Minerva Reefs | Prometheism Transhumanism Post Humanism

August 03, 2017 19:11

Facebook

Twitter

Google +

Pinterest

Andaman And Nicobar Islands Blue Seas, Virgin Islands And Colonial Past:- Andaman and Nicobar Islands, located in the Bay of Bengal are known for their scenic beaches, dense forests and adventurous water sports.

Out of the 600 islands in the Bay of Bengal, only around 36 islands are inhabited. The archipelago is divided into two groups of islands the Andaman Islands and the Nicobar Islands. Of these, only 9 islands in the Andaman Islands group are open for tourists.

The sandy beaches form as nesting homes to turtles, animals such as spotted deer, wild boar, gecko, crab-eating macaque and python can be spotted in the 86% area still covered by dense forests.

In Andaman and Nicobar Islands, rains are usually on and off while the other days are mostly sunny. You can visit the Beladaru beach at Batarang Island, if it is sunny. There are many indoor activities to indulge you as well, when it rains.

Other places to visit here are Radhanagar, dolphin resort, Cellular jail and Phoenix Bay Jetty which is quite a sight in the rains.

Summer ( April July ) Summer temperatures range between 24 to 37 degrees Celsius. During this time, all the water sports are open to visitors and it is an excellent time to visit the islands.

Monsoon (July September ) During this time, the temperatures range between 22 to 35 degrees Celsius. July and August witness the maximum visits to the islands. However, in case of heavy rainfall and unpredictable seas, water sports may not be an option.

Winter (October March ) Winters are not severe at all. Weather stays mild and pleasant. Temperatures range between 20 to 30 degrees Celsius.

How To Reach

Andamans can be reached via air and water only, since these are an isolated cluster of islands in the Bay of Bengal along the Eastern coast of India.

Veer Savarkar International Airport in Port Blair is connected via flights to Kolkata and Chennai. Only domestic operators offer flight service to Andaman Islands.

Nearest Airport: Veer Savarkar International Airport (IXZ)

You can reach Port Blair via water from Kolkata, Chennai and Vishakhapatnam only. It takes about 4 days to reach Andamans via cruise.

There are auto-rickshaws and taxis available in Port Blair and on Havelock Island and are the best means to move around. On Havelock Island, you can also rent scooters and motorbikes.

1) Havelock Island

Havelock is one of the most popular islands among the 600 in the region and is the most developed when it comes to tourism. It is a 2-4 hour ferry ride away from Port Blair.

Named after a British general, Havelock Island is the largest island that comprises of Ritchies Archipelago. Havelock is located 57 km north-east of the capital city Port Blair. It consists of 5 villages which are Shyam Nagar, Vijay Nagar, Radha Nagar, Krishna Nagar and Govinda Nagar.

2) Scuba Diving

Andaman and Nicobar Islands is a popular spot for scuba diving among tourists. Most popular island among all the islands for the dives, however, is Havelock. It is an ideal diving destination for everyone, right from a novice to an experienced diver. For non-certified amateur divers, charges start from about INR 3,500 for a 30-minute dive.

Scuba Diving is the most sought after activity on Havelock island. The top agencies which are certified by SSI and PADI and provide scuba facilities are Barefoot Scuba, Doongi Dives, DiveIndia, Andaman Dive Club and Andaman Bubbles. Smaller Dive schools include OceanTribe, Gold India and ScubaLuv.

Andamans, with its clear waters and rich coral reserves, offers a large number of spots for shallow as well as deep dives (up to 55m). The major dive spots are: Pilot Reef (6-18m), Lighthouse (6-20m), Aquarium (12-15m), Elephant Beach (6-25m), Jacksons Bar (20-35m), The Wall (10-55m), Johnnys Gorge (25-30m), Dixons Pinnacle (18-40m), Minerva Ledge (10-18m).

3) Cellular Jail

The Cellular Jail constructed by the Britishers is the old colonial prison situated in Port Blair. The jail complex is now owned by the Government of India and it is recognized as the national memorial monument showcasing the life of prisoners during theBritish period.

The jail narrates the horrifying and darkest period in the history of India. Soon after the Sepoy Mutiny in the year 1857, Britishers began to use the islands of Andaman and Nicobar as the jails to put the independence leaders behind the bars. The secluded islands were chosen due to their distant location from the main parts of the country where the prisoners would be kept in the dark depriving them of the situation in the country and excluding them from the society.

Many of the prisoners died due to inhumane conditions, many were hanged till death and many simply perished.

Open Time: National Memorial: 9:00 AM 12:00 PM, 1:00 PM 4:15 PM (Closed on Mondays)

4) Snorkeling in Andamans

Snorkeling is another popular water sport among tourists. Sea around Havelock Island serves as one of the best sites for snorkeling.

You can see a kaleidoscope of colors underwater with a variety of reef, fishes, turtles, sharks and rays. Snorkeling costs around INR 400-500, and is much cheaper compared to Scuba diving.

5) Ross Island

Ross Island is one of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, about 2 km east of Port Blair. One can see remnants of an opulent past in the ruins of the church, swimming pool and the chief commissioners residence with its huge gardens and grand ballrooms. Managed by the Indian Navy, there is also a cemetery and a small museum.

Ross Island, a few km from Aberdeen jetty at Port Blair, is yet another member of the Andaman group of islands.

6) Neil Island

Neil Island is apparently named after a British soldier, James George Smith Neill, who had sternly dealt with the insurgents during the suppression of the 1857 Mutiny.

The island is located 40 kilometres north-east of Port Blair, the capital of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. It is the southernmost island of Ritchies Archipelago.

Neil quite small compared to Havelock is a place to chill out after the bustle of Havelock Island. You can walk the whole island in about an hour or two.

In Neil there have three good sand beaches. The color of sea water is light blue, dark blue and green. Neil Island is a peaceful island. You can go around to see the natural bridge, beach #8, sitapur beach, ramnagar beach and lakshmanpur beach.

7) Water Sports In Andamans

The Andamans, while great for the peaceful, undisturbed soul-searching vacation that you need, also happen to be a hub for indulging in some killer water sports. Come, soak in the fun!

Activities offered : Water-skiing, Sail boats, Windsurfing, Speed Boats, Snorkeling, Scuba Diving, Para sailing, Water scooters, Row boats, kayaks, paddle boats

Cost of Activity : Starts at Rs. 2000 including equipment, depending upon the kind of activity.

Currents : 55 64 cm/sec

Difficulty Level : Easy-Medium

Nearest Airport : Port Blair

Nearest Port : Port Blair

Region : Bay of Bengal

Time required : 4-5 days if you want to try out all the different sports

Water Temperature : 26-30 degrees Centigrade

Air: It is most convenient to travel to Andaman Islands by air. The airport is situated at the capital city of Port Blair. Regular flights are available to the islands from Chennai, Kolkata and Delhi. One can also get flight from Bhubaneshwar on certain days.

Sea: Another way of reaching these exotic groups of islands is through sea. The regular passenger ship services to Port Blair commence from Chennai, Visakhapatnam and Kolkata with usually 3-4 sailings per months both sides. The complete voyage takes around 50 to 60 hours approximately to reach the final destination.

Things to carry

1) Sunblock

2) Flip Flops

3) Hats

4) Bathing Suits

5) Sunglasses

6) Energy Bars

7) Waterproof camera bags, lenses and battery packs

Safety Tips

Carry a small bottle of water during the day for emergencies. Stretch before participating in water sports. Make sure you choose operators that offer up-to-date safety gear.

General tips

The best time to visit the Andamans is from October to May. It is during this time that the Emerald Isle is at its prettiest, balmiest best. Choose good adventure operators who will provide good equipment.

8) Wandur National Park

Located in the south-western coast of the Andaman Islands, Wandur National Park is a marine life conservation area situated at a distance of 25 km from the capital city of Port Blair. The wildlife sanctuary which is also known as the Mahatma Gandhi Marine National Park consists of a group of 12 islands which are situated geographically in a labyrinthine shape and are home to some of the most exquisite marine wildlife in the world.

The national park is a great place to try some snorkeling and diving in the crystal clear water of the islands. The coral reefs are the highlight of the park exhibiting their glorious forms.

The famous islands to visit are Jolly buoy Islands, Redskin Island, Grub Island, Rangat Island, Neil Island and Long Island. The national park can amaze and dazzle everyone visiting especially those who hold wildlife close to their hearts.

Open Time: The first boat trip starts at 8:30am and continues till 10:30am at an interval of 30 minutes. The National Park has only 150 permits for tourist entries distributed on the basis of first-cum-first-serve.

9) Chatham Saw Mill

Chatham Saw Mill is the biggest and the oldest mill across Asia owned by the Forest Department. The mill is also a storehouse for a variety of woods cut into different shapes and sizes.

Open Time: All days of the week except Sunday: 8:30 AM 2:30 PM

10) Corbyns Cove

Corbyns Cove is the nearest beach to Port Blair. It is quite popular among tourists as well as locals.

It serves as an ideal place to just get a good sunset view and laze around. There are quite a few water sports which draw many adventure enthusiasts here.

Open Time: All days of the week: 12:00 AM 12:00 PM

11) Barren Island

Barren Island is located at a distance of 35 kms of Port Blair, the capital city of the Andaman and Nicobar islands. The island is famous as a rare and interesting scuba-diving destination.

12) Viper Island

Years before Cellular Jail was constructed, Viper Island was used by the British to keep the freedom fighters in exile. You can still see the remains of the jail which was built in 1867 by the British.

13) Wandoor Beach

A small village in the southern part of South Andaman, Wandoor is most recognized for its Mahatma Gandhi Marine National Park.

The village also has some beaches which are relatively less crowded and offers mesmerizing views. You can combine your trip with a visit to Jolly Buoy or Red Skin Island, where you get to see beautiful corals. Wandoor is easily accessible and is only 1-2 hour bus ride away from Port Blair.

14) Baratang Island

Read more from the original source:

Andaman And Nicobar Islands Blue Seas, Virgin Islands And Colonial Past Andhrawishesh (blog)

Continue reading here:

Minerva Reefs | Prometheism Transhumanism Post Humanism

Why Bitcoin Cash Is Not Bitcoin [BTC vs. BCH – Differences …

The crypto-sphere is heating up and simultaneously becoming more confusing as it evolves.

I am sad to see how the viruses of confusion and myth are purposely injected into the ecosystem and how the whole system is manipulated as well as hijacked on a regular basis.

Specifically, I am talking about the recent insane price spike of Bitcoin Cash and the doomed price fall of Bitcoin in just a matter of hours.

Some of you who are old players of the crypto-sphere must have benefitted from this sudden rise and fall, but I think its not good for newcomers, and its not healthyfor Bitcoin in the long term.

Thats why in this write-up I wish to convey some of my thoughts on how Bitcoin Cash is not Bitcoin. And I also want to clarify why the newcomers should not fall prey to the Bitcoin Cash PR campaign.

For the latecomers, I want to first explain what Bitcoin Cash is and show you some facts. Then, Ill explain Bitcoin and leave it to you to decide for yourself.

Bitcoin Cash is a Bitcoin fork which was created this year on the 1st of August by a minority group of influential miners, developers, investors, and users who were against the agreed consensus of SegWit implementation to scale Bitcoin.

Namely, there are three main players in the Bitcoin Cash community Roger Ver, Jihan Wu, andDeadal Nix.

They decided to fork the original Bitcoin blockchain and create a new version called Bitcoin Cash (aka BCH) with an adjustable block size up to8 MB blocks.

Some of the benefits & features of Bitcoin Cash

This on-chain increase in the ability of Bitcoin Cash provides several benefits to its users against Bitcoin, but these benefits come at a huge price that its users have to pay. (I will explain this huge price further in the article.)

Some more benefits

For more details, read our extensive guide on Bitcoin Cash:

Ignoring the fact that many of you would have made a good amount of money in the recent Bitcoin Cash rally, one needs to pay a huge cost for using Bitcoin Cash.

This cost cannot be measured in dollars, euros, or yens, but instead, it is a cost that you pay by compromising the original dream of Satoshi Nakamoto to make an uncensorablealternative monetary system which isnt controlled by an individual or a group of people.

Some of you might say that I am incorrect because Bitcoin Cashs official site claims that they are carrying forward Satoshis Vision by stating:

Some of the developers {of couse the Bitcoin Core Devs} did not understand and agree with the original vision of peer-to-peer electronic cash that Satoshi Nakamoto had created.

And

Bitcoin Cash is the continuation of the Bitcoin project as peer-to-peer digital cash.

https://www.bitcoincash.org/

But actually speaking, they are not even close to Satoshis originalvision of decentralized and uncensored money.

Bitcoin Cash is extremely censored.

Wait! Some of you might say that I am biased and I am just a Bitcoin fan, but I have facts!

1. A decentralized cryptocurrency having a CEO? Really?!?!

Do you really need a CEO for a currency? If you do, then whats the difference between a business and a crypto?

Check this out https://www.bitcoincash.org/letter-from-the-ceo.pdf

An official statement from the CEO of #Bitcoin Cash: how we resolve conflicts in our community, our values, and our development of leaders and people https://t.co/BaNupOmh2m

Rick Falkvinge (@Falkvinge) November 12, 2017

Archive of @Falkvinge "Official Statement" procaliming himself CEO of $BCH in incoherent/confusing post (now taken down https://t.co/IzBiFYCXZI) available here: https://t.co/PefMk1JsH6. Very creepy and immature rambling, hallmark of $BCH poor leadership $BCH BUYERS MUST READ pic.twitter.com/HIDdbaoaxU

Francis Pouliot (@francispouliot_) November 12, 2017

2. Centralized mining

Bitcoin Cash mining is highly centralized. If you look at the above image, you will certainly be able to put in perspective what I am talking about.

This is the hash power distribution for Bitcoin Cash mining for the last 144 blocks mined.

If we combine the hash power of Antpool, ViaBTC, and BTC.com, which makes more than 50% hash power, this is detrimental for any coin. To make a 51% attack on Bitcoin Cash would be a decision of three mining parties coming together.

Forgot to mention. BCH is a lot more miner centralized. Because its network hashrate is a lot less than BTC, a small BTC pool can 51% attack it. So it's security is weak because of that. Litecoin doesn't have this problem because Litecoin dominates Scrypt hashing.

Charlie Lee [LTC] (@SatoshiLite) November 12, 2017

The argument is that Bitcoin also had such hashrate distribution in its early days; but dont forget that Bitcoin was trading in pennies at that time. Anyone attacking BTC at that time had no incentive in doing so because it was almost worthless.

But now that Bitcoin Cash is trading well above $1000, its very susceptible to 51% attacks, which is not good. Read more about 51% attacks here.

3. Total full nodes are fewer than Bitcoin

Bitcoin has more than 10,000 active full nodes running, which is one of the most important factors of a truly decentralized currency. This means that anyone attacking Bitcoin would need to have the ability to hijack more than 50% of the 10,000 nodes that are running across the globe.

On the other hand, Bitcoin Cash only has around 1200 nodes as per Coin.Dances node summary.

4. Hard forks without polls

Who does hard forks or upgrades in the currency protocols without polls?

Well,Bitcoin Cash does.

Bitcoin Cash had their hard fork (or protocol upgrade) on 13th November 2017.

The upgrade/fork was done to change the underlying mining algorithm to make it more competitive against Bitcoin and to prevent it from miners abuse in the event of reduced or increased difficulty. Read more about the Bitcoin Cash fork here.

Well, I am not against Bitcoin Cash changing something and trying to be competitive, but they should not try being competitive in this way by doing things without polling the community.

If something is getting upgraded in the protocol, then it has to happen with proper polling and agreements. But this official write-up shows that they didnt have any such polls.

Also, this write-up gives a hint that there is actually no need for polling because their community is so small and censored. In reality, there are only three individuals who made the decision. (Their names arent there but everyone knows who these three were Roger Ver, Jihan Wu, andDeadal Nix.)

You can see how easy it is to upgrade Bitcoin Cash. Their community is comprised of 3 people. They are the miners, the developers, and the users. Funny!!

Bitcoin is the DADDY of cryptocurrencies. Some of the facts that make Bitcoin truly decentralized and much better than Bitcoin Cash are:

I know that some of you might be thinking that I am a huge Bitcoin fan and thats why I am biased towards Bitcoin Cash, but I want you to make one thing clear: I am not really that biased.

I certainly think that Bitcoin Cash has a future, but if it is trying to be Bitcoin and continue down this same path that its on now, its not going to end well.

If you are a Bitcoin Cash fan, then you should try to convince the community that BCH is BCH it cant be Bitcoin. And if Bitcoin Cash continues to be an altcoin and not attack Bitcoin, then I dont think there are any problems.

Even Andreas suggested this to both communities.

Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash will coexist and serve different use cases, just like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Its not a zero sum game. Work on building your project, not on destroying the other

Andreas (@aantonop) November 12, 2017

On the other hand, I am not naive or ignorant about current challenges that Bitcoin is facing in terms of scalability (despite SegWit implementation).

I am also aware that a huge number of Bitcoin txs are stuck in the mempool.

But lets remember that it wasnt always so easy to send emails in the early days of the internet. Similarly, Bitcoin will scale with the much-anticipated Lightning networks or sidechains in the future. And yes, those scaling solutions need to happen soon, otherwise, there will be more drama like this for ages to come.

Also for the newcomers: Stay away fromRoger Versowned domain Bitcoin.comthat is trying spread this FUD and exclaiming that Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin.

So thats all from my side in this article.

If you are with me and understand Bitcoins true nature, then do retweet/share this write-up with the Bitcoin community, and join hands in finding permanent solutions to Bitcoins scalability.

Read more from the original source:

Why Bitcoin Cash Is Not Bitcoin [BTC vs. BCH - Differences ...

Fear Not to Do Good – By President Henry B. Eyring

My dear brothers and sisters, I pray humbly that the Spirit of the Lord will be with us as I speak today. My heart is full of gratitude to the Lord, whose Church this is, for the inspiration we have felt in fervent prayers, inspired sermons, and angelic singing in this conference.

Last April, President ThomasS. Monson gave a message that stirred hearts across the world, including mine. He spoke of the power of the Book of Mormon. He urged us to study, ponder, and apply its teachings. He promised that if we dedicated time each day to studying and pondering and kept the commandments the Book of Mormon contains, we would have a vital testimony of its truth, and the resultant testimony of the living Christ would see us through to safety in times of trouble. (See The Power of the Book of Mormon, Ensign or Liahona, May 2017, 8687.)

Like many of you, I heard the prophets words as the voice of the Lord to me. And, also like many of you, I decided to obey those words. Now, since I was a young boy, I have felt the witness that the Book of Mormon is the word of God, that the Father and the Son appeared and spoke with Joseph Smith, and that ancient Apostles came to the Prophet Joseph to restore priesthood keys to the Lords Church.

With that testimony, I have read the Book of Mormon every day for more than 50 years. So perhaps I could have reasonably thought that President Monsons words were for someone else. Yet, like many of you, I felt the prophets encouragement and his promise invite me to make a greater effort. Many of you have done what I did: prayed with increased intent, pondered scripture more intently, and tried harder to serve the Lord and others for Him.

The happy result for me, and for many of you, has been what the prophet promised. Those of us who took his inspired counsel to heart have heard the Spirit more distinctly. We have found a greater power to resist temptation and have felt greater faith in a resurrected Jesus Christ, in His gospel, and in His living Church.

In a season of increasing tumult in the world, those increases in testimony have driven out doubt and fear and have brought us feelings of peace. Heeding President Monsons counsel has had two other wonderful effectson me: First, the Spirit he promised has produced a sense of optimism about what lies ahead, even as the commotion in the world seems to increase. And, second, the Lord has given meand youan even greater feeling of His love for those in distress. We have felt an increase in the desire to go to the rescue of others. That desire has been at the heart of President Monsons ministry and teaching.

The Lord promised love for others and courage to the Prophet Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery when the tasks ahead of them could have seemed overwhelming. The Lord said that needed courage would come from their faith in Him as their rock:

Fear not to do good, my sons, for whatsoever ye sow, that shall ye also reap; therefore, if ye sow good ye shall also reap good for your reward.

Therefore, fear not, little flock; do good; let earth and hell combine against you, for if ye are built upon my rock, they cannot prevail.

Behold, I do not condemn you; go your ways and sin no more; perform with soberness the work which I have commanded you.

Look unto me in every thought; doubt not, fear not.

Behold the wounds which pierced my side, and also the prints of the nails in my hands and feet; be faithful, keep my commandments, and ye shall inherit the kingdom of heaven (D&C 6:3337).

The Lord told His leaders of the Restoration, and He tells us, that when we stand with faith upon His rock, doubt and fear are diminished; the desire to do good increases. As we accept President Monsons invitation to plant in our hearts a testimony of Jesus Christ, we gain the power, the desire, and the courage to go to the rescue of others without concern for our own needs.

I have seen that faith and courage many times when believing Latter-day Saints have faced fearsome trials. For one example, I was in Idaho when the Teton Dam broke on June5, 1976. A wall of water came down. Thousands fled from their homes. Thousands of homes and businesses were destroyed. Miraculously, fewer than 15 people were killed.

What I saw there, I have seen whenever Latter-day Saints stand firmly on the rock of a testimony of Jesus Christ. Because they have no doubt He watches over them, they become fearless. They ignore their own trials to go to the relief of others. And they do so out of love for the Lord, asking no recompense.

For example, when the Teton Dam broke, a Latter-day Saint couple was traveling, miles away from their home. As soon as they heard the news on the radio, they hurried back to Rexburg. Rather than going to their own home to see if it was destroyed, they went looking for their bishop. He was in a building that was being used as the recovery center. He was helping to direct the thousands of volunteers who were arriving in yellow school buses.

