The phrase orbital mechanicslike nuclear particle physics or the theory of relativityis something that makes many peoples eyes glaze over. The average person thinks that subjects like these are far too complex to understand. But if you strip away all the math and simply try to understand what is going on, they are actually not that hard to grasp. As for orbital mechanics, it is the physics of spaceflightit describes how objects move relative to one another in space. Once you understand the mechanics of how planets and spacecraft interact with gravity, its easy to make a spacecraft do what you want it to do.
If you take a baseball and throw it straight away from yourself, it will eventually hit the dirtit runs out of speed, and then gravity pulls it to the earth. If youre a major league pitcher, your throw will probably go farther than mine because it launches off your hand faster. But gravity eventually does its thing, and the ball will come down to the earth. Now, lets build a machine to throw the ball fasterit will go farther, of coursebut the ball will always curve down and hit the dirt. That curve the ball follows, by the way, is known as a ballistic path. Because of gravity, any object thrown or fired into the air will eventually be pulled back to the earth. With every increase in speed, the ball goes farther. If we change the ball to a projectile, and start firing it from a gun, then it will go farther still.
Naval guns can fire projectiles so far that they go over the horizon before falling back to the earth (hopefully on their targets). That phrase, over the horizon, is key to understanding orbital mechanics. The spherical shape of Earth means that as you travel horizontally, the surface is always curving down. If you can throw the object fast enough that its drop, its ballistic path, is equivalent to Earths curvature, then it will never hit the planetand voil it has gone into orbit!
It takes a tremendous amount of speed to reach that point where your object is not going to hit the earthin the neighborhood of 25,000 feet per second (thats over 17,000 miles per hour) if youre talking about flying in the region known as low-Earth orbit (LEO). Lets call that anywhere from about 100 miles above the surface to about 400 milesgive or take. Thats where the Space Shuttle did all its work. If we take our imaginary baseball or projectile and keep upping the speed, eventually it will go so fast that it never falls back to Earth. The speed at which that occurs is known as escape velocity. We never worried about escape velocity with the Shuttleit didnt have the capability to go that fast. Unlike the Apollo spacecraft that took men to the moon, the entire Shuttle spacecraft was always coming back to Earth. It would have taken approximately its own weight in fuel to propel the Orbiter to the moon. (I asked my navigators to figure that out one night)
So the first element of orbital mechanics isnt that hardmake an object move fast enough relative to the planet, and it will never hit the planet. It will just keep going around and around and arounduntil, of course, something slows it down to where it begins dropping toward the surface. What might slow it down? Well, one thing might be running into the thinnest wisp of the atmosphere, the widely spaced molecules of gas that reach for hundreds of miles into space. The atmosphere doesnt just end abruptly, it gradually gets thinner and thinner as you move away from the planets surface. It never really goes away completely, it just eventually fades in density until it no longer has any effect. Just about 100 miles above Earths surface, there are enough air molecules that if a spacecraft runs into them, an infinitesimal amount of energy is lost with every collision. You cant measure the energy from any one collision, but if you add up enough of them you can eventually discover that you have lost some speed. And that speed loss adds up.
The slower you go, the more you fall back to Earth. So the effect of running into the atmosphere is that it drags you back down. If you dont add some velocity with a rocket motor burn every once in a while, you wont stay in orbit. It doesnt take a lotjust a couple of feet per second every daybut if you dont account for it, your mission isnt going to last very long. We use this effect to our advantage, of courseits how we bring a spacecraft home. If you point your spacecraft so that when you ignite an engine it slows the craft down significantly, then you will drop lower into the atmosphere where the gas is thicker, which then slows you down even moreeventually to the point where you have been captured by the atmosphere, and you fall to the earth. This is what happens when a meteor becomes a meteorite: it generates enough heat from the friction of the atmosphere to quickly burn up, which creates the streak we see in the night sky. Of course, burning up on reentry is the last thing we want a spacecraft to do, so we have to enter in a controlled fashion. Well talk about that later.
