As the days unfold with a seeming sameness in this odd summer of the pandemic, news of vaccine clinical trials begins to trickle in, and another buzzword from epidemiology is entering the everyday lexicon: durability.
To be successful, a vaccines protection must last or booster shots periodically restore it. Some vaccines lose efficacy over time, including those for yellow fever, pertussis, and of course influenza.
For some vaccines, antibodies and the B cells that make them persist and protect for a long time. For other infectious diseases, like TB and malaria, T cells are needed in vaccines too. B and T cells (lymphocytes) are types of white blood cells, which are part of the immune system.
Give amanafishand you feedhimfor a day.Teach himhow tofishand you feedhimfor a lifetime, said Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu, founder of Taoism.
Tzu might have been referring metaphorically to the immune systems response to viral infection: an initial rush of antibodies that fades as a longer-lasting cell-based memory builds that primes the body to rapidly release antibodies upon a future encounter with the pathogen.
Antibodies are proteins, so they dont make more of themselves as cells might. Thats why antibodies collected from plasma from a person whos recovered from COVID-19 lasts a few weeks. Its also why an antibody medicine like Regenerons dual-antibody REGN-COV2 provides only short-term protection, a bridge until a vaccine becomes available.
To remain effective over a reasonable period of time, a vaccine must mimic the memory component of an immune response, which arises from B and T cells and is therefore called the cellular immune response. The shorter-term release of antibodies into the bloodstream is the humoral immune response (humor means fluid).
A strong antibody response to a vaccine may be a harbinger of lasting B and T cell protection, but vaccines may be marketed before their durability is known a complete understanding of how long a vaccines protection lasts can take years. The vaccine against the mumps, for example, went on the market in 1967, but in 2006, several colleges had outbreaks, among students whose childhood mumps vaccine had worn off. A booster extends the coverage.
Clues to a COVID-19 vaccines durability come from natural immunity from past coronavirus infections. The antibody response to SARS and MERS persisted less than a year. But so far, the cellular immune response to SARS, the older of the two, has lasted eleven years.
Clinical trials to evaluate COVID-19 vaccines in people consider both antibody production and the building of cellular immunity. And a vaccine can be even more protective than natural immunity.
A vaccine elicits memory B and T cells so the immune system remembers how to fight the disease in the future. Natural infection is not likely to produce durable immunity and vaccination will be essential to produce herd immunity to reduce the probability of viral transmission, said Arlene Sharpe MD PhD co-director of the Evergrande Center for Immunologic Diseases at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Womens Hospital on a recent zoom that MassCPR, a group of Boston-area institutions that formed in early March in response to the pandemic, held.
The immune system isnt as easy to visualize as a skeleton splayed out in a Halloween decoration, the flattened entrails of a roadkill, or the circulatory system, which even Groucho Marx in the film Horse Feathers could easily explain. (Let us follow a corpuscle on its journey through the body.)
Instead, the immune system is an army of billions of cells and their secretions that stand ready to attack newly encountered pathogens, remember old ones, and at the same time recognize self, protecting the bodys own tissues. The cells travel in clear lymph fluid, passing through lymph nodes that filter out debris.
The immune system reacts in three stages. First, physical barriers keep pathogens out: skin, earwax, waving cilia in the throat, stomach acid, diarrhea. Next, innate immunity unleashes a bath of inflammatory molecules that are a generalized response to infection.
Finally comes adaptive immunity, which is specific and provides the memory that a vaccine emulates. In addition to T and B cells, innate immunity includes the wandering, blobby macrophages, which engulf pathogens and are festooned with bits of a pathogens surface antigens that alert other immune defenses.
Antibody production begins when a stimulated B cell divides in the bone marrow, giving rise to two types of cells. One, a plasma cell, has a clear oblong area that is a ginormous Golgi apparatus, which processes 2,000 antibodies per second that enter the circulation.
The second daughter cell of a dividing B cell is a memory B cell. Like the name suggests, a memory B cell hangs around, and if the pathogen shows up again, jumps into action and pumps out more antibodies, cutting off the new infection fast.