The couple walked up to the bishop and said, We just got back. Bishop, where can we go to help? He gave them the names of a family. That couple stayed mucking out mud and water in one home after another. They worked from dawn to dark for days. They finally took a break to go see about their own home. It was gone in the flood, leaving nothing to clean up. So they turned around quickly to goback to their bishop. They asked, Bishop, do you have someone for us to help?

That miracle of quiet courage and charitythe pure love of Christhas been repeated over the years and across the world. It happened in the terrible days of the persecutions and trials at the time of the Prophet Joseph Smith in Missouri. It happened as Brigham Young led the exodus from Nauvoo and then called Saints to desert places all over the western United States, to help each other create Zion for the Lord.

If you read the journal entries of those pioneers, you see the miracle of faith driving out doubt and fear. And you read of Saints leaving their own interests to help someone else for the Lord, before getting back to their own sheep or to their own unplowed fields.

I saw that same miracle a few short days ago in the aftermath of Hurricane Irma in Puerto Rico, Saint Thomas, and Florida, where Latter-day Saints partnered with other churches, local community groups, and national organizations to begin cleanup efforts.

Like my friends in Rexburg, one nonmember couple in Florida focused on helping the community rather than laboring on their own property. When some Latter-day Saint neighbors offered help with the two large trees blocking their driveway, the couple explained that they had been overwhelmed and so had turned to helping others, having faith that the Lord would provide the aid they needed at their own home. The husband then shared that before our Church members arrived with offers of assistance, the couple had been praying. They had received an answer that help would come. It came within hours of that assurance.

I have heard a report that some have started calling the Latter-day Saints who are wearing yellow Helping Hands T-shirts The Yellow Angels. One Latter-day Saint took her car in for service, and the man helping her described the spiritual experience he had when people in yellow shirts removed trees from his yard and then, he said, they sang some song to me about being a child of God.

Another Florida residentalso not of our faithrelated that Latter-day Saints came to her home when she was working in her devastated yard and feeling overwhelmed, overheated, and close to tears. The volunteers created, in her words, a pure miracle. They served not only with diligence but also with laughter and smiles, accepting nothing in return.

I saw that diligence and heard that laughter when, late on a Saturday, I visited with a group of Latter-day Saints in Florida. The volunteers stopped their cleanup labor long enough to let me shake some hands. They said that 90 members of their stake in Georgia had created a plan to join in the rescue in Florida just the night before.

They left Georgia at 4:00 in the morning, drove for hours, worked through the day and into the night, and planned to labor again the next day.

They described it to me all with smiles and good humor. The only stress I sensed was that they wanted to stop being thanked so they could get back to work. The stake president had restarted his chain saw and was working on a downed tree and a bishop was moving tree limbs as we got into our vehicle to go to the next rescue team.

Earlier that day, as we pulled away from another site, a man had walked up to the car,taken off his hat, and thanked us for the volunteers. He said, Im not a member of your church. I cant believe what you have done for us. God bless you. The LDS volunteer standing next to him in his yellow shirt smiled and shrugged his shoulders as if he deserved no praise.

While the volunteers from Georgia had come to help this man who couldnt believe it, hundreds of Latter-day Saints from that very devastated part of Florida had gone hundreds of miles south to another place in Florida where they had heard the people were harder hit.

That day I remembered and understood better the prophetic words of the Prophet Joseph Smith: A man filled with the love of God, is not content with blessing his family alone, but ranges through the whole world, anxious to bless the whole human race (Teachings of Presidents of the Church: Joseph Smith [2007], 426).

We see such love in the lives of Latter-day Saints everywhere. Each time there is a tragic event anywhere in the world, Latter-day Saints donate and volunteer to the Churchs humanitarian efforts. An appeal is seldom needed. In fact, on some occasions, we have had to ask would-be volunteers to wait to travel to the recovery site until those directing the work are prepared to receive them.

That desire to bless is the fruit of people gaining a testimony of Jesus Christ, His gospel, His restored Church, and His prophet. That is why the Lords people doubt not and fear not. That is why missionaries volunteer for service in every corner of the world. That is why parents pray with their children for others. That is why leaders challenge their youth to take President Monsons request to immerse themselves in the Book of Mormon to heart. The fruit comesnot by being urged by leaders but by the youth and members acting on faith. That faith, put into action, which requires selfless sacrifice, brings the change of heart that allows them to feel the love of God.

Our hearts, however, remain changed only as long as we continue to follow the prophets counsel. If we stop trying after one burst of effort, the change will fade.

Faithful Latter-day Saints have increased their faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, in the Book of Mormon as the word of God, and in the restoration of priesthood keys in His true Church. That increased testimony has given us greater courage and concern for others of Gods children. But the challenges and the opportunities ahead will require even more.

We cannot foresee the details, but we know the larger picture. We know that in the last days, the world will be in commotion. We know that in the midst of whatever trouble comes, the Lord will lead faithful Latter-day Saints to take the gospel of Jesus Christ to every nation, kindred, tongue, and people. And we know that the Lords true disciples will be worthy and prepared to receive Him when He comes again. We need not fear.

So, as much as we have already built faith and courage in our hearts, the Lord expects more from usand from the generations after us. They will need to be stronger and braver because they will do even greater and harder things than we have done. And they will face increasing opposition from the enemy of our souls.

The way to optimism as we go forward was given by the Lord: Look unto me in every thought; doubt not, fear not (D&C 6:36). President Monson told us how to do that. We are to ponder and apply the Book of Mormon and the words of prophets. Pray always. Be believing. Serve the Lord with all our heart, might, mind, and strength. We are to pray with all the energy of our hearts for the gift of charity, the pure love of Christ (see Moroni 7:4748). And above all, we are to be consistent and persistent in following prophetic counsel.

When the way is difficult, we can rely on the Lords promisethe promise President Monson has reminded us of when he has often quoted these words of the Savior: Whoso receiveth you, there I will be also, for I will go before your face. I will be on your right hand and on your left, and my Spirit shall be in your hearts, and mine angels round about you, to bear you up (D&C 84:88).

I testify that the Lord goes before your face whenever you are on His errand. Sometimes you will be the angel the Lord sends to bear others up. Sometimes you will be the one surrounded by angels who bear you up. But always you will have His Spirit to be in your heart, as you have been promised in every sacrament service. You have only to keep His commandments.

The best days are ahead for the kingdom of God on the earth. Opposition will strengthen our faith in Jesus Christ, as it has since the days of the Prophet Joseph Smith. Faith always defeats fear. Standing together produces unity. And your prayers for those in need are heard and answered by a loving God. He neither slumbers nor does He sleep.

I bear my witness that God the Father lives and wants you to come home to Him. This is the true Church of the Lord Jesus Christ. He knows you; He loves you; He watches over you. He atoned for your sins and mine and the sins of all of Heavenly Fathers children. Following Him in your life and in your service to others is the only way to eternal life.

I so testify and leave you my blessing and my love. In the sacred name of Jesus Christ, amen.

More here:

Fear Not to Do Good - By President Henry B. Eyring

Hedonism II – Top Lifestyle Resort in Negril, Jamaica

Hedonism II is the only resort of its kind in the world. It's the resort where you can do what you want, when you want, in a way that can only happen at Hedonism II. From the expansive beach to piano bar to the disco, Hedonism II is the best resort for your all inclusive vacation. At Hedonism II, all meals, drinks, activities and entertainment are included and tipping is simply not permitted. If you don't have fun at Hedonism II, you probably won't have fun anywhere.

What is Hedonism ??

From the moment Hedonism II's gates opened thirty plus years ago, it's been the most widely recognized, and notorious, resort in the world. Words really can't quite describe the thrill of actually being here. It's the ultimate guilty pleasure, only without the guilt. Hedonism II is located on Negril's famous 7 mile beach regarded as the party capital of the world.

Everything You've Heard... It's true. The rumors, the legends, the myths. All true. For more than thirty years, It's what happens when you combine warm water, a white-sand beach, open bars and open minds. This is about as far as you can get from your everyday life. And best of all, just about everything you can eat, drink and do is included.

Sooner or later, it's gonna happen. The primal urge to just let go. Unwind. Unplug. You're not alone. Hedonism II on world-famous Negril Beach was created as a reward for all those times you've had to deny your basic instincts. In these lush gardens of pure pleasure, the word "no" is seldom heard.

Hedonism is a sandbox for your inner child, nourishment for the mind, body, spirit and soul. Pleasure comes in many forms. Choose one. Or two. Or more. After a week at Hedonism, you'll view the world from a slightly different angle. You'll be tanned and relaxed. And at times you'll find yourself smiling for no reason whatsoever. Hedonism, there's nothing else on earth quite like it.

The resort has 280 rooms located in a tropical beach scene with separate two-story buildings with two twin or king beds in each room. Some rooms face the beach, some are garden view locations. The resort is arguably the "Mother of all inclusive resorts" and has a world-wide reputation for fun and frolic. Our clients who visit Hedonism II come from every continent in the world and they're there for one reason -- to have fun. If you like to read a book and chill out, you can do that, but this place is so active with lots of interesting people, you may miss some of the greatest opportunities to meet the most fun loving people... from all over the world.

See original here:

Hedonism II - Top Lifestyle Resort in Negril, Jamaica

[REPOST] The Non-Libertarian FAQ | Slate Star Codex

[This is a repost of the Non-Libertarian FAQ (aka Why I Hate Your Freedom), which I wrote about five years ago and which used to be hosted on my website. It no longer completely reflects my current views. I dont think Ive switched to believing anything on here is outright false, but Ive moved on to different ways of thinking about certain areas. Im reposting it by popular request and for historical interest only. Ive made some very small updates, mostly listing rebuttals that came out over the past few years. I havent updated the statistics and everything is accurate as of several years ago. I seem to have lost the sources of my images, and Im sorry; if Ive used an image of yours, please let me know and Ill cite you.]

Contents

0. Introduction

A. Economic Issues

1. Externalities2. Coordination Problems3. Irrational Choices4. Lack of Information

B. Social Issues

5. Just Desserts and Social Mobility6. Taxation

C. Political Issues

7. Competence of Government8. Health Care9. Prison Privatization10. Gun Control11. Education

D. Moral Issues

12. Moral Systems13. Rights and Heuristics

E. Practical Issues

14. Slippery Slopes15. Strategic Activism16. Miscellaneous and Meta

Introduction

0.1: Are you a statist?

No.

Imagine a hypothetical country split between the tallists, who think only tall people should have political power, and the shortists, who believe such power should be reserved for the short.

If we met a tallist, wed believe she was silly but not because we favor the shortists instead. Wed oppose the tallists because we think the whole dichotomy is stupid we should elect people based on qualities like their intelligence and leadership and morality. Knowing someones height isnt enough to determine whether theyd be a good leader or not.

Declaring any non-libertarian to be a statist is as silly as declaring any non-tallist to be a shortist. Just as we can judge leaders on their merits and not on their height, so people can judge policies on their merits and not just on whether they increase or decrease the size of the state.

There are some people who legitimately believe that a policys effect on the size of the state is so closely linked to its effectiveness that these two things are not worth distinguishing, and so one can be certain of a policys greater effectiveness merely because it seems more libertarian and less statist than the alternative. Most of the rest of this FAQ will be an attempt to disprove this idea and assert that no, you really do have to judge the individual policy on its merits.

0.2: Do you hate libertarianism?

No.

To many people, libertarianism is a reaction against an over-regulated society, and an attempt to spread the word that some seemingly intractable problems can be solved by a hands-off approach. Many libertarians have made excellent arguments for why certain libertarian policies are the best options, and I agree with many of them. I think this kind of libertarianism is a valuable strain of political thought that deserves more attention, and I have no quarrel whatsoever with it and find myself leaning more and more in that direction myself.

However, theres a certain more aggressive, very American strain of libertarianism with which I do have a quarrel. This is the strain which, rather than analyzing specific policies and often deciding a more laissez-faire approach is best, starts with the tenet that government can do no right and private industry can do no wrong and uses this faith in place of more careful analysis. This faction is not averse to discussing politics, but tends to trot out the same few arguments about why less regulation has to be better. I wish I could blame this all on Ayn Rand, but a lot of it seems to come from people who have never heard of her. I suppose I could just add it to the bottom of the list of things I blame Reagan for.

To the first type of libertarian, I apologize for writing a FAQ attacking a caricature of your philosophy, but unfortunately that caricature is alive and well and posting smug slogans on Facebook.

0.3: Will this FAQ prove that government intervention always works better than the free market?

No, of course not.

Actually, in most cases, you wont find me trying to make a positive proof of anything. I believe that deciding on, for example, an optimal taxation policy takes very many numbers and statistical models and other things which are well beyond the scope of this FAQ, and may well have different answers at different levels and in different areas.

What I want to do in most cases is not prove that the government works better than the free market, or vice versa, but to disprove theories that say we can be absolutely certain free market always works better than government before we even investigate the issue. After that, we may still find that this is indeed one of the cases where the free market works better than the government, but we will have to prove it instead of viewing it as self-evident from first principles.

0.4: Why write a Non-Libertarian FAQ? Isnt statism a bigger problem than libertarianism?

Yes. But you never run into Stalinists at parties. At least not serious Stalinists over the age of twenty-five, and not the interesting type of parties. If I did, I guess Id try to convince them not to be so statist, but the issues never come up.

But the world seems positively full of libertarians nowadays. And I see very few attempts to provide a complete critique of libertarian philosophy. There are a bunch of ad hoc critiques of specific positions: people arguing for socialist health care, people in favor of gun control. But one of the things that draws people to libertarianism is that it is a unified, harmonious system. Unlike the mix-and-match philosophies of the Democratic and Republican parties, libertarianism is coherent and sometimes even derived from first principles. The only way to convincingly talk someone out of libertarianism is to launch a challenge on the entire system.

There are a few existing documents trying to do this (see Mike Hubens Critiques of Libertarianism and Mark Rosenfelders Whats (Still) Wrong With Libertarianism for two of the better ones), but Im not satisfied with any of them. Some of them are good but incomplete. Others use things like social contract theory, which I find nonsensical and libertarians find repulsive. Or they have an overly rosy view of how consensual taxation is, which I dont fall for and which libertarians definitely dont fall for.

The main reason Im writing this is that I encounter many libertarians, and I need a single document I can point to explaining why I dont agree with them. The existing anti-libertarian documentation makes too many arguments I dont agree with for me to feel really comfortable with it, so Im writing this one myself. I dont encounter too many Stalinists,so I dont have this problem with them and I dont see any need to write a rebuttal to their position.

If you really need a pro-libertarian FAQ to use on an overly statist friend, Google suggests The Libertarian FAQ.

0.5: How is this FAQ structured?

Ive divided it into three main sections. The first addresses some very abstract principles of economics. They may not be directly relevant to politics, but since most libertarian philosophies start with abstract economic principles, a serious counterargument has to start there also. Fair warning: there are people who can discuss economics without it being INCREDIBLY MIND-NUMBINGLY BORING, but I am not one of them.

The second section deals with more concrete economic and political problems like the tax system, health care, and criminal justice.

The third section deals with moral issues, like whether its ever permissible to initiate force. Too often I find that if I can convince a libertarian that government regulation can be effective, they respond that it doesnt matter because its morally repulsive, and then once Ive finished convincing them it isnt, they respond that it never works anyway. By having sections dedicated to both practical and moral issues, I hope to make that sort of bait-and-switch harder to achieve, and to allow libertarians to evaluate the moral and practical arguments against their position in whatever order they find appropriate.

Part A: Economic Issues

The Argument:

In a free market, all trade has to be voluntary, so you will never agree to a trade unless it benefits you.

Further, you wont make a trade unless you think its the best possible trade you can make. If you knew you could make a better one, youd hold out for that. So trades in a free market are not only better than nothing, theyre also the best possible transaction you could make at that time.

Labor is no different from any other commercial transaction in this respect. You wont agree to a job unless it benefits you more than anything else you can do with your time, and your employer wont hire you unless it benefits her more than anything else she can do with her money. So a voluntarily agreed labor contract must benefit both parties, and must do so more than any other alternative.

If every trade in a free market benefits both parties, then any time the government tries to restrict trade in some way, it must hurt both parties. Or, to put it another way, you can help someone by giving them more options, but you cant help them by taking away options. And in a free market, where everyone starts with all options, all the government can do is take options away.

The Counterargument:

This treats the world as a series of producer-consumer dyads instead of as a system in which every transaction affects everyone else. Also, it treats consumers as coherent entities who have specific variables like utility and demand and know exactly what they are, which doesnt always work.

In the remainder of this section, Ill be going over several ways the free market can fail and several ways a regulated market can overcome those failures. Ill focus on four main things: externalities, coordination problems, irrational choice, and lack of information.

I did warn you it would be mind-numbingly boring.

1. Externalities

1.1: What is an externality?

An externality is when I make a trade with you, but it has some accidental effect on other people who werent involved in the trade.

Suppose for example that I sell my house to an amateur wasp farmer. Only hes not a very good wasp farmer, so his wasps usually get loose and sting people all over the neighborhood every couple of days.

This trade between the wasp farmer and myself has benefited both of us, but its harmed people who werent consulted; namely, my neighbors, who are now locked indoors clutching cans of industrial-strength insect repellent. Although the trade was voluntary for both the wasp farmer and myself, it wasnt voluntary for my neighbors.

Another example of externalities would be a widget factory that spews carcinogenic chemicals into the air. When I trade with the widget factory Im benefiting I get widgets and theyre benefiting they get money. But the people who breathe in the carcinogenic chemicals werent consulted in the trade.

1.2: But arent there are libertarian ways to solve externalities that dont involve the use of force?

To some degree, yes. You can, for example, refuse to move into any neighborhood unless everyone in town has signed a contract agreeing not to raise wasps on their property.

But getting every single person in a town of thousands of people to sign a contract every time you think of something else you want banned might be a little difficult. More likely, you would want everyone in town to unanimously agree to a contract saying that certain things, which could be decided by some procedure requiring less than unanimity, could be banned from the neighborhood sort of like the existing concept of neighborhood associations.

But convincing every single person in a town of thousands to join the neighborhood association would be near impossible, and all it would take would be a single holdout who starts raising wasps and all your work is useless. Better, perhaps, to start a new town on your own land with a pre-existing agreement that before youre allowed to move in you must belong to the association and follow its rules. You could even collect dues from the members of this agreement to help pay for the people youd need to enforce it.

But in this case, youre not coming up with a clever libertarian way around government, youre just reinventing the concept of government. Theres no difference between a town where to live there you have to agree to follow certain terms decided by association members following some procedure, pay dues, and suffer the consequences if you break the rules and a regular town with a regular civic government.

As far as I know there is no loophole-free way to protect a community against externalities besides government and things that are functionally identical to it.

1.3: Couldnt consumers boycott any company that causes externalities?

Only a small proportion of the people buying from a company will live near the companys factory, so this assumes a colossal amount of both knowledge and altruism on the part of most consumers. See also the general discussion of why boycotts almost never solve problems in the next session.

1.4: What is the significance of externalities?

They justify some environmental, zoning, and property use regulations.

2. Coordination Problems

2.1: What are coordination problems?

Coordination problems are cases in which everyone agrees that a certain action would be best, but the free market cannot coordinate them into taking that action.

As a thought experiment, lets consider aquaculture (fish farming) in a lake. Imagine a lake with a thousand identical fish farms owned by a thousand competing companies. Each fish farm earns a profit of $1000/month. For a while, all is well.

But each fish farm produces waste, which fouls the water in the lake. Lets say each fish farm produces enough pollution to lower productivity in the lake by $1/month.

A thousand fish farms produce enough waste to lower productivity by $1000/month, meaning none of the fish farms are making any money. Capitalism to the rescue: someone invents a complex filtering system that removes waste products. It costs $300/month to operate. All fish farms voluntarily install it, the pollution ends, and the fish farms are now making a profit of $700/month still a respectable sum.

But one farmer (lets call him Steve) gets tired of spending the money to operate his filter. Now one fish farm worth of waste is polluting the lake, lowering productivity by $1. Steve earns $999 profit, and everyone else earns $699 profit.

Everyone else sees Steve is much more profitable than they are, because hes not spending the maintenance costs on his filter. They disconnect their filters too.

Once four hundred people disconnect their filters, Steve is earning $600/month less than he would be if he and everyone else had kept their filters on! And the poor virtuous filter users are only making $300. Steve goes around to everyone, saying Wait! We all need to make a voluntary pact to use filters! Otherwise, everyones productivity goes down.

Everyone agrees with him, and they all sign the Filter Pact, except one person who is sort of a jerk. Lets call him Mike. Now everyone is back using filters again, except Mike. Mike earns $999/month, and everyone else earns $699/month. Slowly, people start thinking they too should be getting big bucks like Mike, and disconnect their filter for $300 extra profit

A self-interested person never has any incentive to use a filter. A self-interested person has some incentive to sign a pact to make everyone use a filter, but in many cases has a stronger incentive to wait for everyone else to sign such a pact but opt out himself. This can lead to an undesirable equilibrium in which no one will sign such a pact.

The most profitable solution to this problem is for Steve to declare himself King of the Lake and threaten to initiate force against anyone who doesnt use a filter. This regulatory solution leads to greater total productivity for the thousand fish farms than a free market could.

The classic libertarian solution to this problem is to try to find a way to privatize the shared resource (in this case, the lake). I intentionally chose aquaculture for this example because privatization doesnt work. Even after the entire lake has been divided into parcels and sold to private landowners (waterowners?) the problem remains, since waste will spread from one parcel to another regardless of property boundaries.

2.1.1: Even without anyone declaring himself King of the Lake, the fish farmers would voluntarily agree to abide by the pact that benefits everyone.

Empirically, no. This situation happens with wild fisheries all the time. Theres some population of cod or salmon or something which will be self-sustaining as long as its not overfished. Fishermen come in and catch as many fish as they can, overfishing it. Environmentalists warn that the fishery is going to collapse. Fishermen find this worrying, but none of them want to fish less because then their competitors will just take up the slack. Then the fishery collapses and everyone goes out of business. The most famous example is the Collapse of the Northern Cod Fishery, but there are many others in various oceans, lakes, and rivers.