For now, lets remember that if we go fast enough horizontally, we end up orbiting Earth rather than falling back to the surface. The faster you go, the higher you go. The slower you go, the lower you go (until you fall out of orbit and are captured by the planets atmosphere). These are the basics of orbital motion (or mechanics). With that mental picture, you can understand almost anything else well talk about when it comes to the Space Shuttles trajectory.
To get the Shuttle into orbit, you have to do two things: get it out of the atmosphere and accelerate it to orbital velocity. In the simplest terms, the first part of that is done with the Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs). These two monsters had enough energy to loft the entire Shuttle stack up to an altitude where the air was so thin as to be negligible. They did this in just a little over two minutes. Each SRB put out about 3 million pounds of thrust, for a combined total of 6 million pounds. By comparison, the three Shuttle main engines contributed another half-million pounds of thrust each, for a total of 1.5 million poundsa much smaller portion of the overall thrust available at liftoff. Not insignificant, of course, but stillthe SRBs dominated during what we referred to as the first stage.
When the SRBs dropped off, the vehicle was up where the air was not a real factor, but it was only going a couple thousand feet per second horizontally. It was now the job of the main engines to accelerate the ever-lightening stack (the Orbiter and External Tank) to that magic number of 25,000 feet per second to get it to stay in orbit. That ever lightening part is importantas you burn fuel, you get lighter, but with a constant thrust (about 1.5 million pounds, remember?) you are going to accelerate more quickly. Thats a consequence of Newtons basic law of motionif the force remains the same and the mass decreases, the acceleration goes up! Now the Orbiter was designed for a maximum acceleration of three times the force of gravity (3 Gs). A G is about 32 feet per second per second, so 3 Gs is just about 100 feet per second per secondyoure really gaining velocity quick! When the acceleration reached that point, the only thing you could do to keep from over stressing the vehicle was to throttle the engines back, and that is what we did. In the last two minutes or so, the throttles would come back to make sure we didnt break anything.
In the simplest terms, when you reached the desired velocity to make orbit, you shut down the engines and coasted into orbit. It sounds simplebut it isnt. Lets stretch our knowledge of orbital mechanics a bit. Lets assume that you are in a circular orbitthe same altitude above Earth at all points in the orbit. If you decide that you want to go higher, then you have to increase your speed. This is done with a thrust event, known as doing a burn, because we thrust by firingburningan engine. If you squint and allow yourself to approximate, doing a burn to increase your speed by 1 foot per second will increase your altitude by about a half mile. Thats not an instantaneous gainwhat you are actually doing is driving yourself uphill until you reach that new altitude, which you will reach when you are halfway around Earth. But you wont remain there. Think of the ballistic path that a ball takes when you throw itit first increases in height, then gravity pulls it back down, and so it comes back down again. The same thing happens when you increase the Orbiters velocityit will go uphill to the new altitude, but it eventually comes back to where it startedright to the altitude where you increased the speed. It so happens that youll reach your new altitude halfway around the world, and then youll be back where you started when you complete the orbit. It will continue in this elliptical path for as long as you let it.
However, if we want to raise the orbit all the way around, we can simply thrust again by the same amount when we reach our new height (referred to as the apogee). We will have raised our altitude at the starting point by a half mile as well, meaning that we will be in a new circular orbit a half-mile higher than when we started the pair of burns. We will have also increased our velocity by 2 feet per second total.
The math is really convenient if youre trying to do it in your headif you want to raise the orbit by 10 miles, you simply burn 20 feet per second (fps) initially, then another 20 fps at the new apogee, and voilyoure in a new circular orbit 10 miles higher, and it cost you a total velocity change (referred to as delta V) of 40 fps. Raising and lowering the orbit is how you execute a rendezvous. But for now, its important that we get into, and then know how to get out of, orbit.
Lets take a look at the very end of the initial launch. There we are, thrusting all three main engines, accelerating at 100 feet per second every second. Knowing what we now know about orbital mechanics, we know that for every second we burn the main engines at this point, we are raising the orbital altitude by 50 miles when we get around the planet. We need about 100 miles of altitude to reliably stay out of the atmosphereconsider it the minimum safe altitude we want to end up in. The International Space Station is at an altitude of about 200 miles, the Hubble Space Telescope is about 350. The Orbiter lived in the altitude band between 100 miles and 350 milesa difference of just 250 miles. In terms of orbital insertion speed, that is just five seconds of burn time.
