Passing a new stimulus measure should not be that hard – USA TODAY

The Editorial Board, USA TODAY Published 9:25 p.m. ET July 22, 2020 | Updated 6:42 a.m. ET July 23, 2020

Where does the U.S. stimulus money come from? Here's how the Federal Reserve is saving the economy from the COVID-19 crisis. USA TODAY

The congressional debate over the next stimulus measure should be fought along the normal lines. It is almost reassuring that Democrats want more spending,Republicans less. Despite COVID-19, at least some things stay the same. But President Donald Trump's populist excesses ruin the picture of normalcy.

Democrats, who control the House, have already passed a $3 trillionmeasure. That is the size of the previous stimulus, plus an emergency measure to refill a depleted fund for small businesses.

Republicans, who control the Senate, wantsomething in the range of $1 trillion.

In normal times the two parties, the two camps, would work out some kind of a deal that includes the top priorities of both sides, makes no one totally happy, and demonstrates an ability to compromise.

President Donald Trump during a news conference about his administration's response to the ongoing global coronavirus pandemic.(Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

But Trump is never content with normal. He wants to cut out funding for COVID-19 testing and contact tracingwhile making in-person classes a requirement for receiving school aid. These proposals would yield more sickness, death and economic pain merely to let Trump show how unwilling to he is to admit mistakes and make adjustments.

OPPOSING VIEW: Workers, businesses need payroll tax break

Trump also is pushing for a payroll tax cut. Unlike his other ideas, this one is not horrible, merely bad. If Republicans want to cut taxes, they should cut the income tax and leave Social Security alone. Most Republicans are not enthusiastic about a payroll tax cut, but may go along with it anyway in an effort to quiet Trump down.

Social Security is not a cash drawer to raid every time Congress or a president needs money. It is apension fund that is partially self-sufficient. If its funding source is cut, it will reach insolvency sooner.

Congress can and should ignore Trump's destructive ideas and draft a reasonable plan, one that helps make a bad public heath and economic situation somewhat better and reflects the political balance of power.

The measures price tag should be somewhere in the $2 trillion range, halfway between the two parties starting points. It should include a continuation of the $600 supplemental unemployment payments that were part of the first stimulus measure, and are set to run out this weekend.

Republicans have refused to consider the idea so far, which seems a bit hard-headed given the bleak economy. But they are right that the payments could be a disincentive for people to return to work. Rather than continuing the payments in full through the end of the year, as Democrats would do, the payments could be gradually reducedover time, or pegged to the unemployment rate so that they drop automatically if and when the economy picks up steam.

Money for states and localities, including for schools and for the holding of safe and fair elections during a pandemic, should be part of the package. Payola to special interest lobbies (including those preaching the virtue of limited government) who glommed onto funding in the first round, should not be part of the package. We should not be reading in coming days that the Ayn Rand Institute or Citizens Against Government Waste took advantage of sweetheart deals from federal tax payers.

And granting businesses immunity from lawsuits should people get sick on their premises is a worthwhile trade-off that Democrats should accept.

Put the package together and the legislation kind of writes itself. If only members of Congress can ignore the counterproductive ideas coming from the White House.

If you can't see the below poll, please refresh your story page:

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/todaysdebate/2020/07/22/passing-new-stimulus-measure-should-not-hard-our-view/5483672002/