If not for resistance to government regulation, the Canadian governments could have set strict fishing quotas, and companies could still be profitably fishing the area today. Other fisheries that do have government-imposed quotas are much more successful.

2.1.2: I bet [extremely complex privatization scheme that takes into account the ability of cod to move across property boundaries and the migration patterns of cod and so on] could have saved the Atlantic cod too.

Maybe, but left to their own devices, cod fishermen never implemented or recommended that scheme. If we ban all government regulation in the environment, that wont make fishermen suddenly start implementing complex privatization schemes that theyve never implemented before. It will just make fishermen keep doing what theyre doing while tying the hands of the one organization that has a track record of actually solving this sort of problem in the real world.

2.2: How do coordination problems justify environmental regulations?

Consider the process of trying to stop global warming. If everyone believes in global warming and wants to stop it, its still not in any one persons self-interest to be more environmentally conscious. After all, that would make a major impact on her quality of life, but a negligible difference to overall worldwide temperatures. If everyone acts only in their self-interest, then no one will act against global warming, even though stopping global warming is in everyones self-interest. However, everyone would support the institution of a government that uses force to make everyone more environmentally conscious.

Notice how well this explains reality. The government of every major country has publicly declared that they think solving global warming is a high priority, but every time they meet in Kyoto or Copenhagen or Bangkok for one of their big conferences, the developed countries would rather the developing countries shoulder the burden, the developing countries would rather the developed countries do the hard work, and so nothing ever gets done.

The same applies mutans mutandis to other environmental issues like the ozone layer, recycling, and anything else where one person cannot make a major difference but many people acting together can.

2.3: How do coordination problems justify regulation of ethical business practices?

The normal libertarian belief is that it is unnecessary for government to regulate ethical business practices. After all, if people object to something a business is doing, they will boycott that business, either incentivizing the business to change its ways, or driving them into well-deserved bankruptcy. And if people dont object, then theres no problem and the government shouldnt intervene.

A close consideration of coordination problems demolishes this argument. Lets say Wandas Widgets has one million customers. Each customer pays it $100 per year, for a total income of $100 million. Each customer prefers Wanda to her competitor Wayland, who charges $150 for widgets of equal quality. Now lets say Wandas Widgets does some unspeakably horrible act which makes it $10 million per year, but offends every one of its million customers.

There is no incentive for a single customer to boycott Wandas Widgets. After all, that customers boycott will cost the customer $50 (she will have to switch to Wayland) and make an insignificant difference to Wanda (who is still earning $99,999,900 of her original hundred million). The customer takes significant inconvenience, and Wanda neither cares nor stops doing her unspeakably horrible act (after all, its giving her $10 million per year, and only losing her $100).

The only reason it would be in a customers interests to boycott is if she believed over a hundred thousand other customers would join her. In that case, the boycott would be costing Wanda more than the $10 million she gains from her unspeakably horrible act, and its now in her self-interest to stop committing the act. However, unless each boycotter believes 99,999 others will join her, she is inconveniencing herself for no benefit.

Furthermore, if a customer offended by Wandas actions believes 100,000 others will boycott Wanda, then its in the customers self-interest to defect from the boycott and buy Wandas products. After all, the customer will lose money if she buys Waylands more expensive widgets, and this is unnecessary the 100,000 other boycotters will change Wandas mind with or without her participation.

This suggests a market failure of boycotts, which seems confirmed by experience. We know that, despite many companies doing very controversial things, there have been very few successful boycotts. Indeed, few boycotts, successful or otherwise, ever make the news, and the number of successful boycotts seems much less than the amount of outrage expressed at companies actions.

The existence of government regulation solves this problem nicely. If >51% of people disagree with Wandas unspeakably horrible act, they dont need to waste time and money guessing how many of them will join in a boycott, and they dont need to worry about being unable to conscript enough defectors to reach critical mass. They simply vote to pass a law banning the action.

2.3.1: Im not convinced that its really that hard to get a boycott going. If people really object to something, theyll start a boycott regardless of all that coordination problem stuff.

So, youre boycotting Coke because theyre hiring local death squads to kidnap, torture, and murder union members and organizers in their sweatshops in Colombia, right?

Not a lot of people to whom I have asked this question have ever answered yes. Most of them had never heard of the abuses before. A few of them vaguely remembered having heard something about it, but dismissed it as you know, multinational corporations do a lot of sketchy things. Ive only met one person whos ever gone so far as to walk twenty feet further to get to the Pepsi vending machine.

If you went up to a random guy on the street and said Hey, does hiring death squads to torture and kill Colombians who protest about terrible working conditions bother you? 99.9% of people would say yes. So why the disconnect between words and actions? People could just be lying they could say they cared so they sounded compassionate, but in reality it doesnt really bother them.

But maybe its something more complicated. Perhaps they dont have the brainpower to keep track of every single corporation thats doing bad things and just how bad they are. Perhaps theyve compartmentalized their lives and after they leave their Amnesty meetings it just doesnt register that they should change their behaviour in the supermarket. Or perhaps the Coke = evil connection is too tenuous and against the brains ingrained laws of thought to stay relevant without expending extraordinary amounts of willpower. Or perhaps theres some part of the subconscious that really is worry about that game theory and figuring it has no personal incentive to join the boycott.

See the article here:

[REPOST] The Non-Libertarian FAQ | Slate Star Codex

Ethereum Price Forecast: Even JPMorgan Isn’t Sure What Happens Next

Ethereum News Update
Reports surfaced on Friday that JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) is thinking of spinning off its "Quorum" blockchain division into a separate company. Is this good for cryptocurrencies like Ethereum? Is it bad?

Let’s take a closer look…

Quorum is JPMorgan’s attempt to build a blockchain. You can think of it as a corporate version of Ethereum, with the noticeable difference being that Quorum is a permissioned blockchain and Ethereum is not. This subtle difference limits innovation on Quorum by dictating who can or cannot write to its blockchain.

JPMorgan is “still in the early days” of making this decision, but according.

The post Ethereum Price Forecast: Even JPMorgan Isn’t Sure What Happens Next appeared first on Profit Confidential.

Go here to see the original:
Ethereum Price Forecast: Even JPMorgan Isn’t Sure What Happens Next

What is Social Darwinism

QUESTION: What is Social Darwinism?

ANSWER:

Herbert Spencer, a 19th century philosopher, promoted the idea of Social Darwinism. Social Darwinism is an application of the theory of natural selection to social, political, and economic issues. In its simplest form, Social Darwinism follows the mantra of "the strong survive," including human issues. This theory was used to promote the idea that the white European race was superior to others, and therefore, destined to rule over them.

At the time that Spencer began to promote Social Darwinism, the technology, economy, and government of the "White European" was advanced in comparison to that of other cultures. Looking at this apparent advantage, as well as the economic and military structures, some argued that natural selection was playing out, and that the race more suited to survival was winning. Some even extended this philosophy into a micro-economic issue, claiming that social welfare programs that helped the poor and disadvantaged were contrary to nature itself. Those who reject any and all forms of charity or governmental welfare often use arguments rooted in Social Darwinism.

At its worst, the implications of Social Darwinism were used as scientific justification for the Holocaust. The Nazis claimed that the murder of Jews in World War II was an example of cleaning out the inferior genetics. Many philosophers noted evolutionary echoes in Hitler's march to exterminate an entire race of people. Various other dictators and criminals have claimed the cause of Social Darwinism in carrying out their acts. Even without such actions, Social Darwinism has proven to be a false and dangerous philosophy.

Scientists and evolutionists maintain that this interpretation is only loosely based on Darwin's theory of natural selection. They will admit to an obvious parallel between Darwin's theory of Natural Selection and Spencer's beliefs. In nature, the strong survive and those best suited to survival will out-live the weak. According to Social Darwinism, those with strength (economic, physical, technological) flourish and those without are destined for extinction.

It is important to note that Darwin did not extend his theories to a social or economic level, nor are any credible evolutionists subscribing to the theories of Social Darwinism. Herbert Spencer's philosophy is only loosely based on the premises of Darwin's work.

However, according to evolutionary theory, nature is a "kill-or-be-killed" system. Those that cannot keep up are either left behind or cut off. If evolution, through chance, is solely responsible for life as we now know it, why should that process be countered? If "survival of the fittest" or "kill or be killed" cannot apply in what we define as "decent society," then, which is wrong, society or evolution? If neither, then how do we explain morality, charity, and compassion? Why drain resources from the strong to support the weak? Certainly, we should be charitable and help those in need.

Though Darwin did not promote Social Darwinism, basic evolutionary theory raises some nagging questions.

What is your response?

Yes, today I am deciding to follow Jesus

Yes, I am already a follower of Jesus

I still have questions

Original post:

What is Social Darwinism

Air Seychelles – Check out our great Global fares to …

From * - Select -Abu Dhabi (AUH), UAEAhmedabad (AMD), IndiaAl Ain (AAN), UAEAmman (AMM), JordanAmsterdam (AMS), NetherlandsAntananarivo (TNR), MadagascarAthens (ATH), GreeceBahrain (BAH), BahrainBangalore (BLR), IndiaBangkok (BKK), ThailandBeijing (PEK), ChinaBelgrade (BEG), SerbiaBerlin (TXL), GermanyBologna (BLQ), ItalyBordeaux (BOD), FranceBrisbane (BNE), AustraliaBrussels (BRU), BelgiumCairo (CAI), EgyptCape Town (CPT), South AfricaCasablanca (CMN), MoroccoChennai (MAA), IndiaChicago IL (ORD), United StatesColombo (CMB), Sri LankaCopenhagen (CPH), DenmarkDallas TX (DFW), United StatesDammam (DMM), Saudi ArabiaDubai (XNB), UAEDublin (DUB), IrelandDurban (DUR), South AfricaDsseldorf (DUS), GermanyEast London (ELS), South AfricaEdinburgh (EDI), United KingdomEntebbe (EBB), UgandaFlorence (FLR), ItalyFrankfurt (FRA), GermanyGeneva (GVA), SwitzerlandGenoa (GOA), ItalyHo Chi Minh City (SGN), VietnamHong Kong (HKG), Hong KongHyderabad (HYD), IndiaIstanbul (IST), TurkeyJaipur (JAI), IndiaJeddah (JED), Saudi ArabiaJohannesburg (JNB), South AfricaKochi (COK), IndiaKolkata (CCU), IndiaKuwait (KWI), KuwaitLondon (LHR), United KingdomLos Angeles CA (LAX), United StatesLyon (LYS), FranceMadrid (MAD), SpainMahe, Seychelles (SEZ), SeychellesManchester (MAN), United KingdomMarseille (MRS), FranceMauritius (MRU), MauritiusMelbourne (MEL), AustraliaMilan (MXP), ItalyMontpellier (MPL), FranceMoscow (DME), RussiaMumbai (BOM), IndiaMunich (MUC), GermanyMuscat (MCT), OmanNagoya (NGO), JapanNarita (NRT), JapanNew Delhi (DEL), IndiaNew York (JFK), United StatesNice (NCE), FrancePalermo (PMO), ItalyParis (CDG), FrancePerth (PER), AustraliaPort Elizabeth (PLZ), South AfricaPraslin (PRI), SeychellesRabat (RBA), MoroccoRiyadh (RUH), Saudi ArabiaRome (FCO), ItalySan Francisco CA (SFO), United StatesSao Paulo (GRU), BrazilSeoul (ICN), South KoreaSingapore (SIN), SingaporeStockholm (ARN), SwedenSydney (SYD), AustraliaThiruvananthapuram (TRV), IndiaToulouse (TLS), FranceTurin (TRN), ItalyVenice (VCE), ItalyVienna (VIE), AustriaWashington DC (IAD), United StatesZurich (ZRH), Switzerland

Are all the passengers residents?

Promo code

See the original post:

Air Seychelles - Check out our great Global fares to ...

Cryptocurrency Market How To Create Life Changing …

ATTENTION! Investors,Traders,Hedge Funds, Private Portfolio Managers, Professional Athletes, & Housewife Investors Who WantTo Make Life Changing ProfitsIn Cryptocurrency Investing! Finally, The Ultimate, Most Complete,& Highly Anticipated

In 2012, I discovered the bitcoin whitepaper while working at an energy brokerage firm that operated a bitcoin mining farm. I did not understand the computer math and coding in the whitepaper so I asked my good friendLeon Fu Dot Com (we call him that because he is a professional software engineer and a real nerdy techie) to help me verify that bitcoin really works.

Leon Fu Dot Com started investing in bitcoins and litecoins after reading the whitepaper and immediately made some really nice profits so that encouraged me to start investing in bitcoins as well. We realized it was like the internet dot com boom of the 1990s again and we wanted to get an early mover advantage to make some massive Life Changing Profits!

2. How did you learn to invest in cryptocurrencies?

Leon Fu Dot Com had dabbled instocks and options investing and I had experience in trading stocks, futures and the forex markets so we thought we had an advantage when we first started to invest in cryptocurrencies (aka, cryptos). We were totally wrong andgot slaughtered in 2013! We made a ton of ugly, reckless, & bonehead mistakes and almost lost everything and gave up on crypto but we had never seen an asset in human history grow over 1,000,000%before like bitcoin so we were determined not to give up!!!

Plus, we were passionately motivated to leave our 9 to 5 job and stop working for the man and be a slave to the almighty alarm clock again because working for an hourly wage was NOT the recipe to making Life Changing Moneyso wepushed ourselves to figure it out and learn from our past mistakes & failures which led us tosome BIG breakthroughs including:

Certain traditional investing strategies that worked in the stock marketwould cause you to lose bucket loads of money in crypto! Certain traditional investing strategiesworked amazingly better than others. Certain cryptos such as Ethereum displayed very obvious traits of success long before they became a big hit. Even better we noticed that when you combine certain investing strategies, it dramatically increased your profits!

After carefully analyzing our successes and failures, Leon Fu Dot Com and Icame across a HUGE game changer & discovered that there were 5 common traits to all the cryptocurrencies that hit it big like Ethereum, NEO, Cardano, Decred, etc.

Westarted to share our crypto insights and discoveries on YouTube and others started to follow and havetremendous success as well. Before you know it, we started to get thousands of newsubscribers and a flood of requests for us to teach what we know about cryptocurrency investing to others.

We never expected random strangers from around the world to contact us and ask us to invest their money for themafter watching us on YouTube so we had to respectfully decline everyones requests to manage their money sincewe are NOT licensed financial advisors. Afterwards, we started getting requests from viewers asking us to teach them privatelyabout cryptocurrency investing but we did nottake it seriously because we genuinely thought they were just joking around or trolling (harassing) us. However, after talking toseveral viewers who contacted us privately to seek coaching & mentoring, we started to realize that our viewers requests to teach them our crypto investing system and methodologies werereal and that is how we created theCryptocurrency Investing Bootcamp.

We did not realize that there were thousands of beginning,uneducated and uninformed crypto investors out there who were struggling to figure out cryptocurrency investinglike we did. Therefore, dont be frustrated if you are struggling with cryptocurrency investing because you are NOT alone! Its NOT just you! Our advice is to get properly educated so you cantake advantage of the Life Changing Profit potential in cryptocurrency investing before it becomes mainstream in 2-3 years and there is no opportunities left to make Life Changing Money anymore.

Absolutely we have proof that our system works! We have a firm belief that documentation trumps conversation! Let me show you the documentation (proof)so you can see that its not just all conversation.

PROOF #1 Here is a video documenting how Leon Fu Dot Com clearly predicted that Factom will reach $3.50 back when it was still only trading at a low of $1.20:

Factom exploded over 3,000% (30X) in growthfrom $1.20 to a high of $36.32 on June 23, 2017 just 15 months after we released the video price prediction above on April 13, 2016:

PROOF #2 Using the analysis strategies we teach in the bootcamp, Leon Fu Dot Com made an assessment that buyingEthereum Classic (ETC) in March 2017 was a better potential for profit than Ethereum (ETH) and it turned out to be true because ETC went up 327% (3X)while ETH only moved up 136%.

PROOF #3 Based on my analysis of bitcoin in Oct 2016 I suggested bitcoin was at a good buy level which grew a phenomenal 882% of Life Changing Profits in just 1 year!

PROOF #4Some folks missed the bitcoin buying opportunity I previously mentioned so I identified another opportunity for everyone which yielded a whopping 182% of Life Changing Profits in just 5 months:

PROOF #5Here is another tweet & chart documenting my analysis of Monero which resulted in a quick 1,226% of Life Changing Profits in just 10 months:

As you can see, this is just a small sample documentation to show that our crypto investing strategies work and that we are not just all conversation.

The Cryptocurrency Investing Bootcamp is a private, 4 day, hands on comprehensive crypto investing workshop whereLeon Fu Dot Com and I will personally hold your hand and teach you everything we know about how to get started and show you the best methods we know to reduce your risk and increase your potential to be a consistently profitable cryptocurrency investorby showing youexactly how to find the potentially profitable cryptocurrencies that will give you the highest potential to make Life Changing Profits. There will be lots of hands on practice so that we can check to make sure you do it correctly in front of us before you go home and safely do it on your own portfolio.

How to eliminate the 3 mental barriers to crypto investing success. The crypto investors worth following online. The 10 key advantages of investing in cryptos vs. traditional investing. The 7 key disadvantages of investing in cryptos vs. traditional investing. 9 stupid & silly myths that dont make you money in crypto investing. The 8 common traits of successful cryptocurrency investors. The 5 key components of the Cryptocurrency Investing Bootcamp that makes it different from any other program. How to AVOID these bonehead mistakes that cost us over $500k! The 6 foolproof ways to shortcut your way to crypto investing success. The 4 essential secrets to learning cryptocurrency investing fast!

How to choose the appropriate brand of computer for crypto trading/investing. How to select the appropriate RAM, Solid State Drive, CPU, hard drive connector, monitors, & necessary computer hardware for crypto investing, mining, & staking. How to choose thecorrect computer softwares such as operating systems, screenshot softwares, spreadsheets, etc. needed for crypto investing. Where to buy your computers & monitors to get the most value for your money.

How to choose the right cryptowallet based on your needs. How to choose the right cryptowallet based on your computing device. The 4 critical components to safely store & secure your cryptos. How to use a password manager to protect your crypto passwords. How to use two factor authentication to secure your cryptos. How to safely send & receive your first cryptos & NOT lose them. How to send and receive cryptos from another person. How to send and receive cryptos from an exchange. How to send and receive any crypto from anyone or anywhere.

The 5 types of crypto exchanges that every investor MUST use. The 5 criteria for selecting a good cryptocurrency exchange. How to set up a new cryptocurrency trading account. How to connect your bank account to your crypto account. How to test your new crypto account.

How to set up your cryptocurrency price charts & watchlists. How to choose & submit the correct BUY and SELL orders to get your orders filled correctly and not get slipped. Howto quickly get in and out of a trade during a fast moving market using a Hybrid Market Limit order. How to create automated set & forget BUY & SELL orders that will automatically buy or sell your cryptos for you even when you are asleep or away from your computer so that your crypto investments are protected. How to put in stop loss orders to protect your investments.

You will learn the traditional trading & investing tools that :

Work very well in the cryptocurrency market, Do NOT work very well in the cryptocurrency market, Needs to be avoided like the plague, or Needs to be modified to work effectively in the crypto market.

You will also learn the new and astonishing crypto analytical tools that we developed specifically just for the cryptocurrency market to help you:

Easily find low risk ENTRIES that minimize your risk & gives you an edge over everyone else as well as Effortlessly calculate high probability EXITS that gives you an unfair profit advantage.

You will learn how to systematically filter & tune out the market noise from hundreds of cryptocurrencies screaming for attention & choose the highest probability cryptocurrencies with the lowest risk and highest potential to generate massive Wall Street like profits by understanding the 5 Key Traits of a Profitable Cryptocurrency. This module is designed to pull you away from the blind, ignorant, uneducated, emotional & predictable, sheep like, herd like mentality of amateur crypto investors and place you in the realm of an educated, & systematic crypto investor who knows how to invest and make Life Changing Profits like the big boys on Wall Street. You will learn The VC MAN Method that we developed through trial and error that allows you to systematically identify the legitimate and A Gradecryptocurrencies worth investing in (that are not scams) by identifying the 5 Key Traits of a Profitable Cryptocurrency.

You will learn some highly effective & battle tested cryptocurrency investing strategies that you can constantly use over and over to generate potentially HUGE PROFITS because they have been proven to be consistently profitable! You will the difference between mining, staking, short term trading, long term trading, etc. Also, you will learn the silly crypto investing strategies that are highly discussed & debated in the crypto forums & troll boxes and appear to be very enticing, lucrative and profitable on the surface but do not really make you any money, creates a lot of frustration, will lose you a ton of money and just a plain waste of your time & capital. You want to AVOID these nasty & unprofitable crypto investing strategies at all cost! After the training in this module, you will have a proven, systematic, effective & potentially profitable, ready to go set of cryptocurrency strategies in your investing toolbox so you no longer have to waste time on the internet searching for gimmicky & unproven investing strategies during your bedtime and waste time wondering if they will work or not.

You will learn from our experience when is the best time to get in a trade to drastically reduce your risk using our proprietary & simple to learn, 4 StepEntry Method so that you have a methodical, consistent, and easy to understand approach to enter the market so that its not a guessing game. Learnhow to be precise & confident with your ENTRIES so you dont have to depend on others to figure it out for you. After the training, you will no longer need to ask annoying questions like, WHEN do I get in? or WHERE do I get in? anymore. Basically, you will be able to discover a goldmine of investment opportunities.