A full ascent, from the launch pad to Main Engine Cutoff (MECO) was about eight and a half minutes, or about 510 seconds. The orbital altitude range of the vehicle meant that cutoff would be plus or minus five seconds, which is a very small percentage of that total burn time. Miss it by 1 percent and we were either not in orbit or we were going way too high, without enough thrusting capability to circularize the orbitor to get home. So MECO was criticalyou had to time it exactly right in order to get precisely into the orbit you wanted, and we considered precise to be within a couple of miles.
No problem, right? I mean, throw the switch at the right time to cut off the engines, and youve got it made. Well its not that simple, because you dont just shut off an engine thats putting out a half million pounds of thrust. It doesnt go from full thrust to zero in an instantit tapers off. Every engine tapers off a little differently, so you need to know the exact shutdown characteristics of each engine. You can measure these characteristics on a test stand on the earth, and then use that information to figure out when to command the engines off, in fractions of a second, so that you end up with exactly the amount of thrust you need to end up at the target altitude. When you look at the hundreds of variables involved, you quickly realize that its going to take a lot of smart people to figure this out. Fortunately, there are lots of engineers and physics guys who are smart enough to model it and come up with the right answer. In the earliest of rocket flights, way back to Mercury, they were happy just to know that theyd made it into orbit. In the Apollo and Shuttle eras, we needed to have precise control of where we were going to end upand the accumulation of rocket flight experience made that possible.
Now those who are following closely have already figured out that spaceflight is much more complicated than this. Recall the basics of orbital mechanics, remembering that what goes up must come down. If we have thrusted ourselves from the ground up to an orbital altitude, say 200 miles, we are only at our apogee. Like throwing a ball straight up into the air, were going to be coming back down to our starting altitude. This will happen when we get all the way around Earth. The nitty gritty, of course, is that we need to do some shaping of the trajectory to make sure we arent going to come all the way back down to the ground. Remember we need to travel horizontally at a high enough speed so that we dont fall back to the surface. If we really want to end up in a circular orbit (and not an ellipse), we need to do a burn about halfway around the planet. Since we go around the planet in ninety minutes, it means that forty-five minutes after launch we need to do that burnand we cant use the main engines to do it. For that, we switch to our Orbital Maneuvering System (OMS) engines.
The OMS engines are mounted in pods on the upper rear corners of the Orbiter. There are two of them, and each produces about 8,000 pounds of thrust. You can burn them together, or separately, depending on how much thrust you need and how finely you want to manage the final velocity. These engines burn propellant stored in their pods, the same kind of fuel and oxidizer used for the attitude control jetsin fact, the tanks for the OMS and Reaction Control System (RCS) jets can be shared (or interconnected) between the two systems, if need be. Once you have shut down the main engines, and jettisoned the big External Tank (about eight and a half minutes into the flight), the OMS and RCS are all that you have. Because these engines are so much smaller than the main engines in terms of thrust, you have to burn them longer to get the same amount of velocity changein fact, the acceleration available from the OMS engines is barely noticeable inside the vehicle.
But getting back to circularizing the orbit. In the simplest terms, when you get halfway around Earth from your launch site (over the Indian Ocean when launching from Kennedy Space Center), you point yourself in a direction to thrust ahead, and then burn the OMS engines to add the velocity that you need. It can be in the neighborhood of 100 feet per second or more. In the earliest Shuttle flights, we were happy to see that it worked to keep us in orbitlater on, we had learned enough about trajectory shaping and burn times that we were pretty unhappy if we missed our orbital parameters by more than a couple miles. We used ground and space tracking to confirm the orbit we needed to be up in, and we added what we learned into planning for every flight until we became very good at putting the Orbiter exactly where we wanted it to be.