An important part of the antibody response is that its polyclonal differently-shaped antibodies are produced, each recognizing and binding to a different part of a pathogen, like using different weapons to tackle different parts of an enemys body.
Some antibodies just bind to a pathogen, but others neutralize it, and those are the ones that make a vaccine or immune response effective. Yet certain other antibodies actually enhance infection; vaccines are designed to block this from happening.
T cells come in several varieties and exert complex effects.
Tracking T cells is important in evaluating potential vaccine durability. And although we only have a half-year of data, the natural infection suggests that antibody responses may be short-lived or not strong enough.
Investigators are reporting the antibody response in humans infected with COVID who recover tends to drop relatively quickly. To some people thats an alarm bell and they guess that a vaccine will show little durability. But following recovery from an acute infection, a decline in antibodies is normal B cell biology and is exactly what we predict, said Daniel Barouch, MD, PhD, professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School and director, Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
One of the first reports showed antibodies decreasing by half in just 37 days among a small sample of people who had mild cases. Thats similar to SARS and MERS, in which antibodies fade away within a year. But so far, reports of phase 1 clinical trial results for two COVID vaccines are encouraging.
The first interim report, published in The New England Journal of MedicineJuly 14, found that all 45 participants who received one of three doses of Modernas mRNA-1273 vaccine made antibodies, more with the higher dose. Binding antibodies appeared by day 15 and neutralizing antibodies after a second dose on day 28. Neutralizing antibodies are a biomarker of vaccine protection for other respiratory viruses, so thats good news.
Responses are comparable to what occurs with natural infection, and perhaps a little higher. Data are encouraging; the strategy elicits immune responses that are targeted against the virus, said Lindsey R. Baden, MD, associate professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School and director of clinical research, Brigham and Womens Hospital. The study used antibodies in plasma from recovered patients as a control for the natural immune response, and the vaccine exceeded that comparison.
Even better news: participants made T cells. Helpers appear first, which pump out a specific soup of cytokines, and then after the second dose of vaccine, killers appear, making sure that any remaining viruses cant replicate.
The phase 1 trial showed that the middle of three doses is best for tempering efficacy with side effects. Phase 2 began in May and phase 3, began on July 27. Overall, depending on the number of trials that progress, hundreds of thousands of people may participate.
Modernas vaccine (mRNA-1273) is designed to enhance visibility to the immune system. The target cell translates it into an engineered version of the viruss spike protein that tames the inflammatory response. The spike is also tweaked to be more stable than the natural one.
On July 20 the second clinical trial report came from the Oxford COVID Vaccine Trial Groups candidate ChAdOx1, in The Lancet. That vaccine consists of the genetic instructions for the spike protein delivered in a chimpanzee virus.
Like the mRNA vaccine, Oxfords candidate is given in doses 28 days apart. And it, too, evokes both a humoral (antibody) and cellular (T cell) response.
So far, the numbers of vaccinated people are small, but the reports are optimistic.
With clever variationson the clinical trial theme, like overlapping phases and designing spike proteins to be more visible to the immune system, it may indeed be possible to barrel through phase 3 clinical trials that test a statistically significant number of people. But post-marketing surveillance, a normal part of drug development, is going to be critical.
The participants in the MassCPR zoom marveled that vaccine development for COVID-19 is so far taking 5 to 10 months, compared to the historical 5 to 10 years.
We are only months into knowing about this virus, so any longevity of the immune response we have to interpret with care because our understanding of the biology and durability of the biology will take time. The virus will evolve and we have to take that into consideration, said Baden. He showed data from monkeys that suggest a long-lasting effect is possible.
Practically speaking, the phase 3 trials will take time because the participants arent being injected with virus, for ethical reasons. Instead, investigators must wait for the volunteers to encounter the virus in their communities, to see if a smaller percentage of vaccinated people become infected than the unvaccinated control groups. And thats why a vaccine by the end of the year would be quite a surprise for many of us, said Ken Mayer, MD, of the Fenway Institute.