You will learn how much of your money you should invest into each cryptocurrency. In gambling terms, it is basically asking, WHAT is the correct bet size? Do you invest 100%, 50%, 10%, etc. of your portfolio on one crypto or do you spread it out across several cryptos? In other words, how much of your portfolio should be allocated to bitcoin, ethereum or a new and unproven crypto? We created an easy to use and easy to understand TaiFu RiskMatrix that automatically calculates your correct bet size based on your a) experience level and b) how much money you are working with. We lost a ton of money to field test the TaiFu Risk Matrix and well share it with you at the bootcamp so it will completely eliminate any guesswork for you when when you need to calculate how much risk you should take in an A-Grade, B-Grade, or C-Grade crypto.

You will learn to identify the 2 nasty market leeches in cryptocurrency investing that quickly suck & drain the money out of your account leaving you broke & clueless as to what just happened to my investing account?! (NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO THESE 2 VICIOUS MARKET LEECHES INCLUDING YOU! They sucked my account dry multiple times when I first got into trading! and it was nasty!) You will learn the 3 powerful investing shields that you can use to prevent these two nasty Market Leeches from draining money out of your accountbefore you even have a chance to make a profit! You will also learn how to properly exit a trade in the RIGHT way that will allow you to be profitable in cryptocurrency investing even when you are wrong on over 66% of your cryptocurrency picks! Imagine being RIGHT less than 34%of the time in your crypto investing and still be profitable! (This means you do not have to be RIGHT all the time to make money in crypto investing!) The beauty of these 3 powerful investing shields is that they are arithmetic based, easy to calculate (no calculator needed), requires very little booksmarts, and very easy to implement after you learn them.

You will learn how to systematically diagnose your crypto investing system to:

Troubleshoot whats causing your crypto investing system to be profitable so that you can CONTINUE doing it. Troubleshoot whats causing your crypto investing system to be unprofitable so that you can STOP doing it.

Our previous students consider this module to be the MOST CRITICAL component to cryptocurrency investing success & worth the bootcamp registration fee alone! Nothing is more annoying then putting your hard earned money to work for you and youre not making money and you dont even know WHY? This module is designed to troubleshoot and diagnose your cryptocurrency investing system to see why its not making you money. NOTICE: WE PROMISE YOU WILL NOT LEARN THIS SECTION ABOUT TRADING DIAGNOSTICS ANYWHERE ELSE! IF YOU DID IT WAS

PROBABLY FROM ONE OF OUR PREVIOUS BOOTCAMP ATTENDEES OR THEY STOLE IT FROM US!

How to legally pay the least amount of taxes on your crypto profits. How to calculate your potential tax liability before making a trade or investment. How to understand crypto tax guidelines. How to qualify your CPA to make sure they understand cryptotaxes. How to invest in cryptos in your retirement accounts. How to guesstimate your crypto taxes. How to record and document your crypto investments for tax purposes. Understanding Ordinary Income vs. Short & Long Term Capital Gains What is a 1031 Like For Like Exchange? Tax jurisdictions that are favorable to crypto traders and investors. Our analysis of the Puerto Rico tax benefits to crypto traders and investors.

You will be reviewed and tested to make sure you can clearlyperform the 6 key components of safe & successful crypto investing. Therefore, you will berequired todemonstrate that youcan clearly perform the following tasks:

1. You know how to confidently FIND CRYPTOSwith a high potential for Wall Street like profits.2. You know how to select the APPROPRIATE INVESTING STRATEGYfrom your strategy toolbox.3. You know how to identify a potentialLOW RISK ENTRY PRICE.4. You know how to correctly calculate the BET SIZE for each investment.5. You know how calculate your EXIT PRICE when you are wrong and when you need to take profits so its not a mystery.6. You know to how toDIAGNOSE your crypto portfolio and identify a) what is MISSING from your crypto investing system, or b) what needs to IMPROVE in your current crypto investing system.

You will learn how to access your monthly online follow ups to make sure you get continual training, new tools, & security updates, etc. since the crypto investing landscape changes very rapidly. Bootcamp summary & wrap up. Final bootcamp Q&A. Whats the next steps?

The TOTAL VALUE of the Cryptocurrency Investing Bootcamp is$95,930!

Obviously, the Cryptocurrency Investing Bootcamp is NOT a good fit for everyone

If you would rather struggle WORKING HARDandlose your hard earned moneyto figure it out on your own instead of learning to do it RIGHT from a team of grizzled & experienced crypto investors (like Leon Fu Dot Com and Tai Zen) who have already crossed the minefield of crypto investing terror then this bootcamp is NOT a good fit for you. If you have a tendency to be negative, stubborn, whine, bitch, complain, & youre difficult to work with, always want to be right, or blame outside circumstances for your results then this bootcamp is NOT a good fit for you. If you are NOT willing to be TEACHABLE, COACHABLE, TRANSPARENT & be held ACCOUNTABLE and would rather stay right where you are, instead of investing in skills that could potential help you make Life Changing Money FAST in crypto then this bootcamp is NOT a good fit for you. If you plan to sit on your butt and do absolutely nothing and you are NOT interested in doing the RIGHT action steps we show you that are necessary to REALLY Make it Happen! and give yourself a chance to possibly create Life Changing Money then dont bother registering for the bootcamp because its not the right fit for you. If you can IDENTIFYthe cryptos that can potentially create Life Changing Profits & already know the RIGHTTECHNICAL ANALYSIS TOOLSto identifyWHENto get IN and OUT then you dont need our bootcamp. If you dont believe there is a massive opportunity to create Life ChangingProfits in crypto investing as an early bird investor and alreadyhappy with makinga tiny1-10% profit in traditional stock investing then our bootcamp is not the right fit for you. If you have a spouse that doesnt UNDERSTAND the Life Changing Opportunities available in crypto investing and thinks you are wasting your money instead of seeing this bootcamp as an INVESTMENT in yourself & will be calling us up to nag, yell, bitch and complain about you attending our high value bootcamp then this bootcamp is NOT for you. Obviously, if you have to use your grocery or rent money to register for the bootcamp then this is not the right time for you. please come back later. Also, if you do not know how to: a) turn on a computer b) operate a computer mouse c) operate multiple windows on a computer d) search for a website on a browser, PLEASE DO NOT REGISTER FOR OUR BOOTCAMP! because we will REFUND you immediately the minute we find out you do not know how to use a computer! This is NOT a joke! Lastly, if your name happens to be Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, Michael Dell, Donald Trump, Satoshi Nakamoto or Vitalik Buterin, you probably wont even need the Cryptocurrency Investing Bootcamp!

On the other hand

If you have the burning desire to make Life Changing Money Faster Than You Ever Have and SICK & TIRED of struggling to figure things out alone & listening to bullshit from people who dont make a living from crypto investing then this bootcamp is a perfect fit for you. If you would like to have multi-millionaire crypto traders like Leon Fu Dot Com, myself (two of the most popular & trusted crypto investors online) and our team in your corner, holding your hand, & show you how we made Life Changing Money in crypto & quit our jobs & retired early then this bootcamp is a perfect fit for you. If you would like to spend 4 full days, in person, with Leon Fu Dot Com, myself and our team in a PRIVATE and INTIMATE setting and have us help you with any & ALL aspects of crypto investing followed by 1 FULL YEARof follow up & technical support then this bootcamp is really your ONLY choice! If youd like to be a part of a crypto investing Family where you get to meet AWESOME PEOPLE, create AMAZING friendships for life, who become LIFELONG & SUPPORTER then this bootcamp is a good fit for you. If you are DISGUSTEDwith the measly returns you are getting in your traditional stock investments and want to find opportunities in crypto that has a potential to make Wall Street like PROFITS then you definitely need to attend the bootcamp. If you realize you made some FAT PROFITS from investing in a random crypto such as Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, Factom, Monero, Dash, Stratis, NEO, Verge, Decred, Cardano, etc. off of pure luck and you want to hit it big again using REAL investing SKILLS only if you knew how to find the next big winner and not have to rely on luck again then be sure to register for the bootcamp immediately! If you want to GET RIDof the anxiety, nervousness, self-doubt, and FEAR of picking picking the wrong cryptocurrency and lose your hard earned money then dont think twice about it and register for the bootcamp today because its the perfect fit for you. If you are REGRETFUL that you didnt LOAD UP on certain cryptoswhen you had the opportunity because you were unsure or scared.. then register for the bootcamp now and dont wait.

Before you decide if theCryptocurrency Investing Bootcamp is for you or notI want to tell you why this program is vastly different from everything else thats ever been created on the topic of cryptocurrency investing.

Reason #1 This is the FIRST TIMEEVERthat a training program was designed specifically to help investors create Life Changing Profits and not just some EXTRAmoney or extra cash because we have not seen extra money make a significant change in anyones life.

Reason #2 This bootcampis co-created by the two highlyrecognized and world renowned multi-millionaire crypto investors on the internet (Tai Zen& Leon Fu Dot Com) who specialize in creating Life Changing Profits from cryptocurrency investing.

Reason #3 There will be no theorists or paper traders teaching the bootcamp! We have clearly documented all our crypto calls and picksBEFORE they happen on our YouTube channel for all to see, unlike many crypto investors who claim success after the fact.

Reason #4 This will be a condensed, high-impact, Best Of The Best, ground breaking, most comprehensive, step by step, crypto investing training of its kind andyou will have a complete A to Z method to systematically and effortlessly find potentially profitable cryptocurrencies, identify high probability entries, calculate the correct bet size, know when to get out if the investment goes against you, and know how to take profits when you are profitable so you are not scrambling around like a chicken with its head cut off asking your family and friends (who are uneducated about crypto) when to take profits.

Reason #5 We do not believe you should be in front of the computer all day making short term, in and out trades because that is no different than having a job working at home instead of at the office. After the bootcamp, you will learn how to PUT your money to WORK for YOU in the crypto market .

Reason #6 Its the first time that a program has ever been created SPECIFICALLY to help beginning & experienced crypto investors understand the true inner workings of the crypto market by two, highly experienced, multi-millionaire crypto traders.

There are plenty of bullshit investing tricks, gimmicks, magical softwares, paper trading techniques, investment advisors, newsletters, etc. that appear to work and if they did, you wouldnt be reading about our bootcamp right now.

If you want to be a consistently profitable crypto investor then youre going to have to becomean educated crypto investor and learn some REAL crypto investing SKILLS! We believe the more you learn, the more you earn and I seriously doubt you willfind anything else on the market that remotely comes CLOSE to the same level of high caliber training as our bootcamp!

This will be a private, intimate, and very hands on training bootcamp witha 40 Seat Limit! We only want a small number of students so thatwe have plenty of time to personally work with everyone during the bootcamp and the 1 year follow up.

The tuition for the Cryptocurrency Investing Bootcamp is $25,000.

You can register for the bootcamp using any cryptocurrency that trades over $1 million in volume per day according to http://www.CoinMarketCap.com. If you want to register using a crypto that trades less than $1 million per day, please email me at Tai@Cryptocurrency.Market and we can discuss it.

YES, there is a guarantee, if after attending the 1st day, you feel that Leon Fu Dot Com and I did not deliver on what is promised on this website, you can choose to turn in your materials and ask for a full 100% REFUND and youll get it (just make sure you have your crypto address handy because we will ONLY refund the cryptos back to the originalcrypto address).

Now theres no excuse for not attending. If youre serious about learning how we made Life Changing Money in crypto, then register ASAP before the limited number of seats are filled. Once the 40 seats are filled, the bootcamp registration will beclosed!

DURING the bootcamp you will receive:

1. Cryptocurrency Investing BootcampTraining Manual Version 2.0 ($995 value)2. 4 Days of Hands On Training With Tai Zen & Leon Fu Dot Com ($92,930 value)3. 2 Hardware Wallets To Store Your Cryptos Offline ($150 value)4. 115 Dell Latitude Business Class Laptop For Trading, Storing & Transferring Cryptos ($1,200 value)5. 115 Dell Latitude Business Class Laptop For Staking & Masternode Investing ($1,200 value)6. TaiFu Crypto Diagnostics Trade Log ($995 Value)

AFTER the bootcamp you will receive:

1. 90 Min Monthly Online Q&A Sessions Once A Month To Keep You On Track ($5,970 Value)2. Emergency Coaching Sessions When There Is A Major Crypto Security Alert (Online) ($5,970 Value)3. Cryptocurrency Investing Bootcamp Home Study Course ($15,960 value)4. Complimentary Access to the TaiFu Indexes for personal use only when it becomes available. ($995 Value)5. Complimentary Access to the TaiFu Portfolio Tracker for personal use only when it becomes available. ($995 Value)6. TaiFu Private Group Chat

Step #1 Click on the link below to register for the bootcamp:Click Here To Secure Your Bootcamp Seat Now!

Step #2 Pay your Bootcamp registration fee. We use Coinbase to process all Bootcamp registration fees. If you like to register for the Bootcamp using a different crypto please email me at Tai@Cryptocurrency.Marketwith your a) full name b) city, country c) phone number and a good time to call you so I can help you process the payment over skype.

Step #3 Book your flight & hotel for the Bootcamp using the hotel info we provide you.

Step #4 Complete the required computer security setup before attending the bootcamp.

If you have any questions about the Bootcamp registration process, please call our office at: (214) 233-6316 and ask for Tai.

None of the following subscribers have been paid by us to make the following comments. All they got from us was solid cryptocurrency investing knowledge!

Read more from the original source:

Cryptocurrency Market How To Create Life Changing ...

Democrat suggests ‘Second Amendment’ remedy vs. Trump …

A New York Democratic congressman is being accused of promoting violence against President Trump after suggesting during a town hall that citizens may have to take up arms against the president if he doesnt follow the law.

I mean, this is where the Second Amendment comes in quite frankly, because you know, what if the president was to ignore the courts? What would you do? What would we do? Rep. Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y., said during a March 12 Q&A session with constituents in Huntington, on Long Island.

Its really a matter of putting public pressure on the president, he said.

The exchange was captured on a Facebook Live stream.

New York Democratic Rep. Tom Suozzi made the "Second Amendment" comment about Trump during a March 12 town hall meeting.(Screengrab from Facebook Live video)

After Suozzi referenced the Second Amendment, a constituent asked him to explain the amendment.

The Second Amendment is the right to bear arms, the Democrat said. Thats why we have it.

Republicans are accusing Suozzi of promoting violence.

"I mean, this is where the Second Amendment comes in quite frankly," said New York Democratic Rep. Tom Suozzi.

"When resistance and obstruction don't work out, Tom Suozzi proposes violence, National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman Chris Martin said in a statement. He's completely out of touch."

A spokesperson for Suozzi denied that the congressman was calling for "armed insurrection" against Trump.

Taking a page from such great Americans as Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, Congressman Suozzi explained why our founding fathers created the Second Amendment as a way for citizens to fight back against a tyrannical government that does not follow the rule of law,"senior adviser Kim Devlin said in a Monday statement to Fox News.

Devlin added: "To suggest his comments meant anything else or that he was advocating for an armed insurrection against the existing president is both irresponsible and ridiculous.

Suozzi made the comment about the Second Amendment when a constituent asked him a question about Trump and the United States constitutional system of checks and balances.

Suozzi predicted the issue could be going to the courts as well.

Suozzi, who served as Nassau County executive from 2002 to 2009, was elected to Congress in 2016 and is seeking re-election this fall.

Alex Pappas is a politics reporter at FoxNews.com. Follow him on Twitter at @AlexPappas.

Read the original:

Democrat suggests 'Second Amendment' remedy vs. Trump ...

Marshall Space Flight Center – Wikipedia

Coordinates: 343849N 864027W / 34.64688N 86.67416W / 34.64688; -86.67416

The George C. Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC), located in Huntsville, Alabama, is the U.S. government's civilian rocketry and spacecraft propulsion research center.[1] The largest NASA center, MSFC's first mission was developing the Saturn launch vehicles for the Apollo moon program. Marshall has been the agency's lead center for Space Shuttle propulsion and its external tank; payloads and related crew training; International Space Station (ISS) design and assembly; and computers, networks, and information management. Located on the Redstone Arsenal near Huntsville, Alabama, MSFC is named in honor of General of the Army George Marshall.

The center also contains the Huntsville Operations Support Center (HOSC), a facility that supports ISS launch, payload and experiment activities at the Kennedy Space Center. The HOSC also monitors rocket launches from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station when a Marshall Center payload is on board.

After the end of the war with Germany in May 1945, a program was initiated to bring to the United States a number of scientists and engineers who had been at the center of Germany's advanced military technologies. The largest and best-known activity was called Operation Paperclip. In August 1945, 127 missile specialists led by Wernher von Braun signed work contracts with the U.S. Army's Ordnance Corps. Most of them had worked on the V-2 missile development under von Braun at Peenemnde. Von Braun and the other Germans were sent to Fort Bliss, Texas, joining the Army's newly formed Research and Development Division Sub-office (Rocket).

For the next five years, von Braun and the German scientists and engineers were primarily engaged in adapting and improving the V-2 missile for U.S. applications; testing was conducted at nearby White Sands Proving Grounds, New Mexico. Von Braun had long had a great interest in rocketry for space science and exploration. Toward this, he was allowed to use a WAC Corporal rocket as a second stage for a V-2; the combination, called Bumper, reached a record-breaking 250 miles (400km) altitude.[2]

During World War II, the production and storage of ordnance shells was conducted by three arsenals nearby to Huntsville, Alabama. After the war, these were closed, and the three areas were combined to form Redstone Arsenal. In October 1948, the Chief of Ordnance designated Redstone Arsenal as the center of research and development activities in free-flight rockets and related items, and the following June, the Ordnance Rocket Center was opened. A year later, the Secretary of the Army approved the transfer of the rocket research and development activities from Fort Bliss to the new center at Redstone Arsenal. Beginning in April 1950, about 1,000 persons were involved in the transfer, including von Braun's group. At this time, R&D responsibility for guided missiles was added, and studies began on a medium-range guided missile that eventually became the Redstone rocket.

Over the next decade, the missile development on Redstone Arsenal greatly expanded. Many small free-flight and guided rockets were developed, and work on the Redstone rocket got underway. Although this rocket was primarily intended for military purposes, von Braun kept space firmly in his mind, and published a widely read article on this subject.[3] In mid-1952, the Germans who had initially worked under individual contracts were converted to civil service employees, and in 1954-55, most became U.S. citizens. Von Braun was appointed Chief of the Guided Missile Development Division.[4]

In September 1954, von Braun proposed using the Redstone as the main booster of a multi-stage rocket for launching artificial satellites. A year later, a study for Project Orbiter was completed, detailing plans and schedules for a series of scientific satellites. The Army's official role in the U.S. space satellite program was delayed, however, after higher authorities elected to use the Vanguard rocket then being developed by the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL).

In February 1956, the Army Ballistic Missile Agency (ABMA) was established; von Braun was the director of the Development Operations Division. One of the primary programs was a 1,500-mile (2,400km), single-stage missile that was started the previous year; intended for both the U.S. Army and U.S. Navy, this was designated the PGM-19 Jupiter. Guidance component testing for this Jupiter intermediate range ballistic missile (IRBM) began in March 1956 on a modified Redstone missile dubbed Jupiter A while re-entry vehicle testing began in September 1956 on a Redstone with spin-stabilized upper stages named Jupiter-C. The first Jupiter IRBM flight took place from Cape Canaveral in March 1957 with the first successful flight to full range on 31 May.[5] Jupiter was eventually taken over by the U.S. Air Force. The ABMA developed Jupiter-C was composed of a Redstone rocket first stage and two upper stages for RV tests or three upper stages for Explorer satellite launches. ABMA had originally planned the 20 September 1956 flight as a satellite launch but, by direct intervention of Eisenhower, was limited to the use of 2 upper stages for an RV test flight traveling 3,350 miles (5,390km) and attaining an altitude of 682 miles (1,098km). While the Jupiter C capability was such that it could have placed the fourth stage in orbit, that mission had been assigned to the NRL.[6][7] Later Jupiter-C flights would be used to launch satellites.

The Soviet Union launched Sputnik 1, the first man-made earth satellite, on October 4, 1957. This was followed on November 3 with the second satellite, Sputnik 2. The United States attempted a satellite launch on December 6, using the NRL's Vanguard rocket, but it barely struggled off the ground, then fell back and exploded. On January 31, 1958, after finally receiving permission to proceed, von Braun and the ABMA space development team used a Jupiter C in a Juno I configuration (addition of a fourth stage) to successfully place Explorer 1, the first American satellite, into orbit around the earth.

Effective at the end of March 1958, the U.S. Army Ordnance Missile Command (AOMC), was established at Redstone Arsenal. This encompassed the ABMA and its newly operational space programs. In August, AOMC and Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA, a Department of Defense organization) jointly initiated a program managed by ABMA to develop a large space booster of approximately 1.5-million-pounds thrust using a cluster of available rocket engines. In early 1959, this vehicle was designated Saturn.

On April 2, President Dwight D. Eisenhower recommended to Congress that a civilian agency be established to direct nonmilitary space activities, and on July 29, the President signed the National Aeronautics and Space Act, creating the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The nucleus for forming NASA was the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), with its 7,500 employees and Ames Research Center (ARC), Langley Research Center (LaRC), and Lewis Flight Propulsion Laboratory (later LRC, then Glenn RC) becoming the initial operations of NASA.

Despite the existence of an official space agency, the Army continued with certain far-reaching space programs. In June 1959, a secret study on Project Horizon was completed by ABMA, detailing plans for using the Saturn booster in establishing a manned Army outpost on the moon. Project Horizon, however, was rejected, and the Saturn program was transferred to NASA.

The U.S. manned satellite space program, using the Redstone as a booster, was officially named Project Mercury on November 26, 1958. With a future goal of manned flight, monkeys Able and Baker were the first living creatures recovered from outer space on May 28, 1959. They had been carried in the nose cone on a Jupiter missile to an altitude of 300 miles (480km) and a distance of 1,500 miles (2,400km), successfully withstanding 38 times the normal pull of gravity. Their survival during speeds over 10,000 miles per hour was America's first biological step toward putting a man into space.