Once you made it to orbit, changing that orbit was simply a matter of adding or subtracting velocity by adding speed with a burn or taking it away (you did that by thrusting backward). When you wanted to come home, you needed to thrust backward. Thats called retrograde. This is where we got the term retrofire, which was done in the early years of space travel with retrorockets. The backward thrust lasts until you slow down the vehicle enough to lower its perigee to about 80 miles, which is where you are assured of being captured by the atmosphere. If you decrease velocity by too much, you lower the perigee by too much, and that means you enter the atmosphere too steeply. Too steep of an entry means that you decelerate too quickly and have to dissipate your orbital energy in a shorter amount of time, which means that you get much higher temperatures on the skin and you burn up. Too little velocity change means that you enter the atmosphere at too shallow of an angle, and you could effectively skip off its surface, much as a rock skips off a pond. The problem with a skip is that you scrub off speed, which makes you slower, so you drop back into the atmosphere more steeply the second time, and eventually you end up with that steep entry again and burn upsort of how those stones always drop into the water and sink. By now, however, you can see that to bring the Orbiter home from a 200-mile orbit, you need to drop the perigee (the low point of the orbit) by about 120 miles (200 minus 80), and to do that, you need to slow it down by about 240 feet per second. If you filled the Orbiters tanks before launch, then you had approximately 600 feet per second total orbital maneuvering capability (the total delta V) that could be used throughout the missionto raise and to lower the orbit. The key to mission planning and execution was to use that delta V wisely.
Read the rest here:
Hitting the Books: How to huck a human into low Earth orbit - Engadget
- A Real Life Hibernation Chamber is Being Made For Deep Space Travel - Futurism [Last Updated On: February 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 7th, 2017]
- Humans to be FROZEN IN TIME for space travel as scientists move to COLONISE other planets - Express.co.uk [Last Updated On: February 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 7th, 2017]
- Space flight changes astronauts' brains, research reveals - Fox News [Last Updated On: February 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 7th, 2017]
- Space travel changes DNA, study finds - STLtoday.com [Last Updated On: February 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 7th, 2017]
- Space travel visionaries solve the problem of interstellar slowdown ... - Science Daily [Last Updated On: February 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 7th, 2017]
- Quantum Entanglement May Be Key To Long Distance Space Travel Ex Lockheed Exec Said It's Already Happening - Collective Evolution [Last Updated On: February 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 7th, 2017]
- Is This Buzz Aldrin-Inspired Locomotive The Future Of Space Travel? - Forbes [Last Updated On: February 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 7th, 2017]
- Celestial bodies: The Kelly twins offer a vital sign for space travel ... - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette [Last Updated On: February 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 7th, 2017]
- Space travel visionaries solve the problem of interstellar slowdown at Alpha Centauri - Phys.Org [Last Updated On: February 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 7th, 2017]
- Newspaper review: Heartthrob and space travel in Wednesday's papers - BBC News [Last Updated On: February 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 8th, 2017]
- Another View: NASA's Twins Study offers vital sign for space travel - Press Herald [Last Updated On: February 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 8th, 2017]
- Piece of tragic shuttle history gets a second chance at space travel - WQAD.com [Last Updated On: February 9th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 9th, 2017]
- Meet Shawn Pandya, The Third Indian-Origin Woman To Space-Travel - Huffington Post India [Last Updated On: February 9th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 9th, 2017]
- Shawna Pandya clears the air on rumours of space travel - Daily News & Analysis [Last Updated On: February 10th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 10th, 2017]
- The Expanse and Frankie Adams: Meet the Kiwi who's conquered space travel - Stuff.co.nz [Last Updated On: February 10th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 10th, 2017]
- Did a CSU study find that space travel makes you younger? Not so ... - The Denver Post [Last Updated On: February 10th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 10th, 2017]
- Twins study offers valuable data on space travel - Herald-Whig - - Herald-Whig [Last Updated On: February 10th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 10th, 2017]
- The Expanse and Frankie Adams: Meet the Kiwi who's conquered space travel - Waikato Times [Last Updated On: February 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 11th, 2017]
- Kelly twins offer a vital sign for space travel - San Angelo Standard Times [Last Updated On: February 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 11th, 2017]
