortures and murders 2 white teenagers makes Black Lives Matter speech in court; No national attention

>White family attacked for being in the Wrong Neighborhood in Baton Rouge, La.; No national attention(Theres those words again: youre in the wrong park, youre in the wrong neck of the woods, youre in the wrong neighborhood)

>3 Black Amerians murder pregnant white woman in Detriot; No national attention

>Three black Americans are accused of tormenting an autistic child at a school bus stop; no national attention

>A 30 year old Black American, Naeem Davis, pushed a 58 year old Korean man into an oncoming train; No national attention

See the rest here:

Black Violence Against Whites: A Recent History past ...