On October 21, 1959, President Eisenhower approved the transfer of all Army space-related activities to NASA. This was accomplished effective July 1, 1960, when 4,670 civilian employees, about $100 million worth of buildings and equipment, and 1,840 acres (7.4km2) of land transferred from AOMC/ABMA to NASA's George C. Marshall Space Flight Center. MSFC officially opened at Redstone Arsenal on this same date, then was dedicated on September 8 by President Eisenhower in person. The Center was named in honor of General of the Army George C. Marshall, Army Chief of Staff during World War II, United States Secretary of State, and Nobel Prize winner for his world-renowned Marshall Plan.

From its initiation, MSFC has been NASA's lead center for the development of rocket propulsion systems and technologies. During the 1960s, the activities were largely devoted to the Apollo Program man's first visit to the Moon. In this, the Saturn Family of launch vehicles were designed and tested at MSFC. Following the highly successful Moon landing, including initial scientific exploration, MSFC had a major role in Post-Apollo activities; this included Skylab, the United States' first space station. With a permanent space station as an objective, the Space Shuttle was developed as a reusable transportation vehicle, and with it came Spacelab and other experimental activities making use of the Shuttle cargo bay. These and other projects are described in a later section. But first, MSFC's present capabilities and projects are addressed.

Marshall Space Flight Center has capabilities and projects supporting NASA's mission in three key areas: lifting from Earth (Space Vehicles), living and working in space (International Space Station), and understanding our world and beyond (Advanced Scientific Research).[8]

MSFC is NASA's designated developer and integrator of launch systems. The state-of-the-art Propulsion Research Laboratory serves as a leading national resource for advanced space propulsion research. Marshall has the engineering capabilities to take space vehicles from initial concept to sustained service. For manufacturing, the world's largest-known welding machine of its type was installed at MSFC in 2008; it is capable of building major, defect-free components for manned-rated space vehicles.

In early March 2011, NASA Headquarters announced that MSFC will lead the efforts on a new heavy-lift rocket that, like the Saturn V of the lunar exploration program of the late 1960s, will carry large, man-rated payloads beyond low-Earth orbit. The Center will have the program office for what is being called the Space Launch System (SLS).[9]

Before it was cancelled by President Barack Obama in early 2010, the Constellation Program had been a major activity in NASA since 2004. In this program, MSFC was responsible for propulsion on the heavy-lift vehicles. These vehicles were designated Ares I and Ares V, and would replace the aging Space Shuttle fleet as well as transport humans to the Moon, Mars, and other deep-space destinations.[10]

Starting in 2006, the MSFC Exploration Launch Projects Office began work on the Ares projects. On October 28, 2009, an Ares I-X test rocket lifted off from the newly modified Launch Complex 39B at Kennedy Space Center (KSC) for a two-minute powered flight; then continued for four additional minutes traveling 150 miles (240km) down range.

MSFC had responsibility for the Space Shuttle's propulsion engines. On February 1, 2003, the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster occurred, with the orbiter disintegrating during reentry and resulting in the death of its seven crew members. Flights of the other Shuttles were put on hold for 29 months. Based on a seven-month investigation, including a ground search that recovered debris from about 38 percent of the Orbiter, together with telemetry data and launch films, indicated that the failure was caused by a piece of insulation that broke off the external tank during launch and damaged the thermal protection on the Orbiter's left wing.

MSFC was responsible for the external tank, but few or no changes to the tank were made; rather, NASA decided that it was inevitable that some insulation might be lost during launch and thus required that an inspection of the orbiter's critical elements be made prior to reentry on future flights.

NASA retired the Space Shuttle in 2011, leaving America dependent upon the Russian Soyuz spacecraft for manned space missions.

The initial plans for the Space Station envisaged a small, low-cost Crew Return Vehicle (CRV) that would provide emergency evacuation capability. The 1986 Challenger disaster led planners to consider a more capable spacecraft. The Orbital Space Plane (OSP) development got underway in 2001, with an early version expected to enter service by 2010. With the initiation of the Constellation program in 2004, the knowledge gained on the OSP was transferred to Johnson Space Center (JSC) for use in the development of the Crew Exploration Vehicle. No operational OSP was ever built.[11]

The International Space Station is a partnership of the United States, Russian, European, Japanese, and Canadian Space Agencies. The station has continuously had human occupants since November 2, 2000. Orbiting 16 times daily at an average altitude of about 250mi (400km), it passes over some 90 percent of the world's surface. It weighs over 800,000 pounds (360,000kg), and a crew of six conducts research and prepares the way for future explorations.

NASA began the plan to build a space station in 1984. The station was named Freedom in 1988, and changed to the International Space Station (ISS) in 1992. The ISS is composed in modules, and the assembly in orbit started with the delivery of Russian module Zarya in November 1998. This was followed in December by the first U.S. module, Unity also called Node 1, built by Boeing in facilities at MSFC.[12]

As the 21st century started, Space Shuttle flights carried up supplies and additional small equipment, including a portion of the solar power array. The two-module embryonic ISS remained unmanned until the next module, Destiny, the U.S. Laboratory, arrived on February 7, 2001; this module was also built by Boeing at MSFC. The three-module station allowed a minimum crew of two astronauts or cosmonauts to be on the ISS permanently. In July, Quest air-lock was added to Unity, providing the capability for extra-vehicular activity (EVA).

Since 1998, 18 major U.S. components on the ISS have been assembled in space. In October 2007, Harmony or Node 2, was attached to Destiny; also managed by MSFC, this gave connection hubs for European and Japanese modules as well as additional living space, allowing the ISS crew to increase to six. The 18th and final major U.S. and Boeing-built element, the Starboard 6 Truss Segment, was delivered to the ISS in February 2009. With this, the full set of solar arrays could be activated, increasing the power available for science projects to 30kW. That marked the completion of the U.S. "core" of the station.

On 5 March 2010, Boeing turned over to NASA the U.S. on-orbit segment of the ISS.[13] It is planned that the International Space Station will be operated at least through the end of 2020. With the retirement of the Space Shuttle fleet in 2011, future manned missions to the ISS will depend upon the Russian Soyuz spacecraft for the immediate future.

MSFC is involved in some of the most advanced space research of our time. Scientist/Astronaut researchers aboard the International Space Station are engaged in hundreds of advanced experiments, most of which could not be conducted except for the zero-gravity environment. The deep-space images from the Hubble Space Telescope and the Chandra X-ray Observatory are made possible in part by the people and facilities at Marshall. The Center was not only responsible for the design, development, and construction of these telescopes, but it is also now home to the only facility in the world for testing large telescope mirrors in a space-simulated environment. Preliminary work has started on a Hubble successor, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST); this will be the largest primary mirror ever assembled in space. In the future, the facility will likely be used for another successor, the Advanced Technology Large-Aperture Space Telescope (AT-LAST).

The National Space Science and Technology Center (NSSTC) is a joint research venture between NASA and the seven research universities of the State of Alabama. The primary purpose of NSSTC is to foster collaboration in research between government, academia, and industry. It consists of seven research centers: Advanced Optics, Biotechnology, Global Hydeology & Climate, Information Technology, Material Science, Propulsion, and Space Science. Each center is managed by either MSFC, the host NASA facility, or the University of Alabama in Huntsville, the host university.

The Hubble Space Telescope was launched in April 1990, but gave flawed images. It had been designed at MSFC, but used a primary mirror that had spherical aberration due to incorrect grinding and polishing by the contractor. The defect was found when the telescope was in orbit. The design was such that repairs were possible, and three maintenance missions were flown in Shuttles during the 1990s. Another servicing mission (STS-109) was flown on March 1, 2002. Each mission resulted in considerable improvements, with the images receiving worldwide attention from astronomers as well as the public.

Based on the success of earlier maintenance missions, NASA decided to have a fifth service mission to Hubble; this was STS-125 flown on May 11, 2009. The maintenance and addition of equipment resulted in Hubble performance considerably better than planned at its origin. It is now expected that the Hubble will remain operational until its successor, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), is available in 2018.[14][15]

The Chandra X-ray Observatory, originating at MSFC, was launched on July 3, 1999, and is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. With an angular resolution of 0.5 arcsecond (2.4 rad), it has a thousand times better resolution than the first orbiting X-ray telescopes. Its highly eliptical orbit allows continuous observations up to 85 percent of its 65-hour orbital period. With its ability to make X-ray images of star clusters, supernova remnants, galactic eruptions, and collisions between clusters of galaxies - in its first decade of operation it has transformed astronomer's view of the high-energy universe.[16]

The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, initially called the Gamma-Ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST), is an international, multi-agency space observatory used to study the cosmos. It was launched June 11, 2008, has a design life of 5 years and a goal of 10 years. The primary instrument is the Large Area Telescope (LAT) that is sensitive in the photon energy range of 8 to greater than 300 GeV. It can view about 20% of the sky at any given moment.[17]

The LAT is complemented by the GLAST Burst Monitor (GBM) which can detect burst of X-rays and gamma rays in the 8-keV to 3-MeV energy range, overlapping with the LAT. The GBM is a collaborative effort between the U.S. National Space Science and Technology Center and the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Germany. MSFC manages the GBM, and Charles A. Meegan of MSFC is the Principal Investigator. Many new discoveries have been made in the initial period of operation. For example, on May 10, 2009, a burst was detected that, by its propagation characteristics, is believed to negate some approaches to a new theory of gravity.[18]

The Burst and Transient Source Experiment (BATSE), with Gerald J. Fishman of MSFC serving as Principal Investigator, is an ongoing examination of the many years of data from gamma-ray bursts, pulsars, and other transient gamma-ray phenomena.[19] The 2011 Shaw Prize, often called "Asia's Nobel Prize," was shared by Fishman and Italian astronomer Enrico Costa for their gamma-ray research.[20]

For 10 years, MSFC has supported activities in the U.S. Laboratory (Destiny) and elsewhere on the International Space Station through the Payload Operations Center (POC). The research activities include experiments on topics ranging from human physiology to physical science. Operating around the clock, scientists, engineers, and flight controllers in the POC link Earth-bound researchers throughout the world with their experiments and astronauts aboard the ISS. As of March2011[update], this has included the coordination of more than 1,100 experiments conducted by 41 space-station crew members involved in over 6,000 hours of science research.

Teams at Marshall manage NASA's programs for exploring the Sun, the Moon, the planets, and other bodies throughout our solar system. These have included Gravity Probe B, an experiment to test two predictions of Einstein's general theory of relativity, and Solar-B, an international mission to study the solar magnetic field and origins of the solar wind, a phenomenon that affects radio transmission on the Earth. The MSFC Lunar Precursor and Robotic Program Office manages projects and directs studies on lunar robotic activities across NASA.

MSFC also develops systems for monitoring the Earth's climate and weather patterns. At the Global Hydrology and Climate Center (GHCC), researchers combine data from Earth systems with satellite data to monitor biodiversity conservation and climate change, providing information that improves agriculture, urban planning, and water-resource management.[21]

On November 19, 2010, MSFC entered the new field of microsatellites with the successful launch of FASTSAT (Fast, Affordable, Science and Technology Satellite). Part of a joint DoD/NASA payload, it was launched by a Minotaur IV rocket from the Kodiak Launch Complex on Kodiak Island, Alaska. FASTSAT is a platform carrying multiple small payloads to low-Earth orbit, creating opportunities to conduct low-cost scientific and technology research on an autonomous satellite in space. FASTSAT, weighing just under 400 pounds (180kg), serves as a full scientific laboratory containing all the resources needed to carry out scientific and technology research operations. It was developed at the MSFC in partnership with the Von Braun Center for Science & Innovation and Dynetics, Inc., both of Huntsville, Alabama. Mark Boudreaux is the project manager for MSFC.

There are six experiments on the FASTSAT bus, including NanoSail-D2, which is itself a nanosatellite the first satellite launched from another satellite. It was deployed satisfactorily on January 21, 2011.[22]

In addition to supporting NASA's key missions, the spinoffs from these activities at MSFC have contributed broadly to technologies that improve the Nation and the World. In the last decade alone, Marshall generated more than 60 technologies featured as NASA spinoffs. MSFC research has benefited firefighters, farmers, plumbers, healthcare providers, soldiers, teachers, pilots, divers, welders, architects, photographers, city planners, disaster relief workers, criminal investigators, and even video-gamers and golfers.[23]

The Space Shuttle is likely the most complex spacecraft ever built. Although MSFC was not responsible for developing the centerpiece the Orbiter Vehicle (OV) it was responsible for all of the rocket propulsion elements: the OV's three main engines, the External Tank (ET), and the Solid-Rocket Boosters (SRBs). MSFC was also responsible for Spacelab, the research facility carried in the Shuttle's cargo bay on certain flights. From the start of the program in 1972, the management and development of Space Shuttle propulsion was a major activity at MSFC. Alex A. McCool, Jr. was manager of MSFC's Space Shuttle Projects Office.

Throughout 1980, engineers at MSFC participated in tests related to plans to launch the first Space Shuttle. During these early tests and prior to each later Shuttle launch, personnel in the Huntsville Operations Support Center monitored consoles to evaluate and help solve any problems at the Florida launch that might involve Shuttle propulsion

On April 12, 1981, Columbia made the first orbital test flight of a full Space Shuttle with two astronauts. This was designated STS-1 (Space Transportation System-1), and verified the combined performance of the entire system. This was followed by STS-2 on November 12, also using Columbia, primarily to demonstrate safe re-launch of a Shuttle. During 1982, two more test flights (STS-3 & STS-4) were made. STS-5, launched November 11, was the first operational mission; carrying four astronauts, two commercial satellite were deployed. In all three of these flights, on-board experiments were carried and conducted on pallets in the Shuttle's cargo bay.[24]

Space Shuttle Challenger was launched on mission STS-51-L on January 28, 1986. (The sequential numbering changed after 1983, but otherwise this would have been STS-25). One-minute, 13-seconds into flight, the entire Challenger was enveloped in a fireball and broke into several large segments, killing the seven astronauts. Subsequent analysis of the high-speed tracking films and telemetry signals indicated that a leak occurred in a joint on one of the solid rocket boosters (SRBs), the escaping flame impinged on the surface of the external tank (ET); there followed a complex series of very rapid structural failures, and in milliseconds the hydrogen and oxygen streaming from the ruptured tank exploded.

The basic cause of the disaster was determined to be an O-ring failure in the right SRB; cold weather was a contributing factor. The redesign effort, directed by MSFC, involved an extensive test program to verify that the SRBs were safe. There were no Space Shuttle missions in the remainder of 1986 or in 1987. Flights resumed in September 1988, with sequential numbering starting with STS-26.

As a reusable space-launch vehicle, the space shuttles carried a wide variety of payloads from scientific research equipment to highly classified military satellites. The flights were assigned a Space Transportation System (STS) number, in general sequenced by the planned launch date. The Wikipedia list of space shuttle missions shows all flights, their missions, and other information.

The first orbital flight (STS-1) by Shuttle Columbia on April 12, 1981, did not have a payload, but all flights that followed generally had multiple payloads. Through 1989, there were 32 flights; this includes the one on January 28, 1986, when Challenger was lost, and the delay until September 29, 1988, when flights resumed. During the 1990s, there were 58 flights, giving a total of 95 successful flights through 1999.[25]

For the Magellan planetary spacecraft, MSFC managed the adaptation of the Inertial Upper Stage. This solid-rocket was used in May 1989 to propel the spacecraft from Orbiter Atlantis on a 15-month loop around the Sun and eventually into orbit around Venus for four years of radar surface-mapping.

Many Shuttle flights carried equipment for performing on-board research. Such equipment was accommodated in two forms: on pallets or other arrangements in the Shuttle's cargo bay (most often in addition to hardware for the primary mission), or within a reusable laboratory called Skylab. All such experimental payloads were under the general responsibility of MSFC.

Pallet experiments covered a very wide spread of types and complexity, but many of them were in fluid physics, materials science, biotechnology, combustion science, and commercial space processing. For some missions, an aluminum bridge fitting across the cargo bay was used. This could carry 12 standard canisters holding isolated experiments, particularly those under the Getaway Special (GAS) program. GAS flights were made available at low cost to colleges and universities, American industries, individuals, foreign governments, and others.

On some flights, a variety of pallet experiments constituted the full payload; examples of these include the following:

In addition to the pallet experiments, many other experiments were flown and performed using Spacelab. This was a reusable laboratory consisting of multiple components, including a pressurized module, an unpressurized carrier, and other related hardware. Under a program managed by MSFC, ten Europeans nations jointly designed, built, and financed the first Spacelab through the European Space Research Organisation (ESRO. In addition, Japan funded a Spacelab for STS-47, a dedicated mission.[26]

Over a 15-year period, Spacelab components flew on 22 shuttle missions, the last in April 1998. Examples of Spacelab missions follow:

In early 1990, MSFC's new Spacelab Mission Operations Control Center took over the responsibility for controlling all Spacelab missions. This replaced the Payload Operations Control Center formerly situated at the JSC from which previous Spacelab missions were operated.[27]

The advent of the Space Shuttle made possible several major space programs in which MSFC had significant responsibilities. These were the International Space Station, the Hubble Space Telescope, the Chandra X-Ray Observatory, and the Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory. The latter three are part of NASA's series of Great Observatories; this series also includes the Spitzer Space Telescope, but this was not launched by a Space Shuttle and MSFC had no significant role in its development.

A manned space station had long been in the plans of visionaries. Wernhar von Braun, in his widely read Collier's Magazine 1953 article, envisioned this to be a huge wheel, rotating to produce gravity-like forces on the occupants.[28] In Project Horizon, prepared by the U.S. Army in 1959, a space station would be built by assembling spent booster rockets. Following this same basic concept, in 1973 MSFC used a modified stage of Saturn V to put into orbit Skylab, but this was preceded by the Soviet Union's Salyut in 1971, then followed by their Mir in 1986. Even during Skylab, MSFC began plans for a much more complete space station. President Ronald Reagan announced plans to build Space Station Freedom in 1984. Luther B. Powell was MSFC's space station program manager.

By the late 1990s, planning for four different stations were underway: the American Freedom, the Soviet/Russian Mir-2, the European Columbus, and the Japanese Kib. In June 1992, with the Cold War over, American President George H. W. Bush and Russian President Boris Yeltsin agreed to cooperate on space exploration. Then in September 1993, American Vice-President Al Gore, Jr., and Russian Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin announced plans for a new space station. In November, plans for Freedom, Mir-2, and the European and Japanese modules were incorporated into a single International Space Station. Boeing began as NASA's prime contractor for U.S. hardware in January 1995.

The ISS is composed of a number of modules, sharing primary power from large arrays of solar power cells. The first module, Zarya from Russia, was delivered to orbit by a Proton rocket on November 20, 1998. On December 4, the first Anmerican component, Unity, a connecting module, was carried up by Space Shuttle Endeavour on flight STS-88; it was then joined with Zarya to form an embrionic ISS. Unity was built by Boeing in MSFC facilities. Additional building supplies were carried to the ISS in May 1999, aboard STS-96.

The ISS continued to be assembled throughout the next decade, and has been continuously occupied since February 7, 2001. In March 2010, Boeing completed its contract and officially turned over to NASA the U.S. on-orbit segment of the ISS.

Shortly after NASA was formed, the Orbiting Solar Observatory was launched, and was followed by the Orbiting Astronomical Observatory (OAO) that carried out ultraviolet observations of stars between 1968 and 1972. These showed the value of space-based astronomy, and led to the planning of the Large Space Telescope (LST) that would be launched and maintained from the forthcoming space shuttle. Budget limitations almost killed the LST, but the astronomy community especially Lyman Spitzer and the National Science Foundation pressed for a major program in this area. Congress finally funded LST in 1978, with an intended launch date of 1983.

MSFC was given responsibility for the design, development, and construction of the telescope, while Goddard Space Flight Center (GFC) was to control the scientific instrument and the ground-control center. As the Project Scientist, MSFC brought on board C. Robert ODell, then chairman of the Astronomy Department at the University of Chicago. Several different people, at various times, served as the project manager. The telescope assembly was designed as a Cassegrain reflector with hyperbolic mirror polished to be diffraction limited; the primary mirror had a diameter of 2.4m (94in). The mirrors were developed by the optics firm, Perkin-Elmer. MSFC did not have a facility to check the end-to-end performance of the mirror assembly, so the telescope could not be totally checked until launched and placed in service.[29]

The LST was named the Hubble Space Telescope in 1983, the original launch date. There were many problems, delays, and cost increases in the program, and the Challenger disaster delayed the availability of the launch vehicle. Finally, on April 24, 1990, on Mission STS-31, Shuttle Discovery launched the Hubble telescope successfully into its planned orbit. Almost immediately it was realized that the optical performance was not as expected; analysis of the flawed images showed that the primary mirror had been ground to the wrong shape, resulting in spherical aberration.

Fortunately, the Hubble telescope had been designed to allow in-space maintenance, and in December 1993, mission STS-61 carried astronauts to the Hubble to make corrections and change some components. A second repair mission, STS-82, was made in February 1997, and a third, STS-103, in December 1999. For these repair missions, the astronauts practiced the work in MSFC's Neutral Buoyancy Facility, simulating the weightless environment of space.

Through the 1990s, the Hubble did provide astronomy images that had never before been seen. During the next decade, two additional repair missions were made (March 2002 and in May 2009), eventually bringing the telescope to even better that its initially intended performance.

Even before HEAO-2 (the Einstein Observatory) was launched in 1978, MSFC began preliminary studies for a larger X-ray telescope. To support this effort, in 1976 an X-Ray Test Facility, the only one of its size, was constructed at Marshall for verification testing and calibration of X-ray mirrors, telescope systems, and instruments. With the success of HEAO-2, MSFC was given responsibility for the design, development, and construction of what was then known as the Advanced X-ray Astrophysics Facility (AXAF). The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (SAO) partners with MSFC, providing the science and operational management.