- Lacoste delves into the world of space travel at New York Fashion Week as Baptista honours founder's lesser-known ... - Evening Standard [Last Updated On: February 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 11th, 2017]
- NASA's Irish Twins Study reveals first results of space travel on humans - IrishCentral [Last Updated On: February 12th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 12th, 2017]
- Starbound to revamp space travel in future update - PC Gamer [Last Updated On: February 12th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 12th, 2017]
- How Does Long-Term Space Travel Affect Humans? - Voice of America [Last Updated On: February 13th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 13th, 2017]
- A VR Company is Attempting to Make Holographic Videos for Space Travel - Mobile Magazine [Last Updated On: February 15th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 15th, 2017]
- Two-Time Space Traveling Astronaut to Speak at Black History ... - Patriots Point [Last Updated On: February 16th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 16th, 2017]
- Make space travel great again: NASA, heeding Trump, may add astronauts to a test flight moon mission - National Post [Last Updated On: February 16th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 16th, 2017]
- In recently unearthed essay, Winston Churchill anticipated space travel and extraterrestrial life - The Providence Journal [Last Updated On: February 16th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 16th, 2017]
- Twins in space: intergalactic travel could change DNA - The Student [Last Updated On: February 17th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 17th, 2017]
- An unearthed essay reveals Winston Churchill anticipated space travel and aliens - Stuff.co.nz [Last Updated On: February 17th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 17th, 2017]
- Focus Friday: The necessity of space travel - The Daily Cougar [Last Updated On: February 17th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 17th, 2017]
- NASA announces $2m investment on technology advancement for deep space travel - WDSU New Orleans [Last Updated On: February 17th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 17th, 2017]
- Focus Friday: The necessity of space travel - The Daily Cougar - The Daily Cougar [Last Updated On: February 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 18th, 2017]
- Ask Ethan: How Can I Travel Through Space Without Getting Into Trouble? - Forbes [Last Updated On: February 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 18th, 2017]
- Do You Have The Right Personality For Long-Term Space Travel ... - Seeker [Last Updated On: February 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 18th, 2017]
- In recently unearthed essay, Winston Churchill anticipated space travel and extraterrestrial life - Washington Post [Last Updated On: February 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 18th, 2017]
- UK bids to be world leader in Space travel by 2020 - Daily Star [Last Updated On: February 20th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 20th, 2017]
- Know before you fly: privatized space travel - Observer Online [Last Updated On: February 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 21st, 2017]
- You could fly to SPACE from the UK within three years as plans are for space port are unveiled - The Sun [Last Updated On: February 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 21st, 2017]
- Cosmic cinema: spurring interest in real-life space travel? - Miami Student [Last Updated On: February 22nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 22nd, 2017]
- Commercial space travel could be ready as early as 2020 - New York Post [Last Updated On: February 22nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 22nd, 2017]
- This Finnish startup democratizes space travel and it just raised over 3 million to find the next 'Slumdog ... - Business Insider Nordic [Last Updated On: February 23rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 23rd, 2017]
- Commercial space travel WITHIN THREE YEARS on flights to launch from BRITAIN - Express.co.uk [Last Updated On: February 23rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 23rd, 2017]
- Katherine Johnson led African American efforts in space travel - Farm and Dairy [Last Updated On: February 23rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 23rd, 2017]
- Space travel is measured in light years, but what's a light year anyway? - MyStatesman.com [Last Updated On: February 23rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 23rd, 2017]
- TRAPPIST-1: How Long Would It Take to Fly to 7-Planet System? - Space.com [Last Updated On: February 24th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 24th, 2017]
- NASA Looking for Bright Ideas to Help With Space Travel - Tech.Co [Last Updated On: February 24th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 24th, 2017]
- The history of space travel encapsulated - Fairfaxtimes.com [Last Updated On: February 25th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 25th, 2017]
- SpaceX's reusable rockets make space travel much cheaper - The ... - CMU The Tartan Online [Last Updated On: February 27th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 27th, 2017]
- Stars align for space travel at memorable Oscars ceremony - Siliconrepublic.com [Last Updated On: February 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 28th, 2017]