Well have increasing clarity as the next 3 to 6 months proceed with a suite of clinical trials underway or soon to be. Most optimistic is late fall for first availability for an Emergency Use Authorization. But a tremendous number of things would have to go perfectly to achieve that. Early 2021 is more realistic, said Barouch. An EUA brought COVID-19 treatment remdesivir to patients before the official FDA approval.
Baden agreed that early 2021 is more feasible. He points out the potential savings of 6 to 12 months from beginning to manufacture candidate vaccines before their clinical trials conclude, well before. Financial risks are acceptable, safety not, and thats why it will take at least 3 to 6 months more.
Once a vaccine is out there, attention will turn to epidemiology. What percentage of the population must be vaccinated or have natural immunity to induce herd immunity? And how many people will actually take a vaccine?
If several vaccines make it to the finish line, how will people be assigned to them? People over age 65, for example, would benefit most from a vaccine that includes an adjuvant, which is a chemical that affects the immune response. A vaccine candidate from Australian biotech company Vaxine Pty Limited, for example, includes a complex sugar that lowers the risk of the vaccine triggering an excessive immune response. The sugar adjuvant has worked well in vaccines against influenza, hepatitis B, and West Nile virus, according to Nikolai Petrovsky, PhD, research director at the company.
Assessing the all-important T cell response will take time, too, because thats the way the cellular immune response unfurls in nature. Gradually. A full immune response is a finely-tuned process that is a consequence of millennia of evolution not of politics, PR, potential profits, or wishful thinking.
Ricki Lewis has a PhD in genetics and is a genetics counselor, science writer and author of Human Genetics: The Basics. Follow her at her website or Twitter @rickilewis.
Read more:
- IOM not webcast today. Why Not? [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- National Academies skeptical at Best. [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Some Confusion Exists [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Why DTC Genomics IS Medicine. [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- First Mari, Now Linda. Who's next? [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Is it true? [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Re-Reviewing the National Academies [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- The problem with nonclinicians....... [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Crazy Night of Emails to Government [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Adrienne Carlson's Personalized Medicine. [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Tell Me, How do you feel now? Sherpa's RX [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- This Just In. 23andMe to go to GPs. I love my readers!! [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Sorry so long away [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- 2D6 Rears its ugly head..... [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Ok, Fine, Back to Plavix [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Kaiser a protoype for Collins' Aim [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- A few months late to the party.... [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Stated Another Way....... [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Excuse Me? Harvard and Navigenics? WTF? [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Follow up to Yesterday's WTF? Harvard, Navi? and Pfizer??? [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Did you get your kit? Thanks Dr. Rob from MedCo [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Gluco...Wha? Parkinson's Disease and Glucocerebrosidase mutations. [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Away and now back, What did I miss???? 23andme layoffs? Selling Genomes for cheap up next! [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Change IS Needed. I agree with William, sometimes. [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Good Enough Science? Apparently so at 23andme [Last Updated On: November 8th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 8th, 2009]
- Long QT Syndrome, location matters [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- Congratulations Generation Health. Nice pick up! [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- An argument 23andSerge can't win...23andme but not medicine [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- Stop. Breathe. Repeat. An analysis of the direction of DTC Genomics Field. [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- Hey DTC genomics, Stay Private, Stay Alive, Go Public and Die [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- You can't have it both way. Either scared your genome is sold off or not. [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- 15 Days Away Gives Time for Perspective. [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- What about the SACGHS registry? Another missed opportunity? [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- AJHG is in and my Favorite Muin is in it! But He Is NOT the Father! [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2009]
- Navigenics for 23andMe prices? [Last Updated On: December 18th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 18th, 2009]
- Lp(a) Maybe there's something there that wasn't there before? [Last Updated On: December 24th, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 24th, 2009]