Work on the AXAF continued through the 1980s. A major review was held in 1992, resulting in many changes; four of the twelve planned mirrors were eliminated, as were two of the six scientific instruments. The planned circular orbit was changed to an elliptical one, reaching one-third of the way to the Moon at its farthest point; this eliminated the possibility of improvement or repair using the Space Shuttle, but it placed the spacecraft above the Earth's radiation belts for most of its orbit.

AXAF was renamed Chandra X-ray Observatory in 1998. It was launched July 23, 1999, by the Shuttle Columbia (STS-93). An Inertial Upper Stage booster adapted by MSFC was used to transport Chandra to its high orbit Weighing about 22,700kg (50,000lb), this was the heaviest payload ever launched by a Shuttle. Operationally managed by the SAO, Chandra has been returning excellent data since being activated. It initially had an expected life of five years, but this has now been extended to 15 years or longer.[30]

The Compton Gamma Ray Observatory (CGRO) is another of NASA's Great Observatories; it was launched April 5, 1991, on Shuttle flight STS-37. At 37,000 pounds (17,000kg), it was the heaviest astrophysical payload ever flown at that time. CGRO was 14 years in development by NASA; TRW was the builder. Gamma radiation (rays) is the highest energy-level of electromagnetic radiation, having energies above 100 keV and thus frequencies above 10 exahertz (1019 Hz). This is produced by sub-atomic particle interactions, including those in certain astrophysical processes. The continuous flow of cosmic rays bombarding space objects, such as the Moon, generate this radiation Gamma rays also result in bursts from nuclear reactions. The CGRO was designed to image continuous radiation and to detect bursts.

MSFC was responsible for the Burst and Transient Source Experiment, (BATSE). This triggered on sudden changes in gamma count-rates lasting 0.1 to 100 s; it was also capable of detecting less impulsive sources by measuring their modulation using the Earth occultation technique. In nine years of operation, BATSE triggered about 8000 events, of which some 2700 were strong bursts that were analyzed to have come from distant galaxies.

Unlike the Hubble Space Telescope, the CGRO was not designed for on-orbit repair and refurbishment. Thus, after one of its gyroscopes failed, NASA decided that a controlled crash was preferable to letting the craft come down on its own at random. On June 4, 2000, it was intentionally de-orbited, with the debris that did not burn up falling harmlessly into the Pacific Ocean. At MSFC, Gerald J. Fishman is the principal investigator of a project to continue examination of data from BATSE and other gamma-ray projects. The 2011 Shaw Prize was shared by Fishman and Italian Enrico Costa for their gamma-ray research.

Shortly before activating its new Field Center in July 1960, NASA described the MSFC as the only self-contained organization in the nation that was capable of conducting the development of a space vehicle from the conception of the idea, through production of hardware, testing, and launching operations.

Initially, engineers from Huntsville traveled to Florida to conduct launch activities at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. The first NASA launch facility there (Launch Complex 39) was designed and operated by MSFC, then in on July 1, 1962, the overall site achieving equal status with other NASA centers and was named the Launch Operations Center, later renamed the Kennedy Space Center (KSC).

Another major NASA facility, the Manned Spacecraft Center (MSC) located near Houston, Texas, was officially opened in September 1963. Designated the primary center for U.S. space missions and systems involving astronauts, it coordinates and monitors crewed missions through the Mission Control Center. MSC was renamed the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center (JSC) in February 1973. Through the years, there have been a number of turf battles between MSFC and MSC/JSC concerning mission responsibilities.

When the Marshall Space Flight Center began official operations in July 1960, Wernher von Braun was the Director and Eberhard Rees was his Deputy for Research and Development. The administrative activities in MSFC were led by persons with backgrounds in traditional U.S. Government functions, but all of the technical heads were individuals who had assisted von Braun in his success at ABMA. The initial technical activities and leaders at MSFC were as follows:[31]

With the exception of Koelle, all of the technical leaders had come to the United States under Operation Paperclip after working together at Peenemnde. Von Braun knew well the capabilities of these individuals and had great confidence in them. This confidence was shown to be appropriate; in the following decade of developing hardware and technical operations that established new levels of complexity, there was never a single failure of their designs during manned flight.

The initial projects at MSFC were primarily continuations of work initiated earlier at ABMA. Of immediate importance was the final preparation of a Redstone rocket that, under Project Mercury would lift a space capsule carrying the first American into space. Originally scheduled to take place in October 1960, this was postponed several time and on May 5, 1961, astronaut Alan Shepard made America's first sub-orbital spaceflight. The delays led to a circumstance similar to that of the first satellite; on April 12, 1961, Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin had become the first person to orbit the Earth.

By 1965, MSFC had about 7,500 government employees. In addition, most of the prime contractors for launch vehicles and related major items (including North American Aviation, Chrysler, Boeing, Douglas Aircraft, Rocketdyne, and IBM) collectively had approximately a similar number of employees working in MSFC facilities.

Several support contracting firms were also involved in the programs; the largest of these was Brown Engineering Company (BECO, later Teledyne Brown Engineering), the first high-technology firm in Huntsville and by this time having some 3,500 employees. In the Saturn-Apollo activities, BECO/TBE provided about 20-million man-hours of support. Milton K. Cummings was the BECO president, Joseph C. Moquin the executive vice president, William A. Girdini led the engineering design and test work, and Raymond C. Watson, Jr., directed the research and advanced systems activities. Cummings Research Park, the second largest park of this type in the Nation, was named for Cummings in 1973.

On May 25, 1961, just 20 days after Shepard's flight, President John F. Kennedy committed the Nation to "achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to Earth".[32] In what would be called the Apollo Program, the primary mission of MSFC was developing the heavy-lift rockets the Saturn family. This required the development and equalization of three new liquid-fueled rocket engines, the J-2, the F-1, and the H-1 (rocket engine); in addition, an existing engine, the RL10, was improved for use on Saturns. Leland F. Belew managed the Engine Development Office.[33] The F-1 engine was, and still is the most powerful single-nozzle liquid-fueled rocket engine ever used in service; each produced 1.5-million-pounds thrust. Originally started by the U.S. Air Force, responsibility for the development was taken over by ABMA in 1959, and the first test firings at MSFC were in December 1963.

The original vehicle, designated Saturn I, consisted of two propulsion stages and an instrument unit; it was first tested in flight on October 27, 1961. The first stage (S-I) had a cluster of eight H-1 engines, giving approximately 1.5-million-pounds thrust total. The four outboard engines were gimbaled to allow vehicle steering. The second stage (SIV) had six gimbaled LR10A-3 engines, producing a combined 90-thousand-pounds thrust. Ten Saturn Is were used in flight-testing of Apollo boilerplate units. Five of the test flights also carried important auxiliary scientific experiments.

The Saturn IB (alternatively known as the Uprated Saturn I) also had two propulsion stages and an instrument unit. The first stage (S-IB) also had eight H-1 engines with four gimballed, but the stage had eight fixed fins of equal size fitted to the sides to provide aerodynamic stability. The second stage (S-IVB) had a single J-2 engine that gave a more powerful 230-thousand-pounds thrust. The J-2 was gimbaled and could also be restarted during flight. The vehicle was first flight-tested on February 26, 1966. Fourteen Saturn 1Bs (or partial vehicles) were built, with five used in unmanned testing and five others used in manned missions, the last on July 15, 1975.

The Saturn V was the pinnacle of developments at MSFC. This was an expendable, man-rated heavy-lift vehicle that was the most vital element in the Apollo Program. Designed under the direction of Arthur Rudolph, the Saturn V holds the record as the largest and most powerful launch vehicle ever brought to operational status from a combined height, weight, and payload standpoint.

The Saturn V consisted of three propulsion stages and an instrument unit. The first stage (S-IC), had five F-1 engines, giving a combined total of 7.5-million-pounds thrust. These engines were arranged in a cross pattern, with the center engine fixed and the outer four gimballed. The second stage (S-II), had five J-2 engines with the same arrangement as the F-1s and giving a total of 1.0-million-pounds thrust. The third stage (S-IVB) had a single gimballed J-2 engine with 200-thousand-pounds thrust. As previously noted, the J-2 engine could be restarted in flight. The basic configuration for this heavy-lift vehicle was selected in early 1963, and the name Saturn V was applied at that time (configurations that might have led to Saturn II, III, and IV were discarded).

The Apollo Spacecraft was atop the launch vehicle, and was composed of the Lunar Module (LM) and the Command/Service Module (CSM) inside the Spacecraft Lunar Module Adapter, with the Launch Escape System at the very top. The Apollo Spacecraft and its components were developed by other NASA centers, but were flight-tested on Saturn I and IB vehicles from MSFC.

While the three propulsion stages were the "muscle" of the Saturn V, the Instrument Unit (IU) was the "brains." The IU was on a 260-inch (6.6-m) diameter, 36-inch (91-cm) high, ring that was held between the third propulsion stage and the LM. It contained the basic guidance system components a stable platform, accelerometers, a digital computer, and control electronics as well as radar, telemetry, and other units. Basically the same IU configuration was used on the Saturn I and IB. With IBM as the prime contractor, the IU was the only full Saturn component manufactured in Huntsville.

The first Saturn V test flight was made on November 9, 1967. On July 16, 1969, as its crowning achievement in the Apollo space program, a Saturn V vehicle lifted the Apollo 11 spacecraft and three astronauts on their journey to the Moon. Other Apollo launches continued through December 6, 1972. The last Saturn V flight was on May 14, 1973, in the Skylab Program (described later). A total of 15 Saturn Vs were built; 13 functioned flawlessly, and the other two (intended as backup) remain unused.

Wernher von Braun believed that the personnel designing the space vehicles should have direct, hands-on participation in the building and testing of the hardware. For this, MSFC had facilities comparable with the best to be found in private industries. Included were precision machine shops, giant metal-forming and welding machines, and all types of inspection equipment. For every type of Saturn vehicle, one or more prototypes were fabricated in MSFC shops. Large, special-purpose computers were used in the checkout procedures.

Static test towers had been constructed at ABMA for the Redstone and Jupiter rockets. In 1961, the Jupiter stand was modified to test Saturn 1 and 1B stages. A number of other test stands followed, the largest being the Saturn V Dynamic Test Stand completed in 1964. At 475 feet (145m) in height, the entire Saturn V could be accommodated. Also completed in 1964, the S1C Static Test Stand was for live firing of the five F-1 engines of the first stage. Delivering a total of 7.5-million-pounds thrust, the tests produced earthquake-like rumbles throughout the Huntsville area and could be heard as far as 100 miles (160km) away.[34]

As the Saturn activities progressed, external facilities were needed. In 1961, The Michoud Rocket Factory near New Orleans, Louisiana, was selected as the Saturn production site. A 13,500 acres (55km2) isolated area in Hancock County, Mississippi was selected to conduct Saturn tests. Known as the Mississippi Test Facility (later renamed the John C. Stennis Space Center), this was primarily to test the vehicles built at the rocket factory.

On January 5, 1972, President Richard M. Nixon announced plans to develop the Space Shuttle, a reusable Space Transportation System (STS) for routine access to space. The Shuttle was composed of the Orbiter Vehicle (OV) containing the crew and payload, two Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs), and the External Tank (ET) that carried liquid fuel for the OV's main engines. MSFC was responsible for the SRBs, the OV's three main engines, and the ET. The Center also received responsibility for Spacelab, a versatile laboratory that would be carried on some flights within the Shuttle's cargo bay. Other assignments included the adaptation of the Inertial Upper Stage Booster, a two-stage rocket that would lift Shuttle payloads into higher orbits or interplanetary voyages.

The first test firing of an OV main engine was in 1975. Two years later, the first firing of a SRB took place and tests on the ET began at MSFC. The first Enterprise OV flight, attached to a Shuttle Carrier Aircraft (SCA an extensively modified Boeing 747), was in February 1977; this as followed by a free landings in August and October. In March 1978, the Enterprise OV was flown atop a SCA to MSFC. Mated to an ET, the partial Space Shuttle was hoisted onto the modified Saturn V Dynamic Test Stand where it was subjected to a full range of vibrations comparable to those in a launch. The second space shuttle, Columbia, was completed and placed at the KSC for checking and launch preparation. On April 12, 1981, the Columbia made the first orbital test flight.

From the start, MSFC has had strong research projects in science and engineering. Two of the early activities, Highwater and Pegasus, were performed on a non-interference basis while testing the Saturn I vehicle.

In Project Highwater, the dummy second stage was filled with 23,000 US gallons (87m3) of water as ballast, and, after burnout of the first stage, explosive charges released the water into the upper atmosphere. The project answered questions about the diffusion of liquid propellants in the event that a rocket was destroyed at high altitude. Highwater experiments were carried out in April and November,1962.

Under the Pegasus Satellite Program, the second stage was instrumented to study the frequency and penetration depth of micrometeoroids. Two large panels were folded into the empty stage and, when in orbit, unfolded to present 2,300-square-feet (210-m2) of instrumented surface. Three Pegasus satellites were launched during 1965, and stayed in orbit from 3 to 13 years.

The overall Apollo Program was the largest scientific and engineering research activity in history. The actual landing on the Moon led to investigations that could have only been conducted on location. There were six Apollo missions that landed on the Moon: Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17. Apollo 13 had been intended as a landing, but only circled the Moon and returned to Earth after an oxygen tank ruptured and crippled power in the CSM.

Except for Apollo 11, all of the missions carried an Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP), composed of equipment for seven scientific experiments plus a central control station (they were controlled from the Earth) with a radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG). Scientists from MSFC were among the co-investigators.

See the rest here:

Marshall Space Flight Center - Wikipedia

Ron Paul .com

Everyone is surely aware by now that all of our digital communications are being sent to government databases for storage. If our American ancestors could see it, they wouldnt believe their eyes. We still, however, have the ability to use

Continue reading

Russiagate has jumped the shark. So says Robert Parry, investigative journalist and founder of ConsortiumNews.com, Parry joins todays Liberty Report to discuss the current state of the mainstream media and the ongoing allegations of Russian interference in American political and

Continue reading

President Trump vehemently denied an NBC report that he called for a ten-fold increase in US nuclear weapons at a meeting this summer. Calling it fake news, the president reportedly threatened NBCs broadcast license. Is this really fake news? Or

Continue reading

The CIA has been forced to declassify nearly 300 documents about a secret torture site in Afghanistan where CIA psychologists devised some of the most cruel and inhuman ways of torturing. Some were killed. The psychologists made millions of dollars.

Continue reading

The White House has rolled out the Presidents 70 point plan to reform the immigration system. Will building a wall, hiring more officers and prosecutors, mandating E-Verify, and other enforcement measures help solve the problem? Or is there a better

Continue reading

Original post:

Ron Paul .com

Tianhe-I – Wikipedia

Tianhe-1 and Tianhe-1AActiveTianhe-1 Operational 29 October 2009, Tianhe-1A Operational 28 October 2010SponsorsNational University of Defense TechnologyOperatorsNational Supercomputing CenterLocationNational Supercomputing Center, Tianjin, People's Republic of ChinaOperating systemLinux[1]Storage96 TB (98304 GB) for Tianhe-1,262TB for Tianhe-1ASpeedTianhe-1: 563 teraFLOPS (Rmax) 1,206.2 teraFLOPS (Rpeak),Tianhe-1A: 2,566.0 teraFLOPS (Rmax) 4,701.0 teraFLOPS (Rpeak)RankingTOP500: 2nd, June 2011 (Tianhe-1A)PurposePetroleum exploration, aircraft simulationSourcestop500.org

Tianhe-I, Tianhe-1, or TH-1 (Chinese: , [tjnxixau]; Sky River Number One)[2] is a supercomputer capable of an Rmax (maximum range) of 2.5 petaFLOPS. Located at the National Supercomputing Center of Tianjin, China, it was the fastest computer in the world from October 2010 to June 2011 and is one of the few Petascale supercomputers in the world.[3][4]

In October 2010, an upgraded version of the machine (Tianhe-1A) overtook ORNL's Jaguar to become the world's fastest supercomputer, with a peak computing rate of 2.57 petaFLOPS.[5][6] In June 2011 the Tianhe-1A was overtaken by the K computer as the world's fastest supercomputer, which was also subsequently superseded.[7]

Both the original Tianhe-1 and Tianhe-1A use a Linux-based operating system.[8][9]

On 12 August 2015, the 186,368-core Tianhe-1, felt the impact of the powerful Tianjin explosions and went offline for some time. Xinhua reports that "the office building of Chinese supercomputer Tianhe-1, one of the world's fastest supercomputers, suffered damage." Sources at Tianhe-1 told Xinhua the computer is not damaged, but they have shut down some of its operations as a precaution.[10] Operation resumed on 17 August 2015.[11]

Tianhe-1 was developed by the Chinese National University of Defense Technology (NUDT) in Changsha, Hunan. It was first revealed to the public on 29 October 2009, and was immediately ranked as the world's fifth fastest supercomputer in the TOP500 list released at the 2009 Supercomputing Conference (SC09) held in Portland, Oregon, on 16 November 2009. Tianhe achieved a speed of 563 teraflops in its first Top 500 test and had a peak performance of 1.2 petaflops. Thus at startup, the system had an efficiency of 46%.[12][13] Originally, Tianhe-1 was powered by 4,096 Intel Xeon E5540 processors and 1,024 Intel Xeon E5450 processors, with 5,120 AMD graphics processing units (GPUs), which were made up of 2,560 dual-GPU ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 graphics cards.[14][15]

In October 2010, Tianhe-1A, an upgraded supercomputer, was unveiled at HPC 2010 China.[16] It is now equipped with 14,336 Xeon X5670 processors and 7,168 Nvidia Tesla M2050 general purpose GPUs. 2,048 FeiTeng 1000 SPARC-based processors are also installed in the system, but their computing power was not counted into the machine's official Linpack statistics as of October2010.[17] Tianhe-1A has a theoretical peak performance of 4.701 petaflops.[18] NVIDIA suggests that it would have taken "50,000 CPUs and twice as much floor space to deliver the same performance using CPUs alone." The current heterogeneous system consumes 4.04 megawatts compared to over 12 megawatts had it been built only with CPUs.[19]

The Tianhe-1A system is composed of 112 computer cabinets, 12 storage cabinets, 6 communications cabinets, and 8 I/O cabinets. Each computer cabinet is composed of four frames, with each frame containing eight blades, plus a 16-port switching board. Each blade is composed of two computer nodes, with each computer node containing two Xeon X5670 6-core processors and one Nvidia M2050 GPU processor.[20] The system has 3584 total blades containing 7168 GPUs, and 14,336 CPUs, managed by the SLURM job scheduler.[21] The total disk storage of the systems is 2 Petabytes implemented as a Lustre clustered file system,[2] and the total memory size of the system is 262 Terabytes.[17]

Another significant reason for the increased performance of the upgraded Tianhe-1A system is the Chinese-designed NUDT custom designed proprietary high-speed interconnect called Arch that runs at 160 Gbit/s, twice the bandwidth of InfiniBand.[17]

The system also used the Chinese made FeiTeng-1000 central processing unit.[22] The FeiTeng-1000 processor is used both on service nodes and to enhance the system interconnect.[22][23]

The supercomputer is installed at the National Supercomputing Center, Tianjin, and is used to carry out computations for petroleum exploration and aircraft design.[13] It is an "open access" computer, meaning it provides services for other countries.[24] The supercomputer will be available to international clients.[25]

The computer cost $88 million to build. Approximately $20 million is spent annually for electricity and operating expenses. Approximately 200 workers are employed in its operation.

Tianhe-IA was ranked as the world's fastest supercomputer in the TOP500 list[26][27] until July 2011 when the K computer overtook it.

In June 2011, scientists at the Institute of Process Engineering (IPE) at the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) announced a record-breaking scientific simulation on the Tianhe-1A supercomputer that furthers their research in solar energy. CAS-IPE scientists ran a complex molecular dynamics simulation on all 7,168 NVIDIA Tesla GPUs to achieve a performance of 1.87 petaflops (about the same performance as 130,000 laptops).[28]

The Tianhe-1A supercomputer was shut down after the National Supercomputing Center of Tianjin was damaged by an explosion nearby. The computer was not damaged and still remains operational.[29]

See original here:

Tianhe-I - Wikipedia

Bitcoin Price Prediction: Congress Report, Indonesia; More Positive Signals for BTC

Daily Bitcoin News Update
While the world leaders are busy deciding the future fate of cryptocurrencies at the G20 Summit in Buenos Aires, it may be reassuring to know that the U.S. government may have already picked a side favorable to Bitcoiners.

The latest report from Congress this month hints that the U.S. government may be more friendly toward Bitcoin and its underlying technology, blockchain, than we previously thought.

The gist of the report is that cryptos deserve a second look from regulators. The report urges U.S. regulators to create regulations that protect investors but don’t stifle the development and growth of the crypto industry.

The report.

The post Bitcoin Price Prediction: Congress Report, Indonesia; More Positive Signals for BTC appeared first on Profit Confidential.

Continue reading here:
Bitcoin Price Prediction: Congress Report, Indonesia; More Positive Signals for BTC

Ethereum Price Forecast: Cryptos Starting to Resemble Other Assets

Ethereum News Update
If there’s one fear that haunts crypto enthusiasts, it’s that governments will attach burdensome regulations to slow innovation across the industry.

So when U.S. regulators—like the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)—started cracking down on the initial coin offering (ICO) market, investors assumed their worst nightmares were coming true. They turned bearish almost instantly.

From the moment it became public that the SEC was handing out subpoenas, we saw cryptocurrency prices fall dramatically. The market feared regulators would refashion cryptocurrencies into something like stocks and bonds, an asset class that plays by the.

The post Ethereum Price Forecast: Cryptos Starting to Resemble Other Assets appeared first on Profit Confidential.