- FSU researcher to lead US-Russia project on health, space travel - Florida State News [Last Updated On: February 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 28th, 2017]
- Crowding the cosmos: space travel turns private - The Student [Last Updated On: March 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 1st, 2017]
- Forget SpaceX: 10 companies that will change space travel in 2017 & 2018 - Geektime [Last Updated On: March 2nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 2nd, 2017]
- Safe space travel: Protecting alien worlds from earthlings - and vice versa - Deutsche Welle [Last Updated On: March 2nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 2nd, 2017]
- Watch: 'Black Holes' A Satirical Comedy About Space Travel From Sundance 2017 - Konbini US [Last Updated On: March 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 3rd, 2017]
- Doctor Launches Vision Quest To Help Astronauts' Eyeballs - NPR [Last Updated On: March 4th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 4th, 2017]
- Beyond Earth talking about space travel - Alaska Public Radio Network [Last Updated On: March 4th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 4th, 2017]
- Would You Book A Flight To The Moon? - The Alternative Daily (blog) [Last Updated On: March 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 6th, 2017]
- Colorado Likely To Benefit From Privatized Space Travel - CBS Local [Last Updated On: March 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 6th, 2017]
- NEC develops reliable FPGAs for space travel - Electronics Weekly - Electronics Weekly [Last Updated On: March 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 8th, 2017]
- 4 Entrepreneurs Changing the Way We Think About Space Travel - Tech.Co [Last Updated On: March 9th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 9th, 2017]
- Why Space Travel Can Be Absolutely Disgusting - Live Science [Last Updated On: March 9th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 9th, 2017]
- EDITORIAL: Exploring private space travel - Indiana Daily Student [Last Updated On: March 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 11th, 2017]
- Harvard Scientists Theorize That Fast Radio Bursts Come From Alien Space Travel - Popular Mechanics [Last Updated On: March 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 11th, 2017]
- Space Exploration: US congress approves $19.5 billion for NASA to get humans to Mars by 2033 - NTA News [Last Updated On: March 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 11th, 2017]
- MIT Conference To Focus On Space Travel For The Public - CBS Boston / WBZ [Last Updated On: March 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 11th, 2017]
- Reusing rockets is best way to advance space travel, SpaceX officer tells symposium attendees - Colorado Springs Gazette [Last Updated On: April 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 8th, 2017]
- How space travel leads to cognitive shifts in awareness | Life and ... - The Guardian [Last Updated On: April 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 8th, 2017]
- Cheap space travel, electric cars and a whirlwind love life love life... the billionaire genius inventing our future - Mirror.co.uk [Last Updated On: April 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 8th, 2017]
- Reusable rockets key for space travel industry - Alamogordo Daily News [Last Updated On: April 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 8th, 2017]
- Is this massive airplane the future of space travel? One billionaire thinks so. - SOFREP (press release) (subscription) [Last Updated On: June 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 6th, 2017]
- spotlight - NYCAviation [Last Updated On: June 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 6th, 2017]
- BBC commissions documentary about commercial space travel fronted by Brian Cox - Radio Times [Last Updated On: June 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 6th, 2017]
- The Physics of Interstellar Travel : Explorations in ... [Last Updated On: June 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 6th, 2017]
- Mars rover scientist, SpaceX engineer join NASA astronaut corps - Reuters [Last Updated On: June 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 7th, 2017]
- How SpaceX Launched a Chinese Experiment Into Space, Despite US Ban - Foreign Policy (blog) [Last Updated On: June 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 7th, 2017]
- 'Blast Camp' gives students lessons on space travel - Fremont News Messenger [Last Updated On: June 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 7th, 2017]
- IKEA looks to space travel for new micro-living furniture collection - Dezeen [Last Updated On: June 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 7th, 2017]
- HPE's next frontier: Space travel & memory-driven computing - IT Brief Australia [Last Updated On: June 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 8th, 2017]
- 20 Out-Of-This-World Companies Working On Space Travel Technologies - Interesting Engineering [Last Updated On: June 12th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 12th, 2017]
- Here's how space travel is helping keep you healthy - Eyewitness News [Last Updated On: June 12th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 12th, 2017]