One of the deepest mysteries in physics, known as the Hubble tension, could be explained by a long-since vanished form of dark matter.

The Hubble tension, as Live Science has previously reported, refers to a growing contradiction in physics: The universe is expanding, but different measurements produce different results for precisely how fast that is happening. Physicists explain the expansion rate with a number, known as the Hubble constant (H0). H0 describes an engine of sorts thats driving things apart over vast distances across the universe. According to Hubbles Law (where the constant originated), the farther away something is from us, the faster its moving.

And there are two main ways of calculating H0. You can study the stars and galaxies we can see, and directly measure how fast theyre moving away. Or you can study the cosmic microwave background (CMB), an afterglow of the Big Bang that fills the entire universe, and encodes key information about its expansion.

Related: The 11 Biggest Unanswered Questions About Dark Matter

As the tools for performing each of these measurements have gotten more precise, however, its become clear that CMB measurement and direct measurements of our local universe produce incompatible answers.

Researchers have offered different explanations for the disparity, from problems with the measurements themselves to the possibility we live in a low-density bubble within the larger universe. Now, a team of physicists is suggesting that the universe might have fundamentally changed between the time after the Big Bang and today. If an ancient form of dark matter decayed out of existence, that loss would have changed the mass of the universe; and with less mass, there would be less gravity holding the universe together, which would have impact the speed at which the universe expands leading to the contradiction between the CMB and the direct measurements of the universes expansion rate.

There was a time, decades ago, when physicists suspected dark matter might be hot zipping around the universe at close to the speed of light, said Dan Hooper, head of the Theoretical Astrophysics Group at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois, and co-author of the new paper. But by the mid-1980s they were convinced that this unseen stuff that makes up most of the mass of the universe is likely slower-moving and cold. Physicists refer to the mostly widely-accepted model of the universe as Lambda-CDM, for Cold Dark Matter.

Still, Hooper told Live Science, the idea of warm dark matter a form of dark matter that falls somewhere in between the hot and cold models still gets some traction in the physics world. Some physicists speculate that dark matter is made of sterile neutrinos, for example, theoretical ghostly particles that barely interact with matter. This hypothetical dark matter would be much warmer than typical Lambda-CDM models allow, but not hot.

Another possibility is that most of the dark matter is cold, but maybe some of it is warm. And in our paper, the stuff thats warm isnt even stuff thats around today. Its stuff that was created in the early universe and after thousands or tens of thousands of years it started to decay. Its all gone by now, Hooper said.

Related: 11 fascinating facts about our Milky Way galaxy

That lost dark matters mass would have represented a significant chunk of the total mass of the universe when it existed, leading to a different expansion rate when the CMB formed just after the Big Bang. Now, billions of years later, it would be long gone. And all the stars and galaxies we can measure would be moving away from us at speeds determined by the universes current mass.

When you measure the local Hubble constant youre really measuring that thing: Youre measuring how fast things are moving apart from one another, youre measuring how fast space is expanding, Hooper said. But translating the CMB data into an expansion rate requires using a model, such as the Lambda-CDM. So if you get different measurements from the local measurements and the CMB measurement, maybe that models wrong.

Local measurements measurements of the region of space close enough to Earth for astronomers to precisely measure the speed and distance of individual objects dont require cosmological models to interpret, so theyre typically seen as more straightforward and robust.

Some researchers have still suggested there may be problems with our measurements of the local universe. But most attempts to resolve the Hubble tension involve tweaking Lambda-CDM somehow. Usually, they add something to the model that changes how the universe expands or evolves. This paper, Hooper said, is another step down that road.

Im not going to give the impression that it makes everything great, he said. Its not a perfect concordance among the data by any means. But it makes the tension less severe I dont know of any solution to this, other than the measurements are wrong, that reduces the tension [as much as youd need to fully solve the problem].

Hoopers original proposal to his collaborators on the paper didnt involve warm dark matter at all, he said. Instead, he imagined a second, lost form of cold dark matter. But when they started to test that idea, he said, they found that this extra cold dark matter was screwing up the whole structure of the universe. Stars and galaxies formed in ways that didnt match what we see around us in the universe today. The decayed, lost form of dark matter, they concluded, had to be warm if it was going to fit observations.

The new paper doesnt determine what particles the lost dark matter might be made of, but strongly suggests that warm dark matter might have been made up of sterile neutrinos particles that other physicists also believe are likely out there.

Its definitely the thing that requires the fewest number of tooth fairies to make work, Hooper said. But other possibilities exist.

Whatever it is though, it must have turned into something even more exotic and feebly interacting when it decayed. Matter cant just stop existing; it has to transform into something else. If that something else were distributed differently through the universe, or interacted differently with other particles in the universe, that would change how the universe expanded.

So wed be surrounded in a bath of this dark radiation, Hooper said. Were already surrounded in a bath of neutrinos so this would just be a little bit more of that kind of stuff. Some sort of bath that fills the universe today of very, very inert forms of matter.

For now, researchers dont have methods for probing the for this sort of hidden radiation, Hooper said, so the idea remains speculative. The paper was published to the arXiv database April 13.

Originally published on Live Science.

Click Here To Read More

Like Loading...

Related

View post:

A long-lost type of dark matter may resolve the biggest disagreement in physics - Times Famous