Read the original:
Ethereum Price Forecast: Cryptos Starting to Resemble Other Assets

Darwinism: Survival without Purpose – The Institute for …

Humans have always wondered about the meaning of life...life has no higher purpose than to perpetuate the survival of DNA...life has no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind pitiless indifference.1 --Richard Dawkins

Evolution is "deceptively simple yet utterly profound in its implications,"2 the first of which is that living creatures "differ from one another, and those variations arise at random, without a plan or purpose."3 Evolution must be without plan or purpose because its core tenet is the natural selection of the fittest, produced by random copying errors called mutations. Darwin "was keenly aware that admitting any purposefulness whatsoever to the question of the origin of species would put his theory of natural selection on a very slippery slope."4 Pulitzer Prize author Edward Humes wrote that the fact of evolution was obvious but "few could see it, so trapped were they by the humandesire to find design and purpose in the world." He concluded:

Darwin's brilliance was in seeing beyond the appearance of design, and understanding the purposeless, merciless process of natural selection, of life and death in the wild, and how it culled all but the most successful organisms from the tree of life, thereby creating the illusion that a master intellect had designed the world. But close inspection of the watchlike "perfection" of honeybees' combs or ant trailsreveals that they are a product of random, repetitive, unconscious behaviors, not conscious design.5

The fact that evolution teaches that life has no purpose beyond perpetuating its own survival is not lost on teachers. One testified that teaching evolution "impacted their consciences" because it moved teachers away from the "idea that they were born for a purpose something completely counter to their mindset and beliefs."6

In a study on why children resist accepting evolution, Yale psychologists Bloom and Weisberg concluded that the evolutionary way of viewing the world, which the authors call "promiscuous teleology," makes it difficult for them to accept evolution. Children "naturally see the world in terms of design and purpose."7 The ultimate purposelessness of evolution, and thus of the life that it produces, was eloquently expressed by Professor Lawrence Krauss as follows: "We're just a bit of pollution. If you got rid of usthe universe would be largely the same. We're completely irrelevant."8

The Textbooks

To determine what schools are teaching about religious questions such as the purpose of life, I surveyed current science textbooks and found that they tend to teach the view that evolution is both nihilistic and atheistic. One of today's most widely-used textbooks stated that "evolution works without either plan or purpose. Evolution is random and undirected."9 Another text by the same authors added that Darwin knew his theory "required believing in philosophical materialism, the conviction that matter is the stuff of all existence and that all mental and spiritual phenomena are its byproducts." The authors continued:

Darwinian evolution was not only purposeless but also heartless--a process in which...nature ruthlessly eliminates the unfit. Suddenly, humanity was reduced to just one more species in a world that cared nothing for us. The great human mind was no more than a mass of evolving neurons. Worst of all, there was no divine plan to guide us.10

Another text taught that humans are just "a tiny, largely fortuitous, and late-arising twig on the enormously arborescent bush of life" and the belief that a "progressive, guiding force, consistently pushing evolution to move in a single direction" is now known to be "misguided."11 Many texts teach that evolution is purposeless and has no goal except to achieve brute survival: the "idea that evolution is not directed towards a final goal or state has been more difficult for many people to accept than the process of evolution itself."12 One major text openly teaches that humans were created by a blind, deaf, and dumb watchmaker--namely natural selection, which is "totally blind to the future."

Humans...came from the same evolutionary source as every other species. It is natural selection of selfish genes that has given us our bodies and our brains. Natural selectionexplainsthe whole of life, the diversity of life, the complexity of life, |and| the apparent design in life."13

The Implications

Many texts are very open about the implications of Darwinism for theism. One teaches that Darwin's immeasurably important contribution to science was to show that, despite life's apparent evidence of design and purpose, mechanistic causes explain all biological phenomena. The text adds that by coupling "undirected, purposeless variation to the blind, uncaring process of natural selection, Darwin made theological or spiritual explanations of the life processes superfluous."14 The author concludes by noting that "it was Darwin's theory of Evolution that provided a crucial plank to the platform of mechanisms and materialismthat has been the stage of most western thought."15 Another text even stated directly that humans were created by a random process, not a loving, purposeful God, and:

The real difficulty in accepting Darwin's theory has always been that it seems to diminish our significance. |Evolution| asked us to accept the proposition that, like all other organisms, we too are the products of a random process that, as far as science can show, we are not created for any special purpose or as part of any universal design.16

These texts are all clearly teaching religious ideas, not science. An excellent example is a text that openly ruled out not only theistic evolution, but any role for God in nature, and demonstrated that Darwinism threatened theism by showing that humans and all life "could be explained by natural selection without the intervention of a god." Evolutionary "randomness and uncertainty had replaced a deity having conscious, purposeful, human characteristics."

The Darwinian view that present-type organisms were not created spontaneously but formed in a succession of selective events that occurred in the past, contradicted the common religious view that there could be no design, biological or otherwise, without an intelligent designer. In this scheme a god of design and purpose is not necessary. Religion has been bolstered by the comforting idea that humanity was created in the image of a god to rule over the world and its creatures. Religion provided emotional solace, a set of ethical and moral values. Nevertheless, faith in religious dogma has been eroded by natural explanations of its mysteries. The positions of the creationists and the scientific world appear irreconcilable."17

Darwin himself taught a totally atheistic, naturalistic view of origins. He even once said, "I would give nothing for the theory of natural selection if it requires miraculous additions at any one stage of descent."18 John Alcock, an evolutionary biologist, therefore concluded that "we exist solely to propagate the genes within us."19

Leading Darwin scholar Janet Browne makes it very clear that Darwin's goal was the "arduous task of reorienting the way Victorians looked at nature." To do this Darwin had to convince the world that "ideas about a benevolent, nearly perfect natural world" and those that believe "beauty was given to things for a purpose, were wrong--that the idea of a loving God who created all living things and brought men and women into existence wasa fable."

The worldsteeped in moral meaning which helped mankind seek out higher goals in life, was not Darwin's. Darwin's view of nature was dark--black. Where most men and women generally believed in some kind of design in nature--some kind of plan and order--and felt a deep-seated, mostly inexpressible belief that their existence had meaning, Darwin wanted them to see all life as empty of any divine purpose.20

Darwin knew how difficult it was to abandon such a view, but realized that for evolution to work, nature must ultimately be "governed entirely by chance." Browne concludes:

The pleasant outward face of nature was precisely that--only an outward face. Underneath was perpetual struggle, species against species, individual against individual. Life was ruled by death...destruction was the key to reproductive success. All the theological meaning was thus stripped out by Darwin and replaced by the concept of competition. All the telos, the purpose, on which natural theologians based their ideas of perfect adaptation was redirected into Malthusian--Darwinian--struggle. What most people saw as God-given design he saw as mere adaptations to circumstance, adaptations that were meaningless except for the way in which they helped an animal or plant to survive.21

Neo-Darwinist Richard Dawkins recognized the purposelessness of such a system:

In a universe of blind physical forces and genetic replication some people are going to get hurt, other people are going to get lucky, and you won't find any rhyme or reason in it, nor any justice. The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.22

How widely is this view held by scientists? One study of 149 leading biologists found that 89.9 percent believed that evolution has no ultimate purpose or goal except survival, and we are just a cosmic accident existing at the whim of time and chance. A mere six percent believed that evolution has a purpose.23 Almost all of those who believed that evolution had no purpose were atheists. This is only one example that Sommers and Rosenberg call the "destructive power of Darwinian theory."24

Purpose and Christianity

Christianity teaches that God made the universe as a home for humans. If the universe evolved purely by natural means, then it just exists and any "purpose" for its existence can only be that which humans themselves attribute to it. But our own experience and intellectual attainments argue against this. The similarity of human-constructed machines and the orderly functioning of the universe is the basis of the design argument. Just as a machine requires a designer and a builder, so too the universe that we see requires a designer and a builder.

Determining the purpose of something depends on the observer's worldview. To a nontheist the question "What is the purpose of a living organism's structure?" means only "How does this structure aid survival?" Eyesight and legs would therefore have nothing to do with enjoyment of life; they are merely an unintended byproduct of evolution. Biologists consistently explain everything from coloration to sexual habits solely on the basis of survival. Orthodox neo-Darwinism views everything as either an unfortunate or a fortuitous event resulting from the outworking of natural law and random, naturally-selected mutations. Conversely, creationists interpret all reality according to beliefs about God's purpose for humans. Evolutionists can usually explain even contradictory behavior, but creationists look beyond this and try to determine what role it plays in God's plan.

Conclusions

Orthodox evolution teaches that the living world has no plan or purpose except survival, is random, undirected, and heartless. Humans live in a world that cares nothing for us, our minds are simply masses of meat, and no divine plan exists to guide us. These teachings are hardly neutral, but rather openly teach religion--the religion of atheism and nihilism. The courts have consistently approved teaching this anti-Christian religion in public schools and have blocked all attempts to neutralize these clearly religious ideas.

As the Word of God states, "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables" (2 Timothy 4:3-4).

References

* Dr. Bergman is Professor of Biology at Northwest State College in Ohio.

Cite this article: Bergman, J. 2007. Darwinism: Survival without Purpose. Acts & Facts. 36 (11): 10.

Read the original post:

Darwinism: Survival without Purpose - The Institute for ...

Nato must improve defences against a ‘more aggressive’ Russia …

Nato must improve its defensive capabilities and willingness to act in the wake of increasingly aggressive and unpredictable actions by Russia, the head of the transatlantic alliance said in a German newspaper interview published on Sunday.

The Nato secretary general, Jens Stoltenberg, said he expected the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, and other Nato leaders to revamp their approach at the next Nato summit this summer, given a risk that Russia could gradually give more weight to nuclear weapons in its doctrine, exercises and new military capabilities.

I think Chancellor Merkel and her colleagues will face new decisions at the Nato summit in July in Brussels. We must be alert and resolute, Stoltenberg was quoted saying by Welt am Sonntag.

The Nato leader last week accused Russia of trying to destabilise the west with new nuclear weapons, cyber attacks and covert action, including the poisoning of a Russian former double agent and his daughter in the British town of Salisbury.

We can always do more and must reflect on that now. Salisbury follows, by all appearances, a pattern weve observed for some years Russia is becoming more unpredictable and more aggressive, he said.

Russia denies any involvement and says it is the US-led transatlantic alliance that is a risk to peace in Europe.

Russia must not miscalculate, Stoltenberg told the newspaper. We are always ready to respond when an ally is attacked militarily. We want credible deterrence. We dont want any war. Our goal is de-escalation.

Georgi Markov

In one of the most chilling episodes of the cold war, the Bulgarian dissident was poisoned with a specially adapted umbrella on Waterloo Bridge. As he waited for a bus, Markov felt a sharp prick in his leg. The opposition activist, who was an irritant to the communist government of Bulgaria, died three days later. A deadly pellet containing ricin was found in his skin. His unknown assassin is thought to have been from the secret services in Bulgaria.

Alexander Litvinenko

The fatal poisoning of the former FSB officer sparked an international incident. Litvinenko fell ill after drinking tea laced with radioactive polonium. He met his killers in a bar of the Millennium hotel in Mayfair. The pair were Andrei Lugovoi a former KGB officer turned businessman, who is now a deputy in Russias state Duma and Dmitry Kovtun, a childhood friend of Lugovois from a Soviet military family. Putin denied all involvement and refused to extradite either of the killers.

German Gorbuntsov

The exiled Russian banker survived an attempt on his life as he got out of a cab in east London. He was shot four times with a silenced pistol. He had been involved in a bitter dispute with two former business partners.

Alexander Perepilichnyy

The businessman collapsed while running near his home in Surrey. Traces of a chemical that can be found in the poisonous plant gelsemium were laterfound in his stomach. Before his death, Perepilichnyy was helping a specialist investment firm uncover a $230m Russian money-laundering operation, a pre-inquest hearing was told. Hermitage Capital Management claimed that Perepilichnyy could have been deliberately killed for helping it uncover the scam involving Russian officials. He may have eaten a popular Russian dish containing the herb sorrel on the day of his death, which could have been poisoned.

Boris Berezovsky

The exiled billionaire was found hanged in an apparent suicide after he had spent more than decade waging a high-profile media battle against his one-time protege Putin. A coroner recorded an open verdict after hearing conflicting expert evidence about the way he died. A pathologist who conducted a postmortem examination on the businessmans body said he could not rule out murder.

Scot Young

An associate of Berezovsky whom he helped to launder money, he was found impaled on railings after he fell from a fourth-floor flat in central London. A coroner ruled that there was insufficient evidence of suicide. But Young, who was sent to prison in January 2013 for repeatedly refusing to reveal his finances during a divorce row, told his partner he was going to jump out of the window moments before he was found.

Stoltenberg said hybrid warfare could be added to the agenda of the next Nato-Russia council, a forum that brings together Nato ambassadors and Russias top diplomat to the alliance, despite the suspension of joint exercises and peacekeeping operations.

Hybrid warfare is a possible topic for the Nato-Russia council. We are now preparing the next meeting, so I dont want to say too much, he told the newspaper, referring to increased use of hybrid tactics such as soldiers without insignia.

Its important that we sit together at the table and speak to each other, he said, urging Russia to abide by nuclear arms control treaties.

Stoltenberg listed as evidence of Russias threat its 2014 annexation of Crimea, support for separatists in Ukraine, military presence in Moldova and Georgia, meddling in western elections and involvement in the war in Syria.

Go here to read the rest:

Nato must improve defences against a 'more aggressive' Russia ...

NATO defense spending goes up for third year in a row – The …

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg spoke about defense spending at a news conference in Brussels March 15. (Reuters)

BRUSSELS NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said Thursday that alliance members increased their defense spending in 2017 for a third consecutive year, amid complaints from President Trump that only a handful of the 29 allies are meeting their pledges.

The numbers were unlikely to allay Trumps anger over his perception that Europe is taking the U.S. defense umbrella for granted. No additional countries met NATOs defense spending goals last year, and only four the United States, Britain, Estonia and Greece reached the mark, although more are expected to get there in 2018.

Lagging European defense spending has frustrated U.S. officials for years, but in the Trump era, the numbers have taken on outsize importance.

Countries registering shortfalls face threats from Washington, including the prospect that the United States might not come to their defense. Some of Trumps economic advisers have said that exemptions to new steel and aluminum tariffs might be grantedonly to countries that spend at least 2percent on defense.

[Heres how Europe is pushing back against Trumps tariffs]

All allies are stepping up, doing more in more places in more ways, Stoltenberg said as he unveiled NATOs annual report.

NATO countries not including the United States collectively spent an estimated 1.45percent of their annual economic output on defense last year, still short of the 2percent agreed to by national leaders in 2014 as a 10-year target.

That was the year Russias annexation of Ukraines Crimean Peninsula sparked fears in Europe that the continent wasbadly prepared for a traditional ground war with Russia, once NATOs reason for being.

The report comes as Britain says it believes Russia carried out a nerve-agent attack on its soil this month, a casethe alliance described as the first instance of chemical weapons being used offensively against a member nationsince its foundingafter World War II.

British diplomats on Wednesday outlined their concerns about the attack to their NATO peers, but they stopped short of triggering a formal alliance response.

The substance used is one of the most toxic ever developed, Stoltenberg said.The attack was a breach of international norms and agreements. This attack was unacceptable. It has no place in a civilized world.

He added that the higher spending will help alliance members defend against and respond to chemical attacks of the type unleashed in Salisbury, which targeted a Russian who had spied for Britain.

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg spoke March 15 about an attack in Salisbury, Britain that targeted former Russian double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter. (Reuters)

This year, eight countries are expected to meet NATOs 2percent goal: Britain, Estonia, Greece, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and the United States. In 2017, Poland narrowly missed the cut at 1.99percent of its annual economic output afterits economy grew faster than it had expected when it made its defense spending plans.

Under pressure from the United States, NATO members have pledged to create road maps of how they will meet the goals by 2024.

[NATO allies boost defense spending in the wake of Trump criticism]

Before individual members defense spending turned back upward in 2015, the overall figure had been falling every year since 2008, in part because of the global economic crisis that struck around that time.

Policymakers who were involved in the 2014 negotiations that ended with the spending commitments said that the 2percent figure was chosen in part to galvanize public discussion, not because it was a magic number that would signal NATO had reached a state of readiness.

It was a judgment about what level could be set that was politically at least somewhat credible and at least somewhat achievable and therefore had some mobilizing power about it,said Adam Thomson, who was British ambassador to NATO until 2016 and is now director of the European Leadership Network, a security-focused think tank.

Nobody could quite have expected the way it has been taken up in such an unsophisticated fashion by Trump, but that, too, has had a real impact, he said.

Leaders of countries that do not meet the goals sometimes say the raw numbers fail to fully capture defense commitments. Efficient spending and a willingness to contribute troops to NATO missions are also an important measure, some of them say. In Germany, which lags on hard military spending, leaders say their extensive development aid commitments contribute to global security.

The United States still spends the lions share on defense in the alliance 68.7percent of the total in 2017. That reflects its roleas the foremost global superpower. The United States spent 3.57percent of its overall economic output on defense last year.

Other countries have dramatically ramped up their spending, a reflection of U.S. pressure that started well before Trump was elected anda sense of vulnerability after the annexation of Crimea. Romania poured an extra 34.8percent into its spending last year. Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Spain and Luxembourg also recorded significant jumps.

Although most countries have boosted their spending, a handful have made cuts. Belgium, a nation of 11million that hosts NATO headquarters, cut defense spending by 0.73percent last year, reducing its outlay in the area to 0.9percent of its economic output. Greece and Britain also registered declines,although both are still meeting their pledges.

Read more:

German defense minister slams Trumps military-heavy approach to security

Will Trumps crude issue linkage work?

Today's coverage from Post correspondents around the world

Like Washington Post World on Facebook and stay updated on foreign news

Read more from the original source:

NATO defense spending goes up for third year in a row - The ...

The Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Debate | United …

The Good News: Dr. Wells, you have been following the evolution vs. intelligent design debate for quite some time. What is your opinion on how its been faring and who iswinning?

Jonathan Wells: Before I answer, its important to clarify the issues. Evolution can mean many thingssuch as change over time, or minor changes within existing species, neither of which any sane person doubts. The problem is Darwinismthe theory that all living things are descended from a common ancestor by unguided processes such as natural selection acting on minor variations. Darwinists often confuse the issue by starting with the noncontroversial meanings of evolution and then slipping in their more controversialclaims.

According to intelligent design, it is possible to infer from evidence in nature that some features of the worldsuch as some features of living thingsare explained better by an intelligent cause than by unguided natural processes. Intelligent design does not claim that everything is designed, nor does it claim that anything is perfectly designed. Nor does intelligent design tell us the nature of the designerthough many, including me, believe it was the God of theBible.

Since Darwinism claims that all features of living things can be explained by unguided natural processes, and intelligent design claims that some features are better explained by an intelligent cause, there is an irreconcilable conflict between thetwo.

Currently, Darwinism is winning on the political, legal and media fronts in the United States. Most universities and public schools teach Darwinism as though it were unquestioned fact, though the truth is that a growing number of scientists are questioning it on evidentialgrounds.

Data from the genome projects are revealing major inconsistencies in the Darwinian claim that all organisms share a common ancestor, and no one has ever observed the origin of a new speciesmuch less the origin of new organs and body plansby variation and selection. On the other hand, the evidence for intelligent design is increasing. Sooner or later, the evidence willwin.

GN: Some time back, you mentioned that if the junk DNA turns out to have viable functions, it would support the case for intelligent design. What does the recent data say on thissubject?

JW: According to modern neo-Darwinism, genes that are passed from generation to generation carry a program that directs embryo development, mutations occasionally alter this genetic program to produce new variations, and natural selection then sorts those mutationsthe raw materials of evolutionto produce new species, organs, and body plans. In the 1950s, molecular biologists discovered that proteins, the microscopic building blocks of bodily structures, are formed according to information encoded in different segments of DNA. They then equated gene with protein-coding sequence and mutations with molecular accidents in suchsequences.

By the 1970s, however, it was clear that most of the DNA in human beings and many other animals does not code for proteins. In 1980, Francis Crick [codiscoverer of the structure of DNA] and Leslie Orgel argued in Nature that this noncoding DNA is merely junk that has accumulated in the course of evolution. For the next 25 years, many biologists continued to regard noncoding DNA asjunk.

In his 2009 book Why Evolution Is True, neo-Darwinist Jerry Coyne compared predictions based on intelligent design with those based on Darwinian evolution. If organisms were built from scratch by a designer, he argued, they would not have imperfections. Perfect design would truly be the sign of a skilled and intelligent designer. Imperfect design is the mark of evolution; in fact, its precisely what we expect from evolution [p.81].

According to Coyne, when a trait is no longer used, or becomes reduced, the genes that make it dont instantly disappear from the genome: evolution stops their action by inactivating them, not snipping them out of the DNA. From this we can make a prediction. We expect to find, in the genomes of many species, silenced, or dead, genes: genes that once were useful but are no longer intact or expressed [pp.66-67].

In contrast, Coyne said that creation by design predicts that no such genes would exist. And the evolutionary prediction that well find pseudogenes has been fulfilled, he wrote. Our genomeand that of other speciesare truly well populated graveyards of dead genes [p.67].

But Coyne was dead wrong. A growing mountain of data from genome-sequencing projects shows that most DNA performs essential functions. The Darwinists claim that a large percentage of DNA is evolutionary junk is totally false. This reflects badly not only on them, but also on neo-Darwinism itself. By Coynes logic, the genome-sequencing data refute neo-Darwinism and support intelligentdesign.

GN: This year is Darwins bicentennial. What would you say is a good summary today about his writings onevolution?

JW: Why didnt we celebrate Mendels centennial in the 1920s, or Newtons tricentennial in the 1940s? Both were greatscientists.

Darwin is celebrated not because of his scientific contributions, but because his theory has become the creation myth of atheism. Darwin Day in the United States is a project of the Institute for Humanist Studies, which is dedicated to promoting a nonreligious philosophy. Some atheists have even said they want to establish Darwin Day as a secular alternative toChristmas.