- Another Year, Another Bankruptcy [Last Updated On: December 31st, 2009] [Originally Added On: December 31st, 2009]
- 5 Technologies going bye bye in this decade? [Last Updated On: January 6th, 2010] [Originally Added On: January 6th, 2010]
- Hackers, HITECH and HIPAA in DTC Genomics, Oh My! [Last Updated On: January 7th, 2010] [Originally Added On: January 7th, 2010]
- Personal Genomics Flop.....big Belly Flop! [Last Updated On: January 8th, 2010] [Originally Added On: January 8th, 2010]
- Gotta Love It. Even the daycare....... [Last Updated On: January 11th, 2010] [Originally Added On: January 11th, 2010]
- Congratulations Navigenics. You ARE a clinical lab! Uh-Oh... [Last Updated On: January 12th, 2010] [Originally Added On: January 12th, 2010]
- CETP, Jewish Centenarians and Alzheimers [Last Updated On: January 14th, 2010] [Originally Added On: January 14th, 2010]
- Enter the "Not" DTC Genomics Rep [Last Updated On: January 17th, 2010] [Originally Added On: January 17th, 2010]
- Why Dr. Vanier's Navigenics appointment is good for PM [Last Updated On: January 22nd, 2010] [Originally Added On: January 22nd, 2010]
- Holy Crap! MedCo Follows in CVS footsteps [Last Updated On: February 3rd, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 3rd, 2010]
- FDA, Warfarin, still not as sexy to me. [Last Updated On: February 5th, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 5th, 2010]
- Hype, Hype, Hype from a single study. [Last Updated On: February 11th, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 11th, 2010]
- I love my readers, even Renata M! [Last Updated On: February 17th, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 17th, 2010]
- How can insurers use DTC genomics to profile? [Last Updated On: February 17th, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 17th, 2010]
- 9p21.....ahem. Paynter et.al. Smackdown. Again. [Last Updated On: February 18th, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 18th, 2010]
- Hey! It's Pete Hulick! Are you Going to GET? [Last Updated On: February 19th, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 19th, 2010]
- I was wrong......AHEM [Last Updated On: February 28th, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 28th, 2010]
- G2C2, finally a tool for genomic education! [Last Updated On: March 2nd, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 2nd, 2010]
- Just 4 million? What 23andMe is worth. [Last Updated On: March 5th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 5th, 2010]
- What a difference a year makes [Last Updated On: March 9th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 9th, 2010]
- ........DTC Genomic Medicine? [Last Updated On: March 12th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 12th, 2010]
- The FDA, 2c19 and the ACC [Last Updated On: March 13th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 13th, 2010]
- The problem with Comparative Whole Genomics...... [Last Updated On: March 13th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 13th, 2010]
- BRCA testing by 23andME is the same as Myriad Genetics. [Last Updated On: March 15th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 15th, 2010]
- The Argument Against DTC Genomics Marketing and such [Last Updated On: March 16th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 16th, 2010]
- A moment of Clarity. Some DTCG is not bad. [Last Updated On: March 18th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 18th, 2010]
- SNPs for breast cancer risk? It Depends. [Last Updated On: March 18th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 18th, 2010]
- How can MDVIP use Navigenics Test for Medicine? [Last Updated On: March 18th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 18th, 2010]
- Why did P&G invest in Navigenics? [Last Updated On: March 23rd, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 23rd, 2010]
- PGx in DTCG? Doesn't stand up to Useful testing. [Last Updated On: March 25th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 25th, 2010]
- End of Gene Patents? [Last Updated On: March 29th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 29th, 2010]
- Sherpa Accepting Chief Medical Officership [Last Updated On: April 3rd, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 3rd, 2010]
- The Rumors of My Death........ [Last Updated On: April 20th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 20th, 2010]
- Happy DNA Day! [Last Updated On: April 25th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 25th, 2010]
- 99 USD, DNA day and patient letters [Last Updated On: April 25th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 25th, 2010]
- 2C19, Navigenics and Clinical Reality. [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2010]
- Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative rising [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2010]
- Personal Genomes in Clinical Care. Quake paper is a waste! [Last Updated On: May 11th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 11th, 2010]
- Personal Genomes in Clinical Care. Quake paper Falls Short! [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2010]
- Last post edited by Drew [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2010]
- GateKeeper? FCUK U! [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2010]
- GateKeeper? F! U! [Last Updated On: May 15th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 15th, 2010]
- Potential of genomic medicine, LOST [Last Updated On: May 19th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 19th, 2010]
- How Bad Can a House Investigation be for DTC Genomics? [Last Updated On: May 20th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 20th, 2010]