Most people never read The Origin of Species, but if they do they will find that it is a work of theology as much as science. Darwins main argument was that certain features of living things are inexplicable on the theory of creation, but make sense only on his theory of unguided descent with modification. Indeed, there are so many discussions of creation in The Origin of Species that U.S. courts might well consider it unconstitutional to use in publicschools.

In my opinion, the best way to summarize Darwins writings on evolution would be as a revival of ancient materialistic philosophy, such as that taught by the Greek Empedocles and the Roman Lucretius, illustrated with examples drawn from 19th-century naturalscience.

GN: What would you say was Darwins greatest mistake regarding his theory ofevolution?

JW: Darwin was mistaken about a lot of things. He was mistaken about heredity, which he attributed to characteristicssome of them probably acquired during an organisms lifetimethat were blended together from every cell in thebody.

He was mistaken about vertebrate embryos, the earliest stages of which he believed showed us our fishlike ancestor in its adultstate.

He was mistaken about the geographic distribution of species, which he thought could be explained entirely by migration or by geologicalseparation.

He was mistaken in claiming that all organisms were part of one great tree of life with a common ancestor at theroot.

And he was mistaken about the power of natural selection, which he arguedby analogy with artificial selection, which had never produced anything more than changes within existing speciesproduced new species, organs and bodyplans.

But Darwins greatest mistake was to deny design in living things. The unguided processes he invoked have never been able to produce the major innovations needed for evolution. And the more we learn about living things, the more designed theylook.

GN: Some scientists claim the chimpanzee genome is about 99 percent similar to the human genome, but others claim it is closer to 75 percent. What is the truth about this, and how significant are thefindings?

JW: Comparing chimpanzee and human genomes is tricky, not the least because the sequences do not line up exactly and one has to decide where to start the comparison. The 99 percent figure involves only a part of each genome; and depending on the technique and the researcher, the estimates can varysignificantly.

But whatever the estimate, the deeper question is, what does it mean? According to evolutionist Jonathan Marks, who published a book in 2002 titled What It Means to Be 98% Chimpanzee, it means very little. Marks argues that since there are only four [molecular compound] subunits in DNA, any two living things are bound to be at least 25 percent similar. Someone who claims that humans are 99 percent similar to chimps might as well add that humans are 35 percent similar todaffodils.

In fact, the similarity between chimp and human DNAwhatever the figure may beposes a problem for neo-Darwinism. According to neo-Darwinism, organisms are what they are because of their DNAwhich is why DNA mutations can supposedly provide the raw materials for evolution. Then why are chimps and humans so different from each other not only in their anatomy and physiology but also in their intelligence and behavior? Basing an estimate of their similarity on DNA comparisons alone is a byproduct of neo-Darwinian dogma, not biologicalscience.

There is actually abundant evidence that embryo development is not entirely controlled by DNA. More information is necessary, and this information is located in cellular structures that the embryo inherits apart from its DNA. But neo-Darwinian dogma tends to blind people to this evidence and thereby hinders scientificprogress.

GN: You are a prolific writer about intelligent design. What are you currently working on in thisregard?

JW: In the past year I have written two book reviews: Darwin of the Gaps, a review of Francis Collins The Language of God and Why Darwinism Is False, a review of Jerry Coynes Why Evolution Is True .

Mostly, however, I have been doing empirical and theoretical research in my own field, cell and developmental biology. The empirical research involves testing an intelligent design-guided hypothesis about a possible cause of cancer, which I published in 2005. The theoretical research involves formulating testable hypotheses about the nature and location of non-DNA information in the embryo, by analyzing the embryo as though it were a designed whole instead of an accidental byproduct of DNA mutations and naturalselection.

GN: You mentioned some while ago that by the year 2025, the theory of evolution would have lost most of its appeal. Do you still think this date is feasible forthat?

JW: Yes, I do. Of course, its risky to put a date on such a prediction, but scientific discoveries are rapidly making Darwinism less and less plausible, and this is becoming more and more obvious to new students and to others not already committed to the old way ofthinking.

I compare Darwinism to a frozen pond in the springtime. As winter passes and the days grow longer, the ice may look thick, but it becomes honeycombed with melt water. In the next thaw it may disappear overnight. GN

Read the original here:

The Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Debate | United ...

Charles Darwin: Evolution of a Man and His Ideas | United …

In a series of coincidences fewer than two years away, three important historical dates will convergethe bicentennial of the births of Charles Darwin and Abraham Lincoln (both born on Feb. 12, 1809) and the 150th anniversary of the publication (in 1859) of Darwins The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. Many celebrations will take place honoring the memories of these two influential men in worldhistory.

Abraham Lincoln, the 16th U.S. president, is known primarily for three great accomplishments: his Emancipation Proclamation that set the stage for freeing the American slaves; his efforts to preserve the United States when it was wracked by the American Civil War; and his actions that marked him as one of the most humane and respected leaders in recentcenturies.

Yet, of the two, the social, psychological, political and scientific impact of Charles Darwin is greater. Ideas based on Darwinian evolution still permeate most scientific fields and the philosophical perspectives presented in schools, universities and the popular press. Just recently, for example, the Science Channel named its top 100 scientific discoveries of all timeand trumpeted as number one Darwins theory ofevolution.

Who exactly was Charles Darwin? Why did his theory of evolution have such an impact? And more importantly, is what he proposed reallytrue?

Much has been written about the man, but two books (by proevolution authors) have exhaustively covered his life Darwin: The Life of a Tormented Evolutionist (1992) by Adrian Desmond and James Moore, and the twovolume set Charles Darwin: Voyaging (1995) and Charles Darwin: The Power of Place (2002) by Harvard professor Janet Browne. Along with these two biographies are Darwins own autobiography and what was written by Darwins son,Francis.

On the other side of the ledger, books critical of Darwin and his theory include the masterly exposition Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (1985) by biochemist and physician Michael Denton and Darwin on Trial (1991) by University of California law professor Phillip Johnson, to name a few. Much of the material for this article is drawn from thesesources.

Darwins earlylife

Many today assume Darwin was the originator of the idea of evolution, but the concept had actually been around as early as Greek times. Darwins achievement was proposing a mechanism for evolution to worknaturalselection.

Two of the most influential people in Darwins early life and thoughts were his father, Robert, and, indirectly, his famous grandfather Erasmus. Although Erasmus died before Charles was born, Charles father made sure Charles was familiar with his grandfathers writings onevolution.

Erasmus Darwin wrote a book, Zoonomia, that included many evolutionary concepts Charles would later adopt. Erasmus had been a successful physician, as was his son, Robert, and both were decidedly antiChristianalthough careful to disguise their ideas in public. The name of Darwin, write Desmond and Moore, was already associated with subversive atheism. Dr Robert was himself a closet freethinker (p.12).

Charles Darwin eventually rejected Christianity, in part because he could not accept the fate he understood it to decree for unbelievers such as his grandfather, father, older brother and even himself. He wrote in his autobiography: Thus disbelief crept over me at a very slow rate, but was at last complete. The rate was so slow that I felt no distress, and have never since doubted even for a single second that my conclusion wascorrect.

I can indeed hardly see how anyone ought to wish Christianity to be true; for if so the plain language of the text seems to show that the men who do not believe, and this would include my Father, Brother and almost all of my best friends, will be everlastingly punished. And this is a damnable doctrine (Onlineedition).

Sadly, Darwin was influenced by an erroneous, though widely believed, view of Christian doctrine. (To learn what the Bible really teaches on this subject, request or download our free booklet What Happens After Death? )

Darwin s mother tragically died when he was 8 years old, and he followed the loose and freethinking ways of his father and deceased grandfather. He wrote in his autobiography, I may here also confess that as a little boy I was much given to inventing deliberate falsehoods, and this was always done for the sake of causing excitement (emphasis addedthroughout).

He was an attentionseeker; he wanted praise , Desmond and Moore add. He would still do anything at school for the pure pleasure of exciting attention & surprise, and his cultivated lies... gave [him] pleasure, like a tragedy. He told tall tales about natural history ... Once he invented an elaborate story designed to show how fond he was of telling the truth. It was a boys way of manipulating the world (p.13).

He often told lies about seeing rare birds, concurs Janet Browne. The lies were not connected to any sense of shame ... More accurately, they mirrored a search for attention. He wanted to be admired ... Liesand the thrills derived from lieswere for him indistinguishable from the delights of natural history ( Charles Darwin: Voyaging, pp.1314)

As we will see, these tendencies for clever but unfounded tales and the fondness for hiding secrets would, regrettably, arise later in his adult life. As one biographer notes, There will always be an ineluctable mystery surrounding the origin of the theory of natural selection, just as there will always be a shadowy web surrounding the real Charles Darwin (Loren Eiseley, Darwin and the Mysterious Mr. X, 1979, p.93).

Darwin was not a very good student at school. He quit medical school, only to be rescued by his wealthy father and sent to Cambridge in the hope he would make something ofhimself.

He confessed in his autobiography: When I left the school I was for my age neither high nor low in it; and I believe that I was considered by all my masters and by my father as a very ordinary boy, rather below the common standard in intellect. To my deep mortification my father once said to me, You care for nothing but shooting, dogs, and ratcatching, and you will be a disgrace to yourself and all yourfamily.

Around the world on the Beagle

His father, although inwardly rejecting Christianity, thought the best thing for his undisciplined and carefree son would be to live the comfortable life of a country parson, wherein he could placidly pursue his interests in naturalhistory.

Darwin actually completed his theology degree and for a while embraced Scripture, but before he could find a job in the clergy he was offered a berth on the British vessel HMS Beagle, as the captains dining companion. He was not the naturalist on board, a role given to the ships surgeon. Those five years on a trip around the world would radically change his life andbeliefs.

Four great experiences then shaped Darwins future. The first was the trip itselfhe discovered a wonderment and love for natural history and geology that would continue throughout hislife.

Secondly, he would rebel at the bigoted Christianity of the ships captain, RobertFitzRoy.

Thirdly, he read Charles Lyells books on geology arguing the earth was millions of years old, shaking his faith in the Bible and ending any desire for a career in theclergy.

Fourth, he became perplexed by the different varieties of creatures he encountered, especially in the Galapagos Islands. He wondered how these differing species could fit into the standard creationist accounts of hisday.

Returning to England and wearied by the long and perilous journey, he vowed never to sail again. He would spend most of his life within the confines of his rural home in Downe and in London, some 15 milesaway.

At 29, he married his first cousin, Emma, and it looked like he would become another British squire, living comfortably off his fathers money and surrounded by a cohort of cooks, maids, butlers and gardeners. He was never duly employed by anyone and had all the wealth and free time he needed to seek whatever interests suitedhim.

Conflicting ideas on naturalselection

He dedicated his life to the study of nature, deeply desirous of making a name for himself as anaturalist.

While reading Thomas Malthus book Essay on the Principle of Population, he was struck by the similarity between mans competitive struggle for limited resources and the constant fight for survival in nature, providing a possible basis for evolutionnatural selection, the survival of the fittest. Here then I had at last got a theory by which to work, hewrote.

In Darwins conception, random genetic mutations would give some offspring physical advantages over others. These fitter creatures would outlive their companions in struggles with environmental conditions and with one another, enabling them to reproduce in greater numbers, passing the genetic advantages on to the next generation. Darwin imagined that over many generations this would give rise to whole new speciesthus explaining all the kinds of plant and animal life wesee.

As he mused over evolution, then called transmutation, Darwin started to question the need for a Creator God. He began to write some secret notebooks on the subject, afraid to divulge his radical ideas. For a country gentleman with a Christian wife and many Christian friends, he wanted to keep his heretical thoughts to himself. He said they made him feel like confessing amurder.

So he cleverly disguised his ideas and used many euphemisms. He began devising ways of camouflaging his materialism, say Desmond and Moore. Dont mention it, he admonished himself, talk only of inherited mental behavior: To avoid stating how far, I believe, in Materialism, he scrawled in a rush, say only the emotions[,] instincts[,] degrees of talent, which are heredetary [sic] He was learning to guard his words (p.259).

Yet in his secret notebooks he was candid enough to say to himself, Oh, you Materialist! In the terminology of the day, this meant one who believed that only matter exists in the universe and that this strictly material universe is governed by physical laws without the need for aCreator.

Sadly, as he tried to live a respectable life that outwardly appeared very normal, his conscience was being torn by his shocking beliefs. But now, deep into his clandestine work, continue Desmond and Moore, compiling notes that would shock his geological compatriots, his health was breaking. He was living a double life with double standards, unable to broach his species work with anyone ... for fear he be branded irresponsible, irreligious, or worse (p.233).

Two devastating deaths in thefamily

Next, he received two devastating blows to his young family. According to biographer Janet Browne, the death of his beloved daughter Annie at age 10, followed a year later by the death of his firstborn son William, caused great bitterness toward God. This death was the formal beginning of Darwins conscious dissociation from believing in the traditional figure of God ... Bleakness swept in. The gradual numbing of his religious feelings ... and the godless world of natural selection he was even then still creating came implacably face to face with the emptiness of bereavement (p.503).

Yet, ironically, some might say Darwin was a victim of his own theory of natural selection because of the genetic dangers ofinbreeding.

In 1839, he married Emma, his first cousin. Both families had intermarried through first cousins for some time, a dangerous trend for heredity. Twentysix children were born from these firstcousin marriages; 19 were sterile and five died prematurely, including Darwins daughter and first son. Many suffered from mental retardation or other hereditary illnesses, as was the case with his last son. All these effects engendered great hostility toward the idea of a personal, interveningGod.

A DevilsChaplain

Darwin wrestled at this time with publishing his theory, fearing ostracism. Moore writes: The strain showed In a letter, Darwin blurted, What a book a Devils Chaplain might write on the clumsy, wasteful, blundering low and horridly cruel works of nature! It was a book that Darwin feared he might be accused of writing, a book that would reveal him as an unbeliever and open him to punishmentlike the original Devils Chaplain, Rev. Robert Taylorthe Cambridge graduate and apostate priest, who was twice imprisoned for blasphemy (DarwinA Devils Chaplain? onlineedition).

He finally did write what he called his accursed book, but most of the writings were hidden away for 20 years. Only after a colleague, Alfred Russel Wallace, sent him a paper with essentially the same theory was his hand forced. Fearing Wallace might get credit for the theory, Darwin first read his own paper and then Wallaces at a scientificmeeting.

From the time he began to write his secret notebooks on evolution and materialism, he started to suffer terrible psychosomatic disorders for most of his long life. He experienced some 40 years of generally poorhealth.

Not only was he suffering from what seemed to be psychologically induced illnesses, but he was also racked with doubts about his own book. He confessed to some fellow scientists: It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaws & holes as sound parts ... [but] I can carry in it my fruit to market ... A poor rag is better than nothing to carry ones fruit to market in. To another colleague he wrote, I ... have devoted my life to a phantasy [sic] (quoted by Desmond and Moore, pp.475477).

The fruit he wanted to market was his theory of evolutionwhich included a direct attack on the prevailing notions of God, Christianity and the Bible. And what deadly fruit it turned out tobe!

As Desmond and Moore explain: Plumbing the radical depths Darwin saw the cataclysmic consequences. Once grant that species ... may pass into each other ... & the whole fabric totters & falls. The Creationist fabric and all it entailed was his target. He peered into the future and saw the old miraculous edifice collapsing (p.243).

A man for thetimes

Although torn with doubt, Darwins ideas came at an opportune moment for him. It was a period deeply affected by the French Revolution and the overthrow of many European monarchies and clerical power. In his autobiography Darwin wrote, Nothing is more remarkable than the spread of skepticism or rationalism during the latter half of my life. He was able to take advantage of the radical political and social winds that were blowing hisway.

The age of positivism had arrived, promising science would lead to an epoch of constant scientific and material progress, ultimately answering all of mans questions and solving his problems without the help of religion. It was also a time when the churches of Britain were viewed by many radicals like Darwin as corrupt andoutdated.

Darwin proposed a theory that essentially displaced the Creator God, with only physical and undirected mechanisms such as natural selection and adaptation doing the creating. His vision, state Desmond and Moore, was no longer of a world personally sustained by a patrician God, but selfgenerated. From echinoderms [marine creatures such as starfish] to Englishmen, all had arisen through a lawful redistribution of living matter in response to an orderly changing geological environment (p.237).

It should be noted that in later editions of The Origin of Species , Darwin did add the term Creator in a few places and in his conclusion, in one place stating: There is a grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one. Yet he later confessed to his outraged colleagues that this impression of theistic or deistic evolution was to soothe the feelings of his Christian wife and of a likemindedpublic.

Even so, Darwin admitted to wavering views and claimed to be an agnostic. In an 1879 letter he wrote: I have never been an Atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God Agnostic would be the more correct description of my state of mind (Darwin to J. Fordyce, published by him in Aspects of Scepticism, 1883).

Consequences of thetheory

The results of Darwins theory ofevolution were dramatic. Atheism and secularism became widely popular. As one of todays most ardent modern supporters of Darwin and atheism, Richard Dawkins, has famously said, Darwin made it possible to become an intellectually fulfilled atheist ( The Blind Watchmaker , 1986, p.6).

So scientific materialism spread like wildfire. Karl Marx, the father of communism, out of gratitude to Darwin, sent him Das Kapital, his principal book on communism. Although developed in the crude English fashion, he wrote to his communist colleague Friedrich Engels, this [Darwins The Origin of Species ] is the book which in the field of natural history, provides the basis for our views. To another he wrote that Darwins work suits my purpose in that it provides a basis in natural science for the historical class struggle (Browne, p.188).

This evolutionary backing eventually helped establish the philosophical framework for the twin scourges of communism and atheism in Russia, China and many othernations.

As Darwins ideas gained respectability, moral absolutes were increasingly questioned. If there is no Creator, then it seemed all things are permissible. If there is no God, then there are no ultimate consequences. If there is no greater authority than yourself, then the rules of survival of the fittest are in effect and back the idea that you can succeed by any means by applying the law of the jungleonly the strongsurvive.

To cap it off, Darwin wrote in 1871 his Descent of Man, describing human descent from apes, a book with considerable baseless speculation and even racist claimsincluding that of white supremacy (as whites were reckoned as further from apes along the evolutionary advancement chain thanblacks).

Hitler later used some of these ideas, called social Darwinism, in World War II to eradicate millions of Jews and others he thought were racially inferior. He said: Nature is cruel, therefore we, too, may be cruel ... I have the right to remove millions of an inferior race that breeds like vermin!... Natural instincts bid all living beings not merely conquer their enemies, but also destroy them (quoted by Hermann Rauschning, The Voice of Destruction, 1940, pp.137138).

In effect, Hitler could say he was applying the theory of evolution and only quickening the inevitable end of the weak. This was necessary to make room for a fitter, superior race. It gave him what he thought was a scientific and moral validity for his warped viewsand some 65 million people died in World War II largely because of those warpedviews.

Flaws in Darwinstheory

As we near the 150th anniversary of The Origin of Species, we find a world deeply divided over Darwins ideas. The belief in God, creation and the Bible has not disappeared, although admittedly it has been greatlyweakened.

Yet as more scientific discoveries are made, including the intricacies of the human DNA genome (consisting of carefully assembled instructions 3 billion genetic letters long), the mindboggling complexity of the cell and the millions of missing transitional forms between different animal and plant types, Darwins theory truly is introuble.

As recently as twentyfive years ago, noted Patrick Glynn, a former atheist and a Ph.D. from Harvard, in 1997, a reasonable person weighing the purely scientific evidence on the issue would likely have come down on the side of skepticism. That is no longer the case. Today the concrete data point strongly in the direction of the God hypothesis ( God: The Evidence, 1997, pp.5556).

But many scientists are unwilling to give up evolution because of the theological and philosophicalimplications.

We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, Harvard biologist Richard Lewontin once candidly admitted, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated justsostories, because we have a prior commitment ... to materialism ... We cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door (Billions and Billions of Demons, New York Review of Books, Jan. 9, 1997, p.31).

Wheres theevidence?

Of course, what Darwin always lacked was the evidence of transitional forms between onecelled and multicelled organisms, between reptiles and mammals, and between apes and men, just to name a few. He even asked: Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against the theory ( The Origin of Species, 1958, Mentor edition, pp.293294).

So what did he do? He explained away the missing fossil evidencesaying the geologic record was sparsely excavated and imperfect. Yet, today, according to biochemist Michael Denton, of the 44 orders of living terrestrial vertebrates, 43 have been found as fossils (a 97 percent recovery rate!). And no transitional forms have been found among these groups. Not even, for instance, anything in between reptile scales and bird feathersand these are groups of creatures supposedlyrelated.

Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould admitted, The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology ( The Pandas Thumb, 1980, p.181).

If Darwins theory is correct, there should be millions of transitional formsanimals and plants in different stages of transformation into other kinds through mutation and natural selection. In fact, if evolution were true, we should see far more transitional forms than fully complete, fully functioning species. In addition, we should expect to clearly see gradually changing creatures in the more than one million species on earth and the even more numerous fossil types. Yet none have beenfound.

There are some reports that Darwin had a shift in thinking near the end of his lifeperhaps regretting how far his ideas had been taken and even accepting the idea of salvation through Christ (though still believing in evolution). While possible, as Darwin considered personal beliefs to be private, none of his family ever admitted to such a change in his thinking, including his believing wife. And for society it wouldnt have really mattered, as his disciples would not have turnedback.

Biographers Desmond and Moore conclude on page 677 with the following scene as Darwin is solemnly laid to rest in Westminster Abbey: It marked the accession to power of the traders in natures marketplace, the scientists and their minions in politics and religion. Such men, on the upandup, were paying their dues, for Darwin had naturalized Creation and delivered human nature and human destiny into their hands. Society would never be the same. The Devils chaplain had done his work. GN

Excerpt from:

Charles Darwin: Evolution of a Man and His Ideas | United ...